HyperPAV devices (was: PLPA and COMMON PAGESPACE Size)

2007-09-21 Thread TISLER Zaromil

Jim Mulder wrote:

snip 
 It checks to see 
 if you specified WLM PAV when you defined the device in HCD.  Since
 WLM doesn't need to manage PAVs when the control unit has been told
 to use HyperPAV mode, our intention was that the specification of
 WLM PAV in HCD would be irrelevant for HyperPAV devices
snip

Well, that would be irrelevant thing brings me to the following question:

If we want to migrate from PAV to HyperPAV, do we need to change the device 
definitions in the IODF from
 WLMPAV YesDevice supports work load manager
to
 WLMPAV No Device supports work load manager

and our WLM policy from
 Dynamic alias management . . . . . . . . YES  (Yes or No)
to 
 Dynamic alias management . . . . . . . . NO  (Yes or No)?

-- 
Zaromil


Re: ISPF Display eXcluded lines (was: zOS Unix DOS2UNIX)

2007-09-03 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Gil,

 While we're on editor techniques, can I do with ISPF 
 something I've found useful in XEDIT:  momentarily and 
 reversibly display excluded lines.  For example, after doing 
 the analogue of EXCLUDE ALL and a few FINDs, I can do
 
 DISPLAY 0
   ... which displays only the remaining excluded lines
 
 DISPLAY 0 1
   ... which displays all lines, whether excluded or not
 
 DISPLAY 1
   return to displaying only the nonexcluded lines.


You could use FLIP command for DISPLAY 0 / DISPLAY 1. Never tried to
do something like DISPLAY 0 1.

-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z9 DRIVER 67

2007-08-10 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Sam,
snip 
 Where did you see that?  Is this something you ran into using 
 SA/390 or some other product that exploits an interface to the HMC? 
snip

For last few years we have used exclusively GDPS Standard actions to manage
all our z/OS systems/lpars (IPL, stop, reset,...).

An SA/390 command using BCP ii is

   INGHWCMD processor name STATCOM


-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z9 DRIVER 67

2007-08-10 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Sam,

snip
Has anyone else migrated to the z9 microcode level DRIVER 67?   We are
planning on moving to DRIVER67L this weekend.  This is concurrent as we have
all the requisites installed for it to be but seems to be a fairly large
bundle so I curious if anyone has had any problems.
snip

we have problems with BCP internal interface - it is extremely slow now.

-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: HMC - Load type SCSI

2007-08-02 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Radoslaw,

 Regarding document mentioned by Brian (thank you BTW): this document is
*very* interesting, but it describes technical details of IPL, but not how
can I have it enabled, or why I don't have it.

Redbook Linux for zSeries: Fibre Channel Protocol Implementation Guide
^URL: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246344.pdf 

snip
3.2 Enabling the SCSI IPL feature
To IPL Linux from an SCSI attached disk (either from VM or in an LPAR), the
SCSI IPL feature (FC 9904) must be installed. When FC 9904 is active, Linux
images on zSeries are enabled to perform IPL from FCP-attached SCSI disks.
z/VM 4.4 is a prerequisite to IPL Linux under z/VM. Installation of the SCSI
IPL
feature is non-disruptive on the z800, z900, and z990. However, a power-on
reset (POR) is required to enable it.

When installing the SCSI IPL feature, ensure that the Enable SCSI IPL check
box is marked as shown in Figure 3-2. From the Reset profile, select the
Options
tab.
snip

and (more or less stating the same)

VM63348: NEW FUNCTION - GUEST IPL FROM SCSI ENABLEMENT
URL: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1VM63348 

snip
NOTE:
For 2064/2066 only:
A microcode upgrade is required to support Guest IPL from SCSI.
When installing the upgrade be sure that the Enable SCSI IPL
checkbox is selected on the IML Options panel.  If the checkbox
is not selected to enable SCSI IPL, VM will display the
following message whenever a Guest IPL command is issued:
HCPLDI2813E CP is running on a processor or in a mode that
does not support Guest IPL from SCSI disks.
For 2084
 An upgrade is also necessary but the feature is automatically
enabled. There is no checkbox to select.
  For specific details see page 5-16 of the Support
Element Operations Guide Version 1.7.3 (SC28-6818-02)
available via Resource Link
snip

-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FW: Deleted PDS - K - kg - Kg

2007-07-27 Thread TISLER Zaromil
--snip--
 Usually they mean binary kilo and mega, although it is not proper in 
 aspect of IS standard. However this is different story: for example 
 every RAM manufacturer use MB and GB instead of correct MiB and GiB.

Probably because the i qualifier is relatively recent?  I do remember
Seagate and others using decimal capacities because it made their disks
appear bigger (e.g., 65K tracks rather than 64K).
--snip--


I would say that it is still so (the 160GB Samsung disk I bought has about
149 GiB capacity) and have never thought of it made their disks appear
bigger as a reason. Isn't that so because disk capacity is not base 2 (i.e.
base 1024) dependent?


--snip--
 BTW: In Europe we *say* kilo as abbreviation of kilogram, but we
 *write* it properly: kg, so assumption about kilograms is bad shot.

Perhaps in your neck of the woods, but I spent fourteen years in Austria and
saw plenty of stores with prices with just a K. And technically, it should
be Kg, not kg, because the convention is to capitalize multiplicative
prefixes.
--snip--


K instead of kg:  prices written manually with a chalk on small paper or
wooden surfaces? Or maybe it is normal to me and I just did/do not perceived
that? 

And I don't know what technically means in this context, but it is kg:

URL: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html 

The smallest capitalized prefix is M for mega:

URL: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/prefixes.html 

Binary multiplicative prefixes are all capitalized.


-- 
Zaromil



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Dynamically Disabling ISV Products

2007-06-28 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
You may be right. Someone elses post(after mine) said a search with 1 space
yielded the same results as 2 spaces, so it appears the blanks may be
getting eliminated.
snip


Not only mainframes have documentation - there is a help for each input
field and it is just a click away:


Help for String
Enter the string you are searching for.

To search for messages about John Kennedy, simply type John Kennedy in the
search box. This will show all the messages that contain the words John
and Kennedy close to each other. 
other possibilities snipped

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Job Stream via FTP

2007-06-12 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Gil,

snip
And, ironically, from a z/OS client:

EZA1701I  SITE filetype=jes
502 SITE command not implemented.
snip

I have never seen this (it has worked on MVS, OS/390,and works on z/OS 1.8):

site filetype=jes
 SITE filetype=jes
200 SITE command was accepted

Isn't the message you get an answer from the FTP server you logged on (maybe
an Unix and not z/OS FTP server)?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Job Stream via FTP

2007-06-12 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 Apparently z/OS treats SITE as quote SITE.

According to RFC959 (4.1.3) SITE is an FTP service command. So only
clients not having SITE command implemented have to use 'quote SITE'
form. You have to use the quote command to forward the whole command
string to server.
Compare the replies to
   help site
and
   quote help site
for a client that supports SITE (z/OS or Solaris, according to your
example).

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Job Stream via FTP

2007-06-12 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 Paul
 
 It's now a bit of a puzzle how you got your copy and paste from the z/OS
client.

Solaris (or some other Unix) FTP server, saying that filetype=jes command
is not implemented or not allowed there?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ISPF list data set attributes?

2007-05-31 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
I just tried to print a data set list from ISRUDLP Data Set List Utility.
I got:

.---
--.
| The listing of data sets was placed in the ISPF list data set. Lines have
|
| been wrapped because the logical record length is less than 127 for RECFM
F |
| or 131 for RECFM V.
|
'---
--'

o There's no code associated with this message.  Is it supposed to
  be self-explanatory?  I know the modal reaction of this group
  to self-explanatory messages.  Or do I need to choose an option
  to display the code?

snip

To see the message ids, go to 
Settings -- Identifier -- Message Identifier

.-- ISPF Settings --.
|Message Identifier |
|   |
| Enter / to select option| 
| /  Display message identifier |
|   |
| Default setting for message identifier|
| 2  1. Off |
|2. On  |
|   |
|   |
.---.

and you'll get 

.---
-.
| ISRU342A The listing of data sets was placed in the ISPF list data set.
|
| Lines have been wrapped because the logical record length is less than 127
|
| for RECFM F or 131 for RECFM V.
|
.---
-.

According to z/OS V1R8.0 ISPF Messages and Codes
URL:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ISPZMC50/SPTWQ820
:

2.2414 ISRU342A




   ISRU342A The listing of data sets was placed in the ISPF list data set.
  Lines have been wrapped because the logical record length is less
  than 127 for RECFM F or 131 for RECFM V.


Explanation: This is an informational message. The option 3.4 SAVE command
was successfully processed and the requested information has been written to
the ISPF list data set but has been wrapped. 

User Response: Use option 0 - List data set characteristics - to increase
the logical record length. 

System Programmer Response: Increase the value of the
LIST_LOGICAL_RECORD_LENGTH configuration table keyword. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DISP=(MOD,DELETE)

2007-05-23 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Paul,

snip
The JCL fragment:

//STEP EXEC  PGM=IEFBR14
//*
//SYSUT1DD   DSN=user.FOO.BAR.SMPLOG,DISP=(MOD,KEEP),
//   VOL=SER=TSO026,
//UNIT=SYSALLDA

where 'user.FOO.BAR.SMPLOG' does not pre-exist on the volume produces
allocation messages:

IEF236I ALLOC. FOR MODKEEP STEP   
IEF237I 3ECA ALLOCATED TO SYSUT1  
IEF142I MODKEEP STEP - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE  
IEF285I   user.FOO.BAR.SMPLOG  KEPT   
IEF285I   VOL SER NOS= TSO026.
IEF373I STEP/STEP/START 2007142.1554  

... but VTOC listing does not show the data set.  As I read the  12.19.11
Summary of Disposition Processing in the JCL RM, I believe it should be
kept. 
snip


according to 12.19 DISP Parameter in the JCL RM (z/OS 1.8):


If the system obtains unit and volume information for an OLD, MOD, or SHR
status, the data set is treated as if it exists, whether or not it is
physically on the device. 


and the 4.6.2.1.8 Disposition Processing of Data Sets that Do Not Exist in
the JCL UG (z/OS 1.8) says:


When VOLUME and UNIT Are Coded: When you code VOLUME and UNIT on the DD
statement, a JCL error will occur if the problem program attempts to open
the data set. Otherwise, the data set disposition depends on the DISP normal
termination disposition: 


When the normal termination disposition is KEEP, the job log will show that
the data set was kept. 


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Sysplex timer

2007-03-29 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Victor,

snip
Yesterday we tried to synchronize our Sysplex Timers with an ETS, but we
couldn't get it. My problem is I didn't find any manuals with help. It shows
an error window, but I don't know where to look for information about it.
Could you tell me where can I look for?
snip


have you seen the IBM Techdocs Flash 10561:
IBM 9037 Sysplex Timer - External Time Source Problems
URL:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH10561 

 revised on 19.03.2007:

with the following
--
Abstract: Problems getting an ETS External Time Source (not modem) to go
operational may be due to the format of the time data being transmitted
to the 9037 by the time code receiver/generator. The 9037 accepts three
specific formats from External Time Sources (time code receiver/generator).
These formats are described in the Maintenance Information for the 9037
Model 2 Sysplex Timer, SY27-2641-02. When an ETS problem is discovered,
ensure that the ETS device being used adheres to the correct structure that
you have configured on your 9037.
--

and more details later in the text?

-- 
Zaromil


P.S. I sent this mail through ibm-main web interface and got the answer:

Your posting  to the IBM-MAIN list  has been rejected because  it only
contains
material  in  a format  disallowed  by  the  list  configuration. The  list
is
configured to remove unwanted material and process the remaining text;
however,
in  this case,  there  would  be nothing  left  after  removing the
disallowed
material. You may  want to resend your  message in plain text,  which is
always
allowed.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Who uses IEE899I for Automation?

2007-03-14 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
I'm pretty sure the AO folks use it if there is a buffer shortage.
They parse the output to see what console has the shortage and change
it to roll mode or perhaps even VARY it OFFLINE.

If any console gets more that 200 messages, automation does a K
Q,L=consid to remove them.

Won't the Message Flooding SPE (OA17514) take care of this problem?
snip

I don't believe it can solve problems in the situations described in the
MVS Planning: Operations:

snip
Recovery Actions for a WTO Buffer Shortage
1. Determine why the buffers are full and correct the problem. Possible
reasons are:

* A console is not ready because: 
- An I/O error occurred. 
- One or more consoles have a slow roll time. 
- The console is in roll deletable (RD) mode but the screen is filled with
action messages.

* The buffer limit is too low to handle the message traffic in the system.
Either the MLIM value in the CONSOLxx parmlib member is too low, or the
system default is not sufficient.
snip

I've also seen consoles in the held mode causing WTO buffer shortage.

-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Where is the NED set

2007-03-13 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
But the configuration data (NED et al.) is stored in a control block that
has not been publicly documented.  I believe that it, too, can be displayed
by an operator command.  If an in-storage NED is hosed, a vary online or
reIPL may be necessary.  Also a PTF may need to be applied.
snip

As I understand it, last four digits in SCP DEVICE NED identify CU logical
address and device UA. Are the good and bad device in the same logical CU?
 
What does the DEVSERV QDASD command returns for both devices? Are the
SCU-SERIAL and DEVICE-SERIAL the same in both cases or you see the anomaly
there too?

Have you tried the VALIDATE parameter of the DEVSERV command (I don't know
if it can help, we used it when moving to new devices without an IPL):
   DS QDASD,bad dev,validate

--
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CDIMG format?

2007-03-07 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
Thanks. They are __supposed__ to be ISO9660 filesystems that can be
burned. I say __supposed__ to be because they are somehow corrupt.
That's why my software (k3b to be exact) didn't like them.
snip

Have you tried to mount them as loop devices, something like

  mount -t iso9660 -o loop /path/to/image.iso /mnt/isoimage?

-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Print Dataset List with Last Date Referred

2007-03-01 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
in 1.7 with pdf3.4, the dsn list does have the reference date. the problem 
may be the spflist lrecl going to 121 and truncating the last few fields.
snip

Look in ISPF Services Guide for
  LMDLIST ... STATS(YES) ... === variable ZDLRDATE

or TSO/E REXX Reference

  LISTDSI ... === variable SYSREFDATE

-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRSMAIN question

2007-01-31 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
 Once you're in gzip you can decompress it on a PC I'm sure.
 
 Oh - you might have to pipe it through iconv to get it into ASCII / 
 Unicode before zipping it.

Thanks for the idea. It may be easier than trying to reverse engineer
TRSMAIN. Assuming that I had the talent to do so and it is not forbidden
by IBM.
- snip -

What about infozip URL: www.info-zip.org ?

Knowing nothing about RACF IRRADU00 reformatted records, a question:

Is it possible to transfer less data using DFSORT/ICETOOL to extract what
you need or even to found the problematic records (or the number of them)?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Interrupting DSLIST [resent with the correct Reply To]

2007-01-12 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
Of course most TSO users now have keyboards with SysRq, Scroll Lock,
and Pause/Break keys wasting space on their PCs.

Do they get used at all?
snip

We use Pause/Break key as Clear key.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: moving files with file extensions from windows to mainframe

2006-12-14 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
If I have a windows directory containing hundreds of files that all have the
same file extension eg filname.DEF,  how can I drop the file extension and
get them into a pds on the mainframe.
- snip -

What about:

1. step
  DOS command:
  rename *.DEF *.


2. step
 ftp with 
 mput *

-- 
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMS question - sharing DASD but not SMS environment

2006-09-20 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
We want to share a few DASD among our four Lpars and have SMS 
doing allocation.  Each Lpar runs z/OS as a monoplex seperate 
from the others.  Two are 1.4 and two are 1.7 right now.  
We do not have any kind of sysplex.  Nor do we have an SMSplex, 
whatever that is. 

We would update SMS rules in every Lpar to indicate these 
volsers in an SMS storage group and set up storageclass, dataclass 
 mgmtclass.  Each high level qualifier would be setup in every 
Lpar's master catalog using an  existing ucat on a non-SMS dasd 
that is online to all lpars.

Would SMS for lpar-P get confused if SMS for lpar-D was allocating 
a file on those dasd at the same time she was?  Does SMS from one 
lpar need to know what SMS from the other lpar is doing?
snip


Our example:
- sysplex A (production) with 5 systems z/OS 1.7, GRS star
- sysplex B (test) with 1 system z/OS 1.7, GRS star

The volumes used to transfer data from sysplex A to sysplex B are SMS
managed, defined in both SMSes.

Allocation of  datasets containing data to be transfered is possible only in
the sysplex A (source). In the sysplex B (test) shared volumes are defined
with DISABLENEW attribute, so it is not possible to allocate them. The
usercatalog is on one of the shared volumes (SMS managed).

It works like this for some years now. 

If you want to be able to transfer data in different directions, you could
control the allocation the way we do, or using security definitions, or ASC
routines.


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Is it possible to prevent a structure into a particular CF (C oupling Facility)?

2006-09-13 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Jan,

snip
Site-2 the recovery site with the PPRC-ed disks  with the controlling K-sys
(The advantage of this is that the Controlling system will continue to be
available even if a disaster takes down the whole production site.).
snip


I would say you also need alternate couple datasets to be in the site-2 if
you want your K-sys to survive a failure in the site-1.


snip
Q2.
We are not that sure at all that we are able to keep our (production)
structures at the site-1 CFs with PREFLIST   ENFORCEORDER(YES).
For example, what happens  with a duplexed structure (at production Site-1)
when one of the site-1 CFs  goes down?
snip


I have no experience with this, we had got rid of the third CF long before
structure duplexing was available. 

But maybe an assymetrical connectivity could solve your problems: 
If you don't go to use the site-2 CF in the production with systems running
in the site-1, you could connect it to site-2 only (k-system and backup
systems). In that case only the structures used by k-system running alone
could be allocated / rebuilded into site-2 CF.

(Well, that is a theory. I've not seen it in praxis.)

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Is it possible to prevent a structure into a particular CF (C oupling Facility)?

2006-09-12 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
Re. Paolo Cacciari saying:
Obviously, I assume that your Data Centers are not involved in a Dispersed
Parallel Sysplex.

It *IS* about a GDPS config, Paolo, 
with the K-sys controlling system in the C/R site.
snip


What kind of D/R you want to have?

What do you plan for the case that you have disk problems only? You move all
your systems to the site-2 after recovering the secondary volumes or you
want to be able to use the secondary volumes running the systems in the
site-1?

The way I understand Paolo's question is:
you don't plan to disperse the application systems over both sites, some of
htem running in the site-1, the others in the site-2?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ftp time problem

2006-09-11 Thread TISLER Zaromil
skip
The STDENV dataset (which has to be a RECFM=VB and possibly LRECL=256).  I 
support a number of systems which are country specific but share the same 
configuration files so I decided to use an MVS symbol for TZ.  The symbols 
correspond to the military/aviation timezone codes for Central European 
Time (A) and Greenwich Mean Time (Z).

The FTPA member contains the following:

_BPX_JOBNAME=FTPD  
TZ=CET-1CEST,M3.5.0/01:00,M10.5.0/02:00

skip

I would expect the (A) to contain the following in the second line:
  TZ=CET-1CEST,M3.5.0/02:00,M10.5.0/03:00

--
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Is it possible to prevent a structure into a particular CF (C oupl ing Facility)?

2006-09-11 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
You answered yourself. PREFLIST.
In case of further investigation: you can have multiple CFRM policies 
with different PREFLISTs.
snip

Assuming it is a GRS star:
if he loses site1 with a CFRM policy without a site2 CF, he loses the
controlling system, too. That is surely a disadvantage.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Data set ENQueues and DEQueues in Jobs

2006-08-03 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
Are you sure that a single volume can't be known by two different
names?  Consider: surely it's possible to rename a volume (the
verb clip comes to mind).  Can one system dismount and rename
a volume while it remains mounted on another system, then
remount it by the new name while the other system still knows
it by the old name?
- snip -

Oh yes. Just replace dismount and remount with vary offline and vary
online respectively.

Zaromil


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Looking For A Search Engine

2006-06-29 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Some time ago I made some changes in a rexx I found on the CBT tape (I'm
sorry not to know the author's name). It searches for a given string in all
datasets that match a given dataset name pattern and/or allocated on volumes
that match a given volser pattern. I use this JCL:


//T1AI$RCG JOB (CA-IT,50150,36110),'BSM: Tisler',CLASS=Y,
// MSGCLASS=Q,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),NOTIFY=SYSUID
//* -
//STEP010 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT1A,
// PARM='ISPF CMD(%FINDSRCL)',
// TIME=1440
//STEPLIB  DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.REXX.SEAGLMD
//ISPPROF  DD  LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=0,RECFM=FB,DSORG=PO,
// DISP=(,DELETE),
// SPACE=(TRK,(1,1,4))
//ISPMLIB  DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISP.SISPMENU
// DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISF.SISFMLIB
//ISPPLIB  DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISP.SISPPENU
// DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISF.SISFPLIB
//ISPSLIB  DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISP.SISPSENU
// DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISP.SISPSLIB
//ISPTLIB  DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISP.SISPTENU
// DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=ISF.SISFTLIB
//SYSEXEC  DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=myuserid.REXX.CEXEC
//SYSTSIN  DD  *
sx03
2
xr%8%% sys1.**
/*
//SYSTSPRT DD  SYSOUT=*
//
3
sys1.p*r*lib*.**
//*
sys4.p*r*lib
//*
ISP.V1R2M3
---


to execute the rexx procedure (there could be problems with ! instead of
|): 



/* - Rexx - */
/* Function   : Search for a string in PO, PO-E, PS data sets   */
/*  using ISRSUPC (SearchFor ISPF utility)  */
/*  with following parameters:  */
/*   SRCHCMP  - search (??) */
/*   ANYC - any case*/
/*   NOSUMS   - no summary listing section  */
/*   LMTO - list group member totals only   */
/*  */
 
Version = 0.02.01 / 19.01.2005
say
say 'Search for a string, version' Version
say
 
/*  */
/* This rexx looks for a string depending upon given volume or  */
/* data set pattern. It uses ISPF LM utilities. */
/*  */
/* LMDLIST is used to fetch all the dataset getting qualified for   */
/* given input. */
/* LMMLIST is used for getting all the members of a partitioned */
/* dataset. */
/*  */
/* It takes a string and 'pattern of dataset or volume' as input*/
/* and lists all datasets matching the pattern or given volume. If  */
/* organisation of a dataset is 'PO' it list all the members and*/
/* find given string in them . It searches all sequential and   */
/* partitioned data set matching a given pattern or volume. */
/*  */
/* Dataset pattern can be given like userid.*.* or anyname.p*.q**/
/*  */
/* The following data sets will be searched:*/
/*  */
/*   PS, PDS, PDSE dataset organization and */
/*   F, FB, FBA, V, VB, VBA record format   */
/*  */
/*  */
 
/*  */
/* Initialization of variables  */
/*  */
 
String = ''
VolName = ''
DSName = ''
 
SAY ' --'
SAY ' This rexx searches for a given string in all PS, PO, AND PO-E data'
SAY ' sets matching a given data set name pattern and/or residing on the'
SAY ' volumes matching a given volser pattern.'
SAY ' --'
SAY ' '
 
SAY 'Enter the string to be searched for (without quotes)'
PULL String
 
SAY ' '
SAY 'Please enter one of the following:'
SAY '  1 - search all data set(s) on volume(s)'
SAY '  2 - search data set(s) on volume(s)'
SAY '  3 - search data set(s)'
SAY '  4 - quit'
PARSE PULL Option
SAY ' '
 
StartTime = sysvar('SYSCPU')
call time('R')
 
/*  */
/*  Get search parameters   */
/*  */
 
  SELECT
WHEN Option = 1 THEN DO
  SAY 'Search volume(s)'
  PARSE PULL VolName
  SAY 'Searching 'VolName''
   IF VolName 

Re: MPF message suppression

2006-06-09 Thread TISLER Zaromil
A few years ago we conseidered implementing a message-flooding prevention
table. We have never used it, but maybe it could be interesting for you.


z/OS V1R7.0 Comm Svr: SNA Resource Definition Reference
URL:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/F1A1B650/5.7?DT=2
0050720144034 

5.7 Message-flooding prevention table

The message-flooding prevention facility identifies and suppresses duplicate
messages that are issued in rapid succession. This reduces the possibility
of duplicate messages flooding the operator console and concealing critical
information. VTAM bases its suppression on the time interval since the
message was last issued and on the similarity of variable text in the
original and subsequent message. 

For each candidate message, the message-flooding prevention table contains
the criteria that must be met before VTAM suppresses duplicate messages and
whether suppressed messages are sent to the hardcopy log. The suppression
criteria include the amount of time between the original and subsequent
messages, and an indication of which variable text fields are to be
compared. If the message is reissued within the specified time interval and
the specified variable text fields contain the same information, VTAM
suppresses the message

etc.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FTP Translate parm

2006-05-12 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
 //STEP0010 EXEC PGM=FTP,
// PARM='( EXIT TRACE TRANS PECTAPP.BLVTOBSP.TCPXLBIN'

EZA1451E Cannot load translate table specified by
TRANSLATE parameter PECTAPP.BLVTOBSP.TCPXLBIN
CX0278 main: Exit with error: 14

 File DOES exist, it is in the correct format. I
works with other FTP(LOCSITE SBD) commands.
- snip -


I haven't used it for years, but I believe you must not specify the whole
name.

According to manual SC31-8780-05
URL:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/F1A1B950/3.2?SHEL
F=F1A1BK61DT=20050708142126


-
TRANslate data_set_name 
Specifies the data set name of a nonstandard translation table. If you
specify this parameter, FTP uses the translation table in the
user_id.data_set_name.TCPXLBIN data set, rather than the standard
translation table provided with TCP/IP (hlq.STANDARD.TCPXLBIN). The
hlq.STANDARD.TCPXLBIN data set is never used if you specify the TRANSLATE
parameter. 
If user_id.data_set_name.TCPXLBIN does not exist, FTP uses
hlq.data_set_name.TCPXLBIN. If neither data set exists, or if they were
incorrectly created, FTP ends with an error message. 

Since the TRANslate parameter also dictates the search order for DBCS
translation tables, you might wish to use a customized DBCS translation
table but not require a modified SBCS translation table. If this is the
case, copy hlq.STANDARD.TCPXLBIN into the nonstandard TCPXLBIN translation
table data set to ensure FTP will start. 
-



I believe it is only the data_set_name part that you need to specify.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Help : FTP A PDS

2006-05-04 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
C:\FTP 12.34.56.78   [or whatever your mainframe's IP address or URL is]

Host name, not URL. FTP will not be able to parse a URL.
- snip -


I am not sure if I have tried FTP with URL instead of host name, but linux
FTP clients (ftp, lftp, ncftp), default Windows 2000 FTP, and z/OS 1.7 FTP
allow the use of URLs ( just checked again the last two). In Windows

 H:\ftp 192.168.243.49

and in z/OS
 TSO FTP 192.168.243.49

both establish a connection.

Help / man page states host and not host name.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Help : FTP A PDS

2006-05-04 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Shmuel,

 That's nice, but 192.168.243.49 is not a URL.

Sorry and thank you for correcting me.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Help : FTP A PDS

2006-05-03 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
C:\FTP 12.34.56.78   [or whatever your mainframe's IP address or URL is]
userid
password
lcd whatever Windows folder you want to put the members in
cd my.PDS.name
mget *
[hit enter for every prompt - alternatively use the prompt command first to
turn off prompting]
- snip -

You can also disable the prompting during mget starting the FTP transfer if
you enter the following command:
   ftp -i 12.34.56.78

To see more FTP-client options and their descriptions enter
   ftp --help 

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Adding LPARs without POR

2006-04-27 Thread TISLER Zaromil
I don't understand two things:

1. Who needs hundreds of linux servers on a single IFL, even if it is
possible?

2. Inactive partitions allocate no physical memory, but if I want to
activate them I must have memory available to accomodate their needs. That
means I must have the capacity although the lpars are still inactive. So,
indirectly they do eat memory.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Adding LPARs without POR

2006-04-27 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 No, until they need the memory, you can give it to other LPARs.

We haven't reconfigured the storage element offline in an active lpar for a
long time, but years ago we had a need once and it did not work, because
that was a CICS allocated storage and stopping it was the same as IPL.

 Alternatively you can add memory concurrently before activating the new
LPARs.

I don't believe there are many fans of it here.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: dynamic PAV

2006-04-05 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
 In the initial setup we defined in HCD base (3390B) and alias 
(3390A) volumes with wlmpav=yes (for the aliases). 
- snip -

Do you have WLMPAV=YES for the base volumes, too?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Barbaras (mini-)rant

2006-03-29 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
I'm with Jim on this. I was a contractor in the mid to late '90's and came
across the early TCPIP stack, written in PASCAL and ported from VM. As I
recall it performed OK, and had some quite advanced features like VIPA
which was the subject of another recent thread.
- snip -

I installed TCPIP 2.2 or 2.2.1 in November 1992. It was written in
PASCAL(/VS?), there were two subsystems: TNF and VMCF (virtual machine
communication? facility) because it was a port from VM. Dataset names were
hardcoded, so I had problems with our dataset naming standards, messages had
no message ids. Somehow I do not remember VIPA at that time, I think it came
in 3.3 or 3.4. I believe to remember it was possible to change the MAC
address on the 3172.

In the release 3.1 or 3.2 there were two FTP servers, one written in C and
one in PASCAL(/VS?).

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SSL Certificate Signing

2006-03-20 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
So I had them redo the request and I made sure to FTP it back to z/OS in
ascii mode. I still get the same error.
- snip -

Why ascii?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Enhanced Catalog Sharing

2006-03-20 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 What is the gain or the advantage of using ECS.

From an old redbook (Enhanced Catalog Sharing and Management, SG24-5594-00,
July 1999):

---
When CAS opens an eligible catalog and the system is in catalog sharing
mode, as described in Activating ECS on page 18, the integrity VVR is
copied into the Coupling Facility structure. Once this occurs, the systems
that share the catalog do not have to read the VVR to detect change, as they
will receive notification from the Coupling Facility. Also, the requirement
to ENQ on the resource is removed because the Coupling Facility architecture
incorporates the necessary locking.
---

and

---
This is an elegant solution to the performance issues. The elapsed time is
reduced because GRS is no longer used, and the number of I/Os is reduced
because the VVR does not have to be read. Also, the new function fits
smoothly alongside the existing reliable and robust code, which will still
be used for non-ECS catalogs. Non-ECS catalogs are now described as being in
VVDS mode, which indicates that the VVR is being read from the VVDS.

In the rare circumstance of a connectivity or Coupling Facility structure
failure, the ECS catalogs will revert to VVDS mode, allowing the integrity
of the catalogs to be maintained across such a failure.
---

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Accessing The Archives

2006-03-16 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Darren wrote:

 That problem has been rectified.

Thank you, Darren.

Sam wrote:

 You can also search them through the Google Groups Archive

http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djqas_ugroup=bit.listserv.ibm-main 

Thank you, Sam. Using the mailing list exclusively, I just forget the
possibility to check the news group.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CF usage at DR location

2006-03-16 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
I have a full test this weekend, so hopefully will have some of this ironed
out. I am going with a newly formatted CFRM dataset and retaining all the
other COUPLE datasets.

If I use a new CFRM dataset, where is the CF policy information stored? I
was thinking it was stored in the XCF COUPLE dataset as how would z/OS know
how to format the CFRM dataset when coming up? I hope to come up in the new
environment and the structures are re-created in the new CF, but all other
COUPLE datasets are intact, e.g. DASD Logger files will retain their state.
- snip -

Why wait? If you want to use a newly created CFRM couple dataset, allocate
it on a mirrored volume, write the policy you want into it, and that should
be it. Just don't use it before the test.

But, if you are already testing, you could first try to IPL with the old
CFRM couple dataset, having a policy with all CFs in it. If it does not
work, take the new CFRM dataset.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Info-ZIP and blksize

2006-03-16 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Last few days I used Info-ZIP quite a lot (z/OS 1.6 and 1.7). The problem I
have is that the blocksize of zipped files equals 80, so the zipped files
need a lot of space. E.g.

  adding:  'N500223/D#060301/CHAN#IOQ/RMF#BC01.TXT' (in=5893937)
(out=523379) (deflated 91%)
total bytes=5893937, compressed=523379 - 91% savings

and the dataset allocations:

Command - Enter / to select action  Tracks %Used
--
 N500223.D#060301.CHAN#IOQ.RMF#BC01.TXT  120   90
 N500223.D#060301.CHAN#IOQ.ZIP#BC01   90   93

Is there any possibility to influence the block size (without modifying the
code)?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Accessing The Archives

2006-03-15 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 Read the trailer inserted by the list serve!

I have problems when searching the archives today.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CF usage at DR location

2006-03-14 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
We were early users of XRC circa 1998. In our first few tests, we had 
lingering problems because, with mirrored CFRM data set, the newly IPLed 
systems could never get over the loss of the two CFs left back in the 
smoking hole. They were convinced that some magic would bring the lost CFs 
back to life. I put the problem to Curt Jews at SHARE--in SCIDS of 
course--and he recommended *not* to mirror the CFRM data set. Voila.

The crux is to IPL the first system with an empty, freshly formatted CFRM 
data set. There is now no trace of the lost CFs ever having been in use. 
- snip -

I remember a lot of problems in case of a failing CF or migration to new
CF(s) in the 90's. But, the functionality is much better now.

Recently we moved a sysplex from 2084 to 2094 (four systems and two ICFs on
the same CEC). We did not use a freshly formatted CFRM couple dataset.
Instead, before the upgrade we activated a new CFRM policy, the old policy
containing CFs CFOLD1 and CFOLD2 and the new policy containing CFs CFOLD1
and CFNEW2. After the successfull upgrade we activated the actual CFRM
policy, containing CFs CFNEW1 and CFNEW2. That worked without problems and
we had a failback possibility all the time. And as you wrote, there is now
no trace of the lost CFs ever having been in use.

Neither we used freshy formatted (new) XCF couple datasets nor freshly
formatted (new) CFRM couple datasets.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: HDS backup process

2006-03-10 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Ron,

 Are you using the BCM (Business Continuity Manager) Host software, or the
archaic PPRC commands?

As a GDPS PPRC site I believe we are stuck to PPRC commands.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: newbie qdasd question

2006-03-09 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
when I issue the console command DS QDASD,5B00 I receive the following
output:

RESPONSE=MJR0
 IEE459I 14.41.05 DEVSERV QDASD 452
 UNIT VOLSER SCUTYPE DEVTYPE   CYL  SSID SCU-SERIAL DEV-SERIAL EF-CHK
 5B00 $X5B00 2107921 2107900  3339  A014 0175-BNCZ1 0175-BNCZ1 RDFEAT?
   1 DEVICE(S) MET THE SELECTION CRITERIA
   1 DEVICE(S) FAILED EXTENDED FUNCTION CHECKING


Can you please explain me what 'RDEFEAT?' does mean?
- snip -


I don't know, but I suppose it hase something to do with features of the
box. In our case in the last column I see
   EF-CHK
   **OK**

If you try
   DS QDASD,5B00,rdfeats
do you get
   FEATURE CODES AT V
followed by an 8 rows x 4 columns with four doublewords per column, all that
after the output you already sent?


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: HDS backup process

2006-03-09 Thread TISLER Zaromil
This thread has begun with a PPRCopy question. I am not sure if this two
parts of Bruce' mails (not to cite John and Ron) talk about PPRC (Truecopy)
or Flashcopy (Shadowimage). I wasn't able to see any of these features in
our z/OS 1.7 PPRC environment using HDS 9980.

- snip -
You don't need to lose the relationship to do the backup.  You probably 
want to backup a point-in-time copy of the volumes, so you can just 
SUSPEND the PPRC relationship.  This freezes the copy and makes it 
read/write so you can relabel (CLIP) it.  After the backup, you can 
RESYNC the PPRC copy, which just copies tracks updated since the SUSPEND. 
- snip -

Supposing we do it in a z/OS 1.7 system I don't understand how is it
possible to clip the secondary volume. I get the info about the device being
a PPRC secondary device. Even if I take the primary volume offline, I get
the same kind of message if I try to take the secondary volume online.


Bruce wrote:
- snip -
I believe that RESYNC will copy any tracks which have been modified on 
the source OR target.
- snip -

The other thing that I don't understand:
To be able to write on the secondary volume, I suppose I have to use
CDELPAIR or at least CRECOVER. If I use CDELPAIR, I can not RESYNC anymore.
If I use CRECOVER the secondary volume switches in the SIMPLEX status, so
how comes its bitmap is updated?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CF usage at DR location

2006-03-07 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
as I wrote, you actually CAN mantain your CFRM couple datasets, with your
policy, provided that your policy comprises both primary and DR CF; what you
need to have for DR purposes only, is an empty and initialized XCF COUPLE
dataset (easy to do once and to forget) and a PARMLIB COUPLExx member,
to be used in DR situations.


...snip ...
I was hoping to use the existing COUPLE dataset and the existing policy.
Since these datasets will be PPRC mirrored I was hoping to find a way to
not maintain 2 separate policy definitions so that the day-to-day policy
definitions would be automatically used at the DR location.
...snip ...
- snip -

You could try the following:

If you do not mirror the primary XCF couple dataset you could dedicate a
volume for it and use the same dataset name and volser in the DR site (the
volume - and so the primary XCF dataset - is not mirrored). That way you can
use even the same COUPLExx.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CF usage at DR location

2006-03-07 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
these datasets will be PPRC mirrored

One of the two sets of datasets IBM recommends to not mirror is the CDS set.
The other is PAGE.

I have another set that I never mirror'd: SCRATCH.

The overhead of synchronous mirroring kills the first two, for sure.
- snip -

The GDPS hyperswap is impossible without mirroring the PAGE datasets.

We don't mirror couple datasets (we are GDPS environment), but mirroring the
LOGR couple datasets is a must if you want to have the information about the
logger staging datasets.

As I understand it, the reason not to mirror the couple datasets (XCF couple
dataset in the first place) is the possibility of freeze on the primaries.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: HDS backup process

2006-03-01 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
I was told that in order to do this the secondary volume labels' must be
clipped before I can bring them online but by clipping them I also loose the
primary-secondary volume relationships.  Besides using another lpar or other
3rd party utilities to run the backups, how does  one handle this situation?
- snip -



From Hitachi Freedom Storage™ Lightning 9900™ V Series Hitachi TrueCopy –
S/390® User and Reference Guide

snip

The RCU does not allow a TC390 R-VOL to be online and rejects all
host-requested read and
write I/O operations for a TC390 R-VOL. The TC390 R-VOLs must be offline
during normal
TC390 operations. Note: TrueCopy – S/390® provides a special R-VOL read
option (see section
2.2.4) which allows read-only access to the R-VOL while the pair is
suspended. If you need
write access to a TC390 R-VOL, you must delete the pair.

2.2.4 R-VOL Read Option

For additional flexibility, TrueCopy – S/390® offers a special R-VOL read
option. The Hitachi
Data Systems representative enables the R-VOL read option on the RCU (mode
20). The
R-VOL read option allows you to read a TC390 R-VOL only while the pair is
suspended, that
is, without having to delete the pair. The RCU will allow you to change only
the VOLSER of
the suspended R-VOL, so that the R-VOL can be online to the same host as the
M-VOL while
the pair is suspended. All other write I/Os will be rejected by the RCU. The
MCU copies the
M-VOL VOLSER back onto the R-VOL when the pair is resumed. When the R-VOL
read option
is not enabled and/or the pair is not suspended, the RCU rejects all read
and write I/Os to a
TC390 R-VOL. Note: If you need write access to an R-VOL, you must delete the
pair.

Note: For 2105 controller emulation, the CSUSPEND command to the R-VOL of a
suspended
TC390 pair will be rejected when the TC390 R-VOL read option is used.

snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: GDPS and DASD Vendors

2006-02-20 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
I thought that Hiperswap was a software only feature ( after all it only
swaps UCB's ) . So i am curious .. why would hardware matter ?
- snip -

I would not say that Hyperswap (GDPS) only swaps UCB's. It must communicate
the hardware to change the mirroring direction at the same time.

I remember we had to wait for new microcode levels to use Hyperswap or at
least some of its new features. E.g. one of the features is (was) changing
the PPRC link direction. The other example was the migration from hw model x
to hw model y (both models from the same vendor).

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Clist problem: character [ is converted to : at output

2006-01-27 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
We've got a problem with clist. The character [ and ] (left and right
square brackets) are stored ok in the dataset (x'AD' and x'BD') but when
clist displays them at terminal they appear as : (colon). This is true even
if the clist displays any dataset with [ or ].
/snip

Non-displayable characters in TSO(?). Output from a rexx exec:

00 01 02 03 37 2D 2E 2F 16 05 25 0B 0C 0D 0E 0F
   :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  : :  :  :
10 11 12 13 3C 3D 32 26 18 19 3F 27 1C 1D 1E 1F
:  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  : :  :    :    :
40 4F 7F 7B 5B 6C 50 7D 4D 5D 5C 4E 6B 60 4B 61
   !#  $  %'  (  )  *  +  ,  -  .  /
F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 7A 5E 4C 7E 6E 6F
0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  :  ;=?
B5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6
:  A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O
D7 D8 D9 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 63 EC FC 5F 6D
P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  :  :  :  ^  _
79 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 91 92 93 94 95 96
:  a  b  c  d  e  f  g  h  i  j  k  l  m  n  o
97 98 99 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 43 BB DC 59 07
p  q  r  s  t  u  v  w  x  y  z  :  :  :  :  :
68 D0 51 42 C0 44 47 48 52 53 54 57 56 58 4A 67
:  ü  :  :  ä  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  Ä  :
71 9C 9E CB 6A CD DB DD DF E0 5A 70 B1 80 BF FF
:  :  :  :  ö  :  :  :  :  Ö  Ü  :  :  :  :  :
45 55 CE DE 49 69 9A 9B AB AF BA B8 B7 AA 8A 8B
:  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :
2B 2C 09 21 28 65 62 64 B4 38 31 34 33 B0 B2 24

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IEASYM override in LOADXX

2005-12-06 Thread TISLER Zaromil
-- snip --

Example:

IEASYM   (00,Z0,L)
NUCLST   Z0
PARMLIB  SYS1.LPLEX.PARMLIB
PARMLIB  SYS1.PARMLIB
PARMLIB  SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB
SYSCAT   CATL00133CCATALOG.LPLEX.MASTER
SYSPARM  (Z0)

*-*
* SL20 SPECIFIC VALUES*
*-*
LPARNAME SL20
IEASYM   (01,Z0,L)
IODF E0 SYS0 LPLEXFPB B0 Y
SYSPARM  (Z0,20)
-- snip --


Your IODF statement is only valid for SL20?


Looking at the description of LOADxx in the MVS Initialization and Tuning
Reference, I don't see a possibility to override a statement. There is no
such combination in the examples.

But, you could try the other way around:


--
NUCLST   Z0
PARMLIB  SYS1.LPLEX.PARMLIB
PARMLIB  SYS1.PARMLIB
PARMLIB  SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB
SYSCAT   CATL00133CCATALOG.LPLEX.MASTER

*-*
* SL20 SPECIFIC VALUES*
*-*
LPARNAME SL20
IEASYM   (01,Z0,L)
IODF E0 SYS0 LPLEXFPB B0 Y
SYSPARM  (Z0,20)

*-*
* General valid (if you have more CECs, repeat this section:  *
*-*
HWNAME   your CEC
IEASYM   (00,Z0,L)
SYSPARM  (Z0)


--


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IEASYM override in LOADXX

2005-12-06 Thread TISLER Zaromil
-- snip --

NUCLST   Z0
PARMLIB  SYS1.LPLEX.PARMLIB
PARMLIB  SYS1.PARMLIB
PARMLIB  SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB
SYSCAT   CATL00133CCATALOG.LPLEX.MASTER

*-*
* SL20 SPECIFIC VALUES*
*-*
LPARNAME SL20
IEASYM   (01,Z0,L)
IODF E0 SYS0 LPLEXFPB B0 Y
SYSPARM  (Z0,20)

*-*
* General valid (if you have more CECs, repeat this section:  *
*-*
HWNAME   your CEC
IEASYM   (00,Z0,L)
SYSPARM  (Z0)

-- snip --

I just tested it. It does not work the way I thought it should. Looking
again at the examples, I would say that you can not override statements
defined in an HWNAME section with statements defined in the LPARNAME
section. It looks like you have to define a statement always on the same
level, like if you have 10 lpars on the CPC, you need ten LPARNAME sections
to define IEASYM statement different for a single system (I do not believe I
am going to test this).


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Using symbolic in JCL

2005-12-02 Thread TISLER Zaromil
-- snip --
Different local offsets in the CLOCKxx member. Or somebody does a weird
T CLOCK= command. The TOD clocks must be in sync. But the local times
may differ.
-- snip --

Well, I know that. We don't use it, but I think I have no problems
understanding it.

-- snip --
For the truly strange (like me): Imagine a sysplex where there is a
different z/OS image for every possible time zone in which the company
does business. The users in that time zone are directed to their z/OS
image. This solves the local time issue!
-- snip --

Shouldn't local time be just a representation (like in FTP or mail clients
- you sent your mail at 10:59:58 -0600, it arrived at 18:00:49 +0100); now
let's look at resources shared in a sysplex:

- what time should be written in the operlog?
- what time should be written in the sysplex coupling datasets, logger
coupling datasets?
- what time use HSM or equivalent product for migration/restore/backup?
- what time is used in DB2 logs, CICS logs, assuming DB2 and/or CICS
instances run in images in different timezones?


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Allocated volumes after the power loss in the storage subsyst em

2005-12-01 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 You normally don't see this, but this still does not mean it cannot occur.
Were the devices really offline?

I do not believe they were offline in the system (another thing to check
during the test!), but they were offline in the real world.

 The UCB Online, Alloc, Busy etc. indicators are independent bits, that do
not have a fixed relationship, however z/OS ensures that things happen in a
certain order and so there are combinations of bits that you will probably
never see. However, you are in an abnormal situation, so you might see rare
combinations now. 
 OLTEP e.g. was one application that allocated an offline device and so the
UCB status was really and correctly offline/allocated.

GDPS Hyperswap does it, too.

 Did you try a V xxx,ONLINE as indicated by IOS002A? This should simulate
the I/O interrupt the system is waiting for.

I don't believe anyone has done it. Another thing to check.

Thank you for your input.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Allocated volumes after the power loss in the storage subsyst em

2005-12-01 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Kees,

 are you testing disaster situations

We are a GDPS site, 3 production parallel sysplexes, 2 - 3 sites, PPRC and
Hyperswap, with unplanned Hyperswap in test parallel sysplexes (two of
them). A smaller part of production volumes is not mirrored (customer's
decision).

Because of GPDS we do test outages quite regularly in our test sysplexes,
simulating an outage mostly through generation of messages. The real storage
subsystem outages are quite rare, because we need the help of the vendor's
technician (field engineer?).

In the production there are regular annual disaster tests for a whole site,
but not with power outage (lot of non-mainframe servers could have problems
establishing normal work).

 or did you really have a complete power outage on a storage device and was
the device configured sufficiently redundant and if so, how could this
happen?

There was a UPS problem, it registered(?) anomaly in the electricity and
itself and cut the electricity on the site (that was my understanding). I
came later in and had to do only with the problems on the mainframe side.
The simplex devices (that is, not mirrored) were not critical for the
production (the applications could go on with the half of the capacity). The
only problem was that applications hanged as result of these allocations.
Luckily, it happened in the night, and as the electricity came, we had the
access to all the volumes again - no problems. Well, as Ed Finnell wrote:
when the subsystem gets IML'd (takes forever under normal  circumstances).
Normally, it is a primary GDPS site for one production sysplex, but at the
time that was our secondary site, so we lost only the systems running there.


Actually we had seen this behaviour a few years ago, as we had done a lot of
basic GDPS functionality testing:

I/O intensive job writing to two different volumes on two subsystems, one is
powered off, you get only the IOS002A message, the job is (if I remember
correctly) all the time in in SDSF DA, no CPU-time change, then we
activate the second box, job writes on as nothing happened.

At that time we thought it was a nice feature g.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: REXX Execs to help in String SRCH

2005-12-01 Thread TISLER Zaromil
A few times I had to check the system datasets (or sysres volumes) for a
specific string occurence. I found it very expensive (CPU and elapsed time)
to search a PDS dataset using rexx (allocating every single member as a
sequential dataset). To reduce the number of allocations I called program
ISRSUPC from rexx with

 ADDRESS ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(ISRSUPC) ,
   PARM(SRCHCMP,ANYC,NOSUMS,LMTO)

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Using symbolic in JCL

2005-12-01 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Walt,

-- snip --
Unfortunately, since different systems in a sysplex (or sharing the 
spool) could have very different times and dates, they could get very 
unexpected results if we let those symbols be used in batch job JCL.

Suppose the job converted on a system where the date is today, and ran 
on a system where the date is several days, or weeks, ago.  (The normal 
case is to have them very close, of course.  And the more likely unusual 
case is to have them simply a few hours off.  But nothing requires that 
the dates/times be anywhere close across systems, that I know of.)
-- snip --

According to Setting Up a Sysplex:

Similarly, for MVS to monitor and sequence events in a sysplex as you
intend, time must be synchronized across all systems.

and

MVS compares time stamps from the TOD clock with time stamps recorded in
the sysplex couple data set. If time stamps in the couple data set are later
than those specified by the incoming system, MVS determines this is an error
and does not allow the system to join the sysplex.

How is then possible to have different times and dates in a sysplex? I
always assumed there is a single clock and a single time in a sysplex, and
all sysplex-wide applications use this concept: all logs, data sharing,
couple data sets...

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Allocated volumes after the power loss in the storage subsyst em

2005-12-01 Thread TISLER Zaromil
John,

-- snip --
I've lost track here! You're running GDPS (I assume with PPRC and
Hyperswap), and you lost power to your secondary site. I assume that those
devices were also the secondary Duplex devices.
-- snip --

Yes, GDPS with PPRC and Hyperswap. But, we have simplex (i.e. not mirrored)
devices too in both sites. Applications that had problems use these devices.
Secondary devices are not allocated by applications, they are offline and
allocated by Hyperswap address space (status F-SYS).


-- snip --
Is it possible that you were experiencing a Long Busy situation in your
production site? (admittedly - very long!)
-- snip --

No, we have not run in this situation yet. Freeze was done, the systems in
the primary site experienced no problems. All issues had to do only with
allocated simplex volumes not being available at the time.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Allocated volumes after the power loss in the storage subsystem

2005-11-30 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Hello!

Scenario:
A power loss for an storage subsystem.

Situation:
The applications having allocated volumes on that subsystem hang.
Neither system nor applications know that these volumes are no more
accessible.
There are no messages in syslog / operlog / application logs about any
problems concerning the allocated volumes.

Question:
Is there any possibility to get out of these problems except IPL /
applications restart / waiting for the electricity + IML of the subsystem?

Have a nice day!

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Allocated volumes after the power loss in the storage subsyst em

2005-11-30 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Kees,

thank you for the reply.

 I wonder if the I/O does not time out and recovery procedures will be
driven.

In that case the timeouts must be extremly long (more than a couple of
hours) g.

 You could try the V ,OFFLINE,FORCE to Box devices. This will terminate
all outstanding I/O's with an I/O error and this should trigger some action
in the applications.

I've never thought of this possibility. I'll test it.

 Hopefully, this storage box does not contain volumes to keep you z/OS
running.

No, no, no, only DB/2 and CICS g.

Regards,

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Allocated volumes after the power loss in the storage subsyst em

2005-11-30 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Hello Peter,

 What does a D IOS,MIH,DEV=/cuaa for one of the hanging devices tell
 you?

00:45.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Allocated volumes after the power loss in the storage subsyst em

2005-11-30 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 So, missing interupt messages should pop up after 45 seconds. Don't you
 see any IOS messages in the syslog?

Yes,
IOS002A NO PATH AVAILABLE ...
at the moment the electricity was gone.

By the time we tried to fix the problems in DB2, we found that the status of
alloc for those devices somehow misleading. Anyway, we did not found a
solution how to free the applications out of this.

I've already learned that offline devices can have alloc status, but it
still confuses me.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: how to lose a sysplex in 30 seconds

2005-11-28 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
We have 2 LPARs in a sysplex, running on 2 different machines in 2 different
sites.
What happened was we lost connectivity between our 2 sites for a few
seconds.
As a result, MVSB (running in site B) lost its connectivity to the
primary SYSPELX couple data set residing on dasd in site A, and issued the
following message:

IXC253I PRIMARY COUPLE DATA SET 953
XCF.COUPLE01 FOR SYSPLEX
IS BEING REMOVED BECAUSE OF AN I/O ERROR
DETECTED BY SYSTEM MVSB
ERROR CASE: PERMANENT ERROR

The above message was then issued by MVSA as well.
Sadly enough, our alternate SYSPLEX couple data set resides on dasd in site
B.
So MVSA had no connectivity to it, which led to a Disabled Wait 0A2 RC 20 in
MVSA.
- snip -

Did you lose the XCF signalling connectivity at all? If you have got the
above message on the MVSA as well, the connection was still there at the
time.

- snip -
After that, MVSB issued the following message:
IXC256A REMOVAL OF PRIMARY COUPLE DATA SET 463
XCF.COUPLE01 FOR SYSPLEX
CANNOT COMPLETE UNTIL
THE FOLLOWING SYSTEM(S) ACKNOWLEDGE THE REMOVAL:
MVSA

Of course, MVSA could never acknowledge since it was in a disabled wait.
- snip -

Your automation tool could vary offline system(s) that are already in
disabled wait in the case of IXC256A.


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: how to lose a sysplex in 30 seconds

2005-11-28 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Bill,

- snip -
The existence of signalling
connectivity created a race condition, in which MVSA and MVSB were
competing to detect and report the loss of access to the CDS at their
respective sites.  MVSB won the race, detecting and signalling the loss of
the primary CDS before MVSA detected loss of the alternate.  MVSA got
MVSB's signal, initiated removal of the primary, and then detected the
inaccessibility of the alternate.
- snip -

What would happen if MVSA got the race? Would MVSB try to access the primary
during acknowledgment of the removal of the alternate CDS? If not, could it
survive the loss of connectivity to primary if it (connectivity loss) would
be short enough?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Allocation Messages

2005-11-20 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 snip 
//*
//STEP1EXEC  PGM=IEFBR14
//TEMP  DD   DISP=(,PASS),SPACE=(TRK,0),UNIT=SYSDA
//*
//STEP2EXEC  PGM=IEFBR14
//TEMP2 DD   DISP=(OLD,PASS),DSN=*.STEP1.TEMP
//*

I get the following allocation messages for STEP2:

**
IEF373I STEP/STEP2   /START 2005324.0926
IEF374I STEP/STEP2   /STOP  2005324.0926 CPU0MIN 00.00SEC ...
IEF237I 3D55 ALLOCATED TO SYS1
IEF285I   SYS05324.T092605.RA000.KEEPTEMP.R0100540 KEPT
IEF285I   VOL SER NOS= MVS3WK.
IEF285I   SYS05324.T092604.RA000.KEEPTEMP.R0100539 DELETED
IEF285I   VOL SER NOS= MVS3WK.
IEF375I  JOB/KEEPTEMP/START 2005324.0926
IEF376I  JOB/KEEPTEMP/STOP  2005324.0926 CPU0MIN 00.00SEC ...
 BOTTOM OF DATA **
 snip 


On our system (1.6) I see the following messages:

IEF237I 9970 ALLOCATED TO SYS1
IEF285I   SYS05325.T080809.RA000.T1AI$AMB.R0202035 KEPT
IEF285I   VOL SER NOS= CTST09.
IGD105I SYS05325.T080809.RA000.T1AI$AMB.R0202034 DELETED,   DDNAME=TEMP2


and, if I omit the //TEMP2DD statement:

IEF237I 9971 ALLOCATED TO SYS1
IEF285I   SYS05325.T080945.RA000.T1AI$AMB.R0202037 KEPT
IEF285I   VOL SER NOS= CTST10.
IGD105I SYS05325.T080945.RA000.T1AI$AMB.R0202036 DELETED,   DDNAME=TEMP


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ABC of Z/os

2005-11-15 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 I'm experiencing some problem on finding the books. A serach in the
redbook site shows no results for ABCs V3/4/6/7/8. Any idea ?


Searching for abcs of z/os I get 9 hits. Volume 3 is there too:


 4.  ABCs of z/OS System Programming Volume 3, SG24-6983-01
Redbook, published 7 November 2005, last updated 7 November 2005 


Volumes 4, 6, 7, and 8 are not published yet (at least as far as I know).

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How much real is required for 64-bit

2005-11-14 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
Not to mention with a wait stated system, since you cannot 'attach a zillion
page packs'. You are limited to 253x4GB page space, about one TB.
snip

Having so many page space makes one want to use dynamic PAV volumes, it
means 253x2 device devices addresses, and it means maximum 128 base volumes
in a logical CU. If we take a 5-way sysplex, we need 5x253x2 device
addresses for page datasets.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: LMDLIST, strange behaviour or WAD?

2005-11-11 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
The differing datasets are
temporary, allocated dynamically by processes running on your system,
and you're listing a volume that's designated in your temp pool.
Between the time your rexx reads that dataset list, and then reads it
again, these easily could have changed.  You're not scanning a static
environment.
snip

Not on our system:
- first part: hundreds of dataset names
- second part: only the dataset name

Three runs, three times the same pattern.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: LMDLIST, strange behaviour or WAD?

2005-11-11 Thread TISLER Zaromil
Sorry.

snip
- second part: only the dataset name
snip

should be:

- second part: only the last dataset name


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Geoplex performance considerations

2005-10-25 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 When I left IGS in June 2004, CF mirroring was not supported.
 Is it now?

No.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Geoplex performance considerations

2005-10-25 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 It depends on what you call CF mirroring: System Managed Coupling Facility
Structure Duplexing is supported now. This requires direct links between the
CF's and these links seem to be limited to 5 km to prevent unacceptable
delays.

According to System-Managed CF Structure Duplexing, page 32  GM13-0103-05
(June 2004)
URL:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/library/techpapers/pdf/gm13010
3.pdf 

Recommendation: In a GDPS/PPRC multi-site configuration, do not duplex CF
structure
data between coupling facilities located in different sites; rather, if
desired, duplex the
structures between two coupling facilities located at the same site. CF
structure data is not
preserved in GDPS site failover situations, regardless of CF Duplexing.

There is no newer information on Coupling Facility and the Parallel
Sysplex
URL: http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/pso/coupling.html 

Regards,
Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ESS pprc question

2005-10-18 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 We have two ESS800 in two locations with PPRC v2.  We plan to power-off 
 ESS_A (primary) for realocation (1-2 hours). For this period of time 
 system and application will be stopped.
 During this time we don’t plan to start system in secondary location, so 
 there will be no update on ESS_B

 I’m looking for a safe procedure to power-off ESS_A with existing PPRC 
 and I don’t want to perform ‘initial copy’ after procedure.

My opinion, assuming all systems are down during the relocation:
Method 1:
- Stopping all systems leaves the volumes in sync. You don't have to do
anything.

Method 2:

- before you power down a box, Delete pair
- after the relocation establish nocopy

Question: Do you make any changes in the GDPS DASD configuration (e.g. pprc
links)?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Geoplex performance considerations

2005-10-07 Thread TISLER Zaromil
---snip---
To all who have helped with our research into GDPS with SRDF/A,
THANKS!

What we've found is that virtually no one is running a GDPS with syncronous
data replication, and we fould only one instance of active data sharing
across sites.

We did find a handful of people running dual sites with application routing
giving the appearance of a GDPS, and with failover between the sites based
on asyncronous data replication.

If you'd like more info on what we've fould, check with Robert Catterall at
IDUG - Robert will be publishing our results.
---snip---

If I understand you correctly, your research and results have to do with the
GDPS with SRDF/A only.

If you mean GDPS, PPRC, multisite (dual) workload, planned/unplanned
hyperswap, then your results are false.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: XMIT problem

2005-08-25 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip 
XMIT nwic.myuhas dsname('ij.source') outdsname('ij.xmit')
- snip 

Have you checked the content of 'ij.xmit'?

In my test I've got the same messages and there was no reference of the
outdsname:

--

PDSFAST/ZOS   VER 5.1CC   CPUID 2084-00116205-1110
 COPYRIGHT (C) 2003 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING OF AMERICA, INC.


PDF0101I  START PDSFAST EXECUTION

PDF0103CCOPY OUTDD=SYS00087,INDD=((SYS00083,R))
PDF0111I  UNLOAD:   SYS00083 DSN=N500223.GDPS.CNTL
VOL=CTST27(PDSE
   DCB=(80 3,120 FB PO)
PDF0112ISYS00087 DSN=SYS05237.T105403.RA000.N500223.R0300610
VOL=
TST25(DISK)   DCB=(3,136 3,120 VS PS)

PDF0131M  SYS00083: MEMBERS:   41 COPIED   0 NOT COPIED  41
TOTAL
PDF0189I  END OF COPY STEP 1   - RC(0)
,  198 CALLS TO BSAM
PDF0199I  END OF PDSFAST EXECUTION - RC(0)
INMX000I 0 message and 70 data records sent as 1668 records to WIENX.N500223
INMX001I Transmission occurred on 08/25/2005 at 10:54:03.
***

--


Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: IFIND

2005-08-05 Thread TISLER Zaromil
 They are functionally equivalent.

If I try IFIND in SDSF under SE or SJ, the cursor jumps to the first
(non-blank?) character in the next line, not to the next occurrence of the
string. if I try IFIND under SB nothing happens (the cursor does not move).

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Setting the Creation Date for datasets

2005-06-14 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
Also there's the concept that with copy commands the file already existed on
the source (and target) environment; with FTP, by nature it's a 'foreign'
file which didn't previously exist on teh target system. It's therefore a
new creation at the time it was sent.
/snip

To me it looks like there are two different approaches used when copying
files in MVS:

- dataset level:
   old copy creation datetime  new copy creation datetime

- PDS(E) member level:
   old copy creation datetime = new copy creation datetime

In the second case it looks like someone found it to be important to
propagate the original creation and change date  time (XMIT does it between
systems).

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DUMMY and BLKSIZE

2005-05-31 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
It's easy to suspect that at some point in time IBM resolved all such
problems by adopting a tactic of converting DSN=NULLFILE to DUMMY early in
the JCL conversion process, and that the few (only?)
contributor[s] to this thread that maintain (without presenting evidence)
that the behaviors differ perhaps have lingering memories of the status quo
ante.
/snip

It is a way back (MVS SP1 ???), but I think there was a functional
difference:
  it was not possible to use DD DUMMY for dummy input datasets, you had to
use DSN=NULLFILE.

Testing today gives no difference.

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: PDF vs BookManager

2005-05-25 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
PDFs, IMO, are wonderful to print from. They are nice for serial reading
(oh, how do I bookmark so that I come back to where I left off?). 
/snip

I have Acrobat Reader 6.0.2 in german language, so there will be some
problems with vocabulary:

  - Ctrl-K (go to General settings or something like that)
  - select Program start (or something like that)
  - instead of eBooks only (or something like that) select All files (or
something like that)in drop-down menu
  - Check Use page cache (or something like that)

It works for me, at least for Diagnosis Tools and Service Aids :-)

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: PDF vs BookManager

2005-05-25 Thread TISLER Zaromil
snip
Depending on how the .PDF was generated, you might not even be able to do
that.  I was reading one a couple of days ago and needed to go to section
2-4 or some such, according to the index.  With some PDFs, you can type
2-4 into the page number field and jump directly there.  Not so with
whatever manual I was reading at the time.  Thus, I pretty much had to plug
in a random page number (64?  51? 123?) and hope I was in the vicinity of
2-4.

Thankfully, that situation is fairly uncommon.
/snip

I would not call it fairy uncommon. All OS/390 and z/OS manuals and
Redbooks I've seen had book page numbering different from pdf page
numbering.

aromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html