Re: 2024 z/OSMF User Survey: We want to hear from you!
Dear z/OS users, We are reaching out to remind you that the z/OSMF 2024 user survey is currently ongoing and will be ending by the end of May. We kindly request that you take 5-10 minutes of your time to answer the survey questions, if you have not done so already. Your feedback is valuable to us and will help us improve our products and services to better meet your needs. We appreciate your cooperation and thank you in advance for your participation in the survey. https://ibm.biz/zosmfsurvey2024 Thank you, z/OSMF development team -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
2024 z/OSMF User Survey: We want to hear from you!
Dear z/OS users, Last year, you helped us better understand how you were using z/OSMF for your work and how it could be enhanced in different ways. Since that survey, the z/OSMF team has been working on areas for improvement based on your feedback. To name a few, we removed CIM dependency for several z/OSMF functions to further simplify z/OSMF configuration, added more REST APIs such as REST API to support validating Parmlib syntax and enhanced z/OSMF Desktop such as supporting remote sysplex. We are always looking for new ways to make your experience with z/OSMF even better and would like to hear your updated feedback before moving forward. Therefore, we would like to invite you back to share your thoughts through our 2024 z/OSMF annual survey. We would really appreciate if you could take about 10 minutes to answer the following survey. https://ibm.biz/zosmfsurvey2024 Thank you, z/OSMF development team -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
Hi Mark, It turned out something more basic. I had forgotten to add the line in my TCPIP.PROFILE to allow z/OSMF to use port 443. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Charles Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 4:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there I have seen this before. You need to make sure that the Certificate you set up for your production system can also be used on the other system. You can have multiple SANs (IP addresses) defined in the Cert, so add any system that might use the same Cert. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
I have seen this before. You need to make sure that the Certificate you set up for your production system can also be used on the other system. You can have multiple SANs (IP addresses) defined in the Cert, so add any system that might use the same Cert. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/osmf missing directory
Never mind - again. The SMP/E job to put the new workflow choked on installing the PTF but apparently got far enough to create the directory. This install is going to cause me to want to retire! Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 3:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] z/osmf missing directory Hi again, Got past my last problem and now while trying to apply UJ93002 to get the 3.1 workflow loaded into the filesystem, the apply failed because /usr/lpp/bcp/upgrade doesn't exist. While I can manually go into the FS and create the directory, I'm concerned that I missed some step that should have created it and others. The only hits I've found in doing searches online are telling me that installing a particular PTF will put the new workflow in this location. So my questions are 1) is it safe for me to just create this directory, and if not, where is the step(s) that I missed that would create it for me? TIA (again) Rex -- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/osmf missing directory
Hi again, Got past my last problem and now while trying to apply UJ93002 to get the 3.1 workflow loaded into the filesystem, the apply failed because /usr/lpp/bcp/upgrade doesn't exist. While I can manually go into the FS and create the directory, I'm concerned that I missed some step that should have created it and others. The only hits I've found in doing searches online are telling me that installing a particular PTF will put the new workflow in this location. So my questions are 1) is it safe for me to just create this directory, and if not, where is the step(s) that I missed that would create it for me? TIA (again) Rex -- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
SAN is Subject Alternate Name in a digital certificate. In that case, I would try a different port such as 2443 or any other port not in use. On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 4:46 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I'm not following you on this one. SANs? In my vocabulary SAN is storage > and we don't run a SAN for our mainframe disk. Direct attach, 2 LPARs on > the same physical CEC, 1 DS8910F storage direct attached, and shared chpids > for both the disk and OSA. > > I did find this - which I didn't see yesterday that is probably my problem > but I can't see what I need to change to fix it: > > CWWKO0221E: TCP Channel defaultHttpEndpoint-ssl initialization did not > succeed. >The socket bind did not succeed for host * and port 443. The port > might already be in use. >Exception Message: EDC5111I Permission denied. (errno2=0x744C7246) > > I do a netstat on port 443 and get this: > > D TCPIP,TCPIP,NETSTAT,ALLCON,PORT=443 > EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V2R4 TCPIP 496 > USER ID CONN LOCAL SOCKET FOREIGN SOCKET STATE > 0 OF 0 RECORDS DISPLAYED > END OF THE REPORT > > Over on the production LPAR I see that IZUSVR1 is bound to port 443. > > Within the z/OSMF active config file I see this on the non-working one: > IZU_APPSERVER_HOSTNAME=TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM > IZU_JWKS_HOSTNAME=TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM > IZU_HTTP_SSL_PORT=443 > IZU_HTTP_PORT=-1 > > TCPIP.DATA has my HOSTNAME TSTJES2 and both TSTJES2 and TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM > both correctly resolve to the test LPAR IP address. > > Over on the working one I do the same netstat and see the bind: > > D TCPIP,TCPIP,NETSTAT,ALLCON,PORT=443 > EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V2R4 TCPIP 600 > USER ID CONN LOCAL SOCKET FOREIGN SOCKET STATE > IZUSVR1 0004A344 172.16.128.14..443 10.53.240.151..34554 ESTBLSH > IZUSVR1 000492CB 0.0.0.0..443 0.0.0.0..0 LISTEN > 2 OF 2 RECORDS DISPLAYED > END OF THE REPORT > > In active config: > IZU_APPSERVER_HOSTNAME=MVSJES2.MNLIFE.COM > IZU_JWKS_HOSTNAME=MVSJES2.MNLIFE.COM > IZU_HTTP_SSL_PORT=443 > IZU_HTTP_PORT=-1 > > TCPIP.DATA on working one has HOSTNAME MVSJES2 and everything resolves > correctly. > > Thoughts/ideas? > > I'm chasing a couple other links people sent me. > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Michael Babcock > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 9:23 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there > > Also, if you cloned prod and changed the IP added and/or domain name, I > would check the certs. Do the certs match the SANs? > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 9:16 PM Michael Babcock > wrote: > > > Does this help? > > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://kinsta.com/knowledgebase/pr-end-of > > -file-error/*what-causes-the-pr_end_of_file_error__;Iw!!KjMRP1Ixj6eLE0 > > Fj!oaOvtuzKsu_CrFeLcgyUKF_gNSfdjsYOIW2qhL0UuZh7RZ70fpwMbhZmzveK6QkZRvM > > nI2nXVMundFuGm1tmuiOd81fQsKoWqjD1$ > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:28 PM Pommier, Rex > > wrote: > > > >> Hi List, > >> > >> We are attempting our first foray into getting z/OSMF up and running. > >> Scenario is we're backleveled maintenance-wise on our 2.4 system. We > >> ran the security configuration setup etc and got z/OSMF up and > >> running on the production LPAR we are planning on running it from. > >> However when we started to load z/OS 3.1 we ran into a problem with > >> missing PTFs. Got one set of PTFs installed and after adding a > >> local_override.cfg file into the configuration directory we got > >> z/OSMF up and running again and past that hurdle. We hit the next > >> one requiring a dozen more PTFs to bypass it. We decided to move the > >> install to our sandbox just to get z/OSMF working to the point we can > >> use it to get our 3.1 software install back on track. I ran > >> disk-level flashcopy copies of my entire production LPAR to the > >> sandbox, made the required changes (IP addresses etc) to get the > >> sandbox up and running. Started z/OSMF and it comes up with no > >> errors or warnings (except the one telling me I'm using the local > override file). However, when I try to get to the web server I get a > "secure connection failure" > >> with " PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR" trying to connect with Firefox and " > >> 172.16.128.108 unexpectedly closed the connection" using Chrome. > >> Security > >> (RACF) is identical to what it is on the production LPAR. z/OSMF > >>
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
Follow-up and resolution. We found it. “stupid sysprog trick”. I was missing a line in my TCPIP PROFILE member telling it to reserve port 443 for z/OSMF on our test LPAR. I looked at that member in production, even running compares against the one being used for test, about a half dozen times and missed it every time. One of my colleagues finally spotted the missing line. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: Pommier, Rex Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 10:02 AM To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there Hi Michael, I'm not following you on this one. SANs? In my vocabulary SAN is storage and we don't run a SAN for our mainframe disk. Direct attach, 2 LPARs on the same physical CEC, 1 DS8910F storage direct attached, and shared chpids for both the disk and OSA. I did find this - which I didn't see yesterday that is probably my problem but I can't see what I need to change to fix it: CWWKO0221E: TCP Channel defaultHttpEndpoint-ssl initialization did not succeed. The socket bind did not succeed for host * and port 443. The port might already be in use. Exception Message: EDC5111I Permission denied. (errno2=0x744C7246) I do a netstat on port 443 and get this: D TCPIP,TCPIP,NETSTAT,ALLCON,PORT=443 EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V2R4 TCPIP 496 USER ID CONN LOCAL SOCKET FOREIGN SOCKET STATE 0 OF 0 RECORDS DISPLAYED END OF THE REPORT Over on the production LPAR I see that IZUSVR1 is bound to port 443. Within the z/OSMF active config file I see this on the non-working one: IZU_APPSERVER_HOSTNAME=TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_JWKS_HOSTNAME=TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_HTTP_SSL_PORT=443 IZU_HTTP_PORT=-1 TCPIP.DATA has my HOSTNAME TSTJES2 and both TSTJES2 and TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM both correctly resolve to the test LPAR IP address. Over on the working one I do the same netstat and see the bind: D TCPIP,TCPIP,NETSTAT,ALLCON,PORT=443 EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V2R4 TCPIP 600 USER ID CONN LOCAL SOCKET FOREIGN SOCKET STATE IZUSVR1 0004A344 172.16.128.14..443 10.53.240.151..34554 ESTBLSH IZUSVR1 000492CB 0.0.0.0..443 0.0.0.0..0 LISTEN 2 OF 2 RECORDS DISPLAYED END OF THE REPORT In active config: IZU_APPSERVER_HOSTNAME=MVSJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_JWKS_HOSTNAME=MVSJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_HTTP_SSL_PORT=443 IZU_HTTP_PORT=-1 TCPIP.DATA on working one has HOSTNAME MVSJES2 and everything resolves correctly. Thoughts/ideas? I'm chasing a couple other links people sent me. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 9:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there Also, if you cloned prod and changed the IP added and/or domain name, I would check the certs. Do the certs match the SANs? On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 9:16 PM Michael Babcock wrote: > Does this help? > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://kinsta.com/knowledgebase/pr-end-of > -file-error/*what-causes-the-pr_end_of_file_error__;Iw!!KjMRP1Ixj6eLE0 > Fj!oaOvtuzKsu_CrFeLcgyUKF_gNSfdjsYOIW2qhL0UuZh7RZ70fpwMbhZmzveK6QkZRvM > nI2nXVMundFuGm1tmuiOd81fQsKoWqjD1$ > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:28 PM Pommier, Rex > wrote: > >> Hi List, >> >> We are attempting our first foray into getting z/OSMF up and running. >> Scenario is we're backleveled maintenance-wise on our 2.4 system. We >> ran the security configuration setup etc and got z/OSMF up and >> running on the production LPAR we are planning on running it from. >> However when we started to load z/OS 3.1 we ran into a problem with >> missing PTFs. Got one set of PTFs installed and after adding a >> local_override.cfg file into the configuration directory we got >> z/OSMF up and running again and past that hurdle. We hit the next >> one requiring a dozen more PTFs to bypass it. We decided to move the >> install to our sandbox just to get z/OSMF working to the point we can >> use it to get our 3.1 software install back on track. I ran >> disk-level flashcopy copies of my entire production LPAR to the >> sandbox, made the required changes (IP addresses etc) to get the >> sandbox up and running. Started z/OSMF and it comes up with no >> errors or
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
Hi Michael, I'm not following you on this one. SANs? In my vocabulary SAN is storage and we don't run a SAN for our mainframe disk. Direct attach, 2 LPARs on the same physical CEC, 1 DS8910F storage direct attached, and shared chpids for both the disk and OSA. I did find this - which I didn't see yesterday that is probably my problem but I can't see what I need to change to fix it: CWWKO0221E: TCP Channel defaultHttpEndpoint-ssl initialization did not succeed. The socket bind did not succeed for host * and port 443. The port might already be in use. Exception Message: EDC5111I Permission denied. (errno2=0x744C7246) I do a netstat on port 443 and get this: D TCPIP,TCPIP,NETSTAT,ALLCON,PORT=443 EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V2R4 TCPIP 496 USER ID CONN LOCAL SOCKET FOREIGN SOCKET STATE 0 OF 0 RECORDS DISPLAYED END OF THE REPORT Over on the production LPAR I see that IZUSVR1 is bound to port 443. Within the z/OSMF active config file I see this on the non-working one: IZU_APPSERVER_HOSTNAME=TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_JWKS_HOSTNAME=TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_HTTP_SSL_PORT=443 IZU_HTTP_PORT=-1 TCPIP.DATA has my HOSTNAME TSTJES2 and both TSTJES2 and TSTJES2.MNLIFE.COM both correctly resolve to the test LPAR IP address. Over on the working one I do the same netstat and see the bind: D TCPIP,TCPIP,NETSTAT,ALLCON,PORT=443 EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V2R4 TCPIP 600 USER ID CONN LOCAL SOCKET FOREIGN SOCKET STATE IZUSVR1 0004A344 172.16.128.14..443 10.53.240.151..34554 ESTBLSH IZUSVR1 000492CB 0.0.0.0..443 0.0.0.0..0 LISTEN 2 OF 2 RECORDS DISPLAYED END OF THE REPORT In active config: IZU_APPSERVER_HOSTNAME=MVSJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_JWKS_HOSTNAME=MVSJES2.MNLIFE.COM IZU_HTTP_SSL_PORT=443 IZU_HTTP_PORT=-1 TCPIP.DATA on working one has HOSTNAME MVSJES2 and everything resolves correctly. Thoughts/ideas? I'm chasing a couple other links people sent me. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 9:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there Also, if you cloned prod and changed the IP added and/or domain name, I would check the certs. Do the certs match the SANs? On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 9:16 PM Michael Babcock wrote: > Does this help? > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://kinsta.com/knowledgebase/pr-end-of > -file-error/*what-causes-the-pr_end_of_file_error__;Iw!!KjMRP1Ixj6eLE0 > Fj!oaOvtuzKsu_CrFeLcgyUKF_gNSfdjsYOIW2qhL0UuZh7RZ70fpwMbhZmzveK6QkZRvM > nI2nXVMundFuGm1tmuiOd81fQsKoWqjD1$ > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:28 PM Pommier, Rex > wrote: > >> Hi List, >> >> We are attempting our first foray into getting z/OSMF up and running. >> Scenario is we're backleveled maintenance-wise on our 2.4 system. We >> ran the security configuration setup etc and got z/OSMF up and >> running on the production LPAR we are planning on running it from. >> However when we started to load z/OS 3.1 we ran into a problem with >> missing PTFs. Got one set of PTFs installed and after adding a >> local_override.cfg file into the configuration directory we got >> z/OSMF up and running again and past that hurdle. We hit the next >> one requiring a dozen more PTFs to bypass it. We decided to move the >> install to our sandbox just to get z/OSMF working to the point we can >> use it to get our 3.1 software install back on track. I ran >> disk-level flashcopy copies of my entire production LPAR to the >> sandbox, made the required changes (IP addresses etc) to get the >> sandbox up and running. Started z/OSMF and it comes up with no >> errors or warnings (except the one telling me I'm using the local override >> file). However, when I try to get to the web server I get a "secure >> connection failure" >> with " PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR" trying to connect with Firefox and " >> 172.16.128.108 unexpectedly closed the connection" using Chrome. >> Security >> (RACF) is identical to what it is on the production LPAR. z/OSMF >> config is identical as well. Does anybody have any idea what I'm missing? >> >> TIA, >> >> Rex >> >> --
Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
Also, if you cloned prod and changed the IP added and/or domain name, I would check the certs. Do the certs match the SANs? On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 9:16 PM Michael Babcock wrote: > Does this help? > > > https://kinsta.com/knowledgebase/pr-end-of-file-error/#what-causes-the-pr_end_of_file_error > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:28 PM Pommier, Rex > wrote: > >> Hi List, >> >> We are attempting our first foray into getting z/OSMF up and running. >> Scenario is we're backleveled maintenance-wise on our 2.4 system. We ran >> the security configuration setup etc and got z/OSMF up and running on the >> production LPAR we are planning on running it from. However when we >> started to load z/OS 3.1 we ran into a problem with missing PTFs. Got one >> set of PTFs installed and after adding a local_override.cfg file into the >> configuration directory we got z/OSMF up and running again and past that >> hurdle. We hit the next one requiring a dozen more PTFs to bypass it. We >> decided to move the install to our sandbox just to get z/OSMF working to >> the point we can use it to get our 3.1 software install back on track. I >> ran disk-level flashcopy copies of my entire production LPAR to the >> sandbox, made the required changes (IP addresses etc) to get the sandbox up >> and running. Started z/OSMF and it comes up with no errors or warnings >> (except the one telling me I'm using the local override file). However, >> when I try to get to the web server I get a "secure connection failure" >> with " PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR" trying to connect with Firefox and " >> 172.16.128.108 unexpectedly closed the connection" using Chrome. Security >> (RACF) is identical to what it is on the production LPAR. z/OSMF config is >> identical as well. Does anybody have any idea what I'm missing? >> >> TIA, >> >> Rex >> >> -- >> The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from >> disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is >> not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for >> delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >> that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action >> omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If >> you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately >> by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, >> whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. >> >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
Does this help? https://kinsta.com/knowledgebase/pr-end-of-file-error/#what-causes-the-pr_end_of_file_error On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:28 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hi List, > > We are attempting our first foray into getting z/OSMF up and running. > Scenario is we're backleveled maintenance-wise on our 2.4 system. We ran > the security configuration setup etc and got z/OSMF up and running on the > production LPAR we are planning on running it from. However when we > started to load z/OS 3.1 we ran into a problem with missing PTFs. Got one > set of PTFs installed and after adding a local_override.cfg file into the > configuration directory we got z/OSMF up and running again and past that > hurdle. We hit the next one requiring a dozen more PTFs to bypass it. We > decided to move the install to our sandbox just to get z/OSMF working to > the point we can use it to get our 3.1 software install back on track. I > ran disk-level flashcopy copies of my entire production LPAR to the > sandbox, made the required changes (IP addresses etc) to get the sandbox up > and running. Started z/OSMF and it comes up with no errors or warnings > (except the one telling me I'm using the local override file). However, > when I try to get to the web server I get a "secure connection failure" > with " PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR" trying to connect with Firefox and " > 172.16.128.108 unexpectedly closed the connection" using Chrome. Security > (RACF) is identical to what it is on the production LPAR. z/OSMF config is > identical as well. Does anybody have any idea what I'm missing? > > TIA, > > Rex > > -- > The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from > disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is > not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for > delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action > omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If > you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately > by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, > whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
security fun with z/OSMF install - can't get there
Hi List, We are attempting our first foray into getting z/OSMF up and running. Scenario is we're backleveled maintenance-wise on our 2.4 system. We ran the security configuration setup etc and got z/OSMF up and running on the production LPAR we are planning on running it from. However when we started to load z/OS 3.1 we ran into a problem with missing PTFs. Got one set of PTFs installed and after adding a local_override.cfg file into the configuration directory we got z/OSMF up and running again and past that hurdle. We hit the next one requiring a dozen more PTFs to bypass it. We decided to move the install to our sandbox just to get z/OSMF working to the point we can use it to get our 3.1 software install back on track. I ran disk-level flashcopy copies of my entire production LPAR to the sandbox, made the required changes (IP addresses etc) to get the sandbox up and running. Started z/OSMF and it comes up with no errors or warnings (except the one telling me I'm using the local override file). However, when I try to get to the web server I get a "secure connection failure" with " PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR" trying to connect with Firefox and " 172.16.128.108 unexpectedly closed the connection" using Chrome. Security (RACF) is identical to what it is on the production LPAR. z/OSMF config is identical as well. Does anybody have any idea what I'm missing? TIA, Rex -- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/osmf
Try here. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=consider-zos-upgrade-workflows -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chalk, Shelia Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 7:09 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXT] z/osmf Please Note: This email is from an [EXTERNAL] sender. Do not click on links or attachments unless you expect them from the sender and know the content is safe. Please contact the Service Desk if you have any concerns regarding this message. Hello, I am wanting to download the z/osmf workflow for z/os 3.1. Can someone send me the link where I can find this? Thanks Shelia Chalk Mainframe System Programmer sch...@ssfcu.org == This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN == This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/osmf
Hello, I am wanting to download the z/osmf workflow for z/os 3.1. Can someone send me the link where I can find this? Thanks Shelia Chalk Mainframe System Programmer sch...@ssfcu.org == This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Z/OSMF email
Nevermind found it Shelia Chalk Mainframe System Programmer sch...@ssfcu.org From: Chalk, Shelia Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 3:08 PM To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: Z/OSMF email Hello, I am looking to setup the z/osmf outgoing email configuration. It has smtp userid and smtp password. On the screen it says it is required, do I have to put both in there or is there a way I can skip the userid and password? Thanks Shelia Chalk Mainframe System Programmer sch...@ssfcu.org<mailto:sch...@ssfcu.org> == This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Z/OSMF email
Hello, I am looking to setup the z/osmf outgoing email configuration. It has smtp userid and smtp password. On the screen it says it is required, do I have to put both in there or is there a way I can skip the userid and password? Thanks Shelia Chalk Mainframe System Programmer sch...@ssfcu.org == This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/osmf error
Hi, Sheila. I cannot help specifically, however, if you do not have the complete error message I am including it below. The message says the reason for the failure is noted in the error. You might consider posting the ENTIRE error message to the group. IZUR400E The request could not be completed. z/OSMF could not connect to the DDS or Linux data gatherer at URL address. Reason: reason. Explanation The request failed because z/OSMF could not connect to the Resource Measurement Facility (RMF) Distributed Data Server (DDS) or to the Linux data gatherer located at the specified URL. The reason for the error is provided. In the message text: address Host name or IP address and port for the DDS or Linux data gatherer. reason Description of the cause of the error. System programmer response Ensure that the z/OSMF server is running. Verify that the resource is available and that the DDS or Linux data gatherer is active. Examine the z/OSMF logs for more details about the error. If the problem persists, contact the IBM Support Center. User response Verify that the host name or IP address and port are specified correctly, and ensure that there are no trailing spaces. If the problem persists, contact your z/OSMF administrator or system programmer. Ramsey On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 1:58 PM Chalk, Shelia wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to z/osmf. I am getting this error > IZUR400E The request could not be completed. z/OSMF could not connect to > the DDS or Linux data gatherer at UR > Can someone point me in the right direction? > > Thanks > > Shelia Chalk > Mainframe System Programmer > sch...@ssfcu.org > > > == > This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the > system manager. This message contains confidential information and is > intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, > you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify > the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by > mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing > or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is > strictly prohibited. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/osmf error
Hello, I am new to z/osmf. I am getting this error IZUR400E The request could not be completed. z/OSMF could not connect to the DDS or Linux data gatherer at UR Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks Shelia Chalk Mainframe System Programmer sch...@ssfcu.org == This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and Zowe
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:47:21 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote: >On 9/19/2023 6:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: >> Zowe, last I saw, ships an SMP/E install as well as a “convenience” build >> that is basically a pax file. Given that Zowe basically updates on a >> frequent basis the update is basically replacing the core software so pax is >> far easier. > >In my experience just the opposite is true. > >The 'pax' is a manual download/install effort each time. > >By contrast, once a product has been installed with SMP/E, it >immediately qualifies for automatic unattended RECEIVE ORDER (including >HOLDDATA). We do this daily. Also Zowe is orderable on IBM SHOPZ as 5698-ZWG IBM Z Dist for Zowe 2.0 if you also want IBM support. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and Zowe
On 9/19/2023 6:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Zowe, last I saw, ships an SMP/E install as well as a “convenience” build that is basically a pax file. Given that Zowe basically updates on a frequent basis the update is basically replacing the core software so pax is far easier. In my experience just the opposite is true. The 'pax' is a manual download/install effort each time. By contrast, once a product has been installed with SMP/E, it immediately qualifies for automatic unattended RECEIVE ORDER (including HOLDDATA). We do this daily. We perform automatic ACCEPT/APPLY every weekend of Zowe (and 62 other SMP/E installed products). We could never pull off such a feat if we had to use the 'pax' method for Zowe or any of the others. -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and Zowe
I think that it comes down to provenance (is where it came from trusted) as well as a need for support when something goes wrong. The community support is best effort with no warranties. Other vendors like IBM, Rocket and Broadcom are now pre-requing the Zowe and as such they provide support and the customer downloads the package from the vendor. At least for Broadcom, it’s the same package as distributed by the Zowe community but most large Z shops won’t even let you access the site. I was on the customer side of the fence for many years and no one wants to say that the thing I’m using came from OpenSource if there is an issue. We want someone to call at 0-dark-thirty when things go wrong. I’m not sure that this requirement has changed. I think that’s the same issue with the Rocket and other ports of common Linux tools although I think those are less impactful to production for the most part. In our world, outages come with post-mortems. Matt Hogstrom “It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive." — Hogstrom > On Sep 20, 2023, at 3:12 AM, Robin Atwood wrote: > > Thanks, Brian and Matt. Perhaps the fact that you can get Zowe directly from > IBM will help mitigate the prejudice against open source! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and Zowe
Thanks, Brian and Matt. Perhaps the fact that you can get Zowe directly from IBM will help mitigate the prejudice against open source! Robin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 12:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF and Zowe I believe you can still order CBIPO, but z/OSMF does (unfortunately) seem to be the way IBM wants everyone to go. I personally disagree with z/OSMF for many reasons (most of them due to overhead and capability restrictions), but mine seems to be a waste of breath. :) Any way ZOWE is open source, and many shops won't allow that. It's actually a pretty good idea, but still some shops see open source as inherently evil. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and Zowe
I believe you can still order CBIPO, but z/OSMF does (unfortunately) seem to be the way IBM wants everyone to go. I personally disagree with z/OSMF for many reasons (most of them due to overhead and capability restrictions), but mine seems to be a waste of breath. :) Any way ZOWE is open source, and many shops won't allow that. It's actually a pretty good idea, but still some shops see open source as inherently evil. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and Zowe
If you want to ship a product that uses Zowe vendors can prereq Zowe. I’d contact Bruce Armstrong at IBM to talk about that. He is involved in the Zowe community and can give some guidance. You can ask questions to the Zowe Community here on their Slack https://openmainframeproject.slack.com/archives/CBVJGPWHX Zowe, last I saw, ships an SMP/E install as well as a “convenience” build that is basically a pax file. Given that Zowe basically updates on a frequent basis the update is basically replacing the core software so pax is far easier. Matt Hogstrom From Lord of the Rings, when Frodo decides to leave the Fellowship and go to Mordor alone . . . Frodo: “I wish the ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.” Gandalf: “So do all who live to see such things. But it is not for them to decide. All you have to do is decide what to do with this time that is given to you.” > On Sep 19, 2023, at 5:42 AM, Robin Atwood wrote: > > > OTOH, Zowe is an open-source project that the average shop will not be using? > So if you want to ship a product that uses it, the customer will have to > install it? > > > TIA > > Robin > > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/OSMF and Zowe
Would it be correct to say that every shop has z/OSMF installed because that is the only method of updating your system that IBM now supports? Ordering CBPDOs (or whatever they were called) is no longer an option? OTOH, Zowe is an open-source project that the average shop will not be using? So if you want to ship a product that uses it, the customer will have to install it? TIA Robin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Classification: Confidential FWIW, I do not use *any* cataloged dataset for SMP/E Targets/DLIBDS. During installation, I took the time to update all of the DDDEFS with VOLSER information. M USD $0.02 worth. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Longfellow Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 3:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] Thanks Kurt. It is comforting to know that I can still punch my way out of a paper bag. I took the 'clear the catalog' approach for the Dlibs.It was not totally clear sailing. Still haunted by data set decisions and location choices made (literally) decades ago. I am now at the Post Deploy options to build and integrate my other products and local mods into an IPLable system. Onwards and upwards. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Thanks Kurt. It is comforting to know that I can still punch my way out of a paper bag. I took the 'clear the catalog' approach for the Dlibs.It was not totally clear sailing. Still haunted by data set decisions and location choices made (literally) decades ago. I am now at the Post Deploy options to build and integrate my other products and local mods into an IPLable system. Onwards and upwards. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
> I have several ideas that I have to consider. > -- Changing the names of my dlibs to have unique names. This should allow > co-existence in my current MCAT. (Possibly just adding a HLQ like the old > ServerPac > days). Downside is the eventual recataloging after z/OS V2R5 goes live. > -- Fully implement indirect cataloging for the Dlib volumes. (This could end > up causing system PARMLIB changes and IPLs just to get an install done) > -- Uncataloging all of my current Dlibs from my production environment (The > guy doing a maintenance cycle now will not be happy) > > Any suggestions? I can't think of anything else besides the options you mention. Sorry. Kurt Quackenbush IBM | z/OS SMP/E and z/OSMF Software Management | ku...@us.ibm.com Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Thanks Kurt.Using Indirect Cataloging did the job for my Target SYSRES datasets. z/OSMF no longer complains. However, this is the first creation of my Dlibs from the Portable Software Instance. They are also intended to have the same names that have been around for (almost) ever. Presently, no indirect cataloging has been implemented for the Dlib Volumes. So, changing the targe Volume to use indirect cannot be done. I have several ideas that I have to consider. -- Changing the names of my dlibs to have unique names. This should allow co-existence in my current MCAT. (Possibly just adding a HLQ like the old ServerPac days). Downside is the eventual recataloging after z/OS V2R5 goes live. -- Fully implement indirect cataloging for the Dlib volumes. (This could end up causing system PARMLIB changes and IPLs just to get an install done) -- Uncataloging all of my current Dlibs from my production environment (The guy doing a maintenance cycle now will not be happy) Any suggestions? Any Other directions? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Tom, to use your existing master catalog and use existing data set names, have to tell z/OSMF you want indirectly catalog the new target data sets. In the Deployment Configuration wizard, on the Volumes page, select your SYSRES volume and click the Modify action. On the Modify Volume page select the option to indirectly catalog the data sets on that volume and specify the volume symbol you want to use. For example, "**" or "" or similar. Having done this, when you attempt to generate the JCL, this time z/OSMF will allow your new target data sets to have the same name as your existing data sets in your existing master catalog, because z/OSMF knows the existing catalog entry containing the volume symbol can be used for both your existing system and for your new target system. Kurt Quackenbush IBM | z/OS SMP/E and z/OSMF Software Management | ku...@us.ibm.com Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Longfellow Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 5:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer Yet another answer to my own post I stripped out everything to do with the Software instances and deployments related to my Zos25 install. I defined an instance for my new deployment This instance was modeled on my ZOS V2R4 install. The source for the instance is the downloaded ShopZ ZFS. The Dataset names had to be trimmed due to assumptions and defaults prefixed to the Target dataset names. The names were modified to match what they will have to be when I continue to use the indirect cataloging in my active system. Volumes and Storage Classes were assigned to local standard locations for DASD placement. Catalog Selection was NOT a chance to select a Catalog for these new to be created datasets.Job generations then fail with IZU9702E messages saying that the dataset in question is ALREADY in that Master Catalog that I am forcing you to use. I am assuming that this is because I am NOT creating a new master of any kind (temporary or other). This is because I actually read my choices for configuring the objectives of the install. and the 'no new catalog' option where you IPL using your old indirect catalog entries from your existing master catalog described exactly what I think I want to do. Do I want to change the objectives to create a new catalog where all the building would be done? If so, what the heck is the 'Existing' catalog objective for?? Time to step back and wait for a flash of brilliance to come to me. Mandatory cooling off period starts... NOW -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Hi Tom, Glad to see that you are getting back on track. For your catalog question, it sounds like you want to use your existing mcat for your new z/OS V2.5 system. That's fine. If you use your existing mcat, you've got to be using indirect cataloging. That is reasonable, as you'd want to use that mcat for both an old instance and new instance, which are on different volumes. You can create new ucat if you like, into your existing mcat, if you desired. For keeping your existing mcat (and it is using indirect entries) you are correct in saying that is on the Objectives section, and you should select Existing master catalog: ---cut and paste from the screen--- Catalogs: Are you deploying z/OS? YES Indicate which catalogs to use for the new target z/OS data sets. For additional help on making the proper selection Learn more... __New target system master catalog: Target system data sets will be cataloged in a new master catalog or new user catalogs connected to the new master catalog. X Existing master catalog: Target system data sets will be cataloged in the existing master catalog, existing user catalogs, or new user catalogs connected to the existing master catalog. If you click on "Help" on that screen, and then "Catalogs" within the help, there are some good pictures which show what will happen with your existing mcat. What is the "Existing master catalog" option there for? To know whether z/OSMF Software Management needs to create a new mcat for you, or to verify that the existing mcat you are using can correctly represent the system you are building with the matching entries (like SYS1.LINKLIB). You're getting there! Often the first time through the interface, if you haven't practiced with a smaller product, can be harder. z/OS is big, and can be a lot to get through. But I'm very happy to see that you are modelling after z/OS V2.4 which will definitely help. -Marna WALLE z/OS System Install and Upgrade IBM Poughkeepsie -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Yet another answer to my own post I stripped out everything to do with the Software instances and deployments related to my Zos25 install. I defined an instance for my new deployment This instance was modeled on my ZOS V2R4 install. The source for the instance is the downloaded ShopZ ZFS. The Dataset names had to be trimmed due to assumptions and defaults prefixed to the Target dataset names. The names were modified to match what they will have to be when I continue to use the indirect cataloging in my active system. Volumes and Storage Classes were assigned to local standard locations for DASD placement. Catalog Selection was NOT a chance to select a Catalog for these new to be created datasets.Job generations then fail with IZU9702E messages saying that the dataset in question is ALREADY in that Master Catalog that I am forcing you to use. I am assuming that this is because I am NOT creating a new master of any kind (temporary or other). This is because I actually read my choices for configuring the objectives of the install. and the 'no new catalog' option where you IPL using your old indirect catalog entries from your existing master catalog described exactly what I think I want to do. Do I want to change the objectives to create a new catalog where all the building would be done? If so, what the heck is the 'Existing' catalog objective for?? Time to step back and wait for a flash of brilliance to come to me. Mandatory cooling off period starts... NOW -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
As always Marna - THANK YOU very much. You are always a treasure trove of information. I am ready to hand the reigns of the temporary HLQ manipulations back to z/OSMF, but am having some difficulties during Job Generation. When I removed my 'unneeded' personal HLQ --- I got 800+ errors that 'you cannot define something that it already in the catalog' I have tried 'juggling' catalog definitions without success. The Deployment is configured to use the 'Existing' catalogs and not create a new master because I wish to IPL from my standard master cat in use today. Software Management detects that the final names already exist in the current master cat and stops. Unfortunately - An aggressive flush of datasets has deleted datasets that belonged to the base Software Instance. This has left me unable to define a workable Deployment at all. Too many 'missing' datasets that are assumed to be there from the Software Management unzips from the Portable Software Instance downloaded from my Software order. I need to go back to Square Zero and re-Install my downloaded Portable Software Instance. I am looking for a Rip and Replace set of steps that will take me back to creating my Software environment from my downloaded ShopZ order. How do you totally clean the installation and its deployments back to that level?My latest hurdle is the DDDEFs in my previously manipulated GLOBAL and TARGET zones point to DSNs that no longer exist and cannot be recovered. I have tried configuring to 'Use a New Master' without success.. I have yet to see anywhere for me to influence or select the old SSA values. It is always difficult to recover from failed, canned procedures that have failed spectacularly. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Tom, The job to remove the temporary catalog alias (aka SSA) and rename the data sets to prepare for an IPL is done during the z/OSMF Deployment (not in the Post Deploy Workflow), and is found in the Software Management provided job, IZUD05RN - that's the name that my generated job was, and it was job #5 out of 6 jobs that were provided for my configuration. It looks like this in Software Management. Sorry for the horrible formatting, but you can see it with the "5" below: - 4 IZUD04UZUnzip Data Sets: Extract the target software instance data sets from the portable software instance archive files, into the location defined by the deployment configuration, using temporary and unique data set names.AQFT Complete MWALLEZOJOB20193CC 0256 U 5 IZUD05RNRename Data Sets: Rename the target software instance data sets from their temporary and unique names to their true names defined by the deployment configuration, and update catalog entries for the data sets as needed. AQFT Complete MWALLEZOJOB26729CC 0008 U 6 IZUD06UCUpdate CSI Data Sets: Update the entries within the SMP/E CSI data sets to reflect the target software instance zone names, data set names and locations, and UNIX directory prefixes. AQFT Complete MWALLEZOJOB28159CC U In that 5th job, I can see that the rename is happening like this. Note "ZS25VBNM" is my temporary catalog alias (SSA): LISTCAT - ENTRY(ZS25VBMW.SYS1.LINKLIB) - CATALOG(MWALLE.VB25.MCAT) IF LASTCC = 0 THEN DO ALTER - ZS25VBMW.SYS1.LINKLIB - NEWNAME(SYS1.LINKLIB) - CATALOG(MWALLE.VB25.MCAT) END What might be happening, is that during the configuration of your deployment, you entered in the names of the final data sets WITH a temporary high level qualifier yourself. If that is so, then you have indicated that that "temporary" HLQ is the final name you wanted. This is something that we've seen experienced CustomPac people do, as they assume they need to handle the temporary HLQ themselves which is not the case in z/OSMF. You can see that z/OSMF will be adding(and removing) the temporary HLQ itself, if you look at the Configuration sample for the data set, so that you will know you don't have to handle the temporary HLQ yourself. Here's the spot in Configure Deployment of Software Management, in Modify where you can see that (see NEWMCAT below as the sample temporary HLQ), and that your name should not attempt to add a temporary HLQ: Enter the data set name or qualifiers to use for the selected data sets. Common data set qualifiers: Example data set name: From: SYS1.LINKLIBSYS1.LINKLIB To: SYS1.LINKLIB SYS1.LINKLIB NEWMCAT.SYS1.LINKLIB( Target data set name with temporary catalog alias ) z/OSMF automatically adds the temporary catalog alias to reference the target data set from the driving system catalog. "NEWMCAT" is the default temporary catalog alias and can be updated in the Catalogs step of the Deployment Configuration. - If indeed, you did add your "own temporary" final name to the data sets, you will need to go back and remove it. You can either go back into the same deployment and do that to backtrack, or if that Deployment is Complete you can start a new Deployment. For a Completed Deployment, you can copy that configuration to do another Deployment which is nice as the pre-defined configuration is reused. It is under Actions -> Copy. It will be grayed out if if the Deployment is not Complete. I duplicate my Deployments often to save time, and only change small things, like the target system, or volumes. -Marna WALLE z/OS System Install and Upgrade IBM Poughkeepsie -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
And the battle continues. Ignorance is taking the hits. I am obviously ignorant to the design of the approved 'how to' way to do this. I tried removing the CB. prefix on my dataset names. 800+ error messages later, I found that the Lion cannot digest that. It regurgitates every name that already exists in my current master catalog. Totally understandable and I sympathized. I returned the CB prefix and moved on. The Catalog step had identified CB as a 'New' prefix that requires a 'New' master catalog to be created. I had done the 'use existing master' option during setup, but I guess I am ignorant to what that truly means. Nothing I try can tell the Lion to use my current existing Master catalog to hold the 'temporary' CB catalog entries. Do I need a new USER cat for the CB entries??? (WILDLY guessing here). Would this be someplace for the Lion to play with its food while the physical datasets are created on the volumes? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
I always feel foolish when I reply to my own posts, but here goes. For those of you playing the home game and watching the gladiatorial combat between "Software Management" and the "Grizzled Veteran" here is todays battle. I think I see where I have not toed the line with the 'new' method of Installing things. I went "old school" and modified my dataset names to prepend a HLQ of CB (I still do not know where that came from - me or z/OSMF). What I did not know is that my worthy opponent (which I will now call the Lion) had secret strategies that it was going to deploy. The Lion took my well crafted and meaningful dataset names and suffixed them with '.#'. The old ServerPac dialogs generated jobs would remove the HLQ on the physical volume and make the names match what was indirectly cataloged in the system being upgraded. For example HLQ.SYS1.LINKLIB cataloged on the newly created SYSRES would be 'zapped' to the name SYS1.LINKLIB which has been indirectly cataloged to ** for many many years and will NOT be changed. A HLQ.xxx catalog entry would be created so that JCL could be used to select which one you were trying to modify. My review of these new jobs is not showing me where any catalog ALIAS entries are being created (but I could have missed them). This left us with the option of IPLing the old release, then new release for testing, then back to old release to get on with our work. To adopt this new suffixing approach, I now have to lose a week of work in order to rename the data sets in such a way that the suffixing process 'might' work. Then back to my local usermods again for re-APPLY. This sort of thing has been happening to me for years. I make a choice for local needs (like software upgrade vs software replacement in the old ServerPacs) only to find out that two days later the generated jobs will not do what I wanted to do or what I thought they would do. Square One!!! Like an Abbot and Costello routing, THIRD BASE!!!. All convoluted difficulties mean Square One. I just have not taking to drinking the IBM Cool-Aid and will stray into the world of independent thought. What I would love to do is 'Copy' my current Deployment as a baseline from which to start over.I cannot find a 'Copy Deployment' under z/OSMF --- Only 'Add'.Welcome to the next battle trying to tame this Lion. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
It is created as part of the workflow jobs. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Longfellow Sent: יום ה 07 ספטמבר 2023 12:57 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer I am very familiar with that Job --- I have run it under ServerPac for a dozen times over the past 20-30 years. What I cannot find now is how to get z/OSMF to generate that JOB for the current software order. I have not been able to find it in the z/OSMF GUI interface. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
I am very familiar with that Job --- I have run it under ServerPac for a dozen times over the past 20-30 years. What I cannot find now is how to get z/OSMF to generate that JOB for the current software order. I have not been able to find it in the z/OSMF GUI interface. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF and the Old Timer
Hi, We just went through the same thing. There is a job that renames the libraries and then creates an alias or path for each one. Once that is run, the catalogs you created for the new system should have the original dataset names (SYS1.NUCLUES, SYS1.LPALIB etc.) and you should be able to IPL from that. The aliases remain on the driving system, so you can access the datasets from there if you want to make changes if the IPL fails for some reason. Gadi From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom Longfellow <03e29b607131-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 19:21 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: z/OSMF and the Old Timer I have had a few minor battles with z/OSMF over the years, so my view may be a bit biased. My new z/OS 2.5 install and upgrade is in progress. I have been going through all of the apps and workflows. All of my local usermods from V2R4 and before are applied. I am a ServerPac veteran and am now pretty pleased with myself on my progress so far. I *thought* I was approaching the point of some initial IPLs and then BAM, all I see is a brick wall. Back in the old days, there were ServerPac jobs to remove the HLQ used during the creation of my new sysres. I have been through the 'Software Management' and 'Software Upgrade' and all the Workflows (that I am now REQUIRED to use) without any success in finding the task/job that would Change HLQ.SYS1.LINKLIB to the good old fashioned SYS1.LINKLIB. Anybody have the secret Point-Click-Edit-Drag-Drop-Whatever sequence that can close out my Deployment to a testable state? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/OSMF and the Old Timer
I have had a few minor battles with z/OSMF over the years, so my view may be a bit biased. My new z/OS 2.5 install and upgrade is in progress. I have been going through all of the apps and workflows. All of my local usermods from V2R4 and before are applied. I am a ServerPac veteran and am now pretty pleased with myself on my progress so far. I *thought* I was approaching the point of some initial IPLs and then BAM, all I see is a brick wall. Back in the old days, there were ServerPac jobs to remove the HLQ used during the creation of my new sysres. I have been through the 'Software Management' and 'Software Upgrade' and all the Workflows (that I am now REQUIRED to use) without any success in finding the task/job that would Change HLQ.SYS1.LINKLIB to the good old fashioned SYS1.LINKLIB. Anybody have the secret Point-Click-Edit-Drag-Drop-Whatever sequence that can close out my Deployment to a testable state? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Thanks - - The IZUPRMxx reference information - fixed one of the issue's This fixed the 2nd issue - that's was what I needed the UNIX directory name - missed it the first time around. Still trying to get familiar with it. Thanks for all the assistance. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 1:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF CAUTION! EXTERNAL SENDER! STOP, ASSESS, AND VERIFY Do you know this person? Were you expecting this email? If not, report it using the Report Phishing Button! > ... I am trying to download a software instance and z/OSMF has generated the > JCL. > The JCL generated has some values that are not correct - some path's > that were generated either have my ID inserted with the ID being > uppercase - our path names are lowercase. Also one path it generated > had a different ID then mine. I must have missed a step somewhere - where do > I update the values that I would like the system to use ? You didn't say specifically which values in the JCL are the issue, but from the Portable Software Instances page clicking the Add... -> From Download Server action opens a short wizard to generate the download JCL. On step 1 of the wizard, at the bottom of the page, you enter the UNIX directory into which you want the files to be downloaded. This value is used on the SMPNTS DD statement in the generated job. z/OSMF derives an initial value for this field from the directory you used last time and the name for the Portable Software Instance you specify at the top of the page. What is the value on that page? Does it contain your desired directory, with the correct case? Is it the SMPNTS DD statement you're having trouble with? Kurt Quackenbush IBM | z/OS SMP/E and z/OSMF Software Management | ku...@us.ibm.com Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
> ... I am trying to download a software instance and z/OSMF has generated the > JCL. > The JCL generated has some values that are not correct - some path's that > were generated either > have my ID inserted with the ID being uppercase - our path names are > lowercase. Also one path it > generated had a different ID then mine. I must have missed a step somewhere - > where do I update > the values that I would like the system to use ? You didn't say specifically which values in the JCL are the issue, but from the Portable Software Instances page clicking the Add... -> From Download Server action opens a short wizard to generate the download JCL. On step 1 of the wizard, at the bottom of the page, you enter the UNIX directory into which you want the files to be downloaded. This value is used on the SMPNTS DD statement in the generated job. z/OSMF derives an initial value for this field from the directory you used last time and the name for the Portable Software Instance you specify at the top of the page. What is the value on that page? Does it contain your desired directory, with the correct case? Is it the SMPNTS DD statement you're having trouble with? Kurt Quackenbush IBM | z/OS SMP/E and z/OSMF Software Management | ku...@us.ibm.com Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
≫ some path's that were generated either have my ID inserted with the ID being uppercase - our path names are lowercase. Did you check this? Enter values in uppercase, lowercase, or mixed case. The system converts input to uppercase, unless the values are enclosed in single quotation marks, which are processed without altering the case. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=system-izuprmxx-reference-information Thanks, Kolusu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
z/OSMF
We are z/OS V2.4. I am trying to download a software instance and z/OSMF has generated the JCL. The JCL generated has some values that are not correct - some path's that were generated either have my ID inserted with the ID being uppercase - our path names are lowercase. Also one path it generated had a different ID then mine. I must have missed a step somewhere - where do I update the values that I would like the system to use ? Thank You -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
I really liked the converged (122 key) keyboard with a cursor diamond. Does anybody make one with an extra key for [ and ]? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bob Bridges Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 3:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF] I'm with you on that; I no longer lust after the 12-over/12-under function-key layout. (The rest of the board looks like what I'm used to now anyway.) When I talk about the advantages of the 3270 keyboard, I'm really talking about the tactile feedback, by which my fingers instantly knew when I hadn't finished the stroke, and went back by themselves without my conscious thought to do it again and right this time. The layout I don't care about as much. (And anyway I've converted to the Dvorak layout. Who looks at keycaps these days? We don' need no steenking keycaps!) --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Q: Isaac Asimov said he resented people rating NIGHTFALL as his best work because he did it so young. Does it bother you that so many of us view ENDER'S GAME as yours? Orson Scott Card: Not at all. I hope someday every family in America is riven with conflict over which of my books is best. */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 14:41 I think I went down the same mental path as you. Nevertheless, these do claim to be clicky-keyboards similar to 3270s, and if done well, $149 is reasonable. It would be really cool to have original cast iron 3278 keyboards rewired for PCs, but there would be a lot of hurdles to producing them, andI can't guess what they'd cost. The keyboard layout does seem to be the main selling point; but as it's been 30 years since I used a 3278 keyboard, I think I've gotten used to the PC layout. I do still remap right-CTRL to ENTER, so there's that. --- On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:13 PM Bob Bridges wrote: > Wait, I just googled "3270 keyboards USB" and found this: > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1qxPV4RS940Jj4LfO0pmLyjDg6mkt37vKxIn3u4uF4jImDbeFloQDm8lElHhTtQzTqjMkFgbJSiY-RKzPz6bRb5GIgejyzTAv6wygIrY-iCDTQyDMJe2xlr-r254Nn6s5GolqPocqhEe_CNzjn3jAAsgtUpOkGOLZRjIYNbBT20offAKl6m6a9GKjV1dm_B_SOy6dGfSZnrMHnYWs4lQk_c2MX39J9ktnBR17kIzrT1FcURqZff1F9mHwxj0v_tCCqUJGyNTda59GUxkIS1sraod3mV6ZQAuS8xR0_t-92e380jJoLpj-6KNa1LPXJXLI-4LrwQESF7wbrzq3-sVfdbcJWyfjOYqWeudkakxv__Wn-G8qRjhu__dOa0KEu5-nIjL3-vYShpTiyru90sp3oBRhETgnA12mHVDcpAEIkHs/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.twindata.com%2F3270keyboard.htm > > But it says "3270-style keyboard", which I'll bet refers to the > layout, not the hardware. > > Hm, or not. "By providing the same layout and heavy duty quality of > original IBM terminals, users will instantly be familiar with the > layout of their new thin client or PC device. In addition, they will > also have the same "clicky" touch and feel of the original IBM > tactile feedback keyboards." Ok, maybe. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
I can't resist: <https://www.pinterest.com/pin/514747432403434674/>? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bob Bridges Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 3:54 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF] LOL, isn't there an xkcd about that? I do some remapping too. My numeric keypad, especially, takes on a few of the PF keys, erase-EOF, HOME and a few others. Right, this one I think: https://xkcd.com/1806/. It stuck in my head because whenever a desktop support jock has to connect to my PC to help me out, I have to explain to him that I'm using Dvorak, and how to switch back and forth. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Faith is acting like God told you the truth. */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 15:09 I remap , etc. Makes other people have problems when they try to use my keyboard. :) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
LOL, isn't there an xkcd about that? I do some remapping too. My numeric keypad, especially, takes on a few of the PF keys, erase-EOF, HOME and a few others. Right, this one I think: https://xkcd.com/1806/. It stuck in my head because whenever a desktop support jock has to connect to my PC to help me out, I have to explain to him that I'm using Dvorak, and how to switch back and forth. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Faith is acting like God told you the truth. */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 15:09 I remap , etc. Makes other people have problems when they try to use my keyboard. :) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
I'm with you on that; I no longer lust after the 12-over/12-under function-key layout. (The rest of the board looks like what I'm used to now anyway.) When I talk about the advantages of the 3270 keyboard, I'm really talking about the tactile feedback, by which my fingers instantly knew when I hadn't finished the stroke, and went back by themselves without my conscious thought to do it again and right this time. The layout I don't care about as much. (And anyway I've converted to the Dvorak layout. Who looks at keycaps these days? We don' need no steenking keycaps!) --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Q: Isaac Asimov said he resented people rating NIGHTFALL as his best work because he did it so young. Does it bother you that so many of us view ENDER'S GAME as yours? Orson Scott Card: Not at all. I hope someday every family in America is riven with conflict over which of my books is best. */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 14:41 I think I went down the same mental path as you. Nevertheless, these do claim to be clicky-keyboards similar to 3270s, and if done well, $149 is reasonable. It would be really cool to have original cast iron 3278 keyboards rewired for PCs, but there would be a lot of hurdles to producing them, andI can't guess what they'd cost. The keyboard layout does seem to be the main selling point; but as it's been 30 years since I used a 3278 keyboard, I think I've gotten used to the PC layout. I do still remap right-CTRL to ENTER, so there's that. --- On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:13 PM Bob Bridges wrote: > Wait, I just googled "3270 keyboards USB" and found this: > https://www.twindata.com/3270keyboard.htm > > But it says "3270-style keyboard", which I'll bet refers to the > layout, not the hardware. > > Hm, or not. "By providing the same layout and heavy duty quality of > original IBM terminals, users will instantly be familiar with the > layout of their new thin client or PC device. In addition, they will > also have the same "clicky" touch and feel of the original IBM > tactile feedback keyboards." Ok, maybe. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
I remap , etc. Makes other people have problems when they try to use my keyboard. :) Steve Thompson On 8/7/2023 2:40 PM, Steve Smith wrote: I think I went down the same mental path as you. Nevertheless, these do claim to be clicky-keyboards similar to 3270s, and if done well, $149 is reasonable. It would be really cool to have original cast iron 3278 keyboards rewired for PCs, but there would be a lot of hurdles to producing them, andI can't guess what they'd cost. The keyboard layout does seem to be the main selling point; but as it's been 30 years since I used a 3278 keyboard, I think I've gotten used to the PC layout. I do still remap right-CTRL to ENTER, so there's that. sas On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:13 PM Bob Bridges wrote: Wait, I just googled "3270 keyboards USB" and found this: https://www.twindata.com/3270keyboard.htm But it says "3270-style keyboard", which I'll bet refers to the layout, not the hardware. Hm, or not. "By providing the same layout and heavy duty quality of original IBM terminals, users will instantly be familiar with the layout of their new thin client or PC device. In addition, they will also have the same "clicky" touch and feel of the original IBM tactile feedback keyboards." Ok, maybe. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
I think I went down the same mental path as you. Nevertheless, these do claim to be clicky-keyboards similar to 3270s, and if done well, $149 is reasonable. It would be really cool to have original cast iron 3278 keyboards rewired for PCs, but there would be a lot of hurdles to producing them, andI can't guess what they'd cost. The keyboard layout does seem to be the main selling point; but as it's been 30 years since I used a 3278 keyboard, I think I've gotten used to the PC layout. I do still remap right-CTRL to ENTER, so there's that. sas On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:13 PM Bob Bridges wrote: > Wait, I just googled "3270 keyboards USB" and found this: > > https://www.twindata.com/3270keyboard.htm > > But it says "3270-style keyboard", which I'll bet refers to the layout, > not the hardware. > > Hm, or not. "By providing the same layout and heavy duty quality of > original IBM terminals, users will instantly be familiar with the layout of > their new thin client or PC device. In addition, they will also have the > same "clicky" touch and feel of the original IBM tactile feedback > keyboards." Ok, maybe. > > --- > Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
Wait, I just googled "3270 keyboards USB" and found this: https://www.twindata.com/3270keyboard.htm But it says "3270-style keyboard", which I'll bet refers to the layout, not the hardware. Hm, or not. "By providing the same layout and heavy duty quality of original IBM terminals, users will instantly be familiar with the layout of their new thin client or PC device. In addition, they will also have the same "clicky" touch and feel of the original IBM tactile feedback keyboards." Ok, maybe. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without hell. -Frank Borman, CEO, Eastern Airlines */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 13:57 I think they said the price for one (indicating quantity discounts available) was US$149. --- On 8/7/2023 1:16 PM, Bob Bridges wrote: > I shudder to think of the cost, but yes, I'm interested at least enough to > enquire...? > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Steve Thompson > Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 11:03 > > Just got a call this morning about 3270 keyboards with USB connections. They > are now in stock. > > Thought I'd let you all know if any of you are interested in having a 3270 > type keyboard for your programming use. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
I think they said the price for one (indicating quantity discounts available) was US$149. Steve Thompson On 8/7/2023 1:16 PM, Bob Bridges wrote: I shudder to think of the cost, but yes, I'm interested at least enough to enquire...? --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Well brought-up people have always regarded the tumbril and the scaffold as places for one's best clothes and best manners. -C S Lewis, "De Futilitate" */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 11:03 Just got a call this morning about 3270 keyboards with USB connections. They are now in stock. Thought I'd let you all know if any of you are interested in having a 3270 type keyboard for your programming use. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
I shudder to think of the cost, but yes, I'm interested at least enough to enquire...? --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Well brought-up people have always regarded the tumbril and the scaffold as places for one's best clothes and best manners. -C S Lewis, "De Futilitate" */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 11:03 Just got a call this morning about 3270 keyboards with USB connections. They are now in stock. Thought I'd let you all know if any of you are interested in having a 3270 type keyboard for your programming use. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Keyboards [WAS: z/OSMF]
Just got a call this morning about 3270 keyboards with USB connections. They are now in stock. Thought I'd let you all know if any of you are interested in having a 3270 type keyboard for your programming use. Steve Thompson On 7/4/2023 4:54 PM, Mike Schwab wrote: https://www.twindata.com/keyboards/twindatakeyboards.htm 5250 / 3270 keyboards w PS/2 or USB connector. IBM 3270 APL converted to USB. https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/product/1394625 On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 3:39 PM rpinion865 <042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Don't remember the manufacturer, I want the actual 3270 keyboard with the USB connect. Sent from Proton Mail mobile Original Message On Jul 4, 2023, 3:53 PM, billogden wrote: Interesting discussion on screen sizes, keyboards, etc. Many of us have various different opinions. My opinions have changed since the early days when some of us (the "older" ones) used 2260s instead of 3270s. I am using a 21" screen at the moment, with three "windows" open on it. I would not want a larger screen and perhaps would prefer a slightly smaller one. I prefer a size that does not require me to constantly move my head to focus on different parts of the screen. For 3270 emulation I prefer 133 character width (and most of us probably agree on that) and at least 50 lines high (and this could vary somewhat). I find 17" laptop screens OK, but not great. More important for me (because I work mostly with text) is having good character resolution. Perhaps because I as not as young as I was a few years ago, I find long periods with crudely-formed characters to be more exhausting. Given a choice, I would say this is more important than the actual screen size. I am not fond of laptop keyboards --- IMO they range from barely OK to poor. At the moment I am using an old PC AT keyboard (with the "round" adapter plug going to a converter to connect it to a USB port). It has the numeric keypad (which I do not use) and has good "movement" of the keys that provides a positive feedback for an old guy like me. (The "real" 3270 terminals had great keyboards!) I can deal with the red "mouse control" on IBM-designed laptop keyboards when needed, but I prefer a "real" mouse (with the center "dial" function, if possible). I use the same glasses for reading books and for dealing with terminals -- I am lucky that they are fairly "weak" glasses. The discussion about z/OSMF? One of these months I will need to spend some time with it. These days I mostly use a relatively slow machine for z/OS and the performance is not attractive for z/OSMF. Bill Ogden -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
The slash was an or symbol. Codeset anybody? On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:35 AM Phil Smith III wrote: > Wayne Bickerdike wrote: > *Was it Sterling Software/Platinum?* > > Heh. Different metals, different companies-but both wound up as part of CA > eventually. > > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Wayne V. Bickerdike -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Wayne Bickerdike wrote: *Was it Sterling Software/Platinum?* Heh. Different metals, different companies-but both wound up as part of CA eventually. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Platinum is right. We used to carry Platinum Software DB2 utility msgs in the MVS/QuickRef DB. Mike Shaw Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Tue, Jul 11, 2023, 4:29 PM Wayne Bickerdike wrote: > *Can anyone remember the major DB2 player was?* > > > *On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 8:26 AM Edward Gould > <04bcc43af339-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu > <04bcc43af339-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>> wrote:* > > *Was it Sterling Software/Platinum?* > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
*Can anyone remember the major DB2 player was?* *On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 8:26 AM Edward Gould <04bcc43af339-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu <04bcc43af339-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>> wrote:* *Was it Sterling Software/Platinum?* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OT: RE: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, at 18:25, Seymour J Metz wrote: > Yes, but is every Scots dialect intelligible to every native Scots > speaker, I doubt it; the dialects spoken by people in Shetland and Orkney (the latter right now considering a return to Norwegian rule!) are substantially different from that spoken in lowland Scotland. See: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-66090102 Also, very many people who would consider themselves Scots, but not speakers of Scots, speak mainly English with greater or lesser amounts of Scots vocab intermixed. -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OT: RE: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
Yes, but is every Scots dialect intelligible to every native Scots speaker, or are there mutually unintelligible regional dialects. Think Cockney versus Oxford or Boston, MA versus Augusta, GA. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Jeremy Nicoll [jn.ls.mfrm...@letterboxes.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 11:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OT: RE: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, at 14:27, Seymour J Metz wrote: > Aggie derives from "agricultural school"; I assure you that the English > of, e.g.,Australia, New Zealand, UK, is just as opaque to us. > > Does Scotland have English terms that are understood in some regions > but not all? Well, we have terms in Scots (which isn't English) which are commonly used in sentences with English terms around them. Two short useful articles: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1r9qPuoqLqtf3IYZ0Zxlppc7IPF2YAqokhEHj3SNsux6RRnxwuL94yaqUqP54peAhFhhR5zCFrxD5RXFKezvCn7pbltnIdxBzW55cweuNZ8Tb22XqKe7LjKGAHoiRr1tyyzggmtmsSKLPrpOe0R9hO8J_EGta5XQ0KInY4Yc6K4BzBJm_gap0_897esGAEdBMwUIPzN65BDOUnjyQQ3ER5qmf6TCFzQg3AmHrHr8RH6TrZPww3tY6enTkvluBqkChFbSbgOzDnw9EPCrLvC3zBOpHUqPbBGbRM1dZmkwYJBYu57JakQSAbaAUB08xrBIU2k0HS2fmxlTH96kH84FhbRbtVfay0nn5r5hWhOH_5mvNzeOsIgPNU_vSuY8iu01vT6yzESkVZUqY9fxacI8oFwPmLL6W9I26q1Cwh_mCRlU/https%3A%2F%2Fdsl.ac.uk%2Fabout-scots%2Fwhat-is-scots%2F https://secure-web.cisco.com/1sVgy4nXnfJIjFkEVlQ9XUkXsin-uQ6siFqpw6KIiowebvlp342haxE3ya83g4YjbPMM9Q29vt6Ddrp1JVtW0ssagt_zZS8h_WUlw2CABSHYu0mGqHHYqBse_ZIHOmrCsAIGTFpm4UfSbTDnWQvnOUEKjCXzkrDIt2Kz6G50TovDDo25qGJD2Mf9XtJ60-Ktu9rYwd_eUOZtWpEhtYk7HWzgKxiL3n2LBgTx8U0Imlr_Fl9cLPs-ELbtQK4YL4Pdx7-1ua3zOjKQPy-FiMgWo3QTKLXBWjCQEJ7QZU1If_mfbPtErZU0T6j2bf76g4JVXVkh95L2T86kwkVNrdAH6BRcAt0UhOIk_ywfsyGqXoot2WE6fp7dwAT4fDJplMJ9W_4Y3eGRiaTAEZtht2hiROthjpi1Sbg2O2z4F4nqj484/https%3A%2F%2Fdsl.ac.uk%2Fabout-scots%2Fa-language-or-a-dialect%2F -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
For the classic game, CBT file 269 has a version of the source program that is 3191 lines long and includes the associated data files. There is a reference to there being the corresponding load module in CBT file 135 with the name "PROGRAM". Somewhere along the way, I seem to have downloaded a newer version of the source that is 4691 lines long. The comments state that it is version 4. However, I failed to download the associated data files and no longer have access to that system. Allan On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 11:07 AM Mike Schwab wrote: > https://www.cbttape.org/cbtdowns.htm > 5 results for Game, including 38 Klingon, 269 Adventure, and 2 groups? > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 9:21 AM David Spiegel > <0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > Hi Robert, > > Is the source code available? > > If yes, how does one get it? > > > > Thanks and regards, > > David > > > > On 2023-07-05 09:17, Crawford Robert C (Contractor) wrote: > > > In the early 80's we had an adventure game written in PL/1. It was > largely table driven so I added a room full of Texas Aggies. To retrieve > the "treasure," an Aggie Joke book, you had to find a bar of soap and throw > it into the room at which point the Aggies would run out of the room > enabling you to get the book. > > > > > > For the record, I am a Texas Aggie and I understand that the joke will > be lost on 49/50ths of the US. > > > > > > Robert Crawford > > > Abstract Evolutions LLC > > > (210) 913-3822 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G > > > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:43 PM > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF > > > > > > On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > > > > > I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. > > > > > > > > > You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave > Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of > “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure > > > > > > Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that > knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. > > > > > > -- > > > Curtis Pew > > > ITS Campus Solutions > > > curtis@austin.utexas.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > -- > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA > Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OT: RE: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, at 14:27, Seymour J Metz wrote: > Aggie derives from "agricultural school"; I assure you that the English > of, e.g.,Australia, New Zealand, UK, is just as opaque to us. > > Does Scotland have English terms that are understood in some regions > but not all? Well, we have terms in Scots (which isn't English) which are commonly used in sentences with English terms around them. Two short useful articles: https://dsl.ac.uk/about-scots/what-is-scots/ https://dsl.ac.uk/about-scots/a-language-or-a-dialect/ -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
https://www.cbttape.org/cbtdowns.htm 5 results for Game, including 38 Klingon, 269 Adventure, and 2 groups? On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 9:21 AM David Spiegel <0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > Is the source code available? > If yes, how does one get it? > > Thanks and regards, > David > > On 2023-07-05 09:17, Crawford Robert C (Contractor) wrote: > > In the early 80's we had an adventure game written in PL/1. It was largely > > table driven so I added a room full of Texas Aggies. To retrieve the > > "treasure," an Aggie Joke book, you had to find a bar of soap and throw it > > into the room at which point the Aggies would run out of the room enabling > > you to get the book. > > > > For the record, I am a Texas Aggie and I understand that the joke will be > > lost on 49/50ths of the US. > > > > Robert Crawford > > Abstract Evolutions LLC > > (210) 913-3822 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > > Pew, Curtis G > > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:43 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF > > > > On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > > > I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. > > > > > > You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave > > Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of > > “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure > > > > Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that > > knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. > > > > -- > > Curtis Pew > > ITS Campus Solutions > > curtis@austin.utexas.edu > > > > > > > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
Sorry, that was a couple of jobs ago. Wish I'd made a copy before I left. We also had a text-based version of Star Trek that ran on CICS. It was actually kind of boring so I eventually ended up blowing up the starbases. Robert Crawford Abstract Evolutions LLC (210) 913-3822 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Spiegel Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 9:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF Hi Robert, Is the source code available? If yes, how does one get it? Thanks and regards, David On 2023-07-05 09:17, Crawford Robert C (Contractor) wrote: > In the early 80's we had an adventure game written in PL/1. It was largely > table driven so I added a room full of Texas Aggies. To retrieve the > "treasure," an Aggie Joke book, you had to find a bar of soap and throw it > into the room at which point the Aggies would run out of the room enabling > you to get the book. > > For the record, I am a Texas Aggie and I understand that the joke will be > lost on 49/50ths of the US. > > Robert Crawford > Abstract Evolutions LLC > (210) 913-3822 > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:43 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF > > On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. > > > You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave > Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters > of “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure > > Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that knowledge > is now lost in the mists of time for me. > > -- > Curtis Pew > ITS Campus Solutions > curtis@austin.utexas.edu > > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 08:52:41 -0500, Matthew Stitt wrote: >My son got me a keyboard very much like the classic IBM Type "M" for Christmas >a few years ago. It is USB attached and has the name "UNICOMP" on it. I bought two Unicomp buckling-spring keyboards. The first one, purchased in 2013 eventually failed, so I bought another in 2020. The quality on the newer one was considerably less than the older one. The buckling-spring keyboard has some travel after the connection is made (and heard and felt). Some of the keys in the newer one didn't have that extra travel. They bottomed out as the contact was made. For a few keys, they would sometimes bottom out without making contact at all. I sent it back (under warranty) and they improved it just enough to be usable. Still, there was an inconsistent feel, with some keys bottoming out sooner than others. I found it disconcerting, but I kept using it for another year until it failed just like the first one, with several keys not registering even though the spring buckled and the contact was apparently made. Just out of warranty. I gave up on them. As for monitors, I have a 43 inch 4k TV that I use as a monitor. When we worked in the office, I had 2 24 inch 1080P monitors. The 4k monitor gives the same horizontal resolution as 2 1080P monitors, but on a single screen. As a bonus, it gives the same vertical resolution as two more 1080P monitors above the other two. At 43 inches the size of the pixels is a bit smaller than with 24 inch monitors, but it works well for me. My 3270 sessions are set to 99 x 142. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
Hi Robert, Is the source code available? If yes, how does one get it? Thanks and regards, David On 2023-07-05 09:17, Crawford Robert C (Contractor) wrote: In the early 80's we had an adventure game written in PL/1. It was largely table driven so I added a room full of Texas Aggies. To retrieve the "treasure," an Aggie Joke book, you had to find a bar of soap and throw it into the room at which point the Aggies would run out of the room enabling you to get the book. For the record, I am a Texas Aggie and I understand that the joke will be lost on 49/50ths of the US. Robert Crawford Abstract Evolutions LLC (210) 913-3822 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. -- Curtis Pew ITS Campus Solutions curtis@austin.utexas.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
My son got me a keyboard very much like the classic IBM Type "M" for Christmas a few years ago. It is USB attached and has the name "UNICOMP" on it. Matthew On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:50:24 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote: >I said I always buy a "real" keyboard (and monitor, and trackball) to plug >into a laptop. I have thought hard about spending real money on them, too, or >at least on the keyboard considering how much time I spend on mine. But so >far I've gone the other way. About once a year I spill a Coke on my keyboard; >I just drop it in the bathtub, pick out a backup and get back to work. No >lost time (or rather very little) and no tearing of hair. > >(I say I "drop it in the bathtub" because I have repeatedly read that >keyboards recover just fine when soaked and then allowed to dry out. So far I >have never yet gotten a keyboard back this way, though; I always end up having >to throw it away. Hints on a better way gratefully accepted.) > >Because of this, so far I buy El Cheapo brand. I can't get El Cheapo for $10 >any longer, but I think the last time I bought a few of them they were less >than $30. > >But, oh boy, do I miss tactile feedback! IBM's software is famously hard to >use, but their hardware is reliably exceptional. Heck, I liked the old >Selectrics, too. > >--- >Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 > >/* There are trivial truths and great truths. The opposite of a trivial truth >is plainly false. The opposite of a great truth is also true. -attributed by >Niels Bohr to his father */ > >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >Mike Schwab >Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2023 16:54 > >https://www.twindata.com/keyboards/twindatakeyboards.htm 5250 / 3270 keyboards >w PS/2 or USB connector. > >IBM 3270 APL converted to USB. >https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/product/1394625 > >On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 3:39 PM rpinion865 ><042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >> Don't remember the manufacturer, I want the actual 3270 keyboard with the >> USB connect. >> >> Original Message >> On Jul 4, 2023, 3:53 PM, billogden wrote: >> >> > Interesting discussion on screen sizes, keyboards, etc. Many of us >> > have various different opinions. My opinions have changed since the >> > early days when some of us (the "older" ones) used 2260s instead of >> > 3270s. I am using a 21" screen at the moment, with three "windows" >> > open on it. I would not want a larger screen and perhaps would >> > prefer a slightly smaller one. I prefer a size that does not require >> > me to constantly move my head to focus on different parts of the >> > screen. For 3270 emulation I prefer 133 character width (and most of >> > us probably agree on that) and at least 50 lines high (and this >> > could vary somewhat). I find 17" laptop screens OK, but not great. >> > More important for me (because I work mostly with text) is having >> > good character resolution. Perhaps because I as not as young as I >> > was a few years ago, I find long periods with crudely-formed >> > characters to be more exhausting. Given a choice, I would say this >> > is more important than the actual screen size. I am not fond of >> > laptop keyboards --- IMO they range from barely OK to poor. At the >> > moment I am using an old PC AT keyboard (with the "round" adapter >> > plug going to a converter to connect it to a USB port). It has the >> > numeric keypad (which I do not use) and has good "movement" of the >> > keys that provides a positive feedback for an old guy like me. (The >> > "real" 3270 terminals had great keyboards!) I can deal with the red >> > "mouse control" on IBM-designed laptop keyboards when needed, but I >> > prefer a "real" mouse (with the center "dial" function, if >> > possible). I use the same glasses for reading books and for dealing >> > with terminals -- I am lucky that they are fairly "weak" glasses. >> > The discussion about z/OSMF? One of these months I will need to >> > spend some time with it. These days I mostly use a relatively slow >> > machine for z/OS and the performance is not attractive for z/OSMF. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Colossal Cave on Android (was: Re: z/OSMF)
There are a number of hits that seem relevant when I do a search for "android version of dosbox", and once you have dosbox installed you should have access to a bunch of old DOS-based text games, including versions of Colossal Cave, I believe. I have not tried this personally, but I use dosbox on Windows and iPadOS for this purpose https://duckduckgo.com/?q=android+version+of+dosbox=newext=v341-1=web -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
OT: RE: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
Aggie derives from "agricultural school"; I assure you that the English of, e.g.,Australia, New Zealand, UK, is just as opaque to us. Does Scotland have English terms that are understood in some regions but not all? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Jeremy Nicoll [jn.ls.mfrm...@letterboxes.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 9:22 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, at 14:17, Crawford Robert C (Contractor) wrote: > In the early 80's we had an adventure game written in PL/1. It was > largely table driven so I added a room full of Texas Aggies. To > retrieve the "treasure," an Aggie Joke book, you had to find a bar of > soap and throw it into the room at which point the Aggies would run out > of the room enabling you to get the book. > > For the record, I am a Texas Aggie and I understand that the joke will > be lost on 49/50ths of the US. Unless you're implying that an Aggie, whatever that is (someone from Texas A? - which even I, in Scotland, have heard of) is averse to soap, it's unclear. We're not all in or from the US. -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, at 14:17, Crawford Robert C (Contractor) wrote: > In the early 80's we had an adventure game written in PL/1. It was > largely table driven so I added a room full of Texas Aggies. To > retrieve the "treasure," an Aggie Joke book, you had to find a bar of > soap and throw it into the room at which point the Aggies would run out > of the room enabling you to get the book. > > For the record, I am a Texas Aggie and I understand that the joke will > be lost on 49/50ths of the US. Unless you're implying that an Aggie, whatever that is (someone from Texas A? - which even I, in Scotland, have heard of) is averse to soap, it's unclear. We're not all in or from the US. -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
YES!! Robert Crawford Abstract Evolutions LLC (210) 913-3822 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric Erickson Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 10:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF PLUGH! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF
In the early 80's we had an adventure game written in PL/1. It was largely table driven so I added a room full of Texas Aggies. To retrieve the "treasure," an Aggie Joke book, you had to find a bar of soap and throw it into the room at which point the Aggies would run out of the room enabling you to get the book. For the record, I am a Texas Aggie and I understand that the joke will be lost on 49/50ths of the US. Robert Crawford Abstract Evolutions LLC (210) 913-3822 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXT] Re: z/OSMF On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. -- Curtis Pew ITS Campus Solutions curtis@austin.utexas.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Colossal Cave on Android (was: Re: z/OSMF)
I care enough to google it only if someone else cares enough to request that I send them a copy. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive, and go do that, because what the world needs is people who have come alive. -Gil Bailie, quoted in "Wild at Heart" by John Eldredge */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2023 20:22 You can create a .apk from the app and send that. I have an old Euchre game that's been discontinued and have moved it to several phones as I've upgraded. Google "find apk for an app" (without the quotes). --- Bob Bridges wrote: >I have a copy on my phone, but I haven't tried to run it recently. If >it works, I wonder whether there's a way to send a copy, if anyone wants it? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Colossal Cave on Android (was: Re: z/OSMF)
Bob Bridges wrote: >I have a copy on my phone, but I haven't tried to run it recently. If it >works, I wonder whether there's a way to send a copy, if anyone wants it? You can create a .apk from the app and send that. I have an old Euchre game that's been discontinued and have moved it to several phones as I've upgraded. Google "find apk for an app" (without the quotes). -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
I said I always buy a "real" keyboard (and monitor, and trackball) to plug into a laptop. I have thought hard about spending real money on them, too, or at least on the keyboard considering how much time I spend on mine. But so far I've gone the other way. About once a year I spill a Coke on my keyboard; I just drop it in the bathtub, pick out a backup and get back to work. No lost time (or rather very little) and no tearing of hair. (I say I "drop it in the bathtub" because I have repeatedly read that keyboards recover just fine when soaked and then allowed to dry out. So far I have never yet gotten a keyboard back this way, though; I always end up having to throw it away. Hints on a better way gratefully accepted.) Because of this, so far I buy El Cheapo brand. I can't get El Cheapo for $10 any longer, but I think the last time I bought a few of them they were less than $30. But, oh boy, do I miss tactile feedback! IBM's software is famously hard to use, but their hardware is reliably exceptional. Heck, I liked the old Selectrics, too. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* There are trivial truths and great truths. The opposite of a trivial truth is plainly false. The opposite of a great truth is also true. -attributed by Niels Bohr to his father */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2023 16:54 https://www.twindata.com/keyboards/twindatakeyboards.htm 5250 / 3270 keyboards w PS/2 or USB connector. IBM 3270 APL converted to USB. https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/product/1394625 On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 3:39 PM rpinion865 <042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Don't remember the manufacturer, I want the actual 3270 keyboard with the USB > connect. > > Original Message > On Jul 4, 2023, 3:53 PM, billogden wrote: > > > Interesting discussion on screen sizes, keyboards, etc. Many of us > > have various different opinions. My opinions have changed since the > > early days when some of us (the "older" ones) used 2260s instead of > > 3270s. I am using a 21" screen at the moment, with three "windows" > > open on it. I would not want a larger screen and perhaps would > > prefer a slightly smaller one. I prefer a size that does not require > > me to constantly move my head to focus on different parts of the > > screen. For 3270 emulation I prefer 133 character width (and most of > > us probably agree on that) and at least 50 lines high (and this > > could vary somewhat). I find 17" laptop screens OK, but not great. > > More important for me (because I work mostly with text) is having > > good character resolution. Perhaps because I as not as young as I > > was a few years ago, I find long periods with crudely-formed > > characters to be more exhausting. Given a choice, I would say this > > is more important than the actual screen size. I am not fond of > > laptop keyboards --- IMO they range from barely OK to poor. At the > > moment I am using an old PC AT keyboard (with the "round" adapter > > plug going to a converter to connect it to a USB port). It has the > > numeric keypad (which I do not use) and has good "movement" of the > > keys that provides a positive feedback for an old guy like me. (The > > "real" 3270 terminals had great keyboards!) I can deal with the red > > "mouse control" on IBM-designed laptop keyboards when needed, but I > > prefer a "real" mouse (with the center "dial" function, if > > possible). I use the same glasses for reading books and for dealing > > with terminals -- I am lucky that they are fairly "weak" glasses. > > The discussion about z/OSMF? One of these months I will need to > > spend some time with it. These days I mostly use a relatively slow > > machine for z/OS and the performance is not attractive for z/OSMF. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Colossal Cave on Android (was: Re: z/OSMF)
I have a copy on my phone, but I haven't tried to run it recently. If it works, I wonder whether there's a way to send a copy, if anyone wants it? --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* even though our political rhetoric is more conservative today, power keeps accumulating in Washington as steadily as if a Socialist Party were the dominant electoral force. Conservatives who think they have "won" because Bill Clinton now adopts anti-government poses are like sheep congratulating themselves because the wolf has been forced to wear sheep's clothing. It might be reassuring, if only the old wolf weren't still eating so well. -Joseph Sobran, 1998 */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Smith III Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2023 13:09 Alas, the Colossal Cave seems to not be compatible with current Android versions. I take that to mean the developer has lost interest. Too bad; seemed like a nice blast from the past time-waster! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
https://www.twindata.com/keyboards/twindatakeyboards.htm 5250 / 3270 keyboards w PS/2 or USB connector. IBM 3270 APL converted to USB. https://www.pckeyboard.com/page/product/1394625 On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 3:39 PM rpinion865 <042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Don't remember the manufacturer, I want the actual 3270 keyboard with the USB > connect. > > Sent from Proton Mail mobile > > Original Message > On Jul 4, 2023, 3:53 PM, billogden wrote: > > > Interesting discussion on screen sizes, keyboards, etc. Many of us have > > various different opinions. My opinions have changed since the early days > > when some of us (the "older" ones) used 2260s instead of 3270s. I am using > > a 21" screen at the moment, with three "windows" open on it. I would not > > want a larger screen and perhaps would prefer a slightly smaller one. I > > prefer a size that does not require me to constantly move my head to focus > > on different parts of the screen. For 3270 emulation I prefer 133 character > > width (and most of us probably agree on that) and at least 50 lines high > > (and this could vary somewhat). I find 17" laptop screens OK, but not > > great. More important for me (because I work mostly with text) is having > > good character resolution. Perhaps because I as not as young as I was a few > > years ago, I find long periods with crudely-formed characters to be more > > exhausting. Given a choice, I would say this is more important than the > > actual screen size. I am not fond of laptop keyboards --- IMO they range > > from barely OK to poor. At the moment I am using an old PC AT keyboard > > (with the "round" adapter plug going to a converter to connect it to a USB > > port). It has the numeric keypad (which I do not use) and has good > > "movement" of the keys that provides a positive feedback for an old guy > > like me. (The "real" 3270 terminals had great keyboards!) I can deal with > > the red "mouse control" on IBM-designed laptop keyboards when needed, but I > > prefer a "real" mouse (with the center "dial" function, if possible). I use > > the same glasses for reading books and for dealing with terminals -- I am > > lucky that they are fairly "weak" glasses. The discussion about z/OSMF? One > > of these months I will need to spend some time with it. These days I mostly > > use a relatively slow machine for z/OS and the performance is not > > attractive for z/OSMF. Bill Ogden > > -- For > > IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Don't remember the manufacturer, I want the actual 3270 keyboard with the USB connect. Sent from Proton Mail mobile Original Message On Jul 4, 2023, 3:53 PM, billogden wrote: > Interesting discussion on screen sizes, keyboards, etc. Many of us have > various different opinions. My opinions have changed since the early days > when some of us (the "older" ones) used 2260s instead of 3270s. I am using a > 21" screen at the moment, with three "windows" open on it. I would not want a > larger screen and perhaps would prefer a slightly smaller one. I prefer a > size that does not require me to constantly move my head to focus on > different parts of the screen. For 3270 emulation I prefer 133 character > width (and most of us probably agree on that) and at least 50 lines high (and > this could vary somewhat). I find 17" laptop screens OK, but not great. More > important for me (because I work mostly with text) is having good character > resolution. Perhaps because I as not as young as I was a few years ago, I > find long periods with crudely-formed characters to be more exhausting. Given > a choice, I would say this is more important than the actual screen size. I > am not fond of laptop keyboards --- IMO they range from barely OK to poor. At > the moment I am using an old PC AT keyboard (with the "round" adapter plug > going to a converter to connect it to a USB port). It has the numeric keypad > (which I do not use) and has good "movement" of the keys that provides a > positive feedback for an old guy like me. (The "real" 3270 terminals had > great keyboards!) I can deal with the red "mouse control" on IBM-designed > laptop keyboards when needed, but I prefer a "real" mouse (with the center > "dial" function, if possible). I use the same glasses for reading books and > for dealing with terminals -- I am lucky that they are fairly "weak" glasses. > The discussion about z/OSMF? One of these months I will need to spend some > time with it. These days I mostly use a relatively slow machine for z/OS and > the performance is not attractive for z/OSMF. Bill Ogden > -- For > IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Interesting discussion on screen sizes, keyboards, etc. Many of us have various different opinions. My opinions have changed since the early days when some of us (the "older" ones) used 2260s instead of 3270s. I am using a 21" screen at the moment, with three "windows" open on it. I would not want a larger screen and perhaps would prefer a slightly smaller one. I prefer a size that does not require me to constantly move my head to focus on different parts of the screen. For 3270 emulation I prefer 133 character width (and most of us probably agree on that) and at least 50 lines high (and this could vary somewhat). I find 17" laptop screens OK, but not great. More important for me (because I work mostly with text) is having good character resolution. Perhaps because I as not as young as I was a few years ago, I find long periods with crudely-formed characters to be more exhausting. Given a choice, I would say this is more important than the actual screen size. I am not fond of laptop keyboards --- IMO they range from barely OK to poor. At the moment I am using an old PC AT keyboard (with the "round" adapter plug going to a converter to connect it to a USB port). It has the numeric keypad (which I do not use) and has good "movement" of the keys that provides a positive feedback for an old guy like me. (The "real" 3270 terminals had great keyboards!) I can deal with the red "mouse control" on IBM-designed laptop keyboards when needed, but I prefer a "real" mouse (with the center "dial" function, if possible). I use the same glasses for reading books and for dealing with terminals -- I am lucky that they are fairly "weak" glasses. The discussion about z/OSMF? One of these months I will need to spend some time with it. These days I mostly use a relatively slow machine for z/OS and the performance is not attractive for z/OSMF. Bill Ogden -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Colossal Cave on Android (was: Re: z/OSMF)
With the ubiquity of Amazon devices it's likely the OP has one of these (Echo, Dot etc.) Just say Alexa Play Colossal Cave and it will play the game for you. XYZZY :-) On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 6:19 AM Mike Schwab wrote: > Install Linux on Android, 3270 emulator, Turkey 4-, then the games? > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 12:09 PM Phil Smith III wrote: > > > > Y'all might think about changing subject lines occasionally. ;) > > > > > > > > Alas, the Colossal Cave seems to not be compatible with current Android > versions. I take that to mean the developer has lost interest. Too bad; > seemed like a nice blast from the past time-waster! > > > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA > Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Colossal Cave on Android (was: Re: z/OSMF)
Install Linux on Android, 3270 emulator, Turkey 4-, then the games? On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 12:09 PM Phil Smith III wrote: > > Y'all might think about changing subject lines occasionally. ;) > > > > Alas, the Colossal Cave seems to not be compatible with current Android > versions. I take that to mean the developer has lost interest. Too bad; > seemed like a nice blast from the past time-waster! > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Colossal Cave on Android (was: Re: z/OSMF)
Y'all might think about changing subject lines occasionally. ;) Alas, the Colossal Cave seems to not be compatible with current Android versions. I take that to mean the developer has lost interest. Too bad; seemed like a nice blast from the past time-waster! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
LOL haven't heard that since I was a kid watching a b/w TV. On 7/4/2023 1:06 AM, rpinion865 wrote: What about Pimento University, good old PU. Sent from Proton Mail mobile Original Message On Jul 4, 2023, 7:32 AM, Tom Brennan wrote: LOL On 7/3/2023 8:30 PM, Eric Erickson wrote: > PLUGH! > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
What about Pimento University, good old PU. Sent from Proton Mail mobile Original Message On Jul 4, 2023, 7:32 AM, Tom Brennan wrote: > LOL On 7/3/2023 8:30 PM, Eric Erickson wrote: > PLUGH! > > > -- > For > IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > -- For > IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
LOL On 7/3/2023 8:30 PM, Eric Erickson wrote: PLUGH! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
No, community college in Southern California, almost free at the time. On 7/3/2023 8:15 PM, Bob Bridges wrote: Yes, about that year for me too, and at a university. Not A State U in Greensboro, NC, by any chance? --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* What fills the eye fills the heart. -Celtic proverb We begin by coveting what we see every day. -Hannibal Lecter in "Silence of the Lambs" I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes. -Psalms 101:3 */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 21:08 Same here, ADVEN on a DEC 10 running TOPS-10, around 1979. One college instructor told us to play it and said, "Let them play games, and that will get them interested." --- On 7/3/2023 12:05 PM, Bob Bridges wrote: Ah, yes, I remember now, we invoked it using ADVEN on the PDP-10, which used 36-bit words and 7-bit ASCII (hence 5 chars per word). I, too, mapped out the whole thing back in the late '70s, and I too have forgotten most of it since then. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
PLUGH! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Yes, about that year for me too, and at a university. Not A State U in Greensboro, NC, by any chance? --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* What fills the eye fills the heart. -Celtic proverb We begin by coveting what we see every day. -Hannibal Lecter in "Silence of the Lambs" I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes. -Psalms 101:3 */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 21:08 Same here, ADVEN on a DEC 10 running TOPS-10, around 1979. One college instructor told us to play it and said, "Let them play games, and that will get them interested." --- On 7/3/2023 12:05 PM, Bob Bridges wrote: > Ah, yes, I remember now, we invoked it using ADVEN on the PDP-10, which used > 36-bit words and 7-bit ASCII (hence 5 chars per word). I, too, mapped out > the whole thing back in the late '70s, and I too have forgotten most of it > since then. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Same here, ADVEN on a DEC 10 running TOPS-10, around 1979. One college instructor told us to play it and said, "Let them play games, and that will get them interested." On 7/3/2023 12:05 PM, Bob Bridges wrote: Ah, yes, I remember now, we invoked it using ADVEN on the PDP-10, which used 36-bit words and 7-bit ASCII (hence 5 chars per word). I, too, mapped out the whole thing back in the late '70s, and I too have forgotten most of it since then. I well remember struggling to figure out the puzzle of the dragon. THROW AXE; "The axe glances harmlessly off the dragon's scales" KILL DRAGON; "With what? Your bare hands?" FEED DRAGON; "There's nothing here it wants to eat (except possibly you)." After some days I gave up and peeked over another player's shoulder while she worked her way casually through the parts of the maze she already understood. Two heads are definitely better than one in such games. A friend and I were both puzzled in the same part of the cavern. I saw a lump of coal in the corner and was instantly sure that it could be turned into diamond, so when I ran across the thing that looked like a washing machine I figured I'd found the right tool for it; but I couldn't figure out how to make it work. There was a coin slot, but it didn't seem interested in my coins. Meanwhile David had very easily understood how to make the "washing machine" work, but he couldn't figure out what it was for. It wasn't until we talked about it that we got the whole picture. Later we collaborated on Zork, with similarly productive results. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Men acquire a particular quality by constantly acting a particular way... you become just by performing just actions, temperate by performing temperate actions, brave by performing brave actions. -Aristotle */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 14:43 You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. --- On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
The version that I saw was table driven; it was half a century ago, but I vaguel recall a response of "You've got to be kidding", but I may be confusing that with the response to "throw troll". -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bob Bridges [robhbrid...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 5:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF I once spent a pleasurable few days hacking (or rather trying to hack) Colossal Cave's "magic mode". The DEC-10 machine at the college I worked at back then had very little security; I could a program and then examine the machine code at leisure. I got quite a few steps into the rather lengthy process of establishing myself as a "wizard", but didn't finish before I ended up doing something else - taking another job somewhere else, I think it was, but I don't remember for sure. And yes, experimenting with various strategies in a complicated game is often more fun than just playing it. Once I discovered the application of statistics to "games theory", I began to think it'd be fun to work on that. But that was before I became a coder, which still keeps me interested. Out of curiosity, did the game know what to do with "eat bird"? I guess if they were doing their job, the writers needed to match every verb with every object and invent a result, just to satisfy people like you. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* When the omniscient God asks you a question, it is not because He is seeking information. -from "The Final Quest" by Rick Joyner */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 17:53 I always found writing games to be more interesting than playing them, and will run experiments rather than concentrating on winning. An example was when I wondered what Adventure would do with absud actions such as "eat bird" or "throw troll". -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
I once spent a pleasurable few days hacking (or rather trying to hack) Colossal Cave's "magic mode". The DEC-10 machine at the college I worked at back then had very little security; I could a program and then examine the machine code at leisure. I got quite a few steps into the rather lengthy process of establishing myself as a "wizard", but didn't finish before I ended up doing something else - taking another job somewhere else, I think it was, but I don't remember for sure. And yes, experimenting with various strategies in a complicated game is often more fun than just playing it. Once I discovered the application of statistics to "games theory", I began to think it'd be fun to work on that. But that was before I became a coder, which still keeps me interested. Out of curiosity, did the game know what to do with "eat bird"? I guess if they were doing their job, the writers needed to match every verb with every object and invent a result, just to satisfy people like you. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* When the omniscient God asks you a question, it is not because He is seeking information. -from "The Final Quest" by Rick Joyner */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 17:53 I always found writing games to be more interesting than playing them, and will run experiments rather than concentrating on winning. An example was when I wondered what Adventure would do with absud actions such as "eat bird" or "throw troll". -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
I always found writing games to be more interesting than playing them, and will run experiments rather than concentrating on winning. An example was when I wondered what Adventure would do with absud actions such as "eat bird" or "throw troll". -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bob Bridges [robhbrid...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 3:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF Ah, yes, I remember now, we invoked it using ADVEN on the PDP-10, which used 36-bit words and 7-bit ASCII (hence 5 chars per word). I, too, mapped out the whole thing back in the late '70s, and I too have forgotten most of it since then. I well remember struggling to figure out the puzzle of the dragon. THROW AXE; "The axe glances harmlessly off the dragon's scales" KILL DRAGON; "With what? Your bare hands?" FEED DRAGON; "There's nothing here it wants to eat (except possibly you)." After some days I gave up and peeked over another player's shoulder while she worked her way casually through the parts of the maze she already understood. Two heads are definitely better than one in such games. A friend and I were both puzzled in the same part of the cavern. I saw a lump of coal in the corner and was instantly sure that it could be turned into diamond, so when I ran across the thing that looked like a washing machine I figured I'd found the right tool for it; but I couldn't figure out how to make it work. There was a coin slot, but it didn't seem interested in my coins. Meanwhile David had very easily understood how to make the "washing machine" work, but he couldn't figure out what it was for. It wasn't until we talked about it that we got the whole picture. Later we collaborated on Zork, with similarly productive results. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Men acquire a particular quality by constantly acting a particular way... you become just by performing just actions, temperate by performing temperate actions, brave by performing brave actions. -Aristotle */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 14:43 You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. --- On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
Ah, yes, I remember now, we invoked it using ADVEN on the PDP-10, which used 36-bit words and 7-bit ASCII (hence 5 chars per word). I, too, mapped out the whole thing back in the late '70s, and I too have forgotten most of it since then. I well remember struggling to figure out the puzzle of the dragon. THROW AXE; "The axe glances harmlessly off the dragon's scales" KILL DRAGON; "With what? Your bare hands?" FEED DRAGON; "There's nothing here it wants to eat (except possibly you)." After some days I gave up and peeked over another player's shoulder while she worked her way casually through the parts of the maze she already understood. Two heads are definitely better than one in such games. A friend and I were both puzzled in the same part of the cavern. I saw a lump of coal in the corner and was instantly sure that it could be turned into diamond, so when I ran across the thing that looked like a washing machine I figured I'd found the right tool for it; but I couldn't figure out how to make it work. There was a coin slot, but it didn't seem interested in my coins. Meanwhile David had very easily understood how to make the "washing machine" work, but he couldn't figure out what it was for. It wasn't until we talked about it that we got the whole picture. Later we collaborated on Zork, with similarly productive results. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* Men acquire a particular quality by constantly acting a particular way... you become just by performing just actions, temperate by performing temperate actions, brave by performing brave actions. -Aristotle */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 14:43 You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. --- On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. You’re talking about the same game. The full name was “Colossal Cave Adventure”, but the program file name was usually as many characters of “ADVENTURE” as the system supported. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Cave_Adventure Forty years ago I knew how to make it all the way through, but that knowledge is now lost in the mists of time for me. -- Curtis Pew ITS Campus Solutions curtis@austin.utexas.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
I was thinking of the old text Adventure written in FORTRAN. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bob Bridges Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 2:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF LOL! Did you know Colossal Cave is now available on Android? I got myself a copy, intending to map it all out, but so far I'm still exploring the forest on the surface. Haven't played it in decades. Maybe I should introduce it to my grandchildren. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* ERRATA: For "errata" read "erratum". */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 14:01 ObNotAdventure You are in a maze of twisty keyboards, all different. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Mike Schwab Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:58 PM 10-11 in laptops generally have 90% keyboard without numeric keyboard.. 13-15 in laptops generally have 100% keyboard without numeric keyboard. 17 in + laptops generally have 100% keyboard with numeric keyboard. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
LOL! Did you know Colossal Cave is now available on Android? I got myself a copy, intending to map it all out, but so far I'm still exploring the forest on the surface. Haven't played it in decades. Maybe I should introduce it to my grandchildren. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* ERRATA: For "errata" read "erratum". */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 14:01 ObNotAdventure You are in a maze of twisty keyboards, all different. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Mike Schwab Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:58 PM 10-11 in laptops generally have 90% keyboard without numeric keyboard.. 13-15 in laptops generally have 100% keyboard without numeric keyboard. 17 in + laptops generally have 100% keyboard with numeric keyboard. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
ObNotAdventure You are in a maze of twisty keyboards, all different. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Mike Schwab Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF 10-11 in laptops generally have 90% keyboard without numeric keyboard.. 13-15 in laptops generally have 100% keyboard without numeric keyboard. 17 in + laptops generally have 100% keyboard with numeric keyboard. On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:40 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > > People use to complain when I printed 88 lines per page (8 LPI instead of 6); > later on, with laser printers, I always used smaller fonts than my colleagues > liked. > > As for lacktops (sic), my biggest complaint is the keyboard. Why is it no > longer possible to buy a laptop with a standard AT or converged key layout, a > mini trackball and the keys at the front of the keyboard? > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of > Bob Bridges > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 10:58 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: z/OSMF > > Apparently I used to have really high-resolution eyesight, judging by the > comments of coworkers ("How can you read that?!"); not so much any more. I > now keep around two types of reading classes, a weaker broad-eye set for > reading my monitor at arm's length and slightly stronger granny glasses for > reading up close. Haven't tried bifocals yet. > > Or have I? I now work at home, and sometimes at my desk I wear them both at > the same time rather than switching back and forth. Then I stand up and get > the door, or join a Teams meeting, and someone is quizzical about the fact > that I seem to be wearing two sets of glasses at once, I having forgotten > about them. It eventually dawned on me that with broad glasses covering my > field of vision and granny glasses at the bottom, that ~is~ bifocals in a > sense. Maybe if Ben Franklin had tried that he wouldn't have invented real > bifocals. (Somebody else probably would have, though.) > > But as my eyes deteriorate I'm going to have to go to an optometrist > eventually; no telling what he'll make me wear, and I suspect I'll wonder > then why I can magically see again and why in the world I waited so long. > > --- > Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 > > /* It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling > exception, is composed of others. -John Andrew Holmes */ > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > David Purdy > Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2023 21:59 > > Second best investment was bifocals cut for 18" monitor and closer for > reading. Ergonomics again...the neck was grateful and more relaxed at the end > of a day. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
10-11 in laptops generally have 90% keyboard without numeric keyboard.. 13-15 in laptops generally have 100% keyboard without numeric keyboard. 17 in + laptops generally have 100% keyboard with numeric keyboard. On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:40 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > > People use to complain when I printed 88 lines per page (8 LPI instead of 6); > later on, with laser printers, I always used smaller fonts than my colleagues > liked. > > As for lacktops (sic), my biggest complaint is the keyboard. Why is it no > longer possible to buy a laptop with a standard AT or converged key layout, a > mini trackball and the keys at the front of the keyboard? > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of > Bob Bridges > Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 10:58 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: z/OSMF > > Apparently I used to have really high-resolution eyesight, judging by the > comments of coworkers ("How can you read that?!"); not so much any more. I > now keep around two types of reading classes, a weaker broad-eye set for > reading my monitor at arm's length and slightly stronger granny glasses for > reading up close. Haven't tried bifocals yet. > > Or have I? I now work at home, and sometimes at my desk I wear them both at > the same time rather than switching back and forth. Then I stand up and get > the door, or join a Teams meeting, and someone is quizzical about the fact > that I seem to be wearing two sets of glasses at once, I having forgotten > about them. It eventually dawned on me that with broad glasses covering my > field of vision and granny glasses at the bottom, that ~is~ bifocals in a > sense. Maybe if Ben Franklin had tried that he wouldn't have invented real > bifocals. (Somebody else probably would have, though.) > > But as my eyes deteriorate I'm going to have to go to an optometrist > eventually; no telling what he'll make me wear, and I suspect I'll wonder > then why I can magically see again and why in the world I waited so long. > > --- > Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 > > /* It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling > exception, is composed of others. -John Andrew Holmes */ > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > David Purdy > Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2023 21:59 > > Second best investment was bifocals cut for 18" monitor and closer for > reading. Ergonomics again...the neck was grateful and more relaxed at the end > of a day. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
People use to complain when I printed 88 lines per page (8 LPI instead of 6); later on, with laser printers, I always used smaller fonts than my colleagues liked. As for lacktops (sic), my biggest complaint is the keyboard. Why is it no longer possible to buy a laptop with a standard AT or converged key layout, a mini trackball and the keys at the front of the keyboard? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bob Bridges Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 10:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF Apparently I used to have really high-resolution eyesight, judging by the comments of coworkers ("How can you read that?!"); not so much any more. I now keep around two types of reading classes, a weaker broad-eye set for reading my monitor at arm's length and slightly stronger granny glasses for reading up close. Haven't tried bifocals yet. Or have I? I now work at home, and sometimes at my desk I wear them both at the same time rather than switching back and forth. Then I stand up and get the door, or join a Teams meeting, and someone is quizzical about the fact that I seem to be wearing two sets of glasses at once, I having forgotten about them. It eventually dawned on me that with broad glasses covering my field of vision and granny glasses at the bottom, that ~is~ bifocals in a sense. Maybe if Ben Franklin had tried that he wouldn't have invented real bifocals. (Somebody else probably would have, though.) But as my eyes deteriorate I'm going to have to go to an optometrist eventually; no telling what he'll make me wear, and I suspect I'll wonder then why I can magically see again and why in the world I waited so long. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others. -John Andrew Holmes */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Purdy Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2023 21:59 Second best investment was bifocals cut for 18" monitor and closer for reading. Ergonomics again...the neck was grateful and more relaxed at the end of a day. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: z/OSMF
I used laptops for years because of travel, but I never used their screens or keyboards at home. I plug a real screen and a real keyboard into the laptop, oh yes and a real trackball too. Laptops are marvelous inventions, but there's no need to put up with their limitations. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* The peculiarity of "civil rights" and associated legislation ("hate crimes," for instance) is that they criminalize motives, as opposed to actions. -from _Are You a Marxist?_ by Joe Sobran, 1998 */ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 00:39 Throughout my career, my definitions of large and small monitors kept shifting; where once 17" was something to aspire to, I now consider it to be tiny, and where once 4Kx4K was "if you have to ask you can't afford it", now "8K UHD" is merely expensive. While I have small legacy laptops and am force to use small screens for work, It's been decades since I purchased anything smaller than 21". -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN