Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Paco
I don't no, but is very interesting.
 El 01/06/2015 05:44, "Louis Lipp"  escribió:

> A friend found an image of what is supposed to be CPM for the trs100. Does
> anyone know if this actually exists?
>


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread VANDEN BOSSCHE JAN

Ah, CP/M !

It's something like the Loch Ness Monster of the Model T-community.

A lot of people believe it exists,
Few have ever seen it,
But until the scientists of Jurassic Park come along
It continues to elude us.

Greetings from the TyRannoSaurus
Jan-80 "
@ work( - @ )
--.ooo--(_)--ooo.---
 Be green, read from the screen!

From: M100 [mailto:m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com] On Behalf Of Paco
Sent: maandag 1 juni 2015 09:43
To: Model 100 Discussion
Subject: Re: [M100] CPM?

I don't no, but is very interesting.

El 01/06/2015 05:44, "Louis Lipp"  escribió:
A friend found an image of what is supposed to be CPM for the trs100. Does 
anyone know if this actually exists?
[http://www.vivaqua.be/facebook.png] Rejoignez-nous sur Facebook - Volg ons op 
FacebookDISCLAIMER

Pensez à l'environnement, n'imprimez cette page et ses annexes que si c'est 
nécessaire.

Ce message électronique, y compris ses annexes, est confidentiel et réservé à 
l’attention de son destinataire.
Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire et d’en 
informer l’expéditeur. Toute divulgation, copie ou utilisation de ce mail est 
dans ce cas interdite.
La sécurité et l'exactitude des transmissions de messages électroniques ne 
peuvent être garanties.

Denk aan het milieu; druk deze pagina en de bijlagen alleen af als het nodig is.

Dit e-mailbericht (inclusief zijn bijlagen) is vertrouwelijk en is uitsluitend 
bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
Als dit bericht niet voor u bestemd is, wordt u verzocht het te wissen en de 
afzender te informeren. Het is in dat geval niet toegestaan dit bericht te 
verspreiden, te kopiëren of te gebruiken.
We kunnen niet garanderen dat de gegevensoverdracht via het internet veilig en 
nauwkeurig is.



Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Joe Grubbs
If it doesn't, we need a clever developer who is very intimate with the Model 
100/200 architecture and the 8085 to port it :)  Someone in the Color Computer 
community ported CP/M to run under OS-9 on the 6809. If that can be done, it 
seems that getting it to run on an 8085 would be plausible.


Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 00:44:09 -0300
From: louis.l...@gmail.com
To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
Subject: [M100] CPM?

A friend found an image of what is supposed to be CPM for the trs100. Does 
anyone know if this actually exists?   

Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Stephen Adolph
What  is challenging for the M100 is the dependence on disk, and the
requirement that it act like a standard FDC.  TPDD1 can do this, but not
TPDD2.  M100 on it's own would struggle also because it has only 32kB of
RAM.  The lower 32kB would be unusable, save for some routines.
We've been discussing this for a long time.

Options for 64kB of RAM:
- REX2
- EXTRam
- XR4

Options for FDC:
- TPDD1
- a software solution on something like LaddieAlpha
- NADSbox with modified firmware




On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Joe Grubbs  wrote:

> If it doesn't, we need a clever developer who is very intimate with the
> Model 100/200 architecture and the 8085 to port it :)  Someone in the Color
> Computer community ported CP/M to run under OS-9 on the 6809. If that can
> be done, it seems that getting it to run on an 8085 would be plausible.
>
>
> --
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 00:44:09 -0300
> From: louis.l...@gmail.com
> To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
> Subject: [M100] CPM?
>
> A friend found an image of what is supposed to be CPM for the trs100. Does
> anyone know if this actually exists?
>


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Bert Put
Are you sure it's not CPM for the TRS-80 model 1?  I had a copy of that but it 
required a switch on the model 1 that swapped out the ROM with a block of 
memory by fiddling with the address lines.  This gave CPM the contiguous block 
of RAM starting at address  that it needed to run.  I had this running on 
my model 1 a long time ago but switched to a Kaypro 2x soon after (which still 
runs today.)

Cheers,Bert

On May 31, 2015, at 22:44, Louis Lipp  wrote:

> A friend found an image of what is supposed to be CPM for the trs100. Does 
> anyone know if this actually exists?


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
Sector access via large files and seek command is already implemented in
LaddieAlpha and Nadsbox.

-- John.


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Monday, June 1, 2015, Joe Grubbs  wrote:

> If it doesn't, we need a clever developer who is very intimate with the
> Model 100/200 architecture and the 8085 to port it :)  Someone in the Color
> Computer community ported CP/M to run under OS-9 on the 6809. If that can
> be done, it seems that getting it to run on an 8085 would be plausible.
>
>
How can that be?

I think typical CP/M programs require an 8080 compatible CPU. The 6809 is
not.

-- John.


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Joe Grubbs
He's basically built an emulator/VM that runs in OS-9. There was a lengthy 
discussion about the finer details on the CoCo list, but here is one of his 
videos demonstrating it running WordStar (wow flashback!):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysn7Na60ZGA



Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:50:14 -0700
From: jho...@pobox.com
To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
Subject: Re: [M100] CPM?



On Monday, June 1, 2015, Joe Grubbs  wrote:



If it doesn't, we need a clever developer who is very intimate with the Model 
100/200 architecture and the 8085 to port it :)  Someone in the Color Computer 
community ported CP/M to run under OS-9 on the 6809. If that can be done, it 
seems that getting it to run on an 8085 would be plausible.

  
How can that be?  
I think typical CP/M programs require an 8080 compatible CPU. The 6809 is not. 
-- John.  

Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Joe Grubbs  wrote:
> He's basically built an emulator/VM that runs in OS-9. There was a lengthy
> discussion about the finer details on the CoCo list, but here is one of his
> videos demonstrating it running WordStar (wow flashback!):
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysn7Na60ZGA
>

Impressive work. Too slow at WordStar to be usable though. "Fast and
furious" :-) Close though!

Maybe some serious optimizations in his virtual machine can make it
fast enough. I'd guess he's straight mapping 8080 instructions to 6309
code. Depending on how he's handling register mapping and whether he's
doing any cached code translation versus straight
mapping/interpretation there should be thing he can do.

Still would be useful for non-interactive programs (like compilers).

-- John.


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread bogus maximus
A cousin of these devices, the NEC PC-8500 is a pseudo-CP/M computer.  It
has WordStar-To-Go built-in and it can be made into a full-fledged CP/M
computer by adding the 32KB memory expansion cartridge and the floppy disk
drive/drive interface.

Just an FYI.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Joe Grubbs  wrote:

> He's basically built an emulator/VM that runs in OS-9. There was a lengthy
> discussion about the finer details on the CoCo list, but here is one of his
> videos demonstrating it running WordStar (wow flashback!):
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysn7Na60ZGA
>
>
>
> --
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:50:14 -0700
> From: jho...@pobox.com
> To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
> Subject: Re: [M100] CPM?
>
>
>
> On Monday, June 1, 2015, Joe Grubbs  wrote:
>
> If it doesn't, we need a clever developer who is very intimate with the
> Model 100/200 architecture and the 8085 to port it :)  Someone in the Color
> Computer community ported CP/M to run under OS-9 on the 6809. If that can
> be done, it seems that getting it to run on an 8085 would be plausible.
>
>
> How can that be?
>
> I think typical CP/M programs require an 8080 compatible CPU. The 6809 is
> not.
>
> -- John.
>


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread DRogers
Too slow for Wordstar cp/m?  Back in the day, I used an Epson PX-8 with dual 
disk drives and a 128K RAM pack -- all of which I still have. It ran a ROM 
based Wordstar. If you had a 4 page document and you made a small change in the 
middle of it, you could hit return then go fix lunch, eat it at a leisurely 
rate, then fix and drink a cup of coffee and MAYBE it would be finished 
thinking through the change. And I am exaggerating only very slightly. 

It seems a little better on my NEC PC-8500, but I have never done any long 
documents on it. 

David

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 1, 2015, at 10:02 AM, John R. Hogerhuis  wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Joe Grubbs  wrote:
>> He's basically built an emulator/VM that runs in OS-9. There was a lengthy
>> discussion about the finer details on the CoCo list, but here is one of his
>> videos demonstrating it running WordStar (wow flashback!):
>> 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysn7Na60ZGA
> 
> Impressive work. Too slow at WordStar to be usable though. "Fast and
> furious" :-) Close though!
> 
> Maybe some serious optimizations in his virtual machine can make it
> fast enough. I'd guess he's straight mapping 8080 instructions to 6309
> code. Depending on how he's handling register mapping and whether he's
> doing any cached code translation versus straight
> mapping/interpretation there should be thing he can do.
> 
> Still would be useful for non-interactive programs (like compilers).
> 
> -- John.


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Fred Whitaker
The CP/M machine that I used as an RPFT was 8085 based.
I have seen more versions for the 8085 than for the 8080.

Frederick Whitaker

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 1, 2015, at 11:50 AM, "John R. Hogerhuis"  wrote:

> 
> 
> On Monday, June 1, 2015, Joe Grubbs  wrote:
>> If it doesn't, we need a clever developer who is very intimate with the 
>> Model 100/200 architecture and the 8085 to port it :)  Someone in the Color 
>> Computer community ported CP/M to run under OS-9 on the 6809. If that can be 
>> done, it seems that getting it to run on an 8085 would be plausible.
> 
> How can that be?  
> 
> I think typical CP/M programs require an 8080 compatible CPU. The 6809 is 
> not. 
> 
> -- John.  


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Frederick Whitaker
Personally I find the Model 100 fast enough for even fast typing. The CP/M 
machine was very slow. I wonder if the problem was CP/M.

Frederick Whitaker

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 1, 2015, at 2:25 PM, Fred Whitaker  wrote:

> The CP/M machine that I used as an RPFT was 8085 based.
> I have seen more versions for the 8085 than for the 8080.
> 
> Frederick Whitaker
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jun 1, 2015, at 11:50 AM, "John R. Hogerhuis"  wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Monday, June 1, 2015, Joe Grubbs  wrote:
>>> If it doesn't, we need a clever developer who is very intimate with the 
>>> Model 100/200 architecture and the 8085 to port it :)  Someone in the Color 
>>> Computer community ported CP/M to run under OS-9 on the 6809. If that can 
>>> be done, it seems that getting it to run on an 8085 would be plausible.
>> 
>> How can that be?  
>> 
>> I think typical CP/M programs require an 8080 compatible CPU. The 6809 is 
>> not. 
>> 
>> -- John.  


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:14 AM, DRogers  wrote:
> Too slow for Wordstar cp/m?  Back in the day, I used an Epson PX-8 with dual 
> disk drives and a 128K RAM pack -- all of which I still have. It ran a ROM 
> based Wordstar. If you had a 4 page document and you made a small change in 
> the middle of it, you could hit return then go fix lunch, eat it at a 
> leisurely rate, then fix and drink a cup of coffee and MAYBE it would be 
> finished thinking through the change. And I am exaggerating only very 
> slightly.
>
> It seems a little better on my NEC PC-8500, but I have never done any long 
> documents on it.
>
> David


My only experience of CP/M is with the WordStar on the 8500.

So maybe I'm spoiled :-)

Anyway, for those interested there is a project to port CP/M to the
Model 100 w/ 64K all-RAM hardware. MTCPM. I host a mailing list,
subversion server for it. Steve Adolph created the necessary hardware.
Ken and I created external disk service software. Phil Avery has done
most of the actual CP/M porting work so far.

http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=MTCPM

More devs with time to work on the project are always welcome.

-- John.


Re: [M100] CPM?

2015-06-01 Thread Joe Grubbs
Wow, wiki page last updated 2010, so this project has been around a while? 
Never knew it existed, thanks for sharing! My *80 assembly skills are pretty 
novice (I've been spoiled by the 6809), but I'm studying OS design and this 
might make a fun project to dabble with.


> 
> Anyway, for those interested there is a project to port CP/M to the
> Model 100 w/ 64K all-RAM hardware. MTCPM. I host a mailing list,
> subversion server for it. Steve Adolph created the necessary hardware.
> Ken and I created external disk service software. Phil Avery has done
> most of the actual CP/M porting work so far.
> 
> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=MTCPM
> 
> More devs with time to work on the project are always welcome.
> 
> -- John.
  

[M100] Accelerators

2015-06-01 Thread Hiraghm
I was just watching a review video of the old Apple IIGS, where he 
talked about getting a processor accelerator. I Remember the 
accelerators for the Amiga, even one for the C64.


I wish there were a "turbo" board one could drop in on an M100, 
replacing the 80c85 with an 8088 (or low-power equivalent) at 4.77mhz 
and accompanying expansion ram.  (imagining an M100 with 640k contiguous 
ram and relative addressing, and drooling...)


Re: [M100] Accelerators

2015-06-01 Thread ultimate quantifier
didn't the bubble memory boards allow for contiguous memory? i recall reading 
that you could write and run a program beyond 32k using their booster pak like 
device.

> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:39:05 -0500
> From: hira...@hotmail.com
> To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com
> Subject: [M100] Accelerators
> 
> I was just watching a review video of the old Apple IIGS, where he 
> talked about getting a processor accelerator. I Remember the 
> accelerators for the Amiga, even one for the C64.
> 
> I wish there were a "turbo" board one could drop in on an M100, 
> replacing the 80c85 with an 8088 (or low-power equivalent) at 4.77mhz 
> and accompanying expansion ram.  (imagining an M100 with 640k contiguous 
> ram and relative addressing, and drooling...)