Re: [LegacyUG] Image captions using misspelled surnames
Lavern Hall wrote: I am working on one branch of the family whose surname is repeatedly misspelled (e.g. original spelling is Giorgio which has turned into Giorgi, Georgi, Gorge, George.) In each case, I've transcribed the record exactly as the name appeared, and I've put the alternate spellings in the AKA's (with their source). 1) I'm not sure this is the best way to handle this part with AKA's, or if I should make a comment under General Notes. The various spellings aren't really AKAs. For instance, Maria GEORGE wasn't also known as (aka) Maria GIORGIO because the name had evolved, right? They aren't really misspellings either. They're closer to variations or alternatives. My BERRY family first appeared as BURY when they moved to a different part of the country, both spellings were apparently randomly used within the family. I use the spelling as it appears in the record but put the alternative spelling in brackets if that has also been used for the same person, eg Thomas Charles BERRY (BURY) or Rose Hannah (Rosanna) BERRY (BURY). 2) When I save the image for the record to my Legacy picture folder, I've saved it using the alternate spelling (e.g. George, Sam if that is how the name appears in the census, instead of Giorgio, Salvatore which is his given name.) So. When I look at the directory of names to see what images I have for any individual, I am having a problem keeping people straight, especially since several family members have the same first names. How about adding the year of birth in brackets (eg GEORGE, Sam (Salvatore b 1926)? -- Charani (UK) OPC for Walton, Ashcott, Shapwick, Greinton and Clutton, SOM http://wsom-opc.org.uk Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Image captions using misspelled surnames
Charani I cannot agree with your suggestion of adding an 'historic' or 'more common' name to that recorded in either vital events or censuses. To me this seems to ignore a basic principle of recording data i.e. it should be recorded as written in the document. I do not see the point of adding the dob to the name either 1) for the above reason and 2) it is unnecessary. In my One-Name I can have a large number of duplicate given names with the Ferguson surname. When checking to see if I already have an entry for a new individual (eg. from a census) I use SearchDetailed Search for Individual; Given Name; Contains; Name (I only use the first name, 2nd perhaps if 1st produces no result) AND Individual; Birth Place; Contains; County. This gives a Name list in dob order, and is quick to use, because when searching only the last field changes. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Charani Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:30 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Image captions using misspelled surnames Lavern Hall wrote: I am working on one branch of the family whose surname is repeatedly misspelled (e.g. original spelling is Giorgio which has turned into Giorgi, Georgi, Gorge, George.) In each case, I've transcribed the record exactly as the name appeared, and I've put the alternate spellings in the AKA's (with their source). 1) I'm not sure this is the best way to handle this part with AKA's, or if I should make a comment under General Notes. The various spellings aren't really AKAs. For instance, Maria GEORGE wasn't also known as (aka) Maria GIORGIO because the name had evolved, right? They aren't really misspellings either. They're closer to variations or alternatives. My BERRY family first appeared as BURY when they moved to a different part of the country, both spellings were apparently randomly used within the family. I use the spelling as it appears in the record but put the alternative spelling in brackets if that has also been used for the same person, eg Thomas Charles BERRY (BURY) or Rose Hannah (Rosanna) BERRY (BURY). 2) When I save the image for the record to my Legacy picture folder, I've saved it using the alternate spelling (e.g. George, Sam if that is how the name appears in the census, instead of Giorgio, Salvatore which is his given name.) So. When I look at the directory of names to see what images I have for any individual, I am having a problem keeping people straight, especially since several family members have the same first names. How about adding the year of birth in brackets (eg GEORGE, Sam (Salvatore b 1926)? -- Charani (UK) OPC for Walton, Ashcott, Shapwick, Greinton and Clutton, SOM http://wsom-opc.org.uk Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Image captions using misspelled surnames
Ron Ferguson wrote: Charani I cannot agree with your suggestion of adding an 'historic' or 'more common' name to that recorded in either vital events or censuses. To me this seems to ignore a basic principle of recording data i.e. it should be recorded as written in the document. I do not see the point of adding the dob to the name either 1) for the above reason and 2) it is unnecessary. It's not ignoring the basic rules. It's a means of linking together family members. My BERRY/BURY family were first found in Kent as BERRY but on tracking them back they became BURY when they lived in Warwickshire. Some of the children start off with one spelling and end up with the other. Some keep one spelling. Others keep t'other. If I didn't link them by adding the other spelling, I could have two completely different families linked to different family lines. The BURYs of Warkwickshire might not be the BERRYs of Kent. Adding the DoB was for the images as a quick identification method. Again one which I find useful when I have four brothers named Charles, John, James and Henry and each of them uses those same four names for their own sons who in turn use them for their sons. The aide memoire tells me straight away which son's record I need. In my One-Name I can have a large number of duplicate given names with the Ferguson surname. When checking to see if I already have an entry for a new individual (eg. from a census) I use SearchDetailed Search for Individual; Given Name; Contains; Name (I only use the first name, 2nd perhaps if 1st produces no result) AND Individual; Birth Place; Contains; County. That's the same with mine: the four above plus William for the boys, Mary, Elizabeth and Ann for the girls plus 22 variant or alternative spellings for the surname. The database is compiled from CMBs and BMDs only. Other sources, such as censuses, wills, deeds, are added in the, um, Other Sources column in the spreadsheet. In Legacy, I have parents and spouses in the index which means I can quickly find the person I want, right click on the name and add the new source to the Notes. This gives a Name list in dob order, and is quick to use, because when searching only the last field changes. Adding a DoB isn't necessary in the name list but for images, I find it very useful. It saves me having to open several images in order to find the one I want. I'm sure a lot of people will be horrified at the way I use Legacy but it works for me. Any similarity between some field names and my use of them is often purely coincidental :)) -- Charani (UK) OPC for Walton, Ashcott, Shapwick, Greinton and Clutton, SOM http://wsom-opc.org.uk Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Finding Dups
I think the finding dups needs some improving. Here is a possible match found. David Johnson born 1962 David Johnson married 1815 I would think that the program should be able to see that this can't be a match. Michele Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups
On 8/8/2012 7:50 AM, Michele Lewis wrote: I think the finding dups needs some improving. Here is a possible match found… David Johnson born 1962 David Johnson married 1815 I would think that the program should be able to see that this can’t be a match. Without seeing your options and the complete return, it is hard to come to your conclusion. -- Tim Rosenlof Utah, USA Swedish Research Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups
That is what is displayed when I run a find dups. On the left side it shows David Johnson with a birth date of 1962, on the right side it shows the other David Johnson who has a marriage date of 1815. Needless to say I marked them as not duplicates but that should have been figured out by the computer. Michele -Original Message- From: Tim Rosenlof [mailto:spa...@xmission.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:18 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups On 8/8/2012 7:50 AM, Michele Lewis wrote: I think the finding dups needs some improving. Here is a possible match found… David Johnson born 1962 David Johnson married 1815 I would think that the program should be able to see that this can’t be a match. Without seeing your options and the complete return, it is hard to come to your conclusion. -- Tim Rosenlof Utah, USA Swedish Research Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups
Michele, I tend to agree with you. I came to the conclusion, rightly or wrongly, that Legacy does not compare vital dates, so I no longer use it, preferring GenMatch or GenViewer (usually the former). Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Michele Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:34 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups That is what is displayed when I run a find dups. On the left side it shows David Johnson with a birth date of 1962, on the right side it shows the other David Johnson who has a marriage date of 1815. Needless to say I marked them as not duplicates but that should have been figured out by the computer. Michele -Original Message- From: Tim Rosenlof [mailto:spa...@xmission.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:18 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups On 8/8/2012 7:50 AM, Michele Lewis wrote: I think the finding dups needs some improving. Here is a possible match found… David Johnson born 1962 David Johnson married 1815 I would think that the program should be able to see that this can’t be a match. Without seeing your options and the complete return, it is hard to come to your conclusion. -- Tim Rosenlof Utah, USA Swedish Research Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups
Michele, This could be the preverbal double edged sword. If the program eliminates this as a dup and one of the dates is in error, then you would not see the error. I think I would rather choose to call it a dup instead of having the computer determine that it isn't. Bobby -Original Message- From: Michele Lewis [mailto:ancestor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:34 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Finding Dups That is what is displayed when I run a find dups. On the left side it shows David Johnson with a birth date of 1962, on the right side it shows the other David Johnson who has a marriage date of 1815. Needless to say I marked them as not duplicates but that should have been figured out by the computer. Michele Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Image captions using misspelled surnames
Thanks everyone! My main concern was with identifying images and I do agree that adding the date of birth, or even just the birth year, would resolve my confusion and allow for quick identification. I've gone back into my Legacy Picture directory and changed the spelling of names to adhere to the name used on birth records plus I added a birth year. Surprising only two family members with the same name were born on the same year. Fortunately, the images weren't linked to individuals, so my next step is linking and sourcing images to individuals. As for the various spellings *not* being actual AKAs. Absolutely. Jenny Benson said, I record names as they appear, but I don't record all the variations as AKAs, preferring to use AKA only for where someone actually used 2 (or more) different names. I agree, and I think following this rule will keep my data simplified in a way that it will be understood by other family members later. Since most of my ancestors have migrated to the US, the majority of their names have been Americanized. One of my uncles, for example, whose birth name is Cateno, was called Gus. Cateno goes on his individual record, Gus goes in his AKA. The 1920 US Census has him listed as August, but since we (the family) don't know him this way, I did a Census Event and did not record August as an AKA. Again, thanks everyone for your input. Lavern Hall Aurora, Ohio, USA On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Charani charan...@gmail.com wrote: Ron Ferguson wrote: Charani I cannot agree with your suggestion of adding an 'historic' or 'more common' name to that recorded in either vital events or censuses. To me this seems to ignore a basic principle of recording data i.e. it should be recorded as written in the document. I do not see the point of adding the dob to the name either 1) for the above reason and 2) it is unnecessary. It's not ignoring the basic rules. It's a means of linking together family members. My BERRY/BURY family were first found in Kent as BERRY but on tracking them back they became BURY when they lived in Warwickshire. Some of the children start off with one spelling and end up with the other. Some keep one spelling. Others keep t'other. If I didn't link them by adding the other spelling, I could have two completely different families linked to different family lines. The BURYs of Warkwickshire might not be the BERRYs of Kent. Adding the DoB was for the images as a quick identification method. Again one which I find useful when I have four brothers named Charles, John, James and Henry and each of them uses those same four names for their own sons who in turn use them for their sons. The aide memoire tells me straight away which son's record I need. In my One-Name I can have a large number of duplicate given names with the Ferguson surname. When checking to see if I already have an entry for a new individual (eg. from a census) I use SearchDetailed Search for Individual; Given Name; Contains; Name (I only use the first name, 2nd perhaps if 1st produces no result) AND Individual; Birth Place; Contains; County. That's the same with mine: the four above plus William for the boys, Mary, Elizabeth and Ann for the girls plus 22 variant or alternative spellings for the surname. The database is compiled from CMBs and BMDs only. Other sources, such as censuses, wills, deeds, are added in the, um, Other Sources column in the spreadsheet. In Legacy, I have parents and spouses in the index which means I can quickly find the person I want, right click on the name and add the new source to the Notes. This gives a Name list in dob order, and is quick to use, because when searching only the last field changes. Adding a DoB isn't necessary in the name list but for images, I find it very useful. It saves me having to open several images in order to find the one I want. I'm sure a lot of people will be horrified at the way I use Legacy but it works for me. Any similarity between some field names and my use of them is often purely coincidental :)) -- Charani (UK) OPC for Walton, Ashcott, Shapwick, Greinton and Clutton, SOM http://wsom-opc.org.uk Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.comhttp://news.legacyfamilytree.com/ ). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines:
Re: [LegacyUG] Show all events
Believe the help. We had so many problem reports about lost sources when all the user had done was turn off show all events that we support people asked the programmers to have show all events turned on when you first open the assigned sources list screen. That will apply each time you use Legacy but should stay turned OFF for the rest of your session once you have turned it off. When you close and restart Legacy the option will reset to on. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation br...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. On 07/08/2012 21:46, Marli wrote: Where do I find the setup to turn off show all events in the assigned sources for: list. I want to just see assigned sources, not all events. I unclick the box and next time I look, it is unclicked. How do I turn it off so it stays off until I want it turned on? Help says I can't. Someone please tell me how I can Marli Yoder -- Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] error 3163
What is the solution to error 3163? I do not know how to correct it. Bob Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] error 3163
On 8/8/2012 1:02 PM, Robert Runion wrote: What is the solution to error 3163? I do not know how to correct it. Bob http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/helpError3163.asp -- Tim Rosenlof Utah, USA Swedish Research Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
re: [LegacyUG] error 3163
Bob, There are several glitches that may popup in the family file from time to time. They can often be fixed by doing a Check and Repair of the family file. First, backup your family file, or if it won't backup, then make a copy of it.. Next, please click on File on the menu bar and select File Maintenance Check/Repair and proceed with the repair. If any error messages occur during the Check/Repair process, click No in the error message box so that the repair steps can finish. Do Check/Repair twice if errors are found. If the program is still gives you errors, export your records into a GEDCOM file and then import the GEDCOM back into a new family file in Legacy. Use the new family file. Please let us know how it goes. Jim Technical Support Legacy Family Tree Original Message From: Robert Runion sarge1...@cox.net Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:02 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] error 3163 What is the solution to error 3163? I do not know how to correct it. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Sourcing UK Census
Hi, I was about to add a UK Census to the sources, when I noticed the the family is split between 2 pages. Fist page starts with the head and a couple of children, and the secon page has the rest of the family. Do I create 2 separate sorces for this? Cheers! Terry Laraman Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing UK Census
Terry, I don’t, I use the census references for the page with the Head on it and attach both page images to the multimedia files. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ From: Terry L. Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:46 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Sourcing UK Census Hi, I was about to add a UK Census to the sources, when I noticed the the family is split between 2 pages. Fist page starts with the head and a couple of children, and the secon page has the rest of the family. Do I create 2 separate sorces for this? Cheers! Terry Laraman Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Sourcing UK Census
Thanks Ron! I think I will do the same but put in notes that there are 2 pages to this family. CheersTerry Laraman From: ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing UK Census Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:59:47 +0100 Terry, I don’t, I use the census references for the page with the Head on it and attach both page images to the multimedia files. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ From: Terry L. Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:46 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Sourcing UK Census Hi, I was about to add a UK Census to the sources, when I noticed the the family is split between 2 pages. Fist page starts with the head and a couple of children, and the secon page has the rest of the family. Do I create 2 separate sorces for this? Cheers! Terry Laraman Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Sourcing UK Census
I do something very similar to Ron. I save both images and attach them to the one source. Then I put both page numbers into the source detail. Cheers Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Finding Dups
Surely Legacy is finding possible duplicates. It is up to you to determine whether or not these are the same people. If one date was in error (have you never written 1856 instead of 1956?) then it would be good to get this shown. If they aren't the same person then mark them as such and they will go away. Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands
I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following situation: A woman had married and had children. The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a 3-month-old daughter. Her husband had died in 1868. The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married surname. So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented, relationship (or two). The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential problems. I've unlinked the three children from their parents and linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father. This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two with names. Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into one, without actually creating someone called Unknown? Advice would be appreciated thanks Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands
Tony, But from what you say Legacy isn't showing them correctly? It is merely confirming what you know, or rather don't, that the father is unknown. I have said many time on this list, the last time being this week, that by right clicking on the unknown father(s) and deleting they will be deleted from Family View etc. They will still appear in the Marriage List, but other than you who will read that list? Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Tony Rolfe Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:24 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following situation: A woman had married and had children. The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a 3-month-old daughter. Her husband had died in 1868. The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married surname. So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented, relationship (or two). The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential problems. I've unlinked the three children from their parents and linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father. This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two with names. Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into one, without actually creating someone called Unknown? Advice would be appreciated thanks Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands
Tony, I should have mentioned, you could, of course, buy the birth certificates to see if a father is named on them. Also you may find references to the father in parish records (birth/baptism), and in court records if an application for maintenance was made. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Tony Rolfe Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:24 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following situation: A woman had married and had children. The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a 3-month-old daughter. Her husband had died in 1868. The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married surname. So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented, relationship (or two). The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential problems. I've unlinked the three children from their parents and linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father. This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two with names. Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into one, without actually creating someone called Unknown? Advice would be appreciated thanks Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands
Maybe all 3 were fathered by different men. It can happen. In the meantime, you can merge the 3 unknowns into 1 unknown using the Merge function. --- JL Beeken JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/ On 8/8/2012 5:24 PM, Tony Rolfe wrote: I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following situation: A woman had married and had children. The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a 3-month-old daughter. Her husband had died in 1868. The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married surname. So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented, relationship (or two). The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential problems. I've unlinked the three children from their parents and linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father. This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two with names. Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into one, without actually creating someone called Unknown? Advice would be appreciated thanks Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5188 - Release Date: 08/08/12 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands
Thanks for the advice so far. I can't merge these people because they don't appear in the name list. and I can't delete them as they are just dummy entries (RIN 0). When I right-click them I just get Add the husband or Edit the marriage. Legacy is displaying them as unknown, which is correct, but is displaying them as different which we don't know is correct. I was just hoping to simplify the Pedigree view display and have just one unknown rather than 3, but it doesn't appear to work that way Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Legacy Dropbox Syncback
Hi, I currently have all my legacy files, both multimedia data, in my dropbox. I have also just become aware that if I don't access my dropbox for 90 days, the dropbox people may delete my files from their server. If I then use my pc, dropbox will automatically delete the files on my pc too. This has all been verified to me by the dropbox help people. SCARY !! So I still like the idea of dropbox but what I'm thinking of doing now is moving all my legacy files back into a normal docs folder and then using syncback to keep an updated copy of those files in my dropbox. That way even if they got deleted from the dropbox folder, I still have my totally up to date files. Does anyone see any problems with this? I couldn't imagine it will muck up legacy in any way. ALSO before anyone brings it up, yes it is highly possible I could be away from my pc for extended times. I Have an ongoing battle with recurring brain tumours and last time I was in hospital for 7 months learning to use my limbs again. As I say, I don't forsee any problems but I fugure it's safer to throw it out there to see what other legacy users think. Cheers Ian GARDENER Australia Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Dropbox Syncback
Yes, I definitely wouldn't keep anything in Dropbox that you could lose for whatever reason. I used to and changed my mind about it. Now I only keep my shared folders and portable apps there. But I also backup My Dropbox to my external hard-drives. Dropbox, by the way, is a more complicated way of using Legacy than say, SugarSync, where you don't have to move your files from their original locations. I don't know if they have also have a time limit for keeping your files, but if they do, your originals are still on your pc where you first installed them. SugarSync is only a backup and may be also there for the convenience of syncing to another computer. In any case, if your files disappeared from SugarSync they'd still be on both your computers. I don't use cloud services for backup. For that I use external hard-drives. As convenient as the cloud can be I don't like the thought of someone else having access to and control over my personal files. So I only use them for collaboration as needed. --- JL Beeken JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/ On 8/8/2012 7:32 PM, Ian GARDENER wrote: Hi, I currently have all my legacy files, both multimedia data, in my dropbox. I have also just become aware that if I don’t access my dropbox for 90 days, the dropbox people may delete my files from their server. If I then use my pc, dropbox will automatically delete the files on my pc too. This has all been verified to me by the dropbox help people. SCARY !! So I still like the idea of dropbox but what I’m thinking of doing now is moving all my legacy files back into a normal docs folder and then using syncback to keep an updated copy of those files in my dropbox. That way even if they got deleted from the dropbox folder, I still have my totally up to date files. Does anyone see any problems with this? I couldn’t imagine it will muck up legacy in any way. ALSO before anyone brings it up, yes it is highly possible I could be away from my pc for extended times. I Have an ongoing battle with recurring brain tumours and last time I was in hospital for 7 months learning to use my limbs again. As I say, I don’t forsee any problems but I fugure it’s safer to throw it out there to see what other legacy users think. Cheers Ian GARDENER Australia No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com http://www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5188 - Release Date: 08/08/12 Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Dropbox Syncback
I also do periodic backups to an external hard drive in addition to using dropbox as my primary folder for saving my genealogy files, including Legacy; it's always best to use multiple back up types for something as important as genealogy research -- it would be difficult, if not impossible, to reproduce so it is definitely one of my very most valuable things in my home. Kathy On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Ian GARDENER ijg3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I currently have all my legacy files, both multimedia data, in my dropbox. ** ** I have also just become aware that if I don’t access my dropbox for 90 days, the dropbox people may delete my files from their server. If I then use my pc, dropbox will automatically delete the files on my pc too. This has all been verified to me by the dropbox help people. SCARY !! ** ** So I still like the idea of dropbox but what I’m thinking of doing now is moving all my legacy files back into a normal docs folder and then using syncback to keep an updated copy of those files in my dropbox. That way even if they got deleted from the dropbox folder, I still have my totally up to date files. Does anyone see any problems with this? I couldn’t imagine it will muck up legacy in any way.* *** ** ** ALSO before anyone brings it up, yes it is highly possible I could be away from my pc for extended times. I Have an ongoing battle with recurring brain tumours and last time I was in hospital for 7 months learning to use my limbs again. ** ** As I say, I don’t forsee any problems but I fugure it’s safer to throw it out there to see what other legacy users think. ** ** Cheers ** ** Ian GARDENER Australia Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp -- Kathy Meyer Personal Publishing Consultant Phone: 801-921-9644 www.heritagemakers.com/ourlegacycreations Preserve your heritage by digitizing your photos slides and sharing them with family. TODAY is the very best day to do genealogy! Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] error 3163
Hi Jim, When recommending an export into a Gedcom and then import the Gedcom I feel it would be well to advise choosing the settings carefully as data can be lost. It could be those needing to be told this procedure are less aware of potential trouble as I was years ago and subsequently lost all [[data]] and 'private' and 'living' individuals. Bob A. -Original Message- From: Jim Terry/Support [mailto:jimte...@legacyusers.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:54 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: re: [LegacyUG] error 3163 Bob, There are several glitches that may popup in the family file from time to time. They can often be fixed by doing a Check and Repair of the family file. First, backup your family file, or if it won't backup, then make a copy of it.. Next, please click on File on the menu bar and select File Maintenance Check/Repair and proceed with the repair. If any error messages occur during the Check/Repair process, click No in the error message box so that the repair steps can finish. Do Check/Repair twice if errors are found. If the program is still gives you errors, export your records into a GEDCOM file and then import the GEDCOM back into a new family file in Legacy. Use the new family file. Please let us know how it goes. Jim Technical Support Legacy Family Tree Original Message From: Robert Runion sarge1...@cox.net Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:02 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] error 3163 What is the solution to error 3163? I do not know how to correct it. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands
...you may also find it helpful until you ascertain the correct parentage of each child to KEEP separate daddies for each of the kids but enclose ...for example Daddy1, Daddy2 Daddy3 in privacy brackets...this keeps them from appearing in print but still gives you full control over whether they appear in print Once exact parentage has been confirmed, the names can be changed to convict the guilty ---Original Message--- From: JLB Date: 8/8/2012 9:38:48 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands Maybe all 3 were fathered by different men.snip Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
[LegacyUG] Latitude and longitude not exporting
Using V 7.5.0.201 I find latitude and longitude are not exporting with a GEDCOM produced for Legacy. This has been an ongoing problem. A few versions ago it was only if I loaded a list that they wouldn't export. Can anyone confirm this? Regards, Jennifer http://colston-wenck.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Re: [LegacyUG] Dropped birth date
I have parish records dated Feb 30, 1846. The next few were dated Mar 1, so I can not ?correct? this error, but I put 'Feb 30, 1846' so it is referenced by notes. From: Ron Taylor doit4...@yahoo.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 4:31 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Dropped birth date I believe after re-checking those screen shots that Dave is correct about the date 29 Feb 1890. Since that is an invalid date, it is not being sorted or shown correctly. Change it to 28 Feb 1890 (with a possible explanation for doing so) and then see if things shake out as they should. Ron Taylor Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
RE: [LegacyUG] Latitude and longitude not exporting
Further to this, if you are looking, it is the _PLAC_DEFN tag that is missing. Jennifer -Original Message- From: Jennifer Crockett [mailto:jcrock...@optusnet.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2012 2:57 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Latitude and longitude not exporting Using V 7.5.0.201 I find latitude and longitude are not exporting with a GEDCOM produced for Legacy. This has been an ongoing problem. A few versions ago it was only if I loaded a list that they wouldn't export. Can anyone confirm this? Regards, Jennifer http://colston-wenck.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
