Slow / Performance problem.

2014-12-02 Thread Stefan B
We have 2 Equallogic Systems, And a Dell Servers.

We have every server give a block device home dir , so the user data are on 
the home dir this is working great its format on xfs filesystem, and 
running iscsiadm version 2.0-870 with linux kernel 3.10.57

But when we logging on the server, the first time we do a dir command on 
the home dir, its take a long time when we get feedback on the dir , the 
next time is fast when we do a dir.
Now we have users on this systems and this problem give not good 
performance on sql and websites an e-mail we are running on the server.

Are the some information how i can fix ore maybe get this problem better 
under control ?

I hope so that somebody can help me, i am searching for more than 3 weeks 
now.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Slow / Performance problem.

2014-12-02 Thread Stefan B
bash-4.3# iscsiadm -m session -P3
iSCSI Transport Class version 2.0-870
version 2.0-872
Target: iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:0-8a0906-6c5f17a03-1244d61b0964922b-srv2
Current Portal: 192.3.168.39:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.3.168.25:3260,1
**
Interface:
**
Iface Name: default
Iface Transport: tcp
Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2005-03.org.open-iscsi:17bf658bc39
Iface IPaddress: 192.3.168.51
Iface HWaddress: default
Iface Netdev: default
SID: 1
iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
iSCSI Session State: LOGGED_IN
Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE

Negotiated iSCSI params:

HeaderDigest: None
DataDigest: None
MaxRecvDataSegmentLength: 131072
MaxXmitDataSegmentLength: 65536
FirstBurstLength: 65536
MaxBurstLength: 262144
ImmediateData: Yes
InitialR2T: No
MaxOutstandingR2T: 1

Attached SCSI devices:

Host Number: 7State: running
scsi7 Channel 00 Id 0 Lun: 0

We have not the Hit Kit installed on the Servers. We use Jumbo frames on 
the switches thats work, but flowcontrol dont work with the switch in the 
Dell Bladecenter.

We use the default mount point 
/dev/sde on /home type xfs (rw)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Slow / Performance problem.

2014-12-02 Thread InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
Heres a sample how it looks like when Hit Kit is working (which whould
boost your SAN Performance dramatically).

root@xxx ~]$ iscsiadm -m session -P3
iSCSI Transport Class version 2.0-870
version 6.2.0-873.10.el6
Target: iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:4-52aed6-f71e0d568-d8000144f353-
Current Portal: 192.168.xx106:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.168.xx100:3260,1
**
Interface:
**
Iface Name: eql.p3p2
Iface Transport: tcp
Iface Initiatorname: iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:11b76f936ab4
Iface IPaddress: 192.168.xx201
Iface HWaddress: empty
Iface Netdev: p3p2
SID: 1030
iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
iSCSI Session State: LOGGED_IN
Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE
*
Timeouts:
*
Recovery Timeout: 15
Target Reset Timeout: 30
LUN Reset Timeout: 30
Abort Timeout: 15
*
CHAP:
*
username: empty
password: 
username_in: empty
password_in: 

Negotiated iSCSI params:

HeaderDigest: None
DataDigest: None
MaxRecvDataSegmentLength: 65536
MaxXmitDataSegmentLength: 65536
FirstBurstLength: 65536
MaxBurstLength: 262144
ImmediateData: Yes
InitialR2T: No
MaxOutstandingR2T: 1

Attached SCSI devices:

Host Number: 1030   State: running
scsi1030 Channel 00 Id 0 Lun: 0
Attached scsi disk sde  State: running
Current Portal: 192.168.xx103:3260,1
Persistent Portal: 192.168.xx100:3260,1
**
Interface:
**
Iface Name: eql.p3p1
Iface Transport: tcp
Iface Initiatorname: iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:11b76f936ab4
Iface IPaddress: 192.168.xx200
Iface HWaddress: empty
Iface Netdev: p3p1
SID: 1031
iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
iSCSI Session State: LOGGED_IN
Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE
*
Timeouts:
*
Recovery Timeout: 15
Target Reset Timeout: 30
LUN Reset Timeout: 30
Abort Timeout: 15
*
CHAP:
*
username: empty
password: 
username_in: empty
password_in: 

Negotiated iSCSI params:

HeaderDigest: None
DataDigest: None
MaxRecvDataSegmentLength: 65536
MaxXmitDataSegmentLength: 65536
FirstBurstLength: 65536
MaxBurstLength: 262144
ImmediateData: Yes
InitialR2T: No
MaxOutstandingR2T: 1

Attached SCSI devices:

Host Number: 1031   State: running
scsi1031 Channel 00 Id 0 Lun: 0
Attached scsi disk sdg  State: running
Current Portal: 192.168.xx101:3260,1


and so on, multipathing is the Point. But different than with other SAN,
since the EQL use a Gate IP which redirects you to one of the other IPs


 ehcmcli -d
Warning: Legacy syntax detected! Please use the new format of the command:
  ehcmcli status

Generating diagnostic data, please wait...


Adapter List

  Name: p3p1
IP Address: 192.168.
HW addr: 90:E2:BA:06:

  Name: p3p2
IP Address: 192.168.
HW addr: 90:E2:BA:06:

  Name: p3p3
IP Address: 192.168.
HW addr: 90:E2:BA:06:

  Name: p3p4
IP Address: 192.168.


Volume list

  Volume: someonesvolume
Target name: iqn.2001-05.com.equ
Device to mount: /dev/eql/yep-a-volume
Status: Normal
Session: 986   /dev/sdf   192.168.xx200 - 192.168.xx102   8d 02:41:53
Session: 1032  /dev/sdh   

Re: Slow / Performance problem.

2014-12-02 Thread Stefan B
We can not hit kit installed thats is correct, the system are not support 
get i back from the installer.

We use the fowling switchs 

Dell Bladecenter we use the Dell PowerEdge M I/O Aggregator connect with 
10Gbit to HP Procruve 3800 switchs and then connected to the 1Gbit 
Equallogic's.

Sometime its takes more than 30 / 45 seconds to get the data back, and the 
sql and webserver are waiting on this, are the some setting whate can give 
this problem ?

On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 3:22:22 PM UTC+1, Stefan B wrote:

 We have 2 Equallogic Systems, And a Dell Servers.

 We have every server give a block device home dir , so the user data are 
 on the home dir this is working great its format on xfs filesystem, and 
 running iscsiadm version 2.0-870 with linux kernel 3.10.57

 But when we logging on the server, the first time we do a dir command on 
 the home dir, its take a long time when we get feedback on the dir , the 
 next time is fast when we do a dir.
 Now we have users on this systems and this problem give not good 
 performance on sql and websites an e-mail we are running on the server.

 Are the some information how i can fix ore maybe get this problem better 
 under control ?

 I hope so that somebody can help me, i am searching for more than 3 weeks 
 now.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Slow / Performance problem.

2014-12-02 Thread InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
Than you should at least tune your iscsi.conf to fit the eql
requirements. I sent a working config from one of our Systems (but keep
in mind this is multiple Gbit, not 10G).

You can take the Manual for Citrix Xenserver Multipathing + Eql to get a
Direction how it should look like since its using open-iscsi, too.

http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/extras/m/white_papers/20438058

Dont forget to check/set the NIC Settings ... regarding the HP Switch i
am out, we where into  EQL + Cisco 3750 and had lots of trouble until we
replaced them with recommended Powerconnects.

Am 02.12.2014 um 16:43 schrieb Stefan B:
 We can not hit kit installed thats is correct, the system are not
 support get i back from the installer.
 
 We use the fowling switchs
 
 Dell Bladecenter we use the Dell PowerEdge M I/O Aggregator connect with
 10Gbit to HP Procruve 3800 switchs and then connected to the 1Gbit
 Equallogic's.
 
 Sometime its takes more than 30 / 45 seconds to get the data back, and
 the sql and webserver are waiting on this, are the some setting whate
 can give this problem ?
 
 On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 3:22:22 PM UTC+1, Stefan B wrote:
 
 We have 2 Equallogic Systems, And a Dell Servers.
 
 We have every server give a block device home dir , so the user data
 are on the home dir this is working great its format on xfs
 filesystem, and running iscsiadm version 2.0-870 with linux kernel
 3.10.57
 
 But when we logging on the server, the first time we do a dir
 command on the home dir, its take a long time when we get feedback
 on the dir , the next time is fast when we do a dir.
 Now we have users on this systems and this problem give not good
 performance on sql and websites an e-mail we are running on the server.
 
 Are the some information how i can fix ore maybe get this problem
 better under control ?
 
 I hope so that somebody can help me, i am searching for more than 3
 weeks now.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups open-iscsi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 mailto:open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
 mailto:open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Slow dir / Performance.

2014-12-02 Thread stefjeot
We have 2 Equallogic Systems, And a Dell Servers.

We have every server give a block device home dir , so the user data are on 
the home dir this is working great its format on xfs filesystem, and 
running iscsiadm version 2.0-870 with linux kernel 3.10.57

But when we logging on the server, the first time we do a dir command on 
the home dir, its take a long time when we get feedback on the dir , the 
next time is fast when we do a dir.
Now we have users on this systems and this problem give not good 
performance on sql and websites an e-mail we are running on the server.

Are the some information how i can fix ore maybe get this problem better 
under control ?

I hope so that somebody can help me, i am searching for more than 3 weeks 
now.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Slow / Performance problem.

2014-12-02 Thread InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
Hit Kit is installed? Filesystem Mountparams?

Output of iscsiadm -m session -P3 whould be helpful

Am 02.12.2014 um 15:22 schrieb Stefan B:
 We have 2 Equallogic Systems, And a Dell Servers.
 
 We have every server give a block device home dir , so the user data are
 on the home dir this is working great its format on xfs filesystem, and
 running iscsiadm version 2.0-870 with linux kernel 3.10.57
 
 But when we logging on the server, the first time we do a dir command on
 the home dir, its take a long time when we get feedback on the dir , the
 next time is fast when we do a dir.
 Now we have users on this systems and this problem give not good
 performance on sql and websites an e-mail we are running on the server.
 
 Are the some information how i can fix ore maybe get this problem better
 under control ?
 
 I hope so that somebody can help me, i am searching for more than 3
 weeks now.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups open-iscsi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 mailto:open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
 mailto:open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Slow dir / Performance.

2014-12-02 Thread Donald Williams
Hello,

 What Linux distro are you using?There are some common tweaks to the
/etc/iscsid.conf and sysctl.conf files that help improve performance.

This link covers how to configure RHEL with EQL.  The same principles apply
to any recent Linux distro.


http://en.community.dell.com/cfs-filesystemfile/__key/communityserver-components-postattachments/00-19-86-14-22/TR1062_2D00_LinuxDeploy_2D00_v1-2.pdf

 Most distros locate all the files under /etc/iscsi.   RHEL/CentOS have
some in /etc/iscsi and the rest in /var/lib/iscsi

 Are you using MPIO?

 What FW are you running on the EQL storage?

 A common tweak I run to help improve read performance is blockdev.
/sbin/blockdev --setra  /dev/device

 This increases the read ahead value which is pretty low by default.   It's
covered in the PDF as well.

  Lastly have you opened a support case with Dell? They can review the
diags and switch logs.

 Regards

 Don


On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:06 AM, stefj...@gmail.com wrote:

 We have 2 Equallogic Systems, And a Dell Servers.

 We have every server give a block device home dir , so the user data are
 on the home dir this is working great its format on xfs filesystem, and
 running iscsiadm version 2.0-870 with linux kernel 3.10.57

 But when we logging on the server, the first time we do a dir command on
 the home dir, its take a long time when we get feedback on the dir , the
 next time is fast when we do a dir.
 Now we have users on this systems and this problem give not good
 performance on sql and websites an e-mail we are running on the server.

 Are the some information how i can fix ore maybe get this problem better
 under control ?

 I hope so that somebody can help me, i am searching for more than 3 weeks
 now.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 open-iscsi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Could not logout of all requested sessions when working with centos 7

2014-12-02 Thread Michael Christie
Thanks for reporting back.

If this happens again, give us the /var/log/messages and the output of

iscsiadm -m session -P 3

when the iscsiadm ….. —logout command is returning the errors you pasted below.



On Nov 30, 2014, at 12:08 AM, Shay Katz shak...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 during the last week i have tried to reproduce the problem without success.
 
 I guess it is false alarm.
 
 Shay
 
 On Monday, November 10, 2014 8:51:00 AM UTC+2, Mike Christie wrote:
 Could you attach your /var/log/messages for when you removed the portals and 
 when you ran the logout command?
 
 
 On Nov 7, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Shay Katz sha...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 I have client (centos 7) with logged in sessions,
 
  
 [root@lgdrm1027 ~]# iscsiadm -m session
 
 tcp: [1] 10.206.12.5:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4a (non-flash)
 
 tcp: [2] 10.205.12.5:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4a (non-flash)
 
 tcp: [3] 10.206.12.6:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4b (non-flash)
 
 tcp: [4] 10.205.12.6:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4b (non-flash)
 
 tcp: [5] 10.206.12.15:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff6 (non-flash)
 
 tcp: [6] 10.205.12.15:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff6 (non-flash)
 
 tcp: [7] 10.206.12.16:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff7 (non-flash)
 
 tcp: [8] 10.205.12.16:3260,1 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff7 (non-flash)
 
  
 After logging in the user remove the portals from the target, now when I am 
 trying to logged out the operation fails
 
 And I didn't find how to remove them (There is no force flag):
 
  
 [root@lgdrm1027 ~]# iscsiadm -m node -u
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 1, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4a, portal: 10.206.12.5,3260]
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 2, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4a, portal: 10.205.12.5,3260]
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 3, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4b, portal: 10.206.12.6,3260]
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 4, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4b, portal: 10.205.12.6,3260]
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 5, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff6, portal: 10.206.12.15,3260]
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 6, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff6, portal: 10.205.12.15,3260]
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 7, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff7, portal: 10.206.12.16,3260]
 
 Logging out of session [sid: 8, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff7, portal: 10.205.12.16,3260]
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 1, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4a, portal: 10.206.12.5,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (9 - internal error)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 2, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4a, portal: 10.205.12.5,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (2 - session not found)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 3, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4b, portal: 10.206.12.6,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (2 - session not found)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 4, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efc4b, portal: 10.205.12.6,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (2 - session not found)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 5, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff6, portal: 10.206.12.15,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (2 - session not found)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 6, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff6, portal: 10.205.12.15,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (2 - session not found)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 7, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff7, portal: 10.206.12.16,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (2 - session not found)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of [sid: 8, target: 
 iqn.2008-05.com.xtremio:001e679efff7, portal: 10.205.12.16,3260].
 
 iscsiadm: initiator reported error (2 - session not found)
 
 iscsiadm: Could not logout of all requested sessions
 
 [root@lgdrm1027 ~]#
 
 same scenario on centos 6.5 worked well.
 
 Shay
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 open-iscsi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to open-iscsi+...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to open-...@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 open-iscsi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 

new comer questions on tgt,lio-utils and iscsitarget

2014-12-02 Thread pillar1986
hi
I am new to iscsi ,have some questions in learning,quite appreciate for 
your help and time

1 \ both lio-utils and tgt are pure user space program? Both of them are 
using the kernel iscsi module ? So ,what is the difference between them?
2 \ Are there any guide documents on how to setup a iscsi target using both 
tgt and lio-utils?

Thanks a lot for your help and time !

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: iSCSI request keep rejected by microsoft iSCSI target because of write_same check

2014-12-02 Thread Martin K. Petersen
 Mike == Michael Christie micha...@cs.wisc.edu writes:

Mike,

Mike This was the issue we worked with Microsoft on wasn’t it? You guys
Mike figured out it was fixed in their target in a recent release
Mike right?

The issue we worked recently was wrt. the thin provisioning reporting.

The WRITE SAME problem was that the target returns an iSCSI-specific
error code rather than a check condition with ILLEGAL REQUEST. You were
going to talk to MS.

However, if somebody sends me the relevant INQUIRY strings for the MS
target I'll add it to the WRITE SAME quirk list.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen  Oracle Linux Engineering

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Antw: Slow dir / Performance.

2014-12-02 Thread Ulrich Windl
 stefj...@gmail.com schrieb am 02.12.2014 um 15:06 in Nachricht
5a7097b3-0dd7-4c28-abbf-ff66800b8...@googlegroups.com:
 We have 2 Equallogic Systems, And a Dell Servers.
 
 We have every server give a block device home dir , so the user data are on 
 the home dir this is working great its format on xfs filesystem, and 
 running iscsiadm version 2.0-870 with linux kernel 3.10.57
 
 But when we logging on the server, the first time we do a dir command on 
 the home dir, its take a long time when we get feedback on the dir , the 
 next time is fast when we do a dir.

Are you sure it's related to iSCSI? Especially for the /home dire several 
different UIDs/GIDs are involved. We had a slow ls -l /home performance when 
the NIS server had a problem. Maybe you use LDAP or something else? Maybe try 
hdparm -t block_device to get a rough number how fast your block device can 
be read. I know there are better tests, but this one is quick and easy to 
perform...

 Now we have users on this systems and this problem give not good 
 performance on sql and websites an e-mail we are running on the server.

You are running a database (sql) via iSCSI?

 
 Are the some information how i can fix ore maybe get this problem better 
 under control ?
 
 I hope so that somebody can help me, i am searching for more than 3 weeks 
 now.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 open-iscsi group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
open-iscsi group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.