Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds
@Miguel Ángel, * Both Kendy and Cloph remain on vacation. Thier TBs of master will wait till they get back... just have to roll your own for the time being. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-tp4158636p4158637.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds
Thanks, good that it's not an issue. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-tp4158636p4158638.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Master builds
Hi, someone know what is happening with master builds: last for /daily/master/Win-x86_64@62-TDF 2015-08-23_00.19.44, last for /daily/master/Win-x86@62-merge-TDF 2015-08-22_23.42.26, other win folders are empty and no builds with symbols. For Linux last for /daily/master/Linux-rpm_deb-x86@71-TDF 2015-08-26_00.58.14/ only for Mac last is from 2015-08-28_00.05.02 Regards. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-tp4158636.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Pedro píše v St 05. 12. 2012 v 17:09 -0800: Hi Petr Petr Mladek wrote I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux tinderboxes with release configuration. I will ping other tinderbox maintainers after I am 100% sure that it works (test a daily build). I tested that the variable was passed with a correct value but I did not test the full build cycle :-) Oddly enough it shows the new dialog on a build from tinderbox@7 compiled with MinGW Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 5da8bdb4d4bde5175c9e89182956043ffc991c5) TinderBox: Win-x86@7-MinGW, Branch:master, Time: 2012-12-04_09:56:47 but not on tinderbox @6 compiled with MSVC Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 76c921de48ee41716b5a500b892945c704da73c) which was pulled more than one day later... libreoffice-4-0~2012-12-05_16.32.06_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US Is this a compiler error? As I said, it is not easy to update all tinderboxes because they have different maintainers. Most likely, the MSVC tinderbox has not been updated yet. Anyway, if a tinder box uploads dailies in the new location, it should have the info in about dialog. If it does not show the info, it is a bug. Please let me know about such cases. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 07. 12. 2012 v 16:29 +0100: Pedro píše v St 05. 12. 2012 v 17:09 -0800: Hi Petr Petr Mladek wrote I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux tinderboxes with release configuration. I will ping other tinderbox maintainers after I am 100% sure that it works (test a daily build). I tested that the variable was passed with a correct value but I did not test the full build cycle :-) Oddly enough it shows the new dialog on a build from tinderbox@7 compiled with MinGW As I said, it is not easy to update all tinderboxes because they have different maintainers. Most likely, the MSVC tinderbox has not been updated yet. Anyway, if a tinder box uploads dailies in the new location, it should have the info in about dialog. If it does not show the info, it is a bug. Please let me know about such cases. Ah, this is not precise because I copied old dailies from the old tree yesterday. A better check is the build date. In a daily build from today or newer does not have the info, it is bug and need to be fixed. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Petr Mladek wrote Ah, this is not precise because I copied old dailies from the old tree yesterday. A better check is the build date. In a daily build from today or newer does not have the info, it is bug and need to be fixed. Info in About box Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: 08d2a6532ece404f12dd5dbc84f0d6122db5abd) from master~2012-12-07_18.13.38_LibO-Dev_4.1.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi from tinderbox Win-x86@6 Still working correctly in MinGW from tinderbox @7 Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: e9b21193ed395061b155955e5098f69af92b4fc) TinderBox: Win-x86@7-MinGW, Branch:master, Time: 2012-12-08_00:08:45 I think it is indeed a bug in MSVC compiled builds... Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4023224.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Hi Petr Petr Mladek wrote I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux tinderboxes with release configuration. I will ping other tinderbox maintainers after I am 100% sure that it works (test a daily build). I tested that the variable was passed with a correct value but I did not test the full build cycle :-) Oddly enough it shows the new dialog on a build from tinderbox@7 compiled with MinGW Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 5da8bdb4d4bde5175c9e89182956043ffc991c5) TinderBox: Win-x86@7-MinGW, Branch:master, Time: 2012-12-04_09:56:47 but not on tinderbox @6 compiled with MSVC Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 76c921de48ee41716b5a500b892945c704da73c) which was pulled more than one day later... libreoffice-4-0~2012-12-05_16.32.06_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US Is this a compiler error? Cheers; Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4022791.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Pedro píše v Pá 30. 11. 2012 v 11:18 -0800: Hi again Petr Petr Mladek wrote I assume the idea is that Public Betas and RC builds will not include this info either? Yup, it will be only in the daily builds. However I think the public Beta builds are not compiled with --enable-release-builds. Won't that be a problem? No, it uses a separate configure option (variable) that is going to be used only for the daily builds. I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux tinderboxes with release configuration. I will ping other tinderbox maintainers after I am 100% sure that it works (test a daily build). I tested that the variable was passed with a correct value but I did not test the full build cycle :-) Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Hi Petr Petr Mladek wrote However I think the public Beta builds are not compiled with --enable-release-builds. Won't that be a problem? No, it uses a separate configure option (variable) that is going to be used only for the daily builds. Excellent! Beta1 is nearly out so it is added just in time :) Petr Mladek wrote I have just pushed the change for tinderboxes, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=d2c42f2c2143c614bb74d2f9603c951d94ab32fe I updated few tinderboxes where I had access, including the two Linux tinderboxes with release configuration. I will ping other tinderbox maintainers after I am 100% sure that it works (test a daily build). I tested that the variable was passed with a correct value but I did not test the full build cycle :-) It almost made it into Tinderbox @6 morning compile (the pull time was only half an hour earlier :) ). I will check it later today or tomorrow. Thank you again for adding the feature! Best regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4022181.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Petr Mladek schrieb: I am going to update tinderbox script. See the attached screenshot for what I have in mind. Hi Petr, that's perfect for the daily builds. Best regards Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Pedro píše v Čt 29. 11. 2012 v 11:39 -0800: Hi Petr, all Petr Mladek wrote Note that it might take longer time because I need to test it carefully to do not break all tinderboxes :-) Don't worry, a few are broken already :) http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html Petr Mladek wrote You might say that I broke the nice design of the about dialog again. Well, this line won't appear in official builds. IMHO, it is very handy to have everything on one place, so you could just open the dialog and paste the info into bugzilla. Also I think that it is easier to have it in about dialog than in any file somewhere hidden on the system. And to be honest, this was the easiest solution :-) This is absolutely perfect!!! Much better than the text file. I assumed it was easier to use the text file. This is in fact what I have been asking since December 2011 :) Thank you for implementing this and for the screenshot :) Cool. I am happy that you like it. I have a patch for tinderbox but I still need to test it. It was somehow busy day. I hope that I will get it into life the following week. I'm sure the marketing and design guys won't be upset since this is for QA geeks only :) As long as the final user version doesn't have any of this, that is. I assume the idea is that Public Betas and RC builds will not include this info either? Yup, it will be only in the daily builds. In fact as I suggested earlier I think the BuildID could be completely removed from the About box of public stable releases since there is no possible confusion between versions (and it is ugly :) ). Yup, it would make sense. I think about to disable it with the --enable-release-build configure option. Well, I need to think a bit more about it if it is not used in other situations. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Hi again Petr Petr Mladek wrote I assume the idea is that Public Betas and RC builds will not include this info either? Yup, it will be only in the daily builds. However I think the public Beta builds are not compiled with --enable-release-builds. Won't that be a problem? Petr Mladek wrote Well, I need to think a bit more about it if it is not used in other situations. Yes, that is a wise decision. Thank you again! Best, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4021829.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Petr Mladek píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 18:01 +0100: Pedro píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 08:20 -0800: Hi all Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming scheme is useless for QA people. (and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...) At the time *Lionel* proposed an epoch based naming scheme and *Björn* mentioned a better solution http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Naming-builds-Please-td3556898i20.html#a3567211 I think there were some improvements. We have the new versioning scheme for official builds and use only one git id. One year later, after installing (at least under Windows) there is still no way to know if build Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 6aabe09ac092c51d4b394bde9c7ea0055b952e3) was installed from master~2012-11-26_00.29.34_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi or from which Tinderbox it came from. Any chance of improving this? Yup, it makes perfect sense. Could you please report a bug? The easiest solution would be to pass the tinderbox credentials via a configure option. I think that it might even be an easy hack. I have just added the LibreOffice part, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=4497b12f586ed668bbe764ff526a13aa375b82cc It adds --with-extra-buildid configure option. The information is shown in the about dialog. I am going to update tinderbox script. See the attached screenshot for what I have in mind. Note that it might take longer time because I need to test it carefully to do not break all tinderboxes :-) You might say that I broke the nice design of the about dialog again. Well, this line won't appear in official builds. IMHO, it is very handy to have everything on one place, so you could just open the dialog and paste the info into bugzilla. Also I think that it is easier to have it in about dialog than in any file somewhere hidden on the system. And to be honest, this was the easiest solution :-) Best Regards, Petr attachment: about-dialog-tinderbox-info.png___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Hi Norbert Norbert Thiebaud wrote I count 3 out of 13 that seems to have their '@' sign gobbled up that a far cry from 'most'... that being said it would be best indeed to ping the owner of these box to get them to fix that... And another 2 (named W2008R2) refer to the host OS not the Target OS ;) So, yes, most was an exaggeration. But the idea is that if all Tinderboxes are correctly identified, then each one has a unique number, thus answering Michael's question. In any case I think that Rainer's suggestion is perfect. I would even risk that the BuildID string could be removed from the About box and just add a nice Build Info button that would open buildinfo.txt (with whatever program is associated with txt files in the user's machine) This would make the About box less geeky and still provide easy access to all the needed information for QA people :) Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4021141.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Pedro píše v Út 27. 11. 2012 v 08:20 -0800: Hi all Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming scheme is useless for QA people. (and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...) At the time *Lionel* proposed an epoch based naming scheme and *Björn* mentioned a better solution http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Naming-builds-Please-td3556898i20.html#a3567211 I think there were some improvements. We have the new versioning scheme for official builds and use only one git id. One year later, after installing (at least under Windows) there is still no way to know if build Version 4.0.0.0.alpha1+ (Build ID: 6aabe09ac092c51d4b394bde9c7ea0055b952e3) was installed from master~2012-11-26_00.29.34_LibO-Dev_4.0.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi or from which Tinderbox it came from. Any chance of improving this? Yup, it makes perfect sense. Could you please report a bug? The easiest solution would be to pass the tinderbox credentials via a configure option. I think that it might even be an easy hack. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
Hi Michael You want to know the host it was built on ? sounds like a reasonable request to me - though it's somewhat unclear how that should be configured / propagated from machine to machine. If the Tinderbox naming followed your own rules http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox that wouldn't be a problem... Unfortunately most of them don't... http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041p4021056.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
