Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On 8 October 2010 09:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis > wrote: >> On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis >>> wrote: On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra > > wrote: > >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. > >> > > > > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew > > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions > > of mine... > > > > See in particular: > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html > > > > I think they are still valid... > > Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then > they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 schema, mentioned here http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 schema? Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it >>> >>> cibadmin -Ql | grep validate >>> >> >> >> [r...@node-01 ~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep validate >> > have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="b7764e7b-0a00-4745-8d9e-6911271eefb2" >> admin_epoch="0" epoch="271" num_updates="3"> >> >> since validate-with is set to pacemaker-1.0, I am using pacemaker-1.0 >> schema, right? > > Right. > >> So, if I upgrade to 1.1.3 and leave validate-with to pacemaker-1.0, I >> will run a stable 1.1.3, but if I set to pacemaker-1.1 I will be >> running a "testing|unstable" 1.1.3. > > You'll be enabling some unfinished features. > >> Have I understood it correctly? > > Essentially, yes. thanks ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis >> wrote: >>> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra > wrote: >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. >> > > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions > of mine... > > See in particular: > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html > > I think they are still valid... Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) >>> >>> I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 >>> schema, mentioned here >>> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >>> >>> Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 >>> schema? >>> Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it >> >> cibadmin -Ql | grep validate >> > > > [r...@node-01 ~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep validate > have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="b7764e7b-0a00-4745-8d9e-6911271eefb2" > admin_epoch="0" epoch="271" num_updates="3"> > > since validate-with is set to pacemaker-1.0, I am using pacemaker-1.0 > schema, right? Right. > So, if I upgrade to 1.1.3 and leave validate-with to pacemaker-1.0, I > will run a stable 1.1.3, but if I set to pacemaker-1.1 I will be > running a "testing|unstable" 1.1.3. You'll be enabling some unfinished features. > Have I understood it correctly? Essentially, yes. ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis > wrote: >> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi >>> wrote: >>> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra >>> > wrote: >>> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. >>> >> >>> > >>> > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew >>> > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions >>> > of mine... >>> > >>> > See in particular: >>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html >>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html >>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html >>> > >>> > I think they are still valid... >>> >>> Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then >>> they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) >> >> I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 >> schema, mentioned here >> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >> >> Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 >> schema? >> Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it > > cibadmin -Ql | grep validate > [r...@node-01 ~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep validate since validate-with is set to pacemaker-1.0, I am using pacemaker-1.0 schema, right? So, if I upgrade to 1.1.3 and leave validate-with to pacemaker-1.0, I will run a stable 1.1.3, but if I set to pacemaker-1.1 I will be running a "testing|unstable" 1.1.3. Have I understood it correctly? Thanks, Pavlos ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra >> > wrote: >> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. >> >> >> > >> > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew >> > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions >> > of mine... >> > >> > See in particular: >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html >> > >> > I think they are still valid... >> >> Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then >> they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) > > I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 > schema, mentioned here > http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series > > Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 schema? > Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it cibadmin -Ql | grep validate > > Cheers, > Pavlos > > ___ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra > > wrote: > >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. > >> > > > > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew > > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions > > of mine... > > > > See in particular: > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html > > > > I think they are still valid... > > Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then > they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) I am a bit confused about the meaning of pacemaker-1.0,1.1 and 1.2 schema, mentioned here http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series Let's I have installed 1.1 how do I know if I use pacemaker-1.o or 1.2 schema? Sorry if it sounds stupid but I simple don't understand it Cheers, Pavlos ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra > wrote: >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. >> > > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew > reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions > of mine... > > See in particular: > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html > > I think they are still valid... Absolutely. These will all be valid until 1.2 comes out (and then they'll apply to 1.3 instead :-) ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker >>> 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. >> >> Have a read of: >> >> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >> >> I would recommend 1.1. Its what ships in SLES11 and RHEL6 >> > > But http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Releases says it's "experimental" > version, not a stable one. I don't see the word "experimental" anywhere on that page ;-) > Is this page outdated then? Some of the information in that blog entry should probably make its way back into the Release page, but its not horribly incorrect. ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra wrote: > That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "colocation -inf", Andrew reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions of mine... See in particular: http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006606.html http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006610.html http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2010-June/006620.html I think they are still valid... Gianluca ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. Thanks Shravan On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker >>> 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. >> >> Have a read of: >> >> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series >> >> I would recommend 1.1. Its what ships in SLES11 and RHEL6 >> > > But http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Releases says it's "experimental" > version, not a stable one. > Is this page outdated then? > > Thanks, > Vadym > > > ___ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker >> 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. > > Have a read of: > > http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series > > I would recommend 1.1. Its what ships in SLES11 and RHEL6 > But http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Releases says it's "experimental" version, not a stable one. Is this page outdated then? Thanks, Vadym ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra wrote: > Hi, > > I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker > 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. Have a read of: http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series I would recommend 1.1. Its what ships in SLES11 and RHEL6 ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
[Pacemaker] pacemaker version
Hi, I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. Thanks Shravan ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
