[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558
--- Comment #5 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com ---
So I've been playing around with this this morning and with the junit-4.11
snapshot, it seems like all we need to do is change the @Parameters to
@Parameters(name = Test file = {0}). That seems to do the trick and
expresses the file name when a failure occurs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53558] All but impossible to find the failing layout test in case of a regression
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558 --- Comment #6 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com --- Ohh and I did some perusing and my sleuthing skills suggest we shouldn't have to wait to long for the 4.11 release. Looking at the 4.x release dates, they seem to be releasing annually (or there abouts) and 4.10 was released 10months ago... Watch out Columbo, there's a new kid in town. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53573] New: Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 53573 Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Summary: Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL) Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified Reporter: na...@th.ibm.com Hardware: PC Status: NEW Version: all Component: fonts Product: Fop Created attachment 29082 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29082action=edit The above text is original FOP output. The below text is CTL enbaled text 1. In order to make Thai glyph substitution work, the language tag must be dflt instead of th. This is because many popular Thai font use dflt. 2. Using dflt language, both GSUB and GPOS are used. The problem is after it used, all glyph are placed further to the right. Notes: 1. Many Thai combining glyph have negative alignment. I suspect this is involved in miss alignment calculation. 2. The ratio of displacement seem irrational. If it shifted to the left by the same ratio, it is still invalid. Question: Should dflt being load by default ? XML Data for testing: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? dataกุญญูฐฐูฏฏูฎฎูบบ่บี่ปป่ปี่กำปำถํ้า/data XSLT for testing: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? xsl:stylesheet version=1.0 xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform; xsl:template match=/ fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; fo:layout-master-set fo:simple-page-master master-name=A4 fo:region-body / /fo:simple-page-master /fo:layout-master-set fo:page-sequence master-reference=A4 fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body fo:block script=thai language=dflt font-size=32pt font-family=AngsanaUPC xsl:value-of select=data / /fo:block /fo:flow /fo:page-sequence /fo:root /xsl:template /xsl:stylesheet The fop.xconf has added font into fonts section of applicaton/pdf renderer: font embed-url=file:///c:/windows/fonts/angsau.ttf kerning=yes font-triplet name=AngsanaUPC style=normal weight=normal/ /font The Java code used to reproduce: FopFactory fopFac = FopFactory.newInstance(new File(fop.xconf)); OutputStream outputStream = new BufferedOutputStream(new FileOutputStream(c:\\temp\\fopThai.pdf)); Fop fop = fopFac.newFop(MimeConstants.MIME_PDF, outputStream); TransformerFactory transFac = TransformerFactory.newInstance(); Source xslData = new StreamSource(new File(data.xslt)); Transformer trans = transFac.newTransformer(xslData); Result res = new SAXResult(fop.getDefaultHandler()); Source xmlData = new StreamSource(new File(thaidata.xml)); trans.transform(xmlData, res); outputStream.close(); -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME OS||All --- Comment #3 from Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com --- For me, the whole test case works as expected against *all* FOP versions, including trunk. Note that there is no build number in FOP release process, as you refer to the build 20120718. Perhaps that build is made by a third party, and perhaps there is something wrong in it. For further investigation, you should dive into, or give, more info: - platform (OS + JVM) - how did you get the FOP 1.1RC1 release - how do you run it - trace log - pdf output - etc. Feel free to reopen if you have further info that allow somebody to reproduce this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com --- This certainly seems like an interesting issue and you'll have to excuse my ignorance on this matter, but are the GPOS and GSUB absolutely necessary for ALL Thai script? I'm sure we have users working with Thai that used FOP prior to the inclusion of the complex scripts feature (which takes GPOS/GSUB into account.) If I've just exposed my ignorance, my apologies, but my suggestion was going to be to try using FOP-1.0 and see if it behaves as expected. You will however have to change your Java slightly due to modifications to the API, but there are plenty of examples and documentation on the website about how to do this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 nick.heywo...@altova.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #4 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- I downloaded the build from here: http://ci.apache.org/projects/xmlgraphics/fop/snapshots/ With 20120718 build I was referring to the file I downloaded (fop-20120718-bin.zip). I just tested with fop-20120719-bin.zip, and using SVG still results in the same problem: When opening the PDF file, Acrobat Reader displays An error exists on this page. Acrobat Reader may not display the page correctly [...], and the image is not present nithe PDF file. My platform is Windows 7 Enterprise SP1; I run it as fop.bat -fo image.fo -pdf out.pdf. I will attach the resulting PDF file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 --- Comment #5 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- Created attachment 29083 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29083action=edit The resulting PDF document -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #6 from Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com --- always not reproducible for me. What java version/vendor do you use? Can you provide a trace log? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 --- Comment #7 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- - java -version gives java version 1.6.0_31 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_31-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.6-b01, mixed mode) - Calling fop.bat with -d gives the trace attached as trace.txt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 --- Comment #8 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- Created attachment 29084 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29084action=edit Output from fop.bat -d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #2 from na...@th.ibm.com --- Thanks for the promptly reply. Yes, i have tested with FOP 1.0 and it product exactly the same as the first line of the picture i attached. There are few Thai fonts that aren't using GSUB and GPOS. Those few deploy a default glyph position that will never collide with other glyph. However, it gave a result with problem that call floating tone mark. These few fonts also leave the glyph determination work to LayoutEngine. It expects LayoutEngine to pick correct glyph by itself. In order to accomplish this, it need State Machine. You can take a peek at ICU4C LayoutEngine. There is a ThaiLayoutEngine there. However, ICU4J doesn't have one. Note: 1. In order to avoid GSUB and GPOS it require the font to use Unicode PVA. Adobe recommends to avoid it as it is non-standard. The best example of problem is ICU4C uses different code point compare to Adobe that assign to Thai glyph.ICU gives more correct result. 2. All known Thai fonts in MS.Windows use GSUB and GPOS except Arial Unicode. 3. All known True Type fonts in Linux use GSUB and GPOS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 nick.heywo...@altova.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #9 from Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #8) Created attachment 29084 [details] Output from fop.bat -d I found something wrong in your trace: target-resolution set to: 0.0dpi (px2mm=Infinity) userconfig is null userconfig is null target-resolution defaults to 72.0dpi, so you have something wrong in your config file, can you check that point? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 nick.heywo...@altova.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #10 from nick.heywo...@altova.com --- Thanks, some progress made. I just realized that FOP 1.1 doesn't use a config file by default. In my FOP 0.95 installation I had (long ago) added -c %LOCAL_FOP_HOME%conf/fop.xconf When I add this to my FOP 1.1 installation, Acrobat reader no longer displays an error message. However, for the image to be rendered, I need to take additional steps: - In the FOP 0.95 config file, I had commented out base./base after observing it prevented URLs being resolved relative to the FO file (our images are usually stored relative to the FO file). But doing the same in the FOP 1.1 config file doesn't help. Has anything changed here? What configuration is required for an image URL to be resolved relative to the FO file? - Since I currently can't get relative URLs to work, I tried an absolute URL. FOP 1.1 seems to be stricter about URL syntax than FOP 0.95. E.g. FOP 0.95 accepts url(C:\Temp\Boxes.svg), but with FOP 1.1 I need to write url(file:///C:/Temp/Boxes.svg). Has anything changed here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53569] SVG seems to be generally broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53569 Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #11 from Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #10) Thanks, some progress made. I just realized that FOP 1.1 doesn't use a config file by default. In my FOP 0.95 installation I had (long ago) added -c %LOCAL_FOP_HOME%conf/fop.xconf When I add this to my FOP 1.1 installation, Acrobat reader no longer displays an error message. However, for the image to be rendered, I need to take additional steps: - In the FOP 0.95 config file, I had commented out base./base after observing it prevented URLs being resolved relative to the FO file (our images are usually stored relative to the FO file). But doing the same in the FOP 1.1 config file doesn't help. Has anything changed here? What configuration is required for an image URL to be resolved relative to the FO file? - Since I currently can't get relative URLs to work, I tried an absolute URL. FOP 1.1 seems to be stricter about URL syntax than FOP 0.95. E.g. FOP 0.95 accepts url(C:\Temp\Boxes.svg), but with FOP 1.1 I need to write url(file:///C:/Temp/Boxes.svg). Has anything changed here? Hmm, the discussion becomes now off topic here, and should be continued on fop-user list. That said, C:\Temp\Boxes.svg is not a regular URL; FOP aims to be compliant with all used standards, this ensure to be more consistant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org --- Please provide the following: * input FO file (not XSLT/XML files) * output PDF file * version of FOP you are using * any console output from FOP Also, note that you should not specify script=thai or language=dflt, as doing so may prevent application of correct GSUB/GPOS tables (assuming you are using FOP1.1rc1 or current trunk). Also, note that [1] does not yet list thai as supported (by the recent complex scripts addition). In fact, the GSUB/GPOS features of thai fonts will be enabled if you do not specify script or specify script=auto and if you do not specify language; however, line breaking does not yet take into account legitimate thai break candidates, and I have not yet tested thai to my satisfaction, so I did not list thai as supported yet. http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/1.1rc1/complexscripts.html#supported_scripts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53577] New: explicit language may prevent gsub/gpos application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 53577 Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Summary: explicit language may prevent gsub/gpos application Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: gad...@apache.org Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: 1.1dev Component: page-master/layout Product: Fop Need to ensure that if author specifies language='dflt' or language='' where '' effectively maps to the default language, but font does not list '', then gsub/gpos features will be used if applicable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53578] New: explicit script may prevent gsub/gpos application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 53578 Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Summary: explicit script may prevent gsub/gpos application Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: gad...@apache.org Hardware: All Status: NEW Version: 1.1dev Component: page-master/layout Product: Fop Need to ensure that if author specifies script='dflt' or script='' where '' effectively maps to the default script, but font does not list '', then gsub/gpos features will be used if applicable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53577] explicit language may prevent gsub/gpos application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53577 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53573 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||53577, 53578 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53578] explicit script may prevent gsub/gpos application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53573 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #4 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org --- Created attachment 29090 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29090action=edit test FO file showing gsub/gpos application This FO shows the same data with Angsana UPC with various settings of language and script. Note that with or without language='dflt' and with or without script='thai' does not impact the results. However, specifying language='th' does prevent gsub/gpos application. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 53573] Fop invalid position combining mark for Thai text (CTL)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org --- Created attachment 29091 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29091action=edit test PDF file showing gsub/gpos application This file shows the output using FOP1.1rc1 with the attachment 29090. Clearly the gsub/gpos features *are* working given acceptable language/script settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
merge from ^/branches/fop-1_1 to ^/trunk
I have completed a reintegration merge from fop-1_1 into trunk followed by a record-only merge on fop-1_1 to allow it to incur future reintegration. Let me know if you notice anything amiss.
