Re: axen - need working USB NIC using axen to test driver change
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 4:12 PM gwes wrote: > Currently axen.c has its PHY address hardwired to 3. > I have a StarTech which has the PHY at 0. > The driver currently searches for all PHYs connected to the MII > and then ignores the result. > I want to test my fix on devices which work now. > > Can anyone point me to a USB NIC which works with axen? > thanks > Geoff Steckel > I’m using the StarTech usb 3.0 one on the ThinkPad X1 Carbon. I don’t have the machine booted up at the moment but I’m running OpenBSD 6.6 and it works with the axen driver. I also purchased a usb 2.0 one - this is recognized as an axen device but it did not work on the ThinkPad X1. I have not yet tried it on another older laptop. > >
Re: Laptop Recommendations?
Off topic (durability): I've owned a couple X220 ThinkPads now and I don't disagree with the Cappuccino report - fans are a real weak point on the ThinkPad - and they break at the worst times - usually when travelling. Basically, the laptop get squished a little, the fan stops working, and you have to get a new one. Other little stuff: the ThinkPad lettering forward of the keyboard just fell off one day - now there's a bare metal spot on the black. While the ThinkPad's are known for durability, the X220 is a little weak in that area. I love the little screen. I love even more that everything works so well under OpenBSD. I just can't afford to have the one computer I take on a trip poop itself at the wrong time. My 2 cents. I am tempted to give the Toughbook a shot now. Thanks for the heads up. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Chris Cappucciowrote: > harry666t [harry6...@gmail.com] wrote: >> On 11 November 2016 at 03:25, Brian wrote: >> > Thinkpads are used often by folks wanting to get that penguin OS going also. >> >> Typing this on a Thinkpad X200s, running 6.0, very very happy with it. > > I consistently get junk when I buy old Thinkpads. Usually the problems are not major, but I started buying Panasonic Toughbook CF-C1A (1st gen intel) and CF-C1B (2nd gen intel) laptops which are equivalent to X200 and X220. I have several units on ebay now for $60 USD which have 14,000 hours (basically on since they were manufactured) and they look and act brand new. I also started getting CF-19 MK3 (Core 2 duo) and CF-19 MK4 (i5) for field use. They are basically rock-solid, even with 8000 hours. Not every single used one has been great, but most have been very, very good...
Re: image view and manipulation
feh is lightweight (relatively). I use it from xterm, then use keyboard chords and dropdown menus to manipulate images (usually view, zoom, rotate, and save as) once they're up on screen. CBT On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, jsgwrote: >Hi folks > Can some of you recommend what packages or package >you use to manipulate, view, resive .png or .img (other) imaeges >for website content. > > >thanks in advance
Re: HUAWEI dongle
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Read, James Cwrote: >>> Read, James C wrote: >>> > I just installed 5.8, I know my dongle is detected and correctly >>> > switched to the right mode because >>> > >>> > a) I can see in dmesg output that the device is detected and >>> > labelled ugen0 >>> >>> See ugen(4). Basically, the dongle isn't supported. > >>There was recently a good discussion about which WiFi dongles are >>reliably supported. I'd suggest finding cheap well-reviewed options >>online and searching their names on the list archives. > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man4/umsm.4?query=umsm > =4 > > My modem is explicitly listed here (Huawei Mobile E353). And, in fact, the > dmesg mentions umsm0 when the device is detected in dmesg. > > Like I said I know the device is detected and working because I can see the > light continuous. This only happens when the device mode has been succesfully > switched. > > What do I need to do to bring this up with ifconfig? > > Raed Samej > I'm jumping in late, sorry if I'm missing context. If you have your dongle plugged in and it is supported, ifconfig (no switches) should show it as an interface like urtwn0 or another chipset family (in your case, umsm0). I have a Verizon MiFi unit for my wireless internet. Your setup will naturally be different unless you're using the same Verizon MiFi unit for internet. (with root privileges) ifconfig umsm0 up nwid Verizon-291LVW-0007 wpakey You may need firmware for the driver. I have to install iwn firmware for the intel wireless on my X201 ThinkPad. If your network associates with that command above, then dhclient umsm0 I always test by pinging google ping www.google.com Good luck. FWIW, OpenBSD does a better on wireless stick driver support than do the other BSD's, at least last time I went through this a couple years back. The trick is buying a chip (manufacturers switch them out all the time, so you can't depend on the unit model name) that's supported. Carl T.
Re: Wireless connection mystery two OpenBSD machines suddenly cannot connect
from the command line ifconfig down I think this resets the device IIRC ifconfig up nwid wpakey At this point you should within a few seconds get an associated conneciton - if not there's another problem. On my thinkpad the little antenna light blinks then stays on constant when it's right. dhclient ping www.google.com to check to make sure everything works. Sorry if I've reviewed stuff you already tried or know. Good luck. On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Jack J. Woehrwrote: > I have two very different laptops running OpenBSD 5.8 with all patches. > > Both were connected to my home wireless via very simple hostname files: > > nwid foo > wpakey bar > dhcp > > Both stopped connecting today .. no link (sleeping). > Both see the station via ifconfig scan with reasonable dB levels > (>55dBm) > My mobile phone still connects to the station with the same credentials, as > does my Kindle. > > Of course this is ridiculous. I don't know enough to be dangerous on this > one. Any tips? > > -- > Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of > www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the > universe > www.softwoehr.com # with a fine understanding of human fallibility. - Carl > Sagan
Re: CD's arrived
Tucson, Arizona On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Ralph Sieglerwrote: > On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:51:28 +, M Wheeler wrote: > >> CD's arrived today UK. Thanks again. > > Just arrived just north of Chicago, IL USA (pre-ordered Sept 15) Many > thanks!
Re: lynx is gone?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:15 PM, L.R. D.S. arrowscr...@mail.com wrote: 1) lynx has some amazingly insecure code So, remove Xombrero from base too, he segfault everytime and is much more insecure due to ECMAscript engine of WebKit. curl Please guys, a browser is different from a http/ftp downloader. A browser have HTML parser, and funcionality's for you... ahm... browse? I accidentally posted off list the first time. I'm just a user, but my preference is to let the devs, for lack of a better word, dev. If I knew how to run the OpenBSD project to end up with something like OpenBSD, which I'm fond of, I'd be . . . a lot smarter . . . The app (lynx) is on the CD's as a package, for now, at least. That works fine for me, and I am a pretty frequent lynx user. My 2 cents. Carl T.
Re: Realtek RTL8192SE wireless card support in OpenBSD 5.5
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Dylan Socolobsky dsocolob...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. I just decided to give OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64) a go in my netbook, everything is working flawlessly so far, except for the Wireless Network. I did install rsu-firmware which did nothing. My netbook has a Realtek RTL8192SE wireless chip, which I can't get to work with OpenBSD. When running ifconfig this is what I get: lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33144 priority: 0 groups: lo inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 lladdr 00:03:0d:fb:20:69 priority: 0 groups: egress media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active inet6 fe80::203:dff:fefb:2069%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.1.5 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 enc0: flags=0 priority: 0 groups: enc status: active pflog0: flags=141UP,RUNNING,PROMISC mtu 33144 priority: 0 groups: pflog So as you can see, I can only see the Ethernet card (re0) which is working properly via DHCP, however, the Wireless interface is nowhere to be seen. Running dmesg | grep Realtek reveals the following: Realtek 8192SE rev 0x10 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 not configured Which leads me to believe that the device is not being properly recognized by the ACPI Interface. Looking at /src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs_data.h , I found the following: { PCI_VENDOR_REALTEK, PCI_PRODUCT_REALTEK_RTL8192SE, 8192SE, }, However I could not find any kind of implementation or interface for the device, all I could find were if_re_pci.c, if_rl_pci.c and if_rtw_pci.c none of which implement the RTL8192SE card. What can I do? Is the card not supported at all? Is it just bad mapping maybe? Thanks for your help. Disclaimer: Wikipedia is not guaranteed to be up to date and accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open-source_wireless_drivers That said, I did a further search on google and can't see a definitive mention of that chipset being supported (yet). I've had some experience outfitting my laptops with those cheap USB WIFI sticks. The cost is hardly prohibitive (sometimes under $10) but nailing down the chipset can be a pain. My suggestion: find a readily available one supported by OpenBSD, install whatever firmware is required, and go that route. Good luck. Carl T.
Re: [Bulk] Re: a half-baked analysis of the verification chicken-and-egg problem, and request
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Eric Furman ericfur...@fastmail.net wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014, at 05:36 PM, Worik Stanton wrote: On 13/08/14 22:13, Eric Furman wrote: [snip] The most absolutely best way any one can contribute to OBSD is to BUY CD'S. Buy some cd's and then buy some more. Buy them for the stickers. Buy them because they fund OBSD. Without cd sales OBSD would cease to exist. It is as simple as that. So, BUY CD'S! That is worth repeating; Without CD sales OpenBSD will cease to exist. PERIOD. Contrary to what a lot of you assholes think I would rather have a 5.5 T'shirt. I am new and when I am ready I will be back here asking questions but for now, I do not want a CD (totally useless to me) but a T'shirt would be cool. It would cover my nakedness. Looking on http://www.openbsd.org/tshirts.html I can see no 5.5 T'shirt. Actually given that today I am at home because of snow on the Lieth Saddle a 5.5 merino hoodie would be best. It would cover my nakedness and keep me warm(er) Fine, buy a T-shirt, but realize that only a small fraction of the cost actually goes to OpenBSD. When you buy a CD the vast majority of the cost goes to OpenBSD. Who cares whether you need the CD or not. Buy if for the cool stickers. Throw the CD in the trash for all I and the OpenBSD developers care. For people earning decent money, $100 a year really isn't much. I've always failed to see why this is such a big deal. I'd prefer not to flame, but if you're a dev and a sysadmin earning decent money, or just someone who uses OpenBSD (like me) and earns OK money, if you refuse to kick in $50 every six months, you probably shouldn't be posting to this list. My OpenBSD knowledge is weak, but I've always had good luck here. I like the OS; it's simple. For me the continued development of the OS and this list are more than worth the $50 every six months. My 2 cents. Puff on!
(off topic) Booth at SCaLE
The project has a booth at the Southern California Linux Expo (SCaLE) as it has in the past, I will be available to sit the booth and help out. https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale12 I've fallen out of touch with my previous contact and cannot get a hold of him. If anyone can point me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it. Thanks a ton. https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale12x Please contact me by e-mail off line. Thanks. Carl T.
Re: Request for Funding our Electricity
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Kent R. Spillner kspill...@acm.org wrote: I notice a lot of people have suggested use an emulator, as if that had never occurred to the OpenBSD developers before, but nobody has volunteered to verify that the available emulators are good enough to actually replace real hardware. Also, I don't understand why anyone thinks emulation would reduce the power bill. Even assuming the OpenBSD developers were interested in using emulators it's not like they're just going to install one and then power down the old machines. The old hardware would still run while they're validating the emulators, and that process would probably take a really long time. So there's no potential cost savings for a really long time, and in the meantime some of the devs are now distracted from actually working on OpenBSD because they're so busy verifying the accuracy of the emulators. Disclaimer: I'm loathe to comment because I'm fairly ignorant and late to the OpenBSD party (I've been a user for about 7 years and have purchased about 5 or 6 CD's and two T-shirts that I can account for). I volunteered at SCaLE a number of years ago at the OpenBSD booth and hope to do that again next month. I just made a donation of an amount that I could afford to make today. Against my better judgement, I will proceed with my input. 1) I don't want the OpenBSD project to change anything - that includes the way it develops for platforms and the way it raises funds. My belief (not proven) is that the intransigent nature of the project and its personalities yields the operating system that I want - less is more, beholden to no one, truly open. 2) Send money to the project now. My 2 cents. CBT
Re: One thinkpad still wanted
Sorry for top post. I am using a second hand X201 right now, but I don't want to part with it. I can kick in $100 for the one Marcus proposed if that's the way the (OpenBSD) project and project leadership want to go. Please contact me off list for any money transfer arrangements. Thanks for your continued hard work on drivers, hardware, and the OpenBSD OS and packages. I am using it almost exclusively now for my home computing. All the best. Carl T. On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Marcus MERIGHI mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote: 12/19/13 15:37, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org: Jonathan Gray and Mark Kettenis are still missing one generation of Intel video. They need a Arrandale/Ironlake model. The Thinkpad x201 is the best laptop for this. They could use a laptop from a different vendor. To verify, pcidump -v will show that the HD Graphics device has a Product ID of 0046. I do not have one of these at hand but: A quick look (http://www.lapstore.de/ = second hand) made me think this will be in the EUR 300-400 range. I have bought a dozen Notebooks there over the last decade. I can donate EUR 100,-- Anyone else wanting even better X windows? http://www.lapstore.de/a.php/shop/lapstore/lang/x/a/10874/kw/Lenovo_Thinkpad_X201_-_3680-KV4 It's a german page but the facts are english. Is Intel Integrated Graphics 4500MHD what is wanted? I have wasted an hour on the lenovo website without success. The closest I got to x201 3680 KV4 was here[1], the closest to a serious product specification here[2]. [1] http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/guides-and-manuals/default.page [2] http://www.lenovo.com/psref/ (Do not search those PDFs, the x201 3680 KV4 is not there. Or I am too stupid. Whatever.) Bye, Marcus Looking to receive it in either in Netherlands, Australia, or here in Calgary so that I can get it to them at the next hackathon. Actually, since the next hackathon is happening fairly soon, we could receive it in a number of other places as well, as long as that is soon. Thanks. !DSPAM:52b304d8316501861912341!
Re: Are there OpenBSD users who are not IT professionals?
OpenBSD has one of the fastest easiest installs of any operating system out there. The doc is clean and excellent. I've never heard less is more as an OpenBSD philosophy, but it is my philosophy and part of why I like OpenBSD. I'm a geologist who does programming in high level, dynamic languages as a hobby and part of my job. My sysadmin skills go as far as I need them to to administer an OpenBSD laptop. The community (this list, for example) will expect you to refer to the documentation and experiment a bit before coming here and asking for help. The one time I got help here on a wireless setup for my Verizon MIFI unit, I got an answer almost right away. People were pretty kind, too, as I did not have a handle on the ins and outs of encryption keys and what a wpa key was. Since then, through working through more than once, I've learned those things. As your machine's admin, you will learn things through using it with OpenBSD. This can take time and it helps to have an interest in these things. Your reward is a machine that behaves the way you expect it to and fewer security problems (every Windows user I know complains bitterly about viruses :-\ ). My 2 cents. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Salim Shaw salims...@vfemail.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenBSD is for the world. You have to ask yourself a few questions. Are you an open source advocate? Do you like the freedom to use an operating system the way you want to? Do you value stability and code correctness in an operating system? Is security paramount in your computing world? Do you value accurate documentation and a developer world who pride themselves on correctness? If the answer to these few question is yes, then OpenBSD is for you. If you like for someone to tell you, how to use an operating system and don't mind your OS crashing and security exploits, then you're in the wrong place. On 11/19/2013 10:37 AM, za...@gmx.com wrote: Hi I am new to OpenBSD. In fact, I am a total newbie here. After reading many posts on this list, I formed the impression that all or most OpenBSD users are high-end IT professionals. I was wondering: are there OpenBSD users who are not so advanced in terms of IT expertise? That is, who are simple computer *users*, not IT professionals? I need to know this because I am starting feeling that, as an average computer user, I might be out of place here. I was attracted to OpenBSD by its security-by-default philosophy. Admittedly, I don't know much about security and I would not be able to set the proper security settings on my own, so I have decided to adopt OpenBSD and use it for simple day-to-day tasks, as a desktop OS (as I would any popular Linux distribution). Does this choice of mine, and its underlying reasoning, make sense? Are there any significant drawbacks to my adoption of OpenBSD (such as OpenBSD being too technical and too difficult, as compared, say, to Linux distros)? Please, give me some advice. If OpenBSD is not for me, I would rather know it sooner than later. Thanks Zaf - -- Salim A. Shaw System Administrator OpenBSD / Free Software Advocate Need stability and security --- Try OpenBSD. BSD, ISC license all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSi4k7AAoJELO0Z/gjFO4kryMIAKifERLcoPeYtYo544vMC+c3 c18nb275QTLp7bMEl+iZqfuEcRsQ0V4cHfO+IsJ6Z1RAWwwEFu5GtYvWm01KOWk/ PIdh+A5e3N5aHsu0VWpgBLZeyJPH2x4QzQwOOITNk6ak5mLyVmPr8PkTDV083zNl /U+NKoOR7o/V+EMcvzrvxd3GQh5TB+pnFaEuqXU7JkqcHdLdS2NhTDy2W7zAp5LQ EL8GWpBKzN/dXD1vUhRq7c7fez5TZxoQ2tL3IvsMyds7P/BSl21B7tTwUIx/oo5O hjB9bF13OCy+WXYWDESKMOodMlREm7wUETMpdubCGVOpxD61L/TZCGWcgKGEXew= =K6m4 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: What should we look before buying a laptop?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.ukwrote: In my experience, now that video is out of the way, the thing to look out most for is getting a well supported built-in wireless card. That's starting to become difficult when buying new laptops because most drivers are lacking support for newer hardware variants. Perhaps someone knows of a usb wireless card with good range that works well under OpenBSD. I bought a Edimax N300 Wifi extender...connected with a 10/100 LAN cable to the back of this desktop machine. Removes the hassle of having a wireless driver. This machine came with a Atheros wireless card which is currently unsupported. Good luck. Hopefully on topic, this is a blog post from an OpenBSD user from the end of last year (8 months ago). He had to purchase some parts and do some config and order a specific wireless setup, but it sounds like a pretty sharp system (Lenovo Thinkpad X320): http://brycv.com/blog/2012/lenovo-thinkpad-x230-for-openbsd-and-linux/ I have a ThinkPad Edge that I bought blind. I eventually got a urtwn based TP-LINK USB WIFI stick that works well, but it was luck. The model number is TL-WN821N (300Mbps), but the chipset has to be right (urtwn0: MAC/BB RTL8192CU, RF 6052 2T2R). Good luck.
Re: Wireless Connection Problem - Verizon MiFi2200
On 9/28/10, Anders Langworthy lagrang...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Carl Trachte ctrac...@gmail.com wrote: ifconfig iw0 scan detects the mifi device and identifies it: nwid Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure chan 11 bssid 6 part id 82db 54M privacy,short_preamble,short_slottime I try connecting using the network id shown above and the 11 digit password on the back of the mifi unit: ifconfig iwi0 up nwid network id nwkey 01234567891 That doesn't work because that password is not a WEP key. It's a WPA key. WEP keys can't be 11 digits. You want something like this: ifconfig iwi0 nwid Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure wpa wpapsk \ `wpa-psk Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure 01234567891` Note that if your iwi device has the same quirk as mine you have to run a scan after you change the nwid or you won't be able to get an IP address. Cheers, Anders. Anders, it worked! (I had had wireless disabled on the Thinkpad - that's what was wrong once you gave me the right command.) Thanks so much. Carl T.
Wireless Connection Problem - Verizon MiFi2200
Hello. I am having difficulty establishing a connection to the internet through the subject device which serves as our internet connection at home. Computer: Lenovo T43 Thinkpad running OpenBSD 4.6 (I will be upgrading to 4.8 later this year); iwi wireless driver; I downloaded the firmware and installed it as a package. I have read ifconfig but I'm missing something. What I have tried and what works so far: ifconfig iw0 scan detects the mifi device and identifies it: nwid Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure chan 11 bssid 6 part id 82db 54M privacy,short_preamble,short_slottime I try connecting using the network id shown above and the 11 digit password on the back of the mifi unit: ifconfig iwi0 up nwid network id nwkey 01234567891 The output of ifconfig shows status: no network dhclient times out with no link. I am neglecting to do something or doing something wrong. I've seen at least one person on Twitter get this working with OpenBSD, so I know, at least in some configurations, it's possible. Any help would be appreciated. Carl T.
Re: Wireless Connection Problem - Verizon MiFi2200
On 9/28/10, Anders Langworthy lagrang...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Carl Trachte ctrac...@gmail.com wrote: ifconfig iw0 scan detects the mifi device and identifies it: nwid Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure chan 11 bssid 6 part id 82db 54M privacy,short_preamble,short_slottime I try connecting using the network id shown above and the 11 digit password on the back of the mifi unit: ifconfig iwi0 up nwid network id nwkey 01234567891 That doesn't work because that password is not a WEP key. It's a WPA key. WEP keys can't be 11 digits. You want something like this: ifconfig iwi0 nwid Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure wpa wpapsk \ `wpa-psk Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure 01234567891` Note that if your iwi device has the same quirk as mine you have to run a scan after you change the nwid or you won't be able to get an IP address. Cheers, Anders. Anders, Thanks for the command and the distinction between WPA and WEP. This is the closest I've gotten to talking to someone who has gotten this to work on a non-windows system, and I appreciate your time. I ran the command and got: ifconfig: SIOCS80211NWID: Device not configured ifconfig: SIOCG80211WPAPARMS: Device not configured Not sure what these mean, but it looks like I've got a problem on my end. Thanks again for the command, though. Carl T.
Re: Wireless Connection Problem - Verizon MiFi2200
On 9/28/10, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Carl Trachte ctrac...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/28/10, Anders Langworthy lagrang...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Carl Trachte ctrac...@gmail.com wrote: ifconfig iw0 scan detects the mifi device and identifies it: nwid Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure chan 11 bssid 6 part id 82db 54M privacy,short_preamble,short_slottime I try connecting using the network id shown above and the 11 digit password on the back of the mifi unit: ifconfig iwi0 up nwid network id nwkey 01234567891 That doesn't work because that password is not a WEP key. It's a WPA key. WEP keys can't be 11 digits. You want something like this: ifconfig iwi0 nwid Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure wpa wpapsk \ `wpa-psk Verizon MiFi2200 BB2F Secure 01234567891` Note that if your iwi device has the same quirk as mine you have to run a scan after you change the nwid or you won't be able to get an IP address. Cheers, Anders. Anders, Thanks for the command and the distinction between WPA and WEP. This is the closest I've gotten to talking to someone who has gotten this to work on a non-windows system, and I appreciate your time. I ran the command and got: ifconfig: SIOCS80211NWID: Device not configured ifconfig: SIOCG80211WPAPARMS: Device not configured Not sure what these mean, but it looks like I've got a problem on my end. Thanks again for the command, though. Some info about those messages : http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_ioctl.h?rev= 1.17 and especially here : http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c?rev= 1.33 case SIOCS80211NWID: if ((error = suser(curproc, 0)) != 0) break; if ((error = copyin(ifr-ifr_data, nwid, sizeof(nwid))) != 0) break; if (nwid.i_len IEEE80211_NWID_LEN) { error = EINVAL; break; } memset(ic-ic_des_essid, 0, IEEE80211_NWID_LEN); ic-ic_des_esslen = nwid.i_len; memcpy(ic-ic_des_essid, nwid.i_nwid, nwid.i_len); error = ENETRESET; break; case SIOCG80211WPAPARMS: error = ieee80211_ioctl_getwpaparms(ic, (void *)data); break; Thanks. I'll have a look at the links. Carl T. Carl T. -- bIf youbre good at something, never do it for free.b bThe Joker
Re: selling bsd in cd for profit??
On 2/26/10, Martin SchrC6der mar...@oneiros.de wrote: 2010/2/27 Richard Toohey richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz: No problem? Maybe not (I don't know) a legal/licence problem, but you are biting the hand that feeds / killing the golden goose. It's not nice, but legal. And people doing this should wear asbestos here. Best Martin I know the BSD Certification group includes a base OS for i386 on their CD - they sell that CD for $40, but it's not for profit, nor is it anywhere near what the official CD set offers. Now that I have the 4.6 one, I'm very happy with my CD's. Really don't know how you could sell OpenBSD for profit unless you play on someone's ignorance - everything is out there on the internet. Befuddled or sucessfully trolled, Carl T.
Re: creating instalation CD
On 1/21/10, Yamidt Henao yamidthe...@gmail.com wrote: *Hi, I try make instalation CD, from OPENBSD machine, I read the http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release, but in the step: # cd /usr/src/etc # make release show me message make: don't know how to make release. Stop in /usr/src/etc. Can Anybody explain me how make this procedure?** Best regards, Y.H * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release 1) if you have the money, buy the 4.6 cd's; everything will be easy from there on out. 2) if not, download the iso and burn a cd. The iso is here: http://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html You will need to select the correct iso for your architecture (i386, 64 bit or 32 bit, etc.) If you need help burning the iso image to the cd, write back at that point. Carl T.
Re: Announcing: JigglyPuffBSD
On 1/19/10, Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote: I'm proud to announce the rebirth of JigglyPuffBSD. Catering to the distinguished *BSD user, JigglyPuffBSD aims to meet the demanding requirements of today's enterprise architectures. With support for a broad range of buzzwords, it excels in B.S. and P.O.S. applications. As a fork of OpenBSD, we're proud of our heritage. We've taken great pains to craft our regex with performance and precision in mind. Copyrights have been rewritten and attributions vanquished. This is not your grandfather's BSD. We're American and damn proud of it. http://jigglypuffbsd.blogspot.com/ -- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net/ I'm a total community newb, so I hadn't seen this before. Name and kitty puff fish graphic with the raytraced eyes made me LOL. Well done, if somewhat unkind to naive newbs like myself. Please keep up the good work on the dev end and I'll keep buying the CD's - really getting my 50 or 60 bucks worth. Thanks for the product and the laugh. Carl T.
Re: OpenBSD's Songs
On 1/1/10, Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, I just would like to thank once the work around the songs and arts for the project, it really is kind of awesome every-time, and is I believe, an important part in the project. Regards The evolution of the fish was my favorite 4.6 sticker. Good times.
problems with X on 4.6 (mtrr?)
Hello, first post. I am writing to request help with X. I had been running OpenBSD 4.5 on a Dell L733r; X worked well. In the fall I purchased the new OpenBSD 4.6 cd set. Since then, I have not been able to get X going. The error I'm seeing is mtrr invalid argument. Googling the problem suggests either that this isn't the source of the problem or that I need to set Memory Remap to off in the BIOS. The BIOS does not have this option. I would be most grateful for any help. Output from startx command: # startx xauth: creating new authority file /home/carl/.serverauth.993 X.Org X Server 1.5.3 Release Date: 5 November 2008 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: OpenBSD 4.6 i386 Current Operating System: OpenBSD puffy.my.domain 4.6 GENERIC#58 i386 Build Date: 01 July 2009 05:20:42PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Sat Dec 26 14:48:52 2009 (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf mtrr set failed: Invalid argument waiting for X server to shut down X log file: # cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log (--) checkDevMem: using aperture driver /dev/xf86 (--) Using wscons driver on /dev/ttyC4 in pcvt compatibility mode (version 3.32) X.Org X Server 1.5.3 Release Date: 5 November 2008 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: OpenBSD 4.6 i386 Current Operating System: OpenBSD puffy.my.domain 4.6 GENERIC#58 i386 Build Date: 01 July 2009 05:20:42PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Sat Dec 26 14:48:52 2009 (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf (==) ServerLayout Simple Layout (**) |--Screen Screen 1 (0) (**) | |--Monitor sonycpd-100sx (**) | |--Device intel 82810E (**) |--Input Device Mouse1 (**) |--Input Device Keyboard1 (==) Not automatically adding devices (==) Not automatically enabling devices (==) Including the default font path /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X 11/fonts/OTF,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/ ,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/. (**) FontPath set to: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/OTF, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/OTF, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/ (==) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules (II) Loader magic: 0x3c01e2e0 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 X.Org Video Driver: 4.1 X.Org XInput driver : 2.1 X.Org Server Extension : 1.1 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.6 (II) Loader running on openbsd (--) PCI:*(0...@0:1:0) Intel 82810E Video rev 3, Mem @ 0xf800/0, 0xffa8/0 (II) System resource ranges: [0] -1 0 0x0010 - 0x3fff (0x3ff0) MX[B]E(B) [1] -1 0 0x000f - 0x000f (0x1) MX[B] [2] -1 0 0x000c - 0x000e (0x3) MX[B] [3] -1 0 0x - 0x0009 (0xa) MX[B] [4] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] [5] -1 0 0x - 0x00ff (0x100) IX[B] (II) extmod will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. (II) dbe will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. (II) glx will be loaded by default. (II) freetype will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. (II) dri will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. (II) LoadModule: dri (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions//libdri.so (II) Module dri: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 1.5.3, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 1.1 (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI (II) LoadModule: dbe (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions//libdbe.so (II) Module dbe: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 1.5.3, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: X.Org Server Extension ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 1.1 (II)