SENDER ! Virus found in message from you !
You sent to user perry message with VIRUS . Wiadomosc, ktora wyslales na adres perry zawierala WIRUSA. KAV Report: document_excel.pif infected: I-Worm.NetSky.d Wiadomosc wygenerowana automatycznie ! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL
V I R U S A L E R T Il controllo antivirus ha rilevato il virus: nella mail inviata ai seguenti destinatari: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] La consegna del messaggio e' stata bloccata ! Seguono in coda gli header della mail come riferimento. V I R U S A L E R T Our viruschecker found the virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s): - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator to do so. For your reference, here are the headers from your email: - BEGIN HEADERS - Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fataautomation.it (host138-88.pool8174.interbusiness.it [81.74.88.138]) by mail.fataautomation.it (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with SMTP id i2GGjq30025917 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:45:53 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unknown Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:46:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=03010558 -- END HEADERS -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Alert
The mail message (file: your_details.zip) you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains a virus (WORM_SOBIG.E) . ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freebsd on xbox ?
I found (1) post in the mailing lists where someone asked about fbsd on xbox and it was seemingly laughed off. I'm a huge FBSD fan, and i think the xbox would be an awesome server. It's small, it's got solid hardware, it's really easy to mod and install linux on --- so why not FBSD? Anybody out there worked on this? have a beta or alpha anything? I'd love to have the power of /usr/ports without the baggage of gentoo. Thanks, -matt ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any success in extracting mpeg from a vcd?
use vcdgear -- it's in the ports collection. Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: Hi, Do you have any success extracting mpeg files from a vcd?For sure I can play them with mplayer with vcd option but I haven't had any luck extracting them. I've been trying to figure out how vcdgear(console) or vcdxrip(vcdimager) works but still no luck. Any idea how they work?? I'm using FreeBSD5.3. I have installed them from ports My cdrom drive is at /dev/acd0 Plesee... I'm begging you... pleaaaseee... I've tried various combinations of options with those programs I've mentioned above but I'm just too dumb that I can't figure out how I should be doing it. I know someday I may be able to comprehend with their manual, its just that I don't have enough time. If I don't return those vcd's to the shop, I will be paying a huge fine:(. Why does it always have to be this way? I was a long time windows user and I know its a tough decision to completely eradicate that entire partition dedicating it all to freebsd, just to be able to learn the right way how people should be using a computer. I remember one time, I have been reading the manual of ldconfig over and over again because of some program that doesn't compile not knowing where my libraries are, and I've played with various options trying to restore the hint files I've messed with only to find out that a complete reboot or just ldconfig alone will bring it back. I just can't get it. I've had a hard time trying to make my modem dial up to internet, and nearly freaked out trying to compile a new kernel with atapicam support, or even skipped a meal trying to learn the vi editor, and even messed really bad with one of our production servers at work trying to create a cvsup mirror, and worst, I even got a lot of awful response when I try to ask a simple question about running packet filter at openbsd's mailing list where a lot of them said hey, this is not linux, there's no Linux-Howto's here. RTFM! I just can't understand it. Why do people have to endure such hardships when they have other choices. What does those people from ports collection gets from maintaining such application that they barely even know if someone have ever looked at its package description. What do you get from responding to these questions. Yeah, you can laugh at me now. I'm pathetic that's it. Open Source is free and free software is good. I'm not an advocate but just a simple user trying to extract these f*ck*ng mpegs out of these damn vcds!! Tomorrow I'll be returning those vcd's to the shop with one day fine, but I won't sleep tonight till I get those mpegs written right on the very surface of my hardrive... __ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vinum raid5 problems......
Hi all: I have a FBSD 5.2.1 box running vinum. 7 *160gb drives in a raid5 array. The array has been problematic recently, but never anything too serious. Always recoverable by a rebuild or something of that nature. Two days ago, the box froze up. I brought it back online to see that one subdisk was down. I started it and it regenerated overnight without error. Today, i go to check the box over, a listing of vinum subdisks plexes looks exactly as it should. when I try to mount the raid5 partition, i get a message about being unmounted improperly and an fsck starts. It says it recalculated the superblock, completes, and mounts the raid5 partition. df -h shows the partition size correct, but the used and freespace are completely wrong. If I try to do fsck_ufs /dev/vinum/raid5, i get an errorcannot allocate xx bytes for inphead. If I try to read from the partition, i cause a kernel panic. I can post specific errors and logs and such later, i'm away from the box right now --- anybody have any thoughts ? -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vinum raid5 problems......
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Thursday, 3 March 2005 at 15:35:31 -0600, matt virus wrote: Hi all: I have a FBSD 5.2.1 box running vinum. 7 *160gb drives in a raid5 array. I can post specific errors and logs and such later, i'm away from the box right now --- anybody have any thoughts ? How about http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html? Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. freebsd 5.2.1 specific problems: 1) a post-mount FSCK causes a kernel panic 2) an FSCK from single user mode errors with cannot allocate bytes for inphead 3) in single user mode, the array will mount and do a small fsck - recalculate the superblock, and then allow me to traverse the array. When i try to access files on the array, i get an error : null rqg zero source changes Vinum List: vinum - list 7 drives: D d7 State: up /dev/ad11s1dA: 0/156327 MB (0%) D d6 State: up /dev/ad10s1dA: 0/156327 MB (0%) D d5 State: up /dev/ad8s1d A: 0/156327 MB (0%) D d4 State: up /dev/ad7s1d A: 0/156327 MB (0%) D d3 State: up /dev/ad6s1d A: 0/156327 MB (0%) D d2 State: up /dev/ad5s1d A: 0/156327 MB (0%) D d1 State: up /dev/ad4s1d A: 0/156327 MB (0%) 1 volumes: V raid5State: up Plexes: 1 Size:915 GB 1 plexes: P raid5.p0 R5 State: up Subdisks: 7 Size:915 GB 7 subdisks: S raid5.p0.s0 State: up D: d1 Size:152 GB S raid5.p0.s1 State: up D: d2 Size:152 GB S raid5.p0.s2 State: up D: d3 Size:152 GB S raid5.p0.s3 State: up D: d4 Size:152 GB S raid5.p0.s4 State: up D: d5 Size:152 GB S raid5.p0.s5 State: up D: d6 Size:152 GB S raid5.p0.s6 State: up D: d7 Size:152 GB Vinum log extract: A few days ago, the array was mucked -- i saw one of subdisks was down...here's the log from that incident 2 Mar 2005 21:46:22.721677 *** vinum started *** 2 Mar 2005 21:46:25.871262 list 2 Mar 2005 21:46:28.935388 start 2 Mar 2005 21:46:31.153046 list 2 Mar 2005 21:46:46.616922 start raid5.p0.s6 2 Mar 2005 21:46:49.949753 quit Other than that - there is nothing of particular note in the vinum history - the entire file can be supplied if need be. Kernel dumps will be supplied later today or tomorrow - i'm not going to load up and dump the raid5 array for fear of further corruption. I'm gathering hardware to make an image of it onto a hardware raid5 controller and see if i can salvage it from there. If you need more, say the word. The kernel dumps will come soon -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot alloc XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX bytes for inphead.........fsck error...
When trying to run FSCK on a raid array, i'm presented with the error in the subject I'm fairly certain i know the corrupted directory. It happens to have no files in it, yet it's listed at 404104882946560 bytes in size. rm -rf comes back saying directory not empty After some reading, i found others with the same problem that solved the problem by running fsck. Running fsck prompted the 'cannot alloc 29387498573987123984758392123 bytes for inphead error and i'm unable to fsck the drive. This is running fbsd 5.2.1 Any suggestions ? :-) thanks! -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which mail server is the best for me?
Bob Johnson wrote: I prefer Courier. It is similar to qmail, but it doesn't require all the patching that it takes to make qmail usable. And unlike qmail, it attempts to comply with email standards. http://www.courier-mta.org /usr/ports/mail/courier - Bob It seems this port is broken...anyone have an idea what needs to be fixed to get it to run? -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attachment Received Autoreply
This is an autoreply based on a message received from you. Thank you for your file-sample. We will review your email and either send you a response or forward to the appropriate contact. If you have sent us a file which contains a possible virus please insure that it is compressed in a password protected zip file (password - infected). __ Please note: We sometimes receive a file that is analysed as clean, but find later that the file was infected when it left the sender and was cleaned or corrupted somewhere along the line. This is why it is necessary to password-protect zip files. Our official response time for virus samples is 48 hours (excluding weekends). This time may be extended when samples need to be analysed by a senior researcher. For faster response, try our WebImmune service at this link: http://www.webimmune.net Submitting to WebImmune can also be very helpful if you are having a problem submitting a file in a password-protected ZIP file, especially if gateway AV software is stripping your file-sample. For sample-related issues please contact: UK : [EMAIL PROTECTED] USA: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Europe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany: [EMAIL PROTECTED] France: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do not resubmit your file-sample if you have already sent it to WebImmune or one of the above email addresses. Virus Research requires the following information: * What symptoms cause you to suspect that your machine is infected * Whether any products find a virus (version number, company, results) * Your Virus Scan information (version number and DAT set number) * System details that may be relevant about your system * Your name, company name, phone number and email address if possible * A list of all items contained in the package/message you are composing * An On-Demand scanner report that would show us your Scanner Engine, DAT file and the file reported as infected if this is relevant. If you do not know how to generate a report please contact technical support Virus_Research accepts file-samples for analysis and possible inclusion into AV signature DAT sets. We are also prepared to answer general virus questions. All product-related questions and comments can be addressed through technical support and customer service, including: * Product installation and update questions * Product usage questions * Specific operating system/version questions * Assistance with detection and cleaning or removal of viruses or trojans Contact Information for Technical Support: US: Corporate Customers: Web: http://www.mcafeesecurity.com/us/support Phone: 888-847-8766 Consumer Products: Web: http://www.mcafeehelp.com Phone: 972-963-8000 UK: Corporate Customers: Web: http://www.mcafeesecurity.com/uk/support/ Phone (PrimeSupport Connect): 0870 9110010 Consumer Products: Web: http://www.mcafeehelp.co.uk Phone (Call-back request): 020 7949 0107 Additional contact information for all worldwide offices can be found at the following web-site: http://www.mcafeesecurity.com/us/contact/home.htm Thanks - McAfee AVERT(tm) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ntop 3.0 in daemon mode not working
Installed ntop 3.0 today, edited the ntop.sh shell script and when I run the script ntop launches and I can connect to the webserver interface. The frame cross the top loads, but when I click ANY link to look at the reports, i get a popup window that is blank. Ntop load -- top frame only loads - click link - new blank window pops up. Now -- if i just run /usr/local/bin/ntop (via a ssh session) ntop runs in interactive mode -- perfectly I thought a ha, that shellscript is just messed up so i run ntop with this: /usr/local/bin/ntop -d(as a daemon) and i get the same behavior as the shellscript - blank windows and empty new windows. Revert to /usr/local/bin/ntop (interactive) and it works perfectly again Anybody have suggestions??? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ntop 3.0 in daemon mode not working
it's 4.7, with patches and updates applied as needed Emanuel Strobl wrote: What OS version? 4.10-REL/-stable, 5.3-BETA, 6-current? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vinum disklabel FBSD 5.2.1....
Hi all! I have (8) maxtor 160gb drives I plan on constructing a vinum raid5 array with. the devices are: ad4ad11 All drives have been fdisk'd and such, ad4s1d.ad11s1d The first step of setting up vinum is changing the disklabel disklabel -e /dev/ad4 The disk label says it has 8 partitions, but only the A and C partitions are shown... **MY DISKLABEL # /dev/ad4: 8 partitions: #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 320173040 16unused0 0 c: 3201730560unused0 0 # raw part, don't edit ** Now, i know i have to change *something* to vinum but i'm unsure which one, or if I need to actually add a line or ??? This is my first time playing with vinum, i've read a handful of howtos and all the documentation I find shows the disklabel looking like this: *HOWTO's Disklabel # disklabel da0 [snip] #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 1024000 10240004.2BSD 2048 1638490 b: 10240000 swap c: 179124120unused0 0 e: 15864412 2048000 vinum (source: http://org.netbase.org/vinum-mirrored.html) Any direction is appreciated :-) -matt ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compatible NIC
Yes, it will work. The rl0 driver works fine. Be advised it's not the greatest NIC and you may drop packets under heavy load. I've never experienced packet loss, but I've read about it and others on the list have hinted at it before. Claudiu Bichir wrote: I want to buy a NIC and I want it to be compatible with FreeBSD. Is RealTek 8139 compatible with FreeBsd ? - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vinum disklabel FBSD 5.2.1....
nobody ??? matt virus wrote: Hi all! I have (8) maxtor 160gb drives I plan on constructing a vinum raid5 array with. the devices are: ad4ad11 All drives have been fdisk'd and such, ad4s1d.ad11s1d The first step of setting up vinum is changing the disklabel disklabel -e /dev/ad4 The disk label says it has 8 partitions, but only the A and C partitions are shown... **MY DISKLABEL # /dev/ad4: 8 partitions: #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 320173040 16unused0 0 c: 3201730560unused0 0 # raw part, don't edit ** Now, i know i have to change *something* to vinum but i'm unsure which one, or if I need to actually add a line or ??? This is my first time playing with vinum, i've read a handful of howtos and all the documentation I find shows the disklabel looking like this: *HOWTO's Disklabel # disklabel da0 [snip] #size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 1024000 10240004.2BSD 2048 1638490 b: 10240000 swap c: 179124120unused0 0 e: 15864412 2048000 vinum (source: http://org.netbase.org/vinum-mirrored.html) Any direction is appreciated :-) -matt ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) www.mattvirus.net ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Alert
The mail message (file: email-body) you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains a virus and has been deleted. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Alert
The mail message (file: message.scr) you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains a virus and has been deleted. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vinum 1TB filesystem limit questions
Hi All - with some help from people on this list, i managed to get vinum and raid5 all figured out! I had 4 * 160gb raid5 array running perfectly. When i ventured home this past weekend, i found another ATA controller and figured I'd change my raid5 array to have 8 drives. I cleaned the drives, reformatted and labeled to have a nice clean start, rewrote my config file and I get this: -- 2day# newfs -U -O2 /dev/vinum/raid5 /dev/vinum/raid5: 1094291.2MB (2241108324 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 5955 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. with soft updates newfs: can't read old UFS1 superblock: read error from block device: Invalid argument --- After some reading, found out this is a pesky problem a lot of people are having. Is there a solution for FBSD 5.2.1 running vinum or do I need to upgrade to 5.3 or some other release using geom-vinum? Does anybody know (for sure) if geom-vinum works with 1TB filesystems? WORST case - i'll remove a drive and bump it down to under 1TB, but it seems like a waste. -matt -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vinum 1TB filesystem limit questions
same exact error. Tried without, tried -O 2, no dice! :-) -matt Martin Hepworth wrote: Matt what happens if you drop the -O flag. Newfs will default to ufs2 in the 5.x versions. or even do '-O 2'??? -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 matt virus wrote: Hi All - with some help from people on this list, i managed to get vinum and raid5 all figured out! I had 4 * 160gb raid5 array running perfectly. When i ventured home this past weekend, i found another ATA controller and figured I'd change my raid5 array to have 8 drives. I cleaned the drives, reformatted and labeled to have a nice clean start, rewrote my config file and I get this: -- 2day# newfs -U -O2 /dev/vinum/raid5 /dev/vinum/raid5: 1094291.2MB (2241108324 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 5955 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. with soft updates newfs: can't read old UFS1 superblock: read error from block device: Invalid argument --- . After some reading, found out this is a pesky problem a lot of people are having. Is there a solution for FBSD 5.2.1 running vinum or do I need to upgrade to 5.3 or some other release using geom-vinum? Does anybody know (for sure) if geom-vinum works with 1TB filesystems? WORST case - i'll remove a drive and bump it down to under 1TB, but it seems like a waste. -matt ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean. ** -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATA over 127 GByte on FBSD 4.8 ?
Mark Terribile wrote: ===I recently replaced smaller drives with a 160G and 250G drives (IDE). They were on the Gigabyte motherboard's SiS 963 chipset. I discovered that attempts to access anything above 127G resulted in errors: You need a new ide controller. I have several 200 and 250gb drives functioning in a fbsd 4.5 environment. Your controllers do not support lba48. $20 at the local computer store fixes your problems. -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1
Joe Dunsmore wrote: I installed freebsd 5.1 on my computer when it was not connected to any network (but my ethernet card was attached). Now that my computer has a network connection, I can't access any internet sites, it says it can't find the host. I've installed freebsd 5.1 on this same computer when it was connected to a network and the internet worked right away. I also have linux on this computer and it can connect to the internet fine. So my question is how do I get the internet working on freebsd? Is there a simple command I can run or do I edit some text file? Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i would simply suggest running /stand/sysinstall --then do the configure option --then do the networking option --then pick interfaces option --then pick your network card --it will ask you if you'd like to try dhcp - i'd suggest you do that method. It should pull the proper settings from your router and off to the races you go -matt -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freebsd 5.2.1 Ntop 3.1 error....
cvsup'd my ports and installed ntop. Seems to work GREAT for about 5 minutes and then i get this error in my log: **ERROR** Reading packets on device 0 (xl0): 'read: Inappropriate ioctl for device' anybody else seen this ? -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Ntop 3.1 error....
matt virus wrote: cvsup'd my ports and installed ntop. Seems to work GREAT for about 5 minutes and then i get this error in my log: **ERROR** Reading packets on device 0 (xl0): 'read: Inappropriate ioctl for device' anybody else seen this ? further reading suggests there is a patch to download to patch this problem with 4.x distributions and inquires about the 5.x branch port/package being fixed. Seems as though the port skeleton does not apply the patch. Any plans of updating it? -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hard drive fullness limits information help request
NMH wrote: Hi all I know hard drives tend to not run well when near full. They have trouble performing self adjustments (hardware), self defragging(unix/FFS) etc.. (as I can express it) However, I need to find some documentation or some help in explaining this better. I am working with some people who store loads of files, on many drives and tend to fill the drives to 95% and more and then can't understand why they become unstable. I need to be able to explain it better and I would also like to know more to be able to factually/sanely set a percent full safe limit. Any help would be appreciatted Thanks! NMH. The Large Print Giveth And The Small Print Taketh Away -- Anon i suggest tunefs as well. My server uses many drives, most filled to 95% and higher. I've never had a filesystem-oriented problem. Cheers! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mysql vs /var partition...
Hi All: My mysql database is growing, it has subsequently filled the /var/db partition to capacity. I tried moving the mysql dir and symlinking it to /var/db/mysql which didn't work. I also tried mount_null from the /usr partition to the /var/db/mysql folder...in both instances, the mysql server will not start. Is there another way around this problem or do i need to somehow resize my /var partition? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still problems with ntop?
I see bug reports and broken port notifications. I get an error when compiling from source cannot find -lmyrrd I have rrdtool installed, i even uninstalled it and reverted to the older version and still no dice. *shrug* anybody got anything? -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mysql without linuxthreads on 5.4?
In trying to install mysql40-server on a newly-installed and cvsup'd 5.4 installation, while installing mysql the install process dies during the linuxthreads dependancy install. I read that freebsd post-5.3 has a new threading method and linuxthreads shouldn't even be necessary. In all my attempts to install mysql without linuxthreads i've been unsuccessful. make install WITH_LINUXTHREADS=no, modifying /etc/make.conf, and other things all result in the mysql install process choking on linuxthreads. I ran portupgrade to sync everything to current version (barely anything installed as it was a fresh install yesterday) and i still get the same problem. Any help is appreciated -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Web forum tools -recomendations please
Vizion wrote: Hi I need to install a community forum system running in a apache/freebsd environment. Any software suggestions ideas and or experiences to share? All contributions appreciated david Invisionboard. It's wonderful. Version 2.0 and prior are/were free if you can find a link to aquire it. New versions are commercial. http://www.invisionboard.com/ -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anything like NetSquid for FreeBSD?
Is there anything like this that runs on freebsd? http://netsquid.tamu.edu/faq.html -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: traffic accounting.
Derrick MacPherson wrote: I am going to pop a machine (bridged interfaces) in tween our LAN and our firewall (pix) and am wanting to know what people would recommend for IP accounting, it would be great to have a web based output to show what traffic, from/to what hosts so the boss is happy to look at it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] have a look at ntop, it's in the ports collection -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cpu
kalin mintchev wrote: My guess is SpeedStep. but my laptop is always using ac not battery... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] you might have to go into the bios and disable powersaving completely to get fbsd to play nicely. -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: newfs options for .75TB RAID 5 unit
darren david wrote: hey all- in the somewhat pending case that i may not be able to retrieve my data from RAID 5 unit, I'm wondering what my best option is for blocksize on a .75TB RAID 5 volume. does the 64k RAID stripe size have any impact on these figures? It was previously set to the default( 16384 blocksize, 2048 fragment ) without any noticeable perf issues, but i'm just wondering if, well, size matters? ;) thanks, darren david ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You shouldn't have any problems. Read about tunefs if you wish, it may help you. I have a 6x250gb array (1.25tb RAID5). FBSD 5.2.1 refused to support a filesystem larger than 1.0tb, so i chunked it into 2 partitions to get around that problem and then I mounted them back using mount_nullfs so it appears as though all dirs are on the same partition in a single directory. Not sure if the 1TB filesystem limit problem is unique to me or not, but you will be fine with your .75tb no question. -- Matt Virus (veer-iss) http://www.mattvirus.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disallowed attachment type found in sent message something for you
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: COM files not allowed per Central Online security policy Please contact your I.T support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO central.net.id) (202.75.45.60) by mail.prime.central.net.id with SMTP; 23 Feb 2004 00:24:33 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: something for you Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:27:17 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=50115704 --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus found in sent message warning
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Virus was reported to be: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your virus scanner or contact your I.T support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: warning Date:Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:20:14 +0200 The original message is kept in: georg-tod.com:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---fprot results --- Virus scanning report - 26. February 2004 10:29 F-PROT 3.11b SIGN.DEF created 25. February 2004 SIGN2.DEF created 25. February 2004 MACRO.DEF created 23. February 2004 Search: /var/spool/qmailscan/georg-tod.com107778417440421541 /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/georg-tod.com107778417440421541 Action: Report only Files: Dumb scan of all files Switches: /ARCHIVE /AI /var/spool/qmailscan/georg-tod.com107778417440421541/document.htm.com Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/georg-tod.com107778417440421541-document.zip-document.htm.com Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Results of virus scanning: Files: 3 MBRs: 0 Boot sectors: 0 Objects scanned: 5 Infected: 2 Suspicious: 0 Disinfected: 0 Deleted: 0 Renamed: 0 Time: 0:01 --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus found in sent message information
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The virus was reported to be: the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus !!! Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support personnel as soon as possible as you may have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO ferramentas-sc.com.br) (200.96.73.17) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 11:31:52 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: information Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:25:49 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=68226765 --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disallowed attachment type found in sent message how?
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Disallowed attachment type was found in an e-mail message sent by you.If you still wish to send this file, please rename it first to be .TXT (e.g. rename the file software.exe to be software.txt - right-click on the filename and select Rename). When the recipient has received it, they can then rename it back to .EXE. This policy is in place to protect your computer from executable files in our clients' email. Our e-mail scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message before reaching its destination. No further action is required on your part, unless you need to re-send it (see comments above). The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be EXE: EXE files are frequently found to contain hidden viruses Our Virus Spam Filtering system protects you and your computer from email viruses and spam. The message you sent had the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO umail5.superb.net) (10.10.10.105) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Feb 2004 12:05:56 - Received: (qmail 29831 invoked by uid 503); 28 Feb 2004 12:06:03 - Received: from unknown (HELO wrif.com) (66.73.37.3) by umail5.superb.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 2004 12:06:03 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how? Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 07:06:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0014_4D7D.032C X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Illegal attachment type found in sent message hi
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Illegal attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Illegal attachment type was reported to be: PIF files not allowed per Company security policy Please contact your I.T support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hi Date:Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:53:35 +0200 The original message is kept in: georg-tod.com:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Illegal attachment type 'PIF files not allowed per Company security policy' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/georg-tod.com10783874894047499/talk.pif --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus found in sent message Re: That movie
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. A Virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Virus was reported to be: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your virus scanner or contact your I.T support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date:Wed, 20 Aug 2003 8:33:05 +0200 The original message is kept in: b.scanner.um:/mail/scanner/tft/quarantine where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---ravav results --- RAV AntiVirus command line for Linux i686. Version: 8.3.0. Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. Searching for the engine in '/usr/local/rav8/'... Registered version. Scan engine 8.11 for i386. Last update: Tue Aug 19 09:32:18 2003 Scanning for 81518 malwares (viruses, trojans and worms). Scanning with following configuration: * checking all files! * checking inside archive files! * don't check for mail files! * heuristic scanning is activated! * integrity check is enabled! * don't use report file! /mail/s...b.scanner.um106136118643819931 - OK /mail/s...31/1061361188.19994-0.lnxh-099 - OK /mail/s...6118643819931/your_details.pif Infected: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scan results: Time: 0 second(s). Objects scanned: 3. New objects: 3 Infected: 1. Different virus bodies: 1. Files: 3. Directories: 1. Archives: 0. Packed: 0. Mail files: 0. Warnings: 0. --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus found in sent message Re: Application
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The virus was reported to be: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO WORTHOPE) ([218.244.230.3]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail-001-imc1-0.imcinternet.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 27 Jun 2003 06:21:07 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Application Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:29:46 +0800 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=CSmtpMsgPart123X456_000_0043069E --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus found in sent message Re: Movie
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The virus was reported to be: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO WORTHOPE) ([218.244.230.3]) (envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail-001-imc1-0.imcinternet.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 27 Jun 2003 06:21:18 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Movie Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:29:56 +0800 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=CSmtpMsgPart123X456_000_00432FF7 --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Virus has been detected in your Email
The following Message you sent contained a Virus and will NOT be delivered To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:18 +0200 Details of the Virus detected are as follows Scenarios/Incoming/Incoming: Sophos AV Interface for Mimesweeper: Threat: 'W32/MyDoom-O' detected by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Incoming: Blocked File Extensions: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'cgey.com'. Scenarios/Incoming/Incoming: Block Executables: 'ItemLength.GE.0'. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warning: Possible E-mail viruses detected
The UCL E-Mail Virus Protection System has been triggered by a message you sent:- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Returned mail: Data format error Date: Mon Jul 26 20:05:31 2004 One or more of the attachments (mail.scr) are on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and will not have been delivered. Consider renaming the files or putting them into a zip file to avoid this constraint. -- UCL E-mail Virus Protection System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internal phone: 37779 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus found in sent message Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The virus was reported to be: Worm.SomeFool.P Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO bitmesra.ac.in) (202.162.48.18) by mail.bitmesra.ac.in with SMTP; 2 Jul 2005 02:34:30 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 07:54:24 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type=multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c150A.pilship.com Virus removed from message
The following viruses were repaired or dropped from the message (MID 10274031) 'W32/MyDoom-O' And, Attachments dropped during repair. Actions taken: Message delivered Original Envelope Sender: From freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu May 19 15:39:13 2011 Message Headers: From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: chris@sha.pilship.com Subject: Error Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:36:08 +0700 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0002_CCEB72FA.241A7AAE X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
problem found in sent message Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A problem was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The problem was reported to be: Disallowed file (message.scr) assosiated with unrelated MIME type (audio/x-wav) - potential virus Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO aroma.ru) (87.241.236.225) by astaroth.aroma.ru with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 07:26:10 +0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:29:29 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type=multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- The original message is kept in: astaroth:/usr/local/qmailscan/quarantine/new/astaroth118066837051248880 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- problem 'Disallowed file (message.scr) assosiated with unrelated MIME type (audio/x-wav) - potential virus' found in attachment message.scr --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem found in sent message Re: Your document
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A problem was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The problem was reported to be: Disallowed double-barrelled attachment filename (document.txt .exe) - potential virus Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO aroma.ru) (87.241.236.225) by astaroth.aroma.ru with SMTP; 9 Jun 2007 07:20:01 +0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Your document Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 10:23:27 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- The original message is kept in: astaroth:/usr/local/qmailscan/quarantine/new/astaroth11813592015123565 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- problem 'Disallowed double-barrelled attachment filename (document.txt .exe) - potential virus' found in file /usr/local/qmailscan/tmp/astaroth11813592015123565/document.txt .exe --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem found in sent message Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A problem was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The problem was reported to be: Disallowed file (message.scr) assosiated with unrelated MIME type (audio/x-wav) - potential virus Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO cncsis.ro) (141.85.254.10) by mail.uefiscsu.ro with SMTP; 19 Oct 2006 10:58:16 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:54:09 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type=multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- The original message is kept in: mail.uefiscsu.ro:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/mail.uefiscsu.ro116125549647916424 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- problem 'Disallowed file (message.scr) assosiated with unrelated MIME type (audio/x-wav) - potential virus' found in attachment message.scr --- -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disallowed attachment type found in sent message Re: details
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: EXE files not allowed per Company security policy Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 250-66-109-203.static.iqara.net (HELO tassgroup.com) (203.109.66.250) by tassgroup.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2007 09:02:25 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: details Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:18:57 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- The original message is kept in: mail.bootham.com:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/mail.bootham.com1168246945469948 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type 'EXE files not allowed per Company security policy' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mail.bootham.com1168246945469948/details.exe ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type 'EXE files not allowed per Company security policy' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mail.bootham.com1168246945469948/details.exe --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
policy-violation found in sent message
Attention: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org A policy-violation was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The policy-violation was reported to be: SCR files not allowed per Company security policy Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org RCPT TO: gifav...@unsl.edu.ar ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org RCPTTO: gifav...@unsl.edu.ar IP-Addr: 113.22.65.102 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (113.22.65.102) by inter11.unsl.edu.ar with SMTP; 8 Sep 2009 04:21:44 -0400 From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: gifav...@unsl.edu.ar Subject: Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:21:37 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0011_C7647978.0EBC1B21 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Illegal attachment type found in sent message stolen
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Illegal attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Illegal attachment type was reported to be: Não e permitido o envio de ficheiros PIF Please contact your I.T support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: stolen Date:Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:23:55 +0100 The original message is kept in: mail.fam.ulusiada.pt:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine where the Mail System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Illegal attachment type 'Não e permitido o envio de ficheiros PIF ' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109093078440416115/note.pif --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus found in sent message hello
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Virus was reported to be: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your virus scanner or contact your I.T support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date:Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:36:11 +0100 The original message is kept in: mail.fam.ulusiada.pt:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine where the Mail System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---fprot results --- Virus scanning report - 3. August 2004 15:32 F-PROT 3.11b SIGN.DEF created 31. July 2004 SIGN2.DEF created 31. July 2004 MACRO.DEF created 2. August 2004 Search: /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109154352140421398 /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109154352140421398 Action: Report only Files: Dumb scan of all files Switches: /ARCHIVE /AI /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109154352140421398/talk.htm.exe Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109154352140421398-talk.zip-talk.htm.exe Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Results of virus scanning: Files: 3 MBRs: 0 Boot sectors: 0 Objects scanned: 5 Infected: 2 Suspicious: 0 Disinfected: 0 Deleted: 0 Renamed: 0 Time: 0:00 --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus found in sent message hello
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Virus was reported to be: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your virus scanner or contact your I.T support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hello Date:Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:43:42 +0100 The original message is kept in: mail.fam.ulusiada.pt:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine where the Mail System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---fprot results --- Virus scanning report - 4. August 2004 10:39 F-PROT 3.11b SIGN.DEF created 31. July 2004 SIGN2.DEF created 31. July 2004 MACRO.DEF created 2. August 2004 Search: /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109161237240421021 /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109161237240421021 Action: Report only Files: Dumb scan of all files Switches: /ARCHIVE /AI /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109161237240421021/mails.htm.exe Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109161237240421021-mails.zip-mails.htm.exe Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Results of virus scanning: Files: 3 MBRs: 0 Boot sectors: 0 Objects scanned: 5 Infected: 2 Suspicious: 0 Disinfected: 0 Deleted: 0 Renamed: 0 Time: 0:00 --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus found in sent message something for you
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Virus was reported to be: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please update your virus scanner or contact your I.T support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and with the following headers: From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: something for you Date:Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:48:54 +0100 The original message is kept in: mail.fam.ulusiada.pt:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine where the Mail System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---fprot results --- Virus scanning report - 17. August 2004 9:44 F-PROT 3.11b SIGN.DEF created 17. August 2004 SIGN2.DEF created 17. August 2004 MACRO.DEF created 16. August 2004 Search: /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109273228040425817 /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109273228040425817 Action: Report only Files: Dumb scan of all files Switches: /ARCHIVE /AI /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109273228040425817/note.com Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109273228040425817-note.com Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Results of virus scanning: Files: 3 MBRs: 0 Boot sectors: 0 Objects scanned: 4 Infected: 2 Suspicious: 0 Disinfected: 0 Deleted: 0 Renamed: 0 Time: 0:00 --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
