Re: [ozmidwifery] Information please

2003-07-13 Thread CJ Knight
Janet
The immunisation certificate is one run by the Health Dept of WA . From
memory it was run over one or two day's and covers you to give all childhood
immunisations. If you are currently in WA contact the HDWA or contact Public
/Population Health in the region you plan to work in for details of courses.
Regards
Jane
- Original Message -
From: Janet Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 1:09 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Information please


 Dear List,
 I am applying for a job in rural WA and wish to know how to obtain an
 immunization certificate.Is it a course ? If so what does it entail?
 Hoping someone can answer me:)
 Yours in Midwifery
 Janet

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun baths

2003-07-13 Thread Lynne Staff



I haven't heard this theory before, Denise, but 
have to put on this post that I have noticed, as have homebirth colleagues of 
mine, that there is a very low incidence of jaundice in infants born at home. 
Between us we think the rare use of oxytocics, any medications in labour, early 
and frequent feeding - there's probably more. Any other homebirth midwives want 
to comment on this?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Denise Hynd 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:24 AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
baths
  
  Dear mary 
  Your comment 
  I also wonder if we haven't been seduced into being a bit paranoid about 
  jaundice? 
  Reminded me of hearing at a breastfeeding confernece here a few years ago 
  of preliminary studies being done in the States (USA) by (?) Prof G (?) 
  which was exploring the benefits of levels jaundice as it is physiological to 
  a degree and there is a theory that this may be of benefit to the developing 
  immune systems and many babies who have some physiological jaundice have lower 
  rates of infections in infancy and childhood.
  
  Does any one else heard of this 
  theory??Denise
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Mary 
Murphy 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:11 
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
baths

Thanks for that information Lois, My understanding was that we needed 
620 NM of light waves for effectiveness. Johnson says " exposing the 
baby's skin to sunlight".. does this mean direct through the glass or 
indirect through the glass or direct sunshine or indirect near the 
window?As you say, it is very difficult to quantify the number of 
nanometers in the various seasons in Australia. I also wonder if we 
haven't been seduced into being a bit paranoid about jaundice? What is 
the range of nanometers of the bililights that are currently used for 
treatment? When I was researching it for my research proposal, the 
research seemed to be going away from the causes of jaundice and the simple 
solutions, into the area of drug control of SBRs. That area 
doesn't seem to have taken off and I wonder what the latest research 
says? MM

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Lois 
  Wattis 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 12:56 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
  baths
  
  Hi again - interesting to get info related to the 
  northern hemisphere.. (thanks Debbie and Marilyn), compared to 
  Australia.
  
  Irevisited my text books before 
  posting my bit on ozmid about natural light for treating physiological 
  jaundice - just to check my facts. The use of natural light this way 
  ismentioned in PGB. Johnston's book "The Newborn Child" (my text 
  from my mid studies) pp181,and 187. Johnson states "exposing the 
  baby's skin to sunlight effectively reduces the bilirubin level but 
  is impractical for treatment in the UK."
  
  Regarding the specific lighting requirement - 
  "exposing the skin to blue light of wavelength 400-500 nmand in an 
  intensity of 4-10 microwatts/cm2 converts the bilirubin in the 
  superficialcapillaries to harmless water soluble metabolites which 
  are then excreted in the urine and bowel". I don't know how to 
  quantify/measure the nm's of natural daylight in various states or seasons 
  in Australia, however I don'tthink it's necessary. The value 
  of exposure to INDIRECT'white' daylight in a well lit room 
  toconvert unconjugatedbilirubin into conjugated water soluble 
  bilirubin for excretion is well documented. Exposure of the head and 
  shoulders, maybe chest in atemperature-controlled 
  environmentis usually sufficient to stimulate the process, in 
  combination with frequent feeding. 
  
  Home and hospital rooms vary in how much light 
  they get, but often it's only a matter of rearranging where the baby is 
  located in the room which makes the difference. I'm sure there are 
  hospital midwives out there who encourage women to put their baby's cot on 
  the opposite side of the bed just to take advantage of the natural light 
  in the room to minimise or treat physiological jaundice the natural way, 
  just as I did when I worked in the hospitals. Attention to 
  this type ofearlytreatmentwill savemany babies 
  fromthe heel pricks forSBR collections ('just to check'), and 
  possibly from separation and Mothers' associated anxiety, interuptions to 
  feedings and so onrelated toartificial 
  phototherapy. Just my two bob's worth! Cheers, 
  Lois
  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
Debbie Slater 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 2:37 
PM

[ozmidwifery] NSW Union election update: Elaine Keenan Paul Rasmussen ­ Sacked fromthe NSWNA

2003-07-13 Thread Heartlogic
Title: Elaine Keenan & Paul Rasmussen – Sacked from the NSWNA




  Hello all, I have forwarded 
  thisinformationon to those of you who are interested in NSW 
  issues. These issues affect NSW midwives as well as NSW nurses. I care 
  deeply about social justice, freedom of speech and the right to 
  compete.It would appearthese principles arethreatened in our 
  union. I found Paul and Elaine ethical, dynamic and concerned about 
  working conditions for both nurses and midwives. They have both been 
  organisers for the union for a number of years (about nine?) I would have 
  thought their commitment,clarityand obvious loyalty to the NSWNA 
  and our professions would have been qualities to beharnessed for the 
  good of ourtwin professions future - diverse voices are to be embraced - 
  we can all learn from those who seek change to the status quo. I 
  have written to Brett Holmes seeking clarity and to register my concern. 
  In solidarity, Carolyn Hastie
Elaine Keenan  Paul 
Rasmussen – Sacked from the NSWNAPlease read this email  support a 
campaign for democracyDear ColleaguesThe election is 
over and the Brett Holmes Team won. The Realnurses Team offers its 
congratulations and wishes them well in delivering improvements for all 
nurses.The realnurses team and our policies offered nurses choice in the 
recent elections. Our campaign has had many positive outcome for all 
members, and these included:

  Getting Nurses workloads on the 
  agenda. The workload case was only launched by the after the Realnurses 
  team launched their policy 
  Getting the issue of NSWNA 
  independence openly debated 
  Forcing the issue of members right 
  to vote on pay offers 
  Giving members real choice. Members 
  had the choice of three teams including 48 candidates for 
  councilWe 
would like to thank you for all your support and bring you up to date with the 
events that have followed.The count took place on June 17. The 
Realnurses Team phoned The Holmes Team at 4pm and congratulated them on their 
win.On June 18 Elaine Keenan and Paul Rasmussen were notified that 
they would not be required to attend work the next day.On June 19 they were 
sent a letter by courier informing them that they were suspended and that NSWNA 
staff had been advised to block their entry to the NSWNA building.On 
June 24 Council of the NSWNA was called to a extra-ordinary meeting at midday. 
Coral Levett, the President of the NSWNA, refused both Elaine and Paul’s 
request to address council, and also denied them representation at the council 
meeting.On June 24 Elaine and Paul received letters by courier that they 
had been terminated (Sacked) and that they would be given thirty minutes to 
remove personal belongings from their desks. The reason for the sacking was 
given as ‘breakdown of the working relationship’. Evidence supporting this 
argument was not provided. The letter did not mention any representation or 
referral for legal advice despite the fact that both Elaine and Paul have been 
members of the NSWNA for many years.Never before have officers of the 
NSWNA been sacked for offering democratic choice. Elaine and Paul have always 
been committed to an Association that is open to all views, ideas and 
debate.Of particular concern is the swift and ruthless application of 
the sacking following the election, the refusal of the NSWNA to afford Elaine 
and Paul procedural fairness including preventing Elaine and Paul from 
addressing council or being represented.Despite many years of NSWNA 
membership Elaine and Paul have not received any NSWNA representation except for 
the offer of $500.00 each toward legal advice. This is woefully inadequate. It 
is Elaine and Pauls intention to seek a legal remedy and this will require 
substantial resources. We believe that the democracy of the NSWNA is 
severely threatened by these sackings. This action has sent a clear message to 
officers of the NSWNA and members that opposition, debate or new ideas 
will not be tolerated.We also believe that there has been a complete 
breach of procedural fairness. How will the NSWNA be viewed by employers and the 
community if its actions and treatment of its own employees is so 
appalling?We call on all nurses to protest this action and demand 
democracy. In a climate of reduction of democracy in the workplace, we now 
have a reduction of democracy in our union. We need to demand a more effective 
and responsive democracy and call on our leader to account for these decision to 
all members. We need to enfranchise diversity and participation in 
democracy at every level.You can help by doing all or any of the 
following actions:

  Forward this email on to other 
  nurses 
  Email Brett Holmes: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please send a copy to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Put resolutions to your Branch 
  expressing your concerns at Brett's actions 
  If you are attending annual 
  conference, tell Brett personally what you think and /or engage in debate 
  

RE: [ozmidwifery] Sun baths

2003-07-13 Thread Heartlogic



Hi 
folks, have to wade in on this one :-)

Certainly much much less overt physiological jaundice in my private 
practice. 

One 
theory/explanation about bilirubin in newbornsthatI've come across 
is that bilirubin is an antioxident and mops up all the free radicals liberated 
by the birthing process and if you do bilirubin levels on all babies, all of 
them have some. 

Overt 
physiological jaundice and deepening of same is very much to do with inadequate 
attachment/poor colostrum transfer and with homebirth/private 
practicemother/baby dyads, early B/F with excellent attachment is the norm 
as the mothers are very well prepared for the realities of what to do and how it 
worksbabies guts are well stimulated, meconium is passed easily and early; 
the entire range of normal physiological processes and cellular interactions 
with feeding are optimally initiated and maintained. Women understand 
normal newborn behaviour/feeding patterns and feed their babies to rhythm rather 
that reading their babies signals as unsettled or troublesome those first few 
nights. All of which allows babies to adapt to extrauterine life and its 
demands in the optimal way. 

Note: 
I'm not talking here about those factors such as blood incompatibilies, 
bruising, prematurity, infectionetc etc that impact upon the neonates 
physiology. I'm talking about healthy term newborn babies. 


As far 
as over reacting to physiological jaundice - kernicterus is a worry with sick 
and premature babies - the blood brain barrier is not robust in these 
infants. For full term, healthy babies, there is greater tolerance - less 
need to do those heel prick levels when the baby is active, alert and feeding 
and the baby is slightly jaundiced- my criteria is thewhites of eyes 
being yellow(and there are shades of that aren't there?) - and the levels 
are always lower than one thinks they would be. My criteria of light bath 
is being near an open window, not sun and kept warm, out of breeze. 
On home maternity visiting runs, making sure from day0the infant is 
getting excellent/optimal transfer of milk/colostrum helps avoid much of these 
concerns. 

Can 
anyone tell me what makes the UV from "lights" ok for babies skin 
health?

warmly, Carolyn Hastie






  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lynne 
  StaffSent: Sunday, 13 July 2003 8:13 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
  baths
  I haven't heard this theory before, Denise, but 
  have to put on this post that I have noticed, as have homebirth colleagues of 
  mine, that there is a very low incidence of jaundice in infants born at home. 
  Between us we think the rare use of oxytocics, any medications in labour, 
  early and frequent feeding - there's probably more. Any other homebirth 
  midwives want to comment on this?
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Denise Hynd 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:24 
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
baths

Dear mary 
Your comment 
I also wonder if we haven't been seduced into being a bit paranoid 
about jaundice? 
Reminded me of hearing at a breastfeeding confernece here a few years 
ago of preliminary studies being done in the States (USA) by (?) Prof 
G (?) which was exploring the benefits of levels jaundice as it is 
physiological to a degree and there is a theory that this may be of benefit 
to the developing immune systems and many babies who have some physiological 
jaundice have lower rates of infections in infancy and childhood.

Does any one else heard of this 
theory??Denise

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Mary 
  Murphy 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:11 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
  baths
  
  Thanks for that information Lois, My understanding was that we needed 
  620 NM of light waves for effectiveness. Johnson says " exposing the 
  baby's skin to sunlight".. does this mean direct through the glass 
  or indirect through the glass or direct sunshine or indirect near the 
  window?As you say, it is very difficult to quantify the number of 
  nanometers in the various seasons in Australia. I also wonder if we 
  haven't been seduced into being a bit paranoid about jaundice? What 
  is the range of nanometers of the bililights that are currently used for 
  treatment? When I was researching it for my research proposal, the 
  research seemed to be going away from the causes of jaundice and the 
  simple solutions, into the area of drug control of SBRs. That area 
  doesn't seem to have taken off and I wonder what the latest research 
  says? MM
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Lois 
Wattis 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Re: [ozmidwifery] Information please

2003-07-13 Thread Janet Caulfield
Dear Jane,
Thanks for your prompt reply...not currently in WA ..In Vic ...but at least
would be able tosay that i am willing to obtain my immunization certificate
after i arrived.
Thanks again.
Janet

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Lieves story

2003-07-13 Thread Pinky McKay



Love to you Lieve and to Lars family - how heatwrenching to be given this 
hope and have it snatched away again.
Pinky

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rhonda 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:05 AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Lieves 
  story
  
  


  
I have heard from Lieve and I am sure she will not mind me replying 
on her behalf. She has been very busy.
Lars passed away after an operation at another hospital that had a 
75% chance of a possitive outcome. It was very traumatic and 
confusing for his parents who were given some hope from this second 
opinion. The first hospital had predicted that Lars would quietly 
slip into a coma and die peacefully and the second hospital said it 
would be much more difficult for him if he remained untreated. 
There was an operation they could do which had a 75 % chance of a normal 
life. They said that they had never seen a baby with his condition 
do so well and breast feed and thrive - he was about 6 weeks of 
age. The parents spoke to parents were given contacts for other 
parents who had babied who had survived the operation and decided to go 
ahead with it. It went well but then a few days latter they said 
that he was failing and would not survive without the life support 
system. Then the parents had to decide to turn it off - Lars went 
peacefully in his mothers arms.
They returned him home and packed him in ice in his cot and had a 
few days to say goodbye and have visitors over.

I do hope lieve that i have relayed the story well for you.
I do hope that Nele is doing well and kept the amazing strength 
that she had throughout this ordeal.

Regards
Rhonda.

---Original 
Message---


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, July 
10, 2003 23:58:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 
[ozmidwifery] Lieves story

I was wondering too.

marilyn

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sheena Johnson 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 
  3:45 AM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Lieves 
  story
  
  Was wondering if anyone had heard 
  from Lieve and what has happened with Nele and Lars, have I missed a 
  posting? 
  
  Regards Sheena 
Johnson


  

  
  


 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - 
  Click 
  Here 
image/gif

Re: [ozmidwifery] whats happening ?

2003-07-13 Thread Trudie de keijzer
dear Jan

3 post partum haemorrhages in 6 weeks, 2 were transferred to hospital - 
I am exhausted, and due for a holiday
much love trudie

Trudie de Keijzer
phone  02 47572337
mobile 0438 572337
 http://www.homebirthservices.com.au
52a Fletcher street
Wentworth Falls
NSW 2782
Australia
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Looking for midwives from Redlands

2003-07-13 Thread ljg


Hi all
A quick request - am looking to chat to midwives from Redlands Hospital
Q. Feel free to email me off list on 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards lisa



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] ACMI Appointment

2003-07-13 Thread Andrea Robertson
Hi Julie,

My Diary is working for me... have another try!

Cheers

Andrea

At 06:40 PM 12/07/2003, Julie Clarke wrote:
Hi Andrea
Excellent news
Tried reading your diary but not available
hug
Julie Clarke
Childbirth and Parenting Educator
Transition into Parenthood
9 Withybrook Pl
Sylvania NSW 2224.
T. (02) 9544 6441
Mobile 0401 2655 30


-
Andrea Robertson
Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.birthinternational.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] ACMI Appointment

2003-07-13 Thread Robin Moon
the address is slightly wrong. Take the 'so' off the end of the 'html'
sequence.
Andrea must have been so excited her fingers moved too fast. :-)

Robin


- Original Message - 
From: Andrea Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] ACMI Appointment


 Hi Julie,

 My Diary is working for me... have another try!

 Cheers

 Andrea

 At 06:40 PM 12/07/2003, Julie Clarke wrote:
 Hi Andrea
 Excellent news
 Tried reading your diary but not available
 hug
 
 Julie Clarke
 Childbirth and Parenting Educator
 Transition into Parenthood
 9 Withybrook Pl
 Sylvania NSW 2224.
 T. (02) 9544 6441
 Mobile 0401 2655 30


 -
 Andrea Robertson
 Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 web: www.birthinternational.com


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] ACMI Appointment

2003-07-13 Thread Julie Clarke
Hi Andrea
I successfully visited your diary this time and read about Barb Vernon -
wonderful news - for mothers and midwives in the future.
We had another South Eastern Sydney Maternity Coalition meeting here on
Saturday night and welcomed another 4 new people who have now joined MC.
More in the diary - minifisms, maxifisms, and informed consent - good to
see these on the agenda again.  Would urge all to discuss the integrity
of these terms.
Hug
Julie


Julie Clarke
Childbirth and Parenting Educator
Transition into Parenthood
9 Withybrook Pl
Sylvania NSW 2224.
T. (02) 9544 6441
Mobile 0401 2655 30


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrea
Robertson
Sent: Monday, 14 July 2003 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] ACMI Appointment

Hi Julie,

My Diary is working for me... have another try!

Cheers

Andrea

At 06:40 PM 12/07/2003, Julie Clarke wrote:
Hi Andrea
Excellent news
Tried reading your diary but not available
hug

Julie Clarke
Childbirth and Parenting Educator
Transition into Parenthood
9 Withybrook Pl
Sylvania NSW 2224.
T. (02) 9544 6441
Mobile 0401 2655 30


-
Andrea Robertson
Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.birthinternational.com


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun baths

2003-07-13 Thread Denise Hynd



Dear Carolyn
That is the underlying physiology of the theory I 
hav heard that there is a safe and even beneficial level of jaundice as 
bilirubin is an antioxidant
Thank you for that 
Denise

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Heartlogic 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 4:01 AM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
baths
  
  Hi 
  folks, have to wade in on this one :-)
  
  Certainly much much less overt physiological jaundice in my private 
  practice. 
  
  One 
  theory/explanation about bilirubin in newbornsthatI've come across 
  is that bilirubin is an antioxident and mops up all the free radicals 
  liberated by the birthing process and if you do bilirubin levels on all 
  babies, all of them have some. 
  
  Overt physiological jaundice and deepening of same is very much to do 
  with inadequate attachment/poor colostrum transfer and with homebirth/private 
  practicemother/baby dyads, early B/F with excellent attachment is the 
  norm as the mothers are very well prepared for the realities of what to do and 
  how it worksbabies guts are well stimulated, meconium is passed easily and 
  early; the entire range of normal physiological processes and cellular 
  interactions with feeding are optimally initiated and maintained. Women 
  understand normal newborn behaviour/feeding patterns and feed their babies to 
  rhythm rather that reading their babies signals as unsettled or troublesome 
  those first few nights. All of which allows babies to adapt to 
  extrauterine life and its demands in the optimal way. 
  
  
  Note: I'm not talking here about those factors such as blood 
  incompatibilies, bruising, prematurity, infectionetc etc that impact 
  upon the neonates physiology. I'm talking about healthy term newborn 
  babies. 
  
  As 
  far as over reacting to physiological jaundice - kernicterus is a worry with 
  sick and premature babies - the blood brain barrier is not robust in these 
  infants. For full term, healthy babies, there is greater tolerance - 
  less need to do those heel prick levels when the baby is active, alert and 
  feeding and the baby is slightly jaundiced- my criteria is 
  thewhites of eyes being yellow(and there are shades of that aren't 
  there?) - and the levels are always lower than one thinks they would be. 
  My criteria of light bath is being near an open window, not sun and kept warm, 
  out of breeze. On home maternity visiting runs, making sure from 
  day0the infant is getting excellent/optimal transfer of 
  milk/colostrum helps avoid much of these concerns. 
  
  Can 
  anyone tell me what makes the UV from "lights" ok for babies skin 
  health?
  
  warmly, Carolyn Hastie
  
  
  
  
  
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lynne 
StaffSent: Sunday, 13 July 2003 8:13 PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
baths
I haven't heard this theory before, Denise, but 
have to put on this post that I have noticed, as have homebirth colleagues 
of mine, that there is a very low incidence of jaundice in infants born at 
home. Between us we think the rare use of oxytocics, any medications in 
labour, early and frequent feeding - there's probably more. Any other 
homebirth midwives want to comment on this?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Denise Hynd 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:24 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
  baths
  
  Dear mary 
  Your comment 
  I also wonder if we haven't been seduced into being a bit paranoid 
  about jaundice? 
  Reminded me of hearing at a breastfeeding confernece here a few years 
  ago of preliminary studies being done in the States (USA) by (?) 
  Prof G (?) which was exploring the benefits of levels jaundice as it is 
  physiological to a degree and there is a theory that this may be of 
  benefit to the developing immune systems and many babies who have some 
  physiological jaundice have lower rates of infections in infancy and 
  childhood.
  
  Does any one else heard of this 
  theory??Denise
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Mary 
Murphy 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:11 
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Sun 
baths

Thanks for that information Lois, My understanding was that we 
needed 620 NM of light waves for effectiveness. Johnson says " 
exposing the baby's skin to sunlight".. does this mean direct 
through the glass or indirect through the glass or direct sunshine or 
indirect near the window?As you say, it is very difficult to 
quantify the number of nanometers in the various seasons in 
Australia. I also wonder if we haven't been seduced 

Re: [ozmidwifery] what's happening ?

2003-07-13 Thread Denise Hynd



Dear Julie
I agree with what you say and do not see it as any 
reflection on any midwife because even when you are 1-1 no one person can be all 
things to every woman.

Additionally we need also to accept that sometimes 
the path of the birth is what is needed for that woman or, and others, seemingly 
negative outcomes can be positive parts of life's journey

Denise

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Julie 
  Clarke 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 5:50 PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] what's 
  happening ?
  
  
  I wholeheartedly 
  agree with you Denise – the antenatal care the woman receives makes a world of 
  difference.
  The women in my 
  preparation sessions who are booked into birth centres or are having other 
  good quality midwifery care are the most positive and empowered, unlike those 
  with OB’s or GP shared care or general ante-natal clinic (cattle mustering 
  yard as one partner in class described it once).
  When women feel 
  “processed” by the system it can be very frightening and damaging to them, it 
  is sooo disempowering!
  Those that are 
  experiencing supportive, trusting, genuine care (and there is a number of 
  midwives in the system providing this), are the ones who are more confident in 
  their own ability to give birth.
  The language the 
  “carer” uses, the attitude they convey, the reactions they give all have a 
  very significant effect not just on how the woman feels during the pregnancy 
  and the birth but how she experiences early motherhood. I feel the potential outcome is a very 
  significant impact on the woman’s relationship with her 
  baby.
  I think the splitting 
  up of care, the different departments in a hospital – the antenatal clinic, 
  the delivery suite, the postnatal ward – with different groups of midwives in 
  each area – is an unbelievably cruel style of “care/processing” to subject a 
  woman to, any relationship of trust she has developed with any midwife is 
  short lived.
  It is an interesting 
  concept the broken current day style of care isn’t 
  it?
  It is very effective 
  in preventing midwives from really being midwives – and from mothers being 
  empowered at a time when they most need it.
  It is the best way of 
  preventing women from really being able to help other 
  women.
  Although I am not 
  qualified as a midwife many women and their partners will automatically turn 
  to me for help and support because I have been the only bit of continuity in 
  the system for them, as their educator in the hospital. I have had regular contact with them 
  from about 25 weeks of pregnancy through to about 2 to 3 months post natally. 
  I give them my home phone 
  number and email address so they can contact me if they want to, and over a 
  decade, this has rarely posed a problem.
  They feel they know 
  me, they can trust me, and they know from my language, my attitude, and my 
  behaviour towards them that I do understand and that I care about each of them 
  and their babies. This is what 
  they like, they need and they want. 
  I am dedicated to supporting midwives and mothers, and am able to fill 
  in many gaps that exit in the system. 
  
  Even with complete 
  continuity of care I think it’s “healthy” for women to have an 
  educator/supporter/trainer/guide to assist them along the path to parenthood – 
  as long as that person has integrity and an attitude of genuine care, then they can be an excellent resource 
  person for parents to be and new parents.
  
  Hug
  Julie
  
  
  Julie 
  Clarke
  Childbirth 
  and Parenting Educator
  Transition 
  into Parenthood
  9 
  Withybrook Pl
  Sylvania 
  NSW 2224.
  T. 
  (02) 9544 6441
  Mobile 
  0401 2655 30
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denise HyndSent: Monday, 14 July 2003 5:27 
  AMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] what's 
  happening ?
  
  
  Judy 
  
  
  Is there a lot differences between 
  these 2 locations for example how ANC is approach positively or as birth is to 
  be feared??Denise
  

- Original Message - 


From: Judy 
Chapman 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Sent: 
Saturday, July 12, 2003 6:02 PM

Subject: RE: 
[ozmidwifery] what's happening ?




I think we all have bad runs. Since I have been at 
my new job primips have given me a hard time with a couple going on to CS. 
Had real good figures at the last place. 
Cheers
Judy
From: Ken Ward 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] what's 
happening ? 
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:26:35 +1000 

Okay, so I'm not a home birth midwife, 
but I do believe in women's bodies 
and abilities. I also have had a run of 
unexpected outcomes. Just the other 
day I took over, 

[ozmidwifery] National Register of ALL Independent Childbirth Educators (NICE)

2003-07-13 Thread Julie Clarke








Hi everyone

Every now and then, I will be
asked to refer someone to another Independent Educator somewhere in Australia and I am
often unable to help simply because there does not seem to be a register of
Independent Educators anywhere.

So I thought lets do it 
lets pull the information together so that anytime I am asked I can
readily refer.

I am currently working on developing
a list of all Independent Childbirth Educators in Australia and
might look at getting it printed professionally J to
make available for distribution.

If you are an independent
childbirth educator who would like to be added to the list then please send
your details to me for inclusion.

(On the other hand, if you know
someone who would like to be on the list then please forward this email to
them).



Name:

Address:

Telephone:

Facsimile:

Mobile:

Email:

Details of Independent
Childbirth Education Classes offered:

The region of area you would
describe as your catchment area and the hospitals in that catchment.



I hope you can all help me 
Of course I will let you know when its complete and make it available to
you. 

I will call this list: NICE 2003 - National Independent Childbirth
Educators 2003.

How funky is that, eh?



hug

Julie
Clarke

Childbirth
and Parenting Educator

Transition
into Parenthood

9 Withybrook Pl

Sylvania NSW 2224.

T. (02)
9544 6441

Fax: (02)
9544 9257

Mobile 0401
2655 30

Catchment: St George and Sutherland Shire Region in the
South Eastern
 Sydney.








[ozmidwifery] SMH Good Weekend Article on Saturday Criticising Birth Plans

2003-07-13 Thread Julie Clarke








Hi everyone, I received this email from a lovely woman who
came through my classes last year  did others see this article too? Hug
Julie

Hi Julie,

I was wondering whether you managed to see the article in this
weekend's Good Weekend magazine in the Sydney Morning Herald. It's
written by Mia Freedman about how (apparently) useless birth plans are, and
basically goes on to ridicule any woman who has the intention of trying to have
minimal intervention in labour.

And I quote: 

Fastforward to the actual birth and $100 says she'll be
swearing at said husband while screaming for an epidural. $200 says the
CDs and the oil burner won't even make it out of the labour bag.

But while birth plans are relatively harmless, I'm far
less tolerant of the very vocal group of childbirth zealots who rail against
pain relief and 'intervention'. Why aren't these women grateful for
medical help?

Epidurals don't appear to affect the baby
physically.

Whilst I wouldn't say that I'm a person who would get up on
her soap box and push the natural birth method on everyone, I was really
offended reading the article. I understand that it's meant to be a
humorous piece of writing, but I think it actually has the effect of offending those
who desire the most natural birth possible, yet will welcome medical assistance
if required.

I feel like writinga letter into the SMH expressing my
disappointment with the article and pointing out a few misconceptions regarding
epidurals, like they're totally risk-free to both mother and baby.

If you haven't seen it, the SMH is still on sale, but if you
don't get to see it and would like to see it, just let me know and I'll pop it
around to you.










Re: [ozmidwifery] SMH Good Weekend Article on Saturday Criticising Birth Plans

2003-07-13 Thread Pinky McKay



Hi Julie, I saw it and it deserves a stack of 
letters, I didnt see it as "funny" -initially, I thought it might be but as I 
read on I began to feel really offended.
Pinky

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Julie 
  Clarke 
  To: Ozmidwifery Mailing List 
  
  Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:34 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] SMH Good Weekend 
  Article on Saturday Criticising Birth Plans
  
  
  Hi everyone, I received this email 
  from a lovely woman who came through my classes last year – did others see 
  this article too? Hug Julie
  Hi 
  Julie,
  I 
  was wondering whether you managed to see the article in this weekend's Good 
  Weekend magazine in the Sydney Morning Herald. It's written by Mia 
  Freedman about how (apparently) useless birth plans are, and basically goes on 
  to ridicule any woman who has the intention of trying to have minimal 
  intervention in labour.
  And 
  I quote: 
  "Fastforward 
  to the actual birth and $100 says she'll be swearing at said husband while 
  screaming for an epidural. $200 says the CDs and the oil burner won't 
  even make it out of the labour bag."
  "But 
  while birth plans are relatively harmless, I'm far less tolerant of the very 
  vocal group of childbirth zealots who rail against pain relief and 
  'intervention'. Why aren't these women grateful for medical 
  help?"
  "Epidurals 
  don't appear to affect the baby physically."
  Whilst 
  I wouldn't say that I'm a person who would get up on her soap box and push the 
  natural birth method on everyone, I was really offended reading the 
  article. I understand that it's meant to be a humorous piece of writing, 
  but I think it actually has the effect of offending those who desire the most 
  natural birth possible, yet will welcome medical assistance if 
  required.
  I 
  feel like writinga letter into the SMH expressing my disappointment with 
  the article and pointing out a few misconceptions regarding epidurals, like 
  they're totally risk-free to both mother and baby.
  If 
  you haven't seen it, the SMH is still on sale, but if you don't get to see it 
  and would like to see it, just let me know and I'll pop it around to 
  you.
  


[ozmidwifery] re midwifery antenatal care

2003-07-13 Thread Malavisi, Pete



Julie, 
I am after some references supporting that women gain from having antenatal care 
by midwives in conjunction with GP's along the lines of what you have 
said,thanks pete malavisi.



RE: [ozmidwifery] SMH Good Weekend Article on Saturday Criticising Birth Plans

2003-07-13 Thread Judy Giesaitis



does 
anyone have the good weekend email handy, I would love to start the bombardment 
of their mail box 

  [Judy 
  Giesaitis]


RE: [ozmidwifery] SMH Good Weekend Article on Saturday Criticising Birth Plans

2003-07-13 Thread Judy Giesaitis





  Like Pinky, I too am getting more and 
  more hot under the collar, Judy 
Giesaitis


[ozmidwifery] Ridiculous Story in the Good Weekend

2003-07-13 Thread Julie Clarke








Hi

Below is my response to the SMH Good
Weekend article  hope they are inundated with lots of letters - SMH
Letters [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can tell it pressed my buttons J

Do you like my last point?

Hug to all

Julie

-Original Message-
From: Julie Clarke
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 14
 July 2003 3:34 PM
To: SMH Letters
Subject: Ridiculous Story in the
Good Weekend



Mia Freedman in her article criticising Birth
Plans and Natural Birth reveals herself as a woman who had
unrealistic expectations about labour and birth, an unpreparedness to
understand and work with her body during labour, along with bizarre ideas about
maintaining appearances (her hairdo) instead of embracing the use of a hot
shower for pain relief. What a
strangely old-fashioned aspect that was to her birth story. I had heard stories
from some of my friends who were like Mia and it taught me that attitude was
everything when it comes to birthing  luckily, I was able to learn from
their mistakes, made smart choices. With enough courage and determination had a
natural birth in the squatting position with my first baby and then a homebirth
waterbirth with my second baby, all the while cared for by wise and wonderful
midwives. So Mia was
spitting the dummy when her birth wasnt quick and easy,
didnt go according to plan and rather than accepting the responsibility
for her own behaviour, she is turning her anger on to others and blaming those
who endorse natural birth. Well there is a little more to it than the
superficial tone to your article Mia.
Becoming pregnant is a very grown up thing to do, fortunately there is
usually about 9 months to realise this.
Many women approach it as a personal growth experience both physically
and emotionally, they listen and learn from experienced mothers, read a wide
variety of books, attend good quality birth and parenting preparation sessions,
accept the responsibility for decision-making and choose wise options.

Many couples recognise the time during the pregnancy when
changes to lifestyle need to occur, they talk more about the future, they plan
all sorts of things together (only one of these elements is a birth plan) and
they will often discover a maturing of their relationship. They become closer and work more as a
team together  this is exactly what a baby needs from its mum and
dad  isnt it?



Julie Clarke

T. (02) 9544 6441










RE: [ozmidwifery] re midwifery antenatal care

2003-07-13 Thread Julie Clarke









Hi Pete 

Its my opinion that women are better off with pure midwifery care
rather than watered down GP shared care.

I cant
give you any references  I have based my opinion on the comments,
thoughts and feelings of the women in my cbe
sessions.

Hug

Julie





Julie Clarke

Childbirth and Parenting Educator

Transition into Parenthood

9
  Withybrook Pl

Sylvania NSW 2224.

T. (02) 9544 6441

Mobile 0401 2655 30





-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Malavisi, Pete
Sent: Monday, 14
 July 2003 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ozmidwifery] re
midwifery antenatal care





Julie, I
am after some references supporting that women gain from having antenatal care
by midwives in conjunction with GP's along the lines of what you have
said,thanks pete malavisi.
















Re: [ozmidwifery] Ridiculous Story in the Good Weekend

2003-07-13 Thread Pinky McKay



great letter - yes I do love the last 
bit!
Pinky

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Julie 
  Clarke 
  To: Ozmidwifery Mailing List 
  
  Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:40 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Ridiculous Story 
  in the Good Weekend
  
  
  Hi
  Below is my response 
  to the SMH Good Weekend article – hope they are inundated with lots of letters 
  - SMH Letters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  You can tell it 
  pressed my buttons J
  Do you like my last 
  point?
  Hug to 
  all
  Julie
  -Original 
  Message-From: Julie 
  Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 
  14 July 2003 
  3:34 
  PMTo: SMH LettersSubject: Ridiculous Story in the Good 
  Weekend
  
  Mia Freedman in her article 
  criticising “Birth Plans” and “Natural Birth” reveals herself as a woman who 
  had unrealistic expectations about labour and birth, an unpreparedness to 
  understand and work with her body during labour, along with bizarre ideas 
  about maintaining appearances (her hairdo) instead of embracing the use of a 
  hot shower for pain relief. What 
  a strangely old-fashioned aspect that was to her birth story. I had heard 
  stories from some of my friends who were like Mia and it taught me that 
  attitude was everything when it comes to birthing – luckily, I was able to 
  learn from their mistakes, made smart choices. With enough courage and 
  determination had a natural birth in the squatting position with my first baby 
  and then a homebirth waterbirth with my second baby, all the while cared for 
  by wise and wonderful midwives. 
  So Mia was “spitting the dummy” when her birth wasn’t quick and easy, 
  didn’t go according to plan and rather than accepting the responsibility for 
  her own behaviour, she is turning her anger on to others and blaming those who 
  endorse natural birth. Well there is a little more to it than the superficial 
  tone to your article Mia. 
  Becoming pregnant is a very grown up thing to do, fortunately there is 
  usually about 9 months to realise this. 
  Many women approach it as a personal growth experience both physically 
  and emotionally, they listen and learn from experienced mothers, read a wide 
  variety of books, attend good quality birth and parenting preparation 
  sessions, accept the responsibility for decision-making and choose wise 
  options.
  Many couples recognise the time 
  during the pregnancy when changes to lifestyle need to occur, they talk more 
  about the future, they plan all sorts of things together (only one of these 
  elements is a birth plan) and they will often discover a maturing of their 
  relationship. They become closer 
  and work more as a team together – this is exactly what a baby needs from it’s 
  mum and dad – isn’t it?
  
  Julie 
  Clarke
  T. 
  (02) 9544 6441