Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Nina Lafayette]

You will find the 64 bit version at: at http://www.getdeb.net/release/3592.

 It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 
 bit Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?
 
 
 
 Ehud Kaplan
 
 
 
 Nick Bell wrote:
  Just a note to the newbies (like me):
 
  This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
  texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.
 
  Nick
 
  Christopher Menzel wrote:
  On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
  Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
 
  Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
  ===
 
  Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
 
  Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put 
  it on
  the Web?
 
  Quick Google search turns up:
 
  http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591
 
  That's for Intrepid, btw.
 
  -chris
 

-- 
Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL 
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:44:33AM -0500, E. Kaplan wrote:
 I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository,  
 and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the  
 32 bit and 64 bit architectures.

And this is how related to missing tex styles in Debian and Ubuntu? Sorry
missing your point somehow here.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Nina Lafayette]

You will find the 64 bit version at: at http://www.getdeb.net/release/3592.

 It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 
 bit Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?
 
 
 
 Ehud Kaplan
 
 
 
 Nick Bell wrote:
  Just a note to the newbies (like me):
 
  This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
  texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.
 
  Nick
 
  Christopher Menzel wrote:
  On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
  Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
 
  Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
  ===
 
  Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
 
  Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put 
  it on
  the Web?
 
  Quick Google search turns up:
 
  http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591
 
  That's for Intrepid, btw.
 
  -chris
 

-- 
Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL 
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:44:33AM -0500, E. Kaplan wrote:
 I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository,  
 and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the  
 32 bit and 64 bit architectures.

And this is how related to missing tex styles in Debian and Ubuntu? Sorry
missing your point somehow here.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Nina Lafayette]

You will find the 64 bit version at: at http://www.getdeb.net/release/3592.

> It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 
> bit Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?
> 
> 
> 
> Ehud Kaplan
> 
> 
> 
> Nick Bell wrote:
> > Just a note to the newbies (like me):
> >
> > This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
> > texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > Christopher Menzel wrote:
> >> On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:
> >>> Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> >>>
>  Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
>  ===
> >>>
> >>> Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
> >>>
> >>> Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put 
> >>> it on
> >>> the Web?
> >>
> >> Quick Google search turns up:
> >>
> >> http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591
> >>
> >> That's for Intrepid, btw.
> >>
> >> -chris
> >>

-- 
Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL 
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:44:33AM -0500, E. Kaplan wrote:
> I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository,  
> and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the  
> 32 bit and 64 bit architectures.

And this is how related to missing tex styles in Debian and Ubuntu? Sorry
missing your point somehow here.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
  Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
 
 Well - it is not only 94 bit -
 It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
 would prefer not to compile from source).
 
 Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
 releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
 be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
 easier for normal users to use the newest versions of LyX.

AFAIK Ubuntu provides a backport repository for some of the older
releases. That would be the place where you should ask about adding
the recent LyX releases.

Beside that there shouldn't be any technical problems with recompiling
the source package on older Ubuntu releases.

Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
against some kind of backporting policy.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Rainer M Krug]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
  Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?

 Well - it is not only 94 bit -
 It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
 would prefer not to compile from source).

 Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
 releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
 be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
 easier for normal users to use the newest versions of LyX.

 AFAIK Ubuntu provides a backport repository for some of the older
 releases. That would be the place where you should ask about adding
 the recent LyX releases.

That is true - but only packages which are in the newer versions of
Ubuntu will be backported - i.e. if intrepid has only Lyx 1.5, 1.6
will not be available. Backports provide some new versions, but only
those included in newer versions of Ubuntu.


 Beside that there shouldn't be any technical problems with recompiling
 the source package on older Ubuntu releases.

Technically true - but it is always a hassle to compile from source (I
have done it - but it takes at least some expertise).
I just realised that the binary for hardy is available again from
box.net. Thanks


 Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
 that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
 of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
 against some kind of backporting policy.

What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
other packages are doing?



 Sven
 --
 If God passed a mic to me to speak
 I'd say stay in bed, world
 Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]




-- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Faculty of Science
Natural Sciences Building
Private Bag X1
University of Stellenbosch
Matieland 7602
South Africa

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:

Hi,

  Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
  that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
  of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
  against some kind of backporting policy.
 
 What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
 other packages are doing?

Bad idea. That's a TeX issue und should be managed with the TeX people.
I'll care for that when this whole xmas party thing is over.
Ideally those missing styles should be distributed with texlive but some
files have license issue or are just too new for the current stable texlive
distribution etc. pp.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository, 
and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the 
32 bit and 64 bit architectures.




Ehud Kaplan



Sven Hoexter wrote:

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
  

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:



Hi,

  

Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
against some kind of backporting policy.
  

What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
other packages are doing?



Bad idea. That's a TeX issue und should be managed with the TeX people.
I'll care for that when this whole xmas party thing is over.
Ideally those missing styles should be distributed with texlive but some
files have license issue or are just too new for the current stable texlive
distribution etc. pp.

Sven
  

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
  Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
 
 Well - it is not only 94 bit -
 It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
 would prefer not to compile from source).
 
 Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
 releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
 be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
 easier for normal users to use the newest versions of LyX.

AFAIK Ubuntu provides a backport repository for some of the older
releases. That would be the place where you should ask about adding
the recent LyX releases.

Beside that there shouldn't be any technical problems with recompiling
the source package on older Ubuntu releases.

Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
against some kind of backporting policy.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Rainer M Krug]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
  Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?

 Well - it is not only 94 bit -
 It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
 would prefer not to compile from source).

 Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
 releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
 be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
 easier for normal users to use the newest versions of LyX.

 AFAIK Ubuntu provides a backport repository for some of the older
 releases. That would be the place where you should ask about adding
 the recent LyX releases.

That is true - but only packages which are in the newer versions of
Ubuntu will be backported - i.e. if intrepid has only Lyx 1.5, 1.6
will not be available. Backports provide some new versions, but only
those included in newer versions of Ubuntu.


 Beside that there shouldn't be any technical problems with recompiling
 the source package on older Ubuntu releases.

Technically true - but it is always a hassle to compile from source (I
have done it - but it takes at least some expertise).
I just realised that the binary for hardy is available again from
box.net. Thanks


 Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
 that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
 of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
 against some kind of backporting policy.

What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
other packages are doing?



 Sven
 --
 If God passed a mic to me to speak
 I'd say stay in bed, world
 Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]




-- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Faculty of Science
Natural Sciences Building
Private Bag X1
University of Stellenbosch
Matieland 7602
South Africa

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:

Hi,

  Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
  that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
  of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
  against some kind of backporting policy.
 
 What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
 other packages are doing?

Bad idea. That's a TeX issue und should be managed with the TeX people.
I'll care for that when this whole xmas party thing is over.
Ideally those missing styles should be distributed with texlive but some
files have license issue or are just too new for the current stable texlive
distribution etc. pp.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository, 
and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the 
32 bit and 64 bit architectures.




Ehud Kaplan



Sven Hoexter wrote:

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
  

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:



Hi,

  

Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
against some kind of backporting policy.
  

What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
other packages are doing?



Bad idea. That's a TeX issue und should be managed with the TeX people.
I'll care for that when this whole xmas party thing is over.
Ideally those missing styles should be distributed with texlive but some
files have license issue or are just too new for the current stable texlive
distribution etc. pp.

Sven
  

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan  wrote:
> > Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
> 
> Well - it is not only 94 bit -
> It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
> would prefer not to compile from source).
> 
> Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
> releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
> be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
> easier for "normal" users to use the newest versions of LyX.

AFAIK Ubuntu provides a backport repository for some of the older
releases. That would be the place where you should ask about adding
the recent LyX releases.

Beside that there shouldn't be any technical problems with recompiling
the source package on older Ubuntu releases.

Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
against some kind of backporting policy.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Rainer M Krug]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter  wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan  wrote:
>> > Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?
>>
>> Well - it is not only 94 bit -
>> It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
>> would prefer not to compile from source).
>>
>> Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
>> releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
>> be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
>> easier for "normal" users to use the newest versions of LyX.
>
> AFAIK Ubuntu provides a backport repository for some of the older
> releases. That would be the place where you should ask about adding
> the recent LyX releases.

That is true - but only packages which are in the newer versions of
Ubuntu will be backported - i.e. if intrepid has only Lyx 1.5, 1.6
will not be available. Backports provide some new versions, but only
those included in newer versions of Ubuntu.

>
> Beside that there shouldn't be any technical problems with recompiling
> the source package on older Ubuntu releases.

Technically true - but it is always a hassle to compile from source (I
have done it - but it takes at least some expertise).
I just realised that the binary for hardy is available again from
box.net. Thanks

>
> Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
> that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
> of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
> against some kind of backporting policy.

What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
other packages are doing?


>
> Sven
> --
> If God passed a mic to me to speak
> I'd say stay in bed, world
> Sleep in peace
>   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
>



-- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Faculty of Science
Natural Sciences Building
Private Bag X1
University of Stellenbosch
Matieland 7602
South Africa

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Sven Hoexter]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter  wrote:

Hi,

> > Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
> > that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
> > of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
> > against some kind of backporting policy.
> 
> What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
> other packages are doing?

Bad idea. That's a TeX issue und should be managed with the TeX people.
I'll care for that when this whole xmas party thing is over.
Ideally those missing styles should be distributed with texlive but some
files have license issue or are just too new for the current stable texlive
distribution etc. pp.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

I am running Kubuntu 8.10 64 bits, which had Lyx 1.5X in its repository, 
and I was unable to upgrade to 1.6 because of the difference between the 
32 bit and 64 bit architectures.




Ehud Kaplan



Sven Hoexter wrote:

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Rainer M Krug wrote:
  

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Sven Hoexter  wrote:



Hi,

  

Maybe one should note that the latest math manual requires a TeX styles
that is not part of Debian and so I would guess it's also not part
of Ubuntu. That's not a major showstopper for most people but might be
against some kind of backporting policy.
  

What about adding that one in a second package lyx-data, as several
other packages are doing?



Bad idea. That's a TeX issue und should be managed with the TeX people.
I'll care for that when this whole xmas party thing is over.
Ideally those missing styles should be distributed with texlive but some
files have license issue or are just too new for the current stable texlive
distribution etc. pp.

Sven
  

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 
bit Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?




Ehud Kaplan



Nick Bell wrote:

Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.


Nick

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put 
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:

 It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 bit
 Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?

Nope, that's a “unique feature” of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?




Jan Engelhardt wrote:

On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:

  

It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 bit
Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?



Nope, that's a âEURoeunique featureâEUR? of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)
  

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Rainer M Krug]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
 Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?

Well - it is not only 94 bit -
It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
would prefer not to compile from source).

Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
easier for normal users to use the newest versions of LyX.

Rainer


 


 Jan Engelhardt wrote:

 On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:



 It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64
 bit
 Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?


 Nope, that's a âEURoeunique featureâEUR? of Debian and its derivates
 that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)





-- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Faculty of Science
Natural Sciences Building
Private Bag X1
University of Stellenbosch
Matieland 7602
South Africa

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 
bit Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?




Ehud Kaplan



Nick Bell wrote:

Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.


Nick

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put 
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:

 It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 bit
 Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?

Nope, that's a “unique feature” of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?




Jan Engelhardt wrote:

On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:

  

It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 bit
Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?



Nope, that's a âEURoeunique featureâEUR? of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)
  

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Rainer M Krug]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan ehud.kap...@mssm.edu wrote:
 Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?

Well - it is not only 94 bit -
It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
would prefer not to compile from source).

Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
easier for normal users to use the newest versions of LyX.

Rainer


 


 Jan Engelhardt wrote:

 On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:



 It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64
 bit
 Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?


 Nope, that's a âEURoeunique featureâEUR? of Debian and its derivates
 that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)





-- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Faculty of Science
Natural Sciences Building
Private Bag X1
University of Stellenbosch
Matieland 7602
South Africa

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 
bit Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?




Ehud Kaplan



Nick Bell wrote:

Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.


Nick

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put 
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:

> It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 bit
> Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?

Nope, that's a “unique feature” of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[E. Kaplan]

Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?




Jan Engelhardt wrote:

On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:

  

It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64 bit
Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?



Nope, that's a âEURoeunique featureâEUR? of Debian and its derivates
that use dpkg.

dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)
  

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Rainer M Krug]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, E. Kaplan  wrote:
> Then how do I upgrade 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 on kubuntu 64?

Well - it is not only 94 bit -
It is also Hardy (8.04) for which only 1.6.0 rc3 is available (And I
would prefer not to compile from source).

Is there a chance to build the binaries for all the most recent Ubuntu
releases and possibly even create a repository for those which could
be added in apt? That would really be brilliant and make it much
easier for "normal" users to use the newest versions of LyX.

Rainer

>
> 
>
>
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday 2008-12-17 15:43, E. Kaplan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> It seems that they have only the 386 version.  Since I am running a 64
>>> bit
>>> Kubuntu (8.10), can I still use it?
>>>
>>
>> Nope, that's a âEURoeunique featureâEUR? of Debian and its derivates
>> that use dpkg.
>>
>>dpkg: error processing foo-0_i386.deb (--install):
>>package architecture (i386) does not match system (amd64)
>>
>



-- 
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Faculty of Science
Natural Sciences Building
Private Bag X1
University of Stellenbosch
Matieland 7602
South Africa

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Nick Bell]

Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.


Nick

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Christopher Menzel]

On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote:

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put  
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.


Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install...


a.k.a. Intrepid Ibex. ;-)

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Nick Bell]

Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.


Nick

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Christopher Menzel]

On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote:

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put  
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.


Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install...


a.k.a. Intrepid Ibex. ;-)

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Nick Bell]

Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install, having installed 
texlive-full first using synaptic package manager.


Nick

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Christopher Menzel]

On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Nick Bell wrote:

Christopher Menzel wrote:

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put  
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.


Just a note to the newbies (like me):

This works with a fresh Ubuntu 8.10 install...


a.k.a. Intrepid Ibex. ;-)

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Fritz Bein]

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
 
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
 
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
 
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
 
Kind regards, Fritz
-- 
Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL 
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Christopher Menzel]

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put  
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Fritz Bein]

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
 
Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===
 
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
 
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
 
Kind regards, Fritz
-- 
Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL 
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Christopher Menzel]

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put  
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Fritz Bein]

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
 
>Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
>===
 
Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!
 
Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put it on
the Web?
 
Kind regards, Fritz
-- 
Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL 
für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a

Re: LyX 1.6.1 binaries for Ubuntu

[Christopher Menzel]

On Dec 15, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Fritz Bein wrote:

Am 15.12.2008, 08:06 Uhr, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller


Public release of LyX version 1.6.1
===


Thank to all developpers for the new version of Lyx!

Does anybody have the 1.6.1 Version as Ubuntu binaries and can put  
it on

the Web?


Quick Google search turns up:

http://www.getdeb.net/release.php?id=3591

That's for Intrepid, btw.

-chris