Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 Released
I'm dreaming, right? - Original Message - From: Patrick Lightbody To: WebWork Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 10:52 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 Released I'm pleased to announce the release of WebWork 2.0. You can download itat:https://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/2886/webwork-2.0.zipXWork 1.0 has also been released and is available at:https://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/2885/xwork-1.0.zipThank you to everyone who provided patches, support, and ideas for overthe past year to get this project from initial concept to completion. Iam convinced that OpenSymphony has the best and most supportive userbase of any open source project - you guys rock!PatrickPS: we'll be making official release announcements tomorrow, but feelfree to start spreading the word ;)---The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and IntegrationSee the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn___Opensymphony-webwork mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 Released
Congratulations on the release! I appreciate all the work you guys have put into WebWork/XWork, and I look forward to what's coming next. Anoop On Feb 8, 2004, at 10:52 PM, Patrick Lightbody wrote: I'm pleased to announce the release of WebWork 2.0. You can download it at: https://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/2886/webwork-2.0.zip XWork 1.0 has also been released and is available at: https://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/2885/xwork-1.0.zip Thank you to everyone who provided patches, support, and ideas for over the past year to get this project from initial concept to completion. I am convinced that OpenSymphony has the best and most supportive user base of any open source project - you guys rock! Patrick PS: we'll be making official release announcements tomorrow, but feel free to start spreading the word ;) --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 Released
Blogged, added news on dev.java.net, and added news on opensymphony.com... It's real! -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 10:53 PM To: WebWork Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 Released I'm pleased to announce the release of WebWork 2.0. You can download it at: https://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/2886/webwork-2.0.zip XWork 1.0 has also been released and is available at: https://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/2885/xwork-1.0.zip Thank you to everyone who provided patches, support, and ideas for over the past year to get this project from initial concept to completion. I am convinced that OpenSymphony has the best and most supportive user base of any open source project - you guys rock! Patrick PS: we'll be making official release announcements tomorrow, but feel free to start spreading the word ;) --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
whatever happened to your plan for writing some documentation every day for one month? :) Patrick Lightbody wrote: I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED] J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
I mailed a fixed taglib.tld to the mailing list earlier. Use it and it'll work. /Daniel -Original Message- From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 19 november 2003 15:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED] J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Joseph, it's the problem where somone already provided a patch: weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'page', (JSP 1.1 spec, 5.4.1) The examples for Jasper Reports never worked: - PDF Error 500--Internal Server Error - HTML Error 500--Internal Server Error - XML Error 500--Internal Server Error - CSV Error 500--Internal Server Error Not that great ... Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED] J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Daniel, thanks, I've used it before beta 2. Regards, Lars I mailed a fixed taglib.tld to the mailing list earlier. Use it and it'll work. /Daniel -Original Message- From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 19 november 2003 15:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED] J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Can you file issues for these? They all work on Orion. Lars Fischer wrote: Joseph, it's the problem where somone already provided a patch: weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'page', (JSP 1.1 spec, 5.4.1) The examples for Jasper Reports never worked: - PDF Error 500--Internal Server Error - HTML Error 500--Internal Server Error - XML Error 500--Internal Server Error - CSV Error 500--Internal Server Error Not that great ... Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED] J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't working. It should work fine in 1.4! Lars Fischer wrote: Joseph, it's the problem where somone already provided a patch: weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'page', (JSP 1.1 spec, 5.4.1) The examples for Jasper Reports never worked: - PDF Error 500--Internal Server Error - HTML Error 500--Internal Server Error - XML Error 500--Internal Server Error - CSV Error 500--Internal Server Error Not that great ... Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED] J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
We all know that Orion is way too forgiving about errors against specs. Weblogic tends to moan more. Jboss is descriptor compliance nirvana. Mathias -Original Message- From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 19 november 2003 15:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released Can you file issues for these? They all work on Orion. Lars Fischer wrote: Joseph, it's the problem where somone already provided a patch: weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'page', (JSP 1.1 spec, 5.4.1) The examples for Jasper Reports never worked: - PDF Error 500--Internal Server Error - HTML Error 500--Internal Server Error - XML Error 500--Internal Server Error - CSV Error 500--Internal Server Error Not that great ... Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report =c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.z ip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2 .z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant[EMAIL PROTECTED] J2EE Editor - Java Developer's Journal [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't working. It should work fine in 1.4! It should ... The first report was about WW 2.0 but I just tested 1.4 with WebLogic 8.1 (see below). This is based on deploying the provided 'webwork.war'. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError at dori.jasper.engine.fill.JRFiller.fillReport(JRFiller.java:138) at dori.jasper.engine.JasperFillManager.fillReport(JasperFillManager.java:348) at webwork.view.jasperreports.JasperReportViewServlet.service(JasperReportViewServlet.java:94) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl$ServletInvocationAction.run(ServletStubImpl.java:1053) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:387) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:305) at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestDispatcherImpl$ForwardAction.run(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:342) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:317) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:97) at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:246) at webwork.dispatcher.ServletDispatcher.service(ServletDispatcher.java:222) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl$ServletInvocationAction.run(ServletStubImpl.java:1053) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:387) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:305) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:6291) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:317) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:97) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletContext.java:3575) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java:2573) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:178) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:151) This is not critical for me because I don't use Jasper Reports at the moment. Regards, Lars Lars Fischer wrote: Joseph, it's the problem where somone already provided a patch: weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'page', (JSP 1.1 spec, 5.4.1) The examples for Jasper Reports never worked: - PDF Error 500--Internal Server Error - HTML Error 500--Internal Server Error - XML Error 500--Internal Server Error - CSV Error 500--Internal Server Error Not that great ... Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Ok, thanks. I'll test and make sure it works. Lars Fischer wrote: Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't working. It should work fine in 1.4! It should ... The first report was about WW 2.0 but I just tested 1.4 with WebLogic 8.1 (see below). This is based on deploying the provided 'webwork.war'. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError at dori.jasper.engine.fill.JRFiller.fillReport(JRFiller.java:138) at dori.jasper.engine.JasperFillManager.fillReport(JasperFillManager.java:348) at webwork.view.jasperreports.JasperReportViewServlet.service(JasperReportViewServlet.java:94) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl$ServletInvocationAction.run(ServletStubImpl.java:1053) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:387) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:305) at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestDispatcherImpl$ForwardAction.run(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:342) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:317) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:97) at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:246) at webwork.dispatcher.ServletDispatcher.service(ServletDispatcher.java:222) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl$ServletInvocationAction.run(ServletStubImpl.java:1053) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:387) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:305) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:6291) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:317) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:97) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletContext.java:3575) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java:2573) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:178) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:151) This is not critical for me because I don't use Jasper Reports at the moment. Regards, Lars Lars Fischer wrote: Joseph, it's the problem where somone already provided a patch: weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'page', (JSP 1.1 spec, 5.4.1) The examples for Jasper Reports never worked: - PDF Error 500--Internal Server Error - HTML Error 500--Internal Server Error - XML Error 500--Internal Server Error - CSV Error 500--Internal Server Error Not that great ... Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030report=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2.zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/1806/webwork-2.0-beta2.z ip Thanks to everyone for all your patience and help getting this release out. Getting 2.0 final should be smooth sailing from here! The WebWork Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Are you referencing the Jasper reports servlet in your web.xml? If so, remove that. Mathias -Original Message- From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 19 november 2003 16:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't working. It should work fine in 1.4! It should ... The first report was about WW 2.0 but I just tested 1.4 with WebLogic 8.1 (see below). This is based on deploying the provided 'webwork.war'. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError at dori.jasper.engine.fill.JRFiller.fillReport(JRFiller.java:138) at dori.jasper.engine.JasperFillManager.fillReport(JasperFillManager.java:348) at webwork.view.jasperreports.JasperReportViewServlet.service(JasperReportViewS ervlet.java:94) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl$ServletInvocationAction.run(Servle tStubImpl.java:1053) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java :387) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java :305) at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestDispatcherImpl$ForwardAction.run(RequestDis patcherImpl.java:342) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubjec t.java:317) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:97) at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImp l.java:246) at webwork.dispatcher.ServletDispatcher.service(ServletDispatcher.java:222) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl$ServletInvocationAction.run(Servle tStubImpl.java:1053) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java :387) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java :305) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(W ebAppServletContext.java:6291) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubjec t.java:317) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:97) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletCo ntext.java:3575) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java :2573) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:178) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:151) This is not critical for me because I don't use Jasper Reports at the moment. Regards, Lars Lars Fischer wrote: Joseph, it's the problem where somone already provided a patch: weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class 'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'page', (JSP 1.1 spec, 5.4.1) The examples for Jasper Reports never worked: - PDF Error 500--Internal Server Error - HTML Error 500--Internal Server Error - XML Error 500--Internal Server Error - CSV Error 500--Internal Server Error Not that great ... Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as mine. On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote: I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic (taglib.tld). Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server (unimportant for OpenSymphony developers). I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't include the source for the example Java files. I'll be sure to include that for the final release - apologies. This release fixes a huge number of bugs, adds features, and most importantly, ensures a smooth migration path for existing WebWork 1.x users. Between now and the final 2.0 release we'll be working on documentation, including the migration path. Besides all the XWork fixes (XWork 1.0 beta 2 was released as well), Matt, Jason, and I - along with Cameron and all the people on this mailing list - resolved 120+ issues. The complete list can be found at http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030repo rt=c hangelog. You can download the releases at: XWork - http://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/1805/xwork-1.0-beta2 .zip WebWork - http://webwork.dev.java.net/files
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Rickard, Is your AOP Framework availible for public use ? ..Cam.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rickard Öberg Sent: Tuesday, 25 February 2003 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Jason Carreira wrote: Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Funny, I just downloaded Roller in order to install here and got stuck immediately. I have the same thoughts as you above. Except, I would use my AOP framework as the base for both object model and persistence :-) Anyway, +1 on the whole thing, and both for the app itself and good demo of WW. /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Title: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Don't know how much value there would be in this nor what proportion of Webwork users would use velocity for presentation, but thought it might be an idea to demonstrate both jsp and velocity in this example app, or was this planned anyway? Eliot -Original Message- From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 February 2003 04:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Definitely needed. Okay. Let me finish up the programmatic configuration and commands (tomorrow maybe?) and Patrick, you want to take the ui tags? Then we can start on the sample app and work out the kinks in WW2 -Original Message- From: Rick Salsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Carreira Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache +1 to both of these and the example app. I'd love to give a hand if needed. rick --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork __ __ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service.
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Cameron Braid wrote: Rickard, Is your AOP Framework availible for public use ? Nope. I built it when we started on the CMS/portal SiteVision that we're developing, but it has not yet been released for public use yet. Ironically, we're actually having a little trouble seeing what benefits it would give us, which is why we haven't released it (along with time constraints). /Rickard --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Is your AOP Framework availible for public use ? Nope. So your AOP framework is not an option here. Let's stick with Hibernate. we're actually having a little trouble seeing what benefits it would give us, which is why we haven't released it Probably none. What advantage would it give to you if it's closed? And then you say: I would use my AOP framework as the base for both object model and persistence Of course you would, but I think that Hibernate is better choice as it can also benefit Hibernate project, not some closed and hyped AOP framework. And your persistence layer... umm... was it persistent hashmap? Nothing against it, but most of us rdbms is the backend we rely on and are familiar with. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Jason Carreira wrote: Undying praise and gratitude? :-) I tried that one, but my co-workers didn't fall for it :-) They just saw the enourmous mountain of support email I'd have to deal with - less time for actual work. /Rickard --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Title: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app hi all, I would be very interested in contributing to this, as i am using webworks and hibernate to make a blog-like tool already :-) (it is only in the prototyping stage for now, but i would rather contribute than make a parallel effort :-) sincerely morten wilken
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
I'd love to help out too Regards, -Andre Mermegas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Carreira Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
+1. I'll contribute something if this gets off the ground. Scott Jason Carreira wrote: Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork -- ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com Expert J2EE Software, Services and Support --- Need a simple, powerful way to track and manage issues? Try JIRA - http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Can't it be both? I think Webwork needs some marketing, so making a good app would be good (Jira's awesome, but not free and opensource). The reason I thought this might be a good app for this is that it's not THAT complicated, so even if we polish it up to be a good usable app it shouldn't get too difficult to jump into. -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app The only question is this: Should this be bundled with WebWork 2.0? Probably not I'd guess... If not, should this be an OpenSymphony project? What is the primary goal of the project: demonstrate WebWork 2.0 OR be a good webblogger? -Pat - Original Message - From: Scott Farquhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app +1. I'll contribute something if this gets off the ground. Scott Jason Carreira wrote: Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork -- ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com Expert J2EE Software, Services and Support --- Need a simple, powerful way to track and manage issues? Try JIRA - http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Should this be bundled with WebWork 2.0? Probably not I'd guess... If not, should this be an OpenSymphony project? What is the primary goal of the project: demonstrate WebWork 2.0 OR be a good webblogger? Hopefully, it could be both. I think what will make it a good demonstration is the documentation that accompanies it. If I had to choose, my vote would be for a good demonstration. -- Matt Ho Principal Indigo Egg, Inc. http://www.indigoegg.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache Maybe OSUser too? Is OSAccess up and running? It was sitting on a shelf the last time I looked. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app this would definetely be a good thing, maybe it could use sitemesh, hibernate, webwork, osaccess and any other opensymphony projects that would help. - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:14 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Carreira Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache +1 to both of these and the example app. I'd love to give a hand if needed. rick --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Definitely needed. Okay. Let me finish up the programmatic configuration and commands (tomorrow maybe?) and Patrick, you want to take the ui tags? Then we can start on the sample app and work out the kinks in WW2 -Original Message- From: Rick Salsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Carreira Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache +1 to both of these and the example app. I'd love to give a hand if needed. rick --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
+1 on this... I'd love to help out in the 'rewriting' of this to webwork. Jason Carreira wrote: Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache Maybe OSUser too? Is OSAccess up and running? It was sitting on a shelf the last time I looked. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app this would definetely be a good thing, maybe it could use sitemesh, hibernate, webwork, osaccess and any other opensymphony projects that would help. - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:14 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Hi guys, What is Roller? Look like I am the only person who doesn't know this. Thanks. --- Andrew Lombardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : +1 on this... I'd love to help out in the 'rewriting' of this to webwork. Jason Carreira wrote: Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache Maybe OSUser too? Is OSAccess up and running? It was sitting on a shelf the last time I looked. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app this would definetely be a good thing, maybe it could use sitemesh, hibernate, webwork, osaccess and any other opensymphony projects that would help. - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:14 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork = --- Hai Pham Quang --- __ Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ? magasinage.yahoo.ca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
www.rollerweblogger.org - it's an opensource blog tool written in Java with Struts and Castor for the backend, although they're working on also supporting Hibernate now. -Original Message- From: Hai Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Hi guys, What is Roller? Look like I am the only person who doesn't know this. Thanks. --- Andrew Lombardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : +1 on this... I'd love to help out in the 'rewriting' of this to webwork. Jason Carreira wrote: Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache Maybe OSUser too? Is OSAccess up and running? It was sitting on a shelf the last time I looked. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app this would definetely be a good thing, maybe it could use sitemesh, hibernate, webwork, osaccess and any other opensymphony projects that would help. - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:14 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app: Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's RSSLibJ. Roller is annoying me because of a) performance and crashing issues, and b) Support for PostgreSql is poor :-) Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering...I think this app should be easy enough to get working pretty quickly (not with all the features, but getting started) and should be both complex enough to be a showcase and simple enough to be easily understood by newcomers. Jason -- Jason Carreira Technical Architect, Notiva Corp. phone: 585.240.2793 fax: 585.272.8118 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork = --- Hai Pham Quang --- __ Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ? magasinage.yahoo.ca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
See inline reply. On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:01:12 -0500 (EST), Joseph Ottinger said: I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the mailing list previously (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3757306 regarding your question on JELLY dependency!) every dependency adds extra complexity. Formproc, in particular, means adding configuration to an extra location. XWork and WW config can be merged together (a WW config would include the accompanying XW config), and requiring formproc means we have a minimum of two config files... in one product. Bad, especially when we can do it ourselves. There's alot of stuff we can do ourselves, but doing so also means having to maintain both code and documentation. Isn't that one of the reasons we choose to use 3rd-party code (read: webwork) in the first place? Because it a) provides functionality not _absolutely core_ to what one does b) has a tried-and-tested codebase c) has well-documented code and good documentation d) gets maintained all at _no additional work on your part_ other than initial integration effort. Why do you keep wanting to tie WebWork to other projects so badly? This is the second time I've seen you wish for extra dependency (the url above was expressing your desire for using JEXL as core WebWork, and your message now is for FormProc for form validation...) If you re-read the threads, you will find that I neither asked for Jexl as part of core (I was throwing the idea of using Jelly around), nor did I ask for FormProc for form validation (Jason mentioned it). I was interested to know the rationale behind the decision to develop another form validation framework. Besides, feel free to ignore me since you seem intolerant of my curiosity...:-) Kelvin The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Inline... On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Kelvin Tan wrote: See inline reply. On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:01:12 -0500 (EST), Joseph Ottinger said: I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the mailing list previously (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3757306 regarding your question on JELLY dependency!) every dependency adds extra complexity. Formproc, in particular, means adding Extra complexity is a crucial point. There's alot of stuff we can do ourselves, but doing so also means having to maintain both code and documentation. Isn't that one of the reasons we choose to use 3rd-party code (read: webwork) in the first place? Because it a) provides functionality not _absolutely core_ to what one does b) has a tried-and-tested codebase c) has well-documented code and good documentation d) gets maintained Sure. Third party code, no problem... except webwork dependencies turn into FOURTH-party code. Plus, you end up handing your requirements to someone else: FormProc does it this way, so I guess we have to do it too. I already mentioned the versioning hell I've seen regarding such lovelies as Xerces. Why do you keep wanting to tie WebWork to other projects so badly? This is the second time I've seen you wish for extra dependency (the url above was expressing your desire for using JEXL as core WebWork, and your message now is for FormProc for form validation...) If you re-read the threads, you will find that I neither asked for Jexl as part of core (I was throwing the idea of using Jelly around), nor did I ask for FormProc for form validation (Jason mentioned it). I was interested to know the rationale behind the decision to develop another form validation framework. Well, the form validation framework itself is sort of a tack-on, since WW has traditionally had a validation hook. It'd be fairly simple to use formproc there, for example, without binding WW to formproc (and its two or more configuration files...) or Jelly. Nobody is saying you can't use formproc or jelly with webwork. I personally wouldn't care if you did... but I don't use them myself, and having jar after jar after jar after jar foisted upon me by a simple command framework would get really, really old quickly. Sure, it's a little more work for Jason and Pat to add an actual validation framework... but that means that the validation framework gets to stay where it should: out of the way of those who don't want to be tied to it (i.e., those who do their own validation, by whatever means they choose.) --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
-Original Message- From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the mailing list previously (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3757306 regarding your question on JELLY dependency!) every dependency adds extra complexity. Formproc, in particular, means adding configuration to an extra location. XWork and WW config can be merged together (a WW config would include the accompanying XW config), and requiring formproc means we have a minimum of two config files... in one product. Bad, especially when we can do it ourselves. Why do you keep wanting to tie WebWork to other projects so badly? This is the second time I've seen you wish for extra dependency (the url above was expressing your desire for using JEXL as core WebWork, and your message now is for FormProc for form validation...) Let's remember the ugliness of the discussions when things like hidden form fields were suggested. Ideas and curiosity are OK, and should be encouraged. A lot of these extra integrations can be built as an optional jar, I think, the way that Ant does. They can also be added to the other library (for instance FormProc). The Interceptor framework makes it very easy to plug in Interceptor classes dynamically without having to be bundled with Xwork. Jason --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Please, let's not have a long thread about features right now. We made decisions in the IRC meeting, let's focus on those and if others want to develop _optional_ features that depend on _optional_ jars, we'll add them in. -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:09 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 -Original Message- From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the mailing list previously (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3757306 regarding your question on JELLY dependency!) every dependency adds extra complexity. Formproc, in particular, means adding configuration to an extra location. XWork and WW config can be merged together (a WW config would include the accompanying XW config), and requiring formproc means we have a minimum of two config files... in one product. Bad, especially when we can do it ourselves. Why do you keep wanting to tie WebWork to other projects so badly? This is the second time I've seen you wish for extra dependency (the url above was expressing your desire for using JEXL as core WebWork, and your message now is for FormProc for form validation...) Let's remember the ugliness of the discussions when things like hidden form fields were suggested. Ideas and curiosity are OK, and should be encouraged. A lot of these extra integrations can be built as an optional jar, I think, the way that Ant does. They can also be added to the other library (for instance FormProc). The Interceptor framework makes it very easy to plug in Interceptor classes dynamically without having to be bundled with Xwork. Jason --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
I use WW + Sitemesh + Hibernate. I hide Hibernate behind data access interfaces, and the implementations of the methods are typically just a few lines of real code. I think Sitemesh and Velocity are both non-intrusive to your code - you can easily layer both on top of WW, so to speak, w/o WW knowing about them. Low - I can send you my code if you'd like to see a real-world implementation, it's used for a public *.org website. Rob - Original Message - From: Heng Sin Low [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:58 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 What sort of design pattern would you recommend for using/glue the four library together ? Or may be all this can be use in a very loose couple manner and it just fall in place nicely ? I think I've heard many time that the combination of the four tool together are great but haven't come across any real world example yet. May be u can give me some pointer on this ? Also, I notice Atlassian flagship product Jira is using ofbiz's entity engine instead of hibernate, any reason ? Shall we consider entity engine instead of hibernate ? thanks. Regards, Low --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
-Original Message- From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Low, I don't know about anyone else's dates, but I'm giving a presentation on WebWork 2 at The Server Side's Symposium in mid June, so it will be stable, tested and released by then ;) And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer combination of tools. Cheers, Mike Hey! How'd you get that gig?!?! Can you at least get Patrick and I in for free? Ha ha... No, really. Ok, then, I expect you to get in there and start coding! :-) Jason --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Jason Carreira wrote: I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Documentation. - Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.comIT Consultant --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Low, I also use these together as well. I recommend you explore the component lifecycle stuff in XWork. Once you have a grasp on that, integrating Hibernate and other resources in to your WebWork actions will become very, very easy. As for velocity integration with WebWork, it's already there in 2.0. Just make a simple Test action with a getFoo() method and then put $foo in your .vm file and you're set. -Pat - Original Message - From: Heng Sin Low [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:58 PM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 What sort of design pattern would you recommend for using/glue the four library together ? Or may be all this can be use in a very loose couple manner and it just fall in place nicely ? I think I've heard many time that the combination of the four tool together are great but haven't come across any real world example yet. May be u can give me some pointer on this ? Also, I notice Atlassian flagship product Jira is using ofbiz's entity engine instead of hibernate, any reason ? Shall we consider entity engine instead of hibernate ? thanks. Regards, Low --- Mike Cannon-Brookes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Low, I don't know about anyone else's dates, but I'm giving a presentation on WebWork 2 at The Server Side's Symposium in mid June, so it will be stable, tested and released by then ;) And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer combination of tools. Cheers, Mike On 13/2/03 5:16 PM, Heng Sin Low ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words: All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / different stuff for now? Here's a quick outline: Xwork 1)Introduction a) What is Xwork Xwork is a generic command pattern framework... b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork? Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork... 2) The basics a) Actions Actions are the basic unit of execution... 1) The Action Interface 2) ActionSupport 3) Lifecycle b) No FormBeans? Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans like Struts... 3) Configuration - Xwork.xml 4) Ognl Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean population utility for Xwork... 5) Interceptors a) Utility Interceptors The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ... b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor populate your Action fields... c) ResultInterceptor 6) Validation Framework (optional) a) The ValidationInterceptor b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml c) Building a FieldValidator d) Localized and Parameterized messages I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and Joe, since you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-) What else do we need in there? Jason -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be building your own validator? or will an existing one be used? - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / different stuff for now? Here's a quick outline: Xwork 1)Introduction a) What is Xwork Xwork is a generic command pattern framework... b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork? Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork... 2) The basics a) Actions Actions are the basic unit of execution... 1) The Action Interface 2) ActionSupport 3) Lifecycle b) No FormBeans? Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans like Struts... 3) Configuration - Xwork.xml 4) Ognl Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean population utility for Xwork... 5) Interceptors a) Utility Interceptors The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ... b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor populate your Action fields... c) ResultInterceptor 6) Validation Framework (optional) a) The ValidationInterceptor b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml c) Building a FieldValidator d) Localized and Parameterized messages I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and Joe, since you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-) What else do we need in there? Jason -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Just my opinion, but I think excellent docs are a big reason Hibernate is getting all of the O/R buzz lately. I'd be willing to contribute to the doc effort down the road when WW2 congeals a little more (and as I get more comfortable with the internals of WW). Heck maybe I could write some code too ;-) -Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick Lightbody Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
I was under the impression that you can only use oscache with jsp but we plan to use velocity only. Regards, Low --- Francois Beauregard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer combination of tools. Cheers, Mike Add OSCache and you simply fly !!! Francois --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
I started building one. The consensus at the design meeting last week was that creating a dependency on another validation framework was a Bad Thing, so, since it only took a few hours to put in localized and parameterized messages, we're sticking with our own. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be building your own validator? or will an existing one be used? - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / different stuff for now? Here's a quick outline: Xwork 1)Introduction a) What is Xwork Xwork is a generic command pattern framework... b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork? Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork... 2) The basics a) Actions Actions are the basic unit of execution... 1) The Action Interface 2) ActionSupport 3) Lifecycle b) No FormBeans? Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans like Struts... 3) Configuration - Xwork.xml 4) Ognl Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean population utility for Xwork... 5) Interceptors a) Utility Interceptors The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ... b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor populate your Action fields... c) ResultInterceptor 6) Validation Framework (optional) a) The ValidationInterceptor b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml c) Building a FieldValidator d) Localized and Parameterized messages I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and Joe, since you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-) What else do we need in there? Jason -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Can it be made to work with properties files (again, for those of us with huge internationalised apps), or does everything have to be moved to xml files? On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 10:41 PM, Jason Carreira wrote: I started building one. The consensus at the design meeting last week was that creating a dependency on another validation framework was a Bad Thing, so, since it only took a few hours to put in localized and parameterized messages, we're sticking with our own. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be building your own validator? or will an existing one be used? - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / different stuff for now? Here's a quick outline: Xwork 1)Introduction a) What is Xwork Xwork is a generic command pattern framework... b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork? Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork... 2) The basics a) Actions Actions are the basic unit of execution... 1) The Action Interface 2) ActionSupport 3) Lifecycle b) No FormBeans? Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans like Struts... 3) Configuration - Xwork.xml 4) Ognl Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean population utility for Xwork... 5) Interceptors a) Utility Interceptors The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ... b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor populate your Action fields... c) ResultInterceptor 6) Validation Framework (optional) a) The ValidationInterceptor b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml c) Building a FieldValidator d) Localized and Parameterized messages I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and Joe, since you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-) What else do we need in there? Jason -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Since the minutes of the meeting are not out (or are they?), its not immediately clear why doing so is a BT. Would you kindly elaborate on how this consensus was arrived at, and why reinventing the wheel, so to speak, is better than using something already tested and in use? Or alternatively, point me to the minutes...:-) Thanks. Kelvin On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:41:01 -0800, Jason Carreira said: I started building one. The consensus at the design meeting last week was that creating a dependency on another validation framework was a Bad Thing, so, since it only took a few hours to put in localized and parameterized messages, we're sticking with our own. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: opensymphony- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be building your own validator? or will an existing one be used? - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / different stuff for now? Here's a quick outline: Xwork 1)Introduction a) What is Xwork Xwork is a generic command pattern framework... b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork? Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork... 2) The basics a) Actions Actions are the basic unit of execution... 1) The Action Interface 2) ActionSupport 3) Lifecycle b) No FormBeans? Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans like Struts... 3) Configuration - Xwork.xml 4) Ognl Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean population utility for Xwork... 5) Interceptors a) Utility Interceptors The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ... b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor populate your Action fields... c) ResultInterceptor 6) Validation Framework (optional) a) The ValidationInterceptor b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml c) Building a FieldValidator d) Localized and Parameterized messages I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and Joe, since you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-) What else do we need in there? Jason -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM To: opensymphony- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony- webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony- webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
The argument was that we did not want to introduce another dependency. I was actually arguing FOR FormProc, but the feeling was that we wanted to keep the required dependencies to a minimum. The main thing I was looking for in FormProc were the localized and parameterized messages, which turned out to be relatively easy to implement, and the ability to define scripts for validation. I'm currently thinking about adding another type of Validator, which is not tied to one particular field, and I'm thinking the first implementation would be one which uses Ognl to evaluate the expression you give it. Since Ognl can be used for basically ANYTHING, including defining lambda expressions, this should easily handle this requirement as well. By looking at the current ValidationInterceptor, however, it should be relatively easy to see how to plug another validation framework into Xwork, and I'd be happy to help you if you want to do that. Which framework were you thinking of? -Original Message- From: Kelvin Tan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Since the minutes of the meeting are not out (or are they?), its not immediately clear why doing so is a BT. Would you kindly elaborate on how this consensus was arrived at, and why reinventing the wheel, so to speak, is better than using something already tested and in use? Or alternatively, point me to the minutes...:-) Thanks. Kelvin On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:41:01 -0800, Jason Carreira said: I started building one. The consensus at the design meeting last week was that creating a dependency on another validation framework was a Bad Thing, so, since it only took a few hours to put in localized and parameterized messages, we're sticking with our own. -Original Message- From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: opensymphony- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be building your own validator? or will an existing one be used? - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Ok, what do we want to see for docs? Should we go back into the stuff from 1.x and re-do that, or just document the new / different stuff for now? Here's a quick outline: Xwork 1)Introduction a) What is Xwork Xwork is a generic command pattern framework... b) How does Xwork relate to Webwork? Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork... 2) The basics a) Actions Actions are the basic unit of execution... 1) The Action Interface 2) ActionSupport 3) Lifecycle b) No FormBeans? Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans like Struts... 3) Configuration - Xwork.xml 4) Ognl Ognl is used as both the expresion language and bean population utility for Xwork... 5) Interceptors a) Utility Interceptors The TimerInterceptor and LoggingInterceptor ... b) Parameter Interceptors - populating your Action The StaticParameterInterceptor and ParameterInterceptor populate your Action fields... c) ResultInterceptor 6) Validation Framework (optional) a) The ValidationInterceptor b) Defining validation rules in a validation.xml c) Building a FieldValidator d) Localized and Parameterized messages I'll take 3, 5, and 6. Patrick, you take (at least) 4, and Joe, since you brought it up, you get 1 and 2 :-) What else do we need in there? Jason -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM To: opensymphony- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We should get cracking on the documentation soon. Maybe you can work on a skeleton documentation effort while you're on the plane? -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint). Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 / WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be ported over to WW2? This isn't an academic question... I'm flying home tonight (probably leaving the office for the airport at about 4-4:30 Central time) and I asked this question to Patrick last night: What's the next most pressing need in WW2.0? Give me something to do on my flight. Jason -Original Message- From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM To: OS-Webwork Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
I did some work on some docs. Here's the beginnings... Please feel free to add :-) Title: Xwork Documentation XWork Introduction What is Xwork? Xwork is a generic command pattern framework. Xwork 1.0 Mission Statement: The Purpose: To create a generic, reusable, and extensible command pattern framework not tied to any particular usage. Features: * Flexible and customizable configuration based on a simple Configuration interface * Core command pattern framework which can be customized and extended through the use of interceptors to fit any request / response environment * Built in type conversion and action property validation using Ognl * Powerful validation framework based on runtime attributes and a validation interceptor How does Xwork relate to Webwork? Webwork 2.0 is built on top of Xwork. Webwork 2.0 Mission Statement: The Purpose: To create the best Model-2 MVC web application framework supporting advanced web application development paradigms such as component based development and code reuse. Features: * Built on XWork, but customized to be specifically tailored for web application development * Custom web-specific Xwork interceptors * Flexible configuration extended from Xwork with web-specific configuration parameters * Multiple web-based views, including custom JSP taglibs, Velocity support with pre-built macros, XSLT views, and JasperReport The Basics Actions Actions are the basic unit of execution... The Action Interface ActionSupport ActionContext Lifecycle No FormBeans? Xwork / Webwork does not require the use of FormBeans like Struts... Configuration - Xwork.xml Xwork is configured through the use of a file named xwork.xml in the root of the classpath. This file defines the action and interceptor configurations and mappings. Packages The primary unit of configuration in XWork is a package. Packages define a context for configuring and referencing actions and interceptors. All action and interceptor references are scoped inside a package. Here's an example package definition: package name=foo extends=default namespace=/foo result-types result-type name=chain class=com.opensymphony.xwork.ActionChainResult/ /result-types interceptors interceptor name=timer class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.TimerInterceptor/ interceptor name=logger class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.LoggingInterceptor/ interceptor name=chain class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.ChainingInterceptor/ interceptor name=params class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor/ interceptor name=static-params class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.StaticParametersInterceptor/ interceptor name=component class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.component.ComponentInterceptor/ interceptor name=result class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.ResultInterceptor/ interceptor name=stack class=com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.StackInterceptor/ interceptor-stack name=defaultStack interceptor-ref name=result/ interceptor-ref name=static-params/ interceptor-ref name=params/ interceptor-ref name=stack/ /interceptor-stack interceptor-stack name=debugStack interceptor-ref name=timer/ interceptor-ref name=logger/ /interceptor-stack /interceptors global-results result name=login type=chain param name=actionNamelogin/param /result /global-results action name=Foo class=com.opensymphony.xwork.SimpleAction param name=foo17/param param name=bar23/param result name=success type=chain param name=actionNameBar/param /result interceptor-ref name=debugStack/ interceptor-ref name=defaultStack/ /action /package We'll take the components of this package declaration one-by-one to understand what this file is doing. Package The package element has one required attribute, name, which acts as the key for later reference to this package. The extends attribute is optional and allows one package to inherit the configuration of a previous package including all interceptor, interceptor-stack, and action configurations. Note that the configuration file is processed sequentially down the document, so the package referenced by an extends should be defined above the package which extends it. Namespace The optional namespace attribute warrants its own discussion section. The namespace attribute allows you to segregate action configurations into namespaces, so that you may use the same action alias in more than one namespace with different classes, parameters, etc. This is in contrast to Webwork 1.x, where all action names and aliases
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Low, I don't know about anyone else's dates, but I'm giving a presentation on WebWork 2 at The Server Side's Symposium in mid June, so it will be stable, tested and released by then ;) And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer combination of tools. Cheers, Mike On 13/2/03 5:16 PM, Heng Sin Low ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words: All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
What sort of design pattern would you recommend for using/glue the four library together ? Or may be all this can be use in a very loose couple manner and it just fall in place nicely ? I think I've heard many time that the combination of the four tool together are great but haven't come across any real world example yet. May be u can give me some pointer on this ? Also, I notice Atlassian flagship product Jira is using ofbiz's entity engine instead of hibernate, any reason ? Shall we consider entity engine instead of hibernate ? thanks. Regards, Low --- Mike Cannon-Brookes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Low, I don't know about anyone else's dates, but I'm giving a presentation on WebWork 2 at The Server Side's Symposium in mid June, so it will be stable, tested and released by then ;) And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer combination of tools. Cheers, Mike On 13/2/03 5:16 PM, Heng Sin Low ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the words: All, We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0 ( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version ). So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and whether it would be inline with our development schedule ( We are looking at releasing the first version by September 2003 ). I do not mind to live with the rough edges of the initial beta release but would like to know the estimated schedule of webwork 2.0 ( For e.g, when it will be promoted from sandbox, what is the estimated first beta release date, etc ). Also, We are looking at using webwork, velocity, hibernate and sitemesh together, maybe someone here can share his/her experience with us ? thanks. Regards, Low __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem +solution?]
Patrick Lightbody wrote: I found a possible way around this, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea or not :) What if the FilterDispatcher never actually makes a call to filterChain.doFilter()? This would get around the duplicate view request problem outlined below, but would require that the filter -must- be the last one applied or else you'll loose the application of filters further down the chain. I don't think this is too bad though, since we can just -clearly- document that the FilterDispatcher (if you want to use it) must be applied last. Thoughts? Works for me :-) /Rickard --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem + solution?]
I don't plan on using it, so as long as it doesn't mess up the core +1 -Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem + solution?] I found a possible way around this, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea or not :) What if the FilterDispatcher never actually makes a call to filterChain.doFilter()? This would get around the duplicate view request problem outlined below, but would require that the filter -must- be the last one applied or else you'll loose the application of filters further down the chain. I don't think this is too bad though, since we can just -clearly- document that the FilterDispatcher (if you want to use it) must be applied last. Thoughts? -Pat - Original Message - From: Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:33 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem] Found one small problem with this approach (and it may just be that using the filter + the servlet at all times just can't always work perfectly): If you are using the filter and servlet and access success.jsp, the action will be invoked, then the ResultInterceptor will kick in, call ServletDispatcherResult, which will see that the filter is in use and _not_ dispatch, since the filter is going to chain right after. This is the correct behavior. But if the result of the action executing is _different_ than the URL being request (ie: error.jsp), the ServletDispatcherResult does what it should (dispatch out to error.jsp) but the filter will still try to grab the original request to success.jsp. Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0 framework/config more rigid and to remove the ResultInterceptor stuff and specifically hard code the ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ the servlet itself (problem solved, but then generic results aren't possible in WW, which includes chaining, and then we open up the door to possibly more hardcoding). Anyway, I'm outta here, let me know what you guys think. -Pat - Original Message - From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:06 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? Patrick Lightbody wrote: snippetysnap What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone else, would this work for YOU? ;) Works for me! :-) /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =omething 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem + solution?]
I found a possible way around this, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea or not :) What if the FilterDispatcher never actually makes a call to filterChain.doFilter()? This would get around the duplicate view request problem outlined below, but would require that the filter -must- be the last one applied or else you'll loose the application of filters further down the chain. I don't think this is too bad though, since we can just -clearly- document that the FilterDispatcher (if you want to use it) must be applied last. Thoughts? -Pat - Original Message - From: Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:33 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem] Found one small problem with this approach (and it may just be that using the filter + the servlet at all times just can't always work perfectly): If you are using the filter and servlet and access success.jsp, the action will be invoked, then the ResultInterceptor will kick in, call ServletDispatcherResult, which will see that the filter is in use and _not_ dispatch, since the filter is going to chain right after. This is the correct behavior. But if the result of the action executing is _different_ than the URL being request (ie: error.jsp), the ServletDispatcherResult does what it should (dispatch out to error.jsp) but the filter will still try to grab the original request to success.jsp. Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0 framework/config more rigid and to remove the ResultInterceptor stuff and specifically hard code the ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ the servlet itself (problem solved, but then generic results aren't possible in WW, which includes chaining, and then we open up the door to possibly more hardcoding). Anyway, I'm outta here, let me know what you guys think. -Pat - Original Message - From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:06 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? Patrick Lightbody wrote: snippetysnap What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone else, would this work for YOU? ;) Works for me! :-) /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher?
Patrick Lightbody wrote: snippetysnap What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone else, would this work for YOU? ;) Works for me! :-) /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher?
Glad to hear it! Also, I just put in an example in success.jsp using the ww:push tag and showing various ways the Ognl EL works. It showcases the two main differences between the WW EL and the Ognl EL. -Pat - Original Message - From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:06 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? Patrick Lightbody wrote: snippetysnap What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone else, would this work for YOU? ;) Works for me! :-) /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem]
Found one small problem with this approach (and it may just be that using the filter + the servlet at all times just can't always work perfectly): If you are using the filter and servlet and access success.jsp, the action will be invoked, then the ResultInterceptor will kick in, call ServletDispatcherResult, which will see that the filter is in use and _not_ dispatch, since the filter is going to chain right after. This is the correct behavior. But if the result of the action executing is _different_ than the URL being request (ie: error.jsp), the ServletDispatcherResult does what it should (dispatch out to error.jsp) but the filter will still try to grab the original request to success.jsp. Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0 framework/config more rigid and to remove the ResultInterceptor stuff and specifically hard code the ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ the servlet itself (problem solved, but then generic results aren't possible in WW, which includes chaining, and then we open up the door to possibly more hardcoding). Anyway, I'm outta here, let me know what you guys think. -Pat - Original Message - From: Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:06 AM Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? Patrick Lightbody wrote: snippetysnap What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone else, would this work for YOU? ;) Works for me! :-) /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem]
-Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0 framework/config more rigid and to remove the ResultInterceptor stuff and specifically hard code the ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ the servlet itself (problem solved, but then generic results aren't possible in WW, which includes chaining, and then we open up the door to possibly more hardcoding). Anyway, I'm outta here, let me know what you guys think. -Pat -1 to hardcoding. I like the way the core framework services are becoming pluggable replaceable interceptors. I still don't understand the reason for wanting to access actions from their view URLs... Jason --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
