Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martijn Dashorst wrote: The time people have to spend chasing bugs because someone doesn't have the right version on the classpath (or possibly multiple versions without knowing it) can be better spent on solving actual bugs, writing documentation or implementing new features. Or by reviewing our release and voting on it :-) Seriously, we're having interesting debates here about version numbers in jar file names and svn eol styles. And we are taking these things to heart. However, at the same time, we *would* like to release UIMA 2.2.2 now, and we're 1 (one) vote short. Anyone? +1 for release jar file names and svn eol styles can be tweaked on next release. --Thilo - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Martijn Dashorst wrote: The time people have to spend chasing bugs because someone doesn't have the right version on the classpath (or possibly multiple versions without knowing it) can be better spent on solving actual bugs, writing documentation or implementing new features. Or by reviewing our release and voting on it :-) Seriously, we're having interesting debates here about version numbers in jar file names and svn eol styles. And we are taking these things to heart. However, at the same time, we *would* like to release UIMA 2.2.2 now, and we're 1 (one) vote short. Anyone? --Thilo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On 4/23/08, Adam Lally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Among the UIMA committers, I'm the main proponent of the no version numbers in jar names. Jar file names that change in each version have always driven me crazy because they force users to update their classpaths when they upgrade their UIMA version. A lot of tools just don't handle this well - Eclipse is one example, AFAIK it doesn't give you any way to use wildcards in classpath so as to pick up any version. I'm very against removing version numbers from jar files. The benefit of exactly knowing which version is actually on my classpath outweighs any benefit of having to modify the classpath manually. Startup scripts can generate a classpath very easily on both Windows and unix like systems. The time people have to spend chasing bugs because someone doesn't have the right version on the classpath (or possibly multiple versions without knowing it) can be better spent on solving actual bugs, writing documentation or implementing new features. Martijn -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Hi Niall, Niall Pemberton wrote: Firstly, I'm +1 on this release. I have a few minor comments/suggestions which you may want to consider for the next release (or not!) 1) Theres a parent pom for apache which if you make the parent of the uimaj pom means you don't have to duplicate the license and organization details in your poms: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/apache/ sounds good, we'll look into it. 2) The source distro unzips to directory uimaj-2.2.2-incubating and the binary distro to apache-uima - which is inconsistent. I don't recall if there was a reason for this, but I agree, seems odd. We'll follow up on uima-dev. 3) IMO its better if the jars include the version number - which they do for the maven repo, but not the ones in the binary distro I personally agree with you, but we had a long discussion about this and the no version numbers in jar names faction carried the day. I believe the main reason is that it makes upgrading to a new version easier, or switching between versions for testing purposes. --Thilo Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Thilo Goetz wrote: snip 3) IMO its better if the jars include the version number - which they do for the maven repo, but not the ones in the binary distro I personally agree with you, but we had a long discussion about this and the no version numbers in jar names faction carried the day. I believe the main reason is that it makes upgrading to a new version easier, or switching between versions for testing purposes. We actually have a Jira issue that may address this, for the next release: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-857 - Marshall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thilo Goetz wrote: 3) IMO its better if the jars include the version number - which they do for the maven repo, but not the ones in the binary distro I personally agree with you, but we had a long discussion about this and the no version numbers in jar names faction carried the day. I believe the main reason is that it makes upgrading to a new version easier, or switching between versions for testing purposes. We actually have a Jira issue that may address this, for the next release: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-857 Among the UIMA committers, I'm the main proponent of the no version numbers in jar names. Jar file names that change in each version have always driven me crazy because they force users to update their classpaths when they upgrade their UIMA version. A lot of tools just don't handle this well - Eclipse is one example, AFAIK it doesn't give you any way to use wildcards in classpath so as to pick up any version. I don't see UIMA-857 as a solution, because UIMA is an embeddable component and people want to take our jar files and add them to their classpaths using typical Java means. I personally wouldn't be happy relying on some special UIMA mechanism for finding its jar files. -Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More timely release reviews? (was: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Monday 21 April 2008 17:46, Paul Fremantle wrote: the mentors to be the primary contacts for any podling. +1. With 3 active mentors, you practically need no other PMC members to wake up (let me sleep ;o) ). If you don't have 3 active mentors, then that IS a problem of concern, and should be fixed asap. Does the mentors know that they are mentors?? They do, and they have reviewed our previous releases. They do seem even busier than usual, though... I haven't seen Ken around for a long time, and I guess Sam is really busy with his duties as Secretary. So perhaps, UIMA should ask the PMC for 3 new mentors... I think an additional mentor or two would be really helpful. First of all, we only have 2. Secondly, we've not been making the kind of progress we'd like to make. A fresh view would be very welcome. That's my personal opinion, other UIMA devs please chime in... --Thilo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Firstly, I'm +1 on this release. I have a few minor comments/suggestions which you may want to consider for the next release (or not!) 1) Theres a parent pom for apache which if you make the parent of the uimaj pom means you don't have to duplicate the license and organization details in your poms: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/apache/ 2) The source distro unzips to directory uimaj-2.2.2-incubating and the binary distro to apache-uima - which is inconsistent. 3) IMO its better if the jars include the version number - which they do for the maven repo, but not the ones in the binary distro Niall On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More timely release reviews? (was: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
The poor UIMA guys have been trying to get this release approved for nearly two weeks now and it still has just a single vote. Could a couple of other IPMCers take a look and vote? ...ant On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Incubator PMC - Thank you for your reviews of this; please do not confuse this with another release vote just posted for the UIMA Add-on package, which is another piece of the project, moving forward under a separate packaging and vote. For this vote, so far we have 1 +1 vote (only). Could some others please review and cast their votes? Thanks again. -Marshall Schor Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/http://people.apache.org/%7Embaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More timely release reviews? (was: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
I'll review the release. However, I would like to see the mentors +1's on this vote as well. The fact is that the incubator is a wide group with disparate interests and it is incumbent on the mentors to be the primary contacts for any podling. Paul On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The poor UIMA guys have been trying to get this release approved for nearly two weeks now and it still has just a single vote. Could a couple of other IPMCers take a look and vote? ...ant On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Incubator PMC - Thank you for your reviews of this; please do not confuse this with another release vote just posted for the UIMA Add-on package, which is another piece of the project, moving forward under a separate packaging and vote. For this vote, so far we have 1 +1 vote (only). Could some others please review and cast their votes? Thanks again. -Marshall Schor Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/http://people.apache.org/%7Embaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 Apache Synapse PMC Chair OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oxygenating the Web Service Platform, www.wso2.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More timely release reviews? (was: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On Monday 21 April 2008 17:46, Paul Fremantle wrote: the mentors to be the primary contacts for any podling. +1. With 3 active mentors, you practically need no other PMC members to wake up (let me sleep ;o) ). If you don't have 3 active mentors, then that IS a problem of concern, and should be fixed asap. Does the mentors know that they are mentors?? I haven't seen Ken around for a long time, and I guess Sam is really busy with his duties as Secretary. So perhaps, UIMA should ask the PMC for 3 new mentors... Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Hello Incubator PMC - Thank you for your reviews of this; please do not confuse this with another release vote just posted for the UIMA Add-on package, which is another piece of the project, moving forward under a separate packaging and vote. For this vote, so far we have 1 +1 vote (only). Could some others please review and cast their votes? Thanks again. -Marshall Schor Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Folks, just a quick reminder that this vote is still open. Please vote if you can find the time to look at our release. Thanks. --Thilo Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Looks ok to me, +1 ...ant On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, just a quick reminder that this vote is still open. Please vote if you can find the time to look at our release. Thanks. --Thilo Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/http://people.apache.org/%7Embaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Is there anything else needed from the UIMA team to get this release approved? -- Michael Michael Baessler wrote: That seems to be a build issue on my side. I missed a parameter when starting the build - sorry for that. I just created another build from the same SVN tag and replaced the files for the maven repository. Now all seems to be correct! -- Michael Kevan Miller wrote: Sources jars (e.g. http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/maven/org/apache/uima/jVinci/2.2.2-incubating/jVinci-2.2.2-incubating-sources.jar) are missing LICENSE/NOTICE files. Beyond this, I didn't see any problems. --kevan On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
That seems to be a build issue on my side. I missed a parameter when starting the build - sorry for that. I just created another build from the same SVN tag and replaced the files for the maven repository. Now all seems to be correct! -- Michael Kevan Miller wrote: Sources jars (e.g. http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/maven/org/apache/uima/jVinci/2.2.2-incubating/jVinci-2.2.2-incubating-sources.jar) are missing LICENSE/NOTICE files. Beyond this, I didn't see any problems. --kevan On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
sebb wrote: On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments Not sure I agree that RELEASE_NOTES don't require an AL header. It would not do any harm to add the header. Most parts of the RELEASE_NOTES are generated using JIRA, so I thought we can apply the rule mentioned on at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. But if you think it would be better to have one, we will add a header next time. Hope that this is not a release stopper. Problem building uimaj: 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 ... Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-adapter-soap:jar:2.2.2-incubating 2) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Should it not be using a more recent version, e.g. 1.1 ? When I remember correctly, I think we explicitly use this version because of some license changes for in the latter versions. Maybe some other UIMA committer can explain more detailed. The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS See separate e-mail regarding eol-style settings. Also, there are 3 .GIF files - the rest are all .gif. Could these be mistakes? We don't see any issues during our testing of this components (CDE plugin) but we will change it for the next release to lower case. Thanks for checking our release! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: Problem building uimaj: 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014 This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being redistributed from the central Maven repository: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo: http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line -Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: Problem building uimaj: 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014 This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being redistributed from the central Maven repository: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo: http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and then pull in a version that IS available. Either the 1.1 version from java.net: http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/ or the geronimo-specs version available at central: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really matter) -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer, IONA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
sebb wrote: On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments Not sure I agree that RELEASE_NOTES don't require an AL header. It would not do any harm to add the header. Most parts of the RELEASE_NOTES are generated using JIRA, so I thought we can apply the rule Which rule? What files in an Apache release do not require a license header? A file without any degree of creativity in either its literal elements or its structure is not protected by copyright law; therefore, such a file does not require a license header. If in doubt about the extent of the file's creativity, add the license header to the file. mentioned on at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. But if you think it would be better to have one, we will add a header next time. Hope that this is not a release stopper. -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: Problem building uimaj: 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014 This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being redistributed from the central Maven repository: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo: http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and then pull in a version that IS available. Either the 1.1 version from java.net: http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/ or the geronimo-specs version available at central: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really matter) If that works, it'll be vastly preferable to the manual do-hicky we have now. We'll follow up on uima-dev. Thanks, Thilo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: Problem building uimaj: 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014 This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being redistributed from the central Maven repository: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo: http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and then pull in a version that IS available. Either the 1.1 version from java.net: http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/ or the geronimo-specs version available at central: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really matter) If that works, it'll be vastly preferable to the manual do-hicky we have now. We'll follow up on uima-dev. FYI: the Geronimo-specs approach works fine for building JMeter. Thanks, Thilo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
sebb wrote: On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: Problem building uimaj: 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014 This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being redistributed from the central Maven repository: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo: http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and then pull in a version that IS available. Either the 1.1 version from java.net: http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/ or the geronimo-specs version available at central: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really matter) If that works, it'll be vastly preferable to the manual do-hicky we have now. We'll follow up on uima-dev. FYI: the Geronimo-specs approach works fine for building JMeter. I changed the POM in the one project that references the javax.activation, changing the dependency to dependency groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.specs/groupId artifactIdgeronimo-activation_1.0.2_spec/artifactId version1.2/version scopecompile/scope /dependency This seems to have done the trick - is that all that we need to do? This artifact appears to be Apache v2 licensed. -Marshall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments Not sure I agree that RELEASE_NOTES don't require an AL header. It would not do any harm to add the header. Problem building uimaj: 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 ... Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-adapter-soap:jar:2.2.2-incubating 2) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Should it not be using a more recent version, e.g. 1.1 ? The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS See separate e-mail regarding eol-style settings. Also, there are 3 .GIF files - the rest are all .gif. Could these be mistakes? Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating
Sources jars (e.g. http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/maven/org/apache/uima/jVinci/2.2.2-incubating/jVinci-2.2.2-incubating-sources.jar) are missing LICENSE/NOTICE files. Beyond this, I didn't see any problems. --kevan On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Michael Baessler wrote: The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1 that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release notes. We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s. The vote thread is here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please review the release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/ There are subdirectories like: /bin - contains the binary distribution files /src - contains the source distribution files /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments The SVN tag for this release candidate is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Please vote: [ ] +1 Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2 [ ] -1 No, because Thanks! -- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
