Re: [NetBehaviour] reariting of the conversation by Rhea Myers & McKenzie Wark

[Joumana Mourad]

Thank you Annie 
I am following.
Kindest
> On 13 Mar 2022, at 12:49, Annie Abrahams via NetBehaviour 
>  wrote:
> 
> Here is a post on our reariting session with Brian Droitcour, Ruth Catlow, 
> Gretta Louw, Daniel Temkin and Annie Abrahams.
> Because I, Annie, felt Myers & Wark‘s conversation contained a lot of 
> interesting points that I didn’t really understand, I organized a reariting* 
> of its publication on OUTLAND. I was/am struggling to comprehend issues 
> around NFT’s, chains and DAO’s, and hoped reariting the conversation would 
> clear up my mind. 
> It worked, I learned a lot. 
> 
> You can dowload a .pdf to check us out:
> https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2022/03/11/reariting-myers-wark/ 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:01 AM Annie Abrahams  > wrote:
> Hi, I am sure some of you have seen this conversation by Rhea Myers & 
> McKenzie Wark in Outland https://outland.art/rhea-myers-mckenzie-wark/ 
>  
> I read it and am intrigued, but some things are very dense or formulated in a 
> way that doesn't refer to what I know.
> 
> Might there be some of you who want to think through this conversation  via a 
> reariting of it?
> I would like to propose Friday March  at 16h Paris time. Please write me an 
> email if you want to think with others on this subject.
> 
> Annie
> 
> 
> 
> Reariting is the act of simultaneous reading and writing together on the 
> Internet. Reariting is used as a technique to think through a text together. 
> While we read the conversation, we will all use the same framapad to write 
> our reactions and asides related to this text. Thus we explain and explore 
> our understandings and misunderstandings of the text .
> 
> 
> 
> Thus the Reading Club manifests itself as a 
> facilitator for a diffractive, distributed intelligence on-the-fly, 
> creating text and relational patterns that do not depend on canons. It 
> generates creative and unexpected “outcomes”. These are, in my opinion, 
> not so much the texts produced, as the “diffractive moments” experienced
>  by the reariters. Diffractive Reading in the Reading Club, Annie Abrahams, 
> 2019.
> https://elmcip.net/critical-writing/diffractive-reading-reading-club 
>  
> 
> In the article with Emmanuel Guez: The machinic author, published in JCWS 
> (Journal of Creative Writing Studies) we formulate it a bit differently:
> She
>  assists in an event that allows for diffractive moments (5) – i.e “a 
> mapping of interference” which take her out of self reflexivity, out of 
> systemised subjectivity, out of a world that only reproduces what it 
> knows already into an intra-active diffractive worlding (6). The machnic
>  author revealed herself as queer.
> Abrahams, Annie and Guez, 
> Emmanuel (2019) ““The machinic author” Artist’s Statement: The Reading 
> Club”, Journal of Creative Writing Studies: Vol. 4: Iss.1, Article 8. 
> ISSN: 2474-2937. Available at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol4/iss1/8 
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



Joumana Mourad
Digital performance specialist/ Artistic Director 
Join our mailing list! http://ijaddancecompany.com/contact/ 

Tel: 07930 378 639
 <>joum...@ijaddancecompany.com 
IJAD Dance Company
Registered Charity: 1080776 
www.ijaddancecompany.com 
@IJADdance
Facebook: IJAD Dance Company page
Curator:http://www.openonlinetheatre.org 

Support IJAD
https://www.giveasyoulive.com/join/IJAD 


‘Think Before You Thank’: If every Brit sent one less thank you email a day, we 
would save 16,433 tonnes of carbon a year - the same as 81,152 flights to 
Madrid:   https://tinyurl.com/qqyuw2y 
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] reariting of the conversation by Rhea Myers & McKenzie Wark

[Annie Abrahams via NetBehaviour]

Here is a post on our reariting session with Brian Droitcour, Ruth Catlow,
Gretta Louw, Daniel Temkin and Annie Abrahams.
Because I, Annie, felt Myers & Wark‘s conversation contained a lot of
interesting points that I didn’t really understand, I organized a
reariting* of its publication on OUTLAND. I was/am struggling to comprehend
issues around NFT’s, chains and DAO’s, and hoped reariting the conversation
would clear up my mind.
It worked, I *learned *a lot.

You can dowload a .pdf to check us out:
https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2022/03/11/reariting-myers-wark/



On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:01 AM Annie Abrahams  wrote:

> Hi, I am sure some of you have seen this conversation by Rhea Myers &
> McKenzie Wark in Outland https://outland.art/rhea-myers-mckenzie-wark/
> I read it and am intrigued, but some things are very dense or formulated
> in a way that doesn't refer to what I know.
>
> Might there be some of you who want to think through this conversation
> via a reariting of it?
> *I would like to propose Friday March  at 16h Paris time. Please write me
> an email if you want to think with others on this subject.*
>
> Annie
> 
> Reariting is the act of simultaneous reading and writing together on the
> Internet. Reariting is used as a technique to think through a text
> together. While we read the conversation, we will all use the same
> framapad to write our reactions and asides related to this text. Thus we
> explain and explore our understandings and misunderstandings of the text .
> 
>
> *Thus the Reading Club manifests itself as a facilitator for a
> diffractive, distributed intelligence on-the-fly, creating text and
> relational patterns that do not depend on canons. It generates creative and
> unexpected “outcomes”. These are, in my opinion, not so much the texts
> produced, as the “diffractive moments” experienced by the reariters.*
> Diffractive Reading in the Reading Club, Annie Abrahams, 2019.
> https://elmcip.net/critical-writing/diffractive-reading-reading-club
>
> In the article with Emmanuel Guez: *The machinic author*, published in
> JCWS (Journal of Creative Writing Studies) we formulate it a bit
> differently:
> *She assists in an event that allows for diffractive moments (5) – i.e “a
> mapping of interference” which take her out of self reflexivity, out of
> systemised subjectivity, out of a world that only reproduces what it knows
> already into an intra-active diffractive worlding (6). The machnic author
> revealed herself as queer.*
> Abrahams, Annie and Guez, Emmanuel (2019) ““The machinic author” Artist’s
> Statement: The Reading Club”, Journal of Creative Writing Studies: Vol. 4:
> Iss.1, Article 8. ISSN: 2474-2937. Available at:
> https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol4/iss1/8
>
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] reariting of the conversation by Rhea Myers & McKenzie Wark (Annie Abrahams)

[Suzon Fuks via NetBehaviour]

2hours too late for me, unless the storm keeps me awake.

Flooding episode not finished yet! we had 2 days of respite...and week
ahead with rain and storms. So many tears!

Suzon
+61439929028

*facebook.com/suzonfuksdesign/shop
<http://facebook.com/suzonfuksdesign/shop>*

*BE LIKE BODY–OBSOLETE *
*- download free e-book http://suzonfuks.net/be-like-body-obsolete-4
<http://suzonfuks.net/be-like-body-obsolete-4>*




*I acknowledge the country, culture and traditional custodians of the land
upon which I walk, work and live, the Turrbal and Jagera peoples. It takes
12000 litres of water to make 500 grams of chocolate! *


On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 22:05, 
wrote:

> Send NetBehaviour mailing list submissions to
> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> netbehaviour-requ...@lists.netbehaviour.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> netbehaviour-ow...@lists.netbehaviour.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of NetBehaviour digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: reariting of the conversation by Rhea Myers & McKenzie
>   Wark (Annie Abrahams)
>2. last post for a while (Alan Sondheim)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:17:44 +0100
> From: Annie Abrahams 
> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
> 
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] reariting of the conversation by Rhea
> Myers & McKenzie Wark
> Message-ID:
>  dkjk+t55njrs4zcs66k1y6q2dejihsxmo...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Got a private email from Ruth asking me if it would be this Friday,
>
> Yes it would be this* Friday March 4*. (16 h Paris time)
> I hope some of you will write me too, because reariting is best when you
> are at least 4. (for now there is just Ruth and me)
>
> Reminder: reariting is about thinking and learning, trying to understand,
> finding links, soft and blind spots, returning and kneading. It always
> starts somewhere in the middle, and somehow never ends.
>
> Best
> Annie
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:01 AM Annie Abrahams 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am sure some of you have seen this conversation by Rhea Myers &
> > McKenzie Wark in Outland https://outland.art/rhea-myers-mckenzie-wark/
> > I read it and am intrigued, but some things are very dense or formulated
> > in a way that doesn't refer to what I know.
> >
> > Might there be some of you who want to think through this conversation
> > via a reariting of it?
> > *I would like to propose Friday March  at 16h Paris time. Please write me
> > an email if you want to think with others on this subject.*
> >
> > Annie
> > 
> > Reariting is the act of simultaneous reading and writing together on the
> > Internet. Reariting is used as a technique to think through a text
> > together. While we read the conversation, we will all use the same
> > framapad to write our reactions and asides related to this text. Thus we
> > explain and explore our understandings and misunderstandings of the text
> .
> > 
> >
> > *Thus the Reading Club manifests itself as a facilitator for a
> > diffractive, distributed intelligence on-the-fly, creating text and
> > relational patterns that do not depend on canons. It generates creative
> and
> > unexpected ?outcomes?. These are, in my opinion, not so much the texts
> > produced, as the ?diffractive moments? experienced by the reariters.*
> > Diffractive Reading in the Reading Club, Annie Abrahams, 2019.
> > https://elmcip.net/critical-writing/diffractive-reading-reading-club
> >
> > In the article with Emmanuel Guez: *The machinic author*, published in
> > JCWS (Journal of Creative Writing Studies) we formulate it a bit
> > differently:
> > *She assists in an event that allows for diffractive moments (5) ? i.e ?a
> > mapping of interference? which take her out of self reflexivity, out of
> > systemised subjectivity, out of a world that only reproduces what it
> knows
> > already into an intra-active diffractive worlding (6). The machnic author
> > revealed herself as queer.*
> > Abrahams, Annie and Guez, Emmanuel (2019) ??The machinic author? Artist?s
> > Statement: The Reading Club?, Journal of Creative Writing Studies: Vol.
> 4:
> > Iss.1, Article 8. ISSN: 2474-2937. Available at:
> > https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol4/iss1/8
>
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] reariting of the conversation by Rhea Myers & McKenzie Wark

[Annie Abrahams via NetBehaviour]

Got a private email from Ruth asking me if it would be this Friday,

Yes it would be this* Friday March 4*. (16 h Paris time)
I hope some of you will write me too, because reariting is best when you
are at least 4. (for now there is just Ruth and me)

Reminder: reariting is about thinking and learning, trying to understand,
finding links, soft and blind spots, returning and kneading. It always
starts somewhere in the middle, and somehow never ends.

Best
Annie

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:01 AM Annie Abrahams  wrote:

> Hi, I am sure some of you have seen this conversation by Rhea Myers &
> McKenzie Wark in Outland https://outland.art/rhea-myers-mckenzie-wark/
> I read it and am intrigued, but some things are very dense or formulated
> in a way that doesn't refer to what I know.
>
> Might there be some of you who want to think through this conversation
> via a reariting of it?
> *I would like to propose Friday March  at 16h Paris time. Please write me
> an email if you want to think with others on this subject.*
>
> Annie
> 
> Reariting is the act of simultaneous reading and writing together on the
> Internet. Reariting is used as a technique to think through a text
> together. While we read the conversation, we will all use the same
> framapad to write our reactions and asides related to this text. Thus we
> explain and explore our understandings and misunderstandings of the text .
> 
>
> *Thus the Reading Club manifests itself as a facilitator for a
> diffractive, distributed intelligence on-the-fly, creating text and
> relational patterns that do not depend on canons. It generates creative and
> unexpected “outcomes”. These are, in my opinion, not so much the texts
> produced, as the “diffractive moments” experienced by the reariters.*
> Diffractive Reading in the Reading Club, Annie Abrahams, 2019.
> https://elmcip.net/critical-writing/diffractive-reading-reading-club
>
> In the article with Emmanuel Guez: *The machinic author*, published in
> JCWS (Journal of Creative Writing Studies) we formulate it a bit
> differently:
> *She assists in an event that allows for diffractive moments (5) – i.e “a
> mapping of interference” which take her out of self reflexivity, out of
> systemised subjectivity, out of a world that only reproduces what it knows
> already into an intra-active diffractive worlding (6). The machnic author
> revealed herself as queer.*
> Abrahams, Annie and Guez, Emmanuel (2019) ““The machinic author” Artist’s
> Statement: The Reading Club”, Journal of Creative Writing Studies: Vol. 4:
> Iss.1, Article 8. ISSN: 2474-2937. Available at:
> https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol4/iss1/8
>
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] reariting of the conversation by Rhea Myers & McKenzie Wark

[Ruth Catlow via NetBehaviour]

Dear Annie,

I like this idea very much and would love to participate.
You didn't give a date. Did you mean this Friday (March 4th)?

Bests
Ruth



On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 9:02 AM Annie Abrahams via NetBehaviour <
netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote:

> Hi, I am sure some of you have seen this conversation by Rhea Myers &
> McKenzie Wark in Outland https://outland.art/rhea-myers-mckenzie-wark/
> I read it and am intrigued, but some things are very dense or formulated
> in a way that doesn't refer to what I know.
>
> Might there be some of you who want to think through this conversation
> via a reariting of it?
> *I would like to propose Friday March  at 16h Paris time. Please write me
> an email if you want to think with others on this subject.*
>
> Annie
> 
> Reariting is the act of simultaneous reading and writing together on the
> Internet. Reariting is used as a technique to think through a text
> together. While we read the conversation, we will all use the same
> framapad to write our reactions and asides related to this text. Thus we
> explain and explore our understandings and misunderstandings of the text .
> 
>
> *Thus the Reading Club manifests itself as a facilitator for a
> diffractive, distributed intelligence on-the-fly, creating text and
> relational patterns that do not depend on canons. It generates creative and
> unexpected “outcomes”. These are, in my opinion, not so much the texts
> produced, as the “diffractive moments” experienced by the reariters.*
> Diffractive Reading in the Reading Club, Annie Abrahams, 2019.
> https://elmcip.net/critical-writing/diffractive-reading-reading-club
>
> In the article with Emmanuel Guez: *The machinic author*, published in
> JCWS (Journal of Creative Writing Studies) we formulate it a bit
> differently:
> *She assists in an event that allows for diffractive moments (5) – i.e “a
> mapping of interference” which take her out of self reflexivity, out of
> systemised subjectivity, out of a world that only reproduces what it knows
> already into an intra-active diffractive worlding (6). The machnic author
> revealed herself as queer.*
> Abrahams, Annie and Guez, Emmanuel (2019) ““The machinic author” Artist’s
> Statement: The Reading Club”, Journal of Creative Writing Studies: Vol. 4:
> Iss.1, Article 8. ISSN: 2474-2937. Available at:
> https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol4/iss1/8
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>


-- 
Ruth Catlow
she/her
Co-founder & Artistic director of Furtherfield & DECAL Decentralised Arts
Lab
+44 (0) 77370 02879

*I will only agree to speak at events that are racially and gender
balanced.

**sending thanks

in
advance

*Furtherfield *disrupts and democratises art and technology through
exhibitions,
labs & debate, for deep exploration, open tools & free thinking.
furtherfield.org 

*DECAL* Decentralised Arts Lab is an arts, blockchain & web 3.0 technologies
research hub

for fairer, more dynamic & connected cultural ecologies & economies now.

https://decal.furtherfield.org/

Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company Limited by Guarantee

Registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205.

Registered business address: Carbon Accountancy, 80-83 Long Lane, London,
EC1A 9ET.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] reariting of the conversation by Rhea Myers & McKenzie Wark

[Annie Abrahams via NetBehaviour]

Hi, I am sure some of you have seen this conversation by Rhea Myers &
McKenzie Wark in Outland https://outland.art/rhea-myers-mckenzie-wark/
I read it and am intrigued, but some things are very dense or formulated in
a way that doesn't refer to what I know.

Might there be some of you who want to think through this conversation  via
a reariting of it?
*I would like to propose Friday March  at 16h Paris time. Please write me
an email if you want to think with others on this subject.*

Annie

Reariting is the act of simultaneous reading and writing together on the
Internet. Reariting is used as a technique to think through a text
together. While we read the conversation, we will all use the same framapad
to write our reactions and asides related to this text. Thus we explain and
explore our understandings and misunderstandings of the text .


*Thus the Reading Club manifests itself as a facilitator for a diffractive,
distributed intelligence on-the-fly, creating text and relational patterns
that do not depend on canons. It generates creative and unexpected
“outcomes”. These are, in my opinion, not so much the texts produced, as
the “diffractive moments” experienced by the reariters.* Diffractive
Reading in the Reading Club, Annie Abrahams, 2019.
https://elmcip.net/critical-writing/diffractive-reading-reading-club

In the article with Emmanuel Guez: *The machinic author*, published in JCWS
(Journal of Creative Writing Studies) we formulate it a bit differently:
*She assists in an event that allows for diffractive moments (5) – i.e “a
mapping of interference” which take her out of self reflexivity, out of
systemised subjectivity, out of a world that only reproduces what it knows
already into an intra-active diffractive worlding (6). The machnic author
revealed herself as queer.*
Abrahams, Annie and Guez, Emmanuel (2019) ““The machinic author” Artist’s
Statement: The Reading Club”, Journal of Creative Writing Studies: Vol. 4:
Iss.1, Article 8. ISSN: 2474-2937. Available at:
https://scholarworks.rit.edu/jcws/vol4/iss1/8
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour