Re: DSNL032I

2013-03-12 Thread Thomas Berg
From QuickRef(TM):

00D35E00   
   
 Explanation   
 DB2 has detected an error while parsing a DDM command or DDM command data.
 An invalid RDBNAM length was sent on an ACCSEC command.   
   
 System action 
 If the length of the RDBNAM is greater than 18, then A DDM reply message  
 (SYNTAXRM) is returned to the DRDA client. If the data in characters 17-18
 of the RDBNAME is non-blank, then a DDM reply message (VALNSPRM) is returned  
 to the DRDA client.   
   
 Operator response 
 Notify the system programmer. 
   
 System programmer response
 If you suspect an error in DB2, refer to Part 2 of Diagnosis Guide and
 Reference for information on identifying and reporting the problem.   
   
 Problem determination 
 Analyze the statistics class 4 trace record identified by the IFCID sequence  
 number enumerated in the DSNL032I message.
   
 At this local DB2, collect the following diagnostic item: 
   
Statistics Class 4 trace record for the LUWID associated with the failing  
 request.  
   
 At this remote server, collect the following diagnostic items:
   
Console output from the system on which the job was run, and a listing of  
 the SYSLOG data set for the period of time spanning the failure.  
   
All dumps taken by the attachment facility or requesting application.  


BTW, I recommend the DB2-L list for questions like this...



Regards
Thomas Berg

Thomas Berg   Specialist   z/OS\RQM\IT Delivery   SWEDBANK AB (Publ)


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of william janulin
 Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 7:16 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: DSNL032I
 
 To list;
 
   I am getting the following error:
 
 07.32.09 STC52839  DSNL032I  -DB8G DSNLZDJN DRDA EXCEPTION CONDITION IN
  463
    463             REQUEST FROM REQUESTOR LOCATION=10.1.3.30 FOR THREAD
 WITH
    463             LUWID=GA01031E.E7BC.CB0B5A5514FC=10350
    463             REASON=00D35E00
    463             ERROR ID=DSNLZSAS0118
    463             IFCID=0191
    463             SEE TRACE RECORD WITH IFCID SEQUENCE NUMBER=0006
 
 
 The user was attempting to access the database from a PC and gets the
 following error messages in the capture below.
 
 Has anyone run into this?
 
 Bill J.
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: smpe receive issue IKJ56228I

2013-03-12 Thread Staller, Allan
Add a DD statement for SMPTLIB with storage info (volser, unit, storclas,)
Or
Update the CSI to add the same information to the SMPTLIB dddef

HTH,

snip
Subject: smpe receive issue IKJ56228I

We had this this issue before but I don't recall how it was fixed.

We have a products receive files in sequential datasets.

BROWSEDB.CFED.HABIA10.SMPMCS Line  Col 001 080
 Command ===  Scroll === PAGE
* Top of Data **
++FUNCTION(HABIA10) FESN(0500045) REWORK(2011128)
 DESC(IBM InfoSphere Classic Federation Server for z/OS)
 RFDSNPFX(IBM) /* TIME=16:02:34 DATE= 5/08/11 */ FILES(9)

Our receive job is coded as:

//SMPPTFIN DD  DSN=DB.CFED.HABIA10.SMPMCS,DISP=SHR
 // DD  DSN=DB.CFED.JABIA11.SMPMCS,DISP=SHR
 // DD  DSN=DB.CFED.JABIA15.SMPMCS,DISP=SHR
 //SMPCNTL  DD  *
   SET  BOUNDARY (GLOBAL) .
   RECEIVE SYSMODS RFPREFIX(SMPE).

The error at receive time attempting to allocated the relfile datasets is

IKJ56228I DATA SET SMPE.IBM.HABIA10.F1 NOT IN CATALOG OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE 
ACCESSED IKJ56228I DATA SET SMPE.IBM.JABIA11.F1 NOT IN CATALOG OR CATALOG CAN 
NOT BE ACCESSED IKJ56228I DATA SET SMPE.IBM.JABIA15.F1 NOT IN CATALOG OR 
CATALOG CAN NOT BE ACCESSED

... remainder snipped
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: smpe receive issue IKJ56228I

2013-03-12 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:38:28 +, Tim Brown wrote:

BROWSEDB.CFED.HABIA10.SMPMCS Line  Col 001 080
 Command ===  Scroll === PAGE
* Top of Data 
**
++FUNCTION(HABIA10) FESN(0500045) REWORK(2011128)
 DESC(IBM InfoSphere Classic Federation Server for z/OS)
 RFDSNPFX(IBM) /* TIME=16:02:34 DATE= 5/08/11 */ FILES(9)

Our receive job is coded as:

//SMPPTFIN DD  DSN=DB.CFED.HABIA10.SMPMCS,DISP=SHR
 // DD  DSN=DB.CFED.JABIA11.SMPMCS,DISP=SHR
 // DD  DSN=DB.CFED.JABIA15.SMPMCS,DISP=SHR
 //SMPCNTL  DD  *
   SET  BOUNDARY (GLOBAL) .
   RECEIVE SYSMODS RFPREFIX(SMPE).

The error at receive time attempting to allocated the relfile datasets is

IKJ56228I DATA SET SMPE.IBM.HABIA10.F1 NOT IN CATALOG OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE 
ACCESSED
IKJ56228I DATA SET SMPE.IBM.JABIA11.F1 NOT IN CATALOG OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE 
ACCESSED
IKJ56228I DATA SET SMPE.IBM.JABIA15.F1 NOT IN CATALOG OR CATALOG CAN NOT BE 
ACCESSED

What DSNAMEs are your relfiles cataloged as?  The prefix for the data set names 
that SMP/E is looking for is defined by your RFPREFIX and the RFDSNPFX in the 
sysmod.  See
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/GIMCOM50/14.2.1?SHELF=GIM2BK91DT=20110523141208

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: CA Chorus Software Manager

2013-03-12 Thread Ed Blazejewski
Hi Dave,

Regarding the renaming of CA Mainframe Software Manager to CA Chorus Software 
Manager, this occurred in the latest GA version r5.1, released in February 
2013.  There were a lot of other cool features added as well. 

New look and feel
Task Policy management which allows you to manage and organize your tasks.
Java 7 support
HTTPS support allows secure connection to CA for downloading products and 
maintenance
Better management of hiding products
Better handling of temporary space
Enhanced summary wizard for product installs.

There is a lot more information found here:
http://www.ca.com/us/~/media/Files/ProductBriefs/ca-chorus-software-manager-release.pdf

Regards,
Ed Blazejewski

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMS QUESTION

2013-03-12 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
John Dawes wrote:

Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to 
allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.

Please post the JCL statements and exact JCL error messages so others can help 
you.

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMS QUESTION

2013-03-12 Thread John Dawes
Elardus,
 
 
Here is the error message :
 IEF344I ISCMURP3 PROC001 SORTOUT - ALLOCATION FAILED DUE TO DATA FACILITY SYST 
IGD17273I ALLOCATION HAS FAILED FOR ALL VOLUMES SELECTED FOR DATA SET  
HESD.KDM.SOR085.SOR1.HESPJZ.X IGD17277I THERE ARE (287) CANDIDATE VOLUMES OF 
WHICH (260) ARE ENABLED OR QUIES IGD17290I THERE WERE 1 CANDIDATE STORAGE 
GROUPS OF WHICH THE FIRST 1 WERE ELIGIBLE FOR VOLUME SELECTION. THE CANDIDATE 
STORAGE GROUPS WERE:SYS001 IGD17279I 27 VOLUMES WERE REJECTED BECAUSE THEY WERE 
NOT ONLINE IGD17279I 27 VOLUMES WERE REJECTED BECAUSE THE UCB WAS NOT AVAILABLE 
IGD17279I 51 VOLUMES WERE REJECTED BECAUSE THEY DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT SPACE  
  
//PROC001 EXEC PGM=SORT,REGION=2048K   
//SYSOUT   DD  SYSOUT=* 
//SYSPRINT DD  SYSOUT=* 
//SORTIN   DD  DSN= HESD.IRN.IFDL.PUL13.PSUL13.X,DISP=SHR 
// DD  DSN=HESD..VIFDL(0),DISP=SHR  
//**SORTIN   DD  DSN=HESD..VIFDL(0),DISP=SHR    
//SORTOUT  DD  DSN= HESD.KDM.SOR085.SOR1.HESPJZ.X,   
// DISP=(,CATLG,DELETE),    
//**   SPACE=(TRK,(3,5),RLSE),  
//**   SPACE=(TRK,(2,5000),RLSE),   
// SPACE=(TRK,(25000,500),RLSE),    
//** !! IF YOU CHANGE THE SPACE IN TEST, CHANGE THE PRODUCTION PROC !!  
// DCB=(MODELDCB,RECFM=VB,LRECL=535)    
//SYSIN    DD  DSN=SYS2.PROD.DATALIB(ISCMURP3),DISP=SHR  


From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION

John Dawes wrote:

Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to 
allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.

Please post the JCL statements and exact JCL error messages so others can help 
you.

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


TS7740: non-concurrent maintenace

2013-03-12 Thread Tim Hare
We're scheduling our second round of NON-concurrent TS7740 maintenance, and so 
far we've had no other kind.  

If there are others on the list who have IBM TS7740:   are you always asked to 
take your box offline for maintenance or is it just these two latest software 
changes?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Format the linkage stack from an SDUMP issued in SRB mode

2013-03-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
I didn't see an obvious way to format the linkage stack for an SRB. Neither
SUMM FORMAT nor 2.2 did the job.

Eventually I browsed the storage using CR15.

What did I mess?

--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMS QUESTION

2013-03-12 Thread John Dawes
Allan 
 
Thanks for the help.  I have changed the Threshold to 60.  Would Space 
Management (Primary  Secondary) be affected because of the new threshold?



From: Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION

I believe your problem is located here:
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :              High    20  (1-100)  Low . . 1  
(0-99)
/snip

IIRC, the HIGH 20 will prevent allocation of new datasets if the PRI space will 
exceed the high threshold. 

BTW, IMO, the ALLOC High of 20 is extremely low. I would suggest a number more 
on the lines of 50 to 80 percent.
You will most likely be able to reduce the number of volumes in this pool after 
the change.

HTH,
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :  High    20   (1-100)  Low . . 1   
(0-99) Alloc/Migr Threshold Track-Managed:  High    85   (1-100)  Low . . 1 
  (0-99) Guaranteed Backup Frequency  . . . . . . NOLIMIT  (1 to  or 
NOLIMIT) BreakPointValue  . . . . . . . . . . . .  (0-65520 or blank)   
  
 
Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to 
allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.  I found the following 
info which may explain the cause.   Am I barking up the wrong tree?  If not, if 
I change the High from 20 to 80 would that address the problem?  Also, would 
HSM miigrate dsn only if the pool is reached 80% or over?
 
MIGR HIGH is also checked during allocation.  SMS attempts to select a volume 
that has enough space available to contain the primary allocation of the new 
data set without exceeding the
   MIGR HIGH threshold.
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMS QUESTION

2013-03-12 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Allan,

While I agree that the High Threshold should be 80 (or in that vicinity), SMS 
does not PREVENT allocations above the High Threshold, it merely tries to 
direct them to a volume below that threshold.
The last line of the error msg. is the problem. 51 volumes lack the free space 
to allow the allocation.

The solution would be to add volumes to the pool OR allow for a multi-volume 
file. Use a smaller Primary space allocation and use UNIT=(3390,10) in your DD 
statement. The 10 is just an example, the upper limit is 59. 

Regards,
Dave O'Brien

-Original Message-
From: Staller, Allan [mailto:allan.stal...@kbmg.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION

I believe your problem is located here:
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :  High20   (1-100)  Low . . 1   
(0-99)
/snip

IIRC, the HIGH 20 will prevent allocation of new datasets if the PRI space will 
exceed the high threshold. 

BTW, IMO, the ALLOC High of 20 is extremely low. I would suggest a number more 
on the lines of 50 to 80 percent.
You will most likely be able to reduce the number of volumes in this pool after 
the change.

HTH,
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :  High    20   (1-100)  Low . . 1   
(0-99) Alloc/Migr Threshold Track-Managed:  High    85   (1-100)  Low . . 1 
  (0-99) Guaranteed Backup Frequency  . . . . . . NOLIMIT  (1 to  or 
NOLIMIT) BreakPointValue  . . . . . . . . . . . .  (0-65520 or blank)   
  
 
Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to 
allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.  I found the following 
info which may explain the cause.   Am I barking up the wrong tree?  If not, if 
I change the High from 20 to 80 would that address the problem?  Also, would 
HSM miigrate dsn only if the pool is reached 80% or over?
 
MIGR HIGH is also checked during allocation.  SMS attempts to select a volume 
that has enough space available to contain the primary allocation of the new 
data set without exceeding the
   MIGR HIGH threshold.
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Ron Wells
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ?? 

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the sender, 
which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is intended 
only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above.  If you are not 
 the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMS QUESTION

2013-03-12 Thread Staller, Allan
What if *all* of the volumes are at/near the high threshold (20%)?
Very often there are candidate volumes defined to SMS,  but that do not 
physically exist (which  could be the 51 volumes lacking space for the 
allocation).

snip
While I agree that the High Threshold should be 80 (or in that vicinity), SMS 
does not PREVENT allocations above the High Threshold, it merely tries to 
direct them to a volume below that threshold.
The last line of the error msg. is the problem. 51 volumes lack the free space 
to allow the allocation.

The solution would be to add volumes to the pool OR allow for a multi-volume 
file. Use a smaller Primary space allocation and use UNIT=(3390,10) in your DD 
statement. The 10 is just an example, the upper limit is 59. 
/snip

I believe your problem is located here:
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :  High20   (1-100)  Low . . 1   
(0-99)
/snip

IIRC, the HIGH 20 will prevent allocation of new datasets if the PRI space will 
exceed the high threshold. 

BTW, IMO, the ALLOC High of 20 is extremely low. I would suggest a number more 
on the lines of 50 to 80 percent.
You will most likely be able to reduce the number of volumes in this pool after 
the change.

HTH,
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :  High    20   (1-100)  Low . . 1   
(0-99) Alloc/Migr Threshold Track-Managed:  High    85   (1-100)  Low . . 1 
  (0-99) Guaranteed Backup Frequency  . . . . . . NOLIMIT  (1 to  or 
NOLIMIT) BreakPointValue  . . . . . . . . . . . .  (0-65520 or blank)   
  
 
Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to 
allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.  I found the following 
info which may explain the cause.   Am I barking up the wrong tree?  If not, if 
I change the High from 20 to 80 would that address the problem?  Also, would 
HSM miigrate dsn only if the pool is reached 80% or over?
 
MIGR HIGH is also checked during allocation.  SMS attempts to select a volume 
that has enough space available to contain the primary allocation of the new 
data set without exceeding the
   MIGR HIGH threshold.
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Staller, Allan
VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among other 
things).

HTH,
snip
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ?? 
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Ken Porowski
Not sure if these fit your needs but products like VPS (LRS), Infoprint Server 
(IBM), and I think MacKinney has something.
These products have components (probably optional, priced) that can transform 
various input to various output formats.
I do not have any of these products but AFAIK they might do what you want/need.

Ken



This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary, 
privileged and confidential information of CIT Group Inc. or its subsidiaries 
or affiliates (collectively, CIT), and are intended solely for the 
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this 
communication, any use, disclosure, printing, copying or distribution, or 
reliance on the contents, of this communication is strictly prohibited.  CIT 
disclaims any liability for the review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or the taking of any action in reliance upon, this communication by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s).  If you have received this 
communication in error, please reply to the sender advising of the error in 
transmission, and immediately delete and destroy the communication and any 
accompanying materials.  To the extent permitted by applicable law, CIT and 
others may inspect, review, monitor, analyze, copy, record and retain any 
communications sent from or received at this email address.


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Ron Wells
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] ASG/Mobius

Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ??

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the sender, 
which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is intended 
only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above.  If you are not 
 the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Gibney, Dave
McKinney

Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
 Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:56 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: ASG/Mobius
 
 VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among
 other things).
 
 HTH,
 snip
 Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..
 
 ASG/Mobius 
 We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the
 Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a
 PCL supported printer..
 
 Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
 or
 Another approach/suggestion ??
 /snip
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Ron Wells
looking to see if anyone used Mobius for this function...not looking to 
buy another vendor ..
not finding it at there site..maybe called something else..





From:   Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 12:55 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among 
other things).

HTH,
snip
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ?? 
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the sender, 
which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is intended 
only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above.  If you are not 
 the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMS QUESTION

2013-03-12 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
No, volumes which are above the threshold but have available space are put into 
a secondary allocation list. Those volumes under the high threshold are in a 
primary allocation list. SMS then searches for a volume which will satisfy the 
allocation. At least that's the way it was explained to me by IBM at the Share 
meeting in Baltimore some years ago.

The OP has 51 volumes with available space which are either badly fragmented or 
do not have 20K tracks within 5 extents. A smaller primary and secondary with a 
unit parameter specifying multiple volumes will allow the allocation.

-Original Message-
From: Staller, Allan [mailto:allan.stal...@kbmg.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION

What if *all* of the volumes are at/near the high threshold (20%)?
Very often there are candidate volumes defined to SMS,  but that do not 
physically exist (which  could be the 51 volumes lacking space for the 
allocation).

snip
While I agree that the High Threshold should be 80 (or in that vicinity), SMS 
does not PREVENT allocations above the High Threshold, it merely tries to 
direct them to a volume below that threshold.
The last line of the error msg. is the problem. 51 volumes lack the free space 
to allow the allocation.

The solution would be to add volumes to the pool OR allow for a multi-volume 
file. Use a smaller Primary space allocation and use UNIT=(3390,10) in your DD 
statement. The 10 is just an example, the upper limit is 59. 
/snip

I believe your problem is located here:
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :  High20   (1-100)  Low . . 1   
(0-99)
/snip

IIRC, the HIGH 20 will prevent allocation of new datasets if the PRI space will 
exceed the high threshold. 

BTW, IMO, the ALLOC High of 20 is extremely low. I would suggest a number more 
on the lines of 50 to 80 percent.
You will most likely be able to reduce the number of volumes in this pool after 
the change.

HTH,
snip
Allocation/migration Threshold :  High    20   (1-100)  Low . . 1   
(0-99) Alloc/Migr Threshold Track-Managed:  High    85   (1-100)  Low . . 1 
  (0-99) Guaranteed Backup Frequency  . . . . . . NOLIMIT  (1 to  or 
NOLIMIT) BreakPointValue  . . . . . . . . . . . .  (0-65520 or blank)   
  
 
Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to 
allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.  I found the following 
info which may explain the cause.   Am I barking up the wrong tree?  If not, if 
I change the High from 20 to 80 would that address the problem?  Also, would 
HSM miigrate dsn only if the pool is reached 80% or over?
 
MIGR HIGH is also checked during allocation.  SMS attempts to select a volume 
that has enough space available to contain the primary allocation of the new 
data set without exceeding the
   MIGR HIGH threshold.
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Craig . Pace
Ron,

Mobius does not support that ability.  If the data is in AFP format in 
Mobius (mainframe), then the output from Mobius via normal distribution on 
the mainframe will be in AFP output.  Now the web viewer will use the 
built in AFP viewer to display the data and then print from there.  There 
is not a way to batch print from Mobius into PDF, PCL, etc. from the 
mainframe.  We just went through this last year as we are getting ride of 
Mobius and wanted a batch way to get the print out for migration.  We 
purchased Crawford Technologies Workflow JES with AFP to PDF conversion to 
do the trick.  We batch print Mobius with all AFP resources and run it 
through Workflow JES to create the PDF.

 
 
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Craig

 
 
 



From:   Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   03/12/2013 12:58
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



looking to see if anyone used Mobius for this function...not looking to 
buy another vendor ..
not finding it at there site..maybe called something else..





From:   Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 12:55 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among 
other things).

HTH,
snip
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ?? 
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the 
sender, which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is 
intended only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above. 
If you are not  the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any 
action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is 
strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


**
This communication contains information which is confidential and
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note
that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
then destroy any copies of it.
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Ron Wells
interestingwill keep that in mind...
what about the Mobius Windows...server...?? 



From:   craig.p...@fotlinc.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 01:28 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



Ron,

Mobius does not support that ability.  If the data is in AFP format in 
Mobius (mainframe), then the output from Mobius via normal distribution on 

the mainframe will be in AFP output.  Now the web viewer will use the 
built in AFP viewer to display the data and then print from there.  There 
is not a way to batch print from Mobius into PDF, PCL, etc. from the 
mainframe.  We just went through this last year as we are getting ride of 
Mobius and wanted a batch way to get the print out for migration.  We 
purchased Crawford Technologies Workflow JES with AFP to PDF conversion to 

do the trick.  We batch print Mobius with all AFP resources and run it 
through Workflow JES to create the PDF.

 
 
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Craig

 
 
 



From:   Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   03/12/2013 12:58
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



looking to see if anyone used Mobius for this function...not looking to 
buy another vendor ..
not finding it at there site..maybe called something else..





From:   Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 12:55 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among 
other things).

HTH,
snip
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ?? 
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the 
sender, which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is 

intended only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above. 
If you are not  the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any 

action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is 
strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


**
This communication contains information which is confidential and
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note
that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
then destroy any copies of it.
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the sender, 
which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is intended 
only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above.  If you are not 
 the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Craig . Pace
The Mobius Server can store its files in different format with that 
add-on from ASG.  The default is store it in their DAT format.

 
 
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Craig 
 
 



From:   Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   03/12/2013 13:30
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



interestingwill keep that in mind...
what about the Mobius Windows...server...?? 



From:   craig.p...@fotlinc.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 01:28 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



Ron,

Mobius does not support that ability.  If the data is in AFP format in 
Mobius (mainframe), then the output from Mobius via normal distribution on 


the mainframe will be in AFP output.  Now the web viewer will use the 
built in AFP viewer to display the data and then print from there.  There 
is not a way to batch print from Mobius into PDF, PCL, etc. from the 
mainframe.  We just went through this last year as we are getting ride of 
Mobius and wanted a batch way to get the print out for migration.  We 
purchased Crawford Technologies Workflow JES with AFP to PDF conversion to 


do the trick.  We batch print Mobius with all AFP resources and run it 
through Workflow JES to create the PDF.

 
 
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Craig

 
 
 



From:   Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   03/12/2013 12:58
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



looking to see if anyone used Mobius for this function...not looking to 
buy another vendor ..
not finding it at there site..maybe called something else..





From:   Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 12:55 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among 
other things).

HTH,
snip
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ?? 
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the 
sender, which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is 


intended only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above. 
If you are not  the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any 


action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is 
strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


**
This communication contains information which is confidential and
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note
that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
then destroy any copies of it.
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the 
sender, which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is 
intended only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above. 
If you are not  the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any 
action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is 
strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 

Re: ASG/Mobius

2013-03-12 Thread Ron Wells
got ya  tks..




From:   craig.p...@fotlinc.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 01:36 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



The Mobius Server can store its files in different format with that 
add-on from ASG.  The default is store it in their DAT format.

 
 
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Craig 
 
 



From:   Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   03/12/2013 13:30
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



interestingwill keep that in mind...
what about the Mobius Windows...server...?? 



From:   craig.p...@fotlinc.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 01:28 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



Ron,

Mobius does not support that ability.  If the data is in AFP format in 
Mobius (mainframe), then the output from Mobius via normal distribution on 



the mainframe will be in AFP output.  Now the web viewer will use the 
built in AFP viewer to display the data and then print from there.  There 
is not a way to batch print from Mobius into PDF, PCL, etc. from the 
mainframe.  We just went through this last year as we are getting ride of 
Mobius and wanted a batch way to get the print out for migration.  We 
purchased Crawford Technologies Workflow JES with AFP to PDF conversion to 



do the trick.  We batch print Mobius with all AFP resources and run it 
through Workflow JES to create the PDF.

 
 
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Craig

 
 
 



From:   Ron Wells ron.we...@slfs.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   03/12/2013 12:58
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



looking to see if anyone used Mobius for this function...not looking to 
buy another vendor ..
not finding it at there site..maybe called something else..





From:   Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   03/12/2013 12:55 PM
Subject:Re: ASG/Mobius
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



VPS from Levi/Ray/Shoup (LRS). Performs AFP to PCL translation (among 
other things).

HTH,
snip
Asked some time ago..do not have copy of reply. and not finding in Arch..

ASG/Mobius 
We have Non-AFP and AFP reports also have  PDF's and JPG's stored on the 
Mainframe/Mobius...Need a means to convert from Mobius/Mainframe to a PCL 
supported printer..

Goal  eliminated need for AFP/IPDS support at the printer..
or
Another approach/suggestion ?? 
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the 
sender, which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is 



intended only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above. 
If you are not  the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of any 



action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is 
strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


**
This communication contains information which is confidential and
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note
that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and
then destroy any copies of it.
**

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Email Disclaimer
This  E-mail  contains  confidential  information  belonging to the 
sender, which  may be legally privileged information.  This information is 

intended only  for  the use of the individual or entity addressed above. 
If you are not  the  intended  recipient, or  an  employee  or  agent 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure,  copying, distribution, or the taking of 

Why does Oracle Agrees to the One proc pricing model on IFL?

2013-03-12 Thread Itschak Mugzach
True question. What interest has Oracle and many other vendors in a pricing
model that involve the number of procs used instead on cpu size?
The regular pricing model used for mainframes for years is based on
measures of the proc size in Mips/MSUs. The vendors are losing licenses
(revenue) currently running on Intel or Unix proprietary procs to IBM's
z/Linux initiative. IBM states that using IFLs, customers Consolidate 3x
or more* servers per core than virtualized x86 offerings. at same time, as
IFL goes neer 100% utilization while other servers uses only about 20% of
resources, I can understand why customers goes z/Linux. Oracle on z?Linux
is Enterprise Edition, but yet, it is much cheaper if you have ten or so
servers. so,  why strong vendrs like Orcale agrees to this pricng model?

ITschak

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: CA Chorus Software Manager

2013-03-12 Thread Gibney, Dave
Don't get me wrong. I like CA-MSM. But, I just updated it to 5.0 in November. 
And due to the uncertainty of continuing a mainframe presence here, when I drop 
in 5.1, I will have literally updated MSM 4 times since I last updated a real 
CA product :(

Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Ed Blazejewski
 Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:14 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: CA Chorus Software Manager
 
 Hi Dave,
 
 Regarding the renaming of CA Mainframe Software Manager to CA Chorus
 Software Manager, this occurred in the latest GA version r5.1, released in
 February 2013.  There were a lot of other cool features added as well.
 
 New look and feel
 Task Policy management which allows you to manage and organize your
 tasks.
 Java 7 support
 HTTPS support allows secure connection to CA for downloading products and
 maintenance
 Better management of hiding products
 Better handling of temporary space
 Enhanced summary wizard for product installs.
 
 There is a lot more information found here:
 http://www.ca.com/us/~/media/Files/ProductBriefs/ca-chorus-software-
 manager-release.pdf
 
 Regards,
 Ed Blazejewski
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


OMVS, /etc, user mods, and SMP/E

2013-03-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
We recently upgraded to 1.13.  Today, I ran afoul of:

From:

z/OS UNIX System Services
Command Reference
Document Number SA22-7802-14


http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZA5C0/SHCMDDES.FILE.6

SHCMDDES.FILE.6

Files

file uses the following file:

/etc/magic
Default system magic file.

For file to work, you need to copy the magic file from the /samples
directory to the /etc directory.

For more information about enabling file, see the section on copying
configuration files in z/OS UNIX System Services Planning. Additional
information about the magic file can be found in magic -- Format of
the /etc/magic file in topic MGC.

Have you ever bought a car that you had to install the
tires yourself before it would work?

Apparently this requirement is well known among coloro che sanno
of OMVS systems programmers.  Ours is mandolinisto; he's overburdened
with other stuff.

Presumably this is to avoid regressing user mods to members of /etc.
But there's a way to deal with this.  Years ago I took a class in SMP/E
software maintenance (Amdahl taught it).  One of the exercises was
to APPLY a USERMOD then attempt to APPLY service that conflicted with
the USERMOD.  It failed.  RESTORE the USERMOD; APPLY the PTF; then
re-APPLY the USERMOD.  Why is /etc/magic not handled this way?
(I'm confident that we have no user mods to that file.)

(Of course, this would work a lot better if SMP/E supported patch(1)
as a utility for maintaining OMVS text files, even as it supports IEBUPDTE
for maintaining legacy text files.)

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMS QUESTION

2013-03-12 Thread Ron Hawkins
David,

Yes, your understanding is the same as mine. The primary eligible device
list contains volumes that will not exceed the max threshold if the primary
space is allocated there. This is sorted on performance criteria. The
secondary eligible device list has volumes with enough free space to satisfy
the primary space request, and my recollection is that this is in free space
order.

If allocation is not satisfied in the primary list it will fall through to
the secondary list. With a high threshold of 20%, most allocation will
likely be influenced by space, rather than activity.

If you suspect that fragmentation is the problem then have you checked if
you have Space Constraint relief set to YES in the DATACLAS used by the data
set, or if the % reduction is aggressive enough to counter the
fragmentation. Another strategy would be to reduce to space request to
something smaller, let's say (TRK(5000,5000),RLSE), and add a unit count so
the space is allocated across multiple volumes - UNIT=(,5).

Ron

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:01 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] SMS QUESTION
 
 No, volumes which are above the threshold but have available space are put
 into a secondary allocation list. Those volumes under the high threshold
are
 in a primary allocation list. SMS then searches for a volume which will
satisfy
 the allocation. At least that's the way it was explained to me by IBM at
the
 Share meeting in Baltimore some years ago.
 
 The OP has 51 volumes with available space which are either badly
 fragmented or do not have 20K tracks within 5 extents. A smaller primary
and
 secondary with a unit parameter specifying multiple volumes will allow the
 allocation.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Staller, Allan [mailto:allan.stal...@kbmg.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:53 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: SMS QUESTION
 
 What if *all* of the volumes are at/near the high threshold (20%)?
 Very often there are candidate volumes defined to SMS,  but that do not
 physically exist (which  could be the 51 volumes lacking space for the
 allocation).
 
 snip
 While I agree that the High Threshold should be 80 (or in that vicinity),
SMS
 does not PREVENT allocations above the High Threshold, it merely tries to
 direct them to a volume below that threshold.
 The last line of the error msg. is the problem. 51 volumes lack the free
space
 to allow the allocation.
 
 The solution would be to add volumes to the pool OR allow for a multi-
 volume file. Use a smaller Primary space allocation and use UNIT=(3390,10)
in
 your DD statement. The 10 is just an example, the upper limit is 59.
 /snip
 
 I believe your problem is located here:
 snip
 Allocation/migration Threshold :  High20   (1-100)  Low .
. 1   (0-99)
 /snip
 
 IIRC, the HIGH 20 will prevent allocation of new datasets if the PRI space
will
 exceed the high threshold.
 
 BTW, IMO, the ALLOC High of 20 is extremely low. I would suggest a number
 more on the lines of 50 to 80 percent.
 You will most likely be able to reduce the number of volumes in this pool
 after the change.
 
 HTH,
 snip
 Allocation/migration Threshold :  High    20   (1-100)  Low .
. 1   (0-99)
 Alloc/Migr Threshold Track-Managed:  High    85   (1-100)  Low . . 1  
(0-99)
 Guaranteed Backup Frequency  . . . . . . NOLIMIT  (1 to  or NOLIMIT)
 BreakPointValue  . . . . . . . . . . . .  (0-65520 or blank)
 
 Of late we have been having allocation problems where the job is unable to
 allocate the first extent and fails on jcl error etc.  I found the
following info
 which may explain the cause.   Am I barking up the wrong tree?  If not, if
I
 change the High from 20 to 80 would that address the problem?  Also, would
 HSM miigrate dsn only if the pool is reached 80% or over?
 
 MIGR HIGH is also checked during allocation.  SMS attempts to select a
 volume that has enough space available to contain the primary allocation
of
 the new data set without exceeding the
    MIGR HIGH threshold.
 /snip
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS, /etc, user mods, and SMP/E

2013-03-12 Thread Andrew Rowley

On 13/03/2013 9:41, Paul Gilmartin wrote:


Presumably this is to avoid regressing user mods to members of /etc.
But there's a way to deal with this.  Years ago I took a class in SMP/E
software maintenance (Amdahl taught it).  One of the exercises was
to APPLY a USERMOD then attempt to APPLY service that conflicted with
the USERMOD.  It failed.  RESTORE the USERMOD; APPLY the PTF; then
re-APPLY the USERMOD.  Why is /etc/magic not handled this way?
(I'm confident that we have no user mods to that file.)


/etc is the standard location for system configuration information. In 
the same way you don't use SMP/E for SYS1.PARMLIB, you wouldn't want to 
use it for /etc.


I'm not sure how it is packaged in z/OS, but in general I think it is 
incorrect to replace the /etc directory when installing a new version of 
the operating system - the same way you would not drop in a totally new 
SYS1.PARMLIB.


Regards

Andrew Rowley

--
and...@blackhillsoftware.com
+61 413 302 386

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS, /etc, user mods, and SMP/E

2013-03-12 Thread Shane Ginnane
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:01:57 +1100, Andrew Rowley wrote:

I'm not sure how it is packaged in z/OS, but in general I think it is
incorrect to replace the /etc directory when installing a new version of
the operating system - the same way you would not drop in a totally new
SYS1.PARMLIB.

lol - you wish ... read this:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r13/topic/com.ibm.zos.r13.e0zm100/at3gend.htm?path=1_5_4_1_2#at3gend

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS, /etc, user mods, and SMP/E

2013-03-12 Thread Andrew Rowley

On 13/03/2013 12:00, Shane Ginnane wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:01:57 +1100, Andrew Rowley wrote:


I'm not sure how it is packaged in z/OS, but in general I think it is
incorrect to replace the /etc directory when installing a new version of
the operating system - the same way you would not drop in a totally new
SYS1.PARMLIB.


lol - you wish ... read this:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r13/topic/com.ibm.zos.r13.e0zm100/at3gend.htm?path=1_5_4_1_2#at3gend


That's not completely inconsistent with what I was saying...

They are telling you to merge your existing /etc and /var with the new 
delivered ones, which is essentially correct. A new installation will 
have stuff delivered in /etc and /var, but the contents will be 
customised and will change and on a real system. The point is you don't 
want to lose your current customisations - which could be for much more 
than the base system software.


My approach would probably be to keep the delivered /etc somewhere e.g. 
in the SERVICE filesystem, and have the real /etc mounted in it's own 
filesystem so it is preserved when you replace the root with an upgrade.


Then you can compare old and new delivered /etc in the SERVICE 
filesystems, and assess and migrate changes to the real /etc as 
required. Typically, I would expect changes to the delivered /etc 
between releases to be fairly minor.


I think the biggest problem with that document is that someone has tried 
to write a procedure that will work in all circumstances, without any 
constraints on what you are starting with e.g. having the old delivered 
/etc to compare. If you can control your starting point, you can make it 
much simpler.


Would a written procedure to merge a delivered and existing SYS1.PARMLIB 
be any better? That's why they implemented concatenated PARMLIBs.


Regards

Andrew Rowley

--
and...@blackhillsoftware.com
+61 413 302 386

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS, /etc, user mods, and SMP/E

2013-03-12 Thread Ed Gould

On Mar 12, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:


On 13/03/2013 9:41, Paul Gilmartin wrote:


Presumably this is to avoid regressing user mods to members of /etc.
But there's a way to deal with this.  Years ago I took a class in  
SMP/E

software maintenance (Amdahl taught it).  One of the exercises was
to APPLY a USERMOD then attempt to APPLY service that conflicted with
the USERMOD.  It failed.  RESTORE the USERMOD; APPLY the PTF; then
re-APPLY the USERMOD.  Why is /etc/magic not handled this way?
(I'm confident that we have no user mods to that file.)


/etc is the standard location for system configuration information.  
In the same way you don't use SMP/E for SYS1.PARMLIB, you wouldn't  
want to use it for /etc.



I am semi surprised that there wasn't and ++HOLD Action on the Function.
Anyone?

Ed

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OMVS, /etc, user mods, and SMP/E

2013-03-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:56:35 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:

I am semi surprised that there wasn't and ++HOLD Action on the Function.
Anyone?
 
Yes.  Good idea.


On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:47:40 +1100, Andrew Rowley wrote:

Would a written procedure to merge a delivered and existing SYS1.PARMLIB
be any better? That's why they implemented concatenated PARMLIBs.
 
Yes.  Even if it simply copied from /samples any files in a supplied
list that weren't otherwise previously installed in /etc.

I took a small unscientific sample (my manager, who has a strong
UNIX background).  He found it astonishing that any UNIX(-like)
installation doesn't supply /etc/magic.  That file is distinctive in
that it's rarely customized at any installation.  Similar should apply
to /etc/services, the customary make rules file, inetd.conf, ...

The idea should be to get a generic system working as well as
possible, then customize it.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN