Re: [Gimp-developer] web site move

2003-10-07 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:43:28 +0200, Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 5 Oct 2003, at 13:46, Sven Neumann wrote:
  David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   [...] There is no reason why
   mmmaybe shouldn't have become www a couple of weeks ago.
  
  If you would have read gimp-web list (where this topic should actually
  be discussed), you would know that there were good reasons for not
  doing the move immidiately. 
 
 I do read the gimp-web list, and I have no idea what you are talking 
 about. The last blocker was resolved last Monday or the Monday 
 before, IIRC.

I suppose that Sven was refering to the comments made on the Thursday
the 18th in bug #121299.  Some of these comments and the related
issues were relayed to the gimp-web list by scizzo in the thread with
the subject Moving of site proposal.  Moving the web site on the
18th was not a good idea because there were still too many broken
pages that could not be fixed immediately, so instead it was proposed
to move it on Sunday 21th.  This did not happen (Yosh said on the
following Monday that he had been too busy) and a few additional
improvements were done in the meantime, so the site was officially
declared ready with the message Status of the new web site that I
posted on Tuesday the 23rd.

  I believe that most or evenall of these
  points have been addressed in the meantime but we should leave it up
  to the web team to decide when they want to move the site.
 
 Could you please tell us which part of the web team has to say the 
 word? 

I don't think that there are any official rules for that (and I doubt
that there should be any).  However, if there is a consensus among the
active members of the web team and/or if the web coordinator (yours
truly) says that it is OK, then we can say that the decision has been
taken.  Both of them happened two weeks ago.  So the official
decision is that the web site should move as soon as possible.

There is no need to wait for any additional decisions.  As far as I
know, the last blocker is that Yosh should find some spare time for
moving the site and all user accounts from the old machine to the new
one.  There are still some things that should be done with the new web
site, such as updating the news on the home page or adding links to
some files from the gimp and gimp-1-2 CVS modules (INSTALL, Wilber
construction kit and others) but this will be much easier to do once
the user accounts are moved so that I can set up the corresponding
links and scripts on the new box.

-Raphaël
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: mailing list problems (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] web site move)

2003-10-07 Thread David Neary
Hi,

Sven Neumann wrote:
I eventually found a way to make it work.  I don't remember
exactly how but there are several ways (web or e-mail) to
subscribe and to confirm the subscription and at least one of
them works.  Please try subscribing again, because any
discussion about the web site should take place on the gimp-web
list.

Raphael, how can one subscribe by mail? I'm only aware of the
mailman web interface.

 Problems subscribing to the gimp-user list were also reported today on
 the cinepaint-developers list. Someone should look into this since we
 really need these lists working. If you or someone else remembers how
 to work around the problem, please let us know.

For information, there is the entirity of the page when I try to
subscribe to gimp-web:

Bug in Mailman version 2.1b4

We're sorry, we hit a bug!

If you would like to help us identify the problem, please email a
copy of this page to the webmaster for this site with a
description of what happened. Thanks!
Traceback:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lists/mailman/scripts/driver, line 87, in run_main
main()
  File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/subscribe.py, line 94, in
main
process_form(mlist, doc, cgidata, language)
  File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/subscribe.py, line 176,
in process_form
mlist.AddMember(userdesc, remote)
  File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py, line 807, in
AddMember
cookie = Pending.new(Pending.SUBSCRIPTION, userdesc)
  File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Pending.py, line 64, in new
db = _load()
  File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Pending.py, line 121, in
_load
return cPickle.load(fp)
TypeError: dict objects are unhashable



Python information:

VariableValue
sys.version 2.2.1 (#1, Oct 5 2002, 11:19:44) [GCC 2.95.4
20020320 [FreeBSD]]
sys.executable  /usr/local/bin/python
sys.prefix  /usr/local
sys.exec_prefix /usr/local
sys.path/usr/local
sys.platformfreebsd4

Environment variables:

VariableValue
PATH_INFO   /gimp-web
HTTP_ACCEPT
text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,video/x-mng,image/png,image/jpeg,image/gif;q=0.2,*/*;q=0.1
CONTENT_TYPEapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded
HTTP_REFERER
https://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web
SERVER_SOFTWARE Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.8.11
OpenSSL/0.9.6g
PYTHONPATH  /usr/lists/mailman
SCRIPT_FILENAME /usr/lists/mailman/cgi-bin/subscribe
SERVER_ADMIN[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCRIPT_NAME /mailman/subscribe
SERVER_SIGNATURE
Apache/1.3.27 Server at lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU Port 443
REQUEST_METHOD  POST
HTTP_HOST   lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE 300
HTTPS   on
SERVER_PROTOCOL HTTP/1.1
QUERY_STRING
PATH_TRANSLATED /usr/local/www/data/gimp-web
REQUEST_URI /mailman/subscribe/gimp-web
CONTENT_LENGTH  105
HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
HTTP_USER_AGENT Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0;
en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030728 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1
HTTP_CONNECTION keep-alive
SERVER_NAME lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
REMOTE_ADDR 194.206.161.214
REMOTE_PORT 21927
HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGEen-us,en;q=0.5
UNIQUE_ID   P4KKz4AgcPIAAFGVafA
SERVER_PORT 443
GATEWAY_INTERFACE   CGI/1.1
HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODINGgzip,deflate
SERVER_ADDR 128.32.112.242
DOCUMENT_ROOT   /usr/local/www/data

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
   David Neary,
   Lyon, France
  E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: mailing list problems (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] web site move)

2003-10-07 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On 06 Oct 2003 18:44:08 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  P.S.: Dave, you mentioned that you had problems subscribing to the
gimp-web list.  I remember having had some problems as well, but
I eventually found a way to make it work.  [...]
 
 Problems subscribing to the gimp-user list were also reported today on
 the cinepaint-developers list. Someone should look into this since we
 really need these lists working. If you or someone else remembers how
 to work around the problem, please let us know.

Well, it looks like the mailing lists are completely broken now.  When
I tried last month, it was still possible to get around the mailman
bug that was triggered during the confirmation step.  But now the
crash occurs during the first step of the subscription, so there is no
way to avoid it.  I just tried to subscribe a new address to the
gimp-web and gimp-developer mailing lists and I immediately got the
following error message:

--
  Bug in Mailman version 2.1b4

  We're sorry, we hit a bug!

  If you would like to help us identify the problem, please email a
  copy of this page to the webmaster for this site with a description
  of what happened. Thanks!

  Traceback:

  Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lists/mailman/scripts/driver, line 87, in run_main
  main()
File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/subscribe.py, line 94, in main
  process_form(mlist, doc, cgidata, language)
File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/subscribe.py, line 176, in process_form
  mlist.AddMember(userdesc, remote)
File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py, line 807, in AddMember
  cookie = Pending.new(Pending.SUBSCRIPTION, userdesc)
File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Pending.py, line 64, in new
  db = _load()
File /usr/lists/mailman/Mailman/Pending.py, line 121, in _load
  return cPickle.load(fp)
  TypeError: dict objects are unhashable
--
[...more info snipped ...]

So after the archives, now it is the subscription mechanism that is
broken.  If I am not mistaken, nobody can subscribe to any of the gimp
mailing lists (user, developer or web) until this problem is fixed.

-Raphaël
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: mailing list problems (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] web site move)

2003-10-07 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:31:45 +0200, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I eventually found a way to make it work.  I don't remember
 exactly how but there are several ways (web or e-mail) to
 subscribe and to confirm the subscription and at least one of
 them works.  Please try subscribing again, because any
 discussion about the web site should take place on the gimp-web
 list.
 
 Raphael, how can one subscribe by mail? I'm only aware of the
 mailman web interface.

As I wrote at the same minute (but 24 seconds before your message ;-)),
the problem that I observed a few weeks ago was only in the confirmation
process, not in the first step of the subscription.  But now the problem
is even more severe: the first step is already broken, so it is not
possible to subscribe to any of the GIMP mailing lists.  :-(

-Raphaël
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] GIMP 1.3 Reference Manuals

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

I've updated the online version of the GIMP 1.3 API reference at

  http://developer.gimp.org/api/1.3/

Thanks to the help of Mitch and DinDinX, the documentation has
improved since version 1.3.20. However there is still a lot of work to
do. We'd like to concentrate on documentation of the libraries for now
since the core API hasn't really settled enough yet.

If someone wants to contribute, there are several things you could
work on:

- Completion of the libgimp* API references

 This basically means adding gtk-doc style comments to
 undocumented functions as well as improving the introductory
 parts that are found in the tmpl directories.

- Proof-reading the existing docs

 More or less the same workflow as above. Please note that the
 comments for the libgimp PDB wrappers are generated from the PDB
 documentation that is found in tools/pdbgen/pdb.

- Addition of some introductory chapters

 This could be for example Compiling a GIMP Plug-In or Porting
 a GIMP Plug-In to the 2.0 API (Jeff Trefftzs expressed interest
 to do the latter).

There is a README in the devel-docs directory that should get you
started with gtk-doc and DocBook XML. If you are interested or if you
have any questions please let the list know.



Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Re: GIMP 1.3 Reference Manuals

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

here are some stats on the current state of the documentation
of our libraries:

libgimp
   77% symbol docs coverage.
   365 symbols documented.
   110 not documented.

libgimpbase
   21% symbol docs coverage.
27 symbols documented.
   104 not documented.

libgimpcolor
3% symbol docs coverage.
 2 symbols documented.
66 not documented.
 
libgimpmath
   81% symbol docs coverage.
60 symbols documented.
14 not documented.
 
libgimpmodule
  100% symbol docs coverage.
20 symbols documented.
 0 not documented.
 
libgimpwidgets
   84% symbol docs coverage.
   261 symbols documented.
49 not documented.


Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] 1.3.21 made it to slashdot.

2003-10-07 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
Thanks to the native SVG support!  :-)

Surelly, it would be a nice time to have the new site in place already.

JS
--
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/07/130202

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Gimp 1.3.21 is on slashdot

2003-10-07 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno


That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will 
point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns, 
including me, have provided links to mmmaybe.gimp.org. However, the 
latest release on mmmaybe is 1.3.17. Could 1.3.21 be announced there in 
the next minutes?

Also, it would be fine if someone could get a 1.3.21 Windows build soon.

Regards,

JS
--
PS. I am not a subscriber to gimp-web .
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Re: mailing list problems (was: Re: web site move)

2003-10-07 Thread Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-10-07 at 1131.45 +0200):
 Raphael, how can one subscribe by mail? I'm only aware of the
 mailman web interface.

When it works and for example for gimp-developer list just send a mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject
subscribe (replace list name and domain as necessary). It comes in the
headers, but I guess most mailers hide them and do not offer a way to
extract the info in a useful way (if you are not faking the user agent
field try pressing h).

GSR
 
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.21 made it to slashdot.

2003-10-07 Thread Simon Budig
Joao S. O. Bueno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Thanks to the native SVG support!  :-)

I'd just like to point out, that most comments at slashdot are too
exaggerated (as usual). Let me get some facts straight:

1) The GIMP is not a SVG editing tool.
 We can just render SVG files to images, the vector information
 are lost, with the notable exception of Paths, which also lose
 some information, since the SVG paths irreversibly get converted to
 bezier paths.

2) The GIMP can not save complete images as SVG.
 Only Bezier paths can be exported in an SVG with non-fancy default
 options.
 
3) The GIMP does not really try to compete with Sodipodi.
 Naturally there are points where the scope of the GIMP and Sodipodi
 overlap, but right now we are only talking about a reimplementation
 of a tool that has been in the GIMP for ages. IMHO it would be
 feasible to have some features of Sodipodi in the GIMP also, but
 it will be a long way.

4) The GIMP uses librsvg in the SVG-plugin for rendering the SVG.
 In fact the Plugin originally was part of librsvg and got
 adopted by Sven into the Gimp after talking with the librsvg
 maintainer.

I hope that this can clean up some confusion from the comments.

Bye,
Simon

-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp 1.3.21 is on slashdot

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will
 point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns,
 including me, have provided links to mmmaybe.gimp.org. However, the
 latest release on mmmaybe is 1.3.17. Could 1.3.21 be announced there
 in the next minutes?

The 1.3.21 announce has been submitted yesterday already. It seems the
news engine is broken which keeps it from showing up. Now who can fix
this?


Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp 1.3.21 is on slashdot

2003-10-07 Thread Manish Singh
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:01:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will
  point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns,
  including me, have provided links to mmmaybe.gimp.org. However, the
  latest release on mmmaybe is 1.3.17. Could 1.3.21 be announced there
  in the next minutes?
 
 The 1.3.21 announce has been submitted yesterday already. It seems the
 news engine is broken which keeps it from showing up. Now who can fix
 this?

Fixed now. Unfortunately, the current situation requires news updates to
be regenned by hand.

-Yosh
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.3.21 made it to slashdot.

2003-10-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 3) The GIMP does not really try to compete with Sodipodi.
  Naturally there are points where the scope of the GIMP and Sodipodi
  overlap, but right now we are only talking about a reimplementation
  of a tool that has been in the GIMP for ages. IMHO it would be
  feasible to have some features of Sodipodi in the GIMP also, but
  it will be a long way.

The main ppoint about adding SVG path import/export was to allow for
better integration with Sodipodi and other vector applications. The
new functionality allows you for example to create a graphics in an
vector application, export it as SVG, import it into GIMP and do some
pixel-manipulation to fine-tune the result. The fact that you get the
paths imported into GIMP should make this task easier since you can
for example use them to create selections.


Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp 1.3.21 is on slashdot

2003-10-07 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:15:40 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will 
 point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns, 
 including me, have provided links to mmmaybe.gimp.org. However, the 
 latest release on mmmaybe is 1.3.17. Could 1.3.21 be announced there in 
 the next minutes?

Unfortunately, this is difficult to do before the move.  That's why I
wanted the web site to move as soon as possible, so that I can play
directly with the files (using my account on the new box, once it is
set up) and replace the temporary news that have been put on mmmaybe
as a test by the real news that have been posted over the years on
news.gimp.org and more recently on www.gimp.org.

Adding a single news item for 1.3.21 would be a quick hack, but would
not solve the problem of migrating the news archive to the new site.
I prepared some of the work by extracting all individual news items
that have been posted on the old web site out of its private CVS
repository, but now I need the web site to be moved before I can
import all these articles with correct dates and authors into the new
system.

In summary, this premature announcement on Slashdot coupled with the
delayed move of the web site is just causing a big mess.  :-(

-Raphaël
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp 1.3.21 is on slashdot

2003-10-07 Thread Carol Spears
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
 
 Adding a single news item for 1.3.21 would be a quick hack, but would
 not solve the problem of migrating the news archive to the new site.
 I prepared some of the work by extracting all individual news items
 that have been posted on the old web site out of its private CVS
 repository, but now I need the web site to be moved before I can
 import all these articles with correct dates and authors into the new
 system.
 

Put back the web site that was right and worked.

I am considering the options.  This mmmaybe web site is not a gimp dot
org anymore as far as I am concerned.

Put the old site back.
no more hacks
no more quick hacks
put the old site back

carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer