Re: GWT SERIALIZATION PROBLEM
Hard to tell without seeing code or stack trace. Please provide: 1. A bit of code illustrating the main players. DTO, Service, ServiceAsync, ServiceImpl method. 2. Stack Trace for the failure. Regards, Alfredo On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Nitheesh Chandran nithe...@aviamatica.com wrote: Hello Guys , I have a problem ,I want to save an object to the database. I passed the object to the server using a function. Like this http://www.easywayserver.com/blog/how-to-serializable-object-in-java-2/. But my RPC is getting failed every time. What will be the problem ? i used isSerializable marker interface for serialization. Cant we send client object to the server through RPC? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Alfredo Quiroga-Villamil AOL/Yahoo/Gmail/MSN IM: lawwton -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Serialization problem !!!!
Hi olivier, Thanks a lot for prompt reply, The solution you said works fine if we extend our class from RemoteServiceServlet . However in my case I am not extending the class from RemoteServiceServlet . I am making the use of HandlerAdapter class of spring for integrating spring wid GWT. Is there any way to achive the same kinda functionality there by not extending from RemoteServiceSerlvet class. Thanks Samir --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT Serialization problem !!!!
Hi olivier, Thanks a lot for prompt reply, The solution you said works fine if we extend our class from RemoteServiceServlet . However in my case I am not extending the class from RemoteServiceServlet . I am making the use of HandlerAdapter class of spring for integrating spring wid GWT. Is there any way to achive the same kinda functionality there by not extending from RemoteServiceSerlvet class. Thanks Samir --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT Serialization problem !!!!
Hi sam, I had the same issue while integrating with acegi, what I choose was to extract the code of RemoteServiceServlet in a helper On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi olivier, Thanks a lot for prompt reply, The solution you said works fine if we extend our class from RemoteServiceServlet . However in my case I am not extending the class from RemoteServiceServlet . I am making the use of HandlerAdapter class of spring for integrating spring wid GWT. Is there any way to achive the same kinda functionality there by not extending from RemoteServiceSerlvet class. Thanks Samir -- Si l'ignorance peut servir de consolation, elle n'en est pas moins illusoire. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT Serialization problem !!!!
Can you please share that code to me ? That will be a great help !! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT Serialization problem !!!!
Hi You should call : RPC.decodeRequest(payload,this.remoteServiceClass, *this*); *this* being the remote servlet (SerializationPoliciyProvider) To resolve the serialization policy (That allow the GWT serialization of Serializable). If no SerializationPoliciyProvider or his the resolution fails to DefaultPolicies (GWT 1.3) is applied and Object must be IsSerializable. You can look at: http://code.google.com/p/net-orcades-spring/source/browse/trunk/orcades-spring-gwt/src/main/java/net/orcades/spring/gwt/SpringGWTRemoteServlet.java from my Spring integration: http://code.google.com/p/net-orcades-spring/ hih On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I have written a code which will integrate the GWT with spring . For this purpose I have overridden the public String processCall(String payload) methode. This works fine if any class which needs to be serilized is implementing isSerilizabel interface. However if I implement the serilizabel interface insted of isSerilizabel , I get serilization exception. Error occours when I try to decode the request by using following code. RPCRequest rpcRequest = RPC.decodeRequest(payload,this.remoteServiceClass); Is there any way by which my code will run there by implementing Serilizabel interface ONLY. Any white paper , any link will greatly be appriciated. Thanks, Samir -- Si l'ignorance peut servir de consolation, elle n'en est pas moins illusoire. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: GWT Serialization problem !!!!
Sorry for my poor expression... If no SerializationPoliciyProvider is given (your case) or if the resolution fails GWT DefaultPolicies (GWT 1.3) is applied and Object must be IsSerializable. On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:54 PM, olivier nouguier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi You should call : RPC.decodeRequest(payload,this.remoteServiceClass, *this*); *this* being the remote servlet (SerializationPoliciyProvider) To resolve the serialization policy (That allow the GWT serialization of Serializable). If no SerializationPoliciyProvider or his the resolution fails to DefaultPolicies (GWT 1.3) is applied and Object must be IsSerializable. You can look at: http://code.google.com/p/net-orcades-spring/source/browse/trunk/orcades-spring-gwt/src/main/java/net/orcades/spring/gwt/SpringGWTRemoteServlet.java from my Spring integration: http://code.google.com/p/net-orcades-spring/ hih On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I have written a code which will integrate the GWT with spring . For this purpose I have overridden the public String processCall(String payload) methode. This works fine if any class which needs to be serilized is implementing isSerilizabel interface. However if I implement the serilizabel interface insted of isSerilizabel , I get serilization exception. Error occours when I try to decode the request by using following code. RPCRequest rpcRequest = RPC.decodeRequest(payload,this.remoteServiceClass); Is there any way by which my code will run there by implementing Serilizabel interface ONLY. Any white paper , any link will greatly be appriciated. Thanks, Samir -- Si l'ignorance peut servir de consolation, elle n'en est pas moins illusoire. -- Si l'ignorance peut servir de consolation, elle n'en est pas moins illusoire. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
