Re: Clarification Needed on Postgresql License Requirement for Hybrid Environment Cluster Configuration

2024-05-06 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hello,

On 2024-May-06, Prasanna Chavan wrote:

> I hope this email finds you well. I am reaching out to seek
> clarification on a matter regarding the configuration of a cluster in
> a hybrid environment.
> Specifically, I am wondering whether we require a PostgreSQL license
> for setting up a cluster in such an environment. Could you kindly
> provide some guidance or clarification on this matter?

Yes, you require a license.  However, luckily for you, the license is
provided for any purpose, without fee, and without a written agreement.
The COPYRIGHT file in the source distribution contains the details.
You can use the software standalone or in cluster configuration, as you
see fit.  In short, you don't need to worry about it.

However, this doesn't necessarily apply to other software packages
derived from PostgreSQL itself, or those that work in conjunction with
it, such as Postgres extensions, admin interfaces, GUIs, monitoring
packages, etc.  You'll have to seek clarification on each such software
package that you intend to use.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera   48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I dream about dreams about dreams", sang the nightingale
under the pale moon (Sandman)




Clarification Needed on Postgresql License Requirement for Hybrid Environment Cluster Configuration

2024-05-06 Thread Prasanna Chavan
Hi,

I hope this email finds you well. I am reaching out to seek clarification on a 
matter regarding the configuration of a cluster in a hybrid environment.
Specifically, I am wondering whether we require a PostgreSQL license for 
setting up a cluster in such an environment. Could you kindly provide some 
guidance or clarification on this matter?
Your expertise and insights on this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thank 
you in advance for your assistance.
Looking forward to your prompt response.
Best regards,
Prasanna


Re: PostgreSQL License Question

2021-01-15 Thread Adrian Klaver

On 1/15/21 6:35 AM, Kristi Kangas wrote:

Hello,

  I see on your website that PostgreSQL is released under an Open Source 
license.


  Do you consider addendums proposed by your users, modifying the posted 
license terms?


I believe that is answered further down on the page:

"Will PostgreSQL ever be released under a different license?

The PostgreSQL Global Development Group remains committed to making 
PostgreSQL available as free and open source software in perpetuity. 
There are no plans to change the PostgreSQL License or release 
PostgreSQL under a different license.


"



  Thank you.

_From your website:_

PostgreSQL is released under the *PostgreSQL License* 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.opensource.org/licenses/postgresql__;!!LAlM4g!ilTFCBLmWeCcHFgyYw1iwH_9ELPG3QxpJBsbWgvL0rQtS4Kkfgv0fLuOZCAevyCwfZM$>, 
a liberal Open Source license, similar to the BSD or MIT licenses.


Kristi Kangas

Procurement and Support Services

312-653-5503


Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication is confidential, 
private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or 
copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received 
this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com




PostgreSQL License Question

2021-01-15 Thread Kristi Kangas
Hello,
 I see on your website that PostgreSQL is released under an Open Source license.
 Do you consider addendums proposed by your users, modifying the posted license 
terms?
 Thank you.
 From your website:
PostgreSQL is released under the PostgreSQL 
License<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.opensource.org/licenses/postgresql__;!!LAlM4g!ilTFCBLmWeCcHFgyYw1iwH_9ELPG3QxpJBsbWgvL0rQtS4Kkfgv0fLuOZCAevyCwfZM$>,
 a liberal Open Source license, similar to the BSD or MIT licenses.

Kristi Kangas
Procurement and Support Services
312-653-5503

__
Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, 
proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the 
addressee.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender immediately.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-19 Thread Steve Atkins



On 19/09/2019 13:48, Steve Litt wrote:

My understanding is the PostgreSQL license is more like the MIT
license, which actually allows one to modify the code and claim it as
proprietary.

You could do that, yes. :)

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_derived_databases

Cheers,
  Steve




Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-19 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:20:14 -0500
Ron  wrote:

> Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for
> PostgreSQL.
> 
> Bottom line: you charge for *services**you provide* not for software
> that other people provide.

That makes a lot of sense. A head gasket costs about $25.00.
*Installing* the head gasket costs well over a thousand. As long as the
customer has the option to install it himself, you're selling your
services.

If you've modified PostgreSQL, as long as you offer the source code to
the customer and say "good luck installing it by yourself",  you can
charge to install it without breaking even the GNU GPL.

My understanding is the PostgreSQL license is more like the MIT
license, which actually allows one to modify the code and claim it as
proprietary.

SteveT

Steve Litt
Author: The Key to Everyday Excellence
http://www.troubleshooters.com/key
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt





Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ron

On 9/18/19 11:43 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:


On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:35 PM Ron <mailto:ronljohnso...@gmail.com>> wrote:


On 9/18/19 8:26 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Ron mailto:ronljohnso...@gmail.com>> wrote:

On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:



On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron mailto:ronljohnso...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as
charging for PostgreSQL.

Bottom line: you charge for *services**you provide* not for
software that other people provide.

That's just really not true.  There is nothing that prohibits
you from selling Postgresql.  I mean, it's not a great business
model because you can get it for free, but there's nothing that
stops you from doing it.


Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago:
"You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part
PostgresQL."


Actually that's Rob Sargent you're quoting. Adrian took issue with
that statement, as do I.  While Google isn't finding me anything that
says "Yes, you can sell Postgresql," here are a few points:

  * Point to anything in the license wording that says you can't
charge money to distribute Postgresql.  You can't.

  * Even software licensed under the GPL, which is a considerably
more restrictive license, can be sold.  The free software folks
consider the right to sell as one of the freedoms associated with
free software.  [1]

  * The Postgresql license page says it is "a liberal Open Source
license, similar to the BSD or MIT licenses." [2] The MIT license
itself explicitly states that it grants rights to "sell copies of
the software."



How do you sell what you don't own?


You can do so because the owners have granted you the right to do so.  
They were just good enough to not charge you money for it.


Maybe I'm too literal.  I understand:

1. selling physical media that software comes on,
2. selling access to a server where the software resides, and
3. selling a license to use software.

Selling a license to Postgres is worse than selling bottled water, because 
at least the bottled water adds a few chemicals for taste, and they put it 
in conveniently sized and shaped bottles.


--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ken Tanzer
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:35 PM Ron  wrote:

> On 9/18/19 8:26 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Ron  wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron  wrote:
>>
>>> Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for
>>> PostgreSQL.
>>>
>>> Bottom line: you charge for *services** you provide* not for software
>>> that other people provide.
>>>
>>> That's just really not true.  There is nothing that prohibits you from
>> selling Postgresql.  I mean, it's not a great business model because you
>> can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from doing it.
>>
>>
>> Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You
>> cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."
>>
>>
>>
> Actually that's Rob Sargent you're quoting.  Adrian took issue with that
> statement, as do I.   While Google isn't finding me anything that says
> "Yes, you can sell Postgresql," here are a few points:
>
>
>- Point to anything in the license wording that says you can't charge
>money to distribute Postgresql.  You can't.
>
>
>- Even software licensed under the GPL, which is a considerably more
>restrictive license, can be sold.  The free software folks consider the
>right to sell as one of the freedoms associated with free software.  [1]
>
>
>- The Postgresql license page says it is "a liberal Open Source
>license, similar to the BSD or MIT licenses." [2] The MIT license itself
>explicitly states that it grants rights to "sell copies of the software."
>
>
> How do you sell what you don't own?
>
>
You can do so because the owners have granted you the right to do so.  They
were just good enough to not charge you money for it.



-- 
AGENCY Software
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
*http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
*https://demo.agency-software.org/client
<https://demo.agency-software.org/client>*
ken.tan...@agency-software.org
(253) 245-3801

Subscribe to the mailing list
 to
learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ron

On 9/18/19 8:26 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Ron <mailto:ronljohnso...@gmail.com>> wrote:


On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:



On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron mailto:ronljohnso...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging
for PostgreSQL.

Bottom line: you charge for *services**you provide* not for
software that other people provide.

That's just really not true.  There is nothing that prohibits you
from selling Postgresql.  I mean, it's not a great business model
because you can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you
from doing it.


Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You
cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."


Actually that's Rob Sargent you're quoting.  Adrian took issue with that 
statement, as do I.   While Google isn't finding me anything that says 
"Yes, you can sell Postgresql," here are a few points:


  * Point to anything in the license wording that says you can't charge
money to distribute Postgresql.  You can't.

  * Even software licensed under the GPL, which is a considerably more
restrictive license, can be sold.  The free software folks consider
the right to sell as one of the freedoms associated with free
    software.  [1]

  * The Postgresql license page says it is "a liberal Open Source license,
similar to the BSD or MIT licenses." [2] The MIT license itself
explicitly states that it grants rights to "sell copies of the software."



How do you sell what you don't own?


Cheers,
Ken

[1] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/
[3] https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT



--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Rob Sargent


> On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:55 PM, Ron  wrote:
> 
>> On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron  wrote:
>>> Charging for installing PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for 
>>> PostgreSQL.
>>> 
>>> Bottom line: you charge for services you provide not for software that 
>>> other people provide.
>>> 
>> That's just really not true.  There is nothing that prohibits you from 
>> selling Postgresql.  I mean, it's not a great business model 
>> because you can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from 
>> doing it.
> 
> Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You cannot 
> (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."
> 
> 
> 
That was my thought actually. By legitimate I meant in good conscience as 
opposed to any comment on the legality 
> -- 
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ken Tanzer
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Ron  wrote:

> On 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron  wrote:
>
>> Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for
>> PostgreSQL.
>>
>> Bottom line: you charge for *services** you provide* not for software
>> that other people provide.
>>
>> That's just really not true.  There is nothing that prohibits you from
> selling Postgresql.  I mean, it's not a great business model because you
> can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from doing it.
>
>
> Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You
> cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."
>
>
>
Actually that's Rob Sargent you're quoting.  Adrian took issue with that
statement, as do I.   While Google isn't finding me anything that says
"Yes, you can sell Postgresql," here are a few points:


   - Point to anything in the license wording that says you can't charge
   money to distribute Postgresql.  You can't.


   - Even software licensed under the GPL, which is a considerably more
   restrictive license, can be sold.  The free software folks consider the
   right to sell as one of the freedoms associated with free software.  [1]


   - The Postgresql license page says it is "a liberal Open Source license,
   similar to the BSD or MIT licenses." [2] The MIT license itself explicitly
   states that it grants rights to "sell copies of the software."

Cheers,
Ken

[1]  https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html
[2]  https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/
[3]  https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT


-- 
AGENCY Software
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
*http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
*https://demo.agency-software.org/client
<https://demo.agency-software.org/client>*
ken.tan...@agency-software.org
(253) 245-3801

Subscribe to the mailing list
 to
learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ken Tanzer
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron  wrote:

> Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for
> PostgreSQL.
>
> Bottom line: you charge for *services** you provide* not for software
> that other people provide.
>
> That's just really not true.  There is nothing that prohibits you from
selling Postgresql.  I mean, it's not a great business model because you
can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from doing it.

Cheers,
Ken



-- 
AGENCY Software
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
*http://agency-software.org/ *
*https://demo.agency-software.org/client
*
ken.tan...@agency-software.org
(253) 245-3801

Subscribe to the mailing list
 to
learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ron

Charging for *installing* PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for PostgreSQL.

Bottom line: you charge for *services**you provide* not for software that 
other people provide.


On 9/18/19 5:11 PM, Ashkar Dev wrote:

Thanks,
but is it legal to charge for installing PostgreSQL?
as you said:

You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL 

should I in the contract write that the price does not include installing 
PostgreSQL, preparing it or PostgreSQL itself?
 or just from my side while I am going to set price I have to dont count 
installing the PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL itself as a part of that price?


On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Rob Sargent > wrote:



On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:
> Hi all thanks,
> I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for
> example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was
> created by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to
> deliver the product to him can I sell the package that contains web
> app files with PostgreSQL software and the database code?
>
You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license),
installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting
your web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any
maintenance and support you care to specify. You can copy-right your app
and schema and data.

You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.



--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Adrian Klaver

On 9/18/19 3:11 PM, Ashkar Dev wrote:

Thanks,
but is it legal to charge for installing PostgreSQL?


Yes, otherwise these folks:

https://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/

would a good deal less business.


as you said:

You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL 

should I in the contract write that the price does not include 
installing PostgreSQL, preparing it or PostgreSQL itself?
  or just from my side while I am going to set price I have to dont 
count installing the PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL itself as a part of that 
price?


On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Rob Sargent > wrote:



On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:
 > Hi all thanks,
 > I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work
locally for
 > example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was
 > created by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to
 > deliver the product to him can I sell the package that contains web
 > app files with PostgreSQL software and the database code?
 >
You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license),
installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting
your web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any
maintenance and support you care to specify. You can copy-right your
app
and schema and data.

You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.




--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com




Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ashkar Dev
Thanks,
but is it legal to charge for installing PostgreSQL?
as you said:

> You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL

should I in the contract write that the price does not include installing
PostgreSQL, preparing it or PostgreSQL itself?
 or just from my side while I am going to set price I have to dont count
installing the PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL itself as a part of that price?


On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Rob Sargent  wrote:

>
> On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:
> > Hi all thanks,
> > I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for
> > example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was
> > created by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to
> > deliver the product to him can I sell the package that contains web
> > app files with PostgreSQL software and the database code?
> >
> You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license),
> installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting
> your web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any
> maintenance and support you care to specify. You can copy-right your app
> and schema and data.
>
> You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.
>
>


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Adrian Klaver

On 9/18/19 11:23 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:




On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:17 PM, Adrian Klaver  wrote:

On 9/18/19 11:06 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:

On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:

Hi all thanks,
I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for example 
for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was created by 
PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to deliver the product to 
him can I sell the package that contains web app files with PostgreSQL software 
and the database code?


You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license), 
installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting your 
web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any maintenance and 
support you care to specify. You can copy-right your app and schema and data.
You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.


Why not?

Pretty sure that is what third parties are doing with their forks of Postgres.


I see your point, but aren’t they in essence charging for their efforts in 
making, managing their fork.  There are plenty of vendors, for a time I was 
one, who happily apply a schema to which ever database the client supplied 
(mssql, ora, pg in my case).


In general that pretty much applies to a lot of software that has price. 
You don't actually own the software, just a paid license to use it. I'm 
not saying whether it is a good idea or not, just that it is possible.



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com




Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Rob Sargent



> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:17 PM, Adrian Klaver  wrote:
> 
> On 9/18/19 11:06 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>> On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:
>>> Hi all thanks,
>>> I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for 
>>> example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was created 
>>> by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to deliver the 
>>> product to him can I sell the package that contains web app files with 
>>> PostgreSQL software and the database code?
>>> 
>> You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license), 
>> installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting your 
>> web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any maintenance and 
>> support you care to specify. You can copy-right your app and schema and data.
>> You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> Pretty sure that is what third parties are doing with their forks of Postgres.
> 
I see your point, but aren’t they in essence charging for their efforts in 
making, managing their fork.  There are plenty of vendors, for a time I was 
one, who happily apply a schema to which ever database the client supplied 
(mssql, ora, pg in my case).







Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Adrian Klaver

On 9/18/19 11:06 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:


On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:

Hi all thanks,
I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for 
example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was 
created by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to 
deliver the product to him can I sell the package that contains web 
app files with PostgreSQL software and the database code?


You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license), 
installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting 
your web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any 
maintenance and support you care to specify. You can copy-right your app 
and schema and data.


You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.


Why not?

Pretty sure that is what third parties are doing with their forks of 
Postgres.



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com




Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Rob Sargent



On 9/18/19 11:50 AM, Ashkar Dev wrote:

Hi all thanks,
I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for 
example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was 
created by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to 
deliver the product to him can I sell the package that contains web 
app files with PostgreSQL software and the database code?


You can charge the pharmacist for your efforts: your web app (license), 
installing postgres and your schema (somewhere) and the data supporting 
your web-app, any documentation of your web-app and schema, any 
maintenance and support you care to specify. You can copy-right your app 
and schema and data.


You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL.





Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-18 Thread Ashkar Dev
Hi all thanks,
I meant maybe I create a web app with PostgreSQL that work locally for
example for a pharmacy that stores data by barcode while the DB was created
by PostgreSQL how I can sell the Database for him, how to deliver the
product to him can I sell the package that contains web app files with
PostgreSQL software and the database code?

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:23 AM Andreas Joseph Krogh 
wrote:

> På onsdag 18. september 2019 kl. 01:07:41, skrev Rob Sargent <
> robjsarg...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh 
> wrote:
>
> På tirsdag 17. september 2019 kl. 22:55:02, skrev Peter J. Holzer <
> hjp-pg...@hjp.at>:
>
> On 2019-09-17 14:56:30 +0300, Ashkar Dev wrote:
> > but it is saying (without fee)
> > if I create a database with it to work with Web Application if want to
> sell it
> > so the buyer must have the PostgreSQL installed in his device to work
> offline
> > right?
> > "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> > documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written
> agreement is
> > hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this
> paragraph and
> > the following two paragraphs appear in all copies."
>
> This means that you don't have to pay a fee or sign a written agreement
> to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation
> for any purpose. It doesn't say that you can't charge a fee for
> distributing (although why anybody would pay you for something they can
> download themselves for free I don't know).
>
> hp
>
>
> A rule of thumb is - you can do anything you want with it (the PG software
> inc. its source), except claim you wrote it, as long as you preserve the
> original license-file(s).
>
>
> I take it that the OP has an app/dataset on top of PG he/she wishes to
> market (and protect).  Perfectly legit, no? Not clear if there is a desire
> to disable direct db access.
>
>
> That seems perfectly legit. I'm not sure what "to work offline" means, but
> using PG for whatever commercial purposes is totally fine, given the
> license-requirement above.
>
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
> andr...@visena.com
> www.visena.com
> 
>
>


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-17 Thread Rob Sargent


> On Sep 17, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh  wrote:
> 
> På tirsdag 17. september 2019 kl. 22:55:02, skrev Peter J. Holzer 
> mailto:hjp-pg...@hjp.at>>:
> On 2019-09-17 14:56:30 +0300, Ashkar Dev wrote:
> > but it is saying (without fee)
> > if I create a database with it to work with Web Application if want to sell 
> > it
> > so the buyer must have the PostgreSQL installed in his device to work 
> > offline
> > right?
> > "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> > documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written agreement 
> > is
> > hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph 
> > and
> > the following two paragraphs appear in all copies."
> 
> This means that you don't have to pay a fee or sign a written agreement
> to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation
> for any purpose. It doesn't say that you can't charge a fee for
> distributing (although why anybody would pay you for something they can
> download themselves for free I don't know).
> 
> hp
>  
> A rule of thumb is - you can do anything you want with it (the PG software 
> inc. its source), except claim you wrote it, as long as you preserve the 
> original license-file(s).
>  
I take it that the OP has an app/dataset on top of PG he/she wishes to market 
(and protect).  Perfectly legit, no? Not clear if there is a desire to disable 
direct db access.



Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-17 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
På tirsdag 17. september 2019 kl. 22:55:02, skrev Peter J. Holzer <
hjp-pg...@hjp.at >: On 2019-09-17 14:56:30 +0300, 
Ashkar Dev wrote:
 > but it is saying (without fee)
 > if I create a database with it to work with Web Application if want to sell 
it
 > so the buyer must have the PostgreSQL installed in his device to work 
offline
 > right?
 > "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
 > documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written agreement 
is
 > hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph 
and
 > the following two paragraphs appear in all copies."

 This means that you don't have to pay a fee or sign a written agreement
 to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation
 for any purpose. It doesn't say that you can't charge a fee for
 distributing (although why anybody would pay you for something they can
 download themselves for free I don't know).

 hp A rule of thumb is - you can do anything you want with it (the PG software 
inc. its source), except claim you wrote it, as long as you preserve the 
original license-file(s). -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner - Visena AS 
Mobile: +47 909 56 963 andr...@visena.com  
www.visena.com   

Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-17 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2019-09-17 14:56:30 +0300, Ashkar Dev wrote:
> but it is saying (without fee)
> if I create a database with it to work with Web Application if want to sell it
> so the buyer must have the PostgreSQL installed in his device to work offline
> right?
> "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written agreement is
> hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph 
> and
> the following two paragraphs appear in all copies."

This means that you don't have to pay a fee or sign a written agreement
to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation
for any purpose. It doesn't say that you can't charge a fee for
distributing (although why anybody would pay you for something they can
download themselves for free I don't know).

hp

-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer| we build much bigger, better disasters now
|_|_) || because we have much more sophisticated
| |   | h...@hjp.at | management tools.
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Ross Anderson 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-17 Thread Ashkar Dev
Thank you all,
but it is saying (without fee)
if I create a database with it to work with Web Application if want to sell
it so the buyer must have the PostgreSQL installed in his device to work
offline right?
"Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose, *without fee*, and without a written
agreement is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and
this paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all copies."

>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:18 PM Laurenz Albe 
wrote:

> Please don't cross-post your question to more than one list!
>
> Ashkar Dev wrote:
> > Can anyone explain the PostgreSQL License to me?
> > Can I create a database with it and sell the database also preventing
> > the buyer from reselling it?
> > Can I change in the logos of the PostgreSQL system and its name?
>
> Yes.
>
> You only have to make sure that the original license text is included
> in your license.  This does not limit what you are allowed to do with
> the software.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> --
> Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>
>


Re: PostgreSQL License

2019-09-16 Thread Laurenz Albe
Please don't cross-post your question to more than one list!

Ashkar Dev wrote:
> Can anyone explain the PostgreSQL License to me?
> Can I create a database with it and sell the database also preventing
> the buyer from reselling it?
> Can I change in the logos of the PostgreSQL system and its name?

Yes.

You only have to make sure that the original license text is included
in your license.  This does not limit what you are allowed to do with
the software.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com





PostgreSQL License

2019-09-15 Thread Ashkar Dev
*Can anyone explain the PostgreSQL License to me?*
*Can I create a database with it and sell the database also preventing the
buyer from reselling it?*
*Can I change in the logos of the PostgreSQL system and its name?*