Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Sun, 04 May 2008 22:12:23 -0700
prad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 i'd like to know how people live with freebsd.

great, thanks for asking! :)

 
 do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?

mostly build my own packages from ports. Sometimes I would use a package when 
either I dont have the time /resources to build ( OOO, but lately i've just 
built it myself). Also using packages for those apps that, 

 do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
 manually?

version to version of what? Of kernel and world, in my workhorse laptop, i do 
source upgrades and roll my own kernel.
For some servers and VM which are fairly generic and don't need much tweaking, 
i just run generic or SMP and use freebsd-update. I've used freebsd-update to 
upgrade VMs from 6.x to 7.x works GREAT (thanks Collin!)

 do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
 whether it is for a server or a desktop?

it actually depends on how much customisation i need

 
 the handbook tells you what you can do, but i'd like to know what is
 actually done and why.

of course :)

have fun!
B

_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome

I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is,  for 
the sake of a useful cause.
   Dostoevsky

I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. 
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been 
Warned.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Michaël Le Barbier

prad wrote:

i'd like to know how people live with freebsd.
  
It will soon be the ninth anniversary of my union with FreeBSD. I have 
been pleased of it, all the time.

do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?
do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
manually?
do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
whether it is for a server or a desktop?
I use FreeBSD in the `desktop' setting, I do a lot of TeX, programming, 
and scientific computing.

In my own views, I segregate applications in three groups:
 -- the zombie group, consisting of applications I rarely use, and do 
not care to keep up to date (almost everything);
 -- the living group, consisting of applications I use often but 
moderately care to keep up to date (Emacs and seamonkey);
 -- the hot group, consisting of applications I am very interested in 
(e.g. some libraries I use in my programs).


I do not care to update the zombie group.
I will maybe consider updating ports in the living group, either for 
security reasons or for some new functionnality I heard of and I really 
want to have.
It is not unlikely I update ports in the hot group every time there is a 
new major release is available.


I do the base install from packages, and use portupgrade for updating my 
software, after I have read /usr/ports/UPDATING.


My primary goal is having a working system for a minimal maintenance 
cost, the way I do works pretty well for me; but some others may have 
better ways to deal with this.

--
Cheers,
Michaël
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Wojciech Puchar

I use FreeBSD in the `desktop' setting, I do a lot of TeX, programming, and


in my view there is no desktop setting or server setting. the only 
difference is if your display and keyboard are directly connected or not.


you simply install programs you need.


scientific computing.
In my own views, I segregate applications in three groups:
-- the zombie group, consisting of applications I rarely use, and do not 
care to keep up to date (almost everything);
-- the living group, consisting of applications I use often but moderately 
care to keep up to date (Emacs and seamonkey);
-- the hot group, consisting of applications I am very interested in (e.g. 
some libraries I use in my programs).


doing similar way. with old rule - if it works, don't touch.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Gemma Fletcher
prad wrote:

 do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?

I use ports 99% of the time.  If only use the packages if I need something up 
and running asap.

 do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
 manually?

manually.
 do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
 whether it is for a server or a desktop?

I don't bother with a GUI for a server and I still stick with my 99% ports.  
For my home desktop I use KDE which I start from the console. It's dual 
booted with XP atm since I can't make WoW play through FreeBSD. :P

-- 
Gemma Fletcher
Burlesque Chic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot

Hello,

 doing similar way. with old rule - if it works, don't touch.

This got me interested. So basically for a server, you don't do any 
upgrades unless there are security issues to solve or new features that 
you need?


It seems to me that sometimes if you have waited with an upgrade for too 
long, it is more difficult to upgrade than it would have been if you had 
followed all small updates which appeared along the way...


Thanks!

--
Zbigniew Szalbot
www.lc-words.com


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Peter Boosten

Quoting Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


This got me interested. So basically for a server, you don't do any
upgrades unless there are security issues to solve or new features that
you need?

It seems to me that sometimes if you have waited with an upgrade for
too long, it is more difficult to upgrade than it would have been if
you had followed all small updates which appeared along the way...



I think you have to differentiate between updates and upgrades. I  
consider an upgrade moving from one release to another (say from 6.2  
to 6.3), while security patches are updates.


I always run updates, but I don't always follow upgrades. Recently I  
upgraded one older machine from 5.5 to 6.2 (en even more recent to 6.3).


Peter

--
http://www.boosten.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg

On May 5, 2008, at 12:12 AM, prad wrote:


i'd like to know how people live with freebsd.


My FreeBSD systems are light weight servers only, so what I do is  
specific to my circumstances and tastes.



do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?


I only use ports, but I suppose that if I had some really large things  
to install like OOo, I would consider using packages.



do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
manually?


I use csup and will rebuild world and the kernel as needed.  I've got  
a fairly stripped down kernel to improve boot times.  But again, I  
kind of find it cool to compile the whole OS.  It may be irrational  
and non-optimal.  That's why I said some of this is a matter of taste  
as well as circumstances.


My choice of when to upgrade the OS really depends on what I need.  I  
don't like to be too far behind.  I recently moved one system for 7.0  
RELEASE to 7 STABLE because of a specific fix that affected one of my  
systems.



do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
whether it is for a server or a desktop?


I suspect that for a desktop, I would be more tempted to keep closer  
to GENERIC and use packages.  But I only have FreeBSD servers on which  
I don't even run an X11 server.


Cheers,

-j


--
Jeffrey Goldberghttp://www.goldmark.org/jeff/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-05 Thread Sahil Tandon
* prad [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-04 22:12:23 -0700]:

 do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?

Primarily ports.

 do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
 manually?

I use portmanager.

 do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
 whether it is for a server or a desktop?

Only my servers run FreeBSD.

 the handbook tells you what you can do, but i'd like to know what is
 actually done and why.

Well, that's just a bit too open-ended isn't it? ;-)

-- 
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: living with freebsd

2008-05-04 Thread Chris Haulmark


Hello!
 
 i'd like to know how people live with freebsd.
 
 do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?

Some uses just ports...while others use packages only if they exist in
the first
place or they cross compiled.

Hell, a lot of people use both ports and packages.

The reasons vary and it is not restrictive to pick either one.

 do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
 manually?

Manually is the traditional way.  The freebsd tools (if you meant the
binary
upgrade method) is just a new way.  Few are switching over as the time
progresses.  There are some in the production environment that prefer
using binary upgrades as it will provide lower downtimes.


 do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
 whether it is for a server or a desktop?

Yes, avoid GUI stuff when using server or vice verse.  That's just one
example out of millions of examples.

 
 the handbook tells you what you can do, but i'd like to know what is
 actually done and why.

The way it should work:

You find out what you want your FreeBSD computer to do, you look into
the available
documentations on how to do it.  Not the other way around.

Chris


 --
 In friendship,
 prad
 
   ... with you on your journey
 Towards Freedom
 http://www.towardsfreedom.com (website)
 Information, Inspiration, Imagination - truly a site for soaring I's
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-04 Thread Manolis Kiagias

prad wrote:

i'd like to know how people live with freebsd.

do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?
do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
manually?
do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
whether it is for a server or a desktop?

the handbook tells you what you can do, but i'd like to know what is
actually done and why.

  
You will probably get too many different views - it is a flexible system 
after all.
For example, I rarely mix ports and packages. On my small home server 
(which also doubles as a workstation for light use) everything is 
compiled from ports. This includes openoffice.org which took more than a 
day to download and compile. I doubt I'll ever upgrade it the same way...
On this machine I am using the XFCE desktop, which I start manually from 
the command line when used as a desktop. But on a real dedicated 
desktop, I would use Gnome (or KDE).
As for versions, I always run -RELEASE. I would go to STABLE if I 
desperately needed a feature not present in RELEASE, but this hasn't 
happened yet. I am using freebsd-update to get security updates / 
patches and then recompile my kernel when needed. I also used 
freebsd-update to get to 7.0-RELEASE from 7.0-RC1.  Quite painless.


For desktop machines, especially when I need to get them up and running 
quickly, I use packages. You can either use the stable packages from the 
site (by setting the PACKAGESITE env variable) or use another machine to 
compile your own (have a look at http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/ ). I 
almost never use the CD packages (except maybe for demonstration 
purposes) since they get outdated really quickly.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: living with freebsd

2008-05-04 Thread Wojciech Puchar


do you use only ports or only packages or a mixture?


ports


do you upgrade from version to version using freebsd tools or do it
manually?


mixed, and don't upgrade frequently. it's not windows, if it works - don't 
touch.



do you have a different approach regarding the above depending on
whether it is for a server or a desktop?

no.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]