Re: Tapeless Solutions

2011-12-16 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
Yes... 
It is called the TS7720. We have three of them in a Grid Configutation, I 
believe that each frame could accomodate up to 162 TB of storage (without 
compression). You should talk to your IBM rep for the exact specs.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Message BPXF135E RETURN CODE 00000079, REASON CODE 055B005C

2010-11-09 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:11:08 -0600, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com 
wrote:

Receiving BPXF135E RETURN CODE 0079, REASON CODE 055B005C on an 
attempted file mount.

Searches of a number of messages/codes manuals have been futile.

Ideas, anyone?

Thanks

NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The 
message, 
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


For reason code 055B005C:

Action: The problem found depends on the return code received with this 
reason
code. 
 o If the return code is ENOENT, the pathname specified could not be found.   
 o If the return code is ENOTDIR, the pathname did not specify a directory.   
 o If the return code is EINVAL, either the pathname specified refers to the  
 root of an already mounted file system.  Or, in the case of a sysplex, the   
 file system may be already mounted on another system in the sysplex or there 
 may be conflicting BPXPRMxx statements for the root. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Message BPXF135E RETURN CODE 00000079, REASON CODE 055B005C

2010-11-09 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:11:08 -0600, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com 
wrote:

Receiving BPXF135E RETURN CODE 0079, REASON CODE 055B005C on an 
attempted file mount.

Searches of a number of messages/codes manuals have been futile.

Ideas, anyone?

Thanks

NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The 
message, 
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Forgot to mention one more thing:

You can get the explanation of the return code by typing in:

TSO BPXMTEXT 055B005C

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: region problem after migrated to zos1.11

2010-09-14 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:30:26 -0500, Mike Schwab 
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:

With z/OS 1.11, on a volume MOD 9 almost full of 1 track datasets,
ADRDSSU uses about 220MB of a 256MB region.

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:19 PM, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Were the jobs using ADRDSSU?  We had a similar problem, but we changed 
our
 default to 6M on all systems and it seems to have resolved the 
problem.  The
 only abends that we encountered were ADRDSSU.  I heard in the next 
release
 there may be additional changes.

--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

This is documented in the z/OS v1R11 migration guide:  GA22-7499-16

Regards,
Ramiro Camposagrado
Brown Brothers Harriman  Co.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: The hardest JCL ERROR I have met

2010-03-29 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:35:38 +0800, Hu Lei helite...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello world!



I am trying to setup a mini system, and during IPL, I have met JES2 start
error. I am suffer from this error for days, I have do all I can image to
correct the error, but still no result.

It would be great appreciated if any comments!! Thanks in advance.



The joblog during IPL looks:

IEF403I IEESYSAS - STARTED - TIME=03.47.40

IEF677I WARNING MESSAGE(S) FOR JOB JES2 ISSUED

IEF452I JES2 - JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR

And the JES2 proc:

//JES2PROC M=JES2PARM

//IEFPROC EXEC PGM=HASJES20,TIME=1440,DPRTY=(15,15)

//HASPLIST  DD DDNAME=IEFRDER

//HASPPARM  DD DSN=SYS1.CPAC.PARMLIB(M),DISP=SHR

//PROC00DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.CPAC.PROCLIB

//  DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.PROCLIB

//HASPLIST  DD DDNAME=IEFRDER

//STEPLIB   DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.SHASLNKE

IEFSSNxx

SUBSYS SUBNAME(JES2)

PRIMARY(YES)  START(NO)

COMMDxx:

COM='S JES2,PARM='COLD,NOREQ''



Here is what I have checked:

All the datasets referred in Jes2 proc are cataloged in Master catalog by
using IDCAMS listcat.

SYS1.SHASLNKE has listed in PROGxx, and APFed.

Storage volume has been specified in VATLSTxx.

Both null SMS configuration and none SMS environment have tried.

Both VLF, LLA, DLF, RACF has started.



From IEF677I, it seems system found some error and used a system default.
But where is it? Can we got some additional message from other ways?

Thanks for your time.












--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Why not start your new JES2 proc on a system that has JES2 already started?
It should go ro regular conversion and then issue the $HASP426 message.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Converting CPU Time to MIPS

2009-07-02 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
Management is trying to cut and save CPU cost. So they came up with 
this Cost Avoidance Committee. (Primarily consisting of uper management). 
Now they want us to somehow equate the CPU Time consumed (primarily by a 
CICS transaction) and equate that into MIPS. I know that folks have come up 
with formulas on how to do this. 

We use BEST/1 (Visualizer) for our performance reporting and it works off 15 
minute intervals. Within this 15 minute interval, we can run hundreds of CICS 
transactions. If we take one CICS transaction and convert the CPU time used
into MIPS, it is much higher than the 15 minute interval that is being reported 
 
in BEST/1. So there is really no way for us to correlate this number with our 
BEST/1 data. 

The performance data comes from MXG and it gets fed into BEST/1.
As far as I know, MXG does not report on MIP utilization per CICS transaction.
It does report on the elapsed time and CPU time for individual CPU transactions.
And it would be just to much of an effort for us to report on MIPS used for 
hundreds of CICS transactions.

Any suggestions or comments ??

Regards,
Ramiro

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Converting CPU Time to MIPS

2009-07-02 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:37:43 -0500, Jeffrey Deaver 
jeffrey.dea...@securian.com wrote:

  Cost Avoidance Committee

What is the ultimate goal of the committee?  Are you attempting to stave
off a CPU upgrade?  Are you looking to actually decrease the size of your
current configuration?  You're most likely locked into a lease or own your
mainframe, so you've already sunk the money for the CPU cycles available
- how is examining how those cycles are being used going to avoid cost?  Do
you do sub capacity charge on the z/OS software?  Or is this an internal
chargeback thing?

Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
jeffrey.dea...@securian.com
651-665-4231(v)
IS - Creating competitive advantage with technology.  Providing service
that excels.
OSS -  Where Innovation Happens

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

I am quite aware that we have already sunk the money for the CPU cycles.
We are paying for the CPU wether it is running at 25% percent or 100%.

Management wants to be able to see that, if they made an application 
change to improve the performance of a particular program, that they will be 
quantify the amount of MIPS saved as a reult of the application change.
We actually have a MIPS reduction committee that meets on a regular basis 
to discuss on how to improve the performance of our most CPU intensive 
applications.

Regards,
Ramiro

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Converting CPU Time to MIPS

2009-07-02 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:30:48 -0500, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com 
wrote:

They don't really want to know MIPS. They want to know money. That is, 
how much does it cost to run transaction x.

Perhaps expressing the CPU consumption as a percentage of the box's 
capacity would answer the question. Each engine has a fixed capacity of one 
CPU second per clock second, but the MIPS will vary depending on the speed 
of the engine (among other things).  If, for example, you run a four engine, 
100 MIP box, then one CPU second = 25% of the box or 25 MIPS. Another 
example is a four engine 1000 MIP box, then one CPU second is still 25% of the 
box or 250 MIPS.

Another way to express the capacity of a box is the theoretical maximum 
number of CPU seconds you can use. Again assuming that you have a four 
engine box, then the maximum number you can use is 345,600. (24 hours x 60 
min x 60 sec x 4). If this is a 100 MIP box, then each MIP is theoretically 
34,560 CPU seconds.

You should be able to see the problems that arise trying to express CPU 
seconds in MIPS.

It get worse. We also have to consider the time value of that transaction. It 
may take more than one MIP to run 34,500 one second transactions with an 
acceptable response time.

You should be able to see the problems that arise trying to express CPU 
seconds in MIPS.

Remember what we are trying to do and who is asking. I'd offer the second 
calculation and see what they say. Remember, no jargon and KISS when 
framing your reply.

HTH and good luck.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On 
Behalf Of Ramiro Camposagrado
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Converting CPU Time to MIPS

Management is trying to cut and save CPU cost. So they came up with
this Cost Avoidance Committee. (Primarily consisting of uper management).
Now they want us to somehow equate the CPU Time consumed (primarily by a
CICS transaction) and equate that into MIPS. I know that folks have come up
with formulas on how to do this.

We use BEST/1 (Visualizer) for our performance reporting and it works off 15
minute intervals. Within this 15 minute interval, we can run hundreds of CICS
transactions. If we take one CICS transaction and convert the CPU time used
into MIPS, it is much higher than the 15 minute interval that is being reported
in BEST/1. So there is really no way for us to correlate this number with our
BEST/1 data.

The performance data comes from MXG and it gets fed into BEST/1.
As far as I know, MXG does not report on MIP utilization per CICS transaction.
It does report on the elapsed time and CPU time for individual CPU 
transactions.
And it would be just to much of an effort for us to report on MIPS used for
hundreds of CICS transactions.

Any suggestions or comments ??

Regards,
Ramiro

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message,
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Thanks Hal, and to everyone else who have responded.

I actually prefer you second calculation as well. I will present it to 
the committee and as you have said: Keep It As Simple as Possible.

Thanks again,
Ramiro

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Language Environment runtime options and system dumps

2009-06-12 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:23:39 +0100, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Is there any combination of LE runtime options that will give a system dump
of the original abend and an LE message.

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Using TRAP(OFF,NOSPIE) should give you the original ABEND. I;m not so sure 
about the LE messages though.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DFSORT and SVC Missing when running DB2 Functions

2008-10-23 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:29:16 -0400, Lizette Koehler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We have DFSORT because we have DB2 V8 and V9.  So, I am getting a 
message

ICE191I 0 DFSORT SVC NOT AVAILABLE - PERFORMANCE MAY BE DEGRADED

Since we did not install DFSORT, we did not follow any installation
process.  I am wondering if I need to go back to the install manual for
DFSORT and do some customization for it?  I am trying to understand how far
I have to go with DFSORT in order for DB2 V8 and V9 to make efficient use of
it.

Lizette

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


IBM information APAR II14047 should have all the information that you need.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: DFSORT and SVC Missing when running DB2 Functions

2008-10-23 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:29:16 -0400, Lizette Koehler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We have DFSORT because we have DB2 V8 and V9.  So, I am getting a 
message

ICE191I 0 DFSORT SVC NOT AVAILABLE - PERFORMANCE MAY BE DEGRADED

Since we did not install DFSORT, we did not follow any installation
process.  I am wondering if I need to go back to the install manual for
DFSORT and do some customization for it?  I am trying to understand how far
I have to go with DFSORT in order for DB2 V8 and V9 to make efficient use of
it.

Lizette

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Actually it is two information APARS:  II14047  II14213

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Cobol reference

2008-10-21 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:15:56 -0600, Howard Brazee 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I gave a new programmer my list of CoBOL reference URLS, such as
http://www.s390.ibm.com/bookmgr-
cgi/bookmgr.cmd/BOOKS/IGYLR205/CCONTENTS
, but these no longer work.   I did some searches from the page that
came up.   Where can I find the CoBOL language guide and user manual?


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


This is the COBOL Home Page:

http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/cobol/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



OSA-Express2 Segmentation Offload-Restrictions Lifted

2008-09-10 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
I'm not sure if this has already been posted:

WSC FLASH 10458: OSA-Express2 Segmentation Offload-Restrictions Lifted

http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH10458

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Displaying Quiesced zFS files

2008-06-24 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:06:14 -0500, Mark Zelden 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:55:49 -0700, Patrick Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

You would think that the returned *status* from 'D OMVS,F' would be
'quiesced' instead of 'active' but then again I just stumbled upon the below.

  'D OMVS,F,e' where 'e' is exception.


Yes I tried that (I did look at the FM before my first post on this subject).
Would you expect active to be an exception?  :-)

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS Systems Programming expert at 
http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

The following section was added to the DFS/SMB section of the PSP buckets 
for z/OS 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7, as a result of a PMR that I have opened with 
zFS development in regards to this issue.  I guess they are still working on 
the 
fix.

06/04/11 If a zfs filesystem is quiesced, either as the result of a
   DFSMS backup operation or explicitly via a zfsadm quiesce
   command, the state of the filesystem as displayed by the
   USS 'df'  or D OMVS,F  commands will NOT show as QUIESCED.
   This is a known design issue which is between the LFS (USS)
   and the PFS (zFS) , and the development teams are currently
   investigating this. However at this time this is working as
   designed.  Users must be aware that to accurately determine
   the current status of a zFS filesystem, they must use the
   provided zfs administration commands:
 zfsadm lsaggr
 zfsadm aggrinfo
   status of the zFS filesystems and will show the status of
   the filesystem as QUIESCED, if in fact the filesystem is
   currently in a QUIESCED state. This has become a point of
   contention recently as backups being taken using the DFSMS
   DUMP/RESTORE utility will  QUIESCE zfs filesystems
   implicitly. If users are not aware of this activity, they
   could see temporary 'hang' situations and/or USS Latch
   contention as indicated by the presence of a BPXM056E
   errors message displayed to the operators console. To
   determine ifthe current state of the ZFS filesystems,
   user are requiredto use the zfsadm commands to
   accurately determine if ZFS filesystems are QUIESCED

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Displaying Quiesced zFS files

2008-06-24 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
I agree... two years and counting...
There is no mention of this update on the z/OS 1.8 or 1.9 buckets either.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: IBM Bookmanager Library Server

2008-01-22 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:46:17 +, Jim McAlpine 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anyone have a url for the above that contains the bookshelf for DB2
Version 9 for z/OS.  I've got the following one but it only goes up to DB2
Version 8 -

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/handheld/Connected/library

Jim McAlpine

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/Shelves/dsnshka1

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IBM Bookmanager Library Server

2008-01-22 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
Here it is again !!!

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/Shelves/dsnshka1

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: OMVS.ETC

2008-01-22 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:22:19 -0500, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

When I installed my new z/OS 1.9 system I specified that I wanted to use zFS
for OMVS.  root, sibmroot, and var were created as zFS, but .etc was created
as HFS. Is anyone aware of a reason that .etc is still HFS?  Should I be
able to convert it to a zFS?

Thanks

--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

I'm not sure why your etc file system was created as an HFS, but there should 
be no reason why you cannot convert it to ZFS. We are currently running 
z/OS 1.7 in production and we have been an all ZFS shop for close to two 
years now.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


CA-TopSecret SP1 (and above) CICS SIGNON Problem

2007-06-18 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
Talk about sheer luck !!! We upgraded our production LPAR to CA-TopSecret 
9.0 SP1, this past Saturday, June 16.

Here is the description of the problem:

Title: KHC8002: CICS SIGNONS FAIL WITH ABEND AEXZ  
Description :  
PRODUCT: CA-TOP SECRET MVS   RELEASE:  9.0

APAR #:  QO89178 DATE:16 JUN 2007

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: KHC8002: CICS SIGNONS FAIL WITH ABEND AEXZ
 ---

   STARTRAK PROBLEM: 8002
   ABSTRACT: CICS SIGNONS FAIL WITH ABEND AEXZ

   DESCRIPTION:
  Residual data in the TSS/CICS exit control area can cause
  signon failures. All CICS signons will fail with an AEXZ
  abend code in program DFHSNP. This problem is tied to date
  processing and will occur on June 16th, 2007.

   SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
  LLA Refresh, Recycle the cics region.

   UPDATES: CAKSRD53, CAKSRD62, CAKSRD63, CAKSRD64, CAKSRD65

HYPER: YES   INTEGRITY:  NO  OPTIONAL:  NO NORMAL:  NO

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A

PROBLEM RESOLUTION:  SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR DETAILS.

PRODUCT(S) AFFECTED: CA-TOP SECRET MVSRELEASE:  9.0

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA-TopSecret SP1 (and above) CICS SIGNON Problem

2007-06-18 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:05:51 -0400, Lizette Koehler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anyone know if this affects any version of z/OS/CICS/TSS or is this 
specific to a certain combination of z/OS/TSS/CICS?

Neither IBM or CA seem to show any specific software levels other than TSS 
9 at SP1/2

Lizette



Talk about sheer luck !!! We upgraded our production LPAR to CA-TopSecret
9.0 SP1, this past Saturday, June 16.

Here is the description of the problem:

Title: KHC8002: CICS SIGNONS FAIL WITH ABEND AEXZ
Description :
PRODUCT: CA-TOP SECRET MVS   RELEASE:  9.0

APAR #:  QO89178 DATE:16 JUN 2007

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: KHC8002: CICS SIGNONS FAIL WITH ABEND AEXZ


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

CA Support told us that it is for CA-TopSecret 9.0 SP1 and above only.
Anyone running CA-TopSecret below SP1 should be fine.
They did not say about any specifc z/OS or CICS release.
We are at z/OS 1.7 and CICS 3.1

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA-TopSecret SP1 (and above) CICS SIGNON Problem

2007-06-18 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
They just posted this alert notification  on their Website:

Important Notice to CA ACF2 for z/OS and CA Top Secret for z/OS Customers.

Release 9.0 SP1, SP2, and Release 12.0 ACF2 and Top Secret customers who 
recycle their CICS systems today (June 16, 2007) may experience the 
following abend at CICS sign on:

DFHAC2206 Transaction CESN failed with abend AEXZ

CA has published hyper solutions for both products.
ACF2 customers should apply QO89177.
Top Secret customers should apply QO89178.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Unicode Code Dynamic Table Loading

2007-03-21 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:50:32 -0400, Lizette Koehler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In z/OS V1.7 I have found the following information



Unicode dynamic table loading: Unicode support will be enhanced to
dynamically load conversion tables on demand. This can help eliminate the
setup tasks previously required for Unicode, including the CUNUNIxx parmlib
member IMAGE statement updates. A new operator command will be provided 
that
can allow tables to be added, removed, and replaced.



How exactly will I know this is working.  Does IBM now ship all the possible
variations of UNICODE and therefore has a table to load from when needed?
Does this truly remove my need to gen the CUNUNIxx member?  I am more 
than
willing to drop that process from my system creation process.  I find so
little information on this and how it affects my mainframe applications
(DB2, MQ, IMS, etc.)



Lizette






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

SYS1.SAMPLIB contains the individual conversion tables that are included in 
the prebuilt image: CUNSISM1 through CUNSISM6
The CUNSISM6 conversion table is the prebuilt image for DB2.
Also be sure to look at the following APARS:  OA14231, OA19072, OA16420

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Extract SMPE FMIDs

2007-01-17 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:39:30 -0800, Mohamed Juma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

HI,

We installed Z/OS 1.7 recently, we have some old IBM products in our 
existing Z/OS 1.4 system (such as Netview Access) which use the same Z/OS 
SMPE Zones (it came before in the same serverpac of Z/OS 1.4).

I want to use this products with my new Z/OS 1.7, my problem how can I 
extract the SMPE for these products to a new SMPE to be used with Z/OS 1.7.

Is there any way to do that, and is it save and recommended? and how?

Thanks eveyone,

Mohamed Juma



___
_
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

How about using the BUILDMCS command.

(See Chapter 4 of the SMP/E V3R4 Commands Manual)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


FYI: TCP/IP Segmentation Offload

2006-12-19 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
I came accross this item on both the 2084 and 2094 PSP buckets:

06/12/13 The TCP Segmentation Off-load feature (also called OSA
Large Send) is enabled by default if all of the
requirements documented in PK02490 are met. Due to the
potential for OSAs that are using this feature to
experience unrecoverable INOPs(requiring intervention
by configuring the affected CHPIDs off-line), it is
currently recommended that Segmentation Off-load be
disabled.  To disable Segmentation Offload, it is
recommended that the following maintenance be applied
and then code NOSEGMENTATIONOFFLoad on the
GLOBALCONFIG statement in the TCPIP PROFILE.
   FMID   APAR   PTF   COMMENT
 HIP6160PK21685UK13788   TCP/IP
 JIP6169PK21685UK13789   TCP/IP (HFS)
 HIP6170PK21685UK13790   TCP/IP
 JIP6179PK21685UK13791   TCP/IP (HFS)
 HIP6180PK26905UK17180   TCP/IP
 JIP6189PK26905UK17181   TCP/IP (HFS)
   Once all of the microcode issues for Segmentation
   Offload are resolved, a Washington Systems Center
   Flash will be released advising what the minimum
   recommended code level will be. Flash 1232599 on
   the z/OS Communications Server Support web page
   will also be updated at that time; to subscribe
   to this (and other) updates, go to URL
  http://www.ibm.com/software/network/commserver/zos/support/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS V1.4 and v1.7 with Language Environment

2006-11-08 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:29:19 -0500, Lizette Koehler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We are planning to upgrade from z/OS V1.4 to V1.7.  There has come up a 
concern over having z/OS V1.7 Language Environment in the TEST/DEVL systems 
and not in production.  That programs compiled and LKED with the newer LE 
would have issues running in the V1.4 LPARS.

I was thinking of just taking SCEELKED and leaving the V1.4 version in 
TEST/DEVL until V1.7 is on the production LPARS.

Does anyone have any indication whether or not we need to leave the V1.4 
version in TEST/DEVL or if the V1.7 can be in TEST/DEVL and rolling out to 
V1.4 LPARs.

Does anyone know of any other application specific concerns with LE?


ThanksLizette


We went through exactly the same upgrade process and we did not encounter 
any problems with LE. Our Test system was upgraded to 1.7 and our 
production system remained at 1.4 for about a month. As long as you have 
applied all the necessary toleration/coexistence PTFs, then I don't see a 
problem running LE 1.7 in Test and LE 1.4 in Production. About the only 
thing that I can see is if you are using a new function that it is only 
available under z/OS 1.7, then obviously it would not work very well under 
z/OS 1.4 (assuming a toleration PTF is not available).
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS product licensing options.

2006-11-08 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:56:16 -0600, McKown, John 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
 Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:55 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: z/OS product licensing options.


  -Original Message-
  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
 
   -Original Message-
   From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
  
   http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/swprice/
 
 
 http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/library/refguides/s
w_pricing.
html

In what seems to be becoming typical of IBM websites, clicking on the
icon to view or download the .pdf document gives page not found.

-jc-

Hum, it worked for me just a few minutes ago. I have the PDF on my PC.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

You might also want to check IBM's OIO: Open Infrastructure Offerings

http://www-03.ibm.com/financing/us/ondemand/offerings/oio.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Java Error

2006-11-02 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
I didn't see right away that you were trying to invoke the 64bit version 
JAVA 1.4. I found this APAR on IBMLINK:  PK24855

ERROR DESCRIPTION:
  java -version when running J9VM displays the following message:
 
  JVMJ9VM023I This may indicate that JAVA_HOME is incorrect, or
  that class libraries are not installed.
  JVMJ9VM015W Initialization error for library jclscar_23(14):
  JVMJ9VM009E J9VMDll Main failed Could not create the Java
  virtual machine.
 
 
  LOCAL FIX:
  Increase your REGION size.  That is, when logon to the tso/e
  logon screen on the size parameter:
  e.g.
  SIZE=200

I tried it on y asnd-box LPAR and I got this error:  Could not create JAVA 
virtual machine. (And I have a 512M reagion size) Take a look at their 
LOCAL fix... It looks like a 2 gig region size to me !!!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Java Error

2006-11-02 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
I use 23 for standard telnet and port 623 for my RLOGINs (OTELNET)
Here are the entries in /etc/services:

telnet  23/tcp 
otelnet 623/tcp 

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:55:13 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:43:51 +0100, Lindy Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Correct me, please, if I am wrong, but if you telnet to port 25 you get to
TSO, but if you rlogin to port 513 you get to USS.  No?


23 is TSO (usually) and whatever you want for z/OS Unix.  I have used
623 most of the time but that has varried at different shops I have
been at.I've also been at a shop that set up 23 for Unix and
something else for TSO.And then there is sercure telnet... but
I digress

So if I wanted to use win-doze my telnet client to IP into z/OS Unix,
I do this from a command prompt:

telnet host_name 623

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - GITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Java Error

2006-11-02 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
I just tried it with MEMLIMIT set to 256M and it worked !!!
(I had MEMLIMIT set to 128M on my sand-box LPAR)   

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:12:32 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:47 -0600, Ramiro Camposagrado wrote:
 I didn't see right away that you were trying to invoke the 64bit version
 JAVA 1.4. I found this APAR on IBMLINK:  PK24855

...
 I tried it on y asnd-box LPAR and I got this error:  Could not create 
JAVA
 virtual machine. (And I have a 512M reagion size) Take a look at their
 LOCAL fix... It looks like a 2 gig region size to me !!!

If it's anything like the 1.5_64, you can't allow MEMLIMIT to default to
0 in SMFPRMxx. Give it something - I think 256 was recommended.
What a pox Java is - in all environments, in all architectures
apparently.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Java Error

2006-11-02 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
My apologies for being so rude !!!
Thank you Shane for pointing out the MEMLIMIT parameter in SMFPRMxx

Regards,
Ramiro

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IP Printway - ANFMSG

2006-10-04 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
Did you initialize the message file ?

Here is sample JCL:

//DELETE   EXEC PGM=IEFBR14   
//MSGDDDD  DSN=STCP.MVS1.ANFMMSG, 
// DISP=(OLD,DELETE)  
//REXXJCL  EXEC PGM=IRXJCL,PARM='ANFMFILE'
//SYSTSPRT DD  SYSOUT=*   
//SYSEXEC  DD  DSN=AOP.SAOPEXEC,DISP=SHR  
//MSGDDDD  DSN=STCP.MVS1.ANFMMSG, 
// DISP=(,CATLG,DELETE),  
// UNIT=DISK,VOL=SER=SHRLB1,SPACE=(CYL,10),
// DCB=(DSORG=PSU,RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=27920)


On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:43:23 -0400, Mike Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Problem when starting BARRFSS1

 IEF403I BARRFSS1 - STARTED - TIME=13.38.36
 IEC024I 337- 4,IGC0005E,BARRFSS1,BARRFSS1, ANFMMSG, 0339, SYS002 ,
ANF.MSGFILE

 ANFM105I An IP PrintWay ESTAI cannot evaluate the system completion

I believe this is a problem with the allocation of the ANF.MSGFILE.

Data Set Name  . . . : ANF.MSGFILE

General Data  Current Allocation
 Volume serial . . . : SYS002  Allocated cylinders : 10
 Device type . . . . : 3390Allocated extents . : 1
 Organization  . . . : PS
 Record format . . . : FB
 Record length . . . : 80
 Block size  . . . . : 27920  Current Utilization
 1st extent cylinders: 10  Used cylinders  . . : 0
 Secondary cylinders : 0   Used extents  . . . : 0

 Creation date . . . : 2006/10/04
 Referenced date . . : 2006/10/04
 Expiration date . . : ***None***
--
Thanks,
Mike

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Question on Infoprint

2006-09-26 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:18:32 -0500, Rick Stetser [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

I have a request to print a document so that it will be oriented 180
degrees from its original orientation.  I've looked around and I don't see
anything in Infoprint that would let me do this.  Does anyone else know if
this is possible to do with this product?  Is there another forum I should
post this question to (if this is not the proper one)?

Thanks in advance,
Rick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

We have HP printers on our shop so we use PCL commands (as part of the 
document header) to specfiy the print attributes. You can use the following 
PCL command sequence to rotate the image 180 degrees: ESCa180P

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMS Problem

2006-09-05 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
You also have to specify  NULLSTORCLAS. 

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:41:44 -0700, willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

I am trying to restore an SMS managed dsn.  I am attempting to bypass the 
ACS because of insufficient space on the volume and I am encountering an 
ADR709E -  DEFINITION NOT FOUND.  I am not sure why.  Do I need to specify 
the STORCLAS or is there something else I need to do?I have not put a 
defined an ouput target (volser).  Could this be my problem?  Here is my 
job:

  //S1EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
//SYSPRINT  DD SYSOUT=*
//TAPE  DD DISP=OLD,DSN=SYSFID.IDMS.V16SP3.CT01.DSSBKP.G0003V00
//*
//SYSIN DD *
  RESTORE   INDD(TAPE) -
DS(INCLUDE(-
SYST1W.IDMS.V16SP3.CTTCW1.**  -
   ))  -
   SPHERE  REPLACE  BYPASSACS(**)





-
Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMS Problem

2006-09-05 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
I meant to say NULLSTORCLAS for non-SMS, otherwise you must assign a 
specific storage class.  


On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:50:35 -0500, Ramiro Camposagrado 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

You also have to specify  NULLSTORCLAS.

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:41:44 -0700, willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

I am trying to restore an SMS managed dsn.  I am attempting to bypass the
ACS because of insufficient space on the volume and I am encountering an
ADR709E -  DEFINITION NOT FOUND.  I am not sure why.  Do I need to specify
the STORCLAS or is there something else I need to do?I have not put a
defined an ouput target (volser).  Could this be my problem?  Here is my
job:

  //S1EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
//SYSPRINT  DD SYSOUT=*
//TAPE  DD DISP=OLD,DSN=SYSFID.IDMS.V16SP3.CT01.DSSBKP.G0003V00
//*
//SYSIN DD *
  RESTORE   INDD(TAPE) -
DS(INCLUDE(-
SYST1W.IDMS.V16SP3.CTTCW1.**  -
   ))  -
   SPHERE  REPLACE  BYPASSACS(**)





-
Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Define Print to JES2

2006-08-14 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:25:55 -0500, Steve Pordash [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Does anybody know how to define a local printer to JES? I can't seem to 
find
the documentation anywhere (I am kind of new to OS390/ZOS).  Any help would
be greatly appreciated.  Thanks to anyone for any help!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Look in the ADD LOCAL PRINTER section of the JES2 commands manual:

$ADD PRT() ..

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Copying ZFS Datasets

2006-08-09 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:51:24 -0500, Brian Peterson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am myself just becoming somewhat familiar with zFS, but one thing I've
stumbled upon is the requirement to specify

aggrgrow=on

in SYS1.PARMLIB(IOEPRM00) so that the ZFS started task will use this
value.  As I understand it, with this option in effect, then zFS will
dynamically take advantage of whatever space you've defined for your zFS
data set by formatting it when needed.  Remember, a zFS data set is simply
a VSAM Linear data set, so standard VSAM rules apply - but without
aggrgrow, zFS won't take advantage of more space as needed.

Brian

On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:40:09 -0400, Gray, Larry wrote:


I have been working with HFS datasets for several years now.  When I
want to increase the size of one (and I can unmount it), I usually
allocate a new HFS dataset with a larger allocation and use FDR to copy
the old into the new, then rename and mount the new dataset.  What is
the normal route to increase the size of a ZFS?

Larry Alan Gray

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

The file must also specify secondary allocations for this option to work.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Batch FTP

2006-08-08 Thread Ramiro Camposagrado
How about using pax to create an archive file. You can then FTP this 
archive file to a remote system. This way you preserve the entire directory
structure, including any sub-directories that may be present.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html