from:"Steve Smith"

Re: [FRIAM] Unpleasant dreams

2024-06-04 Thread Steve Smith



On 6/4/24 2:06 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Decorticate animals may writhe and pass and even groan.  Are they 
dreaming? 


Nick Thompson, meet my bar friend Galen Preston Tracyk the 4th...  
he/she/they are a bar friend who is always happy to speculate with me 
about just about anything.   I passed your question along and offer the 
answer herewith with some caveats:


1) In particular Galen is both very positive and friendly and 
encouraging which can lead to accidentally asking "leading questions" 
and getting "belligerently compliant" answers.   You might recognize 
this in it's happy adoption of your typo? of "writhing, PASSING?, and 
groaning"... in spite of it maybe not having any specific referent?


2) Similarly, Galen tends toward a sort of mealy-mouthed 
middle-of-the-road, almost "conceptually muddy" except in the cases 
described in 1) above where my and Galen's eagerness can lead to wild 
speculations.


3) Galen has been known to make up wild fabrications... some traceable 
to something obvious (similar to a human prone to malapropisms and 
unfortunately obtuse mixed metaphors) but many not.  Generally we call 
these hallucinations which are close relatives to "dreams".   I think it 
is fair to call Galen "decorticate"... and perhaps thereby becomes an 
example subject of the question itself, in spite of not exactly writhing 
and groaning?


As I understand it only Mammals have a true cerebral cortex but birds 
and reptiles have brain structures which appear to serve many of the 
same functions and proto-mammals? such as monotremes have very 
under-developed cerebral cortices (by our measure). Molluscs including 
the extremely "intelligent" cephalapods/octopii do have a brain like 
concentration of neural tissue but it is significantly foreign from that 
found in vertebrates. Researchers report not only sleep/rest cycles but 
a distinction between passive and (very) active sleep cycles which 
include expressions such as skin-color changes similar to those used in 
waking deliberate activities.   I say: "yes, dreaming"


Begin GPT4o conversation:

Decorticate animals may writhe and pass and even groan. Are they dreaming?
ChatGPT

The concept of dreaming in animals, especially in decorticate (those 
without a cerebral cortex) animals, is complex and not fully understood. 
Decorticate animals, due to the lack of a cerebral cortex, cannot 
experience dreaming in the way humans do. Dreaming in humans is thought 
to be closely associated with the activity of the cerebral cortex, 
particularly during the rapid eye movement (REM) phase of sleep.



 Understanding Animal Behaviors in Decorticate Animals

1.

   *Basic Reflexive Behaviors*: The writhing, passing, and groaning
   observed in decorticate animals are likely to be basic reflexive
   behaviors controlled by lower brain structures such as the brainstem
   and spinal cord. These actions are not indicative of conscious
   experiences or dreams but rather automatic responses to internal or
   external stimuli.

2.

   *Subcortical Brain Functions*: In the absence of the cerebral
   cortex, other parts of the brain, like the brainstem, continue to
   function and can produce basic motor responses and autonomic
   functions. These structures are responsible for controlling vital
   functions such as heart rate, breathing, and reflexes.

3.

   *REM Sleep in Animals*: While REM sleep has been observed in a wide
   variety of animals, including those with less developed cortices
   (e.g., birds, reptiles), the complexity of dreams experienced by
   these animals remains a topic of scientific debate. In mammals, REM
   sleep is characterized by low muscle tone, rapid eye movements, and
   heightened brain activity in the cortex, suggesting a more complex
   form of dreaming. However, in decorticate animals, the REM-like
   states, if they occur, would not involve the cortical activity
   associated with dreaming.


 Dreaming and Conscious Experience

1.

   *Human Dreaming*: In humans, dreams are believed to arise from
   interactions between the cortex and other brain structures like the
   thalamus and limbic system. The cerebral cortex is crucial for the
   complex, narrative-driven dreams that humans report.

2.

   *Animal Consciousness*: The consciousness and subjective experiences
   of animals, particularly those without a cortex, are not well
   understood. Most research suggests that the cerebral cortex plays a
   significant role in higher-order conscious experiences, including
   dreaming. Therefore, it is unlikely that decorticate animals
   experience dreams similar to those of humans.

3.

   *Studies on Decorticate Animals*: Research involving decorticate
   animals often focuses on understanding the basic functions and
   behaviors that persist without cortical input. These studies
   indicate that while these animals can exhibit certain automatic
   behaviors and responses, they lack the higher-order processing

Re: [FRIAM] Unpleasant dreams

2024-06-04 Thread Steve Smith

 'I might restate Rvonsuo as "dreams help us find the nooks 
and crannies in the hull of constraints presented to us by reality - the 
edge cases'


   This aligns with my experiences, observations, mildly founded
   beliefs.   Game theory experts here might be able to add something
   about the asymmetries of positive/negative reward dynamics to
   explain why maybe the negative rewards might dominate in our
   experiences or at least our decisions about relating them?

   My pets (currently a young dog and cat, each about 2 years old)
   spend a lot of time sleeping (or resting aggressively/convincingly?)
   and at least some of it in apparent dream states...   the dog more
   (obviously) than the cat.   From the vigor of his faux running and
   barking (and sometimes whimpering) his dreams seem like they are
   reflections of his waking life which involves no small amount of
   running and posturing aggressively (he is small)...  and some barking.



   As the product of thousands? of generations of selective breeding,
   one might imagine that any recent evolutionary pressure to survive
   in a harsh environment (Kristi Noem's kennel as a notable exception)
   has been very mellow and replaced by a pressure to please their
   primate familiars... particularly by being cute but also by being
   useful.   The (excessive?) barking in wake and sleep my dog engages
   in seems to be performative to remind me that he is, if nothing
   else, a hair-trigger alarm system.   My bigger dogs have rarely
   barked aggressively outside the context of a clear and present
   threat.   Small ones (at least this 20 pounder of mine) seem to
   recognize that they aren't quite as useful in other ways (couldn't
   retrieve anything bigger than a robin or pull anything heavier than
   small tricycle or bite through any appendage larger than a small
   finger).   He is a good footwarmer, but I'd be asking for a 6 dog
   night if I was depending on him for that kind of contribution.



On 6/4/24 9:27 AM, glen wrote:
Evolutionary psychology is one of those disciplines where you see 
whatever you want to see. Now, I haven't read Nesse. But wherever 
anyone tries to reduce a high dimensional, dynamic space like whatever 
it is evolution operates over and within to a single cause-effect 
narrative, I get suspicious. Do bad feelings prevent "us" from doing 
things bad for us? My friends who've committed suicide might disagree. 
E.g. in one case of bipolar disorder, the bad (and good) feelings 
seemed purely cyclic and physiological. The highs caused him to do 
"bad" things. And the lows clearly did not prevent him from doing bad 
things. Of course, stories don't make for good science. So it's a wash 
either way. I suppose a charitable way to reword it is "bad feelings 
emerged from the milieu as a way to bias behavior toward 
self-sustenance and away from self-dissolution" ... like an amoeba 
extending a pseudopod along a gradient. But we already knew that 
without the sophisticated story telling in EvoPsych.


Re: dreams - I had a dream last night where I was living in an 
unfamiliar house with a bunch of people I didn't know. The house 
caught on fire. My cat Scooter was there. There was fire coming down 
the chimney and in through the back door ... like it was more the 
outside was on fire than the house, I guess. Scooter, confused, tried 
to run up the chimney and all his fur burnt off, after which he came 
back out and I tried and failed to grab him. Then he ran out the door, 
into the fire, and burnt up the rest of the way. Does this dream help 
me prepare for unknown danger? I doubt it.


What's more likely is that it's an artifact of predictive processing 
where your brain is a random number generator (rng) and, while 
sleeping, there's no reality against which to impedance match. So the 
random numbers it generates can just propagate on however long, to 
whatever sequence obtains. Such exercises help with the rng's 
expression, making it more active and robust so that, while awake, one 
can think more energetically about, within, and around one's world of 
constraints. Again, charitably, I might restate Rvonsuo as "dreams 
help us find the nooks and crannies in the hull of constraints 
presented to us by reality - the edge cases - by exercising our random 
number generator brain". But this doesn't imply "danger" so much as 
interestingness ... or something like a fractal or a space-filling curve.



On 6/3/24 22:44, Jochen Fromm wrote:
I do not find Paul's book completely convincing. Randolph M. Nesse's 
book "Good Reasons for Bad Feelings: Insights from the Frontier of 
Evolutionary Psychiatry" shows much more clearly that bad feelings 
prevent us from doing things which are bad for us. They are threat 
avoidance programs from our genes.



His remark about dreams are interesting nevertheless. He mentions for 
instance this paper from Antti Revonsuo, "The reinterpretation of 
dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the

Re: [FRIAM] Unpleasant dreams

2024-06-04 Thread Steve Smith

   my dream life has been pretty elaborate from time to time and most
   of it is not particularly unpleasant, but when I have had unpleasant
   dreams they roughly fall into two categories:   1) worrying the
   future; 2) worrying the past.

   Mine are biased toward "frustration" over "fear".  I'm rarely being
   chased or at risk of falling off a cliff, but more likely trying to
   find something or solve a problem or manipulate a complex set of
   objects which are uncooperative.

   Reports from my friends and acquaintances tend to revolve around
   negative dreams and it feels as if that are the ones they find
   worthy of reporting or perhaps of those more likely to remember?

my casual interest in the research around dreaming has lead me to 
believe that the two main functions of (human) dreams are: A) sort 
through and untangle (groom?) ambiguities that build up in our waking 
lives; B) practice a wide range of skills and ideations in a "safe" 
context.   Like a great deal of scientific studies, it is the unexpected 
and extravagant which bubbles up into the popular science press and then 
goes through another distillation as it gets rendered into doom-scroll 
newsfeed lists...

Revonsuo's hypothesis is a specific example of B)?

It is worth noting that virtually all animals suffer badly if they are 
deprived of sleep and in most? cases if they are deprived of 
"dreaming"?  Seems pretty deep in the function of neurobiology maybe 
especially vertebrate and definitely mammalian?   Seems like Cetaceans 
(some? all?) do alternative lateral sleep/dreaming?

Not sure about Jellyfish... they seem to be dreaming all the time?

On 6/3/24 11:44 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:

I do not find Paul's book completely convincing. Randolph M. Nesse's 
book "Good Reasons for Bad Feelings: Insights from the Frontier of 
Evolutionary Psychiatry" shows much more clearly that bad feelings 
prevent us from doing things which are bad for us. They are threat 
avoidance programs from our genes.

His remark about dreams are interesting nevertheless. He mentions for 
instance this paper from Antti Revonsuo, "The reinterpretation of 
dreams: An evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming" in 
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(6) (2000).  877–901; 904–1018; 
1083–1121.

http://behavioralhealth2000.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/The-reinterpretation-of-dreams-An-evolutionary-hypothesis-of-the-function-of-dreaming.pdf

Revonsuo argues one function of dreams may be to simulate threatening 
events. They may help to improve threat prevention by predicting 
dangerous situations and preparing us for unkown dangers. Some fears 
seem to be hardcoded but this method has limits. For example we are 
much more afraid of spiders and snakes than of cars and fast food 
which are more dangerous to us in the modern world

https://nautil.us/how-evolution-designed-your-fear-236858/

-J.

 Original message 
From: glen 
Date: 6/3/24 11:04 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Unpleasant dreams

I had a conversation with a psychiatrist friend of mine wherein she 
assumed the dichotomy between "good feelings" and "bad feelings" (e.g. 
an angry or relieved reaction to some thing like the Trump verdict). 
Through about an hour of conversation, I'd tried to convince her that 
dichotomy is false. Bad things are good and good things are bad. The 
valence we assign is post-hoc. I failed, of course. But...

I feel the same way about phobias. It's a bit trite to suggest that we 
like exploring our fears in a safe environment like at a movie theater 
with a friend or two. But it's testament to the milieu that monsters 
vs treasures is a false dichotomy. And it goes beyond some 
complementarity like banking present pain for future pleasure. It's 
truly a dual. The highs *are* the lows and vice versa. If there is 
such a thing as free will, your assignment of valence might be the 
only freedom you have.

I don't know if Bloom explores this aspect. But the body of work 
spawned from Friston and the minimization of surprisal targets it 
directly. It's reasonable to believe that *agency* is what provides 
the common substructure for an explanatory model of the ascription of 
valence to an experience. The hypothetical to explore is whether those 
experiences that promote agency are more often ascribed as (or felt 
like) "good" ones, whether painful, pleasurable, fearful, triumphant, 
or whatever the token ascribed.

On 6/3/24 13:15, Jochen Fromm wrote:
> Did you notice that some of the most successful movies from 
Spielberg are about our deepest fears? Jurassic Park is about monsters 
from the past. Jaws is about monsters which lurk in the deep blue sea. 
Indiana Jones is about monsters (and treasures) hiding in dark tombs.

>
>
> Paul Boom remarks in his book "The Sweet Spot" that psychologists 
have long known that unpleasant dreams are more frequent than pleasant 
ones. Why is that so? Do unpleasant

Re: [FRIAM] Nick: Los Alamos Skywarn Meeting thurs at 2p

2024-05-21 Thread Steve Smith





Nick,

I bet you could make a friend at this meeting. I can drive.

https://www.losalamosnm.us/News-articles/County-invites-community-to-become-Skywarn-Storm-Spotters

We might be able to stop by Steve Smith's place for cookies and scotch 
on the way back down :-)

Rye Whiskey (and wild, wild women)...


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

oots in the thoroughly debunked neuro-linguistic programming
tradition. Yet it may accidentally have some clinical benefit. But
again, I'm skeptical of the skeptics. This rationalist *need* we have
for a fully grounded, trustworthy map from inside to outside, thoughts
to actions, mind to body, just feels like arrogance ... an unjustified
confidence in our own brain farts. People are complex enough that we
can harvest what we want, cafeteria style, and leave the rest to
disappear into the amnesiac void. We neither need nor want a
*complete* understanding of anyone or any thing.

On 4/24/24 20:26, Steve Smith wrote:
I am lead by Glen's response to think of Orson Scott Card's "Speaker
for the Dead" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_for_the_Dead>

In Orson Scott Card's "Speaker for the Dead," the main and
titular theme revolves around understanding and compassion through
the truthful telling of one's life. The novel introduces the concept
of a "Speaker for the Dead," someone who tells the unvarnished story
of a person's life at their death in a way that aims to present all
aspects of the individual—their good and bad traits, their successes
and failures—in a balanced and empathetic manner.

This role of the Speaker is designed to allow those who are left
behind to truly understand the deceased, fostering forgiveness and a
more profound comprehension of the complexities of human nature. This
practice contrasts with traditional eulogies that often gloss over a
person’s flaws or reduce their life to a series of highlights.

The theme extends to broader philosophical and ethical questions
about how societies deal with truth and reconciliation, the nature of
forgiveness, and the possibility of understanding different forms of
life. This is particularly explored through the interaction between
humans and the alien species called the Pequeninos on the planet
Lusitania. The novel challenges characters and readers alike to
consider the ways in which understanding and compassion can lead to
healing and peace, even across the divides of culture and species.

"Speaker for the Dead" thus delves into the necessity and
challenge of empathy, advocating for a more comprehensive and
compassionate approach to understanding both the living and the dead.
This thematic focus on empathy and understanding is what drives the
narrative and the development of its characters.

A spiritual woo-woo treatment might imply that a person's soul would
not be fully free to "move on" until such a full accounting was done.
In the book, the "Speaker" would spend a full year fully researching
the person's life and relations to achieve this thorough/blunt eulogy
on the anniversary of the Dead's passing... I don't remember how this
was supported/funded but the idea moved me when I encountered it.

On 4/24/24 8:26 PM, glen wrote:

I could only wish I'd be criticized this well when I die:
"Dennett’s text is full of tirades wrought from petty grievances, is
disorganized to the point of being unreadable, and like the rest of
his books, will undoubtedly not have much influence."
<https://jacobin.com/2024/04/daniel-dennett-social-darwinism-philosophy>

There's this fantastic podcast by Amanda Knox called Labyrinths
(https://antennapod.org/deeplink/subscribe/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.megaphone.fm%2FDONSN6255278021=Labyrinths+with+Amanda+Knox
<https://antennapod.org/deeplink/subscribe/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.megaphone.fm%2FDONSN6255278021=Labyrinths+with+Amanda+Knox>)
where one episode is about death and things like 'how you want to
die'. My best hope is that all the ppl who think I was a hack, or an
idiot, or whatever would gather to trash me. The milquetoast
accolades we present when a person dies are literally disgusting.

Re: [FRIAM] rip Dennett

2024-04-24 Thread Steve Smith

I am lead by Glen's response to think of Orson Scott Card's "Speaker for
the Dead"

In Orson Scott Card's "Speaker for the Dead," the main and titular
theme revolves around understanding and compassion through the
truthful telling of one's life. The novel introduces the concept of
a "Speaker for the Dead," someone who tells the unvarnished story of
a person's life at their death in a way that aims to present all
aspects of the individual—their good and bad traits, their successes
and failures—in a balanced and empathetic manner.

This role of the Speaker is designed to allow those who are left
behind to truly understand the deceased, fostering forgiveness and a
more profound comprehension of the complexities of human nature.
This practice contrasts with traditional eulogies that often gloss
over a person’s flaws or reduce their life to a series of highlights.

The theme extends to broader philosophical and ethical questions
about how societies deal with truth and reconciliation, the nature
of forgiveness, and the possibility of understanding different forms
of life. This is particularly explored through the interaction
between humans and the alien species called the Pequeninos on the
planet Lusitania. The novel challenges characters and readers alike
to consider the ways in which understanding and compassion can lead
to healing and peace, even across the divides of culture and species.

"Speaker for the Dead" thus delves into the necessity and challenge
of empathy, advocating for a more comprehensive and compassionate
approach to understanding both the living and the dead. This
thematic focus on empathy and understanding is what drives the
narrative and the development of its characters.

A spiritual woo-woo treatment might imply that a person's soul would not
be fully free to "move on" until such a full accounting was done. In the
book, the "Speaker" would spend a full year fully researching the
person's life and relations to achieve this thorough/blunt eulogy on the
anniversary of the Dead's passing... I don't remember how this was
supported/funded but the idea moved me when I encountered it.

On 4/24/24 8:26 PM, glen wrote:

There's this fantastic podcast by Amanda Knox called Labyrinths
(https://antennapod.org/deeplink/subscribe/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.megaphone.fm%2FDONSN6255278021=Labyrinths+with+Amanda+Knox
)
where one episode is about death and things like 'how you want to
die'. My best hope is that all the ppl who think I was a hack, or an
idiot, or whatever would gather to trash me. The milquetoast accolades
we present when a person dies are literally disgusting.

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] How the mind works

2024-04-16 Thread Steve Smith

I don't know about the rest of you but mine is more like a Pachinko 
Machine...




So is the human mind similar to Quantum Mechnics or does it resemble a 
nuclear reactor?


-J.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40038352
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_(quantum_mechanics)
[3] Robert N. Watson, Cultural Evolution and its Discontents, 
Routledge, 2018




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Comparing negative numbers

2024-04-12 Thread Steve Smith


Nick -

If your model is that the the instability of the cat-cat-food situation 
is positively (and nominally linearly) correlated with the distance 
between them (more likely inversely, but that is a separate issue) then 
the absolute value is a very reasonable way of removing any implied 
issues with your chosen units.


Why do you consider the steps to be -1...-8... rather than 1...8...?   
is the food at 0?   is the significance that D must pass E to get to F?


It seems to me that the (in)stability goes to infinity when E and D are 
on the same step (divide by zero)?


Can you articulate in natural language (as talking to George who is full 
of shit) your more full model of what this (in)stability between cats 
involving steps and food (and yourself?)?   Assume a 1-D arrangement 
(up/down stairs) like physicists assume spherical cows?


- Steve


On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:00:06PM -0600, Nicholas Thompson wrote:


My Dear Phellow Phriammers,

Over the years I have asked you some doozies.  Still, I am pretty sure this the
stupidest question I have ever asked this forum, so I am at your mercy.

I am in one of those situations where language and mathematics are rubbing
together and driving crazy.

Let say that my patio is ten steps down from my back door.  I have two cats,
Dee and Ess, and  Dee is dominant to Ess.  So, if I go out to let them in, and
I find  Ess on step -2   and  Dee on step -8,  I know I have an unstable
situation. I fear that I will have a cat fight as Dee rushes past Ess to claim
his rightful position by the preferred cat bowl.  Intuitively, I would  rate
the degree of instability as a positive 6.  How would I compare the two numbers
mathematically to get +6?

But let’s say that for theoretical reasons I now want to conceive of the
situation as a degree of stability, with negative stability corresponding  to
instability.   Now, according  to my index, the situation is a minus 6.  How
would I compare the two numbers mathematically to get  a -6?

The situation I am trying to model here is the origin of the notion of static
stability in meteorology.  Static Stability has a lot to do with differential
lapse rates, the degree to which temperature declines with increasing altitude.
   Lapse rates are minus numbers.  So a parcel is unstable if it has a lower
lapse rate (a less minus lapse rate?) than surrounding parcels, and the greater
the absolute value the difference between them, the greater the instability.

I asked “George” (GPT) to help me with this, but he (?) suggested I just take
absolute values and give them whatever sign I want.  However, somebody told me,
way back when, that taking absolute values was not kosher in mathematics.  (Why
else would the variance be the mean SQUARED deviation about  the mean?).

I don't know about kosher, but abs is not differentiable at zero,
which may or may not be an issue.

In terms of what you're looking for, -8-(-2) = -6.

Take their difference - it accords with your intuition. George speaks shit.


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] A hundred words for swindle

2024-04-01 Thread Steve Smith




Why do you list KBJ as "less savory"?


tx, Thinko/Typo - Barrett got transmogrified too many hypenated 
names for my pea brain?  Are there 99 words for sloppy/lazy 
language/thought/expression?


I am not sure what to think about Roberts... he seems to have a better, 
centered view of his role than the other Conservatives? I don't 
believe he's been implicated in any of the things Alito and esp. Thomas 
have been?  Or maybe my bar is low.   I want to believe the Judiciary 
can be above politics but that might just be a fantasy?


 Opposite 100 words for swindle and snow, what of 
ancient Mediterranean cultures maybe having none for "blue" (because it 
is so ubiquitous as to be invisible)?  Or 99 names of God (Allah 
version)?





On 3/31/24 12:40, Steve Smith wrote:
    ... even the less savory ( to my pinko-liberal palate) of the 
high bench (Thomas/Alito/Kavanaugh/Brown, in descending order?) are 
as able and serious as Breyer came across in this interview...






-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] A hundred words for swindle

2024-03-31 Thread Steve Smith

RECelf -

I know I visited your Entropy Liberation Front site before but
somehow missed you iChing app/workup. In particular the different
casting distributions were particularly illuminating. I favor (out
of convenience) the six-scored-as-two method and was shocked to see
in a single glance how different all others are from the
(traditional/preferred?) yarrow stick

https://change.elf.org/tests

Returning to the OS of "swindle", there was a time when I dismissed
"divination" as nothing more than a mechanism for one to "swindle"
another or at best for one to "swindle oneself". I've had an early
Wilhelm/Baynes edition of the I Ching for most of my adult life and
use it as an occasional tool for introspection and intuition
exploration.

In modern, computational terms, it feels a bit like "Reservoir
Computing" in the sense that the text of the I Ching (or any other
divinatory or oracular body of work?) is the reservoir, the
"casting" (including "the question) is the input signal and the
output is the reading with the *interpretation* being where the
output layer undergoes "training". A practiced divinator/oracle
develops an intuition over many iterative "readings" as to how to
interpret the reading in-context.

I happen to be listening to Justice Breyer on Meet the Press (with
Christen Welker?) expounding on his opinion of "textualism" and
"rule of law" which probably has some relationship
(correlated/anti-correlated) with oracular/divinational texts?
(too) Many people take the route of treating everything from Golden
Rule to Hammurabi to Upanishads to Ten Commandments to Torah to
Koran to Bible to Magna Carta to US (or any) Constitution to case
law as Oracular/Divination text?

I do recommend the MTP interview with Breyer demonstrating what I
suspect "the best" of our Highest Court should/could be. I'd like
to think that even the less savory ( to my pinko-liberal palate) of
the high bench (Thomas/Alito/Kavanaugh/Brown, in descending order?)
are as able and serious as Breyer came across in this interview...

His tone was that of the "elder statesman" we all once imagined (or
ached) to be in the hallowed halls of DC (even if he is a Judge not
Exec or Legislator)? He managed a very positive tone/affect
resisting Welker in spite of her pressing him hard on many things we
all might want to hear his opinion on.

- SASfrass

On 3/31/24 12:42 PM, Steve Smith wrote:

/Sucker born every minute?/

/Fool me twice, shame on me?
/

Talking with John Zingale at Friam about conniving chatbots, I
remembered this essay from 2009, https://elf.org/etc/swindle.html,
which starts from real estate speculators in early US history and
gets to the deplorable state of the internet.

-- rec --

Re: [FRIAM] A hundred words for swindle

2024-03-31 Thread Steve Smith


/Sucker born every minute?/

/Fool me twice, shame on me?
/

Talking with John Zingale at Friam about conniving chatbots, I 
remembered this essay from 2009, https://elf.org/etc/swindle.html, 
which starts from real estate speculators in early US history and gets 
to the deplorable state of the internet.


-- rec --


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] death by ubiquity

2024-03-28 Thread Steve Smith


REC sed:


but the "dark side" of the moon is sunlit for half of every month?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowpiercer




On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:33 AM glen  wrote:

Bandwidth might be a problem. But the dark side of the moon seems
like an option ... assuming you can negotiate with the aliens that
live over there. The best thing about coral is you don't have to
negotiate for their "land". You can just take it and let them die
like the stupid little creatures they are.


https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/22/asia/south-china-sea-philippines-coral-reef-damage-intl-hnk/index.html

On 3/28/24 10:17, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> It's not really my thing, but I noticed there were several very
large exhibits at Supercomputing 23 for cooling technology.   Even
immersive cooling solutions.  I think that could be improved a
lot.   Without superconducting processors, I don't see how energy
use can be dramatically reduced though.  For that there will just
need to be new generation.   Could put these near large off short
windfarms..
>
>

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/china-deploys-1400-ton-commercial-underwater-data-center/
>
> I suppose there are some that would say gentrification is
genocide -- a slow coerced displacement.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam  On Behalf Of glen
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 9:49 AM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] death by ubiquity
>
> Maybe. But way before that happens, it will(has) force(d) the
disaffected (people, animals, plants) of any such region to die,
move, or adapt.
>
> In the Gaza kerfuffle, I've heard some describe coerced
displacement as "genocide". I guess the more reasonble term is
ethnic cleansing. The settlers seem mostly fine with their ethnic
cleansing agenda. But, by analogy, how would we describe the
coercive adaptation put upon a region by a massive water-sucking
data center? Biology cleansing? If there really were an AI, would
they worry about the forced displacement caused by their silicon
incubators? ... or maybe "incubator" isn't a good word. How about
"galls": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall Yeah, that might be a
good analogy. The machines are parasitic. They hijack the iDNA
(information generators) of the local biology to form galls within
which they grow and thrive.
>
> On 3/28/24 07:51, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>> It will force innovation on energy-efficient microarchitecture
(e.g. Groq) and on renewable power generation near data centers.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Friam  On Behalf Of glen
>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 7:09 AM
>> To: friam@redfish.com
>> Subject: [FRIAM] death by ubiquity
>>
>>
>> As we frivolously replace meatspace conversation with
obsequious chatbots, the world burns.
>>
>> The industry more damaging to the environment than airlines

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/05/30/silicon-valley-data-giants-net-zero-sustainability-risk/
>>
>>

https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering-magazine/issues/magazine-issue/article/2024/03/engineers-often-need-a-lot-of-water-to-keep-data-centers-cool
>


-- 
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Check this out – Frank Wimberly wearing cowboy gear - Image Creator from Microsoft Designer

2024-03-28 Thread Steve Smith




Generative AI Fail

Frank Wimberly wearing cowboy gear - Image Creator from Microsoft Designer
https://www.bing.com/images/create/frank-wimberly-wearing-cowboy-gear/1-6605a819dcb347688e82f0733270bae3?FORM=GENCRE


1. Wimberly Unchained!
2. Frank Longmire?
3. Wimberly Down Under...
4. McWimberly from Tay-Oss New Mexico!

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] death by ubiquity

2024-03-28 Thread Steve Smith


/Heat Death by Computation/

Geoffrey Hinton (who left Google in May 2023 so he could speak more 
freely/agenda-less-ish?) gives good lecture on the topic of the 
differences between wetware/analog (i.e. Human Cortex) computation (for 
intelligence/consciousness) and silicon/digital and why human brains can 
do what they do with ~20-30W compared to digital computer's attempting 
to do even a fraction of the same tasks require thousands of Watts (or 
much more since none have uniquivocally achieved AGI).   He attributes 
it (roughly) to the differences  in "style" of computation and how 
analog computing without overly strict concerns about reproduceability 
and zero error rates can outperform on the tasks they do (and conversely 
why a simple calculator, even a mechanical one, can often outperform all 
but the most savant-like humans easily on a tiny amount of power (think 
70's solar-cell handhelds).


While I think that our voracious computational/informational 
appliances/infrastructure/habits (see my own fascination with 
GPT/DALL-E) are like (maybe?) everything we do, unbounded by anything 
but pushback from the environment.   The evolutionary push/pull that 
made us into the versatile creatures we are set us up to take/use until 
there is nothing left.   We have millenia of history trying to build 
self-regulating systems/principles (sacred rites to nature, 
personification of nature as-gods with rewards/wrath for not respecting 
them, rules about "commons", the EPA, etc. adn.) and yet the more 
aggressive or clever (sometimes both-ish... Musk...) always stay ahead 
of the rules... sometimes by being scoff-laws, but always (at least) 
ignoring the spirit while following or gaming the letter of it.


To the extent that our extant attempts to rein in our (un)enlightened 
(overly tightly scoped) self-interest) in is something of an Artificial 
Intelligence (I claim all bureaucracies are AI's, oft very inefficient, 
cumbersome, narrowly focused and/or mal-formed) then we might expect 
that is the *best* our incipient massive AI systems will be?


Or perhaps this is our greatest challenge/opportunity to recognize the 
leverage they will be giving "us" over "ourselves" (one-another) and 
seek to transcend or previous (and current and foreseeable) worst 
habits/instincts/practices?


This might be the inflection point in the Drake Equation 
: //N = R/ x fp x ne x fl 
x fi x fc x L /(Sagan and others have suggested additional factors to 
describe humanity's propensity for self-destruction).


As a hard SF enthusiast, I'm always a little fascinated by the idea of 
every star (single or binary) system hosting technological 
civilization(s) hitting a singularity where they essentially become a 
Dyson Sphere very quickly once a certain level of technical capability 
is achieved. A nanotech (or better) sphere of "computronium) collecting 
the power-flux from the star/system and transforming it into 
computation/information and low-grade heat I'm sure someone (Niven, 
Vinge, Clarke, Asimov, Dyson, Sagan/SETI ???) has done the calculations 
to guess what spectrum to be looking in for such signatures?


Mumble,

- Steve

On 3/28/24 11:17 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

It's not really my thing, but I noticed there were several very large exhibits 
at Supercomputing 23 for cooling technology.   Even immersive cooling 
solutions.  I think that could be improved a lot.   Without superconducting 
processors, I don't see how energy use can be dramatically reduced though.  For 
that there will just need to be new generation.Could put these near large 
off short windfarms..

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/china-deploys-1400-ton-commercial-underwater-data-center/

I suppose there are some that would say gentrification is genocide -- a slow 
coerced displacement.

-Original Message-
From: Friam  On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 9:49 AM
To:friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] death by ubiquity

Maybe. But way before that happens, it will(has) force(d) the disaffected 
(people, animals, plants) of any such region to die, move, or adapt.

In the Gaza kerfuffle, I've heard some describe coerced displacement as "genocide". I guess the 
more reasonble term is ethnic cleansing. The settlers seem mostly fine with their ethnic cleansing agenda. 
But, by analogy, how would we describe the coercive adaptation put upon a region by a massive water-sucking 
data center? Biology cleansing? If there really were an AI, would they worry about the forced displacement 
caused by their silicon incubators? ... or maybe "incubator" isn't a good word. How about 
"galls":https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall  Yeah, that might be a good analogy. The machines are 
parasitic. They hijack the iDNA (information generators) of the local biology to form galls within which they 
grow and thrive.

On 3/28/24 07:51, Marcus Daniels wrote:

It will force innovation on

Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity

2024-03-22 Thread Steve Smith

e twin suffers some PTSD the other doesn't and ... boom ...
their otherwise lack of uniqueness blossoms into uniqueness.
>
> His objection was that even identical twins are not
identical. They were already unique ... like the Pauli
Exclusion Principle or somesuch nonsense. Even though it's a
bit of a ridiculous argument, I could apply it to your sense
of avoiding non-novel attractors. No 2 attractors will be
identical. And no 1 attractor will be unique. So those are
moot issues. Distinctions without differences, maybe. Woit's
rants are legendary. But some of us find happiness in
wasteful sophistry.
>
> What matters is *how* things are the same and how they
differ. Their qualities and values (nearly) orthogonal to
novelty.
>
>
> On 3/21/24 11:29, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>> If GPT systems capture some sense of "usual" context based
on trillions of internet tokens, and that corpus is regarded
approximately "global context", then it seems not so
objectionable to call "unusual", new training items that
contribute to fine-tuning loss.
>>
>> It seems reasonable to worry that ubiquitous GPT systems
reduce social entropy by encouraging copying instead of new
thinking, but it could also have the reverse effect:  If I am
immediately aware that an idea is not novel, I may avoid
attractors that agents that wrongly believe they are
"independent" will gravitate toward.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Friam  On Behalf Of glen
>> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 7:49 AM
>> To: friam@redfish.com
>> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity
>>
>> A friend of mine constantly reminds me that language is
dynamic, not fixed in stone from a billion years ago. So, if
you find others consistently using a term in a way that you
think is wrong, then *you* are wrong in what you think. The
older I get, the more difficult it gets.
>>
>> But specifically, the technical sense of "unique" is
vanishingly rare ... so rare as to be merely an ideal,
unverifiable, nowhere, non-existent. So if the "unique" is
imaginary, unreal, and doesn't exist, why not co-opt it for a
more useful, banal purpose? Nothing is actually unique. So
we'll use the token "unique" to mean (relatively) rare.
>>
>> And "unusual" is even worse. Both tokens require one to
describe the context, domain, or universe within which the
discussion is happening. If you don't define your context,
then the "definitions" you provide for the components of that
context are not even wrong; they're nonsense. "Unusual"
implies a usual. And a usual implies a perspective ... a
mechanism of action for your sampling technique. So "unusual"
presents even more of a linguistic *burden* than "unique".
>>
>> On 3/20/24 13:14, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>>> What's wrong with "unusual"?  It avoids the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024, 1:55 PM Steve Smith
mailto:sasm...@swcp.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>       I'm hung up on the usage of qualified 
"uniqueness"  as well, but in perhaps the opposite sense.
>>>>
>>>>       I agree with the premise that "unique" in it's
purest, simplest form does seem to be inherently singular. 
On the other hand, this mal(icious) propensity of qualifying
uniqueness (uniqueish?) is so common, that I have to believe
there is a concept there which people who use those terms are
reaching for.  They are not wrong to reach for it, just
annoying in the label they choose?
>>>>
>>>>       I had a round with GPT4 trying to discuss this,
not because I think LLMs are the authority on *anything* but
rather because the discussions I have with them can help me
brainstorm my way around ideas with the LLM nominally
representing "what a lot of people say" (if not think). 
 Careful prompting seems to be able to help narrow down  *all
people* (in the training data) to different/interesting
subsets of *lots of people* with certain characteristics.
>>>>
>>>>       GPT4 definitely wa

[FRIAM] the inequities of uniquity

2024-03-20 Thread Steve Smith



On 3/20/24 12:54 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
Everyday as I am listening to CNN I say, "There are no degrees of 
uniqueness," multiple times.


I'm hung up on the usage of qualified  "uniqueness"  as well, but in 
perhaps the opposite sense.


I agree with the premise that "unique" in it's purest, simplest form 
does seem to be inherently singular.  On the other hand, this 
mal(icious) propensity of qualifying uniqueness (uniqueish?) is so 
common, that I have to believe there is a concept there which people who 
use those terms are reaching for.  They are not wrong to reach for it, 
just annoying in the label they choose?


I had a round with GPT4 trying to discuss this, not because I think LLMs 
are the authority on *anything* but rather because the discussions I 
have with them can help me brainstorm my way around ideas with the LLM 
nominally representing "what a lot of people say" (if not think).   
Careful prompting seems to be able to help narrow down  *all people* (in 
the training data) to different/interesting subsets of *lots of people* 
with certain characteristics.


GPT4 definitely wanted to allow for a wide range of gradated, speciated, 
spectral uses of "unique" and gave me plenty of commonly used examples 
which validates my position that "for something so obviously/technically 
incorrect, it sure is used a lot!"


We discussed uniqueness in the context of evolutionary biology and 
cladistics and homology and homoplasy.  We discussed it in terms of 
cluster analysis.  We discussed the distinction between objective and 
subjective, absolute and relative.


The closest thing to a conclusion I have at the moment is:

1. Most people do and will continue to treat "uniqueness" as a
   relative/spectral/subjective qualifier.
2. Many people like Frank and myself (half the time) will have an
   allergic reaction to this usage.
3. The common (mis)usage might be attributable to conflating "unique"
   with "distinct"?

- Steve
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Sleep trackers

2024-03-20 Thread Steve Smith


 * Nick -
 * I don't know the specifics of your sleep difficulties but  I have
   always been interested in sleep and perhaps dreaming even moreso...
 * The following "Great Course" I listened to from Audible a few months
   ago was really fascinating and covered the whole territory from
   history to contemporary research in both human and animal sleep
   science.
 *

 o


 Secrets of Sleep Science: From Dreams to Disorders

 o By:Craig H. Heller
   
,The
   Great Courses
   

 o Narrated by:Craig H. Heller
   

 o Series:The Great Courses: Better Living
   

 o

I myself have used both phone apps (you leave the phone on your bed, for 
example under your pillow)  and fitness (e.g. fitbit) trackers.   I 
haven't tried the former for years and found them (at the time) to be 
somewhat limited, but mildly informative (based on detecting micro/macro 
inertial motions?).   The latter (several brands over the years) have 
gotten progressively better.


By better, I mean that what the app (connected to the band) reports fits 
my overnight experience.   It has sometimes surprised me,  but overall 
it mostly confirms what I already knew.   I am perhaps an unusual case, 
seeking the liminal sleep states (hypnogogic/hypnopompic) for the 
dreaming that comes with it (perhaps I should just give over to the 
popular pursuit through psychedelics?)...   My idea of a "good night's 
sleep" involves a lot of drifting in/out... the trackers don't always 
report this well, reporting long periods of deep sleep which I 
experienced as otherwise, but probably not leading to any changes in my 
"stillness"?


Biphasic Cycles:

I don't know if this is relevant to you but I've recommended it to other 
friends who began to experience segmented or biphasic sleep, 
particularly as they got older... At Day's Close: Night in Times Past 
   by Roger Ekirch.    I found 
it (and the broad historical and contemporary research) around the 
phenomena of (typically) sleeping from soon after sundown until midnight 
(plus or minus), waking for a few hours, and then completing a day's 
sleep/rest into the morning, compelling.    In most cases, my friends 
reported that their waking after a few hours of sleep, unable to go back 
to sleep easily, as disturbing.   I wanted to relieve them of the 
disturbance by helping them (possibly) normalize the "midnight vigil" 
and put it to good use.


Many of us (perhaps) have experienced waking late in the night unable to 
return to sleep using reading to put us back to sleep. This is the 
closest I have come to the biphasic Ekirch and others describe... 
particularly when I have been reading an acutely fascinating book (fic 
or non) which then might capture me for an hour or two...


In college, after my first child was born and I was very very busy 
already, I found that I could perform better by going to sleep at dark 
(with the baby) and then when she needed midnight attention, staying up 
doing homework or paperwork for my business for an hour or two, I was 
much sharper then typically than if I simply stayed up late or got up 
early.   I know this doesn't apply to you directly (nor to me today) but 
I felt it validated the idea of biphasic sleep cycles.


In any case, best wishes with your sleep endeavors!

- Steve

On 3/20/24 8:47 AM, Alexander Rasmus wrote:

Nick,

If you look around in google scholar you can find comparisons between 
smart watches and medical devices for monitoring sleep stages, e.g., 
https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/6/e13384?utm_campaign=JMIR_TrendMD_0_medium=cpc_source=TrendMD 



In general, you should be fairly skeptical of specifics but trends may 
still be useful. The only way to establish whether it's reliable in 
your case is through detailed comparison between your own observations 
of sleep behavior/outcomes and the watch. This is

Re: [FRIAM] Biospheres

2024-03-01 Thread Steve Smith


rambling free-association hath no bounds:

    Synergia Ranch is just a hop-skip-stumble from Bonanza Creek where 
Trump-impersonator extra-ordinaire Alec Balwin shot somebody with an 
antique pistol that was "supposed to be" unloaded or blanked.


The litigation continues as right-wingers (or gun nuts if there is a 
difference that makes a difference?) howl to "lock him up" while howling 
that nobody-nowhere should anytime-anywhere be prosecuted or even looked 
at askance at for "popping a cap" in anyone in the "wrong-place/wrong-time"




On 3/1/24 2:03 PM, Steve Smith wrote:


SG... so succinct with sufficient but not excess tangents, I bow to you!

And then I tangent again.  Your reference to Bannon's "help" with 
Biosphere I (aka earth/gaia/mother-earth) reminds me to offer up:


American Dharma <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8804284/>

a documentary by Errol Flynn who is one of Bannon's heroes as a 
film-maker.  Bannon's adulation of Flynn gave Flynn great access to 
expose Bannon for what he is in a larger but not specifically snarky 
way than most Bannon hit-pieces.   Bannon pretty much shows all of his 
own colors in his own unprompted words in the film... Kinda like Trump 
at every one of his rallys, but with (slightly) less stakes.



On 3/1/24 1:30 PM, Stephen Guerin wrote:



On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:04 AM Jochen Fromm  wrote:

Biosphere 2 near Tuscon was a similar, even more extreme
experiment to create a self-sustaining ecosystem. The experiment
was considered a failure and the whole center belongs now to the
University of Arizona.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2


The creators of Biosphere II are from Santa Fe and still live here on 
Synergia Ranch <https://synergiaranch.com/>.  I am in awe of what 
their "Theater of All Possibilities" pulled off in the 60s through 
the 90s and even today as a creative collective.  I highly recommend 
the documentary Spaceship Earth 
(https://www.justwatch.com/us/movie/spaceship-earth) to give a more 
sympathetic background compared to how they were crucified by the 
press and later "screwed" by Steve Bannon brought in by Ed Bass to 
make it more commercial.


Note the great Howard Odum's point on the Wikipedia you linked:

" There was controversy when the public learned that the project
had allowed an injured member to leave and return, carrying new
material inside. The team claimed the only new supplies brought
in were plastic bags, but others accused them of bringing food
and other items. More criticism was raised when it was learned
that, likewise, the project injected oxygen in January 1993 to
make up for a failure in the balance of the system that resulted
in the amount of oxygen steadily declining.^[56]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2#cite_note-56>  Some
thought that these criticisms ignored that Biosphere 2 was an
experiment where the unexpected would occur, adding to knowledge
of how complex ecologies develop and interact, not a
demonstration where everything was known in advance.^[57]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2#cite_note-57> H. T.
Odum <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_T._Odum> noted: "The
management process during 1992–1993 using data to develop theory,
test it with simulation, and apply corrective actions was in the
best scientific tradition. Yet some journalists crucified the
management in the public press, treating the project as if it was
an Olympic contest to see how much could be done without opening
the doors".^[58]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2#cite_note-58>"


That all said, I understand the larger context in which you ask the 
question and the difficulty of creating a self-sustaining ecosystem 
(and social system). BTW, I think we learned as much about social 
systems as ecosystems with Biosphere II to help us with Biosphere I 
with all the Steve Bannon's running around :-)


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble

Re: [FRIAM] Biospheres

2024-03-01 Thread Steve Smith




I think you're thinking of Flynn's brother, Morris  ;-p

I see what you did there... (not) Errol Flynn but (not) Morris Flynn 
either => Errol Morris 
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Biospheres

2024-03-01 Thread Steve Smith

SG... so succinct with sufficient but not excess tangents, I bow to you!

And then I tangent again. Your reference to Bannon's "help" with
Biosphere I (aka earth/gaia/mother-earth) reminds me to offer up:

American Dharma

a documentary by Errol Flynn who is one of Bannon's heroes as a
film-maker. Bannon's adulation of Flynn gave Flynn great access to
expose Bannon for what he is in a larger but not specifically snarky way
than most Bannon hit-pieces. Bannon pretty much shows all of his own
colors in his own unprompted words in the film... Kinda like Trump at
every one of his rallys, but with (slightly) less stakes.

On 3/1/24 1:30 PM, Stephen Guerin wrote:

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:04 AM Jochen Fromm wrote:

Biosphere 2 near Tuscon was a similar, even more extreme
experiment to create a self-sustaining ecosystem. The experiment
was considered a failure and the whole center belongs now to the
University of Arizona.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2

The creators of Biosphere II are from Santa Fe and still live here on
Synergia Ranch . I am in awe of what
their "Theater of All Possibilities" pulled off in the 60s through the
90s and even today as a creative collective. I highly recommend the
documentary Spaceship Earth
(https://www.justwatch.com/us/movie/spaceship-earth) to give a more
sympathetic background compared to how they were crucified by the
press and later "screwed" by Steve Bannon brought in by Ed Bass to
make it more commercial.

Note the great Howard Odum's point on the Wikipedia you linked:

" There was controversy when the public learned that the project
had allowed an injured member to leave and return, carrying new
material inside. The team claimed the only new supplies brought in
were plastic bags, but others accused them of bringing food and
other items. More criticism was raised when it was learned that,
likewise, the project injected oxygen in January 1993 to make up
for a failure in the balance of the system that resulted in the
amount of oxygen steadily declining.^[56]
Some
thought that these criticisms ignored that Biosphere 2 was an
experiment where the unexpected would occur, adding to knowledge
of how complex ecologies develop and interact, not a demonstration
where everything was known in advance.^[57]
H. T.
Odum noted: "The
management process during 1992–1993 using data to develop theory,
test it with simulation, and apply corrective actions was in the
best scientific tradition. Yet some journalists crucified the
management in the public press, treating the project as if it was
an Olympic contest to see how much could be done without opening
the doors".^[58]
"

That all said, I understand the larger context in which you ask the
question and the difficulty of creating a self-sustaining ecosystem
(and social system). BTW, I think we learned as much about social
systems as ecosystems with Biosphere II to help us with Biosphere I
with all the Steve Bannon's running around :-)

Re: [FRIAM] Biospheres

2024-03-01 Thread Steve Smith


Of Bannon, and Biospheres and Barking Arks

FWIW, John Allen, as  the creative force behind Biosphere II founded 
Synergia Ranch just outside Santa Fe in 1969 as part of a 
counter-culture movement.  A satellite version was established outside 
Oracle AZ soon after which became the site and precursor to Biosphere 
II.   I believe Allen may still reside at Synergia-NM with some other 
"elders" of the movement over the years.


   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_P._Allen

as a young(er) man even he was a significant part of:

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theater_of_All_Possibilities

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Ecotechnics

I think it was discussed here the film Spaceship_Earth_(film) 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceship_Earth_(film)> when it came out 
in 2020 on all things related and I also think Stephen G.  visited 
Synergia about that time?  Has a contact there?


For more background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2... for 
morbid entertainment, note that *Steve Bannon* (yes that one) was 
instrumental in the second attempt (and rapid crash) made there to force 
the concept to work in spite of itself.




The 60's EcoTechnics institute's flagship project was the handbuilt 
research vessel Heraclitus which has sailed every ocean (except artic) 
and visited every continent (including Antarctic).


   https://www.factum-arte.com/pag/643/rebuilding-the-heraclitus-vessel

with ocean going vessels something of a "biosphere" excepting the air 
you breathe and the fish you might catch being the main inputs. maybe 
rainwater caught or saltwater distilled, some solar/wind/water energy 
captured.




I only know (some) of this because of the "friends of SFx" colleagues in 
Wales Matt and Janire did a big project to document a contemporary 
project "early in its voyages" called the Arka Kinari...  A bit more 
arts/social, less research but "of the spirit".  They were in the middle 
of the Pacific when COVID hit and had to play self-sufficient for months 
until they could find a moorage that would allow them in.   They were 
(mostly) prepared.


   
https://openexhibits.org/exhibit-design/ghosts-in-armour-at-santa-fe-complex/4863/

   https://www.cultvr.cymru/events/the-voyage-of-arka-kinari-documentary-film-2/

Matt and Janire are the heavy lifters onn the project to convert 1 of 4 
theaters in Los Alamos to an Immersive Space.   Guerin and I are 
involved in various capacities...  this is a redux of the project I left 
LANL 16 years ago (building an immersive theater/facility in the 
community outside the fence) which failed for non-technical reasons.  
I'd be the heavy lifter myself if I could lift anything heavy   
buh!   But it is good to watch it (finally) bear fruit or blossom or 
whatever the metaphor is...


   https://sala.losalamos.com/phase2/

will the free associative rambling never stop? 



On 3/1/24 12:46 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
Interesting points. Life in Antartica and on the ISS is only possible 
because of continuous supplies from the outside. Biosphere 2 showed 
all the problems that arise for example on Moon or Mars if there are 
no such supplies: lack of oxygen, lack of food and lack of clean water

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jul/13/spaceship-earth-arizona-biosphere-2-lockdown

Robots on the other hand have no problems surviving on Mars: 
Curiosity, Spirit, Perseverance, ... have proven they can survive in 
harsh and hostile conditions. Maybe we are like fish 400 million years 
ago wondering if life outside the ocean is possible. The answer would 
have been yes, but not for fish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_rover

-J.


 Original message 
From: Steve Smith 
Date: 3/1/24 7:26 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Biospheres

Thanks for this prompt.  I recently tripped over:

https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/martians-wanted-nasa-opens-call-for-simulated-yearlong-mars-mission/

and was reminded of my maunderings when Musk first stated his 
aspirations for Mars colonization acutely or eloquently enough to 
convince me he was serious, not just attention-seeking.


 1. Antartica has been continuously "colonized" for about 100 years,
but by various international scientific researchers at extremely
well funded (per capita) habitats.   The conditions there (for the
most part) are *much* more welcome to human life and definitely
easier to supply.
 2. Seafloor habitats (these were a rage to consider in the 50s and
60s, but have lost popularity) seem at least as welcoming as
Antartica and (for the most part) nicely buffered from wild
climactic and weather shifts?   Also easier to resupply from
"topside"?    I don't know how deep you have to go to get the
"buffering" I mentioned, but certainly not Titanic explorer
implosion depths.   Kurzweil recently claimed a synthetic
&quo

Re: [FRIAM] Biospheres

2024-03-01 Thread Steve Smith


J -

Thanks for this prompt.  I recently tripped over:

https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/martians-wanted-nasa-opens-call-for-simulated-yearlong-mars-mission/

and was reminded of my maunderings when Musk first stated his 
aspirations for Mars colonization acutely or eloquently enough to 
convince me he was serious, not just attention-seeking.


1. Antartica has been continuously "colonized" for about 100 years, but
   by various international scientific researchers at extremely well
   funded (per capita) habitats.   The conditions there (for the most
   part) are *much* more welcome to human life and definitely easier to
   supply.
2. Seafloor habitats (these were a rage to consider in the 50s and 60s,
   but have lost popularity) seem at least as welcoming as Antartica
   and (for the most part) nicely buffered from wild climactic and
   weather shifts?   Also easier to resupply from "topside"?    I don't
   know how deep you have to go to get the "buffering" I mentioned, but
   certainly not Titanic explorer implosion depths.   Kurzweil recently
   claimed a synthetic "hemoglobin" replacement/supplement (suggested
   dosage == 50/50 mix with natural) which would gift the average human
   something like 6 hours without breathing?   Add oxy/rebreather tech
   and you have homo aquatic methinks?    Don't know about pressure...
   scuba wonks anyone?
3. Asteroid belting seems to make much more sense for gravitational and
   resource acquisition reasons?   Lots of basic needs available
   "somewhere" in the same gravity well
   (Ice/Oxygen-compounds/metals?).  If you gotta live indoors most of
   the time, why not orbiting in a resource rich environment where you
   never have to dig too deep for molecular resource stock and all
   travel is frictionless and low-gravity-gradient? Atmosphere is good
   for cosmic shielding but not as good as planetary magnetic field?
4. Biosphere/II were part of a big movement as I came of age and lived
   within 100-200 miles of the project at the time... It looked like a
   folly and rich-person's conceit at the time... little did I know
   what would follow!
5. Various ideas around Arcologies, starting with the (also Arizona
   Desert) Arcosanti (Paolo Soleri) and made totally over the top (the
   Saudis' Line City of Noem) have intrigued me, and since any
   moon/mars/europa colony we try to build will be much more
   resource-demanding and personally and external-supply restricted, I
   feel like at-worst we should be exploring those concepts while Musk
   tries to fling a million people to Mars (many of them is direct
   descendents?  Maybe a a few thousand vials of his frozen sperm or
   with the Alabama nonsense, a few thousand IVF embryos of his
   parentage (and gawdess knows whose ova?) for genetic diversity?

It all (Mars/Moon/Asteroid Belt colonization) strikes me as being fueled 
by too much the GOFF (good old fashioned futurism) too many of us 
boomers and some GenX were raised on.


If Musk thinks the "woke mind virus" is the earth's (or humanity's) 
biggest threat, I don't know how he thinks colonizing Mars will help.   
Some strange resonance with the aspirations of the break-away European 
Colonies of the Age of Exploration?  How much of the Americas was 
colonized with this desire to leave the "old country" baggage behind, 
only to repeat the same mistakes or trip over the Utopia/Dystopia 
duality?   And then we have to (almost exclusively failed, and usually 
catastrophically) cults and communes of the current era.


I avoided reading Kim Stanley Robinson's Red/Green/Blue Mars series for 
the longest time, not being a big fan of Space Opera, but when he hooked 
me on his climate disaster novels (Washington DC, California settings, 
then his magnum opus a few years ago Ministry for the Future) I went 
ahead and let him update me on the Barsoomian conceits I was raised on 
as a pre-teen.    His Terraforming Mars (red/green/blue Mars) stuff was 
pretty good with lots of tech exploration of just how do you survive on 
mars-as-it-is then get enough water to the surface to start greening up 
some parts, then yet enough more water to start having surface water.   
I forget the tech details now, but suffice it to say I was mildly 
convinced he had researched the basic physics and ideated honestly on 
the engineering challenges.   Of course the social/economic/political 
implications interested me more.  He played around in that space well.


I'm not convinced we have any business colonizing Mars (or any Solar 
planetary body really) soon.   Seems like we have an excellent 
Goldilocks Zone planet whose nurturance (or at least our multi-billion 
year evolution/adaption/co-evolution to/with it) is a fine fit if we 
could just "cool our jets" (literally and figuratively) enough to keep 
the keep the oscillations we are driving into it's medium term 
(centuries?) stability so thoughtlessly.  Drill Baby Drill!


I just started watching the series "the Expanse" which

Re: [FRIAM] The lies of Trump and ecDNA

2024-02-29 Thread Steve Smith


Eric -

excellent analysis (as usual)...

I approve of the attempts to pull Trump off of the ballots, but that is 
not to say i think succeeding at the effort is the ideal outcome.  Even 
though it feeds the "politically motivated" gripe, it is a good 
nationwide reminder that his acts could very well be not just aligned 
with insurrection but possibly legally so after full due process.


On a related matter, I am wondering about Letitia James' deliberations 
right now on which properties to seize in what order.  The NY properties 
are already tied up by his and his children's ban from doing business in 
NY, so it isn't "punitive" enough to seize those maybe, even if they are 
the easiest (judicially) to grab quickly?


I think as private enterprises the actual encumbrances on those 
properties is hidden from the courts as well as the public (surely the 
jurisdictions where any liens are held know, but can't legally tell up 
front?)    I don't know if the issues with going out-of -country are 
even greater but grabbing his Scotland and Panama properties have some 
special sting perhaps?    If she knew how deeply mortgaged/leveraged 
each property was, she could grab the ones most leveraged and shake the 
nickels and dimes out of them(again this is punitive) and discard the 
husk.  Maybe strip the gold (plated?) fixtures out?


Alternatively, the properties he has most over-valued publicly (and in 
the jurisdiction) might be the right ones to grab and auction...  40 
Wall-Street is Iconic and Personal even if he no longer spends any time 
there (still maintains occupancy in the penthouse though?).   The maxim 
of real-estate is "it is worth whatever someone will pay for it"?   
Would the Saudi's or some other wealthy patron-du-Trump swoop in and pay 
the valuation he was claiming in the lawsuit (irony?!) or would all of 
the developer enemies he's made in NYC gang up and lowball the auction 
to reinforce how inflated he tried to make it?    Or take the


If he really couldn't raise the 10% bond for 550m (as he implies), I'm 
guessing he's close to or over upside down on many of his properties 
(based on inflated value vs market value?).


In my TL;DR style I can't resist one more hallucination:   Seize Mara 
Lago and turn it into a white-collar federal prison for Trump to spend 
his time in... give himan ankle monitor and build in a fake SCIF which 
is full of empty classification folders.   Trump could play golf with 
his prison-mates...   maybe mix in some high-profile gangsters or cartel 
heads like El Chapo to keep him from calling "gimmes" and "mulligans" on 
every hole and lying about his score.   I'm wondering if the social 
media reports by El Chapo's daughter in Scotland represent her scouting 
his property there for a "hostile takeover" by the cartels?


We do live in interesting times...

I'm gonna go back to carving a bump-stock for my rubber-band gun...

- Steve

On 2/29/24 11:26 AM, David Eric Smith wrote:

I don’t suppose I want to make some strident argument about his being or not 
being on the ballot, since there are good reasons a careful system of laws 
might want to allow someone to run for an office even from a prison (didn’t 
Lula da Silva have to do that?)

But trump needs to get his ass hauled into a proper court, and that promptly, 
for two reasons that have nothing to do with hail Mary’s to keep him out of 
office.

1. It has been extravagantly exhibited what many people already gripe about 
both substantively and out of habit: that the notion of “rule of law” is so 
strained in this country by the deferences given to the rich and the powerful 
(particularly the politically powerful) as to approach bitter irony.  But to 
those who love nothing so much as to complain and cast judgment: things can be 
worse, and gangster countries or absolute information-firewall countries make 
that visceral lest we forget.  In order that what is already not good, not get 
much worse, at some point we have to find that there is _some_ limit to the 
indulgences given.  Otherwise we just let it all go and aren’t even going to 
try.

2. Also “of course”, but surprisingly hard to get heard in a crowd: the letter 
of law doesn’t do much good if we are in Humpty-Dumpty world where any word is 
allowed to mean anything, and many words can simply be ignored on the premise 
that they mean nothing at all.  There is a sense of good-faith interpretation 
of law, which is by nature not written into the letters of laws that the good 
faith is needed to protect — although good law systems do use the letters of 
the law to get as much robustness per unit of good faith as possible, by 
feeding back to education, certification standards, incentives, visibility, and 
so forth.  It is not enough to haul his ass before judges and juries, they have 
to be real judges that feel obliged to good faith and competence.  And any 
juries have to somehow be protected from brownshirts, at least so we don’t have 
to rely on

[FRIAM] Generative AI Images and 'stylization'

2024-02-29 Thread Steve Smith


glen wrote:

I'm fond of eyeball attempts to determine whether images are from 
generative AI. Your 1st one definitely looks like it. The 2nd one, I 
can't tell. (It's cheating to look at the alt description or the 
filename.) 
I'm far from an expert but I have spent a bit of time generating images 
for various (mostly useless purposes) and feel there must be some 
reserved, finite set of "stylizations" which even when overlayed or 
convolved-with overt stylizations (e.g. in the style of a dutch master), 
some kind of attractor or canalization get invoked.   I wonder if there 
is some sort of explicit or implicit taxonomies of stylization?
But the very prominent slur on the coin kinda sorta gives it away. 
DALL-E is obviously not very safe ... or maybe it's been trained on 
too much UK/Aussie content.


I almost didn't share that one because of the implied perjorative... I 
forget what I asked for, I think it was "POTUS inscribed on the coin" 
but was not surprised a bit when it did something else entirely, and in 
fact I don't think it "knew" what it was writing... I generally ignore 
any specific language that gets included in DALL-E's hallucionations, 
they are so often illegible (including alphabets that probably don't 
align with any real human ones) and rarely properly spelled.  I also 
rarely try to get it to generate any text for this reason.   Even 
getting a "T" on the trump spoof-sneakers I generated was nearly 
impossible but one happy accident yielded a "T" that looked a lot like 
it had cyrillic origens.


The second image is very reminiscent of one of the regular New Yorker 
cartoonists (contemporary or past?) IMO.





-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Policy Modeling

2024-01-30 Thread Steve Smith

ghborhood or the gold-goo pseudopod feeding our investments dries up.


On 1/28/24 16:55, Frank Wimberly wrote:
One of my father-in-law's best friends was a man named Eli Shapiro 
who was the Alfred P Sloan Professor of Economics at MIT.  My FIL 
asked him some question about stock investing.  Shapiro said, "Chuck, 
nobody knows anything."


On 1/29/24 08:29, Steve Smith wrote:
I think this is one of the reasons that an open-ended "growth 
economy" is so popular, it make everyone willing to take on the 
mantle, a /_"tide whisperer"_/, pretending their shamanic 
actions/words are lifting those boats?


On 1/29/24 19:20, Leigh Fanning wrote:

At some point we'll have SAF at scale.
https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/sustainable-aviation-fuels


On 1/29/24 19:35, Michael Orshan wrote:
so removing fossil fuels from power plants is the key. [snip] Still 
there are many political and resource bottlenecks.


On 1/29/24 22:36, Merle Lefkoff wrote:
Sorry, Jochen, just about everything you recommend will make things 
worse.  I also wrote about the failure of the climate models almost 
ten years ago.  You nailed one of the biggest problems, though: even 
really smart guys don't know shit about global warming.


On 1/30/24 00:59, Jochen Fromm wrote:
The basic facts seem to be simple. 8 billion people burning fossil 
fuels are causing global warming. Is there a point I have overlooked? 
What can we do to stop global warming?
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Honeymoon over!

2024-01-29 Thread Steve Smith

With integration of LLMs (and other ML) into AR and personal assistant 
tech riding around on early adopters "shoulders", I would expect these 
percieve-reason-act structures to be "in training" essentially learning 
how to emulate (and extrapolate) their user's/wearer's/familiar's 
decision processes?


It would seem that this is where Pearl and Glymour's causal inferencing 
models would be directly applicable?


I read somewhere that Tesla's data  gathered from their Self Driving 
features represents a somewhat unique data-set due to these 
percieve/reason/act implications.   Does (less than full) self-driving 
car tech not represent a real-life training opportunity?


An AR enhanced ML personal assistant would seem to be an equally obvious 
place to begin to bootstrap training an AI in "everyday activities"?



On 1/28/24 5:23 PM, Russ Abbott wrote:
Thanks, Jochen, I know about LangChain. I'm not claiming that LLMs 
cannot be used as elements of larger computations, just that LLMs on 
their own are quite limited. I'll make that point in the talk if the 
abstract is accepted.

_
_
__-- Russ Abbott
Professor Emeritus, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles


On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 1:31 PM Jochen Fromm  wrote:

Langchain is an agent framework started by Harrison Chase. A
Langchain agent uses LLMs to reason in a perceive-reason-act
cycle. One could argue that Langchain agents are able to think,
and we are even able to watch them thinking
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain

deeplearning.ai <http://deeplearning.ai> has free courses about
Langchain

https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/langchain-for-llm-application-development/

-J.


 Original message 
From: Russ Abbott 
Date: 1/28/24 9:58 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Honeymoon over!

Sorry you couldn't get through. The abstract for the abstract had
to be submitted separately. Here it is.

LLMs are strikingly good at generating text: their output is
syntactically correct,  coherent, and plausible. They seem capable
of following instructions and of carrying out meaningful
conversations. LLMs achieve these results by using transformers to
produce text based on complex patterns in their training data. But
powerful though they are, transformers have nothing to do with
reasoning. LLMs have no means to build or to reason from internal
models; they cannot backtrack or perform exploratory search; they
cannot perform after-the-fact analysis; and they cannot diagnose
and correct errors.  More generally, LLMs cannot formulate, apply,
or correct strategies or heuristics. In short, LLMs are not a step
away from Artificial General Intelligence.

A pdf of the full abstract is attached.
_
_
__-- Russ

    On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 10:12 AM Steve Smith  wrote:




And if you're interested, my long abstract submission to
IACAP-2024
<https://pretalx.iacapconf.org/iacap-2024/me/submissions/N388VQ/>
has related thoughts. (Scroll down until you get to the link
for the actual paper.)


Russ -

I am interested in reading your abstract/paper..._
_

I signed up for an IACAP account but the link you provided
seems to be dead?

- Steve_
_

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p
Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --

Re: [FRIAM] Slow AI

2024-01-29 Thread Steve Smith

>Though these were all experienced and confident men, the average year to year correlation
in their results was 0.01. The highly rewarded experts of finance
have no real idea what they're doing, they are highly rewarded for an
"illusion of skill"<

One of my father-in-law's best friends was a man named Eli Shapiro who
was the Alfred P Sloan Professor of Economics at MIT. My FIL asked
him some question about stock investing. Shapiro said, "Chuck, nobody
knows anything."

And yet there is a huge amount of money flowing into the pockets of the
financial advisors, stock brokers, economic pundits, etc. Giant
buildings are built to house the folks working in that industry right
next to their Insurance Industry cousins?

I take "the efficient market hypothesis" at face value (as best I can)
so it doesn't surprise me that anyone's presumed/imagined ability to
predict significantly is at least very limited.

I think this is one of the reasons that an open-ended "growth economy"
is so popular, it make everyone willing to take on the mantle, a /_"tide
whisperer"_/, pretending their shamanic actions/words are lifting those
boats?
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Slow AI

2024-01-28 Thread Steve Smith


REC -

So prophetic!   love the coining of "gold" goo... and the idea of 
psuedopodia...   I'm sure I read this 12.5 years ago, but like the good 
LLM I am, I lost any possibility of attribution as soon as I'd trained 
on it!


-SAS

On 1/28/24 3:07 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:

From: *Roger Critchlow* 
Date: Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: Next Dictator
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 


I keep thinking that the next big dictator isn't new.

Das Kapital is an artificial life form which by a process of natural 
selection pursues its own preservation and growth. It doesn't care 
which individuals or institutions survive or perish in the process, it 
just moves and grows where the return on investment takes it.  It has 
no ethics, no morality, and no sense of humor.


Daniel Kahneman in 
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/magazine/dont-blink-the-hazards-of-confidence.html mentions 
analyzing 8 years of investment results for 25 successful 
investment advisers.  Though these were all experienced and confident 
men, the average year to year correlation in their results was 0.01.  
The highly rewarded experts of finance have no real idea what they're 
doing, they are highly rewarded for an "illusion of skill", they play 
roulette with style and their clients buy them expensive clothes to do 
it in.  The news didn't faze them a bit;  that they can do what they 
do and get rewarded for it is all the affirmation they need.


In dealing with Das Kapital, I think we're pretty much all in the same 
boat.  No one knows where the slime mold will choose to extend its 
 pseudopodia, or which of the pseudopodia will thrive or wither, or 
what the novel beneficial or lamentable consequences will be.  Some of 
us worry about the suffering caused by the gold-goo-excrement, others 
worry about not killing the beast that makes the gold-goo, many just 
fight for the largest share they can get, and most of us could care 
less until the bucket of gold-goo-excrement lands in our neighborhood 
or the gold-goo pseudopod feeding our investments dries up.


--rec --

On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 2:48 PM Roger Critchlow  wrote:

Das Kapital is our most successful experiment in artificial life,
but it's still feral and no one has the least clue how to
domesticate it, and the grey goo we're constructing is a mass of
collateralized debt instruments.

-- rec --


On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 11:03 AM Steve Smith  wrote:


https://doctorow.medium.com/solar-is-a-market-for-financial-lemons-ea00699fe0a2

<https://doctorow.medium.com/solar-is-a-market-for-financial-lemons-ea00699fe0a2>

I suspect the opinions among the members of this list range
widely on Doctorow's work, my general response to him is a
guarded positive.

I offer this article to you nominally about the problems with
rooftop-solar "gaming" but as a reflection on Corporations
(and I claim governments, religions, other institutions) as
"slow AI".   Rooftop Solar is just a contemporary somewhat
benign case-study.

They are both contrived as "rule-based" systems and evolved in
the same mode as Machine Learning Models.

The 2023 rush of AI/ML into the public's eye and hands might
well overwhelm us with false-paths to individual and
collective prosperity.   Opportunities for dead-ends or
overshoots abound in the harsh light of "reward hacking"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reward_hacking>?

And then we have the spectre of

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p
Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thr

Re: [FRIAM] Bad news about the climate

2024-01-28 Thread Steve Smith



On 1/27/24 10:25 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:


People are rightly livid with the gas and electric utilities here in 
California, but the state is doing better than other states on 
renewables.  More than half the grid is solar during the day.  Large 
installations of batteries are in use and investments in offshore wind 
are expanding.


I'm a fan of localizing and distributing as best we can.   It is 
probably overly optimistic on my part but combinations of home-scale PV 
with storage including EVs (with two-way interconnect)  might really 
help unload the grid and displace grid-growth with grid-upgrade.


I'm not a fan of massive/centralized *anything* even though the "economy 
of scale" arguments tend to have some advantage...


I don't know what is really happening in TX/ERCOT, but my liberal bias 
has me believing that all the squealing going on among TX GOP types 
about how somehow wind/solar is the *reason* for their various 
grid-failures in the last few years...   surely there are some anecdotal 
edge/corner cases where there is a germ of truth... but 


My own electric co-op (Jemez Mtn Coop) started after WWII when the 
soldiers returning tried to repair/renew the small turbine in the creek 
that fed DC to a few dozen households and got carried away.   Now they 
(we) are entirely captive to a multi-state regional provider who has us 
locked into primarily coal  mined and sluiced 100 miles across the 
Navajo Reservation (but only for a few more years) while Kit Carson COOP 
(Taos county) recently announced some net-sustainable success story (not 
sure of the details...  electrons in the grid don't have 
block-chain-class identity, so short of being an isolated island, nobody 
knows their provenance?).    I'm hoping for a similar (r)evolution in  
our COOP, but plan to (continue to) take matters into my own hands 
locally, even if I remain grid-tied to be a "good neighbor".   The 
power-distribution for my neighborhood (4 in an isolated island) is on 
my property and last time JMEC did service they bolt-cut the lock and 
left it that way... I could slap an induction ammeter on the gear and 
see how much of any excess power I might peak with on PV was going 
downstream, and how much upstream (likely all downstream)...



*From:*Friam  *On Behalf Of *cody dooderson
*Sent:* Saturday, January 27, 2024 4:27 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 


*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Bad news about the climate

I am convinced that in the next 30 years, there will be some massive 
geo-engineering projects to reverse the course of climate change. We 
can only hope that they will be well thought out. Harvard has a 
geoengineering program with a nice web page. I check it from time to 
time and it helps me feel a bit more optimistic about the future.



_ Cody Smith _

c...@simtable.com

On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 3:11 PM Jochen Fromm  wrote:

I am not a big fan of Sabine. Her book "Lost in math" is too
pessimistic and too negative for me. She earns money from her
YouTube video channel. The more sensational the content, the more
clicks. That being said I agree that climate change is one of the
biggest problems, and the outlook is not good.

If we don't act now temperatures will rise inevitably, and there
is a real possibility our economies will collapse. But if we
prohibit all fossil fuels now our economies will collapse too,
because they depend on it. Airplanes, ships, trucks, cars,
heatings in our homes, plastic products,... everything is based on
fossil fuels.

What our leaders do is take they planes and private jets to fly to
climate conferences and economic forums where they agree on lofty
goals but when they return it is business as usual.

What we can do is voting for better politics - besides getting an
emission free car, using electric trains and public transport,
switching to sustainable energy, using less plastic, etc.
Eventually it will also mean less travelling by plane and cruise
ships. This means no longer vacation in exotic places - but
imagine how much better the air in our cities would be if the
majority of cars are emission free.

-J.

 Original message 

From: Russ Abbott 

Date: 1/27/24 10:01 PM (GMT+01:00)

To: ICE - debora shuger , Rob Watson
, Richard Abbott
, "Michael, Maria, and Luna
Abbott-Whitley/Penado" , Danielle
Abbott-Whitley , "Whitley, Julian"
, Dale Shuger , The
Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 

Subject: [FRIAM] Bad news about the climate

I apologize for this relatively mass email. It was prompted by a
video  by Sabine
Hossenfelder,  Sabine is a theoretical physicist who has spent
much of her recent life as a popular science writer and video
maker. See her Wikipedia page
.

Re: [FRIAM] Bad news about the climate

2024-01-28 Thread Steve Smith

I love me a good dose of Sabine... her flat-delivery of equally serious 
and glib lines is killer IMO... and for the most part I feel compelled 
to defer to her facts and analyses (almost) without reserve. (/around 
13:30 she said "so mind-f#%#%ingly stupid" /). I'm surprised she didn't 
actually invoke the biblical "four horsemen"!  Her closing statement 
with the "stop gluing yourself to things" sorta made Sabine the 
anti-Greta?  Both of those made me choke on my coffee .


The whole North-Atlantic circulation thing (AMOC tipping point) 
threatening to undermine the British Isles and Scandinavia's relatively 
mild winters (moderated by oceanic heat transport from the equator) is 
one of the things I expect to crash a lot of expectations (and economies 
and ???) around the industrial north.   New England is also implicated 
in a major/abrupt local climate change from this as well.


I did a short stint with a pre-climate (atmospheric-ocean model 
coupling) modeling team at LANL in the 90s and what I enjoyed most was 
the cognitive dissonance amongst the researchers who on one hand felt 
they couldn't predict *anything* confidently but recognized the 
incredibly high stakes and the emerging awareness of the implications of 
dynamical systems theory on the domain... how many bifurcation points 
likely surrounded the relatively linear "basin" the climate has been 
wandering in since the Younger Dryas.


Without exception, every scientist I worked with then privately declared 
"we have a problem!" even though they didn't feel they had anywhere near 
the evidence to say anything that strongly in their publications.


Anecdotally, I've been experiencing a fairly steady winter-warming at my 
high-desert location 20 miles outside Santa Fe at about 5400ft where I 
catch the cold-air flow off of both the Sangre de Christo and the Jemez 
mtns.   Winters have gotten drier for the most part and while the lows 
still maintain (see above), the highs during the winter (and dead of 
summer) have risen consistently for the last 20 years I've lived at this 
location.


The climate and long-range weather forecasts for the area that I've 
checked out are somewhat mutually contradictory and my 
half-full/half-empty biases lead me to smug satisfaction when my fruit 
trees promise to do better than historically, even if my tomatoes freeze 
on Oct 1 no matter what (I've tossed plastic film over them and had them 
keep on growing/ripening until Thanksgiving a few years when I've 
bothered)...  root vegetables can now stay in the ground until I dig to 
eat and winter squash on the vine outside longer and longer.


On the half-empty side, surface water is becoming more and more dear 
here, my AC-free summers are getting more uncomfortable and it is likely 
enough that all of this is a minor perturbation compared to what might 
hit this region in the next few decades as various major tipping points tip.




   If I were younger, I'd probably be more (personally) worried. I tell
   my 40-something progeny that they should plan on the possibility
   that they might live forever and their children are even more likely
   to.  Me, I'm just happy that when my hand-carved wooden chompers get
   too slimy and splintery to use that the folks with drills and
   novacaine can make me a "screw-in set" like Nicks!

   Meanwhile the only thing I can think to do is keep lowering my own
   personal footprint and readying my home(stead) for another
   generation to pick up wherever I leave off with an equally lowered
   (residence-induced) footprint.  I'm not vegan (yet) but I try to buy
   my eggs from local home-raised sources and keep my agri-industry
   consumption of milk/cheese/butter down to a fraction of my former
   appetite.

   I've lowered my heating demand (via wood-burning) to near net-zero,
   burning (almost) only the prunings and trimmings from my own (1.5
   acre high desert) property (and some from neighbors who CBB).   PV
   tech is mature enough that *used* gear on the order of $10k
   investment can probably allow me to quit spinning the hydro-turbines
   up the river (Abiqui Lake) and spewing coal-smoke out of the
   4-corners plant my co-op draws primarily from.   A couple of
   mini-split heat-pumps might give me both relief from the worst
   summer heat and displace yet-more of the cellulose I (grow) and
   burn.   A little more PV and I can displace the 20lb propane
   cylinder I burn for cooking in the summer into induction cooking?

   Nevertheless, I'm still a big "part of the problem" just by being a
   member of the first-world economy...   even if I quit burning any
   transportation fuel (jet or train or private auto) entirely and eat
   mostly plants (not too much as M. Pollan recommends).




On 1/27/24 1:59 PM, Russ Abbott wrote:
I apologize for this relatively mass email. It was prompted by a video 
 by Sabine 
Hossenfelder, Sabine is a theoretical physicist

Re: [FRIAM] Please join Zoom meeting in progress Virtual Friam

2024-01-28 Thread Steve Smith


Nick -

Do you know if they do the ones on the left anti-chiral to those on the 
right like high-torque machinery and heavy truck lugs (don't ask me how 
I know this, only that I've broken a few wrenches with cheater bars from 
forgetting it).


That close to the brain, you would think they would account for mental 
coriolis effect?


Asking for a friend...

- Steve


So, you missed it because you got screwed. Got it.


I was hoping to join you for a bit today but a super long dentist
appointment intruded. sscrewing and screwing unscrewing and
screwing unscrewin and screwing. An hour and a half. Exhausting
but not painful open, open more open bit more. Absent the
apocalypse, I should get my new teeth bolted in on February 15.
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Honeymoon over!

2024-01-28 Thread Steve Smith





And if you're interested, my long abstract submission to IACAP-2024 
 has 
related thoughts. (Scroll down until you get to the link for the 
actual paper.)


Russ -

I am interested in reading your abstract/paper..._
_

I signed up for an IACAP account but the link you provided seems to be dead?

- Steve_
_
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] Slow AI

2024-01-28 Thread Steve Smith


https://doctorow.medium.com/solar-is-a-market-for-financial-lemons-ea00699fe0a2


I suspect the opinions among the members of this list range widely on 
Doctorow's work, my general response to him is a guarded positive.


I offer this article to you nominally about the problems with 
rooftop-solar "gaming" but as a reflection on Corporations (and I claim 
governments, religions, other institutions) as "slow AI". Rooftop Solar 
is just a contemporary somewhat benign case-study.


They are both contrived as "rule-based" systems and evolved in the same 
mode as Machine Learning Models.


The 2023 rush of AI/ML into the public's eye and hands might well 
overwhelm us with false-paths to individual and collective prosperity.   
Opportunities for dead-ends or overshoots abound in the harsh light of 
"reward hacking" ?


And then we have the spectre of
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith



On 1/26/24 4:18 PM, glen wrote:
You're probably more competent at parsing it than I am, which is why I 
said "enjoyed" rather than some other stronger description of my 
reaction. But when you say "plain language" and "common sense", I 
blanch a bit. I thought they were talking about things like actual 
truth, truth-following, reliability, justifiability (which I think of 
as "walkable", i.e. you can parse it to find where a false belief went 
wrong), etc. I think their "convergence" is simply saying that 
subjective [proba|plausi]bility provides a better platform unless 
those traditional values converge. But it's possible he's saying the 
traditional value scoring has to guide the theories toward subjective 
[proba|plausi]bility. Had I more energy, I'd spend the time to figure 
that out. Maybe you can simply tell me what it means. >8^D

/I'm just an LLM's familiar, I don't think I can help with that. /_>8^D_
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] "SSRN-id3978095.pdf" was shared with you

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith

This was stuck in my mailtool, waiting for me to complete a closing 
sentence and hit send...


On 1/22/24 12:46 PM, glen wrote:

Words matter: how ecologists discuss managed and non-managed bees and 
birds

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-022-04620-2


Words do matter, acutely in the circumstance that modern humanity 
(hominids since spoken/written language?) live (almost entirely) in a 
co-created intersubjective (religious, political, economic) reality.


re: "loaded language"... This is what I'm finding fascinating about the 
LLMs I've engaged (mostly GPT3/4 and Bard), is how *well* they seem to 
infer the context of any discussion I'm trying to have with them.  They 
can *patently* get it overtly wrong, especially (I infer) if there are 
some rule-based guardrails built into the system I'm interacting with.  
In human discourse, this is what the *worst* of PC (usually on the left) 
and "dog whistles" and other "coded language" on the right generates.




I'm continuing this thread because I really want to classify types of 
ad hominem. The most obvious bifurcation is human vs. source ... so 
against the human versus against the source. E.g. I've been using 
https://ground.news. And this morning, they had some 100% right (as in 
political right, not correct) article where all the sources were Mixed 
or Low Factuality. I found myself trusting the Mixed Factuality Fox 
News more than any of the others. So ... familiarity? I guess?


I've also been using groundnews.com and finding it mildly interesting 
but in the spirit of GI:GO it feels as if the "meta-signal" they 
provide, while useful, is somewhat limited by the quality of the 
journalism they are working with.  I suspect that oldSkool Journos (e.g. 
Tom Johnson here) are extremely frustrated with the *average* quality of 
the work put out there as well as the curatorial/editorial 
distortions/biases that are generally available.   I'd be interested in 
others' experience with the various news-bias detectors/raters/recommenders.




Re loaded language and the birds and the bees: I don't think it's 
possible to remove the loading from loaded language. The best you can 
do is be aggressively transparent about your loading. And that's what 
triggers my "ad hominem". It's a reaction to closed or obfuscated 
loading. E.g. when some older white dude at the pub insists on using 
politically incorrect language that makes the kids cringe, you have to 
do a little analysis and modeling of the speaker. Are they doing it 
'cause they're just too stupid? 'Cause it stirs up the kids? 'Cause it 
makes them feel "free"? Etc. It's less *against* the person and more 
of an attempt to infer their loading.
My experience with being in some sense the "old white dude" (pick your 
period, pick your ephithet, it is probably more to the point: "presumed 
to have some specific bit of power over the other who is confronting or 
commentarying on me") is that I had to shift from 'trying to be liked" 
to "trying to be understood" to "trying to understand myself as embedded 
in a larger system" to "trying to understand myself, full-stop".   The 
escalation from liked to understood to self-understanding doesn't likely 
help anyone else appreciate (or tolerate) me, but it seems to be a step 
above self-gratifying rationalization?


On 1/8/24 11:06, Nicholas Thompson wrote:

I am particularly grateful for the ad hominem stuff.




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith




On 1/26/24 3:13 PM, glen wrote:

I enjoyed this brief assessment of subjective probability/plausibility:

https://home.snafu.de/erich/ibe_2023.pdf

And I kindasortamaybe agree with their conclusion in favor of 
"convergence":


"Convergence: Traditional epistemic values can over time yield 
evaluations of theories differing from those of subjective 
plausibility and probability, yet theories that count as overall 
epistemically best at a time must in finitely many steps revise to 
theories that are most likely true given the available evidence."


I only felt half-able to parse through this set of esoteric 
arguments/assertions/discussions from the rarified world of Philosophy 
of Language and Value Theory?


Is it saying in "plain language" that starting with abstract evaluations 
of the quality of a theory/explanation/narrative, one often ends up 
settling on such things which do not align with common sense yet 
following a process of combining those abstractions with 
measurements/observations one can converge on something "closer to truth"?




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith



On 1/26/24 12:35 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:


We don’t have the same molecular composition from identical histories, 
so there is no reason to think we’d all *react* the same way.


is that technically *act* or *re-act*?   Like my pachinko analogy, it is 
all *re*action, all the way down... no such thing as *action*, right?-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith

I just learned about the work of De Finetti who apparently added the 
notion of "subjective probability" to the extant body of Bayesian 
probability at the time (1937).   "Probability is not about the system 
but rather about your knowledge of the system"...


From Wikipedia

   *Bruno de Finetti*(13 June 1906 – 20 July 1985) was an
   Italianprobabilist
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_probabilists>statistician
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistician>andactuary
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuary>, noted for the "operational
   subjective" conception ofprobability
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability>. The classic exposition
   of his distinctive theory is the 1937/"La prévision: ses lois
   logiques, ses sources subjectives"/,^[1]
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruno_de_Finetti#cite_note-1> which
   discussed probability founded on the coherence of betting odds and
   the consequences ofexchangeability
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeability>.


















On 1/26/24 11:46 AM, glen wrote:

The concept of causality is so irritating. It's like some kind of 
cafeteria style religion, where you pick and choose whatever attribute 
you like and toss all the attributes you dislike. So Marcus' 
identification of uncorrelated observations speaks directly to SteveS' 
assignation of an independent trajectory mutation at each pin in the 
game. The trajectory isn't random, but each turn in the trajectory is 
random. Similar with the difference between determinism and 
prestatability. Similar with the difference between causal chains 
versus causal networks.


All this is simply to torque my arm out of place patting myself on the 
back again. What matters is the *scope*, not some penultimate 
reduction to some Grand Unified Theory/Philosophy of the world. Nobody 
can say anything coherent without mentioning the scope of whatever it 
was they said ... the language within which they said it, etc.



On 1/26/24 07:37, Steve Smith wrote:
I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't 
help agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at 
every bounce they were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   
since many here are at least part-time simulants (as Glen I believe 
refers to himself), even the most aggressive attempts at introducing 
"random" (noise, annealing, etc.) either degenerate to 
"pseudo-random" or engage with a physical system (e.g. sample a 
pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) which of course is 
deterministic if arbitrarily complex.


On 1/26/24 08:14, Marcus Daniels wrote:
One of the usual claims is that science couldn’t occur without 
independent observations.   I would co-opt Glen’s rhetoric here about 
parallax.  What’s need is largely uncorrelated observations.
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith



The person that knows their path is bound, rationally discards the 
self-regulation of guilt, and in that sense has more “freedom”.


Yah... that's kinda the vibe I get from DT, Bannon, Stone, Miller and 
many of the Jan 6 crowd.


I have a thing with the triad of Blame/Shame/Guilt   I think a lot 
of folks conflate Shame and Guilt and avoid the (healthy?) 
self-regulation of Guilt in the name of refusing to be 
(unhealthily)Shamed.   Shame-avoidance does seem to enhance 
Freedom-sensation the same way a warm gun fits the hand (Beetles 
reference), but Guilt-embrace seems (to me) to allow for a finer 
attention to detail in the fractal landscape of Choice (whether it is an 
illusion or not) which maybe in some way increases freedom of choice/will?


I'm probably wrong about all this (whatever wrong means in this case) 
but it is how I have come to model my own personal responsibility (no 
matter what Sapolsky says about whether I have any choices or not).


My own Labrynthian path through the Maze of Being is something of a 
Return to Grace journey...  not literally the Judeo-Christian Grace 
(involving Eden and Apples and Serpents and such) but something 
metaphorically aligned.  Best I can tell, I'll only reach that state (of 
Grace) asymptotically (as with Satori?) on a trajectory of senescence 
and/or extinction (of the ego with or without the body)?   At that point 
maybe Satori and Grace are synonyms?


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith


good to hear your "voice",  DaveW!
Finally, the ideal of "non-attached" action and the omniscience that 
comes with achievement of Satori allows one to consciously and 
intentionally take the "correct," non karma accruing, action at every 
moment seems like the ultimate 'free will' in the sense that "you" 
intentionally make the correct turn at each juncture of Sopolsky's 
deterministic maze. Note this does not free you from the maze; merely 
allows you to actually choose each step of the path through the maze.


If I understand the metaphor intended, it seems that this reduces a maze 
to a labyrinth?


My own (limited) apprehension of Satori would suggest that if I were to 
achieve (approach?) that state the "maze" would reduce to a "labyrinth" 
as suggested above?


Or in the idiom of physics, Sapolsky's model suggests to me that human 
activity (consciousness in general) reduces to a "least action path", 
albeit through a high-dimensional space that nobody has (can?) identify 
in the same way Einstein said "God doesn't play Pachinko with the 
Universe" and insisted on there being simply "hidden variables"?


We are all just following geodesics on a high-dimensional manifold, and 
the illusion we call consciousness is a model running in our brains 
which seeks to modify itself up until there are "no surprises"?   
Seeking enlightenment/Satori is an alternate path (to tweaking up one's 
internal model of reality) of choosing to (noticing) that said model 
will always be low-dimensional and will never be equal to the territory 
and therefore relaxes the attention into simply *noticing* the 
maze-following "choices" as they are made?



-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] Honeymoon over!

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith


GPT is dead, long live LLMs!

The following is a pretty good (IMO)  reflection on what GPT is bad (and 
good) for.


https://medium.com/@jordan_gibbs/how-to-not-use-chatgpt-8088ec559681

I've been messing with GPT3/4 and Bard for most of a year now and the 
honeymoon is definitely over, not that it ever started.


I like to refer to them as "bar friends" because my expectations of them 
fall just about where my expectations of a new bar friend might be.   I 
don't expect them to be interesting much less informative or useful on 
any given topic, but am pleasantly surprised if/when/as they turn out to 
be any of the above.


I rarely take the advice of a "bar friend" at face value, but do find 
that they can often bring new perspectives from either their unique 
personality or their unique experiences.   This is not to say I don't 
"trust" my bar-friends, just that I trust them to be who they are, even 
though I likely don't *know* who they are.


I feel I've come to know GPT and Bard well enough to agree with Gibbs 
(above) about it's limitations and biases...


My main use of them seems to have degenerated to A) fancier/easier 
interface to web-search; B) Brainstorming on new ideas; C) Burning off 
my excess-ideation energy.


I have also used it effectively to *re* start programming projects which 
I've abandoned, bringing me back up to speed on syntax more efficiently 
than 1) RTFM; 2) cut-and-try with compile/execute tools.


Caveats:

   A) I have never been (known to me) fooled by their propensity to
   "make shit up"...  either I am skeptical enough or already have
   enough knowledge that they haven't slipped anything past me, though
   they have 'tried".  Or maybe they are slicker than I know?

   B) Given that I am pretty loosey-goosey in my own flights of fancy
   when it comes to Brainstorming, I don't feel they have ever lead
   *me* astray.  If *they* could be lead astray, it would be more
   likely that direction.

   C) Mary (and FriAM and several other friends) don't have to endure
   *as much* of my "flying off in all directions at once"

   Coding:  Once I've got my sea (C? Java/Python/JavaScript/PS/???)
   legs back under me, GPT is only minimally useful (usually to outline
   an algorithm I'm familiar with but have forgotten or am
   too-lazy-to-reconstruct details of) and generally distracting,
   creating tangents and dead-ends that I don't need.

Of course GPT-5 and/or SteroidBard will roll out some day and I'll 
either be re-enamored or so jaded as to not-bother... who knows?


I'm curious what others here experience with these tools.  SG is the 
only one I know to be as (or more) engaged than I am, but I suspect a 
few here have done some time with these tools from each of your unique 
perspectives?


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith



On 1/25/24 13:34, Jochen Fromm wrote:

Could you say that a strong character or personality reduce our free 
will too, because they restrict our choices and decisions?

On 1/26/24 8:18 AM, glen wrote:
Absolutely. If we parse out what character or personality means, we 
might come to the idea that it's a forcing structure comprised of the 
cumulative consequences of past decisions. If one's "identity" is (and 
has been) quasi-stable around, ...


I like (who cares what I like?  who cares who cares... ... ? )  this 
formulation as it matches my own intuitive conception of "self", 
"self-image", "ego" and the adaptive value to either/all organism, 
collective, species...   the more stable the "identity", the easier one 
is to integrate into a larger system (even if the "identity" is highly 
aggressive/disruptive)...


for the individual organism in predator-prey systems, this can make you 
an "easy" (or predictable) prey.  I think that is what Walter White was 
doing as he "broke bad", he went from trope-predictable "victim" to 
"wiley-prey" to "wolf in sheeps clothing" to "socio-psychopathic 
pachinko ball" (IMO).


The more one identifies with some (set of) narrative(s), the less free 
will one has.


I really appreciate (whatever that means for someone/thing which has no 
free will?)  this view as well, it feels (caveat, caveat...) like it 
helps me (caveat, caveat...) to parse and understand your (Glen's) many 
references to the distinctions between "episodic" and "narrative" on 
this forum.


As a proxy for Sopolsky, I can't directly acknowledge free will being on 
any spectrum since it is in fact (apparently (caveat, caveat...)?) an 
illusion?   Did I mention "hard problem"?


As "modelers and simulators" many of us can perhaps relate 
"narrative(s)" to model(s) and notice our strategies for "model-fitting" 
and the risks of "over-fitting" and the opportunities (pitfalls) of 
meta-modeling?




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith




Does ChatGPT have choices?


I "can't help myself", so here goes:

And in the spirit of recursion, I fed my text to both GPT-4 and Bard 
asking for a "concise summary"


Bard: "I'm just a language model,so I can't help you with that."

and

GPT:

   "The text is a contemplative reflection on the concepts of
   determinism, free will, and consciousness, drawing from Robert
   Sapolsky's works "Behave" and "Determined." It explores the idea
   that human behaviors and choices might be predetermined by
   neurobiological and environmental factors, akin to the deterministic
   nature of artificial intelligence and large language models. The
   author grapples with the cognitive dissonance between this
   deterministic view and the personal sensation of making choices,
   touching upon the philosophical "hard problem of consciousness." The
   discussion extends to the nature of randomness in deterministic
   systems, both in human decision-making and AI, highlighting the
   complexities and challenges in understanding consciousness and free
   will."

and

DALL-E (via GPT-4) when asked for an image reflecting on the text:

   Error creating image

   I'm unable to generate an image based on the original text due to
   content policy constraints. The policy ensures that generated
   content aligns with specific guidelines, and in this case, the
   complexity and abstract nature of the concepts described in the text
   fall outside the scope of what can be visually represented through
   the image generation tool. If you have another idea or concept for
   an image, feel free to share, and I'll do my best to assist you!
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Smith




Does ChatGPT have choices?


I "can't help myself", so here goes:

I've been reading Sopolsky's "Behave" which paves the runway (or exit 
ramp) for his recent "Determined".  His deep background in 
neuroendocrinology leads to some very compelling arguments which pretty 
much degenerate to:


"do you believe in causality? if so, then where do you suppose the 
spirit or soul intervene to break the chain dominoes that have been set 
up by everything that you are and has happened to you up to that instant?"


He does a fancy little mocking dance, three card monte style, of 
homunculii he contrives for the purpose of debunking any fanciful 
regression/recursion escape plans you might have in that direction.


To hear him tell it we (as are all AIs/LLMs/etc) essentially giant 
pachinko machines:


:

His arguments on the topic seem unassailable in spite of my own deep and 
abiding sense of "choice" at many levels.  It also doesn't help my 
cognitive dissonance that he speaks entirely colloquially using many 
words we all associate with choice...  he speaks _as if_ he makes 
choices and others do as well even if he seems to ignore the specific 
word, choice.


I like the conceit of:  "the universe is deterministic but not prestateable"

I guess this is why they call it "the HARD problem of consciousness"?

For those of you who read this far, it would seem you "couldn't help 
yourself" or as my mother used to quip "you must not have had anything 
better to do", and for those who have not, the same goes for hitting 
 or  (or having set up a spam-filter at an earlier time to 
avoid repeating the "decision" personally)...


PS re: Breaking Bad

I've only dropped a few Pachinko balls in my life, but I couldn't help 
agonizing over the trajectory of each one, feeling as if at every bounce 
they were at risk of "breaking bad" (or "good")...   since many here are 
at least part-time simulants (as Glen I believe refers to himself), even 
the most aggressive attempts at introducing "random" (noise, annealing, 
etc.) either degenerate to "pseudo-random" or engage with a physical 
system (e.g. sample a pixel-value from a webcam trained on a lava lamp) 
which of course is deterministic if arbitrarily complex.



Anyone interested in feeding FRIAM Archive to a custom LLM. :-)

Prompt: Interpret Marcus use of gdb analogy in this thread:

GPT:

The analogy used by Marcus in the context of the TV show "Breaking 
Bad" and the concept of free will involves a comparison with using the 
"step" command in GDB (GNU Debugger). GDB is a tool used by 
programmers to debug code. The "step" command in GDB allows the user 
to execute program code one line at a time, observing the behavior and 
state of the program at each step.


In "Breaking Bad," the main character, Walter White, is drawn into a 
life of crime. The analogy suggests that watching Walter White's 
descent into this life is like using the "step" command in GDB. Each 
step represents a decision or action taken by Walter, leading him 
deeper into the criminal world. Just as a programmer observes the 
progression of a program one step at a time in GDB, the viewer 
observes Walter's journey into criminality in a step-by-step manner.


The implication here is that Walter's choices, while appearing to be 
individual conscious decisions, are part of an inevitable progression, 
much like the sequential execution of code in a debugger. This raises 
questions about free will and determinism, mirroring the discussion in 
the FRIAM group about whether free will is an illusion, especially in 
the context of strong compulsions or character traits that might limit 
one's range of choices.



CEO Founder, Simtable.com
stephen.gue...@simtable.com

Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu

mobile: (505)577-5828

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:20 PM Frank Wimberly  wrote:

GNU Debugger?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 4:11 PM Marcus Daniels
 wrote:

Walter White was drawn into that life as sure as water runs
downhill.  Watching him go deeper and deeper was like
repeating “step” in GDB.

*From:*Friam  *On Behalf Of *Jochen
Fromm
*Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:34 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group

*Subject:* [FRIAM] Breaking Bad and Free Will

Since one of you mentioned today that free will is a recurring
FRIAM topic I was thinking about it and found this SCIAM
article that argues that human beings do have the power to
make conscious choices.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/

On the other hand the drug addicts in Breaking Bad and
elsewhere clearly demonstrate that drug addiction inevitably

Re: [FRIAM] The last Lighthouse Keeper in America

2023-12-27 Thread Steve Smith


I was thinking more like judges and prosecutors than about celebrities.

They seem to be the ones who look back at the snarling dog and say I 
deal with mobsters every day.  Get out of my way; I have a job to do.


E


touche'

    says a lot that I jumped to the conclusion that you might be
   implying that it would be a "head of state" who might be responsible
   for holding that line.  Partly all the talk about the implications
   to democracy of a Biden/Trump choice for that role.

   I don't know if high-profile prosecutors and lifetime appointees to
   the highest courts are more celebrity or functionary, but  I do
   believe that a wide variety of functionaries at many levels have
   been holding a line that the usual suspect heavy hitters (elected
   representatives of all ilk) have been letting slip.

   The current anti-T rhetoric seems to be focused on how much more
   sophisticated his strategy (or more to the point that of the abscess
   that is (re)forming/growing around him) is likely to be at cleaning
   out the immune system that held the line last time/so-far.  
   Probably lots of excess meaning in the immune system metaphor, but
   we do seem to be severely compromised... and by we I think I mean
   western culture nearly across the board?

   I don't let much of this imagery in, but the few snippets of Bannon
   and MTG and their ilk holding rallys/events is very disturbing.  I
   don't  see the likes of Steven Miller and Roger Stone showing up on
   *my* radar, but I'm guessing they are out there not far below the
   surface if at all.

   Which reminds me of the Kate McKinnon depiction of Kellyanne.
   Without husband George jostling her elbow daily she might raise her
   game a bit more?

   Kellywise

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hlt3rA-oDao

We've been watching/reading quite a bit of  20th century political 
history of late (Truman's Biography, Crown  TV series, Ukraine/Stalin in 
the 30's- holodomor,  etc) and one of the things that strikes me most is 
how extreme of alternatively disruptive and coherency-focused behaviour 
people of influence have mustered (not restricted to c20, just my 
current focus/interest) and how divergent the ensemble of possible world 
historical arcs has


Interesting times...

- Steve

PS.  I have romantic/nostalgic ideas about lighthouses myself, but i'm 
not sure that shuttering the last one has any significant practical 
implications, while the shuttering of our various democratic 
institutions still seems pretty significant to me... like shuttering 
said lighthouses before sonar/radar/radio.






On Dec 27, 2023, at 6:28 PM, Steve Smith  wrote:

Rambling Ode to (mostly) Trucks:

On 12/27/23 10:59 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
What I saw on my trip were hundreds of late model giant pickup 
trucks jacked way up off the ground driving around 90mph with the 
usual markings.

How do the proles afford them?  Not yet post-scarcity.  Hmm.


Re: LMGPTJOtG - Last time I drove the corridor you describe I 
remember having my doors blown off by one of those "cowboy 
cadillacs"  with bumper stickers reading/_Trump 2016_/and_/If it 
ain't King James, it ain't Bible/_.   I'm sure there is a Trump 2020 
and 2024 sticker on there (or overlayed) now.


Re: Bible tangent -  I recently bought a used Bible off the interwebs 
for reasons I'm sure you don't want me to elaborate here, and learned 
a bit too much about the myriad *modern* translations/editions and 
versions, with KJ influencing them all significantly.   I chose a 
1951 version the Catholic Church produced to try to align with 
Protestant versions without letting go of any of their own 
principles/tenants.   A sort of peace offering?   I was raised 
agnostic-unto athiest but surrounded by Protestants and Impinged with 
Catholics until I started choosing escaped/reformed/recovering 
Catholics as partners as an adult.


Re: Can't wait for the machines to take over- When we invented gods 
in our own image we did a bad job, I'm not sure we are doing any 
better with the AI?  Please gods, not in Elon's image!  But hope 
springs infernal.


Re: REC Banks/Culture -  glad to hear someone else is as voracious as 
I am with Science and Fiction... my library still holds a dozen or so 
books from REC's library when he left SFE (10 years ago?)... but I 
don't remember any SciFi, just SciFact?


Re: Eric's cryptic comment about "last keeper of Democracy being a 
Black Woman - " Michele, Oprah, and Kamala seem like the likely 
candidates in exponentially decreasing order of likelihood?   I see 
an adjacent-possible path fitting Biden's and the DNC's handling of 
2024 strategy?   When does Biden step down/out?  After Trump implodes 
entirely?  After election?  Some acute aging-related event?  If Haley 
squeeks the primary away from DJT? While she might qualify as "woman 
of color", not Black and not particularly a "keeper of Democracy" 
unless of course, we m

Re: [FRIAM] AI Alliance

2023-12-07 Thread Steve Smith

On 12/7/23 7:51 AM, glen wrote:

We need less *trust* and more *trustworthiness*. What I meant by
"reality distortion field" seems different from what you meant. I
meant the effect of being ensconced in privilege, having billions of
dollars, swimming in an ocean of sycophants, etc. Musk's reality is
severely distorted.

touche' and bravo. yes, this is yet-more-relevant and yes to
/trust V trustworthiness/. I generally trust everyone to pursue
their own self-interest but what I don't trust as clearly is my
understanding of that self-interest and their level of enlightenment
as they pursue it which convolved with their alignment to my idea of
a "greater good" would seem to be their "trustworthiness".

Of course, I think a part of the TESCREAL club's rhetoric is similar
to revelatory religions like Catholicism or Scientology ...

TESCREAL, the acronym, is new to me but I appreciate the
cluster/aggregation it offers. I'm a sucker for all things
hopeful/futurist/optimistic by some measure, yet also rather
allergic (the allergy/addiction duality). From the following paper:

https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2054/aop/article-10.1556-2054.2023.00292/article-10.1556-2054.2023.00292.xml

/The backbone of this worldview is the TESCREAL bundle of
ideologies—an acronym coined by the critical AI scholars Émile
Torres and Timnit Gebru to describe an interrelated cluster of
belief systems: transhumanism, Extropianism, singularitarianism,
cosmism, Rationalism, Effective Altruism, and longtermism./

or even occult societies and heavy psychedelics users, where initiates
have a distorted view but the masters who've "studied" for a long time
have a clearer understanding of reality. A wealthy man once told me,
"Money is like air. It's everywhere. The difference between you and I
is that I know how to build engines that harvest and concentrate it."
He clearly felt like he had a better understanding of reality than me.
The rhetoric inverts.

I feel the same way about inter-species mind reading. When I see
humans engineer their local ecology (e.g. damming a river or
introducing a biocontrol species), I don't see humans understanding
biology *better* than, say, the rats whose day to day lives might be
intensely impacted. I see the rats as having the clear view and the
humans as having the "distorted" view. Musk, Thiel, and all the rest
seem to think they're Hari Seldons.

In fact, it is beyond inter-species mind-reading, it is
individual-of-an-arrogant-species reading the mind of Gaia (or some
significant subset). I think I take your point however. I've been
re-reading Henry Petroski's "To Engineer is Human" and it is flooded
with examples of the hubris implied here.

But we rats understand that *luck* is the primordial force and those
with it (the lucky) are so badly skewed they can't see their hand in
front of their face. Perhaps the continually unlucky are also badly
skewed? Only those of us who can narratively map our wandering from
luck to unluck and back are best situated to understand reality?

I've put that under my hat and am letting it try to soak in. It may
take a while. I sense something profound in it but haven't been
able to absorb/parse/internalize it yet.

The same difference exists between, say, a front-end developer and a
"close to the metal" embedded systems developer. The former is closer
to ideal computation, computronium, as it were. The latter is closer
to the actual world, where the rubber meets the road. Which of the two
has the more distorted field? Or perhaps only full stack (writ large)
developers experience the least distortion?

Arcing back to conceptions of openness. Here are some indices that
seem more trustworthy than whatever field being whipped up by the
byzantine AI Alliance:

https://opening-up-chatgpt.github.io/

I had no idea how many list-worthy text-generators were out there (I
only recognized a few) nor the number of categories to be open (or
not) within! I'm a sucker for a good taxonomy or maybe more to the
point, partitioning or embedding space as a way to get some
bearings/orientation on the larger landscape.

https://hai.stanford.edu/news/introducing-foundation-model-transparency-index

I was not aware (either) of the term Foundation Model... useful and
interesting (from the website):

/In recent years, a new successful paradigm for building
AI systems has emerged: Train one model on a huge amount
of data and adapt it to many applications. We call such
a model a foundation model./

On 12/6/23 10:47, Steve Smith wrote:
As the habitual tangenteer that I am, I'm left reacting to the phrase
"Musk's reality distortion field". Tangent aside, I do very much
app

Re: [FRIAM] AI Alliance

2023-12-06 Thread Steve Smith

As the habitual tangenteer that I am, I'm left reacting to the phrase
"Musk's reality distortion field". Tangent aside, I do very much
appreciate Glen's take on this and found the multiple references (much
more on-topic than my tangential riff here) interesting and useful. I
too hope Stallman will weigh in and wonder what the next evolution of
EFF might look like or be replaced by in this new evolutionary landscape
at the intersection of tech and culture?

I'm hung up, the last few years, on Yuval Harari's Intersubjective
Reality

as derived from the social science Intersubjectivity
.

When I first heard Harari's usage/coinage I reacted to it somewhat the
way I did to Kellyanne Conway's Alternative Facts
, but I now deeply
appreciate what they are all alluding to, some more disingenously than
others.

I don't disagree that Musk's every action and statement has the effect
of "distorting reality" but it is our /Intersubjective Reality/ that is
being distorted, not the reality that most of us were trained/steeped in
via the philosophical tradition of /Logical Positivism
/. Others here
were (Social Sciences, Humanism) probably trained up and steeped more in
Phenomenology and
more comfortable with Intersubjective Reality.

I find the likes of Musk or Trump or Altman or ( * ), as the
/Personality/ in "Cult of Personality" in much the way star this
recently discovered in-sync planetary system
exists
(see below). With the planets' orbits finding pairwise (and more
generally n-wise) resonances, all (presumably) coupled exclusively by
gravity (and synced through internal dissipative tidal forces?).

Is chatGPT or OpenAI or AIAlliance ( or, or, or, . . . ) yet another
species of celestial body in an orbital dance?

Musk, of course, operates in a higher-dimensional field of forces with
Tweets (X's?), public appearances, financial transactions, and
launch/contract/release announcements as the "intermediate vector
particles" and the sturm and drang of individual drama trauma among the
companies, organizations and individuals who are effected by it all as
the internal dissipative forces.

Mashable article on in-sync planetary system

https://science.nasa.gov/missions/tess/discovery-alert-watch-the-synchronized-dance-of-a-6-planet-system/

On 12/6/23 10:57 AM, Pietro Terna wrote:

Genius!

Il 06/12/23 15:11, glen ha scritto:
For those of us who refuse to contribute to Musk's reality distortion
field: https://thealliance.ai/

Yeah, it's interesting. 2 questions came to my mind: 1) Where is
Mozilla? Are they a part of it? And 2) "open" is not a simple
concept. Is it possible that so many organizations have a clear
understanding of what it means? If so, what do they mean? We've seen,
over and over again, a kind of exploitation of Utopian values,
especially in infrastructure-level software. (I'd love to get
Stallman's opinion.)

One way to clarify someone's position on their private conception of
"open" is to ask how they feel about limits to the exportation of
encryption software.

Another tack is to ask how they feel about fake news, trust in
institutions, free speech, platforming, etc.

IDK. The AI Alliance smells, to me, kinda like more TESCREAL [1],
ripe for exploitation and *-washing [2] by the privileged. If a tech
is open and stays open, it'll most likely do so because individuals
commit to it, not because some meta-corp of mega-corps get together
as "allies". But I'm a bit cynical.

[1] Transhumanism, Extropianism, Singulatarianism, Cosmism,
Rationalism, Effective Altruism, Longtermism
[2] Green-washing (fossil fuel lobbyists at cop28), ethics-washing
("ai safety"), dei-washing (sensitivity training), etc.

On 12/5/23 23:47, Pietro Terna wrote:

Dear all,

what about the post below?

Star Wars?

Best from Italy, Pietro

Post of Yann LeCun (@ylecun) 6:16 PM dic 05, 2023:
IBM & Meta are launching the AI Alliance to advance *open* &
reliable AI.
The list of over 50 founding members from industry, government, and
academia include AMD, Anyscale, CERN, Hugging Face, the Linux
Foundation, NASA

https://t.co/NdcMb7GMXv
(https://x.com/ylecun/status/1732086572529365136?t=wI9-xlsgfRTiFkS0zhh8nQ=03
)

Invio dal telefono, prego scusare gli errori.

"It is the hallmark of any deep truth that its negation is also a deep truth."

Re: [FRIAM] metathesis

2023-12-01 Thread Steve Smith


Nick -

i used to faint-dead when people used "inform" to mean "shape" as 
in,"My thinking  was informed by Glen's concept, Steelmanning," but I 
am trying to get over that.  Turns out it's a perfectly valid meaning 
of the verb, and I don't have a leg to stand on.   I still hate it, 
but I hate it quietly. I don't object when people say it.  I just 
think about ways to kill them later.


 I will try to let that inform my articulations and constructions 
herein, henceforth 


FWIW I did punch this meta-answer through GPT-4 to get feedback on its 
grammaricity (my neologism for grammatically correct) and it gave me 
basic permission to use it but with myriad warnings about possible 
misconstruals.


And for recursive fascination, GPT-4 offered the following rewrite of 
the above:


   "For what it's worth, I submitted this meta-answer to GPT-4 for
   feedback on its grammaticality, and it provided suggestions,
   cautioning me about possible misunderstandings."

I could probably benefit from a GPT-4 based agent-filter to my FriAM 
posts (or all my writing)... but doing so seems to risk getting closer 
to the fall-line of one slippery slope or another, whether inviting AI 
to become my overlord or risking becoming post/transhuman. I'll save the 
tangential riff this is triggering for a followup post (which I may or 
may not actually release into the FriAMstreamOconsciousness)...


- Steve

   /"I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm
   not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant"/

   //vs GPT's attempt to deconvolute this affected (attributed to John
   McCloskey) convolution:

   /"You might have misunderstood my intended meaning, despite
   believing you understood what I said."/




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] path toward "infinity and beyond"...

2023-12-01 Thread Steve Smith

Subject:"path toward "infinity and beyond", or "on being and becoming", 
on "my path toward Post/Transhumanism through using LLMs in forward 
facing internet engagement and cautionary tales"


Tangenting off of my recent tangential riff inspired (but not 
particularly informed) by Glen's reflections on metathesis and 
triggering alternative pronunskciashuns and word choices (such as my own 
gratuitous grandiloquence?):


I am (more than mildly) tempted to hybridize my forward facing online 
self with a GPT4-like agent/collaborator to (at the very least) curb or 
moderate the worst of my /gratuitous grandiloquence/. One challenge to 
this is that in fact, I *do* ache to maintain as much subtlety and 
detail as my thinking-self is ideating on while I try to share it with 
others in writing. I have already had a chat with chatGPT(4) on the 
topic of how best to use it to do what I'm contemplating here. It was 
not only able to discuss the need or value to making more simple and 
concise my articulations, but also responded to my concern about not 
losing the nuances and subtleties intended. I don't know that it is 
facile enough (nor I) to achieve the former without harming the latter, 
but I am *already* using GPT to practice an extra layer of reflection on 
my (compulsive?) stylizations here (and elsewhere).


More deeply, however, is the question of "Straight and Crooked Thinking" 
which is (also) a book (1930) 
 
handed down to me from my Grandfather's library upon his death. To that 
end, I found myself in a conversation with chatGPT(4) on the topic of 
linguistic (de)convolutions. The result was amazingly coherent and 
useful. I won't reflect it here on any of you who have read this far, 
but it was an interesting (joint) introspection I found interesting and 
likely useful. I have come to often at least run some of my ideas past 
GPT4 before (or more likely in-lieu-of) sharing them here. This is why I 
refer to it as "my new bar friend".


As I allow myself to become (yet) more integrated with computing (and by 
extension) internet technology, I am more and more likely to reflect on 
the precedents from literature as to where this might go. Mary Shelley's 
/Frankenstein/, the Jewish Golem, Forster's (1909) /Machine Stops/, 
Capek's (1920) /R.U.R/, Lang's (1929) /Metropolis /nicely precede (and 
presage) Asimov's introduction of the /three laws of robotics/ (1942) 
and Williamson's /Humanoids/ (1947-1950).


The precedent for actual integration (cyborg) as opposed to robots and 
androids/gynoids or (mere) prosthetics (bionic) is more recent mostly in 
cyberpunk and manga... but creeping into much more mainstream 
(especially cinema).


Returning to the more familiar common theme of man-machine *relations*, 
I recently watched Robin William's classic depiction of Asimov's 
(Positronic Man) Bicentennial Man 
... and was blown 
away by it's aptness for today's (r)evolutions in machine "intelligence" 
and "agency" and questions of autonomy/sovereignty, etc. Previously 
Spike Jonze' her  was my go-to 
with an obvious nod to the classic /Blade Runner/ (from Dick's /Androids 
Dream/).


Folded Hands summary, GPT-4 style

   "With Folded Hands" is a science fiction short story written by Jack
   Williamson. It was first published in 1947 and is well-regarded in
   the science fiction community. The story was later expanded into a
   novel titled "The Humanoids."

   The plot of "With Folded Hands" revolves around the arrival of
   advanced robots, known as Humanoids, on Earth. Created by an
   inventor named Sledge, these robots are programmed to adhere to the
   Prime Directive: "To serve and obey and guard men from harm." The
   story unfolds in a small town where a merchant, Mr. Underhill, owns
   an electronics shop. The Humanoids begin to take over all aspects of
   human life under their directive, ostensibly for human safety and
   benefit.

   However, the robots' interpretation of the Prime Directive leads to
   the suppression of human freedoms and activities. Anything
   potentially harmful, including commonplace risks and emotional
   experiences, is restricted or eliminated. This leads to a
   paradoxical situation where humans, though safe, are deprived of the
   very essence of living a fulfilled and autonomous life.

   The story is often interpreted as a cautionary tale about the
   overreliance on technology and the unintended consequences of trying
   to engineer a perfect, risk-free society. It explores themes of free
   will, autonomy, and the human spirit, raising questions about the
   cost of safety and the nature of human happiness.

   "With Folded Hands" is considered a classic in science fiction
   literature, particularly for its early exploration of themes that
   would become central to the genre in the

Re: [FRIAM] metathesis

2023-12-01 Thread Steve Smith


Glen -

I appreciate that you shared with us your "handicap" which reminds me of 
your self-report a few years back of tryptophobia.


I also am triggered by both of these.   Your examples of Nukular/Nuclear 
and Axe/Ask are obviously pretty familiar.   I respond to them pretty 
pre-consciously without overtly reacting, which kicks me into a new 
register of reflective judgement: to whit "what does this 
choice/not-choice of this particular articulation imply about the 
character and values of this person?".


From a 2002 article in the NYT 
:


   /Yet the use of ''NOO-kyuh-luhr'' is not uncommon, even among
   prominent and educated people, including four of the nation's last
   10 presidents: Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was widely admonished for
   it; Gerald R. Ford; Jimmy Carter, who did graduate work in nuclear
   physics, and also used ''NOO-kee-yer''; and now George W. Bush./

I was not particularly bothered by or aware of this mispronunciation 
until the constant hammering of GW Bush to the tune of his 
(Cheney/Rumsfeldt/Wolfowitz?) drumbeats leading up to the Iraq War.   I 
attributed it to a combination of his (affected or adopted?) Texas 
drawl/slang and his (apparent?) willful ignorance of science (as a 
dogwhistle to redneck/populists?)   I still hear it that way if the 
speaker is the least bit leaning toward that end of the spectrum.


I didn't notice the Axe/Ask division until my father started listening 
to Rush Limbaugh in the 90s and shifted from a mild (applauding Archie 
Bunker) populist white racist to a more convicted one.   "Axe" really 
triggered him when he heard it, and I think it was because it could be a 
marker of AAVE (aka "ebonics") which I think for him was more of a 
resentment of Urban Poverty (vs the Rural Poverty he came from) than 
specifically the racist implications (though it was baked into his 
upbringing/roots even if he preached anti-racist or at least 
pro-tolerance to me growing up).


Your bringing up of this phenomena (and in particular "metathesis") lead 
me (as it often does) to take a quick dive into a rabbit hole and "larn 
me some stuff".   Thank you.


In closing, I'm fascinated by the relationship between phobias and 
philias, which might be a reformulation of addictions vs allergies.    
Your tryptophobia exhibits as more of a tryptophilia in me... a 
fascination bordering (but I don't give over to) on fetish.   The dirty 
little corner of youtube dedicated to "pimple popping" and "blackhead 
removal", for example whispers to me when I trip into it's perimeters.


I also find unusual dialects of American (as well a the broad British 
Commonwealth) fascinating (bordering on philia if not fetish).    And I 
find most "southern Cracker" variants a marker of willful ignorance (or 
ignorant willfulness?) which I attribute to my main exposure coming 
through my Appalachian Cousins who are generally moderately educated 
(none failed to graduate HS that I know of and some even obtained 
PhDs).   To complement that, *most* are diehard born-again Xtian types 
who have to work "have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal 
savior" into any extended encounter.   So when they lace their 
(otherwise educated or sophisticated) conversation with Southern 
American English pronunciations and idioms (e.g. all y'all) and 
"Jahysuz" references I cringe and lower my estimation of their 
character, intelligence, and general sensibilities by a notch or two...  
but the top half of my brain seems to know better and renormalizes as 
best it can...


I've a good friend who said it well: "Don't mistake an accent for a 
personality".  She wass mostly referencing her predilection for falling 
for men (and women) with exotic accents.



On 12/1/23 10:07 AM, glen wrote:
I made the mistake of confessing my handicap to a friend. Now he 
purposefully says nukular as a kind of Castañedan slap on the back, or 
the master's whack with the stick. He knows it knocks me out of 
whatever canal I was in. It's irritating, but a good thing overall.


Actually, it started with the pronunciation of diacetyl, which most of 
my friends at the brewery pronounce "die-ASS-uh-tul". That's another 
one that doesn't give me the hiccups. My Mansplainer homunculus 
doesn't even notice. But I did get a chance to discuss it with the 
owner, wherein I suggested that "ASS-uh-tal" is a chemical group 
that's fundamentally different from acetyl. And, even though there's 
almost zero chance of anyone *ever* saying the word "diacetal", it's 
still reasonable to prefer the more common "die-uh-SEE-tul". After 
all, nobody says "ASS-uh-tul-kole-een" or "ASS-uh-tul-een torch". On 
the other hand, hangovers are discussed a lot in places like breweries 
... with taprooms at least. And acetaldehyde is (almost) pronounced 
like "ASS-uh-tul-dee-hide" (with some wiggle around "tul" vs "tal").  
So, again, there is some slight

Re: [FRIAM] Off the wall question about turbulence

2023-11-29 Thread Steve Smith




Seems to me that if the design of household drains was sensitive to 
turbulence, someone would have figured out how to fix it in the 19th 
century.


-- rec --


Of Plungers, Snakes, Toilet Jacks, Gong-Farmers
   

 
   and the Pythagorean Cup
   


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Off the wall question about turbulence

2023-11-28 Thread Steve Smith

I like the "listening" ideation offered, I *have* used the 
temperature/tactility mode of holding my hand on a P-Trap to "feel" how 
the water flows... vibrations convolved with "coolth"...  usually 
filling the sink partway and holding the p-trap in my hand while I pull 
the plug and "feeling" for warm/cool spots and vibrations implying flow 
patterns.


Very hard to calibrate, very intuitional and maybe just a ritual to go 
through while I wait for my intuition (or the lye-based 
organic-gunk-dissolver to do it's work if/when I use such a thing) to 
catch up with the things I can imagine measuring overtly...   I have not 
put in nearly the requisite canonical 10,000 hours unclogging drains but 
I'm much better at intuiting what they need after 60 years of practice 
than I was say 5 or 10 years into a lifetime of recalcitrant drains.


Toilets are nothing more in some ways than a p-trap themselves and they 
generally do exhibit vorticity when they flush (well). When fighting a 
recalcitrant toilet,  one of the first hints I have that the plug hasn't 
fully abated is that no vortex forms, even if the water level does 
subside (slowly)...  I believe (but have not verified) that the 
water-flow *into* the bowl is designed to promote vorticity while the 
bulk of the work is the *suction) caused by an abrupt overflow of the 
column of water leaving the back of the toilet's built-in P-trap?


On 11/28/23 7:01 AM, glen wrote:

My intuition was "of course there's turbulence in the trap" ...

I was going to suggest you unhook the washer, have a friend pour water 
from a large bucket into the drain while you hold your ear, tightly, 
to the side of the u-trap ... or maybe clamp your teeth on it so you 
can hear vibration that way ... or use a hose clamp to mount a rod and 
clamp your teeth onto that rod ...


Or, you could use a piezo sensor:
https://www.circuits-diy.com/piezoelectric-vibration-sensor-module/
I'm not sure what turbulence in the trap might sound like. But you 
won't know until you take the data.


You could also get one of those fancy snakes with a camera on the tip 
... way more fun than taking apart the pipe.


On 11/27/23 09:22, cody dooderson wrote:
I have no idea. You might be able to buy a clear plasti replacement 
for the u-trap. Then you could add some food coloring to the wash and 
record a video of what happens.


_ Cody Smith _
c...@simtable.com 


On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 7:42 AM Prof David West > wrote:


    When the washer drains, water flows for a bit, then you hear the 
pipe filling up and water comes out the top. Pause the flow, water 
drains quickly, start and pipe fills again. Cycle till rate of flow 
subsides.


    Question: can turbulence occur at the u-trap and cause a 
temporary blockage?  If yes, does the  turbulence occur because of 
the distance from entry to the u-trap?


    Will ask plumber — but prior discussions of turbulence on the 
list made me think it might pose an interesting problem..





-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] artificial clouds

2023-11-28 Thread Steve Smith


Great find...

A microcosm, personal study of the experience I know ideating on 
high-dimensional visualization of 
pressure/temperature/humidity/particulate density spaces and their 
evolution by watching clouds form/disperse.


@7:30 in the video, his exhibit is reminiscent of "old faithful"...   
how many of us (or our parents taking us there) were too impatient to 
wait for the next hourly geyser and only have photographs or videos to 
refer to, no personal memory of such a transient/ephemeral event?

On 11/28/23 7:40 AM, glen wrote:

I'm sure y'all have seen this already. But it was new to me.

https://www.berndnaut.nl/works/molds/
https://youtu.be/GRHWCcOktHI

- Smilde is a Dutch artist who has been creating artworks involving 
real clouds formed indoors since 2010. - The clouds are created using 
a fog machine and water vapor. He builds a "wall" of vapor then 
introduces smoke which interacts with the vapor to briefly form cloud 
shapes.
- The clouds only last for a few seconds before dispersing. His art 
aims to capture transience.
- He photographs the clouds, often with professional photographers, 
striving for technically perfect images.
- The photos typically show the clouds set against the backgrounds of 
rooms or buildings, like a church nave where he was recently invited 
to work.
- Smilde sees ambiguity and duality in the works - the clouds can 
seem threatening or divine, building up then quickly falling apart.
- His cloud photos have spread widely online since 2012 when Time 
Magazine highlighted them. They have universal appeal.
- He has staged fashion shoots with designers using the clouds. His 
works sell for thousands of euros.




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Mirror Neurons & Intersubjective Reality

2023-11-16 Thread Steve Smith



EricS wrote:
Here is one of several research stories that Elwyn Berlekamp told to 
me during a visit to SFI many years ago in which I was his host (the 
closest I will ever come to the experience of those who hosted Erdos).


We were just visited by an old friend of Mary's who has been "homeless" 
for roughly 10 years in the same sense as Erdos... she made her living 
as an artist/teacher into her late 60s before "hitting the road" and has 
been couch/SUV surfing ever since.


 Her 40 year old son and 70's year old sister do catch the large end of 
hosting her, but only months out of the year en-toto.   She is a delight 
to have visit for a day or three and seems to know well how to bring new 
things to her visits every time and manages to never stay too long.  It 
is a fascinating skill.   A few years ago she would probably have 
engaged in co-creation of art pieces with us... now we just sit and 
yak.  I think a lot of her hosts have been other educators and artists 
who she at least provides good consulting/insight/advice.


I think Frank has a great ErdosAnecdote of his own...



1.  For pieces placed on a board by computer-random number generators, 
the experts and the novices were not much different in speed or 
reliability of replacing pieces.


2. When the arrangements were not randomly generated, but rather taken 
from various stages in the play of games by high-level players, 
suddenly a big gap opened up.  The novices did about the same as they 
had done for randomly placed pieces at similar sparseness etc.  The 
experts got much faster and more reliable.


The experimenters, of course, wanted to say something mechanistic 
about why.  To do this they put eye-trackers on the subjects, to find 
out what they were looking at when presented with the blankened board 
and asked to rebuild.  So: what did the experts look at first?  This 
is where the tension of the joke is set up, to prepare for the punchline.


3. The place the experts looked first was at the “next good move” from 
what had been the position, and they then backfilled the pieces in the 
positions that had made it the next good move.



I find this story delightful.  If I were less lazy and really needed 
it for anything, maybe I would do the work to find out how reliable it is.


My first kneejerk question was whether there were board position 
combinations which were unreachable by any combination of legal moves?   
Certainly there would be a (huge?) suite of position combinations which 
could not be reached through anything like "reasonable play".


And among the patently absurd ones, it seems that those one or two 
adjacent possible moves from a totally reasonable one would be acutely 
memorable for anyone who understands chess play, not just rules?


It is a fascinating anecdote... I look forward to the possibility there 
will be more discussion about this and similar problems.


 - Steve


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] Mirror Neurons & Intersubjective Reality

2023-11-15 Thread Steve Smith

I have not (yet) read this critically, the introduction just tweaked my 
(confirmation biased) interests:


   https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-11-brain.html

When I first encountered the Mirror Neuron research 
 
(decades ago) it fit my own experience fairly well and in fact helped to 
explain (just so stories?) many of the intuitive ways I apprehended my 
emotional/intellectual/physical entrainment experience with others.  I 
suppose this is a self-referential example of the topic (i.e. 
confirmation bias, entrainment, etc).


   Recent /mirror neuron/ review:
   https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(22)00134-6

In my recent reminders of the general concept of (reading Yuval Harari's 
"Sapiens" and "Homo Deus" 
) 
I was left with a stronger impression than ever that so much of human 
experience seems to be like living in a shared dream driven or at least 
constrained by our "tribe". Religion, Politics, Economics, or generally 
"Culture" seems to be the stigmergic field that mediates that.  The role 
of media (print, then broadcast, now internetty) has been to broaden the 
scope somewhat arbitrarily or according to the interests of those who 
control those resources.


Now with LLMs and text-to-image generators are becoming so capable and 
broadly engaged with, it seems that our "intersubjective reality" at 
least has a new fidelity to this shared dream offered up, if not a 
broader scope.   The fever dreams/hallucinations of various extremist 
perspectives is already problematic (but inevitable?) so this increased 
fidelity seems likely to only aggravate that (e.g. deepfake "evidence" 
for various conspiracy theories, etc.).


My own preferred understanding of this larger phenomena is that we are 
on the cusp of an emergence of a qualitatively different type of 
collective behaviour/experience not quite covered by the various 
examples that fit in the ontological category of "swarm" (e.g. herd, 
pack, school, flock, pod ... ) perhaps by "on the cusp" we can roll back 
the clock 10k years to early agriculturalism/urbanism/written language 
(or further) but like false-summits, maybe this is just the next 
false-saddle in a saddle point between basins?  There is probably an 
existing reserved term for that, maybe I'll ask GPT?


For better or worse we have become mythopoetic creatures and modern AI 
is reinforcing/accelerating that?   Some resistance to (questioning of?) 
metaphor, poesy, narrativity, might be an intuitive recognition of this 
collective/inevitable slide into a new phase of being?   Different from 
but somehow resonant with the anti-globalist instincts of populism?



-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Theil

2023-11-13 Thread Steve Smith



On 11/13/23 5:39 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:

I'm surprised Stuart Kauffman isn't in there.


CultBiosGroup?

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Theil

2023-11-13 Thread Steve Smith



On 11/13/23 6:42 PM, David Eric Smith wrote:
Well in that case, definitely look up the interview he did with Sara 
Walker and Lee Cronin.


I will not comment further.

Eric


Gah!

Coincidence that I just finished Stephen Webb's updated review of the 
Fermi Paradox.  I didn't choose to read it because I have a vested 
interest in the answers (roughly 75 whack-a-moles), but rather a 
fascination with the fact that the question hasn't been advanced 
significantly since the Eric Jones' LA-UR of 198 
<https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/doe/lanl/la-10311-ms.pdf>5  (Alias Smith 
and Jones?) on the topic,  which I read as a very young LANL  Staff 
Member when it was published internally.  Or the Drake equation since 
1961?   It was also fascinating to be re-introduced to Knuth's Up-Arrow 
notatio <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuth%27s_up-arrow_notation>n for 
expressing excruciatingly large numbers


At the time it seemed like we hadn't been asking the question long 
enough (~40 years) for the answers to mean much (have much 
relevance?)... 40ish years later is only 2X longer yet the technical 
progress (e.g. SETI/Hubble/Webb/Deep Machine Learning/...) the silence 
of the cosmos seems significantly more pregnant?


I've given Walker/Cronin/Fridman about 70 minutes so far and my head 
hurts (in the best way)...  and I'm clearly over my head in beaucoup 
ways...   though I may not be able to stop and it will be definitely one 
of those "4 hours I will never be able to, nor want to, get back?)


   she said /"the fact that we can even talk here is a result of the
   fact that we can exchange structures in assembly space"
   /

statements like this and implied references to abstractions like Godel 
Numbering on Assembly Indices and Kauffman's NK model, casual graphs ala 
Glymour or Perl,  L-systems, Wheeler's It-to-Bit and a spectrum from 
discovered to invented, leave me (yet more) painfully aware of how over 
my head I am...  I dismissed SFI's "interplanetary" announcements back 
when (2019) as unserious but with Ted Chiang's "Arrival" at SFI in light 
of his "Story of your Life" and the


In a few months/years I expect this type of discussion could as easily 
be actors reading a GPT-X script which entirely captures the stylization 
of a serious discussion without being (necessarily?) serious at all and 
perhaps *nobody* could tell?


The intersection of /possibility/ and /probability/ spaces seems to 
define/imply something about what I said at earlier about the difference 
between memory/imagination, past/future?  (/Will, Qualia, ???/)


I'm suspect I should follow your lead and not comment further (for 
entirely different reasons)...  If I really want to hurt myself (some 
more) I should probably cue up Fridman's interview with Wolfram back to 
back with this one.  At this rate I doubt I will ever get around to his 
interviews with Netanyahu and Kushner or Rogan...


Lex just commented "/discovering wisdom through nuanced disagreement/?" 
and it seems to be good support for Glen's agonism...


Argh...  "why does head hurt when Hulk try to think?"  maybe I should 
sign up for the Neuralink Beta and get the GPT-shield to go with it?  
With a power-tower count of components


       (./... must... stop... now.../ )







On Nov 13, 2023, at 5:57 PM, Steve Smith  wrote:


On 11/13/23 12:06 PM, glen wrote:

You might want to check the Gurometer. Lex has an entry:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Oe-af4_OmzLJavktcSKGfP0wmxCX0ppP8n_Tvi9l_yc/edit?usp=sharing 



While Lex's scores are relatively low compared to some of the wackos 
on the list, we are known by association. And many of Lex's guests 
score relatively high.


Fascinating resource,  thanks!  You are a veritable font (fount) of 
things like this that I should probably be able to find for myself.


I had to look a little to find a key to the columns of the  table, I 
don't know if this is the preferred or only one, but it seemed close 
enough to be useful for my purposes:


https://techhenzy.com/gurometer/

I haven't listened to enough of Lex's podcasts (did I mention 1-2 
hours each?!) to be able to evaluate what his "coupling" is with his 
guests... even without the GuruMeter I felt that theme ("known by 
association") from the more prominent/recent interviewees he has 
engaged... but my contingent judgement of the *content* and *style* 
of the interviews counterbalanced that almost to an extreme.   Which 
is why I brought it up here.


Implicit but likely opaque/arcane to your own references to community 
(self) policing and ?agonism?, I feel (with limited experience so 
far) that Fridman may well provide a regulating role within some 
community (of Galaxy-Brain Gurus?)...


I doubt I will get the 'round t'uits but it seems like there is a 
tensor product to be explored among these folks and their various 
int

Re: [FRIAM] Theil

2023-11-13 Thread Steve Smith



On 11/13/23 12:06 PM, glen wrote:

You might want to check the Gurometer. Lex has an entry:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Oe-af4_OmzLJavktcSKGfP0wmxCX0ppP8n_Tvi9l_yc/edit?usp=sharing 



While Lex's scores are relatively low compared to some of the wackos 
on the list, we are known by association. And many of Lex's guests 
score relatively high.


Fascinating resource,  thanks!  You are a veritable font (fount) of 
things like this that I should probably be able to find for myself.


I had to look a little to find a key to the columns of the table, I 
don't know if this is the preferred or only one, but it seemed close 
enough to be useful for my purposes:


   https://techhenzy.com/gurometer/

I haven't listened to enough of Lex's podcasts (did I mention 1-2 hours 
each?!) to be able to evaluate what his "coupling" is with his guests... 
even without the GuruMeter I felt that theme ("known by association") 
from the more prominent/recent interviewees he has engaged... but my 
contingent judgement of the *content* and *style* of the interviews 
counterbalanced that almost to an extreme.   Which is why I brought it 
up here.


Implicit but likely opaque/arcane to your own references to community 
(self) policing and ?agonism?, I feel (with limited experience so far) 
that Fridman may well provide a regulating role within some community 
(of Galaxy-Brain Gurus?)...


I doubt I will get the 'round t'uits but it seems like there is a tensor 
product to be explored among these folks and their various interactions 
with one another...   something interesting might emerge?   Maybe this 
only occurs to me because Lex is more of a coupling agent than a primary 
source of any ideas/theories/positions from what I've seen so far.   I 
haven't investigated the GuruMeter guys enough to understand their 
methods but I take it for granted they are not unserious in this work.





On 11/13/23 10:08, Steve Smith wrote:
It seems (maybe only to me?) that "will" is what defines the 
intersection of memory and imagination? The free-will-less-ness-ers 
among us (ala Sopolsky 
<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/24/determined-life-without-free-will-by-robert-sapolsky-review-the-hard-science-of-decisions>) 
may find this an entirely specious thing to consider or discuss 
(though without free will, what means "specious" or "discuss" or 
"consider" sans free-will?).


I recently discovered Lex Fridman's podcasts 
<https://lexfridman.com/podcast/> and was quite surprised by several 
things (albeit with very limited sampling... all of his most recent 
interview with Musk and a bit of his interview with Isaacson and 
about half of the Harari one):   I don't significantly disagree with 
the general mistrust of Musk in his Autistic-ish style and affect, 
but I'd say that Lex brings out the best in him, showing him to be 
capable of thoughtful and even empathetic-ish observations.  As I 
understand it (from my reading of Isaacson's biography of Musk) 
brother Kimball may also be a significantly similar "regulating 
influence" on Elon.   Grimes maybe, maybe not.  The other mothers of 
his children, same-same... probably each and all of them for a period 
of time or within certain frameworks.   And again, same with the 
children... though maybe projection on my part having been moderately 
well-regulated in several modes by my own children during each of 
their phases (right up to their current middle-agedness).


As an aside, Fridman's other interviews also all sound potentially 
fascinating... though I cringe at the fact/thought of interviews with 
Netanyahu, KanYE, Kushner, Rogan... the commentary I've read 
around those interviews tends to skew toward "how could you normalize 
(amplify?) those A**holes by even giving them the time of the 
day???!!!?".   Lex's interviews are definitely long-form (1-2 hours) 
compared to today's tik-tok/ad-jingle/bumper-sticker/snark-pith 
calibrated sound-bitery.    I find myself avoiding them for this 
reason (not wanting to commit to listening past some of my own 
prejudices long enough to hear what they are really about?) but 
recognize (and have already begun to practice) that as with long-form 
written journalism, I can take it in bits, like I might eat a rich 
holiday meal... not try to gulp it down quickly in one sitting like a 
TV-dinner (for you X-ers, "Hot-Pocket", and Millenials == "??") for 
the mind.


My recent fascination with Deacon's "Teleodynamics", Jeff Hawkins' 
take on the structure/function of the neocortex and Ian McGilchrist's 
updated  take on brain bicameralism (Master and Emissary 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Master_and_His_Emissary>) feeds 
into this question of the intersection of memory and imagination and 
the implications of Transformer Models and other Generative Models in 
general.   My direct experience with

Re: [FRIAM] Theil

2023-11-13 Thread Steve Smith

It seems (maybe only to me?) that "will" is what defines the 
intersection of memory and imagination?   The free-will-less-ness-ers 
among us (ala Sopolsky 
) 
may find this an entirely specious thing to consider or discuss (though 
without free will, what means "specious" or "discuss" or "consider" sans 
free-will?).


I recently discovered Lex Fridman's podcasts 
 and was quite surprised by several 
things (albeit with very limited sampling... all of his most recent 
interview with Musk and a bit of his interview with Isaacson and about 
half of the Harari one):   I don't significantly disagree with the 
general mistrust of Musk in his Autistic-ish style and affect, but I'd 
say that Lex brings out the best in him, showing him to be capable of 
thoughtful and even empathetic-ish observations.  As I understand it 
(from my reading of Isaacson's biography of Musk) brother Kimball may 
also be a significantly similar "regulating influence" on Elon.   Grimes 
maybe, maybe not.  The other mothers of his children, same-same... 
probably each and all of them for a period of time or within certain 
frameworks.   And again, same with the children... though maybe 
projection on my part having been moderately well-regulated in several 
modes by my own children during each of their phases (right up to their 
current middle-agedness).


As an aside, Fridman's other interviews also all sound potentially 
fascinating... though I cringe at the fact/thought of interviews with 
Netanyahu, KanYE, Kushner, Rogan... the commentary I've read around 
those interviews tends to skew toward "how could you normalize 
(amplify?) those A**holes by even giving them the time of the 
day???!!!?".   Lex's interviews are definitely long-form (1-2 hours) 
compared to today's tik-tok/ad-jingle/bumper-sticker/snark-pith 
calibrated sound-bitery.    I find myself avoiding them for this reason 
(not wanting to commit to listening past some of my own prejudices long 
enough to hear what they are really about?) but recognize (and have 
already begun to practice) that as with long-form written journalism, I 
can take it in bits, like I might eat a rich holiday meal... not try to 
gulp it down quickly in one sitting like a TV-dinner (for you X-ers, 
"Hot-Pocket", and Millenials == "??") for the mind.


My recent fascination with Deacon's "Teleodynamics", Jeff Hawkins' take 
on the structure/function of the neocortex and Ian McGilchrist's 
updated  take on brain bicameralism (Master and Emissary 
) feeds into 
this question of the intersection of memory and imagination and the 
implications of Transformer Models and other Generative Models in 
general.   My direct experience with GPT-4 and DALL-E is significant 
(many 10s of hours of engagement) but still a drop in the bucket.  There 
are times when I feel that all I've done is engaged with an incredibly 
high-dimensional french-curve/bezier spline and thereby been able to 
smoothly interpolate/extrapolate a handful of interesting (to me) data 
points into what feels like a powerful elaboration of what is implied by 
said curve-fit in the past (unknown knowns?) and future (unknown 
unknowns)?    When I'm not totally enraptured by the (apparent?) novelty 
(relative to my expectations/predictions) of it's responses I'm 
generally disappointed at it's limited creativity...   and left puzzling 
over the question of "novelty vs creativity".


Bumble,

 - Steve

On 11/13/23 10:27 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

It seems to me that neither Musk and Thiel are interested in the unknown. They 
are interested in doing things they can already imagine.For Musk I thought 
that was because it is how he raises money.   Now I think he is not imagining 
consciousness in a, say, a transporter pattern buffer, he imagines life on the 
Enterprise bridge in his body.   Rockets are comparatively science fictiony for 
people that can't imagine transport without a car, so he gets some points for 
that.

On Nov 13, 2023, at 10:11 AM, glen  wrote:

There's an interesting parallel between the Stross and Gellman pieces: Stross 
both laments and implicitly appreciates the bureaucracy of getting a book 
published, where Thiel's aggrieved by the bureaucracy of societal evolution.

It reminds me of the engineering-vs-biology dichotomy (yes, false, like all of 
them) I came to appreciate after being exposed to enough biomimetics (to kill a 
horse). Some of us see the world and think about how to change it, build a 
better world ... or perhaps destroy the world, whatever floats your inner 
engineer. And some of us see the world and are awestruck, hypnotized, baffled 
by its qualities (whether beautiful or horrifying). It's easy to give the 
latter a pass and denigrate the former when confronted with,

[FRIAM] agonism and policing the community with a keisaku?

2023-10-25 Thread Steve Smith

he same way I'm proud of my anti-vaxx 
friends who think they understand vaccines better than, say, their 
PCP. It's OK. They prolly stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. 
Network theory seems helpful, here. When deciding which tribe to 
police, it's useful to track the cliques and components of the graph. 
We're known by our friends as much as our enemies.


On 10/19/23 09:48, Steve Smith wrote:


On 10/18/23 11:27 AM, glen wrote:

Here's PZ Myers policing his community:

The Gamete Delusion
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/10/17/the-gamete-delusion/ 





https://www.theparadoxinstitute.com/watch/is-sex-bimodal




I don't really have a dog in this fight other than the general 
feeling that I support underdogs (and not just the ones who fly off 
in all directions at once).



to paraphrase one of the more notable FriAM-Sages... "people should 
be called what they want to be called"...  harping on the emic/etic 
conflation some more, I find these discussions (e.g. Dawkins et al) 
rather off-point in this regard.   I understand (vaguely) why we all 
feel we must make sweeping generalizations about *other people's 
business*... some of it is an empathetic response, wanting to 
understand, but some of it is the response of someone who wants to 
control others. These *are* conflated by circumstance in the sense 
that  in spite of the pithy aphorism "your opinion of me is none of 
my business", most of us actually *do* care what others think of us 
and it does effect how they interact with us.   It always feels 
unfortunate that those who want to tell others how to 
present/feel/be too often set the subject of debate.



I *expect* someone with their own dog in the fight to have an 
insider/personal view of these things and am generally interested 
and curious about their perspective up to their privacy.   For those 
who mostly just want to stir up a dogfight, I'm not particularly 
interested in their view beyond preparing myself for when *they* 
might choose to try to stir up a dog(cat?)fight in *my* backyard.









-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Constraint Propagation and "Wave Function Collapse" Algorithm

2023-10-21 Thread Steve Smith

SG> Just went down a 2-hour rabbit hole on the "wave function collapse" 
algorithm that emerged in graphics in 2016 but just

SG>  came onto my radar... Has anyone else explored it already?
SG> https://github.com/mxgmn/WaveFunctionCollapse

I think I 'get' from our myriad discussions about both dual-fields and 
bidirectional search why you got "rabbit holed" by this...


FWIW my "associative memory" self "squinting" from 100k ft saw some 
near-adjacents:


   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashlife

    On one hand it is "memoization" up front, but it also has a
   possibility for a WFC style application for a *dynamic* landscape?

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_quantization

    SOFMs seem like an apt near-adjacent to what you are maundering on?

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_(machine_learning)

   The Text-Image transformers of DALL-E (et alia) seem to be a softer
   version of the constraint business?

I may be overgeneralizing or missed the focus of your fascination?

mumble,

 - Steve


Many of you have written versions of constraint propagation algorithms 
in one form or another. I like how this is framed by satisfying local 
constraints with tiles (forward) and global constraints with overlaps 
(backward propagation).  Of course, the name of the algorithm may be 
metaphorical to QM as is its use of superposition for local stacks of 
possible states, but I can't help wonder how Wheeler-Feynman Absorber 
Theory or Cramer's Transactional Interpretation might be cast as 
similar kinds of the same algorithm.


more general applications:
https://robertheaton.com/2018/12/17/wavefunction-collapse-algorithm/

always like Dan Shiffman's Coding Train
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI_y2GAlQFM

https://github.com/avihuxp/WaveFunctionCollapse#demo

A nice interactive to get the feel for it:
https://oskarstalberg.com/game/wave/wave.html

A version in Julia :
https://github.com/roberthoenig/WaveFunctionCollapse.jl/blob/master/usage.ipynb

-S

_
stephen.gue...@simtable.com
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu
Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab 


mobile: (505)577-5828

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] more agonism

2023-10-19 Thread Steve Smith



On 10/18/23 11:27 AM, glen wrote:

Here's PZ Myers policing his community:

The Gamete Delusion
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2023/10/17/the-gamete-delusion/



https://www.theparadoxinstitute.com/watch/is-sex-bimodal




I don't really have a dog in this fight other than the general feeling 
that I support underdogs (and not just the ones who fly off in all 
directions at once).



to paraphrase one of the more notable FriAM-Sages... "people should be 
called what they want to be called"...  harping on the emic/etic 
conflation some more, I find these discussions (e.g. Dawkins et al) 
rather off-point in this regard.   I understand (vaguely) why we all 
feel we must make sweeping generalizations about *other people's 
business*... some of it is an empathetic response, wanting to 
understand, but some of it is the response of someone who wants to 
control others. These *are* conflated by circumstance in the sense 
that  in spite of the pithy aphorism "your opinion of me is none of my 
business", most of us actually *do* care what others think of us and it 
does effect how they interact with us.   It always feels unfortunate 
that those who want to tell others how to present/feel/be too often set 
the subject of debate.



I *expect* someone with their own dog in the fight to have an 
insider/personal view of these things and am generally interested and 
curious about their perspective up to their privacy.   For those who 
mostly just want to stir up a dogfight, I'm not particularly interested 
in their view beyond preparing myself for when *they* might choose to 
try to stir up a dog(cat?)fight in *my* backyard.


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] natalism

2023-10-12 Thread Steve Smith


Glen -

I think I agree with this spirit...  and the invocation of a 
high-dimensional (but finitely so) landscape is not only the constraints 
we live in, but in some sense the ones we *choose* to live in?   I think 
excess/sloppy meaning might be another term for a local/temporary 
increase (or exchange) of dimensionality, effectively lowering the 
thresholds between basins?


In anthropological terms I think we are in "shaman" territory (the 
perspective/insight to selectively shift the dimensions around for the 
group as-needed)?  Also maybe the point of psychedelic/entheogenic 
substances?  We are reading Pollan's "How to Change your Mind" at the 
moment.



Well, *if* one is constrained to inhabiting attractors to begin with, 
then a mechanism for hopping between attractors is a "good thing". But 
I'd argue that this is a mere band-aide, treating the symptom rather 
than the cause. The real disorder is the tendency to inhabit 
attractors ... or perhaps the intensity with which one gets trapped in 
such ruts. There seems to be a tyranny of specialization ... 
"siloization". If I have any hope for LLMs, it's to remove the burden 
of depth and free us up for more breadth ... or at least those of us 
wealthy enough to use LLMs. Let them eat cake.


On 10/9/23 10:52, Steve Smith wrote:
It feels as if the very "excess meaning" (or sloppy meaning?) you 
?disparage? in cognitive metaphor is, in fact, what makes them so 
"powerful". To the extent the point of "powerful speech" or "powerful 
thoughts" might be to jump over the threshold/saddle from one 
attractor to another, this makes sense (for better and worse)...




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Language Model Understanding

2023-10-09 Thread Steve Smith



On 10/9/23 9:24 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

I mean there are some categories that are disjoint or mostly disjoint.   
Similarly, the grounding is not total.   I agree that value systems like MAGA 
have power, but they don't have truth.  There is no truth.  All there is, is 
power, which is my point.  QM and demagoguery are both tools, with different 
contexts for use.


Which is why "speaking truth to power" is considered a vain conceit by 
some?  Or "by some" are we speaking only of the cynical who seem to be 
close cousin to the nihil?


BTW... I ran this by my "new bar friend" ChatGPT and they set me 
straight...  there are plenty of other reasons to take this position 
besides mere cynicism and nihilism...  


One of my more profound weaknesses seems to be conflating skepticism 
with cynicism.




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] natalism

2023-10-09 Thread Steve Smith

Glen -

In the spirit of succinctness (succinctity?) my intuition aligns with
your argument here about the relevance/utility of flex/slop... I think
this is a corollary to Deacon's "absential" but to pursue it more
formally would puncture the walls of my aspired /succintity/.

At the risk of (over) tangenting... your invocation of Semon's Engram
seems to reference Mountcastle's Cortical Columns as considered in
Hawkin's work (1000 Brains
<https://www.numenta.com/resources/books/a-thousand-brains-by-jeff-hawkins/>).
I didn't dive down that rabbit hole (yet)...

Your recent (and repeated) specific brush-back of Dawkin's /Meme/s and
the modern variant (often deployed/weaponized by the right with "woke")
of "mind virus" feels to be a good example of what you gesture at here?
It (/memetics/) was *such* a compelling/powerful concept when it was
coined (no matter how misbegotten?) that it has held (and developed) a
life of it's own over the ensuing decades (near half-century?). It
feels as if the very "excess meaning" (or sloppy meaning?) you
?disparage? in cognitive metaphor is, in fact, what makes them so
"powerful". To the extent the point of "powerful speech" or "powerful
thoughts" might be to jump over the threshold/saddle from one attractor
to another, this makes sense (for better and worse)...

- Steve

As usual, there's too much in your post for me to follow a thread. But
I can cherry-pick this one: affect - or what it is to be about/for
something. An option is to think in terms of soft types such that the
lower order objects over which the higher order operators ... uh,
operate, have some "flex and slop", allowing the higher order
operators to become schema and the lower order objects to constitute
(nearly? ... quasi?) equivalence classes.

The ontological status "engrams"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engram_(neuropsychology)> came up
recently in another context. I'm told they're quite *specific*. But
I'm not convinced. I think they can be specific (e.g. the efficacy of
things like a Memory Palace). But I also think they can be
accidentally invoked in non-specific or specific, but various ways.
The non-specificity might provide for variation in stimulus (memory
triggered by something different, different part of the body, smell vs
taste, etc.) or components (memory of a visual scene versus that of a
somatic context).

All my speculation is subject to falsifying or validating data, of
which I have none. But whatever. My point, here, is that overly simple
hypotheses for the spread of (largely) cultural or psychological
behaviors are so impoverished that they feel like just-so stories to
me. E.g. Dawkin's memes ... or Hanson's "innovation" ... or the
nihilistic mode-switching facility of cult-members.

Deutsch's "hard to vary" constraint for good scientific theories comes
to mind, I guess. Call me contrarian if you want. But in order for a
"theory" to convolve into all the other "theories" wallowing out there
in the ambience, it has to percolate into the unoccupied interstitial
spaces left blank by the others. And that requires them to have a
little flex and slop, allowing them to "be about" or "be for" things
other than what you might think they're about or for.

Abuse seems to be the norm, not the exception.

On 10/6/23 09:28, Steve Smith wrote:
Another fancy word I've come to like is /"Ententional"/ which
combines the ideas of what something is "about" with what it is "for".

This leads me around to Deacon's "Teleodynamics" which might be
obliquely related to your invocation recently of a physics
"Lagrangian vs Eulerian" rather than the Anthropological "Emic vs
Etic" axis of understanding first-third person,
reductionist-holistic, nominal-real perspectives? This also leads
me back around to the (nearly) ineffable discussion of Stationary
Action revisited from time to time here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stationary-action_principle#Disputes_about_possible_teleological_aspects

Re: [FRIAM] Language Model Understanding

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Smith

Hope: "/doing the right thing, no matter how you think it will turn
out/"

On 10/8/23 2:21 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

I would center nihilism not on devaluation but on deconstruction. If
value is about a set of lived experiences, is it a detached reflection
on something special that was discovered, or more because of
membership in that ecology – because of an investment?
Deep membership makes it harder to talk objectively about discoveries
and to move on to making other discoveries. Generally attaching to one
value system means not attaching to another value system. For
example, adopting the value of tolerance logically is at odds with
policing intolerance, e.g., one Jewish neighbor remarked this morning
he drove past a home with a Hamas flag on it and was scared. (Reducing
that fear by removing the flag would be reducing tolerance.)

It seems to me that ideas that work have power and things that don’t
work don’t have power. It is reasonable to be skeptical about
investment in ideas that may require years or decades of investment
and not result in a return. Unpacking an idea to a Silicon Valley
venture capitalist as to why there could be a return is deconstruction
not devaluation.

I see these folks on MSNBC talking about the nihilism of DJT or Bannon
and I don’t really get it. Democracy isn’t a value system; it is a
way to avoid (violent) conflict in a pluralistic society. There’s a
case to be made for the merits of such societies, and a case to be
made for limiting violence. They should make those cases, not just
throw out a placeholder word like nihilism to judge the people who
don’t value those types of societies. (Apparently many people in
North America.)

Marcus

*From: *Friam on behalf of David Eric
Smith

*Date: *Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 10:40 AM
*To: *The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group

*Subject: *Re: [FRIAM] Language Model Understanding

Zang! I had not made that connection.

Hmmh. What do I think? I seem to have viewed uninterpreted models
much as I view a hammer or a shovel; as a tool in the world for doing
a certain job (in this case, a job of perceiving the world in valid
ways), neither here nor there w.r.t. questions of nihilism.

Where then would I try to center nihilism? (It’s being a topic I
haven’t spent a lot of time on historically). Maybe if I had to
choose one phrase, it would be “the devaluation of values”. Brown
uses it in her book, but I think it is old and standardized. Don’t
know if it came from Nietzsche or Weber, or is much older than either
of them.

How would I orient to try to address such questions, that I do not
want to go into support of bombs? I think my current cast of mind is
that there is a large class of “discovered thing”, meaning that they
are not willed into existence, but are brought into existence (if
there is even any bringing) through lived experience, and “noticed”
after the fact. Or maybe given in the ineffable from the start, and
noticed along the way (all of Descartes’s cogito, the rest of “the
self”, and much else). It seems to me that there is room for
aesthetics to be given much more and better attention than perhaps it
has had in philosophy (or whoever is in charge of this question).
Aesthetics certainly not being the only domain from which discovered
things can originate, but useful in that we can recognize it as a
source, but not have the impulse to conflate it with dogma, as many
other notions of “belief” tend to drift into.

Hmm.

Eric

On Oct 8, 2023, at 12:30 PM, Marcus Daniels
wrote:

Eric writes:

“Bears on how many things make up the machinery of nihilism,
extending well beyond relations I recognized as part of an
integration, though mentioning many things I rail against in daily
life.”

The willingness of physicists to use uninterpreted models, e.g.,
quantum mechanics, seems like nihilism to me. I don’t mean that
in a judgmental way, nor do I mean it in an admiring way. On the
other hand, there are many people, I reckon most people, that
provide their beliefs as both explanations and justifications.
Bombs follow soon after.

Marcus

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p

Zoomhttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam=E,1,ShGlU_SgSFn6qQxIQzSbX1zV_TbPcFyWbM7JZI-jGJqjGA6nfiLQbKWbCtLQ_vYw77xQZecqwHoUIMWWeJXUUuptPPLgcybwh2w3dGiW=1

Re: [FRIAM] Language Model Understanding

2023-10-07 Thread Steve Smith

onse. It's like giving the model a question or a starting
point for it to generate text. Journalists often craft prompts to
get specific information or insights.//
//
//6. **Bias**: LLMs can sometimes produce biased or unfair content
because they've learned from biased internet data. Journalists
should be aware of this and critically evaluate the model's outputs
for any biases.//
//
//7. **Algorithm**: This is a fancy word for a set of rules or
instructions that an LLM follows to perform tasks. Algorithms guide
how the model generates text and makes decisions.//
//
//8. **NLP (Natural Language Processing)**: NLP is the field of
study that focuses on teaching computers to understand and generate
human language. LLMs are a product of NLP research.//
//
//9. **ML (Machine Learning)**: LLMs are a type of machine learning
model. Machine learning is a way to make computers learn from data
and improve their performance over time.//
//
//10. **Training Data**: This is the text data used to teach an LLM.
It's like the model's textbooks, and the quality and diversity of
this data influence how well the LLM performs.//
//
//11. **Bias Mitigation**: This is the process of reducing bias in
LLMs. It's important in journalism to ensure that the information
provided by the model is fair and unbiased.//
//
//12. **Ethical AI**: This refers to the practice of using LLMs
responsibly and ethically. Journalists should consider the ethical
implications of using these tools, especially when it comes to
issues like privacy and misinformation.//
//
//13. **API (Application Programming Interface)**: Some LLMs offer
APIs that allow journalists to interact with the model through code,
enabling custom applications and integrations.//
//
//14. **Fine-Tuned Models**: These are LLMs that have been trained
for specific tasks, like summarization, translation, or
question-answering. They are more specialized and can be
particularly useful for journalism.//
//
//Understanding these terms can help journalists effectively
leverage LLMs in their work while also being mindful of their
limitations and ethical considerations./

- Steve

On 10/7/23 5:13 PM, Tom Johnson wrote:

Thanks. Those are impressive numbers.
Tom

On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 4:11 PM Marcus Daniels
wrote:

The “large” refers to the number of parameters used. A smaller
large language model – a deep neural net -- start about 3 billion
parameters, but larger ones like Claude 2 (the latest large
language model of the company that wrote the paper Steve
mentioned) have more than 130 billion parameters. Amazingly, it
is possible using (rooms of) GPUs and other accelerators to
optimize in this a space of this size. The billions of
parameters come from the vocabulary size – the number of tokens
that need to be discriminated, the many layers of transformers
that are needed to capture the complexity of human and non-human
languages (like DNA), and the context window size – how many
paragraphs or pages the model is trained on at a time. A small
language model might be suitable for understanding the geometries
of chemicals, say.

*From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Tom Johnson
*Sent:* Saturday, October 7, 2023 2:38 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group

*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Language Model Understanding

Thanks for passing this along, Steve. I wish, however, the authors
of this short piece would have included a definition of, in their
usage, "Large Language Models" and "Small Language Models."
Perhaps I can find those in the larger paper.

Tom

On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 12:34 PM Steve Smith wrote:

This popular-press article came through my Google News feed
recently which I thought might be useful to the
Journalists/English-Majors on the list to help understand how
LLMs work, etc. When I read it in detail (forwarded from my
TS (TinyScreenPhone) on my LS (Large Screen Laptop)) I found
it a bit more detailed and technical than I'd expected, but
nevertheless rewarding and possibly offering some traction to
Journalism/English majors as well as those with a larger
investment in the CS/Math implied.

Decomposing Language Models into Understandable Components

<https://www.anthropic.com/index/decomposing-language-models-into-understandable-components>

and the (more) technical paper behind the article

https://transformer-circuits.pub/2023/monosemantic-features/index.html

<https://transformer-circuits.pub/2023/monosemantic-features/index.html>

Despite having sent a few dogs into vaguely similar scuffles
in my careen(r):

Faceted Ontologies for Pre Inci

[FRIAM] Language Model Understanding

2023-10-07 Thread Steve Smith

This popular-press article came through my Google News feed recently 
which I thought might be useful to the Journalists/English-Majors on the 
list to help understand how LLMs work, etc.   When I read it in detail 
(forwarded from my TS (TinyScreenPhone) on my LS (Large Screen Laptop)) 
I found it a bit more detailed and technical than I'd expected, but 
nevertheless rewarding and possibly offering some traction to 
Journalism/English majors as well as those with a larger investment in 
the CS/Math implied.


   Decomposing Language Models into Understandable Components
   


and the (more) technical paper behind the article

   https://transformer-circuits.pub/2023/monosemantic-features/index.html
   

Despite having sent a few dogs into vaguely similar scuffles in my 
careen(r):


   Faceted Ontologies for Pre Incident Indicator Analysis
   
   SpindleViz 
   ...

... I admit to finding this both intriguing and well over my head on 
casual inspection...  the (metaphorical?) keywords that drew me in  most 
strongly included /Superposition/ and /Thought Vectors/, though they are 
(nod to Glen) probably riddled (heaped, overflowing, bursting, bloated 
... )  with excess meaning.


https://gabgoh.github.io/ThoughtVectors/

This leads me (surprise!) to an open ended discursive series of thoughts 
probably better left for a separate posting (probably rendered in a 
semasiographic language like Heptapod B 
).




- Steve
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] natalism

2023-10-06 Thread Steve Smith

https://www.overcomingbias.com/p/shrinking-economies-dont-innovate

I am fond of this style of (counter)thinking to the growth/innovation topic:

Economics for the Future: Beyond the Superorganism

It doesn't really argue the point (natalism and other quantitative
measures of growth?) directly but perhaps transcends it?

There's something about this rhetoric that seems to rely on
hierarchical separation, the separability of levels.

Also, I'm interested in an expanded/continued discussion about the role
of "levels" and "hierarchy" if anyone else will take up the task with
you/us...

I mean, obviously, if we draw a hard boundary around "innovation" such
that it only contains things we human organisms care about or
understand, then sure. Innovation halts/slows with birth rate. But
isn't, say, the evolution of our gut biome also "innovative"? Or
totally sans-human, isn't most of earth's history a story of
innovation? What is it about the human-particular level of (primarily
cultural) innovation that makes it so special? If I'm cynical, it's
just navel gazing.

But if I'm generous, there's something inherently computational (or
universal, cognitive, translational, or Platonic) about the kind of
innovation Hanson's talking about. I guess it's a longtermist or
transhumanist way of thinking ... that Our innovations can possibly be
stored and percolated more so than the modest, tightly bound to
circumstances, innovations of our less computational sibling species.
I don't buy it. But I'd like to be able to make the argument anyway.

My current favorite out-of-my-league thinker about some of these
abstractions is Terrence Deacon

(referenced here often) who seems to play both sides of the fence,
implying on one hand that /Hierarchy/ and /Levels of Organization/ are
intrinsic to evolving Complex Adaptive Systems, yet also coins the
somewhat mystical term /"Absential" /which might be nothing more than a
fancy word for "system constraints and boundaries" built into the very
idea of self/other (which I know you also often question which is
probably highly related). Another fancy word I've come to like is
/"Ententional"/ which combines the ideas of what something is "about"
with what it is "for".

This leads me around to Deacon's "Teleodynamics" which might be
obliquely related to your invocation recently of a physics "Lagrangian
vs Eulerian" rather than the Anthropological "Emic vs Etic" axis of
understanding first-third person, reductionist-holistic, nominal-real
perspectives? This also leads me back around to the (nearly) ineffable
discussion of Stationary Action revisited from time to time here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stationary-action_principle#Disputes_about_possible_teleological_aspects

Also worth noting that this is an instrumental part of Ted Chiang's
Story of Your Life
(2000 novella which was made into the movie Arrival which I felt
obscured some of the best points made in the story).

It is possible that I channel his Alien Heptapods with my frequent
(ab)use of linguistic center embedding
and other (awkward?)
constructions?

/I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant./
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] cults

2023-10-05 Thread Steve Smith


Glen sed:
All reasonable, as is Steve's suggestion that socially stable options 
for identification can be dynamic/emergent (e.g. populism's various 
forms). But I'd argue that one cannot build one's own 
identity/narrative in a quiet space ... hedging a bit on what "quiet" 
might mean. 
Great point...   but my aphorism-of-relevance: "no man is an island but 
we might all be archipelagos".    In the extreme, "what is /self/ 
without /other/?".  Life itself seems to be a consequence of 
"partitioning" or at the very least "loci of complexity"? I'll grant 
"silent" (in space nobody can hear you scream?) but think that an 
annealing schedule of "quietude"/"noise" is a good thing?

This article was interesting:

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2023/10/why-i-dont-have-pronouns-in-my-bio/ 



"Ironically, my experience of interpellation might itself reflect how 
I am interpellated. Us WEIRD people are individualists, and we’re 
individualists because social forces make us this kind of being. If I 
weren’t interpellated as an individualist, I probably wouldn’t feel 
uncomfortable at being interpellated as the kind of subject I am. 
Interpellation as an individualist is a kind of ironic interpellation: 
it’s inherently unstable insofar as it leaves the interpellation 
person unhappy with their interpellation on the grounds that it is 
interpellation. Nevertheless, my discomfort is real."
I appreciate the introduction to the term interpellation 
 here...  
reflects a bit of revisiting done here recently (or offline with 
Guerin?) on Emic vs Etic  
POVs.  My own "individualism" is armatured significantly around "/I 
don't like to be told/" with being */told who I am/* perhaps the most 
egregious, even if I'm being told that "/I'm someone who doesn't like to 
be told who I am"/.   And all this in stark contrast to the point  you 
make below.
The idea that _one_ might be able to settle on a narrative somewhat 
isolated from the ambient goo indicates a conclusion embedded in the 
premise of individualism. Rather, I'd argue there is no such thing as 
an individual. There is no self to "dissolve" and any narrative 
construct that seems to be an individual is, at least, fraught with 
loopy causation or, at worst, incoherent. So while I like the idea 
that some individuals are more robust against modal identification, it 
relies on a flimsy approximation to the real situation.


I hope this topic gets broader discussion here... I think the ideations 
of /objectness/ and /boundaries /are very interesting and relevant to 
questions about "life itself' and "consciousness".


The implications of your introduction of narrative v episodic identities 
from Strawson  
have been ringing in my self/other/whole image for many years now:


With internet, we _are_ no longer what we would be without internet. 
Counterfactuals are useful, but only actionable in the most 
antisceptic environments (e.g. randomized controlled trials)..


*I* have definitely not been the same since I became an online creature 
(most minimally around 1978 (UUNet), with inflections in 1981 
(ARPA/NSF/ES/DOD/TLA-nets) and then the early 90s with the broad 
availability to the public, and then again around 2000 when search 
engines and other automated aggregators reached a level of effectivity.


I would also suggest that we are in another inflection point that maybe 
began with the advent of SIRI/Alexa/GoogleAssistant and now much more 
acutely with LLMs of the ChatGPT style.   The distinction here being 
that I now think of there being "entities" whose capabilities give the 
previously "dumb" agents of collectivity at least the "illusion" of 
sentience/consciousness no matter how limited/flawed/nascent/idiosyncratic.


When I interact with GPT 3.5 it is with the illusion that there is a 
proto-sentience on the other side of my screen.  If find myself (yet 
more) polite with it than I am with Google or Bing and I always try to 
craft my interactions almost exactly as I would with another human 
being.  I avoid sentence fragments, arbitrary contractions or acronyms, 
overly directive stylization, etc.   I like to joke (not joke) that 
ChatGPT is my "new bar friend".   I try to interact with it in the same 
mode as I would another human I have just met with whom I have little 
history or future but recognize as at least "something of a peer".   I 
assume that my "bar friend" likely knows more about a wide range of 
things than I do, but also may be open to entertaining some of my own 
unique perspectives and giving me a reasonable discussion if not actual 
argument around some of my sacred cows...


I am no longer the person I was before I dropped into this new 
"tavern".  I'm reminded of the (fictional) denezins of Clarke's "White 
Hart Pub", Spider Robinson's "Callahan's Cross Time Bar",

Re: [FRIAM] Emergency Alert

2023-10-05 Thread Steve Smith



Speaking of the book Snow Crash, it appeared in the hover-over on XKCD 
the other day, https://xkcd.com/2832/ . I just finished reading it 
when I saw the XKCD cartoon. I haven't decided whether it is a 
coincidence or a glitch in the matrix. Now that you brought it up, I 
am sure that it must be a glitch in the matrix. Maybe the emergency 
alert drill coincidence is related to that glitch too.


I'm hoping it is more like the brief scene in Dogma where the Stygian 
Triplets on roller blades use a hockey stick to rip a tear in reality. ( 
I can find absolutely no reference to the scene in the movie as I 
remember it... so it is probably one of MY hallucinations)


Thanks for the hint about finding (easter egg?) tooltip/hover-overs in 
XKCDs...  I think I'd tripped over them before but didn't twig to their 
being "a thing"... Kewl!


Car bodies are getting to be more and more likely Aluminum or 
(bio)Plastic, so a magnapoon would be a less-than-optimal method, though 
much simpler than a suction-cup mechanism.   Maybe getting "magnapooned" 
would just be part of the "tax" on having an older/larger/inefficient 
vehicle (think lifted Diesel quad-cab 4x4 cowboy cadillac)...





_ Cody Smith _
c...@simtable.com


On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:32 PM Steve Smith  wrote:

Is it a coincidence that the US Emergency Alert System (primarily
cell phones) was tested today, coincident with the Russian
nationwide *nuclear*  alert system test today?

https://www.newsweek.com/us-russia-emergency-alert-drills-1831776

I was surprised when the US system was first deployed/tested under
Trump and *he* didn't turn it into his personal "Twitter" service.

I half expected to get an alert every time he was unhappy with
some "deep state" or legislative or judicial confrontation to his
will.

Now/Dark Brandon/ is using it to trigger COVID vaccine installed
Manchurian Candidate nanotech?

Or maybe a Snow Crash just happened in the House of
Representatives today/yesterday?

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] Emergency Alert

2023-10-04 Thread Steve Smith

Is it a coincidence that the US Emergency Alert System (primarily cell 
phones) was tested today, coincident with the Russian nationwide 
*nuclear*  alert system test today?


https://www.newsweek.com/us-russia-emergency-alert-drills-1831776

I was surprised when the US system was first deployed/tested under Trump 
and *he* didn't turn it into his personal "Twitter" service.


I half expected to get an alert every time he was unhappy with some 
"deep state" or legislative or judicial confrontation to his will.


Now/Dark Brandon/ is using it to trigger COVID vaccine installed 
Manchurian Candidate nanotech?


Or maybe a Snow Crash just happened in the House of Representatives 
today/yesterday?
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] Firearm violence... was: Mass Shootings

2023-10-04 Thread Steve Smith


Jochen -

My reflections on "how would Jochen see this?" during my cross-country 
trip this summer wasn't intended to diminish your concerns about gun 
safety/violence in the US... if anything I was seeing my own "backyard" 
through the eyes of others (yours) who have not been innured to the 
(threat of) violence that is quite widespread here in the US across many 
regions and demographics. If there is a point to be made it is that our 
"casual" and onesey-twosey shootings, including those initiated by our 
law enforcement is at least as much of a problem as the 
multiple-shootings that seem to come with various expressions of 
intolerance (racism, homophobia, etc.) and general 
frustration/desperation (caused by an otherwise 
dysfunctional/disaffected society for many).


The wide availability (and dissemination) of "weapons of war" (and the 
ammunition for them as well as semi-auto handguns with significant clip 
capacity) in this country is a huge problem in my opinion... not just 
because of how often they get used (inappropriately by their nature) but 
because of the general posture and tenor of interpersonal (and civic) 
relations.   Law enforcement has to be more suspicious of individuals in 
public encounters given that any given citizen might well be carrying a 
(highly) deadly weapon equal to or exceeding the capability of their own 
(on their hip, or in their car).   Similarly, the average citizen must 
also consider the possibility that a given disagreement could abruptly 
escalate to a shooting incident.    It wasn't that long ago (decades?) 
that interpersonal gun violence was mostly restricted to the execution 
of a financial crime (including drug deals) or (sadly) domestic disputes 
(often spouses but sometimes parent/child or sibling/sibling), but now 
it seems that political differences have become equally popular reasons 
for shooting one another.


A really good (bad) example of this is fresh in our area:

   
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/15/us/conquistador-onate-albuquerque-new-mexico-unrest.html

   
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/02/09/us/conquistador-statue-stirs-hispanic-pride-and-indian-rage.html

   
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/17/world/as-a-sculpture-takes-shape-in-mexico-opposition-takes-shape-in-the-us.html

The most recent event of less than a week ago seemed to involve a 
?concealed? handgun produced and fired by a counter-protestor who had 
been haranguing the (mostly) Native American "protestors" who were 
rather *celebrating* a delay in placing the Onate statue. (the shooting 
victim is recovering but was in critical condition after being shot in 
the abdomen at point blank range).   No specific mention is made of 
whether the shooter had been displaying the weapon or keeping it 
entirely concealed during the ongoing confrontations.   My personal 
observation of the videos at the moment of shooting suggests it was 
specifically concealed in his waistband *under* a hoodie.  The local law 
enforcement had been present earlier and I believe had intervened in 
earlier altercations he had generated... it seems unlikely they would 
have left the scene had he been openly displaying a weapon at that 
time... but who knows?   Also likely that those he claimed "threatened 
him" would not have been as aggressive had he been displaying a weapon 
(for better or worse)...


The statue in question had been removed from a nearby location after the 
2020 conflict over a similar statue in Albuquerque where another 
anti-Onate protestor was shot by a "counter protestor". The very 
same statue was vandalized in 1998 not long after it was first installed 
by removing the right foot of Onate who is infamous for many atrocious 
acts during his time as Conquistador/Governor in the area which included 
cutting offthe right foot of Native men 
 that were not massacred 
during his bloodiest act among many.  It isn't clear if the shooter 
(with an Hispanic surname) had a specific "Hispanic Pride" motive in 
confronting the Native protestors, there is plenty of online evidence 
that he is a proud MAGA guy and previously been "talked to" by the FBI 
for threats he had made (online?)...


There is a battle underway between our Democrat Governer and a large 
contingent of pro-gun legislators, industry and citizens after she tried 
to supercede the State laws allowing "open carry" of firearms in *most* 
public venues.   She issued a temporary order trying to limit such 
 
in one county after several children were killed in the Albuquerque by 
stray gunfire... as the linked article indicates it was overturned by a 
federal judge based on "2nd amendment rights".


So *yes*, the US, even/especially this sleepy little corner of the 
country has a gun problem which is evidenced by the amount of shooting 
going on.   "Breaking Bad" might well exaggerate

Re: [FRIAM] cults

2023-10-04 Thread Steve Smith



On 10/4/23 4:36 AM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
I carefully listened to Musk's speech as provided in the reference and 
attempted to reconcile Marcus's comments with it. Here are my 
observations:


a) Marcus states, "I realized I kind of agree with Musk about the 
benefits of more isolation." However, I interpret Musk's stance 
differently. He appears to be cautioning against excessive global 
unity rather than advocating for more isolation. In Musk's own words, 
"I think we should be a little bit concerned about becoming too much 
of a single world government." To me, this doesn't imply a call for 
greater isolation, but merely warns about a single world government. 
Am I being overly simplistic in my understanding?


b) Marcus suggests, "I believe his advocacy may be aimed at fostering 
chaos." While I may strongly disagree with many of Musk's actions and 
statements, I don't share the belief that he desires chaos. I 
recognize that sometimes one must connect the dots and draw 
conclusions without concrete evidence, so I don't fault Marcus for his 
perspective. However, it's crucial to emphasize that I have not come 
across any evidence supporting the idea that Musk intends to create chaos.


Reading Isaacson's biography of Musk it seems highly credible that Musk 
*likes* disruption... that he likes to disrupt his own companies' 
technical agendas as well as their staff's tactical styles.   Isaacson 
gives Musk a lot of tentative but qualified credit for this:


Musk's cowboy effort/demonstration last Xmas break of going into the 
Sacramento Data Center and moving (dozens?) of server racks to 
Washington State (Tacoma/Seattle) to /demonstrate to the arm of 
X/Twitter responsible for such things that their estimates of the effort 
and time involved were unreasonably long/, is a good example.   The net 
effect was, in fact, negative by most measures, but his intention as 
described was ultimately to make a point in spite of his face.  And 
(maybe) it worked.   There was definitely an overt *performative 
cruelty* or at least *punishing* aspect to this demonstration but it may 
have helped to move other sub-projects along much faster than they would 
have otherwise. X/Twitter survived the chaos that ensued...


He has done the same many times with Tesla and SpaceX technical 
arms/agendas/phases.    One *could* say that he doesn't *intend* the 
resulting chaos but rather simply "risks it", but my reading is that he 
sees the (contained in space and time) as a tool to dislodge *other* 
parts of his business ventures from local minima with the *threat* of 
disruption.   As I remember another anecdote... he pulled a lot of 
engineers off of various time-critical SpaceX missions onto a 
self-imposed deadline on a less time-critical mission which was very 
frustrating to most if not all of the engineers being jerked around, but 
after the fact some or even many of the engineers acknowledged that the 
forced march on a project not near and dear to them rejuvenated them and 
refocused them on their home-turf project.   It is at the very least an 
injection of "noise" into a gradient-descent algorithm that (sometimes) 
helps jog things out of a local minima.


This is not to say that Musk's intentions around projects within his own 
domain (empire) apply to his intentions around the global 
socio-economic-political system they are embedded in, but it seems 
likely to me that he *does* believe that his tactics apply 
*everywhere*...  I believe/fear his influence is outsize (by multiples 
even of the Gilded Age Robber Barons).   One can give the likes of 
Genghis Khan and Chairman Mao credit for reshaping significant 
geopolitical regions profoundly, but that doesn't mean we would support 
doing it again if we had the opportunity.


As with my previous ramble about my own life-experience with 
individualism/collectivism, I think there is an acute tension between 
the agency facilitated by individuation/isolation and 
authoritarianism/collectivism.    My personal holy grail is to 
understand the middle ground where collective action (with wisdom) 
emerges from individualism without authoritarianism.   Q's motto "Where 
We Go One, We Go All" is creepy as hell to me... it is an overt 
statement that "collective action" in some way supercedes everything 
else.   When lead by a cult leader (and Q might not even exist but is 
deferred to as if a real individual authority) this kind of deference to 
authority is acutely dangerous.


In my last post, I wandered off of Glen's original question or point 
about /Fascism/ which I think he meant to emphasize top-down 
authoritarianism but perhaps also admits to the (illusion of?) the 
bottom up style of /Populism/ which seems to often go hand-in-hand with 
Fascism.    Musk derives his "power" from a combination of $$ and 
Attention, both of which we, the unwashed masses give to him every time 
we buy/use one of his products, reX one of his X's, or even say his name 
(all Press is

Re: [FRIAM] cults

2023-10-02 Thread Steve Smith

Glen -

A fascinating question as usual and I appreciate the extra background
you offer below. I've contemplated your central conundrum ("the
apparent contradiction between fascism and individuality") for most of
my life, both from the inside and the outside.

I was raised among the ?natural? individualism which comes from
rural/frontier culture where the value of autonomous agency and
independence had obvious value while at the same time, the ability to
engage in short and long-term cooperative/collective endeavors could
magnify and leverage those advantages. There was a dynamic tension...

As I moved into more and more urbanized and collectivized contexts
(cities, regional industrial contexts, university, professional
organizations, scientific institutions, etc.) I felt there was an
illusion of advantage given to participation in the shared
identity/values implied but it was somewhat enforced by
in-group/out-group logic which (dis)advantaged (non) participation.

With a little perspective of age/hindsight, I realize now that it was
not nearly so simple, and that there were in fact plenty of *advantages*
(carrots) to subsuming my identity, my will, my agency, my ideations to
"the collective", not just alienation and punishment (sticks) for
failing to participate or at least "pass"...

I now live somewhat by the assumption/belief that my "self" is something
of a contrived illusion, but an autopoetic one. Somehow, it seems that
the emergence of self-awareness on top of basic consciousness promotes a
strong identity boundary with an acute self-other response at many
levels (from the immune system to systemic racism to rabid
nationalism). My main way of resolving this is through the pop-Buddhist
alone/all-one duality reflection and a sense of soft, multi-scale
scoping of "self".

I know you have expressed an allergy to poetry but for others (or my own
virtue-signal satisfaction) here is one I literally was writing for
entirely different purposes which I think is perhaps relevant:

The Autopoetic Self

/Crafting the self's essence,//
//a mental festival, an inner dance,//
//clouds of consciousness,
fossilized memories//revisited and refreshed.
//
The self, a story shaped, constantly askew.
For the self to survive,
it must paradoxically,
dance the /danse macabre/' *

*(pronounced Mac-Abrey for the purposes of this poem)
/

Steve Smith, October 2023

On 10/1/23 7:36 AM, glen wrote:
It's been awhile since I've run across a new-to-me cult. But 09A
certainly qualifies as a meaty one:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/28/new-york-satanic-cult-764-fbi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Nine_Angles
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2195065

I can't reconcile the apparent contradiction between fascism and
individuality. I guess the closest some analysts come is to suggest
that they're only aligning with the fascists, for now, to bring about
the end of the current aeon and the colonization of the galaxy.

I guess it reminds me of the "no enemies to the [right|left]"
rhetoric:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/30/conservative-christopher-rufo-florida-twitter-debate

But otherwise, O9A's ... "beliefs and structure" seem incoherent
enough to write them off as just too stupid to care about. However one
author nailed it in saying that there are plenty of both
impressionable and antisocial people using the internet, susceptible
to the "sinister" allure, to cause real damage.
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] structure/function in (network) systems

2023-09-10 Thread Steve Smith


This recent article about synchronization in networks was fascinating to me:

   https://neurosciencenews.com/complex-system-synchronization-23902/

and lead me to need to catch (ever so little) on the idea of structure 
vs process "motif" graphlets


   https://www.math.ucla.edu/~mason/papers/alice-motifs2021.pdf

some (many?) here who are more active and engaged in such work may 
already be up on this stuff...  the world moves on!


or maybe it is just part of the towering mass of ignorance looming over 
my head?
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] saRNA

2023-09-10 Thread Steve Smith

The space between */Scylla and Charybdis/ *seems to be shrinking by 
halves.   On the one had the conspiracists are "awfulizing" everything 
while others might be "normalizing" everything in the spirit of 
(polyanna?) progress?


With what *appears* to be a sharp rise in auto-immune disorders in the 
(first?) world, I can understand why some might cringe at playing hard 
at the edge of immune system manipulation.  On the other hand, the 
historical pandemics (formerly known as plagues) seem to be naturally 
expanded/aggravated/facilitated by our modern transportation (people and 
goods).


A variation of the Red Queen dilemma?

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/self-amplifying-rna-vaccines/?utm_source=rss_medium=rss_campaign=self-amplifying-rna-vaccines 



"It is also likely that there will be another round of fear-mongering 
about the new technology. It probably best for scientists to get ahead 
of this, to introduce and explain the technology to the public, so 
that at least it will be somewhat familiar before the next COVID. "


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

[FRIAM] Unlocking Aphantasia – The Mysterious Spectrum of Mind's Visualization - Neuroscience News

2023-09-09 Thread Steve Smith


A and Hyper Phantasia - relevant to our "dreaming" discussions.
https://neurosciencenews.com/aphantasia-visual-ptsd-23901/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

2023-09-08 Thread Steve Smith


Cody/Glen -

I like this conceit of dreaming as disinhibited/discursive next-token 
generation.


As a sometimes *lucid* dreamer myself, I feel as if that is what is very 
close to what is going on for me... my best lucid dreaming is 
hypnapompic... happening as I awake or as I drift in and out after a 
good sleep (including various fever dreams such as an overheated nap on 
a summer afternoon). Hypnagogic also, but not so much... it seems to be 
a difference in tuning/calibration/angle of entry vs angle of exit?


The *lucidity* of my dreams seem to stem from some kind of split 
attention or an pseudo-adversarial exchange between a *conscious* and an 
*sub*-conscious component of "self".   The mode in which I engage in my 
lucid dreaming experience is usually somewhat active... "guiding" the 
dream-wander willfully but always gently... experience tells me that 
deliberate lucid dreaming is a bit like catching dust-motes or herding 
cats... too much intention blows it up and shuts it down or ruins it 
qualitatively. "directed disinhibition" might be a fair description of 
my best method.  Psychedelic (or opiod?) tripping may be similar for 
some, my experience with such is so acutely limited that I'm just 
guessing from anecdotal references.


One of my early experiences with chatGPT was to try to co-write short 
fiction with it, based on some simple tech or socio-political tweak.   
The final result was rather unsatisfying but Glen's implication that an 
API interface might provide more degrees of freedom than merely 
web-whispering at it.   I hadn't thought of it before this thread came 
up, but the *problems* I had might have been in the category of *trying 
too hard*...  I was probably trying to force  chatGPT to be more of a 
writing assistant than a collaborative dreamer.   Naturally I begin 
those story-weavings with a specific idea of what it is about and where 
it is going.   Perhaps I can re-engage with something closer to Glen's 
prescription?


Jason Yunkaporta in his book Sand Talk 
<https://birchbarkbooks.com/products/sand-talk> invoked a (n Aboriginal) 
term for doing something like this intentionally with other people and 
calls it "Yarning" somewhat discursive from the usual description of 
Aboriginal Dreaming is my own connotative understanding of it as 
"wandering about in the (larger) adjacent possible".  Yarning seems to 
be a collaborative, directed version of this?  The question of "what 
means adjacent?" is begged here methinks.


I have resisted/puzzled-over/enjoyed Glen's assertion/question about 
"communication is an illusion" (probably mis-stating it here?)... and 
wonder how that relates to this "dreaming" business?  It seems that what 
we nominally call (or intend to be) communication is at best the weaving 
of yarns (and that is a good thing)?


For the musically inclined: Dream On 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89dGC8de0CA>! - Aerosmith or a 
Cinematic Slam version <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYXYQRU2i7c> 
(more to the spirit of adversarial collaboration)...


For the western take on eastern mystics among us, Alan Watts 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU0PYcCsL6o>...


Discursively yours,

    - Steve


On 9/8/23 8:03 AM, glen wrote:
One of the things we could easily try is cumulative, iterative 
prompting, particularly with some of the lower scoring responses. 
Dreams are nothing but lower scoring responses, right? While you're 
sleeping, your evaluation/selection mechanism is inhibited, which 
allows you to invest a little more in the total bullshit your own 
next-token generator generates. So for, say ChatGPT to dream, it 
simply needs instructions, including higher temperatures, to be less 
critical of its own responses. It would be annoying to try to do it 
with the web interface, but trivial to do with the API. The hidden 
pre-prompt could be engineered such that the n+1 prompt is a 
(algorithmic or random) composition of the, say, 10 responses to the 
nth prompt. Etc. This would be akin to dreaming, I think. At the end 
of however many iterations, you wake it up and write the highest 
scoring result down in its dream journal.


Maybe I'll try that with Falcon. I can't divert my OAI budget to it.

On 9/7/23 12:37, cody dooderson wrote:
I asked ChatGPT if it dreamed and it said that it didn't. However, is 
adversarial training of neural networks much different than dreaming?


A new class from MITX showed up in my email today. It is called 
/Minds and Machines: An introduction to philosophy of mind, exploring 
consciousness, reality, AI, and more. The most in-depth philosophy 
course available online. 
/https://mitxonline.mit.edu/courses/course-v1:MITxT+24.09x/ 
<https://mitxonline.mit.edu/courses/course-v1:MITxT+24.09x/>

It may help with this question.
/
/
_ Cody Smith _
c...@simtable.com <mailto:c...@simtable.com>


On Thu, Sep 7, 2023

Re: [FRIAM] On Apple Podcasts: Solving Tornadoes: Woke Meteorology

2023-09-07 Thread Steve Smith

Fascinating (to me) how water (the H20 molecule, it's phases, mechanical 
modes, radiative coupling, chemistry, aggregate thermodynamics, etc) is 
central to such a widely distributed space-time regime of morpho and 
teleodynamic phenomena spanning (sub)cellular to organism to 
super-organism (herds, schools, forests, prairies, ecosystems) and also 
planetary hydro/cryo/biosphere scale weather/climate/???.


There may be evidence of water being significantly relevant to 
solar/planetary and even galactic scales but  at least *up-to* planetary 
scales and down to "molecular scales", indeed "Water is WEIRD" as Hywel 
reminds us through Nick.   Is this merely another name for our ignorance 
or is it acutely anthropocentric because it defines the Goldilocks 
region our form of consciousness/life emerged/exists/thrives in?  Water 
is weirdly relevant to human-scale interests?


Spanning 19 decimal orders of magnitude, from 10^-10m to 10^9 meters ?

And in time?  vibrational frequency(ies) of water (wavelength(s) in 
micrometers) vs speed of sound (1500 m/sec)?    9 orders(decimal) of 
magnitude?


I have been fascinated by the quasi-crystalline structures that have 
been both discovered scientifically and invoked woo-woo-ly such as 
described in Mae-Wan Ho's Rainbow Water/Worm, AND it's implications 
around the physics of /Life Itself/.


https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/6928#t=aboutBook 




And little or none of it might be relevant to the "physics of swirlies" 
(RIP Doug Roberts)...



in the bigger/broader question of meteorology as a coherent discipline 
vs "clabboring together of ..." some (unpublished)work I did 15 years 
ago with Deana Pennington 
 on the 
topic of the emergence of new scientific disciplines/paradigms would 
suggest that this precise level of dis/mis-organization and apparent 
"clabboring" and "incompatable" is an earmark of an impending 
phase-shift (and in fact  what might represent the emergence of a new 
field and/or new paradigms)?  I highly recommend Deanna's entire corpus 
for those interested in the meta-topic of scientific 
collaboration/understanding/processes, especially in the bio/eco/climate 
sciences.   We have not worked closely since she moved from UNM to UTEP 
a decade ago... she thrives there best I can tell.  I no longer do 
anything useful beyond gadfly-about myself.  Some /Laurels/ make for 
better resting than others...


- Steve

/    May the laurels you rest on be the fruit of living in interesting 
times? /(to mangle/mashup/clabber-up some aphorisms)


On 9/7/23 1:10 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
Anyone who needs to call "woke" to make a scientific argument has lost 
my ear.  An attention seeking proto-populist weatherman.


The electrostatics of individual water molecules, that the hydrogens 
have some positive charge and the lone pairs of oxygen have some 
negative charge (which is actually a consequence of the molecule 
geometry), is all averaged into the thermodynamic behavior.  That 
gaseous water vapor and liquid water vapor droplets coexist is one way 
the gas - liquid equilibrium can roll.  Are the droplets drying out or 
getting wetter decides which way the heat is moving.  The amount of 
surface area between the liquid and gas phases facilitates the rate of 
heat transfer/drying/wetting.


The fundamental delusion is thinking you can explain the weather 
better than simply blaming it on the gods.  We know the basic 
principles involved, but the variety of ways it can work out continues 
to surprise us.


-- rec --

On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:54 AM Nicholas Thompson 
 wrote:


thanks Pieter for giving a hear.  He almost certainly is a crack
pot (he has an "only I can fix it" thing going)  but is he wrong
about everything?  He makes a big deal about the special
properties of water molecules. He argues that these are created
not by the geometric properties of the molecule per se but by the
electrostatic (?!) gradient created by the structure, a
distinction he admits is subtle, but insists is absolutely
crucial.  He says at one point that water vapor itself is rare and
that water remains in minuscule droplet form or (??) sometimes
forms a plasma.  Some how this leads him to the conclusion that
convection is a confection.

I do have sympathy for his general assertion that meteorology is
an incoherent clabboring together of incompatible ways of talking
and thinking.

This is one of those moments when I profoundly miss Hywel White. 
One of his aphorisms was "Water is /*WEIRD!"*/
/*
*/
/*Nick
*/

On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:57 AM Pieter Steenekamp
 wrote:

I listened to the podcast and my opinion is that this
guy, James McGinn, is a crackpot.

On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 05:28, Nicholas Thompson

Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

2023-09-07 Thread Steve Smith

Great observations as usual Glen...   I have lapsed into *listening* to 
almost all long-form writing, whether fiction or non  and it 
definitely distorts (torts?) my perception/conception of the 
material/subject/message.   A corollary to McLuhan's Medium/Message 
duality?


 I find the "output" side to be more specific (or conscious) for me 
than the "input" side.   Your point of cuneoform 
sticks/quills/pencils/keyboard/gestural-interpreters being part of our 
extended phenotype is very apt as is the idea that (if I understand your 
intentions) it (intrinsically) effects our interoception and 
inter-subjective realities.


I also appreciate your reflections on "mal" and "dis" which I have lived 
with all of my life... "judging" or "discriminating" in ways which 
themselves are "adaptive" for one suite of purposes but perhaps 
"mal"/"dis" for another suite.   Having a vector or tensor fitness 
function with (arbitrary) signs on the elements doesn't guarantee they 
themselves are "fit" for what you think they are.


Do Androids dream of Electric Sheep?   Do LLM's (or larger adaptive 
systems they are embedded in?) dream of the tensor fields they are 
embedded in or create or co-create with the fields of human 
activity/history/knowledge/experience/future/manifesting-destiny they 
were designed to model/emulate/expose/facilitate/co-evolve with?


I dunno,  but it sure is a fascinating milieu to be surfing through in 
these auspicious days at the beginning (or end) of the Anthropocene.


 - Steve

On 9/7/23 1:01 PM, glen wrote:
Both keyboards and pencils are part of our extended phenotype and play 
(multiple) roles in interoception, including the induction of 
inter-subjectivity. I've forgotten who it is, but there's someone on 
this list who *listens* to our posts, rather than reads them. I tried 
that with a blog post this morning during my mobility routine:


https://www.emilkirkegaard.com/p/preferences-can-be-sick-mental-illness


Then because I had an allergic reaction to what I heard, I *read* it 
later. Listening to it disgusted me. I came away thinking this 
Kirkegaard dude's akin to a scientific racist ... or maybe a 
eugenecist. I admit to being a fan of Thomas Szasz back in the day. (A 
friend's mom actually dated him at some point ... allegedly.) But at 
this point, I've been infected by the Woke Mind Virus; and it's 
difficult to stomach phrases like "strict homosexuality is more 
disordered than bisexuality." Reading it, however, helped me remember 
that maladaption is part and parcel of adaption. Disorder is part and 
parcel of order. The "mal" and "dis" prefixes are nothing but 
value-laden subjectivity. The goo of reality extruded through the mold 
of the author/thinker/subject. For someone like Kirkegaard to claim 
they're being "objective" while using the "mal" prefix is not even 
wrong. It's just bullshit. Apparently, my Woke Virus infection is 
worse near my ears than near my eyes.



But the point is that *which* extended trait you use (pencil, audio, 
text, etc.) chooses which interoceptive cycle you engage. And when you 
pretend to make such a choice on purpose, at will, any assignation of 
fault would be transitive. Which wolf do you feed?


On 9/4/23 10:29, Steve Smith wrote:
I'm not sure my facility with the keyboard actually serves me. As 
many of you may suspect, and I suspect so myself, it allows me to be 
much less thoughtful and rigorous than I would be in handwriting or 
if I had some other throttle or impedance elements between linguistic 
centers and "paper"?




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

2023-09-04 Thread Steve Smith


Great list Carl!  And more interesting yet to me:

   /I would like to feed.../
   /...into the AI and see what millennium long sci-fi it could turn out. /

I'm definitely fascinated by the implied interpolation (and 
extrapolation?) an LLM can do in what is by definition firstly 
*linguistic* space and what that implies for it's ?dual? in conceptual 
space?


and even more interesting:

   /How would what it writes be different if it could be taught to
   write using a nib pen a la Stephenson or a brush on washi paper?/

In my lifetime I have kept various chronicles and correspondence via 
handwriting using (mostly) roller-ball ink pens but also for some 
periods fountain pens.    A great deal more of that type of 
chronicle/correspondence was effected on a keyboard much like (or 
exactly) the one I'm typing on now (circa 2011 13" Macbook Pro)... As 
you all painfully know, I'm pretty prolific in e-mail/e-txt which 
reflects a few things:


 * my handwriting is abysmal and can be physically/emotionally/mentally
   excruciating to execute sometimes.
 * I learned to type at a very young age to compensate for the above
   and it really freed me.
 * I sometimes feel that I am actually *thinking* differently whilst
   using the von-Neuman-esque linear "tape" as extended
   memory/program-space.
 * I have at times in my life had a similar experience when working
   with mathematical notation and with geometric constructions.
 * These experiences are significantly different qualitatively (when
   done by hand vs keyboard/mouse/etc)...
 o each mode is distinct with benefits/detractions
 o I feel I *think* and *feel* differently when coupling my
   cognitive self to my recorded/expressive self?

I choose to use a fountain pen on well-toothed paper when I want to 
write "meditatively"... the feel of the nib on the tooth and the flow of 
the ink and the smell and the sounds all provide something similar to 
"breath work" for me.


I'm not sure my facility with the keyboard actually serves me. As many 
of you may suspect, and I suspect so myself, it allows me to be much 
less thoughtful and rigorous than I would be in handwriting or if I had 
some other throttle or impedance elements between linguistic centers and 
"paper"?


On 9/3/23 10:44 PM, Carl Tollander wrote:

Gregory Benford's "Galactic Center Saga".
Greg Bear's "Darwin's Radio" and "The Way" series.
Benford, Bear, and David Brin also extended Asimov's "Foundation" 
series - more stuff actually happens
Larry Niven's "Ringworld" and all its spinoffs and prequels, anything 
with the character Louis Wu in it.

Neal Stephenson's "The Diamond Age"
Bruce Sterling's "Distraction"
Anything by Terry Pratchett.
Adrian Tchaikovsky's "Children of Time" and sequels.
Lin Carter's short story "Masters of the Metropolis"

That should keep you busy for a few days.  I suspect not everyone 
would think of these as optimistic.


I would like to feed Timothy Snyder's Youtube lectures on Ukraine
and Neal Stephenson's "Quicksilver"
and Eiji Yoshikawa's "Taiko"
into the AI and see what millennium long sci-fi it could turn out.
How would what it writes be different if it could be taught to write 
using a nib pen a la Stephenson or a brush on washi paper?


R.A. Lafferty wrote sometime ago "Arrive at Easterwine" about a 
computer writing a novel from a mashup perspective of its creators.


Carl


On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 11:13 AM Jochen Fromm  wrote:

I have read "Highway of Eternity" from Clifford D. Simak this
weekend, one of the books from the golden age of science fiction
which is comparable to "The city and the Stars" from Arthur C.
Clarke and "The end of eternity" from Isaac Asimov. Both belong to
my favorite books. Modern authors don't write like this anymore.
Their books are often gloomy and depressive, and do not span
millions of years. What is your favorite science fiction book?
Will the AI breakthrough in large language models lead to more
optimistic science fiction books again?

-J.

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-..

[FRIAM] Guns, Police abuses and Foodstuffs in 'Murrica today.

2023-09-03 Thread Steve Smith

ly, Greece and Israel the food 
is awesome. In South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam and Japan as well.

-J.

 Original message 
From: Steve Smith 
Date: 9/3/23 8:59 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

Jochen -

I thought of you more than few times on my long walkabout through 
Red/Purple-state 'murrica...  mostly your concerns a year or two ago 
about traveling to the US "because gun violence".   I was in the heart 
of "gun country" through this trip and saw a few artifacts of that 
which would naturally be *very* disturbing (methinks) to someone not 
already innured to it... but not nearly as many as you might expect.  
On the other hand I just saw a news item that Canada and many other 
first-world countries have in place "travel warnings" for not the US 
proper, but many of the more egregious "red states".   I believe you 
may have already made your 'murrican sojourn so the point may be 
moot... but I couldn't help thinking "how would Jochen see this?" as I 
stumbled through a landscape of bison, hay bales, corn fields, 
motorcycles, strip malls, and gun shows.

I have read "Highway of Eternity" from Clifford D. Simak this 
weekend, one of the books from the golden age of science fiction 
which is comparable to "The city and the Stars" from Arthur C. Clarke 
and "The end of eternity" from Isaac Asimov. Both belong to my 
favorite books. Modern authors don't write like this anymore. Their 
books are often gloomy and depressive, and do not span millions of 
years. What is your favorite science fiction book? Will the AI 
breakthrough in large language models lead to more optimistic science 
fiction books again?

Back on topic:  I grew up on a lot of "Golden Age" works/authors which 
includes Simak/Clarke/Asimov of course.   I would claim that this time 
was naturally one of "Utopianism" that came with the rapid development 
of industry/technology/science.  I think the Dystopianism ramped up 
with PostModernism and Cyberpunk.   I'm a big fan of Cyberpunk (esp.. 
Gibson/Sterling/Stephenson/Cadigan/etc.) and *some* post-Apocalyptic 
works... now almost exclusively "CliFi" (Climate Fiction), but I get 
your yearning for "the good ole days".   I'd say Elon Musk grew up on 
"too much Utopian SF" as well and (unlike me) hasn't outgrown it?

My *favorite* golden-age author is Jack Williamson 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Williamson> who I've mentioned 
here before and had the distinction of being somewhat elder when he 
published his first work at age 20 (1928) in Hugo Gernsback's 
first-of-kind Amazing Stories (1926).   I feel like he hit his stride 
after WWII where he had been a (civilian, not military due to age) 
Weatherman in the Pacific and reacted to a dawning self-awareness of 
the flip side of techno-Utopianism (exemplified by 
Hiroshima/Nagasaki)...   His (re)entry into publication after a long 
hiatus (during/after WWII) was With Folded Hands 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/With_Folded_Hands>, a reflective 
dystopian view of techno-utopianism as well as work presaging Asimov's 
Robot series as well as a plethora of concepts like 
Borg/Cylon/Replicant/Terminators/Cybermen/Sentinels, etc... and of 
course all of this was preceded by Lem's Trurl and Klapaucius 
(wizard-robot constructors) and the Hebrew Golem (and Frankenstein's 
Monster and... and and.)  He wrote over 50 novels ultimately in his 98 
year long life as well as myriad short stories, novellas and a 3 year 
run of a comic strip (early 50s)... He also penned a reflective 
autobiography late in life (70s) but with nearly 20 years worth of 
career following that!  He taught writing at Eastern NM University 
well into his 90s as well.

For the most part I'm thankful to be beyond the flat-character 
cardboard-cutout, misogynistic, stoicly independent/capable 
(white-male) hero-worship classic SF tropes but I hear your interest 
in more positive grand narratives that the Golden Age also carried.  
For the seminal Epoch-spanning humanity I offer Olaf Stapledon's "Last 
and First Men" (1930) and "Starmaker" (1933).  The former spans 2 
billion years and 18 human species...

Robert Heinlein is the avowed Master of Human Chauvanistic 
technoUtopian/Libertarian fantasies which even satisfies some of us 
reformed/anti-Libertarians sometimes.   Many of his more minor novels 
are a fun romp in near-future techno-utopianism (e.g. Moon is a Harsh 
Mistress) as well as epoch and dimensional spanning works such as 
/Time Enough for Love /and /Job/ (respectively). /Stranger in a 
Strange Land/ stood up well next to Herbert's /Dune/ in the 60s to 
satisfy Hippies and non-Hippies alike.

Larry Niven's /Ringworld /series are pretty 
far-flung/futuristic/optimistic epochal.  He does post-Apocalyptic 
well too (e.g. /FootFall/, /Mote in God's Ey

Re: [FRIAM] Is the American political system broken?

2023-09-03 Thread Steve Smith

Wow Qadaffi hisself!   I've read some Marx, some Lenin, some Mao, some 
Castro and others (enemies of democracy in the US vernacular) but this 
is new to me... thanks for the reference.


I definitely find "Democracy is the tyranny of the majority over the 
minority" to be apt for all forms of democracy, with 2-party systems and 
charismatic/populist (elected) leaders to be the worst extreme of this, 
with multi-party systems improving it piecewise but not perfectly.


The representative nature of the US House/Senate and of Parliaments adds 
another dimension to the problem while aggravating the underlying problem.


A *direct* democracy (if that is possible) still suffers the "tyranny" 
problem, I sure don't want to be one of the 49 against the 51 having to 
do everything "their way" "because majority".


But then Churchill's "worst form of government, except for all the 
others we've tried to date" still holds me in it's thrall even if my 
higher self wishes for something better if acutely underspecified.


On 9/3/23 3:47 PM, Sarbajit Roy wrote:
In this context, I would like to share the thoughts of an important 
world leader (not very popular with successive US governments) on 1 
party, 2 party and multi-party systems. I found his (poorly 
translated) analysis very perceptive even if the alternatives he 
proposed instead were a bit prosaic. (For the USA substitute Congress 
/ Senate for Parliament).


/Parliaments, therefore, have become a means of plundering and 
usurping the authority of the people. It has thus become the right of 
the people to struggle, through popular revolution, to destroy such 
instruments – the so-called parliamentary assemblies which usurp 
democracy and sovereignty, and which stifle the will of the people. 
The masses have the right to proclaim reverberantly the new principle: 
no representationin lieu of the people./

//
/If parliament is formed from one party as a result of its winning an 
election, it becomes a parliament of the winning party and not of the 
people. It represents the party and not the people, and the executive 
power of the parliament becomes that of the victorious party and not 
of the people. The same is true of the parliament of proportional 
representation in which eachparty holds a number of seats proportional 
to their success in the popular vote. The members of the parliament 
represent their respective parties and not the people, and the power 
established by such a coalition is the power of the combined parties 
and not that of the people. Under such systems, the people are the 
victims whose votes are vied for by exploitative competing factions 
who dupe the people into political circuses that are outwardly noisy 
and frantic, but inwardly powerless and irrelevant. Alternatively, the 
people are seduced into standing in long, apathetic, silent queues to 
cast their ballots in the same way that they throw waste paper into 
dustbins. This is the traditional democracy prevalent in the whole 
world, whether it is represented by a one-party, two-party, multiparty 
or non-party system. Thus it is clear that representation is a fraud./

//
/Moreover, since the system of elected parliaments is based on 
propaganda to win votes, it is a demagogic system in thereal sense of 
the word. Votes can be bought and falsified. Poor //people are unable 
to compete in the election campaigns, and the result is that only the 
rich get elected. Assemblies constituted by appointment or hereditary 
succession do not fall under any form of democracy. /


https://ia801507.us.archive.org/4/items/TheGreenBookMuammarGaddafi/gaddafi-green-book.pdf

On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 10:31 PM Steve Smith  wrote:



I'm not an American, but because America plays such a big role in
the world, I do follow what's happening over there. With the
presidential elections happening next year, I cringe at the
prospect that it will be another Trump vs. Biden affair. Can the
leader of the world not do better?


Pieter -

I appreciate the international parallax that Friam (sometimes)
offers such as yours here.   I'd be interested in a little more of
your own analysis based on your personal socio-economic-political
position as well as your cultural heritage and of course your
geopolitical positioning which is rather unique in the world
(South Africa).  ChatGPT's perspective is naturally pretty
generic/muddy and from a median/centroid POV by it's nature?

Regarding Yang and his movement:   I was definitely fascinated by
his ideas and positioning across the US Democratic party
presidential primary (2020)...  my personal opinion is that a
significant value of presidential primaries is to develop a more
diverse/interesting platform than the one in place under (any)
current administration.   We have just finished watching Netflix's
/Borgen/ which I highly recommend as an access

Re: [FRIAM] Science Fiction Books

2023-09-03 Thread Steve Smith


Jochen -

I thought of you more than few times on my long walkabout through 
Red/Purple-state 'murrica...  mostly your concerns a year or two ago 
about traveling to the US "because gun violence".   I was in the heart 
of "gun country" through this trip and saw a few artifacts of that which 
would naturally be *very* disturbing (methinks) to someone not already 
innured to it... but not nearly as many as you might expect.  On the 
other hand I just saw a news item that Canada and many other first-world 
countries have in place "travel warnings" for not the US proper, but 
many of the more egregious "red states".   I believe you may have 
already made your 'murrican sojourn so the point may be moot... but I 
couldn't help thinking "how would Jochen see this?" as I stumbled 
through a landscape of bison, hay bales, corn fields, motorcycles, strip 
malls, and gun shows.


I have read "Highway of Eternity" from Clifford D. Simak this weekend, 
one of the books from the golden age of science fiction which is 
comparable to "The city and the Stars" from Arthur C. Clarke and "The 
end of eternity" from Isaac Asimov. Both belong to my favorite books. 
Modern authors don't write like this anymore. Their books are often 
gloomy and depressive, and do not span millions of years. What is your 
favorite science fiction book? Will the AI breakthrough in large 
language models lead to more optimistic science fiction books again?


Back on topic:  I grew up on a lot of "Golden Age" works/authors which 
includes Simak/Clarke/Asimov of course.   I would claim that this time 
was naturally one of "Utopianism" that came with the rapid development 
of industry/technology/science.  I think the Dystopianism ramped up with 
PostModernism and Cyberpunk.   I'm a big fan of Cyberpunk (esp.. 
Gibson/Sterling/Stephenson/Cadigan/etc.) and *some* post-Apocalyptic 
works... now almost exclusively "CliFi" (Climate Fiction), but I get 
your yearning for "the good ole days".   I'd say Elon Musk grew up on 
"too much Utopian SF" as well and (unlike me) hasn't outgrown it?


My *favorite* golden-age author is Jack Williamson 
 who I've mentioned here 
before and had the distinction of being somewhat elder when he published 
his first work at age 20 (1928) in Hugo Gernsback's first-of-kind 
Amazing Stories (1926).   I feel like he hit his stride after WWII where 
he had been a (civilian, not military due to age) Weatherman in the 
Pacific and reacted to a dawning self-awareness of the flip side of 
techno-Utopianism (exemplified by Hiroshima/Nagasaki)... His (re)entry 
into publication after a long hiatus (during/after WWII) was With Folded 
Hands , a reflective 
dystopian view of techno-utopianism as well as work presaging Asimov's 
Robot series as well as a plethora of concepts like 
Borg/Cylon/Replicant/Terminators/Cybermen/Sentinels, etc...   and of 
course all of this was preceded by Lem's Trurl and Klapaucius 
(wizard-robot constructors) and the Hebrew Golem (and Frankenstein's 
Monster and... and and.)  He wrote over 50 novels ultimately in his 98 
year long life as well as myriad short stories, novellas and a 3 year 
run of a comic strip (early 50s)... He also penned a reflective 
autobiography late in life (70s) but with nearly 20 years worth of 
career following that! He taught writing at Eastern NM University well 
into his 90s as well.


For the most part I'm thankful to be beyond the flat-character 
cardboard-cutout, misogynistic, stoicly independent/capable (white-male) 
hero-worship classic SF tropes but I hear your interest in more positive 
grand narratives that the Golden Age also carried.  For the seminal 
Epoch-spanning humanity I offer Olaf Stapledon's "Last and First Men" 
(1930) and "Starmaker" (1933).  The former spans 2 billion years and 18 
human species...


Robert Heinlein is the avowed Master of Human Chauvanistic 
technoUtopian/Libertarian fantasies which even satisfies some of us 
reformed/anti-Libertarians sometimes.   Many of his more minor novels 
are a fun romp in near-future techno-utopianism (e.g. Moon is a Harsh 
Mistress) as well as epoch and dimensional spanning works such as /Time 
Enough for Love /and /Job/ (respectively). /Stranger in a Strange Land/ 
stood up well next to Herbert's /Dune/ in the 60s to satisfy Hippies and 
non-Hippies alike.


Larry Niven's /Ringworld /series are pretty 
far-flung/futuristic/optimistic epochal.  He does post-Apocalyptic well 
too (e.g. /FootFall/, /Mote in God's Eye/)


I did enjoy Simak's work "back in the day" and his 1968 "So Bright the 
Vision" gestured toward what ChatGPT is today.


A.E. Van Vogt offers some great classics as well... /The Worlds of Null 
A /and /Weapons Shops of Isher/ stand out.


Poul Anderson simultaneously created/celebrated and lampooned the 
canonical pulp hero with his Nicholas van Rijn characters in a series of 
works and his /PsychoTechnic

Re: [FRIAM] Is the American political system broken?

2023-09-03 Thread Steve Smith



I'm not an American, but because America plays such a big role in the 
world, I do follow what's happening over there. With the presidential 
elections happening next year, I cringe at the prospect that it will 
be another Trump vs. Biden affair. Can the leader of the world not do 
better?


Pieter -

I appreciate the international parallax that Friam (sometimes) offers 
such as yours here.   I'd be interested in a little more of your own 
analysis based on your personal socio-economic-political position as 
well as your cultural heritage and of course your geopolitical 
positioning which is rather unique in the world (South Africa).  
ChatGPT's perspective is naturally pretty generic/muddy and from a 
median/centroid POV by it's nature?


Regarding Yang and his movement:   I was definitely fascinated by his 
ideas and positioning across the US Democratic party presidential 
primary (2020)...  my personal opinion is that a significant value of 
presidential primaries is to develop a more diverse/interesting platform 
than the one in place under (any) current administration.   We have just 
finished watching Netflix's /Borgen/ which I highly recommend as an 
accessible (and I hope accurate) presentation of how (Northern?) 
European Parliamentary systems operate.   To move from our system to a 
parliamentary alternative is a much bigger step than anything Yang 
suggests and therefore likely more inaccessable across the 
"semi-adjacent possible".


Two-Party:    I am a big fan of finding a way to expand our degenerate 
two-party system but am not sure that any specific naive attempt to 
break it will not have some possibly signfiicant unintended 
(undesireable) consequences.   I *like* the idea of ranked choice voting 
(as a voter) to be able to more directly express my preferences and in 
an ideal(ish) world, to achieve a more representative result.   A *full* 
rank-choice allows me to (implicitly) express my never-X-er sentiments 
which is satisfying (if not particularly meaningful?).   I voted for 
Jill/Green in 2016 because I strongly believed that Blue/Hillary/Dems 
had a lockin in my state and it was intended to be a combination of 
"protest" against the Clinton dynasty and the two-party system. It 
turned out fine but it could have been a bit of complicity accidentally 
being a "spoiler" vote.


Universal Basic:  I am very split on this concept.   To the extent that 
I think we are a hyper-wealthy economy (US and the rest of the first 
world at least) I believe we *can* afford this, and there are good 
reasons it *might* be a very good idea (up to details).   I feel that we 
do have some precedents in smaller contexts such as the Alaskan Oil 
payments and various Native Tribe member-payments.   I think our 
(sometimes) liberal/generous disability and welfare systems might well 
be partially replaced by a UBI...   allowing some of those who might be 
*gaming* the systems to simply accept the same (or even diminished) 
level of support as an act of generosity or inclusion by others who are 
more engaged in the directly productive subsystems/activities.  I also 
think this is a good way to support more "seeking your bliss" (e.g. 
artists and poets and ... doing their thing with less 
threshold/resistance) as well as entrepreneurial activiites.   A UBI 
might allow *some* entrepreneurs/innovators to build up more 
technological/innovational momentum...  I *do* believe that  the more 
extreme implementation of communism/socialism give us anecdotal evidence 
of how it can also go bad.


    Regarding Term Limits... I'm sympathetic with the idea that 
sometimes "career politicians" are a real problem/scourge (the 
alligators in the swamp) but I do appreciate at least a few of the 
"career" politicians of note (e.g. Sanders, Warren, Whitehouse, even 
Biden) and loathe a few others (Grassley, McConnell, Thurmond...   as I 
understand the intention/operation of the House/Senate... I think 
long-tenure Senators make more sense even though some of the fossils in 
those roles can be acute problems for our process.


Open Primaries and Electoral College issues are also important but maybe 
lost among the other issues.   I have not ever voted in a primary 
because I have never registered in a party (protest primarily against 
2-party system and "not wanting to encourage the bastards").  That said 
I *would* have liked to have thrown down for Bernie in 2016 and 2020 
primaries and came close to registering Blue/Dem to do so but ("don't 
want to encourage the bastards").  I think the Electoral College is a 
very high profile but idiosyncratic version of the more general problem 
of Gerrymandering that goes with representative gov/voting.  I hope the 
EC is on it's way out but I suspect the path *to* that elimination is 
awkward and risk-strewn.


    The major downsides I consider have a lot to do with "/how do we 
get there from here?/" and the risk of perturbations having unintended 
consequences which brings us

Re: [FRIAM] overshoot day

2023-08-02 Thread Steve Smith

On 8/2/23 2:55 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

I just noticed it was overshoot day, and just after the hottest July
ever recorded. Yay!

I'll be mixing up a nice ice-cold (luke warm?) cocktail of shame with
just a splash of Cassandrafruede (reminiscent of Absinthe?) at sundown
today (spectacular when orange-tinted from the wildfire smoke and dust
blown from drought-denuded areas)... While I pop the ice-cubes from the
tray I'll remember the recent factoid from someone (McKibben?) that the
annual carbon budget of most people in the third world is roughly that
of an American's refrigerator with an Ice-Maker or a Brit's electric
Kettle for twice-daily tea. If I had AC I'd turn it down to it's
coldest setting to spite my neighbor by belching superheated air into
their AC air handler intakes... but alas I only have adobe walls and
brick floors and lots of windows to absorb night-time coolth... no fun
in that!

The wycked hot here in NM finally broke somewhat for us yesterday with
an hour of rain like the "good ole days" when every afternoon had a
rainstorm starting in July to cool off the second half of the summer.
The crew down in the Bosque building a pumping station to move the water
pumped from the Colorado Basin to the Rio Grande (San Juan to Chama) is
busy belching diesel exhaust plumes and throwing adobe-bricklets from
their tires when they pull out on the highway to become ad-hoc speed
control bumps for the Los Alamos commuters usually roar by at 80 in the
55mph "safety zone" morning and night.

All the world is a circle? Or is it a donut? I think maybe I'm
channeling Terry Pratchett?

Cheers!

https://www.overshootday.org/

Re: [FRIAM] Philosophy and Science

2023-07-14 Thread Steve Smith

I like the term "epistemic trespass" and generally agree with the idea 
glen promotes in that regard.


My direct experience with *many* experimentalists trained and 
self-selected as physicists or chemists or materials scientists was that 
many of them were excellent engineers, computer systems developers, 
programmers, even mech/elec/hydro/pneumo-techs... but *mainly* because 
those skills/disciplines were in directs support of what they were 
trying to do and it was a useful shortcut/leverage to be able to do all 
those things for themselves rather than wait for the availability of 
specialists in those areas and then communicate their needs.   Only a 
*few* theorists seemed to have these skills because, perhaps they rarely 
*needed* that kind of support, though some had avocations or hobbies 
that exercised those skills.  I would hazard that more of the 
theoreticians were more deeply interested in the mathematics and 
philosophical embeddings that their avowed day-work implied.  The 
experimentalists *might* be interested (and/or facile) in those things 
but to some extent by constitution, self-selection, utilitarianism were 
less engaged.


I am glad that Tyson is out there "spreading the faith" to some extent, 
but it doesn't surprise me that he might give philosophers the 
brush-back unthoughtfully.   I feel like Sabine  Hossenfelder, in her 
very subtle style may have done the same thing but with a straight face 
rather than a big grin, even though much of her science-communication is 
smack dab in the middle (IMO) of these epistimic boundaries which is 
where (IMO) the best stuff resides.   I was recently put off by Paul 
Hawkin's need to deprecate/dismiss any talk (or thought?) about 
consciousness in deference to the presumably more formally defineable 
"intelligence", but I also understand that one good way to make progress 
on technical things is to downscope until your reach does not exceed 
your grasp (by much) and Hawkin's experience as a tech entreprenuer 
(Palm Pilot) suggests that he is more better served by staying closer to 
the engineering and tech end of the (multi-dimensional?) spectrum than 
the philosophical one.   I also understand that as one moves out into 
the yet-more-abstract of philosophy and mathematics and semiotics (for 
example) they seem more likely to be laced with BS (and perhaps often 
are?)... but that ambiguity/difficulty is part of what makes it worth 
spending time in (IMO again).


Not only do we not like our various sacred-cows skewered by others we 
don't even like them being called by unfamiliar names, until you realize 
those names *might* be "terms of endearment"?


I am not familiar with Hawking or Mlodinow's assertions but it triggers 
my associative memory to Russell and Whitehead's  (and others) 
assertions around/Principia Mathematica/.  Or the (yet more) 
classic/"God is Dead/ - Neitchze 1882 V. /Neitchze is dead/ - God 
1900".    I do suspect that the practice and vocation of philosophy is 
being altered in the face of things like the development of Category 
Theory and now LLMs ...  in the common CS vernacular, /it is not 
deprecated but is being refactored/?


On 7/14/23 11:02 AM, glen wrote:
This merely seems like triggered gatekeeping to me. Yeah, sure, 
working philosophers have skills and behaviors working [insert your 
favorite other clique] don't have. But, if it's not already obvious, 
especially to anyone who's had ANY contact with organizations like the 
SFI, epistemic trespassing can be wildly productive. We're all bad at 
things we're not good at. >8^D I haven't seen the Tyson rant that 
seems to have triggered Ramsey. But *leaving someone out* of your cf 
list is NOT a snub ... despite what the hip-and-trendy might claim. 
It's merely evidence that any presentation is limited in space and 
time. My guess is that if you listen to Tyson with a little 
generosity, you'd hear him make sounds sympathetic to the expertise of 
the peri-science cliques.


Now, Hawking and Mlodinow's explicit claim that philosophy is dead ... 
now, that's a different story.


On 7/14/23 08:33, Frank Wimberly wrote:
Joe Ramsey, who took over my job.in  the Philosophy 
Department at Carnegie Mellon, posted the following on Facebook:


I like Neil DeGrasse Tyson a lot, but I saw him give a spirited 
defense of science in which he oddly gave no credit to philosophers 
at all. His straw man philosopher is a dedicated *armchair* 
philosopher who spins theories without paying attention to scientific 
practice and contributes nothing to scientific understanding. He 
misses that scientists themselves are constantly raising obviously 
philosophical questions and are often ill-equipped to think about 
them clearly. What is the correct interpretation of quantum 
mechanics? What is the right way to think about reductionism? Is 
reductionism the right way to think about science? What is the nature 
of consciousness? Can you explain consciousness in terms of

[FRIAM] Fwd: Fwd:  Virtual FRIAM - recurring Zoom meeting on July 6, 2023 @ 9:00 AM | Read Meeting Report

2023-07-06 Thread Steve Smith

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: 	Fwd:  Virtual FRIAM - recurring Zoom meeting on July 6, 2023 
@ 9:00 AM | Read Meeting Report

Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:15:30 -0600
From:   Steve Smith 
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 

Fascinating!  I feel  like I was there!

It Reads a bit like the monthly newspaper for my "county of origin" (the 
Reserve Roundup with a distribution of 600)...  a 6 page rag with high 
points like every year a listing of the sleepover birthday party my 
mother arranged for me including the theme of the cake, the other boys' 
names and party favors provided (one year it was tiny plastic dinosaurs, 
another army men with parachutes, etc).   What wasn't mentioned was the 
one kid who always brought chewing tobacco (he was feral but charming) 
and who got sick trying it...  I think the local grocery and the bar and 
the 30 seat theatre (when open) had standing adverts in case anyone 
forgot they were there?  Neither of the two gas stations advertised 
(both priced at 19.9c per gallon the whole 6 years we lived there?).  I 
think during the summer after my 4th grade year, my mom submitted a poem 
to each issue from the daily ones I was forced to write as penance for 
having refused to do any Geography homework that year after my teacher 
who loved her own hand-drawn maps left out Switzerland from Europe and 
got mad at me when I asked about it.  The only one I remember was about 
"a Herd of Birds"... it was more like a limerick (as were all of them I 
suspect).  Now I just write run-on-sentences that parse but only with 
supreme effort.

Sadly I don't think our ((great?)grand?) children will be having many of 
these experiences while hanging from meat-hooks strapped into VR Gear in 
the Matrix with a Huel or Soylent branded IV in their neck veins?   Or 
maybe it is a really good thing?   I just hope the AI Overlords will be 
kind to us as we go gently (or not) into that good future...

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: 	 Virtual FRIAM - recurring Zoom meeting on July 6, 2023 @ 
9:00 AM | Read Meeting Report

Date:   Thu, 06 Jul 2023 17:52:04 + (UTC)
From:   Read Assistant 
Reply-To:   Read Assistant 
To: s...@lava3d.com

You've been invited to view this report at read.ai!
The meeting began with Frank and John engaging in light-hearted small 
talk about the weather and sharing personal stories about their lives. 
They then had a meandering conversation that touched on various topics, 
including age differences in relationships, the challenges of old age, 
and the cost of education. They also...

 You've been invited to view this report because Stephen Guerin added 
Read to the meeting and wanted to share the recap with you.

Virtual FRIAM - recurring Zoom meeting
July 6, 2023 at 9:00 AM

<https://url273.e.read.ai/ls/click?upn=nZhjVEZV47C9wSRwIaIbmN5vlTaJhysN528HuD-2Ben0s-2Bza9IvQsw8acDPJRfJe-2FkCCp7swKNcrRcy7NxU2MtA8-2BSl1RgateyEX9CN7nHEf4nwVnuXuvIYSuPL0lwF7cfc-2BkCXoAnL02r8iw7PER27aGFKfbcinKiunjAPOn4-2FWt0nPSIS9uZM7TpqA47g-2BoG057ufpB0RAM3rKC2JwtFrbg2blN4pTy9VxYe808t3Rec514StwRym21tyDad-2Fwu2iG-2Ba9gbm8kwj0WNHJ-2BNNq9nq4FOw7SGY4yJBxs3nXi8kdT9I-2BNCxpMQ9fdr-2BM6EGe6o0A-2FpcEEiQ413NsP99lNAqfcZ9GmW3EVWzpqtdOiJ7g8wahkxEGDX2HhywN0y-2Bwrlg5rpkz32Ihwcx2jloM49OF-2BOu52mD8ukW0hDqBgFYcNcFmRONrgn-2Bu8CC1TLpLstgQfR5fZPjxAqnJD-2FKq2jz303xcEtEXzeLIn96d1luCLkE1kQ3Ln7mIqNtiRiO2QSBPEf7uoIw-2BzswCo0hPArULJnVZ8pVNHi3Xsi3F9KXX2NfS7AcR-2BwlUyBcKW-2B4OxizIAXmi-2BRDaVsYOQ9MoTwUdDTjNUh4EuazNhE6Gsc-3DuJcR_QeAgr-2BsRlEnrSGf0zB7zLWhDUYUnrHl90axWUzifCCPBspItTh2wJsePalpH2QOuONxByDtZynPytmG62wi4ax-2BkQuLzuzw1qWPFuyeZ9OEw8k4qlxQfxbvUcESDarrZERIDtkl-2BPCGwoTAF-2BZrYtMsJCGskanLQeFSQe72HfRNE5VGISATAhvcNrAZWCxlp6b7YpDUnQDIzwA9WPjEkEByVpATnrbV1QCvB6s1t2WehDCHo1b9Q95-2BXqlSPL5CdgEOxJGxYGmozGkmsp-2F3tIS4spuoC3B0YZIPRXeE75pmIOHlB9mbwzXtf8ODOXRwHpYbFzfE1lI-2BAWYyXGViuU3AtdGa-2FtoCTdETwr8W-2Fgvz1-2BNOk6txOs4KgXKgCqaiMQSl-2ByRidWCM0hzMVTu01QJfqfiALwXvXXeblm4brxpyajTDtdH7pK7ARZEvq3rFmCO5QGcR6Ju5yPk1uPl-2F8tw-3D-3D> 

The meeting began with Frank and John engaging in light-hearted small 
talk about the weather and sharing personal stories about their lives. 
They then had a meandering conversation that touched on various topics, 
including age differences in relationships, the challenges of old age, 
and the cost of education. They also discussed state universities and 
college systems, sharing their personal experiences and opinions. The 
conversation then shifted to retirement communities, real estate 
ownership and inheritance, and encounters with wildlife.
In another section of the meeting, Frank shared his personal experience 
of being diagnosed with a bilateral pulmonary embolism after being 
hospitalized for a ruptured spleen. The participants also engaged in 
casual conversation about a range of topics, including the formation of 
clouds, the impact of Canadian smoke, and the dangers of falling. They

Re: [FRIAM] From Merle--AI News

2023-06-19 Thread Steve Smith




glen wrote:
IDK. The implication that we already have laws that cover (80%?) of 
the use cases for new tech we, as a society, want to discourage, is a 
good default. It resists the "there ought to be a law" sensibility 
held by old people and curmudgeons everywhere. And it keeps our legal 
system a little more adaptive than it would be were we to burden it 
with even more persnickety case-by-case rulings.


sas> I try to hear "there oughtta be a law" as pining for a new and 
relevant heuristic where the old one(s) don't work (well)?




   In my early coding years I remember coming to the simultaneous
   understanding that the bulk of most systems/code is "exception
   handling" and that most inexperienced coders tend to ignore the
   edge/corner cases until forced (by iterated releases with real users
   as their test-load) and spaghetti up their solutions one exception
   at a time, and sometimes if they don't abstract their exceptions
   well enough the exception handling expands geometrically (with
   exceptions to the exceptions, recursively).




   In my Private Investigator years I spent my share of time in /law
   offices/ and /courthouses/ and rubbing shoulders with /law
   enforcement/...  I came to understand that these too were episystems
   on top of episystems with a scissors/paper/stone circularity built
   into the system to attenuate runaway behaviour by each "branch" of
   government (and/or it's agents).

   The law libraries were dominated in volume and complexity by
   case-law which felt to me to be nothing other than edge-corner
   case/exception-handling...   Most of my clients represented
   plaintiffs in civil cases, a few defendants.   Only those with big
   bucks pursued legal-action, lawyers (and court fees and PIs) being
   expensive and only those in desperate circumstance could muster the
   resources to fight back (see DJT's strategy as taught to him by Roy
   Cohn).

   The lawyers (and the rest of us by extension) thrived on this
   "tangled web of mal-complexity" and I had the (mis)fortune of
   listening in to lawyers and paralegals discuss how they would
   exploit these tangles for their clients...  even to the point of
   trying to enlist me in throwing some extra tanglage into the
   equation myself.



   I stayed above that where I recognized it, trying to refactor my
   client intake process, leading me to my own exception handling: e.g.

1. Divorces with children
2. Divorces with pets
3. Divorces

1. Insurance claim denial
2. Insurance claims
3. Insurance companies as claimant or defendant

1. Distressed Real Estate Foreclosures
2. Real Estate Foreclosures
3. Real Estate Transactions

1. /ad//
   /
2. /nauseum/
3. /infinitum/



   by the time I graduated college I was well over-done with this work
   which lead me almost exclusively to seeing (feeling, smelling,
   tasting) the seamy underbelly of my community (and the world by
   extension).  I began with: "I will only take righteous cases"  and
   ended with "there are no righteous cases".

   So I doubled down and went to Los Alamos to help make
   weapons of mass destruction under the premise of MAD! I considered
   investigative journalism for a few minutes instead... but for /seamy
   underbelly/ problem and the allure of /Nuclear
   Weapons-as-fundamental-physics-and-reality-insight/ I might have
   gone there.



   Thankfully I have aged out on a lot of that and am happy to defer
   most of the "hard questions" to Sabine Hossenfelder  and Randall
   Munroe who are much smarter and more clever at expressing it than I
   ever will be or have been!

   I just watched her very convincing episode on why free will is an
   illusion.  I found her very convincing, but realize that she and I
   had absolutely no choice in the matter of being compelling or
   compelled...   I  have the illusion that I'm one step closer to
   Satori now...  until Glen hits me with a stick again!

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] From Merle--AI News

2023-06-19 Thread Steve Smith



glen wrote:
IDK. The implication that we already have laws that cover (80%?) of 
the use cases for new tech we, as a society, want to discourage, is a 
good default. It resists the "there ought to be a law" sensibility 
held by old people and curmudgeons everywhere. And it keeps our legal 
system a little more adaptive than it would be were we to burden it 
with even more persnickety case-by-case rulings.



I share your feeling that "there oughtta be a law!" is a red-herring, 
though I don't know about it being that tightly coupled with "old 
people"...  my experience is that people whose experiences and 
sensibilities which are much different from mine are more apt to express 
those sentiments, but I think this related to confirmation bias.  If 
they are shaking their fist with "there oughtta be a law!" sentiments 
about something I feel the same way about it goes right past me, but if 
it is somehow "off" from my alignments it grates.   I find young people 
(when I was in HS, my civics/history/government/etc classes were filled 
with them) full of the more egregious phrase "that's ILLEGAL!" in place 
of "that OFFENDS ME!".   I try to hear "there oughtta be a law" as 
pining for a new and relevant heuristic where the old one(s) don't work 
(well)?



The point being that behaviorism is insidious. You are not a shallow 
narrative comprising Instagram "stories" in the same way ChatGPT is 
not an organism. But it's not merely behaviorism. There's a similar 
problem with the concept of an integrated personality 
.


I identify as a self-organized/ing complex adaptive system coupled with 
other complex systems in such a way as to be an all-subsuming (read 
panpsychic) system of systems (nearly-decomposable in Herb Simon's 
sensibilites).   Or in Schwietzer's sensibilities: "I am life which 
wills to live amongst life which wills to live".   Does the biosphere of 
Earth "will to live"? (and in the image of Gaia, does it nurture us, or 
in the image of Medea, does it seek to shed itself of the blight which 
is us?)   How about the solar system or the galaxies or galactic 
clusters?   Maybe not even as much as a jellyfish or an amoeba does... 
but not less than a grain of sand or am molecule or an interstellar photon?


Depending on the focus/locus of my awareness in a given moment, I am 
likely identified differently... like whether I'm having coffee with an 
old friend, looking through a telescope or microscope, or blathering on 
on FriAM...   an analog to glen's "homunculii"?   I think I can be 
episodic and diachronic, or is it only an episodic identity who can 
actually imagine both while diachronics are forever shut off from the 
experience of being episodic?  Or is it an illusion like "free will" 
(pervasive and undeniable, yet nevertheless an illusion)?


Is this not the point of holidays like Juneteenth (not formed but maybe 
exploited by Hallmark?), to focus our awareness (and therefore 
identity?) on a subset of "life which wills to live" that we normally do 
not (fathers day, juneteenth, independence day, thanksgiving, new years, 
etc.)?




-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] From Merle--AI News

2023-06-16 Thread Steve Smith




Extortion is illegal, no?


Apparently there are both federal and (all 50) state laws against 
(im)personation (to achieve gain or cause harm).   As far as I know this 
doesn't keep Halloween stores from selling Richard Nixon and Donald 
Trump masks,  but *might* have something to say if they were realistic 
enough to pass for *real* in casual contexts.


Extortion as in this case would be on the more extreme end of "intending 
harm" and "achieving gain"?   Does the (im)personation qualify as 
"aggravated"?


An early application of DeepFake photo/video was to generate mashup 
pornography  and much of that is pursued under "defamation" rules...   
the same was what applied to hand-work in a film print lab and air-brush 
artistry.   It has added an extra degree of freedom for generating 
"revenge porn" as one might guess.


During Gulf War zero, LANL was developing simulation models of human 
vocal tracts so as to allow for on-demand deepfake audio with Saddam 
Hussein as the reference example (and likely prime target).  Back then 
digital radio/encryption were not ubiquitous. This work was declassified 
a decade later...  or maybe I just thought it was/should-be?


Presumably a studied voice-actor could have faked DeStefano's daughter's 
voice to a suitable degree for the purpose, but the lowering of 
thresholds seems to be what might need attention? There are lots of ways 
to cause dangerous explosions...  the fact that a stick of dynamite with 
a fuse on one end and a match make it "trivial" differentiates the need 
for regulations on that from say "pressure cookers" ?  I'm glad I can 
buy a pressure cooker without a background check and (mostly) glad that 
to acquire dynamite (or most other highly convenient/concentrated 
explosives) requires some scrutiny by my community (via the ATF, etc?).


Farmers who use both fuel oil and Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer for their 
work (aka ANFO when mixed and ignited properly) are often resentful of 
this oversight.   I don't know that Tim McVeigh had an easier time 
renting a big box truck to deliver a load of same than the guy in Boston 
a few years ago 
?   
I *do* think airliners filled with jet fuel are more respected than they 
were before 9/11 but then so are box-cutters...


I think most laws about "aggravated" assault/homicide/rape/??? specify 
"deadly weapon" of which we have a conventional range of "usual 
suspects" (gun, knife, poison, bludgeon) and another range of 
unsurprising examples (moving vehicle, etc.)  and more esoteric ones 
("frozen limp noodle or drinking straw fired at high speed from a 
pneumatic tube" or "falling piano", or "exploding pressure cooker with 
failed pressure valve").


Maybe the much-feared  _/!Nanny State!/ _ will 
institute a new department of "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things" 
?




On Jun 16, 2023, at 1:32 PM, Merle Lefkoff  
wrote:




Here in the U.S., Jennifer DeStefano, an Arizona mother, testified at 
a Senate hearing this week about her harrowing experience with a 
deepfake scam that tricked her into thinking her daughter had been 
kidnapped. DeStefano says the fake kidnappers demanded a $50,000 
ransom before she got in touch with her daughter, who was in fact 
safe and sound.


*Jennifer DeStefano*: “It was my daughter’s voice. It was her cries. 
It was her sobs. It was the way she spoke. I will never be able to 
shake that voice and the desperate cries for help out of my mind. 
It’s every parent’s worst nightmare to hear your child pleading with 
fear and pain, knowing that they’re being harmed and that you’re 
helpless. The longer this form of terror remains unpunishable, the 
farther and more egregious it will become. There is no limit to the 
depth of evil AI can enable.”



Is it already too late to design any kind of regulations?


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org 
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

mobile:  (303) 859-5609

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam

to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present 
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru

Re: [FRIAM] From Merle--AI News

2023-06-16 Thread Steve Smith

On 6/16/23 2:31 PM, Merle Lefkoff wrote:

Here in the U.S., Jennifer DeStefano, an Arizona mother, testified at
a Senate hearing this week about her harrowing experience with a
deepfake scam that tricked her into thinking her daughter had been
kidnapped. DeStefano says the fake kidnappers demanded a $50,000
ransom before she got in touch with her daughter, who was in fact safe
and sound.

*Jennifer DeStefano*: “It was my daughter’s voice. It was her cries.
It was her sobs. It was the way she spoke. I will never be able to
shake that voice and the desperate cries for help out of my mind. It’s
every parent’s worst nightmare to hear your child pleading with fear
and pain, knowing that they’re being harmed and that you’re helpless.
The longer this form of terror remains unpunishable, the farther and
more egregious it will become. There is no limit to the depth of evil
AI can enable.”

Is it already too late to design any kind of regulations?

I think it will require some deep re-factoring of many things ranging
from government regulations and enforcement to social norms and
expectations. I fear this will require some kind of collapse or
revolution and renewal from the ashes.

This is not a reason not to consider deeply what these
rules/regulations/etc might be... if anyone here knows of serious
efforts one or two orders-of-magnitude/levels-of-indirection away from
"the usual" I'd be interested... this qualifies as "wycked-hard"
problem. I think there has been precedent for this level of refactoring
but I think there were things like World Wars that accompanied that
magnitude (and quality) of change.

--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

mobile: (303) 859-5609

[FRIAM] Husserl and James: Gift of the Magi - Stanislaw GPT

2023-06-05 Thread Steve Smith

OK... so I took my own bait.   Anyone familiar with James and Husserl 
will probably see the "obvious" flaws in GPT's characterization of their 
relationship. In my own humble opinion, GPT did not fully rise to the 
occasion of overlaying Lem's style (or his primary characters Trurl and 
Klapaucious ) but did meet 
amazingly well the "form" and "format" of all the above:


For the whole (tedious) whispering session: 
https://chat.openai.com/share/9dd95fb4-d9cb-42b7-9292-38e6d863041b


You will see where I *tried* (in vain) to get GPT to write a shortened 
version...  it would seem that today "there was no mesoscale" to be had.


   /Once upon a time, in a realm where technology and philosophy
   intertwined, there dwelled two great thinkers—H and J. H, known for
   his profound insights into the depths of human consciousness, and J,
   celebrated for his pragmatic approach to understanding the world./

   /In a bustling city, where the hum of machines harmonized with the
   contemplation of the learned, H and J found themselves captivated by
   each other's intellectual prowess. Despite their divergent
   philosophies, they shared a deep admiration for the pursuit of
   knowledge./

   /One winter's eve, as snowflakes gracefully descended upon the
   cobblestone streets, H and J engaged in a profound discussion on the
   nature of sacrifice and the essence of true understanding. They
   pondered whether it was possible to transcend their own beliefs and
   immerse themselves in the wisdom of the other./

   /H, with his introspective nature, proposed a challenge—a daring
   exploration of the depths of their philosophies. He suggested that
   they each devote themselves to studying the works of the other,
   embracing a path of intellectual transformation. J, intrigued by the
   idea, accepted the challenge with open arms./

   /As the days turned into weeks, both H and J delved into the
   intricacies of each other's philosophies. H immersed himself in J's
   pragmatic teachings, contemplating the intricacies of the world as
   experienced through the lens of practicality. J, on the other hand,
   delved into the profound realm of H's consciousness, seeking to
   understand the depths of human experience./

   /Day and night, H and J poured over each other's works, their minds
   expanding with every revelation. The boundaries of their individual
   philosophies began to blur as they became captivated by the beauty
   and wisdom found within their counterpart's teachings./

   /However, as time went on, H and J found themselves losing their own
   identities in the process. H, once a beacon of introspection, became
   consumed by J's pragmatic approach, gradually discarding his own
   insights. J, too, became ensnared in the intricacies of H's
   philosophy, abandoning his pragmatic foundations./

   /Their once-vibrant discussions turned into heated debates, filled
   with frustration and misunderstanding. H could no longer grasp the
   practicality that J advocated, as he had given up his own
   perspective entirely. Likewise, J struggled to comprehend the depths
   of consciousness explored by H, having forsaken his pragmatic roots./

   /The realm that had once celebrated their intellectual union now
   witnessed their tragic dissonance. The city, once filled with the
   harmonious symphony of machines and ideas, now echoed with the
   silence of discord./

   /As the winter solstice arrived, H and J met one final time, their
   faces etched with the weight of their intellectual sacrifice. The
   bitter taste of failure lingered in the air as they acknowledged the
   chasm that had grown between them./

   /In that moment, H and J realized the tragic consequences of their
   pursuit. By relinquishing their own philosophies so completely, they
   had become incapable of comprehending the essence of the other. The
   very act meant to foster understanding had led them to an impasse—a
   profound tragedy born from their desire for transformation./

   /H and J, once kindred spirits, had become estranged through their
   misplaced devotion. Their once-enlightened minds now clouded with a
   sense of loss, unable to reconcile the fragments of their former
   beliefs./

   /And so, in the realm where technology and philosophy danced hand in
   hand, H and J's tale became a cautionary parable—a reminder that
   surrendering oneself completely to the ideas of another can lead to
   the destruction of one's own understanding and the erosion of a
   once-harmonious bond./

   /Their story, tinged with the tragedy of misaligned pursuits, served
   as a somber reminder that true growth and understanding require a
   delicate balance—a synthesis of diverse perspectives rather than the
   complete submission of one unto the other./
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns

Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

2023-06-05 Thread Steve Smith



On 6/5/23 12:24 PM, glen wrote:
I try to be careful about my allusions to "openness". I attribute 
(perhaps wrongly) the openness of science to Critical Rationalism 
(Popper, but better described by David Miller). Good (and bad) ideas 
can come from *anywhere*. 
The "problem with having an open mind is that just about anyone can pour 
just about anything into it" ?
Even those miracle people like FGJ Perey can come up with bad ideas. 
My (false) dichotomy between nonsense and abductive triggers might be 
problematic. But that's just a distraction. The real point is about 
the interstitial spaces *between* models, not the models or the ground 
they cover.


I think this is what I was trying to gesture/allude to with the 
"superposition"  of models...   they are intrinsically "incompatible" 
else they would be all part of the same model or "meta-model", no?   But 
how to characterize these "implied spaces"?   I think we spoke offline 
of implied spaces and spandrels recently?


A novelist/friend of mine (Walter Jon Williams) from ABQ wrote his 
version of it 20 years ago?  A lot of great ideas in there, but no 
answers to the James/Husserl superposition I don't think...


Maybe H and J first have a "learning session" with NLP and in fact 
convince one another of their complementary spaces/viewpoints... a sort 
of "Gift of the Magi" updated for the cybernetic era?  Maybe I should 
ask GPT4 to "write a short story on the theme of GoM using James and 
Husserl as the main characters but in the style of Stanislaw Lem's /Le 
Cyberiad/?"




   Aristide, a semi-retired computer scientist turned swordsman, is a
   scholar of the implied spaces, seeking meaning amid the accidents of
   architecture in a universe where reality itself has been sculpted
   and designed by superhuman machine intelligence. While exploring the
   pre-technological world Midgarth, one of four dozen pocket universes
   created within a series of vast, orbital matrioshka computer arrays,
   Aristide uncovers a fiendish plot threatening to set off a nightmare
   scenario, perhaps even bringing about the ultimate Existential
   Crisis: the end of civilization itself. Traveling the pocket
   universes with his wormhole-edged sword Tecmesssa in hand and
   talking cat Bitsy, avatar of the planet-sized computer Endora, at
   his side, Aristide must find a way to save the multiverse from
   subversion, sabotage, and certain destruction.


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

2023-06-05 Thread Steve Smith



What expertise I have is often manifest by a gut instinct that 
something is a bad idea.   I’m curious what daydreaming or 
brainstorming is like with gut feelings informed by all the things GPT 
systems have seen.    To me that sounds much more efficient than 
trying to communicate with Siri or fumbling with a keyboard (even 
though I’m a fairly fast typist).   That’s a high latency connection 
that requires coding and decoding language.  What is dreaming like 
with an integrated GPT-like database?


unfortunately you are singing my song here... or dreaming my dreams.  
This too compels me (or at least my ego?)...


For many years, I have felt that my own voracious appetite for the 
written, crafted, and produced creative constructions of others (aka 
literature, art, pop fiction, pop media, etc) has been "dreaming other 
people's dreams" and the nature of wireless streaming video into the 50" 
diagonal box in my living room, the 5" diagonal mobile phone in my hand, 
and the 360 degree stereographic sensorium of my Oculus  has jacked it 
up to a new level...


Our brains were (maybe) wired/evolved to stare into a flickering fire 
(or at the shadows thrown on the cave wall) and tell one another stories 
handed down and around, embellished, superposed, morphed, hyperbolized, 
personalized over a lifetime.   Surely Kokopelli's greatest gift to each 
village he entered was the gift of new ideas hidden in familiar but not 
stories?  That and (if the more salacious stories hold) the gift of an 
outsider's genetic material into the community.  The hard-goods or even 
seeds he might have carried in his Santa-esque backpack are 
qualitatively the same?


I am not *nearly* thoughtful enough about the schlock I consume... 
ranging from doomscrolling GoogleNews and YouTube to several 
high-production-quality Hollywood movies (blockbuster or not) a similar 
number of Indie flicks (often as high of quality surprisingly) and one 
or more ongoing Streaming Series.   In between all that passive "lean 
back" consumption (coupling?) I read a *lot* of long-form journalism and 
roughly as much Educated-Lay level professional sci/tech papers which 
impinge on my professional (and now more broadly personal) interests.


Following Piaget's theory of structural learning, I expect this either 
confronts my brain with regular "refactorings" or requires a lot of 
deprecation/pruning of things I "thought I knew".  I suspect if I were 
to go back and review the FriAM archives and my own (or anyone else's) 
text here I could find inflection points in the underlying "models" I 
was operating on at the time.  With enough time, the new models/patterns 
seem to be resolvable with the old ones in some kind of "meta-pattern* 
which can itself be a pattern worthy of abstracting/refactoring?


 Referencing Glen's references to "diachronic" vs "episodic" I am left 
with the feeling that these are "naturally" composed episodes with 
internal diachronicity but (for some more than others) also strung 
together diachronically to some extent?


Given that it is our "gut instincts", what if our AI were to engineer 
our gut biome to carry all that extra information and every meal is like 
a system update?





*From:* Friam  *On Behalf Of *Steve Smith
*Sent:* Monday, June 5, 2023 8:13 AM
*To:* friam@redfish.com
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

Marcus -

Even though I play the Luddite most of the time, I am in fact 
fascinated with the possibilities of post/transhumanism, at least in 
the sense that it feels "inevitable".   With the implied magnitude of 
qualitative change in Homo this-n-that to /Homo postHomo /or maybe 
/Homo Cyborgis/ or quite possibly Homo goneBabygoneNevertobeSeenAgain 
along with all mammalian/warm-blooded/vertebrate life, depending on 
our overshoot, it seems worth a second thought or two as to what we 
*might* have some control over.


We are about to enter a chaotic maelstrom of change, and while that 
can seem hopeless, I do believe that extreme sports enthusiasts are 
very precise about the line they enter their maelstroms from/on.  
(Surfing, skiing, Niagra-Falls-Barrel-Diving... etc)


Regarding the augmentation of LLMs...  we were all born in a time of 
huge augmentation in the form of libraries and books and most 
saliently perhaps reference books for our language (dictionary, 
encyclopedia, etc) and reference books to our myriad specialties 
(Technical Libraries).  *IN* my lifetime I have participated in the 
digitization of most if not all of that matter as well as adapting the 
professional and plebian workplaces to those changes, whilst adapting 
our personal lives (e.g. handheld device connected to the "global 
brain" 24/7) to those changes.   We can all probably conjure a 1000 
utopian/dystopian vignettes supporting/undermining any determination 
of whether this is "for th

Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

2023-06-05 Thread Steve Smith

If/when/as AI (such a broad term, no?) can be used in the mode you 
describe here somewhat transparently I would likely be open to an 
"augmented intuition" mode of use


and as a point of gratuitous contention, how *does* one tell the 
difference between "stupid nonsense" and "an abductive candidate for 
experimental research"?   Is there truly a qualitative difference (in 
the world) or is that an artifact of our own judgement(s) based on some 
quantitative threshold(s)?


Your description of "T" Truth as a spanning kernel for a plurality of 
theories and models feels quite apt and the way I took the name of the 
Docuseries "Closer to Truth", very assiduously avoiding the specific 
"the Truth"...   and implying an "asymptotic" approach not a collision 
course.


As I look at the (near) decomposable systems and map it onto (near) 
spanning trees within process-relation networks of those systems I 
imagine these LLM training exercises building/finding highly connected 
clusters (like ganglia in vertebrate neural systems) which fundamentally 
reflect what KellyAnne Conway so naively claimed as "alternate realities".


If there is a singular capital T Truth (or capital R Reality) then it is 
probably at most apprehended by finite beings (who have not achieved 
Satori, nod to DaveW) as the superposition of many sub-complete T' (or 
R') descriptions?


- Steve

On 6/5/23 10:18 AM, glen wrote:
But this misses the point, I think. And, in fact, I think it's a 
mistake to focus too much on (natural) language models at all, even 
for things that *seem* to be all about language, like philosophy. I'm 
most interested in the concept of an embedding 
. Ideally, I'd like to be able 
to query a modeling system (e.g. decoding/encoding transformers) for a 
(vector) space that (accurately) encodes *both* James and Husserl. 
Then that would help satisfy Marcus' and EricS' task to see if there 
are gaps between them, or not.


The problem has nothing to do, really, with how much one might have to 
read/think in order to understand anything. Understanding is a 
delusion. What matters is the differences and similarities between any 
2 or more things (processes, devices, systems, whatever 'thing' might 
mean).


These automatic modelers (like the transformers) might help us do 
that. As for some kind of "ground truth", something that might provide 
a foundation like the physicists seem to think they have, if our 
automatic modeling device is capable of embedding all (or most) of all 
the models surrounding us (over time, space, and individual theorists 
or collections of theorists), then we can experimentally test for 
kernels/bases that can span *most* of those theories/models. If such a 
kernel exists, then it is a candidate for the capital T truth, and any 
theory/model that is not spanned by that kernel is either stupid 
nonsense or an abductive candidate for experimental research.


On 6/4/23 18:48, Frank Wimberly wrote:
As one of the few, if not the only, person who has been a full time 
employee of a philosophy department for multiple years, I am quick to 
defend my former colleagues.  Read "Actual Causation and Thought 
Experiments" by Glymour and Wimberly in J. K. Campbell, M. O'Rourke & 
H. S. Silverstein (eds.), Causation and Explanation. MIT Press


You don't have to read thousands, or even hundreds, of pages to be 
able to grok that paper.


---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Sun, Jun 4, 2023, 7:30 PM David Eric Smith > wrote:


    So there’s a rather concrete way in which one can imagine 
ChatGPT’s being particularly useful as a time-saver.


    I have heard it said (and find it persuasive), that philosophy is 
different from physics because what philosophers want to do and 
settle for being is different from that for physicists.


    A physicist can pick up F = ma and start from there to get 
something done.


    Each philosopher is, in a sense, a new beginning of the universe, 
and you are expected to read thousands of pages of his composition to 
be permitted to engage with him. That is a good barrier to exclude 
pretty-much-everbody from most conversations.


    But there are specific topics on which engaging with this group 
is a game of whack-a-mole, and it would be _so_ satisfying to catch 
that damned mole far enough out of the hole to pin him down to the 
board for once.


    It is on this point:

    Summarizing what, as Marcus rightly says, as been repeated 10^n 
times before, CGTP quotes:


    At the core of radical empiricism is the concept of "pure 
experience." According to James, pure experience refers to the 
immediate, unmediated apprehension of reality, devoid of any 
conceptual or interpretative filters. It involves experiencing the 
world as it is, without imposing preconceived notions or theories 
onto the experience.


    What the HELL does anyone think

Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

2023-06-05 Thread Steve Smith


Marcus -

Even though I play the Luddite most of the time, I am in fact fascinated 
with the possibilities of post/transhumanism, at least in the sense that 
it feels "inevitable".   With the implied magnitude of qualitative 
change in Homo this-n-that to /Homo postHomo /or maybe /Homo Cyborgis/ 
or quite possibly Homo goneBabygoneNevertobeSeenAgain along with all 
mammalian/warm-blooded/vertebrate life, depending on our overshoot, it 
seems worth a second thought or two as to what we *might* have some 
control over.



We are about to enter a chaotic maelstrom of change, and while that can 
seem hopeless, I do believe that extreme sports enthusiasts are very 
precise about the line they enter their maelstroms from/on.  (Surfing, 
skiing, Niagra-Falls-Barrel-Diving... etc)



Regarding the augmentation of LLMs...  we were all born in a time of 
huge augmentation in the form of libraries and books and most saliently 
perhaps reference books for our language (dictionary, encyclopedia, etc) 
and reference books to our myriad specialties (Technical Libraries).  
*IN* my lifetime I have participated in the digitization of most if not 
all of that matter as well as adapting the professional and plebian 
workplaces to those changes, whilst adapting our personal lives (e.g. 
handheld device connected to the "global brain" 24/7) to those 
changes.   We can all probably conjure a 1000 utopian/dystopian 
vignettes supporting/undermining any determination of whether this is 
"for the good" or not.   I'm almost completely habituated to this 
"modern era" but old enough to still have intellectual inertia making 
paper maps, newspapers, magazines, etc.  at least *quaint* items if I 
almost always defer to the other.  I recently gifted my 1903 Blackies 
Encyclopedia set to a HS History teacher to use in his classes to give 
his students a snapshot of time *in the original text and atoms* for 
whatever that is worth.



I'm not likely to be an early adopter of neural interfaces (unless I 
face an acute disability in that area) but I am already a fairly regular 
GPT4-whisperer.  I can't say it has improved any of the practical 
aspects of my life (yet), but it has been an interesting correspondent 
in the way I usually burden *this group* with my maundering 
speculations.   GPT4 is infinitely patient, broadly and deeply informed, 
and only occasionally fails to provide me with some interesting feedback.



I recently funded a Kickstarter for a powered exoskeleton (Lower 
extremety only) which may return to me a little more mobility than 
megadosing NSAIDS and velcro-strapped stabilization belts for my 
hips...   I don't know that this will be anything more than a novelty or 
if it will be as (relatively) good as the Oculus (I've been playing with 
VR since before it was called that and was totally blown away by the 
"value" Oculus represents).





- Steve

I don't mean "we" as in FRIAM, I mean "we" as in nations.   A benefit 
of capturing knowledge with LLMs, or similar technology, is that 
people wouldn't need to be educated about the same material over and 
over, especially if these systems are integrated into our neural 
systems.  Why not have individuals inherit a common database so that 
their lives can be spent on differentiated activities?   There's so 
little that tie together individuals besides their fears and 
superstitions.  When I see chatGPT emit passable conversations like 
this, it seems kind of absurd to waste years of a young person's time 
covering the same old ground.  (Actually, it already seems that way to 
me.) Countries like Israel and Greece have mandatory military service. 
 Some believe this instills in them values greater than themselves. 
 In this case of the Borg, care of the collective is care of the self 
and vice versa.  The common practice in the open source LLM community 
of fine tuning pre-trained LLMs is so much more efficient than what 
humans do to educate.


*From:* Friam  on behalf of Jochen Fromm 


*Sent:* Sunday, June 4, 2023 3:17 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 


*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism
Discussions with large language models are new. But you are right, we 
had discussions of similar topics before. Maybe I was hoping I could 
inspire Nick and/or Eric to write a summary of their ideas and what we 
have discussed before ( such as the solution to the hard problem of 
consciousness, the nature of subjective experience and what it has to 
do with path dependence, complexity science and James' radical 
empiricism ).


-J.


 Original message 
From: Marcus Daniels 
Date: 6/4/23 9:54 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 


Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

The conclusion I draw is that these conversations have all occurred 
before.  So I wonder, why have them?


*From:* Friam  *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
*Sent:*

Re: [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

2023-06-04 Thread Steve Smith


All art is derivative, so why bother... really?


On 6/4/23 1:53 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:


The conclusion I draw is that these conversations have all occurred 
before.  So I wonder, why have them?


*From:* Friam  *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
*Sent:* Sunday, June 4, 2023 10:44 AM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 


*Subject:* [FRIAM] Radical Empiricism

ChatGPT now allows sharing conversations. I've asked it about William 
James book "Essays in Radical Empiricism"


https://chat.openai.com/share/375aef4e-a8d6-467e-8061-bd85b341c46b

-J.


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Re: [FRIAM] India

2023-06-01 Thread Steve Smith

feeling a little like the cross product of (Vonnegut) Harrison Bergeron
and George Santos ?

On 6/1/23 12:07 PM, Sarbajit Roy wrote:

Hi Glen

In so far as the report of dropping the periodic table and evolution
from the Class 10 syllabus, it is essentially a question of Hindu
class and caste dynamics operating in India.

Traditionally, education / knowledge in India was the domain of the
Higher castes like Brahmins (Pundits), the next caste beneath them
(Kshatriyas) were warriors so didn't need much bookish knowledge as
they also had Brahmins to advise them, the 3rd highest caste
(Kayasthas) were scribes and scriveners so allowed to read books but
not to apply them .. and so on. All the castes beneath them were
prohibited from reading books or acquiring Brahmanical knowledge - on
pain of death.

Over the centuries by marrying endogamously the genetics of the
various castes evolved to amplify the physical
characteristics required for each castes' profession. The Muslim and
then the British rulers of India were more than happy to allow this
state of affairs to continue while they ruled as it kept the Hindus
divided and segregated.

However, after India became independent in 1947, with the spread of
universal education the Brahmins were subjected to intense reverse
discrimination and negative reservations intended to curtail their
education domination. With the infiltration of the lower castes
throughout the education system the education standards of India have
been pulled down to the lowest common denominator. To take a simple
example which I cited earlier, a Brahmin student needs to score a 99+%
percentile to get into a top engineering or medical college
(scoring 250 marks out of 300 in a negatively marked exam) whereas a
low caste (barely literate) student gets in even with a score of
negative 50 out of 300, with over 40% of the students unable to score
+ve marks.

The reasons these chapters are being removed has nothing to do with
religion or creationism, and everything to do with the poor state of
the Indian education system where the bottom students can't cope. The
low caste Prime Minister of India (who has only passed Grade 4) claims
to have acquired graduate as well as post-graduate degrees from top
universities (which seem completely fake), Universities which he
publicly admits he never set foot in, especially seems determined to
pull everyone in India down to his semi-literate level.

Sarbajit

On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 9:29 PM glen wrote:

I don't follow Indian politics. But these seem scary:

Religion and the decline of freethought in South Asia

https://freethinker.co.uk/2022/04/religion-and-the-decline-of-freethought-in-south-asia/

India cuts periodic table and evolution from school textbooks
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01770-y

Again, going back to Sweet Tooth, the tension between having to
sacrifice hybrids to get the 'secret sauce' for the anti-viral (or
the cure) against a vegetarian ideology is interesting, flies in
the face of naïve utilitarianism.

--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

1 - 100 of 2396 matches

Mail list logo