Re: Flash
Jona Joachim wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:38:12 +0200 Laszlo Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote: Hello, can I ask you for help, how to set up flash in Firefox natively, step by step? The only native solution I know of is gnash but last time I tried it it was very unstable and very slow. gnash 0.8 is not in the ports yet. It features some great improvements. It can for example play YouTube videos without too many problems. I heard very promising things about gnash last week. gnash has already a lot of advantages compared to the 'real thing' from Adobe. For example it runs on many platforms where Adobe's Flash doesn't run. It will also perhaps soon hit the iPhone. Useless to say Adobe are not so happy about it ;) Best regards, Jona ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I built and installed gnash 0.8.1 this evening. The only additional dependency not installed by the 0.7.x version that I needed was agg (/usr/ports/graphics/agg). Interestingly enough, while the new plugin choked Firefox 2.0.0.5 and Seamonkey 1.14 on pages that had embedded flash files, Konqueror 3.5.7 handled most embedded Flash that was = 7. I built (and ran) it on a GateWay laptop running 6.2-STABLE: FreeBSD access 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Thu Jul 26 00:54:56 EDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ACCESS i386 It still needs work, but it looks like it is headed in the right direction. Tim Kellers CPE/NJIT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dump -L
Colleagues, Right now I am watching a dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] dump -b64 -5Lau /home DUMP: Connection to big.sibptus.tomsk.ru established. DUMP: Date of this level 5 dump: Sat Aug 18 14:02:16 2007 DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: Sun Aug 12 11:10:56 2007 DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/ad0s2f (/home) to /dev/nsa0 on host big DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories] DUMP: estimated 3249348 tape blocks. at the same moment: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] snapinfo -v /home /dev/ad0s2f mounted on /home no snapshots found [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] ll /home/.snap/ total 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] Is this normal? Does it mean that dump is not really dumping a snapshot though it says it is? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating from reiserfs to ext3
Hello! I have a single 200GB HD that is divided in three partitions, one with FreeBSD, another with Linux and the other with my media. The first two are 10GB, and the latter, 180GB. The problem is that it is a ReiserFS partition, not writable from FreeBSD, so I'll have to change it to, say, ext3, if I'm going to be able to use xMule again. Since I can't backup the whole thing, I'll have to use another method to convert it. I'm using quotes because apparently there is no such utility that converts a given partition to another type. Why is that so? I was thinking about the hard links. Since the partition has some free space and its file hierarchy is quite simple (eg, mp3/baroque/bach/bwv82_1.mp3), wouldn't it work if I resize it to be full, using the freed space to create a new partition, and then, until the first one is empty, move content from it to the newly created, resizing both so that the first one is full again? Anybody ever tried something like that? Are there utilities that could help out, or dangers I need to avoid? Thanks! -- Konrad Scorciapino http://www.greencnidoblast.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dump -L
Victor Sudakov wrote: Colleagues, Right now I am watching a dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] dump -b64 -5Lau /home DUMP: Connection to big.sibptus.tomsk.ru established. DUMP: Date of this level 5 dump: Sat Aug 18 14:02:16 2007 DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: Sun Aug 12 11:10:56 2007 DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/ad0s2f (/home) to /dev/nsa0 on host big DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories] DUMP: estimated 3249348 tape blocks. at the same moment: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] snapinfo -v /home /dev/ad0s2f mounted on /home no snapshots found [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] ll /home/.snap/ total 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] Is this normal? Does it mean that dump is not really dumping a snapshot though it says it is? man dump (the section regarding -L) says The snapshot is unlinked as soon as the dump starts, and is thus removed when the dump is complete. What this means to you is that the snapshot is only visible on the file system for as long as it takes dump to start reading from it, dump will have an open filehandle to the snapshot so it can be unlinked from the filesystem and as soon as dump closed its handle then the snapshot is removed. Similar to when you delete a large logfile a program has open and forget to HUP/stop/restart the program, the logfile's diskspace isnt released until the the program closes its file handle. Vince ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dump -L
Vince wrote: Right now I am watching a dump: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] dump -b64 -5Lau /home DUMP: Connection to big.sibptus.tomsk.ru established. DUMP: Date of this level 5 dump: Sat Aug 18 14:02:16 2007 DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: Sun Aug 12 11:10:56 2007 DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/ad0s2f (/home) to /dev/nsa0 on host big DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories] DUMP: estimated 3249348 tape blocks. at the same moment: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] snapinfo -v /home /dev/ad0s2f mounted on /home no snapshots found [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] ll /home/.snap/ total 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] Is this normal? Does it mean that dump is not really dumping a snapshot though it says it is? man dump (the section regarding -L) says The snapshot is unlinked as soon as the dump starts, and is thus This explains why there is no visible snapshot file in /home/.snap/ However, I thought that snapinfo should be aware even of unlinked snapshots. Just like mdconfig -l still shows the backingstore file even if it has been unlinked. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Flash
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:45:29 -0400 Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jona Joachim writes: The only native solution I know of is gnash but last time I tried it it was very unstable and very slow. gnash 0.8 is not in the ports yet. Is there an estimated date of arrival? Sorry but I couldn't tell you, I'm not the maintainer of the port. Jona ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vlc won't play region encoded DVDs
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:57:01PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote: I was under the impression that VLC ignored region-encoding when playing DVDs, but this is apparently not the case on my BSD box. In all but the oldest DVD drives, region encoding is supposed to be enforced by the drive itself, not by your software. You can change the region code setting on your drive a few times, but there is a limit (5 times, I think). Have you succeeded at playing the same DVDs with VLC on a different O/S? All RPC-2 drives behave that way. It is enforced by the firmware, not the hardware itself; and firmware can be hacked / replaced, so that the RPC-2 drive can be flashed to become RPC-1. You'll void your warranty though: http://www.rpc1.org But IIRC, though I may be wrong, mplayer (proably vlc as well) don't care at all about that. They grab the data directly off the drive, and if it's CSS-encoded, they can DeCSS it on-the-fly when linked with /usr/ports/multimedia/libdvdcss. I've been able to view out-of-region region-encoded DVDs both on RPC-2 and RPC-1 drives (both old and recent) with mplayer without any problems; and, yes, I've switched regions much more often that just 5 times per RPC-2 drive: no problems at all. I hope I'm wrong, though. The sooner this idiot DRM stuff dies, the better. Yep. Region encoding and CSS are broken anyway and have been no problem for a long time already; the real interesting hacking is now being done on AACS, but that's another story in the neverending race between good and evil. ;-) - Bob Cheers, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vlc won't play region encoded DVDs
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:25:17PM +0200, I wrote: I've been able to view out-of-region region-encoded DVDs both on RPC-2 and RPC-1 drives (both old and recent) with mplayer without any problems; and, yes, I've switched regions much more often that just 5 times per RPC-2 drive: no problems at all. I've meant to say: I've switched disks from different regions more than five times on RPC-2 drives (using mplayer) without problems; NOT that I've switched the region encoding in the RPC-2 drives themselves (there was no need for that). -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenLDAP: weirdness with slapd.conf vs. slapd.d/
Hello, while fiddling around with OpenLDAP 2.3.37 as taken from the ports collection I revealed something strange. Looking at the manpage of slapd I was taught that if neither -F nor -f option is applied when the SLAPD starts, default config directory /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.d/ is searched for dn=config.ldif. So I did, I configured my own dn=config.ldif file as it is described in chapter 5 and 6 of the OpenLDAP Administrator's documentation. But with FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT and the port I run into something strange not being consistent with the documentation: the start of the slapd server was avoided by an error telling me there wasn't any readable slapd.conf file. What is that? Test with slaptest tells a syntactically correct slapd.d/ directory, but slapd won;t start. Touching an empty slapd.conf let the server start. The documents tell one that slapd.conf is a kind of deprecated, but it seems still in use. On the other hand, typing in the configuration taken from the Administrator's guide of OpenLDAP as found in chapters 5,6 does not work! Strange. Regards, Oliver ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pine - Duplicate Messages
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:36:48 + (UTC) Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 at 18:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:38:59 + (UTC) Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Periodically I get duplicated messages in email folders I have defined and have rules set up for. ... If I remove ALL rules from Pine, I have absolutely no issues with duplicate messages. Are they perhaps deleted messages? when a pine rule moves a message, it copies it, marks the original as deleted and then hides it for the rest of the session. Nope. This happens with new messages that are coming in. What I was describing applies to any email moved by a rule, including new messages. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Share folder over internet
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laszlo Nagy Sent: Friday, 17 August 2007 9:43 PM To: Norberto Meijome; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Share folder over internet It is hardly the freebsd community's fault that Skype / Ebay doesn't create a FreeBSD binary. Actually, the linux compatibility layer is one of the great things in FreeBSD. Of course, you may be having other issues we can't know about until you kindly tell us (on a separate thread pls...) Yes, I agree. I did not tell it is the fault of the FreeBSD community. However, when you need to install an application server for a couple of diskless X terminals, you should not use FreeBSD. I'm serious. There are some very important applications that just don't work. :-( ::shrug:: each solution needs to be considered for the problem. It is, after all, your server, feel free to install linux or pay for MS licenses... (btw, have ever actually used windows file sharing over a slow link ? whatever 'ease of use' you *may* have gain (and i'm not sure how much of that there really is) will probably be lost when you consider other factors...) Well, yes. You are right about these factors. In my case, it is almost too late to migrate to Linux. It would cost too much and there would be other disadvantages too. For some things, FreeBSD is definitely better. Best, Laszlo ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What about ssl-explorer? http://www.sshtools.com/showSslExplorerCommunity.do and the howto http://techbytes.m2technology.com/networking/ssl-vpn-how-to-ssl-explorer-on- freebsd/ Regards, Yance Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mailp=graduation+giftscs=bz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: performance hints (6.2)
At 04:00 PM 8/17/2007, Mark Messier wrote: I've got a freebsd 6.2 system, dual 2Ghz 5130 cpu, 4g ram, with raid5 Adaptec 2120s, running not much more than /usr/ports/mail/imap-uw and I'm having performance problems with only 20 IMAP users. As previously suggested, Raid 5's performance sucks for almost every application. What mailfile format are you using - mbox / mdir? And while it might be a major change, consider dumping UW and using Dovecot http://dovecot.org/ UW's performance, scalability, and security have been less than great for many years. -RW ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stunnel starting up twice?!?
On 17/08/07, Alan Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I've got a weird problem that's just appeared. I'd updated my ports to the latest CURRENT using portmanager, and now it seems like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/stunnel.sh is getting run twice! I have nuked my /etc/rc.d and run mergemaster -i. I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p7, and the port is the latest available (stunnel-4.20). Anyone else seem similar? The running twice is usually that you have the /usr/X11R6 - /usr/local link and your /etc/defaults/rc.conf still has both /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d and /usr/local/etc/rc.d in the local rc scripts line. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error in portupgrading audio/libmtp : bad c++ code ?
Beni wrote: When trying to portupgrade audio/libmtp (and amarok), I'm getting this error : Bad C++ code. I asked the maintainer... it is known, it is being worked on, and the problem and fixes / workarounds are documented here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115218 If you simply pkg_delete the old version before you compile, it will work (because it does not pick up the old header). HTH, Jan Henrik ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BIND $GENERATE IPv6
Hello list, I'm having a problem trying to develop a proper generate record for my IPv6 reverse zones. Can anyone point me to the correct FM in this case? Preferably something with some examples? Thanks! - Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question about reporting bugs
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:53:27 + Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem with the jabberd port in FreeBSD 6.2. The script apparently is not being executed on boot, though it works if executed manually. Who gets the bug report, the porter? Is the porter the person named for the port at FreshPorts? Hello, Do you have jabberd_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf? If you are sure that's a bug, the porter of net-im/jabberd is [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=jabberd-2.1.12 In general, please read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/ and send-pr(1) manpage. Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question about reporting bugs
On Saturday 18 August 2007 16:15:53 Nikola Lecic wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:53:27 + Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem with the jabberd port in FreeBSD 6.2. The script apparently is not being executed on boot, though it works if executed manually. Who gets the bug report, the porter? Is the porter the person named for the port at FreshPorts? Hello, Do you have jabberd_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf? Yes, I have that, but the startup script only works when executed manually. If you are sure that's a bug, the porter of net-im/jabberd is [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=jabberd-2.1.12 In general, please read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/ and send-pr(1) manpage. Nikola Lečić Thank you for the information. 8) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: performance hints (6.2)
On Aug 18, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Rob wrote: What mailfile format are you using - mbox / mdir? And while it might be a major change, consider dumping UW and using Dovecot http://dovecot.org/ UW's performance, scalability, and security have been less than great for many years. UW's performance and scalability is just fine if you use their *recommended* mailbox format, mbx. It's only if you use mbox (unix) which is provided for transition and backwards compatibility that you experience performance and scalability problems. I have no problem with mailboxes with more than 20K messages in mbx format using UW-IMAP. In my experience, all of the performance complaints about UW-IMAP have to do with people using legacy mailbox formats. UW appears to be the only IMAP server which provides support for such legacy formats, so that is probably why it takes so much blame for the performance problems of such mailboxes. See http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/formats.txt.html for Mark Crispin's rant about mailbox formats to help understand the choices made in UW-IMAP. There may be plenty of good reasons to prefer dovecote or cyrus or zimbra over UW-IMAP, but on this performance and scalability issue, UW-IMAP has had an unfair rap. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberghttp://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regular expressions
Hi. I'm trying to use regular expressions inside a shell script (/bin/sh) on my freebsd box and can't get it to work so I searched the web and found http://regexlib.com/RETester.aspx On this webpage I could test my pattern ^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$ and everything was fine, did exactly what I wanted to do, check that a string only contains some combination of the characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, hyphen - and underscore _. I also found some basic example at http://www.grymoire.com/Unix/Sh.html#uh-88 : 88888 #!/bin/sh echo Type in a number read ans number=`expr $ans : ([0-9]*)` if [ $number != $ans ]; then echo Not a number elif [ $number -eq 0 ]; then echo Nothing was typed else echo $number is a fine number fi 88888 The above example doesn't work on my freebsd box. Maybe I need to update my system, sitting with 6.0R which never been updated. Is there anyone who has some advice about how to get regular expressions to work in FreeBSD shell script ? -- Christer Hermansson ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regular expressions
At 12:04 PM 8/18/2007, Christer Hermansson wrote: Hi. I'm trying to use regular expressions inside a shell script (/bin/sh) on my freebsd box and can't get it to work so I searched the web and found http://regexlib.com/RETester.aspx On this webpage I could test my pattern ^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$ and everything was fine, did exactly what I wanted to do, check that a string only contains some combination of the characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, hyphen - and underscore _. I also found some basic example at http://www.grymoire.com/Unix/Sh.html#uh-88 : 88888 #!/bin/sh echo Type in a number read ans number=`expr $ans : ([0-9]*)` if [ $number != $ans ]; then echo Not a number elif [ $number -eq 0 ]; then echo Nothing was typed else echo $number is a fine number fi 88888 The above example doesn't work on my freebsd box. Maybe I need to update my system, sitting with 6.0R which never been updated. Is there anyone who has some advice about how to get regular expressions to work in FreeBSD shell script ? -- Christer Hermansson You have a syntax error using expr. Do a man on expr for more details but if you change that line from: number=`expr $ans : ([0-9]*)` to: number=`expr $ans : \([0-9]*\)` You will get the desired results. Also when debugging scripts remember to add: set -x to your script on the second line, and see what the script lines are actually doing. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fsck strangeness
Hello, I'm having some rather strange behaviour with fsck. When I boot the system, it asserts that all the file systems are clean, but subsequently running an fsck on /dev/ad8s1e (mounted as /var) detects errors. Even if this first check is run whilst the file system is mounted, and is hence run in NO WRITE mode, a second check doesn't find block errors. If I then unmount the file system and check the disk, it's fine, as indeed it is if I unmount, remount, then check. However, if I then reboot, the process repeats, and an fsck immediately after reboot will find errors again. If I bring the system up in single user mode, and run fsck either before or after mounting /var, it finds no errors. I'm running 6.2_RELEASE with a custom kernel based upon generic-smp, but with a lot of unecessary bits removed, and geom_mirror compiled in. I don't think it's the drive that's at fault, all the other partitions in the slice are fine, it's a fairly new drive, and it passes a self test quite happily. Included below is a transcript that attempt to show what's going on in detail, is there anything else relevant? Can anyone suggest what might be going on and how to fix it, or suggest some slightly better diagnostics? Apologies if this is an RTFM issue, I have had a good dig through the handbook, but can't seem to find anything that helps. Regards, Chris # fsck /dev/ad8s1e ** /dev/ad8s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706567 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706583 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706593 (80 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706594 (80 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706595 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706598 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730708 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730779 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730780 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730781 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730784 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730799 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730819 (24 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036295 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036313 (48 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036314 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036315 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036317 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036320 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036321 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036323 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036324 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1719339 (12 should be 8) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1742856 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=730782 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100644 SIZE=771 MTIME=Aug 18 16:27 2007 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=730783 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100644 SIZE=1309 MTIME=Aug 18 16:27 2007 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=730818 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100644 SIZE=10825 MTIME=Aug 18 16:27 2007 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049026 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049029 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049030 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049031 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049032 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? no SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD SALVAGE? no BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no 1048 files, 53949 used, 8068123 free (643 frags, 1008435 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) # fsck /dev/ad8s1e ** /dev/ad8s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=2049026 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049029 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049030 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049031 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049032 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? no SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD SALVAGE? no BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no 1045 files, 54019 used, 8068133 free (653 frags, 1008435 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) # fsck
Re: fsck strangeness
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Christopher Key wrote: Hello, I'm having some rather strange behaviour with fsck. When I boot the system, it asserts that all the file systems are clean, but subsequently running an fsck on /dev/ad8s1e (mounted as /var) detects errors. Even if this first check is run whilst the file system is mounted, and is hence run in NO WRITE mode, a second check doesn't find block errors. If I then unmount the file system and check the disk, it's fine, as indeed it is if I unmount, remount, then check. However, if I then reboot, the process repeats, and an fsck immediately after reboot will find errors again. If I bring the system up in single user mode, and run fsck either before or after mounting /var, it finds no errors. I'm running 6.2_RELEASE with a custom kernel based upon generic-smp, but with a lot of unecessary bits removed, and geom_mirror compiled in. I don't think it's the drive that's at fault, all the other partitions in the slice are fine, it's a fairly new drive, and it passes a self test quite happily. Included below is a transcript that attempt to show what's going on in detail, is there anything else relevant? Can anyone suggest what might be going on and how to fix it, or suggest some slightly better diagnostics? Apologies if this is an RTFM issue, I have had a good dig through the handbook, but can't seem to find anything that helps. Running fsck on a file system that has been mounted read/write will almost always report spurious errors and can really screw up the disk if it tries to 'correct' those errors. You should normally not run fsck on a mounted filesystem and you should *NEVER* run fsck on a filesystem that has been mounted read/write. -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fsck strangeness
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm having some rather strange behaviour with fsck. When I boot the system, it asserts that all the file systems are clean, but subsequently running an fsck on /dev/ad8s1e (mounted as /var) detects errors. Even if this first check is run whilst the file system is mounted, and is hence run in NO WRITE mode, a second check doesn't find block errors. If I then unmount the file system and check the disk, it's fine, as indeed it is if I unmount, remount, then check. However, if I then reboot, the process repeats, and an fsck immediately after reboot will find errors again. If I bring the system up in single user mode, and run fsck either before or after mounting /var, it finds no errors. Don't run fsck on mounted filesystems unless they're mounted read-only. Although, it's possible I misunderstood your description of the problem. I'm running 6.2_RELEASE with a custom kernel based upon generic-smp, but with a lot of unecessary bits removed, and geom_mirror compiled in. I don't think it's the drive that's at fault, all the other partitions in the slice are fine, it's a fairly new drive, and it passes a self test quite happily. Included below is a transcript that attempt to show what's going on in detail, is there anything else relevant? Can anyone suggest what might be going on and how to fix it, or suggest some slightly better diagnostics? Apologies if this is an RTFM issue, I have had a good dig through the handbook, but can't seem to find anything that helps. Regards, Chris # fsck /dev/ad8s1e ** /dev/ad8s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706567 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706583 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706593 (80 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706594 (80 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706595 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=706598 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730708 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730779 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730780 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730781 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730784 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730799 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=730819 (24 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036295 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036313 (48 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036314 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036315 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036317 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036320 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036321 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036323 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1036324 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1719339 (12 should be 8) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=1742856 (4 should be 0) CORRECT? no ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=730782 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100644 SIZE=771 MTIME=Aug 18 16:27 2007 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=730783 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100644 SIZE=1309 MTIME=Aug 18 16:27 2007 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=730818 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100644 SIZE=10825 MTIME=Aug 18 16:27 2007 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049026 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049029 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049030 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049031 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049032 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? no SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD SALVAGE? no BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no 1048 files, 53949 used, 8068123 free (643 frags, 1008435 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) # fsck /dev/ad8s1e ** /dev/ad8s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=2049026 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049029 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049030 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18 16:40 2007 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=2049031 OWNER=slimserv MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 18
problem with supfile
Someone please tell me why my supfile is not working. I think the problem is the tag but I am unsure why: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress # This collection retrieves the www/ tree of the FreeBSD repository #www ports-all ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with supfile
Pollywog wrote: Someone please tell me why my supfile is not working. I think the problem is the tag but I am unsure why: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix This how one of my (working) files look. *default host=cvsup.de.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default tag=. *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix Good luck, Per olof ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with supfile
Pollywog wrote: Someone please tell me why my supfile is not working. I think the problem is the tag but I am unsure why: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress # This collection retrieves the www/ tree of the FreeBSD repository #www ports-all ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since this is obviously a ports-supfile, are you sure you want to cvsup the RELENG_6_2 ports; These refer to the ports tree at the exact point when 6.2 was released. You already have them, you installed that ports tree from your CDROM during installation. Instead, you probably need a line like: *default release=cvs tag=. to get the latest available ports. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with supfile
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: Pollywog wrote: Someone please tell me why my supfile is not working. I think the problem is the tag but I am unsure why: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress # This collection retrieves the www/ tree of the FreeBSD repository #www ports-all ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since this is obviously a ports-supfile, are you sure you want to cvsup the RELENG_6_2 ports; These refer to the ports tree at the exact point when 6.2 was released. You already have them, you installed that ports tree from your CDROM during installation. Instead, you probably need a line like: *default release=cvs tag=. to get the latest available ports. And if the OP did want the ports tree that shipped with 6.2, then RELENG_6_2 would have been the wrong tag anyway (in that case the tag should have been RELEASE_6_2_0.) -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fsck strangeness
Bill Moran wrote: Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm having some rather strange behaviour with fsck. When I boot the system, it asserts that all the file systems are clean, but subsequently running an fsck on /dev/ad8s1e (mounted as /var) detects errors. Even if this first check is run whilst the file system is mounted, and is hence run in NO WRITE mode, a second check doesn't find block errors. If I then unmount the file system and check the disk, it's fine, as indeed it is if I unmount, remount, then check. However, if I then reboot, the process repeats, and an fsck immediately after reboot will find errors again. If I bring the system up in single user mode, and run fsck either before or after mounting /var, it finds no errors. Don't run fsck on mounted filesystems unless they're mounted read-only. Although, it's possible I misunderstood your description of the problem. Thanks Eric, Bill, I must have misunderstood, I was under the impression that running fsck on a device with a mounted file system would scan, but not actaully write anything, hence its reporting 'NO WRITE'. I'll reread the fsck manpage. Is running fsck -B /dev/ad8s1e safe, as I understand it, this creates a snapshot of the filesystem and scans that. Regards, Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with supfile
Erik Trulsson wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: Pollywog wrote: Someone please tell me why my supfile is not working. I think the problem is the tag but I am unsure why: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress # This collection retrieves the www/ tree of the FreeBSD repository #www ports-all ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since this is obviously a ports-supfile, are you sure you want to cvsup the RELENG_6_2 ports; These refer to the ports tree at the exact point when 6.2 was released. You already have them, you installed that ports tree from your CDROM during installation. Instead, you probably need a line like: *default release=cvs tag=. to get the latest available ports. And if the OP did want the ports tree that shipped with 6.2, then RELENG_6_2 would have been the wrong tag anyway (in that case the tag should have been RELEASE_6_2_0.) True, and quite obviously :) I never csup-ed the release ports myself, so I missed this one! Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem of connection between Windows and FreeBSD when using IPSec transport.
Hi,
On one side there's FreeBSD 6.2, ipsec-tools-0.6.7; on the other Windows
2003 Server.
If I start pinging under Windows everything works ok,
C:\Documents and Settingsping 111.111.111.2
Pinging 111.111.111.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Negotiating IP Security.
Reply from 111.111.111.2: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=63
Reply from 111.111.111.2: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=63
/var/log/racoon.log
2007-08-17 12:10:18: INFO: @(#)ipsec-tools 0.6.7
(http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net)
2007-08-17 12:10:18: INFO: @(#)This product linked OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25
Oct 2004 (http://www.openssl.org/)
2007-08-17 12:10:18: INFO: 111.111.111.2[500] used as isakmp port
(fd=5)
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: respond new phase 1 negotiation:
111.111.111.2[500]=111.111.111.1[500]
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: begin Identity Protection mode.
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: received broken Microsoft ID: MS NT5
ISAKMPOAKLEY
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: received Vendor ID: FRAGMENTATION
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established
111.111.111.2[500]-111.111.111.1[500]
spi:ceb3ba2040683da6:f80fc5ab1e3d931e
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: respond new phase 2 negotiation:
111.111.111.2[0]=111.111.111.1[0]
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: IPsec-SA established: ESP/Transport
111.111.111.1[0]-111.111.111.2[0] spi=36304726(0x229f756)
2007-08-17 12:29:16: INFO: IPsec-SA established: ESP/Transport
111.111.111.2[0]-111.111.111.1[0] spi=3194585143(0xbe698037)
From FreeBSD:
# ping 111.111.111.1
PING 111.111.111.1 (111.111.111.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 111.111.111.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=127 time=0.526 ms
64 bytes from 111.111.111.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=127 time=6.382 ms
and ping works for 2 sides.
But if I initiate ping under FreeBSD (after restart racoon daemon),
# ping 111.111.111.1
PING 111.111.111.1 (111.111.111.1): 56 data bytes
^C
--- 111.111.111.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
I see in the log the following:
2007-08-17 12:44:16: INFO: @(#)ipsec-tools 0.6.7
(http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net)
2007-08-17 12:44:16: INFO: @(#)This product linked OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25
Oct 2004 (http://www.openssl.org/)
2007-08-17 12:44:16: INFO: 111.111.111.2[500] used as isakmp port
(fd=5)
2007-08-17 12:44:21: INFO: IPsec-SA request for 111.111.111.1 queued
due to no phase1 found.
2007-08-17 12:44:21: INFO: initiate new phase 1 negotiation:
111.111.111.2[500]=111.111.111.1[500]
2007-08-17 12:44:21: INFO: begin Identity Protection mode.
2007-08-17 12:44:21: INFO: received broken Microsoft ID: MS NT5
ISAKMPOAKLEY
2007-08-17 12:44:21: INFO: received Vendor ID: FRAGMENTATION
2007-08-17 12:44:21: INFO: received Vendor ID:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2007-08-17 12:44:21: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established
111.111.111.2[500]-111.111.111.1[500]
spi:94372eb384516aef:bccacea73409cfc6
2007-08-17 12:44:22: INFO: initiate new phase 2 negotiation:
111.111.111.2[0]=111.111.111.1[0]
2007-08-17 12:44:22: ERROR: unknown notify message, no phase2 handle
found.
2007-08-17 12:44:38: ERROR: 111.111.111.1 give up to get IPsec-SA due
to time up to wait.
2007-08-17 12:45:21: INFO: ISAKMP-SA expired
111.111.111.2[500]-111.111.111.1[500]
spi:94372eb384516aef:bccacea73409cfc6
2007-08-17 12:45:21: ERROR: unknown Informational exchange received.
2007-08-17 12:45:22: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted
111.111.111.2[500]-111.111.111.1[500]
spi:94372eb384516aef:bccacea73409cfc6
My configs:
# cat /etc/ipsec.conf
spdadd 111.111.111.2 111.111.111.1 any -P out ipsec
esp/transport//require;
spdadd 111.111.111.1 111.111.111.2 any -P in ipsec
esp/transport//require;
path pre_shared_key /usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.txt ;
log notify;
padding
{
maximum_length 20;
randomize off;
strict_check off;
exclusive_tail off;
}
timer
{
counter 5; # maximum trying count to send.
interval 20 sec; # maximum interval to resend.
persend 1; # the number of packets per a send.
phase1 30 sec;
phase2 15 sec;
}
remote anonymous
{
# exchange_mode aggressive,main;
exchange_mode main, base;
doi ipsec_doi;
situation identity_only;
nonce_size 16;
lifetime time 1 min; # sec, min, hour
initial_contact on;
support_proxy on;
proposal_check obey; # obey, strict or claim
proposal {
encryption_algorithm 3des;
hash_algorithm sha1;
authentication_method pre_shared_key ;
dh_group 2 ;
}
}
sainfo anonymous
{
pfs_group 1;
lifetime time 36000 sec;
encryption_algorithm 3des,des,cast128,blowfish ;
authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1,hmac_md5;
compression_algorithm deflate ;
}
What do I have to change in conf files, to make
IPSec properly work no matter from which server I initiate the
connection?
Thank you for any answers.
--
BRGDS. Alesha
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Re: problem with supfile
Pollywog wrote: On Saturday 18 August 2007 19:47:21 Manolis Kiagias wrote: Pollywog wrote: Someone please tell me why my supfile is not working. I think the problem is the tag but I am unsure why: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress # This collection retrieves the www/ tree of the FreeBSD repository #www ports-all ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since this is obviously a ports-supfile, are you sure you want to cvsup the RELENG_6_2 ports; These refer to the ports tree at the exact point when 6.2 was released. You already have them, you installed that ports tree from your CDROM during installation. Instead, you probably need a line like: *default release=cvs tag=. to get the latest available ports. Thanks, that has to be it, because on my laptop, I have it as above and it works. The problem is that when I updated src-ports with a similar supfile, I ended up with FreeBSD 7 on the laptop. Yes, and this is the right behavious since tag=. will get you HEADS from the repository and if you use it for the BASE SYSTEM, that is src-all, you will get FreeBSD 7.0 If you use it for the ports, you will simply get the latest available applications, which (should) work fine on the RELEASE version. If you wish to get the latest stable (base) system: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 src-all If you wish to get the security branch of 6.2 RELEASE, us: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 src-all I suggest you read the example files in /usr/share/examples/cvsup. You will get it instantly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with supfile
On Saturday 18 August 2007 19:47:21 Manolis Kiagias wrote: Pollywog wrote: Someone please tell me why my supfile is not working. I think the problem is the tag but I am unsure why: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress # This collection retrieves the www/ tree of the FreeBSD repository #www ports-all ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since this is obviously a ports-supfile, are you sure you want to cvsup the RELENG_6_2 ports; These refer to the ports tree at the exact point when 6.2 was released. You already have them, you installed that ports tree from your CDROM during installation. Instead, you probably need a line like: *default release=cvs tag=. to get the latest available ports. Thanks, that has to be it, because on my laptop, I have it as above and it works. The problem is that when I updated src-ports with a similar supfile, I ended up with FreeBSD 7 on the laptop. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with supfile
On Saturday 18 August 2007 20:26:53 Manolis Kiagias wrote: I suggest you read the example files in /usr/share/examples/cvsup. You will get it instantly. Thanks. I do get it now, after reading your post and looking at the sample files. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silly Sendmail Tricks
Under FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE, among other things, I had this in my access file: # Throttling Defaults # GreetPause: 2000# Set in the .mc file ClientRate: 10 ClientConn: 10 # Don't throttle 127.0.0.1 or LAN traffic GreetPause:127.0.0.10 # Time to wait before 220 msg ClientRate:127.0.0.10 # Connections/interval ClientConn:127.0.0.10 # Concurrent connections GreetPause:192.168.00 # Time to wait before 220 msg ClientRate:192.168.00 # Connections/interval ClientConn:192.168.00 # Concurrent connections Now, I've switched to FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE and it seems that the semantic of 0 means no limiting is no longer supported. With the configuration above, the system starts throttling traffic generated on the localhost when, say, a mailing list manager starts firing off a bunch of message. I have to change things to: ClientRate:127.0.0.11000 # Connections/interval ClientConn:127.0.0.11000 # Concurrent connections (I've not changed things for 192.168.0/24 because nothing on that network sends email directly - or they shouldn't be - it all is routed via the FreeBSD host.) This fixed things - I can now send large volumes of email from localhost. But, I wonder why the old setting does not work. Did something change in the semantics of sendmail since 4.11 that could have caused this? Under 6.2 I have this for sendmail, BTW: Version 8.14.1 Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SASLv2 SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG SYSTEM IDENTITY (after readcf) (short domain name) $w = xxx (canonical domain name) $j = xxx.xxx.xxx (subdomain name) $m = xxx.xxx (node name) $k = xxx.xxx.xxx ADDRESS TEST MODE (ruleset 3 NOT automatically invoked) Enter ruleset address Inquiring minds wanna know ;) -- Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regular expressions
Derek Ragona wrote: At 12:04 PM 8/18/2007, Christer Hermansson wrote: I also found some basic example at http://www.grymoire.com/Unix/Sh.html#uh-88 : 88888 #!/bin/sh echo Type in a number read ans number=`expr $ans : ([0-9]*)` if [ $number != $ans ]; then echo Not a number elif [ $number -eq 0 ]; then echo Nothing was typed else echo $number is a fine number fi 88888 The above example doesn't work on my freebsd box. Maybe I need to update my system, sitting with 6.0R which never been updated. You have a syntax error using expr. Do a man on expr for more details but if you change that line from: number=`expr $ans : ([0-9]*)` to: number=`expr $ans : \([0-9]*\)` You will get the desired results. Also when debugging scripts remember to add: set -x to your script on the second line, and see what the script lines are actually doing. -Derek Thanks Derek ! Now both the example and my own code works for me. I changed my code from ^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$ to \([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\) It seems that FreeBSD's expr want some different syntax than the webbased test tool at http://regexlib.com/RETester.aspx -- Christer Hermansson ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD 6.2 on a Dell Inspiron 531s
I'm looking at purchasing a Dell Inspiron 531s to use as a low- end workstation. The price is _really_ reasonable. Anyone have FreeBSD running successfully on these units? Any problems getting FreeBSD to recognize/work with the hardware? -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migrating from reiserfs to ext3
Hello Konrad, On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:51:19 -0300 Konrad Scorciapino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I have a single 200GB HD that is divided in three partitions, one with FreeBSD, another with Linux and the other with my media. The first two are 10GB, and the latter, 180GB. The problem is that it is a ReiserFS partition, not writable from FreeBSD, so I'll have to change it to, say, ext3, if I'm going to be able to use xMule again. Since I can't backup the whole thing, I'll have to use another method to convert it. Well, migration from ReiserFS to EXT3 is not really a question for FreeBSD list. :) They are both native to Linux; ReiserFS is fully implemented in Linux only. You might consider using UFS2 instead of EXT3 -- but I'm not sufficiently sure if write support in Linux is still marked as experimental (it was some time ago). I'm using quotes because apparently there is no such utility that converts a given partition to another type. Why is that so? I was thinking about the hard links. True, with a couple of not very interesting exceptions (it's possible to convert EXT2 to EXT3 in place, and pure little window$ has a built-in convertor from FAT32 to NTFS) -- as far as official conversions are concerned; for unofficial, see below. (Let someone corrects me if I'm mistaken, but it's not possible to convert UFS to UFS2 in place.) Since the partition has some free space and its file hierarchy is quite simple (eg, mp3/baroque/bach/bwv82_1.mp3), wouldn't it work if I resize it to be full, using the freed space to create a new partition, and then, until the first one is empty, move content from it to the newly created, resizing both so that the first one is full again? I think it's the best for you to do so. How much free space you have there? You can shrink ReiserFS partition either from Linux or, maybe easier, using GParted (http://gparted.sourceforge.net). Please note that GParted surrently cannot resize Reiser4 partitions. Or, if you are extremely brave, you can try http://freshmeat.net/projects/convertfs/ (I wouldn't do it.) Anybody ever tried something like that? Are there utilities that could help out, or dangers I need to avoid? Every utility dealing with partition resizing will tell you to backup your data first if you really need them. Since you can't do that, I'd suggest reading ReiserFS manual and careful deciding what tool to use for shrinking. But this is a Linux part of your job. However, if you end up with one or two UFS2 partitions, then further work with them will be a different story and you'll certainly get much more answers. :) Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems with networking...
[Please keep the mailing list in the CC] Michael Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Certainly. Here it is: #ifconfig -a vr0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 10.11.12.253 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.11.12.254 That's really strange. Your broadcast address should be 10.11.12.255. It's quite likely that this is part of your problem, but I can't imagine how you could have arrived at this configuration. What is in /etc/rc.conf? ether [MAC ADDRESS REMOVED] media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) statusL active plip0: flags=108810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 #netstat -m 65/205/270 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 64/134/198/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/128 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/0/0/0 4k (page size) jumbo clisters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)0/0/0/0 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 144k/319k/463k bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/4/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines That's netstat -rn, not -m. Unfortunately, the -m doesn't tell me what I'm looking for, which is your routing table. I'm wondering if your ipnat rules are awry. Please provide the ifconfig, routing table, and nat rules from the router machine. ...again, this is straight out of a fresh install (which I did because I had the exact same problem with the last install). Well, obviously, you did it the same both times, and are getting the same result. On 8/18/07, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry if this is sorta n00bish, but I have a problem that Google hasn't answered for me yet... I have a moderately-sized network that I am trying to run, with about 70 or so machines on it. The DHCP server (running FreeBSD 6.2, IPv4 address: 10.11.12.254, Subnet is 10.11.12.0/24) acts as a gateway server as well, and has ipnat running for traffic routing. So far, I have had no problems with ANY of the machines on this network connecting, save one--my File server (running FreeBSD 6.2 as well, IPv4 address: 10.11.12.253). For some reason, whenever I try to establish any connection to ANY network address (on any protocol), it will only connect to one address: 10.11.12.252 (and won't connect to anything when that machine is off). Here is a ping listing: #ping 10.11.12.254 PING 10.11.12.254 (10.11.12.254): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.11.12.252: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.852 ms ...and it continues precisely in that manner until I stop it. I have tried re-installing the OS on the file server, but with no change in results. I have removed the machine at 10.11.12.252 with the only change being that the file-server can obtain NO connection to ANY IP address. Any help would be appreciated. Why don't your cut/paste the output of ifconfig -a and netstat -rn I suspect your network settings are incorrect. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 412-422-3463x4023 IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-07-29 - 2007-08-18
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists and/or The FreeBSD Diary http://www.freebsddiary.org/. These are the articles posted during this period: 6-Aug : IBM ThinkPad T41: Upgrading RAM and HDD - pictures Pictures now! http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41-hardware-upgrades-pics.php?2 1-Aug : IBM ThinkPad T41: Upgrading RAM and HDD Things are getting tight and slow... http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41-hardware-upgrades.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(no subject)
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:32:28 +0200 Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Christopher Key wrote: Hello, I'm having some rather strange behaviour with fsck. When I boot the system, it asserts that all the file systems are clean, but subsequently running an fsck on /dev/ad8s1e (mounted as /var) detects errors. Even if this first check is run whilst the file system is mounted, and is hence run in NO WRITE mode, a second check doesn't find block errors. If I then unmount the file system and check the disk, it's fine, as indeed it is if I unmount, remount, then check. However, if I then reboot, the process repeats, and an fsck immediately after reboot will find errors again. If I bring the system up in single user mode, and run fsck either before or after mounting /var, it finds no errors. I'm running 6.2_RELEASE with a custom kernel based upon generic-smp, but with a lot of unecessary bits removed, and geom_mirror compiled in. I don't think it's the drive that's at fault, all the other partitions in the slice are fine, it's a fairly new drive, and it passes a self test quite happily. Included below is a transcript that attempt to show what's going on in detail, is there anything else relevant? Can anyone suggest what might be going on and how to fix it, or suggest some slightly better diagnostics? Apologies if this is an RTFM issue, I have had a good dig through the handbook, but can't seem to find anything that helps. Running fsck on a file system that has been mounted read/write will almost always report spurious errors and can really screw up the disk if it tries to 'correct' those errors. I'm a bit confused by this. I've been running 'fsck -n' over FreeBSD systems since 2.2.6, and modulo seeing the at-the-time inconsistencies on those filesystems in /etc/fstab that are mounted, as Chris reported and as are expected, I've never had a problem with it, nor seen the sort of inconsistent results between runs that Chris is reporting. You should normally not run fsck on a mounted filesystem and you should *NEVER* run fsck on a filesystem that has been mounted read/write. This seems to imply that using the -n switch may have different results than not using it and having fsck determine 'NO WRITE' itself from the fact that it's noticed that the fs is mounted? Are you suggesting by can really screw up the disk if it tries to 'correct' those errors that fsck might WRITE to a mounted fs that it's showing as 'NO WRITE'? I've never had any screwups with it, but then I've always specified -n. Later Bill Moran said: Don't run fsck on mounted filesystems unless they're mounted read-only. Although, it's possible I misunderstood your description of the problem. so I'm still curious, and am wondering if Chris using SMP kernel and/or geom_mirror might have anything to do with this? Or whether his use of 'umount -f' might be (or cause) the problem indicated by his results? # umount -f /var # mount /var Cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
