Re: [M100] test

[Daniel L]

Thanks man and Merry Christmas.

I'm finishing a project of refreshing a tape deck i bought at goodwill a 
few weeks back. Once she's on her feet and playing tapes again, I"m 
going to get started on my 100 to see why it doesn't function, and why 
my 200 suddenly stopped functioning one day while creating a blog post. 
so frustrating.


And maybe i'll pull out a trs-80 tape drive and finish fixing it up. My 
projects have been stacking up. I'm so bad.


Daniel

On 12/23/22 13:27, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:


And of course welcome back to the list Daniel. Sometimes it happens... 
you address an email broadly, two possibilities... it seems like 
everyone responds or no one responds. Sometimes we're just trying not 
to respond all at once :-)


-- John.

Re: [M100] test

[John R. Hogerhuis]

And of course welcome back to the list Daniel. Sometimes it happens... you
address an email broadly, two possibilities... it seems like everyone
responds or no one responds. Sometimes we're just trying not to respond all
at once :-)

-- John.

Re: [M100] test

[Daniel L]

Cool forgot about that feature. In the past, I was self hosting my email 
server at home and was constantly being added to spamlists by the big 
mail networks out there because they don't like people self-hosting anymore.


I had to resign self hosting and get a host to manage my mail services. 
Sometimes my email could still land in spam traps.


On 12/23/22 07:54, RETRO Innovations wrote:

On 12/23/2022 4:17 AM, Daniel L wrote:


hehe thanks. I posted a greeting the other day and no one replied so 
I began to wonder.


On 12/23/22 02:10, James Zeun wrote:
I can confirm with 100% confidence that I did not receive your 
message asking if I had received your message. I hope this answers 
the question I didn't see you ask 


On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, 9:26 am Daniel L,  wrote:

Is my message making it to the list?


Daniel

Given all of the current reasons email could potentially not be 
delivered, as a general rule, when I send a msg to any list that does 
not appear to make it, I surf over to the list archives and check:


http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/

Looks like your msg came through on Dec 11:

http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/2022-December/056135.html


--
RETRO Innovations, Contemporary Gear for Classic Systems
www.go4retro.com
store.go4retro.com

Re: [M100] test

[RETRO Innovations]

On 12/23/2022 4:17 AM, Daniel L wrote:


hehe thanks. I posted a greeting the other day and no one replied so I 
began to wonder.


On 12/23/22 02:10, James Zeun wrote:
I can confirm with 100% confidence that I did not receive your 
message asking if I had received your message. I hope this answers 
the question I didn't see you ask 


On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, 9:26 am Daniel L,  wrote:

Is my message making it to the list?


Daniel

Given all of the current reasons email could potentially not be 
delivered, as a general rule, when I send a msg to any list that does 
not appear to make it, I surf over to the list archives and check:


http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/

Looks like your msg came through on Dec 11:

http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/2022-December/056135.html


--
RETRO Innovations, Contemporary Gear for Classic Systems
www.go4retro.com
store.go4retro.com

Re: [M100] test

[Greg Swallow]

Yep

Sent from my iPad

> On Dec 23, 2022, at 2:26 AM, Daniel L  wrote:
> 
> Is my message making it to the list?
> 
> 
> Daniel
> 

Re: [M100] test

[Daniel L]

hehe thanks. I posted a greeting the other day and no one replied so I 
began to wonder.


On 12/23/22 02:10, James Zeun wrote:
I can confirm with 100% confidence that I did not receive your message 
asking if I had received your message. I hope this answers the 
question I didn't see you ask 


On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, 9:26 am Daniel L,  wrote:

Is my message making it to the list?


Daniel

Re: [M100] test

[James Zeun]

I can confirm with 100% confidence that I did not receive your message
asking if I had received your message. I hope this answers the question I
didn't see you ask 

On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, 9:26 am Daniel L,  wrote:

> Is my message making it to the list?
>
>
> Daniel
>
>

Re: [M100] test?

[Bert Put]

Thanks John, much appreciated.

Regards,Bert

On 10/12/22 11:57, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:

Received, Bert.

We have been having an issue with bellsouth email addresses bouncing and 
getting unsub'd. They don't even get the direct subscription 
confirmation email.


-- John.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, 9:47 AM Bert Put > wrote:



Looks like my old email is no longer reachable to the list, so
testing a
new email address...

Regards,    Bert

Re: [M100] test?

[John R. Hogerhuis]

Received, Bert.

We have been having an issue with bellsouth email addresses bouncing and
getting unsub'd. They don't even get the direct subscription confirmation
email.

-- John.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, 9:47 AM Bert Put  wrote:

>
> Looks like my old email is no longer reachable to the list, so testing a
> new email address...
>
> Regards,Bert
>

Re: [M100] test

[Daryl Tester]

On 30/1/22 10:11, Joshua O'Keefe wrote:

On Jan 29, 2022, at 1:29 PM, Peter Vollan  wrote:

well, mComm has stopped working on me.
Sorry but I don't see my posts, just your answers to them


Peter, it looks like your messages are getting through to the list just fine as 
they are being archived here:
http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/2022-January/054880.html 


I don't normally get my own messages back from the list, but if that's 
something might be able to change in your listserv settings.


That's a commonly reported issue with gmail.  nachomountain.com looks like it's 
also hosted on Google mail infrastructure.

I believe the "listserv" (actually, mailman) by default sends you copies of 
your posts, so unless you've change that option,
it's probably the above problem.

Cheers,
  --dt

Re: [M100] test

[Joshua O'Keefe]

On Jan 29, 2022, at 1:29 PM, Peter Vollan  wrote:
> well, mComm has stopped working on me.
> Sorry but I don't see my posts, just your answers to them

Peter, it looks like your messages are getting through to the list just fine as 
they are being archived here:
  
http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/2022-January/054880.html

I don't normally get my own messages back from the list, but if that's 
something might be able to change in your listserv settings.

Don't have any useful advice for mComm, as I've only played with the Python 
version a little and don't have any Android devices with which to use the other 
version.

Re: [M100] test

[Peter Vollan]

well, mComm has stopped working on me.

Sorry but I don't see my posts, just your answers to them

On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 12:59, Lloyd Johnson  wrote:

> Responding
>
>
>
> *From:* M100  *On Behalf Of *Peter
> Vollan
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 29, 2022 2:09 PM
> *To:* Model 100 Discussion 
> *Subject:* [M100] test
>
>
>
> Someone please respond to this so that I can see that I am getting through
> to the list.
>
>
>

Re: [M100] test

[Lloyd Johnson]

Responding

 

From: M100  On Behalf Of Peter Vollan
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2022 2:09 PM
To: Model 100 Discussion 
Subject: [M100] test

 

Someone please respond to this so that I can see that I am getting through to 
the list.

 

Re: [M100] test

[birt_j]

It is not going to the list. Nope, I did not see it…

 

From: M100  On Behalf Of Peter Vollan
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2022 2:09 PM
To: Model 100 Discussion 
Subject: [M100] test

 

Someone please respond to this so that I can see that I am getting through to 
the list.

 

Re: [M100] test

[Tom Wilson]



On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 12:09 PM Peter Vollan  wrote:

> Someone please respond to this so that I can see that I am getting through
> to the list.
>
> --
Tom Wilson
wilso...@gmail.com
(619)940-6311

Re: [M100] TEST

[Stephen Adolph]

Chris all your stuff always ends up in my spam folder for some reason. I
watch for them.

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:13 AM Josh Malone  wrote:

> Yes - although it only avoided my spam filters due to overrides I have
> in place. Yahoo vs. mailman vs. gmail == unhappy
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 9:41 AM Chris Fezzler  wrote:
> >
> > TEST.  Is this on?
>

Re: [M100] TEST

[Josh Malone]

Yes - although it only avoided my spam filters due to overrides I have
in place. Yahoo vs. mailman vs. gmail == unhappy

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 9:41 AM Chris Fezzler  wrote:
>
> TEST.  Is this on?

Re: [M100] test because its quiet

[Brad Grier]

Neat!! Appreciate the detail and random test-reply! I'm sure I can put this
to use.

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:38 AM Brian K. White  wrote:

> On 4/9/21 11:22 PM, Bert Put wrote:
> > test?
> >
>
> Many, many years ago on a distant shore
> Men did gather secretly beyond a hidden door
>
> What's more appropriate for soldering than heavy metal and songs about
> hell? It's literally lead, and it's literally hot enough to melt, and
> there's even noxious fumes. Soldering is metal af. :)
>
> Got a technique pretty much down for making dip legs on pcbs out of
> plain gold plated brass jewelry wire.
>
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/mQnsaH5LVoQW2RdJ6
>
>
> Stick a dip-28 machined round socket in a breadboard.
>
> Cover the top with a piece of painters tape. I'm using green Frog tape,
> but anything like masking tape or blue painters tape will work the same.
>
> Set the pcb on top of that.
>
> Poke the brass wire down through the top of the pcb in one corner via,
> punch through the tape, into the socket, and bottom it out in the socket.
>
> Snip the wire flush with the top of the pcb.
>
> Repeat for the opposite corner.
>
> Add flux and solder those two legs. You only need to touch the heat to
> the top, The flux will tak ethe solder down into the via and the tape
> will keep the solder from going down into the socket. 2 or 3 seconds is
> generally plenty.
>
> Then repeat just the poke & cut steps for all other legs.
>
> Then solder all legs.
>
>
> The wire you want is 26 gauge gold-filled brass, half-hard.
>
> "gold filled" is like gold plated but way more gold than we actually
> need, but no one seems to sell merely gold plated wire, just bare brass
> or gold-filled.
>
> 26 gauge is thin enough to fit into machined round sockets and not even
> theoretically harm any sockets by stretching them out like ordinary
> square pins do, yet strong enough to inserted into connectors without
> bending. Prices vary pretty widely for the same product, so you should
> shop around...
>
> These are some that I actually purchased and tried and they work well:
>
> This is probably the most economical I've found so far:
>
> https://www.wirejewelry.com/round-red-brass-wire/26_Gauge_Round_Half_Hard_Red_Brass_Wire-14549-901.html
>
> https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07HCMYWGN?psc=1
>
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/Red-Brass-Wire-Round-Half-Round-Square-14-16-18-20-21-22-24-26-28-Gauge/123161530578?var=423571461737
>
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/26ga-Gold-plated-copper-round-wire-4mm-015-create-wire-wrapped-jewelry-pw023/203158831071
>
>
> This one (below) does NOT work well, but only because it's thinner than
> 26 gauge despite saying 26 gauge. Perhaps 24 gauge from the same
> supplier would be perfect. Even this does work, just the legs are a bit
> thin and weak. They still do manage to insert into even fairly stiff
> sockets without folding, so really, you could use this just fine. And
> the thin/weakness of the wire does have a benefit that when you bend the
> legs accidentally from handling the finished object, you can just bend
> them back and they don't break off.
> https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07S9JFK2V
>
> This one works but is a bit softer than ideal. It does say copper not
> brass, so it makes sense. However, "dat price tho"... Stiffer brass is
> better, but this does actually work. It's just a little more delicate
> about punching through the painters tape. The legs insert into sockets
> just fine.
>
> https://www.ebay.com/itm/26ga-Gold-plated-copper-round-wire-4mm-015-create-wire-wrapped-jewelry-pw023/203158831071
>
>
> And you want to avoid any that say "tarnish resistant" or "gold color",
> because they will actually be aluminum wire with an enamel coating.
>
> Example of what at avoid:
> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077ZP7H4C
>
> Exmple of what to get (I didn't actually buy this one, it's just an
> example that meets the criteria):
> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06ZZ83F5N
>
>
> The advantage? The point of all this? Actual micro-pins from MillMax or
> Keystone are around $0.10 per pin in small quantities and don't go down
> very much in larger quantities. Punched sheet leadframe pins from
> TE-Connectivity are also about $0.10 per pin, and those are only tin
> plated not gold.
>
> This method uses under 6.0mm of wire per pin (I measured 5.88mm average
> over several pins). You can get 15,000mm of gold plated wire for $3 plus
> $3.50 shipping from the ebay one above (49feet $2.95) That's 2,500 legs
> for $0.0026 per leg, or $0.07 for an entire 28-pin pcb.
>
> And the time/care/effort needed to do the job is actually about the same
> for all 3 options.
>
> Hey gold & brass... more heavy metal.
>
> (The first two lines in this email are the first two lines in the most
> ridiculously over the top caricature of a metal tune I ever heard. So is
> the album art. Metal Church by Metal Church.)
>
> This concludes this test of the m100 list broadcast system.
>
> --
> bkw
>


-- 
-- 
Brad Grier

Re: [M100] test because its quiet

[Brian K. White]

On 4/9/21 11:22 PM, Bert Put wrote:

test?



Many, many years ago on a distant shore
Men did gather secretly beyond a hidden door

What's more appropriate for soldering than heavy metal and songs about 
hell? It's literally lead, and it's literally hot enough to melt, and 
there's even noxious fumes. Soldering is metal af. :)


Got a technique pretty much down for making dip legs on pcbs out of 
plain gold plated brass jewelry wire.



https://photos.app.goo.gl/mQnsaH5LVoQW2RdJ6


Stick a dip-28 machined round socket in a breadboard.

Cover the top with a piece of painters tape. I'm using green Frog tape, 
but anything like masking tape or blue painters tape will work the same.


Set the pcb on top of that.

Poke the brass wire down through the top of the pcb in one corner via, 
punch through the tape, into the socket, and bottom it out in the socket.


Snip the wire flush with the top of the pcb.

Repeat for the opposite corner.

Add flux and solder those two legs. You only need to touch the heat to 
the top, The flux will tak ethe solder down into the via and the tape 
will keep the solder from going down into the socket. 2 or 3 seconds is 
generally plenty.


Then repeat just the poke & cut steps for all other legs.

Then solder all legs.


The wire you want is 26 gauge gold-filled brass, half-hard.

"gold filled" is like gold plated but way more gold than we actually 
need, but no one seems to sell merely gold plated wire, just bare brass 
or gold-filled.


26 gauge is thin enough to fit into machined round sockets and not even 
theoretically harm any sockets by stretching them out like ordinary 
square pins do, yet strong enough to inserted into connectors without 
bending. Prices vary pretty widely for the same product, so you should 
shop around...


These are some that I actually purchased and tried and they work well:

This is probably the most economical I've found so far:
https://www.wirejewelry.com/round-red-brass-wire/26_Gauge_Round_Half_Hard_Red_Brass_Wire-14549-901.html

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07HCMYWGN?psc=1

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Red-Brass-Wire-Round-Half-Round-Square-14-16-18-20-21-22-24-26-28-Gauge/123161530578?var=423571461737

https://www.ebay.com/itm/26ga-Gold-plated-copper-round-wire-4mm-015-create-wire-wrapped-jewelry-pw023/203158831071


This one (below) does NOT work well, but only because it's thinner than 
26 gauge despite saying 26 gauge. Perhaps 24 gauge from the same 
supplier would be perfect. Even this does work, just the legs are a bit 
thin and weak. They still do manage to insert into even fairly stiff 
sockets without folding, so really, you could use this just fine. And 
the thin/weakness of the wire does have a benefit that when you bend the 
legs accidentally from handling the finished object, you can just bend 
them back and they don't break off.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07S9JFK2V

This one works but is a bit softer than ideal. It does say copper not 
brass, so it makes sense. However, "dat price tho"... Stiffer brass is 
better, but this does actually work. It's just a little more delicate 
about punching through the painters tape. The legs insert into sockets 
just fine.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/26ga-Gold-plated-copper-round-wire-4mm-015-create-wire-wrapped-jewelry-pw023/203158831071


And you want to avoid any that say "tarnish resistant" or "gold color", 
because they will actually be aluminum wire with an enamel coating.


Example of what at avoid:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077ZP7H4C

Exmple of what to get (I didn't actually buy this one, it's just an 
example that meets the criteria):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06ZZ83F5N


The advantage? The point of all this? Actual micro-pins from MillMax or 
Keystone are around $0.10 per pin in small quantities and don't go down 
very much in larger quantities. Punched sheet leadframe pins from 
TE-Connectivity are also about $0.10 per pin, and those are only tin 
plated not gold.


This method uses under 6.0mm of wire per pin (I measured 5.88mm average 
over several pins). You can get 15,000mm of gold plated wire for $3 plus 
$3.50 shipping from the ebay one above (49feet $2.95) That's 2,500 legs 
for $0.0026 per leg, or $0.07 for an entire 28-pin pcb.


And the time/care/effort needed to do the job is actually about the same 
for all 3 options.


Hey gold & brass... more heavy metal.

(The first two lines in this email are the first two lines in the most 
ridiculously over the top caricature of a metal tune I ever heard. So is 
the album art. Metal Church by Metal Church.)


This concludes this test of the m100 list broadcast system.

--
bkw

Re: [M100] test because its quiet

[Bert Put]

Thank you... I was beginning to worry that my email address had gone bad
or something :-)


On 4/9/21 10:37 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> We're here :-)

Re: [M100] test because its quiet

[Ken Pettit]

▄ ▄ ▄   ▄▄█▄█▄▄ ▄
▄▄██▀█▀▀▄▀█▀▀███▀█ ▀▄▀▄▀█▀█▄▄
  ██▀█ █ █ █▄▀ █ █  ██ █ █ ▄▀▄▀▀▀█▄
   ▀██▀▄▀▄ █ ▄▀▀▄█ █▀   ▀█▄▀▄█▄▀▄ ▀█ █▀██
  ██ ▀▄▀ █ █ █▄▀█▄█ ██ █▄█▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ █ ██
▄█▀▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄█▄█▄█  █ ███▄▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ ▀██
   █▄██ █ █ █   ▀██▄█▄▀▄▄▀▄▀▄▀▀█▄▄
  ▀█▀▄▀█▀▀▀█▀█▀▀█▀▀██▄███▀██▀█
 ▀██ ▀█ ▀▄▀▄▀█▀██ ▀█▀▄▀▄ ▄▄▄ ██
  ▀██▄▀▄▀ █ █ █ █ █▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▄ █▄█▄
▀▄█ █▄ ▀▄▀▄▀█ █▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ █ ▄█▄█
▀ █▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ ▀█ █▄▀▄ █ █ █▄▄██
   ▀▀██▄▀▄▀▄▀█   ▀█▄▀▄ █ ▀█▄▀█
  ▀▀▀█▄█▄▀▀█▄█▄██▀█
 ▀ ▀█  █▀▀ ▀
   ▀█  █▀
   ▀█  █▀
   ▀█ ▀█▀
   ▀█  ██  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄
   ▀█ ▄ ▄ █ ▄▀▄▀▄█ █ █ █ █ ▄
   ▄▄█▄██ ▄ █ ▄▀▄▀▄█ █ █▀ █ █ ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
  █▀ ▄ ██▀ █▄▀▄▀█ ▄█▄█ █ ▄██ █ █ ▄▀▄▀
 ▄█▄▄▀█  █▄██  ███ █  ▀▀█ █  ▄  █▄█▄▀▄▀▄
   █▀   ███  ███▀ ▄  ██▀ ▄▀ ██▀ █▀ ▀▄▄ █ █
  █▀ ▄█  ██▀ ▄█ █▀█ ▄█  ▄█▄▄██▄███ ██
  █  ▄█  ██▄▄██▄█▀█▀▀█▀█  ▄█
 █ █ ▀ ▄███  ▄▄▄███
█ █ █▀▄▄███▀  ▄▄▄██▀█▀▀█ ▀ ▀
█ █ █ █ ▄▀▄▀█▀  ▄███▀▄▀▄▀ ▀
   █ ▀▄▀ █▄█ █ █▄▀█▄▀▄▀█▀█ ▄▀
▀ █ ██▄▀███ █▀▄▀▄▀ ▀
 ▀ ▀ ▀ ▀


On 4/9/21 8:37 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:

We're here :-)

Re: [M100] test because its quiet

[John R. Hogerhuis]

We're here :-)

Re: [M100] test

[Brian K. White]

On 11/10/20 8:38 PM, Daryl Tester wrote:

On 10/11/20 1:57 am, Brian K. White wrote:


Both of my subscribed accounts are gmail.
I'll try subscribing a protonmail account.


Possibly relevant: 



That is remarkable. Google's proposed solution is to add the alias 
address as another address you can send from, or send as, which only 
covers the case where the other address is just an alias you own for 
yourself. It totally ignores the strange new fangled unsupported 
unofficial bizarre thing called a mail list. You can't set up an alias 
for the list address to your own.


And their other solution that you can see your own sent mail in your 
sent-mail folder, also seems to totally ignore the realities of mail 
lists, and mail in general for that matter. Seeing that I wrote a 
message and attempted to send it is pretty much never why I want to see 
the list copy of that message. Not to mention, if you keep list messages 
in their own folder, that folder doesn't contain every message, it's 
missing all of your own. The fact that those missing messages may be 
found in some other place is not useful.


Like have they ever actually used email?


"Messages sent to email alias or group don't appear in inbox"

Although because that answer's couched in non-canonical email
speak, I can't make sense of it.  I've seen other mailing list
software have similar complaints against Gmail:

 



Cheers,
   --dt


--
bkw

Re: [M100] test

[Daryl Tester]

On 10/11/20 1:57 am, Brian K. White wrote:


Both of my subscribed accounts are gmail.
I'll try subscribing a protonmail account.


Possibly relevant: 

"Messages sent to email alias or group don't appear in inbox"

Although because that answer's couched in non-canonical email
speak, I can't make sense of it.  I've seen other mailing list
software have similar complaints against Gmail:



Cheers,
  --dt

Re: [M100] test

[Brian K. White]

On 11/8/20 3:51 AM, Daryl Tester wrote:

On 8/11/20 6:02 am, Brian K. White wrote:


On 11/7/20 2:11 PM, Peter Vollan wrote:



Are my messages to the list getting through?



Yes but there is a list server configuration problem where
you don't get a copy of your own outgoing posts. You only
see them if someone happens to reply.


I'd say something more subtle is afoot, as I do get copies of
my posts.

 From memory, John is using a hosted mailing list, so he hasn't
got access to the infrastructure to see what's going on.

--dt



Interesting.
Both of my subscribed accounts are gmail.
I'll try subscribing a protonmail account.

--
bkw

Re: [M100] test

[Daryl Tester]

On 8/11/20 6:02 am, Brian K. White wrote:


On 11/7/20 2:11 PM, Peter Vollan wrote:



Are my messages to the list getting through?



Yes but there is a list server configuration problem where
you don't get a copy of your own outgoing posts. You only
see them if someone happens to reply.


I'd say something more subtle is afoot, as I do get copies of
my posts.

From memory, John is using a hosted mailing list, so he hasn't
got access to the infrastructure to see what's going on.

--dt

Re: [M100] test

[Brian K. White]

On 11/7/20 2:11 PM, Peter Vollan wrote:

Are my messages to the list getting through?


Yes but there is a list server configuration problem where you don't get 
a copy of your own outgoing posts. You only see them if someone happens 
to reply.


Several months ago I started switching all my stuff over from one gmail 
acct to another, and here, both my old and new addresses are still 
subscribed, and so when I post, I can see that the acct I didn't post 
from always gets a copy of the post.


There is an option explicitly for that, which I have just verified is 
set to Yes, on both accounts.

You can see those settings here:
http://lists.bitchin100.com/options.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com

"Receive your own posts to the list? [*] Yes"

It's even supposed to be the default anyway even without setting it 
explicitly.


However, I still never receive a copy of my own posts despite the 
setting. So the setting does not do as advertised, which means it's a 
server configuration problem.


--
bkw



On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 17:17, Philip Avery  wrote:


Good news is it's going to rain for a few days here, so I can spend time
inside & improve M100 CP/M by:

- increase Directory size from 256 entries to 512.
- make Import/Export "user" friendly. ie for user area to remain
constant before & after.

Thought I'd let CP/Mers know this so they can delay any mega-installs
until I complete the above.

Philip

On 7/11/2020 3:36 am, Bert Put wrote:

Hi Philip,

On 10/29/20 3:53 PM, Philip Avery wrote:

Hi Jim

Fear not, we can increase the size of the Directory making full use of
4MB. This will require BIOS changes & an OS update. That means... at
present you'll have to re-import all your user files.

I'll vote for an expanded directory as well please, thank you!

Cheers,Bert





--
bkw

Re: [M100] test

[Jason Benson]

Tested.

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:28 PM Mike Stein  wrote:

> test
>

Re: [M100] test

[Lucas Roberts]

I don't talk much but I watch most things! (Trying to add some activity)

> On May 14, 2019, at 10:26 PM, Willard Goosey  wrote:
> 
> Admittedly I was starting to wonder, myself...
> 
> still pulling overtime, no time/energy for m100 :-(
> 
> willard
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A
> 
>  Original message 
> From: Kurt McCullum 
> Date: 5/14/19 9:33 PM (GMT-07:00)
> To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
> Subject: Re: [M100] test
> 
> Yes the list is active. Often VERY active. It's been quiet for a couple days 
> but it's definitely still alive and well.
> 
> Kurt
> 
> On Tue, May 14, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Ed Graffius wrote:
>> IS this still active?  I am looking for any type of forum where I can ask a 
>> few M100 questions...
> 

Re: [M100] test

[Willard Goosey]

Admittedly I was starting to wonder, myself...still pulling overtime, no 
time/energy for m100 :-(willardSent from my Galaxy Tab® A
 Original message From: Kurt McCullum  
Date: 5/14/19  9:33 PM  (GMT-07:00) To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com Subject: Re: 
[M100] test Yes the list is active. Often VERY active. It's been quiet for a 
couple days but it's definitely still alive and well.KurtOn Tue, May 14, 2019, 
at 6:24 PM, Ed Graffius wrote:IS this still active?  I am looking for any type 
of forum where I can ask a few M100 questions...

Re: [M100] test

[Kurt McCullum]

Yes the list is active. Often VERY active. It's been quiet for a couple days 
but it's definitely still alive and well.

Kurt

On Tue, May 14, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Ed Graffius wrote:
> IS this still active? I am looking for any type of forum where I can ask a 
> few M100 questions...

Re: [M100] Test

[Kurt McCullum]

The only difference from my end is that I’m using Outlook instead of  webmail 
so perhaps that has something to do with it.

 

Kurt

 

From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of John R. 
Hogerhuis
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 7:59 AM
To: Model 100 Discussion <m100@lists.bitchin100.com>
Subject: Re: [M100] Test

 

 

 

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Kurt McCullum <kurt.mccul...@att.net 
<mailto:kurt.mccul...@att.net> > wrote:

Looks like I'm up and working. Thanks John!

 

 

Well, haven't done anything yet except talk about it.

 

I will add the MX record as soon as I figure out how to do it in the host's web 
panel.

But good that it's working at the moment :-)

 

-- John. 

Re: [M100] Test

[John R. Hogerhuis]

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Kurt McCullum 
wrote:

> Looks like I'm up and working. Thanks John!
>
>
Well, haven't done anything yet except talk about it.

I will add the MX record as soon as I figure out how to do it in the host's
web panel.

But good that it's working at the moment :-)

-- John.

Re: [M100] Test

[MikeS]

Apparently not ;-)

- Original Message - 
From: "Kurt McCullum" 
To: "'Model 100 Discussion'" 
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:28 AM
Subject: [M100] Test


> Just checking to see if the MX issue is still blocking my emails

Re: [M100] Test

[Kurt McCullum]

Looks like I'm up and working. Thanks John!

-Original Message-
From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Kurt McCullum
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 7:28 AM
To: 'Model 100 Discussion' 
Subject: [M100] Test

Just checking to see if the MX issue is still blocking my emails