[NTSysADM] RE: RDS timeout issues

2017-05-09 Thread Bill Humphries
Wouldn't it just disconnect the session if that was the case, rather than 
provide the message below?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:00 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: RDS timeout issues

Just guessing, but I would take a look at the remote router and/or firewall to 
see if it has TCP timeouts configured.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bill Humphries
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 9:12 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [NTSysADM] RDS timeout issues

Hi all,

I am once again, seeking wisdom from the group.

I have a single RDS server running on 2012 R2 for a client.  Most users are in 
local office and connect to the RDS session on LAN.  A few users are remote.  
We are using TSPrint as a printing solution because  users need to be able to 
print to each other's local printers, even if they are in different locations.  
To allow this printing, the user must be logged into the RDS server so that 
other users can print to the local printer.

I have two users that are at a location in a different state.  These users' 
remote sessions keep ending with "Your remote desktop services session has 
ended because the remote computer didn't receive any input from you."  I need 
this to not happen so that the printers remain available.  No one else 
complains about the time out issue.

On the RDS server I have gone to:

  *   Computer Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows 
Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Session Time 
Limits
  *   User Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows 
Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Session Time 
Limits
And set time out limits to never.  But these two users still get disconnected.  
I do not manage the user PCs on the other end, but my understanding is that 
timeout limits would be managed at the RDS, not at the client computer.

Any help is much appreciated.

Bill




[NTSysADM] RDS timeout issues

2017-05-09 Thread Bill Humphries
Hi all,

I am once again, seeking wisdom from the group.

I have a single RDS server running on 2012 R2 for a client.  Most users are in 
local office and connect to the RDS session on LAN.  A few users are remote.  
We are using TSPrint as a printing solution because  users need to be able to 
print to each other's local printers, even if they are in different locations.  
To allow this printing, the user must be logged into the RDS server so that 
other users can print to the local printer.

I have two users that are at a location in a different state.  These users' 
remote sessions keep ending with "Your remote desktop services session has 
ended because the remote computer didn't receive any input from you."  I need 
this to not happen so that the printers remain available.  No one else 
complains about the time out issue.

On the RDS server I have gone to:

  *   Computer Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows 
Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Session Time 
Limits
  *   User Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows 
Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Session Time 
Limits
And set time out limits to never.  But these two users still get disconnected.  
I do not manage the user PCs on the other end, but my understanding is that 
timeout limits would be managed at the RDS, not at the client computer.

Any help is much appreciated.

Bill




RE: [NTSysADM] sql express database limit

2016-11-14 Thread Bill Humphries
According to this, Server 2012 R2 Essentials is supported:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143506(v=sql.110).aspx


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 6:54 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] sql express database limit

It’s not supported to run full SQL (standard or enterprise) on a DC. I don’t 
know if it’s a hard block or not.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bill Humphries
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 4:16 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] sql express database limit

They are running sql express 2012.  I am using a utility to backup and zip the 
backups nightly.  This zip has been about 6 gigs.  I just did a backup of the 
database using the LOB backup utility to see size there and the bak file was 20 
gigs.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wittenberg
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 4:00 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] sql express database limit


I've had dozens of very small clients who ran SQLExpress for Pos software. Does 
your client have a more current version of SQL as the DB size is different for 
older versions of SQL Express?

Eric Wittenberg

On Nov 14, 2016 1:41 PM, "Bill Humphries" 
<b...@red5support.com<mailto:b...@red5support.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

I have a small client that runs a single physical server that has essentials 
role installed on it, as well as running their LOB application on sql express.  
It seems they have been uploading photos at a rapid pace from smartphones into 
this app which has blown up the database to the limit of express.  I know it 
isn’t best practice, but sometimes used in small businesses to install sql on a 
domain controller.  Are any of you doing this with success or have horror 
stories about why not to do this?  This is a small business with about 10 users 
connecting to the server.  The LOB is a crm and dispatch system.

Bill

Bill Humphries
Red5
Superior IT
www.red5support.com<http://www.red5support.com>
o:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301>[linkedin] 
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo>



RE: [NTSysADM] sql express database limit

2016-11-14 Thread Bill Humphries
They are running sql express 2012.  I am using a utility to backup and zip the 
backups nightly.  This zip has been about 6 gigs.  I just did a backup of the 
database using the LOB backup utility to see size there and the bak file was 20 
gigs.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Eric Wittenberg
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 4:00 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] sql express database limit


I've had dozens of very small clients who ran SQLExpress for Pos software. Does 
your client have a more current version of SQL as the DB size is different for 
older versions of SQL Express?

Eric Wittenberg

On Nov 14, 2016 1:41 PM, "Bill Humphries" 
<b...@red5support.com<mailto:b...@red5support.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

I have a small client that runs a single physical server that has essentials 
role installed on it, as well as running their LOB application on sql express.  
It seems they have been uploading photos at a rapid pace from smartphones into 
this app which has blown up the database to the limit of express.  I know it 
isn’t best practice, but sometimes used in small businesses to install sql on a 
domain controller.  Are any of you doing this with success or have horror 
stories about why not to do this?  This is a small business with about 10 users 
connecting to the server.  The LOB is a crm and dispatch system.

Bill

Bill Humphries
Red5
Superior IT
www.red5support.com<http://www.red5support.com>
o:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301>[linkedin] 
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo>



[NTSysADM] sql express database limit

2016-11-14 Thread Bill Humphries
Hi all,

I have a small client that runs a single physical server that has essentials 
role installed on it, as well as running their LOB application on sql express.  
It seems they have been uploading photos at a rapid pace from smartphones into 
this app which has blown up the database to the limit of express.  I know it 
isn't best practice, but sometimes used in small businesses to install sql on a 
domain controller.  Are any of you doing this with success or have horror 
stories about why not to do this?  This is a small business with about 10 users 
connecting to the server.  The LOB is a crm and dispatch system.

Bill

Bill Humphries
Red5
Superior IT
www.red5support.com
o:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301>[linkedin] 
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo>




[NTSysADM] persistent lies

2016-09-30 Thread Bill Humphries
I have a client that is windows 2008 domain and all client machines are windows 
7 64 bit.  Over the pas month, it looks like any mapped drives (via GPO) have 
decided to no longer be persistant.  Any time a user bootsup away off network, 
the drives do not appear.  No red exes, just missing.  As a few people work 
offsite very frequently this has become an issue.

I'm suspicious that some MS update for windows 7 has broken this persistence.  
Anyone have any insight into this behavior or suggestions for fixing?

Thanks.

Bill



RE: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

2015-03-25 Thread Bill Humphries
I’m thinking of giving this a whirl:
http://support.sprint.com/support/device/Netgear/NETGEARreg_LTE_Gateway_6100D-dvc8040009prd
According to Sprint, where their office is has the best level of service for 
their new Spark LTE service.
The device is $200, plus data.  Sprint only charges $3 to add a static IP.

Bill


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Chad Leeper
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 9:36 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

+1 for the CradlePoint.  Have a couple customers configure that way with a 
static IP.
One customer has email, one server and 6 users and the CP works fine.

 On 3/24/15 at 6:53 PM, in message 
 915196167_215985...@myitforum01.orcsweb.commailto:915196167_215985...@myitforum01.orcsweb.com,
  Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Verizon CradlePoint.
Static IP addresses available.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bill Humphries 
b...@red5support.commailto:b...@red5support.com wrote:
Hi all,
So, I have a small office client whose office manager bailed about the same 
time their ISP/phone provider notified them that they were shutting down. Long 
story, short, they are looking at losing internet and phone service April 1st, 
and the new carrier can’t make that deadline for circuit delivery. They have 
really low bandwidth needs, but they currently have a static IP for exchange 
server and 1.5mb circuit for internet/mail flow and VoIP. So, they may need 
something to cover that for a couple of weeks.
I’m tempted to try an LTE modem, but don’t know about getting a static IP for 
short term.
Thanks.
Bill
Bill Humphries
Red5Support
Superior IT
www.red5support.comhttp://www.red5support.com
o:404-919-8002tel:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781tel:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301 [linkedin] 
http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo S


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this transmission is 
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately 
reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then 
delete it. Thank you.


RE: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

2015-03-25 Thread Bill Humphries
It is Atlanta, Georgia.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 10:21 AM
To: NT
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

Where is the client ? country /state/city




Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:44:42 -0700
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options
From: kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Let me know if you find something cheaper.
Kurt

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Bill Humphries 
b...@red5support.commailto:b...@red5support.com wrote:
I just saw something stating a static IP with Verizon for LTE was a $500 fee 
upfront.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 8:14 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

1+

Should be easy enough to deploy, and a great service to model business 
continuity contingency site/services against.

--
Espi


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Kurt Buff 
kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Verizon CradlePoint.
Static IP addresses available.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bill Humphries 
b...@red5support.commailto:b...@red5support.com wrote:
Hi all,

So, I have a small office client whose office manager bailed about the same 
time their ISP/phone provider notified them that they were shutting down.  Long 
story, short, they are looking at losing internet and phone service April 1st, 
and the new carrier can't make that deadline for circuit delivery.  They have 
really low bandwidth needs, but they currently have a static IP for exchange 
server and 1.5mb circuit for internet/mail flow and VoIP.  So, they may need 
something to cover that for a couple of weeks.


I'm tempted to try an LTE modem, but don't know about getting a static IP for 
short term.

Thanks.

Bill


Bill Humphries
Red5Support
Superior IT
www.red5support.comhttp://www.red5support.com
o:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301[linkedin] 
http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo S






[NTSysADM] temporary internet options

2015-03-24 Thread Bill Humphries
Hi all,

So, I have a small office client whose office manager bailed about the same 
time their ISP/phone provider notified them that they were shutting down.  Long 
story, short, they are looking at losing internet and phone service April 1st, 
and the new carrier can't make that deadline for circuit delivery.  They have 
really low bandwidth needs, but they currently have a static IP for exchange 
server and 1.5mb circuit for internet/mail flow and VoIP.  So, they may need 
something to cover that for a couple of weeks.


I'm tempted to try an LTE modem, but don't know about getting a static IP for 
short term.

Thanks.

Bill


Bill Humphries
Red5Support
Superior IT
www.red5support.com
o:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301[linkedin] 
http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo S



RE: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

2015-03-24 Thread Bill Humphries
They currently have no problems with 1.5mb.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:42 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

Can you get the new carrier to expedite the delivery for an additional fee?  
Define low bandwidth: What is the minimal they can conduct business with in 
the interim?

--
Espi


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bill Humphries 
b...@red5support.commailto:b...@red5support.com wrote:
Hi all,

So, I have a small office client whose office manager bailed about the same 
time their ISP/phone provider notified them that they were shutting down.  Long 
story, short, they are looking at losing internet and phone service April 1st, 
and the new carrier can't make that deadline for circuit delivery.  They have 
really low bandwidth needs, but they currently have a static IP for exchange 
server and 1.5mb circuit for internet/mail flow and VoIP.  So, they may need 
something to cover that for a couple of weeks.


I'm tempted to try an LTE modem, but don't know about getting a static IP for 
short term.

Thanks.

Bill


Bill Humphries
Red5Support
Superior IT
www.red5support.comhttp://www.red5support.com
o:404-919-8002tel:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781tel:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301[linkedin] 
http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo S




RE: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

2015-03-24 Thread Bill Humphries
I just saw something stating a static IP with Verizon for LTE was a $500 fee 
upfront.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 8:14 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] temporary internet options

1+

Should be easy enough to deploy, and a great service to model business 
continuity contingency site/services against.

--
Espi


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Kurt Buff 
kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Verizon CradlePoint.
Static IP addresses available.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bill Humphries 
b...@red5support.commailto:b...@red5support.com wrote:
Hi all,

So, I have a small office client whose office manager bailed about the same 
time their ISP/phone provider notified them that they were shutting down.  Long 
story, short, they are looking at losing internet and phone service April 1st, 
and the new carrier can't make that deadline for circuit delivery.  They have 
really low bandwidth needs, but they currently have a static IP for exchange 
server and 1.5mb circuit for internet/mail flow and VoIP.  So, they may need 
something to cover that for a couple of weeks.


I'm tempted to try an LTE modem, but don't know about getting a static IP for 
short term.

Thanks.

Bill


Bill Humphries
Red5Support
Superior IT
www.red5support.comhttp://www.red5support.com
o:404-919-8002tel:404-919-8002
c:770-548-1781tel:770-548-1781
Like us: [facebook] 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Red-Five-LLC/349345845176301[linkedin] 
http://www.linkedin.com/company/red-five-llc?trk=company_logo S





[NTSysADM] help for a hypocrite

2014-11-02 Thread Bill Humphries
Ok, I haven't been fully practicing what I preach and haven't backup up a 
personal laptop in a while.  It seems that my little girl was typing on it this 
weekend and my wife saw her and closed the lid...which should have made it 
hibernate.  I go to open it tonight and it won't boot.  I haven't noticed any 
bad hard drive sounds coming from it beforehand.


This is a win 7 thinkpad.  I yanked the harddrive and tried to mount it to 
another PC to look at data.  In disk manager I could see the small system drive 
partition and the lenovo partition...the windows partition showed as RAW 
instead of readable.  I then booted to ubuntu live CD and tried to see the 
data.  In DISKS it shows that partition as unknown and doesn't present anything 
as available...but does show the other partitions as I would expect them to 
show in linux.


Any ideas what has happened or best course of action?  Should I try cloning the 
drive and working off of that?


Thanks for any help/insight.


Bill



RE: [NTSysADM] password expiration notices

2014-08-14 Thread Bill Humphries
Thanks for the options, guys.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Dave Lum
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 10:16 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] password expiration notices

Agreed. In this regard Netwrix has been better than most, I've been using this 
free app for over a year and don't recall getting any calls.

Emails are easy enough to unsubscribe/filter.

Dave

 I hate these free apps that require I register and provide contact 
 information. They always lead to calls and e-mails I'm not interested 
 in and they often turn into aggressive sales pitches.

 Regards,
 Hank Arnold

 Consumer Security

 There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
 Those who understand binary and those who don't.

 My Blog: http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/personal-pc-assistant/
 Twitter: @Hank_PCDoc
 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hank.arnold.96

 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
 On Behalf Of Dave Lum
 Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:29 AM
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] password expiration notices

 I use Netwrix free password expiration tool. it notifies the user and 
 optionally an administrator, so the user gets hey your password 
 expires in x' days and you as an admin get a list of whose password 
 expires soon.

 Uses task scheduler and can run on a Win7 box or a server OS.

 I used to use a PowerShell script that I kyped from someplace.

 Dave

 Hi all,

 I have a client that has an SBS 2011 network.  One of the owners 
 claims that they no longer get notifications that passwords are 
 expiring.  They said the other owner thinks he isn't getting them 
 either.  I can't figure out how to track if this is true or they just 
 don't notice the bubble pop up that happens with windows 7.  The XP 
 notification was much more unavoidable.  Is there an event ID to look 
 for somewhere?  I can't find anything using google powers.


 Also, I'd be interested in a more obtrusive method of 
 notification..like a screen pop up message you have to acknowledge or 
 maybe an email. Anything easily implemented?

 Thanks.

 Bill

















[NTSysADM] password expiration notices

2014-08-13 Thread Bill Humphries
Hi all,

I have a client that has an SBS 2011 network.  One of the owners claims that 
they no longer get notifications that passwords are expiring.  They said the 
other owner thinks he isn't getting them either.  I can't figure out how to 
track if this is true or they just don't notice the bubble pop up that happens 
with windows 7.  The XP notification was much more unavoidable.  Is there an 
event ID to look for somewhere?  I can't find anything using google powers.


Also, I'd be interested in a more obtrusive method of notification..like a 
screen pop up message you have to acknowledge or maybe an email. Anything 
easily implemented?

Thanks.

Bill



RE: [NTSysADM] Kyocera Copier

2014-08-05 Thread Bill Humphries
Every copier I've ever had to touch at a client was setup with the default user 
name/password.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 9:29 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Kyocera Copier

Security issue but if the vendor refuses to fix you will have to work around 
it.  Personally I would put the web page on a different subnet that only those 
you trust will have knowledge of and which you would have to change your 
machines IP to get to.

\*Rant on

Vendors both hardware and software are getting away with way too much.  If it 
was their a$$ hanging out there when the auditors come calling or when the 
hackers take control of your network due to their lack of security concern you 
would either see fewer vendors or tighter security on their stuff.

Rant off*\

Jon


Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:59:41 -0400
Subject: [NTSysADM] Kyocera Copier
From: cssunetad...@cssu.orgmailto:cssunetad...@cssu.org
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
We have a small office with a Kyocera network copier.  I learned last week- as 
I was going to add a new mailbox on it- that from the web browser, no log in is 
required to add- or edit- mailbox names, e-mail addresses or network paths for 
scan to folders.  I was able to- without logging in at the browser- to change 
the e-mail address of anyone who had one set up to one either in or outside our 
domain.  I could do the same with the network path.  To make sure that I was 
magically logged in because of my network rights,  I logged into the 
workstation with a guest account- same thing.

A call to the vendor who services the machines said that Kyocera acknowledged 
this issue but a fix wasn't in the offing.  Their solution was to restrict 
access to the management webpage from specific machines by IP or disable the 
web page.

Am I nuts or is this a giant security issue?



RE: [NTSysADM] Exchange list?

2014-07-29 Thread Bill Humphries
It is so weird that a party line was even a thing.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jon Harris
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 5:41 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Exchange list?

+1  I remember those days, can still remember our home number!

Jon

 From: richard.mccl...@aspca.orgmailto:richard.mccl...@aspca.org
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Exchange list?
 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:46:50 +

 Why, when I was a kid, I'd lift the receiver and wait for the operator to ask 
 for the number to call. That number had letters in it! (Of course, this was 
 possible only if none of the neighbors happened to be using the party line at 
 the moment.)

 --
 richard

 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott
 Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 12:23 PM
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Exchange list?

 On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Chenault 
 dani...@hotmail.commailto:dani...@hotmail.com wrote:
  Why, when I was a kid in the then-new interwebz we had dig. You kids
  with your fancy-schmancy browser-based search engines... We didn't
  have no stinkin' browser! And we LIKED it cu we didn't know any better!
  You kids get off my lawn!

 You had an Internet connection? Luxury! Why, when I was kid, I was dialing 
 into BBSes and downloading files with XMODEM! ;-)

 -- Ben




 The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from 
 The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(r) (ASPCA(r)) 
 and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain 
 legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, 
 and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
 e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently 
 delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof.



FW: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

2014-07-23 Thread Bill Humphries

This is a 20 person firm and Lacerte’s slow death of DMS was the final nail in 
the coffin.  It has to happen this off season.

They already utilize CCH for PM and Engagement, so I think that is the way 
things will fall.  I’ve been pretty happy with CCH support for the software 
they currently use.

I haven’t gotten to sit in on any webinar yet, but CCH is really pushing the 
client to only consider the cloud offering.  I don’t really get why there is 
the huge push from accounting LOBs to ditch the on premise.  Even with on 
premise they get yearly recurring software license fees.

I know they promise roses and eternal bliss, but I’d like to see them actually 
do a data conversion to see how well that actually works.

I’m working on a list of questions and concerns that need to be addressed at 
the next meeting.

Bill




From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 8:29 PM
To: Bill Humphries
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

I wanted to come back to this after basically saying indeed, in response to 
seeing the security or lack thereof.  I work for a 40 person accounting firm, 
and I saw you're assisting with a move from Lacerte.  I can't speak to that 
migration, but we are in the beginning phases of assessing cloud providers and 
moving our operations to the cloud.  We probably won't be doing it anytime 
soon, but we're going to do a bunch of due diligence here and TCO comparisons.
One of the things to be cognizant is vendor lock in that comes with going with 
Thomson's or CCH's cloud offerings.  From what I've seen, getting access to the 
underlying data is something of a challenge and unknown quantity, so switching 
to a different provider at a later date may become cost prohibitive.

We are a Thomson, UltraTax shop, but last summer evaluated the CCH Tax offering 
again.


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Bill Humphries 
b...@red5support.commailto:b...@red5support.com wrote:
I have an accounting firm that is ditching Lacerte and all the other vendors 
are pushing nothing but cloud options at them.  Most of the security talk has 
been let us tell you how the datacenter is secured.  No talk of real factors 
such as how passwords stored, multifactor authentication availability, backing 
up your own data, etc.

One of the vendors did provide a couple of PDFs for security.  One sheet was 
like a SAS 70 checklist with a blurb stating we have a policy for this for each 
section.  The other PDF was outlining the IBM datacenter they use and that IBM 
maintains their security and backups.  The one interesting thing in that is 
that they claim that all the backups are through Tivoli to tape and then cloned 
for offsite storage.  That is a lot of tape.

Bill


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:49 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...
I just called up my cable company to reconfigure my ever increasing cable bill 
and renegotiated the costs.  So the idea that cloud services
has a defined cost structure I would debate on.   My personal experience
in all cloud services is that some have gone up, some have gone down.   :-)

As the premise options become
a. more expensive
b. less attractive

and quite frankly as we dinosaurs age out/retire/the youngsters that only use 
Google apps take over/ this will all change.  No one here is not saying all of 
this is not happening, I'm just not willing to accept some of the ideas that 
the vendors provide are the key advantages.  It's an advantage for them for 
sure.
As the vendors themselves stop developing premises based software - (and this 
is the key movement I see in the SMB space) - because it's cheaper for them 
(less support for us pesky desktops with lord knows how many versions of OS), 
easier for them to build the infrastructure where they want it, and better for 
them as they can plan on the revenue subscription model.  As Rod said, it's the 
app model taking over.
It is what it is.  All of us will deal.  But outsourcing isn't always best for 
a firm (ask the NSA and their outsourced admin Snowden) and has it's risks as 
well as the benefits that shouldn't be overlooked.

Ask the hard questions of the vendors and don't just click through those eulas 
(as we in small biz do).  Ask who has the encryption keys, etc etc.

(spreadsheets from the cloud security alliance as examples)

https://downloads.cloudsecurityalliance.org/initiatives/ccm/ccm-v3.0.1.zip
https://downloads.cloudsecurityalliance.org/initiatives/cai/caiq-v3.0.1.zip

Many of the vendors are still putting in place key elements and still fighting 
jurisdictional issues.  (Examples:
http://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2014/06/04/unfinished-business

RE: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

2014-07-23 Thread Bill Humphries


P.S. regarding the other point made in a different comment and provide a geek 
comment... If a vendor says they are SAS 70 certified, I'd ask them what it 
got replaced with because SAS 70 is the old wording

The security PDF says they are transitioning from SAS 70 to SOC2.  

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:09 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

You use the phrase how I want to buy a service which is what I'm 
struggling over.   I don't have departments in my firm and thus don't 
consider employing someone to do a task as buying the service which is I 
think where the misunderstanding is starting out from.

For some items, like utilities, where it doesn't have a confidentiality issue, 
I buy the service in the manner that it's given to me and think nothing of it.  
For others, like legal services, in my firm we hire the 
Attorney and his reputation and sign an engagement letter.   I'm not 
always buying a service in my mind.  I engage another human being that 
I trust.   It's not a commodity, it's still a relationship.

In my personal space how you want to buy a service isn't the question I start 
with (and apologies as I that's what I'm stumbling over).  For some small 
businesses the question is how cheap they can get a service 
for.   For others, like mine, it's more of this fuzzy am I comfortable 
in hiring someone that I don't have direct control over.  It's not necessarily 
'how to buy' but 'do we hire'?

Neither one of us is talking rubbish, we just are coming with different 
backgrounds (and hopefully providing useful links or food for thought along the 
way).

http://www.csoonline.com/article/2126003/compliance/sas-70-replacement--ssae-16.html

On 7/22/2014 10:21 PM, Ken Schaefer wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
 Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2014 3:11 PM
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

 You have an RFP, a contract.  I have a eula I click through.  I still say 
 you have more negotiating power.
 None the less, we still have to ask the same question before buying. 
 You can't get anything after you sign a contract

 We print tax returns with potential identity theft information as well
 as potential sensitive business documents.   For my firm, Kinkos is not
 even an option and honestly wouldn't even be considered in the analysis.

 We have one wifi printer for clients, we don't do wifi enabled printers in 
 the lan, so the wifi standard hasn't really come up.
 I think you're missing the point - it's not about Kinkos or WiFi - that's was 
 just an illustrative example. Surely you do not need me to give you 
 hundreds of examples until you find one that fits your personal 
 circumstances? Either you agree or disagree with the wider point. How about 
 having a discussion about that? If you think I'm talking rubbish, then just 
 say so, and why, and I will stop wasting my breath.




 On 7/22/2014 10:01 PM, Ken Schaefer wrote:
 There's nothing you've written below that indicates that your space is any 
 different to mine. We have to ask questions up-front as well - we don't get 
 to change things once a contract's been signed either.

 How you want to buy a service is something you need to decide before you 
 even go look at a EULA is my point. When you decide you need to produce some 
 printed material, is the first thing you do read a EULA? Or is it decide 
 whether to have a printer internally vs. using the local Kinkos/print house? 
 I'd say that the latter question is far more important than worrying whether 
 a printer supports your WiFi security standard.

 Cheers
 Ken

 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
 Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2014 2:48 PM
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

 In small business we click yes to a eula.  We don't get the ability to set 
 the requirements as the software vendors don't give us options so we must 
 ask the questions from the get go because we don't get the right to change 
 anything.  We either buy or don't buy the software.

 It's just a different space is all.


 On 7/22/2014 8:07 PM, Ken Schaefer wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
 Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2014 12:49 PM
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

 I just called up my cable company to reconfigure my ever increasing cable 
 bill and renegotiated the costs.
 So the idea that cloud services has a defined cost structure I would 
 debate on.

[NTSysADM] storage spaces?

2014-07-22 Thread Bill Humphries
Any opinions about this?  I was looking at it as an option for storing backups 
and maybe for media and backup server at home.  A simple box with some NAS 
drives would be more economical than dedicated RAID hardware.

Thanks.

Bill



RE: [NTSysADM] storage spaces?

2014-07-22 Thread Bill Humphries
2012 r2 essentials for clients also.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Art DeKneef
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 5:46 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] storage spaces?

Timely topic as I was just looking in to this also and was about to ask the 
same question.

From I gather, Storage Spaces is based on the old drive extender technology 
from Windows Home Server but vastly improved. It is software RAID. It is 
normally not as fast as hardware RAID. But for home use that may not be that 
big of a deal.

What were you thinking of running Storage Spaces on? I am looking at using it 
on our installs of Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials.

Your thinking of a simple box, some drives and free NAS software would probably 
be less expensive depending on what you had or needed to buy..

Art DeKneef
Avanti Computers
Mesa, AZ
480-649-4430 Office
480-529-4430 Mobile

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bill Humphries
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:43 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] storage spaces?

Any opinions about this?  I was looking at it as an option for storing backups 
and maybe for media and backup server at home.  A simple box with some NAS 
drives would be more economical than dedicated RAID hardware.

Thanks.

Bill



RE: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

2014-07-22 Thread Bill Humphries
I have an accounting firm that is ditching Lacerte and all the other vendors 
are pushing nothing but cloud options at them.  Most of the security talk has 
been let us tell you how the datacenter is secured.  No talk of real factors 
such as how passwords stored, multifactor authentication availability, backing 
up your own data, etc.

One of the vendors did provide a couple of PDFs for security.  One sheet was 
like a SAS 70 checklist with a blurb stating we have a policy for this for each 
section.  The other PDF was outlining the IBM datacenter they use and that IBM 
maintains their security and backups.  The one interesting thing in that is 
that they claim that all the backups are through Tivoli to tape and then cloned 
for offsite storage.  That is a lot of tape.

Bill


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:49 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] I'm sure you've heard already...

I just called up my cable company to reconfigure my ever increasing cable bill 
and renegotiated the costs.  So the idea that cloud services 
has a defined cost structure I would debate on.   My personal experience 
in all cloud services is that some have gone up, some have gone down.   :-)

As the premise options become
a. more expensive
b. less attractive

and quite frankly as we dinosaurs age out/retire/the youngsters that only use 
Google apps take over/ this will all change.  No one here is not saying all of 
this is not happening, I'm just not willing to accept some of the ideas that 
the vendors provide are the key advantages.  It's an advantage for them for 
sure.

As the vendors themselves stop developing premises based software - (and this 
is the key movement I see in the SMB space) - because it's cheaper for them 
(less support for us pesky desktops with lord knows how many versions of OS), 
easier for them to build the infrastructure where they want it, and better for 
them as they can plan on the revenue subscription model.  As Rod said, it's the 
app model taking over.

It is what it is.  All of us will deal.  But outsourcing isn't always best for 
a firm (ask the NSA and their outsourced admin Snowden) and has it's risks as 
well as the benefits that shouldn't be overlooked.

Ask the hard questions of the vendors and don't just click through those eulas 
(as we in small biz do).  Ask who has the encryption keys, etc etc.

(spreadsheets from the cloud security alliance as examples)

https://downloads.cloudsecurityalliance.org/initiatives/ccm/ccm-v3.0.1.zip
https://downloads.cloudsecurityalliance.org/initiatives/cai/caiq-v3.0.1.zip

Many of the vendors are still putting in place key elements and still fighting 
jurisdictional issues.  (Examples: 
http://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2014/06/04/unfinished-business-on-government-surveillance-reform/
http://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2014/07/01/advancing-our-encryption-and-transparency-efforts/

Susan Bradley
Meet up with me, Amy, Philip and Jeremy at the Brain Explosion in Florida this 
September.  I'll be talking about protecting your network 
http://www.thirdtier.net/brain-explosion/

On 7/22/2014 6:47 PM, Ken Schaefer wrote:

 I s*trongly* urge the guys (and gals) on the list that think like the 
 previous post to take a step back, and ask yourself “why are these 
 cloud providers becoming popular?” This is a bit of a long post, but 
 bear with me – but it might help shape your future career.

 For large enterprises, we went to outsourcers a long time ago – MSPs 
 also had some limited penetration in the SME market. But traditional 
 outsourcing involves a fair amount of vendor management overhead, so 
 it was significant barriers for SMEs (and even large organisations).
 Despite these costs and barriers, people still outsourced. Why?

 There’s only a single reason IME.

 Look in any ITSM framework (ITIL is the obvious candidate here), and 
 you’ll see a section in Service Architecture called “Financial 
 Management” – how do develop business services that provide value 
 whilst also being profitable (or at least, break-even). In many 
 organisations, due to the thinking in some of the posts in this 
 thread, it was impossible to quantify the actual cost of IT. Consider 
 the very simple financial model below. It doesn’t even have a service 
 catalogue – it just attributes general ledger costs (actual cash
 outgoing) back to business units. *Most organisations had IT units 
 that were incapable of figuring this out*.

 Instead, IT is simply see as a sinkhole of random requests for money – 
 need to replace the SAN. Need to replace a server. Need to buy some 
 network bandwidth. But what’s the **value** provided by that kit? What 
 applications is that kit supporting – is the app bringing in $1m 
 running on $2m of expenses? What business units are consuming this 
 expense? Can they justify the bills 

[NTSysADM] RE: terminal server unexpected restarts

2014-01-23 Thread Bill Humphries
One of the two power supplies is already bad.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:20 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: terminal server unexpected restarts

I had this on a DL380.  Bad power supply. It shut down about once a day...but 
gradually got worse. New power supply fixed it instantly.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bill Humphries
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:56 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] terminal server unexpected restarts

Hi all,

I have a new client that uses a terminal server that has quickbooks enterprise 
and a sql express LOB application installed on it.  It is server 2008.  It has 
begun randomly having unexpected shutdowns/restarts.  Event viewer system and 
application logs seem to be clean prior to the shutdown.

I recently inherited the system, and they were mostly fly by the seat of their 
pants DIY before they brought me in.  It's an HP ml350 with two sata drives in 
it..not mirrored.  gulp.

It's a plumbing company with 24 hour service, so having the thing down for long 
periods of time troubleshooting isn't very doable.

Any suggestions where to start looking for the issue? RAM?

Bill



RE: [NTSysADM] RE: terminal server unexpected restarts

2014-01-23 Thread Bill Humphries
Not enabled yet.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Richard Stovall
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:20 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: terminal server unexpected restarts

Dump files enabled?  Anything there?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Maglinger, Paul 
pmaglin...@scvl.commailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
First thing I’d check is the vents and fans to make sure it’s not clogged with 
dirt.  And while you’re in there it wouldn’t hurt to reseat cards and RAM.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Bill Humphries
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:55 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] terminal server unexpected restarts

Hi all,

I have a new client that uses a terminal server that has quickbooks enterprise 
and a sql express LOB application installed on it.  It is server 2008.  It has 
begun randomly having unexpected shutdowns/restarts.  Event viewer system and 
application logs seem to be clean prior to the shutdown.

I recently inherited the system, and they were mostly fly by the seat of their 
pants DIY before they brought me in.  It’s an HP ml350 with two sata drives in 
it..not mirrored.  gulp.

It’s a plumbing company with 24 hour service, so having the thing down for long 
periods of time troubleshooting isn’t very doable.

Any suggestions where to start looking for the issue? RAM?

Bill



RE: [NTSysADM] Random thoughts on evaluating SANs

2013-08-02 Thread Bill Humphries
That is tight.  My cheap SAN is a Stornext FX/Xsan and for 20 tb, you'd be 
close to that number. We used it for video storage/workflow and mounted on 
widows systems for backup and file server.  It is fiber channel and we use 
Promise Vtrak arrays.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Matt Hawes
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 11:19 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Random thoughts on evaluating SANs

That is very tight for a SAN budget...


I am in an medium size school district and we have an HP P2000 Fiber Channel 
storage attached to an brocade blade switch. ... Depending on what you 
viritualize the P2000 can't handle the pressure if you throw over 20 VM's on 
it.  Since we have over 1,2000 Exchange mailboxes and 2 SQL servers, having an 
SAN with the IOPS and controller CPU performance is an absolute must.  We 
recently had to move our Exchange 2010 to an dedicated host with DAS because of 
the awful performance on the P2000.

Some considerations I always look into...

 Solid state ?  Can the controller support it?
Total IOPS for what each controller can support?
Type of connectivity (iSCSI, NFS,FC,SAS)

I am a big fan of NetApp but you will pay through the nose but well worth the 
investment (IMO).

Sent from Outlook Web App/Exchange 2013
Sent from Exchange 2013
Matt Hawes
m...@hawesfam.com
Microsoft Certified IT Specialist - Enterprise Administrator
A+,Network +, Server +

I'd tell you a UDP joke but I'm afraid you won't get it. TCP jokes are the 
best because you always get them


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on behalf of Kurt Buff
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 10:07 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Random thoughts on evaluating SANs

I'll have to check the numbers again, but I believe the budget is around $30k.

Primary usage by volume of data is file storage. However, I'd like to 
virtualize as much as I can, and there are going to be a couple of SQL servers 
in the mix, as well as Exchange 2010. I don't expect there to be a huge 
challenge for IOPS, but I haven't done measurements on the current SQL configs 
yet, so don't have hard numbers for that load - when I have that, I'll probably 
double the IOPS to account for growth

Kurt

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:

 What's the budget, and will the primary usage be VM hosting?





 ASB
 http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
 Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations  Information Security) 
 for the SMB market...




 On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:

 All,

 I've probably mentioned it before, but I'm in the process of looking 
 at a new SAN.

 The EMC VNXe 3100 isn't cutting it for us, due its iSCSI 
 implementation not doing LUNs larger than 2tb, and the LeftHand is 
 approaching EOL rapidly.

 So, I've started jotting down some of my thoughts on what might be 
 important for comparing vendors and models. If anyone cares to add to 
 this, I am all ears.

 (BTW, I'm currently considering a 2nd gen VNX or VNXe from EMC, 
 Nimble, Equallogic and NetApp - the only vendor I haven't met with 
 yet is NetApp)

 The final decision will come about by balancing the following factors
 - including final cost, of course:

 o- Cost/byte for ~20tb config (assume reasonable dedup ratio, if 
 supported , and any other overhead (protection, etc.) - I care about 
 final usable size more than anything else WRT space)

 o- Cost/IOP for ~20tb config

 o- Other advantages (harder to put numbers on some of these)
 - Support reputation
 - Offsite replication (not immediately needed as we don't 
 have an offsite, but good to know)
 - Integration with backup (especially DPM)
 - Integration with VMware
 - Ease and completeness of management
 - Ease and completeness of monitoring (integration with SCOM?)
 - Training included
 - Cost to expand
 - Trade in on LH and/or VNXe
 - Cost to upgrade to 10g (we don't have 10g just yet)

 I can probably re-purpose the VNXe in the engineering lab, but I'll 
 need to look at their needs vs. what we can get for the trade in 
 before making that call.

 Thoughts?

 Kurt




This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, 

RE: [NTSysADM] Uhhh...

2013-07-12 Thread Bill Humphries
We have the snowden leaks.
We have stuxnet, which used legitimate certificates that the virus creator 
(CIA) used for application signing.  Of course verisign says these were stolen.
We have the ATT whistleblower who claimed there were cabinets being installed 
to suck up all traffic between backbone providers.

You really have to assume they have access to almost any data in transit.

Bill

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ziots, Edward
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 11:31 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Uhhh...

I aint, this stuff has been going on for years... you think your communications 
are private but honestly, they aren't.

Z

Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, CISA, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.orgmailto:ezi...@lifespan.org
Work:401-255-2497


This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and confidential 
and protected from disclosure. If you are reading this message, but are not the 
intended recipient, nor an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are 
strictly prohibited from copying, printing, forwarding or otherwise 
disseminating this communication. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to the message. Then, 
delete the message from your computer. Thank you.
[Description: Description: Lifespan]


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 6:04 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Uhhh...

You're surprised?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 4:26 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Uhhh...

Wow...just, wow.

New information on Microsoft's involvement in PRISM

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data


Rod Trenthttp://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/community/members/rodtrent/
[WindowsITProButton]http://windowsitpro.com/author/rod-trent[myITSMButton]http://www.myitforum.com/[TwitterButton]http://twitter.com/rodtrent[Facebookbutton]http://www.facebook.com/rodtrent[LinkedInButton]http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=2881785


inline: image001.jpginline: image002.pnginline: image003.pnginline: image004.pnginline: image005.pnginline: image006.png

RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup

2013-07-12 Thread Bill Humphries
I didn't think it did macs...

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Matthew W. Ross
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 2:39 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup

* WARNING: ZOMBIE THREAD *

Because you were wondering, after we had looked at multiple solutions, we are 
now attempting the trial of Appassure. I'll let you guys know if we like it in 
the end.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Bill Humphries
[mailto:b...@red5support.com]
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com]
Sent: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:56:42
-0800
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup


 Matt,
 
 I wouldn't mind knowing what you end up doing.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Bill
 
 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
 On Behalf Of Matthew W. Ross
 Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:43 PM
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup
 
 From: Jeff Frantz
 
  Have you looked at Retrospect?  It's been a few years since I've 
  used it but it has always been a great solution at a reasonable 
  price for both Mac and Windows platforms.
 
 I will check it out. Thanks.
 
 
 --Matt Ross
 Ephrata School District
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jeff Frantz
 [mailto:jfra...@itstechnologies.com]
 To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com'
 [mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com]
 Sent: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:35:37
 -0800
 Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup
 
 
  Matt,
  
  Have you looked at Retrospect?  It's been a few years since I've 
  used it but it has always been a great solution at a reasonable 
  price for both Mac and Windows platforms.
  
  -Jeff
  -Original Message-
  From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
  [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
  On Behalf Of Matthew W. Ross
  Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 7:17 PM
  To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
  Subject: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup
  
  Good Afternoon, all.
  
  After much frustration with Acronis, I have come to the realization 
  that it cannot do what I want it to. We've had the product for a 
  year, and have had marginal success making and pulling data from 
  backups. I am resorting to standard Windows Backups now.
  
  
  So, I'm in the market. I would love to have the list's current 
  recommendations (for and against) various backup products.
  
  Here is my single requirement:
  
   * File level restore of a Window's file share - Our biggest need is 
  when a teacher/student accidently deletes or writes over a file... 
  and would like the copy form 3 days ago.
  
  The following are optional:
  
   * VMware support - We are now running all of our servers from the 
  VMware cluster, some of which are running linux.
  
   * Macintosh file support - Acronis chokes on some Macintosh file 
  names when doing a file-level backup, and I'd love something that is 
  known to work with these.
  
   * Mild costs - I'm not looking for a cheap solution, but I'll take 
  one that's inexpensive.
  
   * Ease of use - A backup solution should not require constant 
  grooming/tending/clearing to work.
  
  All suggestions are appreciated.
  
  
  --Matt Ross
  Ephrata School District
  
  
  
  
 
 
 




RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup

2013-06-26 Thread Bill Humphries
Matt,

I wouldn't mind knowing what you end up doing.

Thanks.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Matthew W. Ross
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:43 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup

From: Jeff Frantz

 Have you looked at Retrospect?  It's been a few years since I've used 
 it but it has always been a great solution at a reasonable price for 
 both Mac and Windows platforms.

I will check it out. Thanks.


--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District


- Original Message -
From: Jeff Frantz
[mailto:jfra...@itstechnologies.com]
To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com'
[mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com]
Sent: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:35:37
-0800
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup


 Matt,
 
 Have you looked at Retrospect?  It's been a few years since I've used 
 it but it has always been a great solution at a reasonable price for 
 both Mac and Windows platforms.
 
 -Jeff
 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
 On Behalf Of Matthew W. Ross
 Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 7:17 PM
 To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: [NTSysADM] Wisdom of the crowds: Backup
 
 Good Afternoon, all.
 
 After much frustration with Acronis, I have come to the realization 
 that it cannot do what I want it to. We've had the product for a year, 
 and have had marginal success making and pulling data from backups. I 
 am resorting to standard Windows Backups now.
 
 
 So, I'm in the market. I would love to have the list's current 
 recommendations (for and against) various backup products.
 
 Here is my single requirement:
 
  * File level restore of a Window's file share - Our biggest need is 
 when a teacher/student accidently deletes or writes over a file... and 
 would like the copy form 3 days ago.
 
 The following are optional:
 
  * VMware support - We are now running all of our servers from the 
 VMware cluster, some of which are running linux.
 
  * Macintosh file support - Acronis chokes on some Macintosh file 
 names when doing a file-level backup, and I'd love something that is 
 known to work with these.
 
  * Mild costs - I'm not looking for a cheap solution, but I'll take 
 one that's inexpensive.
 
  * Ease of use - A backup solution should not require constant 
 grooming/tending/clearing to work.
 
 All suggestions are appreciated.
 
 
 --Matt Ross
 Ephrata School District
 
 
 
 




RE: [NTSysADM] How to send secure communication to your friends and relatives. Cheap!

2013-06-21 Thread Bill Humphries
Or the NSA is gobbling all the traffic off the backbone carriers...

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jonathan Link
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 3:25 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] How to send secure communication to your friends and 
relatives. Cheap!

If google is giving away your email, despite it being sent, kind of moot...


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:08 PM, 
kz2...@googlemail.commailto:kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Even easier...just type a draft email message, save it, give friends the login 
details for your account, they can read and add to the draft. No email ever 
sent and lots faster than snail mail. Popularized by criminals and General 
Petraeus, IIRC
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY

From: David Lum david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org
Sender: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:04:28 +
To: 
NTSysADM@lists.myITforum.commailto:NTSysADM@lists.myITforum.comNTSysADM@lists.myITforum.commailto:NTSysADM@lists.myITforum.com
ReplyTo: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] How to send secure communication to your friends and 
relatives. Cheap!

Snail mail. Sounds obvious doesn't it?  I wonder if searching snail mail 
without a warrant will be allowed someday, I mean hey, once it leaves your 
house you should have no expectation of privacy right? Isn't digital 
communication the same thing, except using ISP's instead of the postal service?

Just thinking aloud, as it were. But hey we stopped 1.4 shootings by opening 
up your letters!
David Lum
Sr. Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229tel:503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 
503.267.9764tel:503.267.9764





[NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

2013-06-13 Thread Bill Humphries
I have one client that we bought a fortigate email appliance for.  They seem 
happy with it.  I basically set it up and forget about it unless someone calls 
me and wants me to resend a quarantine email to them that they deleted.  One 
thing to consider is complexity.  It is exponentially more complex that the 
Sonicwall.  For a simple setup, the wizard will work to get it going for 
you...but it is so very configurable and complex because it runs the same 
software that you would use if you were running an ISP spam solution.

Bill

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Phil Brutsche
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:15 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

We are currently using a Dell SonicWALL Email Security VMware appliance and The 
Boss Man(tm) would like to evaluate alternatives.

One of the appliances that meets our requirements is the FortiGate FortiMail 
Email Security Appliance.

Is anyone using one of these boxes, and, if you are, do you have any feedback 
you would like to share?

In case anyone is wondering, these are the requirements:
* LDAP support (believe it or not, there are actually boxes that don't support 
that!)
* Available as a virtual appliance so we can run it in the VMware cluster
* Support for quarantine delegation - we need to give specific users access to 
the quarantine folder for distribution groups

--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.commailto:p...@optimumdata.com




[NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

2013-06-13 Thread Bill Humphries
The lower end barracuda boxes don't do individual user quarantines, do they?  I 
know you used to have to step up to the 400 maybe?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:44 PM
To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

+1 on the Cuda.  Been running them for 10 years.  Not sure on the dist list 
quarantine.  But you can get a free demo unit/vm from them and their support is 
top notch. They will tell you how that part of it works.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of N Parr
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:42 PM
To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

I've been running Barracuda's appliance in a VM for a couple years now and it 
does everything you require.  But I don't allow user access to quarantine.   I 
set it in global mode and generally forget about it.  Once you get it tuned 
right for spam and ham it's pretty dead on.  Every week or so I'll take a look 
at my quarantine just to see if anything legit has been caught.  I guess you 
could give users access to a shared mailbox that contains the quarantine.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Brutsche
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:15 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

We are currently using a Dell SonicWALL Email Security VMware appliance and The 
Boss Man(tm) would like to evaluate alternatives.

One of the appliances that meets our requirements is the FortiGate FortiMail 
Email Security Appliance.

Is anyone using one of these boxes, and, if you are, do you have any feedback 
you would like to share?

In case anyone is wondering, these are the requirements:
* LDAP support (believe it or not, there are actually boxes that don't support 
that!)
* Available as a virtual appliance so we can run it in the VMware cluster
* Support for quarantine delegation - we need to give specific users access to 
the quarantine folder for distribution groups

--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.commailto:p...@optimumdata.com




RE: cloud spam filtering WAS RE: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

2013-06-13 Thread Bill Humphries
Why not just look at moving them to office 365 for 4 bucks a mailbox and have 
MS do the antispam?  Any cloud spam service will cost almost that much.

Bill

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ken Schaefer
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:06 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: cloud spam filtering WAS RE: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail 
email security boxes - feedback?

No quarantine option with those guys AFAIK

Which does bring up a question I've been meaning to ask. For a home user (or 
very small business), does anyone have recommendations for a mail filtering 
service? Was going to sign up with Postini, but they don't seem to deal direct 
anymore (and are pushing people to Google Apps now anyway).

It's only for a few mailboxes (~3), but two domains (one is aliased to the 
other), so would prefer not to have to pay for two separate domains. Needs to 
have a viewer for quarantined items, and preferably a store-n-forward in case I 
have an issues with the home mailserver.

Cheers
Ken

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Friday, 14 June 2013 5:34 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

Not sure how many domains you are filtering for, but you may want to have 
someone else filter 50 bucks a year i think

http://dyn.com/email/dyn-email-gateway/












Jean-Paul Natola


From: p...@optimumdata.commailto:p...@optimumdata.com
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:22:51 +
Ok, I just looked and the appropriate Barracuda VM - Barracuda Spam  Virus 
Firewall Vx V300 - is $1500-ish USD.

That's what I get for not checking before writing. They've diversified the 
options since I last looked 3-4 months ago.

--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.commailto:p...@optimumdata.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Brutsche
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:53 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

The Barracuda Networks VMs are $ - $3k USD or so for the VM.

For comparison, the unlimited user FortiMail VM is $1500-ish USD and the 
SonicWALL VM was $800-ish USD for 50 users.

--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.commailto:p...@optimumdata.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of N Parr
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:42 PM
To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

I've been running Barracuda's appliance in a VM for a couple years now and it 
does everything you require.  But I don't allow user access to quarantine.   I 
set it in global mode and generally forget about it.  Once you get it tuned 
right for spam and ham it's pretty dead on.  Every week or so I'll take a look 
at my quarantine just to see if anything legit has been caught.  I guess you 
could give users access to a shared mailbox that contains the quarantine.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Brutsche
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:15 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?

We are currently using a Dell SonicWALL Email Security VMware appliance and The 
Boss Man(tm) would like to evaluate alternatives.

One of the appliances that meets our requirements is the FortiGate FortiMail 
Email Security Appliance.

Is anyone using one of these boxes, and, if you are, do you have any feedback 
you would like to share?

In case anyone is wondering, these are the requirements:
* LDAP support (believe it or not, there are actually boxes that don't support 
that!)
* Available as a virtual appliance so we can run it in the VMware cluster
* Support for quarantine delegation - we need to give specific users access to 
the quarantine folder for distribution groups

--
Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.commailto:p...@optimumdata.com