Re: NetSurf 3.11 Released
In article , Michael Drake wrote: > NetSurf 3.11 is now available to download from > https://www.netsurf-browser.org/ > The biggest change to the core is improved CSS support, including > support for the "display: flex" property value, which improves the > layout of some web pages. There is also a new option in the Choices > to disable CSS. > A huge number of other changes have also been made including > new features, significant performance optimisations, stability > improvements, and other fixes. [Snip details] Many thanks, much appreciated. B -- _________ Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com RISC OS 5.28 (16-Dec-20) on Raspberry Pi _ ___ netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
Re: Please test the latest build
In article , Michael Drake wrote: > Please could you test the latest builds (5377 or later) from: > https://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/ [Snip] #5378 now running here. -- _ Brian Jordan RISC OS 5.28 (16-Dec-20) on Raspberry Pi _ ___ netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
Re: Fetch_NS
In article <59767da924d...@triffid.co.uk>, Dave wrote: [Snip] > Ooeer! > I've just rechecked and that's what is presented after a *show > inetdbase*. I have just had a look at VA here and I get precisely this response to the same input. > Obviously I have no idea what it all means... RISC OS 6.20 hasn't been > touched/updated since December 2009. And a MeToo here. The rest of this thread has enabled me to get Fetch_NS going again although there doesn't seem to be a great deal new for me to fetch... B -- _________ Brian Jordan RISC OS 5.28 (19-Oct-20) on Raspberry Pi _ ___ netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
Re: Netsurf suddenly fails to start
In article <595d8eeeb9d...@triffid.co.uk>, Dave wrote: > In article <595d865f5ad...@triffid.co.uk>, >Dave wrote: [Snip] > It should start with "Exclaim" :-( It's OK Dave - we knew what you mwaned. B -- _____ Brian Jordan RISC OS 5.28 (19-Oct-20) on Raspberry Pi _ ___ netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
Re: antiClickJack
On 25 Apr, brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: > In article <0f08bf2259.harr...@bazleyfamily.co.uk>, >Harriet Bazley wrote: > [Snip] > > body{display:none !important;} > > which has the effect of hiding the entire content of the page. > [Snip] > Great find, thank you. > B My interest piqued I have been looking at this and discovered (I say 'discovered' while suspecting this is well known) that using NetSurf's Full save facility produces a page which can be opened. The layout is something of a dog's breakfast and all pictures are pixellated but the links I have tried so far work and lead to nicely laid out pages which NetSurf is happy with. Stuffed Eggs BĂ©arnaise anyone? 'If a web page fails to render in Netsurf try a full save' now added to my 'Things to Try' notes NetSurf test builds 5278 and 5286 B -- _________ Brian Jordan RISC OS 5.28 on Raspberry Pi _ ___ netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
Re: antiClickJack
In article <0f08bf2259.harr...@bazleyfamily.co.uk>, Harriet Bazley wrote: [Snip] > body{display:none !important;} > which has the effect of hiding the entire content of the page. [Snip] Great find, thank you. B -- _____ Brian Jordan RISC OS 5.28 on Raspberry Pi _ ___ netsurf-users mailing list -- netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org To unsubscribe send an email to netsurf-users-le...@netsurf-browser.org
Re: The 3.9 Release
In article <20190721164517.iurgjow5ipdso...@kyllikki.org>, Vincent Sanders wrote: > I am pleased to announce the latest release of NetSurf is now available. > NetSurf 3.9 features support for CSS Media Queries (level 4) and > improvements to JavaScript handling. > Also included are many bug fixes and improvements. > We recommend all users upgrade to NetSurf 3.9. Many thanks, this is much appreciated. -- _________ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Text colour
In RISC OS build #4350 I see mainly white text on a black background. In article <000cb429.01e9b4902...@smtp.freeola.net>, Peter Slegg wrote: > Hi, > https://newsspaceflight.com/news-from-space-tech-expo/ > This page mostly show black text on a black background. > Atari build 4350. Is it the same in other ports ? > Peter -- _________ Brian Jordan RISC OS 5.23 on Raspberry Pi _
Re: Forcing website menus to reveal themselves
On 23 February 2018 13:51:14 GMT+00:00, Tim Hillwrote: >I have never been able to get CSS-only drop-down menus to work in NS. Nor I. Typical is the "Results" tab in www.wodql.org.uk which behaves as expected when viewed in all other browsers I've tried; similarly the overflow of the last menu item, which could be related, is peculiar to NS. -- Sent from my Android tablet.
Re: Page causes crash
In article <b1b93a9356.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Young <pnyo...@ormail.co.uk> wrote: [Snip] > OT: I am, and I do. Aren't, and don't, we all? -- _____ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Page layout
In article <5690f953cd...@timil.com>, Tim Hill <t...@timil.com> wrote: [Snip] > It's great example of a page which uses Javascript to no advantage but > even if hover-and-drop menus are implemented with only CSS they don't > work in NetSurf either. :-( Yeah. I spent ages some time back trying to get to the bottom of why I couldn't get some hover-and-drop CSS code to work. The reason was that I was using RISC OS to develop sites, mainly because of StrongED and the command line access to HTML Tidy, but then I was testing the code on Netsurf. I continue to use RISC OS to write web stuff but these days always test it in Chrome on the other side. -- _________ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Unable to Fetch document
In article <0011707f.01e9b4902...@smtp.freeola.net>, Peter Slegg <p.sl...@scubadivers.co.uk> wrote: [Snip] > I updated to 4095 and that is the same. After 1-2mins: > Unable to fetch document > I suspect it is some sort of timing issue but other pages will render > after 15-20mins. > Peter As I have today update NetSurf to #4098 I thought I'd try this. The result is a full download of the page in, according to the message at the foot of the page, 16.4 seconds. "Done (16.4s)" My machine details in my signature. -- _________ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: input focus
In article <4b8d703756@abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel <nets...@abbeypress.co.uk> wrote: > I notice that the input focus -- often but not always -- goes to > Netsurf when I click on a link in an email that opens a web page. > This was not the case until fairly recently*. The input focus always > used to remain with the email window. [Snip] > Using Ro 5.23 on ArmX6, Ro 5.22 on Armini (Beagle). I confess to not having noted this as a change but I can confirm that as of now (using Netsurf #4085) the behaviour here is as Jim has described. A click on the Archive magazine link in the Pluto article viewer which has the input focus opens the web page in Netsurf and the Netsurf window gains the input focus. -- _____ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: RESOLVED: [Was] Netsurf inconsistent behaviour between RISC OS 5.23 and 6.20
In article <5603e20e5c...@timil.com>, Tim Hill <t...@timil.com> wrote: > In article <5603a241a4brian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan > <brian.jord...@btinternet.com> wrote: [Snip] > /> > Appending any fake variable to the URL forces it to be loaded every > time the page is viewed and not just when the browser feels like it. You live and learn! Many thanks for this tip. -- _____ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
RESOLVED: [Was] Netsurf inconsistent behaviour between RISC OS 5.23 and 6.20
In article <56039cd7babrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan <brian.jord...@btinternet.com> wrote: > In article <56033109cfbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, >Brian Jordan <brian.jord...@btinternet.com> wrote: [Snip] >Today I discovered that NetSurf on the VA displays the site as intended > when it is loaded from my local mirror although it still doesn't work > properly with files from the www. "Aha!" you say "go through the site > until you find the discrepancy, it's probably a style sheet." "But," I > reply,"it still renders correctly on the same version of NetSurf on the > Pi when viewed via the www." Mystified and digging deeper. [Snip] After clearing out HostFS::HardDisc4.$.!Boot.Choices.Users.Single.WWW.NetSurf the problem has gone away. I suspect two versions of the relevant style sheet were being stored and that one was invoked when I loaded the online version of the site and the other when I loaded the local version. Anyway the site now displays as I intended in NetSurf #3966 whether it is downloaded or loaded locally both on both platforms and with both. versions of RISC OS. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Netsurf inconsistent behaviour between RISC OS 5.23 and 6.20
In article <56033109cfbrian.jord...@btinternet.com>, Brian Jordan <brian.jord...@btinternet.com> wrote: [Snip] >If there is an inconsistency relating to OS versions I will file a > report to the NetSurf developers, if not I shall have to dig a lot > deeper here. Thanks B [Snip] Thanks all for your responses. I have been looking more closely at this and am beginning to think the problem is of my own making so, until I have probed further, I shall hold fire on sending anything to the developers. Today I discovered that NetSurf on the VA displays the site as intended when it is loaded from my local mirror although it still doesn't work properly with files from the www. "Aha!" you say "go through the site until you find the discrepancy, it's probably a style sheet." "But," I reply,"it still renders correctly on the same version of NetSurf on the Pi when viewed via the www." Mystified and digging deeper. PS. Jim, pinch away the design ideas aren't originally mine - I just pinched and modified them. FWIW the site was designed and laid out using RISC OS and NetSurf in particular. -- _________ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Netsurf inconsistent behaviour between RISC OS 5.23 and 6.20
The home page of www.clubmans.org.uk has a news area in the lower part. It is intended that this is a scrolling and in all mainstream browsers I have tried this is the case [1]. it is also the case in NetSurf #3966 running under RISC OS 5.23 on my Raspberry Pi. However, using the same browser to view the same page on this emulator with RISC OS Select 6.20 the overflows. The most likely explanation is, as ever, that this is a local issue and that I have missed the obvious but to help define the problem I wonder if some of you would take a look and let me know what you see and the OS version you are using? If there is an inconsistency relating to OS versions I will file a report to the NetSurf developers, if not I shall have to dig a lot deeper here. Thanks B [1] HTML tidy reports the page as and I test in the Windows browsers because these are what the majority of visitors us. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Web page magnification
In article <55f8413d86dhw...@talktalk.net>, David H Wild <dhw...@talktalk.net> wrote: > I am having problems reading because of a cataract which needs removing, > i find that I can read the screen fairly well if I increases the > magnification to 150%. Is there any way of telling NetSurf that this is > how I want all pages? when in Netsurf will bring up the "Scale view" dialogue; I imagine you know this already but to make this the default you need to over the NetSurf window and in the "Display" sub menu click on "Save as default". Good luck! -- _____ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Javascript ON when it's OFF
In article <cb298fef55.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Young <pnyo...@ormail.co.uk> wrote: > On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill <t...@timil.com> wrote: > > In article <f4c16bef55.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter > > <r...@minijem.plus.com> wrote: > >> On 16 Dec 2016 Tim Hill wrote: > >>>>> http://timil.com/riscos/calendar/ > >>>> Not working here, #3803. The site says that JavaScript is on, even > >>>> though I've turned it off, quit NetSurf and tried to see the site > >>>> again. > >>> Must be a problem with that version. The message saying it is ON is > >>> rendered with Javascript so how can it possibly be disabled? > >>> You shouldn't need to quit, only reload after SETting that Content > >>> Choice option. > >>> #3798 works as expected. > >> Works on #3803 here (6.20 RPC) > > Thanks. I'll assume 'user error'. > How? I can only report what I see! I call up the site, it tells me > that JavaScript is on, I turn it off, and the site still tells me that > it's still on. How could I have made an error that made that happen? > Is it something to do with the ARMX6, or with something else that I'm > running? I have JavaScript enabled here as a matter of course (Choices--> Content--> Not ticked, which appears to be the default setting. The calendar display is incomplete with the message "You may need to disable Javascript and reload this page" If I then disable JS and reload the page the display area has a message "Your browser does not appear to support JavaScript but this page needs to use JavaScript to display correctly. You can visit the HTML-only version of this page at: NetSurf #3803 is doing my head in, Boss. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: memory-gobbling on Virtual Acorn
In article <aaeab6b255.davem...@my.inbox.com>, Dave Higton <d...@davehigton.me.uk> wrote: > In message <3f4747b255@abbeypress.net> > Jim Nagel <nets...@abbeypress.co.uk> wrote: [Snip] > Recent (as I type this) is #3672. I have #3672 here as well. I have just taken a look at the Jenkins NetSurf changes page and the most recent version reported there is #3543 (May 15, 2016 4:27 PM). Has the location of this information been changed or have no changes been made since that date? http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/jenkins/job/netsurf/changes -- _________ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Very slow page rendering
In article <000a3379.01eff490b...@smtp.freeola.net>, Peter Slegg <p.sl...@scubadivers.co.uk> wrote: > http://git.netsurf-browser.org/netsurf.git/tree/atari/gemtk/guiwin.c > This page takes abut 20mins to download and render, Highwire browser > takes about 6sec. > I think the difference is that Highwire doesn't handle the css > so maybe there could be some performance gains to be had in > either downloading or the css handling ? FWIW on this virtual RPC with JavaScript and css running the download/render process takes c10.5 seconds. -- _____ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: Saving Choices
In article c45a69f154.ga...@wra1th.plus.com, Gavin Wraith ga...@wra1th.plus.com wrote: I have noticed that Disable JavaScript appears not to be saved in Choices$Write.WWW.NetSurf.Choices. Is that right? Using NS 3.4 #2876 That seems to be the case. From the Jenkins changes log: #2872 (9th August) 2. Permanently enable display of the 'enable javascript UI options' Does this mean that on other platforms there is now a javascript on/off button or menu option which does away with the need to permanently save this preference? If so maybe this won't work in the RISC OS version until the UI is updated. Only guessing. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 10 Pro 64-bit RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Crash with #2860
In article 14a182e554.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: I can't raise a bug report for this, as the bug-reporting page was off-line when I tried just now. I'll try again later today. ARMX6, RISC OS 5.21. I downloaded #2860, which immediately crashed when I opened my home page, www.bbc.co.uk/news. I shut the machine down. and this time the home page loaded, but when I tried to open http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/gl52 NetSurf crashed again; I have the logfile. I reverted to #2856, which behaved. Has anyone else found this? If so, I'll raise a proper bug report when I can do. Exactly the same here Peter, I too have reverted to #2856. BJ -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: !Fetch_NS
In article f445d9de54.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: [Snip] I've just discovered that the version I have is by Frank de Bruijn. This is directly available from Frank's site www.aconet.org/tools/ BJ -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Google
In article 54c3467e90ris...@gotadsl.co.uk, Richard Ashbery ris...@gotadsl.co.uk wrote: In article 54c2328532joh...@ukgateway.net, John Williams joh...@ukgateway.net wrote: In article 1c3b90c054.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: I think it's absolutely essential that we have a javascript on/off button on the toolbar. If javescript is off google won't work and if it's on streetmap.co.uk won't work. I've just tried Google again with Javascript off and a search works normally. Anyone able to confirm? Seems to be true here as well. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Unable to report a bug.
In article f71659b454.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 14 Apr 2015 Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: I have tried to report this on the bug tracker, but can't. It didn't accept my username and password, I have tried twice to change the password, and still can't get in. Perhaps someone who can access the tracker might kindly like to report it. ARMini, RISC OS 5.18, NS #2720 I tried to access http://www.remapglos.org.uk/ and get Warning from NetSurf: OK. The site works properly on Chrome in Windows. I have the relevant logfile. I have now been able to report this using Windows Chrome, but still can't do it with RISC OS NetSurf. Why, I wonder? If you want to enhance your report Netsurf is being tripped up by the following meta statement within the head/head of the document. meta http-equiv=Content-Type content= text/html; charset=us-ascii / An interesting page in many ways, running it through HTML Tidy here throws up a lot of warnings and concludes Info: Document content looks like HTML Proprietary -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Updated disc cache
In article 20150403111441.gb18...@kyllikki.org, Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: [Snip] If you are feeling very adventurous you can report the bandwidth achieved. [Snip] (152.54) content/llcache.c llcache_finalise 3352: Backing store average bandwidth 561256 bytes/second -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: AJAX
In article 54a6c02a46bbai...@argonet.co.uk, Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: I receive a monthly newsletter. The latest cannot be read. NS says 'This browser is not AJAX enabled'. What's that all about, please? Is there a way round it so that the newsletter can be read? AJAX is an ACRONYM for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML. The concensus, from a few articles I have just read, seems to be that JavaScript has to be enabled in order to avoid this message. Maybe enabling JavaScript in NetSurf, if you haven't already done so, will be sufficient? I say this because some sites seem to test for the presence of JS even if it isn't actually needed in order to display (at least some of) the content. Should I complain to the sender, perhaps? They are a large company. Probably not worth the bother I'm afraid. Unless you want the usual corporate We have optimised... reply. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Dictionary.com
In article defcef9854.tig...@bc63.orpheusinternet.co.uk, Nick Roberts tig...@orpheusinternet.co.uk wrote: The website http://www.dictionary.com/ is supposed to have a field where one can type in a word to look up. This field is either not present or invisible in NetSurf CI#2600. This is a display issue; I'm not sure whether CSS or Javascript is the culprit. In my PC browsers the top, blue bar contains the logo and Dictionary, Thesaurus, Translator and More... legends all aligned centrally. Beneath, and still within the top bar is the search field. In the Netsurf rendition the field is still there, directly beneath those legends albeit without the magnifying glass icon and displayed as a white box at the top of the grey left sidebar. Typing a word into that area and hitting return leads to a new definition page which is also malformed in the Netsurf view but at least with the definitions displayed. Also using Netsurf CI#2600 -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Continuous disc activity when NetSurf running (RISC OS)
In article 546f22559dch...@chris-johnson.org.uk, cj ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk wrote: In article cbcf176f54.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: Has any other user of RISC OS NetSurf found that there is continuous disc activity while a development build is running? I've just reported this on the bug tracker. Is this not simply Netsurf writing out to the Cache after each page is loaded? Possibly related; in #2412 I have just seen a new, to me, Warning from NetSurf Disc cache write bandwidth is too slow to be useful, disabling cache. BJ -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Warning! Crash in recent development builds
I have discovered that attempting to complete forms rendered in 3.3 (Dev CI #2327) can crash NetSurf and stiff the computer. In particular ists, where one selects from a list to complete the form, fail to show the list and everything hangs - here anyway. Bug report raised (after reverting to an earlier NetSurf to circumvent this problem on the tracker). -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Warning! Crash in recent development builds
In article f4a9f06654.pitt...@iyonix.home, David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote: In message 5466e9f50bbrian.jord...@btinternet.com Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: I have discovered that attempting to complete forms rendered in 3.3 (Dev CI #2327) can crash NetSurf and stiff the computer. In particular ists, where one selects from a list to complete the form, fail to show the list and everything hangs - here anyway. Bug report raised (after reverting to an earlier NetSurf to circumvent this problem on the tracker). I have uploaded a log. On the Raspberry Pi an alt-break stopped NetSurf without the whole machine going down. Here alt-break delays the agony momentarily. Pressing Stop in the Window Messenger dialogue box stiffs the emulator. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Warning! Crash in recent development builds
In article mpro.nf3cpb0072n0v0136.pit...@pittdj.co.uk, David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote: Brian Jordan, on 15 Nov, wrote: In article f4a9f06654.pitt...@iyonix.home, David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote: In message 5466e9f50bbrian.jord...@btinternet.com Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: I have discovered that attempting to complete forms rendered in 3.3 (Dev CI #2327) can crash NetSurf and stiff the computer. In particular ists, where one selects from a list to complete the form, fail to show the list and everything hangs - here anyway. Bug report raised (after reverting to an earlier NetSurf to circumvent this problem on the tracker). I have uploaded a log. On the Raspberry Pi an alt-break stopped NetSurf without the whole machine going down. Here alt-break delays the agony momentarily. Pressing Stop in the Window Messenger dialogue box stiffs the emulator. It is fixed in #2335, for which many thanks. So it is! Your thanks very much seconded here. For anyone who doubts the value of raising a bug report it is absolutely worthwhile, the developers are doing a fantastic job and it is nice, in a humble way, to help them. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Maps
In article 544811cf.9080...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: Since NetSurf doesn't have enough JavaScript support to use Google Maps, I've added a simple front end to the Google Static Maps API. You can have a go with this if you visit: about:maps in the latest NetSurf development build. Very nice, thank you. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Maps
In article e18bca5a54.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk, Tony Moore old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: [Snip] Now that is really useful. Many thanks. Searching for an explanation of the various parameters led me to https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/staticmaps/ This has a black background, but can be read easily in NetSurf, by pressing ctrl-a to select all. As you say, a most useful reference. Strangely I have no black background problems here with build 3.3 (Dev CI #2193) if JavaScript is disabled. If JS is enabled the page doesn't render at all. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: boxconvert
In article 35e23c4c54@abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote: What means the boxconvert error that Netsurf 3.2 gives for this site? http://glastonbury.bocabar.co.uk/ (Using Ro 5.18 on Iyonix). It was broken this morning, now it is mended. NetSurf 3.3 (Dev CI #2123) -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: 2004: curious behaviour
In article 5423a02fbdbrian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: [Snip] Possibly related... I can't put the cursor into the search box in www.google.co.uk in 2004 whereas it's OK in 2000. This and everything else mentioned in this thread appears to be fixed in 2011. My thanks, as always, to the developers. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: 2004: curious behaviour
In article mpro.n8btb9002psgu059v.pit...@pittdj.co.uk, David Pitt pit...@pittdj.co.uk wrote: Dave Higton, on 6 Jul, wrote: I noticed, with NS 2004, on the ROOL fora pages, that when I click on a link with a hash and then try to scroll up, NS rapidly oscillates between redrawing the window at the original location and my chosen scrolled-to location. 2000 is OK, 2004 not. Can someone else please confirm this before I raise a bug report? Confirmed. https://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/3/topics/2597#posts-32716 I also notice the title bar flickering. Confirmed here too. This behaviour is seen in 2002 and and 2003 but not 2000; I don't have a copy of 2001 so can't comment on that build. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: 2004: curious behaviour
In article dd51262354.davem...@my.inbox.com, Dave Higton d...@davehigton.me.uk wrote: I noticed, with NS 2004, on the ROOL fora pages, that when I click on a link with a hash and then try to scroll up, NS rapidly oscillates between redrawing the window at the original location and my chosen scrolled-to location. 2000 is OK, 2004 not. Can someone else please confirm this before I raise a bug report? Possibly related... I can't put the cursor into the search box in www.google.co.uk in 2004 whereas it's OK in 2000. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Persistant disc cache
In article 5413381f05brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: In article 20140605162123.gm27...@kyllikki.org, Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: I am pleased to be able to announce that I have enabled the persistent source object cache on the RISC OS build. This means that RISC OS CI builds from #1956 onwards have the capability to store cacheable objects fetched from from the web to disc. I would appreciate any feedback on this feature though bugs should be logged through the usual means of the bug tracker. [Snip] Subjectively, this is a massive enhancement. Using the default cache size I feel I am seeing reloads of pages very much quicker than before. I am just off to set a masive cache size on this machine... I have trebled the cache here and this morning have been browsing a forum site onto which users load unnecessarily large photographs. The reloading of these pictures used to take so long on Netsurf that I preferred to use a Windows browser when I visited it. Although still a little slower than the Windows browser I can now happily use NetSurf with so much being preserved between sessions. Thank you. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: web page is blank with new vwersion on NeSurf
In article c243b61354.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk, John Rickman Iyonix rick...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Since moving to #1959 the following page is blank. It should show three columns of text. http://rickman.orpheusweb.co.uk/lynx/lynxweb.html It works as expected with #1785 and all earlier versions. Would someone please check that this problem is reproducible on a machine other that my Iyonix. I have updated Boot with the Boot that came with the disc cache version and Java script is enabled. It's blank here too in #1959. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Full save not working
In article 88a3ea0854.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk, Tony Moore old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On 16 May 2014, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: I just noticed that full saves of pages doesn't work in v1885, only !Run, !Sprites and URL files are saved and the accompanying warning message reads The file could not be saved due to an error: Is a directory. A quick look back through the versions I have available suggests this was introduced between v1841 and v1862. I'll have a couple more glasses and try to report it on the tracker. I've done that already http://bugs.netsurf-browser.org/mantis/view.php?id=2126 Thanks Tony, I see this has been fixed in #1886. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: MousAxess
In article mpro.n3koc90bs5f2o01q0.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk, Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote: On 7 Feb, Brian Jordan wrote in message 53d648f824brian.jord...@btinternet.com: In article 53d64596f0li...@torrens.org.uk, Richard Torrens (lists) li...@torrens.org.uk wrote: It's definitely MoussAxess related. I now do RMKill Moussaxess before surfing - if I remember! I reported this at 13:59. I received a confirmatory email at 14:16 saying the issue has been referred to Steve Fryatt. Apparently the problem is: Caused by failed assertion in RISC OS mouse handling: I've put an attempt at a fix into CI#1781. I don't /think/ there will be any unintended consequences, but it would be good if people could try and break it nonetheless. That's not just MouseAxess users -- the affected code is called whenever the mouse passes over a NetSurf window on RISC OS. Steve This seems a good news, good news story. First, I have spent some time trying to crash the latest Netsurf with the MousAxess menu scrolling method and failed. Second, nothing else appears to been affected by the fix. Many thanks -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: dates of !Boot and !System within download
In article 9b5f51d953@abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote: [Snip] Suggestion to the Netsurf team: Please, could you include an extra Readme-date file in the download zipfile that would simply state in plain text the date of the last actual change and words to the effect that If you have updated !Boot and !System since this date, there is no need to do it this time. It would save the chore of going to every machine and repepetititively performing the merge-boot and merge-system rigamarole when it isn't necessary. (The rest of the job of updating the !Netsurf application on all stations can be done over the network.) Thanks. [Snip] I work on the assumption that if a merge-boot or merge-system is required that NetSurf will let me know with an appropriate message. Otherwise I just let NetSurf get on with it. Am I under vigilant or are you over vigilant? It seems to me that the NetSurf team have far bigger fish than this to fry. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Dev Cl #1717
In article 53d838bf45bbai...@argonet.co.uk, Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: In article b00735d853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does not render completely and crashes on 'PORTFOLIO' Confirmed here. Are you going to report it on the bug tracker? Ah, well, I guess that was predictable. Bug tracker says I got something wrong, I don't know what, asked me to return to the previous page to correct whatever, which it didn't. Perhaps someone else would like to have a go?!? I have the logfile here, so could do that, though today is a busy one. Off to Australia tomorrow with my daughter and family! Peter, if you haven't yet sent this to the tracker relax and get ready for your trip down under and I'll submit this one as I have something else for the tracker. Out of interest the problem Brian has reported trips up stable versions 2.9 and 3.0 as well. Have a great holiday (or are you deserting soggy Gloucestershire for good?) -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Dev Cl #1717
In article d1cf3ad853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: In article b00735d853.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 11 Feb 2014 Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Re: http://500px.com/Valtsu does not render completely and crashes on 'PORTFOLIO' Confirmed here. Are you going to report it on the bug tracker? Ah, well, I guess that was predictable. Bug tracker says I got something wrong, I don't know what, asked me to return to the previous page to correct whatever, which it didn't. If it's the same as I saw here, entering the NS version number has to be done without the #, or the site has a hissy-fit. Perhaps someone else would like to have a go?!? We crossed in the post, so I'll not send it. And yes the # seems to be the issue, certainly the tracker accepts reports with the NS version number left blank. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Dev Cl #1717
In article 53d83be5c4bbai...@argonet.co.uk, Brian bbai...@argonet.co.uk wrote: [Snip] Who'd have thought it?? Certainly not me. I'm intuitive but not that intuitive. I assumed that # was as per American practice and is part of any/all part codes. I think the logic is that the # is in the caption alongside the box in much the same way as we often see ÂŁ alongside boxes when a sum of money needs to be entered. Several of us seem to have fallen foul of this and had to rewrite our reports, I reccommend writing reports in a text editor and saving them as insurance and not putting the # in the version number. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: MousAxess
In article 53d800aac8brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: In article mpro.n0sy5900onrvk02i1.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk, Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote: [Snip] That looks like some of my code, yes... Can MouseAxess still be legally obtained from anywhere? Google searches all lead to dead websites or people emailing each other hooky copies. Well, the help file says MouseAxess is Freeware, and suitable for RISC OS computers only. You may use and copy it freely, as long as the application remains unchanged. I have copied it to http://www.clubmans.org.uk/netsurf/mousax.zip is this wrong? Sorry, crossed in the post. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Netsurf and the Mantis bug tracker
In article out-52f61fa4.md-1.4.17.chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk, Chris Young chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote: On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:29:14 + (GMT), Brian Jordan wrote: [Snip my description of perceived problem] I'm not sure that is a bug, but more a feature request. It is easily reproduced by searching for something using Google, and then pressing back after the search results are displayed. The previous page displays, but without the previous search term pre-filled. So it does! I have been using NetSurf since it was a boy and have never before come across this feature or lack thereof. I imagine people submitting bug reports will be using NetSurf is there a case for making the error trapping a little less harsh particularly as logfiles contain build information? Meanwhile I reiterate that it's a good idea to compose and save reports off-line to avoid this frustration. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: MousAxess
In article 53d63916ddli...@torrens.org.uk, Richard Torrens (lists) li...@torrens.org.uk wrote: [Snip] Well I went there, then to the next page. How do I report a bug? Life's too short to open accounts and log in or to work out complicated routines, sorry. If someone else can do this, there are 3 log at http://www.torrens.org.uk/documents/Logs/ If you haven't yet done so, I'll post yours along with one of my own which is a log of I crash I provoked when scrolling with the menu button. Netsurf crashes erratically, but this appears to be caused by MouseAxess. It is associated with use of the menu button, for instance to scroll the window. [Snip] -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: MousAxess
In article 53d63f0cd7brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: [Snip] If you haven't yet done so, I'll post yours along with one of my own which is a log of I crash I provoked when scrolling with the menu button. [Snip] OK. It's done. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: MousAxess
In article 53d64596f0li...@torrens.org.uk, Richard Torrens (lists) li...@torrens.org.uk wrote: In article 53d63f0cd7brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: [Snip] If you haven't yet done so, I'll post yours along with one of my own which is a log of I crash I provoked when scrolling with the menu button. Thanks. It's definitely MoussAxess related. I now do RMKill Moussaxess before surfing - if I remember! I reported this at 13:59. I received a confirmatory email at 14:16 saying the issue has been referred to Steve Fryatt. Apparently the problem is: Caused by failed assertion in RISC OS mouse handling: riscos/mouse.c, line 183: ro_mouse_track_start: Assertion failed: ro_mouse_poll_end_callback == NULL ro_mouse_poll_track_callback == NULL ro_mouse_poll_data == NULL -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: MousAxess
In article 53d4c22179li...@torrens.org.uk, Richard Torrens (lists) li...@torrens.org.uk wrote: Is anyone else here using MouseAxess with NetSurf? I am. I hav found Netsurf very inclined to crash. It feels like it's caused bey switch bounce, usually from the menu button. But removing MouseAxess seems to stop it. I run as much as possible the latest development Netsurf. Netsurf does crash from time to time and it has crossed my my mind that this may be MouseAxess related. However in my case I have wondered whether the extra window dragging and scrolling facilities offered by MouseAxess are causing the problems. I haven't seen anything which would suggest switch bounce here. I have not found any other programs which crash like this... Neither have I. I'll try a few days without MouseAxess running and see if anything comes up. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Another site crashing NS?
In article 53d02999c8m...@johnwoodhouse.plus.com, m...@johnwoodhouse.plus.com wrote: As soon as I open http://www.leroyalmeridien-dubai.com/ the page opens with part of the page loaded, and then freezes completely. I am using it from VRPC, so need to quit RISC OS to get out of the situation. Does this site also cause a freeze using real RISC OS, or is it just VRPC? Like you I use VA. I have just visited this site and find that it looks like it does in Firefox on the other side and I have had no crashes at all. Where there are Youtube videos in iframes NetSurf displays, as one would expect, black rectangles. I didn't investigate site searches nor the booking facilities where there may be problems. This is using NetSurf 3.1 (Dev CI #1659) with Javascript disabled. Other details of my setup in my sig. Brian -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Output from forms different in Netsurf than other browsers.
In article 53ce673e55brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: In article 53ce20aa62t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 53cdf35ab4brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: A bit more checking show that 3.1 (Dev CI #1586) submits emails formatted the sames as other browsers whereas (Dev CI #1598) submits the different formatting. I don't have versions between these to enable me to narrow it down further. Please report it on the bug tracker and include the HTML for the page with the form. Reported. And fixed in #1644. Excellent! -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Output from forms different in Netsurf than other browsers.
In article 53cdc3dd71brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: In article 53cda29d93brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: [Snip] There is a difference in the formatting of the emails submitted from Netsurf than all browsers used by league members as shown below. [Snip] A bit of checking this evening shows that the emails are formatted the same as those submitted from other browsers when the form is submitted from Netsurf 3.0 (20th April 2013) but the different formatting is evident when using 3.1 (Dev CI #1635). A bit more checking show that 3.1 (Dev CI #1586) submits emails formatted the sames as other browsers whereas (Dev CI #1598) submits the different formatting. I don't have versions between these to enable me to narrow it down further. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Output from forms different in Netsurf than other browsers.
In article 53ce20aa62t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 53cdf35ab4brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: A bit more checking show that 3.1 (Dev CI #1586) submits emails formatted the sames as other browsers whereas (Dev CI #1598) submits the different formatting. I don't have versions between these to enable me to narrow it down further. Please report it on the bug tracker and include the HTML for the page with the form. Reported. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Output from forms different in Netsurf than other browsers.
I run the web site for our local pub quiz league where one of the pages has a form on which teams can submit their match scores, the information gets to me via formmail.com and Pluto. There is a difference in the formatting of the emails submitted from Netsurf than all browsers used by league members as shown below. Other browsers... - Date: 20 Jan 2014 Home Team: Red Lion Home Score: 43 Away Team: White Hart, Overton A Questions: on Away Score: 54 Member of: White Hart, Overton - Netsurf... - Date: 27 Jan 2014 Home Team: Bell Home Score: 99 Away Team: Greyhound A Questions: on Away Score: 99 Member of: Bell - The formatting is different where the data field in the form uses a drop down menu. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Output from forms different in Netsurf than other browsers.
In article 53cda29d93brian.jord...@btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: [Snip] There is a difference in the formatting of the emails submitted from Netsurf than all browsers used by league members as shown below. [Snip] A bit of checking this evening shows that the emails are formatted the same as those submitted from other browsers when the form is submitted from Netsurf 3.0 (20th April 2013) but the different formatting is evident when using 3.1 (Dev CI #1635). -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: Grey page
In article 53c32539bdstuartli...@orpheusinternet.co.uk, lists stuartli...@orpheusinternet.co.uk wrote: Although the home page http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/default.aspx appears to disply correctly, trying to go to any other page results in a completly grey page NetSurf 3.1 (Dev C1 #1556) [Snip] Some pages have the expected content and below that a massive grey area, some are the other way around with the grey at the top. Scroll down these pages, eventually you will find the content. At least that's what I see with the same version of NetSurf. Thanks for the link, as it happens this is a site I will find very useful ;-) -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8.1 Pro RISC OS 6.20 _ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem
In article b30c843f53.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: [Snip] The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page becomes incredibly slow and clunky to move around. I would hazard a guess that NS is continually struggling to resize the images as it tries to move them around. Almost certainly you hazard correctly. I have just done a Full save of the page and resized the offending images. On reloading, the page moves around and scrolls very smoothly. Would it be possible to resize the images once when they are downloaded and then hold them at the required display size? Apart from using Full save I can't think of another way and that's probably not what you want. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: NetSurf on Virtual Acorn
In message 533d3d5a8bt...@netsurf-browser.org Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article op.wrhukyovif396l@alansall, Alan Sally jare...@xtra.co.nz wrote: NetSurf 2.9 runs nicely on this set up but I have had no luck with any of the later development versions. I have just downloaded 3.0 Dev #833 with the same result. It seems that since NetSurf 2.9 DNS doesn't work when running on VirtualRPC. It works on real hardware and, I believe, on RPCEmu (can anyone confirm?). None of the NetSurf developers have VirtualRPC so we aren't in a position to investigate this. Perhaps you could contact the VirtualRPC developers, if it's still being maintained? FWIW I have run a great number of development versions of NetSurf (currently 3.0 (Dev CI #1054)) on this VA - details in sig. I have had no problems connecting to the Internet at all. I note the OP is using VA on a Mac, perhaps this is relevant? -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8 RISC OS 6.20
Re: Find !Fetch_NS
In message 1850912e53.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk John Rickman Iyonix rick...@argonet.co.uk wrote: [snip] But a good day happens about one in three. More common is that it forces NS to quit, deletes the current NS then fails to find the new one. So I have to complete the job manually. Try having your de-archiving program (SparkFS or whatever) loaded and on the icon bar before you run FetchNS. This improved the success rate to 100% here (admittedly on a sample of only 3 downloads) after having exactly the problem you describe; I imagine something in FetchNS times out while waiting for the archive to be opened. Anyway it isn't too hard to download the archives from the Netsurf site and manually install the program and I have reverted to doing it that way. -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8 RISC OS 6.20
Re: viewing CSS
In message 0229de1f53.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk John Rickman Iyonix rick...@argonet.co.uk wrote: Does anyone know of a neater way of viewing CSS? [snip] Full save to disc, open generated pseudo app, read CSS file(s). Or have I missed the point? -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 8 RISC OS 6.20
Re: RISC OS Javascript support
In message 20121216210011.gn15...@kyllikki.org Vincent Sanders vi...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: ok last try for now, ci #744 is built with spidermonkey 1.7.0 maybe it works maybe it doesn't. Please also remember to use the json tagged downloads if you want to try with javascript as the jsoff ones do not even have teh interpreter linked. Recently, somewhere in the CI#5xx builds it became possible to use HSBC Internet banking with NetSurf. The site warns about javascript being off but nontheless it goes to a non-javascript area and is entirely useable. With javascript versions of the browser, with javascript turned on, the warnings are no longer present but some links don't work, specifically those which attempt to follow javascript:void(0);:my account details. Sorry I can't be more specific and many thanks for this leap forward. -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA on Windows 7 RISC OS 6.20
Re: Full Save not setting of CSS files
In message 152966f652.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk John Rickman Iyonix rick...@argonet.co.uk wrote: When you run a NetSurf Full Save application it does not act on the the CSS information because the CSS file is given a type of Text. This is on an Iyonix 5.19, NetSurf #674. I think it used to work but am not sure. As an example open:- http://rickman.orpheusweb.co.uk/temp/ do a Full Save, then run the resulting !temp application. The background picture is not shown and the two column layout is lost. On my machine the CSS file created is called 0x71755530, and has a type of text. If this is changed to type CSS the two column layout is reinstated but the background image is still not shown because the name in the CSS file no longer matches the name of the image that NetSurf has created. [snip] Here the CSS file (in this case 0x67192c10) is shown as the correct type (f79 CSS) and I see the two column layout when I load the HTML file. The background image is saved as a jpg file 0x669d26e0 but the reference within the CSS file is unchanged as torridon.jpg. Editing the CSS file to use the saved name of the graphic file achieves the correct result. It looks like the CSS file should be edited in the full save process or the graphic file should have its name unchanged. This in version 685 of Netsurf and after a quick check all the above seems to apply under Netsurf 2.9. Brian -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20
Re: Full Save not setting of CSS files
In message d58c6df652.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk John Rickman Iyonix rick...@argonet.co.uk wrote: John Rickman Iyonix wrote: When you run a NetSurf Full Save application it does not act on the the CSS information because the CSS file is given a type of Text. This is on an Iyonix 5.19, NetSurf #674. eg http://rickman.orpheusweb.co.uk/temp/ do a Full Save, then run the resulting !temp application. The background picture is not shown and the two column layout is lost. ... Brian Jordan wrote Here the CSS file (in this case 0x67192c10) is shown as the correct type (f79 CSS) and I see the two column layout when I load the HTML file. The background image is saved as a jpg file 0x669d26e0 but the reference within the CSS file is unchanged as torridon.jpg. Editing the CSS file to use the saved name of the graphic file achieves the correct result. It looks like the CSS file should be edited in the full save process or the graphic file should have its name unchanged. This in version 685 of Netsurf and after a quick check all the above seems to apply under Netsurf 2.9. Thanks Brian I have just updated to #685 but get the same result, ie the css file is typed Text. Are you using RISC OS 5.19? John Is this file type a mimemap issue? Does your mimemap file contain a line like text/css CSS f79 .css? If not it might help to add it. As to my operating system it is 6.20 on a Virtual Acorn. -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20
Re: BBC news site misbehaving.
In message 52f4c7c585t...@netsurf-browser.org Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: In article 6162c5f452.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: I have just downloaded #672 and ran it. I was horrified at the hash it made of my homepage, which is http://m.bbc.co.uk/news I'm not sure if I'm getting the same thing you are. I just get the mobile version of their site. Same here. It seems they've started sending the mobile version if the browser's useragent string contains armv5l, which NetSurf's does when running on the Iyonix hardware. Might be any arm in the useragent string. I am using a Virtual Acorn and RISC OS Select 6.20 and the useragent string contains armv4l - I see exactly the same as Peter. NetSurf on x86 linux gets the desktop site. -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20
NetSurf running out of memory
The page shown at www.bjordan.org.uk/test/index.html has started throwing up a NetSurf is running out of memory error since at least NetSurf 3.0 (Dev CI#471) and up to 492. In fairness the file is a data file named as .html and RISC OS file typed as HTML; it is prepared for use in a program which later adds it to a template file to produce a valid page. The file contains valid HTML and for many years I have been able to open it in NetSurf as part of the editing process. It opens as expected in NetSurf 2.9 and in the main Windows browsers and is available in a .zip file at www.bjordan.org.uk/test/test.zip -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20
Re: NetSurf running out of memory
In message 52e00f1fc2ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk cj ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk wrote: In article c2800be052.br...@brian.jordan9.btinternet.com, Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: The page shown at www.bjordan.org.uk/test/index.html has started throwing up a NetSurf is running out of memory error since at least NetSurf 3.0 (Dev CI#471) and up to 492. If the first two lines $zonkpage 1.35 $usetemplate:zonkregister$dir.tpl.level1/tpl are removed then it loads fine. These lines don't look like valid html to me. This is what I intended to indicate in the explanatory paragraph, In fairness the file is a data file... This is a report on the behaviour of recent test releases of NetSurf showing an inconsistency with what has gone before and with mainstream browsers. I would have expected a complaint about the content more than a warning about memory availability in this case. -- Brian Jordan
Re: NetSurf running out of memory
In message 20121017132553.gb4...@pepperfish.net Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Brian Jordan wrote: This is a report on the behaviour of recent test releases of NetSurf showing an inconsistency with what has gone before and with mainstream browsers. I would have expected a complaint about the content more than a warning about memory availability in this case. Please see my reply on the 8th of October on a thread with similar subject to this. My apologies, I missed that message. -- Brian Jordan
Re: User feedback requested (esp. RISC OS)
[snip] It would help us if people could test the new builds and let us know how you get on. I have just downloaded and briefly used Netsurf from archive netsurf-2012-09-28_19-54-37/zip. So far it has been in use for about 35 minutes, visiting several sites without problem. -- Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20
Re: Nervous tick
In article 52869aceb1dhw...@talktalk.net, David H Wild dhw...@talktalk.net wrote: [Snip] It does it here on my RPC 6.20 with r13571 as long as the picture is on the screen. Moving the page so that the picture is off the display stops the flicker but moving it back restarts the flickering. Cat- pigeons On my emulated machine (details in sig) and NetSurf r13571 I see no evidence of this flickering, just the pointing hand. The problem seems to be that the picture is part of a link (on PC Firefox clicking on it causes an enlarged version of the picture to cover the underlying page) but there is a missing /span in the html. After doing a Full save on the page and inserting the /span appropriately the effect is quite different; when the image is selected the picture appears in NetSurf, not on the same page as in Firefox but in a new page. As I didn't see the tic in the first place I can't confirm whether this has made it go away. The corrected full save is in www.btinternet.com/~brian.jordan9/netsurf/page.zip if you want to give it a try. Brian -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Speed
In article 66463fa051.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: The NetSurf web site says: Efficiency lies at the heart of the NetSurf engine, allowing it to outwit the heavyweights of the web browser world. The NetSurf team continue to squeeze more speed out of their code. I've been doing one or two comparisons on a 300MHz Kinetic RiscPC running OS 6.16. [Snip] One thing occurs to me; you are using r11515 which is a development build of Netsurf which has with it a warning Notice: At any given time these builds may be unstable or have verbose logging enabled which could compromise performance of the browser, have you fallen foul of this? Maybe a comparison with the most recent release version might give a different result. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Strange graphic doodad
In article 2879065351.r...@user.minijem.plus.com, Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote: [Snip] Why am I getting Not found for all of these links? Presumably having fixed the problem Dave has removed the files. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Downloading zip files
In article 513abd67c0rh.li...@phone.coop, Russell Hafter - Lists rh.li...@phone.coop wrote: In article 20100722091803.660ac...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:42:25 +0100 Russell Hafter - Lists rh.li...@phone.coop wrote: Twice in the last week or so I have downloaded zipped archives from MW Software, using r10638. In both cases I did not get an archive icon to drag to a filer window, but the NetSurf window filled up with the data. Can you give us an example URL that demonstrates this? Given that in both cases I was downloading paid for software and had to enter username and password, I am not at liberty to do so. You would have to take that up with the owner. I was downloading the PostScript 3 Printer Driver and Easiwriter 8.82 Out of interest I took a look at the password protected Artworks area on the MW site and can confirm that, there too, the download data fills the browser page with data. However... on the area of the site where there are free software downloads a normal Netsurf Download box with a draggable icon appears. By way of comparison Firefox on Win7 treats both downloads the same offering a 'save' or 'open' option and not filling the browser window with data. Netsurf r10656 -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Downloading zip files (from mw-software)
In article 20100722114538.6df73...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net, Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:40:14 +0100 Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: Out of interest I took a look at the password protected Artworks area on the MW site and can confirm that, there too, the download data fills the browser page with data. However... on the area of the site where there are free software downloads a normal Netsurf Download box with a draggable icon appears. When the page is full of data, what do the type and encoding fields say in Menu - Page - Info? Type: text/html Encoding: Windows-1252 (detected) HTH -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: NetSurf and Printing
In article 9610261051.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Dr Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 30 Apr 2010 Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: In article 02fc231051.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk, Dr Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 30 Apr 2010 Dave Symes d...@triffid.co.uk wrote: Has anyone else had problems printing from the recent releases of NetSurf, up to and including todays 30 April r10528? [Snip details] Just printed a simple page from r10528 without problems. Printers 1.74 with the new PS3 driver, network-connected via RemotePrinterFS to a Xerox Phaser 6120, FWIW. Haven't tried anything more complex. Whereas I am seeing the same as DS. Interestingly (maybe?) You have RISC OS 5.16, presumably on an Iyonx, DS and I have RISC OS 6.20 [1]. Coincidence? [1] OS versions versions extracted from email headers so unless your systems are spoofing I guess this is correct. Yes, correct; Iyonix 5.16. What about the versions of Printers and about the printer drivers? Printers 1.91a Using UniPrint to connect with my Windows side, so effectively printing to file. Brian -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Splitting of open brackets and next letter
In article dbfca00d51.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com, Roger Darlington roger...@freeuk.com wrote: When bracketted text is in the wrong place on a line, then Netsurf may split the open bracket from the next character. [Snip example] Isn't this what nbsp; is for? Without it I think any browser will perform these arbitary splits if provoked. Obviously this can only be fixed in one's own pages; other authors may need a nudge. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: Splitting of open brackets and next letter
In article mpro.l1g61c0aro6u80177.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk, Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote: On 25 Apr, Brian Jordan wrote in message 510da2f319brian.jord...@btinternet.com: In article dbfca00d51.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com, Roger Darlington roger...@freeuk.com wrote: When bracketted text is in the wrong place on a line, then Netsurf may split the open bracket from the next character. [Snip example] Isn't this what nbsp; is for? Without it I think any browser will perform these arbitary splits if provoked. Roger's example was bracket-letter, so no space is involved. Ah yes, I'll look more closely in future. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released
In article 510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. [Snip] And I'm happy to be using it as my default browser here. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: google maps
In article eb1de7f850.old_coas...@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk, Tony Moore old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: [Snip problem with r9799 and Google maps] Can anyone please confirm this problem. If so, does anyone know of a link to Google Maps which still works? Yes, I see exactly the same here. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.20 _
Re: NetSurf at Wakefield Show 2010
In article mpro.kwc5mh00p5zqo0385.li...@stevefryatt.org.uk, Steve Fryatt li...@stevefryatt.org.uk wrote: On 15 Jan, Michael Bell wrote in message 9d6e16da50.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk: In message 20100115131610.5b82a...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net Rob Kendrick r...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: [Snip] That may be true, but I've asked groups of RISC OS users to take on some of the more paper shuffling tasks that I've been doing for the platform over the last six months, to free up the time that I required for looking at NetSurf. They were things that could be done with a copy of Ovation Pro and a grasp of the English langauge[1], but even these requests for help were met with total silence. 1. For the avoidance of any possible doubt, these tasks were *not* Archive's PD Column or the editing of the Wakefield Club newsletter. I have Ovation Pro, have a reasonable grasp of the English language and would be willing to help if it enables an ongoing RISC OS presence at Netsurf. I see that you have two other volunteers here; Peter, James and I probably a constitute a group of RISC OS users so let us know what is needed. Brian -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.16 _
Re: Page crashes Netsurf
In article 50693842ddli...@torrens.org.uk, Richard Torrens (lists) li...@torrens.org.uk wrote: www.fodradio.org/ crashes Netsurf. Not a normal crash: Netsurf simply evaporates. No log, no warning. Done so 3 times, so it's consistent here. That page works fine here in 7703 and 7730. There is a brief Server returned an error message while the page renders but that is all. -- _ Brian Jordan Virtual RPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.16 _
Re: NetSurf 2.0 + Royal Mail Address Finder
In article 5053ad248brh.li...@phone.coop, Russell Hafter - Lists rh.li...@phone.coop wrote: It was not possible to use the Royal Mail's Address Finder with NetSurf 1.2, though many of the more recent test builds did work OK. I have just tried it with NetSurf 2.0 and there is a problem again. www.royalmail.com/postcodes [Snip] Works well here VirtualRPC-AdjustSA RISC OS 6.16 NetSurf r7370 -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK. __
CSS changed?
A recent change to Netsurf has caused one of my sites to stop rendering as I intended. Very recently [1] my site at www.clubmans.org.uk started having its content jumping out of the containing div in a very inelegant fashion. It looks as if the left margin is spacing the content away from the floated left menu buttons whereas previously it was spaced from the left side of the containing div. I am happy to concede that I am a CSS newcomer and that my code may well be at fault, nontheless it worked until recently and continues to work on most other browsers in XP, Mac and Ubuntu. Can anyone using a not fully up to date Netsurf 2 have a look and help me narrow the change down so that I can report this properly? Brian [1] This has happened within the last month but I can't say exactly when as I don't have previous builds available to me, I am also aware that the photo galleries don't work in NetSurf due to my use of some CSS which hasn't been implemented yet inNetsurf and I am not concerned about this but it would be nice to see the home page and other simple pages working even though I am probably the only person to view this site in NetSurf. -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK. __
Re: Web site downloads section
In article 501a0905d4t...@netsurf-browser.org, Michael Drake t...@netsurf-browser.org wrote: The NetSurf web site's downloads section has been restructured to accommodate other operating systems. http://www.netsurf-browser.org/downloads/ The RISC OS section looks pretty much like the old downloads section used to look, although the RiscPKG package information has been moved to the bottom of the development builds page and there are a few other tweaks. Since things have moved around quite a bit, please let us know if you find any broken links. The Development builds link in http://www.netsurf-browser.org/documentation/info#GettingNetSurf leads to a Page not found error page. This is similar to an error in the internal help documentation which I reported to the webmaster recently. Brian -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK. __
Broken link on NetSurf site
Recent attempts to download the latest development build of Netsurf via the internal help files fail. The Development builds link from file:///NetSurf$Dir/Docs/documentation/info_en#GettingNetSurf produces a Page not found error The Test builds link from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/downloads/ works as expected. Brian -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK.
Re: Broken link on NetSurf site
In message fde5b20f50.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk Dr Peter Young pnyo...@ormail.co.uk wrote: On 18 Dec 2008 Brian Jordan brian.jord...@btinternet.com wrote: Recent attempts to download the latest development build of Netsurf via the internal help files fail. The Development builds link from file:///NetSurf$Dir/Docs/documentation/info_en#GettingNetSurf produces a Page not found error The Test builds link from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/downloads/ works as expected. URL pointed to by the Documentation file: http://www.netsurf-browser.org/downloads/testbuilds_en which is the page which doesn't exist. Can the developers fix this perhaps? If anyone can tell any of us out here how to submit a modified file, I'm sure some of us could do this, and save developers' time. Fixing the file is trivial, involving the removal of 3 characters. This might not be the problem however, it could be that the page being requested is misnamed or missing. -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK.
Re: Saving background images
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Vigay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to save/export the background image from a web page? Irrespective of where you click, NetSurf's 'Object' menu item is greyed out. Fresco used to export the background image by clicking MENU somewhere over the background in the top-left corner of the page. I'm trying to save the background image from a website, but looking at the source, it's quite fiddly to find, involving manually searching through loads of CSS files. Is there an easier way that I'm missing? Full save and look through the images? If you have Thump you can even drag the saved directory onto that and see thumbnails. Brian -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK.
Re: Overlapping text and pictures
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Snip] http://preview.tinyurl.com/64vtz5 This doesn't! Ah! Silly me, it is necessary to follow the link on this page to get to the problem page. Sorry for any confusion on my part. -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK.
Re: Overlapping text and pictures
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This URL :- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1081995/Schoolboy-15-held-terr or-suspect-taking-photos-railway-station-GCSE-project.html This shows the problem... or http://preview.tinyurl.com/64vtz5 This doesn't! shows overlapping text abnd pictures. The update of Netsurf is (26 oct 12:30) r5632. Michael Bell -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK.
Re: Export PDF functionality in NetSurf
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Tytgat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm happy to announce we just did the first merge of Adam Blokus' GSoC work (providing Export PDF functionality in NetSurf) to our main development branch. [Snip] Enjoy, John, as mentor of Adam's work. This is a great start. Thanks to all concerned. -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK.
Re: bizarre redraw problem
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Howlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6 Oct, Tony Moore wrote: When NetSurf (30 Sep 2007) r3613 displays http://www.microsoft.com/windows/downloads/ie/getitnow.mspx if the vertical scroll bar is moved down, bits of the Windows logo and the search box overwrite the NetSurf toolbar. Using a StrongED window, to wipe away the mess, causes the StrongED window to be overwritten too. Is this a NetSurf or RISC OS 6.06 problem? It doesn't happen with the 4-10-07 21:30 r3622 build, on Iyonix with RO5.13 Same Netsurf build here on RISC OS 6.06 (Virtual RPC-Adjust) displays the page without the described problem. -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK. __
Re: No default magnification
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Sprangers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear developers, At some point, builds since the beginning of August fail to take the default scale factor into account. I have a default magnification of 150% (manually set in the choices file), but since a few days, NetSurf overrules this by displaying everything at 100%. I'd love to see a fix. Kind regards, Paul Sprangers Out of interest,why do you set this manually in the choices file? I have scaling set at 120% set via the Display - Scale view menu. This sets the relevant line in the choices file to option_scale:120. Remember to Save as default though. -- __ Brian Jordan From somewhere in North Hampshire. England. UK. __