Re: LaTeX internals question (maybe OT)
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:51:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yes, I know that LyX does not offer any way to avoid that. Beofre coding such a behaviour, we would have to think about a good user intereface allowing to choose between these two different behaviours. Dear JMarc, my question was just a LaTeX question. I thought that there are some LaTeX experts on the LyX list and therefore asked. BTW thanks a lot to the whole development team for the new LyX version. Great software !! Greetings Frank
Re: LaTeX internals question (maybe OT)
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:51:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yes, I know that LyX does not offer any way to avoid that. Beofre coding such a behaviour, we would have to think about a good user intereface allowing to choose between these two different behaviours. Dear JMarc, my question was just a LaTeX question. I thought that there are some LaTeX experts on the LyX list and therefore asked. BTW thanks a lot to the whole development team for the new LyX version. Great software !! Greetings Frank
Re: LaTeX internals question (maybe OT)
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:51:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Yes, I know that LyX does not offer any way to avoid that. Beofre > coding such a behaviour, we would have to think about a good user > intereface allowing to choose between these two different behaviours. > Dear JMarc, my question was "just" a LaTeX question. I thought that there are some LaTeX experts on the LyX list and therefore asked. BTW thanks a lot to the whole development team for the new LyX version. Great software !! Greetings Frank
LaTeX internals question (maybe OT)
Dear LaTeX experts within the LyX community,
I have a problem with the LaTeX \newenvironment command.
I can define my new environment and it works fine, but there is one
problem. If I write (LaTeX mode)
\begin{myenvironment}
Some text in the environment
\end{myenvironment}%
following text
I always get an implict \par in front of the following text
text. The whole document requires a \parskip-value 0, therefore
setting it to 0cm does not work. I tried to reset it within the
environment and the newenvironment, but that does not work.
Adding a \vspace*{-\parskip} seems _very_ _ugly_.
Any help appreciated.
Frank
PS
Background of the Problem: I need an itemize environment with just
normal spacing, i.e.:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
The normal environment produces:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
By setting topsep and partopsep I got:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
LaTeX internals question (maybe OT)
Dear LaTeX experts within the LyX community,
I have a problem with the LaTeX \newenvironment command.
I can define my new environment and it works fine, but there is one
problem. If I write (LaTeX mode)
\begin{myenvironment}
Some text in the environment
\end{myenvironment}%
following text
I always get an implict \par in front of the following text
text. The whole document requires a \parskip-value 0, therefore
setting it to 0cm does not work. I tried to reset it within the
environment and the newenvironment, but that does not work.
Adding a \vspace*{-\parskip} seems _very_ _ugly_.
Any help appreciated.
Frank
PS
Background of the Problem: I need an itemize environment with just
normal spacing, i.e.:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
The normal environment produces:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
By setting topsep and partopsep I got:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
LaTeX internals question (maybe OT)
Dear LaTeX experts within the LyX community,
I have a problem with the LaTeX \newenvironment command.
I can define my new environment and it works fine, but there is one
problem. If I write (LaTeX mode)
\begin{myenvironment}
Some text in the environment
\end{myenvironment}%
following text
I always get an implict \par in front of the "following text"
text. The whole document requires a \parskip-value > 0, therefore
setting it to 0cm does not work. I tried to reset it within the
environment and the newenvironment, but that does not work.
Adding a \vspace*{-\parskip} seems _very_ _ugly_.
Any help appreciated.
Frank
PS
Background of the Problem: I need an itemize environment with just
normal spacing, i.e.:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
The normal environment produces:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
By setting topsep and partopsep I got:
text before
- an item
- another item
text afer
Re: Copyright notice at footer of every page
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:53:30PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: How do I make a footer to house my copyright notice at the bottom of every page? For this particular file I'm using the Article document class. You can use the fancy-header LaTeX package. The Pagestyle fancy in the document layout dialog should correspond to it. HTH Frank
Re: Copyright notice at footer of every page
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:53:30PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: How do I make a footer to house my copyright notice at the bottom of every page? For this particular file I'm using the Article document class. You can use the fancy-header LaTeX package. The Pagestyle fancy in the document layout dialog should correspond to it. HTH Frank
Re: Copyright notice at footer of every page
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:53:30PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > How do I make a footer to house my copyright notice at the bottom of every > page? For this particular file I'm using the Article document class. You can use the fancy-header LaTeX package. The Pagestyle fancy in the document layout dialog should correspond to it. HTH Frank
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:04:30AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: http://nexus.aub.auc.dk/kl/latex2e/psduplex.html the download doesn't work. do you have the stylefile? I just mailed the author of the web page ... Hopefully I will get a response (which will be forwarded ...) Searching with google, altavista and CTAN did not give a result ... Frank
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:04:30AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
http://nexus.aub.auc.dk/kl/latex2e/psduplex.html
the download doesn't work. do you have the
stylefile?
The author mailed me the sty file, I attach it.
Frank
% Definitions for enabling duplex print on PostScript printers (dvips)
% (c) Copyright 1998 Kasper Løvschall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\ProvidesPackage{psduplex}[1998/03/23 v1.1 Duplex print on PostScript device (KL)]
% Defining duplex options
\DeclareOption{longedge}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble false put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex Long Edge Binding is active}}
\DeclareOption{shortedge}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble true put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex Short Edge Binding is active}}
\DeclareOption{none}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex false put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble false put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex None is active}}
% Defining media position
\DeclareOption{tray2}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 0 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 2 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray3}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 1 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 3 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{envelope}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 2 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Envelope media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray1}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 3 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 1 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray4}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 4 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 4 media selected}}
% Beginning-Of-Page hooks
\DeclareOption{kopi}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 300 scalefont setfont
50 -10 moveto 0.8 setgray (KOPI) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{kladde}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 200 scalefont setfont
50 20 moveto 0.8 setgray (KLADDE) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{udkast}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 200 scalefont setfont
40 20 moveto 0.8 setgray (UDKAST) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{hemmeligt}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 135 scalefont setfont
40 40 moveto 0.8 setgray (HEMMELIGT) show grestore}def end}}
% Error message if invalid argument
\DeclareOption*{%
\PackageWarning{psduplex}{Unknown argument \CurrentOption}}
\ProcessOptions*\relax
\endinput %EOF
% For PostScript level 2 use:
% /Duplex true /Thumble false setpagedevice
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:04:30AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: http://nexus.aub.auc.dk/kl/latex2e/psduplex.html the download doesn't work. do you have the stylefile? I just mailed the author of the web page ... Hopefully I will get a response (which will be forwarded ...) Searching with google, altavista and CTAN did not give a result ... Frank
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:04:30AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
http://nexus.aub.auc.dk/kl/latex2e/psduplex.html
the download doesn't work. do you have the
stylefile?
The author mailed me the sty file, I attach it.
Frank
% Definitions for enabling duplex print on PostScript printers (dvips)
% (c) Copyright 1998 Kasper Løvschall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\ProvidesPackage{psduplex}[1998/03/23 v1.1 Duplex print on PostScript device (KL)]
% Defining duplex options
\DeclareOption{longedge}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble false put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex Long Edge Binding is active}}
\DeclareOption{shortedge}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble true put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex Short Edge Binding is active}}
\DeclareOption{none}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex false put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble false put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex None is active}}
% Defining media position
\DeclareOption{tray2}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 0 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 2 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray3}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 1 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 3 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{envelope}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 2 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Envelope media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray1}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 3 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 1 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray4}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 4 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 4 media selected}}
% Beginning-Of-Page hooks
\DeclareOption{kopi}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 300 scalefont setfont
50 -10 moveto 0.8 setgray (KOPI) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{kladde}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 200 scalefont setfont
50 20 moveto 0.8 setgray (KLADDE) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{udkast}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 200 scalefont setfont
40 20 moveto 0.8 setgray (UDKAST) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{hemmeligt}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 135 scalefont setfont
40 40 moveto 0.8 setgray (HEMMELIGT) show grestore}def end}}
% Error message if invalid argument
\DeclareOption*{%
\PackageWarning{psduplex}{Unknown argument \CurrentOption}}
\ProcessOptions*\relax
\endinput %EOF
% For PostScript level 2 use:
% /Duplex true /Thumble false setpagedevice
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:04:30AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > http://nexus.aub.auc.dk/kl/latex2e/psduplex.html > > the download doesn't work. do you have the > stylefile? > I just mailed the author of the web page ... Hopefully I will get a response (which will be forwarded ...) Searching with google, altavista and CTAN did not give a result ... Frank
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 10:04:30AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > http://nexus.aub.auc.dk/kl/latex2e/psduplex.html
>
> the download doesn't work. do you have the
> stylefile?
>
The author mailed me the sty file, I attach it.
Frank
% Definitions for enabling duplex print on PostScript printers (dvips)
% (c) Copyright 1998 Kasper Løvschall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\ProvidesPackage{psduplex}[1998/03/23 v1.1 Duplex print on PostScript device (KL)]
% Defining duplex options
\DeclareOption{longedge}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble false put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex Long Edge Binding is active}}
\DeclareOption{shortedge}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble true put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex Short Edge Binding is active}}
\DeclareOption{none}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /Duplex false put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /Tumble false put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Duplex None is active}}
% Defining media position
\DeclareOption{tray2}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 0 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 2 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray3}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 1 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 3 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{envelope}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 2 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Envelope media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray1}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 3 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 1 media selected}}
\DeclareOption{tray4}{\special{!userdict begin /start-hook{
1 dict dup /DeferredMediaSelection true put setpagedevice
1 dict dup /MediaPosition 4 put setpagedevice
}def end}\PackageInfo{psduplex}{Tray 4 media selected}}
% Beginning-Of-Page hooks
\DeclareOption{kopi}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 300 scalefont setfont
50 -10 moveto 0.8 setgray (KOPI) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{kladde}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 200 scalefont setfont
50 20 moveto 0.8 setgray (KLADDE) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{udkast}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 200 scalefont setfont
40 20 moveto 0.8 setgray (UDKAST) show grestore}def end}}
\DeclareOption{hemmeligt}{\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 200 30
translate 65 rotate /Courier-Bold findfont 135 scalefont setfont
40 40 moveto 0.8 setgray (HEMMELIGT) show grestore}def end}}
% Error message if invalid argument
\DeclareOption*{%
\PackageWarning{psduplex}{Unknown argument "\CurrentOption"}}
\ProcessOptions*\relax
\endinput %EOF
% For PostScript level 2 use:
% <> setpagedevice
[OT] VMware comments
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:08:41AM -0400, Piotr R. Sidorowicz wrote: Well, I took a shot at vmware recently, so here are my observations: 1. vmware install is problem free 2. I installed win95 3. couldn't get networking/printing to work in the emulated windoze. 4. emulated screen rez is limited to 800x600 5. vmware requires massive horsepower from the host machine (my machine is a pentium3/500MHz/256MB) and the Win emulation felt like a 386. Hence forget running Word or anything equally resource wasteful. Conclusion: vmware is at best a good academic exercise, and for the time being a waste of your valuable time. Before becomming completely OT, just my comment. I use NT as the guest OS. Measuring showed a loss of about 15% for my apps (not using Word etc.). I use vmware even on a P3/366MHz/192MB laptop sucessfully, compared to a native NT intall on the same machine it feels a little bit slower, but not that much. I can set up virtual resolution greater than 1280x1024 ... We can continue the discussion of VMware per pers email... Greetings Frank
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:50:21AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: on odd pages and even on right pages. But I can't find any place to tell the printer the job is duplex. Anyone know? There are IMHO two options: - within the printer menus, change from simplex printing to duplex printing - prepend your job with the appropriate command to print duplex, unfortunately I do not have access to that command right now :( - There might be some document on the HP web page, my HP printer can be switched into (out of) econo mode by a few chars sent to the printer HTH Frank
[OT] VMware comments
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:08:41AM -0400, Piotr R. Sidorowicz wrote: Well, I took a shot at vmware recently, so here are my observations: 1. vmware install is problem free 2. I installed win95 3. couldn't get networking/printing to work in the emulated windoze. 4. emulated screen rez is limited to 800x600 5. vmware requires massive horsepower from the host machine (my machine is a pentium3/500MHz/256MB) and the Win emulation felt like a 386. Hence forget running Word or anything equally resource wasteful. Conclusion: vmware is at best a good academic exercise, and for the time being a waste of your valuable time. Before becomming completely OT, just my comment. I use NT as the guest OS. Measuring showed a loss of about 15% for my apps (not using Word etc.). I use vmware even on a P3/366MHz/192MB laptop sucessfully, compared to a native NT intall on the same machine it feels a little bit slower, but not that much. I can set up virtual resolution greater than 1280x1024 ... We can continue the discussion of VMware per pers email... Greetings Frank
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:50:21AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: on odd pages and even on right pages. But I can't find any place to tell the printer the job is duplex. Anyone know? There are IMHO two options: - within the printer menus, change from simplex printing to duplex printing - prepend your job with the appropriate command to print duplex, unfortunately I do not have access to that command right now :( - There might be some document on the HP web page, my HP printer can be switched into (out of) econo mode by a few chars sent to the printer HTH Frank
[OT] VMware comments
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:08:41AM -0400, Piotr R. Sidorowicz wrote: > Well, I took a shot at vmware recently, so here are my observations: > > 1. vmware install is problem free > 2. I installed win95 > 3. couldn't get networking/printing to work in the emulated windoze. > 4. emulated screen rez is limited to 800x600 > 5. vmware requires massive horsepower from the host machine >(my machine is a pentium3/500MHz/256MB) and the Win emulation felt like >a 386. Hence forget running Word or anything equally resource wasteful. > > Conclusion: vmware is at best a good academic exercise, and for the time > being a waste of your valuable time. > Before becomming completely OT, just my comment. I use NT as the guest OS. Measuring showed a loss of about 15% for my apps (not using Word etc.). I use vmware even on a P3/366MHz/192MB laptop sucessfully, compared to a native NT intall on the same machine it feels a little bit slower, but not that much. I can set up virtual resolution greater than 1280x1024 ... We can continue the discussion of VMware per pers email... Greetings Frank
Re: How do I print duplex?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:50:21AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > on odd pages and even on right pages. But I can't find any place to tell the > printer the job is duplex. Anyone know? > There are IMHO two options: - within the printer menus, change from simplex printing to duplex printing - prepend your job with the appropriate command to print duplex, unfortunately I do not have access to that command right now :( - There might be some document on the HP web page, my HP printer can be switched into (out of) econo mode by a few chars sent to the printer HTH Frank
Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:13:03PM +0200, Vladimir Milovanovic wrote: I am currently running a w2k setup, and most of the software I use daily is for windoze. However, I have used lyx before, and I think Please, email me directly if you have a suggestion, since I am not subscribed to the list. Vlad, Have you looked at vmware ( http://www.vmware.com gives oportunity to download trial version)? With that tool you can run another OS in a window. You can use your win*#$ software and use Linux as OS for running lyx. I do not have any experience with the win*#$ port, therefore I can not give any advice, but the Linux version is IMHO a killer app. HTH Frank
Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:13:03PM +0200, Vladimir Milovanovic wrote: I am currently running a w2k setup, and most of the software I use daily is for windoze. However, I have used lyx before, and I think Please, email me directly if you have a suggestion, since I am not subscribed to the list. Vlad, Have you looked at vmware ( http://www.vmware.com gives oportunity to download trial version)? With that tool you can run another OS in a window. You can use your win*#$ software and use Linux as OS for running lyx. I do not have any experience with the win*#$ port, therefore I can not give any advice, but the Linux version is IMHO a killer app. HTH Frank
Re: What's a better platform - win2k or Linux
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:13:03PM +0200, Vladimir Milovanovic wrote: >I am currently running a w2k setup, and most of the software I use >daily is for windoze. However, I have used lyx before, and I think > > >Please, email me directly if you have a suggestion, since I am not >subscribed to the list. > Vlad, Have you looked at vmware ( http://www.vmware.com gives oportunity to download trial version)? With that tool you can run another OS "in a window". You can use your win*#&$ software and use Linux as OS for running lyx. I do not have any experience with the win*#&$ port, therefore I can not give any advice, but the Linux version is IMHO a killer app. HTH Frank
Re: Konquereor users please test...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:17:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: I suppose I should say what I want you to report: mozilla 0.9.0 @ Linux Does the menubar work in its variations? long sidebar short sidebar long topmenu short topmenu long nocss short nocss Hopefully nothing else has changed or broken... Load site - short sidebar - about: now the sidebar has the long entries, clicking the short cust. link produces the short variant clicking now on No CSS produces the naviage at the top: is that intended? I assume yes. Long top bar works fine top bar long, no CSS works fine Selecting short and then top navbar produces long entries at the top. HTH Frank
Re: Konquereor users please test...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:51:05PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: mozilla 0.9.0 @ Linux Load site - short sidebar - about: now the sidebar has the long entries, clicking the short cust. link produces the short variant There seems to be something weird happening with the cookies. If you hit reload it should get it right. I have seen this with a variety of browsers and I think the old site did it as well. The cookie handling hasn't changed. OK. I block all cookies IMHO the most important thing is that the pages are - standart conform - quickly loadable - well structured - without any flash-boing-blinck *#%$ - without JavaScript etc. The new LyX pages have IMHO all these attributes. Conclusion: Congratulations, _VERY_ _WELL_ _DONE_ Frank
Re: Konquereor users please test...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:17:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: I suppose I should say what I want you to report: mozilla 0.9.0 @ Linux Does the menubar work in its variations? long sidebar short sidebar long topmenu short topmenu long nocss short nocss Hopefully nothing else has changed or broken... Load site - short sidebar - about: now the sidebar has the long entries, clicking the short cust. link produces the short variant clicking now on No CSS produces the naviage at the top: is that intended? I assume yes. Long top bar works fine top bar long, no CSS works fine Selecting short and then top navbar produces long entries at the top. HTH Frank
Re: Konquereor users please test...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:51:05PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: mozilla 0.9.0 @ Linux Load site - short sidebar - about: now the sidebar has the long entries, clicking the short cust. link produces the short variant There seems to be something weird happening with the cookies. If you hit reload it should get it right. I have seen this with a variety of browsers and I think the old site did it as well. The cookie handling hasn't changed. OK. I block all cookies IMHO the most important thing is that the pages are - standart conform - quickly loadable - well structured - without any flash-boing-blinck *#%$ - without JavaScript etc. The new LyX pages have IMHO all these attributes. Conclusion: Congratulations, _VERY_ _WELL_ _DONE_ Frank
Re: Konquereor users please test...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:17:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > I suppose I should say what I want you to report: mozilla 0.9.0 @ Linux > > Does the menubar work in its variations? > > long sidebar > short sidebar > long topmenu > short topmenu > long nocss > short nocss > > Hopefully nothing else has changed or broken... > Load site -> short sidebar -> about: now the sidebar has the long entries, clicking the short cust. link produces the short variant clicking now on No CSS produces the naviage at the top: is that intended? I assume yes. Long top bar works fine top bar long, no CSS works fine Selecting short and then top navbar produces long entries at the top. HTH Frank
Re: Konquereor users please test...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:51:05PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: > > mozilla 0.9.0 @ Linux > > > Load site -> short sidebar -> about: now the sidebar has the long > > entries, clicking the short cust. link produces the short variant > > There seems to be something weird happening with the cookies. > If you hit reload it should get it right. > > I have seen this with a variety of browsers and I think the old site did > it as well. The cookie handling hasn't changed. > OK. I block all cookies IMHO the most important thing is that the pages are - standart conform - quickly loadable - well structured - without any "flash-boing-blinck" *#%$& - without JavaScript etc. The new LyX pages have IMHO all these attributes. Conclusion: Congratulations, _VERY_ _WELL_ _DONE_ Frank
How to UNSUBSCRIBE (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2)
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:41:17PM +0200, BFI Automation wrote: UNSUBSCRIBEUNSUBSCRIBE!! !!UNSUBSCRIBE Sorry, but you have to do that by yourself. Nobody on the list will be able to do that. Look in the header of _every_ list message. There you will find a line with List-Unsubscribe information. Just send email to that addess HTH Frank
How to UNSUBSCRIBE (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2)
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:41:17PM +0200, BFI Automation wrote: UNSUBSCRIBEUNSUBSCRIBE!! !!UNSUBSCRIBE Sorry, but you have to do that by yourself. Nobody on the list will be able to do that. Look in the header of _every_ list message. There you will find a line with List-Unsubscribe information. Just send email to that addess HTH Frank
How to UNSUBSCRIBE (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.1.6fix2)
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:41:17PM +0200, BFI Automation wrote: > UNSUBSCRIBEUNSUBSCRIBE!! > !!UNSUBSCRIBE Sorry, but you have to do that by yourself. Nobody on the list will be able to do that. Look in the header of _every_ list message. There you will find a line with List-Unsubscribe information. Just send email to that addess HTH Frank
Re: I am still having problems to install - Solaris
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:27:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: leo Hi I am still trying to install Lyx on Solaris 8. I was having What version of CC is that? We are currently trying to make LyX Do you have access to gcc 2.95.2? Using gcc --version 2.8.1 on uname -a SunOS NAME 5.8 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 with make --version GNU Make version 3.78.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath. Built for sparc-sun-solaris2.8 worked fine for me. HTH Frank
Re: I am still having problems to install - Solaris
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:27:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: leo Hi I am still trying to install Lyx on Solaris 8. I was having What version of CC is that? We are currently trying to make LyX Do you have access to gcc 2.95.2? Using gcc --version 2.8.1 on uname -a SunOS NAME 5.8 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 with make --version GNU Make version 3.78.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath. Built for sparc-sun-solaris2.8 worked fine for me. HTH Frank
Re: I am still having problems to install - Solaris
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:27:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > leo> Hi I am still trying to install Lyx on Solaris 8. I was having > What version of CC is that? We are currently trying to make LyX > > Do you have access to gcc 2.95.2? > Using gcc --version 2.8.1 on uname -a SunOS NAME 5.8 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 with make --version GNU Make version 3.78.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath. Built for sparc-sun-solaris2.8 worked fine for me. HTH Frank
Re: Problem at www.lyx.org?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:38:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: "Joao B. Oliveira" wrote: Any other sites I try are ok... just lyx.org is behaving strangely. no problem for me at 7.30 pm MEZ Herbert 14 191.at-3-0-0.TR1.AMS2.Alter.Net (146.188.2.1) 18 ms 20 ms 17 ms 15 so-3-3-2.TR1.CPH3.Alter.Net (146.188.5.206) 33 ms 32 ms 33 ms 16 so-7-1-0.XR1.OSL1.Alter.Net (146.188.12.29) 45 ms 44 ms 44 ms 17 POS0-0-0.GW2.OSL1.Alter.Net (146.188.12.42) 45 ms 44 ms 43 ms 18 Trolltech-gw1.customer.ALTER.NET (146.188.38.58) 128 ms 67 ms 62 ms 19 * * * 20 * * * Apr 19, 09:08 MESZ Frank
Re: Problem at www.lyx.org?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:38:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: "Joao B. Oliveira" wrote: Any other sites I try are ok... just lyx.org is behaving strangely. no problem for me at 7.30 pm MEZ Herbert 14 191.at-3-0-0.TR1.AMS2.Alter.Net (146.188.2.1) 18 ms 20 ms 17 ms 15 so-3-3-2.TR1.CPH3.Alter.Net (146.188.5.206) 33 ms 32 ms 33 ms 16 so-7-1-0.XR1.OSL1.Alter.Net (146.188.12.29) 45 ms 44 ms 44 ms 17 POS0-0-0.GW2.OSL1.Alter.Net (146.188.12.42) 45 ms 44 ms 43 ms 18 Trolltech-gw1.customer.ALTER.NET (146.188.38.58) 128 ms 67 ms 62 ms 19 * * * 20 * * * Apr 19, 09:08 MESZ Frank
Re: Problem at www.lyx.org?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:38:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > "Joao B. Oliveira" wrote: > > > > Any other sites I try are ok... just lyx.org is behaving strangely. > > > no problem for me at 7.30 pm MEZ > > Herbert > 14 191.at-3-0-0.TR1.AMS2.Alter.Net (146.188.2.1) 18 ms 20 ms 17 ms 15 so-3-3-2.TR1.CPH3.Alter.Net (146.188.5.206) 33 ms 32 ms 33 ms 16 so-7-1-0.XR1.OSL1.Alter.Net (146.188.12.29) 45 ms 44 ms 44 ms 17 POS0-0-0.GW2.OSL1.Alter.Net (146.188.12.42) 45 ms 44 ms 43 ms 18 Trolltech-gw1.customer.ALTER.NET (146.188.38.58) 128 ms 67 ms 62 ms 19 * * * 20 * * * Apr 19, 09:08 MESZ Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +, John Levon wrote: No, we have been through this before. Any distribution that requires the kernel headers via the symlink like this is broken. Most modern ones are fixed now. For the broken distributions, you *must* include the kernel headers in the correct place if you hope to compile programs. This is simply a requirement of the distribution in question. It has *nothing* to do with LyX, and we should not have any special-case test. Hopefully in two years everyone's distribution will be fixed and this issue won't arise. Sorry for being not clear enough. Hopefully now better: - I agree that it is not a LyX fault. - I agree that it is a problem of the SuSE distribution (in this case). - I suggest to add a small text notice within the INSTALL or within the configure-produced warning that xforms is not working like the following: "This xforms problem might be due to missing Linux kernel header files" Thanks, Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:02:38AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: - you have not installed the kernel sources. The you should ^ insert n What more can we do?? Nothing but insert the "n" letter ;-) My message was just to clarify my point of view. Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +, John Levon wrote: No, we have been through this before. Any distribution that requires the kernel headers via the symlink like this is broken. Most modern ones are fixed now. For the broken distributions, you *must* include the kernel headers in the correct place if you hope to compile programs. This is simply a requirement of the distribution in question. It has *nothing* to do with LyX, and we should not have any special-case test. Hopefully in two years everyone's distribution will be fixed and this issue won't arise. Sorry for being not clear enough. Hopefully now better: - I agree that it is not a LyX fault. - I agree that it is a problem of the SuSE distribution (in this case). - I suggest to add a small text notice within the INSTALL or within the configure-produced warning that xforms is not working like the following: "This xforms problem might be due to missing Linux kernel header files" Thanks, Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:02:38AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: - you have not installed the kernel sources. The you should ^ insert n What more can we do?? Nothing but insert the "n" letter ;-) My message was just to clarify my point of view. Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:16:30PM +, John Levon wrote: > > No, we have been through this before. Any distribution that requires the kernel > headers via the symlink like this is broken. Most modern ones are fixed now. > > For the broken distributions, you *must* include the kernel headers in > the correct place if you hope to compile programs. This is simply a > requirement of the distribution in question. It has *nothing* to do with > LyX, and we should not have any special-case test. > > Hopefully in two years everyone's distribution will be fixed and this issue > won't arise. > Sorry for being not clear enough. Hopefully now better: - I agree that it is not a LyX fault. - I agree that it is a problem of the SuSE distribution (in this case). - I suggest to add a small text notice within the INSTALL or within the configure-produced warning that xforms is not working like the following: "This xforms problem might be due to missing Linux kernel header files" Thanks, Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:02:38AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > - you have not installed the kernel sources. The you should ^ insert n > > What more can we do?? Nothing but insert the "n" letter ;-) My message was just to clarify my point of view. Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 01:08:15PM +, John Levon wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: - You need valid Linux kernel headers (!) which are included within the xforms test within configure. Having no proper includes in /usr/src/linux will result in a complaint about a non-working xforms lib. Just to clarify, this is essentially a SuSE bug, not a LyX problem. They should not be including kernel headers directly. I am not sure about that, but: I posted this problem to the LyX users list some weeks ago and the developers responded that they do not know how to produce a valid test for that. The only detail I know is the following: the configure generated file includes a xforms header which (indirectly (?)) includes some linux kernel header file for some constants. For _me_ everything is allright, I suggest to add a small note in the error message. I did not make any tests with other Linux distributions therefore I do not know. Perhaps somebody can try to compile on another Linux distrib without a kernel source tree (and without the kernel header files) Greetings Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 01:08:15PM +, John Levon wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: - You need valid Linux kernel headers (!) which are included within the xforms test within configure. Having no proper includes in /usr/src/linux will result in a complaint about a non-working xforms lib. Just to clarify, this is essentially a SuSE bug, not a LyX problem. They should not be including kernel headers directly. I am not sure about that, but: I posted this problem to the LyX users list some weeks ago and the developers responded that they do not know how to produce a valid test for that. The only detail I know is the following: the configure generated file includes a xforms header which (indirectly (?)) includes some linux kernel header file for some constants. For _me_ everything is allright, I suggest to add a small note in the error message. I did not make any tests with other Linux distributions therefore I do not know. Perhaps somebody can try to compile on another Linux distrib without a kernel source tree (and without the kernel header files) Greetings Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 01:08:15PM +, John Levon wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: > > > - You need valid Linux kernel headers (!) which are included within > > the xforms test within configure. Having no proper includes in > > /usr/src/linux will result in a complaint about a non-working xforms > > lib. > > > > Just to clarify, this is essentially a SuSE bug, not a LyX problem. > They should not be including kernel headers directly. > I am not sure about that, but: I posted this problem to the LyX users list some weeks ago and the developers responded that they do not know how to produce a valid test for that. The only detail I know is the following: the configure generated file includes a xforms header which (indirectly (?)) includes some linux kernel header file for some constants. For _me_ everything is allright, I suggest to add a small note in the error message. I did not make any tests with other Linux distributions therefore I do not know. Perhaps somebody can try to compile on another Linux distrib without a kernel source tree (and without the kernel header files) Greetings Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:29:16PM +0100, Stefan Jung wrote: Can anyone, if available, tell me how he/she mastered the cliffs of installing a stabile and fast lyx1.1.6fix1-system on SuSE 7.1. I have already tried to compile something with the available tar-balls but ran into I used the .tar.gz, un-tar-ed it, used ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/lyx-1.1.6fix1 and then make and make install to build and install it. It runs very well. Some possible pitfalls: - you need the development version of the xforms lib package (extra rpm within SuSE) - You need valid Linux kernel headers (!) which are included within the xforms test within configure. Having no proper includes in /usr/src/linux will result in a complaint about a non-working xforms lib. HTH Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:29:16PM +0100, Stefan Jung wrote: Can anyone, if available, tell me how he/she mastered the cliffs of installing a stabile and fast lyx1.1.6fix1-system on SuSE 7.1. I have already tried to compile something with the available tar-balls but ran into I used the .tar.gz, un-tar-ed it, used ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/lyx-1.1.6fix1 and then make and make install to build and install it. It runs very well. Some possible pitfalls: - you need the development version of the xforms lib package (extra rpm within SuSE) - You need valid Linux kernel headers (!) which are included within the xforms test within configure. Having no proper includes in /usr/src/linux will result in a complaint about a non-working xforms lib. HTH Frank
Re: Lyx1.1.6fix1 on SuSE 7.1
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:29:16PM +0100, Stefan Jung wrote: >Can anyone, if available, tell me how he/she mastered the cliffs of >installing >a stabile and fast lyx1.1.6fix1-system on SuSE 7.1. I have already >tried to compile something with the available tar-balls but ran into I used the .tar.gz, un-tar-ed it, used ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/lyx-1.1.6fix1 and then make and make install to build and install it. It runs very well. Some possible pitfalls: - you need the development version of the xforms lib package (extra rpm within SuSE) - You need valid Linux kernel headers (!) which are included within the xforms test within configure. Having no proper includes in /usr/src/linux will result in a complaint about a non-working xforms lib. HTH Frank
Re: lyx-Anfänger-Frage
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:23:29PM +0100, Horst Jurkat wrote: First I am going to give a short translation Excuse for German posting. Horst installed LyX 1.1.6 and KLyx on SuSE 7.0, he can start the programs. Printing does not work (other programs can print) Error message is "Converting from latex to dvi Running sh: ./Datei: Keine Berechtigung No rights ... dvips: ! DVI file can`t be opened" Within the xterm Window he gets "apsfilter: unsupported filetype" Same problem with KLyx. Hi Horst, a simple but important question: how did you install the LyX 1.1.6? AFAIK SuSE ships lyx-1.1.4p3 and on the SuSE FTP Server there is no update to 1.1.6. (Yes I know there are rpms from third party but ...) From with directory do you start LyX? Did you try to save the .lyx file first? For me it looks like a problem with permissions within the filesystem to create the LaTeX DVI file and therefore there is "nothing" to print. You can try to export a .ps of your document and then print it from the shell. Now a short german Translation: Soweit ich weis, ist bei SuSE 7 "nur" die Version 1.1.4p3 von LyX dabei. Wie hast Du die 1.1.6 installiert? Von SuSE gibt es kein Upgrade-rpm. Vermutung: Keine Rechte im Dateisystem, die LaTeX DVI-Datei zu erzeugen, daher ist nichts zum Drucken vorhanden. Tip: Dokument vorher als .lyx speichern und dann noch einmal probieren. Alternativ auch als .ps exportieren und dann mit der Shell drucken (testweise) HTH Frank
Re: lyx-Anfänger-Frage
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:23:29PM +0100, Horst Jurkat wrote: First I am going to give a short translation Excuse for German posting. Horst installed LyX 1.1.6 and KLyx on SuSE 7.0, he can start the programs. Printing does not work (other programs can print) Error message is "Converting from latex to dvi Running sh: ./Datei: Keine Berechtigung No rights ... dvips: ! DVI file can`t be opened" Within the xterm Window he gets "apsfilter: unsupported filetype" Same problem with KLyx. Hi Horst, a simple but important question: how did you install the LyX 1.1.6? AFAIK SuSE ships lyx-1.1.4p3 and on the SuSE FTP Server there is no update to 1.1.6. (Yes I know there are rpms from third party but ...) From with directory do you start LyX? Did you try to save the .lyx file first? For me it looks like a problem with permissions within the filesystem to create the LaTeX DVI file and therefore there is "nothing" to print. You can try to export a .ps of your document and then print it from the shell. Now a short german Translation: Soweit ich weis, ist bei SuSE 7 "nur" die Version 1.1.4p3 von LyX dabei. Wie hast Du die 1.1.6 installiert? Von SuSE gibt es kein Upgrade-rpm. Vermutung: Keine Rechte im Dateisystem, die LaTeX DVI-Datei zu erzeugen, daher ist nichts zum Drucken vorhanden. Tip: Dokument vorher als .lyx speichern und dann noch einmal probieren. Alternativ auch als .ps exportieren und dann mit der Shell drucken (testweise) HTH Frank
Re: lyx-Anfänger-Frage
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:23:29PM +0100, Horst Jurkat wrote: First I am going to give a short translation > Excuse for German posting. > > Horst installed LyX 1.1.6 and KLyx on SuSE 7.0, he can start the programs. > Printing does not work (other programs can print) > Error message is > >"Converting from latex to dvi > > Running > > sh: ./Datei: Keine Berechtigung > No rights > > ... > > dvips: ! DVI file can`t be opened" > > Within the xterm Window he gets > >"apsfilter: unsupported filetype" > > Same problem with KLyx. Hi Horst, a simple but important question: how did you install the LyX 1.1.6? AFAIK SuSE ships lyx-1.1.4p3 and on the SuSE FTP Server there is no update to 1.1.6. (Yes I know there are rpms from third party but ...) >From with directory do you start LyX? Did you try to save the .lyx file first? For me it looks like a problem with permissions within the filesystem to create the LaTeX DVI file and therefore there is "nothing" to print. You can try to export a .ps of your document and then print it from the shell. Now a short german Translation: Soweit ich weis, ist bei SuSE 7 "nur" die Version 1.1.4p3 von LyX dabei. Wie hast Du die 1.1.6 installiert? Von SuSE gibt es kein Upgrade-rpm. Vermutung: Keine Rechte im Dateisystem, die LaTeX DVI-Datei zu erzeugen, daher ist nichts zum Drucken vorhanden. Tip: Dokument vorher als .lyx speichern und dann noch einmal probieren. Alternativ auch als .ps exportieren und dann mit der Shell drucken (testweise) HTH Frank
Re: Document Revision feature request
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:12:34PM +, Tulan Shah wrote: I was wondering if Lyx could do something along the lines of a track changes to a document by multiple authors (So that they can be checked and later accepted or rejected) . If there is a way of doing this please help me out and let me know. IMHO you should use a version-tool like RCS or CVS. CVS can show differences between two versions of a document, becoming familiar with the LyX format gives clues what has changed... IIRC within LyX there is a sub menu for version control issues. HTH Frank
Re: Document Revision feature request
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:12:34PM +, Tulan Shah wrote: I was wondering if Lyx could do something along the lines of a track changes to a document by multiple authors (So that they can be checked and later accepted or rejected) . If there is a way of doing this please help me out and let me know. IMHO you should use a version-tool like RCS or CVS. CVS can show differences between two versions of a document, becoming familiar with the LyX format gives clues what has changed... IIRC within LyX there is a sub menu for version control issues. HTH Frank
Re: Document Revision feature request
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:12:34PM +, Tulan Shah wrote: > I was wondering if Lyx could do something along the lines of a track > changes to a document by multiple authors (So that they can be checked > and later accepted or rejected) . If there is a way of doing this > please help me out and let me know. > IMHO you should use a version-tool like RCS or CVS. CVS can show differences between two versions of a document, becoming familiar with the LyX format gives clues what has changed... IIRC within LyX there is a sub menu for version control issues. HTH Frank
Re: View problem, bug maybe.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:07:10PM +0100, Joeri R. Verbiest wrote:
When I open a new file and to view dvi and pdf than it works.
But if I save the document newfile to newfile.lyx or another file name,
and if I to view pdf or dvi, than it doesn't work, gives error: missing
\begin{document}.
Stange. Is this a bug?
Hi Joeri,
that is all right. Lyx uses its own format in the .lyx files. You have
to use the Export as LaTeX feature in order to produce a file which
can be fed into LaTeX.
Alternative: having a .lyx file you just open it with lyx and use the
view PS function.
HTH
Frank
Re: View problem, bug maybe.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:07:10PM +0100, Joeri R. Verbiest wrote:
When I open a new file and to view dvi and pdf than it works.
But if I save the document newfile to newfile.lyx or another file name,
and if I to view pdf or dvi, than it doesn't work, gives error: missing
\begin{document}.
Stange. Is this a bug?
Hi Joeri,
that is all right. Lyx uses its own format in the .lyx files. You have
to use the Export as LaTeX feature in order to produce a file which
can be fed into LaTeX.
Alternative: having a .lyx file you just open it with lyx and use the
view PS function.
HTH
Frank
Re: View problem, bug maybe.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:07:10PM +0100, Joeri R. Verbiest wrote:
> When I open a new file and to view dvi and pdf than it works.
> But if I save the document newfile to newfile.lyx or another file name,
> and if I to view pdf or dvi, than it doesn't work, gives error: missing
> \begin{document}.
> Stange. Is this a bug?
>
Hi Joeri,
that is all right. Lyx uses its own format in the .lyx files. You have
to use the Export as LaTeX feature in order to produce a file which
can be fed into LaTeX.
Alternative: having a .lyx file you just open it with lyx and use the
view PS function.
HTH
Frank
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.5
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is my pleasure to announce the release of LyX 1.1.5. This release sports large internal changes, new features and increased stability, ^^^ Does that mean, that the 1.1.5 is considered a stable version? Or should I stay with 1.1.4fix3 in a "production environment"? Thanks in advance for a short comment. Frank
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.5
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It is my pleasure to announce the release of LyX 1.1.5. This release sports large internal changes, new features and increased stability, ^^^ Does that mean, that the 1.1.5 is considered a stable version? Or should I stay with 1.1.4fix3 in a "production environment"? Thanks in advance for a short comment. Frank
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX 1.1.5
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It is my pleasure to announce the release of LyX 1.1.5. This release > sports large internal changes, new features and increased stability, ^^^ Does that mean, that the 1.1.5 is considered a stable version? Or should I stay with 1.1.4fix3 in a "production environment"? Thanks in advance for a short comment. Frank
Re: Compilation of Lyx 1.1.4
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Dirk Feyerabend wrote: I'm running Lyx 1.0.1 on SUSE 6.2. Recently I wanted to upgrade to 1.1.4. But if I try to run "./configure" I get the following error. X-Libraries not found. If you work under Linux check wether you have the development-packages installed. Which development packages are meant by that and why does Lyx 1.0.1 run fine? ---end quoted text--- SuSE often splits libraries in to rpm files. One with the "core" library file (that is used by the linker for executing programs which use the lib) and another with the .h header files for compilation of programs. SuSE default is installation of the core, no development rpms. HTH Frank -- Frank Derichsweiler Please *NO* CC. I read the mailing list!
Re: Compilation of Lyx 1.1.4
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Dirk Feyerabend wrote: I'm running Lyx 1.0.1 on SUSE 6.2. Recently I wanted to upgrade to 1.1.4. But if I try to run "./configure" I get the following error. X-Libraries not found. If you work under Linux check wether you have the development-packages installed. Which development packages are meant by that and why does Lyx 1.0.1 run fine? ---end quoted text--- SuSE often splits libraries in to rpm files. One with the "core" library file (that is used by the linker for executing programs which use the lib) and another with the .h header files for compilation of programs. SuSE default is installation of the core, no development rpms. HTH Frank -- Frank Derichsweiler Please *NO* CC. I read the mailing list!
Re: Compilation of Lyx 1.1.4
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Dirk Feyerabend wrote: > I'm running Lyx 1.0.1 on SUSE 6.2. Recently I wanted to upgrade to > 1.1.4. But if I try to run "./configure" I get the following > error. X-Libraries not found. If you work under Linux check wether > you have the development-packages installed. > Which development packages are meant by that and why does Lyx 1.0.1 run fine? ---end quoted text--- SuSE often splits libraries in to rpm files. One with the "core" library file (that is used by the linker for executing programs which use the lib) and another with the .h header files for compilation of programs. SuSE default is installation of the core, no development rpms. HTH Frank -- Frank Derichsweiler Please *NO* CC. I read the mailing list!
Test
Test -- Frank Derichsweiler University of the German Federal Armed Forces Department of Computer Science - Institute for Softwaretechnology
Test
Test -- Frank Derichsweiler University of the German Federal Armed Forces Department of Computer Science - Institute for Softwaretechnology
Test
Test -- Frank Derichsweiler University of the German Federal Armed Forces Department of Computer Science - Institute for Softwaretechnology
