Re: OpenOffice Outline - making it stick

2003-11-19 Thread Mike Reinehr
I've used this with paragraph formatting, not outlining. With OOo it seems 
that the trick to modifying the default format for a document is through the 
styles menu. Open Format/Styles/Catalog and you will see a pull-down menu of 
paragraph, character, frame, page  numbering styles. For each of these, 
then, there are a number of options, default being the one in effect for a 
new document. You either can then modify the default style, or create  name 
a new one.

For your problem, I think the solution would be to select Numbering Styles, 
and then either modify or creat a new numbering style that will be the 
default for your entire document. Whereas, what you are doing (and I did, as 
well) is selecting a style for a specific paragraph, which ends with that 
paragraph.

Hope this helps.

mike

On Tuesday 18 November 2003 10:15 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
 I'm running OpenOffice 1.1 and am finding that if I set up the numbering
 for an outline (i.e. level 1 I, II, ..; level 2 A,B,..; etc) under
 format-outline numbering or Tools-Outline numbering that it doesn't
 stick.  If you break the outline to add text as in

 I. blahlbha
   A. bblah
   1 blah
   B more lbah
 Notes to myself so I don't forget
 II. blah balh
 Here, instead of A I get the default 1 again.  When I got to
 Format-Outline numbering I see it's reset to default.

 How do I save this and setup my defaults!!  I haven't found anything in
 the help yet.

 Thanks.

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: tar + bunzip2

2003-11-15 Thread Mike Reinehr
With COL 3.1 you can use the long option --use-compress-program=bzip2. Check 
out `info tar` for all the long  short options.

cmr

On Friday 14 November 2003 07:35 pm, M.W. Chang wrote:
 Even COL 3.1 doesn't have the -j and --bzip option. I will use the
 bzcat2 | tar - method. thanks.

 # tar -xjvf file.tar.bz2
 
  Yup. I'm running various SuSE distributions from 8.1-9.0 and they all
  have this option. My only remaining Caldera box (eD2.4), however, does
  not. It appears to have been added in newer versions of GNU tar.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: backup windows partition (fat)

2003-11-03 Thread Mike Reinehr
Rather than purchase commercial software, why not just use tar, cp, dd, or 
partimage? I'm a little rusty on my DOS, but I seem to remember there are a 
couple of hidden system files that have to go back into a certain place in 
the partition (io.sys, msdos.sys?) but you should be able to get around that 
by doing a system format, before restoring the files.

mike

On Sunday 02 November 2003 10:39 pm, you wrote:
 Collins Richey wrote:
  Is there an easy way to backup a windows partition then restore it later
  without gimping anything that windows requires?
 
  I have a small hda (hda1 is a win98 partition, the rest is a swap and a
  linux partition).  My active linux systems are on hdb.
 
  I want to retain the win98 stuff (rest of hda is not needed) then replace
  hda with a much larger disk, restore the win98 stuff, redo grub, etc.
 
  Booting without hda is no problem, since I have a grub boot disk.
 
  I just want to avoid the pain of reinstalling win98 (mucho yucky, worse
  than configuring sendmail).

 try and get a copy of ghost. Then you can move the wintendo partition
 over to the new drive. Less hassle then any back-up scheme.

 On another note, I just put a new system together and starting the
 gentoo install as I type. For some reason I could not get my scsi cdrom
 to boot the live cd. We got arround it and am now waiting for the
 emerge system to complete. I thought that this wasn't so bad on an AMD
 750 Athlon but this 1.8 G Athlon sure seems snappy.

 Cheers

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: strange cd problem

2003-10-23 Thread Mike Reinehr
Following up on what Net Llama  Roger have said, what type of CD is it, CD-R 
or CD-R/W? Have you noticed your CD drive laboring to read the CD, i.e., 
seeming to thrash and then failing? I have a CD reader that is only about a 
year or so old, which can not read CD-R/W's, no matter how slowing burned. It 
would labor for what seemed an eternity and eventually just give up. It had 
no problem with CD-R's, however. I replaced the drive with another, newer one 
of a different make and the problem went away.

mike

On Thursday 23 October 2003 08:50 am, you wrote:
 Is your cd reader happy with other CDs burned by the burner? What speed was
 it burned at? Not-so-very-old CD readers can have trouble reading CDs
 burned 'fast' on some other burner.

 On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:40:13 -0400

 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  greets, folks!
 
  this one is kind of weird. i have a cd, burned by a friend, containing
  data in mbox format that i really need to get to.
 
  i can open the cd in, say, midnight commander, and can view the files,
  no problem. but if i try to copy those files to the hard drive, i get
  an input/output problem error.
 
  any idea what in the world this might be about?

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: strange cd problem

2003-10-23 Thread Mike Reinehr
The universe doesn't hate you -- it just doesn't care! ;-)

mike

On Thursday 23 October 2003 09:17 am, you wrote:
 i never did anything to anger the universe. i do not know why the
 universe seems to set on ruining me.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: more .pdf -- why not?

2003-10-21 Thread Mike Reinehr
This is not a particularly elegant solution, but it's one way to get it done. 
GIMP has the ability to import postscript files and a text tool which you 
could use to complete the forms. The major drawback is that the end result is 
a binary graphic file.

I can't remember where, but sometime during this past year I was reading a 
file about postscript and PDF's which explained that it was very difficult to 
convert a PDF file back into a formatted text file. I wish I could explain 
why, but my brain stored the conclusion and quickly forgot all the detail.

mike

On Monday 20 October 2003 02:36 pm, you wrote:
 first, in answer to my own question having to do with cutting a few
 pages out od a pdf file and saving them as a separate pdf file, it
 finally got done though, sadly, by a friend who was running a windows
 app which converted the postscript file i got from printing those pages
 to a file. (the winapp did, though, make it into a 1.6-meg pdf, which
 is a little excessive.)

 now i'm seeking to do something else. the state of connecticut offers
 all its court forms as .pdfs. which may be printed out and filled out
 by hand or -- ugh -- typewriter. i do not need to preserve these as
 .pdfs, but i would like to import them into something such that i can
 fill them out on the computer prior to printing and then, of course,
 save them. this would, ideally, allow them to simply be imported into a
 word processor or something like it. i know of no linux application
 which allows this, however. any ideas?

 (for those who might be interested as to why i need to do all this, i
 draw your attention to the october 27 issue of national review, page
 44, an essay by me.)

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: question

2003-10-07 Thread Mike Reinehr
Rick,

Check out www.xsane.org. 

I'm not sure exactly how, but since installing xsane, it shows up under 
File/Acquire of Gimp. I haven't tried scanning directly into Gimp -- 
stand-alone, xsane works great -- but it should work.

mike

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 05:13 pm, you wrote:
 I thought gimp had a scnner ability, only thing that
 have found is a camera selection now. What is there for scanner software?

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: sharing an inbox in kmail

2003-10-04 Thread Mike Reinehr
This would be my preferred solution, as well. Otherwise, I believe the 
following would work, as well.

Kmail stores all your messages in ~/Mail, that is, a Mail subdirectory in 
your home directory. Using your login, configure Kmail as you would like it. 
Then, under her login configure Kmail identically. Then, replace the ~/Mail 
subdirectory in her home directory (or yours) with a link pointing to the 
other ~/Mail subdirectory. Next, make sure all permissions relating to the 
~/Mail subdirectories and any and all files and subdirectories therein are 
readable, writeable and searchable by both of you.

Both of you should then be able to login as appropriate, check and send 
e-mail, as long as you're not both logged in simultaneously.

No warranty expressed or implied! :-)

mike

On Saturday 04 October 2003 10:33 am, you wrote:
 My ISP lets us have two email addresses at no extra charge. She has her's
 and I have mine.
 - Original Message -
 From: Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 11:19 AM
 Subject: Re: sharing an inbox in kmail

  On Friday 03 October 2003 23:36 pm, Andrew Mathews wrote:
   Tom Wilson wrote:
   | Hi all
   |
   | My wife and I have an e-mail address that we share for general
   | corresponce with friends and family.   She is getting tired of
   | having to have me login under my username so she can see any e-mail
   | that she gets that I happened to download.
   |
   | Any recommendations on a method so we can share the inbox for our
   | shared e-mail account?
  
   [...]
  
   If you have the ability to use IMAP4 instead of POP3 this would solve
   the problem immediately. If not, it's multiple copies of email on
   multiple machines (why I went to IMAP4 instead).
 
  Or use fetchmail and procmail to make two copies of each email.  And
  procmail could do spam filtering (spamassassin) as well as backing up
  each incoming email as well as other filtering.
 
 
  --

 +--
- -+

  + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 10/04/03
  11:17  +

 +--
- -+

  The more the pleasures of the body fade away, the greater to me is the
  pleasure
and charm of conversation. - Plato
 
  ___
  Linux-users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -

 http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: File times

2003-10-03 Thread Mike Reinehr
I believe that `ls -al` shows the modification time, i.e., the time that the 
content of the files was last modified. In the case of a binary distribution, 
tar ball, etc. this, most likely, is the time that the package was created. 
The other times, creation time or access time, would represent the times when 
you installed or used the files in question.

mike

On Thursday 02 October 2003 06:48 pm, you wrote:
 When I list a directory with
  ls -al

 I get many files with a date of Dec 2001.

 If I use ls -al --time=ctime or --time=atime or --time=status I get a
 variety of newer dates, but nothing with Dec 2001. What time is being
 shown with ls -al ?

 Thanks,
 Joel

 On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:25:27PM -0500, Mike Reinehr wrote:
  From Info:find
 
  Time
   
 
   Each file has three time stamps, which record the last time that certain
   operations were performed on the file:
 
 1. access (read the file's contents)
 
 2. change the status (modify the file or its attributes)
 
 3. modify (change the file's contents)
 
  You can search for files whose time stamps are within a certain age
   range, or compare them to other time stamps.
 
  Cheers
 
  mike
 
  On Wednesday 01 October 2003 09:21 pm, you wrote:
   Can someone point me to documentation on file times?
  
   I am a bit confused regarding this subject (ctime, atime, and the
   rest).
  
   My hope is to find a time that is set when the file is created but
   which is not changed even if the file is modified.
  
   Joel
  
   ___
   Linux-users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
   http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 
  --
  Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964
  
  More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC
  
  ___
  Linux-users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
  http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: File times

2003-10-02 Thread Mike Reinehr
From Info:find

Time
 
 
 Each file has three time stamps, which record the last time that certain
 operations were performed on the file:
 
   1. access (read the file's contents)
 
   2. change the status (modify the file or its attributes)
 
   3. modify (change the file's contents)
 
You can search for files whose time stamps are within a certain age
 range, or compare them to other time stamps.

Cheers

mike

On Wednesday 01 October 2003 09:21 pm, you wrote:
 Can someone point me to documentation on file times?

 I am a bit confused regarding this subject (ctime, atime, and the rest).

 My hope is to find a time that is set when the file is created but which
 is not changed even if the file is modified.

 Joel

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-16 Thread Mike Reinehr
I don't qualify as an expert, but I've identified two likely suspects on my 
system:

/usr/local/Acrobat5/Reader/intellinux/app-defaults/AcroRead
/home/cmr/.acrobat/prefs

There's only one problem. AcroRead defaulted to lpr and, in the print window, 
I changed it to kprinter, which it now remembers. But I can not find kprinter 
saved in either of these two files. So, there must be at least one more file 
that I haven't found.

cmr

On Tuesday 16 September 2003 06:58 am, you wrote:
 greets.

 i've been printing from acrobat via cups. the command is lp -d LJIIIDSS.
 problem is, i cannot get acrobat to remember this, and i cannot find
 where in the damned thing the print command is stored. i do not object
 to cracking open just about any part of it in order to hardwire this,
 but i cannot for the life of me find it. anybody know?

 tia.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Helloooooo...

2003-09-11 Thread Mike Reinehr
No, you've got that just backwards. All email is being delivered to a server 
located in your local post office, where it is printed. This printed copy is 
then delivered to the recipients local post office by 25 year old mule-back, 
tramp steamer, etc. Upon being delivered, it is then scanned and, finally, 
emailed to it's ultimate destination. The USPS has to justify all that fancy 
sorting  delivery equipment.  Not to mention all those high priced managers. 
  ;-)

cmr

On Thursday 11 September 2003 03:55 pm, you wrote:
 On Thursday 11 September 2003 01:30 pm, dep wrote:
  quoth Tony Alfrey:
  |  Well if you consider getting a message on Thursday afternoon that
  |  was sent on Wednesday afternoon OK, then it's working OK here,
  |  too ;-)
  |
  | Oooh, jeeze, I guess I didn't check the dates :o
 
  guess those rumors about the u.s. postal service taking over email
  have proved true . . .

 Yeah, what they do is open your mail, scan it, send it to an appropriate
 local post office as an attachment, print it out, and then deliver it
 in the usual way.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Netscape help

2003-09-09 Thread Mike Reinehr
Tom,

Here's a link to a somewhat dated explanation of how to set a user agent 
string:

http://www.mozilla.org/build/revised-user-agent-strings.html

and how to implement it:

http://www.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html

(read down the page a bit to find the part about user agent strings.)

cmr

On Tuesday 09 September 2003 02:35 pm, you wrote:
 Folks,

 Yes, I work for Neanderthals.  So we have to use windows.  Not only that,
 on our home page they have quit supporting Netscape.  This means that
 they code the web site to only work for ie.  Around here IT stands for
 Intellectually Truncated.  Consequently I have to open the evil browser now
 and again to get things like my virus update.  Oddly, Netscape 4.5 works
 with the virus update link.  But Netscape 7.02 doesn't.

 So, I says to my self, how about if I just tell Netscape to pretend it
 is IE?  Then what?

 Well, says myself back to me, why don't you try it and see?

 Problem is, I don't know how to do that with Netscape.  I don't find it
 anywhere.  I know how to tell Konqueror to pretend it is ie, but not
 Netscape.  Can anyone out there help me find this setting?

 TIA.


 Tom  :-})

 Thomas A. Condon

 Plain Text Emails Don't Spread Virii!
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Fwd: [linux-elitists] Phoenix Developing DRM-Equipped BIOS

2003-09-04 Thread Mike Reinehr
In addition to an open source operating system, I guess we'd all better start 
supporting an open source BIOS:

http://www.linuxbios.org/index.html

cmr

On Thursday 04 September 2003 07:47 am, you wrote:
snip
 Home  Technology News  Phoenix Developing DRM-Equipped BIOS
 September 3, 2003
 Phoenix Developing DRM-Equipped BIOS
 By Mark Hachman

 BIOS maker Phoenix Technologies said it is currently shopping a
 digital-rights-enabled BIOS system to top PC OEMs, the most aggressive
 use of DRM technology to date.

big snip
-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile

2003-09-02 Thread Mike Reinehr
I have two directory heirarchies under /usr/src:

  /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.21-4
  /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.21-4

which are installed from seperate packages. The header files are text files 
with a suffice '.h' that provide variable and function definitions for 
inclusion into program source files.

cmr

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 05:30 am, you wrote:

 To be honest with you I don't understand what you mean by kernel
 headers

 if you mean the stuff that is located (symlinked back to the source) in
 the following dir yes it's there
 /lib/modules/2.4.20-8/build/

 if you don't, then please explain after 4 yrs I am still a newbie
 sometimes.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Duplicate Posts

2003-09-02 Thread Mike Reinehr
Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat 9.0 
/usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a second copy 
from the list server, myself.

I've noticed this occasionally in the past, but, according to my sent-mail 
file, I only made this post once.

I'm curious as to why this is happening. Especially, as to whether something 
is mis-configured on my end.

Thanks,

cmr
--
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Duplicate Posts

2003-09-02 Thread Mike Reinehr
Thanks! At least I know now that it's not just an echo bouncing back to me.

cmr

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 10:57 am, you wrote:
 On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:31 am, Mike Reinehr wrote:
  Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat
  9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a
  second copy from the list server, myself.
 
  I've noticed this occasionally in the past, but, according to my
  sent-mail file, I only made this post once.
 
  I'm curious as to why this is happening. Especially, as to whether
  something is mis-configured on my end.

 I got duplicates of your msg and about two others  Happens from time
 to time.

  Thanks,
 
  cmr
  --
  Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964
  
  More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC
  
  ___
  Linux-users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
  http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Slow printing on RHL 9

2003-09-02 Thread Mike Reinehr
I couldn't find any information on the HP website, so first question is, is 
your HP2200 a postscript capable printer, or is it an HP PCL only printer?

If your HP2200 is post script capable, then your print driver should, 
essentially, just be passing the printfile raw to the printer -- and should 
go very fast.

Otherwise, the postscript has to first be translated into HP PCL which would 
go much more slowly.

If you do have a postscript capable printer, but the wrong CUPS driver, it's 
possible that the postscript is being converted to HP PCL unnecessarily.

cmr

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:33 pm, you wrote:

 OK... got back to this. Printing to a file goes quickly, using lpr to
 print it to the printer from the local desktop machine, takes a LONG time.

 The file is, um, large:
 $ ll *.ps
 -rw-r--r-- 1 tpw  adm   27365874 Sep  2 16:05 2003245149827.ps


 For grins, I scp'd the .ps file to my Samba shared Home directory,
 opened it with Windows' GhostScript and printed it to the same printer.
 It went very quickly. :-(

 The server creates a similar large file, although the example I have is
 somewhat smaller:
 # ll *.ps
 -rw-rw-r-- 1 ddt  ddt   20719300 Sep  2 16:25 2003245149879.ps

 So, I guess what I've determined is that the problem is with the RHL9
 PC. I don''t know if it's CUPS, the driver, ghostscript, or what. Any
 more ideas?

 Thanks,
 Tim


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: how to increase /root space

2003-08-30 Thread Mike Reinehr
There's your trouble. You have the files associated with five (5) different 
kernels in your boot partition:

  2.4.9
  2.4.7-10
  2.4.18-19.7.x
  2.4.18-24.7.x
  2.4.18-26.7.x
  2.4.18-27.7.x

It appears that 2.4.18-27.7.x is the last and current kernel, the one you are 
booting. It that's the case you can free up a lot of space by deleting the 
unused kernel image files. (Just make sure that your lilo or grub 
configurations reflect the correct kernel image or you won't be able to 
reboot.)

cmr

PS  These lists would be a lot easier to read if you would set your margins a 
little wider to minimize the line wrapping.

On Saturday 30 August 2003 12:06 pm, you wrote:
 Hi

 Thanks again.

 Swapana,
 Each time you upgrade with up2date and the kernal is

 updated you add files to

 boot. Clean up the old kernals and you will once

 again have the space you

 need. Remember to make lilo or grub relect the

 changes.

 Ok , i did not know that thanks...here is the
 directory listing of the /boot

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] boot]# ls -l
 total 20574
 -rw-r--r--1 root root 5824 Jun 24
 2001 boot.b
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  612 Jun 24
 2001 chain.b
 -rw-r--r--1 root root42257 Dec 12
 2002 config-2.4.18-19.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root42257 Jan 31
 2003 config-2.4.18-24.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root42257 Feb 24
 2003 config-2.4.18-26.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root42257 Mar 14
 03:56 config-2.4.18-27.7.x
 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 1024 Mar 17
 21:27 grub
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   196914 Dec 21
 2002 initrd-2.4.18-19.7.x.img
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   198824 Feb 13
 2003 initrd-2.4.18-24.7.x.img
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   197466 Mar  8
 19:57 initrd-2.4.18-26.7.x.img
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   197055 Mar 17
 21:26 initrd-2.4.18-27.7.x.img
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   427637 Apr 19
 2002 initrd-2.4.7-10.img
 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   14 Dec 21
 2002 kernel.h - kernel.h-2.4.9
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  405 Dec 21
 2002 kernel.h-2.4.9
 drwxr-xr-x2 root root12288 Apr 19
 2002 lost+found
 -rw-r--r--1 root root23108 Jun 24
 2001 message
 -rw-r--r--1 root root21282 Jun 24
 2001 message.ja
 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   25 Mar 17
 21:26 module-info - module-in
 fo-2.4.18-27.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root15436 Dec 12
 2002 module-info-2.4.18-19.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root15436 Jan 31
 2003 module-info-2.4.18-24.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root15436 Feb 24
 2003 module-info-2.4.18-26.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root15436 Mar 14
 03:56 module-info-2.4.18-27.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root13598 Sep  6
 2001 module-info-2.4.7-10
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  640 Jun 24
 2001 os2_d.b
 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   24 Mar 17
 21:26 System.map - System.map-2.4.18-27.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   490515 Dec 12
 2002 System.map-2.4.18-19.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   490643 Jan 31
 2003 System.map-2.4.18-24.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   490643 Feb 24
 2003 System.map-2.4.18-26.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   490673 Mar 14
 03:56 System.map-2.4.18-27.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   435039 Sep  6
 2001 System.map-2.4.7-10
 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root  2984033 Dec 12
 2002 vmlinux-2.4.18-19.7.x
 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root  2986554 Jan 31
 2003 vmlinux-2.4.18-24.7.x
 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root  2986554 Feb 24
 2003 vmlinux-2.4.18-26.7.x
 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root  2986589 Mar 14
 03:56 vmlinux-2.4.18-27.7.x
 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   21 Mar 17
 21:26 vmlinuz - vmlinuz-2.4.18-27.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  1064322 Dec 12
 2002 vmlinuz-2.4.18-19.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  1064546 Jan 31
 2003 vmlinuz-2.4.18-24.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  1064547 Feb 24
 2003 vmlinuz-2.4.18-26.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root  1065261 Mar 14
 03:56 vmlinuz-2.4.18-27.7.x
 -rw-r--r--1 root root   802068 Sep  6
 2001 vmlinuz-2.4.7-10
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] boot]#

 Is this the same network that you had the earlier

 possible security

 problems on?

 No it is our servers' network. Previously was of our
 client's that is under different network...

 Boot shouldn't change much and certainly the size of

 boot shouldn't be

 changing unless there are some very strange things

 going on.I'd be very

 concerned about why boot was growing, who was

 causing it to grow (if

 it's not you) and what the additional bulk consists

 of.

 We are only upgrading the kernel occassionally with
 up2date .  I have given above the /boot directory
 listing,,,

 pl. guide  me where i am making mistakesMoreover
 also suggest me how we can increase its disk space ,
 it is only 21mb..


 Best regards.
 -Swapna



 

Re: how to increase /root space

2003-08-30 Thread Mike Reinehr
No argument there.

cmr

On Saturday 30 August 2003 12:36 pm, you wrote:
 Since he installed all these kernels via up2date (and consequently, rpm),
 he shouldn't just start rm'ing things. If he uses rpm to remove them, via
 'rpm -e', rpm should take care of the necessary grub (or lilo, if RHL 7.x
 uses that instead of grub) modifications.

 Regards,
 Tim

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: HP scanners on Linux.

2003-08-29 Thread Mike Reinehr
I'm coming in late to this party but I, also, would like to add my vote for 
Epson. After using an HP 4C for several years, it went TU and HP's only 
response was that they were sorry and I would have to buy a new one. After 
surveying the market and checking SANE supported devices:
http://www.mostang.com/sane/sane-mfgs.html#EPSON
I chose an Epson Expression 1680 and have not had a moments trouble.

cmr

On Thursday 28 August 2003 06:27 pm, you wrote:
 I'm getting a bit frustrated with HP after recommending that one ouf our
 customers buy an HP scanner for use with their SuSE 8.2 system.  They
 bought a ScanJet 3670 which is seen by the kernel, but sane doesn't seem to
 recognize (sane-find-scanner says it might be a scanner, but that's as far
 as it goes).  I then built the LatestGreatest version of the sane software
 in hopes that would solve the problem, but no joy there either.

 I sent an e-mail question to HP asking whether this scanner is supported,
 and they said no, but to check http://linux.hp.com for information on
 supported scanners.  Nothing there of any use.  Another e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] asking for a list of current HP
 scanners that _ARE_ supported, and they just sent me off to the sane web
 sites again.  Another e-mail to them pointing out that HP is supposedly
 promoting Linux, sells hardware that should be useful on Linux systems, and
 could they please just send me a list of current scanners supported by
 sane.  The reply I got that basically said bugger off, we don't support
 scanners on Linux.  My reply was mostly polite, saying that I could see no
 reason to use any HP products in the future given the attitude of their
 support folks.

 That said, can anybody recommend current scanners that are well supported
 under Linux?  My current need is for a pretty vanilla flat bed scanner, but
 we will also need ones with automatic document feeders.

 Bill

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Slow printing on RHL 9

2003-08-29 Thread Mike Reinehr
Tim,

I'm still exploring the mysteries of CUPS, myself, so this may be of little 
help, but the first thing I would check would be your choice of printer 
driver. When you install a new printer under CUPS, your presented with a 
choice of drivers. The CUPS people actual provide a few, the GIMP people 
provide a lot more, and then there are the Foomatic drivers. Some of the 
drivers are really good but a lot are not so good. Try experimenting with 
different drivers. I think the GIMP drivers, generally, are pretty good.

cmr

On Friday 29 August 2003 03:15 pm, you wrote:
 I'm conducting an experiment with a willing subject at work. I've
 installed RHL 9 and he's using it in his day to day activity. One of his
 activities involves logging onto an online 3PL site (Third Party
 Logistics) and printing a 2 page bar coded shipping document.
 RHL 9 is configured to use CUPS and the printer is a networked JetDirect
 printer (HP 2200).
 When he prints the document, it takes nearly 5 minutes for both pages to
 finally finish printing. Contrast this to the less than 1 minute it
 takes for the document to print via Windows.
 Now, if he logs into a remote X session on our RHL 7 server and prints
 from there, it prints fast, just like it does from Windows.
 Both the RHL 7 server and the RHL 9 desktop are running CUPS.
 The desktop machine is an AMD K6-2 500 MHz with 256MB RAM, the server is
 a 1GHz Intel.
 Any ideas on what I can try to speed up the printing?
 Tjhanks,
 Tim


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Reinehr
I only know what I've read about it, but it sounds like Ximian Evolution 
would be just the product for you:

http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/

cmr

On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:00 am, you wrote:
   We just got a new CIO at the university where I work.  One thing he is
 about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
 big combined system for all employees and students.  That'll be about
 50,000 users.

   At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus
 Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun
 Internet Mail Server on Solaris.  He intends to replace these with ms
 exchange on windows 2k.  There is a small chance he will listen to
 suggestions to consider non-exchange options.

   Any suggestions?

 Thanks,

 Jason Joines
 Open Source = Open Mind
 

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Ideas for Mail and Calendaring for 50,000 Users

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Reinehr
I should have remembered the proverb: Better to be silent and let people 
think you are a fool, than to speak and let them know it.

My bad. Spoke about something I know nothing about.

cmr

On Wednesday 27 August 2003 12:16 pm, you wrote:
 Ya, evolkution is an Outlook clone.  Its not an exchange clone, AFAIK.

 On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
  Isn't that just for the client end, to connect to the servers?
 
  On 8/27/2003 12:03 PM, someone claiming to be Mike Reinehr wrote:
   I only know what I've read about it, but it sounds like Ximian
   Evolution would be just the product for you:
  
   http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/
  
   cmr
  
   On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:00 am, you wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work.  One thing he
   is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have
   one big combined system for all employees and students.  That'll be
   about 50,000 users.
  
At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus
  Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun
  Internet Mail Server on Solaris.  He intends to replace these with ms
  exchange on windows 2k.  There is a small chance he will listen to
  suggestions to consider non-exchange options.
  
Any suggestions?
  
  Thanks,
  
  Jason Joines
  Open Source = Open Mind
  
  
  ___
  Linux-users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
  http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 
  ___
  Linux-users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
  http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Tape drives

2003-08-26 Thread Mike Reinehr
I've been using DAT DDS-3 for the past four years with good results. Of the 
two units that I have, a Tecmar WangDAT 9300 and an HP Surestore DAT24, the 
Tecmar is my favorite, but Tecmar is out of business now. Both have been 
reliable, and you couldn't go wrong with HP. (I do incremental backups of 3 - 
5 GB's four nights a week, with a full 18GB or so weekly backup.)

DDS-3 has a 12GB native capacity, or approx. 24GB with compression, so it's 
on the low side of your requirement. The next generation, DDS-4, has 20/40 GB 
capacity.

I'm considering a Seagate Scorpion 40 DAT (DDS-4) for my next tape drive. 
Does anyone have any experience with Seagate tape drives?

cmr

On Tuesday 26 August 2003 06:23 am, you wrote:
 Awhile back there was a discussion of the best tape drives for Linux. I
 need a drive in the 20-30GB range, any suggestions on type and brand?TIA,
 Randy Donohoe


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: No longer any xwindows on RedHat 7.3

2003-08-26 Thread Mike Reinehr
Take a look at your /var/log/XFree86* log that's generated every time you 
start your x-windows system. You should find an error there.

cmr

On Tuesday 26 August 2003 01:53 pm, you wrote:
 I've been running Redhat 7.3 on an old Gateway e-3000 system for months and
 never had any problem.



 Last week, I rebooted and the xwindows system did not come up.



 During the reboot, the loader opens and I see a nice display showing all
 listed operating systems (only RH 7.3 in this case) and then the boot
 continues.  Everything looks OK, but there is no xwindows display: only
 command line.



 Any ideas on what happened or what I should do now?



 Regards,



 Matt Carruth
 Information Technology Operations (ITOps)
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone: 214-567-8522


 ITS--Working Together for TI's Competitive Advantage

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Does Kmail support MIME encoding?

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Reinehr
Kmail does, indeed, support MIME encoding.

I'm not expert at this, but I'm guessing that you have received an email with 
html formatting, rather than ascii formatiing and Kmail is not rendering the 
html. If that's the case, then your problem, probably, is that html rendering 
is turned off for security reasons.

Go into Settings/Security/General and see if the checkbox for HTML is turned 
on. Or, alternately, go to Appearance/Profiles and select Kmail with HTML 
previewing (this makes other changes to your options as well).

Hope this helps.

cmr

On Friday 22 August 2003 07:16 pm, you wrote:
 I am using Kmail 1.4.3 with KDE 3.0.5.  I recieved a email that stated the
 following:

 Your Email Client does not support MIME encoding. Please upgrade to
 MIME-enabled Email Client (almost every modern Email Client is
 MIME-capable).

 Since I am not even sure what that means (he blushes with embaressment),
 how can I correct this?

 TIA

 Harry G

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Universal vs local time

2003-08-22 Thread Mike Reinehr
On Thursday 21 August 2003 09:36 pm, you wrote:
 Here is what I get with the various suggestions:
 hammer11:~# uname -a
 Linux hammer11 2.4.20 #1 Thu Jun 19 14:13:55 PDT 2003 i686 unknown unknown
 GNU/Linux

 hammer11:~# date
 Thu Aug 21 22:25:02 EDT 2003

 hammer11:~# date
 Thu Aug 21 22:25:20 EDT 2003

 hammer11:~# hwclock --show
 Thu Aug 21 22:25:31 2003  -0.431234 seconds

 hammer11:~# cat /etc/adjtime
 -0.000528 1061518802 0.00
 1061518802
 LOCAL

 My bios is set to local time. When I change it to UTC, the system sets it
 back to the local time either when starting up or shutting down.
 So, unless I want to get involved in those scripts (which I don't) this 
 box is staying on local time.

You can use `hwclock` with and without the --utc option to query and/or set 
your hardware clock. I switched to Debian from COL a couple of months ago and 
one difference that I've noticed between the two is that when I'm shutting 
Debian down, it sets the hardware clock to whatever the software clock is, 
then, currently set to. This didn't happen with COL. I can't say which method 
is more prevalent, but it sounds like your distribution is resetting your 
hardware clock on shutdown. Again, with COL, there was a parameter buried 
somewhere in the startup scripts which attempted to determine whether your 
hardware clock was set to UTC or local, and then set the software clock 
accordingly. I have dug deep enough into Debian yet, to determine just how 
that's done.

mike

 Well, got THAT question answered. Onward.

 Joel

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Easy to make Linux SCO free...

2003-08-20 Thread Mike Reinehr
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 06:29 pm, you wrote:

 I was able to connect using both the browsers you mentioned plus Opera.

Ok, it's looking more and more like I could benefit from some technical 
assistance. If you guys/gals can connect with Konqueror, Mozilla and Opera, 
but I can't, then the problem must be something unique to my system.

First off, I'm running behind a SonicWall firewall, but I don't think that 
that could be the problem, as I can connect from this very same PC, when 
running IE6 on Win98 under VMware. Likewise, it doesn't sound like a DNS 
problem or a hardware problem.

I switched from COL 3.1.1 to Debian Sarge about two or three months ago, but 
I really can't remember if I noticed this problem before or after (before, I 
think). I've noticed one problem, in particular, that seems to occur only in 
the Mozilla Deb package (having to do with the bookmarks manager) so, I guess 
it's possible that this could be a problem with the Deb packages or 
libraries. First chance I get, I'll download a tarball from mozilla.org and 
try that. Any other suggestions would be appreciated.

mike reinehr
-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Easy to make Linux SCO free...

2003-08-19 Thread Mike Reinehr
Is it just me or is this site down? I've been trying to access this news 
article since I first came into work this morning, five hours ago, but all I 
get is a time-out error.

cmr

On Monday 18 August 2003 08:46 pm, you wrote:
 This says it all...


 http://www.vnunet.com/News/1143061

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Easy to make Linux SCO free...

2003-08-19 Thread Mike Reinehr
Ok, I guess it's me then.

I've tried this link with both Konqueror (v2.2.2) and with Mozilla (v1.4) and 
gotten the same result, a status message connecting with www.vnunet.com and 
then nothing happens for about five minutes until, finally, I receive a 
time-out error message.

I finally broke down and started-up VMware and Windows98 and tried again with 
Internet Explorer and was able to connect immediately.

I've encounted at least two other websites over the past several months which 
have done the same thing. One of them, that I can recall at the moment, is 
www.ingrammicro.com. I've been doing business with I-M for years, but earlier 
this year, all of a sudden, I could no longer connect to their website, 
unless I switched to IE (I normally use Mozilla).

Any insight would be appreciated. Is anyone else having this problem, or is 
it just me?

Thanks!

mike

On Tuesday 19 August 2003 04:39 pm, you wrote:
 On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:30:04 -0500

 Mike Reinehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Is it just me or is this site down? I've been trying to access this
  news article since I first came into work this morning, five hours
  ago, but all I get is a time-out error.
 
  cmr
 
  On Monday 18 August 2003 08:46 pm, you wrote:
   This says it all...
  
  
   http://www.vnunet.com/News/1143061
 
  --
  Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

 Works ok here.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Easy to make Linux SCO free...

2003-08-19 Thread Mike Reinehr
Can't open this one in any browser. In IE6 I get a server not found or DNS 
error message.

For what it's worth, I, at least, could ping www.vnunet.com. I don't get any 
returns from www.perens.org.

mike

On Tuesday 19 August 2003 04:49 pm, you wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 19, 2003, Collins Richey wrote:

 Try this one, fresh from SCO Forum:

   http://www.perens.org/Articles/SCOCopiedCode.html

 Bill

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Easy to make Linux SCO free...

2003-08-19 Thread Mike Reinehr
Or computers which only run on MS branded electricity!

I've sent several emails to their website support address, but haven't gotten 
a single response. I guess they're making so much money they they don't need 
a little bit more.

mike

On Tuesday 19 August 2003 05:35 pm, you wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 19, 2003, Mike Reinehr wrote:
 Ok, I guess it's me then.

 ...

 Any insight would be appreciated. Is anyone else having this problem, or
  is it just me?

 Ask your Ingram Micro sales person if they also have 800 numbers
 that can only be reached by Microsoft telephones.

 Bill

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Easy to make Linux SCO free...

2003-08-19 Thread Mike Reinehr
I saw a news article this week touting the latest Firebird release. I guess 
I'd better give it a try. Sounds really good.

Thanks for the help.

mike

On Tuesday 19 August 2003 05:56 pm, you wrote:
 On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:27:34 -0500

 Mike Reinehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Ok, I guess it's me then.
 
  I've tried this link with both Konqueror (v2.2.2) and with Mozilla
  (v1.4) and gotten the same result, a status message connecting with
  www.vnunet.com and then nothing happens for about five minutes until,
  finally, I receive a time-out error message.
 
  I finally broke down and started-up VMware and Windows98 and tried
  again with Internet Explorer and was able to connect immediately.
 
  I've encounted at least two other websites over the past several
  months which have done the same thing. One of them, that I can recall
  at the moment, is www.ingrammicro.com. I've been doing business with
  I-M for years, but earlier this year, all of a sudden, I could no
  longer connect to their website, unless I switched to IE (I normally
  use Mozilla).
 
  Any insight would be appreciated. Is anyone else having this problem,
  or is it just me?

 Using Mozilla Firebird 0.6.1, www.vnunet.com and www.ingrammicro.com
 work aok, but the www.perens.org site is DOA.

-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

More laws, less justice. -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users