Re: [MSX] MSX blue

2009-09-24 Thread Eric Boon


On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Patriek Lesparre wrote:


Eric Boon wrote:

On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Patriek Lesparre *DID NOT WRITE*:

Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
I suggest to contact Sandy Pleyte (of www.generation-msx.nl), to  
add this to Generation MSX. It shouldn't be that much work and  
part of it is already implemented even.


Because a single point of success is better than choice and  
differentiation?

Yes. :-P


So you still provide the snappy comebacks Quibus is incapable of in  
his place...


Oh, I'm quite sure that Manuel is very capable of those same snappy  
comments. It's just that he's smarter than me and doesnt' want to feed  
the trolls.


Now, as for an on topic comment. I really don't see the harm in  
someone suggesting that two other someones, who share an interest,  
contact each other in order see if they can combine their efforts. If  
you do, then I suggest you learn about communities, co-operation,  
synergy and putting things in perspective. Forgetting about  
conspiracies and witch hunts wouldn't hurt either...


Ah well, nuf said.

Cheers,
Eric

___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx


Re: [MSX] MSX blue

2009-09-24 Thread Patriek Lesparre

Eric Boon wrote:
I really don't see the harm in someone 
suggesting that two other someones, who share an interest, contact each 
other in order see if they can combine their efforts. 


That's not what happened here...

First of all it's not an isolated incident. It's always the same people 
doing the 'suggestions' and always the same (two) sites that would 
'benefit'.


Second, this is a hobby, and people like to (re)invent their OWN wheels. 
Expecting someone to give up the part that makes it fun (in this case, 
actually coding the site), by suggesting to add the idea to an already 
existing site, is a big mistake in a community.


If you do, then I 
suggest you learn about communities, co-operation, synergy and putting 
things in perspective.


If you actually read about those topics, I suggest you reread because I 
think you misunderstood some of it. Like, you seem to have 'community' 
and 'communism' mixed up.


 Forgetting about conspiracies and witch hunts

wouldn't hurt either...


How can one forget that which continues daily?

For my own good I probably shouldn't have said anything, but I refuse to 
stay quiet when the usual suspects yet again try to take away someone's 
fun and ambition like this.


In a software project, nobody typically suggests an author for say a new 
music editor, to contact another editor's author in order to 'synergise' 
their ideas. This is why we have multitude of music editors on MSX, 
which is a good thing.


So what's different for a website? It's just another piece of software!

Patriek

___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx


[MSX] Nemesis review

2009-09-24 Thread Benoît Delvaux
A first review has made its apperance on MSX blue ! It concerns a reference 
game in the MSX universe : Nemesis, published by Konami in 1986. The 
beginning of a long saga of shoot'em ups !!!


http://www.msxblue.com/?page_id=158

French version :

http://www.msxblue.com/?page_id=108 


___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx


Re: [MSX] Nemesis review

2009-09-24 Thread Laurens Holst

Nice!

I’ve added your site to the ‘Planet MSX pipe’ on Yahoo.

http://pipes.yahoo.com/grauw/planetmsx

Lemme plug this a little… If you want a nice RSS feed that aggregates 
MSX news from various sources, give it a try :). And if anyone else has 
or knows of an MSX-related website or blog with an RSS feed that is not 
included yet, let me know and I’ll add it.


p.s. Wrt the previous discussion, the web is built on links and 
distribution of concerns. So even when you are not on the same domain, 
you can still cooperate and add value by linking to eachother. Best of 
both worlds! :) I also wish there were more MSX blogs, so if you want to 
start one you have my encouragement!


~Laurens

Op 24-9-2009 13:32, Benoît Delvaux schreef:
A first review has made its apperance on MSX blue ! It concerns a 
reference game in the MSX universe : Nemesis, published by Konami in 
1986. The beginning of a long saga of shoot'em ups !!!


http://www.msxblue.com/?page_id=158

French version :

http://www.msxblue.com/?page_id=108
___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx




--
~~ Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~
Laurens Holst, developer, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com

___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx


Re: [MSX] Nemesis review

2009-09-24 Thread Benoît Delvaux

Thanks for the addition !

Indeed, this tool is impressive and very useful for the MSX community.

I've just added it to my links section !

Benoît


- Original Message - 
From: Laurens Holst laurens.nos...@grauw.nl

To: msx@stack.nl
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [MSX] Nemesis review


Nice!

I’ve added your site to the ‘Planet MSX pipe’ on Yahoo.

http://pipes.yahoo.com/grauw/planetmsx

Lemme plug this a little… If you want a nice RSS feed that aggregates
MSX news from various sources, give it a try :). And if anyone else has
or knows of an MSX-related website or blog with an RSS feed that is not
included yet, let me know and I’ll add it.

p.s. Wrt the previous discussion, the web is built on links and
distribution of concerns. So even when you are not on the same domain,
you can still cooperate and add value by linking to eachother. Best of
both worlds! :) I also wish there were more MSX blogs, so if you want to
start one you have my encouragement!

~Laurens

Op 24-9-2009 13:32, Benoît Delvaux schreef:

A first review has made its apperance on MSX blue ! It concerns a
reference game in the MSX universe : Nemesis, published by Konami in
1986. The beginning of a long saga of shoot'em ups !!!

http://www.msxblue.com/?page_id=158

French version :

http://www.msxblue.com/?page_id=108
___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx




--
~~ Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~
Laurens Holst, developer, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com








___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx



___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx


Re: [MSX] MSX blue

2009-09-24 Thread Eric Boon

On Sep 24, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Patriek Lesparre wrote:


Eric Boon wrote:
I really don't see the harm in someone suggesting that two other  
someones, who share an interest, contact each other in order see if  
they can combine their efforts.


That's not what happened here...



It is. Really. Or if you want to be *really* nitpicky, the suggestion  
was that one of the two contacts the otherone instead of both  
contacting each other.



First of all it's not an isolated incident. It's always the same  
people doing the 'suggestions'



That's because the MSX community is a relativey small group and some  
people are more outspoken than others.
Just like it's always the same people who start the same rants over  
and over again.



Second, this is a hobby, and people like to (re)invent their OWN  
wheels.



True, nothing wrong with that and I'm in no way saying that people  
shouldn't be allowed to do so.




Expecting someone to give up the part that makes it fun



Please point me to the part in Manuel's mail in which he expects Akop  
to give up his idea. Show me the 'cease and desist' clause.



In a software project, nobody typically suggests an author for say a  
new music editor, to contact another editor's author in order to  
'synergise' their ideas. This is why we have multitude of music  
editors on MSX, which is a good thing.



Most of the MSX musiceditors were written in the '90s when the  
community was a lot bigger and the possibilities of co-operation a lot  
less. But even back then people who had similar ideas teamed up to  
form software- or demogroups.


Grz,
Eric

___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx


Re: [MSX] MSX blue

2009-09-24 Thread Patriek Lesparre

Eric Boon wrote:
... a lot of wriggling.


It's a shame this really small community you speak of has tunnelvision 
and does not see the rest of the MSX world.


It's also a shame that the community (often called the Msx Related 
Community) you belong to shares your belief that it's a good idea if 
everybody does exactly the same thing.


Your perverted definition of co-operation (i.e. assimilation) is in fact 
holding everybody back and kills progress and innovation.


That you perceive 'the community' to be small has little to do with the 
actual amount of people using and developing the MSX computer system, 
and more to do with your community's closed-mindedness and small-mindedness.



Not that I expect any of you to see the light any time soon, and 
certainly not when it's the goddamn anti-christ of your community's 
religion that is holding you up a mirror, but really do yourself a favor 
and at least take a somewhat critical look at that innocent suggestion


Patriek
___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx


Re: [MSX] MSX blue

2009-09-24 Thread Jorge Vidal Wulff

What about ending this pointless argument about...right now!?
If you wish, continue PRIVATELY. I'm not interested in it, REALLY, I'm not!

Regards,
JVW.

El 24/09/2009 19:20, Patriek Lesparre escribió:

Eric Boon wrote:
... a lot of wriggling.


It's a shame this really small community you speak of has tunnelvision 
and does not see the rest of the MSX world.


It's also a shame that the community (often called the Msx Related 
Community) you belong to shares your belief that it's a good idea if 
everybody does exactly the same thing.


Your perverted definition of co-operation (i.e. assimilation) is in 
fact holding everybody back and kills progress and innovation.


That you perceive 'the community' to be small has little to do with 
the actual amount of people using and developing the MSX computer 
system, and more to do with your community's closed-mindedness and 
small-mindedness.



Not that I expect any of you to see the light any time soon, and 
certainly not when it's the goddamn anti-christ of your community's 
religion that is holding you up a mirror, but really do yourself a 
favor and at least take a somewhat critical look at that innocent 
suggestion


Patriek
___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx

__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de 
firmas de virus 4455 (20090924) __


ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com





___
MSX mailing list (msx@stack.nl)
Info page: http://lists.stack.nl/mailman/listinfo/msx