Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Naresh Narang wrote:

 Please don't take this in a negative sense. My
 message was informational, I did not mean that they
 should not charge for support. They have a shop to
 run, by all means, they should sell anything they can.
 This is not meant to be a flame war.

I'm not interested in wars at all but I want you to justify how you think
they aren't. Most of the kernel developers are employed at RH. RH has
contributed many OSS softwares to the community.

rrs
- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC
Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is
research.
Necessity is the mother of invention.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCeTe14Rhi6gTxMLwRAqleAJ9WhhQnvQOcY9ZDcNzy+HMw9J74MgCgnfnQ
umuWk8vn//iRV+m7w+aJ824=
=yiT4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-04 Thread Naresh Narang

--- Ritesh Raj Sarraf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Naresh Narang wrote:
 
  Please don't take this in a negative sense. My
  message was informational, I did not mean that
 they
  should not charge for support. They have a shop to
  run, by all means, they should sell anything they
 can.
  This is not meant to be a flame war.
 
 I'm not interested in wars at all but I want you to
 justify how you think
 they aren't. Most of the kernel developers are
 employed at RH. RH has
 contributed many OSS softwares to the community.
 

  I never said they aren't justified to sell what they
want or can.

Have a good day.
--Naresh Narang



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Naresh Narang wrote:

  I wonder why would RHEL install show that it is
 GNU/Linux if they are not distributed under GNU
 License. AFAIK, you can download and use it but you
 need to pay for the license to get support / updates.

If they don't charge for Support/Updates then how are they going to do
business ?
By selling product manuals ?

rrs
- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC
Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is
research.
Necessity is the mother of invention.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCd7pb4Rhi6gTxMLwRAgonAJkB2c0nt4arIHXCf8C7q2vJQkgJgACeLaOc
H1LdWmQjf+knrjb926tE8OA=
=nE6E
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-03 Thread Naresh Narang

--- Ritesh Raj Sarraf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Naresh Narang wrote:
 
   I wonder why would RHEL install show that it is
  GNU/Linux if they are not distributed under GNU
  License. AFAIK, you can download and use it but
 you
  need to pay for the license to get support /
 updates.
 
 If they don't charge for Support/Updates then how
 are they going to do
 business ?
 By selling product manuals ?
 
 rrs

Please don't take this in a negative sense. My
message was informational, I did not mean that they
should not charge for support. They have a shop to
run, by all means, they should sell anything they can.
This is not meant to be a flame war.

Regards,
--Naresh




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread John Marder
On 4/28/05, vivek v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 AFAIK you cannot make copies of RHEL operating systems.. for all most
 cases for RHEL and compatible systems you can use centos( 
 http://www.centos.org/ )
 cheers 
 vivek
 
 On 4/28/05, John Marder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi!
  
  Does anyone staying in/around Delhi have RHEL 4 WS/ES/AS? If so, may I
  make a copy of it?
  
  Thx in advance
  
  John
  
  ___
  ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
  http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
  Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
 
 
 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
 

Vivek, when you say that you cannot make copies of RHEL operating
systems..do you mean there are legal obstacles (ex. piracy issues) or
are you referring to technical problems (such as cd's being copy
protected etc.)? In case it's the latter, i'm sure somebody must have
cracked the scheme and posted the details online.

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
John Marder wrote:
 Vivek, when you say that you cannot make copies of RHEL operating
 systems..do you mean there are legal obstacles (ex. piracy issues) or
 are you referring to technical problems (such as cd's being copy
 protected etc.)? In case it's the latter, i'm sure somebody must have
 cracked the scheme and posted the details online.

It is a contractual violation. I am not sure how they can prevent GPLed
packages from being copied, but there is such a legal requirement.

- Sandip


-- 
Sandip Bhattacharya  *Puroga Technologies   * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work: http://www.puroga.com  *   Home/Blog: http://www.sandipb.net/blog

PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is interesting, I had this question for a while ?

I am not sure what the exact redhat licenses and protection is ? Are the 
cd's protected, ???

Redhat, it seems,  takes money not for the software but for the setting 
up, maintenance and updates.

So what is to prevent any one from redistributing a) the Redhat itself 
and b) the updates when they come

and if they so have such strong anti copying mechanisms what makes them 
different from Microsoft ?

ram

Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:

John Marder wrote:
  

Vivek, when you say that you cannot make copies of RHEL operating
systems..do you mean there are legal obstacles (ex. piracy issues) or
are you referring to technical problems (such as cd's being copy
protected etc.)? In case it's the latter, i'm sure somebody must have
cracked the scheme and posted the details online.



It is a contractual violation. I am not sure how they can prevent GPLed
packages from being copied, but there is such a legal requirement.

- Sandip


  


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So what is to prevent any one from redistributing a) the Redhat itself 
 and b) the updates when they come
 

Well the updates and the individual packages are available freely. This
is what is helping projects like whitebox linux and taolinux to offer
RHEL compatible distributions.

That itself sets apart Redhat from Microsoft.

- Sandip

-- 
Sandip Bhattacharya  *Puroga Technologies   * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work: http://www.puroga.com  *   Home/Blog: http://www.sandipb.net/blog

PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread gaurav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

This is interesting, I had this question for a while ?

I am not sure what the exact redhat licenses and protection is ? Are the 
cd's protected, ???

Redhat, it seems,  takes money not for the software but for the setting 
up, maintenance and updates.

So what is to prevent any one from redistributing a) the Redhat itself 
and b) the updates when they come

  

Red Hat clearly possesses exclusive legal rights to Red Hat Enterprise 
Linux, namely the exclusive legal right to distribute RHEL in binary 
form, and most importantly, the accompanying exclusive legal right to 
pass along the ISV certifications associated with the RHEL binary 
distribution. Red Hat uses a legal vehicle, a cleverly crafted license 
it calls a subscription agreement, to enable it to possess these 
exclusive legal rights in a product that can continue to be marketed as 
open source.

Best solution is not use Redhat or fedora (Lab Rat for upcoming RHES) or 
some Vendor supported Distro .Move 2 Debian ...I had lot of issues 
with Redhat/fedora now after moving to Debian I am happy Debian user 
.I have moved all my development servers to Debian testing .with 
automatic updates and about 11000 thousand and well tested OS I am 
now tension free :-)

and if they so have such strong anti copying mechanisms what makes them 
different from Microsoft ?

ram

Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:

  

John Marder wrote:
 



Vivek, when you say that you cannot make copies of RHEL operating
systems..do you mean there are legal obstacles (ex. piracy issues) or
are you referring to technical problems (such as cd's being copy
protected etc.)? In case it's the latter, i'm sure somebody must have
cracked the scheme and posted the details online.
   

  

It is a contractual violation. I am not sure how they can prevent GPLed
packages from being copied, but there is such a legal requirement.

- Sandip


 




___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

  



___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:

Well the updates and the individual packages are available freely. This
is what is helping projects like whitebox linux and taolinux to offer
RHEL compatible distributions.

That itself sets apart Redhat from Microsoft.

  

so then what is the problem in distributing RHEL ??


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
Raj Mathur wrote:
 
 AFAIR RH specifies that you lose your service contract if you
 redistribute their software or use it on systems for which it is not
 licensed.  So if you're willing to not have RH service you are welcome
 to redistribute RHEL.
 
 

Hmm. So does that mean that it is ok to buy a single copy of RHEL, and
use it throughout the office, and keeping your apt/yum repositories
pointing to whitebox/taolinux?

- Sandip




-- 
Sandip Bhattacharya  *Puroga Technologies   * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work: http://www.puroga.com  *   Home/Blog: http://www.sandipb.net/blog

PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread gaurav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:

  

Well the updates and the individual packages are available freely. This
is what is helping projects like whitebox linux and taolinux to offer
RHEL compatible distributions.

That itself sets apart Redhat from Microsoft.

 



so then what is the problem in distributing RHEL ??


  

you need to change all the Redhat logos etc  to something to else 
..https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-February/msg04523.html
and check out centos

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

  



___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 Sandip == Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Sandip Raj Mathur wrote:
 AFAIR RH specifies that you lose your service contract if you
 redistribute their software or use it on systems for which it
 is not licensed.  So if you're willing to not have RH service
 you are welcome to redistribute RHEL.

Sandip Hmm. So does that mean that it is ok to buy a single copy
Sandip of RHEL, and use it throughout the office, and keeping
Sandip your apt/yum repositories pointing to whitebox/taolinux?

I doubt it :)

Perhaps the RH people on this list could (unofficially) clarify?  If
you don't want to specify the legal position on the list, please send
me a personal mail and I can cut and paste from that without having to
specify name/designation in an informal message.

Regards,

- -- Raju
- -- 
Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://kandalaya.org/
   GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
  It is the mind that moves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQFCdeakyWjQ78xo0X8RAkqEAKCKQepqK+dPUTMPtzSRUaAnqcUcSACfZ+VN
yeEQ8Tpcb8wtOmmWPV5Y2NQ=
=RUCy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-05-02 Thread Naresh Narang

--- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
  Sandip == Sandip Bhattacharya
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Sandip Raj Mathur wrote:
  AFAIR RH specifies that you lose your service
 contract if you
  redistribute their software or use it on
 systems for which it
  is not licensed.  So if you're willing to not
 have RH service
  you are welcome to redistribute RHEL.
 
 Sandip Hmm. So does that mean that it is ok to
 buy a single copy
 Sandip of RHEL, and use it throughout the
 office, and keeping
 Sandip your apt/yum repositories pointing to
 whitebox/taolinux?
 
 I doubt it :)
 
 Perhaps the RH people on this list could
 (unofficially) clarify?  If
 you don't want to specify the legal position on the
 list, please send
 me a personal mail and I can cut and paste from that
 without having to
 specify name/designation in an informal message.
 
 Regards,
 
 - -- Raju

   I wonder why would RHEL install show that it is
GNU/Linux if they are not distributed under GNU
License. AFAIK, you can download and use it but you
need to pay for the license to get support / updates.

Regards,
--Naresh

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] Anyone has RHEL4?

2005-04-28 Thread vivek v
AFAIK you cannot make copies of RHEL operating systems.. for all most
cases for RHEL and compatible systems you can use centos( 
http://www.centos.org/ )
cheers 
vivek

On 4/28/05, John Marder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Does anyone staying in/around Delhi have RHEL 4 WS/ES/AS? If so, may I
 make a copy of it?
 
 Thx in advance
 
 John
 
 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/