Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 16:47 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. Thanks for the explanation. IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'. (i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble. How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can do something like: \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} For refstyle: \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings), or wherever you wish: Style Subsection RefPrefix sec End The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the system one. I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work (still '??'). For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually writing 'section'. Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put Format 35 as the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change what's already there. Added this, but no change. What I recognized is that formatted references (I use refstyle) are fine within a one file document, i.e. added 'section'. But when I have child documents included they appear as '??' Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 19:47 schrieb Julien Rioux: On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. Thanks for the explanation. IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'. (i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble. How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can do something like: \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} For refstyle: \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings), or wherever you wish: Style Subsection RefPrefix sec End The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the system one. I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work (still '??'). For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually writing 'section'. Sebastian Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats? There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this, and the refstyle package used for formatted references. Indeed I am using subfloats. Thanks for pointing that out. Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 16:47 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. Thanks for the explanation. IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'. (i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble. How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can do something like: \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} For refstyle: \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings), or wherever you wish: Style Subsection RefPrefix sec End The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the system one. I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work (still '??'). For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually writing 'section'. Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put Format 35 as the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change what's already there. Added this, but no change. What I recognized is that formatted references (I use refstyle) are fine within a one file document, i.e. added 'section'. But when I have child documents included they appear as '??' Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 19:47 schrieb Julien Rioux: On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. Thanks for the explanation. IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'. (i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble. How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can do something like: \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} For refstyle: \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings), or wherever you wish: Style Subsection RefPrefix sec End The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the system one. I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work (still '??'). For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually writing 'section'. Sebastian Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats? There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this, and the refstyle package used for formatted references. Indeed I am using subfloats. Thanks for pointing that out. Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 16:47 schrieb Richard Heck: > On 07/14/2011 07:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: >> Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: >> >>> On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. >>>> >>>> I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is >>>> quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. >>>> >>>> Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references >>>> appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case >>>> for references within a 'subsection'. >>>> >>>> This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document >>>> easily. >>>> >>>> Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? >>>> Any comments? >>>> >>> The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for >>> such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle >>> defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. >>> Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. >> Thanks for the explanation. >> IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of >> 'sub'. >> >>> (i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble. >>> How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or >>> prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can >>> do something like: >>> \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} >>> For refstyle: >>> \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} >>> Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. >>> >>> (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, >>> and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings), >>> or wherever you wish: >>> Style Subsection >>> RefPrefix sec >>> End >>> The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy >>> the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, >>> ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the >>> system one. >> I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work >> (still '??'). >> For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually >> writing 'section'. >> > Putting the above into local layout (make sure you put "Format 35" as > the first line, though) should change the default. It won't change > what's already there. Added this, but no change. What I recognized is that formatted references (I use refstyle) are fine within a one file document, i.e. added 'section'. But when I have child documents included they appear as '??' Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 14.07.2011 um 19:47 schrieb Julien Rioux: > On 14/07/2011 7:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: >> >> Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: >> >>> On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. >>>> >>>> I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is >>>> quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. >>>> >>>> Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references >>>> appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case >>>> for references within a 'subsection'. >>>> >>>> This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document >>>> easily. >>>> >>>> Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? >>>> Any comments? >>>> >>> The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for >>> such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle >>> defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. >>> Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. >> >> Thanks for the explanation. >> IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of >> 'sub'. >> >>> (i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble. >>> How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or >>> prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can >>> do something like: >>>\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} >>> For refstyle: >>>\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} >>> Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. >>> >>> (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, >>> and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings), >>> or wherever you wish: >>>Style Subsection >>>RefPrefix sec >>>End >>> The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy >>> the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, >>> ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the >>> system one. >> >> I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work >> (still '??'). >> For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually >> writing 'section'. >> >> Sebastian > > Are you by any chance also using subfloats? i.e. floats within floats? > There is a incompatibility between the package used by LyX to do this, and > the refstyle package used for formatted references. Indeed I am using subfloats. Thanks for pointing that out. Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. Thanks for the explanation. IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'. (i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble. How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can do something like: \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} For refstyle: \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings), or wherever you wish: Style Subsection RefPrefix sec End The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the system one. I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work (still '??'). For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually writing 'section'. Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix sub for such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. Thanks for the explanation. IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'. (i) Put a format declaration for sub references into your preamble. How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or prettyref. (This is set under DocumentSettings.) For prettyref, you can do something like: \newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} For refstyle: \newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, and can be done in a module, in local layout (under DocumentSettings), or wherever you wish: Style Subsection RefPrefix sec End The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the system one. I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work (still '??'). For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually writing 'section'. Sebastian
Re: formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Am 09.07.2011 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Heck: > On 07/09/2011 10:08 AM, Sebastian Rockel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. >> >> I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is >> quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. >> >> Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references >> appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for >> references within a 'subsection'. >> >> This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document >> easily. >> >> Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? >> Any comments? >> > The reason for this is that LyX by default uses the prefix "sub" for > such references, as you create them, but neither prettyref nor refstyle > defines a format for this. I'm not sure if that counts as a bug or not. > Anyway, you can deal with it two ways. Thanks for the explanation. IMO another solution would be that LyX by default uses 'sec' instead of 'sub'. > (i) Put a format declaration for "sub" references into your preamble. > How you do this depends upon whether you are using refstyle or > prettyref. (This is set under Document>Settings.) For prettyref, you can > do something like: >\newrefformat{sub}{Subsection \ref{#1}} > For refstyle: >\newref{sub}{refcmd={Subsection \ref{#1}}} > Of course, you can adapt these as you wish. > > (ii) Modify what LyX uses for subsections. This is a matter of layout, > and can be done in a module, in local layout (under Document>Settings), > or wherever you wish: >Style Subsection >RefPrefix sec >End > The defaults are in the file stdrefprefix.inc. If you like, you can copy > the system file to your local layout directory (by default, on Linux, > ~/.lyx/layouts/), modify it, and then LyX will use it instead of the > system one. I tried local layout and stdrefprefix.inc (under Mac OS) but it didn't work (still '??'). For the time being I don't use LyX 'formatted reference' and keep manually writing 'section'. Sebastian
formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? Sebastian
formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? Sebastian
formatted cross-reference to subsection broken
Hi, I am using Lyx-2.0 with KOMA-book class (pdflatex) on Mac OSX 10.6.8. I am often using the cross-reference option 'Formatted reference' as it is quite convenient to have automatic addition of 'figure', 'section' etc. Nevertheless I noticed (by accident) that in the Lyx window references appear to be fine but show up in the final pdf as '??'. This is the case for references within a 'subsection'. This is a little bit annoying as it can be overseen in a larger document easily. Is this a bug? Has anyone else this problem? Any comments? Sebastian
Re: PDF will not reload
Hi, Am 19.05.2011 um 10:46 schrieb Trevor Jenkins: On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Hafney hafne...@gmail.com wrote: I'm at the end of my rope with adobe acrobat. I'm using adobe acrobat reader 10. I can successfully generate a pdf but I cannot update the pdf after I make changes to my .lyx document. How do I fix this? (I'm using windows). I'd like to know the same thing. Except I'm encountering this issue under Mac OS X. After changing the document I use the View PDF (pdflatex) option. If I have a version of the PDF open in Adobe Reader already then I do NOT see the newer version. My workaround is to close the Adobe Reader window (or close Reader entirely) before viewing the updated PDF version. I personally use the lightweight pdf viewer Skim [0] which auto-reloads pdfs, supports LyX' output syncing (from pdf to LyX) and more. Alternatively MacOSX default viewer 'Preview' does also reload pdfs when updated by LyX (you have to give it the focus though). I am, as far as I can tell, running the latest version of Reader (10.0.3) and definitely the latest version of OS X Snow Leopard Server, which I'm using from a user level account. And my copy of LyX is 2.0.0 (29 April 2011 build). I have MacTex installed (latest available from CTAN). Regards, Trevor. Sebastian [0] http://skim-app.sourceforge.net
Re: PDF will not reload
Hi, Am 19.05.2011 um 10:46 schrieb Trevor Jenkins: On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Hafney hafne...@gmail.com wrote: I'm at the end of my rope with adobe acrobat. I'm using adobe acrobat reader 10. I can successfully generate a pdf but I cannot update the pdf after I make changes to my .lyx document. How do I fix this? (I'm using windows). I'd like to know the same thing. Except I'm encountering this issue under Mac OS X. After changing the document I use the View PDF (pdflatex) option. If I have a version of the PDF open in Adobe Reader already then I do NOT see the newer version. My workaround is to close the Adobe Reader window (or close Reader entirely) before viewing the updated PDF version. I personally use the lightweight pdf viewer Skim [0] which auto-reloads pdfs, supports LyX' output syncing (from pdf to LyX) and more. Alternatively MacOSX default viewer 'Preview' does also reload pdfs when updated by LyX (you have to give it the focus though). I am, as far as I can tell, running the latest version of Reader (10.0.3) and definitely the latest version of OS X Snow Leopard Server, which I'm using from a user level account. And my copy of LyX is 2.0.0 (29 April 2011 build). I have MacTex installed (latest available from CTAN). Regards, Trevor. Sebastian [0] http://skim-app.sourceforge.net
Re: PDF will not reload
Hi, Am 19.05.2011 um 10:46 schrieb Trevor Jenkins: >> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Hafneywrote: >> I'm at the end of my rope with adobe acrobat. I'm using adobe acrobat reader >> 10. I can successfully generate a pdf but I cannot update the pdf after I >> make changes to my .lyx document. How do I fix this? (I'm using windows). > > I'd like to know the same thing. Except I'm encountering this issue under Mac > OS X. After changing the document I use the View PDF (pdflatex) option. If I > have a version of the PDF open in Adobe Reader already then I do NOT see the > newer version. > > My workaround is to close the Adobe Reader window (or close Reader entirely) > before viewing the updated PDF version. I personally use the lightweight pdf viewer Skim [0] which auto-reloads pdfs, supports LyX' output syncing (from pdf to LyX) and more. Alternatively MacOSX default viewer 'Preview' does also reload pdfs when updated by LyX (you have to give it the focus though). > I am, as far as I can tell, running the latest version of Reader (10.0.3) and > definitely the latest version of OS X Snow Leopard Server, which I'm using > from a user level account. And my copy of LyX is 2.0.0 (29 April 2011 build). > I have MacTex installed (latest available from CTAN). > > Regards, Trevor. Sebastian [0] http://skim-app.sourceforge.net
Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes
Hello, I can confirm that on my OSX 10.6.7 machine LyX2 is reproducible crashing when using BetterTouchTool to resize the main window. (I think that wasn't the case with any release candidate as far as I remember, LyX 1.6 was okay as well) Kind regards, Sebastian Am 17.05.2011 um 18:27 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 17.05.2011 um 18:05 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: I am lost on this. I have installed the last version of Lyx and it crashes quite systematically. I have never seen this with Lyx. It is nearly unusable. I have also version 1.6 on my laptop but the preferences folders are of course separated. I have downloaded and reinstalled Lyx (two hours ago), but I continue to get the same problem. I can launch Lyx, but at one point it crashes as soon as I click somewhere on the window. I have renamed the old Lyx2 config folder and started Lyx, but it has immediately crashed (but It has created the new configuration folder in the Library). I have also tried to launch Lyx from a terminal window. I have ended with a Segmentation fault I get the following crash report under OSX: ... It looks like you're using divvy or SizeUp or a similar tool. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7365 Please, can you stop it and try again? Stephan PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes
Hello, I can confirm that on my OSX 10.6.7 machine LyX2 is reproducible crashing when using BetterTouchTool to resize the main window. (I think that wasn't the case with any release candidate as far as I remember, LyX 1.6 was okay as well) Kind regards, Sebastian Am 17.05.2011 um 18:27 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 17.05.2011 um 18:05 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: I am lost on this. I have installed the last version of Lyx and it crashes quite systematically. I have never seen this with Lyx. It is nearly unusable. I have also version 1.6 on my laptop but the preferences folders are of course separated. I have downloaded and reinstalled Lyx (two hours ago), but I continue to get the same problem. I can launch Lyx, but at one point it crashes as soon as I click somewhere on the window. I have renamed the old Lyx2 config folder and started Lyx, but it has immediately crashed (but It has created the new configuration folder in the Library). I have also tried to launch Lyx from a terminal window. I have ended with a Segmentation fault I get the following crash report under OSX: ... It looks like you're using divvy or SizeUp or a similar tool. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7365 Please, can you stop it and try again? Stephan PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Re: Lyx 2.0.0 OSX crashes
Hello, I can confirm that on my OSX 10.6.7 machine LyX2 is reproducible crashing when using BetterTouchTool to resize the main window. (I think that wasn't the case with any release candidate as far as I remember, LyX 1.6 was okay as well) Kind regards, Sebastian Am 17.05.2011 um 18:27 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 17.05.2011 um 18:05 schrieb Murat Yildizoglu: > >> I am lost on this. I have installed the last version of Lyx and it crashes >> quite systematically. I have never seen this with Lyx. It is nearly unusable. >> I have also version 1.6 on my laptop but the preferences folders are of >> course separated. I have downloaded and reinstalled Lyx (two hours ago), but >> I continue to get the same problem. I can launch Lyx, but at one point it >> crashes as soon as I click somewhere on the window. >> >> I have renamed the old Lyx2 config folder and started Lyx, but it has >> immediately crashed (but It has created the new configuration folder in the >> Library). >> I have also tried to launch Lyx from a terminal window. I have ended with a >> "Segmentation fault" >> >> I get the following crash report under OSX: > > ... > > It looks like you're using divvy or SizeUp or a similar tool. > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7365 > > Please, can you stop it and try again? > > Stephan PGP.sig Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Re: Bibliography.lyx auf deutsch nutzen
In general for a german language document you should change \language english and \quotes_language english to german (in Lyx [german] try: Dokument - Einstellungen.. - Sprache - ...). Sebastian Am 28.08.2010 um 10:06 schrieb Stephan Schuster: Hallo, eine Frage zu Lyx ist aufgetaucht. Ich verwende nun Papers um meine PDFs zu verwalten, habe die Papers Library nach BibDesk exportiert und nutze nun BibDesk um zu zitieren. Allerdings erscheint mein Literaturverzeichnis nun auf englisch. Sieht dann so aus: http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/2638/csisd.jpg Was muss ich ändern? Code: #LyX 1.6.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 345 \begin_document \begin_header \textclass scrreprt \begin_preamble \usepackage{preamble} \end_preamble \options twoside,openright,titlepage,fleqn,pointlessnumbers ,headinclude,10pt,a4paper,BCOR5mm,footinclude,clea rdoubleempty \use_default_options false \language english \inputencoding auto \font_roman default \font_sans default \font_typewriter default \font_default_family default \font_sc false \font_osf false \font_sf_scale 100 \font_tt_scale 100 \graphics default \paperfontsize 10 \spacing single \use_hyperref false \papersize a4paper \use_geometry false \use_amsmath 1 \use_esint 0 \cite_engine natbib_numerical \use_bibtopic false \paperorientation portrait \secnumdepth 3 \tocdepth 3 \paragraph_separation indent \defskip medskip \quotes_language english \papercolumns 1 \papersides 2 \paperpagestyle default \tracking_changes false \output_changes false \author \end_header \begin_body \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout % work-around to have small caps also here in the headline \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash manualmark \end_layout \end_inset \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash markboth{ \backslash spacedlowsmallcaps{ \backslash bibname}}{ \backslash spacedlowsmallcaps{ \backslash bibname}} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout % work-around to have small caps also \end_layout \end_inset \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash refstepcounter{dummy} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash addtocontents{toc}{ \backslash protect \backslash vspace{ \backslash beforebibskip}} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout % to have the bib a bit from the rest in the toc \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{ \backslash tocEntry{ \backslash bibname}} \end_layout \end_inset \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash bibliographystyle{plainnat} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset CommandInset label LatexCommand label name app:bibliography \end_inset \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex LatexCommand bibtex bibfiles Bibliography options plainnat \end_inset \end_layout \end_body \end_document CODE
Re: Bibliography.lyx auf deutsch nutzen
In general for a german language document you should change \language english and \quotes_language english to german (in Lyx [german] try: Dokument - Einstellungen.. - Sprache - ...). Sebastian Am 28.08.2010 um 10:06 schrieb Stephan Schuster: Hallo, eine Frage zu Lyx ist aufgetaucht. Ich verwende nun Papers um meine PDFs zu verwalten, habe die Papers Library nach BibDesk exportiert und nutze nun BibDesk um zu zitieren. Allerdings erscheint mein Literaturverzeichnis nun auf englisch. Sieht dann so aus: http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/2638/csisd.jpg Was muss ich ändern? Code: #LyX 1.6.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 345 \begin_document \begin_header \textclass scrreprt \begin_preamble \usepackage{preamble} \end_preamble \options twoside,openright,titlepage,fleqn,pointlessnumbers ,headinclude,10pt,a4paper,BCOR5mm,footinclude,clea rdoubleempty \use_default_options false \language english \inputencoding auto \font_roman default \font_sans default \font_typewriter default \font_default_family default \font_sc false \font_osf false \font_sf_scale 100 \font_tt_scale 100 \graphics default \paperfontsize 10 \spacing single \use_hyperref false \papersize a4paper \use_geometry false \use_amsmath 1 \use_esint 0 \cite_engine natbib_numerical \use_bibtopic false \paperorientation portrait \secnumdepth 3 \tocdepth 3 \paragraph_separation indent \defskip medskip \quotes_language english \papercolumns 1 \papersides 2 \paperpagestyle default \tracking_changes false \output_changes false \author \end_header \begin_body \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout % work-around to have small caps also here in the headline \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash manualmark \end_layout \end_inset \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash markboth{ \backslash spacedlowsmallcaps{ \backslash bibname}}{ \backslash spacedlowsmallcaps{ \backslash bibname}} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout % work-around to have small caps also \end_layout \end_inset \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash refstepcounter{dummy} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash addtocontents{toc}{ \backslash protect \backslash vspace{ \backslash beforebibskip}} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout % to have the bib a bit from the rest in the toc \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{ \backslash tocEntry{ \backslash bibname}} \end_layout \end_inset \begin_inset ERT status open \begin_layout Plain Layout \backslash bibliographystyle{plainnat} \end_layout \end_inset \end_layout \begin_layout Standard \begin_inset CommandInset label LatexCommand label name app:bibliography \end_inset \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex LatexCommand bibtex bibfiles Bibliography options plainnat \end_inset \end_layout \end_body \end_document CODE
Re: Bibliography.lyx auf deutsch nutzen
In general for a german language document you should change > \language english and > \quotes_language english to "german" (in Lyx [german] try: Dokument -> Einstellungen.. -> Sprache -> ...). Sebastian Am 28.08.2010 um 10:06 schrieb Stephan Schuster: > Hallo, > > eine Frage zu Lyx ist aufgetaucht. > > Ich verwende nun Papers um meine PDFs zu verwalten, habe die Papers Library > nach BibDesk exportiert und nutze nun BibDesk um zu zitieren. > Allerdings erscheint mein Literaturverzeichnis nun auf englisch. Sieht dann > so aus: > > http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/2638/csisd.jpg > > Was muss ich ändern? > > > Code: > > #LyX 1.6.2 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ > \lyxformat 345 > \begin_document > \begin_header > \textclass scrreprt > \begin_preamble > \usepackage{preamble} > \end_preamble > \options twoside,openright,titlepage,fleqn,pointlessnumbers > ,headinclude,10pt,a4paper,BCOR5mm,footinclude,clea rdoubleempty > \use_default_options false > \language english > \inputencoding auto > \font_roman default > \font_sans default > \font_typewriter default > \font_default_family default > \font_sc false > \font_osf false > \font_sf_scale 100 > \font_tt_scale 100 > > \graphics default > \paperfontsize 10 > \spacing single > \use_hyperref false > \papersize a4paper > \use_geometry false > \use_amsmath 1 > \use_esint 0 > \cite_engine natbib_numerical > \use_bibtopic false > \paperorientation portrait > \secnumdepth 3 > \tocdepth 3 > \paragraph_separation indent > \defskip medskip > \quotes_language english > \papercolumns 1 > \papersides 2 > \paperpagestyle default > \tracking_changes false > \output_changes false > \author "" > \end_header > > \begin_body > > \begin_layout Standard > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > % work-around to have small caps also here in the headline > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \end_layout > > \begin_layout Standard > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > > \backslash > manualmark > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > > \backslash > markboth{ > \backslash > spacedlowsmallcaps{ > \backslash > bibname}}{ > \backslash > spacedlowsmallcaps{ > \backslash > bibname}} > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \end_layout > > \begin_layout Standard > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > % work-around to have small caps also > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > > \backslash > refstepcounter{dummy} > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \end_layout > > \begin_layout Standard > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > > \backslash > addtocontents{toc}{ > \backslash > protect > \backslash > vspace{ > \backslash > beforebibskip}} > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \end_layout > > \begin_layout Standard > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > % to have the bib a bit from the rest in the toc > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \end_layout > > \begin_layout Standard > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > > \backslash > addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{ > \backslash > tocEntry{ > \backslash > bibname}} > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \begin_inset ERT > status open > > \begin_layout Plain Layout > > > \backslash > bibliographystyle{plainnat} > \end_layout > > \end_inset > > > \end_layout > > \begin_layout Standard > \begin_inset CommandInset label > LatexCommand label > name "app:bibliography" > > \end_inset > > > \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex > LatexCommand bibtex > bibfiles "Bibliography" > options "plainnat" > > \end_inset > > > \end_layout > > \end_body > \end_document > > CODE
Re: Spell checker problem
Hello, I can confirm this issue also on my site (same configuration). First I 'added' Gärdenfors in the spell checker dialog then suddenly it complains about correct words like 'with'. Secondly the added word does not appear in any of my personal aspell dictionaries (~/.aspell.*) I tried also to play with 'use input encoding' in lyx spell checker preferences, no effect either. Sebastian Am 02.07.2010 um 01:55 schrieb Mehrdad Oveisi: Hello I am using LyX 1.6.6.1 on a Mac. I am setting the document encoding to Unicode (utf8), and I use aspell as the spell checker. On my system if an article contains non-English letters, e.g. Gärdenfors, spell checker gets confused. That is, after reaching Gärdenfors, if I hit Add so that it does not pick it as an error, then after that point it picks some correct words and reports them as misspelled, and it misses actually misspelled words. Please find attached a sample lyx file which contains a few spelling errors and the word Gärdenfors. The spell checker behavior after the word Gärdenfors is not as expected. Thanks in advance for your help! SpellCheckerTest.lyx
Re: Spell checker problem
Hello, I can confirm this issue also on my site (same configuration). First I 'added' Gärdenfors in the spell checker dialog then suddenly it complains about correct words like 'with'. Secondly the added word does not appear in any of my personal aspell dictionaries (~/.aspell.*) I tried also to play with 'use input encoding' in lyx spell checker preferences, no effect either. Sebastian Am 02.07.2010 um 01:55 schrieb Mehrdad Oveisi: Hello I am using LyX 1.6.6.1 on a Mac. I am setting the document encoding to Unicode (utf8), and I use aspell as the spell checker. On my system if an article contains non-English letters, e.g. Gärdenfors, spell checker gets confused. That is, after reaching Gärdenfors, if I hit Add so that it does not pick it as an error, then after that point it picks some correct words and reports them as misspelled, and it misses actually misspelled words. Please find attached a sample lyx file which contains a few spelling errors and the word Gärdenfors. The spell checker behavior after the word Gärdenfors is not as expected. Thanks in advance for your help! SpellCheckerTest.lyx
Re: Spell checker problem
Hello, I can confirm this issue also on my site (same configuration). First I 'added' Gärdenfors in the spell checker dialog then suddenly it complains about correct words like 'with'. Secondly the added word does not appear in any of my personal aspell dictionaries (~/.aspell.*) I tried also to play with 'use input encoding' in lyx spell checker preferences, no effect either. Sebastian Am 02.07.2010 um 01:55 schrieb Mehrdad Oveisi: > Hello > > I am using LyX 1.6.6.1 on a Mac. I am setting the document encoding to > Unicode (utf8), and I use aspell as the spell checker. > > On my system if an article contains non-English letters, e.g. Gärdenfors, > spell checker gets confused. That is, after reaching "Gärdenfors", if I hit > "Add" so that it does not pick it as an error, then after that point it picks > some correct words and reports them as misspelled, and it misses actually > misspelled words. > > Please find attached a sample lyx file which contains a few spelling errors > and the word Gärdenfors. The spell checker behavior after the word Gärdenfors > is not as expected. > > Thanks in advance for your help! > >
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 19:31 schrieb Micha Feigin: On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:35:42 +0200 Sebastian Rockel sebastianroc...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Sebastian Rockel wrote: Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ normal spellcheck works? Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works fine. Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. Sebastian Sounds to me like you didn't have the aspell development libraries (or other spell developement libraries) when configuring. I also had that problem under linux (debian). I installed libaspell-dev and now spelling is working. Not sure what the right package is under OsX or how to install it though. Thanks for the hint, did use the pre-build .dmg version though (see below). pavel Am 01.04.2010 um 00:37 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 31.03.2010 um 15:35 schrieb Sebastian Rockel: Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Sebastian Rockel wrote: Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ normal spellcheck works? Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works fine. Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. I guess you're using the LyX-2.0.0alpha1.dmg I build on Snow Leopard. You're right, no aspell support :( I didn't read carefully enough this part of configure output: checking aspell.h usability... yes checking aspell.h presence... yes checking for aspell.h... yes checking for new_aspell_config in -laspell... no checking whether to use aspell... no So I looked for the reason and found that configure detected the headers of aspell but did not find the library. Thanks for this clarification and for the build anyway. Sebastian When trying to improve the situation I learned that my universal aspell library from macports is like that: % file /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64 /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib (for architecture i386): Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386 So in fact I cannot build a ppc version of LyX with aspell now. I'll see what I can do... Stephan
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 19:31 schrieb Micha Feigin: On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:35:42 +0200 Sebastian Rockel sebastianroc...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Sebastian Rockel wrote: Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ normal spellcheck works? Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works fine. Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. Sebastian Sounds to me like you didn't have the aspell development libraries (or other spell developement libraries) when configuring. I also had that problem under linux (debian). I installed libaspell-dev and now spelling is working. Not sure what the right package is under OsX or how to install it though. Thanks for the hint, did use the pre-build .dmg version though (see below). pavel Am 01.04.2010 um 00:37 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 31.03.2010 um 15:35 schrieb Sebastian Rockel: Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Sebastian Rockel wrote: Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ normal spellcheck works? Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works fine. Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. I guess you're using the LyX-2.0.0alpha1.dmg I build on Snow Leopard. You're right, no aspell support :( I didn't read carefully enough this part of configure output: checking aspell.h usability... yes checking aspell.h presence... yes checking for aspell.h... yes checking for new_aspell_config in -laspell... no checking whether to use aspell... no So I looked for the reason and found that configure detected the headers of aspell but did not find the library. Thanks for this clarification and for the build anyway. Sebastian When trying to improve the situation I learned that my universal aspell library from macports is like that: % file /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64 /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib (for architecture i386): Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386 So in fact I cannot build a ppc version of LyX with aspell now. I'll see what I can do... Stephan
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 19:31 schrieb Micha Feigin: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:35:42 +0200 > Sebastian Rockel <sebastianroc...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> Sebastian Rockel wrote: >>>> Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref >>>> pane is grayed out:-/ >>> >>> normal spellcheck works? >> >> Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). >> I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works >> fine. >> Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. >> >> Sebastian > > Sounds to me like you didn't have the aspell development libraries (or other > spell developement libraries) when configuring. I also had that problem under > linux (debian). I installed libaspell-dev and now spelling is working. Not > sure > what the right package is under OsX or how to install it though. Thanks for the hint, did use the pre-build .dmg version though (see below). > >> >>> pavel Am 01.04.2010 um 00:37 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 31.03.2010 um 15:35 schrieb Sebastian Rockel: > >> Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> Sebastian Rockel wrote: >>>> Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref >>>> pane is grayed out:-/ >>> >>> normal spellcheck works? >> >> Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). >> I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works >> fine. >> Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. > > I guess you're using the LyX-2.0.0alpha1.dmg I build on Snow Leopard. > > You're right, no aspell support :( > I didn't read carefully enough this part of configure output: > > checking aspell.h usability... yes > checking aspell.h presence... yes > checking for aspell.h... yes > checking for new_aspell_config in -laspell... no > checking whether to use aspell... no > > So I looked for the reason and found that configure detected the headers of > aspell but did not find the library. Thanks for this clarification and for the build anyway. Sebastian > When trying to improve the situation I learned that my "universal" aspell > library from macports is like that: > > % file /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib > /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures > /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit > dynamically linked shared library x86_64 > /opt/local/lib/libaspell.dylib (for architecture i386): Mach-O > dynamically linked shared library i386 > > So in fact I cannot build a ppc version of LyX with aspell now. I'll see what > I can do... > > Stephan >
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 12:10 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Jose Quesada wrote: I could not get the inline spelling working. Is this disabled on this release, or did I miss some ./configure flags? it is supposed to work. normal spellcheck works? preferences checkbox for continuous spellcheck is enabled? Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ Sebastian pavel
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Sebastian Rockel wrote: Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ normal spellcheck works? Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works fine. Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. Sebastian pavel
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 12:10 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Jose Quesada wrote: I could not get the inline spelling working. Is this disabled on this release, or did I miss some ./configure flags? it is supposed to work. normal spellcheck works? preferences checkbox for continuous spellcheck is enabled? Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ Sebastian pavel
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Sebastian Rockel wrote: Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ normal spellcheck works? Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works fine. Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. Sebastian pavel
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 12:10 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Jose Quesada wrote: >> I could not get the inline spelling working. Is this disabled on this >> release, or did I miss some ./configure flags? > > it is supposed to work. normal spellcheck works? preferences checkbox > for continuous spellcheck is enabled? Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref pane is grayed out:-/ Sebastian > > pavel
Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (alpha 1)
Am 31.03.2010 um 14:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Sebastian Rockel wrote: >> Here in the mac version I cannot enable it due to everything on that pref >> pane is grayed out:-/ > > normal spellcheck works? Also the menu item is grayed out (F7 doesn't do it either). I just double checked Lyx 1.6.5 with aspell 0.60.6 (MacPorts) and it works fine. Running on Mac OSX 10.6.3. Sebastian > pavel
Re: Mac OSX Lyx: No XDVI?
Hi, Am 26.03.2010 um 05:00 schrieb john: Hi everyone After years of using Linux, I was persuaded by my daughter to try her hand-down Mac. I installed all my usual goodies - C development system and, of course, LyX. The LyX works fine, after I had got used to the Mac idiom of separate windows for LyX and each opened document. But .. When I click on the View DVI button, LyX behaves as though I had hit the View PDF document. Is this expected behaviour? Or do I have to find and install the OSX version of Xdvi? You can find help in the Lyx User Guide under 3.8.2. Something like print preview I guess (I have the german version though). There you can set up the dvi previewer (usually xdvi). xdvi comes for example with the MacTeX distribution (TeX Live), maybe with the MacTeXtras.zip (then usually under /usr/texbin/xdvi). Sebastian John O'Gorman
Re: Mac OSX Lyx: No XDVI?
Hi, Am 26.03.2010 um 05:00 schrieb john: Hi everyone After years of using Linux, I was persuaded by my daughter to try her hand-down Mac. I installed all my usual goodies - C development system and, of course, LyX. The LyX works fine, after I had got used to the Mac idiom of separate windows for LyX and each opened document. But .. When I click on the View DVI button, LyX behaves as though I had hit the View PDF document. Is this expected behaviour? Or do I have to find and install the OSX version of Xdvi? You can find help in the Lyx User Guide under 3.8.2. Something like print preview I guess (I have the german version though). There you can set up the dvi previewer (usually xdvi). xdvi comes for example with the MacTeX distribution (TeX Live), maybe with the MacTeXtras.zip (then usually under /usr/texbin/xdvi). Sebastian John O'Gorman
Re: Mac OSX Lyx: No XDVI?
Hi, Am 26.03.2010 um 05:00 schrieb john: > Hi everyone > > After years of using Linux, I was persuaded by my daughter to try her > hand-down Mac. > I installed all my usual goodies - C development system and, of course, LyX. > > The LyX works fine, after I had got used to the Mac idiom of separate > windows for LyX and each opened document. > But .. > When I click on the View DVI button, LyX behaves as though I had hit the > View PDF document. > Is this expected behaviour? > Or do I have to find and install the OSX version of Xdvi? You can find help in the Lyx User Guide under 3.8.2. Something like "print preview" I guess (I have the german version though). There you can set up the dvi previewer (usually xdvi). xdvi comes for example with the MacTeX distribution (TeX Live), maybe with the MacTeXtras.zip (then usually under /usr/texbin/xdvi). Sebastian > > John O'Gorman >
Re: invisible dialog box text - OSX 10.6.2 Lyx 1.6.5
Am 06.01.2010 um 02:31 schrieb Mark Dransfield: Mark Dransfield mark@... writes: OK, I have made the problem go away by renaming Lyx.app as Lyx_165.app! Found Thx Mark, I had done this too without noticing that as reason for the problem disappearing;-) Sebastian by accident but I checked by renaming back to Lyx.app (dialog and menu text went invisible) and then to Lyx_165.app again (text re-appeared) and all now appears to work fine provided I keep this new name. I hope this will help in uncovering and fixing the cause. Mark
Re: invisible dialog box text - OSX 10.6.2 Lyx 1.6.5
Am 06.01.2010 um 02:31 schrieb Mark Dransfield: Mark Dransfield mark@... writes: OK, I have made the problem go away by renaming Lyx.app as Lyx_165.app! Found Thx Mark, I had done this too without noticing that as reason for the problem disappearing;-) Sebastian by accident but I checked by renaming back to Lyx.app (dialog and menu text went invisible) and then to Lyx_165.app again (text re-appeared) and all now appears to work fine provided I keep this new name. I hope this will help in uncovering and fixing the cause. Mark
Re: invisible dialog box text - OSX 10.6.2 Lyx 1.6.5
Am 06.01.2010 um 02:31 schrieb Mark Dransfield: Mark Dransfield writes: OK, I have made the problem go away by renaming Lyx.app as Lyx_165.app! Found Thx Mark, I had done this too without noticing that as reason for the problem disappearing;-) Sebastian by accident but I checked by renaming back to Lyx.app (dialog and menu text went invisible) and then to Lyx_165.app again (text re-appeared) and all now appears to work fine provided I keep this new name. I hope this will help in uncovering and fixing the cause. Mark
Re: invisible dialog box text - OSX 10.6.2 Lyx 1.6.5
Hello, Am 23.12.2009 um 06:48 schrieb Mark Dransfield: Hi, I am a new Lyx user but like it very much. I just upgraded to 1.6.5 but now the text in the paragraph environment pull-down box disappears when I pull it down and all the dialog boxes have no visible text except the OK button. Since no-one else has reported this, I suspect an instal problem may be the cause. Any hints very welcome. I had this once with the same configuration. Since I figured out that Lyx version 1.6.5 is not recommended for OSX 10.6 (right at the download page), I installed Lyx 1.6.4.2 which is working so far. Nevertheless the problems with 1.6.5 have disappeared now as well (I have both installed on 10.6.2). Sebastian thanks Mark
Re: invisible dialog box text - OSX 10.6.2 Lyx 1.6.5
Hello, Am 23.12.2009 um 06:48 schrieb Mark Dransfield: Hi, I am a new Lyx user but like it very much. I just upgraded to 1.6.5 but now the text in the paragraph environment pull-down box disappears when I pull it down and all the dialog boxes have no visible text except the OK button. Since no-one else has reported this, I suspect an instal problem may be the cause. Any hints very welcome. I had this once with the same configuration. Since I figured out that Lyx version 1.6.5 is not recommended for OSX 10.6 (right at the download page), I installed Lyx 1.6.4.2 which is working so far. Nevertheless the problems with 1.6.5 have disappeared now as well (I have both installed on 10.6.2). Sebastian thanks Mark
Re: invisible dialog box text - OSX 10.6.2 Lyx 1.6.5
Hello, Am 23.12.2009 um 06:48 schrieb Mark Dransfield: Hi, I am a new Lyx user but like it very much. I just upgraded to 1.6.5 but now the text in the paragraph environment pull-down box disappears when I pull it down and all the dialog boxes have no visible text except the OK button. Since no-one else has reported this, I suspect an instal problem may be the cause. Any hints very welcome. I had this once with the same configuration. Since I figured out that Lyx version 1.6.5 is not recommended for OSX 10.6 (right at the download page), I installed Lyx 1.6.4.2 which is working so far. Nevertheless the problems with 1.6.5 have disappeared now as well (I have both installed on 10.6.2). Sebastian thanks Mark
Re: Snow Leopard, Auto-save, Etc: Binary for Testing
Hello, Used that binary for quite some time now (on SL 10.6.1) with moderate file size (30 pages). I set the autosave to 1 min and noticed no slowdown, in fact it worked flawlessly. Great work! Sebastian Am 04.11.2009 um 17:15 schrieb rgheck: OK, a binary for testing is now available here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/LyX-1.6.5svn-Snow-Leopard-Test.app.zip Please test if this fixes your problems on Snow Leopard and report back. Also please report whether the autosave slowdown is bearable, or any strange behaviour that might occur.
Re: Snow Leopard, Auto-save, Etc: Binary for Testing
Hello, Used that binary for quite some time now (on SL 10.6.1) with moderate file size (30 pages). I set the autosave to 1 min and noticed no slowdown, in fact it worked flawlessly. Great work! Sebastian Am 04.11.2009 um 17:15 schrieb rgheck: OK, a binary for testing is now available here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/LyX-1.6.5svn-Snow-Leopard-Test.app.zip Please test if this fixes your problems on Snow Leopard and report back. Also please report whether the autosave slowdown is bearable, or any strange behaviour that might occur.
Re: Snow Leopard, Auto-save, Etc: Binary for Testing
Hello, Used that binary for quite some time now (on SL 10.6.1) with moderate file size (<30 pages). I set the autosave to 1 min and noticed no slowdown, in fact it worked flawlessly. Great work! Sebastian Am 04.11.2009 um 17:15 schrieb rgheck: OK, a binary for testing is now available here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/LyX-1.6.5svn-Snow-Leopard-Test.app.zip Please test if this fixes your problems on Snow Leopard and report back. Also please report whether the autosave slowdown is bearable, or any strange behaviour that might occur.