[mssms] RE: My turn to retire
Forgot the smiley :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Stephen Murley [stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk] Sent: 20 March 2015 20:42 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: My turn to retire No one has the nerve to tell you that you were officially retired 100 years ago. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Ed Aldrich [ed.aldr...@1e.com] Sent: 20 March 2015 20:30 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: My turn to retire Hey, if *I’m* still here, you should be too!! :) Seriously, thanks for all your contributions to the community and best of luck in your retirement!!! Ed Aldrich | Channel Solutions Engineer | 1E +1 (401) 924-2293 [Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt (2003-2014) Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lutz, Ken Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:01 PM To: SMS List Subject: [mssms] My turn to retire I am both pleased and saddened to announce that I will no longer be monitoring this list. I must say that this has been one of the best resources for SCCM that one can have. Collectively you guys are great at helping everyone! I know I got a lot of direct help from the group, and learned a lot more from being a member of this list. Thank-You everyone!!! Ken Lutz Note: I am retiring on March 27, 2015 after 42 years of service. Senior Systems Administrator Information Systems Department Spokane County 815 N. Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 [cid:image003.png@01D0632B.25399A60] Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: My turn to retire
No one has the nerve to tell you that you were officially retired 100 years ago. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Ed Aldrich [ed.aldr...@1e.com] Sent: 20 March 2015 20:30 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: My turn to retire Hey, if *I’m* still here, you should be too!! :) Seriously, thanks for all your contributions to the community and best of luck in your retirement!!! Ed Aldrich | Channel Solutions Engineer | 1E +1 (401) 924-2293 [Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt (2003-2014) Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lutz, Ken Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:01 PM To: SMS List Subject: [mssms] My turn to retire I am both pleased and saddened to announce that I will no longer be monitoring this list. I must say that this has been one of the best resources for SCCM that one can have. Collectively you guys are great at helping everyone! I know I got a lot of direct help from the group, and learned a lot more from being a member of this list. Thank-You everyone!!! Ken Lutz Note: I am retiring on March 27, 2015 after 42 years of service. Senior Systems Administrator Information Systems Department Spokane County 815 N. Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 [cid:image003.png@01D0632B.25399A60] Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally!
Are you now on the run from the law? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Lindenfeld, Ivan [ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com] Sent: 21 November 2014 20:26 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! I like the Devolutions offering so much I gave them my company’s money. Ivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Aakash Shah Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 3:07 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! +1 I switched from VisionApp to Devolutions earlier this year. -Aakash Shah From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Pete Howard Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 11:32 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! http://devolutions.nethttp://devolutions.net/#_ga=1.251405446.1067373049.1416598087 remote desktop manager has a free version that i live on Sent from Yahoo Mail on Androidhttps://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android From:Mark Gailey markagai...@gmail.commailto:markagai...@gmail.com Date:Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:51 PM Subject:Re: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! +1 RoaylTS. Switched over and never looked back. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Craig andrew.cr...@syliance.comUrlBlockedError.aspx wrote: Absolutely. RoyalTS is better than anything I tested. http://www.royalts.com/main/home.aspx From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: 19 November 2014 17:29 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! Honestly, it still doesn't compare to the well-polished commercial product that RoyalTS is. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx listsad...@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx on behalf of Eswar Koneti eswarkon...@outlook.comUrlBlockedError.aspx Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! How about this? https://terminals.codeplex.com/ It has most of the functions that other tools does and its FREE and i Love it :) It saves password, connect to vnc and many other functions in it. Regards, Eswar Koneti www.eskonr.comhttp://www.eskonr.com Sent from Mobile Device, excuse any typo's as a result. --- Original Message --- From: Jason Sandys ja...@sandys.usUrlBlockedError.aspx Sent: November 19, 2014 10:08 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! Pay the $40 for RoyalTS. It's far superior to anything else I've tried. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx listsad...@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx on behalf of Paul Winstanley pwinstan...@gmail.comUrlBlockedError.aspx Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.comUrlBlockedError.aspx Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: New RDCMan! Finally! Daniel, Personally I prefer http://www.mremoteng.org/. You can apply credentials to folders and drag and drop computers around to pick up the new settings. Haven't used RDCMan in years so not sure if this functionality is included in it. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Daniel Ratliff dratl...@humana.comUrlBlockedError.aspx wrote: I use this every day, great free tool for Remote Desktop. They finally released an updated version 2.7! http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=44989 Daniel Ratliff The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet
[mssms] RE: KB2984972 and App-V
Here's the solution from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2984972 Known issues with this security update Symptoms After you install this security update, virtualized applications in Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V) versions 4.5, 4.6, and 5.0 may experience problems loading. When the problem occurs, you may receive an error message that resembles the following: Launching MyApp 100% Note In this error message, MyApp represents the name of the App-V application. Depending on the scenario, the virtualized app may stop responding after it starts, or the app may not start at all. Important This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems might occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you follow these steps carefully. For added protection, back up the registry before you modify it. Then, you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 322756 How to back up and restore the registry in Windows Resolution To resolve this known issue, configure the TermSrvReadyEvent registry entry on the computer where the Microsoft Application Virtualization Client is installed. For Microsoft Application Virtualization 5.0 Registry Key: HKLM\Software\Microsoft\AppV\Subsystem\ObjExclusions Value name: 93 (Or any unique value) Type: REG_SZ Data: TermSrvReadyEvent Example For example, type the following command at an elevated command prompt to add the entry to a system running Application Virtualization 5.0: reg add HKLM\Software\Microsoft\AppV\Subsystem\ObjExclusions /v 93 /t REG_SZ /d TermSrvReadyEvent For Microsoft Application Virtualization 4.6 For all supported x86-based systems Registry Key: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SoftGrid\4.5\SystemGuard\ObjExclusions Value name: 95 (Or any unique value) Type: REG_SZ Data: TermSrvReadyEvent Example For example, type the following command at an elevated command prompt to add the entry to an x86-based system running Application Virtualization 4.6: reg add HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SoftGrid\4.5\SystemGuard\ObjExclusions /v 95 /t REG_SZ /d TermSrvReadyEvent For all supported x64-based systems Registry Key: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\SoftGrid\4.5\SystemGuard\ObjExclusions Value name: 95 (Or any unique value) Type: REG_SZ Data: TermSrvReadyEvent Example For example, type the following command at an elevated command prompt to add the entry to an x64-based system running Application Virtualization 4.6: reg add HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\SoftGrid\4.5\SystemGuard\ObjExclusions /v 95 /t REG_SZ /d TermSrvReadyEvent -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: 20 October 2014 19:32 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: KB2984972 and App-V Sorry, what did you say then?? I wasn't listening. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Michael Mott [michael.m...@1e.com] Sent: 20 October 2014 18:52 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: KB2984972 and App-V So basically you don't listen. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:29 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] KB2984972 and App-V Well, I'd read the media article but still didn't believe it as it went on and on about AutoCAD in App-V. Anyhow, yes, this update does botch App-V apps. I estimate 60% of our App-V apps stop working with this update installed. [Image removed by sender.]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0
[mssms] KB2984972 and App-V
Well, I'd read the media article but still didn't believe it as it went on and on about AutoCAD in App-V. Anyhow, yes, this update does botch App-V apps. I estimate 60% of our App-V apps stop working with this update installed. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: KB2984972 and App-V
Sorry, what did you say then?? I wasn't listening. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Michael Mott [michael.m...@1e.com] Sent: 20 October 2014 18:52 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: KB2984972 and App-V So basically you don’t listen. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:29 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] KB2984972 and App-V Well, I’d read the media article but still didn’t believe it as it went on and on about AutoCAD in App-V. Anyhow, yes, this update does botch App-V apps. I estimate 60% of our App-V apps stop working with this update installed. [Image removed by sender.]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX
The other thing to remember is ... it's not us IT bods that call the shots in every location. If we could just simply keep everything up-to-date we would but when your IT department is stretched, it's hard to prove to the powers that be that you need extra resource to keep on top of something that they don't see any tangible evidence of being a problem. We just need a high profile person to get hacked due to JRE and hey presto we'll find that extra resource!! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Nash Pherson [na...@nowmicro.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 18:48 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX How are you guys going to handle this? Your options are Patch it or Pitch Ithttp://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/07/java-update-patch-it-or-pitch-it/ as Brian Krebs put it. If you can't do either, you need to have some other significant control in place like not allowing these devices to have internet access. If a user needs an outdated Java for one or two apps, give them a link to a Remote Desktop or Remote Presentation instance of a browser with outdated Java, but that remote system must only have access to the website that needed the outdate link. While I'm sure lots of IT admins will have excuses, they are all solvable problems as long as someone starts actual working on them. The GPO option should only ever be used as a last ditch effort to buy time for a fix to be put in place. Don't enable that GPO until there is a clear plan with deadlines on how you will disable it. It's time to stop kicking the can down the road. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. Removing it may make users unhappy since there is so much flash content out on the web. You can turn on Flash's auto update so that it does it silently in the background on systems. This means user get what they want, systems stay secure, and you don't have to manage anything. But, don't forget about Shockwave… Shockwave embeds its own version of flash that is up to 18 months out of datehttp://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/why-you-should-ditch-adobe-shockwave/. This means there really isn't a secure way to have Shockwave. Luckily, very little web content still uses it and you could likely get away with removing it from the enterprise. If you do have a business need for it, you should consider the same strategy as with Java of using locked down remote desktops or remote presentation to give access to the offending business app. I hope that helps, Nash Nash Pherson Senior Systems Consultant Now Micro na...@nowmicro.commailto:na...@nowmicro.com Desk: 651-796-1168 Cell: 507-304-0946 [cid:E66BAB9D0721014F843A4C96FA5C47DD@namprd04.prod.outlook.com]http://www.nowmicro.com/ -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 12:31 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX How are you guys going to handle this? The two most logical answers are keep java up to date or disable this via GPO. I think I'm going to give it a try to keep everything up to date, but am going to keep the GPO ready as well. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:17 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Internet Explorer ActiveX Just in case anyone has missed the news: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet-explorer.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/06/internet-explorer-begins-blocking-out-of-date-activex-controls.aspx [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images
[mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX
NIce idea with Registry key. We have a few peeps that have to use Java 6 due to old but critical pieces of software that use it. By default Java 7 uninstalls Java 6. That's not to mention there's now Java 8. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Miller, Todd [todd-mil...@uiowa.edu] Sent: 11 August 2014 19:02 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX My main block to just deploying Java updates to all systems with Java installed is the two major statistical packages - SAS and SPSS. They both install very old customized versions of Java and as far as I can tell will not operate correctly with any current versions of Java. I have to be extra careful not to remove those versions of Java installed by SAS. If I mistakenly remove Java on one of these machines, it is about a 2.5 hour round trip to get SAS back working again. The version of Java that is tied in to IE can be upgraded on these systems, but it tricky business to uninstall/upgrade java for IE's use and leave only certain older versions installed for SAS - so I usually do not bother. Mostly the problem is keeping track of what machines have old java installed for a reason - and so cannot be upgraded while keeping all of the other Java installations up to date. What I have done is created a special entry in the registry on machines that need to be passed over while doing Java updates. The java upgrade script I wrote checks for that registry key before any upgrade is performed. It is going to be a lot of work on those workstations with the aforementioned stats packages installed to keep IE's Java install up to date. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 12:31 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX How are you guys going to handle this? The two most logical answers are keep java up to date or disable this via GPO. I think I'm going to give it a try to keep everything up to date, but am going to keep the GPO ready as well. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:17 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Internet Explorer ActiveX Just in case anyone has missed the news: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet-explorer.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/06/internet-explorer-begins-blocking-out-of-date-activex-controls.aspx [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments
RE: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX
Nice! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Todd Hemsell [hems...@gmail.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 19:05 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX there is an administrative GPO kit that comes with it. allow certain old ones etc. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:31 PM, John Aubrey jaub...@norwoodmedical.commailto:jaub...@norwoodmedical.com wrote: How are you guys going to handle this? The two most logical answers are keep java up to date or disable this via GPO. I think I'm going to give it a try to keep everything up to date, but am going to keep the GPO ready as well. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:17 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Internet Explorer ActiveX Just in case anyone has missed the news: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet-explorer.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/06/internet-explorer-begins-blocking-out-of-date-activex-controls.aspx [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX
Wow!!! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Taxter, Latisha [ltax...@kh.org] Sent: 11 August 2014 19:15 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX Will be happy to use the GPO. We have Kronos here that is still using Java 5 update 17 and will not work if it is updated. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:11 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX Nice! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Todd Hemsell [hems...@gmail.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 19:05 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX there is an administrative GPO kit that comes with it. allow certain old ones etc. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:31 PM, John Aubrey jaub...@norwoodmedical.commailto:jaub...@norwoodmedical.com wrote: How are you guys going to handle this? The two most logical answers are keep java up to date or disable this via GPO. I think I'm going to give it a try to keep everything up to date, but am going to keep the GPO ready as well. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:17 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Internet Explorer ActiveX Just in case anyone has missed the news: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet-explorer.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/06/internet-explorer-begins-blocking-out-of-date-activex-controls.aspx [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX
Good work John :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of John Aubrey [jaub...@norwoodmedical.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 20:00 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX Right now I am help desk, application guy, and system admin guy since a few people left and one moved to a different role. Not many other have input in a decision like this. The ones that do don't really care much for anything security related. 5 years ago when I started, there were no windows updates pushed, and everyone had local admin rights. It's been a long uphill fight. After a few incidents that could have been prevented, we have moved more preventive then reactive. We are much safer today then we were before. I think of this as another place to secure up. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX The other thing to remember is ... it's not us IT bods that call the shots in every location. If we could just simply keep everything up-to-date we would but when your IT department is stretched, it's hard to prove to the powers that be that you need extra resource to keep on top of something that they don't see any tangible evidence of being a problem. We just need a high profile person to get hacked due to JRE and hey presto we'll find that extra resource!! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Nash Pherson [na...@nowmicro.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 18:48 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX How are you guys going to handle this? Your options are Patch it or Pitch Ithttp://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/07/java-update-patch-it-or-pitch-it/ as Brian Krebs put it. If you can't do either, you need to have some other significant control in place like not allowing these devices to have internet access. If a user needs an outdated Java for one or two apps, give them a link to a Remote Desktop or Remote Presentation instance of a browser with outdated Java, but that remote system must only have access to the website that needed the outdate link. While I'm sure lots of IT admins will have excuses, they are all solvable problems as long as someone starts actual working on them. The GPO option should only ever be used as a last ditch effort to buy time for a fix to be put in place. Don't enable that GPO until there is a clear plan with deadlines on how you will disable it. It's time to stop kicking the can down the road. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. Removing it may make users unhappy since there is so much flash content out on the web. You can turn on Flash's auto update so that it does it silently in the background on systems. This means user get what they want, systems stay secure, and you don't have to manage anything. But, don't forget about Shockwave... Shockwave embeds its own version of flash that is up to 18 months out of datehttp://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/why-you-should-ditch-adobe-shockwave/. This means there really isn't a secure way to have Shockwave. Luckily, very little web content still uses it and you could likely get away with removing it from the enterprise. If you do have a business need for it, you should consider the same strategy as with Java of using locked down remote desktops or remote presentation to give access to the offending business app. I hope that helps, Nash Nash Pherson Senior Systems Consultant Now Micro na...@nowmicro.commailto:na...@nowmicro.com Desk: 651-796-1168 Cell: 507-304-0946 [cid:E66BAB9D0721014F843A4C96FA5C47DD@namprd04.prod.outlook.com]http://www.nowmicro.com/ -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 12:31 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX How are you guys going to handle this? The two most logical answers are keep java up to date or disable this via GPO. I think I'm going to give it a try to keep everything up to date, but am going to keep the GPO ready as well. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:17 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Internet Explorer ActiveX Just in case anyone has missed the news: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet-explorer.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b
RE: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX
Dude, so right. We have a CSI team now. If you suggest any improvements to them, they go off and get together to decide the idea's fate ... then after they give it the go ahead you can guarantee you'll be rewarded with your fantastic ideas by having to do the work yourself. That's on top of the day job. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of John Aubrey [jaub...@norwoodmedical.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 20:39 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX Agreed. I interned at a big company. I only did a tiny aspect of IT. Working for a smaller company you really have to figure stuff out. Typically there isn’t a go to person to fall back on. I have learned, if you question it, it is now your project. Most of the time I keep my mouth shut. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:17 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX I love jobs like that, you learn SO much. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:00 PM, John Aubrey jaub...@norwoodmedical.commailto:jaub...@norwoodmedical.com wrote: Right now I am help desk, application guy, and system admin guy since a few people left and one moved to a different role. Not many other have input in a decision like this. The ones that do don't really care much for anything security related. 5 years ago when I started, there were no windows updates pushed, and everyone had local admin rights. It's been a long uphill fight. After a few incidents that could have been prevented, we have moved more preventive then reactive. We are much safer today then we were before. I think of this as another place to secure up. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX The other thing to remember is ... it's not us IT bods that call the shots in every location. If we could just simply keep everything up-to-date we would but when your IT department is stretched, it's hard to prove to the powers that be that you need extra resource to keep on top of something that they don't see any tangible evidence of being a problem. We just need a high profile person to get hacked due to JRE and hey presto we'll find that extra resource!! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Nash Pherson [na...@nowmicro.commailto:na...@nowmicro.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 18:48 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Internet Explorer ActiveX How are you guys going to handle this? Your options are Patch it or Pitch Ithttp://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/07/java-update-patch-it-or-pitch-it/ as Brian Krebs put it. If you can't do either, you need to have some other significant control in place like not allowing these devices to have internet access. If a user needs an outdated Java for one or two apps, give them a link to a Remote Desktop or Remote Presentation instance of a browser with outdated Java, but that remote system must only have access to the website that needed the outdate link. While I'm sure lots of IT admins will have excuses, they are all solvable problems as long as someone starts actual working on them. The GPO option should only ever be used as a last ditch effort to buy time for a fix to be put in place. Don't enable that GPO until there is a clear plan with deadlines on how you will disable it. It's time to stop kicking the can down the road. We don't have any real business use for Java or flash. Removing it may make users unhappy since there is so much flash content out on the web. You can turn on Flash's auto update so that it does it silently in the background on systems. This means user get what they want, systems stay secure, and you don't have to manage anything. But, don't forget about Shockwave... Shockwave embeds its own version of flash that is up to 18 months out of datehttp://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/why-you-should-ditch-adobe-shockwave/. This means there really isn't a secure way to have Shockwave. Luckily, very little web content still uses it and you could likely get away with removing it from the enterprise. If you do have a business need for it, you should consider the same strategy as with Java of using locked down remote desktops or remote presentation to give access to the offending business app. I hope that helps, Nash Nash Pherson Senior Systems Consultant Now
[mssms] Internet Explorer ActiveX
Just in case anyone has missed the news: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet-explorer.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/06/internet-explorer-begins-blocking-out-of-date-activex-controls.aspx [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] TS Step to create an Error
Have me create the TS. Most of mine fail 1st time ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell Sent: 29 July 2014 22:42 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] TS Step to create an Error What is an easy way to make a TS error out? [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Christopher Bodnar is out of the office. (returning 08/04/2014)
PING Christopher (08.04.20.14): 56 data bytes destination unreachable From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Christopher Bodnar [christopher_bod...@glic.com] Sent: 25 July 2014 22:44 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Christopher Bodnar is out of the office. (returning 08/04/2014) I am out of the office until 08/04/2014. I will respond to your message when I return. If you need immediate assistance please contact the following: For Office 365 related issues (Jeff Adolph) For Active Directory related issues (Earl Lewis) For PING related issues (Matt Schwartz or Vikas Nanda) Note: This is an automated response to your message RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 SP1 CU3: OSD Client fails to communicate with MP sent on 7/25/2014 17:35:01. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. - This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014)
Chuck is the master of all lurkers From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Lindenfeld, Ivan [ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com] Sent: 18 July 2014 19:32 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) I imaging him as an introverted narcissist basking in the glow of all of the attention but without the emotional tools to participate in the conversation. Or maybe I am just trolling him. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ewing, Scott L Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 2:23 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) I suspect Chuck has an email rule that deletes all email from this list. Otherwise he would have commented at least once over the years when we comment on his vacation time. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marable, Mike Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:50 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) He’s going to come back into the office and find an entire email thread devoted to him. To be a fly on the wall of his office when he opens up email Monday morning! “What the…!” From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:28 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) Was he the first ‘lurker’ ever? Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:26 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) Never, even after 12 years From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ) Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 7:09 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) Has he ever posted to this forum? Can't remember a time since I've been a subscriber. Probably 3+ years! On 17/07/2014 8:15 pm, Stephen Murley stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.ukmailto:stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote: Chuck doesn’t talk to us mere mortals. We’re beneath him :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of steven hosking Sent: 17 July 2014 10:27 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) Hi Chuck hope you have a good time off work :D From: chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.commailto:chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 17/07/2014 7:02 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) I am out of the office until 07/21/2014. I will be out of the office from 7/17 thru 7/18. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support, 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] RE: Software updates not installing during build capture sent on 7/17/2014 3:16:25 AM . This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. [http
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014)
Chuck doesn’t talk to us mere mortals. We’re beneath him ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of steven hosking Sent: 17 July 2014 10:27 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) Hi Chuck hope you have a good time off work :D From: chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.commailto:chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 17/07/2014 7:02 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) I am out of the office until 07/21/2014. I will be out of the office from 7/17 thru 7/18. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support, 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] RE: Software updates not installing during build capture sent on 7/17/2014 3:16:25 AM . This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014)
Not that I can recall either. I think this is probably why we get his out of offices as he's blissfully unaware of this list since he signed up :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Johns, Damon (DoJ) [damon.jo...@justice.tas.gov.au] Sent: 17 July 2014 12:09 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) Has he ever posted to this forum? Can't remember a time since I've been a subscriber. Probably 3+ years! On 17/07/2014 8:15 pm, Stephen Murley stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote: Chuck doesn’t talk to us mere mortals. We’re beneath him :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of steven hosking Sent: 17 July 2014 10:27 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) Hi Chuck hope you have a good time off work :D From: chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.commailto:chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 17/07/2014 7:02 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) I am out of the office until 07/21/2014. I will be out of the office from 7/17 thru 7/18. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support, 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] RE: Software updates not installing during build capture sent on 7/17/2014 3:16:25 AM . This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014)
CHUCK'S 2014 LEAVE CARD Was 7 days in total; now +2 days for 17th and 18th. New total = 9 days leave in 2014. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 17 July 2014 10:02 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) I am out of the office until 07/21/2014. I will be out of the office from 7/17 thru 7/18. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support, 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] RE: Software updates not installing during build capture sent on 7/17/2014 3:16:25 AM . This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014)
Good point. Forgot about will. I always say ... Where there's a will there's a way. Scent form may moo boil. Police doughnut excerpt Annie breathe city. On 17 Jul 2014 18:09, Ryan Shugart rshug...@mii.com wrote: Perhaps Will Scott in Atlanta gets to take all the time off this year since Chuck got it last year. Maybe they trade off. Ryan -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 10:17 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) He is really behind this year, I wonder if he is just going to take December off or something. Daniel Ratliff -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:59 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) CHUCK'S 2014 LEAVE CARD Was 7 days in total; now +2 days for 17th and 18th. New total = 9 days leave in 2014. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 17 July 2014 10:02 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014) I am out of the office until 07/21/2014. I will be out of the office from 7/17 thru 7/18. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support, 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] RE: Software updates not installing during build capture sent on 7/17/2014 3:16:25 AM . This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. MiTek Holdings, Inc., 2011-2014, All Rights Reserved This communication (including any attachments) contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan
RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr
That's true of course, but ... most will follow the advice of the experts when you read instructions. First thing you'll be asked if something goes wrong is Did you follow the instructions?. Not got a leg to stand on if you didn't at least first try the advice given. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marable, Mike Sent: 16 July 2014 12:35 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr That is a sad commentary on some of those in our profession. If one is unwilling to push themselves to try and instead need to be handed the perfect answer for their issue, then I think that they are in the wrong field. If someone is unwilling to learn the product, they need to consider stepping aside and letting someone else take over. Unless you try to do something beyond what you have already mastered, you will never grow. -Ralph Waldo Emerson From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:13 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr Right, I think the idea though is that most people just follow directions, so they need to be guided on how best to implement the update. Since it's more likely that people will follow Microsoft guidance, than some random person's blog (like mine :)), I think it is advisable for Microsoft to write with this mindset. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Linton Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:59 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr Not a limitation of the installer or CM obviously just what the author decided to use out of convenience of the post. Looks like a simple blog post for someone who wants to write it up... :) Thanks, Brandon A. Linton | Sr. Consultant | balin...@inkbal.commailto:balin...@inkbal.com | Work 484.323.7205 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:49 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr I left a comment on the blog post saying the exact same thing :) Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:55 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr That's nice--a standalone redistributable, finally. Of course, I'm curious why it's blogged to be deployed as a classic package/program/advert. I can't see why it couldn't easily be an Application Deployment. Sherry Kissinger On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:38 AM, Trevor Sullivan tsul...@gmail.commailto:tsul...@gmail.com wrote: http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2014/07/14/how-to-install-the-windows-update-agent-on-client-computers.aspx Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP ** Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr
Are those the people we don't talk about? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 16 July 2014 13:00 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr But then, who are the experts? Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 7:41 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr That's true of course, but ... most will follow the advice of the experts when you read instructions. First thing you'll be asked if something goes wrong is Did you follow the instructions?. Not got a leg to stand on if you didn't at least first try the advice given. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marable, Mike Sent: 16 July 2014 12:35 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr That is a sad commentary on some of those in our profession. If one is unwilling to push themselves to try and instead need to be handed the perfect answer for their issue, then I think that they are in the wrong field. If someone is unwilling to learn the product, they need to consider stepping aside and letting someone else take over. Unless you try to do something beyond what you have already mastered, you will never grow. -Ralph Waldo Emerson From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:13 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr Right, I think the idea though is that most people just follow directions, so they need to be guided on how best to implement the update. Since it's more likely that people will follow Microsoft guidance, than some random person's blog (like mine :)), I think it is advisable for Microsoft to write with this mindset. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Linton Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:59 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr Not a limitation of the installer or CM obviously just what the author decided to use out of convenience of the post. Looks like a simple blog post for someone who wants to write it up... :) Thanks, Brandon A. Linton | Sr. Consultant | balin...@inkbal.commailto:balin...@inkbal.com | Work 484.323.7205 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:49 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr I left a comment on the blog post saying the exact same thing :) Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:55 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr That's nice--a standalone redistributable, finally. Of course, I'm curious why it's blogged to be deployed as a classic package/program/advert. I can't see why it couldn't easily be an Application Deployment. Sherry Kissinger On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:38 AM, Trevor Sullivan tsul...@gmail.commailto:tsul...@gmail.com wrote: http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2014/07/14/how-to-install-the-windows-update-agent-on-client-computers.aspx Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP ** Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s
RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr
This is the latest WUA version available? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: 15 July 2014 14:55 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr That's nice--a standalone redistributable, finally. Of course, I'm curious why it's blogged to be deployed as a classic package/program/advert. I can't see why it couldn't easily be an Application Deployment. Sherry Kissinger On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:38 AM, Trevor Sullivan tsul...@gmail.commailto:tsul...@gmail.com wrote: http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2014/07/14/how-to-install-the-windows-update-agent-on-client-computers.aspx Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory
Isn't that a bit severe for one incorrect value? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Trevor Sullivan [tsul...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 July 2014 18:45 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory Try winmgmt.exe /resetrepository. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of HELMS, DAVID C Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:32 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory I’ve got several servers that is reporting in incorrect data for Last Boot up time. When I check WMI on the local servers I notice the LastBootUpTime is incorrect.These servers were built in April 2014 and Win32_OperatingSystem - LastBootUpTime is showing Feb 2014. How would I go about correcting this? Do I need to reset WMI? [cid:image001.png@01CFA02A.B1286980] [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory
That's like what my colleagues say when they re-image a machine to fix a problem. It's all working now! If it's worked then fine. Just you have to have nerves of steel with some commands :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of HELMS, DAVID C [dahe...@scana.com] Sent: 15 July 2014 19:11 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory That corrected it. Thanks Trevor. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:46 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory ***This is an EXTERNAL email. Please do not click on a link or open any attachments unless you are confident it is from a trusted source. Try winmgmt.exe /resetrepository. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of HELMS, DAVID C Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:32 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory I’ve got several servers that is reporting in incorrect data for Last Boot up time. When I check WMI on the local servers I notice the LastBootUpTime is incorrect.These servers were built in April 2014 and Win32_OperatingSystem - LastBootUpTime is showing Feb 2014. How would I go about correcting this? Do I need to reset WMI? [cid:image001.png@01CFA036.9A7068D0] [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
Re: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr
Eventually I bet they will. I was just thinking and reflecting ... Should I reevaluate my life if I'm genuinely excited and happy at reading an email about a new WUA standalone installer being released? :) Sent from Mobile Original message From: Murray, Mike Date:15/07/2014 20:58 (GMT+00:00) To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr I did the same already, I was just curious if MS would make it available via Windows Update. Mike From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:47 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr I made it an app checking the dll version and it is working fine. Wonder if you can import it? On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Murray, Mike mmur...@csuchico.edumailto:mmur...@csuchico.edu wrote: That’s the way I read it, too. Seems odd not to release via Windows Update. Mike From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:49 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr According to what I’m reading in the article: • Yes for Windows 8 (no standalone installer available) • No for Windows 7 (only standalone installer available) I may not be interpreting it correctly, however. [cid:_com_android_email_attachmentprovider_1_78061_RAW@sec.galaxytab] Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:43 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr Sorry if I’m missing something, but will this be available via Windows Update as well? Mike From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:57 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr lol. Well, I'm testing it out (as an App Deployment) right now in our lab. Two DTs; one for x64, one for x86; requirements of the OS in... All X64 Windows 7... etc. etc. for the right one. And detection logic of just the file %windir%\system32\wuaueng.dll greater than or = 7.6.7600.320 I can't see why that wouldn't work perfectly But that's what testing is for. Sherry Kissinger On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:49 AM, Trevor Sullivan tsul...@gmail.commailto:tsul...@gmail.com wrote: I left a comment on the blog post saying the exact same thing …. :) Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:55 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] PSA: Updating the Windows Update Agent (WUA) via ConfigMgr That's nice--a standalone redistributable, finally. Of course, I'm curious why it's blogged to be deployed as a classic package/program/advert. I can't see why it couldn't easily be an Application Deployment. Sherry Kissinger On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:38 AM, Trevor Sullivan tsul...@gmail.commailto:tsul...@gmail.com wrote: http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2014/07/14/how-to-install-the-windows-update-agent-on-client-computers.aspx Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7
Woohoo! Can’t wait. Love this tool. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 18 June 2014 11:48 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'; 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 I have searched as well. No luck. It's supposed to be released this year sometime. -Original Message- From: Roland Janus [roland.ja...@hispeed.chmailto:roland.ja...@hispeed.ch] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 06:45 AM Eastern Standard Time To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 I saw that on some screens at TechEd 2014, but wasn’t able to find a download anywhere yet. Anyone knows where to get a newer version then the published 2.2? -Roland The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7
It’s never (well, don’t recall) crashed on me. Been pretty stable. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: 18 June 2014 12:08 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 That would be nice if they *finally* released an updated version. I got so sick and tired of rdcman 2.2 crashing on me all the time I looked for alternatives. There are really good for-pay options, but for the last week or so I've been using Terminals from CodePlex. http://terminals.codeplex.com/ This isn't a ringing endorsement of it--I've only used it for a week and still learning it's quirks (at least as they relate to my environment), but it might be worth a shot if rdcman 2.2 is annoying you to the breaking point (which I hit about 2 weeks ago). Sherry Kissinger On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:55 AM, Stephen Murley stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.ukmailto:stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote: Woohoo! Can’t wait. Love this tool. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 18 June 2014 11:48 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'; 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 I have searched as well. No luck. It's supposed to be released this year sometime. -Original Message- From: Roland Janus [roland.ja...@hispeed.chmailto:roland.ja...@hispeed.ch] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 06:45 AM Eastern Standard Time To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 I saw that on some screens at TechEd 2014, but wasn’t able to find a download anywhere yet. Anyone knows where to get a newer version then the published 2.2? -Roland The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7
Usually 2 at any time, but I have had 5-10 and it’s been fine .. Maybe not the tool but other things like the RDP Protocol version? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ben Glenz Sent: 18 June 2014 12:28 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 Oh it will.. depends on how many connections you have at the same time. The memory usage is insane. But for me still the preferred tool… From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2014 13:15 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 It’s never (well, don’t recall) crashed on me. Been pretty stable. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: 18 June 2014 12:08 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 That would be nice if they *finally* released an updated version. I got so sick and tired of rdcman 2.2 crashing on me all the time I looked for alternatives. There are really good for-pay options, but for the last week or so I've been using Terminals from CodePlex. http://terminals.codeplex.com/ This isn't a ringing endorsement of it--I've only used it for a week and still learning it's quirks (at least as they relate to my environment), but it might be worth a shot if rdcman 2.2 is annoying you to the breaking point (which I hit about 2 weeks ago). Sherry Kissinger On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:55 AM, Stephen Murley stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.ukmailto:stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote: Woohoo! Can’t wait. Love this tool. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 18 June 2014 11:48 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'; 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 I have searched as well. No luck. It's supposed to be released this year sometime. -Original Message- From: Roland Janus [roland.ja...@hispeed.chmailto:roland.ja...@hispeed.ch] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 06:45 AM Eastern Standard Time To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.7 I saw that on some screens at TechEd 2014, but wasn’t able to find a download anywhere yet. Anyone knows where to get a newer version then the published 2.2? -Roland The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk
[mssms] RE: Doble Reboot patch
Thanks for the heads up! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd Sent: 17 June 2014 15:00 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Doble Reboot patch There was a patch released in June that causes double reboots during OSD Task Sequences. Microsoft released an article that says they will keep up to date as patches are released that cause double reboots. This article has not been updated yet. However the article has not been updated with information about this patch. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2894518 The bad patch is kb2965788 which causes a double boot and breaks SCCM OSD Task Sequences. I have found this to be true on Win 7 x64 deployments and have read that it does not affect 32bit Windows 7 - but I haven't tested that myself. Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 06/09/2014)
CHUCK'S 2014 LEAVE CARD Still a very modest 7 days so far. Chuck is going to have a breakdown! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com [chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com] Sent: 06 June 2014 16:00 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 06/09/2014) I am out of the office until 06/09/2014. I will be out of the office on Friday, 6/6/2014. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support, 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: [mssms] Application/Program Deployment with IBCM sent on 6/6/2014 4:32:35 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 05/22/2014)
CHUCK'S 2014 LEAVE CARD A very modest 6 days so far. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 21 May 2014 10:01 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 05/22/2014) I am out of the office until 05/22/2014. I will be out of the office on Wednesday 5/20. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message RE: [mssms] CM Client Startup Script Report sent on 5/21/2014 12:36:38 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] OT: SMS/SCCM Customer Survey...
Is anyone here going to shrug their shoulders with question one and tick Don't know ??? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent Sent: 20 May 2014 14:35 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: SMS/SCCM Customer Survey... Hi, everyone. We've just posted a new survey to help gather some information for the ConfigMgr team at Microsoft. The survey is only 4 questions and the information gathered will be delivered directly to Microsoft. The information will help shape the direction of ConfigMgr. If you know of others not on this email list that should also participate, please forward the information to them, and please help promote this survey through your various networking channels (online and offline). Thanks! The survey: http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/smssccm-customer-survey/ [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] RE: Emory IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything
IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything I don't think taking the ability to do something like deploying to All System collection would fix the issue because there other ways to re-create them such as a bad WQL that adds all systems. How about step in the TS to verify critical systems such as DCs, DNS, DHCPs, and others? I guess this can be accomplished right now though a script to identify these roles on a server How about a mandatory pop-up window with a timer (hint: powershell deployment toolkit) on the client only critical infra systems? How about a touch file that pauses the deployment like Johan does, use web services and/or orchestrator to send and email, receive a response and create the file? How about a SCCM deployment tab where critical windows roles (DC, DNS, etc..) like OS selection in the requirement tab of a program? Default is set to skip those critical roles unless selected. There are hundreds of innovative ways that can be provided currently to prevent such critical infra systems from getting imaged improperly at 'run-time'. On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Sherry Kissinger slkissin...@sbcglobal.netmailto:slkissin...@sbcglobal.net wrote: For all the reasons mentioned... it's really, really difficult to engineer against oopsies and/or just plain unfamiliarity with the tool... but you have full rights to everything (or close to everything). Most things can be prevented with good RBA design, training, and not just having had a 16 hour work day. But it's hard to engineer against little or no training, full rights to everything, and a long work day. All or any combination of those can turn a 5 second lack or attention to detail into a oops. Note it may be possible to engineer something using SCORCH and status filter rules... but you have to be careful about licensing then. If you read the fine print of the Scorch licensing... it was meant for orchestrating server actions. and the way Microsoft interpreted it was that if you did something based on status filter rules from CM and sending instructions back to CM; you are affecting a client--i.e., potentially every single client in CM that you have. So pony up the $ for the expensive licensing for every single client. You may be able to negotiate something; but be aware of that if you are looking at status filter rule triggers and automation via scorch. It could end up costing you more than if you sent your people to training instead! Sherry Kissinger On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 8:18 AM, Ben Glenz gl...@cwd-solution.commailto:gl...@cwd-solution.com wrote: Haha this reminds me on the first User Account Control Prompts i got.. :) You’re absolutely right, there is no 100% protection. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Dienstag, 20. Mai 2014 14:51 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Emory IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything Hmm, I’m pretty sure I could still mess things up even with that :) Yes? Click. Are you sure? Absolutely. Really? Yes. Oops. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin Sent: 20 May 2014 13:46 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Emory IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything Maybe if there was an OS delivery require multiple admin logon to accomplish? Or deployment greater than certain % of env require same? As you say, it’s pretty tough to eliminate the opportunity to screw up. Jimmy Martin (901) 227-8209tel:%28901%29%20227-8209 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ben Glenz Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:26 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Emory IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything I think there are several ways of improvement to prevent issues like this. In my opinion the All Systems collection shouldn’t be allowed in Deployments (all kinds) However, you will never ever prevent issues. E.g. I create my own All Sys collections, Membership Rule include All Systems. Same collection but without limitations. What about an RBAC feature limiting a User to a specific number of deployments. UserA is only allowed to deploy to a maximum of 50 machines? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Czechowski Sent: Dienstag, 20. Mai 2014 03:08 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Emory IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything We actually have several DCRs in a similar vein. Everything from what Damon suggests, to blocking
[mssms] RE: Emory IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything
LOL! That's some sh1t to sort out. I've had an 'Oops' moment in SCCM, but not to this extent! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of William Jackson [w...@utexas.edu] Sent: 16 May 2014 20:32 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Emory IT accidentally deploys Windows 7 to everything I'm thankful that I do not work over there. A Windows 7 deployment image was accidentally sent to all Windows machines, including laptops, desktops, and even servers. This image started with a repartition / reformat set of tasks. As soon as the accident was discovered, the SCCM server was powered off – however, by that time, the SCCM server itself had been repartitioned and reformatted. http://it.emory.edu/windows7-incident/ William [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 03/31/2014)
CHUCK'S 2014 LEAVE CARD A very modest 4 days so far -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 26 March 2014 09:01 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 03/31/2014) I am out of the office until 03/31/2014. I will be out of the office the rest of the week. If you need assistance please call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please emal or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920. Note: This is an automated response to your message RE: [mssms] Java 7 update 15 and Java 6 Update 41 sent on 3/26/2014 3:01:24 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] Microsoft Security Advisory (2953095)
New Security Advisory released yesterday http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2953095 that affects all versions of Microsoft Word. Usual deal ... Remote Code Execution that takes over the computer with the rights of the logged on user. It can be exploited via the usual email attachment, or, more worryingly, The vulnerability could be exploited when the specially crafted RTF email message is previewed or opened in Outlook while using Microsoft Word as the email viewer. There is a fix-it available which configures the Microsoft Office File Block policy to prevent the opening of RTF files in supported versions of Microsoft Word. Microsoft is currently aware of limited, targeted attacks directed at Microsoft Word 2010 [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: OT: RDCMan 2.x?
Sadly not. Be nice to see the more recent versions. Where's wikileaks when you need it? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mote, Todd Sent: 18 March 2014 14:39 To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] OT: RDCMan 2.x? Now that we're starting to have more 8/2012 devices deployed, I've run into an issue with Microsoft's Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.2. It's current version limits the number of connections to these OSes to about 5 at a time, or you get a connection error 3334. Kind of a drag when you have lots to connect to at a time. I've seen screenshots of MS folks that have version 2.5, and have heard that version 2.8 was seen in Vegas recently at the Sharepoint conference. Anybody have any info about RDCMan greater than version 2.2? There is a work around that apparently works, by using editbin.exe in VS to edit the rdcman.exe to add /largeaddressaware to it, but wanted to see if I could find out about a real solution rather than a hack. Thanks for any info you might have/are able to share. Todd [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] Update stuck at 'Downloaded Update'
The SCCM client logs should give you the update ID of what's stuck downloading. Check that update in the SCCM console to see if you've downloaded all the sub-components of the update. That's usually the cause. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Owen Sent: 14 February 2014 16:49 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Update stuck at 'Downloaded Update' Hi guys, In my 2007 environment, I'm seeing a number of clients with their update status stuck at 'Downloaded Update' with no indication of when the installation will take place. I have this deployment set to ignore maintenance windows, and yet they still just kind of hang out there, not doing anything. Prodding it with Software Updates Deployment Eval and Scan cycles doesn't seem to do anything either. I've confimed that the updates are installed and distributed out to the DPs, Status Messages from SCCM don't give me very much either for these systems. Any advice on where to start? [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 02/18/2014)
I'm almost tempted to ring Chuck but that could ruin our future entertainment. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 17 February 2014 10:01 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 02/18/2014) I am out of the office until 02/18/2014. Our office will be closed on Monday 2/17/2014 for the President's day holiday. If you need immediate assistance please call me on my cell phone, 630-853-2365. Note: This is an automated response to your message RE: [mssms] Where are my clients? sent on 2/17/2014 3:02:48 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: OT: VPro
We use vPro here but purely for remote power up and down actions, not any of the funky stuff. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: 03 February 2014 21:41 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: VPro Just curious as to who is using this and whether they love it or hate it. Doesn't seem to be discussed much. Thanks! Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: OT: VPro
Well, it's true that you don't have to use SCCM to do vPro. You can just use Intel's Provision Server. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: 04 February 2014 14:31 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: OT: VPro Well, correct me if I am wrong but couldn't you technically provision them without have a cert? It would seem, according to Intel's information, that you could do the Host based provisioning and use SCCM to deploy the provisioning EXE along with the XML file. Or am I missing something here? Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.commailto:christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.com Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 4:45 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: OT: VPro Way to much work to implement... Unless you already have a full PKI in-place. Christopher Catlett Consultant | Detroit [MCTS_2013_small] Sogeti USA Office 248-876-9738 |Fax 877.406.9647 26957 Northwestern Highway, Suite 130, Southfield, MI 48033-8456 www.us.sogeti.comhttp://www.us.sogeti.com/ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 4:41 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: VPro Just curious as to who is using this and whether they love it or hate it. Doesn't seem to be discussed much. Thanks! Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. inline: image001.jpg
[mssms] RE: OT: VPro
My colleague who is off sick atm knows much more than me as I've not had any direct involvement for the last year. I remember us having to buy a 3rd party certificate when we got rid of Intel's SCS Server and moved to SCCM. Although we're soon having to resurrect a new SCS server as apparently the latest version of vPro is not supported in SCCM 2007 or 2012, and only via Intel's SCS Server. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: 04 February 2014 14:39 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: OT: VPro Without even using a cert right? They show 3-4 ways to provision a machine: Manual, Manual with a USB key, Host based (EXE with XML file) and Remote (fully automated). From watching their instructional videos, it would seem you only need to purchase a cert for the Remote method. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:36 AM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: OT: VPro Well, it's true that you don't have to use SCCM to do vPro. You can just use Intel's Provision Server. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: 04 February 2014 14:31 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: OT: VPro Well, correct me if I am wrong but couldn't you technically provision them without have a cert? It would seem, according to Intel's information, that you could do the Host based provisioning and use SCCM to deploy the provisioning EXE along with the XML file. Or am I missing something here? Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.commailto:christopher.catl...@us.sogeti.com Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 4:45 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: OT: VPro Way to much work to implement... Unless you already have a full PKI in-place. Christopher Catlett Consultant | Detroit [MCTS_2013_small] Sogeti USA Office 248-876-9738 |Fax 877.406.9647 26957 Northwestern Highway, Suite 130, Southfield, MI 48033-8456 www.us.sogeti.comhttp://www.us.sogeti.com/ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 4:41 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: VPro Just curious as to who is using this and whether they love it or hate it. Doesn't seem to be discussed much. Thanks! Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official
[mssms] RE: OT: Chef and automation
I'm going to turn on a rule to block anything work related in the OT list ;) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Dzikowski, Michael [michael.dzikow...@ally.com] Sent: 03 February 2014 19:32 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; myotfo...@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: Chef and automation Anyone ever use Chef for deployment automation? If so, got any feedback? http://www.getchef.com Michael Dzikowski Senior Systems Engineer | Ally Technical Infrastructure – Windows Hosting [cid:image002.gif@01CDF887.776259A0] [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. inline: image001.png
[mssms] RE: OT: Happy New Year
That doesn't seem possible to have that good a year :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Jitendra Ramesh Kalyankar [jite...@microsoft.com] Sent: 02 January 2014 05:53 To: mssms@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [mssms] OT: Happy New Year Dear Community – May all ConfigMgr Clients be Active Healthy! May all SQL servers be alert avAilable! May all Reports run rapidly Promptly! May all Updates bring all Peace compliance! May all NLBs/HLBs work fine! May all DRS messages move speedilY and hastily! May all content oN DPs reach consistEntly swiftly! May all SUPs serve clients balanced And unbiased! May all MPs CPU Memory be undeR-utilized! May all inboxes be empty and prompt! May all SQL Servers work without locks blocks! Thanks, JitenRK [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014)
CHUCK's 2013 LEAVE CARD (I've kept count) ... Was 24.5 days off this year. If we take it that he gets 25/26th off and 1st and the business doesn't close in-between, then it'll be 2 days before Christmas, 3 afterwards before end of 2013. So, that's 29.5 days off for Chuck in 2013. Into 2014, and he'd have 2nd and 3rd off, so he's got 2 on his leave card already. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: 23 December 2013 23:06 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) Million six? Jesus C. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 10:16 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) So, Mott... What's his final count for the year? -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 9:20 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) COME ON MAN -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 5:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) I am out of the office until 01/06/2014. I will be out of the office 12/23-1/3. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920. If an emergency situation and you cannot reach anyone please have a manager or supervisor call me on my cell phone. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 HealthCheck toolkit – Pre-beta version sent on 12/23/2013 3:24:39 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014)
It's an ongoing historic MSSMS list joke Scott :) -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ewing, Scott L Sent: 02 January 2014 16:07 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) What's the big deal? My company gives salaried employees 30 days paid time off after they've been 10 years with the company. That's vacation time and sick time combined. Plus 11 paid holidays. Scott Ewing Unum, Portland, Maine -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 8:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) I wonder if Will Scott in Atlanta gets all these vacations too? On 2 Jan 2014, at 13:51, henry.wil...@sanofi.com wrote: LOL -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 4:56 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) CHUCK's 2013 LEAVE CARD (I've kept count) ... Was 24.5 days off this year. If we take it that he gets 25/26th off and 1st and the business doesn't close in-between, then it'll be 2 days before Christmas, 3 afterwards before end of 2013. So, that's 29.5 days off for Chuck in 2013. Into 2014, and he'd have 2nd and 3rd off, so he's got 2 on his leave card already. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: 23 December 2013 23:06 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) Million six? Jesus C. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 10:16 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) So, Mott... What's his final count for the year? -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 9:20 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) COME ON MAN -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 5:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) I am out of the office until 01/06/2014. I will be out of the office 12/23-1/3. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920. If an emergency situation and you cannot reach anyone please have a manager or supervisor call me on my cell phone. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 HealthCheck toolkit – Pre-beta version sent on 12/23/2013 3:24:39 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014)
Chuck had something like 60+ days off in 2012. The number of his OOO's coming into the list prompted the in-joke. 2013 has been very modest for our Chuck. The list wouldn't be the same without knowing his annual leave dates :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Ewing, Scott L [sew...@unum.com] Sent: 02 January 2014 18:57 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) Yes, I know. I even laughed at Chuck Spalliero too. But then I looked at how much time off I get and stopped laughing. Then I laughed at him for sending out-of-office emails to external email addresses. Scott Ewing -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 11:12 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) It's an ongoing historic MSSMS list joke Scott :) -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ewing, Scott L Sent: 02 January 2014 16:07 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) What's the big deal? My company gives salaried employees 30 days paid time off after they've been 10 years with the company. That's vacation time and sick time combined. Plus 11 paid holidays. Scott Ewing Unum, Portland, Maine -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 8:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) I wonder if Will Scott in Atlanta gets all these vacations too? On 2 Jan 2014, at 13:51, henry.wil...@sanofi.com wrote: LOL -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 4:56 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) CHUCK's 2013 LEAVE CARD (I've kept count) ... Was 24.5 days off this year. If we take it that he gets 25/26th off and 1st and the business doesn't close in-between, then it'll be 2 days before Christmas, 3 afterwards before end of 2013. So, that's 29.5 days off for Chuck in 2013. Into 2014, and he'd have 2nd and 3rd off, so he's got 2 on his leave card already. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: 23 December 2013 23:06 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) Million six? Jesus C. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 10:16 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) So, Mott... What's his final count for the year? -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 9:20 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) COME ON MAN -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 5:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) I am out of the office until 01/06/2014. I will be out of the office 12/23-1/3. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920. If an emergency situation and you cannot reach anyone please have a manager or supervisor call me on my cell phone. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 HealthCheck toolkit – Pre-beta version sent on 12/23/2013 3:24:39 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014)
Chuck wouldn't turn up to his own event as he's on leave that day. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Jason Wallace [jaso...@outlook.com] Sent: 02 January 2014 20:50 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) There used to be. Was called Must Meet Spalliero. After many years of abject failure in its primary objective it was canned. People actually thought they were going to some shindig about software but that was an NSA cover On 2 Jan 2014, at 21:47, Marcum, John jmar...@babc.commailto:jmar...@babc.com wrote: …If only there were a conference to wear them too. John Marcum Sr. Desktop Architect Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:38 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) I totally agree From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 11:38 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) Hey Rod, let’s get an order for these made! From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.commailto:henry.wil...@sanofi.com Sent: 02 January 2014 16:30 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) One of my co-workers actually had a shirt made :) image001.png -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 11:12 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) It's an ongoing historic MSSMS list joke Scott :) -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ewing, Scott L Sent: 02 January 2014 16:07 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) What's the big deal? My company gives salaried employees 30 days paid time off after they've been 10 years with the company. That's vacation time and sick time combined. Plus 11 paid holidays. Scott Ewing Unum, Portland, Maine -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 8:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) I wonder if Will Scott in Atlanta gets all these vacations too? On 2 Jan 2014, at 13:51, henry.wil...@sanofi.commailto:henry.wil...@sanofi.com wrote: LOL -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 4:56 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) CHUCK's 2013 LEAVE CARD (I've kept count) ... Was 24.5 days off this year. If we take it that he gets 25/26th off and 1st and the business doesn't close in-between, then it'll be 2 days before Christmas, 3 afterwards before end of 2013. So, that's 29.5 days off for Chuck in 2013. Into 2014, and he'd have 2nd and 3rd off, so he's got 2 on his leave card already. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott Sent: 23 December 2013 23:06 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014) Million six? Jesus C. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.commailto:henry.wil...@sanofi.com Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 10:16 AM
RE: [mssms] List...
Would those having problems getting emails have got your email to say there was a problem?? Paradox. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of rodtr...@myitforum.com [rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: 03 December 2013 01:10 To: magnus.tve...@iag.com.au; SMS Subject: [mssms] List... The list is working. If you are having issues receiving emails drop me an email offline to get it fixed. Sent from my Surface Pro [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] Microsoft Security Advisory (2914486)
Nah, doesn't beat Adobe Flash or Java JRE surely? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Jimmy Martin [jimmy.mar...@bmhcc.org] Sent: 03 December 2013 13:15 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft Security Advisory (2914486) The most expensive free software ever conceived ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mark Mears Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 4:12 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft Security Advisory (2914486) That only works for two weeks though, then a newer version is released! Thanks, Mark Mears mark.me...@cireson.commailto:mark.me...@cireson.com%0d Phone: (757) 945-2651 [cid:image001.png@01CEAC8E.61A72300]http://www.cireson.com/ [cid:image002.jpg@01CEAC8E.61A72300]http://twitter.com/teamcireson Check out our System Center App Store: www.cireson.com/app-store From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent Sent: Monday, December 2, 2013 4:10 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft Security Advisory (2914486) The ultimate workaround is to update Adobe Reader to the latest version… http://windowsitpro.com/security/update-latest-zero-day-windows-xp-and-windows-server-2003-vulnerability From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Anand Upadhyay - Information Technology Sent: Monday, December 2, 2013 3:50 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Microsoft Security Advisory (2914486) Anyone has any news on this? Any idea if Microsoft is going to release out of band patch for this or regular Patch next month or No Patch and live with Workaround only? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2914486 Anand THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any improper transmission. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by mistake, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message and any electronic or printed copies of this message immediately. Thank you. New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (Company) reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications sent through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, unless the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to communicate on behalf of the Company or one of its subsidiaries. This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it immediately. P Please consider the environment before printing this email... [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. attachment: image001.pngattachment: image002.jpg
[mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2
See they updated the KB article on this one to say that the update for Windows 8 SCCM Clients also applies to Windows 8.1 SCCM Clients: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663 Note This update affects only those platforms that are included in the supported platforms list. The client part of KB 2750782 (SCCM2007AC-SP2-KB2698619-x86-ENU.msp) was originally released to provide support for Windows 8. However, it also applies to Windows 8.1 clients. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: 28 October 2013 17:12 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 Ah, right. It doesn’t make that clear in the KB or in the article (kind of suggests it without spelling it out) that this adds the client hotfix to SCCM. Makes it sound like it’s just a hotfix to add supported platform tick boxes to those particular areas and not a client hotfix. I get it now. It’s actually the latter ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 28 October 2013 16:56 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 Yes, this is that update. See the comments on the following article. http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2013/09/16/support-questions-about-win-8.1-and-winsvr-2012-r2-for-configmgr-and-endpoint-protection.aspx Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 12:50 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 That adds the tick boxes etc, but does the sccm 2007 sp2 client actually work on these new platforms without any other update? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 28 October 2013 16:06 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] FW: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 In case you missed it. Daniel Ratliff Feed: The Configuration Manager Support Team Blog Posted on: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:04 AM Author: J.C. Hornbeck Subject: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663[download63]http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663An update is available for Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2. The update adds Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to the list of supported platforms for the following features: - Software distribution - Software update management - Desired configuration management For all the details including a download link, please see the following: KB2861663http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663 - Asset Intelligence does not count the Office licenses on certain computers in System Center Configuration Manager 2007 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663) J.C. Hornbeck | Solution Asset PM | Microsoft GBS Management and Security Division Get the latest System Center news on Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Microsoft-System-Center-Support/111513322193410 and Twitterhttps://twitter.com/#!/MS_SystemCenter: [clip_image001]http://www.facebook.com/pages/Microsoft-System-Center-Support/111513322193410[clip_image002]http://www.twitter.com/MS_SystemCenter System Center All Up: http://blogs.technet.com/b/systemcenter/ System Center – Configuration Manager Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/configurationmgr/ System Center – Data Protection Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/dpm/ System Center – Orchestrator Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/orchestrator/ System Center – Operations Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/momteam/ System Center – Service Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager System Center – Virtual Machine Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/scvmm Windows Intune: http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsintune/ WSUS Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/sus/ The AD RMS blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmssupp/ App-V Team blog
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 11/18/2013)
CHUCK's 2013 LEAVE CARD ... Still a modest (for Chuck) 24.5 days off this year thus far. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 11 November 2013 10:02 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 11/18/2013) I am out of the office until 11/18/2013. I will be out of the office 11/11-11/15. If you need assistance please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. If you cannot reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920. If an emergency situation and you cannot reach anyone please have a manager or supervisor call me on my cell phone. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] Windows Embedded Handheld 8? sent on 11/11/2013 1:12:20 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] Click on this link
Suuue From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Krishna Mohan Sent: 28 October 2013 11:04 Subject: [mssms] Click on this link http://www.ReferralPayCorp.com/index.php?invite=5448 [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2
That adds the tick boxes etc, but does the sccm 2007 sp2 client actually work on these new platforms without any other update? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 28 October 2013 16:06 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] FW: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 In case you missed it. Daniel Ratliff Feed: The Configuration Manager Support Team Blog Posted on: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:04 AM Author: J.C. Hornbeck Subject: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 [download63]http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663An update is available for Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2. The update adds Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to the list of supported platforms for the following features: - Software distribution - Software update management - Desired configuration management For all the details including a download link, please see the following: KB2861663http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663 - Asset Intelligence does not count the Office licenses on certain computers in System Center Configuration Manager 2007 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663) J.C. Hornbeck | Solution Asset PM | Microsoft GBS Management and Security Division Get the latest System Center news on Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Microsoft-System-Center-Support/111513322193410 and Twitterhttps://twitter.com/#!/MS_SystemCenter: [clip_image001]http://www.facebook.com/pages/Microsoft-System-Center-Support/111513322193410[clip_image002]http://www.twitter.com/MS_SystemCenter System Center All Up: http://blogs.technet.com/b/systemcenter/ System Center – Configuration Manager Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/configurationmgr/ System Center – Data Protection Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/dpm/ System Center – Orchestrator Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/orchestrator/ System Center – Operations Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/momteam/ System Center – Service Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager System Center – Virtual Machine Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/scvmm Windows Intune: http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsintune/ WSUS Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/sus/ The AD RMS blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmssupp/ App-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/appv/ MED-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/medv/ Server App-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/serverappv The Forefront Endpoint Protection blog : http://blogs.technet.com/b/clientsecurity/ The Forefront Identity Manager blog : http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ms-identity-support/ The Forefront TMG blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/isablog/ The Forefront UAG blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/ View article...http://blogs.technet.com/b/configurationmgr/archive/2013/10/28/hotfix-an-update-is-available-that-adds-support-for-windows-8-1-and-windows-server-2012-r2-to-system-center-configuration-manager-2007-service-pack-2.aspx The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2
Ah, right. It doesn’t make that clear in the KB or in the article (kind of suggests it without spelling it out) that this adds the client hotfix to SCCM. Makes it sound like it’s just a hotfix to add supported platform tick boxes to those particular areas and not a client hotfix. I get it now. It’s actually the latter ☺ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 28 October 2013 16:56 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 Yes, this is that update. See the comments on the following article. http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2013/09/16/support-questions-about-win-8.1-and-winsvr-2012-r2-for-configmgr-and-endpoint-protection.aspx Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 12:50 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 That adds the tick boxes etc, but does the sccm 2007 sp2 client actually work on these new platforms without any other update? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 28 October 2013 16:06 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] FW: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 In case you missed it. Daniel Ratliff Feed: The Configuration Manager Support Team Blog Posted on: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:04 AM Author: J.C. Hornbeck Subject: HOTFIX: An update is available that adds support for Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2 [download63]http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663An update is available for Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2007 Service Pack 2. The update adds Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2 to the list of supported platforms for the following features: - Software distribution - Software update management - Desired configuration management For all the details including a download link, please see the following: KB2861663http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663 - Asset Intelligence does not count the Office licenses on certain computers in System Center Configuration Manager 2007 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2861663) J.C. Hornbeck | Solution Asset PM | Microsoft GBS Management and Security Division Get the latest System Center news on Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Microsoft-System-Center-Support/111513322193410 and Twitterhttps://twitter.com/#!/MS_SystemCenter: [clip_image001]http://www.facebook.com/pages/Microsoft-System-Center-Support/111513322193410[clip_image002]http://www.twitter.com/MS_SystemCenter System Center All Up: http://blogs.technet.com/b/systemcenter/ System Center – Configuration Manager Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/configurationmgr/ System Center – Data Protection Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/dpm/ System Center – Orchestrator Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/orchestrator/ System Center – Operations Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/momteam/ System Center – Service Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager System Center – Virtual Machine Manager Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/scvmm Windows Intune: http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsintune/ WSUS Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/sus/ The AD RMS blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmssupp/ App-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/appv/ MED-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/medv/ Server App-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/serverappv The Forefront Endpoint Protection blog : http://blogs.technet.com/b/clientsecurity/ The Forefront Identity Manager blog : http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ms-identity-support/ The Forefront TMG blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/isablog/ The Forefront UAG blog: http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/ View article...http://blogs.technet.com/b/configurationmgr/archive/2013/10/28/hotfix-an-update-is-available-that-adds-support-for-windows-8-1-and-windows-server-2012-r2-to-system-center-configuration-manager-2007-service-pack-2.aspx The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 10/07/2013)
I think that's only a 1/2 day in this case. CHUCK's 2013 LEAVE CARD ... A modest 19.5 days off this year thus far. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Michael Mott [michael.m...@1e.com] Sent: 04 October 2013 20:13 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 10/07/2013) h -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 1:05 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 10/07/2013) I am out of the office until 10/07/2013. I will be out of the office the afternoon of 10/4. If you need assistance please call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] WinPE with lid down sent on 10/4/2013 9:44:47 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] WinPE with lid down
You do remember to do that after you've been, right Ed? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Ed Aldrich [ed.aldr...@1e.com] Sent: 04 October 2013 15:56 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] WinPE with lid down Not much help here, I know, but my wife is ALWAYS telling me to put the lid down. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:45 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] WinPE with lid down Hi there folks I wanted to ask a question around an interesting issue which I am seeing. We are in a desktop transformation project at a client and happily deploying task sequences to rebuild the OS. We have seen some failures and on investigation these systems all were laptops and all had their lids down before they booted into PE. The boot started into PE and hung at the logo page. Opening the lid resumes the screen but Windows is remaining hung at that point. Restarting completes the task sequence as expected. Now I know that the obvious solution is to tell users to keep the lid open but I wondered if someone had seen this and fixed? Oh, these are Lenovo laptops Jason DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence
I think that was my colleague's views. IPv4 not going anywhere during our current image PCs lifetimes. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: 23 September 2013 14:13 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Just a reg key change. We're in the same boat as a few others, network admins though they sky was falling if IPv6 was rattling around their pipes. Might change in our image. I'm guessing most of these existing machines will have been melted into new devices by the time full IPv6 adoption becomes paramount. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 10:46 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence By removing that adapter you forfeit any easy means of turning it back on one day. I would recommend the DisabledComponents method as Jimmy mentioned, that is the recommended method and disables it for all adapters. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 5:50 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence We disable IPv6 on image deployment. Personally, I voted against doing this but was outvoted as apparently our networking guys said our network wasn't ready for IPv6 ... I think we might do a Group Policy as well, and it was 2 years ago that we did all this so I'd need to ask colleagues next week. As far as I know we disable the TEREDO Adaptor which has the desired effect: cmd.exe /c devcon\i386\devcon.exe REMOVE *TEREDO I'll check next week and ask. Certainly on our deplooyed computers users cannot alter any IPv6 settings. IFrom: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin Sent: 20 September 2013 21:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Search ipv6 fff Sent from my Windows Phone From: Trevor Sullivan Sent: 9/20/2013 3:09 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Why are you disabling IPv6? Bad, bad idea. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Scott Kenyon Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1:28 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myITforum.com' Subject: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Has anyone done this, if so could use some help on a script or something to disable IPv6 during image deployments Thanks Scott Kenyon Sr. Computer Specialist Dean of Medicine Information Technology UW School of Medicine 850 Republican Street, Box 358047 Seattle, WA 98109 Phone: 206.685.2825 ServiceDesk: 206.221-2459 | domh...@uw.edumailto:domh...@uw.edu sken...@u.washington.edumailto:sken...@u.washington.edu uwmedicine.orghttp://www.uwmedicine.org/ [Visit UW Medicine on.line]http://uwmedicine.org/ The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are communicating with a UW Medicine Provider or Researcher via email, your acceptance of the risk and agreement to the conditions for email communications is implied. (See http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm.) The information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. See our Notice of Privacy Practices at http://uwmedicine.washington.edu. This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it immediately. P Please consider the environment before printing this email... [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended
RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence
That's what I told everyone! Deaf ears I'm afraid. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: 23 September 2013 14:49 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Hi there folks I wonder whether IPv6 is causing you any problems since the strong recommendation from Microsoft is that it is left enabled. At present testing happens on a single-stack IPv6 and dual IPv4, IPv6 stack but they no longer test code on IPv4 only. Assuming that your organisation is not yet ready for IPv6 then the routers will not be configured to route IPv6 so any impact would be restricted to the local subnet. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx From: stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:20:44 + I think that was my colleague's views. IPv4 not going anywhere during our current image PCs lifetimes. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: 23 September 2013 14:13 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Just a reg key change. We're in the same boat as a few others, network admins though they sky was falling if IPv6 was rattling around their pipes. Might change in our image. I'm guessing most of these existing machines will have been melted into new devices by the time full IPv6 adoption becomes paramount. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 10:46 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence By removing that adapter you forfeit any easy means of turning it back on one day. I would recommend the DisabledComponents method as Jimmy mentioned, that is the recommended method and disables it for all adapters. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 5:50 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence We disable IPv6 on image deployment. Personally, I voted against doing this but was outvoted as apparently our networking guys said our network wasn't ready for IPv6 ... I think we might do a Group Policy as well, and it was 2 years ago that we did all this so I'd need to ask colleagues next week. As far as I know we disable the TEREDO Adaptor which has the desired effect: cmd.exe /c devcon\i386\devcon.exe REMOVE *TEREDO I'll check next week and ask. Certainly on our deplooyed computers users cannot alter any IPv6 settings. IFrom: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin Sent: 20 September 2013 21:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Search ipv6 fff Sent from my Windows Phone From: Trevor Sullivan Sent: 9/20/2013 3:09 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Why are you disabling IPv6? Bad, bad idea. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Scott Kenyon Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1:28 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myITforum.com' Subject: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Has anyone done this, if so could use some help on a script or something to disable IPv6 during image deployments Thanks Scott Kenyon Sr. Computer Specialist Dean of Medicine Information Technology UW School of Medicine 850 Republican Street, Box 358047 Seattle, WA 98109 Phone: 206.685.2825 ServiceDesk: 206.221-2459 | domh...@uw.edumailto:domh...@uw.edu sken...@u.washington.edumailto:sken...@u.washington.edu uwmedicine.orghttp://www.uwmedicine.org/ [Visit UW Medicine on.line]http://uwmedicine.org/ The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are communicating with a UW Medicine Provider or Researcher via email, your acceptance of the risk and agreement to the conditions for email communications is implied. (See http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm.) The information is intended for the individual named above. If you
RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence
I will when the moment arises :) No one here has complained about Hey, my PC doesn't do IPv6 yet :) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: 23 September 2013 15:05 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence So start practicing saying Much as I hate to tell you I told you so without looking smug! From: stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.ukmailto:stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:54:22 + That's what I told everyone! Deaf ears I'm afraid. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: 23 September 2013 14:49 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Hi there folks I wonder whether IPv6 is causing you any problems since the strong recommendation from Microsoft is that it is left enabled. At present testing happens on a single-stack IPv6 and dual IPv4, IPv6 stack but they no longer test code on IPv4 only. Assuming that your organisation is not yet ready for IPv6 then the routers will not be configured to route IPv6 so any impact would be restricted to the local subnet. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx From: stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.ukmailto:stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:20:44 + I think that was my colleague's views. IPv4 not going anywhere during our current image PCs lifetimes. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark Sent: 23 September 2013 14:13 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Just a reg key change. We're in the same boat as a few others, network admins though they sky was falling if IPv6 was rattling around their pipes. Might change in our image. I'm guessing most of these existing machines will have been melted into new devices by the time full IPv6 adoption becomes paramount. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 10:46 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence By removing that adapter you forfeit any easy means of turning it back on one day. I would recommend the DisabledComponents method as Jimmy mentioned, that is the recommended method and disables it for all adapters. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 5:50 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence We disable IPv6 on image deployment. Personally, I voted against doing this but was outvoted as apparently our networking guys said our network wasn't ready for IPv6 ... I think we might do a Group Policy as well, and it was 2 years ago that we did all this so I'd need to ask colleagues next week. As far as I know we disable the TEREDO Adaptor which has the desired effect: cmd.exe /c devcon\i386\devcon.exe REMOVE *TEREDO I'll check next week and ask. Certainly on our deplooyed computers users cannot alter any IPv6 settings. IFrom: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin Sent: 20 September 2013 21:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Search ipv6 fff Sent from my Windows Phone From: Trevor Sullivan Sent: 9/20/2013 3:09 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Why are you disabling IPv6? Bad, bad idea. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Scott Kenyon Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1:28 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myITforum.com' Subject: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Has anyone done this, if so could use some help on a script or something to disable IPv6 during image deployments
RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence
We disable IPv6 on image deployment. Personally, I voted against doing this but was outvoted as apparently our networking guys said our network wasn't ready for IPv6 ... I think we might do a Group Policy as well, and it was 2 years ago that we did all this so I'd need to ask colleagues next week. As far as I know we disable the TEREDO Adaptor which has the desired effect: cmd.exe /c devcon\i386\devcon.exe REMOVE *TEREDO I'll check next week and ask. Certainly on our deplooyed computers users cannot alter any IPv6 settings. IFrom: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin Sent: 20 September 2013 21:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Search ipv6 fff Sent from my Windows Phone From: Trevor Sullivan Sent: 9/20/2013 3:09 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Why are you disabling IPv6? Bad, bad idea. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Scott Kenyon Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1:28 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myITforum.com' Subject: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Has anyone done this, if so could use some help on a script or something to disable IPv6 during image deployments Thanks Scott Kenyon Sr. Computer Specialist Dean of Medicine Information Technology UW School of Medicine 850 Republican Street, Box 358047 Seattle, WA 98109 Phone: 206.685.2825 ServiceDesk: 206.221-2459 | domh...@uw.edumailto:domh...@uw.edu sken...@u.washington.edumailto:sken...@u.washington.edu uwmedicine.orghttp://www.uwmedicine.org/ [Visit UW Medicine on.line]http://uwmedicine.org/ The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are communicating with a UW Medicine Provider or Researcher via email, your acceptance of the risk and agreement to the conditions for email communications is implied. (See http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm.) The information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. See our Notice of Privacy Practices at http://uwmedicine.washington.edu. This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it immediately. P Please consider the environment before printing this email... [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form. inline: image001.gif
RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence
Like I said, I was outvoted. I never said it was a good idea :) I didn't do the testing on this methodology though so exactly how they intended to turn it back on easily ... well, that wasn't something shared with me. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: 22 September 2013 15:46 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence By removing that adapter you forfeit any easy means of turning it back on one day. I would recommend the DisabledComponents method as Jimmy mentioned, that is the recommended method and disables it for all adapters. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Murley Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 5:50 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence We disable IPv6 on image deployment. Personally, I voted against doing this but was outvoted as apparently our networking guys said our network wasn't ready for IPv6 ... I think we might do a Group Policy as well, and it was 2 years ago that we did all this so I'd need to ask colleagues next week. As far as I know we disable the TEREDO Adaptor which has the desired effect: cmd.exe /c devcon\i386\devcon.exe REMOVE *TEREDO I'll check next week and ask. Certainly on our deplooyed computers users cannot alter any IPv6 settings. IFrom: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin Sent: 20 September 2013 21:20 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Search ipv6 fff Sent from my Windows Phone From: Trevor Sullivan Sent: 9/20/2013 3:09 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Why are you disabling IPv6? Bad, bad idea. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Scott Kenyon Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1:28 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myITforum.com' Subject: [mssms] Disabling IPv6 in a Task Sequence Has anyone done this, if so could use some help on a script or something to disable IPv6 during image deployments Thanks Scott Kenyon Sr. Computer Specialist Dean of Medicine Information Technology UW School of Medicine 850 Republican Street, Box 358047 Seattle, WA 98109 Phone: 206.685.2825 ServiceDesk: 206.221-2459 | domh...@uw.edumailto:domh...@uw.edu sken...@u.washington.edumailto:sken...@u.washington.edu uwmedicine.orghttp://www.uwmedicine.org/ [Visit UW Medicine on.line]http://uwmedicine.org/ The above email may contain patient identifiable or confidential information. Because email is not secure, please be aware of associated risks of email transmission. If you are communicating with a UW Medicine Provider or Researcher via email, your acceptance of the risk and agreement to the conditions for email communications is implied. (See http://www.uwmedicine.org/Global/Compliance/EmailRisk.htm.) The information is intended for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply email, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. See our Notice of Privacy Practices at http://uwmedicine.washington.edu. This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it immediately. P Please consider the environment before printing this email... [http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its
[mssms] RE: Leaving Email lists
I didn't know you worked for the FBI!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Stauffer
Sent: 15 August 2013 16:36
To: Myitforum SMS; MyITForum Scripting; MyItforum PowerShell
Subject: [powershell] Leaving Email lists
Hello all,
I am no longer able to use email lists at work. This has been happening for the
last 6 months and is not going to get any better due to all of the security
violations. So I am no longer going to be using this account.
Those of you that I have become good friends with over the past few years can
find me at fluks...@gmail.commailto:fluks...@gmail.com
This will also bring you to my Google Plus account. I am very active there and
considering creating a page just for geek stuff.
Google Plus and Hotmail are also being blocked but i always have my phone with
me that has access to email and my g+ account.
If i am able to i may begin blogging again but it probably wont be on
MyitForum.com because all Forums are also being blocked at work except Technet
and Google Blogger
Hope to see some of you on Google Plus.
Thanks,
Christopher Stauffer
Enterprise SMS Admin
Enterprise AD Admin
Mail: fluks...@gmail.commailto:fluks...@gmail.com
Google Plus: https://plus.google.com/u/0/117914186672941891939/about
{Microsoft Certified}
-- MCSA: Server Administrator
-- MCITP: Server Administrator
-- MCTS: SCCM 2007
-- MCP:SMS 2003
{CompTIA Certified}
-- CompTIA A+
-- CompTIA Security +
Did you know you can also post and find answers on PowerShell in the forums?
http://www.myitforum.com/forums/default.asp?catApp=1
This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained
is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this
email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your
system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every
care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your
responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does
not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in
this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless
accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 08/09/2013)
A modest 19 days off this year thus far. I guess Wil Scott must be off too for Mike to stand in. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: 05 August 2013 01:56 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 08/09/2013) Hmmm. a phone number possibly not good form to harass Mike Stillwater, but maybe Mike can help Chuck setup his ooo better. Dzikowski, Michael michael.dzikow...@ally.commailto:michael.dzikow...@ally.com wrote: Really? Sent with Good (www.good.comhttp://www.good.com) -Original Message- From: chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.commailto:chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com [chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.commailto:chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com] Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 04:02 PM Central Standard Time To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 08/09/2013) I am out of the office until 08/09/2013. I will be on vacation from 8/5 thru 8/9. Mike Millwater will be in the Chicago office. If you need assistance please call him at my desk, 630-435-7852. Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] PowerShell OSD FrontEnd sent on 8/3/2013 1:27:08 PM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK Line nor any of its affiliates make any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession. This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/29/2013)
4 days off. That's not many for Chuck. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 25 July 2013 16:01 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/29/2013) I am out of the office until 07/29/2013. I will be out of the office on 7/25 and 7/26. If you need assistance while I'm out please email or call Will Scott, 770-818-1380, or email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk at NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920, Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] SCCM Report to return more than 10K rows sent on 7/25/2013 6:08:08 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/29/2013)
Just checked. He's only had 14 days off this year! Last year I worked out he'd taken something like 60 odd days. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 25 July 2013 16:01 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/29/2013) I am out of the office until 07/29/2013. I will be out of the office on 7/25 and 7/26. If you need assistance while I'm out please email or call Will Scott, 770-818-1380, or email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk at NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920, Note: This is an automated response to your message [mssms] SCCM Report to return more than 10K rows sent on 7/25/2013 6:08:08 AM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] Justice4Charles
Tee hee From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of Todd Hemsell [hems...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 July 2013 03:43 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Justice4Charles hate when that happens. Autocorrect fixed the address I was trying to send this quote to. My apologies. On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Todd Hemsell hems...@gmail.commailto:hems...@gmail.com wrote: Charles started out legitimately wanting to meet Taylor Swift. The contest was essentially to see who had the best viral marketing skills. One of Charles' friends was a master of this. He enticed 4chan by telling them Charles wanted to sniff her hair. Charles never said that, his friend did. The marketing tactic worked. 4Chans minions became interested and then got Reddit interested. Viral marketing at its best. As a result people all over the world know about Kiss 108 and Taylor Swift. This is the result you guys wanted. There is not a downside here. Kiss 108 ASKED people to create a viral marketing campaign. You got what you asked for. THEN you cancel the contest? Kiss 108 got butthurt so they picked up their toys and went home. They refuse to play with the other kids. They change the rules of the game when it does not go their way. Kiss 108 is a clear channel station. People need to complain to them and their sponsors, not the station. #Justice4Charleshttps://www.facebook.com/hashtag/justice4charles This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
[mssms] MS13-057 for Windows 7 and Video Playback
Some non-server related issues being reported with MS13-057 for Windows 7 with regards to video playback http://podcasts.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/another-botched-windows-patch-ms13-057kb-2803821kb-2834904-222636 This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 05/24/2013)
Been a while Chuck. You're working too hard! -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com Sent: 23 May 2013 10:01 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 05/24/2013) I am out of the office until 05/24/2013. I will be out of the office on 5/23/2013. If you need assistance while I'm out please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk at NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 201-553-3920, or email or call Will Scott, 770-818-1380. Note: This is an automated response to your message RE: [mssms] SCCM for a mid-size environment sent on 5/22/2013 8:31:31 PM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official order form.
