Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread archer
Are they ever going to decriminalize pot?  It seems to be in about the same 
situation booze was in near the end of Prohibition in the 1920s:

Oh, ancient sin, Oh, bathtub gin,
  How rare and how robust,
Bouquet of tin and porcelain
 And little grains of rust.
Our cares dissolved as you evolved,
  Your beauty was benumbing.
You rose full-armor'd from the bath
  Like Venus from the plumbing.
When hardened hearts in foreign ports
  Deride your name with scorn,
And whisper calumnies and say
  That you were basely born,
I plant a wreath of juniper,
  My thirsty tonsils ache
To fill my skin with bathtub gin
  Like Father used to make.
--
From: Bill R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 It was always amusing to read letters from my hippie big sis when she 
 talked about her large garden: beans, squash, pot, corn ... er, I wouldn't 
 send that on a postcard...
 BillR

 On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
 speaking of cooking and such, since the price of groceries has gone up
 so much, Im really thinking about having a garden next year. 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread Mitch Haley

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread Peter Frederick
Criminalization of possession of narcotics is probably  
unconstitutional and certainly does nothing but criminalize a huge  
portion of the population.  It does not deter use, it just makes  
felons of a huge number of people.  I don't know what the percentage  
of people in prison who have only non-violent drug possession  
convictions is, but it's something like half -- to the tune of  
$100,000 per year in cost!

No other nation in the Western world did Prohibition, for just this  
reason.  Drug abuse is a social problem, not a criminal one (except  
for manufacture and distribution), and there is no penalty in Europe  
for possession for personal use.  Therefore most of the using  
population isn't criminal, the prisons aren't full of non-violent  
criminals, and the police have time to work on real crime.

The hysteria about pot started in the teens when nice white urban  
girls started getting turned on to it by, ahem, persons of color  
attached to the Jazz movement.  It was mostly an African/Latino thing  
before that, but proper white society went into a major speed  
wobble when the races started mixing.  The properties of the  
substance weren't really the issue.

The insanity in the 60's started with a whack case in Texas who found  
roaches in the back yard after coming home from an extended vacation  
without the kids -- seems the underage kids had been having a non- 
stop party for the month the parents were gone and Mommy blew a  
gasket about the road to heroin.  Texas passed a law against  
possession that called for the death penalty (no lesser sentence  
available) for detectable amounts of pot.  Sheer lunacy, if one can  
be that kind, and the Texas Supreme Court actually upheld it if I  
remember correctly.

I can understand Carrie Nation's objection to excessive drinking,  
although she was another nut case bound and determined to force  
everyone to do what SHE wanted.  Public drunkenness was a huge  
problem around the turn of the century in America, to the point that  
many industries really only ran Tuesday to Thursday -- by Friday  
afternoon the work force was usually comatose and weren't able to  
work until Tuesday morning.  This is not an exaggeration, it was  
REALLY bad, as many European visitors commented.  Of course working  
people to death for less than it cost to live was also rampant.   
Outlawing alcohol isn't the answer, of course, that just leads to  
people being poisoned by improperly distilled spirits, economic ruin  
for a perfectly normal and safe industry (beer, wine, and spirits  
manufacture), and social chaos when half the population is actively  
engaged in criminal activity.  I think the proper term is contempt  
for the Law -- we end up with a class of people who commit felonies  
several times a day, so they end up feeling that ALL laws are just as  
ridiculous and quickly graduate to things like armed robbery, theft,  
assault, embezelment, and so forth.

I think we will eventually come to our collective senses and de- 
criminalize drug possession, while simultaneously clamping down on  
pharmaceutical companies making precursors freely available (the meth  
problem is easily preventable -- all you have to do is remove the  
easy access to synthetic pseudo-ephidrine).  It worked to stop the  
Qualude epidemic in the 70's.  Can't make psuedoephidrine in the  
basement, it takes a decent sized chemical synthesis setup and  
considerable skill, knowledge, and quality control.  You can,  
however, buy the stuff by the ton on the open market, no questions  
asked, if you have the cash. The major guys have been screaming for  
years it's too profitable to even verify that the purchaser is  
actually a bona fide drug manufacturer.

Ain't profit great?  The main fundamental flaw in the free market  
system is that it's driven solely and completely by making huge  
amounts of money (the other serious flaw is that a free market  
doesn't actually exist, all products require capital investment to  
make, so if you don't have any, you can't compete.  Just try to build  
a 767 in your basement, for instance!).  Making money is all fine and  
good, but just look at what we've done with fuel use -- it may indeed  
prove out that short term, even decades long short term, high profits  
result in a horribly poor public policy.

Galbraith, not Keans.

Peter


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question - now drugs and politics and political financial discussion

2008-05-17 Thread Bill R
Yes, Peter, I agree.  In a slightly different direction, an eye opener for
me was being in Cuba [legally] for a few weeks some years ago and talking
with some party members and just people on the street, as well as meetings
with a cabinet minister and even a short visit with Castro - as well as a
member of the secret police and the tourist agency.  It was easy enough to
talk about and show some of the problems with their form of communism, but
they have their points also.  With limited goods there are two ways to get a
handle on distribution: a price tag or a quota system.  We obviously use the
price tag method, they used a coupon book.  It was somewhat interesting to
realize a number of people had more money than they could use.  The highest
paid persons [we will leave out the big exception, that being the top
government folk] were top university professors, who might make $300 a
month.  A physician [I roomed with one for a week] was about on par with a
mechanic socially and financially [Cuban M.D.'s over here didn't get their
MDiety until they were in the US.]  That seems a pittance to us [even in the
late 1980's when I was there],  but say you made $200/month:  Rent was fixed
at 10% of income and you could feed a family of 4 for $25 a month.  Lots of
public transportation [and old American cars] but just about no consumer
goods unless you had a passport of knew someone [a foreigner] who did and
would take you into those shops [only US $ foreign currency accepted, only
pesos given for change].  You have $200/month to spend and the basics cost
@50.  Clothing / shoes are rationed, as is better food.  Health care is free
as is education.  I took a Presbyterian minister into one of them and he
pulled out enough cash to buy three pair of $100 jeans.  What else is he
going to spend his $ on?  I didn't ask how many Cuban pesos it took to get
US $100, but I suspect it was significant. It was eye-opening to me to see
what I still take to be something of a backwater country [because of Castro
mostly] that has a lower infant mortality rate than we do [we learn to be
better able to take care of the tiny ones, they make sure the pregnant women
get a decent diet], and as an experiment I got on a bus one Sunday morning
and rode 4 hours into the county, got out in a small town and walked to the
last road in the town and every child playing on the street had decent
clothes and shoes.  I did not see a single obviously hungry person in the
three weeks I was there, and the one beggar we did see [at least according
to the cab driver at the time] was doing it by choice outside of a church -
his choice, but not a nec3essity to live.  Gee, I haven't thought about this
stuff for a decade and now I can't shut up. But I will.
BillR  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Frederick
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 10:23 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

Criminalization of possession of narcotics is probably  
unconstitutional and certainly does nothing but criminalize a huge  
portion of the population.  It does not deter use, it just makes  
felons of a huge number of people.  I don't know what the percentage  
of people in prison who have only non-violent drug possession  
convictions is, but it's something like half -- to the tune of  
$100,000 per year in cost!

No other nation in the Western world did Prohibition, for just this  
reason.  Drug abuse is a social problem, not a criminal one (except  
for manufacture and distribution), and there is no penalty in Europe  
for possession for personal use.  Therefore most of the using  
population isn't criminal, the prisons aren't full of non-violent  
criminals, and the police have time to work on real crime.

The hysteria about pot started in the teens when nice white urban  
girls started getting turned on to it by, ahem, persons of color  
attached to the Jazz movement.  It was mostly an African/Latino thing  
before that, but proper white society went into a major speed  
wobble when the races started mixing.  The properties of the  
substance weren't really the issue.

The insanity in the 60's started with a whack case in Texas who found  
roaches in the back yard after coming home from an extended vacation  
without the kids -- seems the underage kids had been having a non- 
stop party for the month the parents were gone and Mommy blew a  
gasket about the road to heroin.  Texas passed a law against  
possession that called for the death penalty (no lesser sentence  
available) for detectable amounts of pot.  Sheer lunacy, if one can  
be that kind, and the Texas Supreme Court actually upheld it if I  
remember correctly.

I can understand Carrie Nation's objection to excessive drinking,  
although she was another nut case bound and determined to force  
everyone to do what SHE wanted.  Public drunkenness was a huge  
problem around the turn of the century

Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread Lee Einer
Another observation on the genesis of marijuana prohibition -

The prohibition against alcohol resulted in an enormous build-up of the
police force, FBI, prisons, etc, a whole burgeoning bureaucracy. Then
prohibition was nixed - and we had a powerful bureaucracy with no
justification for its existence. What to do?

A massive propaganda campaign was launched, linking the weed to
black/brown men violating white women, to incurable insanity, to a bunch
of repugnant, ridiculous, made-up crap. The term marijuana was not
widely in vogue, but the term was popularized during this blitz to
underscore that it was the recreational substance of Mexicans. The
propaganda blitz with its shameless appeal to racism was effective, and
the marijuana tax act was passed only a few short years after
prohibition (of ETOH) ended, with outright criminalization following
closely on its heels.

Mission accomplished! The police state was preserved, and has now grown
to the point where the incarceration of our citizens is a top industry
and we keep a greater percentage of our citizens behind bars than the
Soviet Union ever did.

Lee

Peter Frederick wrote:
 Criminalization of possession of narcotics is probably  
 unconstitutional and certainly does nothing but criminalize a huge  
 portion of the population.  It does not deter use, it just makes  
 felons of a huge number of people.  I don't know what the percentage  
 of people in prison who have only non-violent drug possession  
 convictions is, but it's something like half -- to the tune of  
 $100,000 per year in cost!
 
 No other nation in the Western world did Prohibition, for just this  
 reason.  Drug abuse is a social problem, not a criminal one (except  
 for manufacture and distribution), and there is no penalty in Europe  
 for possession for personal use.  Therefore most of the using  
 population isn't criminal, the prisons aren't full of non-violent  
 criminals, and the police have time to work on real crime.
 
 The hysteria about pot started in the teens when nice white urban  
 girls started getting turned on to it by, ahem, persons of color  
 attached to the Jazz movement.  It was mostly an African/Latino thing  
 before that, but proper white society went into a major speed  
 wobble when the races started mixing.  The properties of the  
 substance weren't really the issue.
 
 The insanity in the 60's started with a whack case in Texas who found  
 roaches in the back yard after coming home from an extended vacation  
 without the kids -- seems the underage kids had been having a non- 
 stop party for the month the parents were gone and Mommy blew a  
 gasket about the road to heroin.  Texas passed a law against  
 possession that called for the death penalty (no lesser sentence  
 available) for detectable amounts of pot.  Sheer lunacy, if one can  
 be that kind, and the Texas Supreme Court actually upheld it if I  
 remember correctly.
 
 I can understand Carrie Nation's objection to excessive drinking,  
 although she was another nut case bound and determined to force  
 everyone to do what SHE wanted.  Public drunkenness was a huge  
 problem around the turn of the century in America, to the point that  
 many industries really only ran Tuesday to Thursday -- by Friday  
 afternoon the work force was usually comatose and weren't able to  
 work until Tuesday morning.  This is not an exaggeration, it was  
 REALLY bad, as many European visitors commented.  Of course working  
 people to death for less than it cost to live was also rampant.   
 Outlawing alcohol isn't the answer, of course, that just leads to  
 people being poisoned by improperly distilled spirits, economic ruin  
 for a perfectly normal and safe industry (beer, wine, and spirits  
 manufacture), and social chaos when half the population is actively  
 engaged in criminal activity.  I think the proper term is contempt  
 for the Law -- we end up with a class of people who commit felonies  
 several times a day, so they end up feeling that ALL laws are just as  
 ridiculous and quickly graduate to things like armed robbery, theft,  
 assault, embezelment, and so forth.
 
 I think we will eventually come to our collective senses and de- 
 criminalize drug possession, while simultaneously clamping down on  
 pharmaceutical companies making precursors freely available (the meth  
 problem is easily preventable -- all you have to do is remove the  
 easy access to synthetic pseudo-ephidrine).  It worked to stop the  
 Qualude epidemic in the 70's.  Can't make psuedoephidrine in the  
 basement, it takes a decent sized chemical synthesis setup and  
 considerable skill, knowledge, and quality control.  You can,  
 however, buy the stuff by the ton on the open market, no questions  
 asked, if you have the cash. The major guys have been screaming for  
 years it's too profitable to even verify that the purchaser is  
 actually a bona fide drug manufacturer.
 
 Ain't profit great?  The main 

Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread MG
2-3 AM!!! that's way to early for me to get up. I usually start around 7 
AM and that's way early. Everything is usually ready by about 2-5PM 
depending what I cook or how fast. You can do a decent Boston Butt in 
about 6 or so hours. I'll have to send a picture of my homebuilt 
smokers. Yeah I have two, one for big parties, it's made of a 150 gal 
propane tank and sits on a small trailer, and the other is smaller about 
the size of a 55 gallon drum for just a small family thing. They were a 
lot of fun to build. I now have a 250 gallon tank that I am considering 
putting on a trailer. It would be separated in the middle. One end for a 
regular grill and the other end for a smoker. Trouble is I don't really 
need anything that big but it's fun to build. Ah heck whatchya gonna do.

I do agree, Lee, that the ETOH is a very important part of the cooking 
process, as well as a good book, a comfy chair and a sun umbrella to 
keep me cool.

You'd never think that I like to eat a lot, would you Bill? I'll have to 
get with your big sister and see about some of those pots she grows, are 
they cast iron? Cause that's what I like to cook with. I always thought 
they were poured in a foundry. OH! never mind I get it now. ;-D

Manfred



Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:40 -0600
From: Lee Einer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I use a Texas smoker, no propane or rotisseries here.

Brine 'em first, helps keep moist. Lower is better, temp-wise.

When I do up a brisket, I typically get up to build the fire around
  2:30
- 3 a.m. and let her smoke slow and easy on an oak fire, for 10 hours
  or
so. Keep the temp low, and it will be smoky/juicy/good. ETOH is also
essential, but not as a marinade or baste. It optimizes the attitude of
the grillmaster.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread Peter Frederick
Exactly.  This is why privatizing prisons makes the hair stand up  
on the back of my neck.

For a real scare, read The New Industrial State but John Kenneth  
Galbraith.

Peter
On May 17, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Lee Einer wrote:

 Another observation on the genesis of marijuana prohibition -

 The prohibition against alcohol resulted in an enormous build-up of  
 the
 police force, FBI, prisons, etc, a whole burgeoning bureaucracy. Then
 prohibition was nixed - and we had a powerful bureaucracy with no
 justification for its existence. What to do?

 A massive propaganda campaign was launched, linking the weed to
 black/brown men violating white women, to incurable insanity, to a  
 bunch
 of repugnant, ridiculous, made-up crap. The term marijuana was not
 widely in vogue, but the term was popularized during this blitz to
 underscore that it was the recreational substance of Mexicans. The
 propaganda blitz with its shameless appeal to racism was effective,  
 and
 the marijuana tax act was passed only a few short years after
 prohibition (of ETOH) ended, with outright criminalization following
 closely on its heels.

 Mission accomplished! The police state was preserved, and has now  
 grown
 to the point where the incarceration of our citizens is a top industry
 and we keep a greater percentage of our citizens behind bars than the
 Soviet Union ever did.

 Lee

 Peter Frederick wrote:
 Criminalization of possession of narcotics is probably
 unconstitutional and certainly does nothing but criminalize a huge
 portion of the population.  It does not deter use, it just makes
 felons of a huge number of people.  I don't know what the percentage
 of people in prison who have only non-violent drug possession
 convictions is, but it's something like half -- to the tune of
 $100,000 per year in cost!

 No other nation in the Western world did Prohibition, for just this
 reason.  Drug abuse is a social problem, not a criminal one (except
 for manufacture and distribution), and there is no penalty in Europe
 for possession for personal use.  Therefore most of the using
 population isn't criminal, the prisons aren't full of non-violent
 criminals, and the police have time to work on real crime.

 The hysteria about pot started in the teens when nice white urban
 girls started getting turned on to it by, ahem, persons of color
 attached to the Jazz movement.  It was mostly an African/Latino thing
 before that, but proper white society went into a major speed
 wobble when the races started mixing.  The properties of the
 substance weren't really the issue.

 The insanity in the 60's started with a whack case in Texas who found
 roaches in the back yard after coming home from an extended vacation
 without the kids -- seems the underage kids had been having a non-
 stop party for the month the parents were gone and Mommy blew a
 gasket about the road to heroin.  Texas passed a law against
 possession that called for the death penalty (no lesser sentence
 available) for detectable amounts of pot.  Sheer lunacy, if one can
 be that kind, and the Texas Supreme Court actually upheld it if I
 remember correctly.

 I can understand Carrie Nation's objection to excessive drinking,
 although she was another nut case bound and determined to force
 everyone to do what SHE wanted.  Public drunkenness was a huge
 problem around the turn of the century in America, to the point that
 many industries really only ran Tuesday to Thursday -- by Friday
 afternoon the work force was usually comatose and weren't able to
 work until Tuesday morning.  This is not an exaggeration, it was
 REALLY bad, as many European visitors commented.  Of course working
 people to death for less than it cost to live was also rampant.
 Outlawing alcohol isn't the answer, of course, that just leads to
 people being poisoned by improperly distilled spirits, economic ruin
 for a perfectly normal and safe industry (beer, wine, and spirits
 manufacture), and social chaos when half the population is actively
 engaged in criminal activity.  I think the proper term is contempt
 for the Law -- we end up with a class of people who commit felonies
 several times a day, so they end up feeling that ALL laws are just as
 ridiculous and quickly graduate to things like armed robbery, theft,
 assault, embezelment, and so forth.

 I think we will eventually come to our collective senses and de-
 criminalize drug possession, while simultaneously clamping down on
 pharmaceutical companies making precursors freely available (the meth
 problem is easily preventable -- all you have to do is remove the
 easy access to synthetic pseudo-ephidrine).  It worked to stop the
 Qualude epidemic in the 70's.  Can't make psuedoephidrine in the
 basement, it takes a decent sized chemical synthesis setup and
 considerable skill, knowledge, and quality control.  You can,
 however, buy the stuff by the ton on the open market, no questions
 asked, if you have the cash. The major guys have been 

Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread Mitch Haley
Peter Frederick wrote:
 
 Criminalization of possession of narcotics is probably
 unconstitutional and certainly does nothing but criminalize a huge
 portion of the population. 

In order to do prohibition, they had to amend the Constitution. Since
then, it's just been easier to ignore the Constitution than try to change
it to allow a police state. 
Like all our Wars on Some Drugs, all it did it make crime profitable and
provide an excuse for law enforcement to act worse than the other criminals. 
http://www.ajc.com/training/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2008/05/13/tesler_0514.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,355796,00.html
Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread Peter Frederick
We were joking at work the other day that most of the guy's wives  
don't like to grill -- hard to schedule everything that way with the  
grill outside and the need for constant attention.

I said, well, it's really about making great food, and it requires a  
good chair, a beer, and a buddy or two to hang around the grill all  
afternoon.  Not industrial cooking, craft cooking  The rest of  
the meal should be stuff from the fridge or quick to heat so you can  
just lay it out when the meat is done.

I'm doing ribs today, need to get them on so we can eat at   
reasonable hour.  Today is mowing day (the grass is a foot tall, I'll  
be at it all day and part of tomorrow for sure!) and I can walk past  
the grill every half hour or so and slap on some more sauce and flip  
them over

Peter


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-17 Thread Bill R
I agree on the wee hours of the night thing.  I'm starting the ribs in a few
minutes for 6:00 dinner.  As usual I didn't have all the ingredients I
wanted, so I used Greek salad dressing instead of Caesar - but it seems to
smell about the same.  A bit of garlic powder and pepper and I am good to
go.
BillR

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MG
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:20 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2-3 AM!!! that's way to early for me to get up. I usually start around 7 
AM and that's way early. Everything is usually ready by about 2-5PM 
depending what I cook or how fast. You can do a decent Boston Butt in 
about 6 or so hours. I'll have to send a picture of my homebuilt 
smokers. Yeah I have two, one for big parties, it's made of a 150 gal 
propane tank and sits on a small trailer, and the other is smaller about 
the size of a 55 gallon drum for just a small family thing. They were a 
lot of fun to build. I now have a 250 gallon tank that I am considering 
putting on a trailer. It would be separated in the middle. One end for a 
regular grill and the other end for a smoker. Trouble is I don't really 
need anything that big but it's fun to build. Ah heck whatchya gonna do.

I do agree, Lee, that the ETOH is a very important part of the cooking 
process, as well as a good book, a comfy chair and a sun umbrella to 
keep me cool.

You'd never think that I like to eat a lot, would you Bill? I'll have to 
get with your big sister and see about some of those pots she grows, are 
they cast iron? Cause that's what I like to cook with. I always thought 
they were poured in a foundry. OH! never mind I get it now. ;-D

Manfred



Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:40 -0600
From: Lee Einer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I use a Texas smoker, no propane or rotisseries here.

Brine 'em first, helps keep moist. Lower is better, temp-wise.

When I do up a brisket, I typically get up to build the fire around
  2:30
- 3 a.m. and let her smoke slow and easy on an oak fire, for 10 hours
  or
so. Keep the temp low, and it will be smoky/juicy/good. ETOH is also
essential, but not as a marinade or baste. It optimizes the attitude of
the grillmaster.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question - now drugs and politicsand political financial discussion

2008-05-17 Thread archer
Did you visit Cuba before or after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Bill?
Gerry
-
From: Bill R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Yes, Peter, I agree.  In a slightly different direction, an eye opener for
 me was being in Cuba [legally] for a few weeks some years ago and talking
 with some party members and just people on the street, as well as meetings
 with a cabinet minister and even a short visit with Castro - as well as a
 member of the secret police and the tourist agency.  It was easy enough to
 talk about and show some of the problems with their form of communism, but
 they have their points also..snip 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question - now drugs and politics and political financial discussion

2008-05-17 Thread Bill R
I was there when the USSR was still supporting them.  I could check an old
passport and get the exact dates, but about two years before the USSR broke
up - I was never good with dates.  As Castro said, They are paying us a
fair price for our sugar and selling us fuel at a fair price i.e. - they
were giving them money hand over fist.  It was a different sight for me to
look out the window when I was in Mantanzas and see Soviet ships in the
harbor.  I saw a troop of Soviet soldiers coming through the airport and
couldn't believe how cheap their uniforms were.  The only Soviet folks I ran
into on the street didn't speak any English so I couldn't talk with them.
They were lovers on vacation and I don't think they especially wanted to
talk anyhow.
BillR

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of archer
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:38 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question - now drugs and
politicsand political financial discussion

Did you visit Cuba before or after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Bill?
Gerry
-
From: Bill R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Yes, Peter, I agree.  In a slightly different direction, an eye opener for
 me was being in Cuba [legally] for a few weeks some years ago and talking
 with some party members and just people on the street, as well as meetings
 with a cabinet minister and even a short visit with Castro - as well as a
 member of the secret police and the tourist agency.  It was easy enough to
 talk about and show some of the problems with their form of communism, but
 they have their points also..snip 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-16 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
speaking of cooking and such, since the price of groceries has gone up 
so much, Im really thinking about having a garden next year.

Bill R wrote:
 Tried out my new [to me] grill tonight, and tried the rotisserie for the
 first time in my life.  Pretty basic stuff, I stuck two chickens on the
 spit, put some BBQ rub on them and cranked it up.  I was also dealing with
 some grandkids at the time, and when I thought it was stable at 450 degrees
 I wandered off for a time.  When I got back a few minutes later it as at 550
 and the chicken skin was black.  Tasted good [burn was only of the skin],
 but not visually appealing, to say the least.  It's a 4 burner Jenn-Air,
 64,000 BTU.  Anyone have a good method for using a rotisserie?  It did not
 come with a manual.
 
 BillR   
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/banned_okiebenz.com
 

-- 
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
  94 E420, 92 300SD, 92 250D Turbo, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D,
  89 560SEL, 89 260E, 87 300SDL, 86 560SL, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro,
  84 190D, 84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D,
  76 300D, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-16 Thread Bill R
It was always amusing to read letters from my hippie big sis when she talked
about her large garden: beans, squash, pot, corn ... er, I wouldn't send
that on a postcard...
BillR 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:58 PM
To: Banned List
Cc: 'Mercedes Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

speaking of cooking and such, since the price of groceries has gone up 
so much, Im really thinking about having a garden next year.

Bill R wrote:
 Tried out my new [to me] grill tonight, and tried the rotisserie for the
 first time in my life.  Pretty basic stuff, I stuck two chickens on the
 spit, put some BBQ rub on them and cranked it up.  I was also dealing with
 some grandkids at the time, and when I thought it was stable at 450
degrees
 I wandered off for a time.  When I got back a few minutes later it as at
550
 and the chicken skin was black.  Tasted good [burn was only of the skin],
 but not visually appealing, to say the least.  It's a 4 burner Jenn-Air,
 64,000 BTU.  Anyone have a good method for using a rotisserie?  It did not
 come with a manual.
 
 BillR   
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/banned_okiebenz.com
 

-- 
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
  94 E420, 92 300SD, 92 250D Turbo, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D,
  89 560SEL, 89 260E, 87 300SDL, 86 560SL, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro,
  84 190D, 84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D,
  76 300D, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-16 Thread Lee Einer
I use a Texas smoker, no propane or rotisseries here.

Brine 'em first, helps keep moist. Lower is better, temp-wise.

When I do up a brisket, I typically get up to build the fire around 2:30
- 3 a.m. and let her smoke slow and easy on an oak fire, for 10 hours or
so. Keep the temp low, and it will be smoky/juicy/good. ETOH is also
essential, but not as a marinade or baste. It optimizes the attitude of
the grillmaster.

Bill R wrote:
 It was always amusing to read letters from my hippie big sis when she talked
 about her large garden: beans, squash, pot, corn ... er, I wouldn't send
 that on a postcard...
 BillR 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
 Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:58 PM
 To: Banned List
 Cc: 'Mercedes Discussion List'
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question
 
 speaking of cooking and such, since the price of groceries has gone up 
 so much, Im really thinking about having a garden next year.
 
 Bill R wrote:
 Tried out my new [to me] grill tonight, and tried the rotisserie for the
 first time in my life.  Pretty basic stuff, I stuck two chickens on the
 spit, put some BBQ rub on them and cranked it up.  I was also dealing with
 some grandkids at the time, and when I thought it was stable at 450
 degrees
 I wandered off for a time.  When I got back a few minutes later it as at
 550
 and the chicken skin was black.  Tasted good [burn was only of the skin],
 but not visually appealing, to say the least.  It's a 4 burner Jenn-Air,
 64,000 BTU.  Anyone have a good method for using a rotisserie?  It did not
 come with a manual.

 BillR   

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/banned_okiebenz.com

 


-- 

Lee

If you would be unloved and forgotten, be reasonable. - Kurt Vonnegut

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-16 Thread Bill R
Obviously we have at least some folks who like to eat.  Forget the chicken
for a minute [just cooked what I had], how about country ribs?
BillR

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lee Einer
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:11 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

I use a Texas smoker, no propane or rotisseries here.

Brine 'em first, helps keep moist. Lower is better, temp-wise.

When I do up a brisket, I typically get up to build the fire around 2:30
- 3 a.m. and let her smoke slow and easy on an oak fire, for 10 hours or
so. Keep the temp low, and it will be smoky/juicy/good. ETOH is also
essential, but not as a marinade or baste. It optimizes the attitude of
the grillmaster.

Bill R wrote:
 It was always amusing to read letters from my hippie big sis when she
talked
 about her large garden: beans, squash, pot, corn ... er, I wouldn't send
 that on a postcard...
 BillR 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
 Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:58 PM
 To: Banned List
 Cc: 'Mercedes Discussion List'
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question
 
 speaking of cooking and such, since the price of groceries has gone up 
 so much, Im really thinking about having a garden next year.
 
 Bill R wrote:
 Tried out my new [to me] grill tonight, and tried the rotisserie for the
 first time in my life.  Pretty basic stuff, I stuck two chickens on the
 spit, put some BBQ rub on them and cranked it up.  I was also dealing
with
 some grandkids at the time, and when I thought it was stable at 450
 degrees
 I wandered off for a time.  When I got back a few minutes later it as at
 550
 and the chicken skin was black.  Tasted good [burn was only of the skin],
 but not visually appealing, to say the least.  It's a 4 burner Jenn-Air,
 64,000 BTU.  Anyone have a good method for using a rotisserie?  It did
not
 come with a manual.

 BillR   

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/banned_okiebenz.com

 


-- 

Lee

If you would be unloved and forgotten, be reasonable. - Kurt Vonnegut

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-16 Thread Peter T . Arnold
Only thing I've hurt bad in my smoker was a beef brisket, I couldn't
keep in cool enough.  Got to try again.

Pete
On Fri, 16 May 2008 19:10:40 -0600, you wrote:

I use a Texas smoker, no propane or rotisseries here.

Brine 'em first, helps keep moist. Lower is better, temp-wise.

When I do up a brisket, I typically get up to build the fire around 2:30
- 3 a.m. and let her smoke slow and easy on an oak fire, for 10 hours or
so. Keep the temp low, and it will be smoky/juicy/good. ETOH is also
essential, but not as a marinade or baste. It optimizes the attitude of
the grillmaster.

Bill R wrote:
 It was always amusing to read letters from my hippie big sis when she talked
 about her large garden: beans, squash, pot, corn ... er, I wouldn't send
 that on a postcard...
 BillR 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
 Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:58 PM
 To: Banned List
 Cc: 'Mercedes Discussion List'
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question
 
 speaking of cooking and such, since the price of groceries has gone up 
 so much, Im really thinking about having a garden next year.
 
 Bill R wrote:
 Tried out my new [to me] grill tonight, and tried the rotisserie for the
 first time in my life.  Pretty basic stuff, I stuck two chickens on the
 spit, put some BBQ rub on them and cranked it up.  I was also dealing with
 some grandkids at the time, and when I thought it was stable at 450
 degrees
 I wandered off for a time.  When I got back a few minutes later it as at
 550
 and the chicken skin was black.  Tasted good [burn was only of the skin],
 but not visually appealing, to say the least.  It's a 4 burner Jenn-Air,
 64,000 BTU.  Anyone have a good method for using a rotisserie?  It did not
 come with a manual.

 BillR   

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/banned_okiebenz.com

 

--

Regards,

Peter T. Arnold

2007 HHR, 2.4L/Auto, LT2, 20Kmi, No problems!
1987 300SDL  286 KMI  Now lives with Dave Walton, Cleveland Ohio
1995 F-250 PowerChoke  199Kmi
1954 Metropolitan Convertible, Hanger Queen
Wife has a Cruizer, 89 Kmi, as reliable as an Ice Box, the car that is!

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

2008-05-16 Thread Robert Rentfro
You guys who don't live on the surface of the sun like I do and you don't
have a garden? No excuse for that.

Bob R
Jonesin' for a garden

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 5:58 PM
To: Banned List
Cc: 'Mercedes Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [MBZ] [Banned] OT rotisserie question

speaking of cooking and such, since the price of groceries has gone up 
so much, Im really thinking about having a garden next year.

Bill R wrote:
 Tried out my new [to me] grill tonight, and tried the rotisserie for the
 first time in my life.  Pretty basic stuff, I stuck two chickens on the
 spit, put some BBQ rub on them and cranked it up.  I was also dealing with
 some grandkids at the time, and when I thought it was stable at 450
degrees
 I wandered off for a time.  When I got back a few minutes later it as at
550
 and the chicken skin was black.  Tasted good [burn was only of the skin],
 but not visually appealing, to say the least.  It's a 4 burner Jenn-Air,
 64,000 BTU.  Anyone have a good method for using a rotisserie?  It did not
 come with a manual.
 
 BillR   
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/banned_okiebenz.com
 

-- 
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
  94 E420, 92 300SD, 92 250D Turbo, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D,
  89 560SEL, 89 260E, 87 300SDL, 86 560SL, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro,
  84 190D, 84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D,
  76 300D, 72 250C, 69 250
http://www.okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com