Re: [ozmidwifery] Serena Esther arrived

2007-02-03 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy

Congratulations Philippa, i am so glad you got the birth you wanted. well
done!
mike and Lindsay Kennedy
who are loving our new jobs in melbourne

On 2/4/07, Philippa Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi all,



I thought you would all like to know that Serena Esther Scott was born
gently and beautifully into the water at home on 1/02/2007. She was a lovely
9pnd 7oz or 4280grams (my biggest by far). It was a perfect birth for us
with no tears or bleeds or anything else to necessitate the need for
assistance. As you can imagine I am on a high. Alana  Brianna watched with
awe and excitement and are talking about it lot. It was so wonderful to have
them there. Trevor is finally convinced home water birth is the way to go,
he was terrific. All my women folk where as amazing as I knew they would be
I am so blessed to have friends such as these. The experience would not have
been the same with out them.



Cheers





Philippa Scott
Birth Buddies - Doula
Assisting women and their families in the preparation towards childbirth
and labour.
President of Friends of the Birth Centre Townsville







--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] Victorian Election and rural Obstetrics

2006-11-02 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Poor overworked obstetricians we should give them a raise. What the article doesn't say is that all the public ones have registrars and junior doctors to do most of their work and that midwives provide more than 97% of care for the women (including private patients) and most of the births.
Perhaps if obstetricians were only seeing the women who really needed to see them (ie the truly high risk ones) and left midwives to get on with the other 95% there wouldn't be a shortage of obstetricians by rather a surplus. Of course research shows time and time again that a midwifery model of care with referral for high risk is the safest method for women and their babies and allows women to have their babies without traveling. Gee I guess if they don't have to travel to another city to have their babies there might not be roadside deaths.
On 11/2/06, Justine Caines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





Dear All

The following story is the same old spin from the Obs. I plan to engage the Herald_sun to see if we can get some real news and solutions into print.

Can all you Victorians on list write in with Midwives are the answer type letters!

Go to the Herald Sun website

www.news.com.au/heraldsun

You will find a 'send a letter' choice under the opinion button on the sites main page.

JC




DOCTORS say it is only a matter of time before mothers and babies die by the roadside because of a critical lack of specialist obstetrics care in rural Victoria.
 Only 37 specialist obstetricians and gynaecologists practise outside Melbourne.

Obstetrics services have disappeared from 34 towns since 1997.

Wodonga senior obstetrician Pieter Mourik said the lack of maternity centres and specialist obstetricians in rural Victoria would inevitably lead to roadside deaths.

It is not a case of if a woman and a baby is going to die, it is a case of when. It will happen, he said.

Almost 16,000 babies were born in country Victoria last year -- an average of 342 for each of the bush's overworked specialists.

In Melbourne there are 189 obstetricians and gynaecologists -- an average of one for every 246 of the 46,500 babies born in Melbourne last year.

Mothers in the state's far east and northwest are hardest hit, with huge distances between specialists, forcing some pregnant women to endure up to four hours' travel to access care.

Their plight has been made worse by a shortage of rural-based anaesthetists, which has left some mothers without access to epidural pain relief or an emergency caesarean without a risky mid-birth ambulance transfer.



Horsham obstetrician and gynaecologist Dr David Morris said the shortage of rural specialists was at crisis point.

He said the lives of women and their unborn children were put in danger by trips of up to three hours to reach his practice.

It can be perilous for some women (with difficult pregnancies), he said. They have a choice

of staying in hospital for two or three weeks before delivery, at great personal cost, or taking the risk the hospital will be too far away if they need it.

The doctors warned the situation was about to worsen because many of the remaining rural-based obstetricians are approaching or already past retirement age.

Of the remaining specialists, 24 are 50 or older, with eight over 60.

Just three are under 30 and only two are women.

Rural Doctors Association president Dr Mike Moynahan said further closures of country obstetric services seemed unavoidable, with about 80 per cent of the 167 rural GPs qualified to deliver babies also due for retirement in the next five to 10 years.


Health Minister Bronwyn Pike said a national shortage of doctors was to blame for the decline in rural obstetrics.

It's not a funding issue, a spokesman said.

There haven't been enough doctors trained in recent years and lack of doctors leads to lack of obstetricians and anaesthetists coming through the system.

Ms Pike said $4.4 million was being spent to recruit doctors from overseas and $4 million to promote midwife-led services at rural hospitals.

Opposition health spokeswoman Helen Shardey said it was too little too late.

Obstetric services have already closed down right across Victoria, she said.

If you're looking to provide more specialists throughout Victoria you don't wait seven years, allow services to close and then announce you're going to spend $4 million bringing doctors from overseas.





-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] risks for birth...

2006-10-19 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Mayby the norm should be Midwives not obstetricians as it is in many countries.rgds mikeOn 10/19/06, Honey Acharya 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






Maybe we should start hiring Vets rather than 
Obstetricians as seems to be the norm in our culture right now ;)
LOL at the thougth of telling them that you will be 
hiring your vet as your caregiver when booking in at the hospital.


  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
  Tania 
  Smallwood 
  To: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:11 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] risks for 
  birth...
  
  
  
  My kids are watching the ABC pet 
  show tonight…Question – "so, what's the greatest risk when your pet is giving 
  birth?"
  
  Straight from the spunky vet's 
  mouth…"THE THING THAT PUTS YOUR PET AT THE GREATEST RISK IS THAT PEOPLE TRY 
  AND INTERFERE TOO MUCH" 
  
  Sigh…and we can't see that 
  fantastic wood for those dastardly trees…
  
  Tania
  x
  --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by 
  AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release 
  Date: 18/10/2006

-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] Trivial ? For hosp midwives

2006-10-19 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
the birth reg papers can and do get reissued in qldOn 10/20/06, meg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lisa,At our hospital the parents fill the birth reg papers out. The midwife fills
in the centrelink declaration and the ward clerk puts together a pack forthe parents but they need to fill it in.Regards,Meg.- Original Message -From: LJG 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSent: Friday, October 20, 2006 8:42 AMSubject: [ozmidwifery] Trivial ? For hosp midwives
 Hi all - am wanting toask a silly question - when do you give out the birth registration forms and who fills them in? i.e. is this done by m/wsor ward clerks?? Thanks Lisa
 Feel free to pm me -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 __ NOD32 1.1816 (20061019) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
--This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.comLife is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is 
as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] Trivial ? For hosp midwives

2006-10-19 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I was at a birth recently and after she had the baby the mother asked me about the paperwork and whether she could get a registration reissued. It turned out that she had never registered the previous child (now 4 years old) and had lost the papers! We were able to reissue the registration papers after we verified the birth in the register. I think she would have a fine to pay tho.
LindsayOn 10/20/06, Mike  Lindsay Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the birth reg papers can and do get reissued in qldOn 10/20/06, meg 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lisa,At our hospital the parents fill the birth reg papers out. The midwife fills
in the centrelink declaration and the ward clerk puts together a pack forthe parents but they need to fill it in.Regards,Meg.- Original Message -From: LJG 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSent: Friday, October 20, 2006 8:42 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Trivial ? For hosp midwives
 Hi all - am wanting toask a silly question - when do you give out the birth registration forms and who fills them in? i.e. is this done by m/wsor ward clerks?? Thanks Lisa
 Feel free to pm me -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit 
http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 __ NOD32 1.1816 (20061019) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. 
http://www.eset.com
--This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au
 to subscribe or unsubscribe.
-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - 
Http://likeminz.dotphoto.comLife is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is 
as safe as it gets. Unknown

-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] Breastfeeding

2006-10-12 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I would assume that a hands off approach to assisting this woman with breastfeeding would be of benefit. What techniques do others use in the early postnatal period to assist with attachment, positioning etc without manhandling? (excuse the pun) What methods Can be used antenatally to prepare her. Spending time with another breastfeeding woman springs to mind.
rgds mikeOn 10/12/06, Barbara Glare  Chris Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Hi,

I wonder if some talking through, some info and the 
importance of skin to skin contact after birth could help here. This may 
be related to previous sexual abuse, but then again, maybe not. Many 
survivors of sexual abuse find that breastfeeding can be extremely healing, and 
a way of reclaiming back their bodies.

Men handling my breasts doesn't make me feel ill as 
such, but I hate the sensation. It gives me the fingernails scraped 
on the chalkboard feeling. In some cultures (apparently) men are 
considered imature and unmanly if they want to play with breasts.

On theother hand, I have breastfed 4 children 
beautifully for over 13 years. They can suck, knead and cuddle to their 
heart's content - I love it! (though nipple twiddling is rather 
annoying)

So there may be many reasons for not liking your 
breasts being touched and it may help to know other women feel the same and 
still go on to breastfeed.

Barb

  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
  Janet 
  Fraser 
  To: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:42 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] 
  Breastfeeding
  
  I've seen this before and it was 
  indeed related to sexual abuse. Fortunately the woman involved was keen that 
  her issues didn't end up impacting negatively on the life of her baby so she 
  went for counselling and was able to work through her stuff enough to 
  bf.How sad that our abusers are able to reach through us to our children 
  like this.
  J
  
- Original Message - 

From: 
Andrea Bilcliff 
To: 
Ozmidwifery 
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:05 
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] 
Breastfeeding

I'm posting this on behalf of a birth attendant 
who has contacted me. She will be supporting a womansoon who has for 
want of a better term, 'breast issues'. 

The woman really wants to breastfeed but 
thethought of itmakes her feel ill. She hates it when her 
partner touches her breasts. The birth attendant is not sure whether this is 
related toprevious sexual abuse or not.

I've never come across this situation before 
and wondered if others had experience of this and what helped the 
women?

Thanks,
Andrea 
Bilcliff

-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] New Inventors birth seat

2006-10-08 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I understand that the back comes off so that the 'dad' (partner, support person) can cradle the woman the same way as a traditional birth chair.On 10/7/06, 
Andrea Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,Only problems with this birth chair arethat it eliminates the needfor a support person behind the woman (poor dad misses out), and alsofixes the woman in a static position. Not easy for her to move about,
wriggle, rock back and forth etc if she wants to. Convenient for theaccoucher as the women is in a still positionThis birth stool has been available for some time. Without the backrest, however (which is new) the woman tends to tilt her pelvis
forward, and can easily end up in an almost horizontal position,because the seat on the stool slopes backwards.The backrest putsthe woman's pelvis into a forward tilt position, which is a morenatural drive angle, thus overcoming a design problem (as I see it)
with the basic stool.With traditional birth stools, the father usually sits behind thewoman and can help her into a standing position between contractions,to assist with maintaining circulation, which is important for
avoiding perineal oedema. It also gives him close contact with herand an important role in the whole process. I can't imagine a womangetting up and down easily from this particular birth stool with itsbackrest in place.
The invention didn't win the award on the night.AndreaAt 10:53 AM 7/10/2006, you wrote:Did anyone else manage to catch this on Wednesday night - I onlymanaged to get the info from their website after the event, but its
looks wonderful!!!http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1754147.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/newinventors/txt/s1754147.htm(you can play the video too)What a fanastic invention - apparently quite 'cheap' too.. Not sureif she won the nights award - but cant wait for the day when these
are standards in hospitals and universities for mid training...Kristin-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit tosubscribe or unsubscribe.--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.-- 
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.comLife is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is 
as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] DO SOMETHING!

2006-10-04 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I agree with the do something philosophy. The government in NZ didn't
wake up one day and decide oh i think I will change the entire obstetric system. Midwives and women (and men ;) created the climate for change and the government eventually got the message. 

The midwives in this unit could:

1 Refuse to train/supervise RN's in this role unless they are
completing a recognised mid program. Remembering that they not the
hospital accepts responsibility for any role they delegate to an RN.
2 Refuse to do overtime/extra shifts
3 Contact nursing/midwifery/union organisations to support them
4 Use the networking resources of this group to provide support, evidence and submissions

It would cost this hospital about $10,000 over and above wages to fully
sponsor an RN to become a qualified midwife. When compared to
recruitment costs this is very reasonable and the hospital gets a
multiskilled professional as a bargain price.

rgds mikeOn 10/2/06, Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:















Many of us seem to think that it is a
retrograde step, but telling each other stories will not change things. What
can we do to put forward our views to the government? I guess we could rely on
"someone else" to "do something" but WE really need to
write to our Federal Health Minister, our local fed Politician, go and see them,
etc. If everyone on this list wrote to Minister Tony Abbott, he would have to be
a little bit impressed and may actually get more info before continuing on his
rigid way. LETS DO IT. MM











From: owner-
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of brendamanning
Sent: Monday, 2 October 2006 8:13
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Backward step 







Going back to the maternity nurse or Gen/
Obstetric nurse workingin Midwifery ishow NZ worked in the 70's
 80's. It was unsatisfactory then  would be the same now, despite the
fact the we did 6 months obsin our general training we weren't midwives
 it showed.





I worked in mid whilst attending
homebirths, worked in birth suite, postnatal, taught pre-natal
classesspent 3 yearsin charge of SCN as a RGON in the
early 80's  when I went to train as a midwife justlike Di MI
too found it a revelation.











It's a retrograde step  undermines
all the recognition of your specialised professionyou Australian midwives
have fought so hard for. It's just another path on: follow the American
leader.











With kind regards
Brenda Manning 
www.themidwife.com.au








- Original Message - 






From: 
D. Morgan






To: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: Monday, October
02, 2006 9:54 AM





Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
RE: 











I agree Michelle, I too worked in a rural area prior to
completing my Mid many years ago and can still remember the revelations I felt
while learning Midwifery.As anRN non Midwife, I was quite ignorant
of what a true Midwife's role involved. It was scarey stuff.





Cheers





Di M











-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] Backward step

2006-10-04 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Good point, I guess the problem is there is only one route to nursing but two to Mid at the moment. When we had a mix of hospital trained and Uni trained nurses the issues were the same. It took a long t6ime to accept Uni trained nurses which is ofcourse the norm now. Mid will be the same, eventually ;)
On 10/5/06, Christine Holliday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

















I
understand why people refer to the Bachelor of Midwifery as a direct entry course
but I wish we could learn to stop doing this.
If we continue it still means we are measuring midwifery against nursing
or still referring to nursing, we never see Registered Nurses referred to as direct
entry nurses. If you are having
difficulty explaining direct entry midwifery to managers etc if you refer to RN's
as direct entry nurses they do seem to get a better grasp on this.



I don't
intend this to sound critical just to try and cause change.

Christine





-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike  Lindsay Kennedy
Sent: 05 October 2006 07:49
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
Backward step



I would like to reply to this one as a
just about to finish Mid student with 6 years as an RN. There are two ways to
become a midwife in Au, a one year (18 months) upgrade or a 3 year direct entry
course. The upgrade course for RN's relies on the fact that you have some
nursing experience WHY? From where I am now, I absolutely agree that an RN
cannot do the full job of a
midwife without formalised midwifery training. Before I began my course, I too
thought that midwifery was really just another nursing specialisation like an
ICU nurse or a Psyc Nurse. 

There are a lot of skills and
practices that are common to both professions especially as most of us work in
a hospital setting. Midwifery requires advanced people skills, time management
skills and assessment skills as well as learning to work within the hospital
system and learning to work with other health care professionals in an often
autonomous role. Even after 3 years of training RN's need a new grad year to
develop the basics of these skills and probably a further 2 or 3 years to
become proficient. Obviously maturity, background and life experience all play
a part in this transition.

I have met a couple of new grad RN's
who have gone straight into 1 year mid training and they appear to find it
difficult as the upgrade program appears to expect a level of
knowledge/experience not yet developed in a new grad RN. Not to say that
experienced RN's find it a breeze, its not. It's hard work and can be bloody
stressful ;) Obviously this is a generalisation and once again the maturity,
background and life experience of the individual will apply. 

In NZ RN's were able to upgrade in a
similar way. However those RN's felt that they were not receiving as adequate
training as the direct entry Midwives. So now RN's complete the same course as
the direct entry mids with a credit for a portion of the course based on their
qualification/experiance.

So that is why I feel as an RN
almost midwife that RN's should have at least one year post grad experience
prior to training. The better way would be to do the 3 year direct entry course
if you want to be a midwife and not an RN as well.

Some more thoughts on the original
post.

It feels like the proposal to train
RN's to work in mid is not based on a concern for the patients or the RN's but
a way of staffing the ward cheaply. They could offcourse pay for these RN's to
do the Mid training which is available, as it is appropriate for mid students
who happen to be RN's to work on the ward under midwife supervision. Assuming
the RN's are willing to complete the appropriate assignment work etc. If they
aren't they are they really the right ppl to be working on maternity in the
first place.

Most RN's would agree that it would be
inappropriate to replace RN's with AIN's and train them to look after patients,
take obs, change dressings, mobilise patents etc. Then have an RN be held
responsible should the AIN make a mistake or fail to recognise a patient who
had deteriorated or needed reviewing. That is the legal situation in Queensland
if an RN works in a maternity unit. They work under the supervision of the
midwife, so the midwife is the one held responsible for the practice of the RN
should there be a problem. 

Remember an American obstetrics nurse is
just that, not a midwife (yes America has midwives too). They really are nurses
as Doctors perform most of the advanced birthing roles (like actually
delivering the baby etc) that midwives do here.



Rgds Mike





On 10/2/06, Rene and Tiffany
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:





It has been fantastic reading all
the responses to the nurse/midwife question. As a nurse about to begin
midwifery training, I look forward to learning and developing the specialist
skills you wonderful women have described! My original response stemmed
from the fact

Re: [ozmidwifery] RE:

2006-09-28 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
But the better option would be to facilitate them to become midwives rather than stick a bandaid on the problem which is a shortage of midwives. On 9/28/06, 
Ken Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Some 
of the best people I have worked with have been div2's. Their knowledge and 
understanding put some of the 'midwives' to shame. Just how much nursing care 
does a newborn need? Many LC's are not midwives, as are childbirth 
educators. Maybe we should be assisting these people to be woman wise, and 
not judge them on qualifications. 

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ganesha 
  RosatSent: Thursday, 28 September 2006 8:33 AMTo: 
  ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: 
  
  Hi all u wonderful 
  women!
  
  Just a quick posting in line with 
  the current debate about maternity services within country areas and who 
  provides services. 
  
  The hospital I am currently 
  working in has decided to address our midwife shortage but training division 
  two nurses to work in the maternity department.
  These nurses have 3 days of 
  theory, one day of orientation in óbstetric' and five days of clinical 
  experience. 
  On completion of their modules 
  these girls will be able to:
   
  Assist in the provision of antenatal nursing care to the 
  client
   
  Assist in the provision of nursing care to the healthy newborn 
  baby
   
  Discuss the establishment and maintenance of 
  breastfeeding
   
  Assist in the evaluation of key stage of growth and development of the 
  baby
   
  Assist in the provision of postnatal nursing care to the 
  woman
  
  This again indicates to me the 
  lack of understanding of the needs of women (not clients). Instead of the 
  hospital supporting midwives and creating a working environment that 
  encourages new midwives to come to the area, they find quick fixes that only 
  further add to the fragmentation of care.
  
  Anyway what do u all think? And is 
  this happening anywhere else?
  
  Cheers 
  Ganesha
   
  
  
  

-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after more than one c-sec in the perinatal data?

2006-09-15 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Pretty simple for QLD as a women is not offered a Vbac if she has had more than 1 C/S even if she has had a successful vaginal birth between the c/s's. Don't know about the private system but they appear do more c/s and less vbac than the public system so probably less than no chance with them.
On 9/16/06, Janet Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Hi all,
is there some way in which the 
perinatal data for each state records vb after multiple c-secs in the hospy 
system? I wonder if it's too statistically insignificant or is there a part of 
the data I haven't noticed. I know they're different in each state as well. How 
about hospy's own data? Are people recording how many c-secs women have before a 
vb? We really need MIPPs to be recording HBACs so we can contrast that with the 
truly appalling national average. I've only seen blanketVBAC figures, not 
how many surgeries prior. Anyone know?
J
For home birth information go 
to:Joyous Birth Australian home birth network and forums.http://www.joyousbirth.info/Or 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] Vaginal examinations

2006-08-31 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Hi would also like your photoLinzOn 8/30/06, Jo Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two words:PURPLE LINEI have a great photo of mine (thanks for pointing it out, Mary!)
:)JoOn 30/08/2006, at 9:31 PM, Sally @ home wrote: Just to add to this... There was an extremely heated discussion at a meeting with docs and midwives where I work about how doing a VE is the only way to
 ascertain progress in the normal labour of uncompromised healthy women. The midwives now have to come up with evidence showing that doing a VE within 1- 4 hours of admission to hospital (then 4-6
 hourly thereafter) is not necessary as we are able to assess progress in different ways (all of which have been poo-pooed by the medicos)...so...am needing the help of all you wonderfully wise women out there.
 Thanks in advance. Sally - Original Message - From: Sally @ home [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:30 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] Vaginal examinations Was wondering what guidelines others worked with regarding when to
 do vaginal examinations...specifically in the hospital setting. And what evidence they base their practice on. Thanks in advance. Sally --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe. --
 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.0.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/428 - Release Date: 25/08/2006 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.--This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.-- My photos online @ 
http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - 
http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.comLife is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] Ezzo alert

2006-08-28 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
ok whats an Ezzo ;)mikeOn 8/28/06, Janet Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Those nasty Ezzos are moving into 
birth as well! I will hardly be able to bear to read this one after the trash of 
their others.
: (
J


http://www.gfi.org.au/resources/on%20becoming.html

Quote:

  
  
Medical research continually develops better 
  ways to manage labour and delivery for healthy outcomes. With all of the 
  choices, theories, and plethora of ideas available today, it's a challenge 
  for expectant parents to know where to turn for wise counsel. Where will 
  you turn for help? On Becoming Birthwise has reliable answers for you. As 
  an outgrowth of a childbirth course created in 1989 by a group of 
  health-care providers knowledgeable and skilled in labour and delivery, 
  (and now with over seventy years of collective hospital and clinical 
  experience behind them), this resource is a must-read for every expectant 
  parent. Our authors explore the medical options available from high-tech 
  intervention to natural childbirth. You will grow in your understanding 
  and appreciation of the physical and emotional transitions taking place 
  during pregnancy and at each stage of labour. Similar to the other seven 
  books in our series, On Becoming Birthwise is informative, practical, and 
  easily understood. Perhaps most importantly, this book is written from the 
  hearts of moms who are also medical professionals. We are pleased to add 
  this book to our parenting series. We have read many glowing post-delivery 
  reports, we have listened to mums and dads speak with confidence and 
  satisfaction of their birthing experience, and we know this resource will 
  serve to encourage you through the miraculous process of bringing forth a 
  new 
life.

For home birth information go 
to:Joyous Birth Australian home birth network and forums.http://www.joyousbirth.info/Or 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] midiwfe in Vic

2006-08-21 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Casey hospital in Berwick appears to be a low risk low intervention hospital.On 8/22/06, Belinda Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:I have a client in midwifery group practice who would like to birth in
Melb with her family, she is over 34 weeks so i am assuming she wont getinto birth centers?? She is close to Monash, is there anyone who couldtalk to her regarding her options there??Belinda SA--This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.-- My photos online @ 
http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nzMy Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - 
http://mikelinz.dotphoto.comLindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.comLife is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] consent to formula feed?

2006-06-03 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Interesting question about the consenting rights of the father. He seems to have no rights. The baby is baby of the mother. What is the fathers legal position? Any other time the parents have equal rights and one or other can sign.
rgds mikeOn 6/4/06, Lynne Staff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ditto Di- Original Message -From: diane [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 5:58 PMSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] consent to formula feed? Written info on consent form signed by mother only in our area. Di - Original Message -
 From: Sue Cookson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] consent to formula feed? Hi, just wondering what the policies are concerning consent to give formula to a baby (any baby).
 is the consent to be written or verbal, and is it gained from either parents or just the mother? sue --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe. -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.--This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.Visit 
http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.-- My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_PhotographersNew Photo site@Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.comLife is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is as safe as it gets. Unknown


Re: [ozmidwifery] SMH: Midwife-led births seen as safe and cheap

2006-05-10 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy

The ministers reply just seems like dragging the chain to me. There is
loads of Australian and International research that proves the safety
and efficiency of midwifery led care already, including both low and
high risk women. Not to mention the fact that it already works in
other countries. So why do we need 10 years (Dr Pesce) to prove that a
system that already works in other western countries will work here.
Is Australia really that slow

It amazes me how positive articles can be given a neatly hidden negative slant.

rgds mike

On 5/10/06, Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Midwife-led births seen as safe and cheap

By Julie Robotham Medical Editor
 May 10, 2006

BIRTHS supervised only by midwives are safe and popular and can cut health
system costs by up to half, according to the first formal audit of two NSW
pilot programs for healthy women at low risk of complications.

The surveys raise the stakes in the escalating war between doctors and the
state health system over midwives' increasing involvement in the management
of births. Doctors have consistently opposed midwife-only birth centres,
saying they put mothers and babies at risk.

Among the first 245 women booked at a midwife-only centre at Ryde Hospital,
which does not have an on-site doctor, 84 per cent went spontaneously into
labour and had a normal vaginal birth.

One-third of the women who joined the program in the 14 months to October
were transferred to larger hospitals either during pregnancy or labour, when
the midwives detected medical difficulties that meant they needed more
complex care.

But of the 179 women who gave birth at Ryde, two-thirds did not have any
pain-relieving drugs. All the babies were born healthy.

The service was also 20 to 50 per cent cheaper per delivery than standard
public hospital care, according to the analysis by Northern Sydney Central
Coast Health.

It suggests most of the savings were attributable to midwives' increased
productivity.

Midwives employed in the program take responsibility for individual women
and manage their own workload. In the Ryde program, one midwife is employed
for every 33 women, versus an average of one to 23 under normal public
hospital rostering.

A report into the first seven months of a similar unit at Belmont, near
Newcastle, found nearly half the women had to be transferred to John Hunter
Hospital, but many of these needed antibiotics, which the Belmont midwives
will be able to administer in future. The women used less pain relief
compared with the state average, and their babies were more likely to be
breastfed.

Sally Tracy, who established the Ryde service and is now a senior research
fellow in the University of NSW's School of Women's and Children's Health,
said a high proportion of the mothers came from non-English speaking
backgrounds and appreciated the relationship with an individual midwife
during their pregnancy.

This level of support for people who would otherwise be lost within the
system has quite far-reaching community effects, Professor Tracy said.

But Andrew Pesce, an obstetrician and a federal councillor of the Australian
Medical Association, said the number of births so far at the units was too
small to reveal any shortcomings. We have one full-term unexpected foetal
death in 2000 deliveries, Dr Pesce said. If they can keep this up for 10
years then that's good. It's too early to make any comment about the
relative safety [of midwife-only units and standard maternity hospitals].

Intuitively I'm worried about that … I don't see the rationale when there
are tertiary referral centres [nearby] that can do everything.

The NSW Minister for Health, John Hatzistergos, said the reports
represented, an encouraging start, to the wider availability of
midwife-led births.

The two models are still relatively small … there'll be ongoing evaluation,
but we're pleased with the outcomes.





Best Regards,

 Kelly Zantey
 Creator, BellyBelly.com.au
 Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
 BellyBelly Birth Support -
http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support





--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery Strengths

2006-05-05 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy

How about the fact that midwives provide more that 90% of the woman's
care regardless of whether they are in the private or public system.

That most babies are actually delivered by midwives and that they
mostly provide one on one care in the public system. Could explore the
nursing theory that Patients see the care provided by all nurses as a
continuum of nursing care, not as a series of individual nursing
events (Christensen, Episodic continuity - try a search google on
Christensen +episodic continuity +midwifery). How does this apply to
midwifery? Does it apply at all? How does this apply to the ideal of 1
on 1 midwifery care throughout the pregnancy continuum. Can we provide
good care outside this model.

When women don't understand what the doctor said or why they want to
do something they ask the midwife to explain. Midwives tend to give
information in a way women understand and are often better at
presenting all the risks, benefits and options to women. Sometimes
this creates a challenge for the midwife who has to work within the
system yet must be the womans advocate.

rgds mike

On 5/5/06, Great Birth  Men at Birth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


G'da Denise,


Andrew Bisits is an obstetrician.  He wrote the afterword of my book Having
a Great Birth in Australia which is available from Birth International.
www.birthinternational.com

Cheers,

David



On 05/05/2006, at 5:52 PM, denise thomson wrote:

Hi there,
Is Andrew Bissits a book or a journal article?
Denise

Justine Caines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Renee

I will give a strength from the consumer perspective!

The power of the relationship between a woman and a midwife.  When it works
there is nothing a woman cannot do. The impact of that trust and that belief
in 'being with woman' has the capacity to transform lives.

Read Andrew Bissits' afterward in Having a Great Birth in Australia  He
comments on the trust and the relationship women have with midwives
providing 1-2-1 care.  Something the vast majority of other carers (and
midwives in fragmented models) cannot achieve.

Gee I wish I was writing this essay (shame I don't want to be a MW!)  I
would approach the core of strength from the perspective of when midwives
actually do as the word means be 'with woman'

So to be with her one should know her, and put her as central to the
process.  To do this she comes first and Hospital protocols after and Dr's
timeframes after etc.  I guess the real strength is when practice is
optimal.

Kind regards

Justine Caines





Hi all.
I am a 1st year B.Mid student writing the obligatory essay on Midwifery
in Australia. No easy feat really and I need to outline some strengths
and weaknesses. Well there is plenty out there about what is wrong with
Midwifery Services and what the threats are (New Idea anyone?)  but not
a lot talking about what is right with it, besides the inherent fact
that it works!! So I thought I'd do a little bit of a survey and ask
you all what you think are the strengths. What do you all see as being
great about being a Midwife in Australia?? Your feedback would be most
appreciated.
Renee


 24 FIFA World Cup tickets to be won with Yahoo! Mail. Learn more




--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] article FYI

2006-05-05 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy

Interesting that doctors would say they have risks ?

On 5/5/06, leanne wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Calif. law would ban Cruise ultrasound copycats

Bill restricting home setups like star's moves on to state Senate

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - The California Assembly has voted to restrict the use
of ultrasound machines for personal use, approving a bill that would allow
them to be sold only to licensed professionals.

Democratic Assemblyman Ted Lieu introduced the bill after Mission:
Impossible III star Tom Cruise bought an ultrasound machine to see images
of his unborn child. The actor's fiancee, Katie Holmes, gave birth to the
couple's daughter, Suri, last month in Los Angeles.

Doctors and technologists typically receive years of training to perform
ultrasound exams, which help obstetricians check a baby's health.

Cruise was criticized by doctors who said improperly using the devices can
harm a fetus.

Lieu said his bill was intended to prohibit copycats from using the devices
at home. An ultrasound machine listed on the online auction site eBay was
selling for $5,500 Wednesday.

What we don't want is someone who unintentionally damages the fetus, Lieu
said Thursday on the Assembly floor.

If someone sees Tom Cruise buy one, they think this is the thing to do,
added Lieu. There's really no medical reason for an untrained person to use
this machine.

The actor's publicist, Paul Bloch, did not return phone messages seeking
comment. Cruise has been promoting his new film, which opens in theaters
Friday.

Ban on unlicensed use
The chamber voted 55-7 to pass the bill and send it to the Senate.

The bill prohibits a manufacturer or person from selling, leasing or
distributing an ultrasound machine to any person other than a licensed
practitioner.

Some Republican lawmakers questioned whether the bill would prohibit the use
of ultrasound devices by private companies that provide keepsake photos for
parents-to-be.

Lieu said it would not, as long as the person operating the machine was
licensed under a certain section of the state's Business and Professions
Code.

Laboratory tests have shown that certain diagnostic levels can affect human
tissue, according to the Food and Drug Administration. The agency has
determined that keepsake fetal videos and personal snapshots are an
unapproved use of a medical device.

The machine is also used by doctors on a high-frequency setting to get a
better image of an adult's kidneys, pelvis, uterus and other internal
organs.

There are many settings you would only use on adults and not on a fetus,
said Dr. Miyuki Murphy, director of ultrasound at Radiological Associates of
Sacramento.

Obviously, somebody enamored with their own child would want to use it all
the time, said Murphy, identified by the California Medical Association as
an expert on the topic. You might push that button because the pictures are
prettier.

Critics of the bill said lawmakers should leave such decisions to health
professionals.

We don't have the expertise to dispense medical advice, said Assembly
woman Audra Strickland, the mother of a 6-month-old daughter.

(c) 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of Women's Business
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.




--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery Strengths

2006-05-05 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy

Addit The ACMI site has some info that might help and send out a email
newsletter.

rgds mike

On 5/5/06, Mike  Lindsay Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

How about the fact that midwives provide more that 90% of the woman's
care regardless of whether they are in the private or public system.

That most babies are actually delivered by midwives and that they
mostly provide one on one care in the public system. Could explore the
nursing theory that Patients see the care provided by all nurses as a
continuum of nursing care, not as a series of individual nursing
events (Christensen, Episodic continuity - try a search google on
Christensen +episodic continuity +midwifery). How does this apply to
midwifery? Does it apply at all? How does this apply to the ideal of 1
on 1 midwifery care throughout the pregnancy continuum. Can we provide
good care outside this model.

When women don't understand what the doctor said or why they want to
do something they ask the midwife to explain. Midwives tend to give
information in a way women understand and are often better at
presenting all the risks, benefits and options to women. Sometimes
this creates a challenge for the midwife who has to work within the
system yet must be the womans advocate.

rgds mike

On 5/5/06, Great Birth  Men at Birth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 G'da Denise,


 Andrew Bisits is an obstetrician.  He wrote the afterword of my book Having
 a Great Birth in Australia which is available from Birth International.
 www.birthinternational.com

 Cheers,

 David



 On 05/05/2006, at 5:52 PM, denise thomson wrote:

 Hi there,
 Is Andrew Bissits a book or a journal article?
 Denise

 Justine Caines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Renee

 I will give a strength from the consumer perspective!

 The power of the relationship between a woman and a midwife.  When it works
 there is nothing a woman cannot do. The impact of that trust and that belief
 in 'being with woman' has the capacity to transform lives.

 Read Andrew Bissits' afterward in Having a Great Birth in Australia  He
 comments on the trust and the relationship women have with midwives
 providing 1-2-1 care.  Something the vast majority of other carers (and
 midwives in fragmented models) cannot achieve.

 Gee I wish I was writing this essay (shame I don't want to be a MW!)  I
 would approach the core of strength from the perspective of when midwives
 actually do as the word means be 'with woman'

 So to be with her one should know her, and put her as central to the
 process.  To do this she comes first and Hospital protocols after and Dr's
 timeframes after etc.  I guess the real strength is when practice is
 optimal.

 Kind regards

 Justine Caines





 Hi all.
 I am a 1st year B.Mid student writing the obligatory essay on Midwifery
 in Australia. No easy feat really and I need to outline some strengths
 and weaknesses. Well there is plenty out there about what is wrong with
 Midwifery Services and what the threats are (New Idea anyone?)  but not
 a lot talking about what is right with it, besides the inherent fact
 that it works!! So I thought I'd do a little bit of a survey and ask
 you all what you think are the strengths. What do you all see as being
 great about being a Midwife in Australia?? Your feedback would be most
 appreciated.
 Renee

 
  24 FIFA World Cup tickets to be won with Yahoo! Mail. Learn more



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown




--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Article FYI new vaccination

2006-04-25 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I have moms who brestfeed while their babies are being vacinated,
facilitating bonding and very effectivly distracting the babies. I
have to ask the question. How does getting one of the diseases we
vacinate against contribute to bonding and breastfeeding.

rgds mike

On 4/25/06, Megan  Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Is this really the best thing we could be doing for our precious little
 babies when they are first born?
 This is more than a pro/anti vaccination debate. Anything that interferes
 with early bonding, breatfeeding etc has to be questioned.

 Research could save newborns
 From: http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.au/
 By Clare Masters
  April 25, 2006
 NEWBORN babies could soon be vaccinated at birth against bacterial diseases
 after scientists discovered how to boost a baby's immune system, guarding
 them against possible fatal infections.

 Dr John Smythe, a neo-natologist at the Royal Hospital for Women at
 Randwick, Sydney, yesterday hailed the finding, which would close the
 current two-month window before a baby is immunised against the infections.

 Babies are already immunised against hepatitis B at birth and given a
 vitamin K shot but the new findings will allow newborns to be protected
 against a host of other infections.

 It's exciting because their bodies don't take up immunisations for tetanus,
 as an example, at that age, he said.
 Most adults and children can repel contagious bugs with a group of receptors
 called TLRs that sit on the surface of white-blood cells – the body's
 defence system.

 These recognise bacteria and viruses and trigger immune cells to attack
 them.

 But newborns' immune systems have not developed this network, making them
 vulnerable to conditions like tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough.

 By studying white blood cells from the newborns' cord blood, scientists from
 the Children's Hospital Boston found a way to boost a particular TLR and
 strengthen the infant's immune system.

 The researchers believe their findings could be used for a vaccination given
 at birth, closing off the current two-month window.

 From a global health perspective, if you can give a vaccine at birth, a
 much higher percentage of the population can be covered, researcher Ofer
 Levy said. He said this particular vaccination could also be given to babies
 as treatment for infections or as a preventive measure against a disease or
 bio-terrorist threat.

 Dr Smythe said newborns, particularly premature babies, were vulnerable to
 bacteria and viruses.
 Their immune system isn't as efficient when they encounter an infection,
 he told The Daily Telegraph.
 There isn't a huge amount at the moment that we can do.
 The period before they are vaccinated is a vulnerable one and this is quite
 a breakthrough. He said a newborn's entire system was immature and unable
 to cope with some bugs such as meningitis and whooping cough.


--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] yep send on your caseload refs please

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Absolutly agree. So how do we get there? Do nothing or set up programs
that move us as a profession towards the ideal?

rgds mike

On 4/19/06, Justine Caines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Debbie

  It may be useful to think about women having choice and that 1-2-1 care is
 recognised as best practice so perhaps what 'suits Orange' should be of
 lesser concern!

  Sorry but I am a little over what suits practitioners and organisations.
 Women deserve to share their most intimate moment with someone they know and
 hopefully trust.  And we simply cannot gauge what 'suits' women until we
 offer a full compliment of CHOICE.

  In solidarity

  Justine Caines


  PS:  The National Maternity Action Plan available on the Maternity
 Coalition Website should be useful

  www.maternitycoalition.org.au




--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] article FYI

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Interesting. Can't think = can't feel pain. Someone should tell that
to the lower orders of living beins. They obviously can't feel pain as
they havn't developed conscious understanding of pain

On 4/19/06, leanne wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Fetuses Called Impervious to Sensation of Pain

 By Neil Osterweil, MedPage Today Staff Writer
 Reviewed by Rubeen K. Israni, M.D., Fellow, Renal-Electrolyte and
 Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
 April 14, 2006

 Explain to interested patients that the author asserts that fetal neural
 circuitry determining pain perception is not fully developed until about 26
 weeks of gestation, and that fetuses do not have the developmental capacity
 to experience pain, which requires development of conscious understanding.

 Be aware that three states -- Arkansas, Georgia, and Minnesota -- mandate
 that health care providers tell women that fetuses may be able to feel pain
 by 20 weeks of gestational age, an assertion that according to the author is
 not supported by medical evidence.


 Review

 BIRMINGHAM, England, April 14 - Fetuses are physically incapable of feeling
 pain until the end of the second trimester, and unlike newborn children have
 not developed the processes that would allow them to recognize pain as a
 signal of a harmful encounter, a researcher here asserted.


 An absence of pain in the fetus does not resolve the question of whether
 abortion is morally acceptable or should be legal, wrote Stuart W.G.
 Derbyshire, Ph.D., a senior psychologist at the University of Birmingham, in
 the April 15 issue of the BMJ, formerly the British Medical Journal.
 Nevertheless, proposals to inform women seeking abortions of the potential
 for pain in fetuses are not supported by evidence.


 The states of Arkansas, Georgia, and Minnesota have all enacted legislation
 requiring that women seeking an abortion be told that fetuses may feel pain
 after 20 weeks of gestation; and 22 other states have similar legislation
 pending. A comparable federal law has been proposed.

 Yet such laws are based on information of dubious merit, Dr. Derbyshire
 asserted.

 Legal or clinical mandates for interventions to prevent such pain are
 scientifically unsound and may expose women to inappropriate interventions,
 risks, and distress, he wrote.

 Avoiding a discussion of fetal pain with women requesting abortions is not
 misguided paternalism, but a sound policy based on good evidence that
 fetuses cannot experience pain, he added.

 The crux of his argument is that both from a physiologic and developmental
 standpoint, fetuses cannot experience pain - in part because the neural
 circuitry is not fully connected before 26 weeks' gestation, and in part
 because fetuses don't have the developmental capacity to understand that a
 provocative stimulus is painful.

 Important neurobiological developments occur at seven, 18, and 26 weeks'
 gestation and are the proposed periods for when a fetus can feel pain, he
 noted. Although the developmental changes during these periods are
 remarkable, they do not tell us whether the fetus can experience pain. The
 subjective experience of pain cannot be inferred from anatomical
 developments because these developments do not account for subjectivity and
 the conscious contents of pain.

 Dr. Derbyshire likened the pain perception system in the developing fetus to
 an alarm system in which the wiring is gradually laid down, but the final
 connections are not made until 26 weeks gestation, when neuronal projections
 from the thalamus to the cortex have been completed.

 The minimum gestational age at which a pain signal may be transmitted from
 the periphery is seven weeks, the point at which neural projections from the
 spinal cord can reach the thalamus, he said.

 Yet the wiring from the thalamus to the cortex is not laid down until about
 12 to 16 weeks, and thalamic projections into the cortical plate are not
 completed until about 23 weeks. Another two to three weeks are needed before
 peripheral free nerve endings and their projection sites in the spinal cord
 are fully mature.

 By 26 weeks' gestation, the characteristic layers of the thalamus and
 cortex are visible, with obvious similarities to the adult brain, and it has
 recently been shown that noxious stimulation can evoke hemodynamic changes
 in the somatosensory cortex of premature babies from a gestational age of 25
 weeks, he wrote. Although the system is clearly immature and much
 development is still to occur, good evidence exists that the biological
 system necessary for pain is intact and functional from around 26 weeks'
 gestation.

 But even with a fully intact and functional system in place, he argued
 further, fetuses have not developed the conscious capacity to understand,
 process, or experience pain.

 He pointed out that the International Association for the Study of Pain
 defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience 

Re: [ozmidwifery] massage in pregnancy

2006-04-15 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
A quick literature search found a recent article that deals with this
subject well. Didn't find any midwifery/nursing specific articles with
this search but I better get back to my assignment ;0.

http://www.massagetoday.com/archives/2006/01/11.html

Drop me a line if you can't access it and I will forward it on.

From my general reading on the net the massage student shouldn't
perform massage during pregnancy(but not for the reasons she was
given). The consensus of opinion seems to be that massage during
pregnancy (especially in the first trimester) is a specialist field
that requires specific training and experiance for some of the reasons
mentioned above.

rgds mike

On 4/16/06, Carol Van Lochem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi Janet,

 I did a relaxation massage course 10 years or so ago  we were told never to
 massage anyone in the first trimester for risk of miscarriage. I remember
 having an argument with the teacher about it as he couldn't give a
 satisfactory explanation as to why. During the course I myself became
 pregnant. As students we used to massage each other as we learnt different
 aspects of the art. I was massaged by my fellow students the whole way
 through my pregnancy with the same teacher aware I was pregnant. I think
 basically they taught not to massage in 1st trimester to protect from
 someone suing if they happened to suffer a miscarriage shortly after a
 massage. Doubt that any such action would ever stand up in court anyway.

 Carol


  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] massage in pregnancy
 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:26:00 +1000



 Hi all,
 can anyone recommend a form of massage particularly beneficial in pregnancy?
 I've been in contact with a massage student who's been told that she must
 never on any account massage a woman in pregnancy as it can cause
 miscarriage. Personally I know that's a crock but I'd love to be able to
 give her better info, perhaps on traditional and well evidenced forms of
 massage in pregnancy.
 TIA,
 J
 For home birth information go to:
 Joyous Birth
 Australian home birth network and forums.
 http://www.joyousbirth.info/
 Or email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger


--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: Hospital situations

2006-04-15 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I find many women birthing in hospital expect and request painrelief
including epidurals. I have attended some lovley births both with and
without epidurals. I certianly don't promote them but if a women wants
an epidural she can have one.

On 4/13/06, Susan Cudlipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 'Good births do happen in hospitals.

 Regards, Barbara'


 Very true barbara - thankfully! But its good to hear all these other bits of
 midwife wisdom
 Sue (also hospital midwife)
 The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
 nothing
 Edmund Burke

 - Original Message -
 From: Barbara Stokes
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:08 AM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] Re: Hospital situations




  Dear Midwives,

 I work in a small rural hospital as a midwife/RN for 34 years and we
 certainly offer many of the suggestions that have been mentioned.  Please
 remember that midwives in hospitals are midwives just as you are with the
 mothers best interests

 In their hearts.



 in most hospital situations all that would be thought of would be

 an epidural to lessen sensation!

 :-)

 Sue

 Good births do happen in hospitals.

 Regards, Barbara


  


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/310 - Release Date: 12/04/2006





--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Group G Strep

2006-04-11 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Try this link. There is a link to the full text article too.

Group G streptococcal pneumonia and sepsis in a newborn infant.

A case of neonatal pneumonia and sepsis caused by a group G
Streptococcus is described. Clinical and microbiological aspects of
group G streptococci are compared with those of group B streptococci.

http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=273262

On 4/10/06, Michelle Windsor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 Just wondering if anyone has any experience with Group G strep?  We recently
 had a woman come through with it and I hadn't heard of it before.  Some
 midwives thought it should be treated the same as Group B strep (ie IV ABs
 in labour, obs on bub) and others thought is wasn't a conern.  Since then
 I've talked to someone from pathology who assures me it isn't a concern for
 the baby and no need for IV ABs etc.  Just interested to know what other
 places do.

 Thanks

 Michelle


  
 On Yahoo!7
  Messenger: Make free PC-to-PC calls to your friends overseas.




--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Traditional birth practices

2006-04-07 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Wow thanks to everone.

rgds mike

On 4/7/06, Honey Acharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Here's one website with some reports And the women said... from Kildea
 http://www.maningrida.com/mac/bwc/introduction.html#aims
 I found it really interesting.
 I was also reading a report on Borning.. today although a bit old
 explained some of the things that were really important to the Aboriginal
 women interviewed at the time.

 - Original Message -
 From: diane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Traditional birth practices


  Hi,
  I like the Maningrida site too, anything by Sue Kildea is good. Helen
  Callaghan (was in Newcastle) addressed some indiginous issues in a paper
 she
  wrote for PhD or doctorate or something along those lines. There is a
  conference in Sydney soon too, focussing on indiginous issues and birth.
 Its
  on the board at work, will chase up details tomorrow if I remember.
  Di
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike  Lindsay Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:32 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Traditional birth practices
 
 
  Anyone have any articles re traditional birth in the Aboriginal
  culture for an assignment i'm working on?
 
  rgds mike
  --
  My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
  My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
  New Photo site@
  Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
  Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com
 
  Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
  as safe as it gets. Unknown
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email

2006-04-06 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
'Growing Kids God's Way' was an amazingly manipulative philosophy that I
recall spreading through the Christian churches in my home town.  Many
lovely Christian people that I knew were influenced by these ideas that were
obviously 'God based'.
I don't think that Christians are more rigid or susceptible to this
philosophy, but in my lifetime I have seen these philosophies circulate
churches repeatedly with (what I consider) devastating results.
Lindsay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philippa Scott
Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2006 6:19 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email

I have to agree with Leanne Here. I am very disappointed to think that
people believe this of most Christians. I wonder how many Christians you
know personally to make that kind of statement. It is certainly not true of
any Christians I know and I have spent my whole life in the Christian faith
and churches. 
Very sad statement.

Philippa Scott
Birth Buddies - Doula
Assisting women and their families in the preparation towards childbirth and
labour.
President of Friends of the Birth Centre Townsville


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of leanne wynne
Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2006 10:36 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email

Hi Mike and others,
You are right about this sort of rigid, controlled child-rearing practices 
rearing it's head every so often, but it's not Christian in it's foundation 
anymore than David Koresh and Waco Texas was Christian in it's foundation. 
This sort of individual (eg Gary Ezzo) is psuedo-christian and merely twists

Scripture to manipulate susceptible, vulnerable, sleep-deprived parents into

following their instructions. Christianity teaches love and caring in all 
relationships not the rejection and failure to meet a baby's need for touch 
and affection that controlled-crying conveys to children!!
I'll get off my soap-box now...
Leanne.

Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of Women's Business
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862




From: Mike  Lindsay Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 23:35:09 +1000

This isn't new. If rears its head regularly (often in christian
circles). The resul;ts of this type of teaching boarder on abuse.

rgds mike

On 4/4/06, Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm pretty sure this one doesn't have children either. But at least 
she's
  more professional and composed than some other sleep experts I know. 
She's
  open to criticism and wont offer to sue as a first step LOL
 
  Best Regards,
 
  Kelly Zantey
  Creator, BellyBelly.com.au
  Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
  BellyBelly Birth Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Watson
  Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 1:03 PM
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email
 
  Yet again we have another 'expert' telling us firstly that our babies
  *should* be sleeping through the night, and secondly that there is
  only one way to make them do this.  Children's sleep cycles are so
  different to adults, that 'sleeping through the night' for them means
  a 5 hour stretch, not the 11 or so hours mentioned this morning.
 
  We are told we 'need' to force strict routines on our babies eating,
  playing and sleeping.  Does this work for anyone? I get hungry at all
  different times of the day, and denying my body what it needs at the
  time is not healthy.
 
  Our babies tell us what they need, so we practice a child-led
  'routine'.  It is not a schedule dictated by times, but waiting for
  him to tell me when he's hungry/tired/ready to play, etc.
 
  I don't expect him to sleep all night - I certainly don't!  What
  about getting a different breed of expert on to talk to parents about
  the realities of baby sleep.  Most babies' sleep problems are, I'm
  sure, due to parents high expectations... then comes the guilt for
  'giving in' and allowing your baby to sleep next to you *gasp* so
  that you can actually get some sleep yourself.
 
  There is nothing wrong with helping your baby to sleep in gentle
  ways, not forcing them to learn that no one will come to them if they
  cry in the night.
 
  For your next baby sleep expert, I nominate Pinky McKay.  :)
 
  Thanks,
  Jo Watson
  (Mother and Midwife)
 
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 


--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http

Re: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email

2006-04-06 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Hi Philippa

Fairly simple really. As a Salvation Army Officer (Minister) I knew
many Christians. In the early to mid 90's we had a very strong
non-denominational christian following of these beliefs. This was
across most main stream and penticostal churches and fairly much
country wide (NZ). I don't know what the Australian scene was like at
the time but this stuff was out of America so I assume that there
would have been some influence here too, but perhaps not as strong.

I did not intend to tar most christians with this brush and did not
say that I felt it was a christian belief. I said that it pops up
every now and then and the people who put this out use religion to get
their message accros.

If you take a look at the Growing christian families website
http://www.gfi.org/ you will not be surprised to see the name of the
author of the article that started this conversation.

I actually feel that we were all saying the same thing. This
philosophy is not christian.

I feel that further discussion of this topic on the list is probably
not appropriate but am happy to discuss philosophy anytime off list or
in person.

kindest regards mike

On 4/6/06, Philippa Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have to agree with Leanne Here. I am very disappointed to think that
 people believe this of most Christians. I wonder how many Christians you
 know personally to make that kind of statement. It is certainly not true of
 any Christians I know and I have spent my whole life in the Christian faith
 and churches.
 Very sad statement.

 Philippa Scott
 Birth Buddies - Doula
 Assisting women and their families in the preparation towards childbirth and
 labour.
 President of Friends of the Birth Centre Townsville


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of leanne wynne
 Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2006 10:36 AM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email

 Hi Mike and others,
 You are right about this sort of rigid, controlled child-rearing practices
 rearing it's head every so often, but it's not Christian in it's foundation
 anymore than David Koresh and Waco Texas was Christian in it's foundation.
 This sort of individual (eg Gary Ezzo) is psuedo-christian and merely twists

 Scripture to manipulate susceptible, vulnerable, sleep-deprived parents into

 following their instructions. Christianity teaches love and caring in all
 relationships not the rejection and failure to meet a baby's need for touch
 and affection that controlled-crying conveys to children!!
 I'll get off my soap-box now...
 Leanne.

 Leanne Wynne
 Midwife in charge of Women's Business
 Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862




 From: Mike  Lindsay Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email
 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 23:35:09 +1000
 
 This isn't new. If rears its head regularly (often in christian
 circles). The resul;ts of this type of teaching boarder on abuse.
 
 rgds mike
 
 On 4/4/06, Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I'm pretty sure this one doesn't have children either. But at least
 she's
   more professional and composed than some other sleep experts I know.
 She's
   open to criticism and wont offer to sue as a first step LOL
  
   Best Regards,
  
   Kelly Zantey
   Creator, BellyBelly.com.au
   Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
   BellyBelly Birth Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Watson
   Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 1:03 PM
   To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
   Subject: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email
  
   Yet again we have another 'expert' telling us firstly that our babies
   *should* be sleeping through the night, and secondly that there is
   only one way to make them do this.  Children's sleep cycles are so
   different to adults, that 'sleeping through the night' for them means
   a 5 hour stretch, not the 11 or so hours mentioned this morning.
  
   We are told we 'need' to force strict routines on our babies eating,
   playing and sleeping.  Does this work for anyone? I get hungry at all
   different times of the day, and denying my body what it needs at the
   time is not healthy.
  
   Our babies tell us what they need, so we practice a child-led
   'routine'.  It is not a schedule dictated by times, but waiting for
   him to tell me when he's hungry/tired/ready to play, etc.
  
   I don't expect him to sleep all night - I certainly don't!  What
   about getting a different breed of expert on to talk to parents about
   the realities of baby sleep.  Most babies' sleep problems are, I'm
   sure, due to parents high expectations... then comes the guilt for
   'giving in' and allowing your baby to sleep next to you *gasp* so
   that you can actually get some sleep yourself

[ozmidwifery] Traditional birth practices

2006-04-06 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Anyone have any articles re traditional birth in the Aboriginal
culture for an assignment i'm working on?

rgds mike
--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email

2006-04-05 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
This isn't new. If rears its head regularly (often in christian
circles). The resul;ts of this type of teaching boarder on abuse.

rgds mike

On 4/4/06, Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm pretty sure this one doesn't have children either. But at least she's
 more professional and composed than some other sleep experts I know. She's
 open to criticism and wont offer to sue as a first step LOL

 Best Regards,

 Kelly Zantey
 Creator, BellyBelly.com.au
 Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
 BellyBelly Birth Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Watson
 Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 1:03 PM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] My Sunrise Email

 Yet again we have another 'expert' telling us firstly that our babies
 *should* be sleeping through the night, and secondly that there is
 only one way to make them do this.  Children's sleep cycles are so
 different to adults, that 'sleeping through the night' for them means
 a 5 hour stretch, not the 11 or so hours mentioned this morning.

 We are told we 'need' to force strict routines on our babies eating,
 playing and sleeping.  Does this work for anyone? I get hungry at all
 different times of the day, and denying my body what it needs at the
 time is not healthy.

 Our babies tell us what they need, so we practice a child-led
 'routine'.  It is not a schedule dictated by times, but waiting for
 him to tell me when he's hungry/tired/ready to play, etc.

 I don't expect him to sleep all night - I certainly don't!  What
 about getting a different breed of expert on to talk to parents about
 the realities of baby sleep.  Most babies' sleep problems are, I'm
 sure, due to parents high expectations... then comes the guilt for
 'giving in' and allowing your baby to sleep next to you *gasp* so
 that you can actually get some sleep yourself.

 There is nothing wrong with helping your baby to sleep in gentle
 ways, not forcing them to learn that no one will come to them if they
 cry in the night.

 For your next baby sleep expert, I nominate Pinky McKay.  :)

 Thanks,
 Jo Watson
 (Mother and Midwife)


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] managed versus physiological 3rd stage, was: after birth pains

2006-04-03 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Just a couple of thoughts.

1 Despite a 30min limit they cannot give you treatment without your
consent. So as long as you arn't bleeding out you can take longer to
deliver your placenta. Logic dictates you arn't going to refuse
treatment if this becomes essential and you can always change to
active managment if this really become necessary.

2  Early breastfeeding is good for you and for your baby and will
probably help deliver your placenta sooner.


On 4/3/06, Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Physiological 3rd stage is usual in homebirths and I observe that pain is
 often when the placenta is separated and sitting in the cervix.  The uterus
 is signaling, get it out. It is a sign for the woman to make efforts to
 expel it. This may be squat over a bucket, sit on the toilet or simply bear
 down.  The pain goes when the placenta is expelled.  Afterbirth pains then
 take over and this has already been discussed.  Cheers, MM



  



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] quote of the week

2006-04-03 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I guess the word Paternal(ism) is the one that springs to mind.
Another one with a negative conotation sadly.

On 4/3/06, Julie Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 I have found this thought provoking –

 And I am left wondering about the English language; we have a word for a
 male dominated society patriarchal, and a word for a female dominated
 society but I am at a loss to come up with the right word for a society in
 which the male and female genders are represented equally…. Perhaps the
 feminist society….

 That's the world I'd like to live in…

 Warm hug

 Julie





  


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Watson
  Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2006 9:22 PM

  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] quote of the week






 So true, Mary.  Women are the harshest judges of eachother.  Some of the
 pregnancy/birth/parenting forums I read show this to be true in almost every
 topic.  :(





 Jo






 On 02/04/2006, at 3:58 PM, Mary Murphy wrote:






 If I could wave my wand, our culture would be matriarchal...one of peace,
 of softness...where children are beloved, where women are revered and taken
 care of, where birth and mothering are honored and supported.— Raven Lang
 Midwifery Today Issue 70Wish this was true.  It seems to me that women
 judge each other harshly. MM











--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] H*lp please - Article in the Sun Herald

2006-04-03 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Hey David, did you get the article? Would love a copy.

rgds mike

On 3/31/06, Mike  Lindsay Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hey david

 I found the link to the paid version but couldn't find a downloadable
 copy which is unusual.

 http://newsstore.smh.com.au/apps/newsSearch.ac?page=1sp=nrmso=relevancedt=selectRangerc=10dr=1yearpb=all_ffxsfx=headlinesfx=textkw=revolutionsy=smh

 Lonely beginnings for fathers of the revolution
 Dads are almost social pariahs if they miss baby's birth, but inside
 the delivery suite they're also feeling unwanted, Danielle Teutsch
 writes.
 Sun Herald 26/03/2006 Cost - $2.20 1195 words

 It is produced by Sydney morning heralt BTW http://www.smh.com.au/

 rgds mike

 On 3/31/06, Sally-Anne Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  David
 
  I will try and get a copy for you but when a similar thing has happenned to
  me in rural Vic... if you call the paper they can send copies either
  directly to you or your local newsagent (if you have one !).  As well as
  copies been kept in most libraries (public, uni etc) is worth keeping in
  mind.
 
  Kind Regards
 
  Sally-Anne
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Great Birth  Men at Birth
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 4:02 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] H*lp please - Article in the Sun Herald
 
 
  Dear Folks,
 
 
  Apparently last Sunday (26 March) in the Sun-Herald (Sydney paper) on page
  76 there is an article called Lonely beginnings for fathers of the
  revolution.  I provided some material for this article and the journalist
  was going to let me see it before it went to print.  Unfortunately she never
  let me know it was being published last weekend and therefore I have been
  unable to get a copy of the article (I live outside Canberra and by the time
  I found out about it no Canberra newsagents had a copy).
 
 
  I have tried contacting the journo but she has gone on maternity leave!  And
  the paper won't give me her contact details.
 
 
  Does anyone have a copy of it that they could send me?  I will of course pay
  postage costs.
 
 
  Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated.
 
 
  Cheers,
 
 
  David
 
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.acmi.org.au/menatbirth.htm
 
 
   
 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006
 
 
 
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006
 
 
 


 --
 My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
 My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
 New Photo site@
 Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
 Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

 Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
 as safe as it gets. Unknown



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Nitrous oxide

2006-04-03 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I'd like a copy or a link to your article if possible.

rgds mike

On 4/3/06, Andrea Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Paivi,

 I realised that you meant this message for me personally, however I
 did want to let list readers know that my article on the hazards of
 using nitrous oxide for midwives is in the March issue of MIDIRS.  I
 wrote this article using extensive research supplied by a midwife
 colleague in the UK and it was primarily aimed at the British
 midwives who frequently use Entonox in enclosed, unventilated  labour
 rooms, often for many hours. There are significant health effects for
 midwives (and probably the women as well) and I have written these up
 in the article.

 Nitrous oxide affects DNA synthesis and removes Vitamin B12 from the
 body.  That is probably the reason why miscarriage rates are high
 amongst midwives - the embryo may be damaged by either of these
 deficiencies and therefore not viable. It is recommended that
 midwives planning a pregnancy have their B12 levels checked before
 starting on a pregnancy and that they work in areas away from labour
 wards during the pregnancy (and possibly breastfeeding).  There are
 other effects as well - chronic fatigue is also reported in midwives
 (and again may be a problem postnatally for women exposed to nitrous
 oxide for many hours during labour).

 I don't know of any research that suggests a link between nitrous
 oxide and Downs Syndrome.

 As soon as I can get this article available, you'll all have the
 references and full details.

 Regards,

 Andrea

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] H*lp please - Article in the Sun Herald

2006-03-30 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Hey david

I found the link to the paid version but couldn't find a downloadable
copy which is unusual.

http://newsstore.smh.com.au/apps/newsSearch.ac?page=1sp=nrmso=relevancedt=selectRangerc=10dr=1yearpb=all_ffxsfx=headlinesfx=textkw=revolutionsy=smh

Lonely beginnings for fathers of the revolution
Dads are almost social pariahs if they miss baby's birth, but inside
the delivery suite they're also feeling unwanted, Danielle Teutsch
writes.
Sun Herald 26/03/2006 Cost - $2.20 1195 words

It is produced by Sydney morning heralt BTW http://www.smh.com.au/

rgds mike

On 3/31/06, Sally-Anne Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 David

 I will try and get a copy for you but when a similar thing has happenned to
 me in rural Vic... if you call the paper they can send copies either
 directly to you or your local newsagent (if you have one !).  As well as
 copies been kept in most libraries (public, uni etc) is worth keeping in
 mind.

 Kind Regards

 Sally-Anne

 - Original Message -
 From: Great Birth  Men at Birth
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 4:02 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] H*lp please - Article in the Sun Herald


 Dear Folks,


 Apparently last Sunday (26 March) in the Sun-Herald (Sydney paper) on page
 76 there is an article called Lonely beginnings for fathers of the
 revolution.  I provided some material for this article and the journalist
 was going to let me see it before it went to print.  Unfortunately she never
 let me know it was being published last weekend and therefore I have been
 unable to get a copy of the article (I live outside Canberra and by the time
 I found out about it no Canberra newsagents had a copy).


 I have tried contacting the journo but she has gone on maternity leave!  And
 the paper won't give me her contact details.


 Does anyone have a copy of it that they could send me?  I will of course pay
 postage costs.


 Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated.


 Cheers,


 David


 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.acmi.org.au/menatbirth.htm


  


 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006



 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/296 - Release Date: 29/03/2006





--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Inducing labour

2006-03-29 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Probably not a PC suggestion but would a medical IOL be better than a
C/S. The most natural is lots of intercourse with orgasim.

On 3/29/06, Melissa Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Kim,

 Given that the baby has to come early, I'd be inclined to introduce
 non-pharmacological methods of cervical ripening first.  For example,
 evening primrose oil, acupuncture, sexual intercourse plus many of the other
 herbal remedies.  Evening primrose oil, in my opinion only, works
 wonderfully to ripen the cervix.

 Most importantly I would ask her to examine her feelings towards birth,
 natural versus caesarian and help her resolve any fears and anxieties.  She
 also really needs to ask herself is she ready emotionally for this baby to
 be born.   I have seen this work wonders on post dates women who want to
 avoid induction.  Often the big thing for them is fear of change in family
 dynamics which they have avoided but once they face them and resolve that
 fearthey start labouring!! But as I've stated that I have only used
 this method on term/post dates women.

 Hope this is helpful,
 Melissa
 - Original Message -
 From: Kim Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:29 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] Inducing labour


  Hi everyone,
 
  I'd like to turn the tables and take off my List Admin
  hat and you all for a little assistance.
 
  I have a friend at college who is due to give birth to her
  second child in mid April.  She has had a very bad time
  with all day sickness for the entire pregnancy and is
  at a point where all she wants is to get it out and has
  almost got to the point of booking a caesarean.  Her
  first child was born by caesarean, so this idea doesn't
  seem to phase her, although I do get a sense that she'd
  like to have a natural birth this time round.  The catch is
  it has to come early.
 
  Can anyone offer any suggestions or way to naturally
  bring on labour, so that a caesarean can be avoided.
 
  I have asked some of my lecturers about homoeopathics
  and herbal remedies and they have made the following
  suggestions that help only after labour has started.
 
Cauloph 200 hourly to initiate labour if
contractions are weak.
 
or herbal partus preparation  2.5ml of this taken every hour
during labour:
  raspberry leaf
  cramp bark
  motherwort
  sqaw vine
  wild yam
 
Jasmine essential oil to the temples to give
strong contractions.  Jasmine, Clary Sage and
Lavender essential oils to the temples on for
pain relief.
 
  I am still looking into this but would appreciate any help
  you can offer.
 
  Warm regards
  Kim
 
  your friendly listadmin
 
 
  ---
  Kim Hunter
  List Administration
  Birth International
  ACE Graphics and Associates in Childbirth Education
 
  http://www.birthinternational.com/
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] But there is Dr delay to the story from NZ

2006-03-29 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
There is a definite media bias in both Oz and NZ when it comes to midwifery/doctor involvement in Birth issues especially in the area of maternal/neonatal mortality. Interesting to note that the coroner in other recent cases in NZ has made recommendations for improvements but has not blamed/challenged the system in use in NZ. 
rgds mike On 3/23/06, Susan Cudlipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







What I cannot understand here is that the woman was 
transferred at 23.45hours for mec liquor, and sat on for the next 5 hours, 
presumably being monitored by CTG all that time with the mec getting 
thicker.
How come the midwives are copping the blame 
here? The attending midwife obviously transferred appropriately, it would 
appear to be hospital mis-management, either lack of monitoring, inexperience in 
reading the monitor, or lack of appropriate assessment by doctor on 
duty.
Either way, to allow a woman to labour with fetal 
distress which must have been increasing for the babe to be so compromised is 
certainly unforgiveable - but why was she left so long? That is the 
question that needs to be answered. Even in hospital care the doctor was 
'too busy' to assess this poor woman?
Tragic.

Sue
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do 
nothingEdmund Burke


  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
  B  
  G 
  To: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 6:39 
PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] But there is Dr 
  delay to the story from NZ
  
  
  


  



  
Just read 
the fuller details. Seems to me the midwives took her to hospital 
correctly but a huge delay in being seen by the Dr! Seems to me there is 
scaremongering going on. Love to know more about the Dr stats. 
Barb




This article is owned by, or has been licensed to, 
the New Zealand Herald. You may not reproduce, publish, electronically 
archive or transmit this article in any manner without the prior written 
consent of the New Zealand Herald. To make a copyright clearance 
inquiry, please click here.

  
  


  


  
  

  
  

  
Alan and Heather Phillips place 
  flowers at the grave site of their baby daughter Tyla in Awhitu. 
  Picture / Kenny Rodger
Baby died after hospital errors 

20.03.06By Martin Johnston
Another baby 
has died after a series of mistakes partly blamed on midwife care. 
Tyla Phillips survived for only 7 hours after she was born at 
Middlemore Hospital in an emergency caesarean operation last August. 
A hospital specialist later told her parents, Heather and Alan 
Phillips, that if the operation had been performed three hours earlier 
she might have lived. The specialist said midwives misread a 
fetal heart rate monitor. The couple now want an inquiry into 
maternity and midwifery care because their case follows other newborn 
deaths with similar themes. Middlemore is saying little publicly 
about Tyla's birth until the Accident Compensation Corporation has 
reported its decision to the hospital and Health and Disability 
Commissioner Ron Paterson has investigated. The hospital says it 
may refer the case, which had devastated the staff involved, to the 
commissioner, or medical or midwifery bodies. However, hospital 
documents and a tape recording the Phillips have of one of their 
meetings with senior clinicians catalogue the mistakes that led to 
Tyla's death on August 18 and a follow-up internal review. A key 
failure was midwives' mis-reading of a fetal heart rate monitor, 
according to the obstetric consultant on call at the time, Dr Alec 
Ekeroma, on the tape. He also indicated that the fetal 
blood-acidity test which led to the caesarean decision - done after an 
obstetric registrar reviewed the heart monitoring - was unnecessary in 
the circumstances and wasted time. He said the 21-minute 
caesarean operation - Tyla was born at 5.53am - should have been done 
probably two or three hours earlier. If it had been, this may have 
changed the outcome. Mrs Phillips was several days overdue when 
she went to the Middlemore-allied Botany Downs Maternity Unit, which was 
managing her pregnancy. The unit's midwives had her transferred to 
Middlemore at 11.45pm on August 17. Her waters had broken around 9pm, 
containing what her medical file says was moderate meconium (faeces 
from the baby). Staff noticed thick meconium when she arrived at the 
hospital. The presence of meconium can indicate a distressed 
baby. Because of 

Re: [ozmidwifery] article FYI

2006-03-29 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
The other concern is that a very high persentage of the worlds soy is GE.

On 3/21/06, leanne wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Studies Short on Soy Formula Risks
 Experts See Little Health Danger With Formula

 By Todd Zwillich
 WebMD Medical News

 Reviewed By Louise Chang, MD
 on Friday, March 17, 2006

 March 17, 2006 -- There is not enough scientific data to determine whether
 or not soy formula consumed by millions of infants poses a health risk, a
 government panel concluded Friday.

 Experts say they have little concern that an estrogen-like substance in soy
 -- known as genistein -- poses a developmental risk to infants who consume
 it or whose parents consumed it in soy-based foods.

 Still, very few studies have looked at the long-term health effects of soy
 formula, which is used to feed an estimated 25% of all U.S. infants, the
 panel says.

 Soy has raised concerns not only because of its exploding consumption by
 U.S. infants and adults but also because studies have shown that genistein
 can interfere with hormonal function in rats and their offspring.

 A variety of toxic effects, including stunted growth, sexual organ
 abnormalities, and decreased fertilization, have all been observed in
 laboratory animals. All of the effects appear to be caused by genistein's
 ability to mimic the effects of natural estrogen. Some researchers also
 suspect soy of playing a role in reduced breast cancer rates in Japan, where
 soy consumption is very high.

 The committee says it had negligible concern that usual intakes of
 genistein cause adverse health effects in newborns and infants who consume
 soy formula, though one expert -- Ruth Etze, MD -- dissented from the
 conclusion. Etzel, a pediatrician at the Alaska Native Medical Center in
 Anchorage, could not be reached for comment.

 Human infants consume much lower genistein doses than laboratory animals,
 and most of the chemical is not absorbed into the human bloodstream, says
 Karl Rozman, PhD, a University of Kansas toxicologist who led NIH panel.

 But at the same time, few studies have looked at soy's effects in a
 controlled way, he explains.

 More Study Needed

 That means there are studies there, but they are not allowing us to come to
 a firm conclusion one way or another. But it also means that we do not see a
 problem, says Rozman.

 One study pegged infant formula feeding as a risk factor for premature
 breast development in girls. Experts called for better research to determine
 if that and other potential health effects are real.

 Another case-control study to examine premature breast development in
 females following exposure to soy infant formula is needed, the committee
 concludes.

 Panelist Jatinder Mhatia, MD, says soy formula has not shown a blip on the
 radar screen in terms of ill health consequences, despite use by an
 estimated 40 million total infants.

 But Mhatia also says parents are up to 10 times more likely to give their
 infants soy formula in the U.S. than in Britain. Some countries, including
 Israel, have restricted formula use to prescription-only status for infants
 who cannot consume milk. But American doctors are quick to recommend formula
 for fussy infants, which parents are heavily encouraged by advertising to
 use, he says.

 Only in our country are we using [soy] in a free-for-all, Mhatia, a
 pediatrician at the Medical College of Georgia, tells WebMD. Soy has a
 specific indication, and we tend to use and abuse in America.

 Why should you use soy unless there's an indication? he says.


 

 SOURCES: NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental
 Toxicity of Genistein, Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human
 Reproduction, National Institutes of Health, March 17, 2006. Karl Rozman,
 MD, University of Kansas. Jitander Mhatia, MD, department of pediatrics,
 Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.

 (c) 2006 WebMD Inc. All rights reserved



 Leanne Wynne
 Midwife in charge of Women's Business
 Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] burst vagina's

2006-03-18 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
 What the hell is a burst vagina anyway??? Sounds like a big crock to me.

Amazing they way language can be used, so much for informed consent.

Here is a nice definition:

Informed consent is the process by which a fully informed patient can
participate in choices about her health care.

Perhaps they were referring to a Vaginal fistula, a potential result
of obstructed labour. As many as 2/2000 3rd world births. Previous
abdominal surgery (I assume C/sect fits here)  is the primry cause in
the western world.


http://www.womenshealthsection.com/content/urog/urogvvf002.php3

Although the exact incidence of vesico-vaginal fistula in the United
States is unknown, estimates range between 0.01 to 0.04% of
gynecologic procedures. In developing countries vesico-vaginal
fistulas are more common and are related to obstructed labor due to
unattended deliveries, small pelvic dimensions, malpresentation, poor
uterine contractions and introital stenosis. The primary cause of
vesico-vaginal fistula in the United States is related to gynecologic
surgery.




--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] trials

2006-03-04 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
On 3/4/06, Dean  Jo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cs what happened to the
 other  23.3% that didn't birth vaginally

What the research said was that 23.3% did not deliver within 24hours.
So they either failed to be inducded at all or took longer than
24hours to birth their babies.


 Also, are women going to be told that they have almost a 50% chance of
 needing a cs with an induction?

Obviously only 22.5% actually required a CS (Yes too high still
acording to WHO guidlines) but where did you get 50% risk from?

That inductions fail almost half the
 time

Once again where does this percentage come from.


You raise really valid issues but this trial seemed to me to be
offering birthing women a better option for induction than the very
invasive Vaginal option.

Yes we do too many IOL'S and way too many C/S's. But many women don't
know, don't care or don't have any choice and this particular peice of
research might just give them one more option that is less invasive.

As for the VBAC situation - women can choose a vbac, many choose
elective C/S too.


 At least they asked the women's preference. Guess what they chose?  MM

 Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled
 trial - BMJ , vol 332, no 7540, 4 March 2006, pp 509-511 Dodd JM; Crowther
 CA; Robinson JS - (2006) OBJECTIVE: To compare oral misoprostol solution
 with vaginal prostaglandin gel (dinoprostone) for induction of labour at
 term to determine whether misoprostol is superior. DESIGN: Randomized double
 blind placebo controlled trial. SETTING: Maternity departments in three
 hospitals in Australia.Population Pregnant women with a singleton cephalic
 presentation at /=36+6 weeks' gestation, with an indication for
 prostaglandin induction of labour. INTERVENTIONS: 20 microg oral misoprostol
 solution at two hourly intervals and placebo vaginal gel or vaginal
 dinoprostone gel at six hourly intervals and placebo oral solution. MAIN
 OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaginal birth within 24 hours; uterine hyperstimulation
 with associated changes in fetal heart rate; caesarean section (all); and
 caesarean section for fetal distress. RESULTS: 741 women were randomised,
 365 to the misoprostol group and 376 to the vaginal dinoprostone group.
 There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in
 the primary outcomes: vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours (misoprostol
 168/365 (46.0%) v dinoprostone 155/376 (41.2%); relative risk 1.12, 95%
 confidence interval 0.95 to 1.32; P=0.134), caesarean section (83/365
 (22.7%) v 100/376 (26.6%); 0.82, 0.64 to 1.06; P=0.127), caesarean section
 for fetal distress (32/365 (8.8%) v 35/376 (9.3%); 0.91, 0.57 to 1.44;
 P=0.679), or uterine hyperstimulation with changes in fetal heart rate
 (3/365 (0.8%) v 6/376 (1.6%); 0.55, 0.14 to 2.21; P=0.401). Although there
 were differences in the process of labour induction, there were no
 significant differences in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.
 CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows no evidence that oral misoprostol is superior
 to vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labour. However, it does not lead
 to poorer health outcomes for women or their infants, and oral treatment is
 preferred by women. Trial registration National Health and Medical Research
 Council, Perinatal Trials, PT0361. (11 references) (Author)



 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/273 - Release Date: 3/2/2006



 --
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/273 - Release Date: 3/2/2006



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] placental gardening

2006-02-20 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
Hi
I had two placentas (or are they placentae) in my freezer at one stage.  The
first thing to be sure of, is to thaw the placenta properly!  I have to
admit that the significance of placing your placenta under a tree is marred
when the tree dies, due to having frozen placenta under it.  Unfortunately
that was what happened to me.  However I had many friends in NZ who
'planted' their placentas under roses and fruit trees and kauri and the
like.  Choose a 'hardy' plant... my personal preference is fruit trees
because I like the idea that my placenta is bearing fruit of it's own.
Cheers
Lindsay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Watson
Sent: Monday, 20 February 2006 6:47 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] placental gardening

Vicky, I am in the same boat - mine is still in the freezer from  
almost 9 months ago!
I also had a home water birth, 29 min pushing, 7 hours total labour,  
physiological third stage...
I am also a primip Midwife ;)

Jo
On 20/02/2006, at 4:19 PM, Vicky Gotte wrote:

 Hi everyone,
 I was wondering if anyone could give me some advice
 about planting my placenta- it has been in the freezer
 for 5 months and I really need to do something with
 it!). I want to put it in a pot plant as I'd want to
 take the plant if we move. What plants would you
 recommend (please note I have killed mint!)and should
 I put it in a big plant pot or a small one. Do I need
 to do anything with the potting mix, or is a placenta
 and premium mix enough to make sure the plant
 thrives?. I know it's not really a mid question but I
 really want a 'special' plant for my daughter, and I
 didn't think the local nursery could give much advice.
 By the way, I had a beautiful water birth (with hardly
 any pushing), after a 2 1/2 hour first stage, and
 completed with a physiological third stage. (Not bad
 for a primip midwife!). Thanks a lot,  Vicky


   
 
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Find a local business fast with Yahoo! Local Search
 http://au.local.yahoo.com
 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 17/02/2006




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 17/02/2006

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] article FYI

2006-02-20 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Just for clarification.

This FDA warning is for the new 4D color ultrasounds. There is no
problem with having an ordinary ultrasound and getting a print. The
warning is because they are new and basically they don't know if they
are as safe as the traditional scan.

Good article at

http://www.southflorida.com/sfparenting/sfe-sfp-fetalimage,0,5283379.story

rgds mike

On 2/20/06, leanne wynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Source: http://www.medicinenet.com

 Health Tip: Avoid Needless Ultrasounds of Fetus
 (HealthDay News) -- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has warned against
 taking a picture of a developing fetus merely as a keepsake.

 These images can show facial features, hair and even the developing baby's
 sex.

 But the FDA says while ultrasounds are generally safe, they can affect
 developing tissues and may cause a rise in fetal temperature.

 Also, prenatal images being marketed for non-medical reasons are often done
 by less-experienced personnel and may expose a fetus to a longer period of
 imaging than one performed by a medical technician.

 The FDA recommends that women limit ultrasounds to those done for medical
 reasons only.

 -- Deborah DiSesa Hirsch


 Copyright (c) 2006 ScoutNews LLC. All rights reserved.





 Leanne Wynne
 Midwife in charge of Women's Business
 Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] reaction to anti D

2006-02-01 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
Hi
I wondered if anyone had every had a woman have an reaction to the anti D
injection?
Today I gave a woman her 24 week dose of anti D.  This is her second
pregnancy and thus her 4th dose of anti D.  She appeared fine and left. I
went out to the waiting room to discover her swaying on her feet, flushed
and looking very unwell.  Took her back into the consult room and did obs...
she was tachycardic, tachypnoeic with raised BP.  She was short of breath
and felt 'funny'. Called the doc and we put a cannula in, however she seemed
to come right and we didn't do any further treatment, except monitor her for
about 45 minutes.  However her husband rang once she got home to say that
she was feeling unwell and shaky.  He brought her back into the hospital...
I don't know if she required further treatment.  She was feeling a bit
unwell before the injection, getting a cold she said.  
None of the other midwives had ever had a patient react to anti D.  
Lindsay



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.25/247 - Release Date: 31/01/2006

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] IV Synto for 3rd stage

2006-01-24 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I have got away with carfully suggesting that there are things I
have to do (because they are hospital policy)  but they can always
refuse if they wish ;)

rgds mike

On 1/24/06, Justine Caines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi kylie re whats been chatting on about
 you probably were at the same hospital. large teritary. but if it is
 hospital protocol and you are found not to be doing the protocol then it is
 your job which would you prefer.
 Regards


 Gee What about some lateral thinking!

 How about informing women about evidence and appropriate care, and giving
 them a choice!!!

 Slow in-roads to change but a least a chance of it when midwives work with
 women to inform and support them rather than with obstetric dominance that
 dictates and abuses

 JC


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as life gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence or UR?

2006-01-24 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Well said Brenda

On 1/24/06, brendamanning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am not on anyones side   I am not  intending to be inflammatory.
 But I am a realist  inform my homebirthing clients that should they make
 controversial choices (  I am a big supporter of BAC  VBreech) they need
 to be:  not  intending to allocate blame if the outcome is unfavourable.

 It means NOT SUING the OB/MW if the outcome is poor because the client has
 chosen to take responsibility for her own decision-making.
 This doesn't make the client a victim. She made informed choices, her
 caregiver agreed to work with them  the outcome is then the clients
 responsibility (barring out  out negligence).

 When we make important decisions we are accepting the responsibility of
 educating ourselves about the benefits  risks of a procedure  then
 accepting the outcome as this is the consequence of our actions. It's
 unreasonable to blame-shift if you make a decision while fully informed 
 then don't like the outcome.
 I'm not absolving health professionals of their role which is to provide a
 safe practice arena within their sphere of expertise. We are all accountable
 for our own practice. But the ever increasing litigiousness of our society
 is a large part of why womens choices are so reduced.

 I believe that compromise is the solution globally. Unfortunately there are
 alot of professionals  consumers who won't/don't/can't discuss  'give a
 little to get alot'. Collaborative practice is where everyone ( health prof
  clients) work together for the benefit of the client. That's what we are
 aiming for.

 With kind regards
 Brenda Manning
 www.themidwife.com.au

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike  Lindsay Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:49 AM
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence or UR?


 I like the point you make. People should be able to do it their way.
  And I see and hear midwives annoyance at manipulative behaviour by
  doctors. But I can also see it from a medical point of view. If it
  goes wrong the patients become victims and they and their lawyers
  come running looking for someone to blame.
 
  rgds mike
 
  On 1/23/06, brendamanning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Jo,
 
  I would absolutely agree with your first statement, heard it many times,
  got in  saved/rescued your baby, just in the nick of time !
  I am such a hero!
 
  With the second part: whilst very supportive of BAC I think labouring
  with a
  uterus which has already dehisced  is subsequently heavily scarred is
  really pushing the boundaries of safety.
  However: as long as the mother is well informed (  being well informed
  means knowing the down side as well as the up side) about the risks  not
  intending to allocate blame if the outcome is unfavourable ie a second UR
  (
  hysterectomy etc, plus or minus a fetal death) then she can do what ever
  she
  chooses.
 
  I have seen in OT the uterus of a woman booked for a repeat EL LUSCS, not
  in
  labour, 38/40 with a dehisced area easily 5 cms in the old scar  no
  apparent ill effects for mother or baby. Normal obs, normal CTG, normal
  fetal mvmts. Absolutely no sign before OT that there was anything amiss.
  Amazing.
  She had been offered BAC  chose
  LUSCS...what if ?
 
  With kind regards
  Brenda Manning
  www.themidwife.com.au
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dean  Jo
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:15 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence or UR?
 
  not trying to be controversial (honest!) just wanting to think outside
  norm...how many times have I heard the story of an ob saying to a woman
  when
  giving her the repeat cs (for a 'failed vbac attempt not linked to a
  rupture) oh the scar was so thin it could have ripped open at any
  second...lucky I saved you from it.  (well I am TRYING not sound too
  facetious)
 
  I suppose like anything we must look at rationale for the first event.
  IF a
  rupture did occur you could conclude that the repair to the uterus would
  be
  quite extensive IF she managed to not lose the uterus- hence the risks
  for
  future rupture would increase.  But a dehiscence has not been proven to
  be a
  serious concern according to the investigation I have done in the last
  almost 9 years.  There is speculation that a scar  can slightly part with
  no
  harmful effects.
 
  Just asking questionsdon't they just HATE informed consumers! ;o)
  love Jo
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Janet Fraser
  Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:40 PM
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Subject: *SUSPECTED SPAM* Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence
  or
  UR?
 
  You made all my points, Jo.
  : )
  J
  - Original Message -
  From: Dean  Jo
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:46 PM

Re: [ozmidwifery] dive reflex

2006-01-24 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
On 1/23/06, Ken WArd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Have you got The Midwife Companion? This book is my bible. Maureen

Can you tell me the author of this book.

rgds mike



My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as life gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence or UR?

2006-01-23 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I like the point you make. People should be able to do it their way.
And I see and hear midwives annoyance at manipulative behaviour by
doctors. But I can also see it from a medical point of view. If it
goes wrong the patients become victims and they and their lawyers
come running looking for someone to blame.

rgds mike

On 1/23/06, brendamanning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jo,

 I would absolutely agree with your first statement, heard it many times,
 got in  saved/rescued your baby, just in the nick of time !
 I am such a hero!

 With the second part: whilst very supportive of BAC I think labouring with a
 uterus which has already dehisced  is subsequently heavily scarred is
 really pushing the boundaries of safety.
 However: as long as the mother is well informed (  being well informed
 means knowing the down side as well as the up side) about the risks  not
 intending to allocate blame if the outcome is unfavourable ie a second UR (
 hysterectomy etc, plus or minus a fetal death) then she can do what ever she
 chooses.

 I have seen in OT the uterus of a woman booked for a repeat EL LUSCS, not in
 labour, 38/40 with a dehisced area easily 5 cms in the old scar  no
 apparent ill effects for mother or baby. Normal obs, normal CTG, normal
 fetal mvmts. Absolutely no sign before OT that there was anything amiss.
 Amazing.
 She had been offered BAC  chose
 LUSCS...what if ?

 With kind regards
 Brenda Manning
 www.themidwife.com.au

 - Original Message -
 From: Dean  Jo
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:15 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence or UR?

 not trying to be controversial (honest!) just wanting to think outside
 norm...how many times have I heard the story of an ob saying to a woman when
 giving her the repeat cs (for a 'failed vbac attempt not linked to a
 rupture) oh the scar was so thin it could have ripped open at any
 second...lucky I saved you from it.  (well I am TRYING not sound too
 facetious)

 I suppose like anything we must look at rationale for the first event.  IF a
 rupture did occur you could conclude that the repair to the uterus would be
 quite extensive IF she managed to not lose the uterus- hence the risks for
 future rupture would increase.  But a dehiscence has not been proven to be a
 serious concern according to the investigation I have done in the last
 almost 9 years.  There is speculation that a scar  can slightly part with no
 harmful effects.

 Just asking questionsdon't they just HATE informed consumers! ;o)
 love Jo

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Janet Fraser
 Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:40 PM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: *SUSPECTED SPAM* Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence or
 UR?

 You made all my points, Jo.
 : )
 J
 - Original Message -
 From: Dean  Jo
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:46 PM
 Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after dehsicence or UR?

 I would have to look for the research (we all know how 'fair' research can
 be!) but the stated contra-indicators for vbac is previous rupture.  Now it
 doesn't actually state if the chances of another rupture are higher than a
 normal scar or whether it is a case of dam! Not going to let that happen
 again! attitude.  You could argue I suppose that even a dehiscence that
 required repair would be considered the same as a repeat cs??  Perhaps
 no vbac after one rupture/dehiscence would be based on fear and/or
 presumption.  Similar to the situation where a woman loses a baby during
 labour there is the assumption that she will want a cs next time.???

 jo

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Janet Fraser
 Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 3:37 PM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after dehsicence or UR?

 Hi all,
 does anyone know of research on VB after UR? I was asked this:

 So if you've had a scar come apart to the point where the baby was on its
 way out via the DIY sunroof, and the ob says he would have had to cut me
 open to stitch it up even if I had pushed the baby out, would that make
 VBA2C too risky?

 Thanks in advance,
 J

 Joyous Birth
 Home Birth Forum - a world first!
 http://www.joyousbirth.info/forums/

 Attending births is like growing roses. You have to marvel at the ones that
 just open up and bloom at the first kiss of the sun but you wouldn't dream
 of pulling open the petals of the tightly closed buds and forcing them to
 blossom to your time line.

 ~Gloria Lemay~






 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 1/20/2006



 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 1/20/2006



 --
 

Re: [ozmidwifery] Syringe for sub-cut Heparin?

2006-01-20 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
If you look at an enoxaparin syringe (or other low molecular weight
heparin) there is an air bubble that ensures you get the complete and
accurate dose. All product litrature recomends not removing this air
bubble. So I draw up the .2ml of Heparin 5000u in an insulin syringe
and ensure that there is a .1ml air bubble. Not exactly evidence based
but seems to be common sense.

rgds mike

On 1/20/06, Sadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks Andrea, you are confirming what I am thinking.

 Sadie


 - Original Message -
 From: Andrea Quanchi
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:07 PM
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Syringe for sub-cut Heparin?

 This injection is only 0.2 mls and so if you give it in a 2 ml syringe the
 dead space is more than that so common sense says this is not a good idea
 and thus I have never even looked for a policy regarding it. Can you imagine
 anyone researching this because measuring the dead space would tell you it
 wont work. try putting a measure amount in any syringe and then push it up
 until fluid comes out of the syringe and needle. If you draw up 0.2 mls and
 then push till the dead space is eliminated in a 2 ml syringe it will not
 fill the dead space. Therefore the smallest syringe available is the best
 option and in most cases this would be a 0.5 ml insulin syringe. I havent
 had a look at the product info it probably gives a recommendatiion.
 Andrea Q
 On 20/01/2006, at 11:18 AM, Sadie wrote:




 Hi Wise Women,



  Is anyone working with a hospital policy regarding the size of syringe to
 be used when giving a sub cut Heparin 5000 iu injection? If so what is the
 research behind it.

 Cheers,



 Sadie


--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as life gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] birthing in private hosp question

2006-01-20 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
It is sad that women pay for private Ob's and Private Hospitals
thinking that they are going to get better service and more choices.
So often they seem to get the opposite.

rgds mike

On 1/20/06, Andrea Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Jayne,

 Perhaps your friend could try seeing her obstetrician as an
 insurance policy. Worth paying the money for in case a problem
 arises, but otherwise not required to do anything until a
 complication actually arises.  An analogy I use is that paying for a
 doctor is like paying for house insurance. Wonderful when the roof
 blows off as it means and instant fix is available, but in the
 meantime, I don't want a roofer coming around every so often to see
 if he can help out with anything on the roof!

 When labour starts, she can ask the midwives to call the doctor only
 if needed. Most  doctors won't come anyway until second stage, and
 then only for the shortest time possible. If all is going well, your
 friend can ask the midwives to catch the baby, but she will  have to
 make it clear to the doctor in advance that this might be the
 case.  Another idea would be to hand him the camera to take the
 photos - keep his hands busy elsewhere!

 Tell her to remember that as she is paying the bill, she is entitled
 to ask him to do anything (within reason!)!

 Best wishes,

 Andrea



 At 10:06 PM 19/01/2006, you wrote:
 I have renewed hope in our maternity system!  My friend -  41yo, 1st
 time mum 29 weeks into pregnancy seeing private ob and planing on
 birthing in private hosp (you know, she only wanted the BEST) - said
 to me today if I get the chance to have a 2nd child I will by
 pass the ob and only use a midwife.  The ob has done NOTHING!  He
 has barely felt my stomach yet a girl from work is seeing a midwife
 and she is learning so much from the midwife about her pregnancy.  I
 look forward more to hearing about her midwife visits than I do my ob visits.
 
 So I casually suggested that it wasn't too late to 'sack' the ob and
 go with a midwife!  She said she would if she hadn't of already paid
 the ob the $3,000 out of pocket expense  I'm not sure if she had
 to pay up front or if she was just being financially organised as
 she is prone to do.  I sarcastically told her that chances were he
 would do something at the birth to justify his fee :(
 
 My friend still likes the idea of birthing in the private hosp
 because if she has a 'natural' birth she is moved to a swish 5 star
 motel for days 3 to 5 pp funded by her health fund.  She wants to
 know if you have to have an ob when birthing in a private hosp?
 
 Regards
 
 Jayne
 
 


 -
 Andrea Robertson
 Director
 Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 web: www.birthinternational.com


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as life gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] article in our local paper today

2006-01-08 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Did anyone save a copy of this article. I can't seem to access it.
Please forward. RGDS Mike

On 1/7/06, Sally-Anne Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Congratulations to you Andrea and the women of Echuca .
 A fabulous article and very timely 

 2006 the year for reclamation of rural birthing services !!

 Kind Regards

 Sally-Anne
 - Original Message -
 From: Andrea Quanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Maternity Coalition [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 ozmidwifery ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Cc: Steve  Robin Humphress [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jan  Gale Perry
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Helen Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 6:45 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] article in our local paper today


  This was in our local paper today and I thought you might be interested. I
  sent them an email over a month ago when I received a copy of the report
  and it took till now for it to appear.
  Andrea Quanchi
 
  http://rivheraldechuca.net/story.asp?TakeNo=200601066155153
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
 
  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: 6/01/2006
 
 



 --
 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: 6/01/2006

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as life gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] baby bowel troubles

2005-11-03 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
























Hi

I was just speaking to a woman whose birth
I attended 9 weeks ago. She tells me that one of her twins is having bowel
problems. This baby does not poo without assistance. At two weeks of age she
had an xray which showed lots of gas in her bowel. After a PR she had a bowel
motion. This mum says she has been taking her to the hospital every two weeks
for suppositories. She is fully breast fed and her twin has no problems. Baby
has had dye studies which show no obstruction. This baby is gaining weight but
not as well as her sibling. However she is obviously uncomfortable and
screams. Any ideas?



Lindsay








No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/161 - Release Date: 3/11/2005


RE: [ozmidwifery] 3rd degree tears

2005-08-31 Thread Lindsay Kennedy








Hi Sue

It was about 11 weeks. I was booked
into the hospital clinic, had the USS and antenatal appointment and decided I couldnt
stand the cattle market philosophy and changed to a GP who did deliveries (this
was a few years ago in NZ, prior to independent midwives). On my first
visit with my new GP he picked up that it was twins!



Speaking of twins

I had my first ever twin delivery the
other evening. Lovely woman having baby 3 and 4. First twin was
cephalic presentation, second twin was breech. 37/40. She was
induced as part of that twin timing trial and had an epidural as that is the
policy. She thought the epidural was a bit ridiculous really. Had
not had pain relief for other births and felt a bit silly waiting for the
labour to progress. It all went very smoothly, it was just me and this
couple and we were laughing in between pushes and out came baby number
one. Then of course everyone else arrived and baby two was assisted by
the Dr. The woman refused an episiotomy despite the Dr thinking it was a
good idea. Baby came out bottom and foot first. 

I know it was pretty managed with Synto
infusion and epidural and CTG monitoring, but the woman was very very
thrilled with how it had gone. She had expected it to be far more
traumatic and certainly the birth of twin one was as quiet and beautiful as you
could want. Within half an hour of twin two delivering (approx 40mins
after twin 1) they were both on the breast. 

I am a big fan of home birth and find it
challenging sometimes to create a good atmosphere in the hospital. This
couple were so grateful that we had managed to create that atmosphere for
them. 

Lindsay











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sue Cookson
Sent: Wednesday, 31 August 2005
5:46 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] 3rd
degree tears





Hi Lindsay,
At what gestation did the u/sound miss your twins pregnancy?
Anyone else have a similar story?

Sue



I had ultrasounds on the day of birth of my last two babies,
I was overdue both times and had to see Obstetrician. These were my 4th
and 5th children. Number 4 he said would be large. At
least 9lbs. He was 7lb 3oz. Number 5, I think he was remembering
his previous error and said this was not a big baby. He was 9lb
1oz. I have little faith in USS. Keeping in mind that my twins were
also missed on USS and picked up on Abdo palp.

Lindsay






















RE: [ozmidwifery] 3rd degree tears

2005-08-30 Thread Lindsay Kennedy








I had ultrasounds on the day of birth of
my last two babies, I was overdue both times and had to see Obstetrician.
These were my 4th and 5th children. Number 4 he
said would be large. At least 9lbs. He was 7lb 3oz. Number 5,
I think he was remembering his previous error and said this was not a big
baby. He was 9lb 1oz. I have little faith in USS. Keeping in
mind that my twins were also missed on USS and picked up on Abdo palp.

Lindsay











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Julia Vaughan
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August 2005 7:59
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] 3rd
degree tears





No experience of vaginal birth following 4th
degree tear (thankfully!). But I personally had an ultrasound at 37 weeks
last pregnancy (at a specialist womens ultrasound clinic) and the
estimate of bubs weight was actually spot on (if you allow approx a 1oz
a day foetal weight gain). At the time I was told that the estimate could
be as much as + or  10% which is huge when you are talking about 4500+
grams of baby!



HTH,

Julia



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kim Stead
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August 2005 9:19
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] 3rd
degree tears




 
  
  
  Out of curiosity.. does anyone have any experiences of
  vaginal birth following previous 4th degree tear? I've just recently
  met a woman who wants to give vaginal birth a go - has new partner (says old
  one was huge!). She is smallish person - 60kg, last babe 10lbs (1st
  baby). What do you think. She will be birthing in hospital.
  I've asked her to get a copy of her obstetric records from previous
  hospital. Still in early pregnancy so can't gauge size yet. Is a
  later ultrasound a good idea for a gestimate on the weight? I know they
  can be so inaccurate.
  
  
  
  
  
  Kiwi Kim,
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
   









   
  
  
  
 











RE: [ozmidwifery] Routine collection and testing of cord blood

2005-08-23 Thread Lindsay Kennedy








We collect cord blood routinely on all
babies and send to lab for coombs etc Babies of Aboriginal or Torres Strait
Islander mothers have two tubes sent, the second for syphyllis serology. Cord
gases are also performed routinely on all babies. 

Lindsay









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Susan Cudlipp
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2005
11:39 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Routine
collection and testing of cord blood







I agree, what a waste of time and money as well as your
other concerns.





We collect a small ammount of cord blood at each
birth. The reason given is so that we have some of baby's blood if s/he should
develop any infection or extreme jaundice, that it might be tested. It is
discarded after a few days. I have never actually known of this being used, but
I may be wrong.





Cord blood is taken for Rh-v as well but we do not bleed the
babies - surely that is not necessary.





We don't do routine cord blood cultures as part of infection
screens anymore, but the babies usually have CRP on day 1  2. Mec liquor,
PROM, GBS, unbooked clientsand maternal fever are the ones who have
routine infection screen





Cord blood collection via private agencies is coming in fast
and I for one, find this worrying. Some hospitals routinely clamp and cut
a section of cord asap to check the Ph level.











Sounds like this needs to be challenged





Good luck, Sue





The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men
to do nothing
Edmund Burke







- Original Message - 





From: Helen
and Graham 





To: ozmidwifery 





Sent: Wednesday, August
24, 2005 8:02 AM





Subject: [ozmidwifery]
Routine collection and testing of cord blood











I have another question, this time regarding the routine
collection of cord blood. In previous places I have worked, we only
collected it for RH negative women or those with no antenatal blood results
available. Even if the woman was RPR positive, the doctors would still
bleed the baby to get a more accurate result instead of relying on the results
of the cord blood. There were no other indications for collecting
it. 











At the place I now work, we are still collecting it on every
patient and they are all being tested for group and coombs etc.
This seems a total waste of time and money to me as well as an unnecessary
occupational safety risk to staff.

















The only otherreason I see to justifycollecting
it would be ifit could be used in a cord blood bank? Does anyone
know if this is the case?











Looking forward to some more advice

















Helen Cahill 









No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.14/79 - Release Date: 22/08/2005








No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/80 - Release Date: 23/08/2005


[ozmidwifery] Clinical experiences

2005-08-15 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
Hi
For my Diploma of midwifery I need to do some hours of 'alternative
birthing'.  Originally I planned to go to Selangor in Nambour, but am
worried about the cost and practicality of this.  The other possibility is
Mareeba as it is closer... can anyone give me some input or ideas?  I live
in Townsville.  Ideally I am looking to do 2 weeks in October as I have
leave booked.
Thanks
Lindsay



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date: 15/08/2005

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Re:Pre-Eclampsia

2005-08-04 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
According to my one of my text books the risk is 10 times higher with first
pregnancy, the risk reduces with subsequent pregnancies providing the
subsequent pregnancy is with the same father.
Unfortunately women who have previously had pre eclampsia are at a higher
risk of having it again (20% increased risk).
There is an interesting research article suggesting that increased exercise
before and during pregnancy may decrease the risk.
Lindsay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philippa Scott
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:25 PM
To: ozmidwifery; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Re:Pre-Eclampsia

This woman was using Dr Ted Weaver at Selangor Hospital (he is apparently
very pro expectant management)  had a very sudden onset, she was not aware
of the seeing stars as a warning  had no others signs. It was literally
less than 3 hours from being at home to the ambo trip to hospital  C/S. I
am not sure that her care was the issue in this case. However she is a real
stressed person at the best of times, was married at 5mths pg had 3mths to
plan it, and was moving  selling houses. I think she had way to much
happening. She also continued to drink  smoke during the pg, although a lot
less (This cant have helped.) and she walked for a few months of the pg. She
has heard that it is less likely for subsequent babies to the same father.
True/ False/Sometimes?
Thanks for all your help so far, if there is more I'll take it.
Cheers
Birth Buddies
Supporting Women ~ Creating Life
President - Friends of the Birth Centre Townsville



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 3/08/2005




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.0/63 - Release Date: 3/08/2005

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D

2005-08-02 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
Further to the discussion about anti-D, I was in clinics today and the
subject came up.  Woman was Rh - and partner was also Rh -.  Dr was happy
for her to skip anti-D.  After she left he explained that in many instances
they give it anyway.  He said that the Blood typing system in common use is
not entirely accurate and that there can be a partially expressed Rh + that
reads as a negative.  If this is the case, baby can still be Rh +, despite
parents both being negatives.  
I had not heard of this before.
Lindsay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G Lemay
Sent: Friday, 29 July 2005 4:01 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D

Yes, mistakes can be made by hosp labs on the blood typing of the 
newborn.  Happened to me.  Two neg parents, first child neg.  Normally I 
wouldn't have even checked the bld type of the 2nd child but the parents 
wanted the ABO group.  Monogamous couple.  Had to beg to have the lab 
check again.  Turned out they had made an error.  Big apologies.  
Started me wondering how many other mistakes are made.  Now, I buy Eldon 
Cards to type the Dad and newborn myself at home.  It's really pretty 
easy and these little kits make it idiot proof.  They cost about $8 
Canadian and  are well worth it.  The hosp labs are a second 
confirmation after  we do testing at home. 

Also, I hate to get into this because it gives me a headache but I was 
corrected by a student about the idea that Rh neg is recessive.  She did 
a wonderful, brainy presentation to the class to demonstrate that Rh neg 
is dominant.  I'm sorry I can't duplicate it, but think about it.  Two 
Rh neg parents always have Rh neg offspring but two Rh pos parents can 
have an Rh neg child.  Gloria

leanne wynne wrote:

 Rh neg is recessive so in order for someone to be Rh neg blood group 
 they must possess 2 x Rh neg genes - one from each parent. If somone 
 is Rh pos it is possible for them to carry either a positive or 
 negative recessive gene. I hope that makes sense?
 Leanne.

 From: Fiona Rumble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D
 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:57:37 +1000

 Both parents must have had one gene for each Rh typing and passed on 
 their recessive gene so that bub got two copies of positive and 
 therefore was positive
 Regards
 Fiona Rumble
   - Original Message -
   From: Susan Cudlipp
   To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
   Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:45 PM
   Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D


   At the risk of sounding stupid, I remember a couple who were both 
 Rh-ve and
   yet their baby was Rh+ve.
   Now was this a case of 'Father unknown' or a mistake, or is it 
 possible for
   this to happen?
   Both partners seemed quite sure that the parentage could not be is 
 question
   by the way!

   I'm also Rh-ve and have had 3 bubs, one of whom was
   -ve.  I had several risky episodes during the course of these 
 pregnancies:-
   small APH, attempted ECV (failed), Chorionic villus testing, 
 Elective C/S
   (no 1), 2 VBAC's, and a retained placenta with MRP(3rd).  As I am a 
 blood
   donor (or used to be) I know that I never developed antibodies, 
 although I
   did have anti-D at the appropriate times following potential risks 
 - except
   for the APH and ECV attempt.

   Quite apart from the moral rights and wrongs of giving anti-D during
   pregnancy, it causes us no end of headaches in our busy ante-natal 
 clinics.
   We are not allowed to keep a stock as it is 'too precious' to place 
 into the
   hands of midwives ( who might presumably throw it away or sell it 
 on the
   black market??)  So we have to go through a complicated ordering 
 process
   which takes time away from our clients, and increases our work load 
 - I hate
   it!
   As to the seemingly generous supply of Rhogam - where does this 
 come from?
   While it was less available we were only giving the 28  34 week 
 doses to
   primips, now apparently there is enough for multips too.
   Sue
   The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men 
 to do
   nothing
   Edmund Burke
   - Original Message -
   From: Naomi Wilkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
   Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:20 PM
   Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Rh anti-D


   I had this experience!  I am Rh neg and so is my hubby.  I was 
 told I would
   still need to have anti-D during pregnancy.  Although the doctor 
 never
   stated that my husband may not have been the father of my child, 
 that's
   what was implied.  I refused and thankfully was saved from any 
 further
   harassment as I had my beautiful baby at home.
   
Naomi
   
   
   
   
   
   Funnily enough, we are not allowed to test the partners of Rh neg 
 women to
   see if they are negative too, thus ruling out the necessity for 
 giving
   

RE: [ozmidwifery] ventouse information

2005-08-01 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
Title: Message








I have seen a subgaleal hemorrhage. The
baby died. It was awful. It was the first neonatal death I had ever
witnessed. Baby had cord round neck and after the cord was cut turned out to
have shoulder dystocia. I cant remember whether they attempted ventouse
I think so, but unsuccessfully, finally was forceps delivery, but unfortunately
baby was severely damaged, we did CPR, transfused it, intubated, ventilatedetc
etc. but no good. I will remember that for a long time. The swollen head was
unbelievably large and went down its neck. 

Lindsay 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gloria Lemay
Sent: Monday, 1 August 2005 8:31
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
ventouse information







I have a video of a 20/20 segment from here in N. America which shows two severely injured babies after
a ventouse extraction. The pediatrician on the film talks about how
subgaleal hemmorhages can cause the infant to losehis/her entire blood
volume. One of the baby girls in the film required extensive surgery in
her first year of life and the other died from the trauma. The one who
lived was presenting by the brow and the ventouse was applied over the front
fontanelle. She looked like someone had hit her with a baseball
bat---black eyes and huge swelling on the forehead. It's quite astounding
that babies actually can take that kind of punishment and live. I'd love
to send it to Australia---do
you have players for VHS?? They were very critical in the film of
drs applying it for longer than 30 minutes.











Of course, one of the deadly things about both
forceps and ventouse is the greatly increased risk of shoulder dystocia and all
it's trauma. It's one thing to bring that unwilling head out that has not
properly molded but then, the fundus doesn't have a chance to firm up and
piston the rest of the baby out. Personally, I'd go for a cesarean before
I'd allow these implements on my child's head. Not that that's any
guarantee, because the ventouse and forceps are often used to help get babe's
head out during surgery.





Gloria







- Original Message - 





From: Robyn
Thompson 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent:
Sunday, July 31, 2005 1:59 AM





Subject:
RE: [ozmidwifery] ventouse information









Babies are affected by
Ventousse and Forceps. Many babies in my years of breastfeeding data are
unable to feed properly for up to 7 days due to trauma around the
tempro-mandibular joint. If you watch carefully the baby is tentative, the pain
is obvious as he/she avoids stretching the joint to allow the mandible to move
downwards. They reduce the movement to protect themselves from the pain of
extension. It is hard to imagine the pressure on their tiny little heads,
the soft tissue bruising and extensive oedema. They often have difficulty
breastfeeding and because of the magic 10% weight loss, many are
teat fed. These little babies often need very gentle finger feeding with
a periodontal syringe for the first 5 to 7 days to encourage gentle joint
movement by the small let down from the long tapered tip of the
syringe which flows gently over the back of the tongue creating the swallow
reflex. In cases where these little babies are offered a teat it
should be long and soft, definitely not teats attached to those narrow
disposable hospital bottles, nor anything like the ridiculous Avent style wide
neck teat with short nipple. Very gentle coaxing to move the joint with small
amounts of milk at a time until the joint, soft tissue, muscles, ligaments and
never endings recover. If cup feeding is used then small amounts gently given
so the baby can cope with the flow when trying to co-ordinate the use of the
painful tempro-mandibular joint. 



Robyn





-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nicole Carver
Sent: Sunday, 31 July 2005 12:00
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery]
ventouse information





One of the presentations at ICM was about ventouse. There are known
side effects. Minor ones include caput succanadeum which is swelling of the
scalp and cephal haematoma which is bruising between the skull bone and its
membrane covering. The major one was a sub apponeuretic haemorrhage which I
think is inside the skull and so the bleeding is less limited because there is
more space, and the baby can lose quite a bit of blood. It can also cause
pressure on the brain. The midwife suggested that hourly head circumferences
after a ventouse might pick these up early. However, they are very rare. The
higher the baby when the ventouse is applied, and the longer the time it is
applied seems to be important. The pressure should not be on continuously for
more than ten minutes, and the obstetrician should not use it for more than 2-3
contractions. I have had a quick look through the program, but can't find the
midwife's name. She also mentioned an 

[ozmidwifery] homebirth in Adelaide

2005-07-20 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
Hi
Just an enquiry about midwives in Adelaide.  A woman from work who is
expecting her second child, has just found out her husband has a posting to
Adelaide.  She will be 35 weeks pregnant then.  She is very interested in
having a Homebirth but worried that this leaves her too little time to
organise it.  Is there anyone I can put her in contact with?
Cheers
Lindsay



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/52 - Release Date: 19/07/2005

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] vulval varices

2005-06-06 Thread Lindsay Kennedy








Hi

I am doing some research into varicose
veins for an assignment. According to Foote (1960), it is possible that
extensive vulval varices could rupture during birth and cause fatal
hemorrhage. Does anyone know anything about this subject? It is the
only bit of research I found that said this. But there is very little
info on vulval varices at all. 

Cheers

Lindsay








No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.2 - Release Date: 4/06/2005


RE: [ozmidwifery] RE Twins

2005-06-01 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
There is a study currently being done to assess induction/caesarean section
at 38 weeks for twins.  Apparently there is suggestions of deterioration in
outcomes after that.  Having said that I had twins at 40 weeks (by induction
in the end) and they were 30 minutes apart with no apparent problems.
Lindsay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lieve Huybrechts
Sent: Thursday, 2 June 2005 2:19 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] RE Twins

Hello Yvette,

I live in Belgium, Europe.

The best way to interprete the condition of your placenta are the signs
your twins and your body will give you. Feel for changes in the
movements. When the baby's feel like in a playgarden there is nothing
wrong with your placenta. When the baby's become quiet then you have to
be alert. It is a myth that baby's stop moving so much at the end of the
pregnancy. So feel what they tell you and feel also your body for signs
of fear of tension.
Also your body will tell you if something is going wrong. When the
placenta's condition is not so well, your bloodpression will rise and
your will have swollen feet and hands. Also other signs of unwellness
are important. But even then you have to consider the risks of inducion
against waiting and respect the signs by giving your body the rest and
relaxation it needs.
Organise already the last weeks help in your housekeeping and make your
life as pleasant as you can. Read those books you ever wanted to read,
go for small walks and enjoy your life.

I will not answer mails now till Tuesday. I am leaving for Finland in an
hour.

Greetings
Lieve

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Lindsay  Yvette
Verzonden: donderdag 2 juni 2005 2:55
Aan: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Onderwerp: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE Twins



Thanks for your reply Lieve.  What state are you in?

I'm certainly not keen to let them induce if I get to 38 weeks.  They
say 
there is no way of telling the condition of the placenta, and that
there's 
evidence or studies to show significant increase in worse outcomes after
38 
weeks or something like that, but I don't know yet what studies/evidence

they're relying on re this.  I will be asking for details as soon as
they 
let me see someone.

I see with the second one you described there was 1/2 hour between
babies 
for monochorionic diamniotic twins.  I'm not convinced about the 10
minute 
thing either, and they'll have to give me details of what evidence
they're 
relying on if they want me to consider this seriously as well.

I'm starting to think I should place the onus more on them to prove to
me 
why I should adhere to their recommendations rather than the other way

around.  If they can let me see the info myself I can consider it, but I

don't think I should just take their word for it.

I met another pregnant mum yesterday, same type of twins as me and in a 
public hospital in Melbourne too.  She's having the same issues as me.
She 
doesn't want an epidural and has been told she has to have one.  She
waits 
up to 2 hours for a rushed 10 minute appointment with an Ob, then
doesn't 
get to ask any questions.  We'll be staying in touch; she's due a few
weeks 
before me.

Yvette
(pg with monochorionic diamniotic twins due 5th Sept).



 Hello Yvette,

 I just want to tell you my excperience. I accompagned two twin births 
 this year in the hospital. We have there very good supporting obs, 
 that are very confident with breech and twin births. Lieve

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.3 - Release Date: 31/05/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.3 - Release Date: 31/05/2005
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 1/06/2005




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 1/06/2005

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Consent

2005-05-27 Thread Lindsay Kennedy








Where I work we obtain written consent
antenatally for Hep B, and discuss Vit K antenatally. We confirm both consents
before administration, but the vit K remains verbal consent. Our Neonatal
screening now comes with a consent attached, so has to be consented. We also
do newborn hearing screening which needs to be consented in writing too.

Lindsay











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Kim Stead
Sent: Saturday, 28 May 2005 10:50
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Consent






 
  
  
  Hi Katrina
  
  
  
  
  
  Where I work we
  obtain written consent for Hep B and oral consentfor the other
  two. It doesn't sit well with me as often these women have had little
  or noantenatal information and almost no midwifery input and we are
  making them make a 'so called informed choice' at a time when they are
  probably not in the best head space to be doing so. Sometimes we don't
  even give them the choice. just inform them it is happening.
  
  
  
  
  
  It would seem
  that women just accept it as another one of those 'routine' things that
  happen in hospital. I wonder when someone will come backyears or
  monthsfrom nowand say, I didn'tgive consent for
  that and we have no written record? In an ideal world, such
  things would be discussed in the antenatal period anddetailed enough
  for the woman and family to be making truly informed choices not thrown at
  them straight after birth. 
  
  
  
  
  
  Kim
  
  
  
  
  
  ---Original
  Message---
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  
  
  Date: 27/05/2005 11:50:07 a.m.
  
  
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  
  
  Subject: [ozmidwifery]
  Consent
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Hi everyone
  
  
  
  
  
  I was just
  wondering what people had experience with in regards to the
  
  
  New Born
  Screening Test, Vit K and Hep B vaccine. Where I work, we
  
  
  obtain written
  consent for the Vit K antenatally , oral consent for the
  
  
  Hep B and NBST at
  the time. A midwife I worked with the other day was
  
  
  saying that where
  she used to work it was the other way around, written
  
  
  for Hep B and
  oral for the Vit K and NBST.
  
  
  
  
  
  I was looking
  after a woman the other day that was actually booked into
  
  
  Nepean and they obtain written consent for all 3
  procedures...
  
  
  
  
  
  I'm just
  wondering what other people have come across
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Katrina
  
  
  
  
  
  --
  
  
  This mailing list
  is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  
  
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to
  subscribe or unsubscribe.
  
  
 
 
  
  
   









   
  
  
  
 











RE: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation

2005-05-23 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
We had a baby recently that became very unwell with GBS.  I believe that the
mother had PROM for quite some time.  Had another case last year where a
baby died.  Both cases though associated with prolonged rupture of
membranes.  I have to say that now they are very jumpy with women with PROM.
A woman the other day rang to say that she had just ruptured her membranes
(term baby.  She wanted to stay at home, but they insisted on her coming in
for a 'check up'.  Little did she know that the Syntocinon infusion and Abx
were already charted.  
Lindsay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny Cameron
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2005 11:38 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation

Agree Marilyn. I have seen a baby develop GBS. He was a normal birth at 
term, good Apgars. No prolonged ROM. Became ill very quickly (within one 
hour of birth), profound apneas  brady's, collapsed  died with 24 hours of

birth. A big contributing factor to his death was delay in starting him on 
AB's. The tricky thing with newborns is that they don't always become 
febrile in response to infection, even a severe one. More likely a drop in 
temp. This case was many years ago  a baby presenting like that now would 
be given AB's immediately until proven otherwise. GBS has an incidence of 
1:1000 and good midwifery care will detect a sick or becoming sick infant. I

wonder about the issue of antibiotic resistance, although this is less 
likely with Penicillin than the broad spectrums. WHO have big concerns about

antibiotic resistance. 30% is a lot of women and babies.
Jenny
Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACM
PO Box 1465
Howard Springs NT 0835

0419 528 717
- Original Message - 
From: Marilyn Kleidon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation


 What your describing is the risk based protocol vs the culture based one.
 UNfortunately the recent evidence shows more babies were missed using the
 risk based protocol that the culture based one. This is all covered on the
 web sites posted. Whenever you practice prophylactic treatments you are
 going to be treating some people unnecessarily it's the nature of the
 beast!! We don't have the test(tests) to positively identify those mthers
 who have a 100% chance of their babies becoming septic with GBS. And yes 
 it
 does become a pathogen again we don't know all the triggers that make it
 change from being normal flora. Of course women refuse the antibiotics and

 I
 personally have never known anyone who has had a baby become ill or die 
 from
 GBS disease. And I have attended births at home and in hospital with women
 who have refused the antibiotics(after testing positive) or who birthed
 before the iv could be set up and we simply watched the baby closely
 especially taking temp's 4/24 for 48 hours and regularly for the first 
 week.
 However, if you read the web sites you must become aware that thinking you
 can pick who will have a sick baby from health status of the mother can be
 risky and erroneous. Though I have to say I would think babies in the
 one-to-one continuity of care model would be much safer than those with
 multiple providers and early discharge.

 marilyn

 - Original Message - 
 From: Ken WArd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 3:14 AM
 Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation


 Do they really need iv ab's, or are we over treating as usual?  The vast
 majority of these babies are fine. Maybe we should only be treating those
 women with prom, not those in active labour, especially those with intact
 membranes.  Another reason for leaving membranes intact i.e. no arm's.
 as we all carry GBS can it be pathologic?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jenny Cameron
 Sent: Monday, 23 May 2005 10:34 AM
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation


 I guess not if they need IV antibiotics.
 Jenny
 Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACM
 PO Box 1465
 Howard Springs NT 0835

 0419 528 717
 - Original Message -
 From: Sally Westbury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 3:30 PM
 Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation


  30% of women are not normal Gosh.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny 
  Cameron
  Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 1:27 PM
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation
 
  GBS is not normal. What is the cut-off point for midwifery care  scope
  of
  Px?
 
  Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACM
  PO Box 1465
  Howard Springs NT 0835
 
  0419 528 717
  - Original 

RE: [ozmidwifery] Evening primrose oil

2005-05-17 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
Hi,
I work in the neonatal unit, and we never do rectal temps.  Nor do we do
tympanic temps, they are all axilla.  My opinion is that this must have
varying levels of accuracy, depending on how careful you are with placement
of the thermometer (have seen some very poor practice at times).  One of the
nurses at our NICU is doing research into tympanic vs traditional temp
monitoring at present.  
Cheers
Lindsay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2005 8:21 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Evening primrose oil

 hi i know this is off the track but i would like to know if it is common
practice in all SCBU that you do a rectal temp on neonates when they are
admitted. i know that there is evidence to state this practice is not good
and that we should be doing tympanic temps as they are far more accurate
also can anyone point me in the right direction to find this as ive tried
looking but can find the trial to print out 
thanks sharon
 Anne Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Dear Joanne,
 

 
The dose for evening primrose oil for overdue women as per Birth Centre
Induction of Labour booklet! 
 
Take Evening Primrose oil (gel-caps 500mg) orally 3 times per day and insert
2 in the vagina at   bedtime--you must stay laying down on your side or else
the caps may fall out (only try this as long as the bag of waters is
intact). 
 

 

 
It doesn't START labour, only prepares the cervix. You can buy Evening
Primrose oil at just about any health food/vitamin/herbal type store or
supermarket. You can start taking about2 - 3 capsules orally daily at
almost 38 weeks.
 

 
 
 


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Secondary Postpartum Haemorrhage

2005-04-20 Thread Lindsay Kennedy
We had a lady who had 3 or 4 PPHs.  Finally required an embolisation of a
vessel around? In? her uterus.
Aside from severe tiredness (related to blood loss) she appeared well in
between PPHs.  I am not sure how unusual this is.
Lindsay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Whitten
Sent: Thursday, 21 April 2005 10:43 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Secondary Postpartum Haemorrhage


Thanks that is a great help Andrea

Is it atipical to have no fever, and generally feel 'well' when infection
is the cause of 2ndy postpartum haemorrhage?

Thanks again

Dawn

At 08:47 AM 21/04/05 +1000, you wrote:
Dawn,

I would think that haemorrhage at this stage would nearly always be due 
to infection and thus would require antibiotics as the lining of the 
uterus is eroded by the infection to such a degree that bleeding is 
occurring and until the infection is gone tissue regeneration will not 
occur.

You would also need to eliminated other causes of bleeding at this 
stage and the two that come to mind would be
   resumption of sexual activity causing trauma
   resumption of mensus

Hope this helps

Andrea Q
On 20/04/2005, at 8:34 PM, Dawn Whitten wrote:

 Hi All,

 Would love to hear opinions on appropriate treatment of secondary 
 postparum
 haemorrhage at around 28 days postpartum.

 Is routine prescribing of antibiotics appropriate?

 Are there different ideas around when curettage is appropriate? Is this
 procedure over used?  Does ultrasound predict retained placenta 
 accurately?

 Many Thanks

 Dawn


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Births

2005-04-15 Thread Lindsay Kennedy








Hi

I am a student midwife I wrote a
few weeks ago about the first baby I caught a Ceasarean! But finally
yesterday I had the big moment caught my first baby from a real
birth. Wow! That was some buzz. Only a week tiny 34 weeker
and came out so quick! I did literally catch it.

One of the odd things, was that I caught
the baby, and the Obstetric registrar, who was also present, drew up the
syntometrine and put up the bag of synto. (MUM had had a previous PPH and
did bleed quite a bit) Seemed like a reversal of roles. I have been
reading about interprofessional cooperation nice to see it at work.


It was a pretty amazing day in Birth suite
really. Almost as exciting was the vaginal breech I saw delivered earlier
in the day. That was a bit of a surprise really, the mother presented in
advanced labour, going along very quickly, 3rd baby. The midwife
called for help as she had mec liq and as I rang the NICU reg she
realised that she had a bottom presenting. Too late for a Caesar, and
quite rapidly delivered a lovely little girl. I suppose I wont see too
many of them, since they routinely deliver breech babies here by caesarean. 

I have had a great week lots of
vaginal births, lots of great experience. I am so relieved after my week
of caesareans last month, I was beginning to wonder if I really wanted to be a
midwife. Now I can remember why I wanted to do this!

Lindsay








No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.12 - Release Date: 15/04/2005


[ozmidwifery] Birth reborn

2005-04-15 Thread Lindsay Kennedy

Hi.
I am in the middle of an essay and have used the book Birth Reborn by Michel
Odent extensively, unfortunately I haven't got it anymore and haven't
written down the reference yet.  Does anyone own this book?  If so could you
give me the complete reference for it... ie year of publishing, publishers
name, city of publishing.  
This would make my day as the essay is due in Monday. I put the title in
below... has taken me so long... mostly to work out what not to put in as
there is so much information.

Discuss and critically analyse how historical issues, events and today's
changing social, economic and political trends that have either impeded or
supported normal childbirth and the role of the midwife to providing
women-centred care.
Cheers
Lindsay



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.12 - Release Date: 15/04/2005

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] A wonderfully successful vbac birth this morning

2005-03-29 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy








Hi.

I have just come home from an exciting day
as a Student Midwife. My first Two births Okay I was only a
witness, but it was still pretty exciting stuff. The first lady was a
VBAC. Supposed to be a Cesar on Friday, came in this morning in labour
and I think the Obstetrician was so busy with his theatre list that he just let
her labour. I think he planned to do a Cesar (in his mind anyway) after
lunch. He kept saying that she was progressing BUT she probably wouldnt
deliver. And she did!! Not only that but the Dr didnt get
there! It was beautiful! Within half an hour the lady who I had
been with all morning (IOL for postdates) also delivered. The Dr made it
for that one. Shame really, it just wasnt as nice. So.. not
my perfect scenarios, I am a Home Birth fan myself, but in a hospital where two
weeks ago everyone had a LSCS, I was pretty thrilled to have two normal
deliveries. I have to admit caring for the women post section I was
beginning to doubt my desire to be a Midwife. It just isnt my
thing, all those post op obs and PCAs and drains etc. But todays
experience reminded me why I want to do this! 



Totally enthused!

Lindsay











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Julie Clarke
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005
6:21 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] A
wonderfully successful vbac birth this morning





Hi 

I have just come in the door from supporting at another
wonderful birth, which was a successful vbac.

The woman had made a well informed choice to aim for a vbac
and not a repeat cesar, however she experienced the usual normal anxiety of
anyone having a vaginal birth compounded with lack of confidence because she
didnt get there last time.

Well we worked through those issues slowly and gently, over
an hour and a half she pushed her baby into the world  a gorgeous baby
girl with a lovely head of dark curly hair.

The midwife was lovely, gentle, positive, calm, quiet and
unobtrusive.

The dad was great and got into trouble a couple of times
 I felt sorry for him  he was crestfallen because he was trying
to do his best.

The woman was so pleased with herself at having achieved
what she wanted to achieve a natural active birth with no drugs, no
intervention and a fine healthy baby.

She didnt have any colostrum after the cesar and was
worried  but after this normal birth we got the baby on and the baby
looked very contented and relaxed as I left.

And I have come home with another big smile on my face
satisfied in the knowledge that when a woman puts her mind to it and no one
stands in her way she can do anything cant she?

A great experience to start the day.



Warm hug to all

Julie



Julie Clarke CBE

Independent
Childbirth and Parenting Educator

HypnoBirthing (R) Practitioner

ACE
Grad Dip Supervisor

NACE
Advanced Educator and Trainer

NACE
National Journal Editor

Transition into Parenthood Sessions

9 Withybrook
  Place

Sylvania NSW 2224

Telephone
9544 6441

Mobile: 0401 2655 30

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

visit Julie's website: www.transitionintoparenthood.com.au










RE: [ozmidwifery] FW: vasectomy

2005-03-22 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Title: FW: vasectomy








I did meet a man in New Zealand who
had, had two vasectomies, they were on the their sixth child, as both
vasectomies had failed. They decided that it must be the Will of
God. Who can argue with that???

Cheers

Lindsay











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Megan and Larry
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005
9:49 AM
To: ozmidwifery
Subject: [ozmidwifery] FW:
vasectomy







Hi
all, 
Having
just done the research, my beloved says he found the suggested fail rate of a
vasectomy quoted as being between 1 in 500 to 1 in 1000. Most instances were
due to not having waited long enough or getting confirmation with a second
test.

I
also have a girlfriend having her third baby, 2 1/2 yrs after a vasectomy.


Having
said that I have heard a tubal ligation has a fail rate of 1 in 200, with the
risk of an ectopic pregnancy very high as a result. Looking better for the
blokes than us girls.

If
you really think there is a risk (as in Jo's hubbys case) get him to have a
sperm count done, it should rule out if he is fertile. Could be worth having
done every so often to see what is happening? Or , look at that if you get
another baby, then thats a bit special too.

Cheers

Megan

(Looking
forward to life post-vasectomy very soon. LOL) 








[ozmidwifery] First birth

2005-03-19 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I am studying to be a Midwife, doing a Diploma of Mid, here in Queensland.
Coming from NZ and having had my babies at home, I have a pretty 'normal'
view of birth, so have found Midwifery here somewhat surprising if not
shocking!  I had the pleasure of 'catching' my first baby last week.  I was
a little saddened that my first baby was born by Caesarean Section!!  
I have spent the last week working in a private hospital, where it seems
nearly all babies are born by C/s.  It seems so tragic that these women who
are paying for the 'best' care are being cheated of what can be the most
rewarding and amazing experience of a woman' life.  I know that some women
need to have c/s, but the first c/s I witnessed was for Breech presentation,
imagine my surprise when the baby came out head first.  The next one was
because the baby was 'huge'.  I weighed that baby... just on 8lb.
It all seems distorted with women choosing Specialist care that seems to
make them at higher risk for any birth interventions, particularly c/s.  Yet
women tell me that going to an Obstetrician means that they don't have to
wait up at the hospital clinics for hours, and at least they see the same
person each visit.  I understand where they are coming from, it just seems
that, that 'one person' they see, should be a Midwife.

Disillusioned:(
Lindsay

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] First birth

2005-03-19 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Why is it that women have to wait so long at public clinics?  

I can answer this question in respect to the local public hospital.  I
worked in clinics a few weeks ago.  They make appointments from 8.00am.  No
doctors start before 9.30 at the earliest.  Of course the women have to wait
for hours!  They are reporting up to 5 hr waits!  I think it is
appalling, but of course being the student, there isn't a lot you can do.  I
did suggest to women (unofficially) that they ring to see if the
appointments were running on time to see if that would minimize the wait.
The other thing that causes problems, is that there are more women booked
often than there is enough time for.
Lindsay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 12:16 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] First birth

Lindsay wrote women tell me that going to an Obstetrician means that they
don't have to
 wait up at the hospital clinics for hours, and at least they see the same
 person each visit.  I understand where they are coming from, it just seems
 that, 'one person' they see, should be a Midwife.

Why is it that women have to wait so long at public clinics?  All the women
I ask to attend a pub clinic for homebirth backup booking tell me the
same.  sometimes it is a factor in them not going for the visit and refusing
to return at a later date.  The Obs has his receptionist and ? one other?
why do we have so much support staff in hospital clinics and yet it can take
all morning waiting for an appointment . It makes women feel as tho they
are 2nd class citizens.  Is there an efficiency expert out there that could
fix this?  MM

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.4 - Release Date: 3/18/2005


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] breastmilk for preterm babies

2005-03-01 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
Hi
I work in NICU (in addition to being a student midwife).  We encourage the
mothers to begin expressing ASAP and we use al the milk and colostrum.  We
tend to begin enteral feeds quite quickly ie in the first 2-3 days at a very
low rate... perhaps 1ml 12 hrly for littlies.  We have a clear policy
regarding storage of EBM.  Can be in the fridge for up to 5 days.  We freeze
a lot of milk and it can be kept in the deep freeze for 6-12 months
depending on the type of freezer.  Once defrosted we use it within 24 hrs.
All EBM is double checked before use.  All calories are double checked.  We
don't get a lot of HIV mothers so I am unsure about our practice there,
however we have had mothers with Hep B who have breastfed.
Hope this answers the question
Cheers
Linz

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denise Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 9:08 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] breastmilk for preterm babies

Hi all
I've had an enquiry from a Lactation Consultant in France wanting to know 
about how we in Australia manage mother's milk for our preterm babies.
Could you please share with me what your NICU and SCBU does?
ie... is all colostrum and breastmilk automatically saved and given to the 
baby as soon as baby is tolerating enteral feeds? How is this milk stored? 
Does the mother have to be checked for HIV, Hep B, C, CMV, HTLV1, HTLV2? Is 
mothers own breastmilk treated in any way - ie must be frozen, must be 
pasteurised, etc.

All I want is a general idea - you don't need to identify your units, 
unless of course you are particularly proud of your excellent 
breastfeeding-friendly practices :-)

Thank you
Denise

***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.7 - Release Date: 3/1/2005




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.7 - Release Date: 3/1/2005

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.