Re: is there any document for using shopz
Try https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/search/shopz On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:36 PM Jason Cai wrote: > Hi all > >I just am authorized to access IBM shopz. I had never accessed IBM > shopz before. > > Is there any document about how to order production or PTF by shopz. > > Any suggestion is greatly appreciated! > > Thanks a lot! > > Jason Cai > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
Just a question. Are you still using old links to the "Knowledge Center" site or new links to the "IBM Documentation" site? For example: See https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0 for the z/OS 2.40 books. I have been using the "IBM Documentation" site all day yesterday and today and haven't noticed any problems. --Roger On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:36 AM Richards, Robert B. (CTR) < 01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I remember doing those tech updates by hand...circa 1985? > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Carmen Vitullo > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:24 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? > > not shameless IMHO, a great tool I use first before hitting the books. > > to age myself a bit, I remember getting boxes of hard copy, and updates > periodically and was able to update the doc by hand, anyone remember the > > | update makes and what pages to remove and replace? > > taking that away and replacing it with a ACTION(DOC) update is little to > no help with all the products that now encompass the base > > I hope IBM developers are reading, listening, we really need the ability > to update PDF doc, IBM pushed KC to be on our local processors, and HAD a > great tool to get the doc from IBM and update our local copy of the KC, > last I head that's not working? or de funked? > > I don't know how this can be done, but I'm sure it can be done via SMP/E > or an outboard tool to update our local doc with any ACTION(DOC) I would be > willing to do what's necessary to create a local repository and update any > cfg file to make this happen locally > > Carmen > > > > On 1/21/2022 11:03 AM, Ramsey Hallman wrote: > > To throw in a shameless plug, if you have MVS/QuickRef, much of the > > IBM and ISV content is available on your mainframe for instant access, > > internet or not, KC up or down, USB plugable, etc. And for our > > clients, if there is content we do not currently have that you desire, > > let us know and we will do our best to obtain that content and add it to > our database. > > > > Prior to becoming a developer for MVS/QuickRef, every shop I worked in > > as a s/p had QuickRef. If it didn't when I arrived, it did by the time > I left. > > I don't know what I would have done without it. It's almost > > impossible to keep physical manuals up to date as quickly as software > changes. > > > > Ramsey Hallman > > MVS/QuickRef Development > > Chicago-Soft, Ltd. > > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:48 AM René > > Jansen > > wrote: > > > >> Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in > >> which progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s > >> to everything are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome > >> to stay updated, by e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the > >> docs databases. If these were of the tagged variety, we could even > >> generate updated PDFs out of these. I would be like updating TLS > >> newsletters without catching your finger in the blue binder! > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> René. > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >>> On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > >>> > >>> One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs > >>> to > >> read the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The > >> document database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and > >> a supported and stable API interface would be welcome. > >>> Matt Hogstrom > >>> PGP key 0F143BC1 > >>> > On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans < > >> 03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? > Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. > I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never > went > >> down :-) but think of the trees. > Damn ! Am I that old ? > > I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. > > --- > --- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > IBM-MAIN > >>> > >>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > >>> IBM-MAIN > >> - > >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > >> IBM-MAIN > >> > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > -- > /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be tru
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
Never run your favourite development edit macros, when the output dataset for the LINK has been temporarily tweaked to an office load library, which is also APF-auth and allocated to the production JES3, particularly when the macro reacts to x37 abends by compressing DISP=SHR. I've never heard so many phones ring at once! In my defence, the whole office was sysprogs, every one of them Captain Kirk, so nobody had told me about the cheeky extra library :-) Roops -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: REXX long string to SAY and IKT00405I
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:06:02 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote: >> >> Unprintable data is a more likely culprit. > >Yes, that was the reason. > Did you resolve the problem with a TRANSLATE() filter or at the source? Is it related to the Polish alphabet? What code page does your terminal use? -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
If it was a 4245 printer, those things were built like tanks. I was messing around with a golf club (I don't golf) and swung it, not realizing the amount of force they have in front of the printer and smacked the door - hard. Didn't even dent the thing. I was relieved. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of carl swanson Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system... Many years ago the 3rd shift computer operator was having issues with the 5245 (I believe) printer. After the printer jamming numerous times he had it with the printer and instead of addressing the issue, he took out his hand gun and shot it a single time. Only damaged the cover and not the printer but operations management did not challenge him on this. Carl Swanson carl.swans...@verizon.net -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Bridges Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 11:01 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system... People often say "times have changed" when what's actually changed is a fashion. I'm not saying more fundamental issues never change, but it's well to keep the distinction in mind, and to know which is which. Just sayin'. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Being famous has its benefits, but fame isn't one of them. -Larry Wall */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 00:15 Indeed. Yet so many "production" systems (non-Z) don't take that approach, yet get away with it. Oh, that e-commerce website is down for a half-hour/day/week? That helpdesk is offline because someone pulled a cable (to get back to Matt's post)? No big deal. I don't get it. Are we wrong? Are they wrong? It's easy to be purist, but have times changed?? I like to think not, but the evidence seems otherwise in so many cases. --- Shmuel wrote: >Asking "what can possible go wrong?" is good. Believing that nothing >can go wrong is suicidal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I'd settle for more complete PDF metadata and an OOREXX package to read them, to include * Authors when applicable * Date * Edition * Editors when appropriate * Form code * Title * URL for citing -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of René Jansen [rene.vincent.jan...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 11:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in which progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s to everything are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome to stay updated, by e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the docs databases. If these were of the tagged variety, we could even generate updated PDFs out of these. I would be like updating TLS newsletters without catching your finger in the blue binder! Best regards, René. Sent from my iPad > On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs to read > the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The document > database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and a supported and > stable API interface would be welcome. > > Matt Hogstrom > PGP key 0F143BC1 > >> On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans >> <03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >> :-) but think of the trees. >> Damn ! Am I that old ? >> >> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
Many years ago the 3rd shift computer operator was having issues with the 5245 (I believe) printer. After the printer jamming numerous times he had it with the printer and instead of addressing the issue, he took out his hand gun and shot it a single time. Only damaged the cover and not the printer but operations management did not challenge him on this. Carl Swanson carl.swans...@verizon.net -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Bridges Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 11:01 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system... People often say "times have changed" when what's actually changed is a fashion. I'm not saying more fundamental issues never change, but it's well to keep the distinction in mind, and to know which is which. Just sayin'. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Being famous has its benefits, but fame isn't one of them. -Larry Wall */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 00:15 Indeed. Yet so many "production" systems (non-Z) don't take that approach, yet get away with it. Oh, that e-commerce website is down for a half-hour/day/week? That helpdesk is offline because someone pulled a cable (to get back to Matt's post)? No big deal. I don't get it. Are we wrong? Are they wrong? It's easy to be purist, but have times changed?? I like to think not, but the evidence seems otherwise in so many cases. --- Shmuel wrote: >Asking "what can possible go wrong?" is good. Believing that nothing >can go wrong is suicidal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I remember independent TNLs hitting the same page, neither including the new text of the other. The indexed BM READ collections were a major improvement, IMHO, although they messed up diagrams. The PDF manuals should have had equivalent functionality, but they're no there yet. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Carmen Vitullo [cvitu...@hughes.net] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? not shameless IMHO, a great tool I use first before hitting the books. to age myself a bit, I remember getting boxes of hard copy, and updates periodically and was able to update the doc by hand, anyone remember the | update makes and what pages to remove and replace? taking that away and replacing it with a ACTION(DOC) update is little to no help with all the products that now encompass the base I hope IBM developers are reading, listening, we really need the ability to update PDF doc, IBM pushed KC to be on our local processors, and HAD a great tool to get the doc from IBM and update our local copy of the KC, last I head that's not working? or de funked? I don't know how this can be done, but I'm sure it can be done via SMP/E or an outboard tool to update our local doc with any ACTION(DOC) I would be willing to do what's necessary to create a local repository and update any cfg file to make this happen locally Carmen On 1/21/2022 11:03 AM, Ramsey Hallman wrote: > To throw in a shameless plug, if you have MVS/QuickRef, much of the IBM and > ISV content is available on your mainframe for instant access, internet or > not, KC up or down, USB plugable, etc. And for our clients, if there is > content we do not currently have that you desire, let us know and we will > do our best to obtain that content and add it to our database. > > Prior to becoming a developer for MVS/QuickRef, every shop I worked in as a > s/p had QuickRef. If it didn't when I arrived, it did by the time I left. > I don't know what I would have done without it. It's almost impossible to > keep physical manuals up to date as quickly as software changes. > > Ramsey Hallman > MVS/QuickRef Development > Chicago-Soft, Ltd. > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:48 AM René Jansen > wrote: > >> Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in which >> progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s to everything >> are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome to stay updated, by >> e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the docs databases. If these >> were of the tagged variety, we could even generate updated PDFs out of >> these. I would be like updating TLS newsletters without catching your >> finger in the blue binder! >> >> Best regards, >> >> René. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: >>> >>> One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs to >> read the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The document >> database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and a supported and >> stable API interface would be welcome. >>> Matt Hogstrom >>> PGP key 0F143BC1 >>> On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans < >> 03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went >> down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> -- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I have to correct me speeling again :) *| update marks and what pages to remove and replace? *IIRC Bob, yeah that's about right, till about 1998-99 or so Carmen ** On 1/21/2022 11:35 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: I remember doing those tech updates by hand...circa 1985? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:24 PM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? not shameless IMHO, a great tool I use first before hitting the books. to age myself a bit, I remember getting boxes of hard copy, and updates periodically and was able to update the doc by hand, anyone remember the | update makes and what pages to remove and replace? taking that away and replacing it with a ACTION(DOC) update is little to no help with all the products that now encompass the base I hope IBM developers are reading, listening, we really need the ability to update PDF doc, IBM pushed KC to be on our local processors, and HAD a great tool to get the doc from IBM and update our local copy of the KC, last I head that's not working? or de funked? I don't know how this can be done, but I'm sure it can be done via SMP/E or an outboard tool to update our local doc with any ACTION(DOC) I would be willing to do what's necessary to create a local repository and update any cfg file to make this happen locally Carmen On 1/21/2022 11:03 AM, Ramsey Hallman wrote: To throw in a shameless plug, if you have MVS/QuickRef, much of the IBM and ISV content is available on your mainframe for instant access, internet or not, KC up or down, USB plugable, etc. And for our clients, if there is content we do not currently have that you desire, let us know and we will do our best to obtain that content and add it to our database. Prior to becoming a developer for MVS/QuickRef, every shop I worked in as a s/p had QuickRef. If it didn't when I arrived, it did by the time I left. I don't know what I would have done without it. It's almost impossible to keep physical manuals up to date as quickly as software changes. Ramsey Hallman MVS/QuickRef Development Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:48 AM René Jansen wrote: Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in which progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s to everything are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome to stay updated, by e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the docs databases. If these were of the tagged variety, we could even generate updated PDFs out of these. I would be like updating TLS newsletters without catching your finger in the blue binder! Best regards, René. Sent from my iPad On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs to read the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The document database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and a supported and stable API interface would be welcome. Matt Hogstrom PGP key 0F143BC1 On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans < 03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. --- --- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Re: zEDC Justification documents or links
I replied offline to Glenn that I am definitely interested in his charts as typical management definitely responds to pretty pictures! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Glenn Wilcock Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zEDC Justification documents or links Hi Robert, if your shop uses DFSMShsm, I have some charts that I can share with you that show the significant advantages of using zEDC for backup and migration. zEDC is the #1 Best Practice for DFSMShsm. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I remember doing those tech updates by hand...circa 1985? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? not shameless IMHO, a great tool I use first before hitting the books. to age myself a bit, I remember getting boxes of hard copy, and updates periodically and was able to update the doc by hand, anyone remember the | update makes and what pages to remove and replace? taking that away and replacing it with a ACTION(DOC) update is little to no help with all the products that now encompass the base I hope IBM developers are reading, listening, we really need the ability to update PDF doc, IBM pushed KC to be on our local processors, and HAD a great tool to get the doc from IBM and update our local copy of the KC, last I head that's not working? or de funked? I don't know how this can be done, but I'm sure it can be done via SMP/E or an outboard tool to update our local doc with any ACTION(DOC) I would be willing to do what's necessary to create a local repository and update any cfg file to make this happen locally Carmen On 1/21/2022 11:03 AM, Ramsey Hallman wrote: > To throw in a shameless plug, if you have MVS/QuickRef, much of the > IBM and ISV content is available on your mainframe for instant access, > internet or not, KC up or down, USB plugable, etc. And for our > clients, if there is content we do not currently have that you desire, > let us know and we will do our best to obtain that content and add it to our > database. > > Prior to becoming a developer for MVS/QuickRef, every shop I worked in > as a s/p had QuickRef. If it didn't when I arrived, it did by the time I > left. > I don't know what I would have done without it. It's almost > impossible to keep physical manuals up to date as quickly as software changes. > > Ramsey Hallman > MVS/QuickRef Development > Chicago-Soft, Ltd. > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:48 AM René > Jansen > wrote: > >> Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in >> which progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s >> to everything are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome >> to stay updated, by e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the >> docs databases. If these were of the tagged variety, we could even >> generate updated PDFs out of these. I would be like updating TLS >> newsletters without catching your finger in the blue binder! >> >> Best regards, >> >> René. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: >>> >>> One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs >>> to >> read the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The >> document database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and >> a supported and stable API interface would be welcome. >>> Matt Hogstrom >>> PGP key 0F143BC1 >>> On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans < >> 03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went >> down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. --- --- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >> - >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >> IBM-MAIN >> > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
not shameless IMHO, a great tool I use first before hitting the books. to age myself a bit, I remember getting boxes of hard copy, and updates periodically and was able to update the doc by hand, anyone remember the | update makes and what pages to remove and replace? taking that away and replacing it with a ACTION(DOC) update is little to no help with all the products that now encompass the base I hope IBM developers are reading, listening, we really need the ability to update PDF doc, IBM pushed KC to be on our local processors, and HAD a great tool to get the doc from IBM and update our local copy of the KC, last I head that's not working? or de funked? I don't know how this can be done, but I'm sure it can be done via SMP/E or an outboard tool to update our local doc with any ACTION(DOC) I would be willing to do what's necessary to create a local repository and update any cfg file to make this happen locally Carmen On 1/21/2022 11:03 AM, Ramsey Hallman wrote: To throw in a shameless plug, if you have MVS/QuickRef, much of the IBM and ISV content is available on your mainframe for instant access, internet or not, KC up or down, USB plugable, etc. And for our clients, if there is content we do not currently have that you desire, let us know and we will do our best to obtain that content and add it to our database. Prior to becoming a developer for MVS/QuickRef, every shop I worked in as a s/p had QuickRef. If it didn't when I arrived, it did by the time I left. I don't know what I would have done without it. It's almost impossible to keep physical manuals up to date as quickly as software changes. Ramsey Hallman MVS/QuickRef Development Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:48 AM René Jansen wrote: Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in which progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s to everything are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome to stay updated, by e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the docs databases. If these were of the tagged variety, we could even generate updated PDFs out of these. I would be like updating TLS newsletters without catching your finger in the blue binder! Best regards, René. Sent from my iPad On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs to read the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The document database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and a supported and stable API interface would be welcome. Matt Hogstrom PGP key 0F143BC1 On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans < 03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: zEDC Justification documents or links
Hi Robert, if your shop uses DFSMShsm, I have some charts that I can share with you that show the significant advantages of using zEDC for backup and migration. zEDC is the #1 Best Practice for DFSMShsm. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
To throw in a shameless plug, if you have MVS/QuickRef, much of the IBM and ISV content is available on your mainframe for instant access, internet or not, KC up or down, USB plugable, etc. And for our clients, if there is content we do not currently have that you desire, let us know and we will do our best to obtain that content and add it to our database. Prior to becoming a developer for MVS/QuickRef, every shop I worked in as a s/p had QuickRef. If it didn't when I arrived, it did by the time I left. I don't know what I would have done without it. It's almost impossible to keep physical manuals up to date as quickly as software changes. Ramsey Hallman MVS/QuickRef Development Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:48 AM René Jansen wrote: > Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in which > progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s to everything > are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome to stay updated, by > e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the docs databases. If these > were of the tagged variety, we could even generate updated PDFs out of > these. I would be like updating TLS newsletters without catching your > finger in the blue binder! > > Best regards, > > René. > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > > > One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs to > read the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The document > database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and a supported and > stable API interface would be welcome. > > > > Matt Hogstrom > > PGP key 0F143BC1 > > > >> On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans < > 03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > >> > >> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? > >> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. > >> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went > down :-) but think of the trees. > >> Damn ! Am I that old ? > >> > >> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. > >> > >> -- > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
Yes, that is a very good idea. It would follow the general route in which progress is made, then undone, and then redone. As JSON api’s to everything are the fashion nowadays, that would be really welcome to stay updated, by e.g. having a nightly cronjob that updates the docs databases. If these were of the tagged variety, we could even generate updated PDFs out of these. I would be like updating TLS newsletters without catching your finger in the blue binder! Best regards, René. Sent from my iPad > On 21 Jan 2022, at 16:25, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs to read > the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The document > database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and a supported and > stable API interface would be welcome. > > Matt Hogstrom > PGP key 0F143BC1 > >> On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans >> <03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >> :-) but think of the trees. >> Damn ! Am I that old ? >> >> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
Speaking about bookmanager - I am right in assuming the Linux version is MIA? I was looking into making a Docker container for my older books - to run on the Mac actually - but could not find that anymore. Is there a good bookmanager—>pdf conversion somewhere? Best regards, René. > On 21 Jan 2022, at 17:06, Carmen Vitullo wrote: > > I also like Book-manager, and agree the search function once the index was > built the first time was very good. > > we merged our systems doc using Book-manager build with the book-manager doc > and placed that doc on the same Book-manager server...running OS/2 Warp :) > > Carmen > > >> On 1/21/2022 9:58 AM, Bob Bridges wrote: >> I always liked the HTML versions, and much prefer the search facility that >> came with those. But once IBM discontinued them, I bit the bullet and now >> have a sizable collection of PDFs. It's true there's an advantage of being >> able to look in them even when my internet connection is down. >> >> --- >> Bob Bridges,robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 >> >> /* Often when I'm reading a good book I stop and thank my teacher. That is >> I used to until she got an unlisted number. */ >> >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >> Hank Oerlemans >> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 17:18 >> >> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >> :-) but think of the trees. >> Damn ! Am I that old ? >> >> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > -- > /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, > but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody > that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him > when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I also like Book-manager, and agree the search function once the index was built the first time was very good. we merged our systems doc using Book-manager build with the book-manager doc and placed that doc on the same Book-manager server...running OS/2 Warp :) Carmen On 1/21/2022 9:58 AM, Bob Bridges wrote: I always liked the HTML versions, and much prefer the search facility that came with those. But once IBM discontinued them, I bit the bullet and now have a sizable collection of PDFs. It's true there's an advantage of being able to look in them even when my internet connection is down. --- Bob Bridges,robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Often when I'm reading a good book I stop and thank my teacher. That is I used to until she got an unlisted number. */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 17:18 How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
People often say "times have changed" when what's actually changed is a fashion. I'm not saying more fundamental issues never change, but it's well to keep the distinction in mind, and to know which is which. Just sayin'. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Being famous has its benefits, but fame isn't one of them. -Larry Wall */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 00:15 Indeed. Yet so many "production" systems (non-Z) don't take that approach, yet get away with it. Oh, that e-commerce website is down for a half-hour/day/week? That helpdesk is offline because someone pulled a cable (to get back to Matt's post)? No big deal. I don't get it. Are we wrong? Are they wrong? It's easy to be purist, but have times changed?? I like to think not, but the evidence seems otherwise in so many cases. --- Shmuel wrote: >Asking "what can possible go wrong?" is good. Believing that nothing can go wrong is suicidal. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I always liked the HTML versions, and much prefer the search facility that came with those. But once IBM discontinued them, I bit the bullet and now have a sizable collection of PDFs. It's true there's an advantage of being able to look in them even when my internet connection is down. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Often when I'm reading a good book I stop and thank my teacher. That is I used to until she got an unlisted number. */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 17:18 How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
good point, and normally not inserted unless I know I've loaded new content that I want to save and I use the last USB port on the front of this tower to recharge my wireless ear pods :) On 1/21/2022 9:31 AM, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote: I'd suggest to remove the stick. And insert it only when doing backup. Reason: cyber resiliency. Ransomware could destroy content of both your primary HDD/SSD and backup device. And it's worth to have two (or more) devices. And round robin. I did it. My backup space is IMHO huge - approx. 70GB. So I use regular HDD in external case, USB attached. However incremental backup takes approx. 4-5 minutes. Yes, I have a lot of pictures, PDFs, etc. But I do not modify majority of these pictures. The most of time spent for backup is checking directiories against content change. (Of course it's scripted). -- /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: TCPIP and ICSF. And RMF
Radolslaw, There are 2 parts to TLS encryption, the handshake and the data encryption. (Others may argue there are more.) These are the handshake and the data transfer. The handshake uses asymmetric encryption (RSA key pairs typically, but also Elliptic Curve key pairs), while the data transfer uses symmetric encryption. TLS will use CPACF for the data encryption if it is physically available and the encryption mechanism is supported by CPACF. TLS will use Crypto Express 2 device for the handshake if it can. This may depend again on the encryption mechanism requested in the Cipher suite specified. TLS will use software where it cannot use the hardware. TLS also uses hashing. This too is usually handled using CPACF, if available. Also I think that the z15 CPACF has some asymmetric support which can also be invoked. You have to make sure that the Cipher Suite you choose is supported by the hardware. There are RMF reports showing Crypto usage, but I have only seen these in batch reports. Maybe they are available on panels and others can help you. You will probably find it useful to run the SSL started task, GSKSRVR. This will give you information about sessions using TLS and SSL. It is an optional address space. It is documented in Chapter 11 of Cryptographic Services System Secure Sockets Layer Programming SC14-7495-50. Depending on the 3270 client you are using there will usually be a way to see what is being used. For example on Vista 3270 you can click the little upward arrow in the bottom left of the screen. This shows you the crypto services being used. Regards Lennie Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw https://rsclweb.com ‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka Sent: 21 January 2022 13:11 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: TCPIP and ICSF. And RMF How to reconfigure TCPIP family members (TCPIP, TN3270, FTP, etc.) to start using ICSF services for things requiring cryptography? And how to check whether they use/don't use ICSF? Another question: is there any RMF screen showing current utilization of crypto HW? -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I'd suggest to remove the stick. And insert it only when doing backup. Reason: cyber resiliency. Ransomware could destroy content of both your primary HDD/SSD and backup device. And it's worth to have two (or more) devices. And round robin. I did it. My backup space is IMHO huge - approx. 70GB. So I use regular HDD in external case, USB attached. However incremental backup takes approx. 4-5 minutes. Yes, I have a lot of pictures, PDFs, etc. But I do not modify majority of these pictures. The most of time spent for backup is checking directiories against content change. (Of course it's scripted). -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 21.01.2022 o 16:12, Carmen Vitullo pisze: indeed, that's why I still use this Desktop, but my hard drive is still a 1tb spinner :( I have my USB stick loaded all the time and run incremental backups daily. my last PC had a disk controller failure and I ALMOST lost all my doc/pictures and NO - I'm not going to any cloud :) Carmen On 1/21/2022 9:05 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: A home computer is a device with a comfortable keyboard, a decent pointing device and a large* UHD monitor. Of course, a 2 TB or larger SSD wouldn't hurt. * FSVO large that grows every year. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Richards, Robert B. (CTR) [01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:58 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Our company PC's and Laptops are also disabled, but I was making a point, albeit poorly, to be careful with USB sticks these days. What's a home PC these days? My only laptop is old and hasn't been booted in years. iPads and iPhones and Watches are the rage in my house. 😊 Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:50 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. Just ask the Iranians. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of René Jansen Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! otherwise it was all hand coded. Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig thi
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
One thing not mentioned on the thread is the ability to have APIs to read the IBM document database. If one exists please share. The document database assumes a human at a browser which is limiting and a supported and stable API interface would be welcome. Matt Hogstrom PGP key 0F143BC1 > On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:18, Hank Oerlemans > <03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? > Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. > I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) > but think of the trees. > Damn ! Am I that old ? > > I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I understand why companies are providing and locking down their laptops. They connect to the company network and can easily infect other systems. The most annoying feature is the lack of ability to plug in external storage (not just USBs). The answer is push everything to the cloud. I’ve seen too many cases where one person is not diligent and causes the most harm so the answer is lock down everything and deal with exceptions; which are few and far between. Matt Hogstrom PGP key 0F143BC1 > On Jan 21, 2022, at 09:50, Carmen Vitullo wrote: > > for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on > company PC's and Laptops :( > > Carmen > >> On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: >> I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. >> >> Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work >> computer. Just ask the Iranians. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >> René Jansen >> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM >> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >> >> My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, >> people! >> >> You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In >> fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very >> bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an >> absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites >> using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online >> of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, >> and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based >> emulators. >> >> Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. >> >> My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational >> copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern >> high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. >> >> Best regards, >> >> René. >> >> On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: >>> >>> I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was >>> intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you >>> want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the >>> better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. >>> >>> the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team >>> members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! >>> otherwise it was all hand coded. >>> >>> >>> Carmen >>> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
indeed, that's why I still use this Desktop, but my hard drive is still a 1tb spinner :( I have my USB stick loaded all the time and run incremental backups daily. my last PC had a disk controller failure and I ALMOST lost all my doc/pictures and NO - I'm not going to any cloud :) Carmen On 1/21/2022 9:05 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: A home computer is a device with a comfortable keyboard, a decent pointing device and a large* UHD monitor. Of course, a 2 TB or larger SSD wouldn't hurt. * FSVO large that grows every year. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Richards, Robert B. (CTR) [01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:58 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Our company PC's and Laptops are also disabled, but I was making a point, albeit poorly, to be careful with USB sticks these days. What's a home PC these days? My only laptop is old and hasn't been booted in years. iPads and iPhones and Watches are the rage in my house. 😊 Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:50 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. Just ask the Iranians. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of René Jansen Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! otherwise it was all hand coded. Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion ListOn Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: migrate from DS8884 to DS8910F
When we migrated from our 8870 to the 8910 we used a similar approach. As a small shop (2 LPARs) we took an outage to do the actual swing. We used global mirror to replicate the 8870 to the 8910 (async replication between2 boxes 10 feet apart, across a couple fibers is really fast). We had fibers between the z14 and the 8910 already laid and ready to plug into the z. When the cutover came we shut down the z, unplugged the 8870 from the z, plugged the 8910 in the same Ficon ports and brought the z back up. BTW, at least in our case (and our business partner said this is normal) IBM provided a no-charge limited license for global mirror for this express purpose. As far as the DR configuration, you may want to consider whether you want to use the 8884 for DR. They're falling off support at the end of this year. We currently have that exact configuration - an 8910 at the primary site and an 8884 at the DR site. We're looking at upgrading the 8884 - probably with another 8910 at DR. In our case, we are using a couple fiber channel ports out the back of the 8910 into a Brocade switch (IBM branded) and over our WAN link to the alternate site. A second Brocade takes the data into the 8884. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 2:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: migrate from DS8884 to DS8910F Zoran Trifunović wrote: >We have two z14 and IBM DS8884 and ds8190f. Can you briefly explain how >to migrate from IBM DS8884 to ds891f using copyservice. >And another question how to make dr solution where IBM DS8884 and one >z14 would be dr center and ds8190f and z14 would be primary center also >using copyservices Richard Pinion wrote: >Not sure if this is the correct answer for you. But, we recently moved >all of our data from a Hitachi Data Systems G1500 box to a Hitachi Data >Systems 5100 (some say 5100 others say 5500) box. We used TDMF. Zoran, your first point of call ought to be the folks who sold you your IBM DS8190F storage unit(s). It's quite likely they would be able to advise you well on migration and DR options. That said, here's an introductory answer. I agree with Richard that TDMF is quite useful particularly if planned service interruptions are unacceptable or at least undesirable, and you want to reduce or eliminate outages. However, you mentioned Copy Services, so I'll answer that way. One basic approach for migration is: 1. You configure Global Mirror replication from your IBM DS8884 to your IBM DS8190F. Why Global Mirror? Because it's asynchronous, so it doesn't require as much forethought and planning since it's lower impact than synchronous replication. 2. After the Global Mirror pairing is humming along nicely, you shut down the IBM Z server. This can be on a LPAR by LPAR basis, typically starting with a Development LPAR. 3. You wait for Global Mirror replication to "drain," so that the target storage device is caught up to the primary. This shouldn't take long at all. 4. You sever the mirroring. 5. You swing the new storage unit (which now has all the replicated volumes) into the primary role. 6. You start up your IBM Z server again, LPAR by LPAR typically. (Migrating the storage volumes for each LPAR in turn.) 7. You decommission or repurpose your IBM DS8884. (Donate it to me! :-)) Storage growth is quite common, and ideally you would configure your new IBM DS8190F so that you'd use larger volume sizes, notably EAVs, for your next growth phase instead of assuming you add any more Mod9s or whatever. But of course you can carry forward the existing volume sizes. There are some more detailed specifics about how you attach the storage units (cables, ports, switches if any, etc.) Ideally you would have everything cabled up and ready to go so that you're not actually doing anything physically when you shut down and restart your IBM Z LPARs since that part tends to be time critical. Having both storage units available would also let you restart the LPAR(s) again with the IBM DS8884 if for whatever reason you can't relaunch the LPAR(s) on the IBM DS8910F. Disaster Recovery (DR) is another whole topic, and there are many choices available. The two big "numbers" for DR are Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO). If you have consensus agreement in your organization what those metrics need to be, you should be able to configure and deploy an IBM Z environment that meets or exceeds them. RTO means basically "what is the maximum time delay tolerable to restore end user service in a disaster," and RPO means "what is the maximum tolerable amount of data loss (if any) for committed transactions in a disaster." For example: RTO = 4 hours RPO = zero (no data loss) would be one pair of objectives. To get to RPO = zero for transaction processing systems that exhibit at least tolerable end user re
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
LOL! my home desktop tower, is an HP Pavilion, 4G of memory, a 2.4 GHZ AMD processor chip running winders 10 64bit not winders 11 compatable, but it still runs Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:58 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: Our company PC's and Laptops are also disabled, but I was making a point, albeit poorly, to be careful with USB sticks these days. What's a home PC these days? My only laptop is old and hasn't been booted in years. iPads and iPhones and Watches are the rage in my house. 😊 Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:50 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. Just ask the Iranians. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of René Jansen Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! otherwise it was all hand coded. Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion ListOn Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, sendemailtolists...@listserv.ua.eduwith the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall there
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
A home computer is a device with a comfortable keyboard, a decent pointing device and a large* UHD monitor. Of course, a 2 TB or larger SSD wouldn't hurt. * FSVO large that grows every year. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Richards, Robert B. (CTR) [01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Our company PC's and Laptops are also disabled, but I was making a point, albeit poorly, to be careful with USB sticks these days. What's a home PC these days? My only laptop is old and hasn't been booted in years. iPads and iPhones and Watches are the rage in my house. 😊 Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: > I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. > > Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. > Just ask the Iranians. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of René Jansen > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? > > My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, > people! > > You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In > fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very > bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an > absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites > using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online > of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, > and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based > emulators. > > Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. > > My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational > copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern > high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. > > Best regards, > > René. > > >> On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: >> >> I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was >> intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you >> want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, >> no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. >> >> the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team >> members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! >> otherwise it was all hand coded. >> >> >> Carmen >> >>> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>> It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page >>> design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, >>> reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, >>> e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user >>> the required format and to reject valid characters. >>> >>> Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>> >>> >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on >>> behalf of Allan Staller >>> [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >>> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> Classification: Confidential >>> >>> The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those >>> the are replacing. >>> I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >>> Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans >>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you >>> trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be >>> a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise >>> your Computer.] >>> >>> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >>> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >>> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >>> :-) but think of the trees. >>> Damn ! Am I that old ? >>> >>> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >>> >>>
Plan B for the Internet - Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
This reminds me of the TED talk by Danny Hillis (who is from Baltimore) https://www.ted.com/talks/danny_hillis_the_internet_could_crash_we_need_a_plan_b -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of René Jansen Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject:Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. > On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: > > I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was > intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want > to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no > glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. > > the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team > members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! > otherwise it was all hand coded. > > > Carmen > >> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page >> design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, >> reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail >> addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the >> required format and to reject valid characters. >> >> Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. >> >> >> -- >> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >> >> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of >> Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AM >> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >> >> Classification: Confidential >> >> The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those >> the are replacing. >> I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). >> >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >> Hank Oerlemans >> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM >> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >> >> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the >> sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, >> which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] >> >> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >> :-) but think of the trees. >> Damn ! Am I that old ? >> >> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email >> tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> ::DISCLAIMER:: >> >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and >> intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not >> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, >> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain >> viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without >> referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator >> or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email >> are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or >> opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, >> copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this >> message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of >> HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please >> delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or >> attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects.
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I have all the 2.3 and 2.3 z/OS and products doc on our company share, my issue was my co-worker was working with the IBM DEBUG team and a new parm was provided for COBOL that aided in debug was not in this original doc. I'd have to check my holddata for any hold actions for DOC that I may have missed. something I normally do is send the update for AO and DOC to the team, since support for COBOL was moved to me just recently, I'm sure it was something I overlooked thanks Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:55 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: Download to a network on your work PC. If you are paranoid* then make local copies of the most critical. At today's disk and SSD prices, it's a lot more affordable than it used to be. * Even paranoids have real enemies. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Carmen Vitullo [cvitu...@hughes.net] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:49 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. Just ask the Iranians. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of René Jansen Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! otherwise it was all hand coded. Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion ListOn Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, sendemailtolists...@listserv.ua.eduwith the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
Our company PC's and Laptops are also disabled, but I was making a point, albeit poorly, to be careful with USB sticks these days. What's a home PC these days? My only laptop is old and hasn't been booted in years. iPads and iPhones and Watches are the rage in my house. 😊 Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: > I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. > > Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. > Just ask the Iranians. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of René Jansen > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? > > My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, > people! > > You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In > fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very > bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an > absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites > using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online > of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, > and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based > emulators. > > Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. > > My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational > copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern > high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. > > Best regards, > > René. > > >> On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: >> >> I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was >> intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you >> want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, >> no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. >> >> the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team >> members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! >> otherwise it was all hand coded. >> >> >> Carmen >> >>> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>> It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page >>> design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, >>> reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, >>> e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user >>> the required format and to reject valid characters. >>> >>> Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>> >>> >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on >>> behalf of Allan Staller >>> [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >>> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> Classification: Confidential >>> >>> The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those >>> the are replacing. >>> I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >>> Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans >>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you >>> trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be >>> a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise >>> your Computer.] >>> >>> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >>> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >>> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >>> :-) but think of the trees. >>> Damn ! Am I that old ? >>> >>> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >>> >>> >>> - >>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >>> ::DISCLAIMER:: >>> >>> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and >>> intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not >>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, >>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain >>> viruse
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
Download to a network on your work PC. If you are paranoid* then make local copies of the most critical. At today's disk and SSD prices, it's a lot more affordable than it used to be. * Even paranoids have real enemies. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Carmen Vitullo [cvitu...@hughes.net] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: > I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. > > Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. > Just ask the Iranians. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > René Jansen > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM > To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? > > My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, > people! > > You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In > fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very > bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an > absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites > using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online > of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, > and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based > emulators. > > Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. > > My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational > copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern > high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. > > Best regards, > > René. > > >> On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: >> >> I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was >> intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you >> want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, >> no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. >> >> the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team >> members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! >> otherwise it was all hand coded. >> >> >> Carmen >> >>> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>> It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page >>> design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, >>> reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, >>> e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user >>> the required format and to reject valid characters. >>> >>> Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>> >>> >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on >>> behalf of Allan Staller >>> [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >>> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> Classification: Confidential >>> >>> The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those >>> the are replacing. >>> I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >>> Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans >>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you >>> trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be >>> a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise >>> your Computer.] >>> >>> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >>> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >>> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >>> :-) but think of the trees. >>> Damn ! Am I that old ? >>> >>> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >>> >>> - >>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >>> ::DISCLAIMER:: >>> >>> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and >>> intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not >>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, >>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, a
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
Of course. I am very biased against company provided laptops. Also, using your own for the docs provides the extra screen real estate, and - most of the time - better resolution needed for reading comfort. Of course my machines have an up to date copy of the stick on SSD. And when a company has sensible VPN access, a better 3270 emulator. @Carmen - having an undocumented parm for COBOL deserves an immediate Documentation APAR. Paying for software means having supported documentation, which is up to date. Please ask them in the APAR to have synchronised sources for the PDF and the website, where the PDF is the primary output. I am not sure what is happening to IBM. Is COBOL now also outsourced? Best regards, René. Sent from my iPad > On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:47, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) > <01c91f408b9e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. > > Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. > Just ask the Iranians. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > René Jansen > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? > > My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, > people! > > You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In > fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very > bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an > absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites > using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online > of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, > and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based > emulators. > > Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. > > My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational > copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern > high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. > > Best regards, > > René. > > >> On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: >> >> I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was >> intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you >> want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, >> no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. >> >> the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team >> members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! >> otherwise it was all hand coded. >> >> >> Carmen >> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >>> It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page >>> design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, >>> reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, >>> e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user >>> the required format and to reject valid characters. >>> >>> Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >>> >>> >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on >>> behalf of Allan Staller >>> [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >>> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> Classification: Confidential >>> >>> The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those >>> the are replacing. >>> I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >>> Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans >>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >>> >>> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you >>> trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be >>> a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise >>> your Computer.] >>> >>> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >>> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >>> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >>> :-) but think of the trees. >>> Damn ! Am I that old ? >>> >>> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >>> >>> - >>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >>> ::DISCLAIMER:: >>> >>> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are conf
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
for me Bob, I'd have to download on my home PC, USB's are disabled on company PC's and Laptops :( Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:47 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote: I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. Just ask the Iranians. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of René Jansen Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! otherwise it was all hand coded. Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PMTo:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. - - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. ---
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I hope you only plug that USB stick in your own PC. Policy here is that it can get you fired if you plug it into a work computer. Just ask the Iranians. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of René Jansen Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. > On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: > > I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was > intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want > to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no > glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. > > the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team > members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! > otherwise it was all hand coded. > > > Carmen > >> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page >> design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, >> reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail >> addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the >> required format and to reject valid characters. >> >> Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. >> >> >> -- >> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >> >> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on >> behalf of Allan Staller >> [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >> >> Classification: Confidential >> >> The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those >> the are replacing. >> I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). >> >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >> Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans >> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >> >> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you >> trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be >> a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise >> your Computer.] >> >> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >> :-) but think of the trees. >> Damn ! Am I that old ? >> >> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >> >> - >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >> IBM-MAIN >> ::DISCLAIMER:: >> >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and >> intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not >> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, >> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain >> viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without >> referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator >> or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email >> are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or >> opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, >> copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this >> message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of >> HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please >> delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or >> attachments, please check them for viruses and other
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
+1 good point, in my case, a new COBOL parm, not documented in the doc we had downloaded was not provided thus the need to get up to date content. do we now need to mimic what SMP/E does for system maint and holddata and run a ORDER from server to make sure we have up to date, valid content? Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:40 AM, René Jansen wrote: My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! otherwise it was all hand coded. Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the messag
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
My regular warning to download the all the pdf files of all the manuals, people! You might not have external internet access when it all goes sideways. In fact, that is an extremely common scenario, in which you would want, very bad, access to all the crummy, slow, wrong-link infested crap that is an absolute showcase of how not to provide documentation, or build websites using active content, for that matter. That mainframe would be still online of course, and reachable, provided you have a direct Telnet 3270 link to it, and no ‘stepping stones’ on deplorable technology. Or webserver based emulators. Books are even better of course, but not everyone has the space. My usb stick with manuals is very well maintained, and I have generational copies of that. That stick, and the readability of the pdf file on a modern high res screen is a showcase of modern technology, the website is not. Best regards, René. > On 21 Jan 2022, at 15:21, Carmen Vitullo wrote: > > I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was > intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want > to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no > glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. > > the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team > members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! > otherwise it was all hand coded. > > > Carmen > >> On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page >> design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, >> reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail >> addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the >> required format and to reject valid characters. >> >> Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. >> >> >> -- >> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >> >> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of >> Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AM >> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >> >> Classification: Confidential >> >> The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those >> the are replacing. >> I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). >> >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >> Hank Oerlemans >> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM >> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? >> >> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the >> sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, >> which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] >> >> How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? >> Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. >> I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down >> :-) but think of the trees. >> Damn ! Am I that old ? >> >> I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email >> tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> ::DISCLAIMER:: >> >> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and >> intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not >> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, >> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain >> viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without >> referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator >> or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email >> are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or >> opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, >> copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this >> message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of >> HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please >> delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or >> attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. >> >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subsc
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
Welcome to the world of the sound byte, where profit means 90-day cash flow and planning means "apres moi le deluge." Times have changed. The good news is that some of the changes are positive. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Phil Smith III [li...@akphs.com] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 12:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system... Shmuel wrote: >Asking "what can possible go wrong?" is good. Believing that nothing can go >wrong is suicidal. Indeed. Yet so many "production" systems (non-Z) don't take that approach, yet get away with it. Oh, that e-commerce website is down for a half-hour/day/week? That helpdesk is offline because someone pulled a cable (to get back to Matt's post)? No big deal. I don't get it. Are we wrong? Are they wrong? It's easy to be purist, but have times changed?? I like to think not, but the evidence seems otherwise in so many cases. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I have to agree, back in the early days development of a index page was intended to be simple, provide some wording, and some links to where you want to go, mostly due to performance, the faster the page loads the better, no glitter, pictures or unnecessary icons. the only tools we had back in the early 90's was a C program one of my team members write to convert DCF/SCRIPT to HTML (thanks to Mike Myers) ! otherwise it was all hand coded. Carmen On 1/21/2022 8:02 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- /I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
It's not just IBM. There seems to be a race to the bottom in web page design. Glitz is more important than, e.g., ease of use, performance, reliability. Take entry and validation of, e.g., credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, names, ZIP codes; it is bog standard to not tell the user the required format and to reject valid characters. Not that "everybody else does it" is a valid excuse. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 7:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
TCPIP and ICSF. And RMF
How to reconfigure TCPIP family members (TCPIP, TN3270, FTP, etc.) to start using ICSF services for things requiring cryptography? And how to check whether they use/don't use ICSF? Another question: is there any RMF screen showing current utilization of crypto HW? -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: REXX long string to SAY and IKT00405I
W dniu 20.01.2022 o 23:35, Hank Oerlemans pisze: Without actually checking long string behaviour my first reaction would be to check the data ? Unprintable data is a more likely culprit. Yes, that was the reason. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
I wonder if IBM realises that these tools showcase IBM products. Do I want tools and products like this to run my business? On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 12:18, Allan Staller < 0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Classification: Confidential > > The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those > the are replacing. > I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Hank Oerlemans > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? > > [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust > the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing > email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] > > How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? > Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. > I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down > :-) but think of the trees. > Damn ! Am I that old ? > > I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ::DISCLAIMER:: > > The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and > intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not > guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, > corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain > viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without > referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator > or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this > email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the > views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, > dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or > publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized > representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before > opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and > other defects. > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: IBM Knowledge Center down?
Classification: Confidential The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional or available as those the are replacing. I have been sayig this for the last 10 yrs (or more). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hank Oerlemans Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Knowledge Center down? [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] How many online systems have IBM put out there now ? Just when it's all seems stable it changes and we go around again. I could mention the stacks of manuals I started with that never went down :-) but think of the trees. Damn ! Am I that old ? I'm gonna download the pdf collection for now. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: What not to do on a z/OS system...
Phil, that is a very good question, and one I struggle with sometimes. On the one hand, when I was a system programmer (wel, don’t we keep being that always?) we had strict rules that nothing impacted customer’s work, and that implied always doing changes at night-time and in weekends. For production, we had batch windows and inter-application consistent moments (running DB2 quiesce a lot). But on the other hand, everything was limited to the current timezone, and when that stopped being so, there went the batch windows out of the door (or the window), there was always somebody needing the system somewhere, DB2 utilities got ‘online’ versions. Banks nowadays close systems with large differences because interfaces did not run at the right moment, and in the hope that tomorrow everything will be fine again - I remember the day when we needed to stay for the weekend because the ledger had a one cents discrepancy (It was COBOL rounding - and one programmer that had covered errors like that a decade before it happened). Because of no consistent points in time anymore, the discrepancies run into the millions sometimes and nobody really cares it seems (and sometimes it really turns out to be fraud). Yes times have changed. But I think they need to change back. It will only take some great disasters before it will happen. When you are accustomed to RACF and structured security, it is a bit odd to see youths running with Windows Admin and Linux root for all small changes, and really nobody understanding how safe a system can be when one understands the difference between user- and supervisor mode. Not observing that, is another prominent reason for outages of the unplanned kind. Best regards, René. > On 21 Jan 2022, at 06:15, Phil Smith III wrote: > > Shmuel wrote: > >> Asking "what can possible go wrong?" is good. Believing that nothing can go >> wrong is suicidal. > > > > Indeed. Yet so many "production" systems (non-Z) don't take that approach, > yet get away with it. Oh, that e-commerce website is down > for a half-hour/day/week? That helpdesk is offline because someone pulled a > cable (to get back to Matt's post)? No big deal. > > > > I don't get it. Are we wrong? Are they wrong? It's easy to be purist, but > have times changed?? I like to think not, but the evidence > seems otherwise in so many cases. > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: migrate from DS8884 to DS8910F
Zoran Trifunović wrote: >We have two z14 and IBM DS8884 and ds8190f. Can you briefly >explain how to migrate from IBM DS8884 to ds891f using copyservice. >And another question how to make dr solution where IBM DS8884 and >one z14 would be dr center and ds8190f and z14 would be primary >center also using copyservices Richard Pinion wrote: >Not sure if this is the correct answer for you. But, we recently >moved all of our data from a Hitachi Data Systems G1500 box to a >Hitachi Data Systems 5100 (some say 5100 others say 5500) box. We >used TDMF. Zoran, your first point of call ought to be the folks who sold you your IBM DS8190F storage unit(s). It's quite likely they would be able to advise you well on migration and DR options. That said, here's an introductory answer. I agree with Richard that TDMF is quite useful particularly if planned service interruptions are unacceptable or at least undesirable, and you want to reduce or eliminate outages. However, you mentioned Copy Services, so I'll answer that way. One basic approach for migration is: 1. You configure Global Mirror replication from your IBM DS8884 to your IBM DS8190F. Why Global Mirror? Because it's asynchronous, so it doesn't require as much forethought and planning since it's lower impact than synchronous replication. 2. After the Global Mirror pairing is humming along nicely, you shut down the IBM Z server. This can be on a LPAR by LPAR basis, typically starting with a Development LPAR. 3. You wait for Global Mirror replication to "drain," so that the target storage device is caught up to the primary. This shouldn't take long at all. 4. You sever the mirroring. 5. You swing the new storage unit (which now has all the replicated volumes) into the primary role. 6. You start up your IBM Z server again, LPAR by LPAR typically. (Migrating the storage volumes for each LPAR in turn.) 7. You decommission or repurpose your IBM DS8884. (Donate it to me! :-)) Storage growth is quite common, and ideally you would configure your new IBM DS8190F so that you'd use larger volume sizes, notably EAVs, for your next growth phase instead of assuming you add any more Mod9s or whatever. But of course you can carry forward the existing volume sizes. There are some more detailed specifics about how you attach the storage units (cables, ports, switches if any, etc.) Ideally you would have everything cabled up and ready to go so that you're not actually doing anything physically when you shut down and restart your IBM Z LPARs since that part tends to be time critical. Having both storage units available would also let you restart the LPAR(s) again with the IBM DS8884 if for whatever reason you can't relaunch the LPAR(s) on the IBM DS8910F. Disaster Recovery (DR) is another whole topic, and there are many choices available. The two big "numbers" for DR are Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO). If you have consensus agreement in your organization what those metrics need to be, you should be able to configure and deploy an IBM Z environment that meets or exceeds them. RTO means basically "what is the maximum time delay tolerable to restore end user service in a disaster," and RPO means "what is the maximum tolerable amount of data loss (if any) for committed transactions in a disaster." For example: RTO = 4 hours RPO = zero (no data loss) would be one pair of objectives. To get to RPO = zero for transaction processing systems that exhibit at least tolerable end user responsiveness requires careful attention to the "fiber distance" between sites. It'd be wonderful to put one site in Zurich and the other in Vancouver, for example, but the fiber distance between those two locations imposes significant delays that don't really work for transaction processing systems typically found on IBM Z servers. (And on other servers too, for that matter.) If your primary and secondary data centers are at "metro distance" -- a few kilometers apart, or tens of kilometers -- then you can probably get to RPO = zero if need be. Beyond that it gets "interesting." (I happen to work with a few customers that need RPO=zero over intercontinental distances for very selective, extremely high value transactions. Can be done, but you have to be a little clever.) In certain circumstances you can get RTO down to zero, too, if need be. To get RTO down below several hours requires automation. Generally speaking you need a bigger budget and more operational excellence the lower your RTO and RPO numbers. Thus there's some balancing of costs versus risks, and that's ultimately a business decision (or public policy decision if you're a government agency). There's heightened interest in recovering from logical data corruption events given increasing malware and ransomware threats. That's a hot topic right now, and there are excellent IBM Z-based answers to defend against and quickly recover from all sorts of logica