Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ready for Matt's c++ patches and then tag V2.4.0!
Two more patches. One that probably conflicts with the c++ changes Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 20, 2016, at 6:01 PM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > > I rebased yesterday--is there more to do? > > Matt > > - "Frank Filz" wrote: > >> Matt, Could you rebase and submit your c++ compile patches? >> >> Assuming nothing crashes and burns, I will merge those and tag V2.4.0 >> by >> tomorrow afternoon. >> >> On the concall, we discussed keeping things a bit in flux and not >> formally >> opening V2.5 until after Bakeathon. >> >> Bill has some RDMA patches he wants tested at Bakeathon. We could >> include >> those (though he could also just bring a branch running those to >> BAT...) in >> next. I suspect there will also be some performance fixes and other >> bug >> fixes over the next few weeks. >> >> We could tag V2.4.1 right after Bakeathon with anything up until that >> point. >> >> Thanks all, >> >> Frank >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> >> -- >> ___ >> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list >> Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > -- > Matt Benjamin > CohortFS, LLC. > 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A > Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 > > http://cohortfs.com > > tel. 734-761-4689 > fax. 734-769-8938 > cel. 734-216-5309 -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ready for Matt's c++ patches and then tag V2.4.0!
Is RDMA feature complete for NFS3? That would be interesting. Matt - "Frank Filz" wrote: > Matt, Could you rebase and submit your c++ compile patches? > > Assuming nothing crashes and burns, I will merge those and tag V2.4.0 > by > tomorrow afternoon. > > On the concall, we discussed keeping things a bit in flux and not > formally > opening V2.5 until after Bakeathon. > > Bill has some RDMA patches he wants tested at Bakeathon. We could > include > those (though he could also just bring a branch running those to > BAT...) in > next. I suspect there will also be some performance fixes and other > bug > fixes over the next few weeks. > > We could tag V2.4.1 right after Bakeathon with anything up until that > point. > > Thanks all, > > Frank > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel -- Matt Benjamin CohortFS, LLC. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://cohortfs.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ready for Matt's c++ patches and then tag V2.4.0!
I rebased yesterday--is there more to do? Matt - "Frank Filz" wrote: > Matt, Could you rebase and submit your c++ compile patches? > > Assuming nothing crashes and burns, I will merge those and tag V2.4.0 > by > tomorrow afternoon. > > On the concall, we discussed keeping things a bit in flux and not > formally > opening V2.5 until after Bakeathon. > > Bill has some RDMA patches he wants tested at Bakeathon. We could > include > those (though he could also just bring a branch running those to > BAT...) in > next. I suspect there will also be some performance fixes and other > bug > fixes over the next few weeks. > > We could tag V2.4.1 right after Bakeathon with anything up until that > point. > > Thanks all, > > Frank > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel -- Matt Benjamin CohortFS, LLC. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://cohortfs.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ready for Matt's c++ patches and then tag V2.4.0!
Matt, Could you rebase and submit your c++ compile patches? Assuming nothing crashes and burns, I will merge those and tag V2.4.0 by tomorrow afternoon. On the concall, we discussed keeping things a bit in flux and not formally opening V2.5 until after Bakeathon. Bill has some RDMA patches he wants tested at Bakeathon. We could include those (though he could also just bring a branch running those to BAT...) in next. I suspect there will also be some performance fixes and other bug fixes over the next few weeks. We could tag V2.4.1 right after Bakeathon with anything up until that point. Thanks all, Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Announce Push of V2.4-rc6
Branch next Tag:V2.4-rc6 NOTE: This merge includes an ntirpc pullup, please update your submodule. Release Highlights * Several FSAL_GLUSTER fixes * Handle ntohl of exportid in file handle differently so FSAL_PROXY unafected * ntirpc pullup - Coverity fixes and other * Fix attribute pass back in FSAL_PROXY * Fix gid regression in FSAL_RGW Signed-off-by: Frank S. Filz Contents: 7b76e77 Frank S. Filz V2.4-rc6 fa90477 Matt Benjamin rgw: fix gid regression in fsal_rgw_setattr2 c5eade6 Patrice LUCAS Fix file handle bytes switching in xdr_nfs_fh4 XDR_ENCODE 3bede69 Patrice LUCAS FIX attributes pass back in pxy_lookup_path 68f76bf Matt Benjamin ntirpc pullup bdcd2d7 Jiffin Tony Thottan FSAL_GLUSTER : Avoid double free for glfsal_module ef109a2 Daniel Gryniewicz FSAL_RGW - Add back a close() op fffcfbf Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use chk_verifier_stat to verifier comparision in open2() b5019ad Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Clear ATTR_RDATTR_ERR mask bit in case of successful read 89ca7f7 Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: avoid fetching attributes in setattr2 cbeaa47 Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Avoid redundant fsync operation --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: rgw: fix gid regression in fsal_rgw_setattr2
>From Matt Benjamin : Matt Benjamin has uploaded a new change for review. https://review.gerrithub.io/295195 Change subject: rgw: fix gid regression in fsal_rgw_setattr2 .. rgw: fix gid regression in fsal_rgw_setattr2 This apparently broke with support_ex--but is a typo. Matt Change-Id: Idb8878a1fb928714f3b5dcf086c2a4c1fc81f126 Signed-off-by: Matt Benjamin --- M src/FSAL/FSAL_RGW/handle.c 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://review.gerrithub.io:29418/ffilz/nfs-ganesha refs/changes/95/295195/1 -- To view, visit https://review.gerrithub.io/295195 To unsubscribe, visit https://review.gerrithub.io/settings Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Change-Id: Idb8878a1fb928714f3b5dcf086c2a4c1fc81f126 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: ffilz/nfs-ganesha Gerrit-Branch: next Gerrit-Owner: Matt Benjamin -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] pre-merge for V2.4-rc6
> I have posted a pre-merge for V2.4-rc6, it contains the patches that have so > far been code review +2, verif +1 as found here: > > https://review.gerrithub.io/#/q/status:open+label:Code- > Review%253D2+project: > ffilz/nfs-ganesha+branch:next > > I have posted to my ffilz githib next branch: > > https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/next > > The primary intent is for Matt to do a rebase of his C++ changes, but if > anyone else wants to throw mud at it and see what sticks, we have a day or > two for additional patches before we have to close down 2.4.0. > > NOTE: This branch is subject to rebasing or other git history mangling things, > that's why I'm NOT pushing it to nfs-ganesha/next... I have added Patrice's two patches to the above. Marc, would you please test FSAL_GPFS pNFS against this branch. Thanks Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: FIX attributes pass back in pxy_lookup_path
>From Patrice LUCAS : Patrice LUCAS has uploaded a new change for review. https://review.gerrithub.io/295148 Change subject: FIX attributes pass back in pxy_lookup_path .. FIX attributes pass back in pxy_lookup_path In pxy_lookup_path, we test pnext to pass back attributes only for the last entry when calling pxy_lookup_impl. The test was inverted and led to entries without attrs when mdcache was upon FSAL_PROXY. FSAL_PROXY tests revealed first mount error when attrs of root entry were empty. Change-Id: I2232e951e4ce04a95fe20077a47d07b6e7fe6064 Signed-off-by: Patrice LUCAS --- M src/FSAL/FSAL_PROXY/handle.c 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.gerrithub.io:29418/ffilz/nfs-ganesha refs/changes/48/295148/1 -- To view, visit https://review.gerrithub.io/295148 To unsubscribe, visit https://review.gerrithub.io/settings Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Change-Id: I2232e951e4ce04a95fe20077a47d07b6e7fe6064 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: ffilz/nfs-ganesha Gerrit-Branch: next Gerrit-Owner: Patrice LUCAS -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ntirpc-1.4.0 GA sooner, rather than later.
they are the same now because I moved the tag; I can try to restore it so there is a difference, but it would be unfortunate - Original Message - > From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" > To: "Matt Benjamin" , > nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:21:37 AM > Subject: Re: ntirpc-1.4.0 GA sooner, rather than later. > > On 09/20/2016 10:06 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote: > > Sorry. I had moved the 1.4.0 tag, and then decided I'd better create a new > > one. > > > > Well, _release_ tags should never be moved. > > But is there supposed to be a difference between 1.4.0 and 1.4.1, > because there isn't, as far as I can tell. At least a `diff -r` of the > two tar files (untarred) doesn't show any diff. > > > > Matt > > > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" > >> To: "Matt Benjamin" > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:53:12 AM > >> Subject: Re: ntirpc-1.4.0 GA sooner, rather than later. > >> > >> On 09/19/2016 05:43 PM, Matt Benjamin wrote: > >>> had to push a 1.4.1 > >>> > >> > >> Why? There's no diff between the two trees? > >> > >> Curiosity is killing the cat. ;-) > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Kaleb > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-707-0660 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ntirpc-1.4.0 GA sooner, rather than later.
On 09/20/2016 10:06 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote: > Sorry. I had moved the 1.4.0 tag, and then decided I'd better create a new > one. > Well, _release_ tags should never be moved. But is there supposed to be a difference between 1.4.0 and 1.4.1, because there isn't, as far as I can tell. At least a `diff -r` of the two tar files (untarred) doesn't show any diff. > Matt > > - Original Message - >> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" >> To: "Matt Benjamin" >> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:53:12 AM >> Subject: Re: ntirpc-1.4.0 GA sooner, rather than later. >> >> On 09/19/2016 05:43 PM, Matt Benjamin wrote: >>> had to push a 1.4.1 >>> >> >> Why? There's no diff between the two trees? >> >> Curiosity is killing the cat. ;-) >> >> -- >> >> Kaleb >> >> >> > -- ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
