Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Repoman SVN support
Fabian Groffen wrote: Hi all, Please find attached the patch of the prefix repoman sources against the current trunk. I hope I removed all hunks that have prefix-only changes. You realize I wrote generic SCM support into repoman over the summer right? :P It was never merged (afaik I slacked on it, but also because it uses Popen and you pesky OSX folks are stuck on python2.3, so I need to convert to portage.spawn). However the support was generic, so for pretty much any system that 'is kinda like cvs/svn' should work fine with a few tweaks to the exec mapping. biasThis of course excludes GIT, since it's a huge non-standard piece of crap./bias I may work on fixing that code up and putting it into HEAD before I retire. -Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Repoman SVN support
On 24-11-2006 23:29:53 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fabian Groffen wrote: Please find attached the patch of the prefix repoman sources against the current trunk. I like the idea of having svn support, but I think it will be much nicer if we separate the cvs and svn support into plugins. That way, it should make the code cleaner and we'll more easily be able to add support for additional revision control systems if we want. I would prefer that, as I'm an OO-freak, but like I said I only revamped this patch into a working one. Besides that, I'm not a Python guru, so more than a few if-s is getting a challenge already. All in all, if there is an interface somewhere, then the code parts can be copied in there for sure, quite easily. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Repoman SVN support
On 25-11-2006 03:00:10 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: Hi all, Please find attached the patch of the prefix repoman sources against the current trunk. I hope I removed all hunks that have prefix-only changes. You realize I wrote generic SCM support into repoman over the summer right? :P It was never merged (afaik I slacked on it, but also because E no... probably because at that time I wasn't making my hands dirty on portage code. it uses Popen and you pesky OSX folks are stuck on python2.3, so I need to convert to portage.spawn). You can drop that, as I already require python 2.4, since portage needs at least 2.3.1 currently and I don't feel like checking with an older version to see if it breaks more. During bootstrapping I first install python 2.4. On a slightly related side note: you can also drop all your bash-2 code, as we end up running bash-3 too. Would only be nice if the basic functionally would work with bash-2, otherwise I need to bootstrap bash too. (Worth the time if it simplifies portage.) However the support was generic, so for pretty much any system that 'is kinda like cvs/svn' should work fine with a few tweaks to the exec mapping. biasThis of course excludes GIT, since it's a huge non-standard piece of crap./bias Great! I feel that SVN won't be the only thing folks use, so I'm looking forward to your interface from a (hopefully) functional view point. I may work on fixing that code up and putting it into HEAD before I retire. E... what? The first is nice, the latter for sure isn't. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Repoman SVN support
Fabian Groffen wrote: On 25-11-2006 03:00:10 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: Hi all, Please find attached the patch of the prefix repoman sources against the current trunk. I hope I removed all hunks that have prefix-only changes. You realize I wrote generic SCM support into repoman over the summer right? :P It was never merged (afaik I slacked on it, but also because E no... probably because at that time I wasn't making my hands dirty on portage code. it uses Popen and you pesky OSX folks are stuck on python2.3, so I need to convert to portage.spawn). You can drop that, as I already require python 2.4, since portage needs at least 2.3.1 currently and I don't feel like checking with an older version to see if it breaks more. During bootstrapping I first install python 2.4. On a slightly related side note: you can also drop all your bash-2 code, as we end up running bash-3 too. Would only be nice if the basic functionally would work with bash-2, otherwise I need to bootstrap bash too. (Worth the time if it simplifies portage.) ZOMG, I love you long time. *shudders at python 2.3* However the support was generic, so for pretty much any system that 'is kinda like cvs/svn' should work fine with a few tweaks to the exec mapping. biasThis of course excludes GIT, since it's a huge non-standard piece of crap./bias Great! I feel that SVN won't be the only thing folks use, so I'm looking forward to your interface from a (hopefully) functional view point. I haven't actually tried the others, but the support should be trivial assuming they have similar commands and output (yay regex...oh wait, not quite yay :) ) I may work on fixing that code up and putting it into HEAD before I retire. E... what? The first is nice, the latter for sure isn't. We will see; I may stay on and do both, but I don't have a ton of time to work on stuff and it makes me feel guilty, hence trying to clean up loose ends around here. -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Repoman SVN support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fabian Groffen wrote: Please find attached the patch of the prefix repoman sources against the current trunk. I like the idea of having svn support, but I think it will be much nicer if we separate the cvs and svn support into plugins. That way, it should make the code cleaner and we'll more easily be able to add support for additional revision control systems if we want. Zac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFZ/Dw/ejvha5XGaMRAkgmAKDQDtOJRiE+ytgtlReGl4UEhECnfQCgsj7G oA2wXDQXNjxw21BnK4t+59s= =pwuX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
