Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS

2006-11-18 Thread Sue Cookson
Propolis tincture taken orally is supposed to be effective against GBS - 
again, little research in the alternate area perhaps because of the 
mega$$ pharmaceutical and diagnostic industries around childbirth.
And the research really shows that although IV antibiotics decreases the 
number of babies with GBS, it also increases the number of babies with 
other blood borne infections that can also be dangerous (the ABs killoff 
the GBS but allow other bugs to gain resistance). And the babies whose 
mothers were given IV antibiotics in labour have an increased resistance 
to that antibiotic - obviosly more of an issue for premmie and sick 
babies...


An interesting article by Christa Novelli 2003 which discusses the risk 
of the mother taking antibiotics as well:

www.mothering.com/articles/pregnancy_birth/birth_preparation/group-b.html


How great is the risk from antibiotics?
The recommended antibiotic for treating GBS during labor is 
penicillin. Fewer bacteria currently show a resistance to penicillin 
than to other antibiotics used to treat GBS. The options are fewer for 
women known to be allergic to penicillin. Up to 29 percent of GBS 
strains have been shown to be resistant to non-penicillin 
antibiotics.46 For women not known to be allergic to penicillin, there 
is a one in ten risk of a mild allergic reaction to penicillin, such 
as a rash. Even for those women who have no prior experience of a 
penicillin allergy, there is a one in 10,000 chance of developing 
anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction.


We can compare this to CDC estimates that 0.5 percent of babies born 
to GBS-positive mothers with no treatment will develop a GBS 
infection, and that 6 percent of those who develop a GBS infection 
will die. Six percent of 0.5 percent means that three out of every 
10,000 babies born to GBS-positive mothers given no antibiotics during 
labor will die from GBS infection. If the mother develops anaphylaxis 
during labor (one in 10,000 will), and it is untreated, it is likely 
that the infant, too, will die. So, by CDC estimates, we save the 
lives of two in 10,000 babies-0.02 percent-by administering 
antibiotics during labor to one third of all laboring women. We should 
also keep in mind that this figure does not take into account the 
infants that will die as a result of bacteria made 
antibiotic-resistant by the use of antibiotics during labor-infants 
who would not otherwise have become ill. When you take that into 
account, there may not be any lives saved by using antibiotics during 
labor.


Nothing we do or take in life can be an absolute - and some of this 
stuff takes lots of sorting out.
Where I have been doing my clinical placements, if a mother had GBS in 
her previous pregnancy (but not necessarily this one) she is still 
treated with IV antibiotics. Yet the research clearly states that a 
previous baby with GBS disease is an indicator for GBS treatment in 
subsequent pregnancies, not merely being GBS positive in the previous 
pregnancy.


So midwives, women and the medical profession seem to be all over the 
place with different interpretations of research and policy directives. 
It must come down to individual's perception of risks and safety - and 
that there can be no assurances that treatment or non-treatment will 
work. As Novelli states, women with negative GBS cultures still have a 
1:2000 risk of her newborn developing GBS disease.


I guess all we can do is give the information and trust that the 
decision made by the parents will be one that they are happy with ...


Sue








--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: RE: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread abby_toby

Hi Mary,

 If midwives actually ask for this larger payment, would women still want to 
 have their services?

I think women still want their services, but Sydney midwives are way out of 
some mamas price range.  

 Women now have an income from the Government that would pay for the midwife,
 but many parents see this as a payment to relieve the mortgage, clear debt
 or buy a big TV.  

Or, some women use that money so they can stay at home longer with their new 
bub. For my sis, in sydney, it was a choice between having a very much wanted 
homebirth and only being able to stay at home with her bub for 6 weeks or 
birthing in a birth centre and being able to stay at home for 6 months. 

the money from the government, despite what some people may do with it, is a 
generous offer to help out with the costs of staying at home with a new baby. 
It seems that in Sydney, midwives prices have gone up whenever the baby bonus 
has gone up. I think it is really sad that women in Sydney have to pay more and 
use more of that money when women allover the rest of the country get to have a 
homebirth and also have the benefits of reduced stress levels because of the 
leftover baby bonus they receive.

I think midwives are worth it if a woman so desires, but I don't see how come 
Sydney midwives are worth s much more??

Abby xo
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: Re: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread abby_toby
Hi Barb,

I think it's wonderful that you had such an amazing birth and wish for all 
women to have such an experience. From my understanding, many Sydney midwives 
ask their clients to come to them not vice versa. So a lot of their care is not 
midwifery care at home, rather it is out of their home until the final weeks. 
I'm not sure about all midwives, but this seems more common place now in Sydney.

 And, you get paid $4000 to have a child these days.  Midwifery care at 
 home?  It's a bargain.

I find it very interesting that people see you get paid to have a baby. I was 
under the impression that the baby bonus was given to help mums to be able to 
afford to stay home longer from work, or upgrade their car if they need more 
space, or buy car seats, slings, good food for nourishment while breastfeeding 
etc. The only women I know that can afford to spend that whole $4000 on 
midwifery care are the women that didn't need that money in the first place. 
The women that choose to spend the whole amount even though they can't afford 
it, because they have no other choice in Sydney, have no benefits from the baby 
bonus for living expenses with a newborn. There is no bargain if you can't 
afford it.

I understand the value of midwives and continuity of care and midwifery care at 
home, but why should women in Sydney and NSW be paying that much more?? Nobody 
has answered that question. I'm not questioning the value of midwifery care, 
more why Sydney midwifery care is so much more 'valuable' in the dollars and 
sense kind of way?

Love Abby xo
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS

2006-11-18 Thread Heartlogic
Yes, I know the literature, but our health service has made it a required 
screening. All women in our health service are 'offered' the screening. 

warmly, Carolyn 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mary Murphy 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 6:43 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] GBS


  Journal of Obstetrics  Gynaecology   Publisher:  Taylor  Francis   Issue:  
Volume 25, Number 5 / July 2005   Pages:  462 - 464   URL:  Linking Options   
DOI:  10.1080/01443610500160261

  Group B streptococcus disease in neonates: To screen or not to screen?

  O. Subair A1, P. Wagner , F. Omojole , H. Morgan 

  A Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Whittington Hospital, London, UK

  Abstract: 

  Summary

  An audit was undertaken of the prevention of early-onset Group B 
streptococcus (EOGBS) disease in neonates. The prevention strategy in use 
involved offering Intra-partum Antibiotic Prophylaxis (IAP) to mothers with 
identified risk factors, which include maternal fever in labour gt; 38°C, 
previous baby with GBS disease, prolonged rupture of membranes gt; 18 h, 
pre-term labour, GBS urinary tract infection and known GBS carriage. The most 
common risk factor identified was GBS carriage (41%) which was known 
ante-partum but logistical problems prevented these mothers from receiving 
adequate prophylaxis 4 h before delivery and so were classified as at risk of 
GBS disease. We found an incidence of GBS in our unit of 0.55 per 1,000 births 
over the study period. One neonate developed EOGBS disease and the mother had 
no identifiable risk factor ante-partum/intra-partum. Recent recommendations 
from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) could reduce 
the number of babies having sepsis screens performed as the time interval from 
beginning IAP to delivery has been shortened to 2 h and routine surface 
cultures or blood cultures are not recommended in well newborns. The evidence 
is lacking at this point to recommend universal screening for GBS in all 
pregnant women but patients are increasingly aware of this option and may 
request anogenital swabs to assess GBS carriage.

   


Re: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread Jo Bourne
Speaking as a consumer who just paid sydney prices for a homebirth -  
the cost of living is higher here than most if not all other cities  
in Australia. It's one of those odd things that some careers are FAR  
better paid in Sydney than elsewhere, others are not. We, for example  
are far better off living in Sydney because my husband's pay is FAR  
better, my mother on the other hand (who recently moved here to be  
near us) was financially better off in Adelaide as her pay here the  
same (or less) but her costs are higher. I have no problem with  
someone who can set their own rate of pay doing so at a level that is  
proportional to their cost of living.


My midwife came to me for all visits, she was with us for a magical  
birth at the end of a fairly awful pregnancy that could not possibly  
have ended so well without her care and the post natal care in our  
home was exceptional. She took care of things like having synto and  
vit k available should i need them, and everything else we might  
need. I believe she takes on a maximum of 24 clients a year, this  
year more like 10-12. Even with 24 clients, let alone 10-12, less  
costs I imagine it works out to an average wage at best.


We should not have to pay for homebirth, but neither should midwives  
have to earn less than they are worth,  so we can have the choice.


On 18/11/2006, at 10:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Barb,

I think it's wonderful that you had such an amazing birth and wish  
for all women to have such an experience. From my understanding,  
many Sydney midwives ask their clients to come to them not vice  
versa. So a lot of their care is not midwifery care at home, rather  
it is out of their home until the final weeks. I'm not sure about  
all midwives, but this seems more common place now in Sydney.


And, you get paid $4000 to have a child these days.  Midwifery  
care at

home?  It's a bargain.


I find it very interesting that people see you get paid to have a  
baby. I was under the impression that the baby bonus was given to  
help mums to be able to afford to stay home longer from work, or  
upgrade their car if they need more space, or buy car seats,  
slings, good food for nourishment while breastfeeding etc. The only  
women I know that can afford to spend that whole $4000 on midwifery  
care are the women that didn't need that money in the first place.  
The women that choose to spend the whole amount even though they  
can't afford it, because they have no other choice in Sydney, have  
no benefits from the baby bonus for living expenses with a newborn.  
There is no bargain if you can't afford it.


I understand the value of midwives and continuity of care and  
midwifery care at home, but why should women in Sydney and NSW be  
paying that much more?? Nobody has answered that question. I'm not  
questioning the value of midwifery care, more why Sydney midwifery  
care is so much more 'valuable' in the dollars and sense kind of way?


Love Abby xo
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] birth pool

2006-11-18 Thread Andrea Quanchi
If any one is interested there is a la bassine birth pool advertised  
on ebay with a few days to go in the bidding it is only up to $80:00  
so far

Andrea Q
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS

2006-11-18 Thread Diane Gardner
A homebirth midwife friend of mine in the USA sent me the douch and garlic 
recipes a while ago. Here they are:

regards
Diane Gardner


douche:

three parts water

one part hydrogen peroxide

douche before bed four nights in a row having the morning of the fifth day the 
day of your 'test' (if person is taking the test this gets you a negative 
result, which is a real result as the h2O2 has killed off all the strep virons 
in the vagina so the woman is 'good to go' for her birth as well)

 

OR:

insert one raw garlic clove vaginally for six nights in a row. Scoring the 
cloves is best, however, the raw garlic juice can be strong and 'burny' in the 
vagina.  Start with just one or two 'scores' or break surface of the clove with 
a knife point 2-3 times.  See how that feels and go from there, the more 
scoring or pokes into the surface of the garlic, the more GBS killing takes 
place.

The woman may taste garlic in her mouth after insertion.  Some women are really 
worried and do both, the douche and then insert garlic--THAT combo would REALLY 
get all GBS microbes for sure!


RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread Roberta Quinn
I don't think anyone really understands what the baby bonus is for! Not even
the government... as is proven by the latest change in policy.

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifairy
Sent: Saturday, 18 November 2006 8:42 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

Hi Barb,



I think it's wonderful that you had such an amazing birth and wish for all
women to have such an experience. From my understanding, many Sydney
midwives ask their clients to come to them not vice versa. So a lot of their
care is not midwifery care at home, rather it is out of their home until the
final weeks. I'm not sure about all midwives, but this seems more common
place now in Sydney.



  

And, you get paid $4000 to have a child these days.  Midwifery care at 

home?  It's a bargain.





I find it very interesting that people see you get paid to have a baby. I
was under the impression that the baby bonus was given to help mums to be
able to afford to stay home longer from work, or upgrade their car if they
need more space, or buy car seats, slings, good food for nourishment while
breastfeeding etc. The only women I know that can afford to spend that whole
$4000 on midwifery care are the women that didn't need that money in the
first place. The women that choose to spend the whole amount even though
they can't afford it, because they have no other choice in Sydney, have no
benefits from the baby bonus for living expenses with a newborn. There is no
bargain if you can't afford it.



I understand the value of midwives and continuity of care and midwifery care
at home, but why should women in Sydney and NSW be paying that much more??
Nobody has answered that question. I'm not questioning the value of
midwifery care, more why Sydney midwifery care is so much more 'valuable' in
the dollars and sense kind of way?



Love Abby xo

--

This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.

Visit  http://www.acegraphics.com.au http://www.acegraphics.com.au to
subscribe or unsubscribe.





  

The real question as far as Im concerned ( yes I have a 'vested interest'
as a midwife, which I guess is slightly different to the vested interest I
had when I was a consumer of homebirth midwifery services) is why are women
being made to pay out of their own pockets at all just because they choose
to birth at home? If women had to pay up-front for obstetric services, ie
they were not provided 'free' by the public health system nor were rebatable
by the majority of private health insurance companies, then this
conversation might have some balance to it. 
I think some of the answers to the question of differences in charges of
homebirth midwifery services is more about supply and demand, cost of living
in different geographical areas, the fact as Mary has stated that midwifery
service is traditionally undervalued not just within the profession but by
other health professionals and consumers alike.and we are meant to be
seen as 'caring' and how caring can you be when you actually charge what
your service is worth, when you want to provide care to women whether they
can afford it or not, regardless of their financial situation, when the
midwife in the next suburb or state charges significantly differently
because she has different financial needs or different ways of practice or
. 
Please just take into account that every single independently practising
midwife I know has worked for no or very little pay, sometimes by choice
because we dont want to turn away a woman desperate for a homebirth, or
because we've had a client who either didnt pay or didnt pay the agreed
amount. Please also take into account that every single homebirth a midwife
attends is a major financial risk in terms of the lack of PI insurance - we
can be sued by anyone at any time with no recourse to any sort of support,
and yes we all want to believe this doesnt happen but it does actually,
enough that a significant number of midwives stopped practicing
independantly after the PII was no longer available. 
Rather than asking why are women in NSW paying more, the question should be
why are women in other states paying less? And why are they being made to
pay at all, when homebirth is provided free in some very specific areas and
obstetric care is 'free' everywhere?


-- 


Jennifairy Gillett RM 

Midwife in Private Practice 

Women's Health Teaching Associate 

ITShare volunteer - Santos Project Co-ordinator 
ITShare SA Inc - http://itshare.org.au/ 
ITShare SA provides computer systems to individuals  groups, created from
donated hardware and opensource software 



Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS

2006-11-18 Thread Janet Fraser
There is considerable literature on the dangers of antibiotics in labour not to 
mention the added difficulty to the women trying to labour with an IV hanging 
off them. Antibiotics can also cause thrush which when passed from mother to 
baby and back again can cause immense difficulties with breastfeeding. It's not 
as simple as antibiotics are easier than dying of GBS, nothing like it!
http://www.joyousbirth.info/articles/gbsnaturalapproach.html
  - Original Message - 
  From: Diane Gardner 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 11:41 PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS


  A homebirth midwife friend of mine in the USA sent me the douch and garlic 
recipes a while ago. Here they are:

  regards
  Diane Gardner


  douche:

  three parts water

  one part hydrogen peroxide

  douche before bed four nights in a row having the morning of the fifth day 
the day of your 'test' (if person is taking the test this gets you a negative 
result, which is a real result as the h2O2 has killed off all the strep virons 
in the vagina so the woman is 'good to go' for her birth as well)

   

  OR:

  insert one raw garlic clove vaginally for six nights in a row. Scoring the 
cloves is best, however, the raw garlic juice can be strong and 'burny' in the 
vagina.  Start with just one or two 'scores' or break surface of the clove with 
a knife point 2-3 times.  See how that feels and go from there, the more 
scoring or pokes into the surface of the garlic, the more GBS killing takes 
place.

  The woman may taste garlic in her mouth after insertion.  Some women are 
really worried and do both, the douche and then insert garlic--THAT combo would 
REALLY get all GBS microbes for sure!


Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS

2006-11-18 Thread Sue Cookson

Hi,
Some more on the GBS line.

Propolis tincture taken orally is supposed to be effective against GBS - 
again, little research in the alternate area perhaps because of the 
mega$$ pharmaceutical and diagnostic industries around childbirth.
And the research really shows that although IV antibiotics decreases the 
number of babies with GBS, it also increases the number of babies with 
other blood borne infections that can also be dangerous (the ABs killoff 
the GBS but allow other bugs to gain resistance). And the babies whose 
mothers were given IV antibiotics in labour have an increased resistance 
to that antibiotic - obviosly more of an issue for premmie and sick 
babies...


An interesting article by Christa Novelli 2003 which discusses the risk 
of the mother taking antibiotics as well:

www.mothering.com/articles/pregnancy_birth/birth_preparation/group-b.html


How great is the risk from antibiotics?
The recommended antibiotic for treating GBS during labor is 
penicillin. Fewer bacteria currently show a resistance to penicillin 
than to other antibiotics used to treat GBS. The options are fewer for 
women known to be allergic to penicillin. Up to 29 percent of GBS 
strains have been shown to be resistant to non-penicillin 
antibiotics.46 For women not known to be allergic to penicillin, there 
is a one in ten risk of a mild allergic reaction to penicillin, such 
as a rash. Even for those women who have no prior experience of a 
penicillin allergy, there is a one in 10,000 chance of developing 
anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction.


We can compare this to CDC estimates that 0.5 percent of babies born 
to GBS-positive mothers with no treatment will develop a GBS 
infection, and that 6 percent of those who develop a GBS infection 
will die. Six percent of 0.5 percent means that three out of every 
10,000 babies born to GBS-positive mothers given no antibiotics during 
labor will die from GBS infection. If the mother develops anaphylaxis 
during labor (one in 10,000 will), and it is untreated, it is likely 
that the infant, too, will die. So, by CDC estimates, we save the 
lives of two in 10,000 babies-0.02 percent-by administering 
antibiotics during labor to one third of all laboring women. We should 
also keep in mind that this figure does not take into account the 
infants that will die as a result of bacteria made 
antibiotic-resistant by the use of antibiotics during labor-infants 
who would not otherwise have become ill. When you take that into 
account, there may not be any lives saved by using antibiotics during 
labor.


Nothing we do or take in life can be an absolute - and some of this 
stuff takes lots of sorting out.
Where I have been doing my clinical placements, if a mother had GBS in 
her previous pregnancy (but not necessarily this one) she is still 
treated with IV antibiotics. Yet the research clearly states that a 
previous baby with GBS disease is an indicator for GBS treatment in 
subsequent pregnancies, not merely being GBS positive in the previous 
pregnancy.


So midwives, women and the medical profession seem to be all over the 
place with different interpretations of research and policy directives. 
It must come down to individual's perception of risks and safety - and 
that there can be no assurances that treatment or non-treatment will 
work. As Novelli states, women with negative GBS cultures still have a 
1:2000 risk of her newborn developing GBS disease.


I guess all we can do is give the information and trust that the 
decision made by the parents will be one that they are happy with ...


Sue











Re: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread Jo Bourne
Actually my out of pocket costs for my OB were pretty much equal to  
my out of pocket costs for my midwife. Even with private health  
insurance and the medicare safetynet private OBs are far more  
expensive in Sydney than elsewhere too.


The real question as far as Im concerned ( yes I have a 'vested  
interest' as a midwife, which I guess is slightly different to the  
vested interest I had when I was a consumer of homebirth midwifery  
services) is why are women being made to pay out of their own  
pockets at all just because they choose to birth at home? If women  
had to pay up-front for obstetric services, ie they were not  
provided 'free' by the public health system nor were rebatable by  
the majority of private health insurance companies, then this  
conversation might have some balance to it.
I think some of the answers to the question of differences in  
charges of homebirth midwifery services is more about supply and  
demand, cost of living in different geographical areas, the fact as  
Mary has stated that midwifery service is traditionally undervalued  
not just within the profession but by other health professionals  
and consumers alike.and we are meant to be seen as 'caring' and  
how caring can you be when you actually charge what your service is  
worth, when you want to provide care to women whether they can  
afford it or not, regardless of their financial situation, when the  
midwife in the next suburb or state charges significantly  
differently because she has different financial needs or different  
ways of practice or .
Please just take into account that every single independently  
practising midwife I know has worked for no or very little pay,  
sometimes by choice because we dont want to turn away a woman  
desperate for a homebirth, or because we've had a client who either  
didnt pay or didnt pay the agreed amount. Please also take into  
account that every single homebirth a midwife attends is a major  
financial risk in terms of the lack of PI insurance - we can be  
sued by anyone at any time with no recourse to any sort of support,  
and yes we all want to believe this doesnt happen but it does  
actually, enough that a significant number of midwives stopped  
practicing independantly after the PII was no longer available.
Rather than asking why are women in NSW paying more, the question  
should be why are women in other states paying less? And why are  
they being made to pay at all, when homebirth is provided free in  
some very specific areas and obstetric care is 'free' everywhere?


--
Jennifairy Gillett RM

Midwife in Private Practice

Women’s Health Teaching Associate

ITShare volunteer – Santos Project Co-ordinator
ITShare SA Inc - http://itshare.org.au/
ITShare SA provides computer systems to individuals  groups,  
created from donated hardware and opensource software







Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS

2006-11-18 Thread diane
Small sample I know, but of two women who have used the garlic, one swabbed 
positive with heavy growth, the other negative...

Cheers,
Di

- Original Message - 
From: Robyn Dempsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS


I'd consult with a herbalist. Echinacea tinctures/ douches etc can be 
mixed up. I also have heard that a clove of garlic inserted into the 
vagina ( peeled clove) for 3 nights in a row also aids in reducing GBS.


Robyn D
- Original Message - 
From: Melanie Sommeling [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:15 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS



Hi wise women of the list,

I am curious if anyone can enlighten me of any alternatives to 
Antibiotics

in labour to decrease GBS transfer from mother to baby. I recollect some
info about douching during labour, but the info was sketchy to say the
least. I understand the risks of transfer are low and the risk or 
negative

effects are even lower, but alternatively have witnessed a birth of a GBS
positive mother where AB's were administered and the baby still developed
respiratory distress with several hours of birth and question the 
validity
of using AB'a at all. Any advice on the matter would be greatly 
appriciated.


Melanie

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread Sonja Barry

Abby,
I think the cost differences may be partly due to a limited number of 
midwives available in NSW to be at homebirths.  Those that do seem to need 
to travel far distances for some of the women.  Most I know do antenatal and 
postnatal in the woman's home and if they are driving 80+kms each way would 
be quite expensive for petrol and wear  tear on their cars.  We also need 
to consider that women, of which I have met 2 recently, who have spent 
$8000- $1 out of their own money, because they did not have private 
health insurance, to employ a private obstetrician.  For this they get to 
wait 2-3 hours at the doctor's rooms for a 10minute visit, no time to ask 
questions, no postnatal other than the 6 week checkup, an increased chance 
of an induction of labour, an epidural, leading onto the caesarean for 
failure to progress, maternal exhaustion etc, and in one case the ob did not 
even make the birth.  I certainly would be more than happy to pay $4000 for 
a midwife to come to me and have my baby at home.  I also understand that 
some of these midwives will accept full payment after the birth, and some 
women will choose to take up this option and use the baby bonus for this, 
whilst other women will pay amounts throughout their pregnancy and a balance 
after the baby is born.

Sonja
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs


How come there is such a big difference? I mean, that is a really BIG 
difference!!


Love Abby




Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Same in WA. MM



  _



Approx $2000-$2500 here in SA I think, from what I know anyway.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS

2006-11-18 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
I have a woman at the moment who has had threatened pre-term labour, they
are hoping with everything she gets to 37 weeks... I know some doctors like
to have ab's for prem labour - is this the case in most hospitals?

Best Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Creator, BellyBelly.com.au
Conception, Pregnancy, Birth and Baby
BellyBelly Birth Support

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of diane
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 9:26 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS

Small sample I know, but of two women who have used the garlic, one swabbed 
positive with heavy growth, the other negative...
Cheers,
Di

- Original Message - 
From: Robyn Dempsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS


 I'd consult with a herbalist. Echinacea tinctures/ douches etc can be 
 mixed up. I also have heard that a clove of garlic inserted into the 
 vagina ( peeled clove) for 3 nights in a row also aids in reducing GBS.

 Robyn D
 - Original Message - 
 From: Melanie Sommeling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:15 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS


 Hi wise women of the list,

 I am curious if anyone can enlighten me of any alternatives to 
 Antibiotics
 in labour to decrease GBS transfer from mother to baby. I recollect some
 info about douching during labour, but the info was sketchy to say the
 least. I understand the risks of transfer are low and the risk or 
 negative
 effects are even lower, but alternatively have witnessed a birth of a GBS
 positive mother where AB's were administered and the baby still developed
 respiratory distress with several hours of birth and question the 
 validity
 of using AB'a at all. Any advice on the matter would be greatly 
 appriciated.

 Melanie

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] birth pool

2006-11-18 Thread diane
Does anyone have experience with this type of pool?? Can you get disposable 
liners ??

Cheers,
Di

- Original Message - 
From: Andrea Quanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 10:24 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] birth pool


If any one is interested there is a la bassine birth pool advertised  on 
ebay with a few days to go in the bidding it is only up to $80:00  so far

Andrea Q
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] homebirth costs.

2006-11-18 Thread Mary Murphy
 I'm not questioning the value of midwifery care, more why Sydney midwifery
care is so much more 'valuable' in the dollars and sense kind of way?

Something that hasn't been mentioned is the lack of professional indemnity
insurance for midwives.  Midwives put their life and all their goods and
chattels on the line every time they care for a woman.  We are lucky in WA
that the Gov. took heed of the continuous lobbying over about 10yrs and let
us have a free homebirth program.  We struggle to keep it.  Midwives are
indemnified by the Govt insurance, but at the cost of more bureaucracy and
restricted options.  I am not complaining, just pointing out some of the
difficulties. MM 

 

 



Re: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs.

2006-11-18 Thread Janet Fraser
That restriction of practice really bothers me, and I can imagine it would 
bother midwives who want to provide evidence based care to their clients. Women 
with breech babies are in an unenviable position in Perth.
J
   Midwives are indemnified by the Govt insurance, but at the cost of more 
bureaucracy and restricted options.  I am not complaining, just pointing out 
some of the difficulties. MM 
   

   


Re: [ozmidwifery] birth pool

2006-11-18 Thread Janet Fraser
We have one we rent out in JB and are hoping to get more. I haven't seen
disposable liners but methylated spirits works to kill everything in labs so
we use that. If it's washed by the previous family and the subsequent family
and left in the home for a few weeks to load up with friendly normal
household bacteria specific to that home it's pretty good. No one's
complaining ; )
J
- Original Message - 
From: diane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] birth pool


 Does anyone have experience with this type of pool?? Can you get
disposable
 liners ??
 Cheers,
 Di

 - Original Message - 
 From: Andrea Quanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 10:24 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] birth pool


  If any one is interested there is a la bassine birth pool advertised  on
  ebay with a few days to go in the bidding it is only up to $80:00  so
far
  Andrea Q
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs.

2006-11-18 Thread Lisa Barrett
I've not picked up lots of the mails in the past few days but can see the 
replies.  I've just logged on to the digest to try and catch up so forgive me 
if this has been covered already.

I understand that women should have the right to choose a homebirth and that 
the consensus is that homebirth as provided in Perth is the way to go.  However 
as Mary said the restrictions are huge as are the policies protocols guidelines 
what ever you'd like to call them.
And There are skilled midwives like Mary who could easily undertake briths with 
variation of normal but are restricted in doing so.  The actual truth is most 
midwives working in the system wouldn't be comfortable with twin, breech, vbac 
at home.  Midwives who carry that skill will always have to be employed 
separately, they are in Britain, Netherlands etc.   I don't feel bad about 
charging for my skill.  I give up family life, the women always come first.  I 
travel miles I'm on call 24/7/ 7days a week.  I don't take holiday's or 
sometimes even day's off if required.  I constantly update, interface with 
others, provide free advice and counselling etc etc.  I'm a little sad not to 
be in NSW :-)

Who cares what the baby bonus is for.  It has nothing to do with women 
employing me for my midwifery skill.I would be doing exactly the same thing 
if there were no baby bonus.
Lisa Barrett


Re: Re: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread cath nolan
Didn,t someone previously say that the cost of living in NSW is more 
expensive, well that also goes for the midwives not just the women birthing. 
Midwives have families/lives /mortages etc. Cath
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Re: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs



Hi Barb,

I think it's wonderful that you had such an amazing birth and wish for all 
women to have such an experience. From my understanding, many Sydney 
midwives ask their clients to come to them not vice versa. So a lot of 
their care is not midwifery care at home, rather it is out of their home 
until the final weeks. I'm not sure about all midwives, but this seems 
more common place now in Sydney.



And, you get paid $4000 to have a child these days.  Midwifery care at
home?  It's a bargain.


I find it very interesting that people see you get paid to have a baby. I 
was under the impression that the baby bonus was given to help mums to be 
able to afford to stay home longer from work, or upgrade their car if they 
need more space, or buy car seats, slings, good food for nourishment while 
breastfeeding etc. The only women I know that can afford to spend that 
whole $4000 on midwifery care are the women that didn't need that money in 
the first place. The women that choose to spend the whole amount even 
though they can't afford it, because they have no other choice in Sydney, 
have no benefits from the baby bonus for living expenses with a newborn. 
There is no bargain if you can't afford it.


I understand the value of midwives and continuity of care and midwifery 
care at home, but why should women in Sydney and NSW be paying that much 
more?? Nobody has answered that question. I'm not questioning the value of 
midwifery care, more why Sydney midwifery care is so much more 'valuable' 
in the dollars and sense kind of way?


Love Abby xo
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread cath nolan
As a result of all this information, I spoke with a woman who wants a second 
homebirth, her first she was charged the cost of fuel to get to her for visits 
etc. I mentioned $2500 and she was taken aback. She said to me , Ï understand 
you need to cover costs but truly I think she has no real idea of the true 
value. This woman lives a 11/2 hour drive from me and said she will shop 
around. I wished her luck. It is difficult asking for money, and difficult 
getting a response such as this where effectively they did not pay previously, 
Cath
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mary Murphy 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:42 PM
  Subject: RE: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs


  How come there is such a big difference? I mean, that is a really BIG 
difference!!

   

  Midwives have always worked altruistically and undervalued their services. It 
takes an enormous emotional step for midwives to believe they are worth it.  
If midwives actually ask for this larger payment, would women still want to 
have their services? 

  And then again midwives want women to be able to afford their services. Women 
now have an income from the Government that would pay for the midwife, but many 
parents see this as a payment to relieve the mortgage, clear debt or buy a big 
TV.  It is more complex than just putting up the fees.  MM



   Approx $2000-$2500 here in SA I think, from what I know anyway.

   

   Same in WA. MM


Re: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread spahl
I have found this topic quite an eye-opener, particularly as someone who
hopes to practice independently after finishing my degree.  It makes me
feel sad that midwifery is so undervalued that midwives are only expected
to be allowed to recoup costs and nothing else.  Midwifery is a passion as
well as a profession.  Just because midwives feel passionate about their
profession shouldn't mean that they have to operate a charity, nor should
they be expected to.
It is up to the government to pull up their socks and start offering
better midwifery models and funding rather than midwives providing it at
their own personal expense.

Cheers,
Sam.


As a result of all this information, I spoke with a woman who wants a
 second homebirth, her first she was charged the cost of fuel to get to her
 for visits etc. I mentioned $2500 and she was taken aback. She said to me
 , Ï understand you need to cover costs but truly I think she has no real
 idea of the true value. This woman lives a 11/2 hour drive from me and
 said she will shop around. I wished her luck. It is difficult asking for
 money, and difficult getting a response such as this where effectively
 they did not pay previously, Cath
   - Original Message -
   From: Mary Murphy
   To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
   Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:42 PM
   Subject: RE: RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs


   How come there is such a big difference? I mean, that is a really BIG
 difference!!



   Midwives have always worked altruistically and undervalued their
 services. It takes an enormous emotional step for midwives to believe
 they are worth it.  If midwives actually ask for this larger payment,
 would women still want to have their services?

   And then again midwives want women to be able to afford their services.
 Women now have an income from the Government that would pay for the
 midwife, but many parents see this as a payment to relieve the mortgage,
 clear debt or buy a big TV.  It is more complex than just putting up the
 fees.  MM

   

Approx $2000-$2500 here in SA I think, from what I know anyway.



Same in WA. MM



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] birth pool

2006-11-18 Thread Andrea Quanchi
I have used mine several times now and found it to be really good.  
Plenty of room for the women to move around and sides that re strong  
enough to lean on and a base that is inflated so soft to kneel on.  
The thick inflated sides keep the water warm enough to be able to  
keep the pool at the right temp with kettle top ups.


The pool is all seamless plastic and so can be cleaned with chlorine  
solution between uses.  I ask the women to do it both before and  
after use thus it is leaned twice between uses and I also sit it out  
in the sun before repacking it in its carry bag.


Andrea
On 19/11/2006, at 10:36 AM, diane wrote:

Does anyone have experience with this type of pool?? Can you get  
disposable liners ??

Cheers,
Di

- Original Message - From: Andrea Quanchi  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 10:24 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] birth pool


If any one is interested there is a la bassine birth pool  
advertised  on ebay with a few days to go in the bidding it is  
only up to $80:00  so far

Andrea Q
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] FYI news article

2006-11-18 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
Well what do you know - that big email I sent out to the pollies recently
spilling all my guts on the horrific things going on in birth, breastfeeding
and MCHN's CC'ing training - I finally have a reply from my local labor
candidate and he's given me his mobile number to call him:

 

You have raised many important issues that no email can do it justice.

Can you give me a call and we can discuss the points raised.

My best number is my mobile 

 

Will be an interesting discussion, he seems rather caring and receptive :-)
Now I wish I knew a hell of a lot more than I do so I can put forward the
most intelligent arguments!!! This is where I would love your brain Justine
and your ability to think on your feet, no matter what discussion you are
thrust into!

 

At least I got what I asked for - no standard office replies! If only I
can get one back from the liberal member for my area - the state
opposition!!! :-)

 

Best Regards,

 

Kelly Zantey

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justine Caines
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:12 PM
To: OzMid List
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] FYI news article

 

Hi Kelly

I would really like to talk with you and perhaps Pinky off list to nut out
some strategies on 'mainstreaming' 1-2-1 mid options and making our goals
palatable 'out there'.  I know you and Pinky have contact with some big
players and I have often thought we need to maximise ay exposure (not saying
you don't just would like to natter about it a bit!).

Kind regards

Justine 



[ozmidwifery] setting up a website

2006-11-18 Thread Kristin Beckedahl
Speaking of our independent services... My next adventure is setting up a website. Whose got one and can anyone give me a ballpark figure at how much this is going to cost me, and how long the process can take? Thanks.
Kristin (CBE, Naturopath)Advertisement: Looking for the latest range of toys available?   Go to www.tradingpost.com.au  

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit  to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] birth pool

2006-11-18 Thread EKS

Just be careful that using chlorine, bleach, metho or the sun for
sterilisation isn't ruining the plastic. Without knowing what kind of
plastic it is, cleaning with those kinds of chemicals may cause the
pool to perish much more quickly.

Em
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.