Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Resurrecting this bit of discussion from June, as I get caught up on list matters. :-) > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Mercury Thirteen wrote: > >> I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source >> compliant. >> >> What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with >> software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses >> exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available >> should be excluded (e.g. Pegasus) but if the source code is freely >> available and/or public, yet not explicitly released under the GPL, does >> this also suffice for inclusion? On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Steve Nickolaswrote: > Personally - this is just my opinion - I would use this guideline: a > program is open source if the source is freely available to use, modify > and redistribute (in any combination, commercially or noncommercially). > Or, in other words, the same idea as > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html . > > That's just my opinion though. FreeDOS has always used the slightly more liberal view of "open source software" v "free software." Certainly my view is that FreeDOS needs to include source code, otherwise why are we creating a "Free" DOS? But the license doesn't need to be from the Free Software Foundation (GNU GPL). FreeDOS programs that are GNU GPL, or BSD, or MIT, etc. are all fine. In the past, we had included some programs that didn't include source code, but allowed users to install it and use it and share it. This was great at the time, and we went there. That's why we added a few programs like Pegasys Mail. But as time goes on, we've been stung by one or two instances where not having the source code caused a problem. So now, my goal is the FreeDOS 1.2 distribution should *only* include programs that provide source code (GPL, BSD, MIT, etc.) If the program is "freeware" (binary only, no source code) I don't think it should be in the FreeDOS distribution. That's the official FreeDOS 1.2 distribution, of course. I've always supported people who want to create their own "spin" of the FreeDOS distribution, and include their own software. That's still cool. FreeDOS is free, and you should be free to share and remix per the license. So if someone else wants to create an "unofficial" FreeDOS distribution that includes some "no source code" freeware, go for it. Jim -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I too would like to be able to install FreeDOS from a USB stick or from iso image that could be booted from Syslinux, Grub4DOS or GRUB2. I would likely install FreeDOS to USB stick. I don't know yet how FreeDOS 1.2 will boot; Syslinux has the advantage of being usable to boot other images/partitions as well as FreeDOS, or even a newer, future FreeDOS kernel. I assume only a very small minority of FreeDOS users will use FreeDOS exclusively. Is WATT-32 not included in the upcoming FreeDOS 1.2? Or is some part of WATT-32 (watt-32.net) not open-source? Tom -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Thomas Mueller mueler6...@twc.com wrote: ... Is WATT-32 not included in the upcoming FreeDOS 1.2? Or is some part of WATT-32 (watt-32.net) not open-source? ... Wow, I forgot all about WATT-32. Actually, since it was the official FreeDOS.org software list that I was working off of, I guess FD.org forgot about it too lol I'll work on adding that. Thanks! -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote: ... * CuteMouse needs fixing to avoid closed-source COM2EXE (already done locally, but no response from maintainer) * Jemm386 needs to remove JLOAD and similar closed-source pieces (no maintainer) * UIDE and XMGR from 2011? eh?? if we're going to include this at all, at least use 03-05-2015 (no maintainer) * remove Pacific C, it's closed source (I had thought Jim already agreed to that) (no maintainer) * Mined has a newer version (2015.25) * FDShell? it's not in the Software List at all, but meh whatever * Lynx 2.8.8?? [sic] if you're really including that, make sure to include (mandatory) dependencies mentioned in Juan Manuel Guerrero's comp.os.msdos.djgpp announcement (e.g. two DXEs, maybe other stuff) * CompInfo? seriously, why do we still include that at all? does it even work?? * Ranish? I forget the details, is this open source?? or was that just the older version?? * remove TTF2FNT, it's a Win32 GUI app!! ... This is great, just the type of feedback I need. Thanks! -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Since it's not directly executable and the rest of the platform is 16-bit, I suppose there's no need for it to be included as well. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Hi again, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 24, 2015 1:27 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I had found that but I was looking specifically for code to version 2.09c. I suppose this may do, though, thank you. It's the exact same source code, only a recompile was done (AFAIK). A quick check shows these already existing on iBiblio: ./distributions/1.1/repos/util/srdisk.zip ./distributions/1.0/pkgs/srdisks.zip ./distributions/1.0/pkgs/srdiskx.zip But I think I'll mirror the ones from SF.net explicitly, esp. since it's already included under UTIL. http://sourceforge.net/projects/srdisk/ http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/ramdisk/srdisk/ I really do think I read recently that it's the exact same source code. But the only way to find out for sure is to either recompile yourself or email the author directly. (But it's highly unlikely that he's still around after so many years.) -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Hi, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: Attached is the list of everything in the new distro. [list.txt , 4 kb] Just a quick look (at your list only, not the actual .ZIP) with a few quick comments: * CuteMouse needs fixing to avoid closed-source COM2EXE (already done locally, but no response from maintainer) * Jemm386 needs to remove JLOAD and similar closed-source pieces (no maintainer) * UIDE and XMGR from 2011? eh?? if we're going to include this at all, at least use 03-05-2015 (no maintainer) * remove Pacific C, it's closed source (I had thought Jim already agreed to that) (no maintainer) * Mined has a newer version (2015.25) * FDShell? it's not in the Software List at all, but meh whatever * Lynx 2.8.8?? [sic] if you're really including that, make sure to include (mandatory) dependencies mentioned in Juan Manuel Guerrero's comp.os.msdos.djgpp announcement (e.g. two DXEs, maybe other stuff) * CompInfo? seriously, why do we still include that at all? does it even work?? * Ranish? I forget the details, is this open source?? or was that just the older version?? * remove TTF2FNT, it's a Win32 GUI app!! Honestly, most stuff has no maintainer anymore, so I'm not sure why I mention that. So we have to do everything ourselves, which (as I already mentioned) means either partially deleting problematic pieces or dropping them entirely. There are other minor quibbles, but that's probably worrying excessively for little gain. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Okay, that's the way I will proceed. Also, I am removing Necromancer's DOS Navigator due to being closed-source. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Hi, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. Any thoughts/comments? 1). http://www.freedos.org/software/?prog=srdisk 2). http://sourceforge.net/projects/srdisk/files/srdisk/ Apparently the sources are under 2.09/: srsrc209.zip . Thus 2.09c is just a binary recompile (or such). Also, I am removing Necromancer's DOS Navigator due to being closed-source. There are other Dos Navigator clones that are open source (DN/2, DNOSP), even including the original (DN151). But it's probably not crucially important to include anyways. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Yes, I had found that but I was looking specifically for code to version 2.09c. I suppose this may do, though, thank you. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. Any thoughts/comments? 1). http://www.freedos.org/software/?prog=srdisk 2). http://sourceforge.net/projects/srdisk/files/srdisk/ Apparently the sources are under 2.09/: srsrc209.zip . Thus 2.09c is just a binary recompile (or such). Also, I am removing Necromancer's DOS Navigator due to being closed-source. There are other Dos Navigator clones that are open source (DN/2, DNOSP), even including the original (DN151). But it's probably not crucially important to include anyways. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. Any thoughts/comments? On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, that's the way I will proceed. Also, I am removing Necromancer's DOS Navigator due to being closed-source. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On 6/24/2015 11:07 AM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. GPL licensed software is always copyrighted by default. In fact, non-copyrighted software can not be licensed with any GPL version... Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Ah, ok. Maybe I was expecting to see copyleft lol On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/2015 11:07 AM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. GPL licensed software is always copyrighted by default. In fact, non-copyrighted software can not be licensed with any GPL version... Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Should we make FreeDOS able to install from a usb?It seems hardwired to install from the CD.Perhaps this should be an added update to the 1.2 CD. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/2015 11:07 AM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. GPL licensed software is always copyrighted by default. In fact, non-copyrighted software can not be licensed with any GPL version... Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
That would be up to Jim to include in his installer. Sounds like a good feature to have if possible. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org wrote: Should we make FreeDOS able to install from a usb?It seems hardwired to install from the CD.Perhaps this should be an added update to the 1.2 CD. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/2015 11:07 AM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. GPL licensed software is always copyrighted by default. In fact, non-copyrighted software can not be licensed with any GPL version... Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Yeah.It does. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: That would be up to Jim to include in his installer. Sounds like a good feature to have if possible. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org wrote: Should we make FreeDOS able to install from a usb?It seems hardwired to install from the CD.Perhaps this should be an added update to the 1.2 CD. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/24/2015 11:07 AM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: Also, also (lol) I am not finding any source for SRDisk. FreeDOS.org lists it as GPL, its own documentation lists it as copyrighted. Perhaps the initial version was GPL and it later forked over to an author-copyrighted license? Not sure, but I'm inclined to remove it altogether. GPL licensed software is always copyrighted by default. In fact, non-copyrighted software can not be licensed with any GPL version... Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Attached is the list of everything in the new distro. Package NameVersion [Base] Append 5.0-0.6 Apropos (Part of FastHelp suite)1.1 Assign 1.4 Attrib 2.1 Chkdsk 0.9.2 Choice 4.4 Command 0.84 pre 2 Comp1.04 Cpidos 3.0 Cutemouse 2.1 beta4 Debug 1.25 Defrag 1.3.2 Deltree 1.02g.mrlg Devload 3.25 Diskcomp 06jun2003 Diskcopybeta 0.95 Display 0.13 Dosfsck 2.11c Edit0.9a Edlin 2.15 Exe2bin 1.5 Fasthelp (Part of FastHelp suite) 3.5 Fasthelp Suite 2004 Fc 3.03 Fdapm 2009sep11 Fdisk 1.3.1 Fdxms286 0.03.Temperaments Find3.0 (22 Sep 2007) Format 0.91v (14 Jan 2006) Graphics 2008jul14 Help1.0.7a Himemx 3.32 Jemm386 5.75 KC 2.0 Kernel 2041 (FAT12/FAT16/FAT32, 8086+) Keyb2.01 KPDOS 3.1 Label 1.4b Lbacache 2008-04-07 Mem 1.11 Mirror 0.2 Mode 12may2005 More4.3 Move3.3a Nansi 4.0d (2007may26) Nlsfunc 0.4 Print 1.02ea Recover 0.1 (BETA) Replace 1.2 Share 0.99 Shsucdx 3.05 Sort1.4 (23 Sep 2007) Swsubst 3.2 Tree3.7.2 Uide 2011-10-16 Undelete 2004-01-19 Unformat0.8 WhatIs (Part of FastHelp suite) 1.1 Xcopy 1.4 Xmgr 2011-06-11 [Boot] Blackout 1997-03-04 Bootmgr
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Hi, On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source compliant. What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available should be excluded (e.g. Pegasus) but if the source code is freely available and/or public, yet not explicitly released under the GPL, does this also suffice for inclusion? Mercury, I'm sure we all appreciate your work here. It's very tedious and difficult, so any efforts from you are very welcome. However, I've not even downloaded your archive myself. Too exhausting, especially trying to vet thousands of files and licenses. Long story short: I'm pretty sure Jim Hall (as official project head) only wants free/libre, aka four freedoms. Which here, at least, means only stuff that is 100% approved by FSF or OSI, if at all possible. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html http://opensource.org/licenses/category Honestly, it's almost a lost battle. Without many active maintainers of various programs, there's not much else we can do. So we can't relicense anything. We can only rewrite key pieces (unlikely) or remove them entirely (painful). This is why it's probably best to keep to a minimum, at first, and expand upon it later, instead of including everything and the kitchen sink. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source compliant. What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available should be excluded (e.g. Pegasus) but if the source code is freely available and/or public, yet not explicitly released under the GPL, does this also suffice for inclusion? On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:38 PM, sparky4 spar...@cock.li wrote: Hmm I am sorry for late reply!! I will check it out~ -- View this message in context: http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FreeDOS-1-2-package-compilation-tp22618p22903.html Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Mercury Thirteen wrote: I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source compliant. What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available should be excluded (e.g. Pegasus) but if the source code is freely available and/or public, yet not explicitly released under the GPL, does this also suffice for inclusion? Personally - this is just my opinion - I would use this guideline: a program is open source if the source is freely available to use, modify and redistribute (in any combination, commercially or noncommercially). Or, in other words, the same idea as https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html . That's just my opinion though. -uso. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I would tend to agree; GPL / public domain / source-code-free-and-available-at-no-cost options are all viable in my mind, but I want to 1) make sure I perform this task to the standards of the project's leader and the community to which I have volunteered and 2) avoid a potential user out there thinking something like, Well, I *would* choose FreeDOS, but not all its components are GPL code. My problem is FreeDOS may end up being used in any number of capacities (commercial, private, industrial, etc.) and this isn't my project so I'm not sure how strict we want to be - e.g. I would hate to see our markets or user base narrowed over one single choice. Jim, what is your input on this? On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Steve Nickolas usots...@buric.co wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Mercury Thirteen wrote: I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source compliant. What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available should be excluded (e.g. Pegasus) but if the source code is freely available and/or public, yet not explicitly released under the GPL, does this also suffice for inclusion? Personally - this is just my opinion - I would use this guideline: a program is open source if the source is freely available to use, modify and redistribute (in any combination, commercially or noncommercially). Or, in other words, the same idea as https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html . That's just my opinion though. -uso. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Mercury Thirteen wrote: I guess I didn't scroll up enough to read your reply! Sorry about that, and thanks for the input. :) So, you're saying we should only use 100% GPL software, yes? I can easily go through and pull the affected packages; I really don't think there are that many remaining, so going with GPL-only programs doesn't put us in too big of a hurt. BSD, X11, etc. are fine too, no? As well as other licenses so long as they are in fact open source licenses, and not just source licenses. -uso. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Yes, they should be. I think they are all mostly the same as the GPL, but I'm not certain. For the time being, I'll just remove the closed source packages and leave all the public domain and source-freely-available programs. If there's an issue, I can always pull more stuff out later on. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Steve Nickolas usots...@buric.co wrote: On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Mercury Thirteen wrote: I guess I didn't scroll up enough to read your reply! Sorry about that, and thanks for the input. :) So, you're saying we should only use 100% GPL software, yes? I can easily go through and pull the affected packages; I really don't think there are that many remaining, so going with GPL-only programs doesn't put us in too big of a hurt. BSD, X11, etc. are fine too, no? As well as other licenses so long as they are in fact open source licenses, and not just source licenses. -uso. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I guess I didn't scroll up enough to read your reply! Sorry about that, and thanks for the input. :) So, you're saying we should only use 100% GPL software, yes? I can easily go through and pull the affected packages; I really don't think there are that many remaining, so going with GPL-only programs doesn't put us in too big of a hurt. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still reviewing the packages to ensure they're all open source compliant. What are we considering acceptable in this regard? Are we going only with software which has been made available under one of the GNU licenses exclusively? Obviously programs which are free but have no source available should be excluded (e.g. Pegasus) but if the source code is freely available and/or public, yet not explicitly released under the GPL, does this also suffice for inclusion? Mercury, I'm sure we all appreciate your work here. It's very tedious and difficult, so any efforts from you are very welcome. However, I've not even downloaded your archive myself. Too exhausting, especially trying to vet thousands of files and licenses. Long story short: I'm pretty sure Jim Hall (as official project head) only wants free/libre, aka four freedoms. Which here, at least, means only stuff that is 100% approved by FSF or OSI, if at all possible. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html http://opensource.org/licenses/category Honestly, it's almost a lost battle. Without many active maintainers of various programs, there's not much else we can do. So we can't relicense anything. We can only rewrite key pieces (unlikely) or remove them entirely (painful). This is why it's probably best to keep to a minimum, at first, and expand upon it later, instead of including everything and the kitchen sink. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
from Mercury Thirteen: Yes, they should be. I think they are all mostly the same as the GPL, but I'm not certain. For the time being, I'll just remove the closed source packages and leave all the public domain and source-freely-available programs. If there's an issue, I can always pull more stuff out later on. That makes the most sense. Software that is genuinely open-source should be eligible even if licensing is not GPL. There is difference of opinion in the open-source community on various open-source licenses, and arguments both for and against GPL. FreeBSD is one example of a non-GPL open-source OS (BSD license) but is just as legitimately open-source as FreeDOS. Tom -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Hmm I am sorry for late reply!! I will check it out~ -- View this message in context: http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FreeDOS-1-2-package-compilation-tp22618p22903.html Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I personally think it is great! -- View this message in context: http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/FreeDOS-1-2-package-compilation-tp22618p22904.html Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical virtual servers, alerts via email sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
The installer.We should add a more...'friendly' interface to it.Mostof the installer is a bunch of keypresses and text on the screen after you select the packages to install.(I myself often forget which keys to press). On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: I'm removing the Pegasus mail app due to it being closed source. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Perhaps it should take a cue from the MSDOS installer - prepare the drive and copy over there core OS. Then at the end of the core install, prompt for the additional stuff On Sun, Jun 21, 2015, 12:47 PM JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org wrote: The installer.We should add a more...'friendly' interface to it.Mostof the installer is a bunch of keypresses and text on the screen after you select the packages to install.(I myself often forget which keys to press). On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: I'm removing the Pegasus mail app due to it being closed source. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
That list doesn't contain version information; doing so will require more time. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote: On 18/06/2015 15:02, Mercury Thirteen wrote: No, it's not all that different, just fleshed out and more complete. What do you mean by 'fleshed out'? And more complete how? Fleshed out and more complete in that I went through every package by hand and updated all the old ones to the newest versions if available and updated / corrected the LSM files. Could you please provide some list of packages+version from your distro, so I could compare with what's in FDNPKG? If there are new packages you created for FreeDOS, I'd be happy to import them into FDNPKG. See the attached list. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I'm already on it, that was just my quick in-the-middle-of-work way of saying I'll have to post that later on. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote: Hi Mercury, That list doesn't contain version information; doing so will require more time. Please invest that time: Having version information will make it easier to know if you have the newest version for both installing packages and for updating the collection. Regards, Eric Fleshed out and more complete in that I went through every package by hand and updated all the old ones to the newest versions if available and updated / corrected the LSM files. Could you please provide some list of packages+version from your distro, so I could compare with what's in FDNPKG? If there are new packages you created for FreeDOS, I'd be happy to import them into FDNPKG. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote: On 18/06/2015 15:02, Mercury Thirteen wrote: No, it's not all that different, just fleshed out and more complete. What do you mean by 'fleshed out'? And more complete how? Fleshed out and more complete in that I went through every package by hand and updated all the old ones to the newest versions if available and updated / corrected the LSM files. Could you please provide some list of packages+version from your distro, so I could compare with what's in FDNPKG? If there are new packages you created for FreeDOS, I'd be happy to import them into FDNPKG. See the attached list. [Base] Append Assign Attrib Chkdsk Choice Command Comp Cpidos Cutemouse Debug Defrag Deltree Devload Diskcomp Diskcopy Display Dosfsck Edit Edlin Exe2bin Fasthelp Fc Fdapm Fdisk Fdxms286 Find Format Graphics Help Himemx Jemm386 Kernel Keyb Label Lbacache Mem Mirror Mode Move Nansi Nlsfunc Print Recover Replace Share Shsucdx Sort Swsubst Tree Uide Undelete Unformat Xcopy Xmgr [Boot] Blackout Bootmgr Bootsplash Grub4dos MetaKern SmBtMgr Syslinux XOSL [Dev] 4th BASEC Bin2C BWBASIC CC386 CLib DFlat DMake FAsm FreeBASIC FreePascal Frm-Init Insight JWAsm Kitten Lib NAsm OpenWatcom Pacific-C PDCurses Rexx S-Lang SmallBASIC Suppl UPX-UCL Val WAsm XHarbour YAsm [Edit] Blocek FED Freemacs Mined OSPEdit SETEdit TDE VIM [GUI] FDShell OpenGEM [Net] Arachne Code eRTOS FDSMTPOP FreeXP Gopherus LeetIRC LSPPP Lynx MIME64 MTCP OpenXP Pegasus SSH2DOS Terminal WattTCP [Sound] ABCMIDI DRTrack ID3Tools LAME MIDIPlay MPXPlay Normalize OpenCubic RealMIDI SBMix [Util] 4DOS 7-Zip Arj BZip2 C-Lock CabExtract Cal CDRCache CMOS CompInfo DirStack Dog DOS32A DOSLFN DOSZip DU FDAV FDNPkg FDShield Fips FoxCalc FoxType GZip Head LFNDOS LoadFont LoadHi Locate MD5Sum MKeyb MoreSys NDN NRO Password PCISleep PDTree PG PowerPaint Ranish RARead ROMDisk ROMOS RunTime SetLock ShExt SHSUFDRV Sleep Spool SRDisk Stamp Start SwitChar Tail TAr TDsk Tee TopSpin Touch TrCh TTF2FNT UnRAR UnZIP Uptime USBDOS VMSMount WCD Which XGREP XKeyb ZIP-- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Hi Mercury, That list doesn't contain version information; doing so will require more time. Please invest that time: Having version information will make it easier to know if you have the newest version for both installing packages and for updating the collection. Regards, Eric Fleshed out and more complete in that I went through every package by hand and updated all the old ones to the newest versions if available and updated / corrected the LSM files. Could you please provide some list of packages+version from your distro, so I could compare with what's in FDNPKG? If there are new packages you created for FreeDOS, I'd be happy to import them into FDNPKG. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On 18/06/2015 15:02, Mercury Thirteen wrote: No, it's not all that different, just fleshed out and more complete. What do you mean by 'fleshed out'? And more complete how? Could you please provide some list of packages+version from your distro, so I could compare with what's in FDNPKG? If there are new packages you created for FreeDOS, I'd be happy to import them into FDNPKG. Mateusz -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I'm removing the Pegasus mail app due to it being closed source. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote: Input? Well, do you really think that people download 281MB ZIP file, one that also alerts most anti-virus software due to some of it's contents, without knowing what this is about? How's that for input? Ralf That input is about par for the course here. Perhaps I was amiss in my assumption that the subject line would explain exactly what this is about, especially when posted by the person who - according to FreeDOS.org - has volunteered to put together the new FreeDOS 1.2 distribution. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Louis Santillan lpsan...@gmail.com wrote: * I don't know if the permissions were set by you or the original zip files, but they're messed up in several place, at least with respect to *nix. Some are set to 555. Not sure why execute bit is even set anywhere at all. I'm not quite sure there. I made this under Windows, so I would guess it was the original ZIP files which had those bits set? I can fix that if it's an issue * It's large (1.1GB decompressed). Yeah, I hear you there lol But I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing. The compressed ZIP is under a few hundred megs and the installer should be able to extract only the parts required without ever having to unzip the entire package. * Lots of files/folders are not in 8.3 compliant or could have a different file name depending on the DOS version used to view the CD I was operating under the impression that the installer would be LFN compliant. If that's not the case, I can fix the offending file names with no problem. * Is it really necessary to have both the *x.zip (binaries) and *s.zip (source) extracted in this tree? I extracted everything to achieve better compression. The installer should only be extracting what it needs from this package, and could even theoretically extract then ZIP the sources, if the user desired. * I would argue just a list of the packages (in CSV format), and their attributes (LSM attribute, plus other review criteria, has LICENSE, has SOURCE, etc.) would have sufficed over producing a large zip file. Possibly, but I opted to make everything available for you all here to help catch potential errors I may have made. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Antony Gordon cuzint...@gmail.com wrote: That was a HUGE zip file (once uncompressed). No kidding! I was honestly surprised there was that much DOS material to choose from. I’m just glad I use a sandbox for stuff like this, that zip file was like a box of chocolates… Yeah, I had two false positives (or what I optimistically assume are such) myself. I presume this is due to the low level nature of the programs in question. For example, one was Touch.exe which intentionally alters the date and time stamps of files. This also just happens to be a technique used by viruses. That being said…that much stuff comes on the FreeDOS full CD image? Not necessarily. I worked off the official software list as posted on FreeDOS.org. Many packages were a part of the original 1.1 release, but lots have been added after that point as well. The *Dev* category is easily the largest, comprising about two thirds (over 600 MB) of the image's overall size. It kind of reminds me of the old Linux distributions that would ship a distribution on one CD and then a separate CD that was a snapshot of the Linux parts of various FTP sites. I guess when you have almost 700MB to fill, you gotta do something. I guess so lol On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Antony Gordon cuzint...@gmail.com wrote: What I think would be useful would be an Xcode/Visual Studio type of environment that includes all of the recommended build tools setup with a batch file to set paths to have the tools work from any location on the hard drive. This can be used to rebuild the OS or to develop new applications for the OS. That sounds useful. If someone wants to make such an animal, I'd be glad to throw it in. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On 6/2/2015 7:39 PM, Louis Santillan wrote: I'm not of this effort, but, Ralf, what are you using to scan for viruses? Got the alert from Avast here on my Windows 8.1 laptop, got the same warning for AVG and Norton on two customer PCs. Ended up downloading it with AV disabled in a sandbox. Still think that asking people to download a 281MB file just on a lark, without knowing what it is, is not the right thing to do... Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
On 6/2/2015 5:09 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: Everyone take a look at this ZIP http://mercurycoding.com/FreeDOS/FreeDOS-1.2.zip and let me know your feedback. Anything which shouldn't be included? Anything which should but wasn't? There's a few non-open source programs I didn't catch for removal. Let me know your input. Input? Well, do you really think that people download 281MB ZIP file, one that also alerts most anti-virus software due to some of it's contents, without knowing what this is about? How's that for input? Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
Everyone take a look at this ZIP http://mercurycoding.com/FreeDOS/FreeDOS-1.2.zip and let me know your feedback. Anything which shouldn't be included? Anything which should but wasn't? There's a few non-open source programs I didn't catch for removal. Let me know your input. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
* I don't know if the permissions were set by you or the original zip files, but they're messed up in several place, at least with respect to *nix. Some are set to 555. Not sure why execute bit is even set anywhere at all. * It's large (1.1GB decompressed). * Lots of files/folders are not in 8.3 compliant or could have a different file name depending on the DOS version used to view the CD * Is it really necessary to have both the *x.zip (binaries) and *s.zip (source) extracted in this tree? * I would argue just a list of the packages (in CSV format), and their attributes (LSM attribute, plus other review criteria, has LICENSE, has SOURCE, etc.) would have sufficed over producing a large zip file. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone take a look at this ZIP and let me know your feedback. Anything which shouldn't be included? Anything which should but wasn't? There's a few non-open source programs I didn't catch for removal. Let me know your input. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
I'm not of this effort, but, Ralf, what are you using to scan for viruses? On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/2/2015 5:09 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: Everyone take a look at this ZIP http://mercurycoding.com/FreeDOS/FreeDOS-1.2.zip and let me know your feedback. Anything which shouldn't be included? Anything which should but wasn't? There's a few non-open source programs I didn't catch for removal. Let me know your input. Input? Well, do you really think that people download 281MB ZIP file, one that also alerts most anti-virus software due to some of it's contents, without knowing what this is about? How's that for input? Ralf -- [image: Avast logo] http://www.avast.com/ This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation
What I think would be useful would be an Xcode/Visual Studio type of environment that includes all of the recommended build tools setup with a batch file to set paths to have the tools work from any location on the hard drive. This can be used to rebuild the OS or to develop new applications for the OS. On Jun 3, 2015, at 12:42 AM, Antony Gordon cuzint...@gmail.com wrote: That was a HUGE zip file (once uncompressed). I’m just glad I use a sandbox for stuff like this, that zip file was like a box of chocolates… That being said…that much stuff comes on the FreeDOS full CD image? It kind of reminds me of the old Linux distributions that would ship a distribution on one CD and then a separate CD that was a snapshot of the Linux parts of various FTP sites. I guess when you have almost 700MB to fill, you gotta do something. On Jun 2, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Mercury Thirteen mercury0x0...@gmail.com mailto:mercury0x0...@gmail.com wrote: Everyone take a look at this ZIP http://mercurycoding.com/FreeDOS/FreeDOS-1.2.zip and let me know your feedback. Anything which shouldn't be included? Anything which should but wasn't? There's a few non-open source programs I didn't catch for removal. Let me know your input. -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel