Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Marco Peereboom
That's not true.  If you have a signed piece of paper saying I wrote it
in mm-dd- you are good to go.  The same way patents work; prior art
can be proven by writing your idea in an engineering notebook (you know,
pen and paper!) and then signing it.  Since those notebooks are usually
in chronological order they are considered valid pieces of evidence.

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:18:33PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
 That wouldn't work because the original author would be able to prove
 he was the owner of the copyright.
 Comrade RIngo Kamens
 On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:09:37PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
  | My guess would be that the content is released into the public domain
  | since you can't sue because there is no proof that you are the
  | copyright holder.
  | Comrade RIngo Kamens
 
  Let me just steal some code somewhere, relicense it and release it as
  'anonymous'. *poof* .. it's public domain because you can't sue ?
 
  That's a bit too easy...
 
  Cheers,
 
  Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
 
  --
 [++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
  +++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
  http://www.weirdnet.nl/



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Sunnz
Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?

One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said
code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to
claim that they are the anonymous person unless they provide evidence,
otherwise they can't change the license or do anything not permitted
by the license, right?



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Marco Peereboom
I didn't claim it was a good idea.

Anyway, this is all theoretical.

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
 Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
 of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
 
 One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said
 code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to
 claim that they are the anonymous person unless they provide evidence,
 otherwise they can't change the license or do anything not permitted
 by the license, right?



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-06-23, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
 of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?

Someone may want to intentionally release it anonymously, then
go back and try and sue people for infringing their copyright.

It's hard to _totally_ guard against this, but for a project
to accept code where there's a distinct possibility this happened
would be pretty insane. At least where the submitter has a name
and can establish some credibility/trust with a project, the
risk is reduced.



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Pieter Verberne
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:45:59AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
  Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
  of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
  
  One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said
  code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to
  claim that they are the anonymous person unless they provide evidence,
  otherwise they can't change the license or do anything not permitted
  by the license, right?
 
 I didn't claim it was a good idea.
 
 Anyway, this is all theoretical.

True. I've been arguing for public domain dedication before. But you'll
get an infinet discussion about the legal value of public domain etc. I
just stuck with ISC because public domain is not worth all the
discussion.



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Ted Unangst
On 6/22/08, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...

Looking back, I realized the subject question is not the same as the
body question and nobody has answered it.  For OpenBSD, the answer is
no, you cannot contribute anonymously.

  If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
  license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
  it was released as public domain?



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Theo de Raadt
 Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...
 
 If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
 license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
 it was released as public domain?

I guess the actually question you wanted to as was:

  Does OpenBSD accept anonymous code?

No.  OpenBSD does not.  We don't do a dumb thing like that.



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Sunnz
2008/6/24 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...

 If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
 license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
 it was released as public domain?

 I guess the actually question you wanted to as was:

  Does OpenBSD accept anonymous code?

 No.  OpenBSD does not.  We don't do a dumb thing like that.



Well, actually I was just curious, so that's no for OpenBSD... I am
interested to know what is the general case as well. It is nothing
major, it is not like I want to make a killer app under anonymous or
something. :p

-- 
This e-mail may be confidential. You may not copy, forward,
distribute, or, use any part of it. Note, this text has no effective
legal binding on your part, there is no obligation to abide any or all
parts of this. Treat it with the same level of care as any other
pretending-to-be-law-speaking-but-not-really texts attached to e-mail
messages you normally find on any other e-mails. For more information
about disclaimers, please see:
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Predrag Punosevac

Sunnz wrote:

2008/6/24 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  

Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...

If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
it was released as public domain?
  

I guess the actually question you wanted to as was:

 Does OpenBSD accept anonymous code?

No.  OpenBSD does not.  We don't do a dumb thing like that.





Well, actually I was just curious, so that's no for OpenBSD... I am
interested to know what is the general case as well. It is nothing
major, it is not like I want to make a killer app under anonymous or
something. :p

  
You question is probably non of my business as I am mathematician but 
accidentally there is a mathematician turn computer scientist who 
released some code in the past under very strange license that might 
be of great interest for you.


So case study is: D. J. Bernstein from University of Illinois at  Chicago.

Software in question djbdns, qmail, ucspi-tcp, damontools publicfile .

Do not look for his software among OpenBSD ports. You will not find it. 
His code is removed. Why? Well I am leaving to you to investigate the 
whole matter. It might not be exactly what you had in mind but it is 
definitely educative.


The demise of his qmail is a wonderful example of interesting project 
which died because of the bad licence. I know that lots of people here 
like his djbdns but just imagine what could have happened with his 
projects if they were released under BSD license.


Kind Regards,
Predrag



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-23 Thread Emilio Perea
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:01:57PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:

 The demise of his qmail is a wonderful example of interesting project which 
 died because of the bad licence. I know that lots of people here like his 
 djbdns but just imagine what could have happened with his projects if they 
 were released under BSD license.

I started using OpenBSD in version 2.7 in order to run qmail and djbdns
due to DJB's suggestion, and have not found any reason to regret either
choice.  His weird ideas about licensing as well as hier (7) made it
impossible to keep his stuff in ports, but it is by no means dead.

Unfortunately, BSD licensing would never work for a part-time amateur
programmer who insisted on total control.  (But you know how crazy those
mathematicians are. :-) 



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Paul de Weerd
IANAL...

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 03:43:09AM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
| Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...
| 
| If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
| license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
| it was released as public domain?

Well .. as the author of a work, you are the copyright holder to it.
If you then release it under some permissive license, you basically
give up some of the rights that copyright gives you, granting others
a license to copy, modify and/or redistribute etc. Using ISC or
BSD-like licenses, you indicate that you want to keep some (very
basic) but give up most rights.

So you want the world to know that *you* want to retain some rights
but not who you are ? That does not compute. Who wants to retain those
rights exactly ?

Seems to me like a legal can of worms you do not want to open.

In answer to your question, my guess would be no. I would guess that
effectively you've given up no rights whatsoever and that the license
is void if it lists an alias or 'anonymous' as the creator of the
work.

Cheers,

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

-- 
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
+++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/ 



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Ringo Kamens
My guess would be that the content is released into the public domain
since you can't sue because there is no proof that you are the
copyright holder.
Comrade RIngo Kamens

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 IANAL...

 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 03:43:09AM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
 | Hi, just wondering what's your opinion on this...
 |
 | If one were to release some code under an ISC or BSD-like 2 clause
 | license, but under the name of anonymous, would it effectively as if
 | it was released as public domain?

 Well .. as the author of a work, you are the copyright holder to it.
 If you then release it under some permissive license, you basically
 give up some of the rights that copyright gives you, granting others
 a license to copy, modify and/or redistribute etc. Using ISC or
 BSD-like licenses, you indicate that you want to keep some (very
 basic) but give up most rights.

 So you want the world to know that *you* want to retain some rights
 but not who you are ? That does not compute. Who wants to retain those
 rights exactly ?

 Seems to me like a legal can of worms you do not want to open.

 In answer to your question, my guess would be no. I would guess that
 effectively you've given up no rights whatsoever and that the license
 is void if it lists an alias or 'anonymous' as the creator of the
 work.

 Cheers,

 Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

 --
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
 +++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:18:33PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
| That wouldn't work because the original author would be able to prove
| he was the owner of the copyright.

And that isn't possible in the hypothetical situation posted by the
OP ?

Cheers,

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

-- 
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
+++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/ 



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:09:37PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
| My guess would be that the content is released into the public domain
| since you can't sue because there is no proof that you are the
| copyright holder.
| Comrade RIngo Kamens

Let me just steal some code somewhere, relicense it and release it as
'anonymous'. *poof* .. it's public domain because you can't sue ?

That's a bit too easy...

Cheers,

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

-- 
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
+++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/ 



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Ringo Kamens
That wouldn't work because the original author would be able to prove
he was the owner of the copyright.
Comrade RIngo Kamens
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:09:37PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
 | My guess would be that the content is released into the public domain
 | since you can't sue because there is no proof that you are the
 | copyright holder.
 | Comrade RIngo Kamens

 Let me just steal some code somewhere, relicense it and release it as
 'anonymous'. *poof* .. it's public domain because you can't sue ?

 That's a bit too easy...

 Cheers,

 Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

 --
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
 +++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Ted Unangst
On 6/22/08, Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My guess would be that the content is released into the public domain
  since you can't sue because there is no proof that you are the
  copyright holder.

He absolutely can sue.   He says I don't know who this anonymous
person is, but they copied my code.  And now the people using that
code are screwed.



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Ringo Kamens
Sorry, I should have been more clear in my statement. What I was
saying is that if the original author of the work published it
anonymously, he would not be able to sue because he would not be able
to prove he was the original author and copyright holder of the work.
Comrade Ringo Kamens

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 6/22/08, Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My guess would be that the content is released into the public domain
  since you can't sue because there is no proof that you are the
  copyright holder.

 He absolutely can sue.   He says I don't know who this anonymous
 person is, but they copied my code.  And now the people using that
 code are screwed.



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:18:51PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
| Sorry, I should have been more clear in my statement. What I was
| saying is that if the original author of the work published it
| anonymously, he would not be able to sue because he would not be able
| to prove he was the original author and copyright holder of the work.

Well .. why not ? He can later say : I was this anonymous guy, here
is $PROOF, you are in violation of my license, now pay me $$$.

Cheers,

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

-- 
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
+++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/ 



Re: Can you contribute code under anonymous under ISC License?

2008-06-22 Thread Ringo Kamens
Said individual would have to be able to prove he originally made the
content available. I guess this could theoretically be possible ie if
server logs verify it or something along those lines. Things to
consider:

1. If said individual posted code anonymously, wouldn't that indicate
they would like to remain anonymous?

I think the court would also question why he posted the code
anonymously and his proof would certainly come under some scrutiny.
Comrade Ringo Kamens

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:18:51PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
 | Sorry, I should have been more clear in my statement. What I was
 | saying is that if the original author of the work published it
 | anonymously, he would not be able to sue because he would not be able
 | to prove he was the original author and copyright holder of the work.

 Well .. why not ? He can later say : I was this anonymous guy, here
 is $PROOF, you are in violation of my license, now pay me $$$.

 Cheers,

 Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

 --
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
 +++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/