Re: [semi-OT] bash complete a la tcsh

2002-07-05 Thread darren chamberlain

* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-05 00:08]:
 In tcsh, as discussed on the list quite a while back, one can
 construct a command to complete mutt folders as shown in the attached
 snippet (I watched the ideas come across and saved all of the various
 flavors, so I have more than just one line).
 
 Can the same thing be done in bash?  I see that bash also has a
 complete command but the man pages are a little obtuse and I can't
 tell if such delightful magic is possible.  I know that I sure miss it
 already, though!

Here's a simple bash function/complete pair that is a (good?) place to
begin.  I've only been using bash's programmable completion for a few
weeks, and I'm still pretty new at it.  The gist of it is, fill the
COMPREPLY array with the output of compgen; the trick is getting the
correct thing into COMPREPLY, of course.

There is a bug in here, somewhere; if you do mutt -f =mbtab, and have
a mailbox beginning with  mb, or course, it ends up with two ='s at the
beginning.  This doesn't happen if you define your lists with + and not
=, so there's probably something special about using = as a beginning
character.

Another fun thing this does is give a command-line arg summary unless
you are typing -f, in which case it gives you mailboxes.  A good
improvement would be that -atab, -itab, -Ftab, and -Htab give
you file completions, and -ctab and -btab give you email address
completions from your ~/.mail_aliases file.

Be sure to set MBOXLIST and MUTT appropriately, BTW.

  _mutt() {
local MBOXLIST=$HOME/.mutt/lists
local MUTT=/usr/bin/mutt
local mboxes cur prev
mboxes=$(grep '^ *mailboxes' $MBOXLIST | sed -e s/mailboxes// | tr -d \012)

COMPREPLY=()
cur=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}
prev=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD-1]}

if [[ $prev == -f ]]
then
  COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -W $mboxes $cur) );
else
  COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -W $($MUTT -h | awk '/^ *\-/{printf %s , $1}')) )
fi

return 0;
  }

  complete -F _mutt -o default mutt

Good luck.

(darren)

-- 
It ain't those parts of the Bible that I can't understand that bother
me, it's the parts that I do understand.
-- Mark Twain



postponed messages

2002-07-05 Thread Eduardo Gargiulo

Hi all.

I'm using mutt 1.4 and folder-hooks to set from and return-path
headers. The problem is that when i postpone a message and then send
it, i'm loosing the return-path setup, and it's replaced by default
folder-hook return-path. Is there any way to postpone a message and
don't miss the return-path header?

TIA

-Eduardo

-- 
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, 
and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein



Re: imap and maildirs

2002-07-05 Thread Michael Tatge

 This muttrc doesnt work like i want it. I'm sure you can tell that. This
 config make my local mail look like it is being sent from one of the imap
 accounts. Thanks for your help.
 
 --
 mailboxes !
 mailboxes imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX 'set imap_user=user imap_pass=password 
realname=User Name from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 mailboxes imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX 'set imap_user=user imap_pass=password 
realname=User Name from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 mailboxes imap:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX 'set imap_user=user imap_pass=password 
realname=User Name from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 --

Please read the manual again. The mailboxes commant doesn't work as a
hook. Look for account-hook.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
It's God.  No, not Richard Stallman, or Linus Torvalds, but God.
(By Matt Welsh)

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



Re: [semi-OT] bash complete a la tcsh

2002-07-05 Thread Justin R. Miller

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

If you come up with some completions that work well, you might consider
contributing them to this project:

http://freshmeat.net/projects/bashcompletion/

- -- 
[!] Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31)
Mutt/GnuPG guide at http://codesorcery.net

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9Jadk94d6K8nEDDERArrNAKCGuqQboyaYB8Bi7CnWCEZyFzoo1wCgkaL4
psFDIx/0ehrZg5ocP1CBq6A=
=RMgV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: Mutt users ml downloadable archives

2002-07-05 Thread David T-G

Alain --

...and then Alain Bench said...
% 
% Hello,

Hi!


% 
% I checked the 3 web archives of this mailing list given on Mutt's
% site, but could find only online reading and searching. And that's not

Yeah.  Ugh.


% very practical. Is there somewhere a downloadable archive, preferably in
% mbox format?

I haven't found it yet (that *is* one thing I like about Mailman lists,
though it can be set up by any third party for any list), but I can
(after having just been kicked off the mutt-users list for a week
because of problems when changing servers)-: heartily endorse
yahoo2mbox.pl from http://freshmeat.net/projects/yahoo2mbox/ (thanks
again, Adam!).

% 
% 
% Bye!  Alain.


HTH  HAND

:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg29390/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: 2 questions

2002-07-05 Thread Victor Maida

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:03:11AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have something that I haven't been able to figure out in mutt:
 
 I have the pager set to stop, so that it does not automatically go on to the
 next message.  Unfortunately, this doesn't prevent falling out of the
 current message, you can see the end of the message, but you can't scroll
 backwards.
 

Try this in your .muttrc:

bind pager up previous-line
bind pager down next-line


-- 
  .''`.   Victor Maida - vmaida
 : :'  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN #118093678
 `. `'`   GnuPG Key ID D36F9126 at www.keyserver.net
   `- GNU/Linux User #159455  Debian User #161

 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
 Version: 3.12
 GG/J/CM/IT d+@d- s-:- a- C+++ UL$ PP++ L+++
 E--- W++ N++ o? K w--(---) O? M V? PS+ PE++ Y PGP++ t+
 5? X+ R? tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G e++ h r+++ y+++()**
 --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--



msg29391/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Signature

2002-07-05 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero

Hello mutt-users:

Is there a way I can disable the signature in the bottom of an email
when replying of forwarding an email? It's kinda dull when I have to
erase it manually.

--
Nelson D. Guerrero



mutt window copy/paste

2002-07-05 Thread Deb


Hi Folks,

I'm happily learning/configuring mutt... and I ran across an
interesting problem.  

When I copy multiple lines of text from a message I'm reading in mutt,
then paste that text into a different window, all the lines are posted
appended with space padding and a NL is on the end of the line at the
window edge.  

On the other hand, if I use elm or other MUA to do the same thing,
the NL is at the end of each line of text, as it should be, and not at
the edge of the window, as described above.

Is this a configuration problem, or...??  

Ideas?

deb


-- 
If it dies, it's biology.  If it blows up, it's chemistry,
and if it doesn't work, it's physics.
-- University bathroom graffito
ô¿ô
 ~ 



Re: mutt window copy/paste (Correction)

2002-07-05 Thread Thomas Dickey

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 07:40:17PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:18:01 -0700, Deb wrote:
  When I copy multiple lines of text from a message I'm reading in mutt,
  then paste that text into a different window, all the lines are post-appended
  with space padding and a NL is on the end of the line at the window edge.
 
 This is a FAQ. You should use a terminal that have bce support
 (like the Xfree86 xterm) and terminfo data that announce bce.
 If you use ncurses 5.2 terminfos, TERM=xterm-xfree86 and
 TERM=xterm-vt220 should be OK for the Xfree86 xterm.
 
 BTW, this doesn't solve all the problems. I sometimes notice trailing
 spaces in headers.

There's more than one possibility here (including bugs, of course).  For
instance, the header may have been written on top of some existing blanks, and
the optimization takes that into account.  For xterm, the spaces that are
copied via mouse-selection are from explicit writes to those positions since
the last clearing operation, e.g., erase-display, erase-line.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net



Re: Signature

2002-07-05 Thread Michael Tatge

Nelson D. Guerrero ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
 Is there a way I can disable the signature in the bottom of an email
 when replying of forwarding an email? It's kinda dull when I have to
 erase it manually.

Make you editor delete it for you.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
Oh, I've seen copies [of Linux Journal] around the terminal room at The
Labs.
(By Dennis Ritchie)

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



Re: mutt error

2002-07-05 Thread Fisayo Adeleke

Hi Lee,

Actually i wasn't yet on the list when isent in the question the first time 
and thus i didn't recceive the reply.

Anyway, can you please forward those posts to me? 

I use Exim and not Sendmail. 

What permissions are supposed to be on /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock ?

thanks

-fiao

On Thursday 04 July 2002 08:43 pm, Lee J. Moore wrote:
 On Thu, 04 Jul 2002, Fisayo Adeleke wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  I'm probably the newest member here ... anyway, i got a problem! When i
  try to send mails using mutt, i get the following error messages
 
  Error sending message, child exited 127 (Exec error.).

 When you asked this the other day, I told you to investigate the
 set sendmail option in muttrc and IIRC Andre Berger told you to
 investigate the permissions of /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock.

 If you missed those posts, read back and/or explain whether
 these posts helped.


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset=us-ascii; 
name=Attachment: 1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: 




Re: sort threads

2002-07-05 Thread Raoul Bönisch

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:58:09PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
 * On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
  On Thu, 04 Jul 2002, Raoul Bönisch wrote:
  
   The setting set sort=subject should have no effect because it is
   overwritten by set sort=threads. Or am I wrong here?

[...]

  My mail is sorted by procmail in different folders ... everything that
  does not match is directed to my main mbox ... here often mails arrive
  that do not relate to the same subject ... but I wanted them to be
  sorted ... so if mutt cannot find any threads it is sorting (better it
  should) mails by subjects ...
 
 But you can't have $sort set to two different things at the same
 time.  If, as you say, you are doing this:
 
set sort=subject
set sort=threads
set sort_aux=date
 
 ... then you're setting $sort to subject and then wiping that out
 and setting it to threads.  You can verify the actual value by
 typing the following within mutt:
 
:set ?sortenter

That's what I mean. Those three lines could be cut down to two by
erasing the first. Though one configuration line is little
overhead. But it's less elegant.

Raoul




Re: mutt error

2002-07-05 Thread Lee J. Moore

On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Fisayo Adeleke wrote:

 Hi Lee,
 
 Actually i wasn't yet on the list when isent in the question the first time 
 and thus i didn't recceive the reply.
 
 Anyway, can you please forward those posts to me? 

[snip]

Your original post and replies to it are archived here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/mutt-users@mutt.org/msg29346.html

-- 
Lee J. Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Benefit the community and reply to the list



msg29400/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Deleting portions of large mail folders

2002-07-05 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park


--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alas! Wayne Chapeskie spake thus:
 On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:20:01PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
  * because of the wonderful mbox-hooks, every time I leave a folder, all
  the mails I read are moved into the appropriate archive folder.
=20
 Do you have an example of how you set up the mbox-hooks automatically?
 I'm assuming a bunch of lines of the form
 mutt-hook =3Dmutt-dev =3Darchives/2002-07-mutt-dev
 but I'm not quite sure how to get get the year and date in there
 automatically, since I doubt you update your .muttrc every month.

You could try this:

mbox-hook =3Dinbox =3Darchives/`date +%Y-%m`-inbox

But it gets better! Lets say I unsubscribe from one list and subscribe
to another... I don't even have to make a new mbox-hook, or delete the
old one! ;)

You see, I don't have a .muttrc. I have a perl script that generates my
=2Emuttrc for me, every time mutt is run. It automatically detects all my
mboxes, and writes mbox hooks for them ;)

--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/
--
Bureau Termination, Law of:
When a government bureau is scheduled to be phased out,
the number of employees in that bureau will double within
12 months after the decision is made.

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9JeyxPTh2iSBKeccRAoDcAJ9EwGlZajocjJB9KRrAN0/BRmvTlQCfeQBb
kdG198Doc6b4HOO031Mv4ww=
=ZMbu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--



Re: mutt window copy/paste (Correction)

2002-07-05 Thread Deb

I forgot to mention that I'm using xterm-166, with terminfo
xterm-color, on Solaris, Sparc.  Not sure the xfree86 is
appropriate for this platform?

I suspect what Thomas Dickey stated is closest to the truth,
that the spaces are explicit writes to those positions.  And
a test with both the /usr/openwin/bin/xterm and xterm-166
both show this to be the case - but ONLY when using mutt.  It
doesn't seem related to the window interface at all, but 
instead to how mutt is drawing the picture.

I would consider this a bug.

deb




* Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-05 13:56:52 -0400]:

 On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 07:40:17PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
  On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:18:01 -0700, Deb wrote:
   When I copy multiple lines of text from a message I'm reading in mutt,
   then paste that text into a different window, all the lines are post-appended
   with space padding and a NL is on the end of the line at the window edge.
  
  This is a FAQ. You should use a terminal that have bce support
  (like the Xfree86 xterm) and terminfo data that announce bce.
  If you use ncurses 5.2 terminfos, TERM=xterm-xfree86 and
  TERM=xterm-vt220 should be OK for the Xfree86 xterm.
  
  BTW, this doesn't solve all the problems. I sometimes notice trailing
  spaces in headers.
 
 There's more than one possibility here (including bugs, of course).  For
 instance, the header may have been written on top of some existing blanks, and
 the optimization takes that into account.  For xterm, the spaces that are
 copied via mouse-selection are from explicit writes to those positions since
 the last clearing operation, e.g., erase-display, erase-line.
 
 -- 
 Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://invisible-island.net
 ftp://invisible-island.net

-- 
If it dies, it's biology.  If it blows up, it's chemistry,
and if it doesn't work, it's physics.
-- University bathroom graffito
ô¿ô
 ~ 



Re: [semi-OT] bash complete a la tcsh

2002-07-05 Thread darren chamberlain

I've banged together a (reasonably) complete version of the completion
stuff for bash that David T-G asked about earlier.  It's attached.  The
only thing that doesn't seem to work for me is getting aliases from
~/.mutt/aliases (the commented out awk piece); the awk script works from
the command line but goes into an infinite loop within the _mutt
function.

If anyone decides to try to use this, be sure to set $MBOXLISTS and
$MUTT to correct values for your setup, of course.

I'll look into donating it to tbe Bash Programmable Completion project
next week.

(darren)

-- 
We protest things because we are too impotent to effect change. We
effect change through positive action, not simply through
demonstrations of intent.


# vim: set ft=sh:
_mutt() {
local MBOXLIST=$HOME/.mutt/lists
local MUTT=/usr/bin/mutt
local ALIASES=$HOME/.mutt/aliases
local mboxes cur prev
mboxes=$(grep '^ *mailboxes' $MBOXLIST | sed -e s/mailboxes// | tr -d \012)

COMPREPLY=()
cur=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}
prev=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD-1]}

if [[ $prev == -f ]]
then
# Mailbox name
COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -W $mboxes $cur) );
elif [[ $prev == -a ]] || [[ $prev == -F ]] || \
 [[ $prev == -H ]] || [[ $prev == -i ]]
then
# Files: attach (-a), alternate muttrc (-F), headers (-H), include
# (-i)
COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -W $(echo *) $cur) )
elif [[ $prev == -m ]]
then
# Mailbox type: mbox, MMDF, MH, Maildir
COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -W mbox MMDF MH Maildir $cur ) )
#elif [[ $prev == -b ]] || [[ $prev == -c ]]
#then
## Addresses: Cc (-c) and Bcc (-b)
#addresses=$(awk '$NF~/$/{gsub([],,$NF); print $NF}' $ALIASES)
#COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -W $addresses $cur) )
else
# Default: Mutt help (mutt -h)
COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -W $($MUTT -h | awk '/^ *\-/{printf %s , $1}') $cur) 
)
fi

return 0;
}

complete -F _mutt -o default mutt



Re: mutt window copy/paste (Correction)

2002-07-05 Thread Thomas Dickey

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:13:47PM -0700, Deb wrote:
 I forgot to mention that I'm using xterm-166, with terminfo
 xterm-color, on Solaris, Sparc.  Not sure the xfree86 is
 appropriate for this platform?

But xterm-color usually says that the terminal doesn't implement back color
erase (bce).  In that case, most full-screen applications will write explicit
blanks, which xterm's select/paste will preserve.

 I suspect what Thomas Dickey stated is closest to the truth,
 that the spaces are explicit writes to those positions.  And
 a test with both the /usr/openwin/bin/xterm and xterm-166
 both show this to be the case - but ONLY when using mutt.  It
 doesn't seem related to the window interface at all, but 
 instead to how mutt is drawing the picture.
 
 I would consider this a bug.

( sure - but not in mutt or xterm ;-)

 
 deb
 
 
 
 
 * Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-05 13:56:52 -0400]:
 
  On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 07:40:17PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
   On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:18:01 -0700, Deb wrote:
When I copy multiple lines of text from a message I'm reading in mutt,
then paste that text into a different window, all the lines are post-appended
with space padding and a NL is on the end of the line at the window edge.
   
   This is a FAQ. You should use a terminal that have bce support
   (like the Xfree86 xterm) and terminfo data that announce bce.
   If you use ncurses 5.2 terminfos, TERM=xterm-xfree86 and
   TERM=xterm-vt220 should be OK for the Xfree86 xterm.
   
   BTW, this doesn't solve all the problems. I sometimes notice trailing
   spaces in headers.
  
  There's more than one possibility here (including bugs, of course).  For
  instance, the header may have been written on top of some existing blanks, and
  the optimization takes that into account.  For xterm, the spaces that are
  copied via mouse-selection are from explicit writes to those positions since
  the last clearing operation, e.g., erase-display, erase-line.
  
  -- 
  Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://invisible-island.net
  ftp://invisible-island.net
 
 -- 
 If it dies, it's biology.  If it blows up, it's chemistry,
 and if it doesn't work, it's physics.
 -- University bathroom graffito
 ô¿ô
  ~ 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net



Re: Feature request: cross-mbox threading

2002-07-05 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann

Hi.

On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
 * Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
 I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a limit
 pattern to show only the mails of one correspondence.

How?

  I do not think so. The work to do would not be
  significantly more than with one folder and threading
  enabled. Sure, it takes some time, but that it already
  does with one folder, which you suggested as work-around.
 
 Well, the code added would have to read mails from a few
 additional folders instead of just one.

But my point was that your suggestion would have all the
mails in one folder instead. I cannot see loading 3 x 1000
messages being significantly slower/faster than 1 x 3000.

Or are we talking at cross-issues?

 I have a problem with the checks involved allthough it may
 be quite less. I also run mutt on a really old machine
 where every portion of new code makes working
 unnecessarily hard.

Well, the behaviour would be optional. One if-case doesn't
cost much in this case.

 You can also make mutt save the mail to the folder it was
 sent from.

I already have in- and outgoing mails in the same
folder. Don't know if that matters to the original poster.

 You can limit to every mail not from you. If you
 don't need the thread anymore, move it to the archive.

Well, that is exactly the point. If I moved it to the
archive and get a new message and have to look it up...

[...]
  Currently I have a macro defined which files the message
  in the archive folder as mark that it has been done.
 
 I do it completely different without creating the need of
 such a flag on my own. I also keep a state 'done' which I
 nicely work around without another flag. My filter creates
 an archive I usually read only. A mail is considered to be
 'done' if I delete it from the folder. I see my folders as a
 kind of temporary place. Older folders are compressed and
 can be read using the rr.compressed patch. Outgoing mail is
 saved to the same archive folder, so I have all I need in
 one place.

If I did not misunderstand you, that is exactly what I have,
except that I move the mails only after they are done. But
this does not matter in this case. To repeat:

New mails are filed in a seperate folder, there is also an
archive folder. Outgoing mails go directly to the
archive. Mails are deleted from the incoming folder, when
done (and for me, also moved to the archive). And
additionally, the archive is also compressed. ;-)

The problem arises (or more precisly: the requested feature
could be of use), when a new mail arrives, which belongs to
an done thread and I have to look it up in the archive.

As I said, that mainly happens only with support mails to
me, so maybe you simply do not encounter this, because you
do no support? This includes two things: Getting mails after
a long period of time (more than a month), which continues
an old thread, and people unable to quote significant
context in such mails.

On the other hand, I delete/file done mails at once, because
I need to be able to see quickly, if there are undone mails
pending. And unread would not work, because priorities often
demand that I read all e-mails, but do not process the
unimportant ones for some days.

[...]
 I don't want to say that such a feature would be useless at
 all, I just say it's useless to me since I've organized my
 communication to not require such features.

Or because you do not get the kind of mails I get? ;-)

[...]
 If you find this feature that usefull, well, than start
 coding it... ;-)

As I said initially in my first mail, I am not sure whether
I agree with the original poster about the solution.

I just wanted to show that the requested feature would
indeed solve a problem which has no direct solution yet.

Greetings,

Benjamin.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



msg29405/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


mutt error

2002-07-05 Thread Patrick

* Fisayo Adeleke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07-05-02 13:39]:
 Hi Lee,
 
 Actually i wasn't yet on the list when isent in the question the
 first time and thus i didn't recceive the reply.
 
 Anyway, can you please forward those posts to me? 
 
 I use Exim and not Sendmail. 
 
 What permissions are supposed to be on /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock ?

lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   27 Jan 31 20:42
/usr/bin/mutt_dotlock - /usr/local/bin/mutt_dotlock
-- 
Patrick Shanahan
Registered Linux User #207535 
  @ http://counter.li.org