Re: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3
Nothing logged in /var/log/* or crashes that exist in /var/crash would indicate to me some sort of hardware related problem. Have you tested your hardware lately and know that it is in operational order? ~Paul On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:36:54PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote: Hi. Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY, CANNOT RUN FAST FSCK Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: CANNOT SET FS_NEEDSFSCK FLAG Apr 9 20:09:22 kernel: running manually: # fsck -y /dev/ad8s1e ** /dev/ad8s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /tmp ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 99 files, 10 used, 506477 free (45 frags, 63304 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) Server reboot two or three time per day # uname -a FreeBSD flux 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #3 r231881: Fri Feb 24 17:07:48 UTC 2012 adm@flux:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v8 amd64 before this it works about month without problems /var/crash - empty, in /var/log/messages there is no any messages before crash. Can any help to fix problem? ___ freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message. See http://www.datapipe.com/legal/email_disclaimer/ for further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic communication. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: keep-state and divert
Victor Sudakov wrote: Colleagues, I have read some recommendations on combining a stateful firewall with divert, e.g. http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD-Security/2003-06/0078.html and http://nuclight.livejournal.com/124348.html (the latter is in Russian). Do I understand correctly that it is (mathematically?) impossible to use the two together without also using skipto? If we consider a simple example below, how would you replace the 600th rule for a stateful one? 00100 divert 8668 ip from any to table(1) out via rl0 00200 deny log logamount 100 ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any out via rl0 00300 deny log logamount 100 ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any out via rl0 00400 deny log logamount 100 ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any out via rl0 00500 divert 8668 ip from table(1) to any in via rl0 00600 allow ip from table(1) to any in via rl0 00700 deny log logamount 100 ip from any to 10.0.0.0/8 in via rl0 00800 deny log logamount 100 ip from any to 172.16.0.0/12 in via rl0 00900 deny log logamount 100 ip from any to 192.168.0.0/16 in via rl0 65535 allow ip from any to any Thank you in advance for any input. Hopefully you don't mind a response which provides a fully functioning firewall ruleset. It's by no means complete, but should give you the answer to your question. http://procacci.me/ipfw.conf This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message. See http://www.datapipe.com/emaildisclaimer.aspx for further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic communication. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
mountd requests
Hey All, We have a shared nfs machine that is used between multiple client machines. While this in itself is ok, any client that issues a `showmount` command can see the other mounts that are currently established. I can't for the life of me figure out how this is a good thing. I big security related `no no` comes to mind whenever I see all mounts from all clients returned back to me from a client. Now, mountd doesn't have a `secure` option to turn this off, but I have developed an untested patch for doing this. I think the reasonable default behavior would be to return only mounts that the physical host making the request currently has established. I guess my real question is, has anyone ever been concerned by this? ~Paul This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message. See http://www.datapipe.com/emaildisclaimer.aspx for further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic communication. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Glob error?
Steve Watt wrote:
( Please cc: me on replies, as I can't keep up with traffic on -questions )
I did the following:
% cd /tmp
% mkdir -p a/dir1/new a/dir1/cur
% mkdir -p b/dir1/new b/dir1/cur
% mkdir -p c/dir1/new c/dir1/cur
% ls -ld */dir1/new
drwxrwxr-x 2 steve wheel 512 Nov 7 15:10 a/dir1/new/
%
System is:
FreeBSD wattres.Watt.COM 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #9: Tue May 13 16:06:34
PDT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WATTRES i386
Source was probably updated a few hours before the kernel build time.
Shell doesn't seem to matter (have tried both tcsh and bash).
My cygwin installation seems to get it right.
Known issue? A quick glance for glob in gnats didn't show anything promising.
I too can't reproduce this on any of my machines:
nat# mkdir -p {a,b,c}/dir/{cur,new}
nat# ls -ld */dir/*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 7 19:07 a/dir/cur
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 7 19:07 a/dir/new
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 7 19:07 b/dir/cur
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 7 19:07 b/dir/new
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 7 19:07 c/dir/cur
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 7 19:07 c/dir/new
Awefully strange indeed.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: a quick?
david mellick wrote: how long does it normally take GNOME to install? Thanks Dave ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is quite an open-ended question that has lots of variables. The answer is, it depends on your system in which no one will be able to provide any specifics; more or less. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Images-only webserver, lighttpd vs NginX
Francis Dubé wrote: Hi everyone, I posted last week about my webserver hitting the kernel's max process allowed (error : collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC). As a part of the solution, I decided to build a jail with a light webserver dedicated to images requests, the biggest part of the requests the server have to process. Most of the websites hosted on the server have approximately 200 small images with a size between 1k and 32k each. I'm currently hesitating between NginX and lighttpd, which both seems to offer similar benchmarks for this job. The questions : Is someone doing something similar to this with one of the two ? Which one do you suggest and why ? I've read about a memory leak in lighttpd, is anyone is having issues with this under FreeBSD ? Any ideas regarding our situation is appreciated, Thanks ! Francis Dube R D Optik Securite www.optiksecurite.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] They are both good static content servers. You can easily max out a GiGe link using either. We use lighttpd more extensively than nginx, however we do use both. Quite frankly, it's truthfully up to you. Performance wise, they are on par with once another. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Images-only webserver, lighttpd vs NginX
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: They are both good static content servers. You can easily max out a GiGe link using either. We use lighttpd more extensively than nginx, however we do use both. Quite frankly, it's truthfully up to you. Performance wise, they are on par with once another. ~Paul at the risk of being slightly OT is there a recent toutorial that anyone knows of for lighthttpd on FreeBSD 7, I have used Google and I can't turn up anything recent Sam Fourman Jr. Fourman Networks What kind of tutorial are you looking for? Their documentation is quite extensive. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with FreeBSD
J MPZ wrote: Hi guys, I have some problem with my FreeBSD server. I have this: #### # # Linux1 # - ASA - Internet - # FreeBSD # - # Linux2 # #### # If I run a ssh for Linux1 to FreeBSD, my connection freeze when the return of some command is a big text. Example: I make a ssh connection in the from the Linux1 to FreeBSD server, then, I execute some commands, like: 'pwd', 'whoami', 'ls /'... this work perfectly. But, if I run some command that return a big text, like as: 'ls /dev/', or top, my connection freeze. In other terminal, the tcpdump continues showing packets in this connection that was freeze. If I try to access the Linux2, throught FreeBSD (redirect port on natd or redirect port with rinetd), the same thing happens. Is this a problem with FreeBSD? Someone know how I can fix it? Some sysctl? Regards, J. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The tcpdump that you say continues showing packets..are the packets leaving the freeBSD machine or arriving at the FreeBSD machine. My guess is you meant leaving the FreeBSD destined for your linux machine. If this is the case, then the problem most likely lies with the ASA. If you monitor the ASA's external interface during your testing, do you see packets arriving? If so, do you see packets leaving the internal interface going back to your Linux1 machine? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: calendar software wanted
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/sunbird/ Marco wrote: hello list, anybody has experience with calendar software which runs on freebsd. i maybe would integrate it also in thunderbird/mutt,but thats not necessary, or use a stand alone software. minimum requirements to the software would be making entries, getting alarms for appointments. thank you for responses, marco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel: Approaching the limit on PV entries...
Bob Johnson wrote: A web server with several jailed copies of Apache is having problems that seem to be caused by incorrect IPFW rules, but in the process of working on that, I find in the log the following repeated many times: Oct 8 23:29:50 spider kernel: Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing either the vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the vm.pmap.pv_entry_max sysctl. Oct 8 23:30:52 spider kernel: Approaching the limit on PV entries, consider increasing either the vm.pmap.shpgperproc or the vm.pmap.pv_entry_max sysctl. sysctl gives me: # sysctl vm.pmap vm.pmap.pmap_collect_active: 0 vm.pmap.pmap_collect_inactive: 0 vm.pmap.pv_entry_spare: 45818 vm.pmap.pv_entry_allocs: 595716945 vm.pmap.pv_entry_frees: 595133939 vm.pmap.pc_chunk_tryfail: 0 vm.pmap.pc_chunk_frees: 3543052 vm.pmap.pc_chunk_allocs: 3546795 vm.pmap.pc_chunk_count: 3743 vm.pmap.pv_entry_count: 583006 vm.pmap.shpgperproc: 200 vm.pmap.pv_entry_max: 2243305 The system: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 #0: Wed Oct 1 07:51:58 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Can someone briefly explain what this is telling me and how to decide which sysctl to increase? I have found some old postings that predate the sysctls that suggested increasing shpgperproc in the kernel configuration, about 50 at a time until the problem goes away, but I still have no clue what that is accomplishing. Also, the system has been rebooted since I collected those messages, and they aren't happening any more, but I expect they will reappear eventually. Until then I probably can't actually test anything. Thanks for your time, -- Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For what it's worth, I just came across a machine with the same exact problem, except when I do finally run out of entries, I get a kernel panic. FBSD 7-RELEASE-p4 ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GCC Compliler
Dean Huffaker wrote: I need to compile a c module called camerad. I have a makefile that is suppose to be used to perform this compile job. Problem is that I get an error and I don't understand exactly what the problem is. Here is the execution of the makefile with the error and then I did a cat on the makefile itself. CameraMgr2# ./makefile camerad.o:: not found CameraMgr2# cat makefile camerad : camerad.o ../shared/util.o gcc -o camerad camerad.o ../shared/util.o camerad.o: camerad.c camerad.h ../shared/util.h gcc -I../shared -c camerad.c The first part of the makefile makes sense to me. Create a camerad using camera.o and stuff from .shared/util.o camerad : camerad.o ../shared/util.o gcc -o camerad camerad.o ../shared/util.o And that part works fine. If I just run those two statements it works OK. But the second part does not make sense. and It gets the error camerad.o not found. camerad.o: camerad.c camerad.h ../shared/util.h gcc -I../shared -c camerad.c Any idea what might be going on? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try using the make utility. make -f ./makefile ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General Mysql Performance Question
Hey All, Recently I've been asked to do performance testing of postgres and mysql on FreeBSD. Kris' page (http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/mysql.html) was extremely useful in giving me a starting point for my own comparisons. Additionally, his name is splattered all over the web with patches, tuning tips, etc. For that, I thank you Kris. With that said, I've come across something that I can not find the answer to and I'm hoping I have missed something incredibly simple. If this has been mentioned before, then I apologize in advance. http://paul.procacci.me/benchmarks/freebsd7-Release.html My question is in reference to the 1st and 2nd graphs on this page. While testing the performance of the databases given in this graph, the one thing that sticks out is that when Mysql uses the myisam engine with the ULE schedular, performance drops quite considerably regardless of mysql version. The clearly shows ULE to perform worst at higher work loads than 4BSD, at least in this one example. Now, I read that lockmgr code is still a work in progress, but I'm unsure if that applies specifically to this specific problem that I'm providing. What I'm hoping for quite frankly is a yes, this is because type of response. This isn't a problem per se, but rather a curiosity type of question. Thanks in advance, ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: General Mysql Performance Question
Kris Kennaway wrote: Paul A. Procacci wrote: My question is in reference to the 1st and 2nd graphs on this page. While testing the performance of the databases given in this graph, the one thing that sticks out is that when Mysql uses the myisam engine with the ULE schedular, performance drops quite considerably regardless of mysql version. The clearly shows ULE to perform worst at higher work loads than 4BSD, at least in this one example. Now, I read that lockmgr code is still a work in progress, but I'm unsure if that applies specifically to this specific problem that I'm providing. What I'm hoping for quite frankly is a yes, this is because type of response. This isn't a problem per se, but rather a curiosity type of question. myisam has huge lock contention, so probably ULE is more efficiently scheduling the processes and increasing contention yet further, leading to a net drop of performance. That kind of thing is fairly common when you have a workload with high contention; if you improve performance at one bottleneck the performance at a later bottleneck can get worse. Performance will still be better on other workloads, or when further work improves the other bottlenecks. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kris, Thanks for your prompt response. I was aware that myisam had pretty huge lock contention, but didn't think ULE, because it's doing it's job better, is actually making things worse. I appreciate your insight. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mysql Performance Question 4.1.22 vs 5.1.26.rc
Jim Pazarena wrote: I changed from 4.1.22 to 5.1.26.rc and my performance in a very busy db, tanked! could the use of an 'rc' possibly be my issue? is there any chance that the 'rc' has debugging enabled which is slowing me down? Hello, I've ran some tests just this past week (in fact I emailed freebsd-general about this yesterday), unfortunately however it was comparing performance between 5.0.51 and 5.1.26. http://paul.procacci.me/benchmarks/freebsd7-Release.html 5.1 performs worse than 5.0 at higher workloads. I'm unsure about 4, but am quite sure moving to 5.0 is probably the best decision you could make. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where is wrong with tcpdump?
EdwardKing wrote: I want to watch ip:172.0.10.2 port:19 TCP information,so I use following command: #tcpdump tcp port 19 host 172.0.10.2 tcpdump: syntax error Why? How to do it? Thanks -- Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, storing, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you. --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] tcpdump tcp port 19 and host 172.0.10.2 Works here; P ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regular Expression Trouble
Martin McCormick wrote:
I am trying to isolate only the MAC addresses that appear in
dhcpd logs.
For anyone who is interested, the sed construct that should do
this looks like:
sed 's/.*\([[ your regular expression ]]\).*/\1/'
The \1 tells sed to only print what matched and skip all the rest.
I am doing something wrong with the regular expression
that is supposed to recognise a MAC address. MAC addresses look
like 5 pairs of hex digits followed by :'s and then a 6TH pair
to end the string.
I have tried:
[[:xdigit:][:xdigit:][:punct:]
Sorry. It won't all fit on a line, but there should be a string
of 5 pairs and the : and then the 6TH pair followed by the
closing ] so the expression ends with ]]
One should also be able to put:
[[:xdigit:][:xdigit:][:punct:]]\{5,5\}[[:xdigit:][:xdigit]]
Any ideas as to what else I can try?
What happens is I get single characters per line that look like
the first or maybe the last character in that line, but
certainly nothing useful or nothing that remotely looks like a
MAC address.
Any ideas as to what's wrong with the regular
expression?
Many thanks.
Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK
Systems Engineer
OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't have a seperate dhcp log and you didn't make it clear if you do,
but I do have something similar written for awk that parses the system
log file.
awk ' /DHCPREQUEST/ { print $10 } ' /var/log/messages
Maybe that will help.
~Paul
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sed html tags
siran wrote: Hi, I have the string span 111 /span span /span And i wish to use sed to strip *only* the span tag and its contents... is this possible ? I'm trying this expression, but it doesn't work... sed 's/span [^\(/span\)]+\/span//g' file is there anything like it ? I would like to obtain I hope someone can help, thank you, siran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sed -E 's/\/?span[^]*//g' Myabe that's what you want? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: /etc/groups gone
John Nielsen wrote: I would start by comparing the contents of /usr/ports/GIDs with the ports you have installed (as listed in /var/db/pkg). You can get a stock group file from src/etc/group. Reinstalling ports will recreate the groups they use (though you could do most of it manually), and you may be on your own for any custom groups you have. On Thursday 21 August 2008 12:05:49 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Yesterday night at 1 a.m. I have managed to remove /etc/groups (rm instead of vi, was already sleepying). Luckily only a few groups (2-3) was created earlier. No backup, of course. I believe the file system is still correct, it uses group IDs instead of names (?). Though ls does not show the correct group names (only IDs) and creating new groups will reuse the old group IDs. Is there any better way of rebuilding /etc/groups than guessing and manually adding one-by-one. Can I somehow list all group IDs used by the file system? Many thanks. Balazs _ News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now! http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/backups might have various backups of those important files. Might want to tcheck that out. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: making FreeBSD phone home via SSH
Elliot Finley wrote: Hello all, I have an interesting project. I have several FreeBSD servers that I will be deploying to remote locations. They will be sitting behind a NAT. I would like them to make a SSH connection to a local server sitting on a public IP. I need them connected in a way that will give me remote shell access. Has anyone done this before? I'd rather not re-invent the wheel. TIA for any pointers. Elliot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've been using vtund for just that. Simple, easy, effectivejust another option of course. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No buffer space available
Hello, Since moving over ftp traffic to a 6-STABLE from 9/20/2007 to a machine of ours, we've been getting the above errors in the logs. Obviously the machine becomes unresponsive from the network and requires a console to log in and reboot. I generally can fix these types of problems rather quickly (or thought I did), as I've handled these problems before in the past quite frequently. However, this particular machine is giving me a really hard time. I have to reboot the machine every 2ish weeks due to the above. It's my hopes that after reading through the output that follows, someone can point out a crucial piece that I am missing...cause I am stumped. With the above said, and while looking through tons of output, I came across what I believe to 'be the gem'. I'm hoping that this can be either confirmed or denied: ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQUESTS FAILURES mbuf_cluster: 2048, 64000, 1024, 10, 1024, 0## While machine is borked mbuf_cluster: 2048, 64000, 1532, 246, 1823214, 0## While the machine is not borked The above is output from vmstat -z obviously trimmed just to show the specific lines. The first line quite frankly makes no sense to me whatsoever. In fact, it's ?artifically? stuck at 1024 for both the 'used' and 'requests' fields. Formatting bug? or integer overflow of some kind? Maybe..but it's ironic that the network is locking up at the same time. That and the values simply don't add up. Additionally, I have netstat -m output that follows which again shows strange values for requests for I/O initiated by sendfile and calls to protocol drain routines: --- 522/888/1410 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 516/518/1034/64000 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 516/508 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/0/0/0 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/0 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 1162K/1258K/2420K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/5/8704 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines --- 0 ?? Those items mentioned above are counters which increment extremely slowly. I can't imagine this ever being an integer rollover type of problem. Something is weird here as well. --- Lastly, em0 shows no errors to speak of: NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs Coll em01500 Link#1 00:0e:0c:b1:a7:0e23104 027905 0 0 01:00:5e:00:00:01 744 0 --- Would certainly appreciate any help whether in the form of links, patches, or other non aggressive types of responses ;) Thanks, Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i have questions
Lawyer Q8 wrote: Hello, Please i have FreeBSD 6.3 RELEASE i want to upgrade to 7.0 stable if upgrade stable my files is lose and removed or not ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you follow /usr/src/UPDATING you should be ok. However keep in mind it's HIGHLY suggested you `dump` your files first! ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can one list permission bits numerically...
Modulok wrote: Perhaps I missed it somewhere in the man page, but is there a way to list files with their permission bits displayed as numeric (octal, as in chmod(1)), instead of symbolic? Something like: ls -lF -imaginaryFlag 0755 4 Modulok Modulok 512 Dec 17 18:39 dir1/ 0644 1 Modulok Modulok 101786 Feb 23 05:53 file1 0644 1 Modulok Modulok 140097 Feb 13 23:38 file2 Thanks. -Modulok- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe something like this will suit you: stat -f %p %l %u %g %z %m %N * It produces output similar to the following: 100755 1 0 0 64 1201845218 blah The fields that I choose are in the man page, so it should be easy reading, and is pretty close to `ls -l`. As for as `ls` having this ability, it doesn't. Cheers. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted
Fira wrote: Hi list, I want to mount my /dev/ad1s1e, but it produce error output : root# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data1/ mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted I've checked my /var/log/messages, but it doesn't show any message related to that. I've fsck that slice, and retried to remount, but it failed again. Then, I add in my fstab this entry : ...snip.. /dev/ad1s1e /data1 ufsrw 2 2 and reboot my machine, but still the system didn't want to mount it. This is my bsdlabel output : root# /dev/ad1s1: 8 partitions: #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 4883920020unused0 0 # raw part, don't edit d: 1638404.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 e: 12288 163844.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 f: 16384 286724.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 g: 37832002 450564.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 In my understanding, ad1s1e has been formatted into ufs, and I think there should be no problem to mount it. So, where is the point of my mistake? Thanks a lot for your responses. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's your securelevel? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QMail Help
Victor Farah wrote: Hello I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my /var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I made. I start qmail using supervise scripts. Also in my smtproutes file can I use IP's, and do they have to be enclosed inside brackets? E.G. super.com:[1.2.3.4] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, This isn't the right place to ask this question. Irregardless of that, since you are using supervise to manage the daemon, try the following: svc -h /path/to/service/directory OR svc -a /path/to/service/directory If neither of those work, you can restart the daemon altogether svc -d /path/to/service/directory followed by svc -u /path/to/service/directory ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: named questions.
jekillen wrote: Hello: I have named running as secondary server on v6.2 It will not start without a specific configuration file set on the command line. After doing some investigation it appears that that is because it runs chrooted and there is not a symlink from /etc/namedb. Is that a correct assumption? I read the man page and it specifies the default configuration file as /etc/namedb/named.conf and along with this file there are master and slave directories. Would I make the /etc/namedb/named.conf file to be a symlink to /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf? What you've read is correct. chroot'ing does in fact prevent the program from traversing higher in the file hiarchy. This makes sense as to why you need to specify the configuration file on the command line. I presume named will read the configuration file prior to chrooting. I don't use named though as I have my preference, and can't be 100% without looking at the source code. A symlink does you no good do to my explanation above. If you chroot, you lose the ability to get into /var or vica versa. That's the whole purpose of 'change root'. There are some other entries in rc.conf related to named that appear in my primary nameserver rc.conf file that relate to getting it up at boot but I have lost root access to that machine so I cannot recover the rc.conf details and I do not remember what document- ation I was using to set it up. I was advised to start named as a user other than root but when I tried that named would not start because the user I set it to does not have write permission in the directory that has the pid file. named must be started as root in order to bind to port 53. Afterwards I assume it changes it's uid using some configuration setting. This is a standard practice now adays amongst utilities needing to bind to reserved ports. Check your config file to set the user you want to run the daemon as after it's done with it's initialization (i.e. binding to the port and creating the /var/run file), but remember you must physically start named as root in order to get named working correctly. When named starts at boot what user does it run as, by default? bind That's a guess based on the following: nat# fgrep bind /etc/passwd bind:*:53:53:Bind Sandbox:/:/usr/sbin/nologin Thank you for any guidance. Jeff K ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email pop3 question
David Banning wrote: I am using dovecot email on my server - Users can connect via IMAP or POP3. I have a user who is using pop3 but not removing the email from the server - so the email stays on the server, -and- it is collecting on their computer - as the emails build up, will there be a problem with this? For IMAP it stays on the server, so I assume the server will not be presented with any problem - but will the user suffer any problem eventually? The assumption that just because the user is using IMAP will alleviate any problems isn't necessarily true. I'd suggest getting over to the dovecot mailling lists and asking them specifically the same question. I don't use dovecot exclusively where I work, but generally when there is a problem, it's because of a user having way too much email. Whether the user keeps their mail on the server via pop or uses imap exclusively, the majority of the time it takes to grab headers and/or parse through all the emails is limited by disk. It's not uncommon for some of our users to have 4000+ emails in their inbox, and it's not uncommon for me to tell them why their pop/imap client is slow. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: USB printer
Gligor Lucian wrote: Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, usb printers are attached as normal in FreeBSD. It's up to you to provide the necessary utilities for speaking to it. CUPS for instance. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[FreeBSD 7] 3 Terabyte Array Doesn't Attach
Howdy, Been searching mailling lists and reading the FBSD documentation, but couldn't find an answer. I'm hoping this list can point me in the correct direction. I have a client that wants a raid 6 array, w/ 6 x 750G drives (i.e. 3Terabytes). The machine has a 'HP Smart Array P400' controller (ciss), which we use quite often, just not on an array of this magnitute before. Configuring the array through the raid bios is pretty simple as it's just like any other you would setup. However, the kernel is unable to `attach` the device as is. I am wondering if a) anyone has run into this issue before, and/or b) knows of any good workaround. Here are errors from the logs: Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): got CAM status 0x4 Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): lost device Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): removing device entry Some things I have tried: 2 raid5 arrays w/ gstripe - This yields a usable 3Terabyte partition but this isn't an option due to client restrictions. zfs - works like a charm, but client unwilling to use something 'new'. Restrictions can sometimes be a pain I tell ya. I should mention the mahcine is amd64, not sure if this has any relavance. Help? -P Thanks, Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [FreeBSD 7] 3 Terabyte Array Doesn't Attach
Paul A. Procacci wrote: Howdy, Been searching mailling lists and reading the FBSD documentation, but couldn't find an answer. I'm hoping this list can point me in the correct direction. I have a client that wants a raid 6 array, w/ 6 x 750G drives (i.e. 3Terabytes). The machine has a 'HP Smart Array P400' controller (ciss), which we use quite often, just not on an array of this magnitute before. Configuring the array through the raid bios is pretty simple as it's just like any other you would setup. However, the kernel is unable to `attach` the device as is. I am wondering if a) anyone has run into this issue before, and/or b) knows of any good workaround. Here are errors from the logs: Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): got CAM status 0x4 Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): lost device Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): removing device entry Some things I have tried: 2 raid5 arrays w/ gstripe - This yields a usable 3Terabyte partition but this isn't an option due to client restrictions. zfs - works like a charm, but client unwilling to use something 'new'. Restrictions can sometimes be a pain I tell ya. I should mention the mahcine is amd64, not sure if this has any relavance. Help? -P Thanks, Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, I've done more research and came across this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2008-January/027855.html This is disappointing. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is a EOF or NL
Bob Falanga wrote: I have been a long time trying to print anything on freebsd, as some know. Everything seems to be working new but nothing is printed. Today I reboot the computer and behold a page printed. This implied to me that the printer never receives a New Line or EOF or whatever the printer requires to proceed printing what it has just received. My question is where do I configure an option to print. Sounds like to me your print daemon wasn't running. The reboot started it automagically, and henceforth started the job. As for configuration this depends entirely on the daemon you are using. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: devd
E. J. Cerejo wrote: How do I find out if this daemon got loaded at boot time? I do have it on my rc.conf but I don't see anything in dmesg that tells me that it got loaded nat# ps -auxww | fgrep devd root 876 0.0 0.2 1888 420 ?? Is Sun07PM 0:00.02 /sbin/devd ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAM not recognized
Robert Huff wrote: RW writes: And also bear in mind that amd64 uses memory less efficiently than i386 Would you care to elaborate? (A pointer will do.) Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only 'less efficient' thing 64-bit programs have, are larger pointers as well as other potenial data items. Though I'm not sure I'd consider this 'less efficient'. Ok, so we have larger binaries and a bit more ram usage for the aforementioned, but isn't that all? I'd guess to say yes, and if it is, then that's not so bad. In fact, I don't think I'd even call is an inefficiency. My 2 cents. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there a Relay proxy port can do this?
Norman Maurer wrote: Hi, maybe mod_proxy can help you ( apache module ) or rinetd. Cheers Norman Am Dienstag, den 04.03.2008, 01:49 -0800 schrieb Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri: Hello Network Gurus, I have Adobe Flex 2 application which hosts the flash applet on apache 2.2.8, then flash applet will connect to port 28001 but users who are behind firewalls and proxies which only allow connections to port 80. So I need a daemon to work around this problem and allow these users to connect to my application. Is there a port can do this? Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Provided you have ip's to space AND the port of your flash applet is modifiable, you *could* bind apache to one address tcp:10.5.21.1:80 (for example), and bind the flash applet to another tcp:10.5.21.2:80. If tis isn't an option, than Normans suggestion is right on. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RAM not recognized
Cesar Amaya wrote: Hello every one, I have installed FreeBSD-7.0_RELEASE on Dell Power Edge 1950 Quad Core and 4GB of RAM. The problem is that FreeBSD does not recognize all of the RAM. This is part of the dmesg. # dmesg CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz (2496.28-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0xce3bdSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,DCA,b19 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF Cores per package: 4 real memory = 3484745728 (3323 MB) avail memory = 3405631488 (3247 MB) ACPI APIC Table: DELL PE_SC3 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard Can anyone give me some light in this issue? Thank you very much!!! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, se nd any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forgot to CC list This is not a problem of FreeBSD but of i386/x86 architecture which max memory limit is 4GB i theory and 3-3.5GB in practice, you can use PAE to use 36bit addressing (instead of default 32bit) for memory to get full 4GB on i386 but you will not be able to have loadable kernel modules for example, other sollution for this is using amd64/64bit FreeBSD, where you will have full 4GB and even more without any problems. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spam mails
Server wide blocking w/ an rbl of your choice: http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html Server wide or inbox specific filtering w/ bayes capabilities: http://spamassassin.apache.org/ Or, don't run a mail server...which is the most effective. ;) Obviously there are many other programs you can use, however I just provided two off the top of my head. ~Paul Ming Tang wrote: Hi - My email server is on FreeBSD 5.4 Release. I got a lot spam mails every day and it is really a headache to clean these mails in my pop mail client software daily. Is there any effective way to reduce and block these spam emails? Please help to provide me hint or direction. Thank you in advance. - Ming ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-N650SLI-DS4
Frank Shute wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:06:30PM +0200, David Naylor wrote: Hi, I am currently replacing my defunct motherboard, I am unable to test the hardware before purchase and I am seeking advice on which motherboard to get. Upon review I have selected a Gigabyte GA-N650SLI-DS4, does FreeBSD work with this board. It does have a nForce 650i (and I am not sure FreeBSD works with it?) I just built a workstation with a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L (P35/ICH9) board and am running a core 2 duo on it with AMD 7.0RC1. Everything works including ACPI which is very important if you want to run more than 1 core. If anyone has an alternative suggestion please let me know. The motherboard will have to support (my budget is about ZAR2000 ~ USD275): o) Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Mine supports that with up to 1333MHz FSB. o) 4x 800Mhz DDR2 Ram Yep. I've got 4GB, don't know whether it will go to 8, the handbook is no help. o) 2x SATA HDD Yep. 4 Channels. o) 2x IDE CDROM Drive Yes. Only 1 IDE channel but supports 2 devices o) 2x nVidia 7600 GT I guess that's SLI which I don't know a lot about or whether FreeBSD (X) can make any use of it. Only 1 PCI-E x 16 on my board so I guess not for me. Thank you all for your help I don't know anything about your nForce650i chipset but as a rule of thumb, if the technology is more than 6 months old, it's likely to work unless there's non-disclosure by the manufacturer (I think Nvidia are quite good in that respect). May be somebody else can comment on whether it will work. Or if you can drop one of the video cards you can use the same motherboard as me since I've tested it (apart from sound). And it's probably cheaper! About 65 quid (130 USD). Just to add additional information for the OP. I too have a Gigabyte P35-DS3R (slight difference in model, but nearly the same) rev. 2.1 board, and it works like a champ. My specs (whether relavant or not to you): o) Core 2 Q6600 Quad Core OC'd to 1333 FSB. o) 4x 1066Mhz DDR2 Ram o) IDE channel(s) not in use. o) 4 SATA drives in raid 0+1 in use, 1 SATA CDROM drive in use o) Floppy Controller / Drive in use. o) nVidia 8800 GTX obviously in use. Like Frank mentioned, my video card doesn't run in Sli mode, however I've had nothing but luck thus far. I hope this little bit helps. Maybe next time if otherwise. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: java decoder?
Gary Kline wrote: Guys, I doubt this but is there anything that will take a foo.jar and turn in back into java? Or at least assembler? gary http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/javaprogramming/JAR/basics/ I went to google and typed: 'unpack jar'. There are many other results that you may be interested it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: two links
Suprema Informática Ltda - Leandro wrote: Good morning, I need active two links of internet, but i don´t know do this. I have 3 interfaces internet 1 adsl gateway = 172.168.0.254 - ip interface = 172.168.0.253 internet 2 adsl gateway = 192.168.1.254 - ip interface = 192.168.1.253 interface to lan internal = 10.0.0.254 My default gateway is 172.168.0.254. I need active the second link (192.168.1.254) only access port 22, just port 22. Freebsd 6.3 + ipfw Thanks for all.t ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] First explictly allow transmission on the interface in question, and deny everything else. Additionally, you probably want to keep state within the ruleset as well. ipfw add some_num allow tcp from any to me 22 in via interface ipfw add some_num+2 deny tcp from any to me 22 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Password file migration help
Sean Murphy wrote: I have a FreeBSD 5.4 system and would like to migrate users in the password file with UIDs 3000 through 5000 to a FreeBSD 6.3 system on a running on a separate box. Is there a way to export just those users? Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Open vi/vim/etc on both machines via `vipw`, and copy 'n' paste. Repeat for the group file in necessary. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: phpinfo(); not working
Tipper wrote: I have FreeBSD-6.2 and I'm having trouble setting up apache, mysql and php for my business. I can't get phpinfo(); to display. If I run php -i, I get several pages of information which means php is working. This only means you have the php binary installed, and that's it. It's unrelated to the apache module. cd into /usr/ports/lang/php4 or /usr/ports/lang/php5 Do a 'make config'. Ensure that the WITH_APACHE item is checked. make / make install etcrestart apachedone. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
