Re: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...

[Luis Marco]

In response to
"The Ontologies space has a single page with a few attachments, of which
nothing has been changed since 2012. Does this really warrant a separate
space? Could this page be moved to a different space?"


I think Ontologies could be a subsection of terminologies, I would not
advocate for hgaving a separate space.

Best!
Luis

El mié., 7 ago. 2019 a las 9:27, Bakke, Silje Ljosland via
openEHR-technical () escribió:

> I think we may need a more thorough discussion about how to best use the
> wiki. How do we maximise information findability, how do we enable new
> people (and not-so-new people!) to find their way around? Do we make new
> empty spaces when we start something new, or do we branch them out when the
> existing spaces become crowded? How do we decide what goes in which space?
>
>
>
> For now:
>
>- I’ve reactivated the Education space, since I saw it was used for
>the Spanish openEHR Day. (Is this really education though, and not
>community?)
>- The Ontologies space has a single page with a few attachments, of
>which nothing has been changed since 2012. Does this really warrant a
>separate space? Could this page be moved to a different space?
>- Could the Community space be merged with Resources? If I understand
>correctly, their uses are at least partly overlapping.
>
>
>
> Kind regards, Silje
>
>
>
> *From:* openEHR-technical  *On
> Behalf Of *Thomas Beale
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 6, 2019 3:51 PM
> *To:* openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
> *Subject:* Re: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...
>
>
>
>
>
> On 06/08/2019 13:43, Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-technical wrote:
>
> Picking this up again half a year later…
>
>
>
> I’ve archived the following spaces, since there seemed to be a consensus
> that they weren’t used. This is easily reversible:
>
>- Healthcare
>- Demonstration Space
>- Education
>- Ontologies
>- Website
>
>
>
> Thomas, have you had a chance to look at and/or move the stuff in the
> following spaces?
>
> although the CIMI and Terminology spaces are not added to in recent times,
> they are both regularly viewed for content, including by outside agencies
> (including US VA and HL7).
>
> I'd rather keep the Ontologies space alive as well, it is read quite often.
>
> I also suspect Education is going to start being used soon (including by
> me ;)
>
>
>- CIMI
>- Terminology
>
>
>
> For the rest of you, does anyone care if the following spaces are archived?
>
>- Projects (https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/projects)
>
> this is historical info, and I think can be archived.
>
>
>
>
>-
>- Zz openEHR Community (https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/oecom
>)
>
> I guess this can be archived, but what happens the next time people want
> to discuss and record ideas about openEHR Community functioning ;)
>
>
>
>
>-
>
>
>
> Regarding the CQ space: Nobody has asked a question in two years in any of
> the spaces. Do we need to keep the Questions functionality at all?
>
>
>
> I don't really know how to interpret the lack of use - I think people with
> questions do not think to go to the openEHR website and find the Questions
> link, which used to be on the home page. Maybe we should put it back?
>
> - thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards, Silje
>
>
>
> *From:* openEHR-technical 
>  *On Behalf Of *Thomas Beale
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:29 PM
> *To:* openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
> *Subject:* Re: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...
>
>
>
>
>
> On 19/12/2018 11:19, Ian McNicoll wrote:
>
>
>
> Effectively empty:
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/healthcare (mostly empty
>pages, last edit in 2011)
>
> there is some content here, but no idea who cares about it.
>
>
>
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ds (Demo default
>Confluence space?)
>
> seems to be Confluence help material - not sure if we should delete or not.
>
>
>
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CQ
>
> I think Confluence creates this when we started using Questions - and it
> says not to delete...
>
>
>
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/WEB
>
> we can probably remove this, since we use Jira to manage web work now, but
> I need to check.
>
>
>
>
>-
>
>
>
> Apparently abandoned:
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ADL (last three edits 338,
>965 and 1631 days ago)
>
> this one is not abandoned - contains pages that are linked to from the 
> Archetype
> specs release page
> 
>
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CIMI (last activity in
>2015)
>
> contains material that should be retained somewhere - I'll have a look
>
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/edu (two pages, the most
>recent edited in 2012)
>
> looks dead
>
>
>
>
>- https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ontol (only one page,
>edited in 2012)
>

RE: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...

[Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-technical]

I could definitely live with that, but only if the scope of each space is made 
clear in the space description and with a clear delineation to related spaces 
on the front page. To me, “Ontology” or “Terminology” isn’t clear at all, and 
especially with regard to where they intersect with “Specifications” and 
“Clinical”. There also seems to me there’s an overlap in use between 
“Education”, “Community” and “Resources” that needs to be delineated.

I also noticed that we have the Calendar app enabled. Does anyone use it? If 
not, could we disable it?

Kind regards, Silje

From: openEHR-technical  On Behalf 
Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 11:19 AM
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...


My personal view is that it is better to have slightly more spaces each with 
clear scope, even if some have not much content, rather than trying to push all 
content into a few spaces with larger amounts of content. To me it seems 
obvious what kinds of things I might find in 'ontology' and 'education', 
whereas if I know there are some articles on these areas, but they are buried 
in e..g the 'specifications' space, it's going to be a matter of trying to 
search for them with various keys.

I fixed the Resources space a little bit, but it seems to me there is a fair 
bit of content like FAQs that people may well access.

these are just my views, and others may have better ideas...!

- thomas
On 07/08/2019 08:26, Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-technical wrote:
I think we may need a more thorough discussion about how to best use the wiki. 
How do we maximise information findability, how do we enable new people (and 
not-so-new people!) to find their way around? Do we make new empty spaces when 
we start something new, or do we branch them out when the existing spaces 
become crowded? How do we decide what goes in which space?

For now:

  *   I’ve reactivated the Education space, since I saw it was used for the 
Spanish openEHR Day. (Is this really education though, and not community?)
  *   The Ontologies space has a single page with a few attachments, of which 
nothing has been changed since 2012. Does this really warrant a separate space? 
Could this page be moved to a different space?
  *   Could the Community space be merged with Resources? If I understand 
correctly, their uses are at least partly overlapping.

Kind regards, Silje


___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Re: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...

[Thomas Beale]

My personal view is that it is better to have slightly more spaces each 
with clear scope, even if some have not much content, rather than trying 
to push all content into a few spaces with larger amounts of content. To 
me it seems obvious what kinds of things I might find in 'ontology' and 
'education', whereas if I know there are some articles on these areas, 
but they are buried in e..g the 'specifications' space, it's going to be 
a matter of trying to search for them with various keys.


I fixed the Resources space a little bit, but it seems to me there is a 
fair bit of content like FAQs that people may well access.


these are just my views, and others may have better ideas...!

- thomas

On 07/08/2019 08:26, Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-technical wrote:


I think we may need a more thorough discussion about how to best use 
the wiki. How do we maximise information findability, how do we enable 
new people (and not-so-new people!) to find their way around? Do we 
make new empty spaces when we start something new, or do we branch 
them out when the existing spaces become crowded? How do we decide 
what goes in which space?


For now:

  * I’ve reactivated the Education space, since I saw it was used for
the Spanish openEHR Day. (Is this really education though, and not
community?)
  * The Ontologies space has a single page with a few attachments, of
which nothing has been changed since 2012. Does this really
warrant a separate space? Could this page be moved to a different
space?
  * Could the Community space be merged with Resources? If I
understand correctly, their uses are at least partly overlapping.

Kind regards, Silje



___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

RE: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...

[Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-technical]

I think we may need a more thorough discussion about how to best use the wiki. 
How do we maximise information findability, how do we enable new people (and 
not-so-new people!) to find their way around? Do we make new empty spaces when 
we start something new, or do we branch them out when the existing spaces 
become crowded? How do we decide what goes in which space?

For now:

  *   I’ve reactivated the Education space, since I saw it was used for the 
Spanish openEHR Day. (Is this really education though, and not community?)
  *   The Ontologies space has a single page with a few attachments, of which 
nothing has been changed since 2012. Does this really warrant a separate space? 
Could this page be moved to a different space?
  *   Could the Community space be merged with Resources? If I understand 
correctly, their uses are at least partly overlapping.

Kind regards, Silje

From: openEHR-technical  On Behalf 
Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 3:51 PM
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...



On 06/08/2019 13:43, Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-technical wrote:
Picking this up again half a year later…

I’ve archived the following spaces, since there seemed to be a consensus that 
they weren’t used. This is easily reversible:

  *   Healthcare
  *   Demonstration Space
  *   Education
  *   Ontologies
  *   Website

Thomas, have you had a chance to look at and/or move the stuff in the following 
spaces?

although the CIMI and Terminology spaces are not added to in recent times, they 
are both regularly viewed for content, including by outside agencies (including 
US VA and HL7).

I'd rather keep the Ontologies space alive as well, it is read quite often.

I also suspect Education is going to start being used soon (including by me ;)

  *   CIMI
  *   Terminology

For the rest of you, does anyone care if the following spaces are archived?

  *   Projects (https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/projects)

this is historical info, and I think can be archived.



  *
  *   Zz openEHR Community (https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/oecom)

I guess this can be archived, but what happens the next time people want to 
discuss and record ideas about openEHR Community functioning ;)



  *

Regarding the CQ space: Nobody has asked a question in two years in any of the 
spaces. Do we need to keep the Questions functionality at all?


I don't really know how to interpret the lack of use - I think people with 
questions do not think to go to the openEHR website and find the Questions 
link, which used to be on the home page. Maybe we should put it back?

- thomas




Kind regards, Silje

From: openEHR-technical 

 On Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:29 PM
To: 
openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...



On 19/12/2018 11:19, Ian McNicoll wrote:

Effectively empty:

  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/healthcare (mostly empty pages, 
last edit in 2011)

there is some content here, but no idea who cares about it.



  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ds (Demo default Confluence 
space?)

seems to be Confluence help material - not sure if we should delete or not.



  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CQ

I think Confluence creates this when we started using Questions - and it says 
not to delete...



  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/WEB

we can probably remove this, since we use Jira to manage web work now, but I 
need to check.



  *

Apparently abandoned:

  *   
https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ADL
 (last three edits 338, 965 and 1631 days ago)

this one is not abandoned - contains pages that are linked to from the 
Archetype specs release 
page

  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CIMI (last activity in 2015)

contains material that should be retained somewhere - I'll have a look

  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/edu (two pages, the most recent 
edited in 2012)

looks dead



  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ontol (only one page, edited in 
2012)

not used AFAIK



  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/projects (last real 
contribution 720 days ago)

the community should have a look at this one and decide if it is useful I think



  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/stds (last real contribution 
950 days ago)



we do actually use this, just not that frequently. I'll move the CIMI material 
here



  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SYS (last activity 2015)

 we use this for sysadmin; last update: 2018-06-11

  *   https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/term (last activity 2014)



not used for a long time. I would