Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
At least we have someone to blame. But please be careful next time, pal :) On 25/04/06, Whisper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm sorry, it's my fault I've created a monster ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
- Original Message - From: kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com I cut out the rest.Cause after all who really cares. ::The making of a tool shed:: The person whom made the post about the whole retirement thing,is absoulutely 100% correct.I used to work in law enforcement,but did not retire from them.And as most people know you have to work for someone for at least 25 years before retirement.Not only that but you can not work for law enforcement until you are of age.Which is 21 to be legally covered by federal ways.IE you get killed in the line of duty.So lets assume for a moment he went into law enforcement at 21.He worked the minimum of 25 years.What age does that make him?46.For the LAPD which my uncle retired from he worked with the for 28 years and retired out at 59.So the math there doesn't correctly add up for him.If he did indeed retire at 41 that would only make him 16 at time of hire.The federal mandate law of law enforcement limits upon age hiring requirements went effective in 1978.His hiring date as of 25 years ago would have been 1980-1981 somewhere in that time frame.Which would have missed the year totally.Assuming that he retired this year.Any earlier than that and he would have been UNDER 16!!And judging that he was a police officer then I would say he's F.O.S. Who ever posted the links deal.That was hilarious.Thanks alot. And last but not least.This has got to be the best troll we have ever had.Not only is he a moron,(his word I would pick something alittle more on the educated side) but he proves it email after email. So for only 39.95 a month you can have 50x the dial up speeds so you can jump online and become an idiot too!Also for 9.95 I will sell you an all inclusive book that shows you step by step to make people think you actually make money doing it!So what are you waiting on call now! 1-800-GET-LIFE ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
If by accident there is any information in this thread that can be useful for an admin, can someone make a summary for me please? Thanks :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roman Hatsiev Sent: 25. april 2006 10:12 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run At least we have someone to blame. But please be careful next time, pal :) On 25/04/06, Whisper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm sorry, it's my fault I've created a monster ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Here you go Alexander http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index.php/Tickrate It is for SRCDS only though On 4/25/06, Alexander Kobbevik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If by accident there is any information in this thread that can be useful for an admin, can someone make a summary for me please? Thanks :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roman Hatsiev Sent: 25. april 2006 10:12 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run At least we have someone to blame. But please be careful next time, pal :) On 25/04/06, Whisper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm sorry, it's my fault I've created a monster ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
Agreed... sound advice; I'm done. -Original Message- From: Chris Bass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:08 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run Or we could all just stop feeding the troll and he will go back under his bridge. Bud Ingram wrote: From: kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 6:38 PM Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I have more fun then should be legal, this year ill be playing at least 6 events on the AGspanos golf tour and then in between events ill be on the road playing 9ball and one pocket. http://www.gaysports.com/page.cfm?sectionid=18parent=1 You see theres the Rub, if you haven't broken bread with the person or hung out with them, then you really can't know what a person thinks or why they act the way they do. I have so many irons in the fire many many people think im just totally full of shit. I'm also in the process of writing two different screen plays. www.queendom.com/test/minitests/fx/egomania.html When I have a few free minutes to check on my servers, I respond to emails I think need a resonse. This is not my life, it just seems that way because I'm able to multitask like an animal. And in a few weeks ill be traveling arounfd the US and possibly to another country and then no one will here from me fro quite a while. I'm sure all of you will be please I wont be around. www.osric.com/university/pathlying.html P.S. I misspelled around (arounfd) just to annoy Edward Luna. :P Oh and BTW if any of you play chess online I'm rated a 2200 almost a master and I play for money. Let me know if you want to hook up and play. You must have an account in order to play though. www.proenhance.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
[hlds] The Thread That Never Dies (was: SRCDS will not run)
I'm a bit put out by some of the Aussie admin's bashing Kyle for his language. I mean, isn't that a bit hypocritical? Just take a look at this (Other Ideas for Aussie Tourism Campaign) to see what I mean... http://youtube.com/watch?v=IAwjpTtD2PEsearch=where%20the%20bloody%20hell%20 are%20you Where the bloody hell are you, indeed! F. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
One small correction... he said he's 41 and has been retired for over 10 years. That makes him 5 when he joined the force. -Original Message- From: [GS]-BeNt- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:34 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run - Original Message - From: kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com I cut out the rest.Cause after all who really cares. ::The making of a tool shed:: The person whom made the post about the whole retirement thing,is absoulutely 100% correct.I used to work in law enforcement,but did not retire from them.And as most people know you have to work for someone for at least 25 years before retirement.Not only that but you can not work for law enforcement until you are of age.Which is 21 to be legally covered by federal ways.IE you get killed in the line of duty.So lets assume for a moment he went into law enforcement at 21.He worked the minimum of 25 years.What age does that make him?46.For the LAPD which my uncle retired from he worked with the for 28 years and retired out at 59.So the math there doesn't correctly add up for him.If he did indeed retire at 41 that would only make him 16 at time of hire.The federal mandate law of law enforcement limits upon age hiring requirements went effective in 1978.His hiring date as of 25 years ago would have been 1980-1981 somewhere in that time frame.Which would have missed the year totally.Assuming that he retired this year.Any earlier than that and he would have been UNDER 16!!And judging that he was a police officer then I would say he's F.O.S. Who ever posted the links deal.That was hilarious.Thanks alot. And last but not least.This has got to be the best troll we have ever had.Not only is he a moron,(his word I would pick something alittle more on the educated side) but he proves it email after email. So for only 39.95 a month you can have 50x the dial up speeds so you can jump online and become an idiot too!Also for 9.95 I will sell you an all inclusive book that shows you step by step to make people think you actually make money doing it!So what are you waiting on call now! 1-800-GET-LIFE ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
And its the people have have the holier than thou mentality we could do without. Take some of that excessive money and rather be self-indulgent, give it to someone who could use it more than you or something. Better yet, invest in some English classes and learn the difference between their, there and they're. Convincing 156 IQ argument there buddy. Every intellectual person I know is able to effectively argue their point without have to use excessive profanity. Those who must use excessive profanity I've found tend to have some sort of fixation on the fact that they -wish- they could argue effectively.but all that comes out are 4 letter words and suicide suggests. There's a big LAWL for you sir. Who are you trying to convince here? You've posted more on this forum (lol, it's a mailing list) more than I have in years just in these past couple of days. Stereotyping will get you know where. Oh wait, you were in the police force. If I was to take the same position and outlook as you, by example, I would assume you're a close-minded, racist, stereotypical human being that only become a police officer for the power trip. Do I honestly think that about all cops? Of course not. Why? I'm not a close mind egotistical maniac as you so have painted yourself to be. I'd say take some of your own advice, but I'd hate to lower myself to your level of insults. Feel free to continue commenting though. The last couple days at work have been relatively entertaining reading your responses. Fighting on the internet makes you e-cool. Flex those e-muscles kyle! gogo! /p Quoting kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] You think I'm angry because I'm swearing and insulting others. I just do it to make there stomach ache and to let them know there morons. The problem is all of you come from the standpoint of the common working man I'm not common nor do I have to work, I haven't had to work since July of 1992. I dabble at my hobbies golf billiards gaming and other things travel etc. And I haven't lost control of anything since I was 13. Your projecting your own thoughts Edward.LAWL I would say that around 65% of people who play online FPS games and 85% of server admin's are complete and total losers and need to run right out and purchase a gas autoloading shotgun and point it directly into there own mouths. Talk about the absolute bottom of the barrel of humanity, total control freak power tripping ego maniacs that feel the need to get off and raise there self esteem through posting in Internet forums. (THIS MEANS YOU) In the coming years there will be a massive study that will be released about how totally pathetic Internet users and in specific gamers and server admin's really are. The funny thing is that most software creators/game makers think that there not in this class of Internet user but they are and they are just in denial due to the fact that they make the games and feel they have a higher morality... Stop playing games and working all day to support your self and then maybe you'll have time to start reading and learning about the real world outside your PC and about how the Internet is changing the way people interact with each other for the worse. Not the better. I seriously don't think anyone on these forums knows anything about human beings and what's really sad is they don't care. Example.Remember when you were a little kid and you knew something that your friends didn't and when you told them they all got embarrassed because you knew and they didn't and they didn't like you for it. The quickest way to alienate or lose friends is to be smarter then there are and prove it to them time and time again. People don't like to feel dumb and that's what I have done here in these forums. Sorry for simply stating the truth. And if I have made any mistakes or errors in my reply's it was due to the fact that we have been talking in cross terms, I.e HLDS vs SRCDS,tickrate vs ticrate,FPS_max etc. When you have some many stupid people saying stupid things it gets a little confusing even for someone with an IQ of 156... So in closing when you have been retired for over 10 years, been to 19 different countries, have an IQ of 156, are ex Oakland ca police officer, and have enough money to never have to work again in your life, then maybe ill think about what you have to say. ---Original Message--- From: Edward Luna Date: 04/24/06 06:42:39 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run Kyle's the only 41 year old I've ever seen use stfu. ROFL... I've used it... and I'm 59... but I'd never use it here... it has no place in this mailing list. Anger is the first indication that your loosing control of the situation -Original Message- From: James McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:56 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
[hlds] Re: Server tickrate suggestions
Whisper, I know you and I haven't agreed on everything in the past, but I'm glad to see that you're 'somewhat' recommending a tickrate of 66 versus 100. Lord knows, I've tried to beat it into stupid little people's heads (joking here) that running a tickrate of 100 is more for 'advertising' or 'commercial' purposes - but in my experience, setting tickrate of 100 (as you said - and as I've always said before) is more DETRIMENTAL to the server than causing it any performance benefit - in my testing. Sure, I here people say 'well u my server runs 100 tickrate NO PROBLEM MAN'. Well guess what mn? You're using up valuable resources on your 3.0ghz Dual-Processor Xeon rented server - and I'd guess that hardly any other servers can run on this besides yours. And as you said, doors won't open sometimes .. and things stick. Congrats. HEY! But you're at 100 tick BAAABY! (smile) Any rate, just glad you're posting pretty accurate information about this now - because I think you and I disagreed on which was better in the past. I knew that with tickrate 66 .. and srcdsfpsbooster, my server has been very smooth for a LONG time - and I VERY rarely get complaints about any kind of 'choppiness' or 'lag'. If I do, it's most always on the client's end. Get a better internet sucka! :D Regards, Dabos -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Here you go Alexander http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index.php/Tickrate It is for SRCDS only though -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:27 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: hlds digest, Vol 1 #4629 - 7 msgs Send hlds mailing list submissions to hlds@list.valvesoftware.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of hlds digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: SRCDS will not run (Roman Hatsiev) 2. Re: SRCDS will not run ([GS]-BeNt-) 3. RE: SRCDS will not run (Alexander Kobbevik) 4. Re: SRCDS will not run (Whisper) 5. RE: SRCDS will not run (Edward Luna) 6. The Thread That Never Dies (was: SRCDS will not run) (Frazer) 7. RE: SRCDS will not run (Edward Luna) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:12:11 +0400 From: Roman Hatsiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com At least we have someone to blame. But please be careful next time, pal :) On 25/04/06, Whisper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm sorry, it's my fault I've created a monster --__--__-- Message: 2 From: [GS]-BeNt- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:34:04 -0500 Reply-To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com - Original Message - From: kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com I cut out the rest.Cause after all who really cares. ::The making of a tool shed:: The person whom made the post about the whole retirement thing,is absoulutely 100% correct.I used to work in law enforcement,but did not retire from them.And as most people know you have to work for someone for at least 25 years before retirement.Not only that but you can not work for law enforcement until you are of age.Which is 21 to be legally covered by federal ways.IE you get killed in the line of duty.So lets assume for a moment he went into law enforcement at 21.He worked the minimum of 25 years.What age does that make him?46.For the LAPD which my uncle retired from he worked with the for 28 years and retired out at 59.So the math there doesn't correctly add up for him.If he did indeed retire at 41 that would only make him 16 at time of hire.The federal mandate law of law enforcement limits upon age hiring requirements went effective in 1978.His hiring date as of 25 years ago would have been 1980-1981 somewhere in that time frame.Which would have missed the year totally.Assuming that he retired this year.Any earlier than that and he would have been UNDER 16!!And judging that he was a police officer then I would say he's F.O.S. Who ever posted the links deal.That was hilarious.Thanks alot. And last but not least.This has got to be the best troll we have ever had.Not only is he a moron,(his word I would pick something alittle more on the educated side) but he proves it email after email. So for only 39.95 a month you can have 50x the dial up speeds so you can jump online and become an idiot too!Also for 9.95 I will sell you an all inclusive book
Re: [hlds] SRCDS sv_maxupdaterate question?
Whisper wrote: On a 33 tickrate CS SRCDS the clients never receive more than 33.9 updates per second (yeah its not exact, but its close enough) therefore a sv_maxupdaterate of 60 is a complete waste, and if it is not, then I have not seen a explanation as to the rationale why! What if the process of the tick and the sendout procedure aren't synchronized? Let's look at this: Time 1: New tick Time 2: Time 3: Update sent out Time 4: New tick Time 5: Time 6: Update sent out Both updates and ticks are at the same rate, but there is a delay between a new tick and the information getting to the client. With a bigger updaterate it would be like this: Time 1: New tick / sending update Time 2: Time 3: sending update Time 4: New tick Time 5: sending update Time 6: So clients will get their new information faster, more accurate of what really happens on the server. That was always my thought on that. With kind regards, ]FUSION[ Gray Death ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Re: Server not showing in master server list...........,(Rick Gillespie)
Ditch Earthlink. Get a real ISP. Earthlink's glory days are over, and they are becoming another AOL. If you have a voip package then you probably have a custom router which blocks a lot of ports and has QoS to make sure the voip packets have priority. Works nice for voice, worthless for most everything else. FWIW, you don't need a static IP to run a server. - Original Message - From: Rick Gillespie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:49 PM Subject: [hlds] Re: Server not showing in master server list...,(Rick Gillespie) Thanks for all the tips. I have 8Meg DSL which tests faster than a T1 down 768 up which must be faster because I'm in Dallas and my brother's in Michigan and he has less than 35 ping NO LAG. just trying to save some money but I talked to Earthlink and they said it was because I have their Digital Voice . They said I can't even get a Static IP those Bas***rds they killed me server LOL Oh well just wanted more than 4 of us guess we'll keep playing on other peoples servers. Sven Coop again :0 Don't be so uptight dudes remember this Games Are Fun! LOL thanks for all the replies and lighten up dudes. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
Since when do 41 year olds use LAWL or any online slang? Biter. ;) ---Original Message--- From: Whisper Date: 04/24/06 23:47:05 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm sorry, it's my fault I've created a monster On 4/25/06, L.o.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Why is this jackass still even here? Or is he here merely for the enjoyment of others to laugh at him? Because we all are laughing at you. I'm sure even Alfred is as well. You rag on us about how anyone that plays games or is a server admin are losers yet, here you are. You trying for the lead loser spot? You already have that won, hands down. ---Original Message--- From: kyle Date: 04/24/06 19:27:32 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Your reply confirms what i have already said, your a moron. So big deal, I'm not that great of a typist, leave it to some Internet loser to not even address the post but to rag on the fact that I have bad spelling and typing. That's the first thing most ignorant Internet losers do when they find out there a moron. Ahhaha duh you spelled wrong, your an idiot. GG dick head. Open mouth more and prove your a bigger lamer. ---Original Message--- From: Edward Luna Date: 04/24/06 14:07:49 To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run Very entertaining Kyle... You think I'm angry because I'm swearing and insulting others. I just do it to make there (I assume you meant their) stomach ache and to let them know there (I assume you meant they're) morons. No need to point out the copious remaining grammatical errors in your diatribe about how everyone else is a moron, the text speaks for itself. However, for those who care about such things... one need only listen to what a person complains most about in others, with strong emotional content, and you'll expose a window into the psyche of the one doing the complaining. I must admit though, I'm very curious my friend. In the last paragraph of your post So in closing when you have been retired for over 10 years, been to 19 different countries, have an IQ of 156, are ex Oakland ca police officer, and have enough money to never have to work again in your life, then maybe ill (I assume you meant I'll) think about what you have to say. So you're an ex Oakland police officer... retired over 10 years and you're currently 41. Does that mean your retired at 30, and if so... how old were you when you took the job with the police... 10? Also, retired at 30; where did you get the money? Lotto... or are they paying Oakland Police officers really well these days? -Original Message- From: kyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:19 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] You think I'm angry because I'm swearing and insulting others. I just do it to make there stomach ache and to let them know there morons. The problem is all of you come from the standpoint of the common working man I'm not common nor do I have to work, I haven't had to work since July of 1992. I dabble at my hobbies golf billiards gaming and other things travel etc. And I haven't lost control of anything since I was 13. Your projecting your own thoughts Edward.LAWL I would say that around 65% of people who play online FPS games and 85% of server admin's are complete and total losers and need to run right out and purchase a gas autoloading shotgun and point it directly into there own mouths. Talk about the absolute bottom of the barrel of humanity, total control freak power tripping ego maniacs that feel the need to get off and raise there self esteem through posting in Internet forums. (THIS MEANS YOU) In the coming years there will be a massive study that will be released about how totally pathetic Internet users and in specific gamers and server admin's really are. The funny thing is that most software creators/game makers think that there not in this class of Internet user but they are and they are just in denial due to the fact that they make the games and feel they have a higher morality... Stop playing games and working all day to support your self and then maybe you'll have time to start reading and learning about the real world outside your PC and about how the Internet is changing the way people interact with each other for the worse. Not the better. I seriously don't think anyone on these forums knows anything about human beings and what's really sad is they don't care. Example.Remember when you were a little kid and you knew something that your friends didn't and when you told them they all got embarrassed because you knew and they didn't and they didn't like
RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
This thread still isn't dead yet? WOW! :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roman Hatsiev Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:12 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run At least we have someone to blame. But please be careful next time, pal :) On 25/04/06, Whisper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm sorry, it's my fault I've created a monster ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] SRCDS will not run
Is there a possibility that he retired early because he was shot on duty, and the payout was so massive that he didn't ever need to work again? This leads me into a new line of questioning surrounding the possibility of him thinking he was playing an fps and got shot, and couldn't reload his save game, but found a cheat code to get unlimited money or something... Then we lead into The Sims 2... Oh crap, I forgot about the sign that said don't feed the trolls, outside the mailing list enclosure. Cheers, Adam -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [GS]-BeNt- Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 18:04 PM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] SRCDS will not run - Original Message - From: kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com I cut out the rest.Cause after all who really cares. ::The making of a tool shed:: The person whom made the post about the whole retirement thing,is absoulutely 100% correct.I used to work in law enforcement,but did not retire from them.And as most people know you have to work for someone for at least 25 years before retirement.Not only that but you can not work for law enforcement until you are of age.Which is 21 to be legally covered by federal ways.IE you get killed in the line of duty.So lets assume for a moment he went into law enforcement at 21.He worked the minimum of 25 years.What age does that make him?46.For the LAPD which my uncle retired from he worked with the for 28 years and retired out at 59.So the math there doesn't correctly add up for him.If he did indeed retire at 41 that would only make him 16 at time of hire.The federal mandate law of law enforcement limits upon age hiring requirements went effective in 1978.His hiring date as of 25 years ago would have been 1980-1981 somewhere in that time frame.Which would have missed the year totally.Assuming that he retired this year.Any earlier than that and he would have been UNDER 16!!And judging that he was a police officer then I would say he's F.O.S. Who ever posted the links deal.That was hilarious.Thanks alot. And last but not least.This has got to be the best troll we have ever had.Not only is he a moron,(his word I would pick something alittle more on the educated side) but he proves it email after email. So for only 39.95 a month you can have 50x the dial up speeds so you can jump online and become an idiot too!Also for 9.95 I will sell you an all inclusive book that shows you step by step to make people think you actually make money doing it!So what are you waiting on call now! 1-800-GET-LIFE ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Hostworks Message Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information contact Hostworks on 1300 30 4848. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS?
Sorry it was late. 2.6 P4 with HT, max players around 20 at most for both instances and only 1 up at a time (srcds or hlds) -[IA]Zealot -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:45 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS? -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] For SRCDS tickrate 100 fps_max 600 sv_maxrate 3 sv_maxupdaterate 100 sv_lan 1 but you have left a lot information out, like Number of SRCDS/HLDS, Players per SRCDS/HLDS, Operating System, and 2.6GHz what? as a 2.6GHz Celeron is not the same as a 2.6GHz Opteron. On 4/25/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the best lan settings (rates cvars) for a 2.6 GHZ with 1 Gig Ram for SRCDS and HLDS? Going to a big lan this weekend (lanwar.com) and I am trying to prep an internet server for lan play. (Physical server will be located in lan hall btw...) -[IA]Zealot ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS?
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Should be fine then On 4/26/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry it was late. 2.6 P4 with HT, max players around 20 at most for both instances and only 1 up at a time (srcds or hlds) -[IA]Zealot -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:45 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS? -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] For SRCDS tickrate 100 fps_max 600 sv_maxrate 3 sv_maxupdaterate 100 sv_lan 1 but you have left a lot information out, like Number of SRCDS/HLDS, Players per SRCDS/HLDS, Operating System, and 2.6GHz what? as a 2.6GHz Celeron is not the same as a 2.6GHz Opteron. On 4/25/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the best lan settings (rates cvars) for a 2.6 GHZ with 1 Gig Ram for SRCDS and HLDS? Going to a big lan this weekend (lanwar.com) and I am trying to prep an internet server for lan play. (Physical server will be located in lan hall btw...) -[IA]Zealot ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] You could (as in YMMV) try it both with and w/o HT enabled. (I believe the SRCDS/HLDS issues with HT enabled are fixed, but that didn't stop me from returning over a million in hardware to Dell over HT issues.) Whisper wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Should be fine then On 4/26/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry it was late. 2.6 P4 with HT, max players around 20 at most for both instances and only 1 up at a time (srcds or hlds) -[IA]Zealot -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:45 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS? -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] For SRCDS tickrate 100 fps_max 600 sv_maxrate 3 sv_maxupdaterate 100 sv_lan 1 but you have left a lot information out, like Number of SRCDS/HLDS, Players per SRCDS/HLDS, Operating System, and 2.6GHz what? as a 2.6GHz Celeron is not the same as a 2.6GHz Opteron. On 4/25/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the best lan settings (rates cvars) for a 2.6 GHZ with 1 Gig Ram for SRCDS and HLDS? Going to a big lan this weekend (lanwar.com) and I am trying to prep an internet server for lan play. (Physical server will be located in lan hall btw...) -[IA]Zealot ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS?
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Well it was a good excuse when you found out Dual Core Opetrons would do twice the job for half the price :p On 4/26/06, Stuart Stegall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] You could (as in YMMV) try it both with and w/o HT enabled. (I believe the SRCDS/HLDS issues with HT enabled are fixed, but that didn't stop me from returning over a million in hardware to Dell over HT issues.) Whisper wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Should be fine then On 4/26/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry it was late. 2.6 P4 with HT, max players around 20 at most for both instances and only 1 up at a time (srcds or hlds) -[IA]Zealot -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:45 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS? -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] For SRCDS tickrate 100 fps_max 600 sv_maxrate 3 sv_maxupdaterate 100 sv_lan 1 but you have left a lot information out, like Number of SRCDS/HLDS, Players per SRCDS/HLDS, Operating System, and 2.6GHz what? as a 2.6GHz Celeron is not the same as a 2.6GHz Opteron. On 4/25/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the best lan settings (rates cvars) for a 2.6 GHZ with 1 Gig Ram for SRCDS and HLDS? Going to a big lan this weekend (lanwar.com) and I am trying to prep an internet server for lan play. (Physical server will be located in lan hall btw...) -[IA]Zealot ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Plus the provider we switched to installed the FC we specified rather than Dell only offering what they offer. (oh and no local hard drives) Whisper wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Well it was a good excuse when you found out Dual Core Opetrons would do twice the job for half the price :p On 4/26/06, Stuart Stegall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] You could (as in YMMV) try it both with and w/o HT enabled. (I believe the SRCDS/HLDS issues with HT enabled are fixed, but that didn't stop me from returning over a million in hardware to Dell over HT issues.) Whisper wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Should be fine then On 4/26/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry it was late. 2.6 P4 with HT, max players around 20 at most for both instances and only 1 up at a time (srcds or hlds) -[IA]Zealot -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:45 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Best LAN Settings for SRCDS and HLDS? -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] For SRCDS tickrate 100 fps_max 600 sv_maxrate 3 sv_maxupdaterate 100 sv_lan 1 but you have left a lot information out, like Number of SRCDS/HLDS, Players per SRCDS/HLDS, Operating System, and 2.6GHz what? as a 2.6GHz Celeron is not the same as a 2.6GHz Opteron. On 4/25/06, Peter Urda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the best lan settings (rates cvars) for a 2.6 GHZ with 1 Gig Ram for SRCDS and HLDS? Going to a big lan this weekend (lanwar.com) and I am trying to prep an internet server for lan play. (Physical server will be located in lan hall btw...) -[IA]Zealot ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
[hlds] SRCDS Mini Dump Files
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Is there any way to read the data in a SRCDS Mini Dump File? We have a couple of problematic SRCDS and rather than forward the mini dump files to Valve, it be nice to know if we could do some troubleshooting ourselves using the mini dumps to see if there is any sort of pattern to the problem and to see if in fact it is probably not even a Valve problem anyhow. Thanks -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] SRCDS Mini Dump Files
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/default.mspx At the best you'll be able to see is what was running at the time of the crash, but don't be surprised if there is nothing useful in the minidumps. - Original Message - From: Whisper To: HLDS hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:33 PM Subject: [hlds] SRCDS Mini Dump Files Is there any way to read the data in a SRCDS Mini Dump File? We have a couple of problematic SRCDS and rather than forward the mini dump files to Valve, it be nice to know if we could do some troubleshooting ourselves using the mini dumps to see if there is any sort of pattern to the problem and to see if in fact it is probably not even a Valve problem anyhow. Thanks -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
Re: [hlds] SRCDS Mini Dump Files
For the most part debuggers don't really provide anything helpful and are generally a crutch. If you have a problematic server 90% of the time the problem is hardware/OS related although some of the HLDS plugins do do weird things for no apparent reason and some combination of settings for Mani Admin mod produce servers that crash more often. Kevin Ottalini wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/debugging/default.mspx At the best you'll be able to see is what was running at the time of the crash, but don't be surprised if there is nothing useful in the minidumps. - Original Message - From: Whisper To: HLDS hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:33 PM Subject: [hlds] SRCDS Mini Dump Files Is there any way to read the data in a SRCDS Mini Dump File? We have a couple of problematic SRCDS and rather than forward the mini dump files to Valve, it be nice to know if we could do some troubleshooting ourselves using the mini dumps to see if there is any sort of pattern to the problem and to see if in fact it is probably not even a Valve problem anyhow. Thanks -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
