Re: [Openpbx-dev] G729 Licensing thread
The company I work for (ZettaServe, www.zettaserve.com) has working, though work-in-progress G729a and G729ab codec for OpenPBX (with support and patches for VAD, silence suppression and CNG) This codec is based on IPP 5.1 and is written against trunk. G729a should be suitable for iax2, h323, sip etc. At this time G729ab support is only for SIP. We should be announcing it properly to this list within about a week. But for now preliminary instructions and code can be found at http://www.zettaserve.com/ default.asp?catid=78, the license for the ZettaServe contributions are public domain. Hi Is this code licensed under GPL? roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] G.729 licensing project
Den 17.4.2007 kl. 02:28 skrev Steve Underwood: Since we have plenty to do right now, I've just been waiting to see what Freeswitch dredges up as a workable solution. We intend to support these things through pipes, with the transcoder running as a separate process. That completely avoids licencing issues with our pure GPL core, and the overhead is no big deal when you compare it against the compute cost of the codec. That'll open up new possibilities with (distributed) transcoding farms for large setups - nice :) roy___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] best xDSL router with QOS for OpenPBX?
Our testing shows PLC+JB alone will suffice. We tested multiple simultanous downloads with p2p sortware, and audio was still good roy Den 28.3.2007 kl. 18:45 skrev Antonio Gallo: wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will allow a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 or more) to be used even if all people are downloading via FTP and eMule to be used with OpenPBX? At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad experiences, basically if someone is using eMule you cannot use VoIP lines at all. Antonio ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] no more names
anyone else? coppice/steve? Den 14.3.2007 kl. 05:42 skrev Jesse Reynolds: Good plan Roy! I don't really like callweaver but it got the most votes so lets use it. In the end, it's just a name! Lets keep working on The Software Formerly Known As OpenPBX.org :-) Cheers Jesse On 11/03/2007, at 1:57 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: may we please keep to what has been suggested? the old poll shows a lead of callweaver, seconed by gnupbx, which is, imho, not an option (see earlier discussions about this) so perhaps we should land it all, pick a name, perhaps callweaver, and try to spend more time developing and testing instead of arguing roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev Jesse Reynolds Virtual Artists Pty Ltd - http://www.va.com.au/ Phone: 08 8223 2288Mobile: 0414 669 790 ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] New to OpenPBX development
Last but not least i've a license question. If my company develops an AGI that work with OpenPBX, can we sell it in binary only form or we're forced to provide source code? I hope OpenPBX GPL will apply only to the OpenPBX source code and not also to external code (AGI, EAGI, FAGI, extensions, etc.) GPL state that any code linked with GPL becomes GPL - and has to be open source etc. The exception is if it is a binary, separated project witch functions also without OpenPBX. The rules are set out in the GPL text. GPL is written like a virus license, so you need to take care if you combine it with proprietary, non-open source. AGI/OGI is not touched by GPL unless you link (as in ld) against libraries that are GPL. Using AGI/OGI over TCP or by fork/exec will not invalidate GPL, and is indeed legal, no matter how much you charge for the app :P roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] New to OpenPBX development
Legalities aside. If you are happy to use GPL'd code why would you not want your code to be GPL'd? While you are not obligated you might think about what others would think. Some companies make money out of writing software, and specialised software may be worth paying for. (I just bought Adobe Lightroom :P) roy___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] bootstrapping build envt on mac os x
Sure. Try these. http://karlsbakk.net/openpbx/openpbx-1.2-rev2549.tar.gz http://karlsbakk.net/openpbx/openpbx-trunk-rev2549.tar.gz Great, thank you. I'll try them out. It might be worth having a nightly bootstrapped tarball available for download from the website, both for trunk and 1.2. How hard would this be to set up? I doubt it'll be much work. How about making daily bootstrapped snapshots? roy there is.For quite sometime now... http://openpbx.hotlap.org IMHO there should be MD5 sums available (printed on the right-hand side?) roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] bootstrapping build envt on mac os x
Den 14.3.2007 kl. 10:03 skrev Jesse Reynolds: On 14/03/2007, at 4:20 PM, bkml wrote: On Mar 14, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Jesse Reynolds wrote: Does anyone have any instructions on how to get the openpbx source bootstrapped on mac? You are not expected to bootstrap on non-Linux platforms. The established consensus has been that bootstrapping would be done on a Linux system, then use the bootstrapped tarball to build on the non- Linux target system. So, there is in fact no way for me to test the latest 1.2 branch on a Mac? Perhaps someone could provide a tarball of the current 1.2 branch for me? I'd like to test the sip goes to sleep bug present in 1.2 RC3. . Sure. Try these. http://karlsbakk.net/openpbx/openpbx-1.2-rev2549.tar.gz http://karlsbakk.net/openpbx/openpbx-trunk-rev2549.tar.gz roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] more names
hi all after discussing the name suggestion 'gnupbx' on IRC, it was noted, correctly, that this should not be regarded an option, since openpbx is not part of FSF. It would be like naming the project AsteriskPBX or ApachePBX. I suggest we drop that name and let the voting go on with the other candidates best regards roy ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] How to set CLIR in dialplan ? - Where is application: SetCallerPres or CallingPres ???
caller presentation was forgotten during the fork, but it's there now, in subversion, both 1.2 and trunk roy On 19. feb. 2007, at 14.26, Piotr wrote: Hello Ther is no applications: SetCallerPres and CallingPres in OpenPBX How can I disable presentation on ZAP channels on demand - CLIR on Request ? I activated CLIR on Request in my local Teleco I want to make some calls with presentation and all other calls with No presentation How can I set CLIR in dialplan ? When I insert: Set(CALLERID(name)=) into dialplan then this call have Base PRA number :( Best Regards Piotr ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] rfc4733?
hi has anyone looked into this? http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4733.txt it seems nortel has worked out a better way to do dtmf than the old rfc2833 roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] the future
hi once more I wonder what's in the opbx future. it seems to me thre hasn't been too many submits in svn lately. are people giving up this in favor for something else? thanks roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] The OpenPBX Future v2
hi all after some talks, or the lack of such, some people have held back patches, fixes and so on from the tree. some are afraid of Mr. X. stealing the code, but as long as this is GPL, it should be obvious that anyone that wants the code will get it, sooner or later. my advice to the once holding back code is to release it, and not to care about any mister or mrs X. anything else will just hurt this project. roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] The opbx future?
Hi all Lately, there have been some talks about a name change, and some have suggested this to add funding to the project. This is all well, but there has also been talks of someone initiating a takeover for reasons unknown or untold. There were arguments about the lack of stability of trac, and I myself was pretty pissed off for not getting the svn account I was promised. Currently, though, I don't see these problems. Personally, I beleive in this project. We have a pretty stable codebase and enough functionality/features. What we need now, is a open and democratic organization to deal with what should go in and what should not. In case we get funding, a commitee should decide what should be prioritised. We also need guidelines for everything from coding standards to project goals. I beleive this is quite similar to what moc proposed to the list january 24, and this should not be recognised as an opposition to the proposal of his. roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] Release? (was OPBX Changes Proposal Questions alot of other things)
://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] svn account?
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 00:46 +0100, CtRiX wrote: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: can I have that account now, please? or should we move the svn tree to somewhere where we can have more control over it? I think you already have an account somewhere else, don't you ? I've been mirroring the SVN tree into git for a while now. At any point that it's convenient, we could switch over and start using that instead. I just need SSH keys from people who need accounts. sounds great to me. Will you be creating separate svn accounts or just using a common one? roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] Shared svn user?? (was svn account?)
I see there's only a shared svn user in the openpbx tree. How the fsck can an admin monitor who changed what in svn this way? This should be changed ASAP! roy On 23. jan. 2007, at 14.50, Marc Olivier Chouinard wrote: Hi Roy, From what I see, you already have an svn+ssh account to the subversion. The box hosting openpbx project has multiple person who has root access and can create svn account. Spackle, CtRiX and me as of rightnow. I am currently trying to build different responsibility position to manage the different services hosted with the opbx project. SVN is one of them, so but in the mean time if people need svn access they can contact spackle, CtRiX or me. Marc O. Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: hi after asking a few times now, and gotten answers like 'the check's in the mail', I start to get a little frustrated. I've done lots of small improvements for openpbx, but it takes far too long to have others add them. can I have that account now, please? or should we move the svn tree to somewhere where we can have more control over it? roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] svn account?
hi after asking a few times now, and gotten answers like 'the check's in the mail', I start to get a little frustrated. I've done lots of small improvements for openpbx, but it takes far too long to have others add them. can I have that account now, please? or should we move the svn tree to somewhere where we can have more control over it? roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] new NAT logic breaks registrations
New SIP NAT logic breaks registrations with OpenPBX - nat - internet - nat - client. I'll suggest keeping the function call. It won't add overhead since it's inline, and it makes the code more readable roy globalnat.patch Description: Binary data --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] [patch] RTCP support and call quality metrics
It doesn't say anywhere how you're supposed to submit patches, so I'm
mailing it here.
Ported from Asterisk revision 32230.
Changelog:
* Adds support for RTCP
* Provides call quality metrics in the ${RTPAUDIOQOS} and
${RTPVIDEOQOS} variables after the call has hung up
A few questions
- Does this measure actual or theoretic quality?
- How does this relate to the jitterbuffer or the PLC?
thanks
roy
---
I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE!
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] memleaks
hi how can I debug memory leaks in openpbx while running it in production? in asterisk there's astmm, but this doesn't seem to be around in openpbx. roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] app_setcallerid is missing
hi i seems app_setcallerid is missing. we need this for SetCallerPres (or at least that part) to change caller presentation. the porting is simple, but htf can I add that to autoconf/automake? roy --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] [PATCH] app_setcallerpres
hi all the attached patch is a direct port from asterisk. it compiles and so on, but it doesn't stop showing the callerid to the callee. can anyone give me a hand here? this came in early pre-1.0 asterisk, and is an important part if you're working commercially. roy app_setcallerpres.patch Description: Binary data --- I encrypt all my email with ROT-13 - TWICE! Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] leaky stuff
valgrind is talking about some leaks see attached report roy valgrind.log.13844.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov) ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] Versioning? (was branch for 1.2)
hi I'd think it would be a good idea to keep our own version scheme instead of using the one from asterisk. Why would our first version ever be 1.2? it sounds strange. reminds me of IBM, never releasing x.0 versions of AIX, that is, 4.1 was the first 4.x roy On 26. nov. 2006, at 16.46, CtRiX wrote: Hello list, i have just created a new branch: http://trac.openpbx.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/2144 This is going to become 1.2 final, so only bugfixes will be accepted for this branch. There is no reason to add new features to 1.2 but we should focus on stability and on the problems arisen from the support of the new platforms and the new generic timers. Trunk is now avalaible for new features and heavy developing of what will become the next major release. Please remember to submit fixes both to the new branch and to - trunk, if applicable. Max ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov) ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] Versioning? (was branch for 1.2)
I'd think it would be a good idea to keep our own version scheme instead of using the one from asterisk. Why would our first version ever be 1.2? it sounds strange. reminds me of IBM, never releasing x.0 versions of AIX, that is, 4.1 was the first 4.x there are mainly 2 different reasons of starting from 1.2 1) pre0.2 was ready for production but never released as stable. That was meant to be 1.0 2) 1.2 is from where the * fork started, so we thought it was convenient to start from there. I understand, but still disagree. OpenPBX has not yet been released, so IMHO it should be named 1.0 roy --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov) ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] Versioning? (was branch for 1.2)
I understand, but still disagree. OpenPBX has not yet been released, so IMHO it should be named 1.0 I do not really agree with this, but I's ok. I will not argue. roy --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov) ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] /dev/FAXn symlink move?
hi all currently, openpbx needs a custom acl to create the /dev/FAXn symlink since it runs as a normal user. This is ugly. A better solution, imho, would be to create the symlink somewhere else, say, /var/run or /tmp or something any opinoins? onions? roy --- Humans mostly aren't particularly evil. They just get carried away by new ideas, like dressing up in jackboots and shooting people, or dressing up in white sheets and lynching people, or dressing up in tie-dye jeans and playing guitars at people - Terry Pratchett --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] project dormant?
hi does anything happen to opbx now? the topic on #openpbx says | openpbx.org| Release .2 This month and in two months .3 | We need assistance with release files and docs, ask how you can help! |, but was set august 2th does it still move on, or has it stopped up? roy --- Humans mostly aren't particularly evil. They just get carried away by new ideas, like dressing up in jackboots and shooting people, or dressing up in white sheets and lynching people, or dressing up in tie-dye jeans and playing guitars at people - Terry Pratchett --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] --with-everything
hi perhaps there should be a --with-everything flag so if you want to do a full install for testing purposes, you could use that instead of a commandline the size of jupiter... roy --- Humans mostly aren't particularly evil. They just get carried away by new ideas, like dressing up in jackboots and shooting people, or dressing up in white sheets and lynching people, or dressing up in tie-dye jeans and playing guitars at people - Terry Pratchett --- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] automake/libtool versions (was Getting started)
the developers/users we should aim at testing out openpbx while it's writtenOn 7. des. 2005, at 21.30, Michael Bielicki wrote:automake and al the related things are for developers so which userbase are we talking about ?On 07/12/05, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:hiis there a good reason we require the latest versions of automake/ libpri? are we doing things that are impossible with the older onesused in most distros?I'm afraid we are excluding quite a bit of the potential userbasewith thisroyOn 5. des. 2005, at 01.51, David Burgess wrote: Thanks for the link I missed it. However, I am running a yum updated FC3 and The installation process failed (naturally) due to the automake/ libtool requirements. Back to ast for me. Good luck with the project guys. Goodbye. On 12/5/05, Rico -mc- Gloeckner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:06:29AM +1100, David Burgess wrote: The wiki getting started page has # Run the autoconfiguration ./configure --prefix=$INSTALL_DIR However, ./configure does not exist in the current trunk download. What have I missed. The second link within the body of this page (that reads ' OpenPBX.org Reference'). -- http://www.ukeer.de/about.html "Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration." --Stan Kelly-Bootle ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___Openpbx-dev mailing listOpenpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev-- Michal BielickiHalo Kwadrat Sp. z o.o.http://www.asterisk.pl/ http://www.openpbx.org/___Openpbx-dev mailing listOpenpbx-dev@openpbx.orghttp://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
