tcsh script: quote and spaces problems
Hello, I've been trying to include the quote () characters and spaces into a tcsh script variable; for already two days I've been trying various ways doing this to no avail! I'm about to think that it is impossible. For example: #!/bin/tcsh set flag=-f t This obviously doesn't work because of too many quotes involved; but what does work to achieve this? There are two problems here: 1) flag should contain the two internal quotes of t 2) the t contains two spaces. When I use set flag='-f t ' the two spaces are automagically (?) reduced to only one space!! The latter seems to be a general problem: set flag=f wil result in flag containing only f . Any solutions for this problem with quotes and spaces in tcsh script? Or is tcsh not suitable for this kind of things? Thanks, Rob. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can't connect to the network
i'm running FreeBSD 4.8 on one of my machines. i'm having a really frustrating problem. i cannot connec to anything outside of the interface. i've quarduple checked that the NIC is assigned an address with the same subnet as my network. i can ping the ip address on the NIC, but i can't ping any other device on the network. i had firewall options in my rc.conf, but they are all commented out (quadruple checked that too). any ideas on how i can resolve this matter? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buggy optimization levels...
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:34:17PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: OK. Can the existence of such problems be confirmed reliably, say by regression testing? The problem is in identifying precisely which piece of code is failing. A regression test is only useful if it concisely exercises a specific set of tests. As I said, in theory any optimization problems can be tracked down to the failure of a certain piece of code, but in something as large as the kernel it is not usually easy. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Ieomega zip
Hallo BSD people. I'm installing BSD4.8 on a DELLi486(notebook) which doesn't have a CD-ROM. I would really appreciate if you know any solutions to how I can install the BSD extra packages with a ZIP100 parralell port after the floppy install. At ieomega.com I didn't find any drives. Any help will be well appreciated. Thank you Fabio reply [EMAIL PROTECTED] have a cool day Obtenga su E-mail GRATUITO en http://lapoe.zzn.com Para obtener su propio servicio de correo electrónico basado en la Multimalla, diríjase a http://www.zzn.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcsh script: quote and spaces problems
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 21:42, Rob Lahaye wrote: When I use set flag='-f t ' When I echo this out, I get what you are wanting... can you show us how you are using this, to get the weird behavior? Thanks MeM ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcsh script: quote and spaces problems
Rob Lahaye wrote: [ ... ] Any solutions for this problem with quotes and spaces in tcsh script? Or is tcsh not suitable for this kind of things? Ugh, the latter. :-) /bin/sh handles nested quoting right, but crunches the space together: % foo=-f \t \ % echo $foo -f t % foo='-f t ' % echo $foo -f t ...however, you might be able to muck with $IFS and get better results. Also, ZSH seems to do exactly what you expected: 64-sec% foo=-f \t \ 65-sec% echo $foo -f t 67-sec% foo='-f t ' 68-sec% echo $foo -f t -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcsh script: quote and spaces problems
ok ok... I noticed one thing while playing with this...
the script hello.sh
#!/bin/tcsh -f
set JUNK='-f t '
echo ${JUNK}
echo ${JUNK}
The first echo prints it -f t
and the second -f t
Can you use it with the double quotes around it?
later
MeM
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 22:12, Michael E. Mercer wrote:
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 21:42, Rob Lahaye wrote:
When I use
set flag='-f t '
When I echo this out, I get what you are wanting...
can you show us how you are using this, to get the weird behavior?
Thanks
MeM
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing 4.8 from a PCMCIA NIC
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 4.8 on a machine with no CD-ROM, and only a PCMCIA NIC (Microsoft (yep) MN-520, Prism 2, works under Linux using the prism2_cs driver). sysinstall prompts for the PCMCIA bus'es memory segment and usable IRQs, and I give it the values that Linux was using on the same hardware. It probes around and loads the main menu, but no network interface is listed by ifconfig on the holographic shell. Do I need to do anything extra to start the card? Its LEDs light up as though it's being managed by the system, but I don't know what to do next. Is there a part of TFM I should be reading? -- Kirk Strauser pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: tcsh script: quote and spaces problems
In the last episode (Jul 31), Chuck Swiger said:
Rob Lahaye wrote:
[ ... ]
Any solutions for this problem with quotes and spaces in tcsh
script? Or is tcsh not suitable for this kind of things?
Ugh, the latter. :-) /bin/sh handles nested quoting right, but crunches
the space together:
% foo=-f \t \
% echo $foo
-f t
% foo='-f t '
% echo $foo
-f t
Actually it doesn't. You get this result because sh splits variables
on $IFS before passing the result to a command, so what echo gets is
argv[1]=-f \t
argv[2]=\
, and echo always prints its arguments separated by a space. You can
verify that the variable is set correctly by running set | grep -a
foo. To pass the entire string as one argument, run echo $foo.
...however, you might be able to muck with $IFS and get better results.
Also, ZSH seems to do exactly what you expected:
64-sec% foo=-f \t \
65-sec% echo $foo
-f t
This is because zsh passes variables directly to commands, unless the
SH_WORD_SPLIT flag is set. You can force spltting with the ${=foo}
syntax.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buggy optimization levels...
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:34:17PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
OK. Can the existence of such problems be confirmed reliably, say by
regression testing?
The problem is in identifying precisely which piece of code is
failing. A regression test is only useful if it concisely exercises a
specific set of tests. As I said, in theory any optimization problems
can be tracked down to the failure of a certain piece of code, but in
something as large as the kernel it is not usually easy.
Ah, my apologies-- I believe I see where the confusion lies.
I understand that figuring out why the kernel died can be hard, particularly if
the failures aren't concise and completely reproducable, and thus tracing the
problem back to making the right change to gcc to fix the optimization that
caused the observed failure is thus also hard.
Fine. However, you don't _need_ to identify the reason why the kernel died, or
solve the bug in global common expression elimination to solve the problem of
compiling the system with cc -O2 resulting in a buggy kernel. If you
determine that compiling with cc -O -fgcse results in failures, one does:
--- toplev.c_oldThu Jul 31 22:23:22 2003
+++ toplev.cThu Jul 31 22:24:01 2003
@@ -4916,7 +4916,6 @@
{
flag_cse_follow_jumps = 1;
flag_cse_skip_blocks = 1;
- flag_gcse = 1;
flag_expensive_optimizations = 1;
flag_strength_reduce = 1;
flag_rerun_cse_after_loop = 1;
...and makes it so that -O2, -O3, etc does not enable GCSE optimization.
--
-Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buggy optimization levels...
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:30:57PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:34:17PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
OK. Can the existence of such problems be confirmed reliably, say by
regression testing?
The problem is in identifying precisely which piece of code is
failing. A regression test is only useful if it concisely exercises a
specific set of tests. As I said, in theory any optimization problems
can be tracked down to the failure of a certain piece of code, but in
something as large as the kernel it is not usually easy.
Ah, my apologies-- I believe I see where the confusion lies.
I understand that figuring out why the kernel died can be hard,
particularly if the failures aren't concise and completely reproducable,
and thus tracing the problem back to making the right change to gcc to fix
the optimization that caused the observed failure is thus also hard.
Note that it is not necessarily gcc which is at fault for such
failures. It may be a bug in gcc, but it may also be a bug in the code
being compiled that has a bug that only shows up under higher
optimization levels.
The latter is probably somewhat more common actually.
Fine. However, you don't _need_ to identify the reason why the kernel
died, or solve the bug in global common expression elimination to solve the
problem of compiling the system with cc -O2 resulting in a buggy kernel.
If you determine that compiling with cc -O -fgcse results in failures,
one does:
--- toplev.c_oldThu Jul 31 22:23:22 2003
+++ toplev.cThu Jul 31 22:24:01 2003
@@ -4916,7 +4916,6 @@
{
flag_cse_follow_jumps = 1;
flag_cse_skip_blocks = 1;
- flag_gcse = 1;
flag_expensive_optimizations = 1;
flag_strength_reduce = 1;
flag_rerun_cse_after_loop = 1;
...and makes it so that -O2, -O3, etc does not enable GCSE optimization.
But if the bug is not in gcc but in the code being compiled (and which
only happens to show up when compiled with GCSE optimization) such a
patch would disable this optimization for correct code also even though
it is not necessary there.
--
Insert your favourite quote here.
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcsh script: quote and spaces problems
Dan Nelson wrote: Actually it doesn't. You get this result because sh splits variables on $IFS before passing the result to a command, so what echo gets is argv[1]=-f \t argv[2]=\ I come to the conclusion that there's no intuitive solution in a tcsh script for set foo='-f a ' My unix knowledge tells me the following should work: set foo=-f\ \a\ \ \ but tcsh does not allow these escape sequences; the backslashes become real backslashes and an error occurs on too many quotes. Another odd behaviour occurs when I say: set foo=abc which tcsh reduces to a b c, despite the quotes. I'd say very un-unix like behaviours Rob. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video Card
try doing a XFree86 -configure and see if that produces a working conf... then just move it and change it to the desired res and whatever... On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:17:06 +0100 Per Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I was wondering if you can tell me how to get my video card working in freebsd?! I am using FreeBSD 4.8, and my video card is: 128 DDR ATI Radeon 9700. I have tried like hell to get the card work, but without any luck.. The X server won`t start without the card working, and so on.. how do i do? // Per Vad står det om dig på nätet? Kolla nu! - http://www.lycos.se/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tcsh script: quote and spaces problems
In the last episode (Aug 01), Rob Lahaye said:
Another odd behaviour occurs when I say:
set foo=abc
which tcsh reduces to a b c, despite the quotes.
This works for me (-CURRENT).
$ tcsh
dan: {3001} set foo=abc
dan: {3002} set | grep foo
_ set foo=abc
foo abc
dan: {3003} echo $foo
abc
dan: {3004}
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
imake won't install-4.3.0
Using sysinstall, was going to install emacs and kde. Install failed on installing imake. The error I got Was Add of package imake-4.3.0 aborted, error code 1 - Please check the debug screen for more info. , then got Loading of dependent package imake-4.3.0 failed. Where is this debug screen I'm supposed to look at? Tried doing a portinstall imake. This failed as well. This was after I did: 1) cvsup -g -L 2 cvsup.conf, 2) portsdb -Uu, 3) pkgdb -F, 4) portupgrade -ra Don't know how to fix this. Overview: - Installed FreeBSD 5.1 Release. - Modified the install unix partitions to support vinum worked after a lot of help from people on this list. - Did as much restore of the previous image the machine had before it crashed. Should have had vinum back then! - Also, added some RCS version control for the config files under /etc, /usr/local/etc, and /root How's the best way to debug this. What files should I be looking at? Thanks in advance for any tips, Richard ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buggy optimization levels...
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:30:57PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: Fine. However, you don't _need_ to identify the reason why the kernel died, or solve the bug in global common expression elimination to solve the problem of compiling the system with cc -O2 resulting in a buggy kernel. If you determine that compiling with cc -O -fgcse results in failures, one does: This is the trivial part (you don't even need to modify gcc, because all the optimizations turned on by -Ofoo are also available as individual -fblah options). As I've already said, once you have a self-contained test-case that demonstrates that a particular gcc optimization level generates broken code, the gcc people will fix it. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: CVSUP
No, that was fine. I understand what you are saying. I was actually thinking that myself, I was just wondering if anyone had any easier way. It's not a big deal really, I just change the default install dirs on one port. That means that I change all of 4 lines in a Makefile, I was just wondering. Thanks anyway man. Cheers If you have lots of disk space, you can try using CVSup to mirror the CVS repository and let CVS merge your changes: * Omit the `tag' in your cvsupfile. Just don't put one in. * Change the `prefix' to a place where you have a lot of space, such as /usr/local/portcvs. (Do NOT use /usr!) * Cvsup as normal. * You should find a lot of files in /usr/local/portcvs/ports/* with names ending in ,v. These are the CVS files. * Back up your ports tree (mv /usr/ports /usr/ports.old). * cd /usr cvs -d /usr/local/portcvs checkout ports * If all went well, you have a ports tree. Now, always cvsup this way. To update your main ports tree, do `cd /usr/ports cvs -d /usr/local/portcvs update'. This will try and merge your changes. This may have been a bit difficult to understand. I'm sure someone else can explain it better than I :-) -- Josh Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freebsd 5.0 and supporting USB 2.0
Hi to all list I'm a newbie of freebsd (I used linux for a couple of years),I had just assembled my new computer (Gigabyte 7VAXP with athlon XP2500+ ), I installed a 5.0 release and is working fine and I'd like to know if I can set the kernel to support usb 2.0 or I have to install the freebsd 5.1 , I saw that is not so stable but I have this USB esternal modem ISDN (DrayTek Vigor 128) and I don't know how to fix it , the sound card(AC97 Realtek ALC650)as well is not reconized but I think I can fix it . Sorry for my English and thank you in advance for your answers :-) Cristiano __ Partecipa al concorso Tiscali collegati e vinci, il primo premio e' un viaggio per 2 persone a Zanzibar! http://point.tiscali.it/numerounico/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: can't connect to the network
i'm running FreeBSD 4.8 on one of my machines. i'm having a really frustrating problem. i cannot connec to anything outside of the interface. Is it giving any error msg? If it says no route to host, you need to setup a default route, but I doubt this is the issue. i've quarduple checked that the NIC is assigned an address with the same subnet as my network. i can ping the ip address on the NIC, but i can't ping any other device on the network. Again, error msg? If it says host is down, I would check hardware. Is there a link light on hub/switch? If there is no hub/switch, are you using a crossover cable? It is hard to say without more details. i had firewall options in my rc.conf, but they are all commented out (quadruple checked that too). That could be an issue. If you have a default to deny in kernel and you comment out all your firewall lines, it will block everything. If you get an error msg of permission denied, this is generally what is going on. any ideas on how i can resolve this matter? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WU FTPD
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:18:25PM -0400, Lucas Holt wrote: There was a vulnerability released today in wu ftpd and I'm unclear if this would affect the software running on a freebsd system. It appears to cause problems on linux 2.4.x kernels but not older kernels due to the way the compiler works. Does anyone know if this problem is exploitable on freebsd? If not, where should I ask this question? I'd look for a better alternative for a ftp server anyways. WU is potmarked with tons of security flaws. It can be locked prety tight if you know what your doing but there are beter alternatives. Many ppl have substituted proftp in it's place and pureftp is starting to gain popularity -- Jerry M. Howell II ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
information
where i can download free FreeBSD, thanks GERARDO DIAZ PERU ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: information
This is where I got the latest ISO: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/5.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerardo diaz Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: information where i can download free FreeBSD, thanks GERARDO DIAZ PERU ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to access the internet through Windows 2000 proxy Server
Dear Mr. Aaron Siegel, I am sorry for bothering you again...and Thank you for your response... Yes, 192.168.1.5 is our gateway's IP address. I was able to route add default 192.168.1.5 as root. When I netstat -r the default 192.168.1.5 showed up. Just to be sure below is the result of my netstat -r Logistics# route add default 192.168.1.5 add net default: gateway 192.168.1.5 Logistics# netstat -r Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default192.168.1.5UGSc00 aue0 localhost localhost UH 1 35lo0 192.168.1 link#1 UC 10 aue0 192.168.1.500:a0:c9:5a:47:ff UHLW1 857 aue0666 Logistics localhost UGHS00lo0 Internet6: DestinationGatewayFlags Netif Expire localhost localhost UH lo0 fe80::%aue0link#1 UC aue0 fe80::20a:79ff:fe0 00:0a:79:03:5d:1b UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0 fe80::1%lo0Uc lo0 fe80::1%lo0link#3 UHL lo0 ff01:: localhost U lo0 ff02::%aue0link#1 UC aue0 ff02::%lo0 localhost UC lo0 These are the 2 results of my ping test: $ ping www.philstar.com ping: cannot resolve www.philstar.com: Host name lookup failure $ ping 210.171.225.106 PING 210.171.225.106 (210.171.225.106): 56 data bytes ^C --- 210.171.225.106 ping statistics --- 377 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss $ ping www.oisca.org ping: cannot resolve www.oisca.org: Host name lookup failure I have a very strong idea that this problem is caused by the remapping of our Ports...as I have informed you, our FTP Port is set to 10021, HTTP Port is set 10080, and so on...How can I set cvsup-without-gui to use 10021 for my FTP and 10080 for my HTTP? I did created the directory /etc/resolv.conf as root, yesterday I had a little talk with the person in-charge of our Computer Room and asked him about our DNS. He told me that our DNS is dynamically provided by our ISP...So, as in our case with sometimes encoumter problems in our Internet Connection and most of the time we have to REBOOT the machine that runs our Proxy Server...Everytime we reboot or turn that machine off, once we turn in on a new DNS will be used from our ISP, dynamically provided...I was told. He said that the best thing for me to do is use www.oisca.org, as my DNS...IS THIS APPLICABLE...for my etc/resolv.conf? So at present this is what is inside my /etc/resolv.conf nameserver www.oisca.org #nameserver 12.105.171.186 (I added a # to disable it for the moment) #nameserver 204.127.202.68 (I added a # to disable it for the moment) I am really sorry that this has been dragging for a long time now...but, I really need your advice on this one... I have cc this Email to the freeBSD Community that anyone with ideas can also help us... Thank you... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does freebsd support IRDA comm.?
Does FreeBSD support IRDA devices? and how to config? thk! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Really Crazy SMTP Problem
Eric, Not knowing what all you've got configured exactly, here's a couple of possible guesses to weed out the basics. Can you do a reverse DNS lookup on your mail server? In other words, perform a whois on the IP address and get a legit domain name. Many servers require this in order to keep out obvious spammers. You should also triple check and make sure that you have SMTP open to come back to you from the outside world. SMTP requires open ports coming in as well as going out. Check your TCP Wrappers and whether or not IPFW or IPFilters is in the mix. Later on, Eric Harrison wrote: Hi, I've been trying everything I can think of to locate the source of this problem and I finally gave up and need some help. This is the situation: I have a server running FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE. I installed Postfix on the machine like I have done at least 20 other times on different machines and got everything configured like it should be. I noticed quickly that it wasn't delivering mail to any remote mail servers so I checked my mail queue and discovered that most of the servers were either refusing the connection or not responding. This was a little strange so I spent about a day checking the postfix configuration, assuming I had just messed something up. I finally came to the conclusion that everything was configured properly and then had the bright idea to try to manually connect to the external mail servers to see if I could connect. This is where it gets wierd. $telnet smtp.ADDRESSWITHHELD.com 25 Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.x... telnet: connect to address xxx.xxx.xxx.x: Connection refused telnet: Unable to connect to remote host I thought this to be rather odd, but thought the worst had happened and I had somehow gotten a blacklisted IP (possibly used previously by a Spammer or something). So I tried a server I knew to NOT be running any type of blacklist filtering (one of my other servers that I knew the config on) and had the SAME result. Connection refused. The other machines on the network running mail servers seem to not be having any problems like this, and I talked to my host to see if anything was reported, and he claiimed it was a misconfiguration of my mail server. Knowing this not to be the case, I am stumped. If ANYONE has any information or insight, you would be a lifesaver. Thanks, Eric Harrison -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. - Yogi Berra ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help PLEASE! on proper kernel config file to use serial portswith puc driver
Stan, Could you describe your hardware in a bit more detail. I can't imagine why your system would hard lock, unless there is something seriously wrong. Also, I'm curious why puc is detecting your card as sio4 and sio5 (COM5 and COM6 respectively) Most mainboards only have sio0/COM1 and sio1/COM2. What is using sio2 and sio3? BTW - I would start from a generic kernel configuration if you don't remember what you did. Then, make the necessary changes to the copy of GENERIC, and go from there. Then, rebuild the kernel - it probably isn't necessary, but it will at least return your kernel to something closer to the baseline. Regards, Seth Henry On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 13:18, stan wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:34:14AM -0400, J. Seth Henry wrote: All you need in your kernel config is 'device puc'. You already appear to have this in your config, as your system detected the adapter. Him I've made some progress on this ;-( I have created teh devices in /dev. I now have just the puc line in the kernel config, and the ports are getting detected like this: puc0: Dolphin Peripherals 4036 port 0xfce0-0xfcff irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci0 sio4: type 16550A sio5: type 16550A That;s the good nes. The bad news is that when I do cu -l cuaa4, the computer locks up! No response to any keyboard input, no response to a ping etc. I have to power cycle it to get it back :-( Sugestions? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP! Undefined symbol __stdoutp in FreeBSD 4.3...
Hi, On a FreeBSD 4.3 server (I inherited when I took over IT duties at a new client), I am getting Undefined symbol __stdoutp error messages when I try to run utilities (e.g. sudo) that I have pkg_add'ed to the server. Also, attempts to build the latest 'sudo' port fail. Initially, the port building failure involved the fact that /usr/local/bin/sed_inplace did not exist. Trying to build that port failed as well... so I pkg_add'ed sed_inplace... But then the sudo port build kept failing. Here is an example of the error I get when I try to run sudo: sudo date /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol __stdoutp referenced from COPY relocation in sudo I tried searching the mailing lists via http://lists.freebsd.org, but was told the lists are unavailable at this time... I have tried 'google' searches etc. The best I can figure is that something changed somewhere along the way in FreeBSD 4.X causing port builds to fail. I am also guessing that it _may_ have something to do with the 'compat' libraries, but this is just a guess. I see the following C lib related compat libraries in /usr/lib/compat: /usr/lib/compat/libc.so.3 /usr/lib/compat/libc_r.so.3 /usr/lib/compat/libc_r.so.4 Note: I do _not_ have a /usr/lib/compat/libc.so.4 should I? I can generally figure things out on my own... but this has kind of got me turning in circles... Maybe if someone can just point me in the correct direction... or send me a pointer to a FAQ or HowTo article, or a simple list of instructions. After doing some more searching... I'm getting the feeling that I need to re-build my libraries, which would mean installing the source, wouldn't it? If this is correct, I need some instructions or pointers to instructions in the handbook. Update: I have done a 'make' in /usr/src/lib/libc and copied the newly created libc.so.4 to /usr/lib/libc.so.4 and changed the permissions to 444... but I still get the same Undefined symbol __stdoutp error... This smells like there has to be a _simple_ fix for this... Many thanks. -- Steve Camp [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
