Port update failure
Hi, all. Just a quick message to say that there seems to be a problem (maybe server side) with port update. Error message is: `Error: /opt/local/bin/port: port selfupdate failed: Couldn't sync the ports tree: Synchronization of 1 source(s) failed` If nobody else is getting this it doesn't clear up, I'll file a ticket with Trac. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 6.5, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora 19 20, OS X Snow Leopard, RHEL 7, Ubuntu Precise Saucy GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc Based in London, UK ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Port update failure
On 08/03/2014 04:34, Ludwig wrote: On Sat, 08 Mar 2014, Phil Dobbin wrote: Hi, all. Just a quick message to say that there seems to be a problem (maybe server side) with port update. Error message is: `Error: /opt/local/bin/port: port selfupdate failed: Couldn't sync the ports tree: Synchronization of 1 source(s) failed` If nobody else is getting this it doesn't clear up, I'll file a ticket with Trac. It works for me. It now works for me too after leaving it for half an hour (third time lucky). Must've been a temporary network glitch. I'm forever getting broken ssh pipes from remote glitches. Thanks, Ludwig. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 6.5, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora 19 20, OS X Snow Leopard, RHEL 7, Ubuntu Precise Saucy GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc Based in London, UK ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Console Vim
Hi all. Vim 7.4 is out MacPorts's version is way behind (7.3.762). Is 7.4 coming in the near future? Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Tiger, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Console Vim
On 05/09/2013 09:31, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2013-09-05 09:33, Phil Dobbin wrote: Hi all. Vim 7.4 is out MacPorts's version is way behind (7.3.762). Is 7.4 coming in the near future? Yes. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40071 Also, don't trust version numbers too blindly. Vim 7.4 is mostly a bugfix release. The only new major component is the new regex engine which you probably won't notice much in daily work. Anything else specific you need from the new version? Hi, Rainer. Well, there's over a thousand bug fixes according to Bram (admittedly between 7.3.0 7.4.0), new regex engine, as you pointed out a far better Python experience to be had. I was just puzzled that's all. I guess you're busy looking at the ticket. No big deal. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Tiger, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Console Vim
On 05/09/2013 15:36, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com mailto:phildob...@gmail.com wrote: Well, there's over a thousand bug fixes according to Bram (admittedly between 7.3.0 7.4.0) Most of which are probably in ours; have you seen the number of patches the vim port applies? It's still 54 patches behind the current release. To see the full list, visit: https://code.google.com/p/vim/source/list There's quite a few important fixes. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Tiger, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
port uninstall inactive
Hi, all. On trying to run `port uninstall inactive' I'm getting: `Unable to uninstall py27-distribute @0.6.43_0, the following ports depend on it: ---py27-altgraph @0.10.2_0 ---py27-dateutil @1.5_1 ---py27-nose @1.2.1_1 ---py27-pygments @1.6_0 ---py27-pyobjc @2.5.1_0 ---py27-roman @2.0.0_0 ---py27-simplejson @3.1.3_0 Error: org.macports.uninstall for port py27-distribute returned: Please uninstall the ports that depend on py27-distribute first. Please see the log file for port py27-distribute for details: /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_registry_portfiles_py27-distribute_0.6.43_0/py27-distribute/main.log Warning: Failed to execute portfile from registry for py27-distribute @0.6.43_0 --- Unable to uninstall py27-distribute @0.6.43_0, the following ports depend on it: ---py27-altgraph @0.10.2_0 ---py27-dateutil @1.5_1 ---py27-nose @1.2.1_1 ---py27-pygments @1.6_0 ---py27-pyobjc @2.5.1_0 ---py27-roman @2.0.0_0 ---py27-simplejson @3.1.3_0 Error: port uninstall failed: Please uninstall the ports that depend on py27-distribute first.` py27-distribute has obviously been updated I don't want to lose the new version so how do I get 'round this predicament? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Tiger, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
libgcc won't build
Hi, all. Why is libgcc trying to install itself after `sudo port -v selfupdate` when it's not installed in the first place hangs the machine interminably so I can't get any updates? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Tiger, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Vim
Hi, all. I was wondering seeing as Vim 7.4 is out when is the MacPorts version going to step up from its current version of 7.3.762? I have every machine upgraded (even Tiger) but not Snow Leopard via MacPorts. Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Tiger, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
bash completion error
Hi, all. I've installed bash bash-completion from MacPorts when adding the required line to my bash_profile to enable the completion as advised, I get: 'bash: [: 05b: integer expression expected]' I've stared at it 'til I'm blue in the face but I can't see why it expects an integer. By the way this is on an old 800MHz G4 PowerMac running 10.4.11 that I bought yesterday for a fiver if that makes any difference at all. Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: bash completion error
On 12/05/2013 12:49, Rainer Müller wrote: On 2013-05-12 12:28, Phil Dobbin wrote: I've installed bash bash-completion from MacPorts when adding the required line to my bash_profile to enable the completion as advised, I get: 'bash: [: 05b: integer expression expected]' I've stared at it 'til I'm blue in the face but I can't see why it expects an integer. By the way this is on an old 800MHz G4 PowerMac running 10.4.11 that I bought yesterday for a fiver if that makes any difference at all. Are you using /opt/local/bin/bash? As stated in 'port notes bash-completion' you need at least bash 4.1. I don't know which version of bash shipped with 10.4.11 as /bin/bash. The bash_completion script tries to detect old bash versions, but maybe it's even too old for that check to work properly? Even on later versions of Mac OS X, your /bin/bash is too old as Apple left it at 3.2, the last version available under GPL-2 and later versions are GPL-3. 'bash --version' returns 4.2.42 is indeed /opt/local/bin/bash. Must be down to the age of the OS. I can't even get any lscolors. May have to edit a Debian bashrc to see if I can fix that. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: bash completion error
On 12/05/2013 13:23, Clemens Lang wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:10:46PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: 'bash --version' returns 4.2.42 is indeed /opt/local/bin/bash. Executing bash --version will not necessarily give you the version of the shell you are currently running, but only the version of the bash binary first in your $PATH. Try echo $BASH_VERSION instead. Also see http://trac.macports.org/wiki/howto/bash-completion Many thanks, Clemens. The version of bash being used was 2.05 so after following the instructions in the URL everything is hunky dory. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.9 6.4, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, Spherical That Damn Cat, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Precise, Quantal Raring GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey.asc ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Complier warning message
On 03/04/2013 03:04, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Apr 2, 2013, at 18:10, Phil Dobbin wrote: I've just ran selfupdate got this warning message: 'Warning: All compilers are either blacklisted or unavailable; using first fallback entry as last resort' I last ran selfupdate twenty-four hours ago it wasn't there. My gcc version is: 'gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)' in /usr/bin Any ideas on why this error popped up if any action is required on my part? I'm using the latest MacPorts on 10.6.8. Only ports can blacklist compilers; MacPorts base itself doesn't. So you should not have received this message when running sudo port selfupdate, but rather when running sudo port upgrade. Which port were you trying to upgrade or build when this message appeared? The port in question may need to have some fallback compilers added, until such as a time as MacPorts 2.2 is released which includes more fallbacks. No, I was running selfupdate the message appeared before I ran 'port outdated' port outdated reported that only webp was available for upgrade when I ran that after receiving the warning. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Complier warning message
On 03/04/2013 07:17, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: Only ports can blacklist compilers; MacPorts base itself doesn't. So you should not have received this message when running sudo port selfupdate, but rather when running sudo port upgrade. Not quite. It's possible that a port which evaluates configure.compiler at its top level has been recently updated to blacklist all Xcode 3.2.x / 4.0.x compilers. The warning would then show up when the sync portion of selfupdate evaluates that particular portfile. Looks like webkit-gtk fits the bill (r104778). I haven't got 'webkit-gtk' installed. But running 'port deps webkit-gtk' returns: 'port deps webkit-gtk Warning: All compilers are either blacklisted or unavailable; using first fallback entry as last resort Full Name: webkit-gtk @2.0.0_0+video Extract Dependencies: xz Build Dependencies: gtk-doc, pkgconfig, autoconf, automake, libtool Library Dependencies: glib2, enchant, geoclue, gtk2, harfbuzz, icu, libxslt, libpng, libsecret, libsoup, mesa, sqlite3, webp, xorg-libXt, gstreamer1-gst-plugins-base' so it seems webp is the culprit. I believe ImageMagick (which I have got installed) depends on webp. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Complier warning message
On 03/04/2013 07:44, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Apr 3, 2013, at 01:41, Phil Dobbin wrote: running 'port deps webkit-gtk' returns: 'port deps webkit-gtk Warning: All compilers are either blacklisted or unavailable; using first fallback entry as last resort Full Name: webkit-gtk @2.0.0_0+video Extract Dependencies: xz Build Dependencies: gtk-doc, pkgconfig, autoconf, automake, libtool Library Dependencies: glib2, enchant, geoclue, gtk2, harfbuzz, icu, libxslt, libpng, libsecret, libsoup, mesa, sqlite3, webp, xorg-libXt, gstreamer1-gst-plugins-base' so it seems webp is the culprit. webp doesn't blacklist any compilers, so it's not at fault. webkit-gtk is at least one of the culprits; there might be others. I can post or attach a list of my installed ports if that'll help. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Complier warning message
On 03/04/2013 08:48, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Apr 3, 2013, at 02:19, Phil Dobbin wrote: I can post or attach a list of my installed ports if that'll help. No need; as I understand it, the message appears anytime you merely access a port blacklisting all compilers, whether that access be by portindex or getting info on it or whatever. So am I right in thinking that I can just go ahead upgrade webp without any disastrous consequences? Furthermore, according to port installed, I, in fact, have gcc47 installed in /opt/local as well as Apple's gcc from Xcode 3.2.6 in /usr/bin, so shouldn't the warning have picked up that before throwing one? Or is that persona non grata too? Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: macports on linux
On 02/04/2013 03:36, Peng Yu wrote: Hi, Linux packages are usually outdated. Since macports are usually updated, is there a way to install macports on linux (e.g. ubuntu). As others have said, it'd probably end up being counter productive trying to use MacPorts on Linux. I use Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian CentOS find by adding the extra repos (rpmforge the like), you're covered for most things. Also, you can add repo keys to appropriate extra software (frowned on by some). If not, the old fashioned way of installing via a tarball is pretty much the way to go. Linux is pretty much set up out the box to do this (after installing 'Development Tools' or build-essential so on) so it's usually no sweat. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: macports on linux
On 02/04/2013 09:38, Niels Dettenbach wrote: Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 09:29:28 schrieb Phil Dobbin: If not, the old fashioned way of installing via a tarball is pretty much the way to go. Linux is pretty much set up out the box to do this (after installing 'Development Tools' or build-essential so on) so it's usually no sweat. This is what pkgsrc uses as a interoperable solution (afaik there are some pkgsrc peoples here within macports) BUT including a clean software management allowing clean installs, deinstall, rolling updates, feature management etc. (as macport does on Mac only). If the stable stuff in pkgsrc is to old you may take an additional look at pkgsrc-wip where you find work in progress ports. http://pkgsrc-wip.sourceforge.net/ If you want software not existing in pkgsrc you may add it byself as under maports too. A simple example on using / installing pkgsrc i.e. on CentOS: htttp://ohess.org/pub/using-pkgsrc-on-centos-55 or Debian: http://ohess.org/pub/using-pkgsrc-on-debian-squeeze That's a new one on me. Thanks, Niels, I'll check it out. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Complier warning message
Hi, all. I've just ran selfupdate got this warning message: 'Warning: All compilers are either blacklisted or unavailable; using first fallback entry as last resort' I last ran selfupdate twenty-four hours ago it wasn't there. My gcc version is: 'gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)' in /usr/bin Any ideas on why this error popped up if any action is required on my part? I'm using the latest MacPorts on 10.6.8. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
selfupdate fails: ghc gcc47
Hi. Running selfupdate results in: 'Configuring zip-archive-0.1.3.4... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: mtl -any Command failed: cd /opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_devel_hs-zip-archive/hs-zip-archive/work/zip-archive-0.1.3.4 runhaskell Setup configure --prefix=/opt/local --with-compiler=/opt/local/bin/ghc -v --enable-library-profiling --with-gcc=/usr/bin/gcc-4.2 Exit code: 1' Now I used to have ghc (haskell haddock) installed but no longer do but selfupdate keeps trying to install it on every upgrade I'm getting this error. One other thing that is different also is that selfupdate installed gcc47 when first running upgrade when before I only ever had Apple's ancient version in /usr/bin. I've tried to troubleshoot this but can't get past its insistence on installing ghc (I take it by the look of the error message it doesn't like /usr/bin/gcc-4.2). Any quick fix for this would be appreciated. I have no use for ghc unless MacPorts requires it. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: selfupdate fails: ghc gcc47
It's not installed. Neither are half a dozen other ports it keeps trying to install which finally culminates in ghc (sorry for the ugly looking reply; I'm using the abomination that is Google's Gmail interface). Cheers, Phil... On 25 March 2013 14:41, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.comwrote: 'Configuring zip-archive-0.1.3.4... Why do you have this port installed? If you removed ghc, perhaps you should remove ports that require and are likely only usable by ghc. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: selfupdate fails: ghc gcc47
On 25/03/2013 15:13, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com mailto:phildob...@gmail.com wrote: It's not installed. Neither are half a dozen other ports it keeps trying to install which finally culminates in ghc (sorry for the ugly looking reply; I'm using the abomination that is Google's Gmail interface). Then I would wonder what you have installed via macports that requires it. There isn't a whole lot in the way of end-user ports that actually depend on haskell; only pandoc comes to mind offhand. (And xmonad, but that wouldn't pull in an archiver, whereas pandoc's deps likely do.) Good call, Brandon: it was pandoc. I removed it all's well. Job's a good 'un. Thanks. Cheers, Phil... ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Side effects?
On 01/31/2013 12:42 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 31, 2013, at 06:07, Ian Wadham wrote: On 31/01/2013, at 2:37 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: It is routinely a GSoC project, and since we were not chosen last year it has definitely fallen behind. BTW, does Macports have a nice safe GUI? If I knew what tools to use on Apple Mac, I might have a crack at it myself. I have had quite a bit of experience with designing and programming GUIs, databases, SQL, Shell scripts and an in-house GUI-based build system where I used to work. The tools to use on the Mac are Xcode and a knowledge of Cocoa. You could always start by reading the code for Pallet, which is in our repository. Or even fork Pallet and work on improving it, with either the goal of improving Pallet or just learning enough about Cocoa and how to integrate with the MacPorts Framework to begin your own GUI from scratch. I've built several things in Cocoa on OS X after pulling them from Github still build my own MacVim using the same route. On Snow Leopard, Xcode is pretty straightforward (I used 'Xcode 3 Unleashed' by Fritz Anderson as my guide in the first instance. Recommended). I can't vouch for it on Lion or Mountain Lion though (I unsubscribed from Apple's cocoa-dev Xcode mailing lists some time ago after the list went into a little bit of a meltdown over all the changes brought about by Xcode 4). What I will say for it is is that it's a hell of a lot easier than working with the old Classic Mac OS although I still have a soft spot for MPW (the Macintosh Programmer's Workshop). That was a nightmare nearly put me off code of *any* sort although, again, it was miles better than Visual Studio... There's plenty of documentation out there, so give it a try. I never found a project/idea I could pursue so this one could be promising for someone. What's to lose? :-) Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: ticket #37725 libnewt
On 01/22/2013 02:54 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 21, 2013, at 01:01, Phil Dobbin wrote: I've just filed the above ticket as libnewt fails to build. I filed a ticket against expect, Tcl libnewt back in December upon re-reading it, I noticed that Ryan suggested filing a ticket against libnewt which I've now done. I've resolved the ticket. FYI you don't need to send an email to the list about a ticket unless it appears that we've forgotten about it. Give us a few days to discover tickets on our own before posting to the list, and then send your mail to macports-dev (which is where we discuss programming changes in MacPorts), not macports-users (which is where we discuss how to use MacPorts). OK, Ryan. I wasn't sure of the procedure. I shall do so in future. Thanks for the update (I had seen it in an update email from Trac; I was just waiting for changes to propagate). Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
ticket #37725 libnewt
Hi, all. I've just filed the above ticket as libnewt fails to build. I filed a ticket against expect, Tcl libnewt back in December upon re-reading it, I noticed that Ryan suggested filing a ticket against libnewt which I've now done. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Apache start on login
On 01/15/2013 07:15 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 15, 2013, at 00:00, Phil Dobbin wrote: Apache/2.2.3 from MacPorts What's the equivalent command to '# chkconfig httpd on' I have run to get apache to start at login? I'm not familiar with the chkconfig command, but if you want to start MacPorts apache2 at login, then you would use sudo port load apache2. Thanks, Ryan. The 'chkconfig' command is the RPM (Red Hat/Fedora/CentOs) equivalent of the init script 'sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 start|graceful|stop' command on Deb/Ubuntu distros when it's installed by apt it automatically starts apache on login (on RPM distros yum doesn't, so you have to use the 'chkconfig' command to ensure it starts at login). Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Apache start on login
Hi, all. Apache/2.2.3 from MacPorts What's the equivalent command to '# chkconfig httpd on' I have run to get apache to start at login? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Port failed
On 01/06/2013 01:55 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 5, 2013, at 23:54, Phil Dobbin wrote: I've just ran 'selfupdate' one of the ports failed to parse with this error message: 'Failed to parse file devel/libc-headers/Portfile: can't set depends_build: invalid depspec: coreosmakefiles' Fixed: https://trac.macports.org/changeset/101199 Thanks, Ryan. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Port failed
Hi, all. I've just ran 'selfupdate' one of the ports failed to parse with this error message: 'Failed to parse file devel/libc-headers/Portfile: can't set depends_build: invalid depspec: coreosmakefiles' I couldn't find anything similar on our friend Google so I thought I'd best ask here. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: apache versions
On 01/03/2013 04:22 AM, Wes James wrote: I looked at http://httpd.apache.org/ to see where it is at versus macports. Some questions: The current macports version for apache2 is: apache2 @2.2.22_2+preforkmpm (active) on apache.org http://apache.org there is 2.2.23. How does this compare with macports version regarding security patches? When will macports be updated to 2.4.x? I can't answer your question but if it makes you feel any better, Ubuntu 12.04 12.10, Fedora 17 Debian Testing/Unstable are all running v.2.2.22 as well (I've just destroyed my Spherical VMs in order to run a new test tomorrow night I can't remember the apache version. I'm also waiting 'til the release to put it back on a physical machine). Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: phinze/homebrew-cask on the same system like MacPorts
On 01/01/2013 08:13 AM, Markus Neuenschwander wrote: I switched back to MacPorts, because brew have to less packaged software. Now found an interesting project about native GUI applications. https://github.com/phinze/homebrew-cask#readme Can I install both on my MacBook Air? I wouldn't recommend having both Mac Ports homebrew (cask or otherwise) installed in regular use at the same time on the same machine. For more info on the subject, check the list archives where you'll find plenty of advice (just search for homebrew and/or /usr/local). Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Tcl upgrade failure
Hi, all. I've just ran selfupdate it stopped at scanning binaries: 'Scanning binaries for linking errors: 9.9% Could not open /opt/local/lib/libtcl8.5.dylib: Error opening or reading file (referenced from /opt/local/bin/expect)' ~ It then proceeded to throw errors on libnewt expect uninstalled them then uninstalled Vim (I had it compiled +tcl) re-installed Vim without tcl. I've got the expect libnewt logs. I should open a ticket I guess? A quick how-to would be appreciated, I've never had the need to open one before I don't think. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Tcl upgrade failure
On 12/30/2012 02:08 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 01:53:33PM +, Phil Dobbin wrote: I've just ran selfupdate it stopped at scanning binaries: 'Scanning binaries for linking errors: 9.9% Could not open /opt/local/lib/libtcl8.5.dylib: Error opening or reading file (referenced from /opt/local/bin/expect)' So the port providing /opt/local/bin/expect should be revbumped after the recent upgrade to Tcl 8.6. You should file a bug for this. It then proceeded to throw errors on libnewt expect uninstalled them then uninstalled Vim (I had it compiled +tcl) re-installed Vim without tcl. So far that's expected to happen; however, it should just have rebuilt expect and all the other broken libraries. There should not have been a need to rebuild vim, unless the rebuild of a dependency of vim failed and it wasn't re-installed again. I've got the expect libnewt logs. I should open a ticket I guess? A quick how-to would be appreciated, I've never had the need to open one before I don't think. Yes, please open a ticket. You can do that at http://trac.macports.org/newticket. Make sure to take a look at the Ticket Guidelines http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets. Hi, Clemens. Yeah, looking at 'port installed', I can see the Tcl/Tk upgrade actually succeeded so why it went ahead uninstalled Vim then re-installed it again, I not sure (Vim's compile time options were +huge +cscope +perl +python27 +tcl -ruby. It's now the same but minus tcl). Thanks for heads up about Trac, I'll go file now. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Tcl upgrade failure
On 12/30/2012 02:46 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: Hi, On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 02:24:58PM +, Phil Dobbin wrote: Yeah, looking at 'port installed', I can see the Tcl/Tk upgrade actually succeeded so why it went ahead uninstalled Vim then re-installed it again, I not sure (Vim's compile time options were +huge +cscope +perl +python27 +tcl -ruby. It's now the same but minus tcl). Oh, I guess the vim binary actually linked against libtcl.dylib, so the rebuild was necessary. Vim should be rev-bumped if +tcl is in the default variants. Loosing a variant when recompiling shouldn't happen. From what I recall, I wrote code to specifically prevent this, which was later simplified by jmr. Maybe somebody who understands the way variants are evaluated in MacPorts could have a look at the code and see why this happens? I'm on Trac at the moment having written up the ticket can't seem to be able to attach any log files (checked the relevant box but no attach file radio button or indeed any other interface for the job is apparent). Any clues? Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Tcl upgrade failure
On 12/30/2012 05:05 PM, Müller wrote: On 2012-12-30 17:51, Phil Dobbin wrote: I'm on Trac at the moment having written up the ticket can't seem to be able to attach any log files (checked the relevant box but no attach file radio button or indeed any other interface for the job is apparent). If you check that checkbox, Trac redirects you to another form to add an attachment directly. You can also use the Attach file button after filing the ticket and it takes you to the same form. So this checkbox only spares you another click. Thanks Rainer Ryan. I did consider that but didn't want to attempt it then have to chase it back out the system if that wasn't the case (dealing with Red Hat's Bugzilla has left me permanently scarred as far as tickets are concerned). Anyway, ticket done. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Tcl upgrade failure
On 12/30/2012 08:51 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: On Dec 30, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com wrote: A quick how-to would be appreciated, I've never had the need to open one before I don't think. Wait, really? Color me surprised :P No, really, it's true :-) My MBP tells me that I started using MacPorts in September 2011 I'm pretty convinced that this is the first time I've created a ticket for something that broke (I've got around 200+ ports installed). The odd thing about it was that I was just about to ask on list had anybody had any luck compiling newt-python (python-newt, newt, whatever you'd like to call it) so I could get the notifications on Byobu working the already installed libnewt went broke before I could untar the source tarball lay keyboard to terminal (if I can get it working, Byobu that is, I was going to try my hand at a portfile). Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Please add Google Dart to MacPorts.
On 12/16/2012 07:45 PM, Markus Neuenschwander wrote: On 12/14/12 3:23 AM, Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote: Would it be possible to add Google Dart to MacPorts? yet another programming language. Don't understand why so much lesser known Open Source languages. It's the very nature life blood of open source, I suppose. Although I'm of the opinion that if you can't do it in bash, it ain't worth doing[1], if not for all these lesser known (at first) languages, then we'd all be still using C (or assembler or Fortran. If we did it in Fortran, it'd be a hell of a lot quicker, what little we could do). I must say I haven't studied Dart. Must go have a look sometime... Cheers, Phil. [1] take however many large pinches of salt as you like with that statement :-) -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Fedora does MacPorts
On 12/08/2012 06:56 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 7, 2012, at 21:50, Phil Dobbin wrote: On 12/08/2012 03:32 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 7, 2012, at 20:59, Phil Dobbin wrote: I thought maybe somebody might find this interesting: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/Software_Collections_Guide/index.html Which part should we be looking at? In what way does Fedora do MacPorts? I didn't see MacPorts mentioned on that page. No, it was more to do with the concept behind Software Collections. Disregarding the fact it installs into /opt, it looks a similar principle; a set of supplementary ports installed elsewhere in the system (in /opt) that do not clash with system stuff. It was all rather light hearted on my part. My apologies if that was not made obvious in my post. Ah I see. Well I'm not surprised by this, since that's the purpose of the /opt directory in a UNIX system: to hold OPTional software. That's why MacPorts uses a prefix under /opt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard#Directory_structure Yeah, I covered all that in my RHCSA exam ;-) Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Fedora does MacPorts
Hi, all. I thought maybe somebody might find this interesting: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/Software_Collections_Guide/index.html Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Fedora does MacPorts
On 12/08/2012 03:32 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 7, 2012, at 20:59, Phil Dobbin wrote: I thought maybe somebody might find this interesting: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/Software_Collections_Guide/index.html Which part should we be looking at? In what way does Fedora do MacPorts? I didn't see MacPorts mentioned on that page. No, it was more to do with the concept behind Software Collections. Disregarding the fact it installs into /opt, it looks a similar principle; a set of supplementary ports installed elsewhere in the system (in /opt) that do not clash with system stuff. It was all rather light hearted on my part. My apologies if that was not made obvious in my post. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, Lubuntu 12.10, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
XQuartz
Hi, all. I've read some very encouraging things about the latest version (2.7.4) of XQuartz which is offered as a binary from their web site. I'm just wondering if installing it will clobber anything installed by MacPorts (I'm not concerned about any Apple update clobbering it as I'm still on Snow Leopard my Macbook Pro is behind a NAT router with no ports forwarded so I don't bother applying the few security updates they release for SL nowadays anyway). I've no specific X Windows stuff installed by MacPorts only a few incidentals that have been dragged along as dependencies without installing the binary I can't really tell where it's going to put stuff but I'm hoping that it wouldn't be into /opt/local anyway. Any help, thoughts advice appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: XQuartz
On 12/04/2012 11:32 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: I've read some very encouraging things about the latest version (2.7.4) of XQuartz which is offered as a binary from their web site. I'm just wondering if installing it will clobber anything installed by MacPorts (I'm not concerned about any Apple update clobbering it as I'm still on Snow Leopard my Macbook Pro is behind a NAT router with no ports forwarded so I don't bother applying the few security updates they release for SL nowadays anyway). If it's an installer package, you'll find Bom files. It's a set structure, so you should be able to track down just what all is installed. xar works like tar, so you can list with -t or extract with -x into a temporary directory. lsbom on each Bom file will show you what's going to be installed on each of them. I've no specific X Windows stuff installed by MacPorts You're probably fine then, but check the file list with xar/lsbom. Thanks, Jeremy. I shall install away :-) Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: XQuartz
On 12/04/2012 11:45 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com mailto:phildob...@gmail.com wrote: I've read some very encouraging things about the latest version (2.7.4) of XQuartz which is offered as a binary from their web site. I'm just wondering if installing it will clobber anything installed by It installs everything under /opt/X11, aside from specific launchd config files that do not conflict. It *may* override a launchd configuration to run xorg-server from macports, but that's a non-default setup. (Also note that MacPorts' xorg server is the *same* XQuartz, by the same maintainer, so if you're using it then you do not need the macosforge one.) Hi, Brandon. No, I'm not using the MacPort's Xorg server so I should be OK. Thanks for the info, Cheers, Phil... -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 6.3, Debian Squeeze Wheezy, Fedora Beefy Spherical, OS X Snow Leopard Ubuntu Precise Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Bacula question
Hi, all. If I issue 'sudo port install bacula +client_only' will that indeed give me just the client only not the director, storage, MySQL, etc? I've Googled it but I can't seem to find a definitive answer. I'm running the director on CentOS so I only need the client on OS X. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Bacula question
Brandon Allbery wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com mailto:phildob...@gmail.com wrote: If I issue 'sudo port install bacula +client_only' will that indeed give me just the client only not the director, storage, MySQL, etc? It gives you whatever building bacula with --enable-client-only gives you. Hi, Brandon. That's what I'm trying to ascertain. What does that give you i.e is it the same as bacula-client bacula-common? Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Bacula question
Frank Schima wrote: On Nov 13, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: On Nov 13, 2012, at 16:46, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com wrote: That's what I'm trying to ascertain. What does that give you i.e is it the same as bacula-client bacula-common? We don't have any port called bacula-client or bacula-common? Try installing bacula +client_only; see if it gives you what you need. I think Phil is talking about that on Linux. I believe the answer is yes. I have not actually tried to install bacula without the +client_only variant and so I'm not sure if the director will work on Mac OS X currently. At work our director is on Linux and we have many Mac clients that successfully use the bacula (+client_only) port - which I now maintain. Hi, Frank. Yep, the only way I could try to get across what I was talking about was using the parlance of Linux versions of the repo files I need. My director is on CentOS so I just need the client files for OS X. Great stuff. Thanks a lot. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: MariaDB vs MySQL for Wordpress CMS
Markus Neuenschwander wrote: Hi MacPorts includes both MariaDB and MySQL. For a new web project with WordPress blog (1000 visitors / day) I need to decide between MySQL and MariaDB. I don't need official support. I googled and found old articles (weeks after buyout from Oracle) and biased info from AskMonty KnowledgeBase. What do you think? Did MySQL loose popularity in web projects (after new owner Oracle)? Do you know numbers about installation base? I've never used MariaDB but if you're used to MySQL, I'd be tempted to stick to MySQL 5.5. MariaDB isn't in the repos for Fedora 17 or Ubuntu 12.10 (didn't bother checking CentOS or Debian: if they ain't in Fedora or Ubuntu, I doubt it's in CentOS or Debian) so it's can't be that prevalent yet so while MariaDB may be the upstream of MySQL nowadays, it'll be a while before the pure volume of help available for it gets anywhere near matching what's on offer freely for MySQL. And besides, if it's a straight drop-in replacement™, you can always cross that bridge when you come to it. Just my two bob. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Can pip be used to install python packages?
Peng Yu wrote: I remember it used to be the case that python packages has to be installed by port. But the problem is that python packages from macports are not very updated. Since there is py27-pip, can I use pip to install python packages so I can have the latest packages from http://pypi.python.org/pypi? What I do is use pip (or easy_install) but I tend to use virtualenv keep everything out of the way of the system Python, etc. Virtualenv seems to be the recommended way to go nowadays but I'm no real pythonista so I expect somebody will point you in the right direction. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: SSH Locale Error
Jasper Frumau wrote: I keep on getting errors with Perl on my Dreamhost VPS Server (Debian Linux) Sample: !309 ~/bin/psmanager.pl http://psmanager.pl check perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_COLLATE = C, LC_CTYPE = UTF-8, LANG = (unset) are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). Check PsManager setup [snip] Try this: `$ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install belocs-locales-bin belocs-locales-data $ sudo vim /etc/locale.gen # en_US ISO-8859-1 # en_US.ISO-8859-15 ISO-8859-15 # en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8 # en_ZA ISO-8859-1 # en_ZA.UTF-8 UTF-8` find the locale you need uncomment it `$ sudo locale-gen Generating locales... en_US.UTF-8 (or whatever you choose)... done Generation complete` That should fix it. If it doesn't, try: `$ sudo apt-get install locales $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure locales` follow the on-screen instructions. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Port re-index?
Phil Dobbin wrote: Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: On Sep 22, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: Hi, all. I ran selfupdate very late last night it started what looked like a port re-index: `Creating port index in /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports Adding port aqua/AppHack Adding port aqua/AppKiDo Adding port aqua/AquaLess...` I sent a SIGHUP when it got down to about: `Adding port devel/hs-tagsoup Adding port devel/hs-terminfo ^C` so this left me wondering wondering if this is a normal re-indexing of all ports? Yes, after port updates the ports tree (port sync or port selfupate) the index must be updated to pickup changes to portfiles. Any help appreciated. $ cd /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports $ portindex # Depending on permissions you may need to use sudo portindex. $ cd ~- Thanks, Bradley. Yeah, I'm used to the port file being updated but this looks like *every* single port that MP provides. I'll just run it before lights out tonight let it do its thing. Just as a quick follow up to this, I did indeed run selfupdate at end of play last night it followed its normal pattern i.e. it didn't attempt to run a full port index just the normal (truncated): `sent 64 bytes received 636 bytes 280.00 bytes/sec total size is 512 speedup is 0.73 --- MacPorts base is already the latest version The ports tree has been updated. To upgrade your installed ports, you should run port upgrade outdated` Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Port re-index?
Hi, all. I ran selfupdate very late last night it started what looked like a port re-index: `Creating port index in /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports Adding port aqua/AppHack Adding port aqua/AppKiDo Adding port aqua/AquaLess...` I sent a SIGHUP when it got down to about: `Adding port devel/hs-tagsoup Adding port devel/hs-terminfo ^C` so this left me wondering wondering if this is a normal re-indexing of all ports? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Port re-index?
Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: On Sep 22, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: Hi, all. I ran selfupdate very late last night it started what looked like a port re-index: `Creating port index in /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports Adding port aqua/AppHack Adding port aqua/AppKiDo Adding port aqua/AquaLess...` I sent a SIGHUP when it got down to about: `Adding port devel/hs-tagsoup Adding port devel/hs-terminfo ^C` so this left me wondering wondering if this is a normal re-indexing of all ports? Yes, after port updates the ports tree (port sync or port selfupate) the index must be updated to pickup changes to portfiles. Any help appreciated. $ cd /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/ports $ portindex # Depending on permissions you may need to use sudo portindex. $ cd ~- Thanks, Bradley. Yeah, I'm used to the port file being updated but this looks like *every* single port that MP provides. I'll just run it before lights out tonight let it do its thing. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: port mirrors
Chris Jones wrote: On 18 Sep 2012, at 10:45pm, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: On Sep 18, 2012, at 09:35, Chris Jones wrote: Surely a better solution here is to figure out what is the issue with themse.uk server, and fix that, rather than try and work around it. Could someone with the contact information follow this up ? The contact information is shown here: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Mirrors Are you suggesting we (I) should contact them ourselves ? Surely this should come from some 'official' MacPorts contact ? I've no idea if anybody did contact mse.uk but their mirror is certainly working with alacrity today. So, if anybody indeed did, thank you kindly. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
port mirrors
Hi, all. For the last week or ten days or so http://mse.uk.packages.macports.org/sites/packages.macports.org has been extremely unresponsive; virtually always reaches its sixty second time-out just now didn't even get that far I invariably end up get the tarballs from http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org (I'm in London). Is there a sources list where I can comment out mse.uk or change its order or level or is this A Bad Idea? Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: port mirrors
Clemens Lang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Is there a sources list where I can comment out mse.uk or change its
order or level or is this A Bad Idea?
The list of package mirrors is defined in
$(port dir nzbget)/../../_resources/port1.0/fetch/archive_sites.tcl
Note that this file will probably be reset with every sync and/or
selfupdate you run.
And that reads:
`set portfetch::mirror_sites::sites(macports_archives) {
http://packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://mse.uk.packages.macports.org/sites/packages.macports.org/:nosubdir`
so is that's not in the order of mirrors polled first?
Cheers,
Phil...
--
But masters, remember that I am an ass.
Though it be not written down,
yet forget not that I am an ass.
Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: port mirrors
Phil Dobbin wrote:
Clemens Lang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Is there a sources list where I can comment out mse.uk or change its
order or level or is this A Bad Idea?
The list of package mirrors is defined in
$(port dir nzbget)/../../_resources/port1.0/fetch/archive_sites.tcl
Note that this file will probably be reset with every sync and/or
selfupdate you run.
And that reads:
`set portfetch::mirror_sites::sites(macports_archives) {
http://packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://mse.uk.packages.macports.org/sites/packages.macports.org/:nosubdir`
so is that's not in the order of mirrors polled first?
Or maybe it's just been re-set after the last successful (just now)
`selfupdate`?
Cheers,
Phil...
--
But masters, remember that I am an ass.
Though it be not written down,
yet forget not that I am an ass.
Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: port mirrors
Phil Dobbin wrote:
Phil Dobbin wrote:
Clemens Lang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Is there a sources list where I can comment out mse.uk or change its
order or level or is this A Bad Idea?
The list of package mirrors is defined in
$(port dir nzbget)/../../_resources/port1.0/fetch/archive_sites.tcl
Note that this file will probably be reset with every sync and/or
selfupdate you run.
And that reads:
`set portfetch::mirror_sites::sites(macports_archives) {
http://packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://mse.uk.packages.macports.org/sites/packages.macports.org/:nosubdir`
so is that's not in the order of mirrors polled first?
Or maybe it's just been re-set after the last successful (just now)
`selfupdate`?
No, scrub that idea, I've just checked the time stamp on it (06/09/12).
Cheers,
Phil...
--
But masters, remember that I am an ass.
Though it be not written down,
yet forget not that I am an ass.
Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: port mirrors
Chris Jones wrote: Surely a better solution here is to figure out what is the issue with the mse.uk server, and fix that, rather than try and work around it. Could someone with the contact information follow this up ? Chris On 18/09/12 15:32, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com mailto:phildob...@gmail.com wrote: Or maybe it's just been re-set after the last successful (just now) `selfupdate`? No, scrub that idea, I've just checked the time stamp on it (06/09/12). Timestamp may not prove anything; it may now be the timestamp of the last checked-in change to the file, overwriting your more recent local changes. `ls -lc` does actually show that the timestamp for the file was modified at the last selfupdate. However, I'm more inclined to go with Chris's point see if we can resolve the issue rather than start writing bash scripts, etc to work round it (unless, of course, someone wants to throw a quick hack together: I haven't got the time right now). Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: port mirrors
Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Sep 18, 2012, at 6:28 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Clemens Lang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Is there a sources list where I can comment out mse.uk or change its
order or level or is this A Bad Idea?
The list of package mirrors is defined in
$(port dir nzbget)/../../_resources/port1.0/fetch/archive_sites.tcl
Note that this file will probably be reset with every sync and/or
selfupdate you run.
And that reads:
`set portfetch::mirror_sites::sites(macports_archives) {
http://packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/:nosubdir
http://mse.uk.packages.macports.org/sites/packages.macports.org/:nosubdir`
so is that's not in the order of mirrors polled first?
IIRC the order is determined by ping response.
`$ ping mse.uk.packages.macports.org
PING www.mirrorservice.org (212.219.56.184): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.219.56.184: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=17.979 ms
64 bytes from 212.219.56.184: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=17.917 ms`
`$ ping lil.fr.packages.macports.org
PING macports.packages.ionic.de (87.98.244.45): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 87.98.244.45: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=21.644 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.244.45: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=21.675 ms`
yep, looks about right.
Cheers,
Phil...
--
But masters, remember that I am an ass.
Though it be not written down,
yet forget not that I am an ass.
Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Backups
Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Aug 29, 2012, at 18:27, Phil Dobbin wrote: So if I `sudo cp -R /opt/local/macports` to a suitable location There's no such directory in a standard MacPorts install... There is /opt/local/etc/macports, /opt/local/share/macports, and /opt/local/var/macports. Yeah, sorry my mistake. I left off the `/etc` use the ports installed file (I regularly take a snapshot of ports installed via `port -qv installed myports.txt`) that should give me a head start in case alarm bells start to toll? By saving the list of installed ports, should your MacPorts installation become so garbled that the port command can no longer run or can no longer read the registry of installed ports, you could nuke your MacPorts install using the uninstallation instructions in the Guide, and then use the reinstallation script on the Migration page to reinstall the ports based on the myports.txt file. I'll also study the migration page although Snow Leopard is where I get off the train as far as OS X is concerned. I mentioned the Migration page not because you're migrating between OS releases but because it discusses how to reinstall a set of ports, which is what you asked how to do. Again, apologies. Still a bit miffed about the direction Apple have taken as it's of no use to me. But I've been using a Mac since 1987 I'm sorry to see our relationship end. Be a lot cheaper for me now though :-) Thanks to everybody for their help, Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Backups
Hi, all. I want to add the required MacPort's configuration files directories to my nightly local remote scheduled backups. I've already got everything in my weekly clone but it'd be handier just to have the files/dirs needed to run everything again put all my ports back in place as they were if the need arose. Could somebody give me the list needed to do this? Thanks. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Backups
Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Aug 29, 2012, at 18:07, Phil Dobbin wrote: it'd be handier just to have the files/dirs needed to run everything again put all my ports back in place as they were if the need arose. Could somebody give me the list needed to do this? MacPorts doesn't really have such a feature, but there is a procedure written about how to do that here: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration There is also a script in the last section of that page automating the reinstallation port. So in your backup, you'd want to perhaps automate running port -qv installed myports.txt and saving that myports.txt file in your backups somewhere. Of course there's no guarantee that at a later time you'll be able to reinstall these particular versions of these ports again, if updates to MacPorts have occurred since you first installed them. Also, this won't save any files you've modified, like config files in /opt/local/etc; you should back up any such files yourself. So if I `sudo cp -R /opt/local/macports` to a suitable location use the ports installed file (I regularly take a snapshot of ports installed via `port -qv installed myports.txt`) that should give me a head start in case alarm bells start to toll? I'll also study the migration page although Snow Leopard is where I get off the train as far as OS X is concerned. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Backups
Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: [ Phil Dobbin wrote on Thu 30.Aug'12 at 0:27:54 +0100 ] [snip} So if I `sudo cp -R /opt/local/macports` to a suitable location use the ports installed file (I regularly take a snapshot of ports installed via `port -qv installed myports.txt`) that should give me a head start in case alarm bells start to toll? I'll also study the migration page although Snow Leopard is where I get off the train as far as OS X is concerned. Cheers, Phil... Couldn't you use traditional UNIX tools like dump/restore or dd to back-up /opt/local? I'm using rsync (actually Duplicity because the remote location is S3) so it was the location of the files on my local drive to be backed up that was the question not the method used for backup. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Django virtualenv
Hi, all. I'm getting: `$ type virtualenv bash: type: virtualenv: not found [Fri Aug 24 10:52:03 dobbin@darkstar:~ ] $ type django-admin.py bash: type: django-admin.py: not found [Fri Aug 24 10:52:20 dobbin@darkstar:~ ] $ python Python 2.7.3 (default, Apr 13 2012, 00:05:08) [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)] on darwin Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import django print django.get_version() 1.5 [Fri Aug 24 10:54:06 dobbin@darkstar:~ ] $ type python python is hashed (/opt/local/bin/python)` My PATH is set: `export PYTHONPATH=/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/` : `$ python -c from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib() /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages [Fri Aug 24 11:14:32 dobbin@darkstar:~ ] $ echo $PYTHONPATH /opt/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ [Fri Aug 24 11:18:48 dobbin@darkstar:~ ] $ port select --list python Available versions for python: none python25-apple python26-apple python27 (active)` I had this working on py26 but I've since cleaned py25 py26 out only use 2.7.3 (all from MacPorts). I'm thinking somehow I've set PYTHONPATH wrong but I'm at a loss to figure it out our friend Google waxes lyrically about the subject for days. Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... p.s. I've tried all different nomenclature of django i.e. django, django-admin, django_just_work_you_son_of_a_bitch so on... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Django virtualenv
Daniel Ericsson wrote: On 24 aug 2012, at 12:21, Phil Dobbin wrote: Hi, all. I'm getting: `$ type virtualenv bash: type: virtualenv: not found [Fri Aug 24 10:52:03 dobbin@darkstar:~ ] $ type django-admin.py bash: type: django-admin.py: not found Do you have '/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/Current/bin' added to your PATH? $ port contents py27-virtualenv | grep bin /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/virtualenv /opt/local/bin/virtualenv-2.7 $ port contents py27-django | grep bin/django /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/django-admin.py /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/bin/django-admin.py /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/bin/django-admin.pyc /opt/local/bin/django-admin-2.7.py Hi, Daniel. That did the trick. Now running: `$ django-admin.py` gets the desired result. Don't know if this mentioned anywhere in the docs but if it isn't, maybe it should be. Probably at the tail end of the install perhaps. Thanks for your help, Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: textmate2
Clemens Lang wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:05:55AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: I was just running `selfupdate` when I noticed textmate2 had been ported. I still use textmate 1.5 occasionally having tried the binary of textmate2 from macromates when it was first Alpha not feeling it was ready for prime time (which, being Alpha, is to be expected), have kind of forgot about it. TBH, I'm not sure it's much better at the moment. Development has picked up quite a bit in the last few days, but there's still quite a few bugs. I'd like to give textmate2 a run out but when running macromates' version, it meant moving textmate1's support folders (Application Support, Preferences, etc) in order not to overwrite them. Is there any way to use MacPort's textmate2 without going down this road? The current state of TextMate 2 in MacPorts is pretty much vanilla upstream; there's no patching going on, so I'm afraid you'll still have to do that, if you want to make sure your TextMate 1.5 support folder isn't changed. Thanks for that. I think I'll leave it a little while longer. It's only curiosity that's prompting me. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
textmate2
Hi, all. I was just running `selfupdate` when I noticed textmate2 had been ported. I still use textmate 1.5 occasionally having tried the binary of textmate2 from macromates when it was first Alpha not feeling it was ready for prime time (which, being Alpha, is to be expected), have kind of forgot about it. I'd like to give textmate2 a run out but when running macromates' version, it meant moving textmate1's support folders (Application Support, Preferences, etc) in order not to overwrite them. Is there any way to use MacPort's textmate2 without going down this road? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Why can't I select the Mountain Lion Python 2.7?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Samuel Halliday wrote: Nevermind, fixed this by updating my PATH export PATH=/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/:$PATH I personally just have MacPort's python27 installed, use a variation of that $PATH use virtualenv for all things Python if I can. Clean, efficient if anything runs amok, easily detroyable. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQI/qPAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJCEsH/RN91/D7AVd+vQB8RGTHWxMF /vvzdvvhqYXGudOh45xGFaFlWVmaE+Q7fzNVne4VOc6Vsoy04CkKsynkgCUr9LF4 9GiNw95Jmas6iScBayWea6plBzPMQ+aAbwZiaG6e7fTQAolcbtrY3Kziks6FNtWt Z+MKAXgRByMWJPOeGJ/2qKZiPSxMo8NbW61fQ6E0KrnTpWZ1/dbZCdUwdgPqXS34 UKXBH7m8cXPg5afwmWxE7tj02ZynSn4pgk2QSO+BHfvLVFj3XQmDmio6Y2+nj/g9 S+5a/2CsjU6G9JU0E21oJplFmWVWDVS8mgxvkPPbQNAl7Bp+QWlKdmtct20QrJo= =3mbF -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: OT upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Linder wrote: I'm using snow-leopard and everything works perfectly: gnome-terminal, wireshark, gimp, wget, latex ... After watching the woes unfold here why would I upgrade, what does lion offer that I don't have? (facebook connectivity etc is rather like a lead balloon) I personally am going to stick at Snow Leopard. Apple seem hell bent ( financially, who can blame them) on turning their Mac line of computers into glorified, very expensive iPads. Also, judging by the amount of posts I see here, on the Xcode list, etc, every time there's an upgrade, people spend weeks trying to sort it out get back to semblance of normality so they can continue working. Also I'm fortunate enough not to have to write Mac apps for a living, so SL works fine for me so if it ain't broke, don't fix it. In all honesty, if it wasn't for Mac Ports, I'd probably just stick to Linux have done with it. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQIdFhAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJo7oIAJ7fYawmcT02LwjMzZjK84uk FUGUff2+NjH+DtEqqvSq9Wf023maJy9qYknvdVbIt3yoHMWavINOdC4VQefnUDSs MyW+WyMWVzZp+6jVWL5PsJYbEWygCkyGbNS8kdHtvCaUJ0xwH17Vchn+uU+tARUj q5R1gwtAOIWXMWslI20n7Un4bIj12RFb9YEkOad0zdL9asv7aFOnGJCHwpoyxxc5 V8KLDjSr3SfIQIInNL2luEA1vxAqlPyvIffueWE9xPBYQ1D/YcwqyrpXbvccNio8 q3E0KxxWKhNaGMg61HVhWADQuvxZQS8BDTjw6TSg0bqyXzFF0px5CLQXQMntvEA= =EUCr -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Mercurial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. I've just run selfupdate got, amongst other things: `mercurial 2.2.3_0 2.3_0` so I ran upgrade outdated but now when I cd into my hg vim repo run `hg pull` it throws the error: `$ hg pull abort: No module named repo!` it's the same when I call `hg status` I Googled for the error but no luck. Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHfOCAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJzyMH/2YuOp7zNljEjgAjQ6WnkbAD bzQn8iQ5Z0SBja9a85W9uyFMKu6/ZewbmBu6YC2qpstJqawJP+CKcJEWLGZ9KhBI SAS21rcQjG5C1YdUhY+oKD4mbBSyahZmiugUwODDzsC4MqWouS+88+ShnNYULntu BDbOyCml1hCRaOXbDHlJRJZ080gfTs3EHSJqDaTJwDkIscM4u4D569vtTSfbmdT+ PEfWAhEhtYnPWzjeZ/xdfQKflelS2pVBlbAMQF0Dmws5A+Mzb3qN1zYh2yq0ulag CpMlVdAuD6dZ48ijqi06KP9j5ejTAcyI8aBXYEu+gJBIa0qXRzROqWNHSrTIuKU= =4Jl7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Mecurial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 just a traceback further to this problem. Hope it helps: `$ hg log --traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/dispatch.py, line 88, in _runcatch return _dispatch(req) File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/dispatch.py, line 710, in _dispatch repo = hg.repository(ui, path=path) File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/hg.py, line 104, in repository peer = _peerorrepo(ui, path, create) File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/hg.py, line 99, in _peerorrepo hook(ui, obj) File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/hggit/__init__.py, line 90, in reposetup if not isinstance(repo, gitrepo.gitrepo): File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py, line 86, in __getattribute__ self._load() File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py, line 58, in _load mod = _origimport(head, globals, locals) File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/hggit/gitrepo.py, line 9, in module class gitrepo(repo.repository): File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py, line 86, in __getattribute__ self._load() File /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mercurial/demandimport.py, line 58, in _load mod = _origimport(head, globals, locals) ImportError: No module named repo abort: No module named repo!` Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHfgvAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJi00IALSCmGfDLvy1t7SGcyxludcg Gash7cdOHS6PwUtPLHBk81ctBWSiwEjG45g5AniqH0Fi9ni5ujMotPG+NXaUhGrs 45MpEDWTtm7ofHZhwUI57qvsrfhPo+Yo5KNeDSv5kOz7LnWgMwp+U3ENn00wHjvK iq7/Q0CF5FBewPgur+BK/fcPbF9xsW8ggEGP7aQhovhi6vCzm3mCP5r85+nim3/y Sx7kDnePRS4Xw7MSRgB6WUqLzrpKUnIQ9elQxCuh4Bu6ig6yfQlb0hr8RhFWySol iEXQ97G03Zi1hK7fjfbH4whEedW4CbANz/BGYnJ12w3VQDliZ3ttzfCmunBqRVo= =fQid -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Mercurial
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ned Deily wrote: In article 501df382.4060...@gmail.com, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com wrote: I've just run selfupdate got, amongst other things: `mercurial 2.2.3_0 2.3_0` so I ran upgrade outdated but now when I cd into my hg vim repo run `hg pull` it throws the error: `$ hg pull abort: No module named repo!` hg 2.3 is working fine for me. Check your ~/.hgrc file and any repo-specific .hg/hgrc files for the stray use of the word repo, for example in the [extensions] section. And make sure you don't have any PYTHON* environment variables set (like PYTHONPATH) that might be causing a problem. Thanks, Ned. It was `hggit/gitrepo.py` (the hggit extension) that was causing the problem. In fact, it's been a problem more than once on several different occasions. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHfqfAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJOJ4IAKSGT/YX34GQ0WhRduThGcsK VSDcXBt/DbWub8psKcVXZy982V5z7lEHfkUxTVkpeeBO0Zd2h0lZV0roBLm5rGr1 JDX0KGp74WZtwcnuky+/jUB4WUabho6g/EMM/eP+nbXfBBuupxZR8i/cgCn5abkI 1vRcsGYSmI0FA7yvi6AfHfOHl9JCLvGZ8JpbmbkKCtgM/EbrQCzrwVKDpP/9tb3y NbQALP/R7PQMAG14Wwkagdh85H7fUxWZRL2vWTrNo1KGTgJB0nvmJ42PgU8blPPb 8rP5PLo7LF/BKRvZjye5FZKaBT1QUyIadtWBXy2bb5Y8cdURroCUunb7Xy8rSA4= =4R11 -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Terminal vim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. Am I correct in thinking in order to install terminal vim with python enabled, it has to use python25? Reason I ask is I'd like to use python27 as quite a few plugins I need to use require it. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQF8ceAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJdGUH/jhAwZcVJZKZAQrzY7snWOjw 96rycPhu+dRUhezgnlqdLi5ql5HUqHkd+z6M7q2DhSZ1ioVQt2WPsODbZ0mew6ei hGwQxDRYvvuKOQwqfDtlpXzB3Ld8TwAO0hxduBM77fAk8NQIg8gZELXgZJRX15LC 1rMe73lCFoyZgNrfb6nhL41HVGmULNUSAaWn/g0lNs5bY63Eqggdh7C2YWcmkp1Z D30j+vkjHe+4Lo/2Fz8kweJg1/4hVTURr6mUMWipG3C6/KIiF2lskKUJB3fs+6pL zPGi+5o6+L2OXOazt747sWwFOVM8qdGXFGSX7+e8hsCpT39GpMecXw1ZHOSneqQ= =iaai -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Terminal vim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Clemens Lang wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:53:03PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: Am I correct in thinking in order to install terminal vim with python enabled, it has to use python25? No. Reason I ask is I'd like to use python27 as quite a few plugins I need to use require it. You can use the +python27 variant. See `port variants vim`. Hi, Clemens. Port variants says: `python: Compatibility variant, requires +python25` which is the reason I asked about it. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQF9VrAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJLbEIALCX6srWGzBCaV8kXN8p3TBz fUKsJBfemmfYvJHuRFQRTUvBzZnwCWo1a4yrL49RKYh/tK+oL6KCu7WGALFtBR9N wCX7c8r5UcIA0bJgfOW7LRqBOlJEUqjq7NsrSt6b1bvb0fn9WUR0z6Tv/YNOp4kt vVc6JSORTDhO32E+gxNh9Wx6h+7b1svCBDJqCBj5nu3WRBU8qiFHjEtunFvPm7aZ tBKIP8jTYdcEU59F/w1ji2x29JleWSTFVjeTySG8GcNTU9qq6BXi+zVZzvXqRDc5 eRPBnEtsVqgWTwhrAX3/3D+SB9EPMde0YES3dU04S3+ArlE2drwdGZOM9raBsKE= =vdst -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: Monitoring Internet Usage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Craig Treleaven wrote: I want to be able to monitor internet usage from my son's Mac*. (Top 5 applications by MB transferred; maybe top 20 internet addresses, etc.) I think there was a commit in the last couple of weeks to a port that did just that--but, of course, I can't find it now. Craig *We keep blowing through our GB cap and the overage charge was $50 on the last bill!! Since there is 4 of us in the house, I've never been clear on how much data he uses. Hover, he has been away at camp the last 4 weeks and our GB usage is down by 2/3! If you have a router, it's probably easier to cap his bandwidth. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQGGXaAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJ5ckH/A85s1Zju4uBy1Xr1qNvLleG OujVzllSTLA7KiSN8HtNb2bU09sjuyqc/ySyQk4iIWdmSa2uh2NFoSd02sxsmMvf GNk+njkf96op/DcTrr3h+NXyKoMLJc3eNeX4YX0JOiOyCcbs+sdr1uYBDF3P5WyH MvYX4oW3iPS5d4YaPWoJI4ioImTI6/FIbkT5gxmle+7DhG8RWezfWmma/KJzMtTC iqyCmoesWmigzbrCpTNdEze06MD6las0usC9OOPF13o1FuGOKiGJ/tpDeiTU4R4I iL5B2gKI28fofRa2biXH1q1CUOraBLylGWh+va7KCFSBU5jYiOKgfGgL/f7b4lA= =Gm/s -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Re: git bash_completion does not work - solved (?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Barrie Stott wrote: On 21 Jul 2012, at 11:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jul 21, 2012, at 04:53, Barrie Stott wrote: On 20 Jul 2012, at 16:08, Clemens Lang wrote: [snip] Thank you for this and your Terminal Preferences change. Everything would have been fine using them and what Stephan said: add /opt/local/bin/bash to /etc/shells and obey chsh -s /opt/local/bin/bash Unfortunately, I thought that merely removing Terminal windows, rather than typing cmd-q, was sufficient to start with a clean Terminal state. Once I used cmd-q everything was fine. I'm grateful for all the help given. Thanks also from me. I've been silently following this thread trying to work out why alt-backspace doesn't work as expected thinking I was using /opt/local/bin/bash -v4 Now it does. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQCr7XAAoJEKuJdOaOnmMJfIwH/RmtmCwvG423U15ROkfNVn4V n02EWBC3YJVVa3aY0xyRtscIUb490pW8hZrhz31y0rq5MQ+VlXImXF/9zx4LbbZS cBtvRjzLP+6LWqjA6UNCGcWiM7tsTFW9YWAhYnkG9NIBGi++d1D00pJSZiQFzVbn 99naynFjqHCiQebdjYgifDpgdqtZFgCZW7BNr6Ykkt8wY7aUI70FYRKDk76R5EcL Fc3uE9F9qDuU6f5GtVrssoxHdW+r0WtgoCgZ9KvytwthMs1b8G2zbQKv2mYKEWAB VTtGNGxMZkzo7NWCDzs6ewXAyI+fenA0kB3pX9wov/AI5p0fNETCUrIom2th3Co= =8tbD -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
xz liblzma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. I've just ran `sudo port -v selfupdate` got: `$ port outdated The following installed ports are outdated: liblzma5.0.3_0 5.0.3_1 ruby 1.8.7-p358_0 1.8.7-p370_0 xz 5.0.3_0 5.0.4_0 ` so I went ahead upgraded. Then I got: `$ sudo port upgrade outdated - --- liblzma is replaced by xz - --- Computing dependencies for xz - --- Fetching archive for xz - --- Attempting to fetch xz-5.0.4_0.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2 from http://packages.macports.org/xz - --- Attempting to fetch xz-5.0.4_0.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2.rmd160 from http://packages.macports.org/xz - --- Installing xz @5.0.4_0 - --- Cleaning xz - --- Deactivating liblzma @5.0.3_0 - --- Unable to deactivate liblzma @5.0.3_0, the following ports depend on it: - --- ImageMagick @6.7.7-2_0+q16 Warning: Deactivate forced. Proceeding despite dependencies.` so it looks like ImageMagick may have a problem. I don't actually mind losing it on this box (its work is done) so do I just go ahead do the usual dependency dance then uninstall? Also, if that's the case, is there a quicker (i.e. one-liner) I can run to take care of uninstalling ImageMagick? Or is it a case of xz replacing liblzma all's well I can forget the whole thing? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP8T3ZAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADe2sH/2MSfjcljzvG5aYyrz+5/Xwr E071To82UIlFrZMskgjcugDTu6jYXgrr59wVlLTGblqULxK/ZeFQ2Cp4R1HtYcBE fgdRyOSaI89M3Jih5Ze04BYdFuumrqnzrAuhfbbh6MP6KdsnsilT08MgYExVo0UN pk4R4E2204im4hV6xlQQbb1mySSbPMVS6CbmPmb1bxlQ7WwTLoid1m4MGdCjMH4H WWQDEnOzAVWbS4lL22H774hU3Qkw1u9MwATyfJnvcwp80PqIG5OPqRPMEMMNTpnf NsodGXGxK4x7+qsVxBP3GjGfujfI7c7pr1RzQN/3Bfsqndy4lZln0U2ttJDfHvU= =d2y/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: xz liblzma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/2012 15:53, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com mailto:phildob...@gmail.com wrote: `$ port outdated The following installed ports are outdated: liblzma5.0.3_0 5.0.3_1 ruby 1.8.7-p358_0 1.8.7-p370_0 xz 5.0.3_0 5.0.4_0 ` so I went ahead upgraded. Then I got: - --- Deactivating liblzma @5.0.3_0 - --- Unable to deactivate liblzma @5.0.3_0, the following ports depend on it: - --- ImageMagick @6.7.7-2_0+q16 Warning: Deactivate forced. Proceeding despite dependencies.` so it looks like ImageMagick may have a problem. I would expect that someone would have noticed this already if xz didn't replace whatever libraries ImageMagick uses with binary compatible versions. That someone would even have been you if you're up to date on MacPorts itself; rev-upgrade would finish up your upgrade run by scanning everything looking (among other things) for shared object breakage of the sort that might be introduced by this, and by default would have kicked off a rebuild of ImageMagick if that breakage had occurred. Hi, Brandon. Guess so. All's quiet on the subject so I reckon I'll clean up go on about my business. Thanks, Phil.. - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP8g5CAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADQAQH/RoggbBL50uyROSAHvGXHCBT 7Vab5ytgtI6RJNeaxvxRaLr/d3v0WOvtEieWu5vmpL+yD6+SaAv/HkvfRFxYzU+8 5EZDutV+OUszy46wvkdkguZKW7q8YDvJRkPfcyHsp2AkzkcKSoLnzVi3JBJHoAt4 ygn+GO8R/MKfGox7F4XX2CPCnAygnDk4pN6Hf+dBvWvsM+MLTto4iQw1w1XNUsg7 ibfBQbKsJ0ki1mnqr7RJM4TUr0coA6N3TJ1jxMt3ev7jGabUUKp96Sekz+xRZ6P2 iNVADpng7JMUUGs0pw4ekSuwElzHLMjM3So57RKD4lJiwBJCDx6WhcxsBWALDn0= =ZAvE -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
npm upgrade problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. I've just ran `sudo port selfupdate` which told me there was a new version of npm. So I upgraded: `sudo port upgrade outdated - --- Computing dependencies for npm - --- Fetching archive for npm - --- Attempting to fetch npm-1.1.32_0.darwin_10.noarch.tbz2 from http://packages.macports.org/npm - --- Attempting to fetch npm-1.1.32_0.darwin_10.noarch.tbz2.rmd160 from http://packages.macports.org/npm - --- Installing npm @1.1.32_0 - --- Cleaning npm - --- Computing dependencies for npm - --- Deactivating npm @1.1.24_0 - --- Cleaning npm - --- Activating npm @1.1.32_0` now I'm getting: `$ npm -h bash: npm: command not found` I did a readlink on /opt/local/bin/npm: `$ readlink npm /opt/local/var/macports/build/_Volumes_work_mports_dports_devel_npm/npm/work/destroot/opt/local/lib/node_modules/npm/bin/npm-cli.js` something to my untrained eye looks amiss. Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP5yyAAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADpUYH/1JswZYJ5GtQe4xDYmDfpF3p rsMkuHH+zc8PUAWhEHG61r7rhIN59rhJlnjYmQOtdrsjZkB+yT4eu71co1Yp7dsG FRmE8cRotpVBwQNGvNJEKo3WPrrkRoWNCdiJZR5zpGU4zF4dSMpnC2PvZbC5KE1e LcamWHFCx6iOu/+frV9/in1+Fjq0FQ9CO7mjKATH1WqrQVubmQCqayttqesltvKr p/vYSio1sm8nUkT+lDHlUx4ZR2dYS5D0+pTIogeQ2rUojmTuJ26TnprqNkLvcYv/ wXF6/oMLTI9ZjfDmTA7aOdgynX1rQRer+EL40abfay9iul2TFMkkcO1hsB7nZFo= =+cpA -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Architecture mixup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/05/2012 07:25, Ian Wadham wrote: This is not strictly a Macports question, but my problem might be due to a Macports upgrade so someone here might be able to help. [snip] I think my processor is quad core 64-bit. It is a 15 Macbook Pro of early 2011 vintage. It is described by About This Mac as 2 GHz Intel Core i7. My software is: Mac OS X 10.7.4 Lion XCode 4.2.1 Macports 2.0.4 Oddly, arch says i386 and machine says i486. Shouldn't they say x86_64? What is going on? Why can't I build? Ideas would be very welcome. Even though the processor on your Mac is 64-bit capable, your OS (i.e. OS X) isn't 64-bit: it's i386. Don't know whether that helps at all... Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPtLDVAAoJEKpMeDHWT5AD7A0H/2CoqZGxyhfJ+WBlT6lPtefz G+KojrkdxupTwKN9WQzx+XC4wtA+rwqcIv9n/JK74dwAeoA8unxR+ZP7HmRsv1dj UqNruow48gAN9T+ummGROy+Me3rURbANTQyboSF0nwDr/DIS2fhTMSFvDXXKqDSk W56sl8Px2cXZCPvca9O6rauaMR7YBM4om1dXCqvh1P6B6XDppthb/9V/xjAnc8uR cfIi5acxNFnEtcKUyKNafnmKDKF5LICw8mxQZqD6SPxG1NGw4Y5+AVYj7ZkRdAgI G5Ut7J/EHCK3ICfM75ie1DFbTvq7P2cOiWvGtlbGwa+qwr9Vx7aJF8COrEgQY/4= =qg4J -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Architecture mixup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/05/2012 14:08, Watch Dog wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com wrote: On 17/05/2012 07:25, Ian Wadham wrote: This is not strictly a Macports question, but my problem might be due to a Macports upgrade so someone here might be able to help. [snip] I think my processor is quad core 64-bit. It is a 15 Macbook Pro of early 2011 vintage. It is described by About This Mac as 2 GHz Intel Core i7. My software is: Mac OS X 10.7.4 Lion XCode 4.2.1 Macports 2.0.4 Oddly, arch says i386 and machine says i486. Shouldn't they say x86_64? What is going on? Why can't I build? Ideas would be very welcome. Even though the processor on your Mac is 64-bit capable, your OS (i.e. OS X) isn't 64-bit: it's i386. Don't know whether that helps at all... Not at all... Pure BS. cd / file mach_kernel mach_kernel: Mach-O universal binary with 3 architectures mach_kernel (for architecture x86_64):Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64 mach_kernel (for architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386 mach_kernel (for architecture ppc): Mach-O executable ppc Thanks for pointing that out so charmingly. I neglected to spot the OP was using Lion: I'm still using Snow Leopard `Darwin darkstar.local 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386` Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPtQkpAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADe/4IAMrGwAWev1W1nB8iAxbYo2bR aZkTIM/XJ9hbtfqUpheN+j4A3wSEps0LIcAqJhZaE0Gy0DhuAGh+xXji2iuVD/4E ZQ4A664nctMEAc/GlBfALg5qrvha4LGKkzVG0IlH132mN4lwh83tiY473ae/MxJ0 bpFE5pPbRJXHmF/QWEi/mhYhjC21PSXHa4lK2IwUCdAnVrvYLk5Q0FKyG2/0COAt 2DQMRaNndQophWVs4Pv7p+C+Masm1JjhvEXWwryDEJGPtFIAFtD5nK80BxN4q3/I /ZaYeFvAKTtdlHjFqVokoUvAIhCkB99JeaWuSFRWmWmYp5Ri2cvf7ObS0imkUwM= =yAMZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Architecture mixup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/05/2012 21:10, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 09:20, Phil Dobbin wrote: Thanks for pointing that out so charmingly. I neglected to spot the OP was using Lion: I'm still using Snow Leopard `Darwin darkstar.local 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386` Snow Leopard is also a 64-bit OS. So is Leopard. So are parts of Tiger. The *kernel* your machine runs (which is what uname tells you about) might still be 32-bit, but that in no way impedes your ability to run 64-bit software. That's kind of what I was trying to say (very badly as it turned out). I can't find the OS X equivalent of: `egrep '(vm|svm)' --color=always /proc/cpuinfo` which although it is strictly speaking the way of finding out if your box is capable of hardware virtualization, is also useful as a sure fire way of knowing if your kernel is 64-bit. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPtV12AAoJEKpMeDHWT5AD58QH/RqF4fUIUsp7KXFwaRtblCzd WIx7LXoi6nbJVIi7vM+V7XZCqljJq5TBvgIQk0IquMyaG8ocTKSxVPWUX8+MAW2G FSmPeamlLkq9KKCRYHbACa/adPWqXZEwijBRKilMWMKrJhbFSv7ji40Np/LJ0GT7 2+BgvLyHqE9/UF+feGZx2YIK4ysftyiGZiopZdgtP6N608mzIshwH19MLPF6IxE6 qi/NC9GIwerrqhvx3SoVJJpFxEfhw1ixD6w5XXlacU/fpEzkxKdB6hymOImwEcWs V8nGyjthG0psFUtdmfiJZORC6bon++zekRmV3wZrrC2ZiH2k/1utYHLlVpMV1+0= =LbiU -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Architecture mixup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/05/2012 21:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 15:27, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: That's kind of what I was trying to say (very badly as it turned out). I can't find the OS X equivalent of: `egrep '(vm|svm)' --color=always /proc/cpuinfo` which although it is strictly speaking the way of finding out if your box is capable of hardware virtualization, is also useful as a sure fire way of knowing if your kernel is 64-bit. Is sysctl viable for that? hw.optional.x86_64: 1 I was not aware of that sysctl variable but it appears to be accurate, though only for Intel machines of course. The one MacPorts base itself uses (to determine the default build_arch) is hw.cpu64bit_capable which should work on PowerPC machines as well. Note that this works on Leopard and up only. For your amusement, here are a few values from a few different systems I have access to: MacBookPro3,1, a 64-bit machine with the 32-bit kernel: $ uname -p i386 $ uname -m i386 $ sysctl hw.cpu64bit_capable hw.cpu64bit_capable: 1 $ sysctl hw.optional.x86_64 hw.optional.x86_64: 1 $ [snip] I get exactly the same on a MacBookPro4,1 Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPtWvlAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADy2QH/A0vgunsMI6GhyYoK7h3vrVp vDRW1t20WkxdNerTQh3d0CM/vIn9ZzZI7/SjopJlh2iXa24cH/Jn0PYiJR/R5cuy 5DLLbTOXBbkq/cQrrzgDfoC/wD4W7p6yN6uhL2rnECc7RxsfQtsNnkL9+dqlph15 nA2wdovOsTMN865hdZO+9RAStdSh0MBSFcf3IIrBbTTqXKZXJOptvuxJK9l6Fq/Y G80lNP+853ir11iAooK9drjIovjILk6wTF4qxm0l0Dg5vUHyEzRit39+2u3dvP1o +m0QsdTSok9DbtYOkncr8uM1uwUAAY14Tg63HA6v7JY0dXPQ27ucKLwZZ4PgnYA= =EeyX -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/05/2012 16:29, Joshua Root wrote: The MacPorts Project is happy to announce that the 2.1.0 version has now been released. It is available via the usual methods: [snip] I've just upgraded via selfupdate on 10.6.8 got a message about Tcl's executable bit being set: `MacPorts base is outdated, installing new version 2.1.0 Installing new MacPorts release in /opt/local as root:admin; permissions 0755; Tcl-Package in /Library/Tcl` upon doing a `ls -als` the OS's whole Tcl directory is 755. Not being that au fait with OS X's Tcl (except that when I try to use it to get any kind of gui with Perl, it never works), I'm not sure whether this is a security matter or not. Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPsolqAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADb1oH/jFRmrGaWPKQgr6biDTXH6Fi WPL7qq1ETzyH7msVRbPUElsQ06lkPnkBcyHHmic1RnXKP4VqPshC3ODbo/1Z0BQo H05ywC1dxEkuBwonhxXen/nJQ+LQd8D8K0XyEqDArmlUiXDhluXvfmq+RqWccDSl rQi7IcUFPyRByqFTJXIxKpIHHlRbPFAayIY1c1ifVwoVmU1PbE6kNVNfQo9PU/pm BzABfhCrHOMtzfwK+xLHp7qUcTZVm0TL2+UOr7S9oQpuFn+o7Hox/2488QS4nBMT ZBJicvNGhVlk1gQHcMw4sza+UwJZHBzm1Y+WLzHduiCRAj0VexspIWIqD9myRtM= =o5uy -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/05/2012 17:54, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: I've just upgraded via selfupdate on 10.6.8 got a message about Tcl's executable bit being set: `MacPorts base is outdated, installing new version 2.1.0 Installing new MacPorts release in /opt/local as root:admin; permissions 0755; Tcl-Package in /Library/Tcl` upon doing a `ls -als` the OS's whole Tcl directory is 755. Not being that au fait with OS X's Tcl (except that when I try to use it to get any kind of gui with Perl, it never works), I'm not sure whether this is a security matter or not. Any help appreciated. Directories must be also be executable, otherwise you can't look the things inside them. Makes sense ( the fact the whole of /Library is set executable). I just wondered why it was pointed it out in the message Tcl was mentioned explicitly. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPsoy1AAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADucIIAJ8X1+5Qkqdql+8WYm2+wDUS s2THibTbY4WW5+S79VPy/XPtqKK4CP055BAEnBHydMow+9HxgI/1CsqWZUGRq/Gf xFzIwRPAAseGpCc2Ts2mhht6hxHXzgatY4NAnqUyDRumWGKDicTOolT+0uTXbVDJ sJmmhTrzg6dJSxp4CMCWg0g6igi0gKxR3P5/3NWjzmxGivETP+1DArs6zKMiIbw7 BxdDAhOJCAnFo/Rgj7hUFINAgoBDUZusKhnWyAioR7nrkyzqL/oZgmxqnG0tq5+H t5Saqn/e3ocCVHO4cQ7sKzJSq5KJMwqccoUCQ2H+KM1tSCc59H3nty2B9QCIWhc= =+x6U -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/05/2012 18:07, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: Makes sense ( the fact the whole of /Library is set executable). I just wondered why it was pointed it out in the message Tcl was mentioned explicitly. It's just letting you know what it's doing and where. It probably reflects any change you might have made if you were compiling it outside of MacPorts. OK. Thanks, Jeremy. I did attempt unsuccessfully to use a gui installer that invoked Tcl via Perl (as I mentioned) a month or so back so that's probably the culprit. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPso5ZAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADa3sH/iQch5m6vmNcGCh0JNyiVpyf nfCWbaex1H87tybGpqvbodcQ8gzpCrSTTxbwK0oden8IUIvP8j/GI05AFMnBZCmx IxSe9nGqcGKdedmt4TQCBTooBvcCevJSITaCpn9sBvXw6yedfcnr/etJleCihS7B GaWxYx+TbcQQ0TGIFLVEVd1vs8n2Fn4fsVp/nRM+VVAXXoaX/Jv4pF0rAckwhEh5 l6sJLgvYgMvtnx7c82eyO1xS/8INq2MTzfxN9rkcbQTf9ZC5W8bYsJjfLRSzFKdT 8jQE/jjokC4TrCbLdJ9F+qVdp9WKZbRAqhYseS5wdfGrqbXsYFgymlR9HBHoaFE= =FRjd -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: gimp fails to install : Unable to execute port: can't read startupitem.install: no such variable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/05/2012 14:42, Brad Allison wrote: bash-3.2$ sudo port install gimp --- Computing dependencies for gimpError: Unable to execute port: can't read startupitem.install: no such variable To report a bug, see http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets Check this week's list archives. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPpWdpAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADb9EIANyCpsvj29c3wBm3GiBLJX4B t2VBtBoHGKLxIdPCF7Xopyif5/CLlSsQQf+ZjuqMWQ8USoIB+ITJ9c7iylj9MWHO RRYdie8DPEuIJVDZBP/RZZJ7pCTQQDLBKnsEcyzdhJ42Pvl7uGdHAzeCCTEzMo4c QnpxuTdW8SIb4gZ0RozaTfo3g5YVWHKOLViuW03Gqb9tqSpbdP5BJt2tW8Pbto5q xrKJUKf4xLZL2eCkuhXbdt8KdvDL5tnz6s/WM7CLearDKpTuvgtaaxRVckOpqsQX QsmaKRgzugFgeXSB75VYpOYn0VNAHQRWziBfCIeZwBxJgsX9o1zRg/UaXBBQdlg= =9sYm -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Where can I download the macports installer for mac?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/05/2012 12:58, Navarro-Suarez, Gerardo wrote: Hi Guys, I cannot download the macports installer because the link (https://distfiles.macports.org/MacPorts/MacPorts-2.0.4-10.6-SnowLeopard.dmg) is not working. Is there an alternative download page? What can I do? Is it possible to fix the problem? I really like the simplicity of the installer and I'd like to avoid building macports manually. Ryan posted this morning that the rsync server was down that they were looking at bringing the backup server online. I've just checked that server it's still down so please be patient the guys will bring it back up as soon as they can. Cheers, Phil (posted as a Mac Ports user in no way affiliated with Mac Ports). - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPoSP2AAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADcxsH/j6DqhPnniq0/E5WA4aBIzdA BPJanp/gZ0VKtfwK3Bff84x8VcVKGqqh7s+0Fz1nkhfYOmBGsmGvDW4T8r3E204J w6qhfycVw+P84vQNeb/H1Jhi/Xq2oB6gpVpOQ7ZRV/YBJD7/pLy4Ptx5suiwt60d YzRxpUj/Zx8AR6Bp1iMN2c2SBm/zdz9bGpiJNuTwz+V7GDCncbDCebF1LUxC9y8u 2+JuvTAPfOpJC1Yecu4Un323ub7zPIcIQ1su6AzHpv04vOv/GJTd0AvydxBvOEYy BBaEhIJF/xRmDtk7Rn2GEYIt2FdLfQ3TaMxFNifpfXwsX/1061h707P+roh5Wn4= =bNND -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Help with conjoined apaches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/04/2012 05:50, j...@ayendesigns.com wrote: Getting warmer :) I installed apache2, mysql5, mysql5-server, php5 and phpmyadmin. Apache is pointing to the correct place for apachectl after I added the path to .profile. The trouble I'm having now is mysql. I'm getting: ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/opt/local/var/run/mysql5/mysqld.sock First of all, have you checked that mysql-server is actually running? Quickest way other than the cli is open Activity Monitor select `All processes` enter `mysqld` in the search box. Or from the cli 'ps -ef | grep mysql' If it isn't running, start the server. If it is running, it's because mysqld can't find the required `mysqld.sock`. In which case re-starting the server should automatically generate the mysqld.sock file. Also if you enter `ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket` in Google, you'll get about a million hits. It's a very common problem when first installing/upgrading MySQL. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPnPp0AAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADhAMH/3LimzJtKhayUzRUPFDgwc10 +7I9t/X7tvop0AtxwTUsnOxBMiFuyXr1XTR54XkPY4ZV4Wc4DYqr8teUWZKXXWX4 J6876wRHf/N5gM2Quf5W2w/bDA6UV9Is2uMyRr8mHNKfV8dJBoyFi8MzNJ/+844B 5bpw8QnDn/gYNjYYf40AMSpyyl91BhAviVMExVAvleyhYiA0EesWCrrcL4YP2AWZ q8NoRRqPcssEwYGRxqVFVqPh7h0VAaK42wVQJPxyY0Krd+XawpzNSdwLdU6QWN72 W3ssoD0DdwcrKeyDxehpe1+ppoAWr6P4MDS4iPcpNQZFiylimx0NGv7zobrRzuk= =Hgyy -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: mysql problem with socket (was Help with conjoined apaches)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/04/2012 18:33, j...@ayendesigns.com wrote: That link came up non-existent [snip] http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/connecting-disconnecting.html http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/connecting-disconnecting.html; trailing bracket caused that. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPnYJEAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADjDMH/ihNeFs+EfX4F4qxflnc9M7L UM0ZrMH6H6owIzkX2Io/p9Fg9EvgRdB86h4jikyD6WL8VB6kEyoyEwMeswOlq2pP y7ww9Ff/OrMJ4rpbeaevGRhnDYjC+NamQ4avU7urCjMF0fhnG3cyFKq7KYpHTj0L klC+nvDw8q6wzIgoh1q45wDVO2WyNLBCURbSStB735Cc7bemLl85fmByyQCdx7pn 76082i68FwkepDfI83qM30i41EL0q2DkogwPZPItS0kEhLbQFwi6KwhzO7AR/kAJ m6pEOKOT2TOMyhpL75z/TgCopOmiQ8qoouxAfebilgwx2rClQKoa2iDYq3QYaFA= =rC5/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: PostgreSQL 91 does not start automatically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/04/2012 19:58, Puneet Kishor wrote: I am completely foxed by this... When I restart my computer, postgresql91-server and apache2 do not start up automatically. If I type $ sudo port load postgresql91-server I get the message that the port is already loaded. Then I do the following and it starts up fine $ sudo port unload postgresql91-server $ sudo port load postgresql91-server I have the same issue with apache2 with a slight difference. It doesn’t start automatically on computer reboot, but starts fine when I type $ sudo port load apache2 This makes unattended reboot (for example, restart automatically after power failure) a deal-breaker. I see nothing of consequence in the logs anywhere. Suggestions? Don't know what you use for Apache (I just downloaded a script of the InterWeb) but if you just want something that starts postgres so you can get on with your life, try this: https://github.com/mckenfra/postgresql-mac-preferences Very helpful chap he is too if you get stuck. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPmFDGAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADzdcIAIqQyFw7Wr16Ws0S7JP5DHmF wFviR99sNLvItx/JEAcnaWxfdsiLQrG57R/ExDDve9VLoL/oua47D5qaYf6IjpCN 0DgoNCJw1D3UdJv13GjeYG2zNn6Fq0Y9MvlHW5f7apI7NO+YYlXgRi9gtymqkwpz CjNYcUcAXWCaPQYlTNWySPD3EO5ccTrV2wgffzMgxUlOpGf5XQ2LeFFyhE4CDexz w7DcRwcavLxzoBS+FI7goTJ86+MV58uHbV3JNR/YwNKo2DzyL1wa5q4Qt16Q6XKX EfEoKtjzF5bnFb/w8MZyoDcaPBye0zayElDCuLYxX1gGd+kNJDTblCBGTWDhmS4= =Aw+y -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: f2c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/04/2012 13:01, Chris Jones wrote: Also, you could run sudo port select gcc mp-gcc46 That will make MacPorts gcc 4.6 compiler your default compiler suite. This will make 'gcc' point to the same consistent version as the fortran compiler. Having done this, you could also use just 'export F77=gfortran' Finally, if you don't want gcc 4.6, you can pick any of the other compiler versions and do the same sort of thing. Hi, Chris. Thanks for the tip. In the end I just grabbed a tarball of f77 used that. Raftor was going into /usr/local anyway so as not mess with /opt/local so f77 went there also. please everybody, let's not re-open the the usr/local thread again :-) My environment, apart from one hiccup concerning rvm in $HOME/, has functioned great with no problems for nearly a year now with Mac Ports /usr/local side by side. YMMV... Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPk/VdAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADhi4IAIF4hr1RSUjTNxsoJn5YcjcH waK6ZdRp8f+IrKz40LaHbH9MlPD4w0mtvmqLLSOPz1im+t5g97dXE1nkJuqb5M2b Kf72DHEY5dNZF/89E8qlbhWhDO8mer4HxKdHg8+OmjtGfbobGoxTLFwLnWRA7b/e FoOAGc1NySJFP6Tch2QGp7VmFr9wdUbK4CsGAbfVsCHP9/sN0XQkwQWtvK7Y+/KR WarkRZbBTCMSTNBJGRV90VGSBTdYdDQOsrkpUCfPS/k3O0DtCgmcMNPbITFa4xZA Gfr2WDThZxlylBn7hzz/XPMR85j0uKkmN4d5C+vmtLhHKjRUsnU9NRzzMYzqiT4= =qszY -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
f2c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. I'm trying to use f2c to compile ratfor but there's no fort77 script so I'm getting: `checking for f2c... f2c checking whether the Fortran 77 compiler (f2c ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: Fortran 77 compiler cannot create executables.` Any workarounds to this or shall I just go grab a tarball? Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPkrKkAAoJEKpMeDHWT5AD3tkH/R8VzqoD6Imfgss0/pnL91zN g0XW7t+3epAAPyH2YU8J90BsekzxhTl39aEONOWPey6YW4+/EO/SW9qnpVgqd9oo R7Hb/bOZb9+uhzvbzB/Ju3Giaq9b5OuuSdDtJzGKLoqw5U6xM4BLTa2uv+py7brN YHLZJ7VtAgkk136LF95rqFsp/Sph4NY7zqzjwSGWVnV9+spDw0ulGdvMZfYzrk92 RBWeeIjK+EzNrzgtcUNpfrIhNkdYuLw3Xx5RciUomyoSm/iEStQ1Re3RLX+iC0VT scETkrgTigMvXcK9+c1EaaQjR6A24Wnpk7ysZ1b/c/X+OV2NvEht15jqL0NqKgM= =5Ypi -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: f2c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/04/2012 19:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Apr 21, 2012, at 08:14, Phil Dobbin wrote: I'm trying to use f2c to compile ratfor but there's no fort77 script so I'm getting: `checking for f2c... f2c checking whether the Fortran 77 compiler (f2c ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: Fortran 77 compiler cannot create executables.` Any workarounds to this or shall I just go grab a tarball? Can you give a reproduction recipe? What files did you download and what commands did you run to try to compile ratfor with f2c? As I understand it, f2c is a fortran77-to-c source code translator which obviates the need for a Fortran compiler but should contain a fort77 script in order to function correctly. I installed ratfor on Debian using apt-get so I checked the package list then went here: http://www.webmo.net/support/fortran_osx.html grabbed a copy of g77 then it installed fine. There was no ratfor port but I thought I'd grab f2c for which there was a port as my build set-up is based almost wholly on the ports in /opt/local minus Apple's dev tools of course. I'm guessing the problem was the fort77 script but of course may be completely wrong... Cheers, Phil. - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPkxjKAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADOQ8H/j3OKpnj5iHGj7u51LD8UkkF juCyq5//ZQEyJ5ZKwvy8ZNDC7622RogPaOT5nsJC6uMnVybQ5GUid9R7bsb9g23j TIGictzm+K6ujxO65w17UTSlOHmHp0fwx/db3PvlHoNcgD2nQnntGNni/cYMvRKv gDzpq1gxGGlJynpPpYaY8z77Q61NAXKtC5ugXRaDJxXaINHDqiVjj9Er1/xDZLxK mQAzAQmid3X9cRDy8TO2ZUrlvQP8L9QwentP3HZchqnl6Fwbra4W11r1lB9IdOO+ JQgiQ8SewunQvXG2BE3J01rTiSNQdf6zt9rYDje3pDrdXBxuychUFWsRZv8oX0w= =CsNG -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: f2c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2012 01:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 21, 2012, at 15:30, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On 21/04/2012 19:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 21, 2012, at 08:14, Phil Dobbin wrote:
I'm trying to use f2c to compile ratfor but there's no fort77
script so I'm getting:
`checking for f2c... f2c checking whether the Fortran 77 compiler
(f2c ) works... no configure: error: installation or
configuration problem: Fortran 77 compiler cannot create
executables.`
Any workarounds to this or shall I just go grab a tarball?
Can you give a reproduction recipe? What files did you download and
what commands did you run to try to compile ratfor with f2c?
As I understand it, f2c is a fortran77-to-c source code translator
which obviates the need for a Fortran compiler but should contain a
fort77 script in order to function correctly.
I installed ratfor on Debian using apt-get so I checked the package
list then went here:
http://www.webmo.net/support/fortran_osx.html
grabbed a copy of g77 then it installed fine. There was no ratfor
port but I thought I'd grab f2c for which there was a port as my build
set-up is based almost wholly on the ports in /opt/local minus Apple's
dev tools of course.
I'm guessing the problem was the fort77 script but of course may be
completely wrong...
I'm still unsure how to reproduce the problem on my system. Can you provide a
list of steps I should follow so that I would see the same error you saw?
$ cd src
$ src tar -zxvf ratfor.xxx.tar.gz
$ cd ratfor.xxx
$ ratfor.xxx ./configure
$ creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /opt/local/bin/ginstall -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for working aclocal... found
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake... found
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking for gawk... gawk
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for g77... no
checking for f77... no
checking for f2c... f2c
checking whether the Fortran 77 compiler (f2c ) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: Fortran 77
compiler cannot create executables.
Cheers,
Phil...
- --
But masters, remember that I am an ass.
Though it be not written down,
yet forget not that I am an ass.
Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPk49pAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADfu4H/1n0Y1KJ7sj/7ccfI+4Cuycm
8eFYOYwkLBunTToXERy9wiIsWhBMZoPtoJJqeEEZll77eHD1bzMgjAZE+qU8Upvp
cI+Dmjey5BfPGXkY5UVtYGALoYUfikyBZ+xUn8mdRiKXzNPv6BZ7rFOsHWCYgJyJ
q1K9KDM/BJ2Y/7+MkZPVavonRFALTTsfJ6DT+fY49T4+qEZgvlNwpynEvmN6lPsi
h9/fBte/YZorXUqEmuV3AgAbDcWojggMoBCTVnfnIvhzNX4jjn/AenOPHewtsJv3
F7OSLPZlhsnaPjy2GY0RZF70PPi8bNVOp3anJAr25JAoPuPfrQSUPeWGYds6sDs=
=rEpn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: How remove port info but not installed files?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/2012 17:38, Arno Hautala wrote: On 2012-04-18, Murray Eisenberg murrayeisenb...@gmail.com wrote: What's the simplest way to get rid of the macports files from texlive and aysmpotote _WITHOUT_ disturbing the original files from the direct TeXLive 2011 installation? [snip] With the current MacPorts design, you'd be best off uninstalling TexLive 2011 and using the MacPorts version. This is just for space savings though. Overall, I don't think there should be any compatibility issues in having both on your system. I think MacTex even includes an application for switching which texlive installation to use, and this includes support for selecting the MacPorts version. Indeed. If you look at the link to the installer page for texlive 2011, you'll see this is mentioned (fink is also mentioned). I took it a step further installed texlive 2011 into $HOME/ as well as having the Mac Port's version of texlive (reason being I needed access to tlmgr for the project I'm currently working on). With disk space no longer a problem these days on OS X (180GB on my Macbook Pro as opposed to 40GBs on my Linux boxes) I decided to cover all bases. Must say, in passing, I was very impressed with the texlive 2011 installer. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPjvKdAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADb/IH/RXz9ENhJUYWIKF5ViWJSe0V X0NSQzXcnPmb7QbL6Y3QdImdIcZNv+RkM34liz4To+lh+66dnrdgNU9hiJbsN3d7 +IGVnCLwBu6r6jDBDafGJKlPSPFFEOhf8lzitQcXWNcaqhLDTf+DHNs6AeDaeVF1 cKFrTBSo45vsSc4gcbt6uu6KEKwsf2PKeZG0bzA+GCYCXmx1etOlekgHNXDMAsr/ Bhi4NR6qeGi8O2ySJWpisIJWE8656scencz40438VbEPLqV8EdlCmeXzsVXkc8OK UBcPmrzKInmd3cJFYosPuA8YP4wu+2DDHrLunu4QfAdGJUHjqEZH/RwrFguvc4Y= =NtJ9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: How remove port info but not installed files?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/2012 18:42, Arno Hautala wrote: On 2012-04-18, Murray Eisenberg murrayeisenb...@gmail.com wrote: Indeed, it's space I want to conserve on my relatively small SSD boot drive. It's the original MacTeX TeXLive 2011 installation I want to keep -- and NOT the MacPorts version. (Various reasons for that preference, including a very helpful GUI maintenance utility that's part of MacTeX.) In that case, your best bet is to uninstall the texlive and asymptote ports and either compile it yourself, see if you can get one of the precompiled binaries to work, or install it with homebrew (not recommended; due to how homebrew installs into /usr/local, this could cause problems with your MacPorts install). You could also try altering the Asymptote Portfile to not depend on texlive. I'm not sure how extensive these changes would have to be. Asymptote can be fetched with tlmgr from within texlive 2011 if it is not installed already. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPjwAQAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADfysIANM+Olnco1M0ojRtPVA+Oyv3 N63wFO/piHLpEkaPsAIPH+JqhTd2ltOKJGbWnY7PgbuhXavMZsoaCaIzFO3ELh1U z85JLjJ7DPBc/9hs6/gUuWeNCw6Zk+XocOL8k6cUTwAEIrDx5s09r3sVdcYXi2FS AJLG1+tLpp9ktPha9RlJTNKq8DrDeiNHgqQAhXh78YOP2h9+/KYRC8JQPR8hHbxs hyDBYaNb6XMDz0TKq8mwoVnUhD6UrRe+yUbB/NlTWS+ShdwlKCEE7kZFOs8h36rS pWBG2FikxzE4N+oMuaTUIvSZ2Ks5es2MnJtxzfZAbSNeOKIpXdvF1d3Gr1mwiSk= =59Q2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Python environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. I finally need to do some work in Python so bear with me... I've port installed virtualenv, pip easy_install comes with Python 2.7 if I'm not mistaken (if I am, it's there anyhows). Which symlinks/aliases do I have to invoke so that they're available to me in the console? Any help appreciated. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPhz01AAoJEKpMeDHWT5AD61wH/0vrXQKzEdxb8JtW08368tLl w3l2j2DB/B0vc2uvapT0dkSZT78uBHTbABPO4r/z0p7NqsrgRECxXldr5g+UH5gr 0qOWGGs/u2He0jf/SdPsxW1Dbp+H33LfoKcqmGAmDl1FkF8DrgG05E6pxbqcx3dd uA+K30LrQlsPEZgdw928dk8u6bJfDRBFoTmvTa0inUneQj65LmuyKguEp7hWYfpd ntD+fkDJAcGookw/bVoEvFupg1a3FUocl3um9D+XaGvNasJapr0IMbZ+vAIrPXcz 6rqT3eNL4A8I/WhdEkRHBGMA3tIz2AM4z6jWAk9VHFX+XC0XChpgIox3E0zdYvU= =dE9w -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Website Management tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2012 16:39, Andrew Long wrote: Well, that is the general kind of thing, yes... Perhaps I phrased it badly. SO, can you recommend some? Perl + link checker as search criteria in Google. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPhF7oAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADR/8IAIyxgutn8Ivc0uZp8rAyk0Q5 zIS67kU717aK4l7QZuz0WxfXpwW6UAwLYkvPgedMns9GUcodnyGpiHGtp9Nr935W muGEDJPPdYxn9trTJmMIfDq07mk42MwC98e1kGe9JtbBiqmXw12RC8YfJVxaino4 TvTkhd0q7pczvLKDJreG7G/WWLIM1ZkxH7bWyW6WcuLUJHMt04qURSjjnAA7BNlg 87dBaRhYIy0X1LZ2k41x79zaNchnVk7T6t725pVJwC19HZoRrK9+09ZlM12WsF6m YvtIlr9y6DCsEjZiS+CKG0gDLJyjUkJasiqWiwOxx1MENtKkUJjV7dqP4UtQ63E= =s36a -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Prefix on subject line for mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/04/2012 18:44, Jerome Yanga wrote: Chris, I was just asking. There is no need to be rude. A simple explanation would have been fine. This just landed in my inbox. Could you please address it correctly to the list (I have cc'd the list on this occasion)? Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPhHR4AAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADHXsH/3tDJNTuQ6VDPPhG/17XGZ3k f2fcqc1GMOhgSzbfxhaZHGBaimCfjcke6xb2Bphci+/08y8j1ktK9bZtJKcL1Pk0 KxhV1n6dhlyqjY24cYUEKa1mZxpRQ7qnoS+hUPjtcax1feNnISuJnL30AMOAAgfj PUrMuyPpsSzcbWwFAG4BKKmcg50JV3lT7O34tZUqtwUc6dB94qIyaI/f/JHzuqlO Xi5bOloP0t2njqv3RtpLhxPF4TnJ8nJyLQCuta5PnUcDUy6XQtW9J6k1OgXrSjOg 8wTjxIi+oeXmKG0r1jlqDuQ0GvyIpoTr3x+aCcbXfGh5z8fWggI5q8tCVf8Ni8I= =/C76 -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
Re: Can selfupdate be done incrementally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/04/2012 18:58, Tim Johnson wrote: I use a 2012 Mac Mini with OSX Lion. I haven't run selfupdate in some time. My observations in the past is that this machine runs alarmingly hot during long compiles. I recall being very nervous during the last selfupdate with temperature raising to as 180 F or more. I'm wondering if it is possible to do selfupdate a step or dependency at a time. That way, I could allow the machine to cool off before resuming. Any comments are welcome. [snip] FWIW, my Macbook Pro running Snow Leopard temperatures get to around 80 degrees Centigrade when upgrading/installing with no ill effects. I also try to run selfupdate daily (one of my other machines is running Debian a cron job kicks around 07:45 each morning to run apt-get update so, if I'm awake, I do Mac Ports too) so the number of ports is minimal on an upgrade if I get a long list of ports, I split them into batches. Not necessary really but I like to keep the machine active on other fronts while they're upgrading as much as possible. Cheers, Phil... - -- But masters, remember that I am an ass. Though it be not written down, yet forget not that I am an ass. Wm. Shakespeare - Much Ado About Nothing -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: §auto-key-locate cert pka ldap hkp://keys.gnupg.net Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPf1idAAoJEKpMeDHWT5ADoGwH/inrEyCWvq/59POXx1UF5e6J DADEF6OT5UILFDsCoRmoq7NPm+63AKJrSz5PNW9438+gKLe9yQBY+eUURRSReTW0 StEUR/zva7bWlrX5SJv/LZ8wB3fhnq4flpXnz30ZUiHu9gwlAK/MIasYlPNjOKoy UVnvNvYiW3KOz3UIJy5b+dy/pDRM6cuevZVFESZ/0HMFFZY4eZsoadIfoxR55msM X1pwM1M/HGX681jB8XpyvAcCdtZzF+oq0DofvZ7uJAp8iXJjPY6TCovtHaoy3h8g FI8ko1h0WGVntP+4OGbDgmgg4LuIYsRTZifU20nbGrtg/w0ZM5aKB916sws3ics= =8oYI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
