Re: SDSF authorizing - AUTH(ALL)

2005-10-05 Thread Brian France

Mark,
  No, we missed that too. AND, I see there is now an AUTH=(ALLOPER) and an 
AUTH=(ALLUSER), which I now need to investigate and see what's under them.


At 03:53 PM 10/4/2005, you wrote:

Speaking of SDSF authorizations...

Did anyone using ISFPRMxx or ISFPARMS notice that you can now
specify AUTH(ALL) as of z/OS 1.5 instead of listing all of the
individual commands?  I didn't until the SDSF PTF was applied
to support the new CK (Health Checker) command and I went to
add the new authority.  Missed this when we upgraded from z/OS
1.4 to z/OS 1.6.  Adding new SDSF commands (for sysprogs) was
always part of our OS upgrade check list and we don't have to
worry about that now - at least for the SDSF super users.

Of course if you use SAF and have your sysprogs authorized to
a default profile of ISFCMD.** then you don't need to worry
about it either.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America and Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Administrative Information Services - Infrastructure/Sysarc
Rm 25 Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread John C. Wolf
I havew a problem with SDSF under z/OS 1.4. I have a user who needs to
see jobs which are not hers. She can see a listing of all the jobs she
just can't look at any output.
The folling are the SDSFPARMS entries that I have set up but they don't
work. She still gets 'Not authorized for job' message when she tres to
look at any output.
IUID(DSFADJP),
ACTION(ALL),
AUTH(DA,H,I,INPUT,O,PR,ST,INIT,PREF,DEST,FINDLIM),
DADFLT(IN,OUT,TRANS,READY,STC,INIT,TSU,JOB),
DSPAUTH(ALL),
ICMD(IDSFADJP),
IDSP(IDSFADJP),
The rest follow but I woun't bore you all with them.
Here are a few NTBL entries:
NTBL NAME(IDSFADJP)
  NTBLENT STRING(A700SFA),OFFSET(1)
There are a lot more entries but these are the ones which I think control
what I am trying to do.
She is trying to see jobs which are SFA I have entered all the job
names which end with SFA.
Thank for any help


John Wolf sysprog University of Cincinnati voice 513-556-0009

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John C. Wolf
 Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:22 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: SDSF authorizing
 
 
 I havew a problem with SDSF under z/OS 1.4. I have a user who needs to
 see jobs which are not hers. She can see a listing of all the jobs she
 just can't look at any output.
 The folling are the SDSFPARMS entries that I have set up but 
 they don't
 work. She still gets 'Not authorized for job' message when she tres to
 look at any output.
 IUID(DSFADJP),
 ACTION(ALL),
 AUTH(DA,H,I,INPUT,O,PR,ST,INIT,PREF,DEST,FINDLIM),
 DADFLT(IN,OUT,TRANS,READY,STC,INIT,TSU,JOB),
 DSPAUTH(ALL),
 ICMD(IDSFADJP),
 IDSP(IDSFADJP),
 The rest follow but I woun't bore you all with them.
 Here are a few NTBL entries:
 NTBL NAME(IDSFADJP)
   NTBLENT STRING(A700SFA),OFFSET(1)
 There are a lot more entries but these are the ones which I 
 think control
 what I am trying to do.
 She is trying to see jobs which are SFA I have entered all the job
 names which end with SFA.
 Thank for any help
 
 
 John Wolf sysprog University of Cincinnati voice 513-556-0009

Does she have the appropriate RACF authorities in the JESSPOOL class?

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread Bob Rutledge

Did you refresh the SDSF server?

Did you have the user re-enter SDSF (as in =s) after doing so?

[...(SFA),OFFSET(5) is easier.]

Bob

John C. Wolf wrote:

I havew a problem with SDSF under z/OS 1.4. I have a user who needs to
see jobs which are not hers. She can see a listing of all the jobs she
just can't look at any output.
The folling are the SDSFPARMS entries that I have set up but they don't
work. She still gets 'Not authorized for job' message when she tres to
look at any output.
IUID(DSFADJP),
ACTION(ALL),
AUTH(DA,H,I,INPUT,O,PR,ST,INIT,PREF,DEST,FINDLIM),
DADFLT(IN,OUT,TRANS,READY,STC,INIT,TSU,JOB),
DSPAUTH(ALL),
ICMD(IDSFADJP),
IDSP(IDSFADJP),
The rest follow but I woun't bore you all with them.
Here are a few NTBL entries:
NTBL NAME(IDSFADJP)
  NTBLENT STRING(A700SFA),OFFSET(1)
There are a lot more entries but these are the ones which I think control
what I am trying to do.
She is trying to see jobs which are SFA I have entered all the job
names which end with SFA.
Thank for any help


John Wolf sysprog University of Cincinnati voice 513-556-0009

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread Lopez, Rich [NCSUS]
She could be falling into another entry. Confirm correct entry by having her
issue the who command form the SDSF prompt. You will be looking for the
GRPINDEX and the GRPNAME which should correlate to your definitions. 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 2:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF authorizing


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John C. Wolf
 Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:22 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: SDSF authorizing
 
 
 I havew a problem with SDSF under z/OS 1.4. I have a user who needs to
 see jobs which are not hers. She can see a listing of all the jobs she
 just can't look at any output.
 The folling are the SDSFPARMS entries that I have set up but 
 they don't
 work. She still gets 'Not authorized for job' message when she tres to
 look at any output.
 IUID(DSFADJP),
 ACTION(ALL),
 AUTH(DA,H,I,INPUT,O,PR,ST,INIT,PREF,DEST,FINDLIM),
 DADFLT(IN,OUT,TRANS,READY,STC,INIT,TSU,JOB),
 DSPAUTH(ALL),
 ICMD(IDSFADJP),
 IDSP(IDSFADJP),
 The rest follow but I woun't bore you all with them.
 Here are a few NTBL entries:
 NTBL NAME(IDSFADJP)
   NTBLENT STRING(A700SFA),OFFSET(1)
 There are a lot more entries but these are the ones which I 
 think control
 what I am trying to do.
 She is trying to see jobs which are SFA I have entered all the job
 names which end with SFA.
 Thank for any help
 
 
 John Wolf sysprog University of Cincinnati voice 513-556-0009

Does she have the appropriate RACF authorities in the JESSPOOL class?

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread John C. Wolf
Yes I did a 'f sdsf,refresh,m=22' after SDSF said that it had refreshed
the parms I had our user logoff TSO and log back on no go.
We use ACF2 here and we control our SDSF users via the SDFF parms and
don't use ACf2

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread John C. Wolf
Does she have the appropriate RACF authorities in the JESSPOOL class?

We use ACF2 here and she can look at her own jobs output all right.
We control our SDSF users via the SDSF parm route.

John Wolf

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread Lizette Koehler

John,

Have you tried trying on tracing in JES2 for security?  It might provide 
ACF2 messages that could help in identifying this issue?


Lizette Koehler

- Original Message - 
From: John C. Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: SDSF authorizing



Does she have the appropriate RACF authorities in the JESSPOOL class?

We use ACF2 here and she can look at her own jobs output all right.
We control our SDSF users via the SDSF parm route.

John Wolf

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread John C. Wolf
Rich,
In your message you asked me to have her do a who and you were right the
relevant fieldes GRPINDEX=48,GRPNAME=ISF00048 are for the group which is
directly ahead of her and their IUID is IUID(DFSA) which is the high order
four bytes of her id which is DFSADJP.
So what should I do? should I move her entry before the DFSA entry?

Thanks

John Wolf

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing - AUTH(ALL)

2005-10-04 Thread Mark Zelden
Speaking of SDSF authorizations...

Did anyone using ISFPRMxx or ISFPARMS notice that you can now
specify AUTH(ALL) as of z/OS 1.5 instead of listing all of the
individual commands?  I didn't until the SDSF PTF was applied
to support the new CK (Health Checker) command and I went to
add the new authority.  Missed this when we upgraded from z/OS
1.4 to z/OS 1.6.  Adding new SDSF commands (for sysprogs) was
always part of our OS upgrade check list and we don't have to
worry about that now - at least for the SDSF super users.

Of course if you use SAF and have your sysprogs authorized to
a default profile of ISFCMD.** then you don't need to worry
about it either.

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America and Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread Bob Rutledge

Yes.  The most restrictive entries have to be first.

Bob

John C. Wolf wrote:


Rich,
In your message you asked me to have her do a who and you were right the
relevant fieldes GRPINDEX=48,GRPNAME=ISF00048 are for the group which is
directly ahead of her and their IUID is IUID(DFSA) which is the high order
four bytes of her id which is DFSADJP.
So what should I do? should I move her entry before the DFSA entry?

Thanks

John Wolf


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread Imbriale, Donald (Exchange)
Yes - you need to move her entry before the more generic one.  In SDSF
parms, first hit counts, not best fit.

Don Imbriale

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of John C. Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF authorizing

Rich,
In your message you asked me to have her do a who and you were right
the
relevant fieldes GRPINDEX=48,GRPNAME=ISF00048 are for the group which
is
directly ahead of her and their IUID is IUID(DFSA) which is the high
order
four bytes of her id which is DFSADJP.
So what should I do? should I move her entry before the DFSA entry?



***
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, 
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer 
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SDSF authorizing

2005-10-04 Thread John C. Wolf
OK I moved her entrie above the  DSFA entrie and she still gets put into
the group that is defined to the IUID(DSFA) which is now after
IUID(DSFADJP). I am noe think that I will have to define a unice IUID for
all DSFA users.
Does this sound right?
If any one wants to e-amil me please use my work id [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks

John WOlf

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html