Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Gerard thusly... On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:40:38 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected. Perhaps they are planning on releasing it with, and hopefully including it in the FreeBSD-7.1 release. That would be darn too long not to install on my own (unless 7.1 is coming out in a month)! - Parv -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Thursday 10 July 2008 14:16:02 Garrett Cooper wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. HTH, -Garrett Err... oops. I meant remove cvsup and all dependent ports and recompile because there may have been a static change to the included libraries or built binaries (shouldn't be, but you never know). -Garrett I have done a portupgrade of cvsup -Rf but still have the same problem. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. I am wondering if anyone could tell me what is going on here and/or whether someone knows enough to decipher the problem by taking a look at the core dump. David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firefox-3.0_2,1 no reactions
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 07:14:26AM +0200, Helko Glathe wrote: Am Freitag 11 Juli 2008 03:05:18 schrieb Guido Falsi: Doug Barton wrote: Guido Falsi wrote: I just disabled the attack and forgery site checks Exactly which prefs are you referring to there? in the security pane, the second and third option, they read: Tell me if the site I'm visiting is a suspected attack site and Tell me if the site I'm visiting is a suspected forgery Disabling this options doesn't fix the problem. From private emails with Josh Tolbert there are some problems with NFS locking too. Most probably firefox is heavily using it. At home I have an nfs server and 2 clients and all using statd and lockd(and since the inclusion of the in kernel locking code I have to restart statd removing it's status file in /var/db when I reboot a client on both the server and the client, but I don't have the knowledge to debug this. I think a recwent commit to -current has fixed this though. I'm waiting for it to be MFCed). NFS locking works usually, but when I don't remove the statd.status file after rebooting a machine the calls to lockd seem to block indefinitely and the app just sits there, maybe this is what is happening to you. Disabling those functions and removing the sqlite files from the .mozilla subdir was needed to me to solve the slowness problm, because the app was rereading via network the whole files each time a page loaded. Please let me know if some specific information is needed. I hope I vcan help shed some light. My machines are all 7.0-STABLE cvsupped around a month ago. -- Guido Falsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tgz in tgz...!
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:58:26 +0300
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:53:13PM +0200, Anders Trob??ck wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:34:39 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Anders Trob??ck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:54:15 +0200
Anders Troback [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:54:10 -0800
Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Anders Troback said:
Hi,
I need some tips about a port that I'm working on!
The problem that I have are that the source of the code
are in a tgz that are in a sub folder in an other tgz! So
first I need the port to download and extract the first
tgz and then extract, configure and make the second tgz!
How do I cope with that?
Thanks!
You can probably extract the second time in post-extract, but
you're going to have to get creative defining the right
${WRKSRC}. After that it should patch and build normally.
Beech
OK! Next problem:-]
The program that I want to build are under a sub folder of
${WRKSRC}/src so first I need to make the main program and
then I have to run make in that sub folder! Are there any
macros that do things like this or is there some other way?
Thanks again!
Is this a legal way of solving this issue?
post-build:
cd ${WRKSRC}/src/extras make
Wouldn't `gmake -C ${WRKSRC}/src/extras' be better?
-Garrett
Yes, much nice and cleaner! I don't need gmake but make was the
same!
Actually, this might miss a lot of settings in the environment and
stuff. It would be much better to do it the way bsd.port.mk does it:
${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${GMAKE} ${MAKE_FLAGS} ${MAKEFILE}
${MAKE_ARGS} ${ALL_TARGET}
Yes, this is a command line consisting entirely of variables :)
Well, okay, to do it in a different directory you would need to use:
${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${GMAKE} -C ${WRKSRC}/src/extras
${MAKE_FLAGS} ${MAKEFILE} ${MAKE_ARGS} ${ALL_TARGET}
The ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} part is really important. The rest - well,
${MAKE_FLAGS} and ${MAKE_ARGS} are most probably not needed in this
particular case, but they still are a good idea in the general case -
although in very few cases, on very weird make invocations, there
might be problems because of flag differences between BSD make and
GNU make. The ${MAKEFILE} is very, very rarely *not* Makefile - and
if you decide to remove ${MAKE_FLAGS}, be sure to check if you still
want to pass ${MAKEFILE}, too :)
Well, okay, so basically, this could *most probably* be shortened to:
${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${GMAKE} -C ${WRKSRC}/src/extras
...maybe :)
G'luck,
Peter
OK, thanks!
--
Anders Trobäck
http://www.troback.com/
Windows: Where do you want to go today?
Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow?
FreeBSD: Are you guys coming, or what?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailgraph no text in rrd graphs
I updated my sytem lately and rrdtool is now at 1.3.0_1 But now mailgraph is showing me the graphs only without the text! Do I need to change something? Regards, Johan Hendriks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help request to undestand the portmon report
Hello everyone, I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port submit, omegaT[1], a translation memory editor. As I can see, portmon reports a 'failed to build' state for the amd64-8-latest environment, but if I took a close look, the log file looks ok (the port and the pakage was build without errors). My question is why portmon think an error occurs during the build (maybe something wrong is hide in the log). And how can I fix this situation to avoid unnecesary problems reported for the port tree. Thanks for your answers. Rodrigo OSORIO [1] http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=editorsportname=omegaT ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help request to undestand the portmon report
On Friday 11 July 2008, Rodrigo OSORIO (ros) said: Hello everyone, I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port submit, omegaT[1], a translation memory editor. As I can see, portmon reports a 'failed to build' state for the amd64-8-latest environment, but if I took a close look, the log file looks ok (the port and the pakage was build without errors). My question is why portmon think an error occurs during the build (maybe something wrong is hide in the log). And how can I fix this situation to avoid unnecesary problems reported for the port tree. Thanks for your answers. Rodrigo OSORIO === Checking filesystem state list of filesystem changes from before and after port installation and deinstallation usr/local/share/java/apache-ant/bin/antRun changed permissions expected 0555 found 0444 Your port seems to be changing file permissions of another port. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailgraph no text in rrd graphs
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Johan Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated my sytem lately and rrdtool is now at 1.3.0_1 But now mailgraph is showing me the graphs only without the text! Since rrdtool 1.3.0, there is not bundle font anymore. Instead it uses pange/fontconfig. Could you please install x11-fonts/dejavu, and see if it works or not? I will work with maintainer to either add an entry in UPDATING or make this a dependency for rrdtool. Regards, Rong-En Fan I did install the x11-fonts/dejavu port and restarted mailgraph but still no text! Regards, Johan No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.7/1545 - Release Date: 10-7-2008 18:43 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help request to undestand the portmon report [IGNORE]
Hi, As usual my question can be answered by a meticulous read of the report, so please ignore my post. Regards On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:42:34AM +0200, Rodrigo OSORIO (ros) wrote: Hello everyone, I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port submit, omegaT[1], a translation memory editor. As I can see, portmon reports a 'failed to build' state for the amd64-8-latest environment, but if I took a close look, the log file looks ok (the port and the pakage was build without errors). My question is why portmon think an error occurs during the build (maybe something wrong is hide in the log). And how can I fix this situation to avoid unnecesary problems reported for the port tree. Thanks for your answers. Rodrigo OSORIO [1] http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=editorsportname=omegaT ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailgraph no text in rrd graphs
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Johan Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated my sytem lately and rrdtool is now at 1.3.0_1 But now mailgraph is showing me the graphs only without the text! Since rrdtool 1.3.0, there is not bundle font anymore. Instead it uses pange/fontconfig. Could you please install x11-fonts/dejavu, and see if it works or not? I will work with maintainer to either add an entry in UPDATING or make this a dependency for rrdtool. Regards, Rong-En Fan Do I need to change something? Regards, Johan Hendriks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
games/warsow and games/warsow-data ouf of date
Hi games/warsow and games/warsow-data are out of date and the mouse isn't working with the version in ports, however there is 0.42 available. Do you have any plans on updating the port? Sandra ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice.org-3.0.20080711 Committers on the hook: ale maho sem skv Most recent CVS update was: U Mk/bsd.php.mk U editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/Makefile U editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/distinfo U ports-mgmt/portconf/Makefile U ports-mgmt/portconf/files/pkg-message.in U ports-mgmt/portconf/files/portconf.sh.in U ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel/Makefile U ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel/distinfo U ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel/pkg-descr U ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel/pkg-plist U www/Makefile U www/p5-Test-HTTP/Makefile U www/p5-Test-HTTP/distinfo U www/p5-Test-HTTP/pkg-descr U www/p5-Test-HTTP/pkg-plist U www/zend-framework/Makefile ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Friday 11 July 2008 06:16:24 Florian Smeets wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
However I notice an oddity.
Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config,
pkg_info reports that
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4
is installed.
It does not look right.
Do you have WITHOUT_X11 set in /etc/make.conf? That would explain it,
see the Makefile.
Cheers,
Florian
Thanks Florian
Nope the only X11 entry in make.conf is:
X11BASE=${LOCALBASE}
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
David Southwell wrote: However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Do you have WITHOUT_X11 set in /etc/make.conf? That would explain it, see the Makefile. Cheers, Florian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. Well, this probably won't help much, but I'm using cvsup/cvsupd on 8-current (amd64) with no problems. However, my binaries are from October, 2007, so this doesn't preclude a regression since then. BTW the Makefile automatically turns off GUI support for amd64, which is what you're running. --- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On Jul 11, 2008, at 4:01 AM, Parv wrote: Perhaps they are planning on releasing it with, and hopefully including it in the FreeBSD-7.1 release. That would be darn too long not to install on my own (unless 7.1 is coming out in a month)! Not being one of the folks working on the port, I can't really say what the hold up is, or that those folks should drop everything else and work on this, but I must say that I find it pretty saddening to not have the port on such a major hunk of software over 6 months after it was released. It doesn't need to be the default perl installed by the system, so that should not be the hold up. When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote: When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this. As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding- edge Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) There are some significant language improvements that would simplify some hairy parts of our code. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following: David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion* AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] subversion now uses neon-0.28.x (www/neon28) port, and automatic portupgrade will fail because neon26 will conflict with installed neon26. You should upgrade neon library tohgether with subversion with # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon subversion command. Also, if you use special subversion port with bindings, you should upgrade your port to clean subversion port with # portupgrade -o devel/subversion subversion-\* and install needed bindings (p5-subversion, py-subversion and/or ruby-subversion) after that. If you use subversion with bindings, installed from devel/subversion with custom options, don't forget to install separate bindings ports after subversion upgrade. __- David No, command portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon subversion causes the same error message itself. Manually deinstall neon26 (you might want to create a backup with pkg_create -b) and then install neon28 and then proceed as usual with subversion. portupgrade -o seems to be broken. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote: When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this. As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon universityKF8NH ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: quagga-0.99.10_3
Daniel Dvořák пишет: Hi Sergey, may the problem with lock pid_file messages be connected with running watchquagga daemon ? Here is what I have got in rc.conf file: quagga_enable=YES quagga_flags=-d quagga_daemons=zebra ospfd ospf6d bgpd Is this order okay ? It's a correct order. quagga_extralibs_path= quagga_delay=10 watchquagga_enable=YES watchquagga_flags=-dz -R '/usr/local/sbin/zebra -d; /usr/local/sbin/ospfd -d; /usr/local/sbin/ospf6d -d; /usr/local/sbin/bgpd -d' zebra ospfd ospf6d bgpd I hope this syntax is right one. I'd recommend this flags instead: -dz -R '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/quagga restart' zebra ospfd ospf6d bgpd -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: poscript display problems
Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ch This time I'm copying Hiroki Sato, who is the fellow who did the last few ch ghostscript commits ... why? Because I just tried to compile ch ghostscript-8.62.tar.bz2 directly from the version that was downloaded by the ch port into distfiles. I only used autogen.sh (with the only options being ch - --prefix=/usr/local), used gmake, and then executed it from the preinstallation ch ./bin directory. Result: it displays fine, no error. I think that hrs ought to ch take a look at his port now, does that sould right? A patch has been committed, so please try the latest version. Or, I think the following commands also fix the problem: % pstops 1:0 lbx.PS lbx2.PS % gs lbx2.PS (For pstops(1) you need print/psutils-*) -- | Hiroki SATO pgpgWlBXt7Vmg.pgp Description: PGP signature
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice.org-3.0.20080711 Committers on the hook: acm ale knu lth maho miwi sem skv Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U databases/p5-DBIx-Class-UUIDColumns/Makefile U databases/p5-DBIx-Class-UUIDColumns/distinfo U databases/p5-DBIx-Class-UUIDColumns/pkg-plist U devel/p5-Devel-Cycle/Makefile U devel/p5-Devel-Cycle/distinfo U devel/p5-Test-ClassAPI/Makefile U devel/p5-Test-ClassAPI/distinfo U emulators/loemu/Makefile U emulators/pyxmame/Makefile U emulators/xgngeo/Makefile U lang/Makefile U mail/p5-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper/Makefile U mail/p5-Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper/distinfo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH thusly... On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote: When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this. As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) We are talking about a port here, not part of the base FreeBSD OS. Expecting a recent stable perl version six months after its release, in relative quietness, is not considered urgent, I think. Mind that perl was separated from base OS in order to have relatively fresh perl around, and not to wait for FreeBSD releases to get perl updated. A perl5.10 can easily exist with perl5 perl5.8 ports. Some of the reasons for my excitement are faster performance of regex engine, named captures, ability to relocate (which would be interesting to see if that works or advisable within Ports infrastructure). - Parv -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:57:11 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote: When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this. As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely to be so dismissive of the needs of others. David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. Well, this probably won't help much, but I'm using cvsup/cvsupd on 8-current (amd64) with no problems. However, my binaries are from October, 2007, so this doesn't preclude a regression since then. BTW the Makefile automatically turns off GUI support for amd64, which is what you're running. --- Good point -- did not realise that - However why should a core dump happen following an upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3? BTW csup works fine using identical files. David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
David Southwell writes: As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely to be so dismissive of the needs of others. And sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar. I have ports installed that are Perl-based, or require Perl for compilation; I am not a Perl programmer, much less a zealot; I did not even know 5.10 was out. If there's a reason to have it - beyond having the latest pretty thing - then let that case be made. (Allies gathered, the cause advanced, ) If there's a reason we don't have it yet, then let's hear about that as well. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump SOLVED
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. Well, this probably won't help much, but I'm using cvsup/cvsupd on 8-current (amd64) with no problems. However, my binaries are from October, 2007, so this doesn't preclude a regression since then. BTW the Makefile automatically turns off GUI support for amd64, which is what you're running. --- Gary Jennejohn ___ BRILLIANT You gave me an idea I Did make deinstall. cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui then make clean make make install and ran cvsup NO problem no core dump[ Sounds like a good candidate for an entry in UPDATING In 6.1 the automatic turnoff of GUI support for amd64 works BUT if you run the same code or install from cvsup on amd64 under 6.3 it produces a core dump!! Problem sorted Thanks everyone David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOT SOLVED --cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. Well, this probably won't help much, but I'm using cvsup/cvsupd on 8-current (amd64) with no problems. However, my binaries are from October, 2007, so this doesn't preclude a regression since then. BTW the Makefile automatically turns off GUI support for amd64, which is what you're running. --- Gary Jennejohn ___ BRILLIANT You gave me an idea I Did make deinstall. cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui then make clean make make install and ran cvsup NO problem no core dump[ Sounds like a good candidate for an entry in UPDATING In 6.1 the automatic turnoff of GUI support for amd64 works BUT if you run the same code or install from cvsup on amd64 under 6.3 it produces a core dump!! Problem sorted Thanks everyone OK got carried
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On Friday 11 July 2008 09:13:21 Robert Huff wrote: David Southwell writes: As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely to be so dismissive of the needs of others. And sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar. I have ports installed that are Perl-based, or require Perl for compilation; I am not a Perl programmer, much less a zealot; I did not even know 5.10 was out. If there's a reason to have it - beyond having the latest pretty thing - then let that case be made. (Allies gathered, the cause advanced, ) If there's a reason we don't have it yet, then let's hear about that as well. Robert Huff If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend their time arguing and we would have none atall. It is not as though Perl is an obscure bit of buggy code that none uses. If there is a request then simply a response to your last question is needed. Enough david. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ports/125452
Plees commit port sysutils/ldap-account-manager ports/125452 -- --- Vasiliy P. Melnik VPM-RIPE, VPM-UANIC ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOT SOLVED --cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
David Southwell wrote: But this may be a clue Here is what happened.. in the past it seemed to core dump immediately - but now it transpires the dumping takes place only once the connection is made. I incorrectly assumed all was OK when I got the Rejected by Server message but jumped too quickly. So problem is still with us!! Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Rejected by server: Access limit exceeded; try again later Will retry at 10:05:05 Retrying Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui] Any ideas?? Can you either get a backtrace or do a binary search on the kernel sources to work out which commit caused it? Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in mind that we would like to make sure as much as possible that the code can actually work. I am not aware of the reason There's no way to do all this testing in a vacuum. Make the port. Publish it. People who want to try it out will and then all the dependent ports (ie, CPAN modules) that may have broken can get fixed by a large group of people who may have more time to volunteer. Seriously, though... is someone actively working on a perl 5.10 port and can we find out what is holding it up for over 6 months now? Around February I started wondering about it, but it wasn't such a big deal to me then. Now it is becoming more of a big deal because our developers want to start using some of the 5.10 features in our new projects, but without a port/package it complicates our dev and production environment management. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/125452
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:16:48PM +0300, Vasiliy P. Melnik wrote: Plees commit port sysutils/ldap-account-manager ports/125452 The PR was submitted on Wed, 9 Jul 2008. Please give lippe time to test it out and get it committed. Given that this is a volunteer effort and he may have other PRs he is working on, two days is simply not enough time. Please give him a week or two before you ping him privately and ask if there is any problem. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOT SOLVED --cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:12:12 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. Well, this probably won't help much, but I'm using cvsup/cvsupd on 8-current (amd64) with no problems. However, my binaries are from October, 2007, so this doesn't preclude a regression since then. BTW the Makefile automatically turns off GUI support for amd64, which is what you're running. --- Gary Jennejohn ___ BRILLIANT You gave me an idea I Did make deinstall. cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui then make clean make make install and ran cvsup NO problem no core dump[ Sounds like a good candidate for an entry
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
David Southwell wrote: If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend their time arguing and we would have none atall. It is not as though Perl is an obscure bit of buggy code that none uses. If there is a request then simply a response to your last question is needed. Enough david. So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in mind that we would like to make sure as much as possible that the code can actually work. I am not aware of the reason for this taking longer then some of you expect. But I am sure that there is a reason. It all remains volunteer work and people might choose to do different things then satisfy your specific need. Not that I am saying we shouldnt do it, but I am stating that there is more then just your wish. Thanks, remko -- /\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Remko Lodder | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xhttp://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOT SOLVED --cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Friday 11 July 2008 12:26:52 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:12:12 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. Well, this probably won't help much, but I'm using cvsup/cvsupd on 8-current (amd64) with no problems. However, my binaries are from October, 2007, so this doesn't preclude a regression since then. BTW the Makefile automatically turns off GUI support for amd64, which is what you're running. --- Gary Jennejohn ___ BRILLIANT You
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On Friday 11 July 2008 12:06:57 Vivek Khera wrote: On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in mind that we would like to make sure as much as possible that the code can actually work. I am not aware of the reason There's no way to do all this testing in a vacuum. Make the port. Publish it. People who want to try it out will and then all the dependent ports (ie, CPAN modules) that may have broken can get fixed by a large group of people who may have more time to volunteer. Seriously, though... is someone actively working on a perl 5.10 port and can we find out what is holding it up for over 6 months now? Around February I started wondering about it, but it wasn't such a big deal to me then. Now it is becoming more of a big deal because our developers want to start using some of the 5.10 features in our new projects, but without a port/package it complicates our dev and production environment management. ___ I am with you on this. I am curious why a straight answer is not available. Being curious is not intended to imply dissatisdfaction with those who are working on the upgrade.. but there is no info to tell us whether anyone is working on the port or why it has taken so long. Come on inform us David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NOT SOLVED --cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 12:26:52 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:12:12 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700 Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: Can anyone help me out here.. Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. Mail is working fine, so is kde. After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.3 I got a core dump from cvsup UNAME: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# uname -a FreeBSD dns1.vizion2000.net 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #1: Thu Jul 10 09:41:47 PDT 2008 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# RECOMPILED cvsup after core dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make clean === Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make deinstall === Deinstalling for net/cvsup === Deinstalling cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# make reinstall BUT STILL GOT: cvsup /var/cvsupconfig/ports-supfile Connected to cvsup10.FreeBSD.org Bus error: 10 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net/cvsup]# Can anyone point me in the right direction please Not sure if you're cutting out the relevant parts but did you actually rebuild cvsup (ie: was it cleaned)? I'm not even sure if that's going to matter or not. Your other option is to just use csup (it's in 6.3). Yes I cleaned (twice) and ran make config before make. This is weird why a core dump why a Bus error?? Strange David Humph weirder stil csup is working - no problem However there must be a problem somewhere for cvsup to fail.. If I ignore it it sure will not go away smiles groans chuckles David (Forgive me if the last make targets aren't correct because I don't have a machine to test with, but the rest of the steps should be proper). Try the following... rm -R /var/obj; cd /usr/src make cleandir clean cd usr.sbin/cvsup make depend all ... to clean out your object directories, start fresh, and compile cvsup from scratch. cvsup is not part of the base system. --- Gary Jennejohn Agreed. To keep this thread together I thought I would bring the substance of my last report into this reply. I have just done a portupgrade -Rf cvsup but still have the core dump. However I notice an oddity. Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info reports that cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4 is installed. It does not look right. Whilst cvsup is not part of the base system I am nonethesless totally puzzled why cvsup should begin core dumping only after upgrading from 6.1 to 6.3 and despite a portupgrade -Rf under 6.3. I do not really want to complete my upgrading to 7.0 stable until I am sure not to be dragging a current vulnerability into the new system !!! Does anyone have any idea what may be going on here and/or whether someone is willing to take a look at the core dump and make sense of it. Well, this probably won't help much, but I'm using cvsup/cvsupd on 8-current (amd64) with no problems. However, my binaries are from October, 2007, so this doesn't preclude a regression since then. BTW the Makefile automatically turns off GUI support for amd64, which is what you're running. --- Gary Jennejohn
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
On Friday 11 July 2008 14:02:09 Remko Lodder wrote: David Southwell wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 11:53:50 you wrote: David Southwell wrote: If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend their time arguing and we would have none atall. It is not as though Perl is an obscure bit of buggy code that none uses. If there is a request then simply a response to your last question is needed. Enough david. So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in mind that we would like to make sure as much as possible that the code can actually work. I am not aware of the reason for this taking longer then some of you expect. But I am sure that there is a reason. It all remains volunteer work and people might choose to do different things then satisfy your specific need. Not that I am saying we shouldnt do it, but I am stating that there is more then just your wish. Thanks, remko This started because I asked a simple question. Is there a possibility of getting perl 5.10.0 and when. I did not expect the third degree chuckles Admittedly I am curious why it is taking six months when most ports do not take that long - but curiosity does not imply personal antagonism, criticsm or sarcasm. Thanks david It also doesn't imply that you can demand that people import 5.10.0 because you want it, need it or whatever. It does mean that probably work is underway but that it stalled or something for a reason. thanks remko I have hear no demand from anyone only reasonable curiosity following six months delay. It is: 1. reasonable to ask when 2. Courteous to give a reply. David David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
David Southwell wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 14:02:09 Remko Lodder wrote: David Southwell wrote: On Friday 11 July 2008 11:53:50 you wrote: David Southwell wrote: If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend their time arguing and we would have none atall. It is not as though Perl is an obscure bit of buggy code that none uses. If there is a request then simply a response to your last question is needed. Enough david. So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in mind that we would like to make sure as much as possible that the code can actually work. I am not aware of the reason for this taking longer then some of you expect. But I am sure that there is a reason. It all remains volunteer work and people might choose to do different things then satisfy your specific need. Not that I am saying we shouldnt do it, but I am stating that there is more then just your wish. Thanks, remko This started because I asked a simple question. Is there a possibility of getting perl 5.10.0 and when. I did not expect the third degree chuckles Admittedly I am curious why it is taking six months when most ports do not take that long - but curiosity does not imply personal antagonism, criticsm or sarcasm. Thanks david It also doesn't imply that you can demand that people import 5.10.0 because you want it, need it or whatever. It does mean that probably work is underway but that it stalled or something for a reason. thanks remko I have hear no demand from anyone only reasonable curiosity following six months delay. It is: 1. reasonable to ask when 2. Courteous to give a reply. David David And I told that you are entitled to do so, but your 'between the lines' stated more then just a question, which I ofcourse can understand. You have had your reply: I think work is underway, we do not know when it's available, but it will be as soon as possible. Thanks, remko -- /\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Remko Lodder | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xhttp://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed
Yuri wrote: I got the error below during portupgrade -aP. Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon? 'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems. Yuri === Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1 === neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s): neon26-0.26.4_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/neon28. Unfortunately portupgrade knows nothing about how neon26 relate with neon28. You should upgrade it by yourself with the command: portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon How it's described in entry 20080701 of UPDATING file. Reading this file is useful when you got any troubles. Or even better before you any upgrading. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: upsd-2.0.1.6_1
Yves Guérin wrote:
Hello,
I redo the rc.d script
#!/bin/sh
# PatrioteBSD - Yves Guerin - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2008-07-10
#
# JAMAIS TESTE AVEC upsd_enable=yes
# NEVER TESTED WITH upsd_enable=YES
#
# mettre dans /etc/rc.conf: upsd_enable=YES
I don't think it's a good idea to have comments not in English.
# PROVIDE: upsd
# REQUIRE: DAEMON
# BEFORE: shutdown
. /etc/rc.subr
name=upsd
upsd_enable=${upsd_enable:-NO}
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
start_cmd=upsd_start
stop_cmd=upsd_stop
upsd_start()
{
[ -x /usr/local/sbin/upsd ] /usr/local/sbin/upsd echo -n ' upsd'
}
upsd_stop()
{
[ -f /var/run/upsd.pid ] kill -QUIT `cat /var/run/upsd.pid` echo
-n ' upsd'
}
Really start/stop could be (and should be) done with rc.subr subroutines.
load_rc_config $name
run_rc_command $1
--
Dixi.
Sem.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following: David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20080701: AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion* AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] subversion now uses neon-0.28.x (www/neon28) port, and automatic portupgrade will fail because neon26 will conflict with installed neon26. You should upgrade neon library tohgether with subversion with # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon subversion command. Also, if you use special subversion port with bindings, you should upgrade your port to clean subversion port with # portupgrade -o devel/subversion subversion-\* and install needed bindings (p5-subversion, py-subversion and/or ruby-subversion) after that. If you use subversion with bindings, installed from devel/subversion with custom options, don't forget to install separate bindings ports after subversion upgrade. __- David No, command portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon subversion causes the same error message itself. Manually deinstall neon26 (you might want to create a backup with pkg_create -b) and then install neon28 and then proceed as usual with subversion. portupgrade -o seems to be broken. Really? Are you sure you use 2.4.3_2 version? Anyway using -o should be only with one port. It may work not as you expected. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
