RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-10 Thread Bill Fumerola

On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, FreeBSD wrote:

 list if you insist on attacking me there. Maybe Karl was right, some people
 in the FreeBSD organization really do think they are above the rest of us. I
 however do not share that belief. So, are you done?

If you had half of the etiquette and knowledge on e-mail you previously
have stated you have, you'd realize that phk doesn't (nor does anyone
with a @FreeBSD.org) speak for the FreeBSD organization.

Please crawl back into the hole you came out of.

-- 
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -






To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: load spike strangeness

2000-01-10 Thread Alwyn Schoeman

 
 Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"? Only a imbecile
 (IMHO) would use their real name on an e-mail that goes out to a public
 list. I don't want people to know my real name or SSN or any other personal
 info for that matter, NOR is it required, as far as I know. If it were to
 become required, I'd prefer to "unsubscribe" than to give that info out, as
 would any other intelligent person. I suggest you check your e-mail security
 information again before babbling nonsense. My e-mail addy is a REAL addy
 not one that goes through an anonymous re-mailer and I use it so IF I start
 getting Spam I can easily rmuser it and create another to resubscribe. Do
 you also use you real full name on IRC? To quote "Mr. T": "I pity da f00!"

I think he was talking about the text that accompanies your e-mail address.
E.g. Bill Gates billy@micro$.com and Bill Gates william@micro$.com
is the same user for human processing, but 2 completely different people
when it comes to spam.

Sometimes I long for the days when people on The Internet were just a few and
netiquette ruled the day.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread Brad Knowles

At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:

  Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to private e-mail and
  let's leave the lists out of this.

I don't think you get the point.  If you continue to use an alias 
(as opposed to your real name), then it looks like everyone is just 
going to filter out your e-mail, and therefore it will do no good 
whatsoever to attempt to continue to post here.

And if you go too far in this questionable behaviour, we may have 
to ask the FreeBSD Postmaster to remove you from the mailing lists 
and put you into the "spam" filters so that you are no longer capable 
of sending anything to the lists.


Please cease and desist, before you do more damage to yourself 
and the lists.

-- 
   These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
  
|o| Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
|o| Systems Architect, News  FTP Admin  Rue Col. Bourg, 124   |o|
|o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels   |o|
|o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium   |o|
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
  Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
   Unix is very user-friendly.  It's just picky who its friends are.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread Brad Knowles

At 4:48 AM -0800 2000/1/9, Amancio Hasty wrote:

  For instance, just because someone  has an email name which resembles
  a real name lets say "Brad Knowles" does not necessarily mean that the
  real "Brad Knowles is sending the mail assuming of course that there
  is a Brad Knowles.

I've built up enough history over the years (all the while using 
my real name and a real e-mail address, although the address has 
changed over the years as I've changed employers, etc...) that you 
can go do some AltaVista or Hotbot searches and find enough stuff 
that I've written that we can be reasonably sure that this really is 
me.  I may not be proud of some of the stupid things I've done or 
said over the years, but I'll own up to them regardless.

I'd say that the same is probably true of most of the people 
posting to the various lists.

  Let me put another way I sure hope we don't assume that any given email
  truly identifies the individual and that the person is legally responsible
  for his email handle.

No more than you can be sure that a particular PGP key belongs to 
the person it claims to belong to, or that a person who presents you 
with a drivers license that claims to tell you their name or address.

However, in the case of electronic discussions, there is likely 
to be enough history available that you can be reasonably sure you're 
dealing with the same person who claims to go by the same name, even 
if that isn't their real name.


It's hard to make the same kinds of connections with an alias. 
Yes, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton published the Federalist 
Papers under assumed names, because that was necessary at the time in 
order to avoid the potential legal consequences of the British 
finding out who the real authors were.  However, I sincerely doubt 
that any such claim can be made today for posting to one of the 
FreeBSD mailing lists.

Claims of "needing" anonymity in cases like this just aren't 
likely to be very well received, and the more strident the claimer 
becomes in their "need" to remain hidden, the more likely people are 
to either try to unmask the jerk or to decide to simply start 
ignoring them.


If you want to post in a public place like this, and you want 
other people to be able to help you or carry on an intelligent 
conversation with you, I would suggest that taking the extremely 
anti-social approach of using an alias is one of the worst possible 
things you could as a first step.

It won't help stop the spam, and it will just annoy the people 
you'd want to be talking to.

-- 
   These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
  
|o| Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
|o| Systems Architect, News  FTP Admin  Rue Col. Bourg, 124   |o|
|o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels   |o|
|o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium   |o|
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
  Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
   Unix is very user-friendly.  It's just picky who its friends are.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread FreeBSD

snip

 At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:

   Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to
 private e-mail and
   let's leave the lists out of this.

   I don't think you get the point.  If you continue to use an alias
 (as opposed to your real name), then it looks like everyone is just
 going to filter out your e-mail, and therefore it will do no good
 whatsoever to attempt to continue to post here.

I don't think YOU get it. I don't care if I'm filtered, that's your right.
I'm not about to post my personal info to a public list. If I'm not taken
seriously, fine. If I'm filtered, fine. If people don't like it, fine. It's
not going to change.


   And if you go too far in this questionable behaviour, we may have
 to ask the FreeBSD Postmaster to remove you from the mailing lists
 and put you into the "spam" filters so that you are no longer capable
 of sending anything to the lists.

What's so questionable about protecting personal info in a public list? Why
don't you include your SSN, mother maiden name, home phone and home address
while you're at it? I'd suggest reading some web pages about internet
security (I don't mean the hacking exploit kind) they all say to keep as
much personal info off the net as possible. As I've stated before if the
charters are changed to demand personal info to be subscribed I'll
unsubscribe because my personal info is not, and should not be, public
information.



   Please cease and desist, before you do more damage to yourself
 and the lists.

I will NOT.


 --
These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
   
 |o| Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
 |o| Systems Architect, News  FTP Admin  Rue Col. Bourg, 124   |o|
 |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels   |o|
 |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium   |o|
 \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
   Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
Unix is very user-friendly.  It's just picky who its friends are.



FreeBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread Devin Butterfield

SNIP
 
 Indeed, I could adduser bknowels and use/be Brad Knowels (for all you know
 my name could also be Brad Knowels) if he prefers. I'm not like that though.
 Some people just aren't happy if they aren't complaining about something.
   

I agree. It would be nice if this thread would die. I have seen
"FreeBSD" posting to lists for a while now and never saw anyone else
complain. If you don't like it, just filter him out of your inbox, but
please...there's been too much cat fighting on this list lately.

 
 
   Amancio Hasty
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 FreeBSD
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 "LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread FreeBSD

more snippage

 At 4:48 AM -0800 2000/1/9, Amancio Hasty wrote:

   For instance, just because someone  has an email name which resembles
   a real name lets say "Brad Knowles" does not necessarily mean that the
   real "Brad Knowles is sending the mail assuming of course that there
   is a Brad Knowles.

   I've built up enough history over the years (all the while using
 my real name and a real e-mail address, although the address has
 changed over the years as I've changed employers, etc...) that you
 can go do some AltaVista or Hotbot searches and find enough stuff
 that I've written that we can be reasonably sure that this really is
 me.  I may not be proud of some of the stupid things I've done or
 said over the years, but I'll own up to them regardless.

   I'd say that the same is probably true of most of the people
 posting to the various lists.

   Let me put another way I sure hope we don't assume that any given email
   truly identifies the individual and that the person is legally
 responsible
   for his email handle.

   No more than you can be sure that a particular PGP key belongs to
 the person it claims to belong to, or that a person who presents you
 with a drivers license that claims to tell you their name or address.

   However, in the case of electronic discussions, there is likely
 to be enough history available that you can be reasonably sure you're
 dealing with the same person who claims to go by the same name, even
 if that isn't their real name.


   It's hard to make the same kinds of connections with an alias.
 Yes, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton published the Federalist
 Papers under assumed names, because that was necessary at the time in
 order to avoid the potential legal consequences of the British
 finding out who the real authors were.  However, I sincerely doubt
 that any such claim can be made today for posting to one of the
 FreeBSD mailing lists.

Look, show me in the mailing list charters where it says I must use my
realname or shut-the-snip-up. If you don't like it filter me, I've already
said I don't care. The Patriots you use as examples risked death by hanging.
We merely risk identity theft and financial ruin. Unfortunately for you, I'm
not willing to take that risk.


   Claims of "needing" anonymity in cases like this just aren't
 likely to be very well received, and the more strident the claimer
 becomes in their "need" to remain hidden, the more likely people are
 to either try to unmask the jerk or to decide to simply start
 ignoring them.

Again, I don't care if it's well received, I'm not here for a popularity
contest. Mr. Bushong had a problem and I replied with a tidbit of possible
info. If you disagree, fine. If you don't like it, too bad. Other than that,
get a life.



   If you want to post in a public place like this, and you want
 other people to be able to help you or carry on an intelligent
 conversation with you, I would suggest that taking the extremely
 anti-social approach of using an alias is one of the worst possible
 things you could as a first step.

Anti-social? Are you for real? Please post your Social Security Number, home
address, home phone, drivers license #, mothers maiden name and date of
birth, Mr. nothing-to-hide-in-a-public-list. Since when does personal info
preclude an exchange of information? I might, now, suggest therapy for you
Mr. Knowles.


   It won't help stop the spam, and it will just annoy the people
 you'd want to be talking to.

What makes you think I want to be talking to a self-righteous bore, with no
respect for peoples privacy in a day and age of identity theft? You, Brad,
have just made my filter list as I hope I've made yours.


 --
These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
   
 |o| Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
 |o| Systems Architect, News  FTP Admin  Rue Col. Bourg, 124   |o|
 |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels   |o|
 |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium   |o|
 \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
   Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
Unix is very user-friendly.  It's just picky who its friends are.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread FreeBSD


SNIP
  
  Indeed, I could adduser bknowels and use/be Brad Knowels (for 
 all you know
  my name could also be Brad Knowels) if he prefers. I'm not like 
 that though.
  Some people just aren't happy if they aren't complaining about 
 something.
  
 
 I agree. It would be nice if this thread would die. I have seen
 "FreeBSD" posting to lists for a while now and never saw anyone else
 complain. If you don't like it, just filter him out of your inbox, but
 please...there's been too much cat fighting on this list lately.
 
  

Amen! I thought this was finished last night, but NOOOooooo.
 
FreeBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard

Can we please end this discussion?  End it now.

It's of no importance to me or, I venture to say, the postmaster
whether or not someone wishes to use an alias in these mailing lists
and it's certainly not a topic which follows the charter for the
FreeBSD-current mailing list.  In fact, the only clear violation of
the mailing list charters I've seen here so far is rampant
cross-posting (which has resulted in more than a few nasty-grams going
out) and the discussion of this topic in all the wrong forums.  This
should have gone to -chat on the first day since it had ABSOLUTELY NO
PLACE in -stable, -current or -security and whomever first
cross-posted it to all three lists needs to seriously have their head
checked.  If I had enough energy to look through the logs and find the
first perpetrator, I'd add them to the filter right now just for
having a room temperature IQ.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-09 Thread Nate Williams

[ Moved to chat ]

 [Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.]
 
 On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:31:19 -0800, "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
  Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?
 
 As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with
 an alias.''
 
 plonk

Boo... Hisss


Nate

;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman

[Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:31:19 -0800, "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?

As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with
an alias.''

plonk

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread FreeBSD

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp
 Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 8:08 PM
 To: FreeBSD
 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD. ORG
 Subject: Re: load spike strangeness


snip

 I think you are not only obnoxius, you are also dead wrong.  Sherlock
 Holmes was *by principle* against anononymity.

As I might have mentioned before, I really don't care what you think. I'm
not here for a popularity contest. Holmes was still fictional and therefore
not capable of having principles save the ones written for him. Since he was
written in a time with NO internet, who do you think you are to say what he
would have recommended for security's sake? At least *I* have the decency to
say "It's my belief" whereas you are so high-and-mighty as to perpetrate
that you KNOW what his character would do. Your omnipotence offends me and
you, too, are the newest addition to my mail filter.


 Anyway, into the mail-filter you go...

See above.


 --
 Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
 FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!

Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to private e-mail and
let's leave the lists out of this. I will, however, reply to the list if you
insist on continuing. While my original reply to this thread was relevant,
your feeble attack is not and yes, I feel I have the right to reply to the
list if you insist on attacking me there. Maybe Karl was right, some people
in the FreeBSD organization really do think they are above the rest of us. I
however do not share that belief. So, are you done?

FreeBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread Matthew Dillon


:
:
:Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"? Only a imbecile
:(IMHO) would use their real name on an e-mail that goes out to a public
:list. I don't want people to know my real name or SSN or any other personal
:info for that matter, NOR is it required, as far as I know. If it were to
:become required, I'd prefer to "unsubscribe" than to give that info out, as
:would any other intelligent person. I suggest you check your e-mail security
:information again before babbling nonsense. My e-mail addy is a REAL addy
:not one that goes through an anonymous re-mailer and I use it so IF I start
:getting Spam I can easily rmuser it and create another to resubscribe. Do
:you also use you real full name on IRC? To quote "Mr. T": "I pity da f00!"
:
:FreeBSD
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
:"LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"

It depends on whether you want people to take you seriously or not.
Frankly, not using your real name puts you at a disadvantage right off
the bat.

Personally speaking, I use my real name to add to the glory of all the
Matt Dillon's out there in the world, so people will remember the name
after I die, and be refering to me, myself, and I!  I don't plan on going
out as a red-shirt.

:-)

-Matt
Matthew Dillon 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread Oliver Fromme

FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
  Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended

Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).

(Sorry -- Back to the topic.)

I have to admit that I've seen the same symptoms, and I have
no idea what's causing it.  It happenes very irregularly (and
rarely), but it clearly _does_ happen sometimes.  It doesn't
seem to be related to any particular hardware or FreeBSD ver-
sion, I have seen it on both 3.x and 4.0-current boxes.  On
some machines it never happened at all (including some busy
servers), at least not while I was logged in and watched it
(it's possible that it happened without me noticing at all).

It _seems_ to happen preferably when a long-time CPU hog has
run (and terminated) recently, such as setiathome.  The load
goes up to 1.0 and stays there for some time (could be a few
minutes, or an hour maybe even a few hours), then drops back
to 0.0 for no apparent reason.  During that period of load 1.0,
there is no activity.  CPU is 100% idle.  There is no process
that consumes any significant amounts of CPU time.  The box
feels fast and responds quickly to interactive work.  vmstat
looks perfectly normal (like an idle machine).

I have come to the conclusion that it must be a subtle bug
somewhere in the kernel's calculation of the load averages.
I tried to track it down in the kernel sources, but without
success.  Since it didn't seem to have any ill effects, but
just being a cosmetic problem, I didn't bother to investigate
further.  I have to admit that I wasn't even motivated to
submit a PR.  Yeah, shame on me.

Oh by the way, I think it happened once even on an OpenBSD/
Alpha box (not sure though, it was a long time ago).  Maybe
it's a long-standing BSD bug, or just strange coincidence.

Please excuse me for forwarding this to -current as well, but
I think it's important enough, and -current is affected, too.

Regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany
(Info: finger userinfo:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

"In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt"
 (Terry Pratchett)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread Oliver Fromme

FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
  FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended
 
  Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).
  
  Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?

It is not required, but it is a matter of good practice,
politeness, and netiquette.  It's a matter of being taken
serious, and of encouraging people to communicate.  This
is not a security issue at all.

  become required, I'd prefer to "unsubscribe" than to give that info out, as
  would any other intelligent person. I suggest you check your e-mail security
  information again before babbling nonsense.

That's ridiculous.  You're making a fool of yourself.

You will not receive less spam when hiding your real name.
And using a real name does not prevent you from creating a
new account, if you think that's necessary.

  Do
  you also use you real full name on IRC?

Yes, I do.  For 5 years.  And there is no reason to hide it.
(I'm not a criminal who has to hide from the police or
something like that.)

  "LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"

While I'm at it:  I don't like that quote either.  :-)

Goodbye
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany
(Info: finger userinfo:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

"In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt"
 (Terry Pratchett)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread FreeBSD

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oliver Fromme
 Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 7:08 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: load spike strangeness


 FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
   FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
 Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended
  
   Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).
  
   Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?

 It is not required, but it is a matter of good practice,
 politeness, and netiquette.  It's a matter of being taken
 serious, and of encouraging people to communicate.  This
 is not a security issue at all.

Suggesting people use their real names in mailing lists, seems like a
security issue to me, while it's not an exploit, it's not safe or smart
(again IMHO).


   become required, I'd prefer to "unsubscribe" than to give that
 info out, as
   would any other intelligent person. I suggest you check your
 e-mail security
   information again before babbling nonsense.

 That's ridiculous.  You're making a fool of yourself.

You are entitled to your opinion.


 You will not receive less spam when hiding your real name.
 And using a real name does not prevent you from creating a
 new account, if you think that's necessary.

No but it does help in preventing identity theft, however little.


   Do
   you also use you real full name on IRC?

 Yes, I do.  For 5 years.  And there is no reason to hide it.
 (I'm not a criminal who has to hide from the police or
 something like that.)

   "LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"

 While I'm at it:  I don't like that quote either.  :-)

 Goodbye
Oliver


I really don't care if you like it. I'd suggest not quoting it then. Are you
now the sig police? There are plenty of quotes I don't care for, but I'm not
whining about it. I might suggest taking this off the lists if all you plan
to do is flame.

FreeBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"






To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread FreeBSD

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oliver Fromme
 Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 6:06 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: load spike strangeness


 FreeBSD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-stable:
   Overclocking is *NEVER* recommended

 Neither is posting anonymously (without a realname).


Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"? Only a imbecile
(IMHO) would use their real name on an e-mail that goes out to a public
list. I don't want people to know my real name or SSN or any other personal
info for that matter, NOR is it required, as far as I know. If it were to
become required, I'd prefer to "unsubscribe" than to give that info out, as
would any other intelligent person. I suggest you check your e-mail security
information again before babbling nonsense. My e-mail addy is a REAL addy
not one that goes through an anonymous re-mailer and I use it so IF I start
getting Spam I can easily rmuser it and create another to resubscribe. Do
you also use you real full name on IRC? To quote "Mr. T": "I pity da f00!"

FreeBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"LinSUX is only free if your time is worthless"

P.S. To kill 2 birds with one stone...
David Bushong: The info about overclocking was mentioned by Jordan, himself,
on IRC in #FreeBSD (I'm not sure which network though) If you'd like, I can
dig through IRC logs and try to find it but I'd prefer to take this to
private e-mail instead. Let me know.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message